Loading...
SR-417-004-06 (5) llA ~;IAR ~ 8 Z005 F: \PC D\Sh a re\200SCou n ci I Staff Reports \p refpa rkzz. d oc Council Meeting: March 8, 200S Santa Monica, California To: Mayor and City Council From: City Staff Subject Resolution Expanding Preferential Parking Zone ZZ to include: 1) Sth, 6th and yth Streets between Wilshire Boulevard and Montana Avenue, 2) Montana and California Avenues between 4th and yth Streets, and 3) Idaho and Washington Avenues between 4th Street and Lincoln Boulevard, and Amending City Council Resolution 9344 CCS Introduction This report recommends the expansion of Preferential Parking Zone ZZ to include the area just north of the current Zone ZZ, namely: Sth, 6th, and 7th Streets between Washington and Montana Avenues, and Idaho and Montana Avenues between 4th and yth Streets. It also extends the zone eastward one block for Idaho and Washington Avenues between yth Street and Lincoln Boulevard. Backqround This area has been considered for preferential parking in the past, as part of the current Zone ZZ, as well as in the comprehensive study of parking along the Montana corridor. Currently, this area is surrounded by preferential parking to the south, west and east. (See Vicinity Map-Attachment B.) To the south, Preferential Parking Zone ZZ was implemented in September 2001 , and is roughly bordered by Washington Avenue, Sth Street, Wilshire Boulevard and 7th Street. The City Council did not extend this zone north to Montana Avenue at that time due to concerns raised by Montana Avenue businesses, and because no petitions had been received from residents north of Washington Avenue. Initial restrictions in this zone were: "Two-hour parking 7am-10pm 11A MAR = jj 200J daily, except by permit." Overnight restrictions were approved but not implemented at that time because the neighborhood directly west did not yet have any preferential parking restrictions. Often these residents parked at night on the streets east of their homes. In June 2002, the Council approved Preferential Parking Zone UU to the west, which included the area from 4th Street west to Ocean Avenue, bordered by Wilshire on the south, and Montana on the north. Since this area is in the Coastal Zone, the City (as a courtesy) applied for a coastal permit from the California Coastal Commission. This delayed implementation of this zone until January 2004. Restrictions in Zone UU are: "No parking 6pm-8am daily, except by permit." At the same time that Zone UU was implemented, the restrictions for Zone ZZ were changed to: "Two-hour parking 8am- 6pm, and No parking 6pm-8am daily, except by permit." The expansion of Zone G was implemented in September 2003. This zone covers the residential streets surrounding the Montana business corridor, roughly bordered by Lincoln Boulevard, Idaho Avenue, 1ih Street and Alta Avenue. Some of the numbered blocks north of Montana already had various preferential parking restrictions. When this zone was expanded, restrictions were standardized, and are currently: "Two-hour parking 9am-9pm Monday-Saturday, except by permit." Residents on the following streets have now petitioned for preferential parking: . Idaho Avenue between 5th and 6th Streets (petition date: February 2004), . 5th Street between Washington and Idaho Avenues (petition date: April 2004). Staff has also received incomplete petitions (fewer than two-thirds of units represented) from the 800 block of 5th Street and the 800 and 900 blocks of 6th Street. It is likely that 2 signatures will continue to be received from these blocks as well, and that these blocks petitions will eventually qualify (two-thirds of units represented). This area was studied several times in 2001. This request for preferential parking did not require further extensive studies. Staff completed spot checks on the two petitioning blocks in May 2004. NeiQhborhood ParkinQ Issues Parking demand in this area is high due to its dense residential development as well as its proximity to the successful business districts on Montana Avenue and in the Downtown. Many buildings in the area, including both residential and commercial buildings, were constructed prior to the adoption of current parking standards. Most available spaces in the adjacent commercial areas are subject to fees and/or time limits in order to encourage turnover and offset the cost of providing parking facilities for visitors and employees. Study FindinQs This area was originally studied in February and March 2001 as part of the original Zone ZZ study. Fifth Street and Idaho between 4th and 5th Streets was studied again in September 2001 as part of the Zone UU coastal area study. The entire area was studied again in October/November 2001 as part of the Zone G Montana area study. In addition, spot checks of the two petitioning blocks were completed in May 2004 to evaluate current occupancies on these blocks and to confirm that the Fall 2001 data is 3 still relevant. The data presented in Attachment C represents the October/November 2001 data and the May 2004 spot checks. All of the data suggests that this area's parking occupancies are quite high. Although some parking is available on most streets at some time during the day, parking spaces are scarce during many hours of the day and at night. Occupancies greater than 85% occur in the early morning and early evenings, indicating a high demand by residents, intensified by demand by non- residents. Weekend occupancies average over 90 percent. Community Input Residents, businesses and property owners of the area were notified of the proposed preferential parking zone by mail and invited to a December 2004 community meeting to discuss preferential parking. A listing of the comments received at the meeting and in writing is included as Attachment D. Generally the residents expressed frustration about all the preferential parking which exists around them. They also felt that their restrictions should be the same as those of their neighbors to the south in Zone ZZ. As this area is really an extension north of the current Zone ZZ, business employees that may be impacted, such as hotel employees, are already affected by the current Zone ZZ and Zone UU in the Coastal Zone. Staff worked extensively with the hotels when Zone UU was implemented. Representatives from businesses did not attend this meeting, nor did they send any comments in response to the notice they received. 4 Staff Analvsis and Discussion: The petitioning blocks are located in the densely populated area west of Lincoln. The 900 block of 5th Street is directly adjacent to Zone ZZ, and the 500 block of Idaho just one block away. Parking on these blocks has likely been affected by the adjacent preferential parking zones, one of which they were originally recommended to be a part. This proposed area fills in the link between three Preferential Parking Zones-ZZ, UU, and G. The regulations proposed are the same as in Zone ZZ because the parking pressure seems to be coming primarily from the Promenade/Coastal Zone rather than the Montana business district. The multi-family residential area east of Lincoln between Idaho and California Avenues remains open and available for all parkers. No petitions have been received from any 900 or 1000 block between ih Street and 16th Street. Although both Idaho and California Avenues are pre-approved, most blocks remain without preferential parking. When surveyed in September 2002, residents in this mid-business corridor area were divided about the concept of preferential parking. Most of the demand in this area midway between Wilshire and Montana is residential in nature, so preferential parking regulations would not substantially improve conditions for most residents, especially at night when the parking is most heavily used. Recommendations for Expanded Zone ZZ The current regulations would remain: . Two-hour parking between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. daily, and No parking between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., except by permit. 5 The specific blocks that would be in the expanded Preferential Parking Zone ZZ are: . 5th, 6th, and ih Streets between Wilshire Boulevard and Montana Avenue . California and Montana Avenues between 4th Street and ih Street . Washington and Idaho Avenues between 4th Street and Lincoln Boulevard Budoet/Fiscallmpact Initially, it is estimated that area residents in the proposed zone will purchase approximately 400 new permits. This will generate approximately $6,000 in additional revenue in FY 04/05 in account 01415.400290 from permits purchased at $15.00 per permit. CEQA Analysis The proposed project has been determined to be categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 19, Section 15301 (c) which was recently amended to define Class 1 exempt projects in the following way: "Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving little or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. . ." This exemption lists as an example of "existing facilities:" "(c) Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities." Preferential parking zones involve only the issuance of permits for the use of an existing public street and include negligible or no expansion of this existing use. 6 Recommendations It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the attached Resolution amending and enlarging Preferential Parking Zone ZZ and amending Resolution 9344 CCS (Resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Monica Re-Establishing Various Preferential Parking Zones) by replacing Exhibit A. 2. Approve the revenue budget adjustment outlined in this report. Attachments: A B C D Resolution Establishing Preferential Parking, Exhibit A- Preferential Parking Zones Vicinity Map Parking Occupancy Summary Community Comments Prepared By: Suzanne Frick, Director of Planning and Community Development Lucy Dyke, Transportation Planning Manager Beth Rolandson, Senior Transportation Planner Ruth Harper, Transportation Planning Associate 7 ATTACHMENT A SEE ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 10025 (CCS) D.. <C :iE ~ - z - () - > . . OJ ~ Z w :iE J: ~ S "A V VNOZHIY GA18 IDIIHSlIM f-< '" 15 ::: (j) ~ ct> .~ "A V VINHOIlI1V:J "A V NOL~NIHSV M "AV OHVOI .... '" :r: f-< ::: ! , I I ' ! I!;; !f "15 !\".,A Q\ "AV VNVLNOJ\l CJj 1'0 10 f!N 1 i ~~ 0)19 > C 0) 0) enO E 0) &w Q ~ :5 8 ~ "O~ 0) L- I!i.&. _en ro () c .0 U5~ Q ~ :5 8 ~ L.~___J "A V VNOZllIV GA 18 IDIIHSlI M !;; 15 t- \ I I I !;; ...... ""..'.' .. II' !;; 15~'1' 15 \C .., lI'l ~."...I..I L-CI: L18[_J I"rfINHOIlI1Y:J r---'Y r--QP~! '~I ~O..j 1:0 10> <I I <.p1~.,!.1 I ~ LJL J "AVNOL~NIHSVM III I. I II .' '1 I D,I,I"."'.,.;, "0...... .'N." ',..,J ,CD.' pJ ... . l--~tij~ u. i~' CJ--:- b, j~' ~ I, @..I~JI' !;; Ii II ~ I '. I ~ II. . ..' I... '. I, ", I I I !I i! ........,.., I I L~.u_1 I. ..__1 "AV VNVLNOJ\l "AVS'.iIGVSI1Vd "AV VL1V !;; 15 '" !;; ~ !" r:::o I I t:P , : I t..J CD I I , L__.~._~,j ",I Q " . ...: ~ S <lI: 0- f-< ~ <lI: !;; ~ " !;; ~ GAl' "AY "AYi\ 10:- I , II'!"\ NJ I ' I f "A !;; ~ "AY "A' () I- Z UJ ~ I () <I:: I- ~ j~ E ra ~ ~ :,O!~ ~ 8 )1 ~ ~ ~I i~ ~1ii .- ::l ra U o C5 ~I ~ ~ ~I !' , ~~I JI cf? '#. eft C'? N ro I'- I'- Ol rficf?cf!.cf!.tf!."ifi'Cf!.*,* o;~2~roR~c;;~ 01'-C'?C'"l01'-f'-:C'"l0C'"l00 0 C'"ia:itrir--:ON r--:r--:a:icDo~N C\I -r-~~vC;;C\lC\lN"rC\l T"'" ~~~~~~~&;~~$~cf2.~ ro <0 I'- I'- ro ro <0 I'- I'- I'- U1 U1 CD co '<tl'-O ~~U1 ~'<t0l1'-C'?0l ~~~~~[:;~~c;;gj~~~~ cf2. * cf!.?f.. cf? cf!. cfl. '* tfl.?f!. cf!. eft. cfl. eft U1 '<t N ...... I'- NOlI'- <0 Ol Ol ro U1 N ro <0 I'- I'- ro ro <0 I'- I'- <0 U1 U1 U1 <0 "! ~ ~ r--: :ri ~ ~ ~ ~ oi ~ tri ;; :i N T""" T""" ('f) ('f') C\I C\J ('I') C\I T""" T""" -~raol.!1 ~~~N~~~~ "I"'" o o N - - ca .... . en .- l - ca c CC c o .- ... ca N .- - .- ... ~ (I) ail (1)1 ~ (I) E ~ .::: ra <( In Z 0 .J:: ro ~ jl !I C'"lONC'"lCOOC'"l C'"l'<t'<tNNC'"lN g; ~ g; ~ g; "E~<(~<(~ ~~5~.9~ !3 ~~g>~g'~ e1i)a;Ci)S~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ro ~ rn ~ l/)Ci5Ci5Ci58 ~~ ~~ ~ l/) .J:: .J:: .J:: C (I) g; (I) 5 (I) 2@~~~~~~c:~ U (I) (I) (I) (I) ro > ro ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ C <( C <( C Ci5Ci5U5U5~~~~-E .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: 0 ro 0 ro 0 :::tii5<'i5j::::2~:2~:2 OJ > <( "C C ro .9 ~ g':; ~~~~31.... ~ - Ci5 Ci5 Ci5 (I) g .J:: 2 ~ U1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <( ~ ~ ~ al ~Ci5Ci5Ci5Ci5 ro .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: ~r:::~ii)cD ~ g; g; g; g;g;g; <(~~~ ~~~ 5~~~ > > > CD CD Ci) Ci) 1D ID ~ ro ro ro <( <( <( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C C C C ~ ~ ~ en U5 U5 U5 en U5 ~ -E -E -E ro ro ro .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: ro 0 0 0 ~ :Q 32 LO LO CD <0 r::: r::: s: ::;: ~ :2 00000000000000 00000000000000 '<t U1 <0 I'- ro Ol ro 0) ro Ol I'- '<t U1 <0 ~ o It) I'- <7l N .., ~ o ..... I'- N ..... .., ~ o N I'- CD ..... .., <7l .., '<t Cii '0 I- ~.... ~ (I) f! ~ 5 I!? ::l o ~I ~ :E ~ CIl (I) U lii ra ~ c: .... ::l I- 0~;;~:~~cD~~~;:~:i '<t tri I'- <0 C'"l 0 C'"l N It) CD ~ ......oroU1l'-rol'-<OO...... N~g)~~~~~~N Ol 0 N 0 N N ~"?~~~~~~~f'-:f'-:"!'<I;N Cl:! :l-raOI.lc:a..~=1 .vg~~~ro~oo "I"'" o o N - - ca .... . en .- l - ca c CC c o .- ... ca .. :I a !I' ~~I ~I J (I) ail (1)1 ~ (I) E (I) .::: ra ~ In Z 0 .J:: ro ~ jl !I OlroNroOC'"lro lOrol'-C'"lC'"l'<t'<t '<t .... .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro <0 I'- I'- ro ro <0 I'- I'- <0 lO lO lO <0 ~ o N CD lO C'"l N N N~~~~ <7l .., '<t C'"lONC'"l<OOC'"l C'"l '<t '<t N N C'"l N (I) OJ (I) OJ (I) OJ :J > :J > :J > C<(C<(~<( "Em ~ 'U "E ~~.9<(5~5~ (],)OClOOOc,Q) ~ S ~ c ~ c ~ c s eCDQ)Q)S~~{g~{g~~a;1i)Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CIl U C ~ C ~ C ~ U Ci5 e ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ @ p U~~~~<( lji<( lji<( lji~~.....s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ al U5U5U5U5~2~2~205U5cnCi5 .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: 0 ro 0 ro 0 ro .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: ::;tiOCDr:::~B~B:2Br:::~iO<E OJ g; g; g; (I) (I) (I) ~ C C C :J :J :J C <(~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lji ..... ..... 0 <( <( <(> > > 1D CD Q) Q) ID CD c, ro ro ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c c c ~ ~ ~ en en en en U5 U5 ~ -E -E -E ro ro ro .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: ro 0 0 0 32 32 32 LO LO CD CD t::: t::: 3: ~ ~ ~ Cii '0 I- 00000000000000 00000000000000 '<t lO <0 I'- ro Ol ro Ol ro Ol r-- '<t lO <0 o I- Z w :2: I o ~ I- ~ )II~I 0. N 6- eIlo.o.o.o.eIl~ ~ .... ...- .... N ()') ell ()') ro r-- 0. 00 0. C. to lO 6- .... ell 0. o.()')(') ell 0. N~Q.(J)~ ~~Ul<<. '#. *****'#.'#.cf?cf?**#-cf!. N ooNOtON()')lOO(')()')Nr--(') r-- ....tOlOr--r--....lOtO....(')....N.... ~ ..J I~i 0. "i' 0. 0. 00 .... 6- (') 0. "i' 0. ell r-- ()') ('0- cO ()') r-- ro 00 0. Q) Q) or c C 0. 0 0 r--zz Q) c c.~ ~ 0. ...- Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) c c c c c 00000 ZZZZZ U l: ta ~ ~I ~ ta Gl Q. 6- r-- C. lO a. Co a. 6.. 00 00 lO N 6. 6. b. a. .... r-- .... N ...- ro o ...- 0. 0. 00 00 0. r-;- a. co 0. 00 00 to 0.. cO ro"'r--r-- r-- 0. N ...- ro 0. 0. 0. ~6.6.~6. ro r-- lO ()') ro r-- ..: "I'"" o o N ~Ii #. #- r-- 00 r-- r-- cf?*~**cf!.**cfl.* a;:e~d'i~d'i~a;j::!:a; #. #. N r-- ()') 00 - - II .... Q) C W 0 l: Z ~ C. U to ~ cO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ()') o:~~~~~~~~~~~~~i!:i ~ c. l!! to Gl ro ~ ()') ~ ~ to (') . en .- =. - II C CC ~ u C II a. :s u u o 1 (/)-_Gll!!1 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m m ID ID W 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c c c ~ ~ ~ ~ en en US CiS U5 CiS ~ ~ ~ ~ ell ell ell ell ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ell 0 0 0 :!2 32 32 !2 10 LO (0 (0 ~ r::: ~ :;E ~ ::: ~iiio"l ~oooooooooooooo 00000000000000 ....lOtOr--oo()')oo()')oo()')r--....lOtO ~ c.: .... N .... :E c.: co ...:. ~m~ ~!I~ ~i~ ~!I~ IU I~I~ IUs~ I~I~ ~I j "I"" o o N - - II .... . en .- en ~ - II C cc " c CD ~ CD CD == II ~I ~III ?ft. * * cf? ~ #. * * * * ~ ?ft. cf? * N r-- to 00 0 r-- lO r-- lO <Xl 0 N (') (') ()') 00 r-- 00 ...- 00 ()') ()') ()') 00 ...- ()') 00 00 (') 0 to N N ...- N~:;~~~~~~~~ cf? cfi. * * * * * ?ft. * cf? cf!. * * ?ft. N (') to (') (') to 0 r-- 00 0 (') 00 r-- (') ()') 00 00 00 ()') ()') ()') ()') ()') ()') 00 00 00 00 (') ()') 00 0 00 lO r-- N ()') 00 ()') (') to ()') N~~N(Y)"l;f(Y)('I')("l')Moc-NNT""" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ()') 00 ()') r-- ...- ()') 00 ()') ()') 00 00 ()') 00 00 ....OO()')...-tOtON()')tOO....tOO N N N ...- .... .... (') (') (') (') N N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ()')r--()')()')()')()')()')r--r--()')oooo (') ...- N N o ()') 0 lO 00 ...- 00 (') to .... to ()') N T""" "l:t """ C"? C") ('l') ('l") 'T""" N N T""" LO M or- """ or- l""'- N N N N .... .... ;~~~~~g~ ~ Qi Qi "tJ~<l:~~~~"E Co c c: c >~5~5~5~ w Q) ..... OJ <l: OJ <l: OJ Q) - ~ 0 c 0 c 0 c ~ ~ Q) Q5 a; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S Q) a; Q3 ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ co ~ co u co c ~ ~ @ (/) en en en (5 S ~ S ~ S ~ 8 en en en m ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ e~~S~U5 ffiU5 ~U5 53~~~S; u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en en en en -E ~ -E ~ -E ~ U5 U5 U5 U5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ell 0 ell 0 ell ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LO <0 r::: ~ :2 ~ :2 ~ :2 r::: ~ LO <0 (jj ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ c c c ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) ffi ffi ffi ffi 5 ~ ~ ~ > > > > Q) Q) a; Q) Q) Q) 0 co co co <l: <l: <l: <l: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c c c ~ ~ ~ ~ en en CiS en en en ~ -E -E -E ell ell ell ell ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ell 0 0 0 :Q :Q B J2 it) LO co <D ~ ;:::. ~ ~ ::;: ~ 00000000000000 00000000000000 .... lO to r-- 00 ()') 00 ()') 00 ()') r-- .... lO to ~ o .... ()') ()') ()') M ~ ~ ()') CD ()') M ~ o N ()') M o .... ~ o o ()') M ()') M ()') M .... iii '0 I- () I- Z UJ ~ I () ~ I- <( jo o QI 0 E :; d I E QI E f! d U cf!. 'if!. '<t 0 Ol ~ ~ 0 N ~ ?f? tf!. (0 N r-- Ol u U') N " M c ~ ...... '<t n 'if. ~ 0 a; '<t "#. 0 Ol JI U') N <X:i ~ ...... .. o o N >t &I :IE ~IJ . en .- ~ - &I C C c o .- .. &I N .- - .- .. ~ -, QI! 3l E ~ III II) Z Jill C") r-- N '<t J!l ~ - II) III III ~ o Q) > <( c Q) ~ ~ c (J) ~ .s:::: ro cD ~ ~ ~ ~ <( ii5 0 :5 -fij U') ~ Q) Q) > <( ~ 0 ii5 .s:::: ro .s:::: ~ ill 0 0 0 0 U') Ol ATTACHMENT 0 Comments from 5th/6th/7th Neiqhborhood Meetinq: December 9.2004 . Preferential parking in surrounding areas has moved all the cars into this area . Is pref park a global policy or does every block have to petition? . It's hard to get through the process because one can't! is uncomfortable/dangerous to collect signatures . 800 block of 5th St.: 18 buildings may have on-site parking spaces and won't sign the petition . First Federal employees/other businesses park all day . People store cars on the street . The rules that require petitions should be changed . This area more impacted than others because of nearby pref park and Montana night businesses; people shouldn't have to collect signatures . Lots of new condos have parking and residents don't want to sign petitions . Many Montana businesses have turned over with no provision for employee parking, such as Marmalade employees, vans, and Flair . Residents get home late and then have to park 4-5 blocks away . Summer: people go to the beach all day . Church: the City allows buses to park on the street even though they have a parking lot . Montana employees are told to park south of Montana . Has there been a study of people that already have preferential parking to see if it has improved things for them? . Giving more permit passes than there are spaces is a problem and is inefficient . Can spaces on the street be marked? . Driveway entrances to buildings should be from the alley . Concern that Montana businesses will fight preferential parking . Desire to change the 2/3 requirement for petitioning . Palisades Ave: what will happen with parking around the Goose Egg? . There is no incentive (Le. free parking) for residents or businesses to use the garage on 4th St. just north of Wilshire . Can the $15/permit fee be reduced? . There should be more incentives for people to rideshare, as driving around and around is polluting . When arrive home at 5pm, must look for parking for 30. min. . Want proof that pref park will work, is City just trying to get more money from permits and tickets? . 3 attendees at meeting want no pref parking . Don't like pref park in other neighborhoods; why would they want it in their neighborhood? . Apt. owners should be required to rent parking spaces on site to their tenants . Daytime regs: attendees prefer 2 hr limits over No parking regs . Nighttime regs: attendees prefer No parking regs over 2 hr limits . Concern that guests will get tickets when they come to visit and park . Business employees should park in a structure and then travel/take shuttle to place of employment-critical of Montana businesses . Concern that pref park is being put into place piecemeal; the area under consideration is not a comprehensive neighborhood . There should be a comprehensive Citywide approach to preferential parking