SR-503-001-02-01 (6)
~ I
'.
~,',
i~
I
~ I
II ..
~
......
~ I
. I
~. I
c J
I
1
, I
, I
I
I
r
I
I
J
I
I
I
RNL
DESIGN
800 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400
Los Angeles, California 90017
(213) 955-9775
Prepared by:
March 2003
1\
.... Entire document printed
on recycled paper
ATTACHMENT C
City of Santa Monica
Corporation Yard
Recycling & Transfer
Facility Study
fiR
6190 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55416
(763) 591-5400
8..-
J
Corporation Yard Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Project Overview
Chapter Two
Recycling and Transfer Facility
Basis of Design
Chapter Three
Evaluation of Existing Southern California Disposal
Transfer Station
Chapter Four
Recycling & Transfer Facility Layout Plan
Chapter Five
Construction Budget and Conceptual Opinion of Cost
f. I
[:
- I
f I
~ I
r',
&;
- 1
I
I
! I
, j
j
I
I
I
I
I
j
J
!
I
. ....
-J
~:;
Corporation Yard Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
Chapter One
Project Overview
Introduction
l;
~
,',
l;.
Qty of Santa Monica Corporation Yard
Santa Monica, California
The City of Santa Monica, California, owns and operates a 10-acre
Corporation Yard Facility that is located at 2500 Michigan Avenue,
(Intersection of 24th Street and Michigan Ave.), within the City of
Santa Monica. The City has operated the Corporation Yard in this
location for 75 years, and the divisions within the yard have outgrown
this facility. Its functional uses have gradually become impaired due
to space limitations, regulatory requirements and the condition of the
facilities.
The City, through its planning consultant RNL Design, developed a
comprehensive master plan to address the functional and operational
needs of the users of the Corporation Yard. This master plan was
completed in March 2002. Included in the Corporation Yard Master
Plan was a strategy for constructing the replacement Recycling &
Transfer Facility and associated improvements as required to meet
the needs of the City Solid Waste Division.
The City of Santa Monica requested an update to the Master Plan,
specific to the Recycling & Transfer Facility, to focus on a confirmation
of Solid Waste Division space needs, confirmation of the proposed
facility layout, an analysis of the potential use of the Southern
California Disposal (SCD) Transfer Station, and a confirmation of the
construction cost. The results of the study are included in this report.
1.1
March 2003
Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
RNLlHDR
"'... J
,.
il;.
k
- I
, I
-.-.
J
Scope of Services
I
~ 1
{t
t"
- I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
,:".
~:j
I
~. .
j
I
f
I
I
I
Report Overview
\.:
~"'f
[J
City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard
Santa Monica, California
Corporation Yard Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
The City of Santa Monica commissioned the RNL Design planning
and design team, consisting of RNL Design (RNL), HDR Engineering,
Inc. (HDR) and Jacobus & Yuang to prepare the Corporation Yard
Recycling & Transfer Facility Study. The scope of work consisted of
confirmation of the facility requirements of the City's Recycling &
Transfer Facility, investigation into alternative layouts for the
Recycling & Transfer Facility, preparation of a final conceptual layout,
and preparation of a construction cost estimate for the improvements
of the Recycling & Transfer Facility. The scope of work also included
an assessment of the existing SCD Transfer Station and the ability of
that facility to process the waste stream of the City in addition to its
current and projected volumes of waste.
The Recycling & Transfer Facility Study prepared for the Corporation
Yard consists of five chapters. The following is a brief description of
the contents of each chapter.
Chapter One - Project OvefView describes the background of the
project, defines the scope of work performed for the study and gives
an overview of the final report.
Chapter Two - Recycling and Transfer Facility Basis of Design
provides a summary of the facility requirements of the City's Recycling
& Transfer Facility based upon an analysis of the quantity of waste
processed and the traffic volumes (current and projected), a
description of the space requirements and planning guidelines, a
description of building features and environmental protections, and a
description of the final conceptua/layout plan.
Chapter Three - Evaluation of Existing Southern California Disposal
Transfer Station presents an evaluation of the SeD facility and its
ability to handle the City's waste stream (current and projected) in
addition to the current and projected volumes processed at the facility.
Chapter Four - Recycling & Transfer Facility Layout Plan presents the
final conceptual layout plan for the Recycling & Transfer Facility, and
a layout on the Corporation Yard Site Master Plan.
Chapter Five - Project Budget provides an order-of-magnitude
construction cost estimate for the proposed improvements and new
construction required for the Recycling & Transfer Facility at the
Corporation Yard. The estimate includes total Project Budget that
delineates the costs for construction, design, phasing, moving, and
other similar project expenses.
1.2
March 2003
Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
RNUHDR
.. .....
J
Corporation Yard Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
Chapter Two
Recycling and Transfer Facility Basis of Design
Introduction
HDR Engineering was commissioned to conduct a study to confirm
the facility requirements of the City's Recycling & Transfer Facility
based upon an analysis of the quantity of waste processed and the
traffic volumes (current and projected), to determine the space
requirements and planning guidelines for the Recycling & Transfer
Facility, to determine the building features and environmental
protections required for this type of facility and to develop a final
conceptual layout plan. The tinallayout plan is the result of an
analysis ot several alternative layouts investigated during this
process.
This chapter includes the HDR Engineering, Inc. Basis of Design
Report dated March 17,2003 in its entirety.
Qty of Santa Monica Corporation Yard
Santa Monica. California
2.1
March 2003
Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
RNUHDR
-- - City of ' ''';-,(~
S.lnU, :\I~Hli.-., _.",~d?E~'
~._ - ~ e<""'~
.sa~1'1111.
City of Santa Monica Recycling
and Transfer Facility
Basis of Design Report
March 17, 2003
Prepared for:
City of Santa Monica
Solid Waste Division
Prepared by:
fiR
HDR Engineering, Inc.
6190 Golden Hills Dr.
Minneapolis, MN 55416
:',': [
~ 0'
r;
rh~
~ I
~ I
~ I
~' .
- I
I
I
: I
1...1
~
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
~.w
'.
....)
""
t
- (It,,~ " -~~~1
San taU () II i t. a - - .JPff'
,. "'~~.
1.0
1.1
1.2
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
4.0
5.0
6.0
\,::,.
~L.' . 9 I I I I I . I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Backg rou nd ... ..... ................... .... ..............."................ ............... ........................ .................. ..................... ","" ........ .... 1
Facility Requirements .................................. ....... .................................................. ...... 1
Waste and Traffic Quantities........................... ........................................ ........ ............ 2
Traffic Considerati ons.................................................................................................. 4
GeneraL................ ..... ............. ......... ........... ........ .............. .......................................... 4
Minimum Vehicle Turning Radii ..................... .......... ......... .............. ..... ................... .... 4
Maximum Roadway Grades... ...... ....... ........ ............. ............................ ....................... 4
Scale Arrangements ... ....... ... ... ...... ... ...... ....... ......... ....... ... .......... ....... .... ...... ....... ... ..... 4
Buy-Back Center and Commingled Recycling Operation ............................................ 4
Exterior Maneuvering for Buildings........ ... ......... .............. ............ ..... ....... ................... 5
Space Allocations... .... .... ... ."", ....... ..................... "'....... ........................"'" .................... .......... ..............."....... 5
Unloading Space ............ .................... ............. .................. ............ .... ........ ................. 5
Queuing Space ........ ........... .................... ..... .................................................... ............ 5
Waste Storage ...... .......... ............ ....... ................... ............ ....................... ................... 5
Transfer Load-out .... ......................................... .......................................................... 6
Sorting and Recycling ................ .... ........ ............ ........ ...... ..... .................. ............... ..... 6
Building Features ...........................,.,. ............. ..... ... ..... ...................... ............ ......"........ ....... ... .... 7
Environmental Protection................................................................. ........................... 7
Conceptual Site Layout ........ ................. ............. ............. ........ ..... ........... .......... ........... 7
Appendix A Santa Monica Recycling & Transfer Facility - Basis of Design Analysis
Appendix B Santa Monica Recycling & Transfer Facility - Conceptual Site Plan
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGEi
MARCH 17, 2003
I
I
,- I
, I
~~,.
:,: I
I
I
[,I
r:;
,
.....~
r
r I
~,
L~
iJ
~
: J
~,
I
I
I
1
J
J
j
I
\ 1 . ,~ d ~i4'~~~
<l' .; (;t \J.. n j (".. , ';.:.:~-:~~~
:t.: '~~J)l:'
t I I I I I . . .
BACKGROUND
1.0 BACKGROUND
In conjunction with RNL Design's previous efforts to conduct a study of the City's needs to
improve their existing Corporation Yard (Corporation Yard Master Plan Study), HDR evaluated
the feasibility of providing significant improvements to the City's existing transfer facility. As a
result of this study, the construction of a new, enclosed recycling and transfer facility at the
Corporation Yard was proposed.
Recently HDR was retained, as a sub-consultant to RNL Design, to verify the validity of the
previous study and investigate options for refinement of the previously proposed design. HDR
was also retained to verify the validity of the previous study conclusions that the existing
Southern California Disposal (SCD) transfer station, across Delaware Avenue, was not suitable
for accepting and transferring the additional waste stream currently handled by the City at their
transfer station and accommodating the City's recycling goals.
1.1 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
HDR met with City staff to review the existing transfer facility operations, identify constraints in
the existing operations and discuss improvements to be incorporated into a new facility.
The following elements were developed to form the constraints or basis for the facility design:
... Existing traffic flow patterns create problems that must be eliminated or minimized in
the new design;
... Additional space needs to be allocated to allow for safe, efficient traffic flow and
planned recycling, waste handling and transfer activities;
... The recycling and transfer facility should be enclosed in metal building construction to
control potential environmental impacts;
... The transfer operation planning should incorporate the most cost effective transfer
technology for the City. Open top technology shall be employed with provisions for
installing preload compactors in the future if conditions warrant;
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE 1
MARCH 17, 2003
~ I
l;
1
- I
'0 I
; I
"
~:.
; 1
":
I
I
: I
~;~
'"
i I
~
II
~
J
J
I
I
j
I
I
I
~,
,.,
f4
~:.
. . I . . I . .
BACKGROUND
... The yard renovation must be planned to allow the existing transfer facility and critical
recycling activities to remain operational during construction. Thus, the new transfer
facility cannot be constructed on space used by the existing facility;
... Waste handling operations in the transfer building should be buffered or shielded from
neighboring businesses and uses;
... Access and egress for all facility traffic can be provided from Michigan or Delaware
Avenues.
... The recovery of waste tipped at the transfer facility should be accommodated in the
facility planning. As such, the transfer facility should consider two transfer load-out
openings, one of which could be used for wood/green waste or C&D load-out and
transfer, and;
... Open floor space adjacent to the transfer tipping and waste storage area shall be
provided for recycling activities. Adjacent to this space shall be bi-level "Z" wall spaces
for roll-off containers of recovered materials.
1.2 WASTE AND TRAFFIC QUANTITIES
To properly size the facility for reasonably anticipated volumes of tonnage and traffic, HDR
referred to existing facility scale records for the entire year 2002. Fluctuations in monthly,
weekly, daily and hourly volumes of tonnage and traffic were accounted for in the design of the
facility. The following Table I presents the current volumes of tonnage and traffic at the existing
facility for both weekday and Saturday operations. Table I identifies traffic and tonnage volumes
for each of the different types of customers that use the facility.
With the limited expected increase in population, coupled with expected increases in source
reduction, re-use and recycling, no net growth in the residential waste stream is expected under
future conditions. However, it is reasonable to anticipate that the facility will experience higher
volumes of commercial waste tonnage and traffic in the future. It is also possible that
neighboring jurisdictions will want to use the City's facility. Thus, it is recommended the facility
be designed for additional volumes of tonnage and traffic, beyond current volumes, to
accommodate these additional waste streams. Table II presents proposed volumes of tonnage
and traffic for design purposes. Back up data used to prepare Tables I and II can be found in
Appendix A.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE 2
MARCH 17, 2003
I
I
- I
'.
[' 1
~..-. I
".
r>:'.
\ I
[ I
:- I
I
~;
r I
I;
'"
I
~;
~
~ I
~
t"
~.
: I
, i
. I
I
I
. - ~ I ~ \ ,- - :: "?1t ~.
.... \1' ---~'"
.. n (a . 0 n I.' it , . .;;~~
. I I I I I . I
BACKGROUND
,____~~.~~__.~~~_~.n_.__.'w_._____w.__.___~.___.____q...~--..-................ ...........""-c~_T~._.____~__,...~..._..___._..........,p~_~_. ,.._.,.........,. ~_________.____,.__,~_..,_.,.._.~__.._._.__..__..~_..___...., .,...
,
- -
Table I
Current Volumes of Tonnage and Traffic
I
1
i
I
,
: Weekday L ~'.!~~_JL~he! l:!'Yyetlk:I..._JL _ _ J'u!>l~c . II Totals
_ _._ ~~t_a!~. J~o_~I_!!>.~~J!<<:>>.!~~JL~~_!_~!1_!!JL~~~~!!!!P~Jl ~~!~~_!~~~_H :ro~.~I~:r~ip~ i __ _ u _.. _ _;
it A\'9I~qjl_____u?Q_1_.H~___JL...J~_JL_____ .... ..11 .m.?XmJL___u_u. ......H ;2~5.
!1.P~~k.TPD II .??:?.ll.......__________JL__nu_...Jl0 IL~-~[=~OlC------1C..4~5.il
1_~~9_y.~p ... . i 1__________ _.J L..m_~~.J L _..____ .__m j Lm__ .'. ..}Q.J L _.__ _ .. _I Ln." . __~~.. .... i C.. .1}?i
1__~~~~_.\!PI:>.J I. .'. .... ....... ..... L___.____ 50 J '--_._mu.___ .J L. . ... .~5..._J L___. ... ... .. .... . '_ . J I 85 ..1 Lmu_ .. ..1 ~_Q
L~~ak VPH L.. _ J 14 JL JL .. 19 J C..__ J L ._,_,,__J_~__)[ w___ _~~J
.. .- ... ...._.. .n........,.....__...___ _no _ ..._.,..._....u. ....L ._n....._~.L.'U _~'n'..'.. ._, '..n.......__.,_._. "_n ....._...._.....,._ _.".,..",.,.,. .__. _,____~.~. nm ...... _......_. ...._..............._._......_........ .!:
saturday iL~_I'~~uc~LClt~er l:~~~h~~""_J[_____J'IlI>~._jl T olals i
. ... u~~~~I~_ u.i [ I~~Ci~_T (;)_':I~i 1!~~~~..!!'!J.!s.J L!()t!,l! ()!'.s.J L T()t~_I_T~~p_s.J I !()!.al "f()n..s, I L"f()~.a_~}~~ip!;j ... ..... . ......... ... J
L_~YJtIPP_"_ '".e.__hJ?L l~_.____...J i__ _..~J L__ ___._ J L_._..__~ 7...J L,...______ . . ..wJ L.. ...... _....!Z~j
iLe~~~!~!L: 1..__. ..._.. J.~<!._J L__,____I L__.___m_~.?.J Ln.._______.__J L_._._~___x~___II.. .__ ... .._____ .j I._.w ... ..fgQi I
11... .'~\lg~~D ......il_m___JL__._.__~~_ll._........~_..__.JI_..._...___J....IL...._..._._._.__...JL_.. ........ ....5? .JI. ....._._ 84:
!lm~~~_~Y~!? n_' L__ _."_..w. ,1 L_~_J L__.___________.J L._m___.__~QJ L__._________..J L __. .... . ?? .. J L._ . ...1 :1~j
IL.~~~.y~l_1. ..JL_ ... . .........1L._.. 11JL_........... Jl.... .......m.~JL______........... . !l 2~ ...JL_.._m_~~i
,-.,--~_._~------------,.,_._...._._~ .,.~_........._~.~_.~---~--,---~----~~--._,--.._....~.,.-..-- --~.. ,..._~___._~...,'~.L_._U.~___L_,_______~T_.'___._~__,.~,__.__..____.......___,_...., . . ... ~.L.' __._-"'~_.___T__.____~_.__ _._~__.,_.~_,'___._..,_,..,..,..
Table II
Proposed Future Volumes of Tonnage and Traffic
~-::::y IT.;;;;r~i~ri;ilT~~_~c1;;;;JLT~;;;,T~;.~bi:;~iTri~~il Totals !
i ..-----.-.----..-...... - Q--~----~ L.__ - ~u_______._~ L -_______1 L____.___J L.w_~...._...._. ._ ..___.........._._,
IL_~k~-II--u~-l. .._-~-iL-_-~:~l__-u~-II_~l~rL_u ~II~~ .~~
J._ ---___~______ ...... L.. . ...... .._.' ....._._ ......_._._..__..._..~ L.__._._._._ C.. .u_.. ....0 L___._....... II.... . .. .... ., [m ...... ..... .____..
t~:j[::-:=1~f=:=.~it-=~~:1=jf==~jE=~jjE__:;~:if::.~~~i
11_.___......,....,.. -- ---- - ~_~'_,..,_.,_",_,,,,_,_,___,_,,___,_,,___,_,_,,,_, _____ _____.__________c.r_'._.'.,..,....,.~.. ....,.....___.._._..__._____....___....,.....~.__~..,_._____________ _ _ _ ............_....._ ...."._....._....."..._._._"..._ .. ....~
i Saturday It_~_k!r!~~LQth~'..l:ity_:o'!h~cle" JI____!'u'!lk:_~_ _ . '/ Totals i
!_ ". ~_~~I~.. .. ..I! ()!",I!()~~J I! ot~L!ri~~j L!()!~I!()n~! 1!()!_CiI !~!p~J t!:()!~~__!(),:,~ I L"f()~i.lI!rip~ i___u_. j
!~g TPD__..,J L_..___u_m~~,?J 1_____Qj L_______~ L.._,...,...._~~_..Qj L~___._j7IL_._~~..._.g] L___...J!~J
IlPeak TPQ_..JL._u__.190j l__~ L___._._....._ 2511_~_._.~L__J5JL_.___...._g!L.._..__29(~1
jlAV9 VPD.._..._JL_.___._~! L_.__~j L~u_~_.__ 01 L..__.______._...zIL.______...__gJ L. __.___..........?f?j L..UU.H..~~i
llPeak ~~Q.__J L_.mo.__ ___ oj L_______~_~j L~,._____...._.9j L.u___._____~Qj L .._._~...._..... n Q! Lm _. .._.______.~7.J C .. _ JA?J
Ile~_~\LP_tl___J I. w.... ... . .___oj L_. ..____.._.J11 L_m.___.__.gI L . . n. ...~j 1._______.____9) I. u. _??! t:~_.~ _~.? II
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE 3
MARCH 17, 2003
[ I
l
" 1
~ I
" I
i
t'.
.. I
""-
I
r I
r~
'to..,-.
f I
L
II
~I
: I
!
~
i I
I,
e;
J
I
I
I
f
J
I
( I.' n~ .>~~,~::.1.
~ a II I it "I H n i {' ~. ':, ' ~'~'~;;_
J I I I I I I I I
TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS
2.0 TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS
Roadway geometric and travel patterns shall conform to the following requirements:
2.1. GENERAL
One way travel lanes shall be 15 feet wide. Two-way roadways shall have minimum 12-foot
lanes. At least one vehicle length before and after turns or in scale approaches shall be
provided. For the transfer vehicles, a drive through arrangement is preferred over a back-in
arrangement. Cross traffic shall be avoided as much as possible.
2.2 MINIMUM VEHICLE TURNING RADII
Transfer Vehicles - Traveled lane, inside radius of 50 ft. and outside radius of 70 ft.
Collection Truck - Traveled lane, inside radius of 35 ft. and outside radius of 50 ft.
2.3 MAXIMUM ROADWAY GRADES
Maximum vertical slopes shall be 8 percent for downgrades and 6 percent for upgrades other
than transfer truck roadways. Transfer truck roadways shall have a maximum downgrade of
12 percent and maximum upgrade of 10 percent. Minimum 25-ft. vertical curves shall be
provided. The grade difference planned for the transfer load-out area is 16 ft. below the tipping
floor. If needed, the transfer building tipping floor could be raised a limited amount to reduce
the transfer load-out area excavation.
2.4. SCALE ARRANGEMENTS
Transfer Facility ~ One inbound and one outbound scale, served by a common scale house is
recommended for weighing waste deliveries. Each scale shall be a minimum of 50 ft. long with
1 Q-ft. approach and exit slabs at each end. One scale house was assumed to eliminate
unnecessary scale attendants. Load-out scales under the transfer chutes are recommended to
optimize payloads and minimize transfer haul costs.
2.5 BuY-BACK CENTER AND COMMINGLED RECYCLING OPERATION
Approximately 60,000 s.f. of space, preferably adjacent to the transfer facility shall be provided
for the operation of the City's Buy-Back Center and Commingled Recycling Operation.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE 4
MARCH 17, 2003
I
I
1
~ I
L
~ I
I
I
L
: I
~;
I
t I
"
r>~
~;
~ I
b
li
: J
.~
: I
l
~~
: I
r:
J
I'
J
I
j
I
"_ ... ~ - ~~~15
. II- .'~'"'m
:"'I a n (a \ 141 H 1 C' a . ._ ___' _ ,~__~: ~.
I I 1.1 I I I I
SPACE ALLOCATIONS
2.6 exTERIOR MANEUVERING FOR BUILDINGS
To reduce capital building costs, exterior waste delivery vehicle maneuvering is recommended.
Delivery vehicles will back into the transfer building.
3.0 SPACE ALLOCATIONS
3.1 UNLOADING SPACE
Inside the transfer facility building, sufficient space must be provided to accommodate
reasonably expected peak incoming traffic. To accommodate anticipated peak hourly incoming
traffic flows of 38 City trucks and 19 public vehicles, 4 - 15 ft. wide packer truck unloading
stalls plus 5 - 10ft. wide self haul unloading stalls are required. Thus, the minimum width of
the transfer building is 110ft. Supporting analyses for determining required unloading space
and spatial requirements for subsequent elements of the facility are included in Appendix A.
3.2 QUEUING SPACE
Sufficient space should be provided before the entry scale to accommodate the peak hourly
flow of traffic into the facility. Allowing for 30 seconds transaction time for City collection
vehicles and 45 seconds for other vehicles, one entry scale should be more than adequate to
accommodate this volume of traffic. To allow for the fact that the incoming traffic will not be
uniform over the peak hour, sufficient space should be provided to stage instantaneous arrivals
of 4 to 5 vehicles. Likewise, sufficient space between the inbound scale and the tipping area
should be provided to accommodate the surges in traffic. Space for 4 to 5 vehicles should be
provided.
3.3 WASTE STORAGE
Per the City's request, to accommodate upset conditions, sufficient space shall be provided
inside the building on the tipping floor to accommodate the average design throughput of the
facility. With 12 ft. high perimeter waste containment I push walls, approximately 13,000 s.f. of
tipping floor area is required to contain one day's storage allowing for loader operations inside
the building.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE 5
MARCH 17, 2003
tl
t,
1
I
~ I
~
',' I
,
to.
ts
r I
:.
l I
,,"
ti
~J
r I
t,
[ I
~,
~
( !
~
~, J
"
~-j
lj
; J
I;
"
L
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
- - ~.>l"':. \7 _.~':,~.~
~ a II r a .\1 0 n i nl '; ",\~~'~- 1
'" ~~..~~\
I I . . . . . !
SPACE ALLOCATIONS
3.4
TRANSFER LOADROUT
The facility must be sized to allow for the transfer of the maximum expected tonnage received in
any given day. With the top loading transfer configuration, one open top port should be able to
provide the capacity to load 4 trailers per hour. At 20 tons per trailer and a 12 hour operating
schedule per day, one open top transfer port should be sufficient to accommodate the
anticipated peak daily tonnage. To accommodate potential problems in transfer vehicle traffic
flow, and to accommodate the separation of MSW transfer from other materials loadout (such
as wood waste or yard waste), two transfer ports are recommended in the facility. Gravity, drive
through loading for transfer trucks typically requires the least loading time per vehicle (can
achieve from 10 to 15 minutes per load depending on loader production). For the drive through
configuration recommended, an additional bypass lane is recommended to accommodate either
vehicle breakdowns or the potential future installation of pre-load compactors under the transfer
ports. Where one way drive through traffic can not be accommodated, a back in operation
could be feasible.
Space at the tipping floor level should be provided behind or adjacent to the transfer ports for
stationary or mobile tamping crane(s).
3.5 SORTING AND RECYCLING
Space shall be allocated in the transfer building for recovery, storage and staging of recyclables
for market. The recycling activities may initially include manual removal of source-separated
loads or material from mixed waste on the tipping floor. This will require space for storing
materials and for off-loading to roll-off bins or the transfer trucks. Approximately 8,000 s.f. of
covered floor area adjacent to the transfer facility tipping floor shall be provided for materials
recovery operations. Along one side of this area, a bi-Ievel UZ" wall configuration shall be
provided to accommodate the storage of recovered materials into roll off containers.
Adjacent Contractor Recycling Facility - Currently the Allan Company occupies approximately
55.000 SF of space on the corporation yard site to separate curbside collected recyclables and
accommodate general public recycling. The goal of the Master Plan was to reallocate space
for this facility to enhance operations and integrate functions with the transfer facility where it
makes sense and is possible.
Review of the current facility indicates that maneuvering is tight in areas, requiring three-point
turns by trucks and cross traffic in areas. Significant space is used for parking of the public
delivering recyclables. The recycling facility should be adjacent to the transfer facility to provide
logistical movement of recyclables and residuals. The Master Plan layout accommodates this
objective.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE 6
MARCH 17,2003
t I
~.
I
- I
~ I
~"
~
I
I
I
I
,
-'
,.
l'~
it'
! I
.~
i [
Ii
,
! I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
<. ~.~ - . ~
. .... - ~ ' "'\ fl~
<; I; fa' Ion i nl .~_- :; :_",
, T. ~_ ... f
BACKGROUND
111111111
4.0 BUILDING FEA lURES
To provide the most cost effective facility construction, it is recommended that the recycling and
transfer building be a pre-engineered metal building, enclosed on sides with an open front for
waste delivery vehicles to back in and unload. Enclosing unloading and transfer operations will
reduce environmental impacts of the operations. The recycling area could be attached to one
side of the transfer building and should be roofed but may also contain open wall/clear spans to
suite operational needs.
The transfer building should span end-to-end, or side-to-side, and be free of interior columns to
provide maximum operational efficiency. To accommodate refuse vehicle unloading, clear
height inside the building should be on the order of 26 feet.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Floor drains, or a trench drain, with grit traps, are recommended on the tipping floor inside the
building. Depending on local sanitary discharge requirements, the drainage system would
discharge to the municipal sanitary sewer or to a holding tank. To minimize accumulation of
dust during waste unloading operations, roof vents and possibly exhaust fans should be
provided. Generally, dust problems on flat slab tipping floor stations are not as severe as
stations configured where waste is unloaded into a pit. Misting systems are often required to
control dust on pit design stations.
The building should be designed to minimize wind tunnel effects. With prevailing wind from the
west. the most favorable location of openings into the transfer building would be on the west
wall. To improve the control of odors, waste should be transferred off the floor on a daily basis.
6.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE LAYOUT
Six potential arrangements of the Recycling and Transfer Facility were developed. Each option
was studied in detail with RNL Design and City staff with consideration given to the Facility
Criteria previously listed in this report. The option that best met all the criteria was the option
that closely compares to the layout developed in the Master Plan and is shown on drawing C-1
included in Appendix B. The major attributes of the selected layout are as follows:
~ The design provides space on City property to queue vehicles and maneuver to and
from unloading areas in a safe and efficient manner.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE 7
MARCH 17, 2003
I
I
, I
- I
~.
~
.- I
, I
I
I
i !
1<
l
~ I
"/
,~
I
!' I
~..
I
I
J
i
1
I
,.
ki
i~
'_ J ". _ - , ' '{k~
S a It I a ".. n i.... , ':,<_;.;~';~
BUILDING FEATURES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
CONCEPTUAL SITE LAYOUT
:.It 8 Q I I Iff I
.... All traffic enters and exits the facility from Michigan Avenue except outbound transfer
vehicles. This will minimize traffic congestion along Delaware Avenue where extensive
traffic to and from the Recycling Yard is expected.
.... The transfer load-out configuration is a convenient drive-thru arrangement with a bypass
lane to allow for the installation of compactors if in the future the situation warrants it.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE 8
MARCH 17, 2003
, I
1,
f<
h;:
t.-::.,~ "~~-\"'..J~
~ it n t it \J 0 II i nl I :'~ [1\'
~ ~ ~ .
- I
;.
..
'. I
~ I
k-
: I
;>"
: I
~. I
~. .
:~ I
<l
~ I
w
tl
~
~ J
~
tl
f,J
~ I
, I
I
J
I
I
I
. . . I I I . .
ApPENDIX A
Appendix A
Santa Monica Recycling & Transfer Facility
Basis of Design Analysis
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
MARCH 17. 2003
:~.I
; I
; I
~.
I
h
" I
I
J
~:
I
.~;..;
L
I
; I
t
~
l ]
.~
I I
,I
l
! I
f.
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
- ,t. ~" '~.;:>>i
S.t n I it .'1 H n i nt . -,-,,~;,-',,~_~p',t
111111111
ApPENDIX A
Sizing Calculations
A. Following is a Table of Transfer Station Design Criteria Taken from the Summary Design
Quantities Worksheet
Table r
Weekday Packer Trucks Other City Veh's. Public Totals
Totals Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips
Avg TPD 451 0 38 0 57 0 545
Peak TPD 525 0 110 0 110 0 745
Avg VPD 0 78 0 30 0 66 174
Peak VPD 0 92 0 45 0 85 222
Peak VPH 0 28 0 10 0 19 57
Saturday Packer Trucks Other City Veh's. Public Totals
Totals Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips
Avg TPD 122 0 9 0 47 0 178
Peak TPD 190 0 25 0 75 0 290
Avg VPD 0 22 0 7 0 55 84
Peak VPD 0 35 0 20 0 87 142
Peak VPH 0 11 0 5 0 22 38
The above values of Tonnage and Traffic reflect the addition of an outside
jurisdiction waste stream coming to the City's station. Since the City's population
has stabilized, and due to further waste reduction, reuse and recycling trends,
no net growth in residential tonnage and traffic is expected.
While some growth in the commercial waste stream is expected, the additional 250 tons per
day allowance beyond existing volumes provides the buffer for growth in the commercial
waste stream.
B. Transfer Station Sizing Calculations
Sizing Assumptions:
Daily Hours 5:00 AM to 5:00 PM =
Weekend Hours 6 AM to 2 PM
Avg. City Packer Payload =
Avg. Public Payload =
Avg. Other City Payload =
12 Hours
8 Hours
5.53 Tons
1.29 Tons
2.44 Tons
Mon - Fri
Sat
Peak Days
Peak Days
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE A-1
MARCH 17, 2003
p j
L
I
~ I
I
~ I
I
i I
':c
~ I
~!
~ I
!'c
t1
~ I
,-
~
l I
l;
f~
~
[.1
~:
I
I
I
I
)
j
. ~ - - '~~ ..+';: ""
, I.... ~ ,
- ---i"
:"-.an(a'lonin. " ;__J,:~-'_
" (. ~(,"7S <
11'lllltt
ApPENDIX A
Vehicle Unloading Area Sizing - Weekdays
f~~.
Incoming Peak Daily Collection & Commercial Truck Tons =
Incoming Tonnage Per Peak Hour =
No. Vehicles Per Peak Hour =
Assumed Truck Unloading Cycle Time =
No. Unloading Stalls Req 1 d. =
Unloading Stall Width =
Unloading Area Length Req I d.=
525 Tons
154 Tons
28 Trucks
5 Minutes
2.32 Stalls
15 Feet
45 Feet
Incoming Peak Daily Other City Vehicle Tons =
Incoming Tonnage Per Peak Hour =
No. Other City Vehicles Per Peak Hour =
Assumed Truck Unloading Cycle Time =
No. Unloading Stalls Req'd. =
Unloading Stall Width =
Unloading Area Length Req'd.=
110 Tons
24 Tons
10 Vehicles
5 Minutes
0.83 Stalls
12 Feet
12 Feet
Incoming Peak Daily Public Vehicle Tons =
Incoming Tonnage Per Peak Hour =
No. Public Vehicles Per Peak Hour =
Assumed Truck Unloading Cycle Time =
No. Unloading Stalls Req'd. =
Unloading Stall Width =
Unloading Area Length Req'd.=
110 Tons
2 4 Tons
19 Vehicles
15 Minutes
4.72 Stalls
10 Feet
50 Feet
Total Unloading Area Length Req'd. =
107 Feet
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGEA-2
MARCH 17, 2003
I I
, I
~
I
I
; I
l~
c I
: I
I
:1
;,
II
~ I
I
I
J
I
l~::::~ ' '>'~t~
... It II f.1 _\10 n i 4' ,it ,,<.,Sit';':.
i J" i ! . J . . . I
ApPENDIX A
Vehicle Unloading Area Sizing - Saturdays
Incoming Peak Daily Collection & Commercial Truck Tons;::
Incoming Tonnage Per Peak Hour;::
No. Vehicles Per Peak Hour =
Assumed Truck Unloading Cycle Time::
No. Unloading Stalls Req'd. =
Unloading Stall Width:
Unloading Area Length Req'd.::
190 Tons
60 Tons
11 Trucks
5 Minutes
0.91 Stalls
15 Feet
15 Feet
Incoming Peak Daily Public & Other City Vehicle Tons:
Incoming Tonnage Per Peak Hour;::
No. Other City Vehicles Per Peak Hour ;::
Assumed Truck Unloading Cycle Time ::
No. Unloading Stalls Req 1 d. :
Unloading Stall Width ;::
"Unloading Area Length Req I d.:
100 Tons
6 Tons
5 Vehicles
5 Minutes
0.41 Stalls
12 Feet
12 Feet
No. Public Vehicles Per Peak Hour:
Assumed Truck Unloading Cycle Time ;::
No. Unloading Stalls Req' d. =
Unloading Stall Width:
Unloading Area Length Req I d.=
22 Vehicles
15 Minutes
5.42 Stalls
10 Feet
50 Feet
Total Unloading Area Length Req'd. ::
77 Feet
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCliNG & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE A-3
MARCH 17, 2003
~ 1
[.
(It.' ~- :,,~."~~l~
I..;.an(a Uoni.-.a l.-'~f\-'
APPENDIX A
I
- I
..111111111
Transfer Unloading Ports Required
~
Avg. Daily Tonnage to Transfer = 545 Tons
Peak Daily Tonnageto Transfer::: 745 Tons
Assumed Average Transfer Truck Loading Cycle Time = 15 Minutes
Assumed Top Loading Transfer Vehicle Payload::: 20 Tons
Hourly Transfer Capacity Per Hopper::: 80 Tons
No. Transfer Hours Per Day::: 12 Hours
No. Transfer Ports Req'd.on Average Days = 0.57
No. Transfer Ports Req' d.on Peak Days = 0.78
No. Ports Provided::: 2
Recommend 2 Ports to provide redundancy in loading out different materials.
,- I
I
Transfer Station Tipping Floor Waste Storaqe Holding Capacity Required
I
i !
~,!
I
:. J
I
I
Total Incoming Refuse Tons (Peak Day) =
Peak Hourly Waste Delivery Rote =
Max. Hourly Transfer Capacity wI 1 Loadout Ports :::
745 Tons
215 Tons
80 Tons
Therefore, with 2 consecutive hours of peak delivery rates, approximately 300 tons
of waste will accumulate on the tipping floor.
Per City Request, SizeTipping Floor to Accommodate Approx. 1 Day's Throughput::: 545 tons.
L
Assumed Storage Pile Height:::
Assumed Storage Pile Density =
S. F. Floor Storage Required =
12 Ft.
350 P.C.Y.
7,007 SF
Entry and Exit Scale Requirements
No. Collection Trucks Per Peak Hour
No. Self Haul Vehicles Per Peak Hour
Assumed Transaction Time Per Credit vehicle =
Assumed Transaction Time Per Cash Vehicle =
No. Entry Scoles Required :::
28 Trucks
29 Vehicles
0.5 Minute
0.75 Minute
0.59
Thus provide 1 entry and 1 exit scale.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE A-4
MARCH 17, 2003
,.1
i:=j"
."
t. I
~;-
I
. 1
~ 1
I
j
,:.
l~
I
I
~I
! I
t
: I
]
j
I
I
I
j
I
t:
i"
:s:~
'.'
~
~
n_ - - , r . ~ <~~ if;-
s;; r; '.it \I H U i C'~. . _..~~Jr<
/" " . ~ ._,' :...";ll:.
. . . I . . . .
ApPENDIX A
Transfer Trailer ReQuirements
Avg. TPD Incoming =
Peak TPD Incoming =
545 Tons
745 Tons
Avg. Current Daily Outbound Recovered Materials in Roll Off Boxes Taken from City Report:
Item TPD - Loads
TIr~ 0 0
Metal 2.5 0.5
OCC 2.5 0.5
C&D 50 6
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE A-5
Project Current Outbound Recovered Materials to Future Based on Ratio of
Avg. TPD Design I Avg. TPD 2002 = 545 I 295 = 1.85
Item
TIr~
Metal
DCC
C&D
TPD Loads
o 0
4.625 0.925
4.625 0.925
92.5 11.1
Thus the following tonnage will be required to be transfer for disposal:
Avg. TPD Transfer = 443
Peak TPD Transfer = 606
Assuming 1 truck can make 3 loads to the landfill per day (60 Tons per Truck)
Thus need approx 10 transfer rigs plus spares for peak days
Thus need approx B transfer rigs plus spares for avg. days
MARCH 17, 2003
[ I
~ I
t
1
I
,. I
~ .
,.
f:
I
1
1
I
I
i I
~
: I
r
I
I
1
I
j
"
~ .
L
c~
I
I
I
I
'" - ' .i'':...~-:./i>"
<.' r; f a \I H If i nJ _ .__._~ ,.~i~
a""II'
ApPENDIX A
Summary of Design Tonnage and Traffic
The following Table II summarizes the monthly quantities of solid waste and trips during the
2002 year. This information was taken from the monthly reports generated by the City.
Table II
Month Packer Trucks Other City Veh's. Public
Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips
Jon 4,692 930 1,177 850 912 1.239
Feb 4.164 798 867 654 1.070 1,318
Mar 4,717 849 910 733 1,320 1.509
Apr 4,823 882 830 745 1.257 1,454
May 4.884 897 741 725 1,778 1.646
Jun 4,717 845 790 757 1,609 1,809
J:ul 5.371 908 1.017 718 1.520 1.854
Aug 5,137 912 900 648 1,694 1.908
Sep 4.787 843 804 579 1,439 1.777
Oct 4.876 857 620 545 1,659 2,001
Nov 4,757 844 720 530 1,483 1.662
Dee 4.821 878 729 544 1,217 1.435
Totals 57,746 10.443 10,105 8,028 16,958 19,612
Avg. Tons/Load 5.53 1.26 0.86
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE A-6
MARCH 17, 2003
, ,., ~:7
~. :-.: ::~>--
,10\ a 11 j a , Ion i n.l , ~j~?!'.
I I I . . . . .
ApPENDIX A
i:_o
.:.'
Tobie III summarize weekday and Saturday Peak Tons per day. Peak Tons per
day and vehicles per day were taken from the Peak Daily Worksheets. The values
used was token between the average of each of the monthly peaks and the highest average
of the top three days for each month. Peak vehicles per hour were taken from the Peak Hourly
Worksheet. Peak vehicles per hour shown for public vehicles includes other City vehicles.
s
Table III
Weekday Totals Packer Trucks Other City Veh' s. Public Totals
Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips
Avg TPD 201 38 57 295
Peak TPD 275 110 110 495
Avg VPD 36 30 66 132
Peak VPD 50 45 85 180
Peak VPH 14 10 19 43
[ I
I
,
"
Saturday Totals Packer Trucks Other City Veh's. Public Totals
Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips
Avg TPD 122 9 47 178
Peak TPD 190 25 75 290
Avg VPD 22 7 55 84
Peak VPD 35 20 87 142
Peak VPH 11 5 22 38
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
ReCYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE A-7
MARCH 17. 2003
I I
lP
,,<
.!.l:2
~ ,- . :ib.,
.....1 n (a 'Iou iv.. , .,-5"
.,. ~ ~
~ I
t.
- I
~~
r.;
( I
,.
l-
e I
I
"I J J . . . I . I
ApPENDIX A
Per instructions from the City, the station should be designed to allow the City to toke on
additional out of City waste should it become feasible in the future. Therefore, allow for an
additional 250 tons per day of out of City tonnage to match what was used in preparing the
facility master plan.
r:.
Assume 6 tons per load
VPD ::: 250 I 6 :::
Peak VPH ::: (42 / 50)*16 :::
42 VPD
14 VPH
Therefore, proposed design quantities of tonnage and traffic for future conditions are shown
in Table IV
- I
I
r I
t~.:.
: I
~.
. Packer Trucks Other City Veh's. Public
Weekday Totals Totals
Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips
Avg TPD 451 0 38 0 57 0 545
Peak TPD 525 0 110 0 110 0 745
Avg VPD 0 78 0 30 0 66 174
Peak VPD 0 92 0 45 0 85 222
Peak VPH 0 28 0 10 0 19 57
Table IV
: j
I::
r:;J
. Packer Trucks Other City Veh's. Public
Saturday Totals Toto Is
Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips
Avg TPD 122 0 9 0 47 0 178
Peak TPD 190 0 25 0 75 0 290
Avg VPD 0 22 0 7 0 55 84
Peak VPD 0 35 0 20 0 87 142
Peak VPH 0 11 0 5 0 22 38
, I
c
: I
o.
j
I
I
I
1
I.
Note the peak public and other City vehicles per hour must be increased to correspond to the
peak values of tonnage. The peak hourly values of 18 vph corresponded to daily public plus
other City vehicle tonnages of approximately 125 tons to 70 tons
CITY Of SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE A-8
MARCH 17, 2003
f. I
~.
~ I
,-
.,.l.~
~
[1.
L
.1
i..:.
f(!
~;
..
..
...
..
c(
!S
Q
Z
W
IL
~
...
.
CI)
G)
.-
..
.-
..
c:
as
:s
.0
(.)
E
as
L..
....
'C
c:
as
G)
m
as
c:
c:
o
~
U)
~
N
o
o
N
...
as
Q)
>-
..
-xRI8~*
aNN
I\)
0..
g-.
'I(
~
as
'C
~
G)
G)
~
00 In 0"""
....11:1")1'--..010
al")N
~
vi
.0
<
......InC:O.....
U......I'--IOIO
U(>')N
o
1'--00..0
>..o..olOv
~NN
1'--1'--............
+-V(>')VV
UNN
o
+-O\VI'--IO
o..lOlOVV
UNN
II)
VNC:Ol'--
Oll'--I'--VV
:3NN
<
C:OIOIOq-
>-..o..ovq-
"SNN
I-"
01Oq-(>')
~CS~vq-
~
I-,
O\NO..o
~~~IOq-
:E
1'--10 In q-
"- v v v q-
S,.NN
'I(
Nq-..oq-
L.oIOq-q-
aNN
:E
001'--00
.o1"l.o.o1O
U(>')N
u..
CD CD N 0
clnq-IOIO
aNN
....,
>-0
~ t=
01
1\)....11:
+- C
a I\)
Uo..
o
t=
-xo
Co..
cf.:>
. -x
~a
<~
o
c...
:>
-x
a
U
c...
en
>
<
I\)
D..
~
L
I\)
~
":
..r:
U
>
1.. 1.. 1.. 1..
j!~j!~
U U U u
a a a a
0.. 0.. c... 0..
.;::-.;::-.;::-.;::-
GGGO
0(>')(>')0
:::I'--q-q-
..01'--0\1'--
!:::;$:lq-q-
O\c:o.oq-
vq-(>')(>')
O\NI'--O\
O\I'--q-(>')
10[\')......0
.ovlT>lT>
NOq-1O
NO\q-lT>
......
NIOlT>I'--
In CD q-lT>
......
100lON
:::CDVq-
I'--1Oq-M
LOlOvq-
C:Oq-IO('\J
q-vvq-
COl'--NN
$:l.ovv
101'--00..0
..oc:oq-v
......
..OOl'--V
I'--Oq-v
...... ......
0\1'--0\1'--
100vv
...... ......
o
~
CJ
c...
:>
o~o~
~cf.g;&
-x . -x .
a ~ 0 ~
~'I(&'I(
..s::..r:..s::..c
U U I\) CIl
>:>>>
.;::-.;::-.;::-.;::-
GOGG
~ ~ ~ ~
..c ..r: ..c ..r:
+-+-+-+-
0000
q-ONoo
0\ CO CD I'--
I'--NVo\
ONO\c:o
N ......
0\ CO In I'--
CO I'--CD I'--
NOOI")N
0\ 00 CD CD
N--O\I'--
00 a) a) CD
O-NCO
CDI'--O\a;)
I'--NIOO
ONCOoo
N --
OVIO.....
OOl'--cooo
.oCO--1O
0\ CD 0\00
0\1'--100
0\ 0\ 00 CO
8~~12
-
I'--(>')N.....
1'--1'--1'--1'--
.....001'--
1'--..01'--..0
(>')a;)NV
IOvl'--..o
o CJ
a... 0..
f- >
0....11:0':':
a.. Cia... a
1--&>&
-x . -x .
CI~CI~
&'1(&<
.~ u u .~
.0::0::0..0
:3 ::J :3 :3
o..o..c...c...
NCOO\N
01'--1010
VM.....-
~:Q12~
vq-__......
--1'--0.0
CO I'--In V
MM.....-
00\0\10
......0\1010
V('I")....-I___
MOVO
MMIOIO
CV) (Y) ~ .....
1'--0\0(>')
NOOIOIO
VM............
.....100\-
1'--[\')1010
vv...........
00\.00
MO\..o..o
VM.....--
I'--NOv
COl'--I'--.o
(T) ('t') ~ ......
v 1'--..0.0
00.0..010
(Y) cY) .....-t ......
..0......00.0
O\lOvv
(Y')M.....-t.....-4
-OM....
OO.oVV
t't)m..............
VNVO
100.010
vv.........
~:gR;b
M(Y)--......
o
~
D....II:D
c... a 0..
f-~:>
.:.: ...::,c.
a ~ a
&<&
o
0..
:>
.:.:
CI
CIl
0..
~
'<(
CI'lOlenen
c c c c
"E 'E 'E 'E
000 0
u U u u
c c c C
HHHH
- --
<'1('<('1(
MO\VV
~~t::;~
MO\VIO
[\')1'--001'--
..ov.........
O\......O\N
vOl'--..o
vv---
00001'--
10 N 00..0
vv-......
v--......CO
0\..0.010
(1")(t')............
--IOMoo
"O......CO'O
..,.q-...........
Mo\..o..,.
MI'--I'--.o
.ov............
M 0\10 I'--
..0-1'--.0
q-..,............
[\') 00 0\ ......
--0\1'--1'--
VM............
..oMOOO
O\CDCO..o
M (Y) ........ ......
100\10..0
10001010
VM---
v""..o-
0-..0..0
1Oq-......-
101'--1'----
a)NI'--..o
\0 V"""""
OM[\')......
1'--01'--.0
v..,...........
o 0
a... 0...
f- :>
D~O~
f=&g;&
..:.: ...:.:
a ~ a ~
cf.'I(&<
"~ u u .~
.0.0::0:0
:::I :3 :::I :::I
a...a...c...c...
+ + + +
:>:>:>:>
uuuu
0000
+ + + +
a... 0..0..0..
UUUU
U
..r:
+-
+-
C
III
III
aI
L
0..
III
L
III
aI
...:!
o
>
o
g;
-0
C
o
o
t=
i-
G
<II
..r:
+-
>-
.0
-0
<II
..c
.~
c
1..
:3
'+-
..s:: tII
+- +-
C L
o 0
E 3-
aI L
..c u
+- \;:
~ 1;
L L
:3 +-
" -0
.;::- a
+- I\)
c en
c c
:3 C
0'" C
<II E
E 2--
+: ..c
<II +-
c C
o 0
+-..cE
l3-::~
..co+-
.9l E E
..c..co
<II U 1..
..r: 0 '+-
+- <II C
+-'4-CIl
co..:.:
U tII a
~ ~~
.5.." L
U +- ~
L III ..
~ ~ tJ
:::I 0) ::J
o.:Eo
> aI >
~~-a
:> 1= ~
~ g- 2--
<II+-..c
0.. U 1:
"..co
C +- E
0'4-
o 0 ~
1= ~.&
..:.: a CI
g ~ ~
c... ~ I-
..:.:
o
<II
c...
~
<
Qj
....
o
Z
C")
o
o
N
r-:
.....
r
U
IX
<(
:E
(J)
<C
UJ
C)
<(
n.
~
:J
o
<(
LL
IX
()~
ZW
o~
~IX
<(I-
!z~
<((,')
C/)~
lL..J
OU
~G
_UJ
00::
c(
)(
a
z
w
~
~ I
I'
L
,~.
:,,~
..
..
~
C'G
"'C
L.
::::s
..
C'G
en
--
..
.-
..
c
C'G
::::s
a
o
E
C'G
L.
I-
"'C
C
ca
CD
en
C'G
c
c
o
I-
U)
l-
N
o
o
N
L.
C'G
CD
>-
~oco
s::2N
0....
en
>
'I(
~N"'"
S (\j M
0....
VI
...Q
'I(
O\t-.
U(\")N
llJ ....
o
V.o
> 0 (\")
o N
Z
.
t/)
CD
100\
~:::......
o
+-VO\
.c...t-.N
llJ ....
If)
,........
Ol ('t') N
:3 ......
'I(
N 10
2-{\j(\")
:3
....,
llJ 0,....
cO(,/,)
:3 N
....,
0\ N
S:::N
::
t..
.c...
'<
0......
(\")N
....
""'('t')
L..NN
o ......
:E
10 10
...QO\('/')
llJ ......
LL
N .0
c.o('/')
o ......
....,
>-OD
t..o....o..
o I- >
~~~
1; S S
Uo....o..
llJ
.D...
~
t.. t..
t.. llJ llJ
llJ~~
VI U 0
::> 0 0
.....,0....0....
-5~ ~
>uu
(\') N
...... .....
0\ 0-.
N N
""'00
0\ 10
Nt-.
......
000
......
t-.N
..... ......
0\. V
N ......
0\. 0\.
...... N
00 00
""'00
t-.,....
...... .....
0\.;:::::
10,....
.... ....
00
r=~
~ ~
o 0
llJ llJ
0.... 0....
.r~
llJ llJ
>>
l::~
uu
t.. t..
llJ llJ
...s:: ...s::
+- +-
00
M ex)
.0"'"
OV
00 0\.
('t') .0
,....,....
0\.0
.0 co
...... 0\.
..000
ON
""'0\.
M (\')
""'0\
M N
.0 co
MV
""'0\
00\
00 ..0
co 0\.
v.o
10 0\
10..0
('t')O
v.o
00 .....
v..o
00
~~
~ .;:,c
S S
0.... a..
U v
...Q ..c
~ :3
0.... 0....
,....co
....0
N .....
N N
ION
N .....
00\.
00\
N
N.....
100
N....
1010
co ......
.........
..0 ..0
M.....
N.....
N N
N N
N....
0\ 10
.0 ....
N.....
,.........
OM
N.....
100
0\ 0'\
.....
V,....
co 0\
.....
10,....
000
..... .....
..... 0\
~O\
N M
NO
N .....
00
~~
~ .;:,c
S S
0.... 0....
en 0"1
C c
'E E
o 0
U U
C C
1-11-1
'1('1(
.0 00
('I) .....
N......
.....0
N.o
M ......
0\.....
...... ......
N......
N .....
OON
N.....
00 10
00 ......
..... ......
v 0\.
LON
N.....
""'..0
N N
N.....
v....
OM
('I).....
NO
0\ ..0
N ....
,....0\
00\
N
10 00
00 0\
......
0\ 0\
0\0
.... ....
""'..0
va
N ....
IOV
N....
N....
00
~~
.;:,c .;:,c
tI tI
llJ llJ
a.. 0....
U V
...Q ...Q
~ :3
0.... a..
+ +
>>
l..Jl..J
00
+ +
a.. 0....
Ul..J
Ct)
o
o
C'\l
r-:
~
:I:
o
D::
<(
~
>-
+-
U
II)
...s::
+-
>-
.J:I
-0
II)
...s::
VI
c
L..
~
<4-
VI
+-
t..
o
.D...
llJ
L..
.~
<4-
"t-
tI
L..
+-
-0
c
o
llJ
0'1
tI
.c
C
o
+-
2-
...s::
+-
c
o
E
llJ
...s::
+-
E
o
L..
<4-
C
II)
.;:,c
o
+-
II)
t..
llJ
~
~
:J
g
~
tI
II)
a..
2-
...s::
+-
c
o
E
llJ
>
o
.J:I
o
llJ
...s::
I-
o
..-
<i:
w
o
<(
a...
~
::J
U
<(
u..
D::
<(w
OIL
ZW
o~
~D::
<(I-
!z~
<(0
(J)Z
lL::J
00
>-G
CW
00::
~ I
~
~
L;
I
- I
[' 1
~~
, I
r I
- I
, I
: I
lOo"
. 1
I":
I
I
1
I
J
I
1
I
I
~,
. '_I~\:-:~ , ~~,r'f1E
"'anla 'Ioni.-a . [--:-"'''-~<.
f.;:.
..1111..
ApPENDIX A
Hourly Traffic Counts
Hourly Traffic Counts for Public and Other City Vehicles
Avg. Peak Peak/ Avg
Date 6AM 7AM 8AM 9AM lOAM 11AM 12PM IPM 2PM 3PM Hr. Hr. Ratio
25-Mar 5 9 9 11 4 8 11 5 3 1 7.22 11 1.52
26-Mar 2 8 5 2 8 8 8 9 3 0 5.89 9 1.53
27-Mar 7 7 9 2 10 7 11 8 7 0 7.56 11 1.46
28-Mar 5 13 7 4 4 6 13 5 0 0 6.33 13 2.05
29-Mar 1 8 7 7 7 8 8 3 0 0 5.44 8 1.47
3D-Mar 2 4 8 4 3 7 4 5 2 0 4.88 8 1.64
24-J un 3 12 13 7 14 7 8 10 3 0 8.56 13 1.52
25-J un 3 7 7 11 6 9 9 13 7 0 8.00 13 1.63
26-J un 1 5 8 15 9 5 4 9 3 0 6.56 15 2.29
27 -J un 6 5 9 12 8 11 9 8 0 0 7.56 12 1.59
28-Jun 2 6 10 14 9 17 9 7 2 0 8.44 17 2.01
29-J un 0 9 4 13 10 14 6 13 0 0 8.63 14 1.62
12-Aug 4 7 10 6 10 6 7 4 2 0 6.22 10 1.61
13-Aug 4 8 11 10 5 4 10 2 4 0 6.44 11 1.71
14-Aug 5 8 8 3 11 9 5 7 2 0 6.44 11 1.71
15-Aug 3 6 5 11 12 14 7 8 3 0 7.67 14 1.83
16-Aug 2 11 3 8 11 9 12 6 4 0 7.33 12 1.64
17-Aug 4 4 5 8 9 14 18 13 4 0 8.78 18 2.05
7 -Oct 4 8 10 7 5 7 9 13 4 0 7.44 13 1.75
8-0ct 5 7 8 10 15 10 9 14 4 0 9.11 15 1.65
9-0ct 3 10 8 10 8 12 13 9 3 0 8.44 13 1.54
IO-Oct 6 12 8 4 9 6 15 14 1 0 8.33 15 1.80
ll-Oct 2 6 11 8 10 13 7 13 2 0 8.00 13 1.63
12-0ct 0 7 10 6 8 17 11 13 2 0 9.25 16 1.73
Avg. M-F 3.65 8.15 8.3 8.1 8.75 8.8 9.2 8.35 2.85 0.05
Peak M-F 7 13 13 15 15 17 18 14 7 1
Peak Sat 4 9 10 13 10 17 18 13 4 0
Use Peak Hr. to Avg. Hr. Ratio of 2.0
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE A-11
MARCH 17, 2003
- - ~ ~l' I~ ; a , I H lJ i .- a . ---: ~)-
, ,fr!
IIIIIIII
ApPENDIX A
Hourly Traffic Counts for All Vehicles
Date 6AM 7AM 8AM 9AM lOAM 11AM 12PM IPM 2PM 3PM 4PM
25-Mar 9 16 13 19 12 14 17 13 13 5 6
26-Mar 3 10 11 9 20 15 13 23 15 2 8
27 -Mar 8 10 14 8 23 14 18 23 17 6 0
28-Mar 5 15 12 13 15 11 23 9 11 6 2
29-Mar 2 12 10 18 14 17 12 8 6 1 3
3D-Mar 2 5 10 11 7 10 11 11 3 2 0
24-Jun 7 14 18 17 24 19 15 16 15 4 2
25-J un 6 11 9 22 11 17 16 24 15 5 5
26-Jun 2 7 13 22 21 15 8 20 15 9 1
27-Jun 9 7 13 23 15 22 16 16 11 3 6
28-Jun 1 9 14 21 12 22 17 16 12 2 5
29-Jun 3 9 a 20 12 21 9 18 3 0 0
12-Aug 7 13 15 20 22 21 11 12 18 5 4
13-Aug 4 10 12 22 11 11 14 12 9 9 2
14-Aug 7 11 14 14 20 16 16 16 10 8 2
15-Aug 5 9 9 18 24 20 14 18 14 9 3
16-Aug 3 14 9 12 14 21 17 12 10 4 2
17-Aug 4 5 9 12 11 19 23 18 6 0 0
7 -Oct 6 14 17 14 14 14 18 21 13 8 6
a-oct 5 a 10 14 25 15 16 23 _ 11 13 3
9-0ct 6 12 14 15 20 15 25 21 14 3 4
1O-0ct 8 17 13 10 20 11 21 23 10 4 3
11-0ct 4 7 13 13 16 19 12 19 6 3 6
12-0ct 2 8 10 11 11 22 14 19 2 0 0
Avg. M-F 5.35 11.3 12.65 16.2 17.65 16.45 15.95 17.25 12.25 5.45 3.65
Peak M-F 9 17 18 23 25 22 25 24 18 13 8
Peak Sat 4 8 10 20 12 22 23 19 6 2 0
CITY OF SANTA MONICA -
ReCYCUNG & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE A-12
MARCH 17, 2003
f I
l;.
Oi-
; I
~~
:', 1
i I
.~,
r;.
~ I
: I
- I
I
- I
" I
c",
~'
I
I
"'
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
... - '. .,.~
.:;' ~t [; (a , I H n i ..... _ ,}~'"
- '.-- E-;::'-:~
..111...
ApPENDIX A
Hourly Traffic Counts for City Packer Trucks
[)ate Avg. Peak/Avg
6AM 7AM 8AM 9AM lOAM 11AM 12PM IPM 2PM 3PM 4PM Hr. Ratio
25-Mar 4 7 4 8 8 6 6 8 10 4 6 6.45 1.55
26-Mar 1 2 6 7 12 7 5 14 12 2 8 6.91 2.03
27 -Mar 1 3 5 6 13 7 7 15 10 6 0 6.64 2.26
28-Mar 0 2 5 9 11 5 10 4 11 6 2 5.91 1.86
29-Mar 1 4 3 11 7 9 4 5 6 1 3 4.91 2.24
3D-Mar 0 1 2 7 4 3 7 6 1 2 0 3.00 2.33
24-Jun 4 2 5 10 10 12 7 6 12 4 2 6.73 1.78
25-Jun 3 4 2 11 5 8 7 11 8 5 5 6.27 1.75
26-Jun 1 2 5 7 12 10 4 11 12 9 1 6.73 1.78
27-Jun 3 2 4 11 7 11 7 8 11 3 6 6.64 1.66
28-Jun -1 3 4 7 3 5 8 9 10 2 5 5.00 2.00
29-J un 3 0 4 7 2 7 3 5 3 0 0 3.09 2.26
12-Aug 3 6 5 14 12 15 4 8 16 5 4 8.36 1.91
13-Aug 0 2 1 12 6 7 4 10 5 9 2 5.27 2.28
14-Aug 2 3 6 11 9' 7 11 9 8 8 2 6.91 1.59
15-Aug 2 3 4 7 12 6 7 10 11 9 3 6.73 1.78
16-Aug 1 3 6 4 3 12 5 6 6 4 2 4.73 2.54
17-Aug 0 1 4 4 2 5 5 5 2 0 0 2.55 1.96
7 -Oct 2 6 7 7 9 7 9 8 9 8 6 7.09 1.27
8-0ct 0 1 2 4 10 5 7 9 7 13 3 5.55 1.80
9-0ct 3 2 6 5 12 3 12 12 11 3 4 6.64 1.81
10-oct 2 5 5 6 11 5 6 9 9 4 3 5.91 1.86
11-0ct 2 1 2 5 6 6 5 6 4 3 6 4.18 1.43
12-0ct 2 1 0 5 3 5 3 6 0 0 0 2.27 2.64
Avg. M-F 1.7 3.15 4.35 8.1 8.9 7.65 6.75 8.9 9.4 5.4 3.65
Peak M-F 4 7 7 14 13 15 12 15 16 13 8
Peak Sat 3 1 4 7 4 7 7 6 3 2 0
Note: The above hourly traffic counts were taken fro In the quarterly traffic reports for each day
during one week per quarter, as provided by the City.
Use ratio of peak hour to average hour for packer trucks of 2.5
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCLING & TRANSFER FACILITY
PAGE A-13
MARCH 17. 2003
i.1
e;
~ I
I
r I
1.;:_:
f I
~ I
- I
i
~ I
:, [
~ I
~. .
[:;
t 1
~}
, I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
- ~. ~ - \ -: ~Li_
.....HIIla \Ioninl _!}~,/;;
., "I" I I . I . . . .
APPENDIX B
Appendix B
Santa Monica Recycling & Transfer Facility
Conceptual Site Plan
L'_"
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECYCliNG & TRANSFER FACILITY
MARCH 17. 2003
I
',>.. '/ I
\,}.:, I ft
I
,..-.J z
i ~ I p ~ I ~ ~ /1 ~ , I:
'1~ ~ ~ /.
:~ a ( I I .
<<;::=::;\;'0"::;>' ., ....;-:" ~ ~.
' "~"O['_} ___, 11 I
---~.- I
' r--r-- I
' , '. " , I
". "." \. \ , , "
" ' ..... . , __m ------ I i .---~-- I
lllj' _or. rom. 8 I II
l. I~___ ,------ --- I f--t;::r'! _
I r-- ~ L _m'
- I m --.
[{ 12 I ! ~ "~;;dJ 1 ·
I !'j · I r ,--------- I
I f I J I p------ I
. roo' I t i I i [--,t" "
I i ~ I i I r I I
I I : I! ~'O
/ 1------: I I ~r----- \
i Im.n J I j' ',t-_ , '
'--'--r!--"-"j i l""",.j ~
I l ---'f"--, I
11-.....:;; , J,' I I
" J I' I .I.
",', - - s.._______ J I .' I OJ
"', . '" 1, .. I ..
i, , ! j ; l.i I t
l I I f i '.,i , .' t ..
i ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
lii
po;!>
Ii
;l!~
;a
~
~
} 6}~
L
I~
ti
j
I
I
I
I
j
I
J
~
~;
I
---~--
~,/~~.L-, .o:;.:::J." ~
: (l(f'r=t:J
dlJ
8-..
--=>
Corporation Yard Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
Chapter Three
Evaluation of Existing Southern California Disposal Transfer Station
Introduction
HDR Engineering was commissioned to evaluate of the SCD facility
and its ability to handle the City's waste stream (current and
projected) in addition to the current and projected volumes processed
at the facility. The report focuses on the current configuration, size,
accessibility to and maneuverability around the SCD facility, as well
as the ability to physically process the projected volumes and types of
waste materials from the City.
As detailed in Section 4.0 Summary of the HDR Report, the existing
SCD Transfer Station cannot handle the projected volumes of
tonnage and traffic in its current configuration, or in an expanded
configuration on the current property.
This chapter includes the HDR Engineering, Inc. Evaluation Report
dated March 17,2003 in its entirety.
City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard
Santa Monica, California
3.1
March 2003
Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
RNUHDR
- Ct t..,~ C f : ~,.',>i'.~~f:.
:: Sit It. H .\Ion i(~.., ," ~:i~;~1~~
~~EIIIIIB
Evaluation of Existing
Southern California Disposal
Transfer Station
March 17, 2003
I: :
Prepared for:
i
I:
City of Santa Monica
Solid Waste Division
Prepared by:
fiR
HDR Engineering, Inc.
6190 Golden Hills Dr.
Minneapolis, MN 55416
I ~ "- ? '?'- ~ -: ~'~J-t\
.... .." ,; I a "\ I.. n i c. .. " ' .'~:)~r:"
1.0
1.1
1.2
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.0
4.0
J i I I I I . . .
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Background ....... .............0. ......... .... ............ .........,.. ........,..... ..'................,...................... 1
Facility Requirements............ ................ ............................................ ..... ............ ......... 1
Waste and Traffic Quantities ............. ........ ...... ..... ...... ........ ........... ............. .... ....... ......2
Existing Station Spatial Eva luation.......... ........... .................... ...... ......................... ......3
Unloading Space. ..... ....... ...... .... ......................................................... .........................3
Queuing & Vehicle Maneuvering Space .. ........... .............. ..... ........... ........ ........ ..........4
Waste Storage........ ............. ....... .... .... .... ... ... ..... ........................ ..... ........ ..... ................4
Recycling Activities .... .......... ........... ... .....;.......... ...... ............ ....... .... .... ................ .........5
Transfer Load-out.. ..... ............... ..... ... ............................................. .............................5
Sorting and Recycling........... .... ... ... ............ ....... ............ ..... ......... ................................6
Expansion Potential of SCOTS. ...... ............. ........... .................... ............ ............... ,...... 6
Summary............. ................. ....... ................. ............ ......................... n. n......'........... ...... 7
Appendix C Southern California Disposal Transfer Station Evaluation Analysis
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISPOSAL
TRANSFER STATION
PAGEi
MARCH 17. 2003
~ I
O;i-'
; \
, .
:~ I
i.,;;,
~ 1
~;l ~
r 1
- I
[ )
tl
( I
~;c'
[ \
:1.",
~
", I
t
~,
~-:
i I
~'.
...
, I
I
:i.
- . ~, -.I- ':, .~'f];
< a II I a "H n i 4' a _: ,_: _ ":;'~~
,~ I I I I I I I I
BACKGROUND
1.0 BACKGROUND
In conjunction with RNL Design's previous efforts to conduct a study of the City's needs to
improve their existing Corporation Yard (Corporation Yard Master Plan Study), HDR evaluated
the feasibility of relying on the existing Southern California Disposal Transfer Station (SCOTS)
to accommodate the needs of the City and its public users as an alternative to constructing a
new City owned transfer and recycling facility. The evaluation concluded that the SCOTS was
not capable of safely accommodating anticipated volumes of tonnage and traffic.
Recently HDR was retained, as a subconsultant to RNL Design, to determine the validity of the
previous study based on more recent information on the existing waste stream.
1.1 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
In evaluating the capability of the SCOTS to meet the City's needs, HDR has assumed the
same requirements that were required in the development of a new City Recycling and Transfer
Facility need to be applied to assessing the SCOTS. These requirements include:
.... Traffic flow patterns must safely accommodate anticipated volumes of the ditterent
types of users and vehicles on site and off public streets;
.. Sufficient space needs to be allocated to allow planned recycling, waste handling and
transfer activities;
.. The recycling and transfer facility should be enclosed in metal building construction to
control potential environmental impacts;
... The transfer operation planning should incorporate the most cost effective transfer
technology for the City. Open top technology shall be employed with provisions for
installing preload compactors in the future if conditions warrant;
.... Waste handling operations in the transfer building should be buffered or shielded from
neighboring businesses and uses;
.... The recovery of waste tipped at the transfer station should be accommodated in the
station planning. As such, the transfer station should consider two transfer load-out
openings, one of which could be used for wood/green waste or C&D load-out and
transfer, and;
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISPOSAL
TRANSFER STATION
PAGE 1
MARCH 17, 2003
~ )
b
- \
c I
~ I
i
L
,.
~ ,.
- I
I
I
I
I
, I
r,.
~
, l
I
l
I
j
J
j
I
~:..
"- ~ t, :~: JJ~
...; a n (it .\1 H II h. 4l .J()l >
~ . v;:"~'"~ ,
BACKGROUND
,J ~ , ~ I . I I I P
... Open floor space adjacent to the transfer tipping and waste storage area shall be
provided for recycling activities. Adjacent to this space shall be bi-Ievel "2" wall spaces
for roll-off containers of recovered materials.
1.2 WASTE AND TRAFFIC QUANTITIES
For purposes of evaluating the capacity of the existing SCOTS, existing tonnage collected by
SeD must be added to the City's current tonnage. In addition, some growth in the commercial
waste stream should be included in the evaluation of the SCOTS. Table I below presents
current volumes of tonnage and traffic at the existing City facility.
Table I
Existing City TS Tonnage and Traffic
l T atals !I_~!!' f'"-cI<~~_J:ru_cl<sl L ()therCitr Vehicles) .... P"blic_. - i I T olal. !
.--------....-.j t~~~I~!'_~j l!~!!'~_Ir.p~J l !~t_~I_!.~.n.~II,. otal!~~p~.J I "f()tal.,. ()~!:i J L,. ()t.d. ,.r.iJl~J ... .. ..._ .... ... J
IL~kI[p~lf---~;-[f- .- ~IL -- 1 ~~"jL ~---II---i~H --------+ = ~:~i
II------.----;--IC ..- r- ...1 _IL_
.L~~YJ[.'y-~Q__..i Ln.._ .._.: en ........ 315n. I r~----;r-.-.--~30--] [-.-.==~lr_.___--n--66--e~ [---1 ~?:
IL~~\!PQ.jL ._1_ ~olC '[~5 i[ JC B~. iL1BQil
IL~.Y..PJ:LJ L~...._n___'_.J 1_._""_____.14_J [ ... ..._u_.. ! [~--1o-1 [____~:____~~~ll. ... ... ...1~. ."J L.. ..~~4~:
While the existing SCOTS is permitted to accept 1,056 tons per day (TPD), according to monthly
records provided by the LEA, in 2002 the throughput was approximately 270 tons per day with
estimated peak daily tonnages of roughly 350 tons per day. To allow for future growth in the
commercial waste stream, an additional 100 TPO will be assumed to be delivered to the facility,
resulting in average and peak daily tonnages of 370 and 450 tons per day respectively. Table II
below incorporates the additional SCO waste stream plus the projected future increase of 100
TPD in the commercial waste stream. In the absence of actual SCD scale records, peak daily
and hourly traffic estimates were derived from the relationship between average and peak City
Packer Truck volumes. It is understood that the station is open to receive waste 6 days per
week.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISPOSAL
TRANSFER STATION
PAGE 2
MARCH 17, 2003
I
c \
- I
I
:- I
I
t l
r,
. I
I
1-'
-- "-' :, c ~ .:,>?~~H;~
Sa n (a \Inn iC-;1 ';" ;;}l.
~ .~,7.;,; s~>;-
SPATIAL EVALUATION
'..r. i ~ fl. . I I I
II
I
! Public
j Totals
! Tons! Trips ,
jl.~=-jL?~L~JI~~.~=~:~~:jL~~i~- _.m ......_.. .'_
L~~~J!'p._.! L.~?~__....J L.... H_.j 1__J.1Q.. ..
L~y'~QJL~w .._.JL..~6........1L_. .. ....__. . 30
L_~~~~.Yf=>Qm.J 1_____..1 L .5Q .... ... j 1___ .. ...... j I.... 45
IL~~~.Yf!:f.....iLn_..n.i[~==]L=.JL 10_.__.___
Table II
Pro.ected Tonna e and Traffic at SCOTS
ij
'I
:1
n_' i Totals
~ i
'I
._.iL
.1
,I
.,t
"
....Ioon.._
Note that since data was not available on existing SCD traffic quantities, it was assumed that all
existing tonnage arrives in collection trucks with average payloads equivalent 0 City packer
truck payloads. In reality, some traffic deliveries to the SCOTS includes the public and small
vehicle haulers with much smaller payloads. Thus average and peak traffic quantities will likely
be higher than those shown above and included in the analysis of the existing station.
2.0
EXISTING STATION SPATIAL EVALUATION
2.1 UNLOADING SPACE
Inside the transfer station building, sufficient space must be provided to accommodate
reasonably expected peak incoming traffic. To accommodate anticipated peak hourly incoming
traffic flows of 47 City and SCD collection trucks and 19 public vehicles, 3 - 15 ft. wide packer
truck unloading stalls plus 5 - 10ft. wide self-haul unloading stalls are required. Thus, the
minimum width of the transfer building is approximately 100 ft; however only approximately 65
ft. of existing building width is available for vehicle unloading. Thus, the existing SCDTS
building is not large enough to accommodate anticipated waste delivery volumes.
The above evaluation is based on an un-conservative assumption that aU materials currently
being delivered to the SCOTS are coming in trucks similar to the City's paCker trucks. While we
do not have data on actual vehicles coming to the facility, the facility currently accepts some
small hauler and self haul loads. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that during peak hourly
traffic flows the number of smaller vehicle unloading stalls will need to be greater than the 5
stalls stated above, thereby making the situation worse. Supporting analyses for determining
required unloading space and spatial requirements for subsequent elements of the facility are
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISPOSAL
TRANSFER STATION
PAGE 3
MARCH 17, 2003
, )
~~ ~
- I
- I
~ I
I
I
I
r l
:. I
w
]
I
I
I
j
!
j
I
r- t \ - - ; ~ ..~~~~.
':"il-';'a \louic'a _ ".,',!.~_~
~ ~,,"'.;.-, ~<t'j ~
i I Iii . . . .
SPATIAL EVALUATION
included in Appendix C.
2.2 QUEUING & VEHICLE MANEUVERING SPACE
Sufficient space should be provided before the entry scale to accommodate the peak hourly
flow of traffic into the facility. Allowing for 30 seconds transaction time for packer truck
collection vehicles and 45 seconds for other vehicles, one entry scale should be adequate to
accommodate this volume of traffic. To allow for the fact that the incoming traffic will not be
uniform over the peak hour, sufficient space should be provided to stage instantaneous arrivals
of 4 to 5 vehicles. Likewise, sufficient space between the inbound scale and the tipping area
should be provided to accommodate the surges in traffic. Space for 4 to 5 vehicles should be
provided.
The existing SCOTS has only one scale for weighing both inbound and outbound traffic. This
scale is located immediately off Frank Street inside the facility gate. Space is available on site
for only about 1 vehicle to queue up in front of the scale. Therefore under peak conditions, 3
to 4 (if not more) vehicles will need to queue up along Frank Street outside the fence line. This
condition will be exacerbated when un-tarred vehicles need to be weighed outbound in the
absence of a separate outbound scale. Furthermore, the entry scale is located immediately
adjacent to the maneuvering area into the tipping floor, and only approximately room for one
vehicle that has been weighed is available while waiting for a space to open up inside the
building to unload.
Due to the lack of space on the site in front of the tipping floor, there may not be enough room
for vehicles that have unloaded to exit the station at the same time that vehicles are pulling off
the scale to unload. Exiting traffic most likely will have to exit the same gate that the transfer
rigs use to back to the transfer ramp because of likely queues blocking the entrance gate in
front of the scale.
The existing scale is 30 ft. long, per the Van Dorpe and Associates drawing. This may not be
long enough for all the potential types of vehicles that would use the facility.
2.3 WASTE STORAGE
To be consistent with the criteria used to size the proposed new City Recycling and Transfer
Facility, to accommodate upset conditions sufficient space shall be available inside the building
on the tipping floor to accommodate the average design throughput of the facility, or 666 TPD.
With a 12 ft. high waste containment I push wall along the back of the building, approximately
200 tons of material can be accommodated on the tipping floor allowing for room for the front
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISPOSAL
TRANSFER STATION
PAGE 4
MARCH 17, 2003
I
- \
- I
~ I
I
i !
I
c I
. (
I
~;
j
I
I
I
I
J
I
j
'"_I t. :: - ~ ~ .!:'~i'
S.a n (a .\1 0 fJ i ...t .}o~~~i;J
t.. ~ I I I I I I
SPATIAL EVALUATION
end loader to operate and load the transfer trailers as well as allowing for some room for
collection trucks to run out their loads without waste being dumped outside the building. Thus
the existing building falls far short of being able to store the anticipated daily volume of
materials.
Another approach is to make sure the tipping floor can hold peak surges in waste deliveries
while at the same time a front end loader moves materials off the tipping floor into transfer
trailers. Assuming 2 consecutive hours of peak waste deliveries (259 TPH) and a transfer
loadout rate of 80 TPH, approximately 360 tons of storage needs to stored on the tipping floor
to avoid disrupting deliveries. The existing floor appears to be undersized to provide this
storage.
2.4 RECYCLING ACTIVITIES
To provide for the recycling needs of the City, sufficient space must be available off the tipping
floor for recovery, storage and staging of recyclables for market. The recycling activities may
initially include manual removal of source-separated loads or material from mixed waste on the
tipping floor. This will require space for storing materials and for off-loading to rolf-off bins or the
transfer trucks. Approximately 8,000 s.f. of covered floor area adjacent to the transfer station
tipping floor was to be provided at a new City Recycling and Transfer Facility for materials
recovery operations. Along one side of this area, a bi-Ievel "l" wall configuration was to be
provided to accommodate the storage of recovered materials into roll off containers.
The existing SCDTS provides approximately 1,000 s.f. of available floor space oft the tipping
floor, which is significantly less than what the new City facility was to be provide for recycling
operations. Furthermore, the SCDTS does not provide for biMlevel "l" waif rol/-oft container
storage for loadout of recyclables.
2.5 TRANSFER LOAD-OUT
The station must provide for the transfer of the maximum expected tonnage received in any
given day, since it is a requirement of their permit to clear the floor daily. With the top loading
transfer configuration, one open top port should be able to provide the capacity to load 4 trailers
per hour. At 20 tons per trailer and a 12 hour operating schedule per day, one open top transfer
port is theoretically sufficient to accommodate the anticipated peak daily tonnage. To
accommodate likely discontinuity in transfer vehicle traffic flow, and to accommodate the
separation of MSW transfer from other materials load-out (such as wood waste or yard waste),
two transfer ports were recommended in the configuration of a new City facility. Only one port
is provided at the SCDTS, thus restricting the flexibility of concurrent multiple materiallcad-out.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISPOSAL
TRANSFER STATION
PAGE 5
MARCH 17, 2003
r j
[ I
[ I
rL I
"'~
I.'. I
L
['; I
~.; I
; I
t,.;
~' l
,
~j
1 I
~
[ I
':;-:'1
rJ
I
j
I
j
I
J
----- Ct~ .,~ ,"-!~:.
~anla 'IHIIi4'..1 .. _ <-~i~
BACKGROUND
'I I . I I I I 1 .
The existing transfer port inside the building is a back in operation. Transfer vehicles maneuver
on the cul-de-sac at the end of Frank Street and back down the ramp into the transfer area.
After they are filled they pull up out of the ramp and back out onto the street to tarp over the
load. They must do this to clear the way for a second transfer vehicle to get down in the
transfer area to maintain operations. In the absence of loadout scales in the transfer area, on
board vehicle scales are necessary to monitor payloads.
Space at the tipping floor level is very limited and does not allow room for stationary or mobile
tamping crane(s). Alternatively, a front end loader equipped with an oversized bucket can be
used to tamp the waste in the trailers to obtain optimum payloads.
In contrast to the proposed new City facility, the SCDTS does not provide for the capability of
installing high capacity pre-load compaction equipment to load containers for rail shipment if
deemed necessary some time in the future.
2.6 SORTING AND RECYCLING
Buy-Back Center and Commingled Recycling Operation - Currently the Allan Company
occupies approximately 55,000 SF of space on the corporation yard site to separate curbside
collected reeyclables and accommodate general public recycling. The goal of the Master Plan
was to reallocate space for this facility to enhance operations and integrate functions with the
transfer station where it makes sense and is possible.
Review of the current facility indicates that maneuvering is tight in areas, requiring three-point
turns by trucks and cross traffic in areas. Significant space is used for parking of the public
delivering recyclables. The facility should be adjacent to the transfer station to provide
logistical movement of recyclables and residuals. The Master Plan layout accommodates this
objective.
3.0 EXPANSION POTENTIAL OF SCDTS
It is HDR's understanding that in addition to the property that the existing SCOTS is located,
SCD owns the following properties nearby:
... Approximately one-third of an acre on the east side of Frank S~reet adjacent to the
Santa Monica Freeway;
SOUTHERN CAUFORNIA DISPOSAL
TRANSFER STATION
PAGE 6
MARCH 17, 2003
I
- I
I
, I
!
- I
, I
f
I
I I
it
( I
L
j
1
I
I
j
I
j
I
I
I I I f I I I I
SUMMARY
back-ups onto public roads, and likely will result in waste materials piling up and blowing out of
the building.
The existing facility lacks the amount of space the City has targeted to conduct recycling
operations off the tipping floor. The City currently recovers certain recyclables from the wastes
delivered to their facility to meet its recycling goals and minimize waste disposed of.
Approximately 8,000 sJ. of floor space has been programmed in the City's proposed new
facility with bi-Ievel construction for roll off container storage. The existing SCDTS has far less
space available.
While the SCDTS is currently permitted to accept 1,056 tons per day over a 12 hour operating
schedule, due to constraints in the size of the building and site, we do not believe the station
has the capacity to actually handle this volume on a regular basis. Also, in SCD's proposal to
the City, no detailed information was provided that would demonstrate otherwise.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISPOSAL
TRANSFER STATION
PAGE 8
MARCH 17, 2003
I
- I
- I
~ I
"
~ I
I~.
c 1
~ I
; I
~ I
l
J , I I I I I I
ApPENDIX C
Appendix C
Southern California Disposal
Transfer Station Evaluation Analysis
! I
,.
~
I
'. I
I
r
j
I
I
)
,.
L:
SOUTHERN CAliFORNIA DISPOSAL
TRANSFER STATION
MARCH 17, 2003
I
- I
c I
~ 1
,
(:
.- I
- I
~ I
Ii
r I
I:
l
~ I
'"
c.
~" I
l:i
: I
I
I
j
I
j
I
J
I
L
- , ..., .: -;- , -' ~~i~~~
,'-..1 n r a 'IHn i.'a _.' _uJ~~'
~ ~ ",_7",~;'j;""
111.....1
ApPENDIX C
Sizing Calculations
A. Following is a Table of Transfer Station Design Criteria Taken from the Summary Design
Quantities Worksheet
Table I Projected Tonnage and Traffic at SCDTS
Totals . City Packer Trucks Other City Veh's. Public SCD + Commercial Totals
Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons' Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips
Avg TPD 201 38 0 57 0 370 0 666
Peak TPD 275 0 110 0 110 0 450 0 945
Avg VPD 0 36 0 30 0 66 0 66 198
Peak VPD 0 50 0 45 0 85 0 82 262
Peak VPH 0 14 0 10 0 19 0 23 66
B. Transfer Station Sizing Calculations
Sizing Assumptions:
Daily Hours 5:00 AM to 5:00 PM =
Weekend Hours 6 AM to 2 PM
Avg. Packer Payload =
Avg. Public Payload =
Avg. Other City Payload =
12 Hours
8 Hou'rs
5.50 Tons
1.29 Tons
2.44 Tons
Mon - Fri
Sat
Peak Days
Peak Days
CITY OF SANTA MONICA TRANSFER STATION
PAGE C~1
MARCH 17, 2003
[...1
~ .
[~~ .
. ~ .:. .. ~ C~{ ';\:~3Q;;:
<.,; ... .\1 H II i nl ;' 3f!~:
_~ r "'Q ~~.
- I
I
~ 1
~:..
~ I
I
,. I
t;.
r I
i I
.-
"
Ill'....I.
ApPENDIX C
Vehicle Unlo(l;dinQ Area Sizing
Incoming Peak Daily Collection & Commercial Truck Tons =
Incoming Tonnage Per Peak Hour =
No. Vehicles Per Peak Hour =
Assumed Truck Unloading Cycle Time =
No. Unloading Stalls Req'd. =
Unloading Stall Width =
Unloading Area Length Req' d.=
725 Tons
203 Tons
37 Trucks
5 Minutes
3.08 Stalls
15 Feet
45 Feet
/
"'
Incoming Peak Daily Other City Vehicle Tons =
Incoming Tonnage Per Peak Hour =
No. Other City Vehicles Per Peak Hour =
Assumed Truck Unloading Cycle Time =
No. Unloading Stalls Req'd. =
Unloading Stall Width =
Unloading Area Length Req' d.=
110 Tons
24 Tons
10 Vehicles
5 Minutes
0.83 Stalls
12 Feet
12 Feet
r. I
r..
~I
Incoming Peak Daily Public Vehicle Tons =
Incoming Tonnage Per Peak Hour =
No. Public Vehicles Per Peak Hour =
Assumed Truck Unloading Cycle Time =
No. Unloading Stalls Req' d. =
Unloading Stall Width =
Unloading Area Length Req'd.=
110 Tons
25 Tons
19 Vehicles
15 Minutes
4.75 Stalls
10 Feet
50 Feet
~ I
~
I
!
I
J
I
I
I
I
Total Unloading Area Length Req'd. =
Total No. Unloading Stalls Req'd. =
107 Feet
9.00
Only approximately 65 ft. of unloading building width is available, thus the existing tipping floor
is insufficient to handle anticipated traffic.
Additionally, the above analysis makes the unconservative assumption that all existing tonnage
received at the SCD TS comes in packer trucks. Since some of the tonnage is being delivered
by small volume haulers and the public, actual traffic counts will be higher than those included
in HDR's analysis, thus requiring more unloading space than shown above.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA TRANSFER STATION
PAGE C-2
MARCH 17, 2003
'"
i;~
ii
:;~
t-~
111'11'.
ApPENDIX C
" I
I
- I
~ I
r I
~ I
Transfer Unloading Ports Required
1..>
Avg. Daily Tonnage to Transfer = 666 Tons
Peak Daily Tonnage to Transfer = 945 Tons
. Assumed Average Transfer Truck Loading Cycle Time = 15 Minutes
Assumed Top Loading Transfer Vehicle Payload = 20 Tons
Hourly Transfer Capacity Per Hopper = 80 Tons
No. Transfer Hours Per Day = 12 Hours
No. Transfer Ports Req'd.on Average Days = 0.69
No. Transfer Ports Req'd.on Peak Days = 0.98
No. Ports Provided = 1
Recommend 2 Ports to provide redundancy in loading out different materials, and to allow for
some discontinuity in loadout operations during peak daily tonnage conditions.
,.
i..;."
, I
c
I
Transfer Station TippinQ Floor Waste Storage Holdina Capacity Required
I
; I
~
I
I
Total Incoming Refuse Tons (Peak Day) =
Peak Hourly Waste Delivery Rate =
Max. Hourly Transfer Capacity wI 1 Loadout Ports =
945 Tons
259 Tons
80 Tons
Therefore, with 2 consecutive hours of peak delivery rates, approximately 360 tons
of waste will accumulate on the tipping floor.
To be consistent with criteria used to size the Tipping Floor of the proposed City Transfer
Station, size Tipping Floor to accommodate approximately daily average throughput =
Assumed Storage Pile Height = 12 Ft.
Assumed Storage Pile Density = 350 P.C.Y.
S. F. Floor Storage Required = 7,650 SF For 1 complete Day
666 Tons
S. F. Floor Storage Required =
4,629 SF
For 2 consecutive Peak Hours
Plus allow for pile slopes
CITY OF SANTA MONICA TRANSFER STATION
PAGE C-3
MARCH 17, 2003
~.. I
If,, I
~~.
~ 1
~~
:..~-.
;. I
i.
n,
r., I
~.;-
~...
~. I
~,
t::
" I
I
t:
I
h
f I
f:
L
(;.
L
~ j
Ii;
~I
! I
~
[ I
b
J
j
I
r _ l ~. ::: - . "' .~:t;:.~
, I. '"<J-'
....Olllla OBI.'" _ ",,~~I;"i.,
~, i' "=?"
I:, * I ! . B . . . .
APPENDIX C
Entry and Exit Scale Requirements
No. Collection Trucks Per Peak Hour
No. Self Haul Vehicles Per Peak Hour
Assumed Transaction Time Per Credit vehicle =
Assumed Transaction Time Per Cash Vehicle =
No. Entry Scales Required =
37 Trucks
29 Vehicles
0.5 Minute
0.75 Minute
0.67
Transfer Trailer ReQuirements
Avg. TPD Incoming =
Peak TPD Incoming =
666 Tons
945 Tons
Avg. Current Daily Outbound Recovered Materials in Roll Off Boxes Taken from City Report:
Item TPD Loads
Metal 2.5 0.5
OCC 2.5 0.5
C&D 50 6
Project Current Outbound Recovered Materials to Future Based on Ratio of
Avg_ TPD Design / Avg. TPD 2002 = 666 / 296 = 2.25
Item
Metal
OCC
C&D
TPD Loads
5.625 1.125
5.625 1.125
112.5 13.5
Thus the following tonnage will be required to be transfer for disposal:
Avg. TPD Transfer = 542
Peak TPD Transfer = 769
Assuming 1 truck can make 3 loads to the landfill per doy (60 Tons per Truck)
Thus need approx 13 transfer rigs plus spares for peak days
Thus need approx 9 transfer rigs plus spares for avg. days
CITY OF SANTA MONICA TRANSFER STATION
PAGE C-4
MARCH 17. 2003
~
~
k~-:
~~.
- - tl~.~':: .' "~~':;~~
... Of 11 fall Hili nl _.; }3'~
'.'~'. .
j.: i I I . . . I . .
ApPENDIX C
Summary of Design Tonnage and Traffic
:. \
~ 1
~ J
- I
~ I
~ I
~
~
~ I
lh
[j
I
I
I
This analysis represents the situation where the City directs its entire waste stream to
the existing Southern California Disposal Transfer Station (SCDTS).
Table I below represents the volumes of tonnage and traffic at the existing City TS.
This information was derived in Appendix A of the Basis of Design Report for the City's
Recycling and Transfer Station. The analysis of the City's Recycling and Transfer
Station showed that weekday conditions governed over Saturday conditions, thus for
analysis purposes, only weekday conditions will be considered.
r
ro,:
Totals City Packer Trucks Other City Veh's. Public Totals
Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips
Avg TPD 201 38 57 296
Peak TPD 275 110 110 495
Avg VPD 36 30 66 132
Peak VPD 50 45 85 180
Peak VPH 14 10 19 43
Table I Existing City TS Tonnage and Traffic
6
In additian to these volumes, the SCDTS must accommodate its own collection forces,
which according to year 2002 LEA records indicate average approximately 270 tons
per day over the course of the year. However during heavier months the average
tons per day is over 300 tons, with peak days probably in the 350 to 400 tpd range.
Thus for purposes of this anaylysis, 270 tpd average and 350 tpd peak will be used to
represent existing conditions at the SCDTS. In addition to this, the facility
should be designed to accommodate anticipated growth in the commercial waste
stream. For purposes of this analysis, that growth will be assumed to be 100 TPD.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA TRANSFER STATION
PAGE C-5
MARCH 17, 2003
~I
\
~ I
~ I
- 1
i.~ '
.' I
~ I
- I
I
'"
l...
~;
I'
~
t. ~: ~ ~.. :_~~~~ l.*c""
,1o.;.lIlfa \Joninl _' ;.;J'~~}~
. I . I . . . I
ApPENDIX C
Table IT presents the volumes of tonnage and traffic that the SCDTS must
be able to accommodate. This includes the waste stream that the City currently
accepts, the waste stream that is currently accepted at the SCDTS, plus 100 TPD of anticipated
growth in the commercial waste stream.
Table IT Projected Tonnage and Traffic at SCDTS
Totals I City Packer Trucks . Other City Veh' s. Public SCD + Commercial Totals
Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips Tot. Tons Tot. Trips
Avg TPD 201 0 38 0 57 0 370 0 666
Peak TPD 275 0 110 0 110 0 450 0 945
Avg VPD 0 36 0 30 0 66 0 66 198
Peak VPD 0 50 0 45 0 85 0 82 262
Peak VPH 0 14 0 10 0 19 0 23 66
Note that since data was not available on existing SeD traffic quantities, it was assumed that
all existing tonnage arrives in collection trucks with average payloads equivalent to City packer truck
payloads In reality, some traffic deliveries to the SCDTS includes the public and small vehicle haulers
with much smaller payloads. Thus average and peak traffic quantities will likely be higher than those
shown above and included in the analysis of the existing station,
CITY OF SANTA MONICA TRANSFER STATION
. PAGE C-6
MARCH 17, 2003
[ I
~.
.
-s
- \
,- I
f,".
C.. I
~.
I.;
r I
p I
e I
I
I
~ I
~
i )
)
I
I
)
I
J
I
Corporation Yard Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
Chapter Four
Recycling & Transfer Facility layout Plan
Introduction
This chapter includes the final conceptual layout plan for the
Recycling & Transfer Facility as prepared by HDR, the revised
Corporation Yard Master Plan incorporating the Recycling & Transfer
Facility layout, the Phase 1 Plan for the Corporation Yard and the
Existing Conditions plan for reference.
The following documents are included:
,".
Exhibit 1
Option
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
Drawing C-1 Santa Monica Corporation Yard Master Plan
Drawing A-5 Site Plan Final Buildout
Drawing A-1 Site Plan Phase 1
Site Plan Existing
,
u
City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard
Santa Monica, CalifornIa
4.1
March 2003
Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
RNUHDR
I 0
II "
II ~
~ ~~ il:
I m
I
I ~
I
I ~
!
, I
/ r--~"'-"'~-,:
r': ::
~----r~:_~:_~:~::_J1
I, I I
I I t r
I I I I
I I I I
I ~-------T---~----
I I I
I I I
I r-------,
I I I
I L_______....
I I I
" ,
I I I
I I
I I
I W I
I U I
I 2 I
: <(:
I Z I ~
I W I ~
I t- I r--..J
I Z I I
: ~ ~ :
I ~ I I
I I I
I I-- I I
I W I I
I W I I
, ....J I I
~ l.i..: ~..~~
I I I I
I I L__...J
I "
I I I
I I I
[___~ ~T-J
I ,J
I I
I I
I I
I ---~ ~-...,.--~-~--=------~_;-
: ~------l : ~ i i
~ 1--------1 I ~ I
I I I I I
I I I L_________..r
: i--u---:r--l
j r I,
1 I 'I
! I I,
~ I I~
I I Ii
l___.L_____-_.J1 j
L__J
/ /// / /
, , I
, , ,
... , ,
I ....... I J
/ i'....,::.... /./
I ......:;.... I t
/ '~~..... trl
... ......., ,
" ('t,
\ I ~
\ ---__~1-, J
\'" ::
I In I I
I W I I
tc ~ ;:
~ ~ I I
I I
--f-----J !
I I
I I
: I
: l'-~----~~~-~--j
I J" ~ .
I ,I ~ J I <(
I" ,....!-.1__~..f~ ~ w
i----",n ~
i <-~ Vl
,.t---~~---~-l t3
I ~ :l:I : ~ I U
J~ :ll__L_...lj' ; ~
: "l-i-r--~ : 2
I I. I I I I 0
: r.1---L--T"'-~ ~
: ~. i ~ I ~
I . ~ : a : 8
i f~~~~~~~L-J
I' : I
~ .... I I
i lI-Iu'---J
~
I i
o
~
II
w
~
c{> Bl"PASS 1.AHE:
U" SlC~ ~ -
c{>- -
EL -14
C:: :::JlJ
--------
C:::: :JOI
-2
<>:
S2
I
U
::;
/
/
/
/
/
t ,/
-' /
d "
"','
r--J'
I
N
+
CI!:
Wz
[J)9lL,:;
z 1-",..1
<( <( Sl'"'
CI!: I- <$
I- (/).,;
~
w
"
I
I ~
\ \
\ \ ,
\ 'v
\'
I1.l
V
Z
<(
Z
I1.l
I-
z
<(
L
W
-.J
I.)IlL
-(/)'"
fiJ <( ~
>:r",-
1-1l;
:tl~
-.J_
LL~
..
~
"
rOt
'~
:~
1;-
I",
I
IlL
Il!s
I
IJ
Id
I",
)
,
,
/
/
,
,
,
,
t,
~ ~
"
I..'}
Z
-.J
I.)lL
}-'"
~~-
CI!:~
~I~
"
L
~
all I ij I ~ ~
Iii [~ ~
~~
W
~
w
n:::
<>:
s:
5
W
Cl
~llll
~j III
I 'I,
!II
~ ~
'1
1_-
LLLLLLkL
LLLLLL~
1JLLLLLL
LLLLLLL
,/ ALLLLLL
II
I
'j
.
I'
l
I.
r
~'
I ~
:),,,
II ~t
fjf
f
l .
/ cr
I.
I
iU
,j ~I f
~I
I
69~
Ifdlll,l! ~~~ 11 J 1 :i; !
i
I.
91 l!;O~ '" U i. f -t
;s- I J: J J I Ii
8:!:~1 ~I :1
II
I.
~~ iii ~ II
~ ill
!i! ."
tl Ii!
~ I,;
I.
,j,' :
'Ql..:{1 .....
,~>'~~;-::-~:~_mmmmm.
:;::'~-./I~......_.. _-'__~____________-+.
//1
. //:'/
" ,:/
"
.... ~>)
11;>)... ,
r.... t .., ,
r- .. K I
I .......If/........./'.,.,~ /
1/<::/ (~~://:'1~
/"$ , " ' ~
.. / /~ , ~~.. /.5.~_T, ~- I
,"-:"'J ' I' I -l-~- " - I
<\< I :j}i~~;~~) ~L--__
,';/ ~ .~:/~~A~/'" <;,,~'-\, j -:~l
' I ...{~-:~ ., r .. .. <... "~ 1 g 5
" "t--"'/ ,',,,,~,,'~ --, ~I
// ;_n-~'J"'~--' .\'1 ,-.',)('.,v,'.J' 'I
I // / r---------r.L--.- .;.y \:~~:~>.... )"F_ l
/"~.. / / ~--P"1r.l..Ji&.....: ~ '\, ,,-'~')Y I ~
( .. "::::::~k/ l: :: ~ I I r I ~ J I "~Y" t I
" \ ( ~.... : ~-~---~'O-I.-T--__-I.:.-t..!.!.!l,..(" ~
/.. \,. ___J~: : C:::J i: l
I I ' I : f :: l ~ : ! ~ I
~ I I ~ < I I ~ I I~ I I ....--.,~
-- r: i -1---1 i l i ,!! ! il Ii! :1
l I --.....:-:. I I I I r-J I ~ I ~ j
W : ~1---..--J ! f !: ! i : ~-_.1
(j) I I 'J?~I t I QI I'" -i'
<( ! l {~;~ ~I i ! ~ i r=J I ~---~---..-f~==-=------J. ""'"='---=----
~ ri.:;=~.:: -"'" I I I I I I
l i i ltEh~~_j; ~j l~~m-.;-~--J ~ rr:::=====-----:.-----.
~: 'l;1 : ~ I ~_n I II' r' ._,__'n,' I ::
I [- -- I. : r---" t J I L-...-_-......Jll I I
.~~.~~LI~.~l~- l~.-..~.........!~U
I I ~ r......I ~.
· I l' , - .... --. ! I.
~ ~ - r~ ---. ;
: i !~. ; II.: " I':
· ~~! · ad .
. .
. .
: II .
~ ~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
I-
!
I
I
/
/
I
I
z
~ ~
@i
...
:....
[-
f'
~ ~ll
.<'f
/ .
: .
.
-- -- ~
............................
II
c
1-,
I.
u
.. ~ll
~If
1
I
I:: Itt
; !H
.. ",
.. II:
.,
I
I.
,
I
I
I I i
~ I !
;10 ~I
I"
I
I
i.
'.
I
I
z
~
t
f
=; f
'. .
,I
l:.-
I
....:.
I
I
~.:.:.
I
I
I
I
I
j
~
J
I
I
I
J
I
I
J
.....
J
Corporation Yard Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
Chapter Five
Construction Budget
Introduction
The following budget includes anticipated costs associated with the
construction of the Recycling & Transfer Facility. A detailed estimate
of anticipated construction bid costs is included in the Conceptual
Opinion Of Cost - Phase 1 ONLY document prepared by Jacobus &
Yuang, Inc.
The Construction Budget includes an estimate of Construction Bid
Cost, plus aliowances for Architectural/Engineering fees. Testing and
inspection costs, post-bid changes, escalation, and other project
related costs are not included.
Cost Summary
Construction
Phase I Transfer Station/Diversion Area
Allen Co. Area (by Allen Co.)
HHW Drop-Off Area (by City
Sub-Total
Design
Architecture & Engineering
Specialty Consultants
Reimbursable Expenses
Owner allowance for special studies
and additional services
Sub-Total
Total
::;,
City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard
Santa Monica, California
5.1
March 2003
$6,680,000
$ 0
$ 0
$6,680,000
$ 668,000
$ 50,000
$ 100,000
$ 50,000
$ 868,000
$7,548,000
Recycling & Transfer Facility Study
RNUHDR
z
<( >-
..J ..J
a.. z
~ 0
W
I- ~
CJ) w
<( U)
:E <C
c J:
a.
~ .
~ I-
U)
Z 0 (.)
~
0 0 M ~
<( 0 0:: Z C>~ ......
- ..-- 0 0 C) Z c o~
N Q) 0"-
l- LL N Ii. <( :> 0""
........ 0 U) ;:) <0<';"
~ 0 0 '<:t UJ W ;>:: >- ~~U~
--.J ..-- 0:: E Q) .. co
<{ C m ~ C> :~ .!! in
:tt: .c cia ~E
Z >- e ll. ...J U)
0 w z ::> U) <(jj
(l] 0::
0 """') :2: ll. 0::: a:l ~ ~ I-
a.. 0 '" --'
- 0
c::: z <(
""')
0 -
a.
0 0
<( ..J
0 <C
- ::J
Z
0 I-
a.
:!: w
<( 0
I- Z
Z 0
<( 0
CJ)
t
;:,J
u.:.,
~---.
I
~
i<::
I
'"v
I-
U)
o
U
IL
o
Z
o
Z
ii:
o
w
X
I-
o
I-
(I)
W
I-
o
Z
Q
Z
<(
W
U
<(
LL
W
a::
D..
I
eo:
[c,
G..
o
en
D-
O
Z
>
o
J-
o
w
a
0::
D-
"""
>-
o
=>
I-
en
LL
o
W
Q..
~
......
......
......
Q)
(/J
ro
..c
Q..
c:
ro
e-
(I)
-
(/J
ro
:2
"E
~
c:
o
:;:::;
~
o
e-
o
()
~'
c:
o
:2
19
c:
ro
en
Q)
..c
-
.....
.E
-
(fl
o
o
.....
o
c
.Q
c
'0..
o
co
:l
-
n
8
c:
o
o
z
o
i=
Z
it:
w
c
N
I-
en
o
()
LL
o
Z
o
Z
a-
o
ro...:~r
,- 0........,
E(I)-
'w 'e- ~ .::i.
E n- 5
o Q)"'O 3:
.......c (I)
.........:Q(I)
"'O.....>..c
(1)00-
> ~.....
'~c .....0
(l)0)~
"- j9 C
"'O(fl 0
!!l~53:;:::;
co.....EQ)
"'OO:la.
-(I)oE
(/)0)08
8 co "'0 ,
....c....."'O
-(/)O)OQ)
~ .2 "00 'F- E
"C - Q)"'C ....
.9~"'O~.E
,!:!! Q) Q) '5 ,!;;;
..c ..c :S 0" c:
CO C ~ (I)
0(/)0 Q)
n..... (I).a
:lO~roo
"'Ccom.....c:
Q):loOQ)
~ g. '5 mE i:u
.a 0 ,!;;; ..c
1i)c-:mQ)
88gw3:
..... Q) ~ (I) -f:j
o:sco:S:c
c......c.....3:
.Q ro .2 0.....
m-o..cEo
:lQ)~(I)~
ro:Q~E5
>>5(1)~
(l)e3:Q1....
Q) n..... "'C 0
.-g c: o.~ (/)
q::.Q (fl Q) E
~m~:S~
.!;;; E~.!;;;o
CO.....
ro 1: .E..c c:
._ 0 0
~ c: ~ :c "in
3:"'O3::l
~l!!.2.....g
:l -0 0 0 .-
..... c. .....
......... ,- E 0
(/)0(1) 'F-
Bc:.a~~
oQ)=......a
::::.- .-
Q)"C 3: '5 :g
.a~Q) 0
= m~n
ro E "- co (fl
1ijo6.~~
':::ocoQ)
1;)"'0 0.. Q) .a
8 8 g.~ Cv"
o.g~Eii>
c: e (/).~ 3:
onQ).....o
'c .0 o.s::::.
,_ (fl c: _ .
8"~~Eg
"~o:;:::; c:
ce=(/)co
<( n<( W 0
......
C\I
o
m
C'.l
N
Q)
E
:;:::;
.....
o
"'C
o
-I::
(I)
D-
"'0
a.>
~
E
co
c:
:c
.....
"3:
"'0
2
a.>
D-
E
8
Q)
.a
.9
E
:l
(fl
"'0
Q)
X
~
ro
....
.E
-c
~
E
.g
Q)
D-
o
-
-0
~
-
c
8
t'I:I
L-
a>
-
c
Q)
.9
:&
o
c
<(
en
c
m
LL
o
0:::
W
lD
:i
::>
z
M
ro
:;:::;
c:
~
&
'5
co
(fl
(\J
(/)
"0
:.a
Q)
>
:;:::;
:;:::;
a>
n
E
o
o
c:
o
.!1
"3
(/)
Q)
....
QI
c:
-3:
o
.E
Q)
.s::::.
-
~
o
.s::::.
(/J
8
c
Q)
-c
Q)
a.
x
a>
en
Z
o
t-
o
Z
o
o
I-
W
~
a:
<(
~
L-
:l
o
C
o
15
:l
L-
-
(fl
c
o
o
....
.E
Ul
c:
o
:2
"'0
c:
8~
-.....
(I) co
-cE
co:;:::;
E ~
--
c: (\J
0) c:
t:'i=
Dr
0)"'"
.s::::.E
~e
-.....
......
C<)
0) ?F.?F.-:R.o-:R.
Q1(\Jol.Ob;:;:::b
m:;:::;I.OC'.l......I.O......
+:>c: I I
CO)..9..9ooo
a.>..... ........+-ol'
e~1.00000
(J)~C'.l..-
0..0+++++
Q)
CvUl 5
.a "'0 E
~D :MLC.i~ 5
ZO"":N.J.<bro
"'0
(I)
.;?:
Q)
o
~
~
co
(fl
"'0
:B
:Q
ro
>
1.0
I
'V
.....
o
E
:l
E
"c
"E
(\J
-
(\J
.s::::.
-
~
:l
(/)
C
(I)
o
-
-
c:
t'I:I
-e
o
c.
E
>.
(])
E
~
x
(])
,~
-~
>.
QI
c:
"E
8
o
<(
~
~q
N~
....
3:if'
:.!
I
I,
.Ii.i
ID~
!j,!c
~
I
l;i
.;
..!:
...
<:
..
:I
>-
...
:I
...
o
...
~
;.:.
...
~
..
a.
!:
Cl.
z
:5
II.
II::
III W
~ :l
:l! IE
13 .
lIl: ....
~ l3
z ~
g 0
~ l!j:
o iE
~ o(lL
o uO
U .(;;J.
(S 2t:
~~~w
:eii::EU
o(l&Io(z
!2~!z8
o(zo( ..
tOlIl:"~~
;.:. .':if
~I-~iii!
aifi(Su
lI::;;!olS
11.......13
tr.-,
1-<(
WI-
20
8....
W
W
U.
o
o
W
C
Z
o
III
I-a:
~g
"'u
00:00:
:<...
u
~~
:~
Cl...
@~
CI
lj~-,
~~E..
fSi~~
m~2.
OJ
~~
wI-
zi5
~~
u
>-
U
ZZI-
!2lg
UlZO
~~~
o
u
z>-
..~~
SlJl
I-
0-,
1Il~<(
~!z5
01-
o
l-
(/)
o
U
I-
Z
=>
:lZ-1-
S
I-
<J)
W
z
o
ii:
it':
u
1Il
11.1
C
::;;-
~~
....OMO
OlJ3-:tOJ
.....,....(V)(\I
-..i<riuiri
vt~~8~
f'i..t
-J'.
o
,..:
It)~....... .,...
..... m U1 O'J
(0 C'?01 01
I.CiN.n~
P)P'J.r,b.......
~ '"
-J'.
It!
m-N(hN
~tI)v~
to 0) ..- IJ')
,....-"':WN
'" '"
-J'.
o
,..:
M 1'--1.0 """'
~g::~
rJ"':..q~
(QN.......
~ '"
CF).....No)
"''''''''''
U')MOt9
Noooi.
"'Itan.....T'""
~'"
;ft;!!;ft*-
00000
g~~e
1J)N~a;;I
OO,.....NCO
CONMM
uiricirti
C'\ICOCO'Q"
v 1.0 r-.....
~C"i
......-tt) co 0
..... r--..... OJ.
c.i'-:cif'!.
~;!~
U"u.-t.L..cn
UJ (J) (JJ -.J
UlIDO_
...."'0
...."'0
oN"oi"
0.... '"
'" ~
III
!;j;
:iE
r::
to
W
u.
o
ll;:
:1
:iE
:1
to
Z
Ow
i=~
~~
z U)d
Q~ffi~
~ou..'"
5:=~ffi
ili~~i!:
oii.il-O
OOOQ
-'-:niM-i
<t
N
0>
.,;
~
..
.,;
co
<0
'"
.n
::J
~
'"
~
.;
'"
<0
N
<0
:i
<t
:0:
N
::f
'"
<0
:1l
N
,.,
...
.,;
en
-'
g
I-
o
in
13
w
~
:iE
1=
ltl
11.1
o
z
o
>-
11.1
dl
o
w
o
0",
<(0
o
U)N
z%
oli!
5~
l1~
"'w
W....
0<(
z:iE
.1=
z'"
OW
I=J!!
:5i=
::Ju.
~O
0(%
01-
ZZ
00
j:::iE
:5111
l1~
"'1&1
III %
....
~
W
~
::<
j::::
00
ILl
00
i:
I-
Z
C
W
C
::::l
-'
U
~
ILl
Ir
"'<(
~;1i
Ot:r::
11.1<(
!;(!!2
OI
Zl-
~~
t:r::0
ILIZ
I-::::l
~~
::<a=
O~
~w
6:::::
~~
ILl 011
~~
~g
~()
II-
~8
i:i:OO
i3ffi
~~
00
ILI>-
zro
001-
<(Z
@~
g.!5
0-'
OIU
::<j;j
"':0
S21r
o ....0
u.t ~u.
~ at:
-' Ww
o 1--'
~ ;!!!2
!!2 z;1i
00 I- Clt:r::
ffi aJ 00<(
o ::; Woo
o n. OX'
in 5 ~t-
ILl 0 t:r::~
> 11.1 >-_
00 ~ ro;1i
Z Z olr
l[ <( ll!<(
'" Z <(0
w UJ Q...CC
a= !z ILI<(
~ fil< g:~
j:::: o::Ooooz
;::: ::l;twC)::i
III -'oozo
~ ~ii:3~6
8"'0 c!Q~~~ll!
L.el~~ ~(/J~~~w
~<(;;; 3l2~"':)~
",3:- uWl-llla.1r
lll~~ ~~It~ffi[2
-,-w C100 1-0
!{~~fil~~~~~~
~ll!;1ig~~g~w3
t:r::a.<(-,OOOOIO
u...z...Jooo.tl:::JuF-~
~O~~ga:d05iii
-cw",u..ozl-ow
COW:t--u.u..-zwO]
!!P2<(t;~wbQ",,,,
=>~~8~~zt;:;~
~1r::::lo;,.~~~~ll!CI
<(< t:r::ooo<(O<(z
oooo~~tt-'ILIg:",5
~~:'i o~ollwt;;f
ii:ii::.(lroo":!!::oo
lLa.I<(ZZ"'u..uz
w
U)
<(
:I:
0.
'"
15
T"'.....MvU)w.....romo
J
:(...
_'l
N~
.....
~~
I
.;..-:
-l!!
11I<
~O
r.i.,
'.0
~
b:,
..;
.E
co
<:
m
::>
>-
.,
::>
...
8
m
.,
>.
...
"C
~
..
~
~
n.
I
~!
~
z
:5
Q.
rr:
w w
... Cl)
fit <
< :J:
::E Q.
o
rr: ...
~ ~
x U
o ~
~ ~
o !'
II: <(....
g u~
c1 .{,<(
- ~~
zZXQ.
OC)OW
::Eii::E!i
;!:!;!:o
z.....ZU
;(~;(z
;:. ..zf
M"'~ii!
ali(1u
rr:~olS
LU....I'c
U)
o
Z
o
<0
1-",
We
"'I-
"'0
~:t.
(.l
if~
~!i
0,,-
~:i!
o
z'"
oz~
t=a:~_
~~~E!
U:f:::JrJI
f3~2.
<D
~~
1111::
zo
~~
(.l
>-
(.l
z~.....
~c;I~
~~~
o!Z<
o
o
:i>-
..~~
8~
...
o
<o~:;t
~~b
01-
o
...
U)
o
o
I-
Z
::>
~z-t-
/:
a
I-
Ul
lU
Z
o
j:;
0.
0:
u
U)
111
(}
~d
eZ
((.....
1-<(
U)I-
Xo
81-
lU
lU
IL
o
C)
...
~~imi!~i~~~~~
M<<i~",o)r-:ONr-: u:iN~"':
fI) T'""_~ ~_ .......N ~
;tI.
o
..:
N~m~~r::~~ro:;~g~
r--m...........(".J-q-COcovov.....o
oj "":.n"""- - - ,..:
;tI.
~
_M....IOIOOlUllDa O~ N(b
'''It..... to-co) 0 0) CD r--m (\10 N......
<<!.T""_N~ ~~ NM ~
;tI.
o
..:
Oor-C""J.q-CO-:fM(")O meo "'It0l
<'>CDO-NT-.[")WlOM 110('1) 0)"'1:1
~.....t--~~"Ij-~t-. m~ ~
m~p)o.....P)t'04.......COU')......NI.O
N('I')T'""('I')LOu)C')OJLt).m~""""
...q-CDO)MNIfl""O"JtD-Nt-T'""CO')
~ ~ui ai - - oj
~~;ft.~"#.-;p."#.,#-";ft tft~ ~rft
0000100000000 00
~~~~~~~~~~~~s
re~!9re:g~~~!~~~~
t~";~gtOimlli ~t: ~~
vWtD<Q..... (0 0) wo:. 'Wo '0(\,1
co...... UJ-.C\l1.I)to(QW ('I4('1)-t"l""t'"
d"':pj"':ui~-q:ci"';<<t~"":o
N
LL.u..U.lLl1.LLLLu.tL U-I4LLU.
t/) (I} 0000 CJ) 00 oo.J...J 000000(1)
00000000011000-01101.0
(l;gggg2~~~m~~t::
guiNpj~c-ig ~~N ~
Z
o
j:;
::;
o
:<
111
a
I- ci
Z 0
~ u: uJ
W '" ()
CIl- (,) UJUJ z
:a ~ 5~ ~
ffi~.ci",:;t 3~ g
~goolu :!w;t
O...J...J~~CJ) lL~ -.J
~ ~~~9+::1 :-c:J ~
> :!O::~S::>~U)ii:o!l 0
<(00::::>"'10:< ~ !::~;:;;
__o.<(OlOlOo::OOZ ~D.lUl:!
xOD.>->->-4'>-O::WlU "X
!il0:: .0::0::0::...J0::}!:1L0::1a",/:
5}!:~~~~i5~::>~~:;tg::;
~~8~2ilg~~~8~~5
a
C!
~
~
i
f5:::NmM~~mM~(:;~
"":I'OLOOQ)('I)(oI"-.....QJ-U').......
~~rD<<:i"cr)(II)<<i"oor-.:dl:'iaj
::'! :n.~~ ~~~
."
'"
u;
.;
'"
O"JLOU'J........r.jItPCOCOLOOI"-
g~o~mt3~r;;:B~~~
""':r-iNfTJ- ....
NN
=
'"
..:
;~~~~!~~~~B~
. or;; cD
'"
'"
..
...
...
iN!(h.....cnmM...O<OCOU)(")
r-- 'V...... (0 M -0 0 M <0 I,{) 110 a.
~~~~CQm"VU')vCDr--q
"'''I
'"
...
'"
~
(O-r-Q)LOOMT'"IX)U')lOom
oCOC\!O)(JJ"q"['IQ)OtO-tO.,-
"'f"COM(OO 0 LOfDq)a)Q) ~
roNW"';~"':
N'"
~g~~~~~~~~~r;
~~~~~~~eee~ci
'"
'"
'"
.;
"I
..
co,..........OtOCO"f"M-CO......M"f"
~gre:gm~Nffi;gm~~
;tre~~e~L6rDt6coaii.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
~d.,.:uiai..;-.iNai....;rJa.ri
or- M......OO.......,-COvU')O
.... NNroOU'JOO
Llitriwr.6rOoi
u.
U)
G~~~~;5i1i;5i1i;5;5~
~
N
....
Ll)I,() VJoU)(\II 'l"'""T'""T'""........0
ID [\f.... cor-- U)
r-N'VQ:lc", V
"":Na;;...: N
...
~~C!~~C;
(bQ) 01 M-t.O-o
...:-r=Nr.D";"":
........,....U')NT'""M
...~
COCOT""-r')OJ."q'"
\D,.-WNUlN
-['>,I C"')oq-...... 01..,.
....:~ri.,.: N
'"
......vT'""v('l)N
g:z~~~~
qi.,.:
c1J-lDt-r-MN
co (l'"J.cocoo,P)
............,.....LOtON
airD~"': N
N
(Od)O)_......cn
OOV('i)(O..q-~
C'?......T'""OT'""CO
~CO...;N~N
'"
"#.~#.'#.~'$.
oOQ.Qoo
~~~~~~
0>..... t'-O'I..... 0
.......00 WO 1"-0".1
m"q"p)I'D'";f-m
c-i~-'-:ci"':m
t--<:o"'=tN~"",
'"
00 0) C'\llCOP>......
.... r--lOv v....
-.".:u)ccioq:~..;
u..u..u..LLu......
UJ(f)CJ)f/)-Jr/J
~8~gg~
vr-(")l(}T'""CI)
~..ntOoq:~cD
'" ~
u.
u.
q w
--' 0::
~ 13 lU
~ lZlU t~m ~
:.: >-Q >-lU ~
?; ;%!1?: ::t IOn:: Cl
ltI >0 0 J-~ Z
::>: ~~ rL ~~ B
15 15i:: 0 a:t ~
!;( 01- 15 g15 c:
z mj[x?; ltIz 11I
o ~~~~ ~g~ ~>_~~
~ ~X~~ o-u-o. ~~~~~ z
> fu~n<( --- C)u;:;;o.~ 0
<( oXTWI1IW"'O::O:: ZZo(WlU j:;
~ 1-~&QQQttt 50~a::>: ~ W
~lU <(00::?;?;?;lUWl1I <(0C)C)0:: 0: (.l
o~ j~Q~~~mm@ ~Q~~~ ~ ~
?;lU <(<(S:NN"'. - .000::>>u. - S:
11IG:iC)~~:J: - -WlUl1IlUZO::o(<(<(o O/l~o
!::--'~ooX~~I-!;(!;(!;(5}!:~~~... ~O::j..J
i1iU)o<(zo::l-o(~~~OClCl<(lUlU<(<(O <(0<( 1-<(
--'wo::-<( 0000.~1L?;s:0:: u?;>-
~~go~>-~!aoo~~~ &~~wwo13~>-!:: 0
I-WOlUl-=>z~~~aool-og::>:2:~O:: !::--' Iii
WZlU!::lU:;;lU~~?;::;::;::;zw o::o::x::>~:!j:; =>
Z~O::<Iln::UIL"'<Il"'''''''u)lUO:: 00:J:() ~=> Cl)
..J
<
b
I-
<0
::>
II>
'"
0::
o
~
I-
iii
o
'"
'"
N
N
N
~
~ ~
cD ~
'" "I
N 0
N
'"
... ...
.... '"
.. '"
oj N
::!
... '"
co '"
'" '"
(II!) ...:
N
.... ...
'" 0
C'4 ~
~ N
~
g ~
... '"
N tJO
"I .,
~
;tI.
o
g
g ~
'" N
~ M
!:! 3
o
~
u.
Ul
U.ILIL
U)U)U)
000
000
000
moiQi"
NNN
--J
~
w
~ ?;
lU gz
S 1110
::J IDj::
~ ClU
w.,. ~~
~o !co
n::z ocr
000::::;0.
.....CijQ;;:~
<(...10:::>-
'5 <(lU;5:!
!;(Iu~o::~
z::i...J<.Ju;J
lUj!::!~~~
>_O::__j:;
o~l-a .0
<o--,~o(Oo
~-Fog~u.
~~~O::~O/l
0( .WOUl
Q.::>~>""'--'
a 0;:;;00n::;t
I- ;5~~tii~&S:
~ crOwo::U)<o'"
'" ~51u;50:)g
0:: ZIO;:;;~l1IUlO
~ o:~ii':U~~O
U) o..<(lUoCllU<Il~
~ bG:iG.;l5lJ;b~
~ :r~~~~~g
o
.;
'" '"
"'t-
......
anN
0..
~co
Pi
.....'"
~ NO>
co.., ...
""':~N
~ N '"
'"
"''''
"''''
'" N
rDO
...
N
w
U)
0(
't:t 1.0 fD ::I:
:; ffl ~ D..-
~~N
<ON
"'N
........
"":0
'"
'" '" 0>
N"'...
"'N'"
N
~'"
"'~
"'''I
ui"'=
N
N
.."'..
... '" '"
t-N'"
~.:...:
'" '"
...'"
N N
crir-:
...
N
"''''N
"'CO...
"'co",
W~N
;tI.;f
00
g~
*;fl~
000
~~~
... <X>
'" ....
...'"
rJri
"'....
'"
N
"'''''''
...."'~
"'co...
Lri'~Lti
~-N
'0
'"
~::;
No}
'"
... '" '"
0"''''
cOccioi
NO'"
"'-
1Lu.u.
U)~~
000
'" <X> '"
'"
ob
l :(...
~ ~ (Q':O........,N <>
~'1' ,:g m m m ~ '"
~-' '"' N
NO. on ;t.....-..;oiui ...
J ..... ;:::;
3~ oo;! '" ... ~~<> '"
<> ~
ZO .f
81- W
U)
<(
-j!! Lu $ '" ... ......C">q)CO...... ;; r
<> '" '" U>N.......O..... 0.
J /Do( W ,..: "': '" NI.DOJC"')Q) ~
IL ~ ..; ri ~1Ii
~c (,) '" ~
Cl ...
$ ;!; do mO('l)(gp) N
II) "1 .. r-T"""01.......... ...
Co '" ~ -q-,...........N"":. '"
Z vi N
0 '"
lD
[.:..
1-""
~~
"'0
!::
0
i'l:lj
~t
Cli::
m'O!
zl-
OZ _
i=5~_
::'j"- en
<9 ~Hi:
u~8
t3~ -
II) ;f! It> .. CONM"'lt"'lt ~
-'z <> '" ... ~~~?3~ ..
;:::Q ,..: "l. ... ~
wI- 1 ci .......- qj ~
1 ZQ -
Wz '"
Clo
u
>- N N -~IO""'rJ '"
0 ... ~&jgm:J; I'>
Z Z I- ~ <> ...
C1'" Z .. N "-:~<<i t
-,,=> ~
I ~~~ ...
U Q~<
0
.E u
~ cii 2:>- ;11 ;f!1f.;f!;f!;f!
C <> Q~qqq
'" ~~u ~ ~~~ee
:::> ZZ
I >- 0'"
'" uCl
:::>
.i:> l- t-- ~ CQ......ON-r.D .. '"
0
U u-' <> ~ ::~~;t~ .. '5
'" ~g;! N '" '"
..... ,.: .,; .....-v.iOulM g
;;.. OOzO ~ N ~ ~ '"
.i:> 01- ...
"CJ U
l!! I-
'" II) ", ~~~:q3!
C- O "!
e 0 - ~~~~~
lL (<)
L:~ !:: 10 CO co,....
"":c-i.o"'=
Z - ..
j =>
:Jz-t- "- :J);li;li;li;l'j
'"
~ <> 1O-.:tC"3~N
It> '"
It> ...
I a
r-
oo
Lu
z
j
"-
It:
I!! '" U)
'" .r
~ <( uJ
:z: -'
::I! "- uJ IL
C > IL<I)
It: I- Z W oz
0 -' ...~
~ '" y
0 ii:
U u 0""
Z IL a: 0 l!if2 U>
0 Co l-
S 0 u 0 ~<I} n:
z II)
0 W Z oZ", 0
0 Z D wiii3 w
;:;; Ul
Do <ii: tt: IILm Ul
a:: UlILI- uJ
0 (,,10 0 "'o<c .r
:;: .{~ "- on.;:;; 0-
j it~!:l! uJ
("I ("I~ Ul 0
:E% Z... "- Lu OO~ Z
OeJOw y ~ 0::"""" -
:Eli;!;!!! 0 ::::; j:55m~
0 u
~~j!o 0 -' ijijG6~ -'
z-,zU Cl g ;t g
.ni~z Z "" zZZ:J:<I)
0 I- uJ ~~~wc I-
..0 <C m :J: OOUI-a: m
;:"ljf 0 ~ I- :l!~~~~ ~
M!ii=~ -' '" 0 '"
........O(u ::E.
i~8= ~~ <>
Do 1:1 -i