Loading...
SR-8B (25)LUTM:P$:DKW:DB/ta002cc.pcword.plan Council Mtg: June 29, 1393 ~+~ J ~: ~~ ~. -_ , s .:ti Santa Monica, California TO: Mayor and City Cauncil FROM: City Staf~ SUBJECT: Zone Change 92-002, Specific Plan Amendment 92-001, Initial Study 93-003 for the properties located on the north side of Broadway between Twentieth and Twenty-Third Streets Applicant: Saint John's Hospital and Health Cen~er , INTRODUCTION This report recommends that the City Council approve Zone Change (ZC) 92-002 and Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 92-001 ta change the Official Districting Map ~ar the north side of Sroadway between 20th and 23rd Streets from C4 (Highway Cammercial) to CP-3 (Commercial Professional) and ta amend th~ Hospital Area Specific P1an to include these parc~ls within the Specific Plan area. Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Qual.ity Act {CEQA}, ~his report also recommends approvaZ of Initial. Study 93-003 and N~gativ~ Daclaration for the proposed application. On May 19, 1993, the Planning Commission vo~ed 4-0 on a rmotion to approve the applicatian and associated Negata.ve Declaration, with one abstention and two absenc~s. BACKGROUND Appl.icatian Description The applicant fi~ed SPA 92-001 and ZC 92-Q02 an December 23, 1992. Included in the application is a petition szgned by ov~r 50 Santa Monica res~dents in support of the proposal. Although - 1 - ~ ~ Ei:'' : u«. .. ~ no application has been submitted for a developmant in association with the proposed amendments, the applicant stated in a letter to staff that "order~y expansion of health care faciZities for Saint Jahn's Hospital requires the inc~usion of its property and similarily~situated property within the Haspital Area Speci£io Plan (HASP) and the CP Zone." (Attachment A.) S~veral parcels and portions af parcels on the north side of Broadway between 2~th and 23rd Streets would changa from a C4 District designation to a CP~3 ~istrict designation i~ the proposal is adopted by the City Council. This area is between l00 and 150 feet in depth from the Broadway street fronta~e, encompasses a total of 106,844 square feet, and is b~sected by 21st Streat, as shown in the plans contained in Attachment N. Most af the affected parc~ls are utiilized for sur£ace parking. A port'lon of a G~neral Telephone sw~tching stat~on~ an 8-story senior housing building, two one-story office structures, and two 1-story residential duplexes are also contained on the subject parcels. The affected ar~a is surrQUndad by a number of different Land Us~ Districts, including CP-3 (Commercial Professional), R3 {Medium Density Multiple Family Residential), BCD (Broadway CommerciaZ)~ C4 (Highway Commercial), and C5 (Special Office) Districts, as shown in the ~vllowing table: _ 2 - Direction Relative Land Us~(s) Zoning to Applicatian Site NQrth Parking structures, surface CP-3, R3 parking lots, medical of~ices, a portion of an 8-story senior housing project, a portion Qf a GTE switching station, and a multifamily building South MGM Plaza offices acrass C5 Broadway East 2-story ~edical offices C4 West 1-story retail structure across Twentieth 5treet BCD CEQA Status The propased Spec~fic Plan Amendment and Zone Change does n~t qualify for a categorical exemption under the City of Santa Moni- ca Guidelines for the Implementation of tha California Enviran- mental Quality Act (CEQA). An Initia~ Study Checklist and pro- posed Negative ~eclaratian were prepared for which the 3a-day comment period end~d on April lg, 1993. No comm~nts were received. Tf the City Council approves the application and adopts a Negative Declaration, a certified Negative Decla~ation will be prepared and a Notice of Determinatian will be filed with the County Clerk. A copy Qf the Initia~ Study Checklist and pro- posed Negative Dec~aration are included in Attachment B. - 3 - ANALYSIS Land Use and Density Implica~ians of the Praposed Specific Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change The area proposed for rezoning was included in the original Study Area €or the Hospital Area Specific Plan (HASP), as shown in At- tachment C. However, it was not included in the area recommen- ded for rezaning within the HASP, as shown in Attachment D. Per the HASP, the parcels currently under revie~r urere nat re~oned te CP-3 and therefore remain part of the C4 District. The propvsal would result in a madification of the Official F3is- tricting Map to shaw "CP-3" rathar than C4 f~r the affected par- cels, and a modification of Maps I5 and 16 of the HASP to show tha subject parcels as re2oned to "CP" designations rather than the current C4. No change to the text of the Zoning Ordinance or the text of the HABP is proposed. A maximum FAR of 1.5 applies to the subject C4-zaned parcels as af the time of this hearing date. However, based on the Coun- cil~s action on June 15, 1993, the FAR for the C4-zoned parcals over 7,50z square feet is substan~ially lower than 1.5 for proj- ects without a residential component. The one change with regard to permitted usas in the C4 District will be that residentia]. ~nixed-use projects will not require a Performance Standards Permit. The proposal wou~d resu7.t in a change to the uses permitted an the subject parcels. The current C4 designation allows general - 4 - retail, office and automobile-serving uses (SMMC Sections 9.04.08.22.02~-050}. The proposed CP-3 d~signation would primarily allow medica~-related uses, including medical-related retail uses, medical affice uses, hospitals, and "affices and meeting raoms far charitable, youth and welfare organizations." It is difficult ta characterize the change in permitted uses in terms of intensity, as the permitted uses are different in character. The proposa]. would a~low restaurants of any size by right, whereas the current zoning requires a CUP far any res- taurant af more than 50 seats; it would eliminate drive-in, drive-through, take-out and fast-food restaurants as possible uses an the subject parcels; it wauld eliminate service stations and autamobile dealerships as possible uses on the subject par- cels; and it would a~law residential uses by right (or with a Perforn~ance standards Permi~ if part of a mixed use project}, whereas the C4 designation allows residentia~ projects anly if a Performance Standards Permit is abtained. (Ordinance ~635{CCS), which is effective until August 14, 1993, allows residential uses in a~l cammercial districts without requiring a Performance Stan- dards Permit.) The proposal would not resu~t in any new nonconforming uses. The surface parking which occupies most of the parcels requires a Conditional Use Permit under both the C4 and CP-3 designatians if it is nat on the same parcel as tha building which utiZizes the parking. The portion af the General Telephone switching station would remain a 1ega1 nancon€flrming use, the senior housing and - 5 - dup~exes wauld become conforming us~s, and the medical office ~ses wou~d xemain conforming us~s. With ane exception, the maximum permitted tloar area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 would remain intaet if the zoning designatian is changed to CP-3 as proposed. The exception would be the provision of the CP-3 Section which states that parking structures have no limit on the number of stories and, if develaped with "at least half of the spaces... provided to address an existing parking space de- ficiency or [to replace] existing parking," no maximum FAR shall apply but the maximum heiqht must not exce~d the maximum of A5 feet parmitted in the District (SMMC Sections 9.04.08.30.03D~a] and [b]), For all types of deveLopment, th~ proposed change wou~d result in an increase in the maximum height from 2 ta 3 stories and from 30 feet to 45 feet. The pr~posal wou~d also result in a required minimum front yard setback of 20', whereas the current C4 desig- nation does not have a frant yard setback requirement ather than a Zandscaped area eq~al to 1.5 times the street frontage. The change in development standards wauld create a nonconforming f~ont yard ~etback for th~ one-story medical affice buildings and residential duplexes wh~ch are located on three parcels fronting 23rd Street an the eastern edge of the area proposed f~r a zon~ chang~, and for the GTE switching station which fronts Broadway on the subject area's western edga. The 8-story senior housing pxoject wouZd r~main nonconforming as to height. It is nat knawn whether the GTE switching statian exceeds 45' 3n height, but it _ 6 - does appear to exceed 30', which wauZd mean it is aurrently nan- confvrming as t~ height. ~bjections Four written objections to the proposal have been received. Ruth Blaom wrote ~hat she opposes ~he Zone Chanqe because it will result ir~ increas~d traffic and reduced parking on Broadway. (Attachment E.) However, with the proposed Zone Change, the maximum FAR is the same for all uses except some parking struc- tures, so it is nat anticipated that the iinpact of the change on circulation voiumes would be different than existing zoning. In that it provides an incentive ta construct parking structures which address an exist~.ng parking deficiency, the proposed Zone Change may actually reduce the demand for street parking on Braadway. Zrwin Zeke Warsaw wrate with a number of concerns relating to tha property Qwned by Saint John's Hospital but not directly re~ated ta the proposed Zone Change. Mr. Warsaw requested a file from staff for 220D Santa Manica Boulevard, an addrass for which no pZanning file exists. He inq~ired regarding the construction of a sma~l parking booth, for which a17, required building permits were obtair-ed after re~iew by the Parking and Traffic Division. Mr. Warsaw s~ates that the 2001 Broadway address used by staff far ths Zone Change fi~e is "incorrect"; however, this number was chosen far reference purposes because it f.s the lawest numbered addr~ss alang Broadway propased for a zone change. Mr. Warsaw - 7 - furth~r states that an Environm~ntal Impact Report shauld be re- quired for the propased zone cha~ge, whereas the City has pre- pared an Initial Study Check~ist and, after review by th~ City Environmental Review Committee, has prapared a draft Negative Declaration which was notic~d in the outlook and made available for public comment £or the required 3D days (no public comment was reaeived). Mr. Warsaw also questioned the inv~~vement of a Planning Commissioner an this application, an issue which was referred ta the City Attorney's affice. The applicant has met with Mr. Warsaw to discuss his concerns. On May 19, 1993, the day of the Plan~ing Commission public hear- ing an this matter, staFf received further corraspondence from Mr. Warsaw. (Attachment E.) This correspondence contained a request far a written response ta his previous correspandence, and a request that the proposal be contznued from the May 19 agenda. Staff respanded the same day with a 3ettar explaining to Mr. Warsaw that his concerns had been addressed in several oral cammunications with staff and in the Planning Commission staff report, and that the Planning Commission was the anly bady with the authority to continue the item. Mr. Warsaw attended the Planning Commiss3an hearing and reiterated his position. However, the Planning Commission did not find that Mr. Warsaw's comp~aints warranted any changes to the propasal. on June 9, 1993, staff mailed Mr. Warsaw further correspandenoe regarding the application, informing him of the scheduZed City Council date, expZaining the proc~ss for reviewing fzles, and - 8 - explaining how to get a copy of the City Counci~ staff report and appraximat~Zy when it wauld become available. A letter was also received from Malcom H. Levin, who is President of the 1440 23rd Street H~meowner's Association~ a condominium building in the R3 District to the nor~h of a portion af area proposed for a Zone Change. Mr. Levin reiterated Mr. Warsaw's concerns, adding a concern rela~ing ta the proposal's impact on "traffic, noise, excess ligh~ing, public safety, and other re- Iated matters" affecting the residential units at 1440 23rd Street. Mr. Levin attended the Planning Commission pubZic hear- inq and has reviewed the Planning Commission staff report and its discussion of the land use and density imp~ications of the pra- pasa~. Staff has also responded to his questians by telephone and infornied him of the City Council public hearing date and the methad far obtaining a copy of the City Council staff report. On June 7, 1993, the applicant met with Mr. Levin to discuss his concerns. The Mid-City Neighbors Assoeiation Board of Directors has voted to oppose Saint Jahn's appl~catian. Their May 19, 1993 Zetter to the Planning Commission sta~es that they do not object ta the future construction of a parking garage on the parcel (which is not proposed at this time), but ~hat they believe that "the con- cept af rezoning the property simply because it has been acquired by St. Jahn's represent~ bad public policy and sets a potentially dangerous precedant." (Attachment E.) The applicant has met with representatives of the Mid-City Neighbors Association. _ g _ General Plan and Specitic Plan Conforntance The praposed change to Maps 15 and 3.5 of the HASP and the pra- posed redistricting are consistent with the goals and objectives aontained in both the General. Plan and the HASP. By allowing increased area for the construction of hospitals and other madical-reZated uses, as we11 as allowing a density incentive far the construction af parking which addresses existing parking de- ficiencies in th~ vicinity, the proposal is consistent with Ob- ~ective 1.13 of the Land Use and Girculat~.on Element (LUCE), which states the fallowing: Recognizing the importance of the City's hospitals to the cammunity and the value oP their aervices to the residents of Santa Monica and thase in surrounding areas, the Land Use Elament acknowledges the hospitals need to expand and accommodates future growth of hospitals and health care €acilities whi~e minimizing harmful effects on surraunding residential neighborhoods. LUCE Policy 1.13.1 further stipulates that the City shall adopt a Specific Plan far the area around the City's two hospitals, and Po~icy 1.13.3 establishes the policy of providing a density incentive for the construction of parking which addresses exist- ing parking deficiencies in the area. The HASP was adopted on Sept~mber 2'7, 1988. The proposed changes are consistent with the statement on page 30 of the HASP which states that "some residents, hospital officials and organized n~ighborhood groups of the area have expressed a preference that parcel rezanings facus St. John's Hospital development sauth of Santa Manica Bou~evard," which inc~udes the area now propasad for rezoning and which is more predominantly - 10 - comm~rcial than the area to the north of Santa Monica Baulevard. Mast af the area currentZy praposed for rezoninq i~ owned by St, John'~ Hospital. As it wou~d allow expanded hospital-related development in an area more predominant~y commercial than the area ta tha north of Santa Manica BouZevard, the proposal is consistent with objective ~ af the HASP Land Use E~ement which states that land us~s shall "ensure that development in tha hospital area balances the need for medical facilities and uses while protecting residential uses in the area.~' The proposal is alsa consistent wi~h Circulation EZement abjective i3 of the HASP, which states that the City shall "protect the anviranmant of 1oca1 res~dential streats by minimizing the intrusian of non-residentiaZ vahicular traffic and parking into residentia~ neighborhoods.~~ HASP C~xculation ~lament ~b~ective 26 states that Saint John's Hospital Centex and Health Center shall~ within five years, provide parking spaces ta eliminate any parking defici~ncy discussed in the Hospital Area Specific Plan of 1988. Spac~s shall be pronided within 500 feet of the Health Center campus. By ar before five y~ars of the adoption of the HASP, the Health Center shall submit docu- mentation that deficiencies have baen eliminated. Failure to meet this o~jective sha11 be a coasideratian in City review of Health Center development applications. 5aznt John's Haspital has nat submitted a d~velopment p~oposal to address existing parking deficiencias or an eva~uation of exist- ing parking def iciencies with this application. The 5-year deadline wi11 not be reached u~til September 27, 1993. - 11 ~ Conclusion The proposed Zone Change and Specific Plan Amendment is consis- tent with the objectives of the General P~an and Hospita~ Area Specific Plan. By allowing a density incentive for the provision af new parking spaces which address existing parkinq deficiencies at Saint John's Hospital and Health Center, by allowing an expan- ded area in which to construct new parking intended to be uti- Iized by the Health Center campus, and by allawing increased op- portunities for medical uses in the primarily commercial area to the sa~th of Santa Monica Boulevard, the praposal is consistent with objectives in the HA5P. An Initial Study Checklist has been prepared by staff which concludes that a Negative Declaration is appropriate. Therefore, staff recammends that the City Counci~ approve o~ th~ praposed Specific Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Negative Declaration. PUBL~C NOTIFICATION The Zoning Ordinance daes not require any public notification for zane changes other than a n~tice in the ~utlnok. However, Specific Plan AmendmEnts require that a noticE of the public hearing be mailed to aIl owners and residential and conunercial tenants o£ property located within a 500' radius of the subjec~ site at least ten consecutive calendar days prior to the hearing. A copy of the notice is contain~d in Attaahmant F. - 12 - BUDGET~FINANCIAL IMPACT The recommendatian presented in this report does not have any budget or fiscal impact. RECOMNlENDATION It is respectfully recommended that the Council adopt ZC 92-002, SPA 92-001 and IS 93-003 based on the following findings: ZONE CHANGE AND SPEC~FIC PLAN AMENDMENT FINDINGS 1. The proposed Specific P1.an Amendment and Zone Change are cansistent in principal with the gaals, objectives, poli- cies, land us~s, and programs specified in the adopted General Plan, in that they are cansistent with Land Use and Circul,ation Element ~bjective 1.13, which states that the City should allflw for the expansion af existing hospi- tais whil.e minimizing their impacts on adjacent residen- tial neighbarhoads, and they are consistent with Objec- ti.ves 1 and 13 of the Hospital Area Specific Plan. 2. The public health, safety, and general welfare require the adoption of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change, in that the amendment wot~ld al~.ow increased oppor- tunities and incentives to address the deficiency of off- street par}~ing spaces wh~,ch exists in the the Hospital Specitic Plan area. NEGATIVE DECLAR.ATION FINDINGS The City Council hereby finds that the Final Initial Study and Negative Dec~aration should ba certified in that: l. The Ci.ty Counail has reviewed and considared the con~ents af the Final Initial Study and Negative Declaratian, consisting of the Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration, public camments, and responses. 2. The Final Initial Study and Negative D~claration adequately review and analyze potential environmental e~fects af the proposEd projECt. 3. The environmental review was conducted in accordance with applicabie stat~ and City CEQA guidelines including preparatian, not~fication, and content requirements. - 13 - 4. A Negative Declara~ion is appropriate, in that the Initial Study pravides sufficient data to support a findzng that the project wiii nat have a significant e~fect on the environment. Prepar~d by: D. Kenyon Webster, Planning Manager Drummond Buckley, Assaciate Planner Planning D~vision Land Use and Transportation Management Department ATTACHMENTS: A, Correspondence from Applicant B. Initial Study 93-003 C. Map 2 of HASP Showing Study Area D. Maps 15 and 16 of HASP Showing Zoning Designations E. Correspondence from Meml~ers af the Public F. Publ~c Notice and Radius Map G. Planning Cammissian Staff Repart H. Planning Commissio~ Statement af official Actian I. Correspondence fram Staff J, C4 and CP Sections of Zoning Ordina~ce K. Photographs of Site and Surrounding Properties L. Qrdinance Implementing Zone Change M. Resolution Implementing Specific Plan Amandment N. Plot Plan DS PC/ta002cc 06/2Z/93 - 14 - A~'T'ACHM~IIT~' A t ~ ~. itJl~y/~5 ~ --- ( i . ~/iiiY/V I _?.4~e OFFiCES OC SFiE~;L3.~ L. ST?~CEY 233 W~LSHIRE BOllLEVARp S:J~TE 510 s_~v~a ~o~ fca c~~Fa~ti i~ aoa.oi ~~ '3i0) 394-~163 %A% :3i0' 394-78a = ebr;~a,~, _ ~ _ o e ~ --_ . ~~~.~r^rio:~d ?uckl~Y ~~w =~~r_ ~,epartmen~. ~~--- ,~_ ~~nta Mon~c~ -~%~ _Ia~r_ S~yeet ,~ :.:1~.., iO :iC~, ~dl~tQ~'~"_1.; ~U+~i1 : F': ~~ZCT?1T1Cr AlarJ! -v~Cl:.: Led?- =I" . nuCk~ey : ~a response ro yc~sr le~ter of ~anuary 2~, ? 99s, I am e~G=~s_:!~ ~~~e ~allow~ng doc~un~r_~s . _. 20 ~hococrra~ns ~~ ~=~e site a~d sux'rou~~ira ~reas ~r~o~r_-~~ ~ ~ 8 ~'? x~? i:~c:~ cGr~ ~~oci~ anc la~e' ~ed as ~~ s~c~tian. a ~ S~a~emen~ ~t =ynd~ngs for *~e ~~~~ ~_^.~~^e and ~:e =Y_ ~~ _ ~an =~r~end.-r.ent . ~. :: co;~y o~ t:~ _c•~ioNrin~ _t~~ns in sLppo~ L: G. ?eLi; ~.o~ ~~= ~~~~r~c~~ng ria~ ~.:ne:~~rnen~ ~xz~Lte~ ~y -~~is ~~ros on behalf o~ ~~:e prcperties a~ ?22~ ~rcad~,~a~,~ arci ~~~~ ..~~~ S~reet; b_ ~ copy ~•r ~~e Pec=L~on ~or ~istrzc~_r.g Map ~~e~u.~z~z exe~':LGCi by ~~~ o.•mers and te:!ants of ~he ~~cUer~y at ~~~- =rcauway: ar.d c. ~ l~c~~r irom ~B/~anagement cn ben~'_= ~~ the o:•:n~_~ c= vre pro~er~y at ~22? ~raadway. ~. n slte ~lar~ s~ow~:~g ~he ex~s~l~:g Vu~uctures ~^d yand ~s~s ~_. ~ze a=~ected par~°ls . ;~ie are u~?a.~rarp ~i tre rloot ~r~as of ~ ~e s,YU~~.ures located o~ t~e~~ ~ropertzes. ~ i ~qyy ~CF'`cc ~~ ~~~".pi.~>~ ~.~ 1., .Cl. ~ aCE~ =,r . ~rl:.:-rrr:cn~4 ~ack ~ ev ^~~'-"~aGi~.7 ~ ~ _~'7.~ ' ?~g~ t ?lease ~roceed to scheaul~ t:~is G~ner~~ Plan Amend.-nenc ~na ~.on~ c~a~ ~e at ~he ~arliest possz~ale date. ?Tery Lruly yours, ~~ ~ ~ S~erman ~,. ~~acey ~ ` ~'~ _'-_ -- - ~ - - ~ ~u_ _tr ~T:C.. :Sll~'~S PAOPOS$D FINDINGS FOR GPA 92-041 AND 2C 92-002 ~. `"he Pra~osed Amendment ~s Conslstent wn ~rinciple ~~Tith the Goa=s, Ob~ect~~.resr Polic~es, ~and L~ses, and Pxoqrams SpeCl~~ed in ~hE Ado~ted General D1an. '~'he G~neral Plan p~ovides i~ Polieies 1.1~, 1.13.1 and ~ ~~... as f~llows_ ° = . ~.:~ G~JEC'~'; ;~E : "Recogn~zing the ~mportance of the City's haspitals ta the com~nunity and the va~ue of thez~ services to the residents ot Santa Mon~ea and those in surro~anci~ng a~eas, the Land Use Element ac~c:~owl~dges the ~!ospitals :~eed uo e~cpanC and accommodates future growth of hospita~s and health- care facilities while m~nimzz~ng narmzul effe~ts on suriounding residential neighborhaocts. ~~POLZCZEs "'_.13.' Follow~ng Ci~.y adopt~on of Speci~ic Plans for the area comprzsing and :~:nmed~at~~y s~arraundir.g each "hospital campus", al.low expansior~s of exssting hospata~ bui3dings wzth the adop~ed Spec~Lic Plans. , ':'he t~•ro ~~i~y hospi~als ~nal E each p~~tiare Hosnital :~iaster ?i~ns fcr th~ir arganizatio: al g~awth and change over ~~e '_0-1~ years ~ollowirg ado~t~on of ~ the ~an~ Use and C~rcFslation E?ernents. (These ~Ias~.er ?? ans shall ~e ~ons~cierea ~y Uhe Ci~y ~n ~reparzng ~he Specifzc Plans.} I=~ prepar~ng said Mastzr ?1ans, eacn hospital snal~ provide opportsnitaes for neighboring residents, ~roperty owners, and business Deople to partycipate in !~:dSL°X' F=d1: developr~nent . ~ny med.ical ar med~cal- reiatEd dpvelopmen~ proposed by ez~her rospital pr~or to Caty approval at ~ts res~ect~ve Speeific Plan shall be sub~~ct to si~e review and shall b~ at~pro~ed only if the development ne~tner pre~ udices ~he development and implementation ot the SpecifiC Plans, r.or adversely affects surraunding neigh~orhoods. Neither the Speci~~c Plans nor any s~~e review shall be adap~ect w~~hou~ publYc n~ar~ngs. * * * "1.13.3 ~ar~~ng structures developed in the CP D~.str~ct ~n which at least nalf of the spaces are prov3ded to address an existing parxing space der~c~ency or are ret~lac~ng ex~st~ng park~ng spac~s shall not be _ 2 _ S~b]~Ct ~O F~~ _-~„Z~a~-OIIS, ~ut ~~~1'1 ~~Et dl~ other develo~men~ standa.~~~s ~or t~e a~ea." ~ ~,Tnder ~.hese pol~cies, on Sep~erri~er 2:', -~88, ~:~e C~.ty ~do~~°~ a 3ospital ~Yea Sp°ci=~~~ Plan (°~iPSP" !. The P=a*~n~r_g x~rea ue=,r_e~ ~r pag~ 3 aF the iiASP ~ncompasses aii of the aTea n~~xth of Br~«d:•~av ~rcm 24th to 19th Stree~ . The HASF const~tutes a specific i l~~ ~; def~.r_~d by Cali~or~~ia ~overr~ner_~ ^oae ~05~5~.. ~n page 30 of the KaS=• ~ t ~s s-ated: "Some res~dents, ::ospita~. o~ficiais ana ~~ganized neighborhaod groups-o~ Lhe area have expressed a preference that parcel rezonings focus Sa~ n~. :;ohn` s Hasp~ta~ develo~ment south of S~nt« Mon~ca ~oule~rard. ~~ Prior ~o the adapt~on ~f the HASP, Saint ~ohn`s :ios?~ltal :za~ ac~uuired a num~er o~ ~ror~erties ncrth of Ar~ zona A~,renue. Based :~n t~e ~ASP, Sa~nt uohn`s Hospital has d~r~cted ?ts expansaon ~-tor~U sou~h of Santa Monica Bpulevard and 'nas ci~s~osed oz the ~rcper~~~s north of Arizo~a Avenue which were rezoned ~-2 The proposed plar. amendment ~s cons~stent v~:~~r~ ~bJect3ve ~Iu.~ers l, 2, ~3, 24 and 26 of t~e hASP. Sinc~ 198$, Sai.4 uohn`s Eosp~tal has acqu~red addit~onal property sou~h o~ Santa Mon~ca Bou~ e~.rar~ z:~cluding ~rontage alozg Braadway. Hospital expa:~s~~~n in - ~ - • - 1 Yh~se areas c~ients hospi4G1 ases ~:~ay zrom the r~si~ent~a~ ~re~~ ncr4~ a~ :r~z~na. To t~e south o~ ~~cadway are corrt~~tercia~ uses. `~cr~.h o= ;r=zona the nospital`s ~resent north~r~y border, vhe ~_ ~evelo;~ment ~s residential. 2. `~":-ie Dublic Health, ~afecy, an~ General T~v'elfare Re~r~re ~.:~e Ada~tion af ~he Proposed ~~end~nEnt . ~~~erly expansion of ~ealt~ care fac~lit~es for Sa~r~t ~ch~'s ~?~s~~tal reqazires tre ~~clusion of i~s ~roperty and ~~:niiGriy situated property with~n the HASP ~nd the CP zane. The ainendmen~ reauested ~s the logical extens~on of the hospital exr~ans~on area contemplated by the xASP. Coord~nat2d d~ve~apment ~fi '~~~s~, ta~ facilities requires that ~he special reqtx~rernents of ~~a `vL Z011v~ be app~ied along Broadwav frcr.~ 20t'-i Street to 23rd Svreet. s~,o^ns\ftnex.gs ~ ~ ~ :¢•':efis~z~ s2~ea ~Sa• a.~ $h~e~Al~l L. $TA A~?IllBlt F~.DI~tLM'litO ~1-~ ~ a~ , i ~~ ~ T~u ~-asss~y~Md p~rgcr,~ s-~cr ~ro~artY ~vnsrs ~Mxat~ts lr,~ !ha Ci~y o! Sas~t« ~~~ ~d hax~hy p~tit#ara tht CItY Qx ~i JIal4isd~~at ~o tls+ OltiCis~ ~Ls~riotirtg Map trhiC~ tt111 C~~• t2~ s~ of ~he prvp~~~y o~- tho xartn ~~d~ ot Brnad-tsY bot~i~A ~~~~ StrNt iAd ~~r~ 8trsst lra~ Za~e C-~ to ~~ns Cp_3. ~ . ~^ ~ i ~ ''"j,.~~ S ~~ ~ _ ~ /=~!~GG~~~. . .. . ~G ~/~S ~~ ~ p~.~,r~~ Si+~t'I~~ut~1K ~ ,~~ ']-~r~s~t ~ia~M+~ - - , dr~ar ~ ~ Z Z ~ ~- ~J~G!-,~ L~`~r - ~ ~ ~ , - ~a~# } ~dds~ ~ - • ~~~ ~t !~% ~ ^~ - ~ ~ •J~/~~ - ,-~ . ~ , , ._ ~-(~~ G~~Jr ~ ~ ~s'4Mlk~ 8Syriat~t~ `Ty l~lir~~ 11~~ __ - - Z 0~~~# ~ `~ - - l ~5~~ ~ ~ ~~ /l~ E~-- 7yi~n~ ~ 1-dds~ ~- - -- ~ ~ ` ~ ' . ~ r~~ cr~ l~--L' ~~1.~ _~~/~ 'C~ . ~ 8t~na~yr ~ ~ Prirlt~-h~ - ~ ~rn ;a ~ ~ ~ : ~y' ~ ~=ry ~ ~ / `~ __ ~~ ~~ ~L-C'L~L--/~~~CG~ _ Sf4'#~~ ] `l~~lares~ ' --- -• • -- ~~~~ ~ ~~9alatnr~ ~ ~ - Pc~~t-~ai~i ~ ~ 4wsx~r [ ] _ _ t~MAC ~ _ _.. . ~, ~ ~, Ad~r~iM - - l~oy~r~y Siqx~~tnrs - ..~ -=~ctnt ~ta~zai~ -- -- - - - p,~r,sr [ 3 - - - • - - - _ . . ~~s~t ~~ } ~lddras• i a ~ _ .~ j0~ 9s '_~ LS ~I .'.t.l 828 ~8~3 $~-17f6Lt]O~G.4LLF.Py ~Ofll s 2!ily1~ S'~11i ~a l~~11ii !.._ ~..~~I a~ r - -~.~ ~ ~ - - - _ =~a~ ~* - -- - --- • ~ ~ ~wM~ l~E~ ~~~ ~ lM~a~1 ~~l~ ~r~ zt~ o~ i~^AS ~~~ 1F~~~4 t ra C~~ ~~ ~ ~irr o~lt~l~! ~iC~~t~ ~p ~.~h 1~l.13 ~li s(ir ~#~a~ ~w ~a ~ae~ aiY ~ ~ ~~ri^s ~~~ ~ ~d ~ t•~Mn ~~ ~--t ~ l~ri~ i~~. . f ~~ r ~ ~ , ~ ' t~ `,. ~~ , ~ ~ ~~ ~ 3 ~~*~~ ~ ~ ~ ~! ~l /• ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~~ - ~~ - - - ~ .^^. a...~ ~ ~~ ~ itf~~ _ ' -- ~~s ~ -- -- oa~ ~ ~ • - -- ..._ ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ --~ ~ --- ' . ~ ~ ~ - ~ __ ~ „~, --- - ~ ~! 7 adawa.A.- i ' Z e _ .,,.._ ..~,.~.~ ~.: .~~:`aT FEBRUARY 5, 1993 CITY OF SANTA M~NTCA ~635 :!t,I?d STREET ~ANTA M~NICA, CA 90401 1 4 ~ ~~~~! / 'J ^`~~, ~ / ' ~ /% f ~ ~ / . f J - "~ ~ : ; _ - ~ - ....~=~ ~ ..~ '~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ , , ~.G~-.',1 ~ i ' -'_.~ ~ - ~~G ~ ~ ' ~ _-v~ ~ RE: ~EZdNING PETITIQN -- NQRTH QF SROAI~WAY, BETWEEN 2QTH & 23RD STREETS, SANTA MONICA, CA TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ON HEHALF OF WHITE EAGLE BRDADW~Y PARTNERSHIP, WE AGREE WITH TFiE APPLICATI~N SUBM~TTED BY SAINT JOHN'S H05PITAL AND HEALTH CENTER TO REZ~N£ THE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH STDE OF BROADWAY BETWEEN 20TH AND 23RD STREETS FROM ZONE C-4 TD ZONE CP-3. WHITE EAGLE BROADWAY PARTNERSHIP'S PROPERTY WOi7LD BE AFFECTED BY THIS PETITIDN, AND WE ARE IN SUPPORT aF THE PROPOSED REZONiNG. PLEASE FEE~ FREE Ta CONTACT ME AT ~2Z5)739-3338 IF YQU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING WHITE EAGLE BROADWAY PARTNERSHIP'S POSITION ON THIS MATTyR. SINCERELY, ., =,, ~,.s, .. ANTHONY J. FILITI AJF:es ~ -~ _ It . .-~. y, =~`% WE ARE MOST EASIi~Y REACHED AT (215)739-3338 . _~ Lraw o~~acES o~ SHER.'+i.4_'~ L. STACEY 233 WILSNIqE BOULEVARD SUITE 510 SA\'TA 3IONICA. CALIFO~\"L+l fl0401 TEY f31a] 394-IIC3 V~r~ ~f ~ F4J[ 131p1 394-7Q41 f~j }~ V~ _ _ ~ t f ~! ~ ~ . ' ~~ ~ l 4!~ 7 /~ rl~v f , ` .y*~ • _ - ~ ` f ~i _ ~ Decemi~er 9, 1992 _~i~ _ ~ aL~ ~er=:~zL D~:~~:.~r_•u ~~r~ctor ..-tv c~ ~wnta .~Ion~ c~ ' ~8: ~Iai~ ~~~ee* ~a~ta `~_onica, ~a~i~~rn~a G04Q1 ~e . ~ai_~4 ~;oh.n' s Hospital and Heai-h Center ~`nplicab~lity of Hospa.tal Area Specific Plan to Broadway ~roperty - Dea~ Mr. ?er~ar.~: This offic~ represents Saint Johr's Hospital ar.d ~iea~~h Cent~r z~ ~cnnection w~~h activit~es re~ated to the Hospital Area S~,~c~~i~ ?~ar:. = have represented Sa~n~ John's ~n this regard for ~he past ~Aven y~ars and was close].y invo~vect ~n the deve~apmen~ of the Hcsp~tal Mc9.5~B?" P1an and the subseauent formu~ation, hearings ar.c ap~~rc~~al ~f ~r~e Hosp~~a~ Area Spec~ ~~c P1 an t"HASP° ?. ~ec~nwly, it has come to my attention trat a d~sagreement ~rav ex~st as to wtiet'tler or not ~he propert~es iocateci along the r_~:.r~hsi~~ o~ Broadway between 20th Stree* ar~C 23rd Sireet are a na~~ c~ t:e ~:ASP. The iinportance of this ctuestion ar~ses due to exist~ng anu ~otentzal future ordznances of the City whkch :nay exemp~ f~~U~r their application properti~s loca~.ed with~n the :~i~SP. Bases t~pon ~y present review of tne Hospztal Area ~pec~fic P1an, :ny review of the Saint ~ohn's Master P~an and the :~~~a=t H~SP ~ogetner wsth the sta~~ reports and envirarLrnenta~ ~ocuments ~ssaciated ~herewith, ~~ a.s *_ny opin1on that ~he p~c~ertwe~ alo*~g Broadway wh~ch I~ave descr~ bed are presen.tly ~arC cf t~e ~i~S~ Gnd any o~d~nance wh~.ch exempts from ~~.s appl~ca~~on ~rapert~~s ~Nith~n the HASP would not be appiicablp to ~hese u~oper~,~s. ;~ase this op~n~on upon ~he follow~ng facts, among o~ners: -. ~n fo~u~a~~ng ~t~s Mas~.er P3an and accept3ng ~he ~AS~, ~~1i~4 ~ohn's accepted the City`s request that ~t r.ot expand -=-,/v 0~=°CES pF sx~~~i ~~ L. sr ~ca~~ ,~1~ . = au~ ~~~ ~ anU ~~~Lember u, -~:92 Fage ~ ~ur~~er ~o the r.a~*r a~~oss : ri~o:~d %:venue and ~~c~ss any pocen~ial ~:~tLre :os~i~~l expansior soutn o~ Sarta ~~onica Boulevard ~o ~road~~rav . 2. ~n fur~~eranee c~ t~~s reorientaticn of ~~os~i~.a~ ~,ro,•~~;~, Sai~t Johr_'s uc~epted t'~e ~ezaning ot a~, properts ;~ortY~ oz :rizonu hvenue to res_~en4~a~ a~d sol~ ~~e N~c~c_~y ~a::~ch ~r had ~r~v~oasiy owned in ~~_at area_ "_'he ma~c~i~y c* ~he pr~perty sold :~-~ S~ J;,t~n's was sa=c ~~ Comanunity Corparatian oL Santa Ma~~ca and ~.ne S~n~or ~iealth a~d ?eer Counselir.g Center, bo~n ag°r:cles -~: Gr:c~~~ly su~porte~~ uy ~ne C~ty o~ Sa: *~ 'Y=an~.ca. ;; . The -iapp~ng of the HASF c? early identif ies substantia~ areas outs~de the present awnership of each hospital. ~ccor~ingiy, I believe an appropria~e characterization of ~he boundaries of the HASP must be ezther (1} the bounctaries shown on th~ map ident~fied as N:ASP Study Area, or (2} the properties zoned CF owned and operate~ by each hospital tagether with such ce~r.~-nerci~lly zoned g_e~erties ad~o~~?ing ~hose properties fer wh~.ch tre ?~_os~~ta? 's master ~ lan ~ der_~:.fied potential tu`ure use. ~t is my u~derstand~ng ~rom discussions witn Suzanne Fr=~:~ that yaur d~partment rnaintains tnat the exempt~on for ~ro~er~~~s sub~ec4 ~o ~he I~~SP ~s limi~ed ~o those ~~cpe~ty~s in ?~n2 ~~P. I bel~eve ~h~s is an ~nnecessari~y rest~~.ctive ~nterp~etatian ent~rely ~ncor~s~sten~ with the developmen+~ o~ ~.he ~ASP ~.n~tially. :iowever, without r~re~udice to the position of ~a~r_~ ~~a~~. ~ s vah~cn ~ nave descr~bed ~n ~r~s ~etter and without ~ec~ssi~.y ~o resolve ~h~s issue at the present ~ime, ~ have advised Sa~nt ~ohn~s, and Sa~n;. ~ohn's has agreed, ~o _~~e an ~pplieat~on vo rezcne the prapert~es fronting along Broa~way ~rom ~one C-a to Zone CF_ T r=av~ contacted General Tele~hone Company ~o request vhat they ~oir ~n sucn appllcat~on wi*h rpgard to proper~~es which ~ney ~wn f rant~ng or 9roadway between 20t~z and 23rd. Such ap~'~~ca~ion wi31 als~ znclude an a=nerament to the K?~SP ~o i~c ~~.de -hese p~opert3es wathir. a defi~ed boundary. ~t such ~~me as the ~ity a~ts upfln the arlends~ent ta Ghe HASP, i~ may w~sh t~ aaflpt specz~~Y boundari~s of ~he HASP sucr ~ha~ any ordinance ,vhich r.iak~s =eTerence _o it wiil ^~ear~.y deli~ea4e ~he ~r~perties :~rhic~ may or may ~at '~e affectea ~v sucn ordinance I believe ~.~~s wzll be Gn appropriate manner in which to retiolv~ ~h? s canflic:~ . ~ look forward to the completlon o~ the a~~l-~ca~~en ~or rezo:~ina and Spec~fic ?lan P~nendment. By seeking _-W CF=IvES O~ SE3E~~1 ~.~ L. STACE~ ___ ~ 3L11 BEr ~ ar:c ~ ~... ~:n~er ~~ , .~ 9 92 =~ c= :~ ~a~r a 5peeific Pl~r~ ~r~end.~nz4, ;aint Jorn'~ does r.o~ :.~nce~p that ~.~^r_ an ~mendmen~ _s ra~u~rew fcr ~he ~3AS~ t~ _nciuae _ =e prcpercy ~~. ~~ =°zonEd. '~.'2~r truiy yours , ~ . ~ ~ - . ~-, ~ ~l ~ L,,~ : ~ ~. ~ ~ tY ~i J!7~T'P.':dll 1. ~t :CEV~ --- ~ ~ --:s,~.•er l~r ~ .. . ~~.Y . Tom Pyne :~~ . ~oe Syxora YTr. Lenard P~ck ~r. John Jalzlli - _fs. Suzanne Frick 4 ~ ; ~~ LAW QFFICES OF SHERMaI~ L. STACEY 233 1M1~LSHi~E BQULF-VARD 5UITE ¢Ip sarrrA MonzcA, ca~~o~.~a aoa.oi TEL {35pS 394-1163 FAX ~3101 394-784f May 17, 1993 P~anning Comm~ss~oners C~ty of Santa Monica 1585 Ma1n Szreet San~a Monica, Californ~a 9040i ~I~Y :~ - - - -- Li S +f ~~ 3t~_ _ - - ` - _ - •I ~ ~~~ { rt f ~; ~ ',1 i G i i ~1 1~`~ ' Re: Specif~c Plan Amendment 92-fl01 District~nq Map Amendment 92-042 Deur Comn~issioners: On May ~.9, ~993, z will appear before yau on behalf of Sazn~ John's Hospital and Health Cen~er in support of appraval of S~ecif~c Plan Amendment 92-001 and Districtang Map Amendment 92- 002. These applicat~ans were f~led by Saint John's and o~hers ta include the frontage on the narth szde of Broadway fram 20th Street to 23rd Street wi~hin the Hospi~al Ar~a Specifsc Plan ("~~SP"; and to rezone that area froin Zone C-4 to Zone CP-3. 'v~hen the HhSP was adop~ed ~n 19$$, hos~ical ar~d medical fac~.li~~.es was direc~ed Monica B~ulevard. Przor to the adopti~n of .7o~~r~'s had antzcipated grow~h nor~h of Ar~.zo pro~er~y for that purpose. Saint John's agr e~torts to erpan~. narth of Arizona and conse ~f ~ts pra~erty ~n that area from Zone C-2 t growth of the 5outh o~ Santa the HASP, Saint na an~ had eed not ta nted ta the o ~one ?R-2. 1988, ~u~nt John~s has d~sposed of 1ts propert~~s nar~h Artzor~a. acqu~red ~ont~nue ~ezoning sa.nce of In accardance w~th the dlrect~ons an the HAS~, Sa}nt Jaxn~s planned for expansion sauth ~oward Broadway. Sa~nt John~s acquixe~ ~arious commercial prope~t~~s south of Santa ?~:onaca Bculevard. The John Wayne Cancer Ins~i~ute znoved ~rom UCL~ ta Saint Jflhn's and ~he build~ng a~ 2200 Santa Monica Bou~evard was a~quire~. and remodeled far that purpose. Commerc~al bu~ldangs on th~ west side of 21st Street were removed ~.a expand parking. Substantial nort-medical operations of the hosp~.ta1 were relocated from the ~na~.n nu~sing tower north of Santa Mon~ca Bou~evard to tne ol~ General Telephone office buildir,g at 20th ana Santa hzanica Boulevard. , ~ LAW 6FFICES O~ SHEAl~i_~~ I.. STACEY Planning CommYSSioners C~ty of Santa Monica May ~7, ~993 Page Two The CP zOne was specifically created for the two San4a Monica hosp~.tals. The perm~tted uses and developrnent star.dards are geared to the ~p~c~al needs af hosp~ta~ and medica' ~ac~lit~es. To es~ablish uni£orm zoning thraughout the bla~,ks from 20th to 23rd Stre~t (~~ith the except~an o~ ~che R-2 zone for t:~~ uondom~nium at 23rd and Schader), Saint John's and Genera~ Telephone filed the present appl~cations. Severa~. other smal? pxope~~.y owners have ~ozne~ the appl~cat~.on or consented to ~t. The P~annina Depar~ment Staff ha~ recommenc~ed chat you approve thF rezoning. Sa~nt John's su~ports ~hat recommendatYOn. ':here are two da.£ferences in develop~lent standards :~p~v~;ee~ the present C-4 zone and 4he CP-3 zone. The fi_st d~fference ~s that the he~ght ].zmit for CP-3 ~s 45 feet an~ for C--4 is 30 feet although t~~~ Floor Area Ratio o~ 1.5 is the same. ;ti~i~h ~x~s~ing buildings (Geneva Tawers and the GTE sw~~cha.ng s~ation) a.~rea~y 45 feet ar higher, this difference has little impac~. - The second d~fference is that parking structures in the CP zon~ are p~rmitted within height artd setbacks without an FAR l~m~~_ This prOV~SiOn encourages Sa~nt John's to buil~ ad~~.~.-ona~ park~ng for zts persannel (and reduce nea.ghborhoad ~,npac~s; to el~m~nate its parkzng deficit. Saint ~7ohn's is zn escroc~. ~c buy add~tlona~ property from General Telephone or the ncrth~•.es~ ccrner of Broadway and 21st Street. Long range pl~~~ing is tc move the proposed location of a park~ng structure f~o~r; 23rd and P.r~zona (oppos~te resident~al zones on 3 sades) to 21s~ a~d Braadway (oppas~.te commercial zanes on 3 sides). Your ac~ion is a recommendat~.on to the City Counc_1. Sa~n~ Jonn's agrees wi~h your staff that ~he applicatians should ~e approved. Sain~ John`s reques~s that vou aCt T~lednesday ~vT~r_~r_y to recommend to th~ Ci~y Council that an ord~nance a~pravi*:g the rezoning be adopted. Very truly yours, ~ ~i SHERMAN L. ST~CEY S~Si'sh cc: riir. Joseph Sykora LAW OFFICES O~ SHEI3I-S ~~T L. STACEY 233 WILSMIRE 60Vl.EvpqD SUITE 51Q $.ANTA AIOti'ICA, C~LIFOH~YIA $0401 7EL (3101 394-t1g3 FAX 1310) 39a-7841 ~~~~ y ° ' _ _ _ , - -r- ~~~1+ Y~_ } €' __ •~~ ~~~ ~ ~ , ,., ~ ~ ~ ?'~ ;_~„ May 17, ~993 M=. ?au- Berlant Plann~n~ D~rec~or City o` Santa Monica 168~ Main Street Sar~~a P~Ion~ ~a, Cal~fornia 90401 Rp: Specaf~c Plan Amendment 92-001 zane Chanc{e 92--002 Dear Mr. Berlant: This off~.ce represen~s Saint John's Hospital and Hea].~h Cen~e~ . = am in receipt of a~et~er dated Apral 30, 1993 from .~ rti•:~ r_ ZekA `~1'arsaw to Paul Berlant rela~ing to Spec3fic Plan Z~men~.'ne:~~ 42-001 and Zane Change 92-002. Mr. TnTarsaw makes numerous a~'~~rat~cns ir~ ~is letter. I~r. ~niarsaw makes several inaccurate ~actual statements on the ~~:s4 p~ge in his 1.etter. These allegations are unfounded. ~. The small parking booth behind 2200 Santa N~onica Bau:~evard is not on property which is the sub~ect o£ the present app~~Lat~o~s. T~e parking booth constructiorl r~ceived all r.acdss~~~ ppr:nits from ~he Building Department and has been inspecte~ 2. The electr~.cal ~ermits for the light s~andards have ~ee_1 -ssuea by the Buzld~.nr Department. Electrzcal perrnit5 were ~ssuew on January 13, 1993 and ~nspecta.ons made on Apr~l 9 and ~pril ' F, ~993. The buzJ.din~ pe~~t app~~cat~ons were made May 20, 1991 ~nd September 25, 1991. 3. I have no knowledge ot what site address your sraf~ ~ight have zncluded n a Ci~y internal case list an Februaxy 23, 1.9G3 Hevaever, since this was not a publ~c notzce and s~nce th~s er~or, ~f ~t cccu~red, has not been re?ied upo~ by anyone, ~t seems hardwy ~elevant. , ~, ~ _ Lqyy pFFIGES OF SHEl~'-Zg.~ L. STACEy Mr. Paul Ber~ant May 17, 1993 Page 2 4. Schader Drive ~s a pub~zc street. The use of Schader Drive by abu~ting property owners does not require a hear~ng by the City. There ~s noth~ng ir_ the present appl~cation that 3nvalves Schader Drzve or any prop~zty abu~tsng Schader Drive. this case. 5. Tom Pyne wi11 not partzc~pate in the decis~on on 6. The previously existing driveway apron ~ust wes~ of 2210 Santa Manica Boulevard was removed and replaced by a curb and gu~ter as a requ~r~ment af the City Department of General Serv~ees as a condit~an to busl.ding permits fox remodelling work at 2200 Santa Monica Boulevard. Na nat~.ce or publ~c hear~ng was requ~red. GJh~ther Mr. Warsaw has cla~ms of same easemenr 1s not an ~ssue for ~h~ Czty ~0 3udge_ Saint John`s dicL not ask the City to close the dr~veway, th~ City asked Saint John's to clase the driveway. Mr. Warsaw demands certain actions by the City. None o~ these ac~ians is war~anted. I. The heazing was postponed from May 5, 1993 to May 19, ~993 because o~ lack of a quarum. II. Mr. Pyne will not participate in the dec~sian. Iz~. There ~.s na grour~ds for a stop work order foz 220G Santa Monica Boulevard as all necessa~y permits and ~n5pectzons have been made. zV. A wholesaie ~nvestigat~.on into viul.atlon of ~ederal, sta~e or local iaws is unwarranted by any allegat~ons made by Mr. ~;~arsaw. V. Th~ present application does no~ involve Schader Dr~ve in any manner. VI. The City staff has conducted an Initial Study and determ~ned that change af zone from C-4 to CP-3 does nat ~nvolve a r~sk of s~gr:~ficant adverse environmental e~fect. Mr. Warsaw comp~ains of an ~nabilzty to exam~r~e Ci~y f~les on th~s ma~ter. I have na explanation for this part of his complaint. I ha~cre never e~eri~nced d~fficulty in examining any LAW OFFICES OF SI3~1~~tA~~ I.. STACEY Mr. Paul Berlant May 17, 1993 Page 3 City files. If Mr. Warsaw has been unable to examine C~~y Planning Depart~ent files for 2200 Santa Monica Boulevard, th~s may not be surprising as ~ do not believe there have been any plannina applicatians at that address. The present applaca~~ons encompass property fronting on Broaclway from 20th Street to 23rd Stree~. I have representAd Saint John's for ~nore thar_ 1p year~ on City land use matters. In my Experience, neither Sa~nt John`s nor the City has ever operated ~n any fash~on o~her than a fully publ~c process. Mr, tnTarsaw's charges are wi~hout bas~s. I am certain that your own evaluation will result in the same canclus~on. Very tru].y yours, -~G_...~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ `~~~ , Sherman L. Stacey,~ SLc: as'•,s~-:a~r.s~2ber. ltr cc: All City Counca.l members All Plann~ng Com~nission r~embers Kenyon Webster, ~lanning Directar B~?1 Rome, Bu~lding & Safety Directpr Ronald Fuc'riiwak~, Park~ng & Traff~c Engineer Stan Sholi, Director of General Services John JaZiii, City Manager ~Tos~ph Lawrence, Acting City Attorney Irrr:~n Zeke Warsaw ,,; A~'ACI~IVIEN~' B ~~~~ ~~ ~~ T_NI'FIAL STG'DY CHECKLIST 93-fla3 Zone Change 92-002 Specific Plan Amendment 92-001 PROJ£CT DESCRIPTION T~:e proposed project cc~nsists of a zone change fram C;~ (Highway Co:.~r:-ercial) to CP-3 (Commercia]. Professional) District for several parcels located on the n~rth side of Broadway between 20th and 23rd Streets, which a].so requires amendment to the L105D1~a1 Area Specific Plan. The parcels are separated by 21st Street and are therefare nat comPletely contiguous. mhe parcels are bound by the CP3 Distr~ct to the north, the C4 Dist~ict across 23rd Street to the east, the C5 (Special Off~ce) District across Broadway to the sattth. and the BCD (Broadway Commercial) ~istract to t~e west. ~o specific development is called for in the project. If a~proved, the project would allaw new deve~apment ta bE 3 maximum of ~5' high instead of the maximum of 30' permitted under the existing zoning designation. The project would also a11ow no FAR restrictions for parking strtxctures for which half af the spaces address existinq parking de~iciencies ar replace existing parking. Under current zoning, there is no density bonus for parking structures. The base FAR of 1.5 and the maximum number a° s~ories of 3 would remain ~f the project were approved. The pr~pased pr~ject wauld alter the permitted uses on the su~ject parcels. Restaurants of any size would be permitted by iirht instead of being rastricted by a 50~seat maximum. P~aces of ~r~orship would require a Canc~itianal Use Pe~mi~ rather than be permitted by right. Residential uses would require a Performance C~ar.daxds Pez~it, as under the existing zoning designation, but wauld be required ta be a campanent of a mixed use building, wh~c~ is not required under ex3sting zoning. CI~Y OF SANTA MONI~A IS No. 93-003 CImY PLANNTNG DIV :ON C~ty Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monzca, Cal~€ornia 90401-3295 INITIAL STBDY AND NEIGHBORHQOD IMPACT STATEMENT DATE FILED 12rZ3~g2 ~ I. $ACRGROUND 1. Name af Applicant St. John's Hospital & Health C~nter 2. Address and Phone Number af Proponent 1328 2nd Street~ Santa Monica~ CA 90404 (3I0~ 829 - 8833 3. Project Address North Side of Broadway betw~~n 20th arsd 23rd Streets Name of Proposal, if ap~alicable 4. Initial Study Prepared by DrunLmand Buckleyr Associate Planner ~T. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations a~ all answers are ~equired on attached sheets.) Yes Maybe Na :~. Earth. Will the proposal result ir~: a. Unstable earth canditi~ns or in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Extensive disruptions, displac~- ments, Compactian or overcoverir~g of soi,l? x c. Extensive change in topography of ground surface relief features? X d. The destrtiction, covering or madification af any unique geologica~ or physical features? X CITY OF SANTA M~NICA ~S Nv. 93-003 C~TY PLANNING DIV =0N C~ty Ha~1, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, Californ~a ~04Q1-329~ Ye5 '~iaybe No e. Considerab~e increase in wind or water erosifln of soils~ either on ~ or off the site? ~ f. Changes in deposition or erosion af beach sands, or changes in siltation~ depositian or erosion which may modify the bed of the ocean or any bay or in~et? x q. yxposure of people ar property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, Iandslides, mud- slides, ground tailure, o~ similar haaards? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Considerable air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? - X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Substantial alteration of air movement, maisture, or tempexature, or any change in climate, either locally ar regi.anally? , X d. Expose the project residents to severe air po~lutian canditions? X 3. Wate r. Will the propasal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh watars? X b. Extensiva changes in absoxp- tian rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ~ c. AlteratXOns to th~ course or fiow of flood waters? X ~. , CI~Y OF SANTA MON7CA y5 ho. 93-~03 CITY PLANNING DI~ I4N City Hall, 1685 Main Street, San~a Monica, California 9040I-329~ Yes P~faybe No d. Substantial change Yn the amount of surtace water in any water body? X e. Discharga into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not lineited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteratian af the dzrection or rate of flow of graund waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through dir~ct additions or withdrawals, or through interceptior~ of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Considerable reduction in the amount af water otherwise avail- able for pu.blic water supplies? X i. Expasure of pe~ple or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X 4. plant Life. WiYl the praposal resu~t in: a. Change in the diversity of species or nu~nber of any species of plants {including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants}? X b. Reductian of the nu~bers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introductian of new species of plants i.nto an area, or result in a barrier to the normal rep~.en- ishment of existing species? X CITY OF SANTA MONI~'A ~5 Pto. 93-003 CITY nLANNING DIV "ON Ci~y :all, 1585 Main Street, Sanza Monica, Calzfarn~a 90401-329~ Yes Piaybe No ~. Animal Life. Will ~he pr~posa~. result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or znsects}? x b. Red~ction of the nu~bers of any una.que, rare or endangered species af anima~s? X c. Introduction o~ new species of aniinals into an area. or result ~n a barrier ~o the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration of existing fish or wild~ife habitats? X 6. Enerqy. Will the propasal result in: a, Use of considerable amount of fuels or energy? X la. Considerable increase in demand upan existing sources af energy, or require ~he development of new aources of energy? X 7. Natural Resources. Will the prop~sal resu~t in: a. Considerable increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. Considerable depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X 8. Naise. will the proposal result in: a. Considerable increases in existing noise levels? K b. Exposure of peop~e to severe naise levels? X CITY ~F SANTA MONT^A ~S ~o. 93-003 CITY ~LANNING DIV ION C~i~y ~all, 1685 Main St~eet, Santa iionzca, Cali{ornia 90401-3295 Yas £•4avbe No ?. Liqht and Glare. Will tha proposal produce considerable new light or glare ' fram street lights Qr other sources? X lo. Sh~dows. Wi11 the proposal produce extensive shadows affecting adjacent uses or property? X 11. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an expZosion or the release af hazardous substances (including, but not limited ta, oil, pesticides, chemicals ar rad~atiQn) in the event of an accident or upset conditians? X b. Passible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuatiori plan? X 1.2. xuman Health, will the proposal result in: a. Creation af any health hazard or potential health hazard (exc~uding mental health)? X b. Exposura of people to potential health hazards? X c. ConSiderable adverse i~npact on health care services? X 13. Population. Wiil the proposal result in: a. Considerable change-in the distri- bution, density, or growth rate af tha human pcpulat~on of an area? X b. The relacation of any persons because of the effects upon housing, com~aercial or industrial facilities? X c. The relocatitin oz dislocation of emplayment or businesses? x ` ` CTTY OF SANTA MONIrA iS No. 93-003 C~TY ~LANNING DIET ~_ON C~~g Hall, I685 Piain Street, Santa Monica, :.al~fornia 904C1-3~95 Yes '•sayhe Na I.4. Land Use. Will the ~raposal result in: ' a. A considerable al~.eration of the present ar planned land use of an area? X b. Demolition, relocation, or remodeling of residentia~. com- mercial or industrial buiidings or ather facilities? ~ 15. xousi.nq. Wi11 the Propasal: a. Create a cansiderable demand for additional housing? x b. Have a considerable adverse impact on the available rental housing in the comr~~nity? x 16. Right of Way. Wil~ th~~proposal result in: a. Reduced lot area? X b. Reduced access? X c. Reduced aff-street parking? }C d. Creation af abrupt grad~ dif- ferential between public and private property? x 17. TransportationJCi~culation. Will the proposai result in: a. Generation of considerable additional vehicuZar movement? X b. Substantial aff~cts on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X c. Considerable adverse impact upan existing bus transit systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns af circulation or mavement af peaple and/or goads by changes to raadways7 x CITY OF SANTA M~N~CA ~5 :IO. °3-(303 CITY PTANNING DIS IpN ~~~}T Hall, 1685 bia:.n St~eet, Santa P~for~ica, Cali~ornia °q401-3295 Ye~ Ilaybe No e. Alterations ta uraterborne, ra~l or air traffic? X f. CQnsiderable adverse impact on traffic safaty to motorists, bicyclists ar pedestrians? X 18. Utilities. Will tha proposal result in a need far naw systems, ar majcr alterations to the fol.lowing utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X b. Comriunications syst~ms? X c. juater? X d. Sewer or septic t~nks? X e. Storm water drainage? X f. Salid Waste and disposal? X 19, public Services. Will the proposal have a considerable effect upon, or result in a need far new ~r altered governmental services in any of ~he follawing areas: a. Fire pratectioz? x b. Police protectian? X c. Schaols, including pre-schools or ch~ld care? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? x e. Maintenance of pub~ic facil- i~ies, including roads? X f. Other governmen~al services? X 20. Canstructicn Effects. Will the praposal have considerable construc- tian-periad impacts due ta the scope, or location af construction activities? X CITX OF SANTA MONIrA ~S 'do. 93-003 CI_I' PiANN2NG DIV. _ON Ci~-~ 'r?all, 1685 tia~n Street, ~anta rionica, Cal~fornia ~040~-3295 Yes '"avbe No . ~1. Fiscal. Will the ~ro~osal have a considerable fiscal effect cn ~he ~ City? X 22. Recreat~on. wi~I ~:~e proposal result in a considerabZe s:npact upon the auality or quantity of existing recreational oppor~:~n~tzes? X 23. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of nr the dastruc- tion of a prehistoric or his- toric archeolagical site2 X b. will the proposal result in adverse pnysical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or his~oric building, structure, or ob~ect? - X c. Does the prapasaZ have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic culturaJ, values? K d. Will the proposal r~strict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X 24. Aesthetics. Will the proposed project result in: a. The obstruction of any scenic vista ar view open t~ the pub].ic? X b. The creation of an a~stheti- ca~ly offensive site open to public view? X c. The destructian of a stand of tress, a rock outcropping Qr ather ~ocally recognized d~sir- able aesthetic natural feature? X d. Any substantial negative aesthetic effect? X CITY OF SANTA MON~~A CIT"-' P:~ANN?NG DIV_ :ON ~i~,- ~iaiw, ;585 DSain Street, Santa :•~onica, zs ~o. y~-ao3 Cal~forn~a 9~401-;295 Yes P•favbe ~Io 25. Neiqhbarhood Effects. Wil~ ~he prop~sal have considerable effects on the proj~ct neighborhQad? X 2&. Mandatary Findinqs of Siqnificanoe. a. Daes the project have Lhe paten- tia~ to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife popuZation to drap below self sustaining levels, threaten to e~.iminate a plant ar animal co~nm~xn- ity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a raze or endangered plant or animal or e~iminate important examples of the major periads of California his4~ry or pre-history? X b. Does the project ha~e the poten- tial to achieve short-term~ ta the disadvantage of long-term, environm~ntal goals? X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually ~imited, btzt cumulatively conside~able7 X ~. Does the project have environ- mental effects which will cause s~xbstantia3 adverse effects on hv.man beings, either direct].y ar indirectly? x I~I. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION ~reas c~ec~ced "No" : 1. Earth (a,b,c,d,e,f,g). The project wiZl not effect earth card~tions in any ~nanner, 2. Air (a,b,c,d}. The project z~rill not affect air conditions in any manner. 3. ~~7ater (aFb,c,d,e,f,g,h,i). The project will nat ad~erse}.y affec~ surface ar ground water in any manner. 4. Plant Life (a,b,c). The project will not impact plant life ir. ar.y manner. CITY OF SANTA MONT~A ~S No. 93-003 C~TY PLANNING DI~ ION ~zty Hall, 1685 21ain Street, Santa ~Sanica, Call.fornia 90401-3295 ~. An~.mai Life ( a, b, c, d) . li~e ~n any manner. 5. ~'nergy (a,~). The c~nsumption. Th~ project will not afrect animal project will not affect ener~y 7. ~~latural Resaurces {a,b}. ' resources. The praject wi1Z nat affect natuxal 8. ?:oise (a,b). The project will not affect noise ~evels, as any czevelopment _n the subject area will be zequired to conform to t:~e City Noise Ordinance with ar with~ut the project. ~. Light and Glare. The praject wi31 nat affect light or glare. 1~. ~isk of Upset (a,b). The project will not involve hazardous s~abstances or impact emergency response or evacuation plans. ~2. E=sman Heait:: (a,b,c). The project will not expose pe4ple to potent~al health hazards, nor ~ai3l it creata health hazards or ~~ve a r:egative ~mpact an hea~.th care services. i3. Population ;a,b,c). The praject wi11 not impact ~.~~ulation. 14. Land Lse (b). The project wil~ not resu~t in the demolition, remodeling ar rel.ocation of any cammercial or industrial buildings or facilities. 15. Housing (a,b). The project will not create any additional demand for housing nor will it ha~e an adverse impact on the avai_ability of rental housing in the cammunity. 16. Right of way (a,b,c,d). The project will not zeduce lot area, access, aff-street parking or create abrupt grada ~~fferent~al betwEen public and private property. 17. '?'ransportation/Cix~culation (a,c,d,e,f). The project will nat impact transportati.an or circuJ.atian patterns. i8. ~tilities ~a,b,c,d,e,f). The project will not require new or additional systems for any utilities. 19. Pub~ic Services (a,b,c,d,e,f), The project wi31 n~t have s~gn~ficant impact on public services. 2~. Ganstruction Effects. The project wi1]. nat have an~ construction-re~ated impacts. 21. Fiscal. The project wiZl have r.a fiscal impacts. 22. Recreation. The praject will have na impact an recr~atianal oppor~unities. 2?. Cultural Resaurces (a,b,c~d}. The project wi?1 have no impact on cultural resources. ,, ~ CITY OF SANTA MONI~A IS NO. 93-003 CITY PLANNING DIV, _ON C~~y Hall, i685 Main Street, Santa Manica, Califarnia 90~01-3295 24. Aesthetics (a,b,c,d). Any development on ~he subject parcels will be subject to the approva~ of the Architectural ~eview Board whether or not the project is appraved. ~herefore, ~he groject will not have any i:npact on aesthetics. 25. Pleighborhood Effects. The project will have no adverse impacts on the neighb~rhood. 26. Mandatory Findings. The project will not degrade the pnvironment or affect fish, wild~ife, rare or endangered plant ~ife or affect examples of histary in Califarnia. The project wil~ not adversely impact long-term enviranmental goals, wil~ not adversely impact ?ong-term environmental goa}.s, wi~l not have considarable cumulative adverse impacts, and will nat cause adverse impacts to humans. Areas Checked "Maybe": l0. Shadows. The existinq development standards for the subject prcperties allow a maximum building height of 3b', whereas the pX0]~Gt would allow a maximum height of 45'. Therefore, the length af shadaws cast by any future development at the subject ~roperties wauld potentially be greater than the length of shadows cast by any proposed development under existing standards. It is not anticipated that any mitigation measures would be required for this possible impact as i~ is nat consi.dered significant. 14. Land Usa (a). The praject does not contemp~ate a specific develop~ent for the subject properties. However, it wauld result in a~imited change to the d~v~lapment standards and permitted uses on the subject properties. The ~'AR would not be affected by the project. However, the maximum height would be increased from 30' to 45' and the maximum number ~f stories would be increased from 2 to 3 for a~I prajects and there would be no maximum FAR for parking structures far which at least haZf of the spaces were "provided to address an existing parking space deficiency" or to replace existing parking. The total ntimber of permitted uses allowed on the subject properties would be reduced by the praject. Restaurants of any size would be permitted by right (instead of limited ta a maximum o~ 50 seats), and resid~ntial uses would be perznitted anly in mixed use prajects (rather than permitted as a single use) with a Perfarmance Standards Per~ait. P].aces af worship would require a Conditional Use Permit (rather than be permittad by right). The threshold at which Development Review is required would be reduced from 25,000 square feet to 22,50a square feet. It is not anticipated that the change in dEVelopn~ent standards w~uld result in any significant impacts. Therefore, na mitigation measures are proposed. CITY OF SANTA MONICA C~T'~ PI,ANNING DIV ~QN C~~,.~ :iall, ~685 Ma~.n Street, I5 T~O, 93-003 SanLa Monica, Californza 90401-329's ~'. ~'ransportatian/Circulation (b). The prapased project may ~ave a positive impact on exis~~ng parking facilities~ in that :.~~s~ of the subject parcels are currently ~tilized ~cr surface park~ng and the prapased project would aZlow a higher FAR €or parking structures which address cu~rent parking defic~.encies or replace existzng parking. The Hospital Area Spec~~ic Plan iden~~aies a severe shortage of parking for the existing ~ has~~~al/medical office uses ~n the vicinity. IV. DETERMINATION CITY OF SANTA MONICA IS No. 93-0~3 EIR ~Io. N~A CITY PLANNING DIVISION City Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90401-3295 DETERMINATION Project Title: SPA 92-001, 2C 92-002 Project Address: North Side a~ Broadway between 20th and 23rd Streets On ~:~e basis of this initial evaluation: I±=r.~ that the proposed project cauld not have a sign~F~cant effect an the environment, and a Pdegative Declaration will. be prepared. I~~r.d that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect zn this case because the ~itigation measures described on an attached sheet have been addad to the project. A raegative Declaratian will be prepared. X ~ • i CITY OF SANTA MON7~A ~~ No. ?3-aQ3 C~TY PLANNING n2'ti N C~ty Hall, 1585 Main Street, Santa Monlca, Calz~ornza ?04~?-3295 I f~nd the proposed project may have a signxfzcant effect on the enviranment. and an Environmencal Impact Report is recruired. ~ ~~~i ~~ 3 ~~-~ Daz~ Director af Land IIse and Transportation Management Dept. zco02chk 43/24/93 A~lACH1VIENT C ~ -. - ~_~ ~ r ~ _y ~ ~ ~;.fi ;r,~~ ~,;,, ~ti ~ ~„u.~- ~-~ ~ , t r i! s~! I I ~ ~~~I!! ~~~~ ~i ~'~:,~, ~~=-~11f~~f~~~l~ ... i ~~ ~ ~ i ~~i,lj~ll~~ ~ [ . '.. ~~~~~jr~lf~ ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ~ : '~~ , ~~I';I'~I'I~ ~ J ~ • , ~i=~~ I' ' ~ ~;~f~~' ~1~~ ~ ,~ ~ ~~ ~~;, J ~ : ~ ~I;~~~~ ~,;~ ~,;;~~ ~ I , ; '~~~I~!' ~II''~.II ~y r r, a I_I-'`~U €~ `---~ ~ ; . ~` ~.~ ~ f ~ ' I ~ `~'~ ~'~~-~ ~''!~' ~!I II ~ ' ~ ~~ ~~~ ,;` ~.'~ii ~ ,1 ~~II'lil~ ~ k~li!i ' ~!i~ ~ f i ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I ~ I C~~!. k~l~ll{i!I ~I Mf '~~ ' . ~ . ~~ ,~Illi~r; .' ~ I~i' 'I ~ ~~ ~ ; ~ '! W~II I~~~~~~ E~ ~ ; , ~, ~ ~. ~ * ; ~, _ ;I j ~~~ o ' i~4 ~ v1 N ; ~!;;iEfl ~ ~ ~'"I'ii!,~f!~I °~ ;~~;,~~lii~ ~ i ~` I i~il i; ~ ! ; ~; ~~~ ~ ~ ~~3;0~;'!~i~~ ~~~F~~~~~~i,~ I ~~!~ '~~I#I~I ~~~'~I~~11111 fi~{i~l!II~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Map 2 I~~I~III!i~ll ~AE~T _ 1If~111I11~1~ ~~~~~~Ef~~~~~ a~c~~ (~f~~~~~lli~ ~1ll~IIlli~~~ llll~llk~~f~ SPECIFIC PLAN ST:'DY AREA ~~;i;~~~il~l~; ~i ~illiI~~ll~ ~ I~i~li~~l~illl I~~II.!~~liill' f Y~~~ I I I f I!; [~Ill~~l~lkl~{ ~~I~ll ~II~~~~ 1lilil~ll111~~ il~~llfl~l~~~ f~~~~lll~l~~~ ~~IfI~IE~~II~ ' ^' ~ _ 1~ ! f frC LO A ~'T'A CI~MENT D ~ ,~, s ~, ._~4~ ~~..,~ ~' r ..'~~ t : ^ i~~ ..1., .. ., :~ s~ ~~~ ~ T ~I~I •o"[ ~o I~ I~~r~l .~ol~ N~~~ Y~ I w I~~ I ~~ Y S yl 5 9I 5 9 i i ~ f f iAP 7 i ~~ ~a ~ t~21 iti;7..0'.~ f ~}E_;~ c~ I - ~s CLOVER FIELD W ~-- (~A ~'(7 CE' o cauat v g ,.. S y•: ~: ~ ~ ~' = ' ~ ~~ g ~ x ~ ~ -- -y ~~ ~o ~a ~ia "~i !~'m ~ c ~ ~ :•• • • • ~ + ^ ~Y~ ~~'~ (~71 9'f) ll 3 l4- ]a_ 3~ J6 35-.11~ 33 F ~ ,s 37~,~ ~ p ff,.S1? ~ .{ :~', , . ~ ~ ^ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ,, ~ .. '~ 9 \ 1 z ~ ' , ~ ~ ~~- ~- ~ ~ b 1~'~ ~ ~ ~ F x ~ ~ 3 _ 73U] s `~ ~ y : .~~:~. ~ ` ~ 10 m ~ ~01 ~ r~a <<~ c.•~~ `[~~~ ~il ,~ .~ ,~ .o a ~_,~.•n = ~ 3~= zao~ ° TWENTY-TNIR~ STRE~T : F-~- 2src~ Sti~~~et S~REEt y ~~~~ ~.'•~.~ 4 ~ ~ f~ 1' '['(} R ~# 9 5 . ~ ^ . ~ i, n b K e .a- ~ * w w ~~~ ~ ~ _. . ~.~ , . _ . . _. _,.._.-- " ;! ~!~~ 1 '~ o~ ~ cs ~ - ~ -- i r r s~~u 7 ~ A 1 ~~ Y f Y Y b 9 i t .. „ N ~ Y s A A R e 9 G y ~~yt - I "° B' 9•+ ID ~! 12 1~ ti~' 15 1i I1 r~ ~4 ?0 21 77 23 II 25 ?6 71 26 ~9 4-'~ ~ 3 ~~ ,~ t ~~3 ~i ~ Y ,o' ~) 9 B . -N? ..-- ~ ~ ' ~I ^ 1•r~S ~~ ~o w ~0 W a ~o ~a N V ~n m .a a6 W ~6 u ~P ~o b ~.a ^ ~ ^ r ~ 4 a ~ ~ ^ I R Y ~ 9 ~.~~ , p 1 :o w i3-~ ao " •a ' ~ .a ~a ~ :o ~e w » .a .~ +a r .o ~ r ~.o ' ~~ 'I~~I -,e~~p ~as ~,~ T T ~_ ~, yu ~. _ ~~ 29 ~ 76 11 ~~6 ?5= II `l3 72 21 20 14 ~ IO' 17 16 15 _ II ~ IOc 9~ a ~ 1 g~3 ; rt I ~ ~ ~ y~ N6 qb ~ i ~~~?" ~~ ~ ~l ~ ~rl [ ~~J 17 a a R ~ ~ A ~ ~ " !l } 9- Z~1q50~Y Z ~ 11 ~ZO 9 w I ~~. w~a ~~9 ,^ Itl01 - ~ b ~4 Li~ ~ f, Q'L i B 4 2lDI 0! ; ~ly ~~ 3 6 ~~g ~~o W ~0 ' W '.o L_ Id1~ r b w .~ w ~e ~a w~ ro n + '`.,; -~ . ~ ~ STR~ET Y ~ ~ a , { , x-.,... „ . ~, ~ .--. _. „__ , ,.,i 'sa"_ ' w'_`' ye .. _ _ ~ ...^.._. ~ Q! ..-,~ ..~,.. ... ~ Ltl - H~ 6- 0 ~ !LK '°° w~, ~. .~.~,......~-_.._~-_~~_...~. M m o~~~sn ~ ! 7 ~ ~ ~ d' ~ ~~ ~! xQR~ AR~ ~ RA~' ~, r5' zs~~ i~y zaX ~z9 Y~ M, ii i:~ ~ _' _ , _ ~,. .~., 14 . !a ,~. nY N L D I I 7 Y M N M N r -_~ • i5 ~~ I~ ~ ,~ lLOCN 7 ~ pf O ~ ; `~- • ; ; ~' -:~__.Y ~+ ~ ° ~1HENTf-fIRST STREET ~ , ~a ~T ie i9 zo z~ ~ t3 ,~ '~ ~ ~_.~ .___. .•~ ~ A(; T ~~ .__, • 0 R C H A R Q T R A C j ,~ li llDp A 11 +o x w ~ se » ~so 2; ~' 21~1 D!_ un 4-to vy i5t~~ ~±~ i~ fl l7 ~ z ~ s ~ STRtET ~ (~ ~ ~+ _~1:1-_ _ .~~r w ,. ~ea~-- M fi f0 10 M f0 M ~,~ _ ' "' 1^ ..•~~._~.~- ^_ ~4 ~a 1/~ ry ~ NE 1~ ~ ~ 1~ _1 14! il ~ _~~ ~ } ~ A SLQLK S z ~ p ~ ~R 4~ s cs ~ e; ~; b~ V ~04 N ~0 f~ 10 M _ _ _ _ l00 _ (~ ~""" e rwEn~iEit+ r. ~e - couRr " a r~ ~IJt 11 ~;~'~ ..~.~.~~. 1Q ~_' '~_ _p ~ iYC ~ Y ~i 0 - '9Q,~ S ; ~; `, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~l~~ ` r .!'~~~i 1 ~ ~O ~ l 4 ~ 1\ G ^~~ V} u_ Y ~ Q t ~y w S `-r~!` 0 ~~~Np. e s r i ~ w Y i 0 K M x v u- 1 ~ ~yl ~ na~ - 7l ~ 4aoZ~R w '~ a ?00~ ot~q'_. ~. _~., .~ ~~ ~o' ~M659~i~YD01 4! ~o x ! ~e r Z001 ~ « o f a eo f ~ 3.w. l.,.....~r ~ H~ Z~t~~ .7trC~E'f ~~ A.1'a~RLa~ Ni ~ y ~ .Y i ~ - .~_.._.T~,. ~~., o I.., tie 'L3'~~e 1 -qy ~~ q6-• 73~.r. --id-""I^ - ~ b u ' e ~a w 10° -~ i G f G x~ D E ~ FI { J K l A b t U £ f ~ N I ~ J K l '~ A L?', f r M f J K~ L .. 9 Si AI SCI ~ l ~ y Y 5t _ y Y v y y, v ~~~ Y~ 1 Y Y I - f ~p 9 Y x , ,-~ ~ A I ~i ~ ~ ~ a i '~; ~ 1 1~ Y P^'I~ r, x a ~ p ~g -.- -- ~. - 10 .W 1a x ~~ te ~a w ea ` ti9 4a io in . ~a ,. +e y~ ^ w - ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~__--~... r-~-- ~ ~ -, , -; .--, . . , -----, - - ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~: , ~ ~~ , , ~ ~, _,; ; ~ , ~ ~-~ E--~. ~,:~ _ ~;_1 ~ , ~ ~ , h=• f`~ '~~ Tr_I I ~ I ~ ~i ~ . n ^ I l. I I ~ I ~ i ~~ _ ~~ ~ 1 ~ k i__.' , _,~;~ .~. _ ~ -:~.r ;, ~i~~'~J ~-" L~ Ul { j ~--,. 1 ,t , ^~. F ~rti ~i~a~~ri~ f ' 0 ^~~1~~~~~~ '~~OO I ~ ; ;~~ ~~ IIIIIIIII 1~~^~~~ ~~''---^~J ---f__ _ ' ~ U~r TMI p =~ ~1 I 1 ~`~ I `~• rr ~ ~~7~ r' f ~~ ~ I~.~I ~ ~1 ~ -~; -~ ~ l ~ C~ 1 ~ ~u ~ ~ ~ _ ,.~_~~ ~ . o rwE+;-Y ~i _ ~ . ~ ~L~p~~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ . I f i!' 1 ~~ ' ~ ---- -w€S'r€rr~ 5 =_- i I ~. ~ ~ I ^ ~ e ~ ~~ j ; ~ N~tie zF"~TN ~ ~ +r~~~ _ `- " __ ~ ~ 1~ ~ l~~ L~~ ~~ ~~ ni i J i ~ (~ ; I ~ ; ; _ ' E~G~rE~r:iH ~ S` c-- ~ 1 ~ f ~~ ~~~ ~r~ ~E ~ ~~ I~~i-~ :, , aE1E~i'fEN7.~ ~ . c--__- ~~ l ~~ l ~ L...~..~~ ~~ , --- . ~ ~1 I^~ ~ ~ C~ 1 ~ ~_ ~ SYTE=HTw - ~ 5' _ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ '~~ ~ ~" ~ ^ ^ ~' ~-- .a...~~. ~ ~ i I ~ t-i , , I FIFTE-kTK • 5~°2?" .rr s:ro-, ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' . . ~ , ~~ ~~ I l ~ I l ` ~' ` F~VRTEEN7q ~ ^~f ~ 5-x__- ,~~~ ~~~ If I' ' °~. ~ ~ - ~~1 .,~ T~~ - E~ uC.~p ~~~1ii~~ ~l~i~r ~1~~~a ~s~~ ~~ 5~n_,- ~ 4 I ~~~ ~ i i~ I i .~ , IC~~ I~ l~l ~l ~ TwF~4cnc ~s S'~=_~- I I~.Y I +~ I ~~: ~ i j_____~, = ~~ ~ _ ~ ~~ K 3 I i N ~I ~~~ lil =L r- fLE4EHT+1 ~ T F - ;---~ d -~---l~ i X ~ r~,,o. ~ ~~' i i j J;( ~`~ ~~~ ~~ ~ i r~ ' i _FHr~ i~ I L~~ ~ _ ~ I ;, ~-- ~~F-~ ~ , ~ ~ „ ~ , PR4POSED GP-3 AND CP 5 AREAS 0 ~ _ i~ r-- ~ ~ ~•.. ~ote: Per Ob~ective 3f, any properties t~:at are cur~ertl~~ devoted to resident~al uses sY~a71 not be redevelone~ unless the exis~.~.nc~ res~den~~al units are replace ~ an- or otf-szte cr axe relocate~ el.sewhere i*: t?:e City. A~'ACI~MENT E RUZH B~~Oh~ r=- ~~~~:a~ ;•~~ V ~ +~ ,~ ~l~~ l. / ~~ ~ - 1~~ ~3 ~~ ~ - - - - ~ ~~ ~y Apnl 24, 1993 Plannu~g Division Room 212 1685 Main Stre~t Santa Moruca. Ca 9a401 Atten~ion: D. Buckley ' To Wham it May Cancern, I appose the zane change for Sauit John's Hospital for the follounng reasons: 1, increased traf~~ load on Broadway Street 2. reduction af publfc s#reet parkirig on Broadway Street T~~~-~k you. /~~ / ,~ ,~; f ~ r ;~ ~ ~--~ ~ ,' v ~ - ~,,~ r`'~'`- - - ~Ruth Blaom, owner Ruth Bloom Gat~~ry _ t 1_ li K~~ ~ ~~ 1~ . ti 5~~. E ~•1tca~ic ~. L~~ iF~~k~i t ~1 E) ~ f l a - _ ~i ] ~ +I[) t3?~l "~~-F • ] 1\ 3l{, h~~ ?(,~, > ` -~ ~ I~ 14~0 23RD STREET HO~fEO~i~'NERS ~SSOCIaT10\ t-~0 ~3~tD STREET SA1TA 1~1QNICa, Ca 90~0-~ May 17, 1993 Paul Berlant, Director Land Use and Transportatian Management Planning Division Room 212 1685 Main Street Santa Monica CA 9~401 Re: Planning Commission Public Hearing May 19, 1993 Sr~ecific Plan 92-001 and Zone Chanae 92-002 Applicant: St. John's Hospital & Health Center Dear Mr. Berlant: The Board of Directors of 1440 - 23rd 5treet Hoineowners Assvciation has decided to send you and other city officz.als this Ietter to znform you af their concern with regard to the above application of St. John's Hospital & Health Center ("App~icant") for a zaning change, and make the fo~lowing requests and observations: 1. We wish to be advised of the Applicant's stated purpases zn requesting this change in zoning. 2. We are coneerned with the apparent or actual conflict of interest by the Applicant and a member a~ the Planning Cammission. 3. We wish to be advised o~ a11 public hearings and other steps the City will take prior to granting the Applicant's requests. 4. We wish to be informed if the Appl~cant has rECeived perm~ts allawing it to do things which the Applicant has already recently done, i.e., the canstruction of lighting and other structures at the west end qf Schader Drive and, if so, the date and the specif~c number assigned to each or any of such permits, and whether ~r not public hearZ~gs wexe held wzth regard to requests for such permits. . _ _~ 14~0 ?3RD STREET HO~lEOL4'NERS a550Ci aT10\ Paul Ber3~ant, Director ~:~.~0 ~3RD STREET May 17 , 199 3 5~vra t~oh[Ca, Ca 90.~0~ Page 2 5. We wish ta be advised if the above applicatiort includes a stated desire by the Applicant to apen Schader Drive as a public thoraughfare. 6. We request an investigatzon and report by the City Attorney to see if any laws, whether city, county ar state, have been violated by the Appl~cant concerning this application or its activitYes in relation thereto. 7. We request, as part of any public study, a dete~nination of the likely effect of the granting of this application on the adjacent res~dential property, to wit, 1440 23rd Street, insofar as increase in tratfic, noise, excess ~ighting, public safety, and other re~ated matters are concerned. 8. We would also like ~o knora if an environ~ental impact study is required prior to the cons~deration of th~s application and, if so, whether or not it ha~s been made. We trust that the City of Santa Monica will perform its ~awful pub~ic function and require that this Applicant comply with all reievant laws. Very truly yours, 1440-23rd STR~ET HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION B ~~.~/ /L~~L~'~ /~,/ . fJ~[ ~C-Gr s'v Y '~ALG'OLM H. LEV~N, President cc: President, Santa Monica City Council Kenyon Webster, Planning Director Ronald Fuch~waki, Parking & Traffic Engineer John Jalili, City Manager Jos~ph Lawrence, Acting City Attflrney Bill Rome, Building & Sa~ety Directar ' . ~ 1 I~'JL~i Z~C 4v'r1RSiiL~: P.C. BOX 3512 5a~'ta A'IC::3Cd~ Ci~. 90~48 TeL. (310} 393-257: - -. - vsP f'T '` e - ~r~Z 30, 1993 ~i ~~ _~- , •- city of santa rronica PaLl Berlant, Directo~ cf La,-y3 ;Jse & Trar:spaztation '~c~rt. Plannizg Division, Roan 212 1685 Nlaa,n Str~t San`.a +~n1ca, C.r~. 9G~C1 Cr.Ct"'iFI~TE OF ?:~;I~~G FtE• P1GnnJn.; C~~a°mission Pui~lic Hearuie .,.. 3]Fy ~, 199~ S~er_ific Pia=. A.-~:~~ 92-001 & Zone Chanqe 92-i;~2 APPLSCr~NP: S4. Jot.n's ~iospztal ana H°alth Centx. TJear ~=. ~erlan=: k°w~. refer.:n~e tc *he abo~e-listec ap_lication, a~ u~~l as c~`r.e- ce~elop- :[~r:t act~~rities occur_~ing o^ or about the Hospzta'_•'s ~.ro*~,.,er~y in Yhis aerer~~ area, there ap~ears to be nwnercus irregular=ties for v:rach fo_nnall; I am re- ~uesti:-~~ investiaatio~s b,~~ ~ne ap~ropriat2 respective de~a~~trle.~ts l~stec beia~a. ~7.sc, I w~u1c 1i{e ~o rec:uest r~~zrten responses ~.~th ana-wp.xs to :~r_.- s?eciric ~ ~e~"~ list~l bela,~•. Rsgardir.g ;his ap^lzca~ion, T have att~ted several t~mes tc secure ~u:lic information a~out various plans and activities occurrinc o.^. or about the situs add.ress of 2200 Santa ~bniCa Boulevard, }mown as the John Fiayne Cancer Institute, ~~ APP~~~~ts Pro1~rtY ~]~t ~reto. For each atta.ipt I have made ta see actual £iles or orig~nal source infagna~ion fran various City departnients (Flannang, Parking &~raff~c, Bu~.lduly & 5a.fety, etc.) I have ha~ ::o luclc irx satisfying im• reques±s. I^ Planninq~ for exar~le. o~ Marc}: 2, 1993, ~ tvas tolc :A wri~e m~ :~a.~, adr.'sess & teleghcne niatiner on a list, ann I uaeuld be concactec about seeing the or_ginal file "in a few days." No one has ever written or call- ed me, sa I ~cuid xrivestxgate a*lc review these files ~.^. order to ~reoare m~rsel` for tt~_e ~~7ay 3th Publ~c F3earing. Zv`ny even h,ave a~li~ Hearinc if th-e p~~;~c ~s rer•ied acc~ss to public infcx7nat~on? Hoi+ couic I or arn-one u.terested in and "er~uraa~" ~- Ci~~- nublic het~ ces to _r,articipat° ~ th~s a.mportant cove .r-~:~tai prccess ~e ~x-~.~ec. _- e~ *_o r~,ake i.~telligent cctmtents cr as~c ~rtanL ~:esticns about ~u~lic i.eal*1:, safetv a:-~d wel`ar~ ~;_thcut beina civer ~ree and u: ~~s~rc:ctec ~ccess ~o th~ data ~ infcm~ation Lo }~e :he sub;ec~~riatter c~ t~e 1-ie~inr,? naturall~.~, I aid ~~c tss 7ust :rsght i~e ~a-~ isola~ed i~cidence; how-ev~, I ti,as sur~risc~ a^.d sh cked tc learn o~ s~uliar cif£sc~,:lties ~.n receiving requested L-~fexmation,re~orrec ~e r,ie ~.~ T;alca-ib LeS;in, Pre5ident c_° the 69 unit Corxlcxr;.nitun Haibeok7i~rs ?,ssec~atio:, locateci a~ 1~9G-23rc Street. 54aecificall~-, I~- c~nc~~ed with }~he folla„u:g r~t~ers. 1. The erec~ion cf a small ~Jur.g nooth & u}i'aty lL 2s leaci:c ~~~re~e klthout a~erfr~t at the wester3y -er- m~n_us c= Schacer Drive. Z. D~_er bu~14i_c actlvity (3~gcinr„ ts~::~'_'~*~c &~ract~or./.'~ri:.g cf lig :.ting s:~zd~rds} withou~ pers~ts at the sa'ne ioca`ic.^. T:~ li~ht standards ~sa 2~' concrete di~neter bas~s 3' ^~g,. 3. P,n incorre: t s=tus ade~sess anc ~~anc c,Gce for this applic.ation on t:e ?1«r ~ng Catmtssao: C~s2 L.ts~ ca~EC.' Fai~. 23, '_99~. 5. E`sn a~parent efLor: t~o ~~a= Schader Drive, a~u~l~c rr.crcug:~ fara, ~nzthc::t noticA or a pabiic he~ing, wh~ch ma;~ cr ~~> no~ ~e i^.clude~ w~,hu~ the al~=e ~pl~cGcio^ (i~ I ever a-r civen th~ op~ortu^.~~: to see it) . 5. I~p~sen= arr3;or ac:.ual Confl~ct-of-Interest b~~ ~he overs~eine of ~-~s ~>alicat~on bj~ a Pla.r,u:g Carrussie^er ~ioye3 ~: tne ~~11can~. 5. R~.=al t.ithout netice cr ~u;l~c riea~L:q of +.he ir_gress/ec=-e~s d`ivewal~ aLSt k~est ~f 2210 Sa:•ta :,cnica Bl~d. & e=ect_o~ c= a ron~~e ~e .:,:rb u~ ~ts ~lace des~,ice :rt~ pr~cr ~_as~ ~f ~oss~=? ?rescricti~re or a~^v_~lled eas~.nis or o*~ rights c~ use t:nere~::. Y~RSr~,s to 3ERL~"T ~rz'_ 3J, 1993 ?aae 2 C= roL:rse, I a-r greatl}~ dxsturl~ that it is t_ ~ City i~se1= whc is sever2l~= har~ca : ing 'n~ e~forts t~o ~repare `_or t:~:is Public Hearing, as ~~1~ as witYinol~^_: other v,~lic ~.=ormation an r~latti.t-c :~=ters. ~ rec~^ ~i~- as .~°s- te-das, I called ths Pl~~inc De~~~~e^~'s ~ublic cou^t~, aslc~na a~~~ou~g ia:.y witethe~ cr ~t Hrcach.a}~• :ti~s an the Iizgi:~,-ay Ca-ariercial Dis~z~t. 5hef~zu :~c*_ ~~w the ans~a~er, so s~e switc:~ed me to th~eir answ-eru,c :nac:a^~, v~hh~rre ~ was asKed t,c leave my~ ~ane & teiepk~ne niari~e~ so s~eone c:cula r~~ur.- --n~ c.:.ll la~~ that afternoon. Ag~:., nc res~onse. Sti11, I a'n confused because ~~_2~ ?lan- n~ng ~ept, staffer's stat~t~ent earlier t;~',at aft~erncon ~ica~ed on1~- S~Tiis"r.~.re a-~c? Sa,-~ta 'Qonica Boulevards were consacse~ed i.~ the iiigkaM1at C.•ime~4~.:1 D~s~ict. SLZCe t:~:e ~~o~er~~ a~°ned :~- t~:e ~,tili~ant horcers botr B~oadr~:ay an4 Sant~ ~~niea 3~vc. ^ I a.-r, con~.erned, a'n~na cther thl^:gs, u~~verLl~g Bro~Gw,~-ar int~ a h.e~t-~- t~a°fic ce.~se h:ghw-ay instead of ~ust a~eaeeful cit~• street. Fcr the a~ot-e reasons, an~ ~ore ; o be cata~ 1~ zf ~er being g~v~ =~~se acvess tc ;he ~ntcmatio : w~ttc: I seeic, it is eas~~ tc :anderstand :a,• fr:;strated a- at~e- rage ~rso^ ca_ bec~ kith ou: cover:.ment. U:~der tne ci~~~nstances I de nct thulk it is faa~ and/ar z;,ui~able tc a11cM tne abo~-e-~isted pr~cs~ e'~:.Fiic4acn te go to Public Hearing at tr.is t~. Ta_e proper ~irie tc sc:~ed:1e t_r,is case is zfter m~t-~ers of the pu~l~c have Deen af°or3ed rU"Li. a.c OP~ti accsss ~~ all i;.for- :~atac: regardinq th~s ~p ;licat~ or_ and an~~vng reaso^ably reiated theretc. Therefore, t.ith resaect tc said ?p~licatio~ i rP~lPst ttie fo~lowin~ acticns ~e ta~er.: I. WITFIDRAfr~L of this Application fr~ the Pla-L.ing Crnmission's Pul~lic Hearirig schedu~ed May 5, I993. II. C!OI+~LETE WI~IDRA3n~L, fran tlzis ~plication b~r Plaruiang Ccatm3ssioner 3tzn Py*-e because he is ~layed by the P~~icant, &#here ~s either a;. actual or apparent Gor.- ~iic~-e~-Ir~terest wit.n :us ia~olvement in t:as ~~se, III. A^. ?*!~?'~~?te ORDER ~~ *.he Buildang & Safety De~artrient tor the ~.~lzcant to cease & nesist fr~ a11 acts.~aty at or about 220G Sant~ rionica Bl~~, u:.: al ~,s~ectors ~a~ verif°Y all necessan- and rr_~,,, red p~...~ats have be~^ recuested anc ~antea. I4'. Ir.t~stigat.~oa and renort 1~~ the C~t~~ Att;;r_:ef~ tc see if a^~ City and/c~ ;eunty cr3i~~nce5, State statutes a.d/or an~- feceral laws hati=e ~een i~~~lated ~s~ t~e A~p~i:.ant recat~c.ing ~}us r~licatio^ and/o~ the activi~ies r~latec thereto. V. Y,r: OIiD~'c2 to `h~. City Parlc~ng & Tra~f~c ~gi-~eer ta candu~ a TFSr,FFIC STCDI w~~h respecV to t;.is ~.^p~ ~ca- ticn to 3st~.~~stigate a: d report: A. Zti3~ Sc:,acer Dr~~~e has ~e~: c-~csed at its ~rest- er~y ter.~un::s for ~p± years~ B, LtiHiiT ~-~r' ,ti,~' w~u1c its pro~os2d r~n, .zg :.ave cn ad~ace^t resi~2ntial and 4air~r~~a1 r,e~ghbors w_`h res~ect, but not lu~itec, to: l. I::crease i.n vol~e of tr~=f~c. 2. I:cr~ase ~:_ tY:e nc~se generatea ;~?frc~. 3. C_eatio: af u....~sance frcrr~ :,_a=~-,-~'°reG -100~ lichts. y. Increase~' ~ubi~c safzty has~s frc-i pro- xsed Schacer Dr. o~ning L clo~ : ~ox- ~.~riti• ta 3 existL~y ~x'iv~~ay- atirons (2 c~nerci~ & 1 res~.a~~tial 65 ~ut c~nw~) . 5. Rece~sidera:.ior. as to tze sa_°et~~ c~ a~sira- ~ilit:- w.lethzr or 7ot Sch~der Drive sho;;~d be co,tvnue:3 as a 2-wa~, strAet ~~est c= 23rd S:reet a a one-wav stree; ir an~as~e~l~,~ cL2ctyo^ ~st c` 23rd Street tc Cloverd~l.e Bouler•~. ~~. ~7e*._e~i e i~ ar• ~v'~ ~~DI~~T'esL L'~~.~.T R:.''P~~' 1s ne~ssar- fo~ :his r~~lication i rior to its Pt:::l_c Hear~ng. 4v~RSAhT to BF~LFINT Apr~l 30, 1993 Paqe 3 Although I am ~vst a la~l Yn th~.s area, ~t se~ns to me th~s Ap~~icatio7 has been sukitutted much too prgnaturely. Both as a private citizen and an ad~a-- cerit pro~eer-ty owner, I a~ quite upset at bei.~g shuffled, rusdirected, :nislead and misinfam~d by mc~st pe~sons I have cantacted involving this Apnlication. Obviously, St. Jo~n's Hosp~tal has mucYz political pawer in Santa I~~nica; an~ it prdbably is the Cit~.='s biggest em~loyer. Nevez-the~ess, the Ap~l~cant's r~ght to have zts gro~ects rev~~ed and a~~roved should NflT be supe~ior ta ~.he pu~lic's rigr~t to obtazn open and free access to informat~on cancexr~ing the satt7e. The der,iocrat~c process is gx'eatly d3mixiished when public in~ormation and knok*ledge is prevented~ stified or ~ust severely cu~rtailed. Let's open the jtiindaws of Darkness in this case and focus s~ne fx'esh a~r and Iir~ht on ~:actl~: WHAT St. John' s Hospital intends t.o c~o! R~spectfully yours, ~~ ,r : t . . ~~ f IF~IIN ZEKE FAR~W Coples to: 1. AZ~ City Counc~.Z m~nbers. 2. All PlannJ.ng Camussion n~nbers. 3. Kem~on webster, P~anning Director. y. B~Il Ra;ie, Bua_lduig & Safety Director . ~. Ronald ~chiwak~, Parking & Traf~ic ~g~neer. 6. Sta~ Sholl, Di.rectar of General Servaces. 7. Jo_'u~ Ja~~.li, Gity Nianager. 8. Jaseph Lawrence, Act~ng City Attorney. 9. Robert ~^~I. Sinskey, M. D., propertv owner. 10. ~.~ouise Robinson, praperty ow~er. 11. ~i. Levi.n, Pres. o~ 1~40-23rd St. Homeow~ers Assoc. (69 units). 12, t,nne Niorg~-~thaler, E~ening Outlook. ~3. C~ty ~ditar, L. A. Ta.mes. Westside edita.on. From :~ARSRW-POB ~512,S.M.~ ~~0408 PHONE Na. 31~ 393 297? ~ay 19 19~3 5.~~~~ P~~ ~N ZE~ WATtS~T p.0. BOX 3~1~ Santa Nbni.ea, CA~ ~0408 ~el, (31Q- 3g3~2977 May 1B, ~993 Cx.tY of Santa Mrani.ca ~ GYTY HAtsL, ]~Ai3L SEt~J~AN~, Dit~t~,x at Lar~d Use &'Fr~ns~~~zar~ M~nt. ~685 M~-~iri S~a.-e~t 5arita Monica, C'A. 904D] D~ar I~ir. T3er~.an~: Vs~ FAXs 531~) 34A-~~fi2 ~loSer3 is araather ~opy of my le~ter ~ yau: da~ A~~rii 30th. ~ kr,~r you are pr~~ably verY }~y: k~ut z~ras r~L7~y dis~g~au~t~ i.n nat ~v~n ~~ceiv~g a aouttesy telepY~rse aa~3 in zespansa ta sa~ aex~,ous Conoexn~ T raj.sed. A9~ri, I~t1 writirig y~au aEor t~ reason5. Fix-~t, I wdrited to ]a3aw wha~ y+DUr' crpinio~ wes on each of ~he 6 r~n~nded ac~inns an Page 2 of my l~~~r ~r~c~ a_f ~nythinq had [a~n dor~e i~gr~dix~c3 ar~Y of th~ it~ I mpmt#.c~ruzd. ~eaan~, fc~r rc~sc~i~ ~xp~ained t~a.aa~ I aan reques~ing a~Orrl'~Ni~ANC~ o~ St. ,3o}~n`s Hasgita~'s Ap~plicai~ion b~use I was x~ot giv~n a~~.~ advanoe natic~ in ~rder to reasonably revie~w and prepare ~or t,a~rra~w night `s prabla.c Hear~ng. ~ccially a~ ].iyht a~ my ~prii 3~th lettex, 1 canzYO~ ~rstand tn~ zt w~~}.d ~alce ~.2 days f inciudir~g 2 va~taalale ta~ker~s} ~a ~o~ify n~ ou a 5tu~ay ~ternoon fihat the S~af f Repox~ w~uld f.~na~~.y be ava~.].abl.e ~ar my revie~w on Monday- 2 days befo~r~ tt~e ~blic Hearutg. Li,1~e mr s~ athers ~ I r~aork for a liv- inq. h~.v~ng previousl.y sc~duled appain~nettts and ~u~itta~er,t~ fc~r y~st~ay and today. Ta dat~, I have i-e~~vnd na written r~~r-ses addressang tY~e isse~s ~ h~ve ra.ised. I afm a~lled and ~5tound~d kxy this s~}.~nce. So~uad gt~vek~ut~nt ~gerial practioe sur~]y we~~1d require ~xne }sind ~f resgonse ~o, for e,~~~~e. mY qu~st~anzng Mr. Pyr~'s dual raZ~ as a Planning ~«<a.ss~oncr and as ar~ ~~-- Ploye~ af 'kt~ A~LLC~nt~-H~asQita~.. Ci~l.y. most ~rtial abservers would ~cC C~a~sszo~nes Fyne to aornp~ete~y wi.~aw ~ram partici.pa~t.an ~n th~s case. Consid~x~~~ th~e lack at r+~s~anse I have ~ceived ~rcm ~exy~ne, I, 2~c- gning to request trie Ci~y Manager t~ axivestigate why rcr~' ir~qui.ries have bee~ ~gnorc~d. O~~cilman Gen~ex agr~ t.~re w~s much r~cxn fnr i~x~v~ben~ in th~ m~nagem~n~ of c~v~rrn-ient bus~ss ~~ the executive IeveX of many Cit~y de}aax~men~~. In c~C3usio37: I a¢~- ati~uestitYg ~stpar~~n~ of ~ea~.fiC Plari Ame~mea~t ~~-D~1 arx3 Zanix~g Chat~c,~e 9~,OD2, schecluled to be h~-d on May 19, 1993, at 7 p.m. by the PZ~ru~.ng Oatmi.ss~.on, sa I maY Frepar~ tar a PR~FR ~u~d bana fi.de Pub~i.~ Hearueg on this mat~s. Please te].~phone m~ at th~ above n~nk~x w~~h o~al floti~e of yati~ dP.~iSxOa~ ~s sooa~ as pDSSible~ as I wil~. ~ w~r~:i.ng iri the ma~nntai.ns t.~rrc~w. F~PS~;rrZT~,1T ~3RS, ~ ~ ~.2,~ ~ ~.._ .~ From ' WARSAtJ--PQ$ 3512, S. M. , CA. +@B P~I~*JE No. 310 393 2977 ,.~.~ ~~ 'Tai ~iOmlaL~k]lA~ ~~I~$~~`Ik:R GITrF~i3 -.--- :iT~kii~! t~'~~ ~aG ddt~~T.$~~T v3.a ~'AX: t310) 39~-Z962 ~; xr~r;x, ~c~e war~aw ~ '~. I314) 3~3-2977 1~A'1"E: Mtty ic~, ~.993 rcE: PU~~ ti~^ ~y~.9, 1,99~ S~ci.~fc F~ ?~n~r~n~ 9~-~Qi ~,o,~{ng CCkysnc,~ , ~~042 D~r G=~•~r~~~ioner Gilpsn: May t9 1993 5 30PM P03 ~nc~~ i.a a ao~ag- o~ ~r May 18. 1993 l~~cr ~ t~lr, Pau~ 8e~lant~ Dire~ctar ~i x+arrd U~e and ~an~pox~tat~ Mat~ag~nen~ ,for ~ C3~.y o~ ~ar~ta M~a~ica. ~or ~,'ea~sor~s expre~~ed i.~ lh3s ],~~~cx ~ aoh ~+~ar.i~wg ~hfe ri~apli.cation be ~"Yx'f~i7i~ trom i:~ni.gl~t' ~ crsa.e¢ade~ a~nd reschedul+~*d t~o e~cxt~t*t~me a~t.er I~xn given n z~a~~al~le ti,me t,o ~ec a~r,d ~view~t ell file~ c~oexr~ir~g thf.g ~t~x. F+ar a c~oug~lc af m~r-~hfa I h~-~a be~t- t.~yfxtig t+~ eh~k~it~ soil7~~ ~il,es arrd i~fo~aatii~r- an this P,~].icatic~n wittxx~t ~tuvcxs.~s. ~ do siat thitYle ~ Pub1~ Il~ar~ shou].d be schedu].ed ~r~ ~ rna~~er un~il ~rs a~ the ~ubiic are al~.aw~ad full aa~ess ~nd tt~ right t~o ea~ fil~s# reoo~da ~d p~~it.s r~l~rant to any app3.i`cai_iaaz. Mr, SY~^u'- L. BtaGy, at"Gorn~ey for St. ~'nfin~ ~ i~~~}~r1., ~us1~ ae.~~i. me a c.~rrpy of hi~ May 17. ~.~~3 lett~s bv Mr. ~~3.~uYt. advisir,g him t1~-t "Mr. Pyx~ wi1]. no~ participat~ ~~#~e decision ~r- thi~ casa." ~t is a bi~ frigtr#~~ir~g tx3 tihink that w~xe ~t n~ tvr m~- ob~ec~ic~¢i~ C+~+u-issio~ner gyru~ ~d pralbbly hav~e par~icip~t~ in t~.s caee. R+1tty such en ad~v~us situ~ti.~ wa.s nat xrnrk4xysly spot'ted 3.~ be~yand t~tY oampi"e]~en~3,vn. 1~t~-hnw, ~~~~o ~*ra~ ~LCt.ing City 11~~ors~y Le~w~~~oe t~ay, aslcing ~or a withdrawai cf thi.s itan. ~~ wou~d 8evn t~ n-~ that i~ #his A~plfcati.on w~,~ ~ be al].VWC~cl ~d be l~eax~d ~tiiB eM~tlltg, ~ BPxf.01.~~ ~wr~titF~i.nnai Fxubl.an~ mi,ght o~is~ inc~uding, bu~ nQt ~.~t;~d tdv~ ~.acfs v~ du~ prac~ess, cli.sc~;,~~^Atior~, v~olatic,ri ot civil r~.ghL•s ~ xig1~ to b~ ~±~+*d, e~c:. i 2~p~ ttle 8ia~r~.i,t~g C+~i~~~t.s8ion wi~l ~u7.~ ~t1~at ~1~e Agplic~.nt'r~ righ~ I.a a Fub1i~ NearuYg ~o~.~.o~ws aa~d ia su~bvrd9na~e ba t~ p~ubl~~'s prixnary aci.~h~ !~e full ar~ op~~ ~xee a~aae~~ tro ~rty infaamnt~i pax+Aa *-ing to said Applic~t~cm. t~.~~i=~t~+T.Y ~OC~ r ~+ , . 1T+1 • WAf~~1L4 ~ ~ ~ . ~ From :~JARSAW-PDB 3512, S. M. ,~F ~04~$ PHt]NE No : 310 393 2977 May. 1~ 19~3 ~. 31PM Pq4 ~s~tu z~ wa~.w P.a. ~ax ~~i~ Sari~a I~ir*a, CA. 90408 Tel. i310) 3~3~-2977 N~ay I8, Y993 Cl~ O~ SAYI~ M~l].Car C~TY I3AT~ PAUr~ 9~R~,~~r, nireGtor of r~rxi us~ & Transpor~a~ion r~~~;,. 16 $ 5 Main Street Sarlta Marxiea, CA. 90~a~. vi.a rA~i: {3~f}) 394-z95~ D~ar Mx'. 8erlant: fi~los~d i~ an~hPx aopy a~ mSr lattex to yo~. datc~d Aprx]. 30~h. T}srra~r yau ara pra-~~-,lY vexl' busY, baet I was ~ai~y a~.~~in~,a in rx~t ~v~n r~eivinq ~ aavr~-.asy te],eghane aall in ro~,c to ~at~c ae~riau~ ~at7o~•ns I rai~ed. Again, I aom wri~3ng ybr~ ~c~` ~~-aon~a. Firat, i w~ar~te~ i:a ]aivw wh~st y+o~r t~sinion wa~ on ~ach ~~ t.h~e 6 r~ed a~ioans ~n par~ 2 af my l~+pr arxl i~ ar-Ythin9 ha,d be~n dan~ rc~.~5 ariY ~f tha it~sns I m~nti.oned. Second, for raaear,s ~tp2.ainec~ br~].au,rt, i~ rc~t~e~titr~g ~ UGR~TP~N[]ANCE ~~ St. John's Iio~pital's Applicatian la~cat~c I was not given ~~~,].e advarice notice in nxd~r ta reasonahly reua.ew arxd prepar~ far to~cx~x~ night' a Publ.ic Hearinq. ~'.sQcacia~.ly ~tY ~iytit of ~iy ,p.~ril 34t3~ ~.etter, I cannot w'~de.rst3rid V4fiY it w+~u1r~ {,ak~ $Z clccyb {irx,:le~3inq 2 valu-~le w~kesidsl to no~i~y m~ on a Sunc9ay a~~oon that the Staff Repoxt vauiald tinx~lly b~ €nr~ila~k~Z~ fc.ar my re~rie~ o~- Mrar~7ay~-~-2 day~ 1~far~ Ll~ ~-~.~lic: ~~i~~y, Li.)c~ ur.~~t c~tt~~b, I w~rk far a liv- ing~ having previozasly s~hedu7.ed ~~nt7t~nts ~u-jd can~n,ittxn~nts for y~~t,erc~y and f,cx3ay. 'I1~ d~te, I h~ve receiv~d xxo wri~~n re~panses ~th~~~u~xg i~~ iss~s ~ have raisacZ. I am a~~+allecl anc~ asi.otuxl~cl k~y ihi.s sil~aic:e. 5a~u3 y~vesia~~rit ~~gera.al pxac~:~ce su.rely wrauZd rr~quix~ ~cne )citxl a~ r~s~+ans~ i..c~, irax r~s~~l~, rn1' qv~sticning Mr. Yyrxe's dual rale as a P].aru~ing (;or-~nri.ssx.on~x arx] as ~t~ ~'n- plqrce ~f thc l~plicadn~ Hartpit~I . C.Ieaz 1y, m~st iinpai tial obseivers wrn-,ld ~xpect Cannis~~ner Pyr~e ta a~~~,I.et.ely withdraw fran participation in l:hi~ case. Oansider~ng ~he ~ack af r~~p.c,~,s~ I hav~e reo~iv~r3 frcm evez~rone, ~ am g~ing ta r~est the City Mar~-gei t.o irxvestigmte va~xY mY i,nqui rfes havE be~sz igi~red. Qa-,u~i3m~1 Ces~er agr~ ~,he~e wa~ mur,tz x~oom ~or im~rovem~nt in i:]1c maz~g~zt Of ~,~t7M1-au~--iai~P..t~~ btlS3rieBS a~ t-1~e ex~+CU~i+ITe l~Ve]. Of mEU1y Cit1- de~uC~?rits~ Tn ~on~l~iot7, z am rGyaesting postpai~~1. oi ~x~iiic Pl~sty Arn~,~e3~n~rit ~32-bb1 asrl ~osii~u~ C}~csrige 92-OQ2, r~c:t~u].r~ tty be hearr~ c~ ~ay 19, 1993, at 3 p.m. }~y ~ Plar:ning Cnntx~.ssion, so I rnaY Prepare for a PI~ER and }~oixa iidc P~1ic: Eic:a~i«y U~~ t~u~ u~utt~.r. P~~~ t:el~Yx~rse m~ at the atx~v~e nunbe,r v~th oral nalc~ce of yoe~r 3GCisi~ri ~ws soam as passible~ as T wii~ be wr~~king ~rx tl~ moun~ait~e txxnar~aw. RE~~7C1~.3t Y~iS, ~ ~ ~1~~ ~~ ~'"anr'a~Vlan~ca~Cr'c~-Cr".~ ]~I'e~li.bar.s May 19,1993 Planning Commission City of Santa Monica f 12 Colorado Avenue, #106 Sartta Monica, ~A 904U1 ,~ ~ ~ £ - _ ~~~ ~~ ~~_ - ~ ~ = ~ _ _ ~= '~~ ~C~sr ~~l _ ~s ~ ~ ,,., RE: Rezoning Applicahon of St Tohn's Hospital Please be advised that the Baard af Directors of l~id-Clty Neighbors has voted unanimously to oppose the applica~ior. of St Jahn's Hospital to rezone the area immediately south of the existing Hospital District We wish to emphasize that Mid-City Neighbors does no~ oppose the proposal advanced by St. John's ta build a parking garage on part of that site. In fact, we agree with St. john's #hat that is a much more appropriate site for such a facility than the alt~rnahve site of 23rd and Arizona Avenue However, we believe that the concept af rezoning the property simply because it has been acquired by St John`s represenfs bad public policy and sets a potentially dangerous precedent We urge the Commission to take no action on this appl~cation at this time. We betiEVe that a meaningful three-way dialogue between the City Staff, the Hospital and the community should be instrtuted and may well lead to an acc~ptable re~olution af this issue Very truly yours, ~ ,~ ~ ~~ , .~".lrJ !` LL,~~C, ;~/~` _-r -`.;!~' 1 r; v~.t'y i~ '~ ~ ' ~ Michael Brourman, Chairperson of the Land Use Committee, for David Paley, Pr~sident af Mid-City Neighbors cc: Sherman Stacey (via f acsimile) 612 Cofurarfo s`Ivenue, #106, Santa ~fonica, C~ 90401 (310~ 450-55~~ AT~'ACHIVIE~ITT ~ , .~. NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT PROPO~AL To: Concerned Persons From: The City of ga~~a Moniaa Subjeat of Hearing: Specific Plan Amendment 92-001, Zane Change 92-Oa2, north side of Broadway between 20th and 23rd Streets, C4 Applicant: Saint John's Hospital and Hea~th Center A Public Hearing will be held by the City Council on the fol~owing request: Specific Plan Amandm~nt and Zone Change to modify the HospitaZ Area Specific Plan and Of~icial Districting Map ~or parcels located on the north side af Broadway between 20th Str~et and 23rd Street fram a C4 (Highway Commercial) District designation to a CP-3 (Commercial Prafessional) District designation. (Planner: Buckley) TIME: TUESDAY, June 29 , 1993 AT 6:30 P.M. LOGATION: G~IINCIL CHAMBER, ROOM 213, CITY HALL 1685 MAIN STREET, SANTA MONICA H04~ TO COMMENT : The City of Santa Monica encourages public comment on this and other projects. You or your representative, or any other persans may comment at the City Council's pub3.ic hearirtg, or l~y writing a letter. Letters should be addressed to: City Counci~, City Clerk~s Offiae 1685 Main Street, Room 102 Santa Monica, California 9{3401 MQRE INFORMATION If des~red, further information on any application may be obtained from the City Planning Division at the address above ar by calling (310) 458-8341. The meeting facility is handicapped accessible. If yau have any special needs such as siqn language interpreting, please cantact the Office af the Disabled at (310)458-8701. Pursuant ta California Gavernment Code Sectian 65009(b), if this matter i$ subsequently challenged in C~urt, the challenge may be limited to only those issues raised at the Public Hearing described in this natice, or in written carrespondence d~li~ered to the City of Santa M~nica at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. - 1 - Esta es un aviso sobre applicaciones proponiendo ser de interes a usted. llamar a Elsa Gonzalez en (310) 458-8341. PCWORD/spa001cc APPROVED AS T~ FORM: D. KENYON WEBSTER Planning Manager una audencia publica para revisar desarrollo en Santa Monica. Esto pueda Si deseas mas informacion, favor de Ia DivisiQn da Plantificacion al numero - 2 - .~F.. ~ ! I ~ f ~ - _' ' ~~1 i ~ ~ ' ` J I ~1, ~ ~! ~ ~ ~ ~r - ~,~,` L~ ~rba ~_ ~ . ~ ,~ ~ ~-- ~ . , . ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ c_ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~~ ~ _ , ; ~, ~ ` ~n~~_ - ~ . ~'t ~ M - 2`~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ - .~ `~ - Co~ =~'.~~. ~ -~ lQ~~',~~.~ -~~- ~'~~~"~ , ~ ~~~, ~ ~ i . M ~ ~,'~ zo== ~- - t~3a15 . -- ; t: . _ . . 4 0- . ._. , ; ~ _ ' ~= - ~t ~ , - ,~., . ~ - ~ ~ . , F ~ ~~ I ~ .. . r• ~ ~. . ~ = e, c: - ~ - -- ` '•- " - ~ 1 ~~_ Ct:~~'"~ - ~' - . 1 ~ ' . ~j s' ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ) t ~~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~\ ~ ~ ~ ~ l l .1 ~~ ~ ~ 0 Y ~'. ~ r. ~ ; ~ ~ 3r - ~~ •~ : ' L r' - • r~~ ~ .' - . '+ " j 7' ~ i { ~ ~, ' .~.'` ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ , i: ~ r .i ~' r ..~ i ~ - - - - " .1, ! ~ li ~. ~ ~~" ` ~~~ ~~. ~__~.. ~~~ . 1 . ~1S 15~ ;-Aly~,4'_4Uy. ~~ _~ ~ s _ ` ~ ~ ' «_ ~'' ~ ~[~' ~ ~ \311 1~ I~ h~~ . x ^ ~ G4i~'~ 1~ ~ T r, ~~~.1 _ ~ ~', ~ . ~ - E ` ~ ~ L ~z O ~ ~~{ ~z- ~ ~ ~ Y ` ~ -~ ~_ ~ ~~ I F E - ~• , _ _~-__ ~ ; C:.1 ° ~ ~ ~ ~ J Z` ~ ~i_ t ~_ ,`.~ s . ` ~ - x ~~~ i ~- ~ I k: -- ~ t~ ~ ~~ ,~ ~- 1 ~ ~ I y _,~t_- '~` ; ~ `~I ' ~ ~~ ] R~ z: , f ~ ~- ~~ I '~ i ~ - ~ ~ -- ~» ~~., ..... ~ 1-n_ ti i iR _ ~ ~ Y 4 r.~-~-~ ~- c~ . ,, r_ n~ - ~ ~ r ._I . (~ r- ~ ~ ~ ~~.- ` ~~ ~ ~I~~~SI ~~ ~+ ~i ~"l ~l F ~ /~ _ _ _ ~ ~~ o~ ~,v~_ ~ `~ - _ . ~~J"~.:ll°,:.~_ ~ 'r_ ~ ~ ,3.. ?~~ ".~~_ ~ °: _..< ~ =~~ e~"'~ _ ; ! ~ _ ~ ! ~ Sr ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~~ R ~ ~, '\:x . ~ ~-- ~~ ~ :_ ~`:_ ~ , -~ ~ ~~ _ -~ :~. ~ , ~ _ ,, £ . ~ ~ F e C R „ ~ . . ~ . ^~ `h '` G r ~ = _33"_ .t~ 3~`~- :c: ~ ~ F~ I f 11 . w - . . I . o _. Y o _ ~ . .~~ _Y ~ R- r D ' ~` ~-- ~ } != r_~;= r I ~ . .. ~ _ I ~ .. ~ . ~ ~ • ' ~~ ~ 'µ-e ~_vt!' 9c - ~ ~`r V:c,.Cw.~ (.r .. _ -Yc r E ~ - J _ _ 3~`~i.~i~ ~.~~~'.~ ~ " ' _' " ~ ' r Il f _lSC_ [rT ' - , r = ' "' . _ ~ A~'TACI~ME~ITT ~ ., . :~a~.;~ , ~. .~ , P&Z:DKW:DB:TA002PC Santa Monica, California P~anning Commission Mtg: May 19, 1993 To: The Honorable Planning Commissian FRQM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Specific Plan Amendment 92-Odl~ Zone Change 92-002 Address: North Side of Broadway between 20th and 23rd Streets INTR~DUCTION Action: Propased Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change would change the Official Districting Map for the parcels on the north side af Braadway between 20th and 23rd Streets from C4 (Highway Commercial) to CP-3 (Commercial Prafessionaly and would amend the Hospital Area Specific Plan td include these parcels within the 5pecific Plan Area. Issuance of a Negative Declaration far the project is also proposed. Recommendation: Cammission discussion and recommendatian af ap- proval to the City Council. Permit Stream~ining Exp~ration Date: None. SITE LOCATI~N AND DESCRIPTION The propased Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change wauld affect 11 parcels and por~ions of parcels with total area of 106,844 square feet located on the north side of Broadway between 20th Street and 23rd Street having a frontage on Braadway af 971 feet and bisected by 21st Street (which is 80 feet wide). Surraunding uses consist of parking structures, surface parking iots, medical offices, a portian of an 8-story senior housing project, a por- tian of a GTE switching statian, and apartment buildings to the north/ CP~3, R3 {Medium Density Multiple Family Residential) Dis- tricts, CoZorada Place of~ices/ C5 (Special Office} District to the sQUth, 2-story medical offices/ C4 District across 23rd Street t~ the east and a one-story retail structura/ BCD (Broad- way Commercial) District across 20th Street to the west. Exist- ing on-site uses include surFace parking far uses adjacent to the narth, a portion af a GTE switching station, a portion of an 8- story seniar housing project~ twa I-story affices, and two 1- stary dup~exes. Zoning District: Current~y C4, Propased CP-3 Land Use District: Currently Highway Conunarcial, Proposed Commercial Pro~essional - 1 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Specific Plan Amend~ent and Zane Change would result in a change from C4 District to CP3 District for parcels located ~n the north s~de of Broadway between 2bth and 23rd Street. No specific development prQject is proposed in conjunction with the Specific Plan Amendment and Zane Change. The subject parcels currently contain surface parking, a port~on of a General Tele- phone switching station, a portion of an 8-story senior hausing pro~ect~ and three 1-story bui~dings built as dwelling units and now utiiized for office purposes. MUNICIPAL C~DE AND SPECIFIC PLAN CONFORMANCE The proposed Zone Change is inconsistent with Map 15 of th~ Hospital Area Specific P1an and therefore requires an amendment to tha~ Specific Plan, The propasal does not require any amend~ ments ta the text of the Zoning Ordinance ar the HASP. CEQA STATUS The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zane Change does not qualify far a categorical exemption under the City of Santa Moni- ca Guidelines for the Impl~mentation af the Californ~a Environ- mental Quality Act (CEQA). An Initial Study Checklist and pro- posed Negative Declaration were prepared for which the 30-day comment period ended an April 19, 1993. No comm~nts were received. If the City Cauncil approves the proposed praject and adopts a Negative Declaration, a certified Negative Declaration wi11 be prepared and a Notice af Determination wi~l be filed with the County Clerk. A copy of the Initial Study Checklist and pro- posed Negative Declaration are incl~ded in Attachmant E. FEES The proposal is nat subject to any develapment fees. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION The Zoning Ordinance does nat require any public natificatian for zane changes other than a notice in the Dutlook. H~wever, Specific P1an Amendments require that a notice of the public hearing ba mailed to a~l owner~ and residential and commercial tenan~s of property located within a 500' radius of the project at ~east ten cansecutive calendar days prior to the hearing. A cop~ af the notice is contained in Attachment A. ANALYSIS Background The applicant filed SPA 92-OQl and ZC 92-002 on December 23, 1992. Included in the application is a petition signed by over 50 Santa Monica residents in support vf the proposal. Although - 2 - no application has been submitted for a development in associa- tion with the praposed amendments, the applicant sta~ed in a let- ter to staff that "orderly expansion of health care facilities for Saint John's Hospital requires the inclusion of its property and similari~y-situated property within the Hospital Area Specific Plan (HASP) and the CP Zone." (Attachment F.~ Several parcels and portions of parcels an the north side of Broadway between 20th and 23rd Streets would change frnm a C4 District designation to a CP-3 District designation if the pro- posal is adopted by the City Council. This area is between 100 and 150 feet in depth from the Broadway street frantage, encom- pas5es a total of 106,844 square feet, and is bisected by 21st Street, as shown in the plans contained in Attachment H. The affected area is surrounded by a numl~er af different Land Use Districts, includi~g CP-3, R3 (Medium Density Multiple Family Residential), C4, and C5 {Special 4ffice) Districts. Most of the affected parcels are utilized for surface parking. A portion of a General Telephane switching station, an 8-story senior housing building, two one-story affice structures, and two 1-stary du- plexes are also contained on the subject parceZs. Prapased Specific P1an Map A~endment and Zon~ Change The area propased for rezoning was included in the original St~dy Area for ~he Hospital Area Speci~ic Plan (HASPy, as shown in At- tachment B. However, it was not included in the area recommen- ded far rezoning within the HASP, as shown in Attachment C. Per the HASP, this area was not rezoned and remains part of a C4 District. The proposal wauld result in a modification of the Official Dis- tricting Map to show "CP-3" rather than C4 for the affected par- cels, and a modification of Map 15 of the HASP ta show the sub- ject parca~~ as rezoned to «CP~~ designations rather than the cur- rent C4. No change to the tex~ of the Zoning Ordinance or the HASP is propos~d. The propasa~ wauld result in a chang~ to the uses permitted on the subject parcels. The current C4 designatian allows general retail, affice and autamotive--related uses (SMMC Sections 9.04.08.22.020-050). The praposed CP-3 designation would primarily allow medical-related uses, including medical-relat~d retail uses, medical office uses, hospitals, and "offices and meeting rooms far charitable, youth and welfare organizations." It is difficult to characterize the change in permitted us~s in terms of intensity, as the permitted uses are different in character. Hawev~r, it should be noted that the proposal wauld allaw restaurants of any szze by right, whereas the current zoning requires a CUP for any restaurant of more than 50 seats; it would eliminate drive-in, drive-thraugh, tak~-out and fast~- foad restaurants as possible nses an the subject parceZs; it wou~d eliminate service stations and autamabile dealerships as a possible uses on the subject parcels; and it would allow residen- tial uses by right (ar with a Performance Standards Fermit if part of a mixed use project), whereas the C4 designation allows - 3 - _ x~, residential pro~ects anly if a Perfoxmance Standards Permit is obtained. (Ordihance 1635, which is effective until August 14, 1993, allows residential uses in all commercial district~ withaut req~iring a Performance Standards Permit.) The proposal wou~d n~t result in any new nanconforming u5es. The surface parking which occ~pies most of the parcels requires a Conditional Use Permit und~r both the C4 and CP-3 designatians if it is not on tha same parcel as the building which utilizes the parking. The porti~n af the General Telephone switching statian wauld remain a legal nonconforming use, the senior housing and duplaxes would become conforming uses, and the medical office uses would remain conforming uses. with one exception, the maximu~ permitted floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 would remain i~tact if the zo~ing designation is changed to CP-3 as proposed. The exception wauld be the provision of the CP-3 Sectian which states that parking structures have no limit on the number of stories and, if developed with "at least half of the spaces... pravided ta address an existing parking space de- ficiency or [to replace] existing parking," no maximum FAR shall apply but the maxi~um height must not exceed the maximum af 45 feet permitted in the District (SMMC Sections 9.04.08.30.030[a] and [b]). For all types of development, the proposed change would result in an in~rease in the maximum height ~rom 2 to 3 st~ries and from 30 feet to ~5 feet. The prQposal wauld alsa result in a required minimum front yard se~back of 2fl', whereas the current C4 desig~ nation does not have a front yard s~tback requirement other than a landscaped area equal ta 1.5 times the street €rantage. The change in development stiandards would create a nanconforming front yard se~back for the ane-stary medical office buildings and residential duplexes which are lacated on three parcels fronting 23rd 5treet an the eastern edg~ of th~ area proposed for a zone change, and far the GTE switching station which frants Braad~ay on the subject area's western edge. The 8-story senior housing project would remain nonconfornting as to height. It is not known whether the GTE switching station exceeds 45' in height, but it does appear ta exceed 30', which would mean it is currently non- conforming as to height. Objections Two letters of objectian have been received by staff. Ruth Bloom wrote that she opposes the Zane Change because it will result in increased traffic and reduced parking on Broadway, However, with the proposed Zone Change, the maxi~tstizm FAR is the same for all uses except same parking structures, s4 it is not anticipatad that the impact of the change on circulation would be different than existing zaninq. Tn that it provides an incentive to con- struct parking structures which address an existing parking de- ficiency, the proposed Zane Change may actually reduce the demand for street parking on Broadway. .. 4 _ Irwin Zeke Warsaw wrote with a number of cancerns relating to the property awned by Saint John's Hospital but not direct~y related to the proposed Zone Change. Mr. Warsaw requested a~ile from staff for 2200 Santa Monica Boulevard, an address for which no planning file exists. He inquired regarding the construction of a small parking boath. for which all required b~ilding permits were obtained after review by the Parking and Traffic Division. Mr. Warsaw states that the 2001 Braadway address used by staff far the file is "incorrect;" however, this number was chasen for reference purpas~s because it is the lowest numbered address alonq Broadway prapased for a zone change. Mr. Warsaw further states that an Environmental Impact Report should be required for the proposed zone change, whereas the City has prepared an Ini- tial Study Checklist and, after re~iew by the City Environmental Review Committee, has prepared a draft Negative Declaration which was nQticed in the Outlaok and made availab~e for public comm~nt for the required 30 days (no public cammant was received). Mr. Warsaw also questioned the involvement of a Planning Co~nmissioner on this project, an issue which has been referred to the City Attornay's office. General Plan and Specific Plan Conf~~mance The proposed change to the Map 15 of the HASP and the proposed redistricting are consistent with the goals and objectives con- tained in both the G~neral Plan and tha HASP. By allawing in- creased area for the construction af hospitals and other meda.cal- related uses, as well as allowing a density incentive for the construction of parking which addresses existing parking de- ficiencies in the vicinity, the proposal is consistent with Ob- jective 1.13 of the Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE), which states the following: Recognizing the importance af the City's hospitals ta the community and the value of their services to the residents of Santa Monica and those in surrounding areas, the Land Use Element acknowledges the haspitals need to expand and accammodates future graw~h of hospitals and health care facilities while minimizing harmful effects on surrounding residential neighborhoods. LUCE Policy 1.13.Z further st~pu~ates that the City shall adopt a specific Plan for the area araund the Cityis two hospitals, and Policy 1.13.3 establishes the policy af providing a density incentive for the construction of parking which addresses exist- ing parking deficiencies in the ar~a. The HASP was adopted an Sep~am}~er 27, 1988. The propased changes are cansistent with the statement on page 30 of the HASP which states that "some residents, haspital officials and organized neighborhood groups of the area have expressed a pr~ference that parcel rezonings fac~s St. John~s HQSpital development south of Santa Monica Bouleva~d," which includes the area now proposed for rezaning and which is more predaminantly cammercial than the area to the narth of Santa Monica Boexlevard. - 5 - ., . ~ '^! _ • i Most of the area currently proposed for rezoning is owned by St. John's Hospital. As it would allow expanded hQSpital-related development in an area more predominantly commercial than the area to the north af Santa Monica Baulevard, the proposal is consistent with Objective 1 of the HASP Land Use Element which states that land uses shall "ensure that devalopment in the hospital area balances the need for medical tacilities and uses while pratecting residential uses in the area." The proposal is a1sQ consistent with Circulation Elemant Objective 13 af the HASP, which states that the City shall "pratect the environment of local residential streets by mini~izing the intrusion af non-residen~ial vehicular traffic and parking into residential neighbarhaods." HASP Circulation Element Objective 2G states that Saint Jahn's Haspital Center and Health Center shall, within five years, provide parking spaces to eliminate any parking defici~ncy discussed in the Hospital Area Specific Plan af 1988. Spaces shall be provided within 50D feet of the Health Center campus. By or before five years af the adoption of the HASP, the Health Center shall submit dacu- mentation that deficiencies have laeeh eliminated. Failure to meet this objective shall be a consideration in City review af Health Center develapment app].i.catians. Saint John's HospitaZ has not submi~ted a development prQposal ta address existing parking deficiencies (ar an evaluation of exist- ing parking deficienaies) with this application. The 5 y~ar deadline wiZl not be reached until September 27, 1993. Conclusion The proposed Zone Change and Specific Plan Amendment is consis- tent with the objecti~es of the General Plan and Hospital Area Speci~ic Plan. Hy allawing a density incentive for the provision af new parking spaces which address existing parkinq deficiencies at Saint John's Hospital and Health Center, by allawing an expan- ded area in which to construct new parking intended ta be uti- lized by the Health Center campus, and by allowing increased op- portunities far medical uses in the primarily commercial area t~ the south of Santa Monica Baulevard. the proposal is consistent with objectives in the HASP. An Ini~ial Study Checkli~t has been prepared by staff which concludes that a Negative Dec7.aration is apprapriate. Therafare, staff recammends that the Planning Com- missian recommend that the City Council approve of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, Zone Changa, and Negative Declaratian. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of SPA 92-001, ZC 92-002 and a Negative D~claratian for these prajects based on the following findzngs: - 6 - ,~` , ; ZONE CHANGE AND SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT FINDINGS 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change are consistent in principal with the goals, objectives, poli- cies, land uses, and pragrams sp~cified in the adopted General Plan, in that they are consistent with Land Use and Circulation Elemant dbjective 1.13, which states that the City should allow for the expansion of existing hospi~ tals while minimizing their impacts on ad~acent r~siden- tial neighbarhoods, and they are consistent with ~bjec- tives 1 and 13 of the Hospital Area Specific P~an. 2. The public health, safety, and general welfare require the adoption of the proposed Specific Plan Amend~ent and Zo~e Change, in that the amendment would allaw increased oppor- tunities and incentives to address the deficiency of off- street parking spaces which exists in the the Hospital Specific Plan ar~a. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FINDiNGS The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Final Initial Study and Negative Declaration should be certified in that: 1. The Commission has reviewed and considered the cont~nts of the Final Initial study and Negative Declaration, cansisting of the Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration, public comments, and responses. 2. The Final Tniti~l Study and Negative Declaration adequately review and analyze potential environmental effeats af the propvsed project. 3. The environmental review was conducted in accardance with applicable State and City CEQA guidelines including preparatian, natification, and con~ent requirements. 4. A Negati~e Declaratian is appropriate. in that th~ InitiaZ Study pravides sufficient data to support a finding that the project will not ha~e a significant effect on the environment. Prepared by: Drummond Buckley, Associate Planner Attachments: A. Notice of Public Hearing and Radius Map B. Map 2 of HASP, Showing Study Area of HASP C. Map 15 of HASP, Showing Area ta Be Rezaned Pursuant to HASP D. C4 and CP S~ctions of Zoning ardinance E. Initial Study Checklist and Proposed Negative Declaration F, Carrespondence G. Photographs of Affected Parcels and Surrounding Properties _ ` _ ' r} y ~ J H. Parcel Assessor's Maps, Plot Plan of Area Proposed far Rezoning, and P1an shawzng Parcels Owned by Saint John's DB:db PC/ta002pc 06/09/93 - 8 - 14~'ACHME~T~' 1~ ,~~, , ~E PLANNING COMMISSION 57A~EM~~1T OF OFF1ClAL AC7ID~ PROJ ECT CASE NUMBER: SPA 92-001, ZC 92-002, IS 93-003 ~OCATION: North side of Broadway between 20th and 23rd Streets APPLICANT: Sa~nt Jahn's Hospita1 and Hea7th Center CASE PLAN~IER: Drummond Buckiey, Associate Planner REQUEST: To amend the Hospital Area Specific Plan and the Official Districting Map CEQA STATUS: Initial Study 93-003 and proposed Negative Declaratian are pending approval ~y the City Counci7 PLANNING CflMMI5SI0N ACTION 5~~9/93 Qate. Approved based on the foi~o~~ng ftndings and su~3ect to the cor~ditions below. Denied. X Other. Reco~nmendation of approval to C~ty Cauncil. EFFECTIVE DA7E{S) OF ACTIOhE(S): 5~19~93 SPA 92-001, ZC 92-Q02, IS 93-003 ZONE CHaNGE AND SPECI~IC PLAf~ AMEND~IEN~ FI~tDINGS 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change are cansistent ~n principal witfi the gaals, objectives, poiicies, land uses, and programs specified in the adopted General Plan, in that they are cansistent with Land Use and ~~rculation Element Objective 1.i3, which states that the City shauld allow for the ex~ansion of ex~sting hospitals while min~mizing their impacts on ad~acent residential neighbarhaods, and they are cons~stent with Ob3ectiues 1 a~d 13 af the Hospital Area Specif~c Plan. 2. The pubi~c health, safety, and general welfare require the adoption of the proposed Specific Plan Amendrrtent and Zone Change, in that the amendment wauld allow increased opportunities and ~ncentives to address the deficier~cy of of#'-street park~ng s~aces which exists 3n the the ~ospital Specif-ic Plan area. -1- ._,, NEGA7IVE DECLARATION FIN~INGS The Planning Com~ission ~ereby finds that t~e Final Initial Study and Negative Dec~aration should be certified in that: 1. The Gammiss~on has reviewed and co~sidered the contents of the Final Initial Study and Negative Declaration, consisti~g of the Draft Initia~ Study and ~egative Declaratian, public comments, and responses. 2. The Final Initial Study and Negat~ve Declaratian adequately review and analyze potential environmental effects of the propased project. 3. The environmental review was conducted in accordance with applicable State and City CEQA guidelines including preparation, notification, and content requirements. 4. A Negative Declaration is appropriate, ~n that the Initial Study provides sufficient data to support a finding that the proje~t wi71 not have a significant effect o~ the environ~ent. Ayes: Mechur, 0'Connar, Parlee, Pal~emus Nays: Abstain: Py~e Abse~t: Gt~p~n, Morales NOTICE - If this is a final clecisian not sub~ect to further appeal under~ the Gity of 5anta ~lonica Comprehensive ~and Use and Zoning Ordinance, the time within which judicial review of this decision m~st be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, which provision i~as been adopted by the City pursuant to Municipal Code Section 1400. I hereby certify that this Statement af Ufficial Action accurately reflects the final determinatian of the Planning Commission o~ the City of Santa Monica. ; signat re Ralp~ Mecf~ur, Chairpersan Please Print Name and Title PC/cc2sta DKW:bz ~~Z1~3 date - 2 - A~'~'ACHM~IITT ~ ~~ l~ ~ - ~ ~~=~~-=~~ _ ~~~~.~~ Land Use and Transportation Management Department Paul V Serlant Di rector May 19, 1993 Irwin Zeke Warsaw P. O. Bax 3512 Santa Monica, CA 90~08 Dear Mr. Warsaw: ~L IJ1 'TJV-VV71 VIA FAX: (310} 393-2977 This letter is in respanse to yours of May 18, 1993. As you have been told, upon receipt of your letter of April 30, 1993, I directed Planning staff to immedi-ately investigate your questions and further directed s~aff ta contact you. That, in fact, did occur as discussed belaw. t~~ith regard to your request far a continuance, only the Planning Commis~ion can do that. The item has been duly noticec~ and the app~icant has a right to and does expect a hearing. Your request must be taken up ton~ght. The questian of Mr. Pyne's partic~.patian was immediately referred to th~ City Attorney and, thus, I~Yill not comment on it. With regard to the other issues you raised, you have been called several tir~es by Mr. Drummond Buckley, Assaciate P~anner, the case planner on th~.s item. He notified you that your concerns would be addressed in the staff report, and as you have seen, they have baen on page 5. Specific responses and your letter are included in the staff report. In addition to Mr. Buckley's cal~s you ~pake with Mr. Kenyon Webster, P}~anning Manager abo~t your questions. Each af the issues was reviewed in full in that conversation as well. Mr. Warsaw, the Planning staff receives num~rous letters on many of the cases braught before the Planning Commission and City Council. We cannot answer each one in writing. Given the nature of yotir concerns, we specifical~y addressed them in the staff report and Mr. Buckley spoke to you directly on mare than one accasion. You were alsa personal~y notified of the ariginal hearing date twa weeks ago and of the continuance to tohight. I am iooking forward to seeing you at the Commission hearing. _ 1 _ ~ ~;, " ~ ' ~ C~t~ Y ~~ ~ ' ~ S~ncereiy, ~~u'" ~ Paul V. Berlant, Director Land Use and Transportatian Management Dept. PVB:eig ARB/Warsaw cc: City Council Planning Commission John 3alili, City Manager Kenyon ~~iebster, Planning Manager Bill Ror~e, Bu~~ding Officer Stan Scholl, General Services Director Ron Fuchiwaki, Parking & Traffic Engineer Jae Lawrence, Acting City Attorney Evening ~ut~ook Las AngeZes Times - 2 - Fram : WARSAW-POB ~S12,S.M., ~4~8 PHONE Na ' 31~ 393 2977 ~ ~WI~I ~II~' ~ ~.o. ~ox 35~2 ~ant~ Maflica, CA. 9Q4~8 ~~. {314) 393~2~77 May IB, Z993 C~ty P~~CTL I.G$S .~x~Zi l ~f ~ant~~ l~.ica, CITY H~ SE~tLANr, ~ii~~r Of lxvxd Us~ & T~;~p~~},~-t.i~i ~~. '~ ~DI7] ["r7 ~ ~',F1. ~~~~Z Main ~t~a~t D~ar l~,r. Bex'].ar~a ~~y• _9 1993 12' S7Ai1 P01 Via FA~i: (31Q) ~94-2~6~ E~C1~clospd is ar~a~hex capy a~ my le~te.~ ~a y~u, da~ Apr~l 30~h. I]a~~ yan are p~ro~bly vex~ husy, but z was x~eally disa~cain~. iti r~ ev~n ~`eveitring ~ cau~tesy te]..~pY~ne ~a21 iri resporis~ i:o ~rne ser~.c~us cona~xns i rai~, ,A93~nr T Eu11 WX`~~]17g yC~u for ~"S~o re&sonC. FiY`t~t, I W~~tt~[3 fiA kI]~bw wY1~~ ~U~' o~irt~on was nn each o~ th~ G~~~a~,exYded acla~or~ an gage ~ ot my le~t~r ar~d i~ ar,y~hin~ had 1~een c~ne rec~luYg ~ ot the it~ms i men~on~. Seoai~i, far reas~:: ~plained be~{ I~n xequ+~~tir~g a~CE of S~. JoYrn`s Hospit~l'~ Appli~ta..on be~-use I wa~ r~t c~~.ven ~~e advance nat5.~ itY order ta reasvr~l~r revicyw ~ gr~p~re ~or ~attiorraw nic~hL' ~ Pu~l~ H~~ ir~g. Esipeci~.ly ~t l~ght o~ my Apx'11 3i~t~1 l~t#~~ I~at~tw~ ~stx~rid ihlfiY zt wa~ld tak+e i2 days f inclez~ling 2~aluabZ~ w~Jt~ru~e) ~a r~~~.~y me on a~ur~d~y a~'ternvon ~hat th~ St.af~ ~port~ vxae~ld tir~a~.ly kae a~a~~ahl~ for m~r reva.ew on Mar~day--2 days b~foxe th~ Pub~ic H~aring. T.ilae m~st o~h~x's, r u~rk for a l~,w in9, having pr~ctic-usly s~heduled ~ini~nt~ and c~mittrn~n~.s far yestrerc3ay a3~d ~~Y- To d~~, I f~.uc~ rc~eiv~4 no v+2ii.~~ respanses ~ddsessitx~ ~he 3.ssu~s z have ~aised. I a~r+ appalled ax~d as~ounded by tY~.s ~ilence. 5aiuzd gr~vexr~nt manag~x]~.al prac~ic:e sUr~ly wvuld requir~ sa~r~ ]€ir~t o~ response ~, €ar exanip~e, m~r qur~s~ion.YncJ Mr* Pyn~'s dual acal~ ~s a Planning ~tss~.an~ar a~d as an ~tr- playee of t~e Applic~n~ xospx~a].. G].ear~y ~ r~s~ ~m~art.ial absexv~xs w~ul.d e~ect Ca~mi~sian~r Fyrie to ~~~,~~~tely wit~udracw f~xn paz~icipa~ian a.n this case. Con6lC~xilYy ~~ ~k bf Y~~~nse 2 Yk3V2 x'~GE1V4~d fyult eV~'yc3n~, I a[tt c~Olt'1~J ~ r~ques~ th~ Ci~y Nl~na~x ~o ir,ve~tagat~ whY rnY inquiries hav~ l~eex~ ignared. 4~un~i,ynari C~nser agxee~ there w~s much raan for smprov~~t ~n ~ marxag~nt ~f gvv~rr~nt busj.ness at th+e executi~ le~el af m~ny Ci~~ ~aaria~ents. In ~onc:Zt,~siwn, ~ am z'equcsting postpoz~~nent o~ Sp~ific P1.an Am~erit 92~001 and Zon~sfg C~iange 92~~02, ~aheduled to ba hear+d on M~.y 19, 1993, a~ 7 p.m. ?~ 1'~E FlaT1~71riq GRa1~1~1,iSS10ri~ so I 11'~y prepare fOr` a P~II~ arid. bo11a fi.C1e Puhl~~ H~aring on th.~a mat~ac. Plc~ase teZ~pl'yr~,~ m~: at ~Yye ~ave n~e~c with ora3. twotic~ af you~ d$cision as ~c~on a~ gassit~l~, as T w~.lx }~ w~rkixig in ~t~ it~dtv'~t~~n~ t~C111D~i"~7W. R~S~'D~'U~,Y Y~i ~ ~ f.~_.1 .~ ~x=e-teG Pag= -• - d ! + ~ L'.C7~'S~~~ {Gp; " ~- -- - - ].. All CxTY C7~tk~C12~ ~,Ei~. ~, All Fl~vza.ny Gc~mi~~ian m~ttl~rs 3. ~~r-y~n W~s1-.~x, Planning Llit'~c:tor 4, i3iZ1 R~ntier 13u~i.Icling &~~tety llir~r:tor ~a. ~~n Shall, piz~~t.c~r o~ Gene~al Servaces 6. I~onald FU~hiWaki~ Parkit~g &~~'.r~ff].c L~gln~er 7. John -7a].il~, Ci~y Mar~ag~x 8, .7o~ph L~.wx~er~ce, ~lctir,y Ca.t~ At~art~y J. L+~ing Outlook io. ~.A. Tix1l~~er Westsid~ eclitior~ . i~ _, f r T ~ ~ ~ ~ l~l ~~ ~~~-- Planrnng and Zoning ~nnsion (310) 45&8341 June 9, ].gg3 Irwin Zeke Warsaw P.a. Box 35~.2 Santa Monica, CA 904Q8 Re: Narth side of Sroadway batween 20th and 23rd Streets SPA 92-OOI, SPA 92-002 Dear Mr. Warsaw: I am writing to iet yau know that the City Council pu}alic hearing for the above-referenced praject is scheduled for Juna 29, ~993. The City Council, staff report for this matter will be availabie from the City Cler]c's vffice for public review on either the afterncon of Thur~day, June 24, or the morning of Monday, June 28 • (Please note that City Hall will be closed on Friday~ June ~~•) Y suggest that you telephone the City Clerk's office an June 24 in order to determine the precise time the stafg reports will be made avaa.lable ta the publ.ic. The City Clerk's telephone num?aer is (310) 458-8211 and tha office is located in room 102 of City HaI1. ~~ you would like to review the ~i.Ie fflr 3PA 92-ODl and ZC 92-002 prior to the Cfty Council public hearing, which ~s under the address 2p01 Hroadway, I suggest that yau telephone me directly because I have the fi~e at my desk. My telephone nvmber is (310) 455-6341. Please give me 2-3 days notfce if you request to see the file so that we may set up a time for you ta review it. Pr~,or to the May ~.9 Planning Co~nn-~ssion publia hearing, yau were contacted regarding the availability for your review of a file for the address 2102-22D8 Santa Monica Boulevard. This file includes infonaation on tha address 2200 Santa Monica Boulevard, which yau have inquired about. ~ do not know if you reviewed this fil.e when it was left for you at the Planning and Zoning caunter. If yflu would like to s~e this fi~e, yau may make another request at the Planning and Zaning counter. P1.ease be advised that th~s file is dated 1950 and is kept in storage, so - I - __ , , t G1~ Y ~~ ~~ ~ i a ~ it will take approximate~y three days for retrieval. In order to avoid confusion and streamline the file retrie~al process~ please make the request for the address "2~02-22a8 Santa Monica Boulevard, Temporary Box Number 57, Recard Center ~ox Number 7~34." If you have any ather questians regarding this project please do not hesitate to call me. I am a~so available at the Planning and Zoning counter if you would like to see me in person. The P~anning and Zoning rec~ptionist (3~0-458-8341 ext.~) can tell yau the dates and tim~s I am on the counter. Sincerely, ~ Drummond Buckley Assaciate Planner cc: Paul Berlant, Director a~ Land Use and Transportatian Management PC/carsaw 06/09/93 - 2 - ,- 3. ~. AT~'ACI-~~~T~' 9.oa.os.zza~o ~ Past 9.OA.08.22 C4 uto~way Comme~+aial i}iatrici 9.04.OS.22.020 Purpase. The C4 D~sn~ct ~s mtended ta pmvtdc fo~ t~e future ordcr~y dcvelop~aent of the ma~or h~ghway comumen~al Com~pxs ln the G~tp. Tht C4 I?lstrict 2S IAtCnded to enoouraga ser~nca c,c~*~+*~araaI bnsu:esses, auto sales and sernca dealezships, and other s~m~ar uses t6at serve n~0~, Cmm~+12A1i]~~ 8t1~ ~4Cdj ~CCdS, W~C T~G~g 3d~aCGIIL lr'-S++9rnt,91 ~ppdg a,pa r_erahlieh~ g~.. bOIhOOd OPmm~31 aiCaB, L~dri~SLLd~ with thC g0815, Ob]CQIVCg, dR~ pOj1ClCS OE tt1C C]CflGl~ P~Ae- ~IlOI CO~C § 902Q.3) 9.04.08.22.0~2D Permitt~ mrs. The faIlowEag uses ~hA~~ be permiRed m t3~e C4 Dis- LiSCi, 1~ COQ~Cd qrith~n ~ C~p~d ~dinv_ ~pt W~1CIC D~OYWtBC PClmli[Cd: ~ (a} Ambuianoe Se~ct. [~~ '~1~anr,C ~aff ghp~, ~C~ AtqS[ a1~~d~OS SbOVE I~C ~iSt IlOO! (d) Aummatic ice dispen~,~ mach~ne wbiC~h need ~Ot bC lII 8~ C~OSCd ~Ill~clino. ~C~ BS~CCIlC3. M ~}~ Baninc gq~ ~gg 3II~ I08I1 lbStihlb4(1& {g) Harbtr or besury shops. ~) B~'n° ~~• (~ Bua~ness wlleges. (~? (~d dag ~re acnurs. (Y) Qeaners. (i) Daact studios. {at) Electri~cal shctips.. (n) IIec~c distabunon substabons. {o) Fuaeral pariors or mortuan~s. (P) Gencra~ offixs. (9} Gzneral rasaal and sp~ar,~~ reta~l us~s. (r) T~nn~OmBis, (s} Medical, de~tal and optome~sst ~++~ aad ~abora- toncs. (t) Medical equ~meut reatal~. (n) Pub13c garics and playgnoundt (v) Pazty' cqmpment rerrA~a_ (a') Phaia.'o~y shops. (z) Places of wo~lup. (y) Plant r~tai[ atares. (z) Rea~ csffite o~ces. {as) Restauiants of SO seats or less. (ab) shettas for t~e hnme4ess. ~ac) Siga Fainpng shups- (ad) Skabng s~nks. {ae) Tailors. (a~ Traade sc~aals. {ag) Vanery stnre.s. (ah) Ac~orY ttses ~vhlch are detcrmmed by the Zoniug Adm~atratar to be nc~x.ssary and aastQn+A'~7Jr ~m°,Y'~'-~ wuh, aad approptiat~, iaa~eatal, aad su~r,~~:i- nate ta, tE~e prmcipa~ permitted uses ana which are oon- s~stent and are na mare durupuv~ or dlsttu~ng thaa per~tted uses. 398 ~ ~~`T~~ ~~ ~rti~T {a~) orher uses ~~ bv ct~ zrn~g a~+~++~a- i0I LD ~!C eim~"inr LO ~OSC ~]SLCd ~?OM1rC aJ7~ W~1Cb 3iG cou~steat and no morc dssrupuve ar dsstnrbiag thaa permittcd uses. (Pnor c~de ~ 9[~220.2) 9.04.08.22.030 Use~ subject w performanct standar~s pcr~L 'Ilie follo+~vwg ~ may ix per**+,~ad ia the CA I?isuia su~ect to the af,N~z„+al of a Perfo=mance Standards Ptr- IDli: ~8~ ~lI4mO~IlC ~CCd1CI5111P6. (b) Rendenttal ~,__~_ (c) Semce statio~. (d) 5idewal3~ cafe~ (Pnor code § 9(~203} 9.04.0l~ 22_!i40 Ca~tionally perneiued ases. Z~6 ~0~09YQl~ 1LS~S ID93i bC ~Ciml[~ lII L~C ~~}LS~1CC subjxt to the n~~~~81 of a Condit~anal L3se Pcrmi~ (a) Aud~c,orn,•,*~. (b) Automob~i~ pariQag iots and s~. ~C~ A11LOQ14~C LCp81r faeti#i~CS. (~~ gt7liar~ ~jp~ ~C~ Qll~S 8~ ~Oi~Gi ~~ ~I1VC"1I1, dISVC-ibt011~1, [~CC~OUt, alLd ~St #QOa f~3C811I8d1S. (gj F~emse faal~kaeg. (ri) Hateh aad mocels. (i} Liqciar steres. {~~ High~ c~ubs {k) R~~+*~nrs over SQ seats. (I) Self-servux starage wareho~es. (Pmor oode § 9ozo.a~ 9.04.~??_~~ Prohi6fted ose.s. (a} Gn~p~ {b) RoafmP P~B oa parcels direcdy abumag, or separated bq an a11ty from, a residennal dis~ict. (c) Aay use not sp~+fi!?~~~- sutharu.ed. (Pnor cnde § 90205) 9.04,0~8,Z2A60 Progerly denlapment standards. Atl praperty m the G4 Distr~ct shall be d~v~eloped m s~.:asa ~th t~ followmg standards: (a) Mdmam Bnixa~•w geigbt and FAR. M~muQe bu~Id~ng hc~~ht, num~er of stanes, a~d f~aar area raea shall bc det~....~+~d as follows: Pe+apeties Mu. fl'on~? the M~. Na ot 1H~. Follawia~ He~t Stones FAR Santa Ma~uza 3U' 2 I S Boe~feva[d Santa Monua 3Q' 2 15 Boulevar~ Auto Uealerais~ps Iincoln Blvd 45' 3 1S No. of Fwy . ; r ! 9.04.08.2ZD50 ~~ ~~~8 the 41~~8 ~ Mar. No. uf H ~~ax, ~' Ol~ ~ffnrdable to law or t~oderate rnrnm~ ~ouiso- eiBht Starirs FAR b~Tses Rrh~ch saGsfy ]oe~ ses~vic~ needs such as a la ~W~ti B~. 3U~ L ~ O un- L~I'L~~I'}At ~OIIIC llIIplqi{i~D7CIIL SIOPC~ F}fIST~7A[}/ OT d}1I a g So. of Fwy. . n~, ndlor cleaners Picc~ BhFd. aoean Avc ~ ~ ' ~.~ or There shall be no ~Cmstatsaa on the number of swncs af aay hatel rGUdenn [ . 4th (~x, 45 3 j0°lo of , ,a suucturc, or det~hod ~arbag ~' so loug as thc he~ht dors a~t eu~es+d the ma~ thc mu.m aumber of fut perrmttrd m this Secuan. {b) Mtri.,~~ Lot S~ 7 P~1~ tt. ~OQ SbB~I ~I'C fCCt Fa'"i~ ~~ Cotltasa ~ mtatmum depth of 250 f zs rm- dent~ t~s ~d a mmt- mum width af 50 feet -_~_~~ that panx~s e~sq~g ~ the cffec~ve date n# th~s (fi~ ~r h li Plso Hlvd. ~~ ~ p s a aot be subjea a~ ~ ~ ~ 7th St LO t ~ t ~~rd ~badc. Lapd~ ~ ~ Liacaln ~ F~uaat W thc pmyisioai oi Part 9,04 1~ 04 . . . (d) Rear Yard Set6~dc None Psco Blvd 3~• Z . , euept (1} Wh~e narpar~el liae abuts a re~n~ Li~oaia-llth S~ 1~ ~ $~ 3'~ equ~ to: N°rth s~e 30' Z flf Broathvay 1S ~Qth St t~ 26t~ 5~ ~ B~ ~~ 2 1S 2lst-3lst Sts. 14cb S~ 3~. z P2ra Blvd-Fwy 1S ~~ APF~~y=1 of A Coaditionat Uae Petmi~ ~ea ~ Fo~li~~ ~ Mu' Na of Iyl~x, °"~ng Eri~t Storfas FAR Piao BIvtl. 45' 3 2~st-3lst Sts, 2Q ~~~ PSOJ~ "''!y'rporates anq of the follow~g a~~~~~ havm8 at ie~t 5,000 squan b. ~1~~8 g~"dablo to !ow or ~~ ~cme ~ou~ c. Usss w~~ ~y jocal ssn~a aeeds sct~ as a laua- dro ~rO~at, hame ~,~~,,;emcnr srore, p~s,~r or stort, a~d/or c~eanrrs, °~8 ~P~+'~le~ ~°~ ~ ~'ouvw~n~ ~- ~ No, al ~,~„ ae~~er sraries ~~R 14th SL 45' 3 ~ Bn~a.-~wy. za ~ ded t~e pro;ect u~r~Or~t~s any of the fo€Iaw~B 5~ + starses x lot vridth3 50; ~~ ioad~inc tD~ ~ Y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ot g parcxl line peti,..~ded ~~"o ar losding does not prtend abox~ t~ ~t floor l~nel snd prvvided ihat a wa]1 nat J~ r~.» 5 feei Or mole than ( f~t III ~1G~1t 73 CrCCtGd A~+ri ~$~t81AE~ ~~$ t~C I~I ~Cit~B~ pBI+CCj 11IIG.1~ s~au b~ perm~tceci to per~es~d~~~}y crass the~ ~ Y~ ~~~mde~ t~e drne~vay ~ ~ ~ t~ht m'*"*~Um w3dih pC]mlCied f0~ ~lC at~i~+o 4uu~d rear qa~f shall uot be ,L~ for oam.+~•.~ p~P~„ ~2) T~ needed to ~±mmodate taadaca~iag and ~g far a s~ar yar,d buffer re4~ P~ant to t3~e Pr~os~oaa of Part 9.04.IQ.fl4. {e) Slde Y~rd ~, N~~ ~~ ~~} ~ ch~ iau~nr s~de ~arrr.~ 1~ ab~t a~.~;~.,~ ~1 disrnct. aa mcenor s~dc Y~srd u~uat to: ~~ f stones a los width SU` Tbe ~nt~r~~r ssde yac~d ~Y b~ u~ for psr~i~v ~ to~dirxg ao doaer than 5 fe~t to xhe mtenar s~de ~ line ~,~~rided the ~g ~ }o~g ~ ~at eue~d above the Srst flaar level ae~d providEd a wall ~tot lesa t~an S fr,~t or mo~ tha~ G feeE m[~eight n er+xked aud ~8ulrstned 81oI1g t170 S~dC ca~nmsrp~ ~} li~e. A t'o9uued iatenor side yarcf s~all nat be used fi~or A~ or far ca~n~,•~ p~' (~) ~]at ~ p~ ~+~w~cu„~r~ far a str~t s~de yard, landr~~ ~~s~ ~~n: co ~ ~o~ ~ ~ 4.aa.2o.o¢. ~ (3} A 10 foat setbr~tk from an iatenar side prug~t~r h ~~hal! be requ~ ~ p~ons of bwidingi tbat oon- ~o~, dooi'~ or other ope~ngg antD ihe iateriar of t~e buildin& f+u- uuenor sitk yard ~es~ than IO feet 399 9 04.D8.2206t} ~ s~all bc perinxtted if gr~vwaons o# the Uniform Bu~l~~*+o Cnde related to fire rate~ open~ags rn ~de yards are SS~Cd. (fl Ik+eiogmant Revirw. A Devei~y~tnt Revtaw Permu ~s requued for aay development of morc than Z~,~O s4uare feet aad aay d~elap~eat airh tnaft~ag par~n4_ {pnoT CodE § 9(F2U.~ 9.D4.08.2Z070 A=+chitectm~ll t~iew A.11 I1C9v L1DI1S~+~rt~np~ n~q Aridi~png t0 GIfS~ bi11~d- lii~S, aIId 3IIy OIbE7 Q[[GI70I 1m~T0~-CC11CnLt ~L ICI]I3IIC ~er~ss~nr2. of a building perm~t shsEl be snbjat to archstoo- turai rcrncw puis~ant to the pmv~sw~s of rhA;+xer 932 of tlus ~rrnde. (Pripr code ~ 907A.'~ 1'ut 9.04.OS.Z4 C5 Special O~oe Cam~nercial DiaLt+itt 9.04.08.24A10 P~epos~ The C5 Distnct Ls mteaded ro providc for the devei- o~meaE of of~Ce aud advB~Ced trrhnn,p~r ~-c~e, SGex~~+fie ~. ~~ A~+++~ 8~ fo! I;~it~f *narn~fa~r ing of relaced produds wlnch requ~ large eapaases af floar azea on targe pa~eLs Dcvelapmeat inua~ry ~s tntended m cncaurage the ~oe of office uses aad uther «~ w~t~;n a campus~~~ envi:an~ent thax w~i be ~ble ~~ siA+~ ~adendal aesghborhoods, espec~aklq m terms af swle ~,~ bu~;*,o ,,,~Q Within the CS Dis~cx it is the goa~ of t~e C~tq to greserve and ~ru:~Ci ~sbIIg Il~7t,fOf-wS~I foi frlill~C tIaffiit u~s}~iivII1- $CS. ~T10I ODdC ~ ~1.~} 9.04.D8.Z4.020 Permf*_!±a usrs. The foila~aving usrs e~n be pernnittr.d ~n the CS D~s- snct, if conductcd wr~*~ a~a cndosed bw~i~;~o, cxctpt v~fiera oc6erw~u ~rted (a) Art~st ~*_+,~!,~s, (b) C~d daY ~F aeate:s. (c) Geneial offias. (d) Laboraoones and ~~~~~es far scieatific research devela~~t.at snd te~++n~ (C} isvi~t m~nnfsc~, (fj Mcd~cal, d~+~A~ aad optc~me~st clinics and labo- ratones. (8? N~-~u+ iagatieat health car~e facilities. {h} P~azxa af warshsp. (i) Production of cxpenrae~taE products, and thc mane~far~ Of S~1C~ plOd11QS $S m~ bC RC~i~- LO f!]G ~CVC~p~= QF ~ip~pp p7 p~Ciateno ~ W~1CIC SUC~ Sy3[D1~! SiC [O bC ]RS~ ~~ OPCfB~ 1[ 8II0[t1Ci ~OC8ilOn. ~i7 Pi]b~1C OI pllYatC 3CbOD~ C.~ F~LOf IO 3~Q~[I~[I O~ Ltl1s ~CCS. (1~) Pnblic u~l;nj serv~c~ centers aud s~rvice yards. (l) Shdtess for tf-~ i~ameleaa. {m) 'I'ra~er oaurts ar mob~e puics aos~sg pr~r sa adQgaon nf t,hia C~ag~er. {n} .~!~•~rq usea rv~*+±~± are determine~ by the Zon- utg A~+**^~ator to be neacaauy aad cuswman~}r at5oa- ated wrth, and an ~~.,~,...~e, ~+~+ta1, and aubor~inate ~ to the prmc~sl Permitted uscs and which are cansistent au~ ao ~amc d~sru~ve nr d~aubmg t~ permuud uxs. EO~ OL}ICr U.R~3 dCLClin7~Q(~ ~ C~IC ~mm~ ~1r~rnmLe~. LOI i4 bC SStIIl~ffi ~O ~OSC ~1StGd ~G~O~ W~1Ch 3!G C01L9S- cent aad no ~re ~puve or disturbmg thaa perm~tt~ uses. {Prior aode ~ 90Z22) 9.oa.os.za.a;o u~ ~~~~e w ~~~~ atandards pernut. (a) Automobs7e rental agenccs. l"~ $GYYIOC St8iL0~5. ~F170f CO~C ~ ~I3~ 9.fl4.08 Z~.04b Con3i~on~ily permitted uasa. Tbe fo~awmg uses msy be perautted :n ihe C~ DisuzcY sub}xt ta tlte agg~~+~at af a Condzt~aaai Use Pernuc: (a) Art CsalEenea. (b) A,~*~±mob~e dealerslnps. (c} DavelEing unus ~uu can~~on wuh live-iu wark studias. (d) No more tban 2596 0# the total square footage a# a devdo~en# shatl be devoted to the follawiag ~ncidental bus~ae~es that grw~ae goods ana serv~ces to amplcryeea an the ~rem~scs: (1) Ba~l~ a~d sav~ngs and toaa insutubons (2) Businesa mac~ne sales, d~sQlay, and seiv~ce. {3) Dcaftiro- bhiegnnting a~sd reproducuaa strvu:cs. {~} He~th ciuha and gy~as~ums. (5) M~dicat aQplesnce sales {6} Q~7 ft-t,tit..a~ aad eqiupment sales. {7) Pltan*"•,~• aad drug srores. ~~~ ~' (9) Rets~ Do serit gr±ma*~jy employees worlaag aESd ~wrs to bns~nes~a oe the prem~ses. (l0) Travel and employmeat offsoes. (e) N~w iadastnal and ~g vses or u~n- swn of e~ng indtuusal gad manufacdu~ng uscs con- ductpdwethin ~a eacjpged bn,~tdinv Or aQ ~pen eacjpsure scxeene~ from public view, Y,.,,nded thry are cam~satible with o~x aad advaaoed technoiogicai uses. {~ 1°nblic or privata srhvols. (~ Public stoiage faaliues, min~-warehavses. {h) 5aviicc snt~ams. (i~ Aay nae of a t~anspa~on nght of way for other r5ran ~~ ptlrp~ees, ~~ 4~~te ~+~*dous waste fapiity. (Pnar tode § 90Z1.4; ~ hy Chd Na 1521CCS, adoptcd S/Sl'94) ~.D~.~.~.Q~ P1D}~~t!'~ ~6lS. ~8~ C1t3Ci~ 1.,} ~II~-L-Ia 8~ ~tiVC-[~IT011~3 I1CSL311T8AlS. ~C~ RDDfGDQ ~IIlg 01t g8lCCL4 d1iCCitV 8bM11[~, OI SG~fliS[G~ ~- 8n B~~C~i ~[Ot~, 3 TCSl~Grltl8~ dIS~ICL {d} Any use not s~ficaily auchonzed. (Prior oode ~ 90215) 9.OA.0$.Z4.060 Propp~t~ derdopment atandwrds. A~L ptvpcrt~t m the CS Discs~t shali he deve~epa3 iu s~~~snce aith rhe foliawuig stanc~ards: (a} M~nm Buiidi~ Heigh~ Three stones, aat to •,~~~ 45 fees. Ttiere shall be no itmiranon o~ the 400 ~ f d) Rcsta~ants are i,~,te~ tn twu ressaurants per bloci~ (ual~ss otheiw~.9e spcafied m this Sa~on) (a bloc~C beu~g both ~dea of Mau~ Street and t~e ad~accat sldes of a~o~nmg ssde str~eets). Pornons of Main S~eet to be desi~sud "B;ocY" for the p~upose of th~s Secuon are: B10C~C ~: B2ocY 2: $locic 3: $loc~ 4• $fock 5: Block 6: B10CIC 7: Sloc~ 8: BIOC~C ~: alock 10: Black li: $p~j~ ~~r i ~m~~ tp j1+~8iIpC S[iGeL Mazme S~eei to Pser Street Pier ta As~+lAnd. pchl~nd OD Hl~l. H~ LO ~OCBa PB~~. Oaan Parlc to Hollister (S restaurancs per- miued m this blqcJc). Hallister co S~aad Straad W P9~~ pae~fic t0 B1Cb7e1~. Bik~C~1 td BSy. Baq to Pic+o. Na aeav ~aats s~ail be pcrmitted an Mam S~eei aatil the Ciry Couac~i deter~~~ss tbat a renew of the CM Disinct ha~ been .,.,~ete~. ~or parposw of chss ScCnoA, a"aCV1~' Tr=v?~!*$IIt ~hali IAC~ildC 8~- ICStB~t nOI ~dv ~ O~Cl3E10~ ~t +~}r~s.~]V~ bS- th0 Plsnnmq~ Cpmm,.c~~ pc1DS io Jarn:azq iQ 1989, w~th the excsgaon of a~raat 1!+~!±~ ~t 2510 Maui Strcet. Thc prohsbf- ~an agaza4t 4aeav" re~ua~s s~u not apply to c~ang~s o vn in ovvnership af resta~ants aiready ~a operauon or 3p~TOVtd by- t~C pl~~mmo Cprnne~rein4 Fi70T t0 .TaAUa[y 10,1989. except as ot~ec~v~.ia ~,.~~ded in subsecaoa (lx). Rastaurants with moze than 50 ~eats. restauraats v~nth a substannai raloc-c~nt b~,~~ aad aalr sernnd-floor rrstaurant ~sse wall requue s Candi~onal Use Permit (e) Bars may ~ot e~xed sevem m ~umher sc3uth of Oaeaa ParJc Boulcvard, nor five in number narth of C]ceaa Parlc Bou~evard. NQ bara ~•~~' be iocated ca a~ MAn+ SilDet COlIIC23. (F4I p1up06Ca Of this Sd~4 `b~" are d~aed as estabiis~meats vr~t~ "p~u~iic pzcm~scs" Ii~unr 3ioea~e~ and r~ weih a liquor sctvue8 faditY Lfi~t l5 ~~-~+~~~- SC~rBIC fiOm ~C riinin~ a~g and ag iC$11~8I~I O~GiSCCd ~~ h4=lI3 ~aL Gdi7C,KQOn~1IIg ZO food s~s~ae hwis.) C.aa~a~al Use Permsu sn roq~u+od for all bars, (f} In ~ ~~o !~,~ ~~.~..-.~~rcisl and t+esi- ~~A~ usea, paria~g aba~v~ rbe 5rst 8oar aheIl be alfaAVe~. (gJ Qther sxaoffi af t~s Chapter notw~thstaading, the fo1lo~avmg nqwremeab s6all appty tc~ ~rabtis~enu a-ith liva entertainmeat or other loud music For wtuch a b[vIdipg ~eraut or etae perm~t is sought aftCr OciOber 10, 198Q: 1. Factersor wall and wiadow canstruction must be [o s m~mmum SZ'C ratiag of 45, as dete~mutod by the ASTM or ather ~+rt„~'• n~ptod ~adusuy staadard. Z F~tenar doaes and doar..~~a: a Doais must be solui cene ar t++~~ra! filled b. Doora most 6e ~t'r~ to psov~de a staf at hr.ad, sili. and jalab. ~ c. Ma~n en~ance must c~nta~a an "acnusdc iock" flr ot~er equnral~nt "sd-md tra~ " ~ 9 D4.08.28.07U d'I'~e mteat of t~s 5e~uon ~s co reguu~e an estab- ~L~eat grov~;*+~ enser~*~snt or lovd m~sc to canta~n tbe res~ltmg no~se w~thm tts walls to tt~~ greatest cxtoat poss~ble. (h) NoCwichstand~ng specafie speua~ refereaeu con- taintd herem, the prova.nans of Part 9 Q4.08,28 azc aot c~eaat to apply to: 1. Uses ~ casunce o~ October 10,19$0, regardless of c3iaages vf awnerstup, uNess the usc ~s ~nt~*+qt~r.d by a floor anea addidoa of mar~ than i5 pemat or by aihCf Stl~~-an~ ~nrr_~~p~ SttC$ aS tbC 1IIC~01] of reg~*ipr~ SC~C~Ll~Cd Cfl[CirainmCIIts C][GC~[ LIfBL LI1Ciz maq be no mo~ t~an an incidental incrcage ui the service area floor s~e of bars aad restauravts. Z ['3~anor,~ lII USC WbICb ICSUIL 1II a 11SG ~ClID1fLCd tn this Pazt t3Lat u lesg intense than the current t~se. EaS~ VSC9 Sb8]] CO~l~t WW8I'd i~]C COt81 RilflibCf Of bSls and Iestas~YSntS pen'DltLed w-e~,n tfle Dis~et. A qureACly r_.~t~g ~ ~~,Atl bt oonsldcred n0 IOngei ~i,.~g ~f that ~ ~s vnfunsanly ci~aagcd or ~s abaadonai for a pertod af oac year. (Pnor codt $ 9Q~3.7} Part 9.04.0830 CP Commereis! Profe~aionii Dishiet 9.oa.os3aa~o ~~o,~ Tha C~ Distnet ~s inteaded to pronda for the futnr~e p~~y ~sea~~~ pf Lho G~tj~s hos~lials SIId Ieisied heatth rart facelides in order to meet the necds of both the commu~ry and regioa while prucecnag Lhe iategisry pf j~C ~liII~II~ I~B~ ne~oh~9l~pp~s m g marm~ ao:ns~stent v-ath the gosls. oblec~ves, and gouc~es of the General Plan. (Pxior code $ 9024.1) 9.04.08 3Q020 Pvmittea n~es. 'Ihe fotla~w~ng ~ses atiA~~ be ger;a~tt~ci m the CP Dis- ~cx, if canducted anthzn au enCiosed builds'ng, aocept w~sre at~erv+ise ~a~ttted: (a) Adult day care fadttus. (b) Arqst stud~os. (c) Barber or beauty shaps. (d~ {~d ~y C2IC LZIIICIS. ~C~ COIIfC~008~- SODICS. (f] Conv~eut, mona4uerses a~ oc~er R,R+I~ar gmnF ~g 4~~- (~ Delicatsaseas. {~) Ds~gstores {~) Flor~sts. U'} Gift or sowenu shogs. {k) Hcc~itafs. (1) Ica cream shops, (m} Medical and dental c,l~ucs and labaratones. {n) Medusl and general o~~s_ (o) Medi~l sugplia aad sernces. {P) Uffices a~,~t ~eet~uag raoms ~or chantable, youth, and weifare orgaruzanons. (s~ O~ce supply st~res. (r) Pu~iic parks and playgraunds. (s) Res~dcnual us~s mtluding res~danuaf uscs at t~e grous~d floor. (t) Restavranrs. 4{y5 '9_OM1 083Q.020 ! (u) Rest homes. (V) Saaitanlt.,,t, (w) Schools. (a) Sheltess for the homelr.ss. {y} Stationery stares. (z) ~~~orq uses which are deserm~ne~ by the Zon- ~ AdR+,*,=.~ator ta be neoe.~sar~- and ~,~*~+~an1}r assoc~- ~ted wtiih, Sn~d aY}i~upS1~, 1~CdG*+tai. S~ 811bOY~inau #O ibC P~pP~ PCI~11CtCd i13C5 S~ W~LICh SIC CQ4~StCIIt ~Ad DOL mOIG dLStl12'~l~ 0i ~1SI1IptIVC ~~lBII PCT7n1LLEd USCS. ~88~ ~Ci IiSGS ~*^n+~ ~- LbC 7, ~....a p~L~.~z.~t. ~ tOI i0 bC aim~lar LO th09C LLSLC~ St1df-C ead Wb]C~ AIC oonascent and not more dis~g vr c~iu~pt~ve than QG2a71itCd SLSCS. (~IlOZ COL~C ~~~-2; 3II1Ctt~ ~- ~I'd. No. I47bCCS, adppted 425!$9) 9.04.0830.OCi0 Uaes snbjcct W Qerlormance standards. The following t~ses may be permimed m the CP Dis~d suolecx co ~e apprwal of a Perfor++*A+~se Standardg Pcra~tt• {3~ RG41dCAU8l uS~S Wlthm a m~rHi ~~~, (b) Sanior g~oup hou~ng, {c) Sidewalk cafes (Pnor code ~ 94)2~3) Table 9Ad.0830.El60 9.04.083D.040 Caadjtlonafly permi~!~ Qses. Tbe follaw~ng ~ses may be pernzrr~? m the CP Disuzct svb~eci to the agproval of a Conditionai Use Permi~: (a) A~tomobile psrldng lots ana strvctzues. ~~ $anlrc gnd ~{nn~c 8~ ~03A Ii1SU.TllUOaS. (c) Clubs aad lodges. (d) C~edit agencies. (C~ ~Gdlt 13II1~3~. ~~ ~}8I1CC 8n(~ GsGICISC S[i1d105. ~~ F'13IIC1d~ ~QI3 ~ ~QI$118IIE5. {h~ L~l8I1CS. (i) p~A~ of worsh~p, (Pnor oode § 9Q24.4) 4.04.08.3Q050 Pr+ohi~ted uses. (a) HC1S[~7ie! land~nv fae~litia. ~~ ~00."'Y ~BI~~ QII ~aPCC~S ~ILCC~y 8~3Uti~no,_ Oi scparate~ b'Y an a~ley from a restdeanaS disuut. (c) Auy use aat sg~fic~lly authonzed. (Prior oodc ~ 9Q?AS) 9.41.D8.30.060 Yropest~ de~etopment stsadarda. A~ ~ID~CI[y 1~ tbC ~ ~1StI3Ct ~hali ~ ~jp~ Iil `a~u~r ~*~' Wlt~ LIlC fO~IdWmg St8A~3i~S l1~CSS O~ICI- wise p~nded iu tha Hospital Arca Spec~fic Plan: ~ Wtt~ App. s.~l of a D~pment Re-iew Permft ~. Mss. ~~- No, o[ Mss. Mu. Na of Ma~. Hcight Storiss FAR Hef~t Stnriea FAR CP3 45' CPS 45' 1.5 2.5 70' S 25 (a} Masimmn Bulla~ra geigh~ Iyr~,~.,um building hrag,~t, mm~bar of stoncs, and flavr area ra~o ehA~i be desernq~ned as fa~o~ws: There shal~ be no E~n,~rA~~a on the number of stones of aay hotei ar deiac~ed ga~+~o suvchire so long as the hesght ~aes nat ~ed Ehe rr~+**~++*~ ntrmber of fezt pesn±,r~~d ia ihis Sectioa (b) Tbe mam h~F„~l ca~ a~ 5amt John's Ho6pstaE and Health Center shall be divided inw two parceis for pu:paaes af calcWat~ag FAR. Fanxl A- Lot 13, Block 3, Orchard Tract; Parcel H- Lo~a 4-29, Tract No. 4b78 aad Lots 1, 2 aad 3, Tract NQ, T164. (c) Pa~*~~ su:utum develo~ed m ihe CP Distnct ~n whECh at lessr half af t6e spaoes are prov~ded to addt~ an e~mn~ p~rhng sgarx de5~ien~r or asc T~Fi~ ~~S P~B ~h~~~ nvt be subject to FAR liautatioQS, bui shall be requur~ m~set ali other dcvel- opmeat staadards for the area. {d) M~+~*~ Lot ~= 7~00 sc~uare feet. ~9~, pa.-cr1 ~~±?~!1 to~tsm a mi~mum depth of 15D feei an~ a m~ni_ mum widt~ of 50 feet, ~t rh~} paroe~a oa the effect~ve date of this C~apter ~~+A~~ ~ot be subject tn this ~q~ure. meet (e) Fevat Yard Setbadr. Rs shown on the affi~Ai Districting Map of the ~ty, or, ~f Qo setback ~s spcpfied, 20 fee~ (fj Rar Yanl Seibadc. None, ee~ccep~ {1} Where rearpatui liae abuts a rac~dent~al distru~, a rcar yard equai to: 5' +fstorses x lot width~ 50' The ~eguued rear yazd ~nay be used for parlctno or losding to wEeh;~ 5 feet of the rcar panxl lina prov~d~ the garking ar}•,A~~no does not ~±~ad abave the 5rs~ floor levei ar~d ~a~ded thas a wali not less rh~*+ 5 feet ar more than 6 feet in he~ght ss crected a~td ma~tatned 406 ~ along thc ir.ar camme~c-ai parcel Iui~. Aacess dr~+eovays chail ~~~~~ to izua3 PCIFCna1Gl118t~V ibe iC~111red rear yard y~~,~dcd the drivaway does aot e~e~d the m~msn~ width perm~tit~ for 1Ehe parlr,n~ area. A re- qu~ ngr y~ ehaIl pot bG liSCd fOI CQ*+++~+~al puipOS^ es (Z) That needed to ~~mmodate 1and~ca~ng aisd ~e~ng far a rear yard buffer r~quired pursuant ta the pro~ans o# Part 9.Q4.I0.04. (8) 3lda YaN Set6adr. None, e~ooep~ (1} Whtsz the mtenvr n~ pa~el ~ine abats a r~4ide~- uaE discner, an uaunor ssde yard e~al to: 5' +{stones x lot width~ 5{Y T'he iaursar side qard may ba used for parivng or IoacirnQ no doser tha~ 5 feei to the ~ntenvx stde p~uytrty l~e 15c v+~~ed ~he p~rkinv Or losding dDes IIcs[ CxiCIId above the frxst floor level a.nd Yawzded a wall not less than 5 feet or more thau 6 feet in he:ght is er~±~ and m9,~ra,~.~ aioag t~e sidc ce*++*+~+R~ pai+cel lin~. A reQtuied IIIOetlor sldE ysid ehail pOi ~fC u.Sed f0i Sa.i,~;~ ar #or co~meraal purposes. (2} ~ 1M~ll'~lY~ m ~} vSli{YL ~u'? ~414J~=~:;...d ~ ______- _ a b for a suut sade yard, landscape buffer and scm*+~na pursnaat to the ~,~~~sioat of Part 9.04.1Q.04. v (3} A 10 5aot setbatt from an iatersor prnperty Ime e chRll ~ PC~Cd fOi PqIt10nS Of b[11~dinv~e i~St OOntBtII ~~OWS, dODlS, O! Ot~Ci O~!rmoa 1a[8 ibC tatCIIOT Of the kn~ldina ~~t~~ g~ ~]~ thRn 10 feeL sl~l be pt~„~+!~ if ~,: ~ssions af t3~e i3niform Bu~~ing Co~s related to fre-rated op~*+:noa ~n si~c yards are sancFr~ (h) De~dopmen# Reriew A Dtvc:~,Y~aat Rtnew Pcrmit ~s ~ur~d far aay development a~ more thaa 2~500 s4uart feet of floor area, for auq deve~opmeat wrrh roaftop p~~~.-.r,_ and to he~hts and floor area ratios in 9.04.08.30.~60(a). ('r) AEl aew k..-.:,n~~1 d~ve~~,~et in tius Disu~ct S~al3 ~srv+7dG flCC emPlayee par~+nv gn,d g miri+~um OIIC hD~ur free vssitox pa~ing uales4 a prcferenLal pa~no zoae easts or is eatabfiai~ed in t~e area af the ~avelo~ mCIIt 3~~ LbC ~ 5IId3 ~t iflE ~CiLAL18~ ~~na dis~7CL~v~i1 ~~~s~~~idoat~ pp~~ SdvE~e oe-St~t F~B i••••'°'`'~ of the dtvelopmeat, or if oth~ca~se y~~,n~ ~ tt~t Hos~tal Area Spaafc Plan. (Prior code ~ 9024.b) 9.t14.fl8~.3D.070 Mb~teetnr*# rer~ew. - AlE canatru~an, additions to e~st~ng buil~inga, a~d a~ry other a~tereor improvemeats that requ~re issuanae of a bulldinv p~t shall be s~tiDjCtt to ert~utectural ce- v:cw pur~,A~~ to the prov~orn of C~a~ter 932 of th~ Arbcle. {Prior caode ~ 9024.'~ 9.04.0~30.080 Nnn-ann[or~~iR~ hpspital boi~din~_ N~g othcr prov~aiom of tl~is t'E±A~ter,~a t1~~1t8~ ~nldir~a ~~pt}y usCd fQ= s~-pSdCAt OvCIl11~1t -- ~ m tl~e CP Disarict w~ic~ is nomx,~u~,~.- uig as to hcig}~t and wh~ch ~s damaged or destroved may ! 9 04.0830.OGD be restored ta ~ts e~nsung non~nfai**+,nv hesghc. (Pnor code ~ 9Q24.8) PArt 9.04.083Z CC G~vic Cmter District 9.fl4.083Z010 Pu:pose. 'Ihe GC DistruY is mteadcd to pronde for tha resea- ~a of the ma~or aomoen~auon of go~erameat and culmr- al f~a7iues at the Saata Monica ~nnc C,~nter aad aon- prafit affix and e~du~atwnal and research uses. The CC Dismcr i~ des~ned ta allaw for additianal uses m the area, inr~±•~+,•,~ ~p~ed and improved goverament and cx~lt~ual facsli~es, as we~ as public rez:reaaonal faa`ii~ea a~ v+~±~r serv:ag use~.s such at hocels aad oommanaat rernauo~al uses The deveiopment uice~ty is mundcd ta s~~-.R~+~±Ae' ~stmg and future uses m the arta oc+~~~tent Rnth the goats, abjcc~v~, and poiicus of the Generai P[aa. (~nor code § 90Z5.1) 9.04A83ZA2D Perm±±*_~± mrs. The follawiag usrs ~h~~~ be ~ermitted in the CC Dis- ~ {a) Caaveauon and rnnferzaca fac~ities. (b) C~itura~ ~~~acs. (c) N~,,,Z,~.,f~l of~Oe, ~,~,n~asal aad nsearc~ fac~ti~s ~d~ ~11~~IC 1nS$Lil~~~t (e) Public Parirs and Flaygrounds- {fj PubF~c ps~s::ag. ~ ShC1LCI8 fCi LhC bOmC~~3S. ~}f~ ~C! ~Stlb~C ~~1C 3LSC5. (~~ On-prem~se, A^_~y uses for azry of the above ti~cr_a ~nr3tivisna ~C3, iL5La11I8t1LS~ 3IId IIG9V~La1tidS, ~Il~l1Ci1 are p~~++A*~y mceaded to serve v~tais aad users of thc Yr ••~•Arf USC. ~CTZ chnil bt IIO d1I~CCt ~rrtce ~p gpy aerr~ sory uSe from the t.uenor af a bua~~,+~e ar sttucnu~e. p,~ a~R~~ be permmed on~ thraugh a foyer, court, lobby, Pa[~o• or othes ~m~iar ~, (Pnor oo~e § 9025.2} 9.Q4.083Z030 Uees ~nb,ject to pertormanee standards permtL (a) Nona (Prior code ~ 90d53) 9.04.Q83Z040 Candittonpli~ perm~~±~ uses. The fallo~wing uses may he perm~tted m the CC Dis- nzcit subjea to thc approval nf a Conditioaal Uat Permtt (a) Usea which ~adude p~blic m~dunal a~d v~±*~- sernng uses such as ~otels and oommeresal recreat~onal .,~ ---(b) Prnate offices. (c) Restauranta. (Pnor code $ 9Q25.4) 9.44.083Z050 Probibtted naes. (a) Any use not specifically authonzcd. (Prior code ~ 90'L5.5) 9.04.083Z.060 Propertr ~erelopa~eet ataadands. A[1 praperty in the CC d~stnct shal~ be devekoped ui 9~+rdance anth the staadards v~nthie a spepfic gian adopted b7' tfse C'iry Cauncd. (Pnor code ~ 9Q?5.6) 407 A ~'TA C~~N~' ~ ~ Broadway at Cloverfi~eld -~+~ -~ 4rb ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /`~Broadway at 21st Street - South side T Broadway ~as~ ot 21s~ Street - Sou~h side Broadway between 21st Street & ' ~•Claverfield - South S~a~ ~~ ~~~ ;_. ~,~I, ,~{. ' ,~w $roadway East af 21st Street -- NartYx ' 1~ side (Saint John's ~arking 1,ot} ~ Broadway East of 20th Street - Nor~h , 5ide (GxE F'ark~ng Lot~ l~ Eroadway at 20th Str~e~ - Nor~h side ' # (GTE Switching Stat~on) , j ~~ IIroadway at 21,st Strc~t - North side J/Broadway at 23rd StYcet - North side /~ Broa~way & Cloverfield - Facing North A~Broadway between 21st Stree~ & 23rd 1 Strect - North s~d~ 1~Braadway ~~est of Cloverfield - ' W Nortn Siae ~J, Broadway East of 20th Street - W South s.~dc f ~~ ~ ~ _. /, Broadway at 20 th Street - Sotxth s ide , Broadway East of 20th 5treet - ~ South side T Broadway East of 20th Street - SOU~h side "'i. R~v.n i~' r$ ~~~ '~ ~ /1 Broadway at Claverfield - Facin~ Wes4 ~ Broadway at 2~st Street - Facing ~~Test ~~ y~ ~/Broadway at 21st Street - Facinr~ East ~Broac~way at 20th Street - ~'acinq ~ast