SR-417-003-01 (94)
F :\PC D\Share\Cou ncil Reports2002\prefparkM M. doc
Council Meeting: March 5, 2002
ItA
-5..
To:
Mayor and City Council
From:
City Staff
Subject:
Resolution Creating Preferential Parking Zone MM (9th Street between
Pico Boulevard and the Santa Monica Freeway, and Michigan Avenue,
Bay Street, Grant Street, and Pacific Street between Lincoln Boulevard
and 10th Street) and Amending City Council Resolution 9344 CCS
Introduction
This report recommends the adoption of a new preferential parking zone including gth
Street between Pico Boulevard and the Santa Monica Freeway, and Michigan Avenue,
Bay Street, Grant Street, and Pacific Street between Lincoln Boulevard and 10th Street.
Backaround
The neighborhoods near the intersection of Lincoln and Pico Boulevards experience
significant parking problems. The circumstances have become worse over the past few
years, and were further exacerbated when 10th Street between Pico and the Santa
Monica Freeway became a permit parking zone (Zone L/College District). Parking by
students from nearby Santa Monica High School (SAMOHI) is a primary concern In
addition, customer parking from nearby businesses regularly interferes with residents'
ability to park near their homes
In April 2000, residents of the gOO block of Michigan submitted a qualifying petition that
initiated the study process in this neighborhood Residents of the following five blocks
have now completed petitions for preferential parking:
l\~
1',4 -5 2IR
. 900 block of Michigan Avenue (between 9th and 10th Streets)
· 800 block of Michigan Avenue (between Lincoln Boulevard and gth Street)
· 1800 block of 9th Street (between Pico Boulevard and Michigan Avenue)
· 1700 block of gth Street (between Michigan Avenue and the SM Freeway)
· 600/700 block of Bay Street (in the Coastal Zone between 6th Street and Lincoln
Boulevard).
In response to petitions, the Transportation Management Division completed a study of
the area east of Lincoln (both north and south of Pico) and west of Lincoln (south of
Pico to Pacific Street, and west to 4th Street), The area west of Lincoln and south of
Pico is part of the California Coastal Zone. The City has committed not to implement
additional daytime preferential parking restrictions in the Coastal Zone. A study was
conducted of this area, however, as a petition was received from the residents of the
600/700 block of Bay Street and there is a perception that this area is also impacted by
student and commercial parkers, The area east of Lincoln and south of Pico (Bay,
Grant, and Pacific Streets between Lincoln and 10th) has not submitted any petitions but
must be considered because of likely spillover to this area.
Neiqhborhood Parkina Issues
This area is primarily low density multi-family residential, with some single-family
homes, Permit parking regulations stating "No parking Monday-Friday, except by
permit" have existed on ih Street between Pico and Michigan across from the high
school since 1996. (This area just north of Pico is not part of the Coastal Zone) In
addition to parking by high school students, customers from businesses along Lincoln
Boulevard park in the neighborhood Some businesses, in particular U-Haul, park their
vehicles in the gth StreeUMichigan Avenue vicinity. This is illegal, and the Police
Department does ticket this infraction, The Clare Foundation, located on Pico between
")
". and 1c1'...Shet,.............~ _.~ide"..PfQlltamsld.unng daytime
and evening hours. Parking for program participants utilizes available on-street parking,
including the 11 angled spaces on gth Street adjacent to the Clare Foundation.
majority of on-street parking spaces are parallel to the curb in this neighborhood, but the
1800 block of gth Street (between Pico and Michigan) has 51 angled (perpendicular)
parking spaces on the east side of the street adjacent to residences, which increases
the amount of parking available on this block,
Study FindinQs
During the spring of 2001, the area generally bounded by gth Street on the east, Pacific
Street on the south, 4th Street on the west, and the Santa Monica Freeway on the north
was studied to determine parking occupancies and usage. A summary of peak parking
occupancies is included as Attachment C The study demonstrates that parking
occupancies are moderate (greater than 50 percent but less than 85 percent) to high
(greater than 85 percent) The highest parking occupancies are located in the gth and
Michigan vicinity where residents from all four blocks have submitted qualifying
petitions. All four blocks have peak occupancies of greater than 90 percent.
occupancies in the rest of the area are mostly moderate. The peak occupancy for the
petitioning block in the Coastal Zone (600/700 block of Bay Street) was 49%. Saturday
occupancies across the area are also mostly moderate. The 800 block of Michigan
(closest to Lincoln) and the 1800 block of gth Street (closest to Pico) have Saturday mid-
day occupancies of 86 percent and 74 percent, respectively. This demonstrates that
customers visiting businesses on Lincoln and Pico do impact the neighborhood on
Saturday.
3
Community Input
A neighborhood meeting was held on July 17, 2001 No initial staff recommendation
was made at that time due to the complexity of the neighborhood geography, i.e. half of
the neighborhood studied is in the Coastal Zone where the City is unable to implement
additional daytime preferential parking restrictions. Staff explained to residents that it is
difficult to recommend preferential parking restrictions east of Lincoln if restrictions
cannot be implemented west of Lincoln in the Coastal Zone. One of the findings
required by the Municipal Code is that "no unreasonable displacement of non-resident
vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas", Staff was concerned that
preferential parking east of Lincoln would make the parking situation west of Lincoln
much worse. At the meeting, staff learned from residents that the problem around 9th
and Michigan is not just a lack of parking availability but also behavior exhibited by the
Santa Monica High School students, and that a meeting with the high school would be
beneficial. Residents also mentioned that U-Haul vehicles and customers park around
gth and Michigan. Comments from this meeting and e-mails and letters received about
this meeting are summarized in Attachment D.
Meetinq at SAMOHI
A meeting was held at the high school on September 26, 2001 Representatives from
the high school administration, high school students, City of Santa Monica staff and
neighbors were present. The meeting centered around the behavior of the students
who parked on the street, and how it might be improved. Preferential parking around gth
4
and Michigan was not the focus of this meeting, There were two administrative
members of the high school staff present, as well as two high school students, one of
whom represents the student government on the issue of parking, The high school
agreed to have a student government meeting about the behavior of students parking
on the street, and to possibly start a "Club" which deals with this civic issue, and also to
consider having a student "Civic Project" about this issue, The administrators
emphasized that they encourage all of their students to take alternative modes of
transportation to campus and that they do not endorse the idea of students parking on
streets near the school. In fact, the vast majority of students do not drive to school.
The high school will communicate directly with the residents about these programs as
they are developed A November 2, 2001 article from the SAMOHI newspaper is
included as Attachment E
SAMOHI Area Preferential ParkinQ Challenae/Solution
The challenge with this area is how to provide relief to the residents in the gth and
Michigan area who have petitioned, who are surrounded by preferential parking areas
and who have a significant parking problem without making the situation much worse for
the area which is in the Coastal Zone and where the City is unable to implement
daytime regulations. Central to this challenge is one of the findings required by the
Municipal Code: "... no unreasonable displacement of non-resident vehicles will result
into surrounding residential areas", Because staff must make this finding when
recommending a new preferential parking zone, it is not possible to recommend
implementing the entire area that has petitioned for inclusion in a new preferential
5
parking zone. Options include: 1) making a maiority, but not all, of the parking spaces
adjacent to residences eligible for preferential parking, or 2) revisiting the preferential
parking zone on 10th Street (1700/1800 blocks) immediately east of this area and
recommending that some of those spaces be made available for non-resident vehicles
to help stem the shift of parkers which could occur from the 9th/Michigan area into the
Coastal area.
Of the two options, the first (majority of spaces become permit-only spaces) appears to
be the best solution and represents an acceptable compromise. Option 2 (changing the
10th Street zone) would not only make things harder for residents of 10th Street but also
would reduce the number of parking spaces available to the 9th and Michigan residents.
(The 9th and Michigan residents will be able, once they have permits, to use their
permits in a two-block radius and therefore gain additional parking opportunities on 10th
Street).
Staff recommends implementing preferential parking on blocks in the gth and Michigan
area, with the EXCEPTION of the 51 angled (perpendicular) spaces on the east side of
the 1800 block of gth Street. These 51 spaces are approximately 38 percent of the total
spaces that could potentially be utilized for preferential parking over the 4 blocks in the
9th and Michigan vicinity. This would leave these spaces available for non-residents.
More importantly, this would reduce the scale and likelihood of a shift of non-resident
parkers into the southwest area (Coastal Zone).
6
A "test" of this solution was possible due to the fact that the east side of 9th Street has
street cleaning on Friday mornings, and thus students must park elsewhere on Fridays.
(This takes away the approximate number of on-street parking spaces as would
preferential parking.) Staff found that the southwest area increases from an overall 45
percent parking occupancy to 70 percent occupancy on Fridays.
Surveys were subsequently mailed to residents both east and west of Lincoln to get
their opinion of the proposed solution and to determine whether residents in the coastal
area would be interested in nighttime regulations. Residents east of Lincoln (including
residents of the 1800 block of gth Street who are most directly affected) supported by a
2: 1 ratio the idea of excluding the 51 perpendicular spaces from the preferential parking
restrictions, if this were the only way to implement any preferential parking in their
neighborhood. However, some residents of the 1800 block of gth Street are vehemently
opposed to this idea and have commented that they believe this does not solve their
problem and does not address the behavioral issues of the students.
Residents in the southwest area (Coastal Zone) did not see a point in nighttime
regulations, as the parking problem is really a daytime issue. One thing that would
improve the situation in the Coastal Area is to change street cleaning hours to occur
after school, i.e. 3:30pm to 5pm. Many coastal area residents said that parking was
most difficult on street cleaning days (which occur in this neighborhood from 9am-
11 am). Staff, including the Solid Waste Management Division, recommends changing
these hours to 3:30pm to 5pm. This would create more on-street parking during school
7
hours for both students and residents. Overall, the east survey yielded a 19 percent
return, and the west survey yielded a 7.5 percent return. Surveys sent and results from
these surveys are included as Attachment F.
Finally, staff considered the area east of Lincoln and south of Pico which was part of the
study area included in this report. These three blocks (Bay, Grant, and Pacific between
Lincoln and 10th) are bordered on the east by the pre-approved college preferential
parking zone. No petitions have been submitted yet from this area, but this area is a
likely spillover area for non-residents who were parking in the gth and Michigan area.
Furthermore, employees of businesses on Lincoln park on these streets and they have
very limited alternatives besides on-street parking in this area. Customers of these
businesses also utilize the on-street parking.
Again, to make the finding required by the Municipal Code that "no unreasonable
displacement of non-resident vehicles will result into surrounding residential areas," staff
feels unable to recommend pre-approving both sides of Bay, Grant, and Pacific
between Lincoln and 10th for inclusion in a new preferential parking zone. Staff is
therefore recommending that the north side of each block only is pre-approved for
preferential parking. Furthermore, the south (unregulated) side of each block should
have street cleaning times changed to 3:30pm to 5pm. This street cleaning time
change will further minimize the impact of non-resident vehicles moving into the Coastal
Zone west of Lincoln Boulevard,
8
-
The objective of these regulations is to alleviate the parking pressure on residential
streets during the weekdays and still allow flexibility for visitors to the residential and
commercial neighbors on Saturdays, The following area is to be pre-approved for
preferential parking so that the majority of block-to-block spillover associated with the
regulations will be incorporated within the proposed zone. The following regulations are
proposed
1) No parking between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and
two-hour parking between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Saturday, except by permit on
. Michigan Avenue between Lincoln Boulevard and 10th Street,
. 9th Street between the Santa Monica Freeway and Michigan Avenue, and
. 9th Street between Michigan Avenue and Pico Boulevard (west side only).
2) Two-hour parking between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and
two-hour parking between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Saturday, except by permit on:
. Bay Street, Grant Street, and Pacific Street between Lincoln Boulevard and 10th
Street (north sides only).
Staff is unable to recommend any preferential parking regulations for the 600/700 block
of Bay Street, or any other blocks in the Coastal Zone south of Pico Boulevard and west
of Lincoln Boulevard that were a part of the study area covered in this staff report.
BudQeUFiscallmpact
Initially, it is estimated that area residents in the proposed zone will purchase
approximately 500 new permits. This will generate approximately $3,750 in additional
o
~ FiNi01.a$7.-in~mmtMpi~..~"4' ~
TM~dwuiiiMl~M_fj.~~
~ ~~ ;~~~~~~.t-:1 ~)~j >.
TIul ~ ~ _ MtIn ~ 6 . ~ ~ ftiMtl Iii
rKO"It4k#)i iii 1W~IIwiVin<<~~ ~._ ~ II ~ :$1
~ Htil wtNt1h ~ ~ amended IS dafInA IH 1 ~ ~ '"
ftM!~[lGW1IV ~ ~iif~~r~ rr~ ~..
~ ~ .rnfn$raa.'d8nH1l~~M~~~
~r"'l M1 W4~ .. ~t~ mIfij~ irw&tvk1tJ (IffJi! ~ ~ iJtf..
__1IiI~ It_iff'mj._mi!l~ ~ ~
lie e ~ tw ~ IlSffIE "(
~g~~ .~~ijiiJ~~ p~
I*~lne EM ~ ~Ifi ~ II ,.t'Mtc . Wi ~ II Mt ~ ~
9frMt_ rmluds "'~~~~_~iIW
~-
ttli.f'9~ Immti C;lV_
~ iWi ~ ~ ctoatlng Pte'tGrentkW ~ HI - ~
~~'""~ ~ __ tIiBf. EJftfa ~ _ ~
AiilImim RQ.~ lIiiMI_lIi wa ~_batw93m1 ~_~
and 1"" ..'8I'tJ and m~W4 ~ - as ~ lDfi15 mv
Council of the City of Santa Monica Re-Establishing Various Preferential Parking
Zones) by replacing Exhibit A.
2. Approve the revenue budget adjustment outlined in this report,
Attachments:
A
B
C
D
E
F
Resolution Establishing Preferential Parking, Exhibit A-
Preferential Parking Zones
Vicinity Map
Parking Occupancy Summary
Summary of Comments from/re: Neighborhood Meeting
SAMOHI Newspaper Article (electronic version not available)
Surveys and Survey Results
Prepared By:
Suzanne Frick, Director of Planning and Community Development
Lucy Dyke, Transportation Planning Manager
Beth Rolandson, Senior Transportation Planner
Ruth Harper, Transportation Planning Associate
11
ATTACHMENT B
s:
4-
4
<D
lI.I
I'&ult It
~._r
N
3
.
I
~~~:--.
~.....
s. ~.
::! III
III ~~4\\ 'ic ,
~~ :P.
~ ~'> 8'glnft
~~X'ool ~ (7 (7 (7
~ ~I i,".' i
..... :;00
IV.
'0 "tl ,'( 0."0
~ ~~;, Ii =. ! ,I "'I.
-In I
k;; inu,1
C~",
l'iN""'.NN""''''''~''''''''''~~~..NNN'''''.N'''''W~_wl'..lo~
0/ 011 0 0 ~ ~ . NO ~ ~ 011 "'" W WN W ~ ..... N . ~ N ,"",
j~ 0
~ ,. ,.. II .. .. ;: ~,. .. .. ,.. "l ;: III ;: " .. .. ;; . ;: .. iii po ~ "l1.....I.,.
F~tj.OII.W.~W.OII~.~.N~~WGW.~...I-~
)'
"1
1111!Ig
8.0
Iii
"'"
8
i ill~'J'~ !dl ~ ~
illllfl ~I[ II
f~$- t 'I' 181 Ii
If 1 11, I. ~~./111. flI,
8(1,1, i I
iii
N
o
o
~ ,"
s'"
Ii
,. g?
iil
c .; !.
K~>i:;: ,.0......0
~~~~~aap~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~IN '4
~ 011... UI O' . ... 0 01 co' . . . "'" CD . .~.. ... . 011 rpl ... .~
OIINOWUl "'~OI~ ~OI""OII ~.........~ ~ . :I
. .
flj ,.,
. "'" . ell . ocl. CD N "'" N "'" . "'" ""'OIl .. . UI .... .'
:Gbb~b~~~-..o~e~~~:=~!=ba~b~1
"
11ft i
CD
<
III
..,
Q,
E.
~
(")
2.
~
OJ
o
r::::
CD
<
III
..,
Q,
en
-
r::::
Q,
,<
)>
..,
(1)
III
. ~~~~a~~~.~~~~~t~*~~~I.~~
t:~'~ ~ ~ ~ #. ~ '#. '#.~ .,. "#. "#. "#. '#. ~ '#. ~ '#. '#.'#.'" . ~ '#. ~
."~
.~~~~..~"l...~g~R~1l.~ti~~8..:~i~
ie,..,
.. (..,......
i : -. "'" 0 0 N "'" 0... "'" "'" 0 "'" 0 0 "'" 0 0 "'" . "'" 0..0 "'" i.
,;: b ~ s ;;r;;r &SI i' g g ai ~ tg !! !s 111 .~. . I. ~. 'ili. .:...1
- ...
".' -
I ,4) ~
I;: ai II ~ 8 ~ ij~. ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ i 8 I e a ! I t II ~ ;tIll
L,'; ";
. ,.
~'i 011 "'" ~ . 011 ..' ... .W "'" "'" "'" m at 011 01 ~ . .N . . UI ell ... OlIN, ~
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~tg~~~~;.~~~t~t
,_,"
n
~
o
....
en
III
~
-
III
3:
o
~
n'
III
n))
:S"-t
~ -t
::l))
))n
I %
cS:
... m
-. z
=-1
N
an
-.
o
~
Qo
o
c
..
~
...
-.
o
~
))
~
~
~
fn
-.
fn
("') n
;:::;:
'< ::r
0 A)
- .,
en ..
III
:::::I m
-
. III
fJ) :s:
III 0 0
e- :::::I
g. n' n
'<:: III n
~ c
c;l:
g. "0
'<:: A)
s~ I :s
::E >< n
lJl 3' '<
~ c:
03 I :r:-
8 0 -.'
-5 8 I :s
~ -5 A)
~ ~ -
~ '<
en
-.
00 en
cO>
'#.'*'
~",~,jJ'I'SJli'f~i~jJiJji~
~~i~li'lllJlj~l~~J'JJji'j5~
-a
n'
o
OJ
o
l:
CD
<
III
...
c..
r=
:::::I
n
2-
:::::I
OJ
o
l:
CD
<
III
...
c..
en
-
l:
c..
'<
)>
...
(1)
III
n~~ u~ i n I I~U ~II ~ ~!~nir ~
!!~ li~I..I,1 IIU .'.- ~ pi. ; i
H mll"R · 1 I '. I I~ I I
'0 "tl g ::I:r 'II f I j
~"~ I . . ~J i ! i 1 i ., ·
: i III, II !i I r
-
,lI NI~ L' '"1''' ... G>> ~ .... N!::l ~. Gila UlN ...
cD e c:..I~.li
:~ i:lr.!"""'~ ~ ~ N ~'.~ lo.l
.~ -I...... 0 C; ....... : - ...~
.
i ...: .~! ej
.. '-' I ~ .... I L' !!!!'
.. ~I~~;..':"'l .
.... OIto.--"':"I"" _w
.
...- ... ... L" L.N
:. ... ~ !Cl !" pi . . ~!lII
011 CJl .... QI.g ... ... ...
f"
i'....
~ff-:.:
...1.. NIL,....
i: i!!!' ....~..:"l
N 1 :w ..
.. ....!!!!' ... ~ 4&1
N!D .'~ .... .
. .......
,,/. a ...,.., I. hi .~ N
'.: ~:.. ~ ~ li:lt; fj ~ :
H'
;..
:IUtf=. i ~ ;~"u I.
~ biG
I 'I' J .JJ!I '# '# ..'#
/'
; ;1; 'J~ Ili__5
.,.
I ~ ~ ... ~ 'I
j NI ~ (ii C :: m Ul : ~
! ;~ Ii
SI! IUI", ... ....
E ~I"" .-
t
.~
~.. ~I ~ e; :'" !:II !:I :""
FJ" C at 01'"
,.-
,,< .
G :""1:"" ~ -I!:I :-" :"''''!:I~
, " i 11
-
i l~ e ~1~J.lli
.
" Q g - :: ~ "'111!d~
is ~!:l wIGl~I!1 ~I~
'i.'
~ ~e:i: C ~~91~ ...I~ ..
--l QJ......
t' ... at - · L '
II .~ is! ...,_
· :. -, i
-- -
I
ft
I
...
.r
I
"'C
C"l
o
OJ
o
c:
CD
<
III
...
Q,
r
::J
C"l
o
::J
OJ
o
c:
CD
<
III
...
Q,
en
r+
c:
Q,
'<
)>
...
CD
III
J n ,
;+
I '<
C)
-.,
en
AI
:, .1
~.
CJ
I -'" .
~'"
C)
:,
. (;'
i CJ
I
-
r
,.
r
I
N
:I:
Ill. f
iiHI
~
'tJ
.1
i
.II
II
"tI
(i'
o
OJ
o
c
(jj'
<
III
-,
CL
;:::
:::s
(")
2-
:::s
OJ
o
c
(jj'
<
AI
..,
c..
en
...
c
c..
'<
)>
-.
1'1)
CJ
A TT ACHMENT D
Comments from Neighborhood Meeting
Tuesday, July 17, 2001
Preferential Parking Options for Lincoln Blvd.lPico Blvd. Area
Bay Street meters affect occupancy on street
Students should take bus or bicycle to campus
· Staggered midday no-parking could help
10th Street preferential parking regulations impact parking on gth Street
Santa Monica High School needs more parking
· Parking problem is during day when high school is open
· 9th Street north of Michigan needs the same regulations as south of Michigan
· U-Haul vehicles and customers park on gth Street and Michigan
· Should implement perpendicular parking on gth Street north of Michigan
· Use the Civic Center parking lot for students
High school needs to be involved: possible shuttle from nearby area
· 6th and Pacific and Grant: area affected by high school
· gth and Michigan have night problems associated with U-Haul
· Beach parking shuttle for the high school students
· Development hasn't provided enough parking
· Make streets to school safer for pedestrians and bicyclists
Pay students not to drive with an incentive, not necessarily monetary
Bay Street east of Lincoln (800/900 block) a lot of non-resident parking (some
associated with motel)
· Students won't cooperate with programs or enforcement
· Concerned about spillover on 5th Street south of Bay
· Solution for problem is to find parking for students
· Preferentic:ll parking is difficult on residents
Students won't respond to penalties
· CLARE (gth and Pico) has night meetings and take up all the parking
· Auto shop on Michigan uses street for overflow parking
· Lincoln Blvd. business refer customers and employees to park on 9th and Michigan
· Day laborers do auto work on 9th and Michigan
· Signs on Michigan for trucks; can't see them
· OPTION: community and city together speaks with school to discuss problem
School board needs to be aware of the problem
· Pacific/6th resident: should have an idea from HS how many drivers there are
· Fees from preferential parking should be used to offset costs with new parking, a
direct correlation
· Preferential parking regulations on only some spaces on 9th Street
· 2 hour parking even in coastal zone
· Residences should have enough parking on site for residents
2 hour parking only (without permits) would be bad for residents
· Students want to drive to campus
· Need to pressure High School, students and parents to act
· Grant and 6th: the road narrows and it is a safety issue
. 9th Street is squeezed by regulations on 10th Street and ih Street
· Parking occupancies in the coastal zone should be higher than data shows
. 9th Street residents should be able to park on 10th Street
Letters and E-mails and written comments received regarding;
Preferential Parking in Lincoln Boulevard/Pico Boulevard Area
· Support Preferential Parking (11)
· Preferential Parking in this area is not needed (6)
· Preferential Parking will reduce chaos from S.M.H.S. students (5)
Building a parking structure would be a better alternative rather than Preferential
Parking (2)
· Preferential Parking should be limited to weekdays from 8am to 4pm (2)
· These restrictions will create problems in neighboring areas (2)
· Restrict parking on gth street in the evening hours only so as not to impact beach-
goers and discourage college students
Work with high school, find a mutual agreement and encourage carpooling or
public transportation for students, teachers, volunteers
· Orposed to further Preferential Parking city-wide
· 5t Street just south of Pacific should be included
· 4th Street should be added as well
· Instead of Preferential Parking in area would rather see height restrictions to
discourage people from living in their various vans/recreational vehicles
\u
\--
;2
'u
~
:t'
~
~
~
I........ - . ~ ~ E .~ j'~ a ~ ! 1 ~ t.t 1 ~ j i ~ j g ~ :~ ~! ] ]
. ~ ~ ~ So ~ ] ~ ~ ! ~ ! ~ ~ "i .~ ~ ~ J j ~ :E :~ ~ ~ ~ ] -
.~ ] ": 1 ~ E oS ] .~ 0 -5 's ~; . ti Jt en i ~ b ~ ~ ~ j ~ <U
.. ~ ~ ~ :g :u ~ ~ ~ ~ ! '0 ~:E c.a ~ ~ ~.. :.s ~ ~; 8.. .: .9
.IJ' < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < 'e' ~ =' ~ u ~ ~ -g 5 .~ ~ j '0] i.! 5'.s al 1 ~
.. :E 1 ~ i ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l ~ t ~ ] ; ~ JI g =.8~ ] ~:~
. uo~~-~ ~ ~5u~~~~ ~~>~gSC~9u. ~
'-'.......... -g: ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ i ~ ~ ~]'5 'e-l>>j ~ ~ ~ is ~ .:: ! ~ 'ill ~ ~ .'5!~ 'B
_ <u a -5 >> ~ - ~ ~ ~.9 till >>~ .. Q Y t:Q .. .. ~ ~ ~ z.~ .s
.. ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ < g.! E:a 11 .9 < ~.~ I". 'E .o!: e::; ~ ~
... ~!5 ~ b 1 ~ ~ 8 i] !."i 8.] ~ 3 ~ ~. ~ ~ ! 1 :~ ~ ~ .~
C.'... .l ~ ~ j ], H. ~ ~ ~ i:~ ] ': ~ ~ ~ i ~ l' ! i ~ 'i ! .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i.. . ~ j ~ 11 ~ 1 ~ i~ i E ! 1 ~ ~ ~] ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .: g .~ ~
,h P ~H ~ itis{llA j ~ 'H ~'t j!r -= ~~.:l H
:';; i_I ~_. ~ j!~ i ~ls h i I Hi i ~i.1i'i HI H 6]
a ~= ~~~~
"'1 i! ~.. j ~ ~.~ ~
-ddl ~ 1H1
-H !:f
- il .Bl
.}5' i-:
- i:; I.
. I I;'.
^ -
.:~ :;.: li~
~- .0 i j;a
.~: i ~-c]
::. " ::ll,~.' .J.
~ .-.fl .
'.~~ J.~I~t 1!
~.I' .......~. . '..'..1."1.'
;:. .... -.."~'~. 'f~~i'
:~'. --.u. :I
. ^ ;. .~ 8< 0
~gdl ~ itll~~.St~ ~ lIE'
" "Ie. l ~ j .~:~-oll j:.J ~.a-];, s !
'.~ '.. ;.; oS; .-!; Q ~ '6 &.2 . ~ !c.;!
, __. !:. ~ . R eo Q >> U li f.'. ~
k: &.: ~ ,5 -! ,3 '=, <( E -e -- ::.: ....
_ i HtlH Un;j8t~l~
~ ~ j i 8 ~ !i :E > ~ ~ ! ;. ~ ~ 1 i' -:
~. ! ihHH~I-uiHnht~ii
Ii _ ~w~~~~ Y ~~~._"M YU
:Q
r
.-d S ..! e c: :
.... .- ftt P u.~_
u -= >>..:: "d 0
ClO~<.tllla ~
.9u~~u>o
.c U .; '1: =
"'~"'~E<U";
2 ::l: ....
o 0 oil ~ '"
--~"'<
_~ 1 :g i'.c u
~.... ~] ~a
u .:5 >> <U u.. _
li .g~ u .= tIO.!C
U -50=
~ ... .... i.;g
u !!. ~ fJ) la'
!. '5 it.., Q.
'" .tJ .5' _
. :-"i;f!r
~ =.::I'~ '.
..-:&-.Q. ',;,... :
! 1I'1-.~
is bl" ...
__.s 1 !.'"
:. ~ i a !I~:
I;; ,!hi
i~ ~'illi":
~1~ ~ j ;J:~
I u 1:- l,- .~:I.;
-5 till.... ~ ~:s
fA ] 5 ... ~ 0
;_~ ~u ~ oil.g'!
~ >. ~ >>.!l .5 .- >.
..~]~..Iolll.tJ
~~u<ue:a~l
s:;; .. .- ~ I:l
o ~ -= c5 .9 .. .g
.. U -.::l _ '-'R .'
.~ ~ ; <U ~ e .;;
"'.. ~ -.::l'" I'
:= ~ ~.~ C3 8..!:!
: '-'0 0 ~ _ &::
.. C) c"'O ....... <<S ...." U
~ ,&l ._ .' >
,_ u u -g = ~ _
~a-5", uS.c
ATTACHMENT F: SURVEYS SENT
o.ctober 15, 2001 Preferential Parking Survey-Residents east of Lincoln (north & south of Pico)
The City of Santa Monica would like your help in gathering information about parking in your
neighborhood and what type of regulations you feel would best meet your area's needs. The
Transportation Management Division would like to recommend preferential parking regulations which
would provide some relief to residents east of Lincoln without unduly affecting the quality of life for
residents west of Lincoln who live in the Coastal Zone, where the City is unable to implement any
new daytime parking restrictions.
We are considering recommending preferential parking restrictions in your neighborhood which would
EXCLUDE the parking spaces on the east side of the 1800 block of 9th Street between Pico
Boulevard and Michigan Avenue which are perpendicular to the curb. All other parking spaces
adjacent to residences would be included. Residents with permits are allowed to park on blocks
within a two-block radius of their homes that are also designated for preferential parking.
As always, preferential parking will be implemented only on blocks that have submitted completed
petitions after the City Council approves any restrictions. Regulations can be implemented on
additional blocks as complete petitions are received. Only residents would be able to purchase
permits, which cost $15 each per year.
Please complete and return this survey by Wednesday, October 31 to:
City of Santa Monica, Transportation Management Division
By mail: Room 115, PO Box 2200, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2200 or by fax: 310/576-9170
Name
Phone
Address
Unit #
1
2,
3,
4
5.
October 15, 2001
Preferential Parking Survey-Residents west of Lincoln and south of Pico
The City of Santa Monica would like your help in gathering information about parking in your
neighborhood. As you are likely aware, you reside in the Coastal Zone of California. The Coastal
Commission has indicated they are unwilling to consider any additional daytime parking restrictions
within the Coastal Zone. The Transportation Management Division would like to recommend
preferential parking regulations which would provide some relief to your neighbors east of Lincoln
(who have submitted qualifying parking petitions) without unduly affecting your quality of life.
We are considering recommending preferential parking restrictions for areas east of Lincoln. These
restrictions would EXCLUDE 51 parking spaces on the east side of the 1800 block of 9th Street
between Pico Boulevard and Michigan Avenue which are perpendicular to the curb. Effectively, this
means that these spaces would still be available to the general public.
We would like to know if you would be interested in nighttime restrictions in your neighborhood.
As always, preferential parking will be implemented only on blocks that have submitted completed
petitions after the City Council approves any restrictions. Regulations can be implemented on
additional blocks as complete petitions are received. Only residents would be able to purchase
permits, which cost $15 each per year.
Please complete and return this survey by Wednesday, October 31 to:
City of Santa Monica, Transportation Management Division
By mail: Room 115, PO Box 2200, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2200 or by fax: 310/576-9170
Name
Phone
Address
r .rUR U
fill" .1' 1
Unit#
6. If city staff are only able to recommend preferential parking restrictions during the evening hours,
would you support preferential parking on your block? (mark one)
DYes
o No
7. If yes, what do you think are the best (evening) hours of regulations for your street? (mark one)
o 6pm to 10pm
o 6pm to midnight
o Other (please indicate hours)
8. If yes, what do you think are the best days of regulations for your street? (mark one)
o Monday through Friday
o Monday though Saturday
9. Currently, is there one particular weekday on which you find it harder to park near your home?
(mark one)
o Yes (please indicate which weekday)
o No
Additional comments:
:
11> I , "
I .... 'laa NIl . . ~... ~
/'
1700 I x x x X
X X X X X
X X X X X ~
X X X X "
I X X X X X
1700 I X X X " X
170011 " X X " X PIt er'
1700 ~ X " X " X N ..-.
7001 X X X X "
1700 I X X X X "
1700l x . X X X "
:700 I X X " X "
" " X X " ,
" - " X X
SIMIIII 14 0 I II II 3 10 I .
-,
1100 . X X X " "
1100 . X X " " X
" ~.......,..... ""'"'._
1100 . " " " " IIIIIIIIl
111IO X " " X "
" " " " "
" " II X "
" X X X X Hat ........
" X II " X
" X } " " "
X . " X ~ 1_......._......
X X " " "
x X " X "
X X X " X .
X " X X "
.............- ".........
1 " " X " " ---
1100'. x " " X "
. HI.............. ",...-..
X II X x. II ..
" " X X X
" x X X HB__
/ X X X X X
11 2 12 . 12 I 16 6 . ..
100 x X X X X
X " X X X
100 x X X .. X X .........-.....
lICIO x X X X X NIt...., ..... ....,...
SIMIIII 3 1 . f 1 3 2 2 1 a
.....: .. 3 211 13 . 20 20 17 . '"
X X X X X ~
X X X " X
" X X x i< .--
X
X .~ X X X
100 " X X X x WIrIIiIII__lM"""'lI -....
- x X x X x
100 X " x " x
x X X " " -
100 I.... X X X X Il
8lIO X x X " X ~
,. X X X X . X j,"'
.. " " X X x
100 X X X X X .'
X X " " 1OItUS__.~.
-
X X X X X --
12 .. 11 .. 7 I 7
.
100 .... X X .X X "
~--.... .....In..'..
100 ... x X " X. x ...., .
~ ~........!!" .........~..
X " X X " ......
X. X X X "
X X " X " .
X X X x
"""1!IIlIll:t ..
x " .X X X
X -
lICIO " X -...
1';, 1_, II .. II 2 5 1 2 S 2 II
x II X " ~
x x x
X X X X X
X X " X X . . .
.....,......... -hill
... X X X " -
x x X X
.x ,
x . .... ... .
" X " X " .. -
X " " X
.. . S 2 . 1 S 3 I 3
11O'rAL SI 11 41 21 :rr 21 . 31 40 at
10 " " x " X ~ .....
10 X " x x "
" X X " .
, .
a 11l :~.'.'~.l!l~'a...~.a.. u: .t.I.IAI :!:..* 1Il11 !S.III~.U. M. !:! !IlIllllfillS lUll" II !:! II ;il I 0:. ~.~. 0:': 0:;0; ".1.11__. ....0. J "...,(oI[Nt....... I
it 1111118 8111~ll.~.I'1.1~il.... IJI1~'I~~,t~II~J~I~ fllfl ifltlRliiIJi[
&;! nUl iiI 11.llll1fU ~....... "'mTi1iTfTi1rl~
~ M M M M. .. M M M 1IC M N. _ Mi.. M M M M II Ii
CIl M M M
CIl M M M
f I~ rr r I
I .
,
.
CD M M M MM M M
-
0. M 1IC MMM
~M M M M M M M M MM M M M M M M M M M M
.
MM MM MM lICMMNMlICMMM~NMf
r:
!
lICM
~
1IC 1IC
.
M
'I ' ,I
loll
I
1IC
M
1IC M
.:
I
:~ .J.[, ,.,.c
~. ~~, ~r ..
I
'..
p ~ i I ~I' ~
I' I:"
. '.
I ' ,
NlIClIClIC)c MM
CIl
It I
>' I e-
MlIC)C NlICM )C 1IC MMlIClIC )eM 1IC1IC M 1IC )C
I f
I l
~ 5
i I
!'
t
i '0;
.
iq! ,.,.i.. , J'lil
51 I! I! .
I~ I J ~I I
II.' ,'. I.! ~ I-
~I I I. ~ ~
j- I -i
II I
I
I'i
-I
I I
, .~I
J i
II
'i
1.1
r
;
:
,
;
.
I.
i -
I
I
I
I .
I.
-.1
,