SR-9B (6)LUTM:PB:DKW:DB/taQ02cc.pcword,plan Santa Monica, California
Council Mtg: June 29, 1993
To: Mayor and City Council
FRaM: City Staff
SUBJ£CT: Zone Change 92-002, Specifia Plan A~endment 92-00~,
Initial Study 93-003 for the properties located an the
narth side of Broadway between Twentieth and
Twenty-Third Streets
Applicant: Saint John's Hospital and Health Center
INTRODUCTION
This report recammends that the City Council apprave Zone Change
(ZC) 92-002 and Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) s2-DO1 to change
the Official Districting Map for the north side of Broadway
between 2oth and 23rd Streets ~rom C4 {H~ghway Commercialy to
CP-3 (Commercial Professional) and to amend the Hospital Area
Specific P~an to include these parcels within the Specific Plan
area. Pursuant to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this report aZso recommends
approval af Tnitial Study 93-003 and Negat~ve Declaratian for the
proposed application. On May 19, 2993, the Planning Commission
vated 4-0 on a motion to approve the application and associated
Negative Declaration, with one abstention and two absences.
BACKGROUND
App~icatian Description
The applicant filed SPA 92-001 and ZC 92-OQ2 on December 23,
1992. Included in the application is a petition signed by over
50 santa Manica residents in support of tha proposal. ~lthough
- 1 -
no application has been submitted for a deveZopment in
association with the propased amend~ents, the applicant stated ~n
a letter to staff that "orderly expansion of health care
facilities for Saint John's Hospital requires the inclusion of
its praperty and similarily-situated property within the Hospital
Area Specif~c Plan (HASP) and the CP ~one.'+ (Attachment A.)
Several parcels and port~ans of parcels on the north side of
Br~adway between 20th and 23rd Streets wau~d change from a C4
District designation to a CP-3 District designation if the
proposal is adopted by the City Counci~. This area is between
300 a~d 15~ feet in depth from the Brvadway street frontage,
encompasses a total of 106,844 square ~e~t, and is bfsected by
21st Street, as shown in the plans contained in Attachment N.
Mast af the affected parcels are utilized for surface parking. A
portion of a General Telephone switching station, an 8-story
senior housing building, two ane~story office structures, and two
1-story residential duplexes are also cantained vn the subject
parcels.
Th~ affected ar~a is surrounded by a number of different Land Use
Districts, ~ncluding CP-3 (Commercial Professional), R3 {Medium
Density Multipl~ Family Residential), BCD (Braadway Commercia~),
C4 (Highway Commercia~), and C5 (Special office) Districts, as
shown in the followinq table:
- 2 y
Directian Relative Land Use(s3 Zaning
ta Application Sita
North Parking 5tructures, surface CP-3, R3
parking lots, medical
offices, a portion of an
8-stary senior housing project.
a pQrtion of a GTE ~witchi~g
station, and a multifamiZy
building
South MGM Plaza offices acro5s C5
Broadway
East 2-story medical offices C4
West 1-story retail structure
ac~oss Twentieth Street BCD
CEQA Status
The proposed Specific Plan Amend~ent and Zone Chanqe does na~
qualify for a categorical exemption under the City of Santa M~ni-
ca Guidelines far the Implementation of the California Enviran-
mental Quality Act (CEQA). An Initial Study Checklist and pro-
pased Negative Declaration were prepared far which the 30-day
comment period ended on April 19, 1993. No comments were
receivad. If the City Counci~ approves the appZication and
adopts a Negative Declaration, a certified Negative Declaration
will bs prepared and a Notice a~ Determination will be filed with
the Caunty Clerk. A copy of the Initial Study Checklist and pro-
posed Negative Dec~aratian are included in Attachment B.
- 3 -
ANALYSIS
Land Use and Density Implicatians of the Proposed Specific Plan
Map Amendment and Zone Change
The area proposed for rezoning was included in the original Study
Area for the HQSpitaZ Area Specitic Plan (HASP}, as shown in At-
tachment C. However, it was not included in the area recommen-
ded far rezoning within the HASF, as shown in Attachment D. Per
the HASP, the parcels currently under review were not rezoned ta
CP-3 and therefare remain part of the C4 District.
The proposal would result in a modification ~f the Official Dis-
tricting Map to show "CP-3" rather than C4 far th~ affected par-
cels, and a modification of Maps ~5 and 16 of the HASP ta show
the subject parcels as rezonad ta "CP" designations rather than
the current C4. No change ta the text of the Zoning Ordinance or
the text of the HASP is proposed.
A maximum FAR o€ 1.5 applies to the subject C4-zaned parcels as
of tha time ef this hearing date. However, based an the Coun-
ci~'s actian an June 15, I993, the FAR for the C4~2oned parcels
over 7,501 square feet is substantia~~y lower than 1.5 for proj-
ects withaut a residential component. The one changa with regard
to permitted uses in the C4 District will be that residential
mixed-us~ pro~ects will not require a Performance Standards
Permit.
The proposal wou~d result in a change to the uses permitted on
the subject parcels. The current C4 designation allows gen~ral
- 4 -
retail~ offiae and sutom~bile-serving uses {SNIIuiC Sections
9.04.~8.22.020-050). The propased CP-3 designation would
primarily allow medical-related uses, including medical-related
retail uses, medical office uses, haspitals, and "affic~s and
meeting rooms for charitable, yauth and welfare arganizations."
It is difficult to characterize the change in peraeitted uses in
terms of intensity, as the permitted uses are differant in
character. The praposal would al~ow restaurants of any size by
right, whereas the currant zoning requires a CUP for any res-
taurant of more than 5~ seats; it wauld eliminate drive-in,
drive-thraugh, take-aut and fast-food restaurants as possible
uses an the subject parcels; it would eliminate service stations
and autom~bile dea].erships as possible uses on the subject par-
cels; and it would a~Iow residential uses by right (ar with a
Performance Standards Permit iF part of a mixed use project),
whereas the C4 dasignation allows residential projects anly if a
P~rformance Standards Perrnit is obtained. (Ordinance 1635(CCS),
which is effective until August 14, Z993, allaws residential uses
in all commercial districts without requiring a Performance Stan-
dards Permit.)
The proposal wauld not result in any new nanconfarming uses. The
surface parking which occup~es most of the parcels requires a
Conditional Use Permit under b~th the C4 and CP-3 designations if
it is not on the same parcel as the b~zilding which utilizes the
parking. The portion af the General Telephane switching station
would remain a legal nonconfarming use, the senior housing and
- 5 -
duplexes would bacome aonforming uses, and the medical office
uses wauld remain conforminq uses.
With one exception, the maximum permitted floor area ratia (FAR}
of 1.5 would remain intact if the zoning designatian is changed
to CP-3 as proposed. The exception wauld be the provision of the
CP-3 Section which states that parking structures have no limit
on the number of stories and, if developed with "at least half of
the spaces,.. provid~d to address an existing parking space de-
fici~ncy or [to replac~] existing parking," no maximum FAR shall
apply but the maximum height must not exceed the maximum of 45
feet permitted in the District {SMMC Sactions 9.04.08.30.o34[a}
an~ [b]).
For a~l types o€ development, the proposed change would result in
an increase in the maximum height from 2 tQ 3 stories and €ram 30
feet to 45 feet. The propasal wauld also result in a required
minimum front yard setback of 2~', whereas the current C4 des~g-
nation does nat have a frant yard setback requirement other than
a landscaped area equal ta 1.5 times the street frontage.
The change in development standards would create a noncantorming
front yard setback for the one-story medical office buildings and
residential duplexes which are located on three parceYs fronting
23rd Street on the eastern edge of the area propased fvr a zone
change, and for the GTE switching station which fronts Broadway
on the subject area's western edge. The S-story senior housing
project wou~.d remain nonconforming as to height. It is not known
whether the GTE switching station exceeds 45' in height, but it
- & -
does appear to exceed 30~, which wouid mean it is currently non-
conforming as ta height.
objections
Four written objections ta tha praposal have ~een recei~ed. Ruth
Bloom wrate that 6he opposes the Zane Change because it will
result in increased traffic and reduced parking on Broadway.
(Attachment E.) However, with the proposed Zone Change, the
maximum FAR is th~ sama far all uses except some parking struc-
tures, so it is not anti.c~pated that the impact of the change an
circulation volumes wauld be different than exi.sting zoning. In
that it provides an incentive to construct parking structures
which address an exist~ng parking deficiency, the proposed Zone
Change may actually redtice the demand far street parking on
Broadway.
~rwin Zeke Warsaw wrote with a number of concerns relating to the
property owned by Saint John's Hospital but not direct~.y re3ated
ta the proposed Zone Change. Mr. Warsaw requested a file from
staff for 220d Santa Monica Boulevard, an address f~r which no
planning file exists, He inquired regarding the construction of
a s~a11 parking booth. far which all required building permits
were obtained after review by the Parking and Traffic Division.
Mr. Warsaw states that the 20D1 Broadway address used by staff
for the Zone Change file is "incorrect"; hawevar, this number was
chosen for reference purposes because it is the lawest numbered
address along Broadway proposed for a zone change. Mr. Warsaw
- 7 -
further states that an Environmental Impact Report should be re-
quired for the proposed zone change, whereas the City has pre-
pared an Initial Study Checklist and, after review by the City
Enviranmenta2 Review Committee, has prepared a draft Negative
Declaration which was nQticed in the Outlook and made available
for public comment for the required 30 days (no public coxrment
was received). Mr. warsaw also questioned the involvement af a
Planning Commissioner an this application, an issue which was
referred to the City Attarney's office. The applicant has met
with Mr. Warsaw to discuss his concerns,
On May 19, 1993, the day of the Planning Commission puhlic hear-
ing on this matter, staff receiv~d further correspandence from
Mr. Warsaw. (Attachment E.) This correspondence contained a
request for a written respanse to his previous correspondence,
and a request that the praposal be continued froin the May 19
agenda. Staff responded the same day with a letter explaining to
Mr. Warsaw that his concerns had been addressed in several orai
communications with staff and in the Planning Cammission staff
report, and that the Planning Commission was the tinly body with
the authority to continue the item. Mr. Warsaw att~nded the
Planning Commissi.on hearing and reiterated his position.
However, the Planning Commission did not find that Mr. Warsaw's
compZaints warranted any changes ta the praposal.
On June 9, 1993, staff mailed Mr. Warsaw ~urther correspondence
regarding th~ appiication, informing him of the schedu~ed City
Cauncil date, explaining the process for reviewing files, and
- 8 -
explaining how to get a copy of the City Council staff report and
approximately when it would become available.
A letter was aZso rece~ved from Malcom H, Levin, who is President
of the 1440 23rd Street Homeowner's Association, a candominium
building in the R3 District to the north of a portian of area
proposed €or a Zone Change. Mr. Levin reiterated Mr. Warsaw's
concerns, adding a concern relating to the proposal's impact an
"traffic, naise, excess lighting, pubZic safety, and other re-
Yated matters" a~fecting the residential units at 1440 23rd
Street. Mr. Levin attended the Planning Commission public hear-
ing and has reviewed the Planning Commission staff report and its
discussion of the land use and density impi~cations af the pro-
pasa~. 5taff has a~.so responded to his questions by telephone
and informed him of the City Council public hearing date and the
method for o3ataining a capy of the City Council staff report. On
June 7, 1993, the applicant met with Mr. Levin to discuss his
concerns.
The Mid-City Neighbors Association Board vf Directors has voted
to appose Saint John's applicativn. Their May 19, 1993 letter to
tha Planning Commission states that they do not ob~ect to the
future construct~.an of a parking garage an the parcel (which is
not proposed at this time), bu~ that they believe that "the con-
cept of rezoning the property simply because it has been acquired
by St. John's represents bad puhlic paliay and sets a patentially
dangerous precedent." (Attachment E.) The applicant has met
with representatives of the Mid-City Neighbors Association.
- 9 -
General Plan and Specific Plan Conformance
The proposed change to Maps 15 and 16 of the HASP and the pro-
posed redistricting are consistent with the goals and objectives
cantained in both the Genera~ Plan and the HASP. Hy a~lowing
increased area for the constructian af hospitals and ather
medical~related uses, as weli as allawing a density incentive for
the constructian af parking which addresses existing parking de-
ficiencies in the vicinity, the proposal is consistent with Ob-
jective 1.13 of the Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE),
which states the fol~owing;
Recagn~zing the impartance of the City's hospita~s to the
community and the value of their services to the residents
af Santa Manica and those in surraunding areas~ the Land
Use Element ac}cr~aw~edges the hospitals need to expand and
accommodates future growth of hospitals and health care
facilities while ~inimizing harmful effects on surraunding
residentia~ neighborhoods.
LUCE Palicy 1.13.1 further stipulates ~hat the City sha~I adopt a
Specific P~an for the area araund the City's tw~ hospitals, and
Po~icy 1.~3.3 establxshes the po~icy of providing a density
incentive for the construction af park~ng which addresses exist-
ing parking deficiencies in the area. The HASP was adopted on
September 27, 1988.
The proposed changes are consistent with the statement on page 30
of the HASP which states that "some res~dents~ haspital afficials
and organized neighborhood groups of the area have expressed a
preference that pa~cel rezon~ngs focus St. Jahn's Hospital
development sauth of Santa Monica Boulevard," which includes the
area now proposed far rezoning and which is more predaminantly
- 1,0 -
commerciaz than the area to the north of Santa Monica Bo~ievard.
Most of the area currently propoaed for rezoning ~s owned by St.
John's Haspital.
As ~t would a~law expanded hospital-related development in an
area more predominantly commercial than the area to the north of
Santa Monica Boulevard, the proposal is consistent with Objective
1 of the HASP Land Use E~ement wh~ch states that land uses shall
"ensure that development in the hospital area balances the need
for medical facilities and uses while protecting residential uses
in the area." The proposal ~s alsa consistent with Circulation
Element Objective 13 of the HASP, whieh states that the City
shall "protect the environment of lacal residential streets by
minimizing the intrusion of non-residential vehicular traffic and
parking into residential neighborhoods."
HASP Circu~at3an Element Ob~ective 26 states that
Sa~nt Jahn's Hospital Center and Health Center ahall,
within five years, pravide parking spaces to eliminate any
parking deficiency discussad in the Hospital Area Specific
Plan of 1988. Spaces shall be prov~dad within 500 feet of
the Health Center campus. By or before five years of the
adoption of the HASP, the Health Center shall submit docu-
mentatian that deficiencies ha~e be~n eliminated. Failure
to meet this objective shall be a cons~deration in City
review of Health Center development applications.
5aint John's Hosp~tal has not submitted a development proposal to
address existing parking deficiencies or an evaZuation of exist-
inq parking deficiencies with this app~ication. The 5-year
deadl~ne will nat be reached until September 27, 1993.
_x~_
Canclusian
The proposed Zone Change and specific Plan Ame~dment is c~nsis-
tent with the objectives flf the General Plan and HaspitaZ Area
Specific P~an. By allowing a density inc~ntiva far the pro~ision
of new parking spaces whieh address existing parking de~iciencies
at Saint John's Hospital and Health Center~ by allowing an expan-
ded area in which tQ construct new parking intended to be uti-
Iized by the Health Center campus, and by allawing increased op-
partunities for medical uses in the primari~y cammercial area to
the south of Santa Monica Boulevard, ~he proposal is consistent
with objectivas in the HASP. An Initial Study Checklist has been
prepared by staff which concludes that a Negative Declaration is
appropr~ate. Therefore, statf recammends that the City CaunciZ
approve of the propased Specific Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and
Negative Declaration.
PUBL~C NOTIFICATION
The Zoning Ordinance does not require any pu]alic notification for
zone changes other than a notice in the Outlaak. However,
Specific Plan Amendments require that a notice of the public
h~aring be mailed to aI~ owners and residential and commercial
tenants of property located within a 50Q' radius of the subject
site at least ten consecutive aalendar days priar to the hearing.
A copy of the not~ce is contain~d in Attachment F.
-ia-
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACT
The recomiaendation presented in this report does not have any
budget or fiscal impact.
RECOMMENDATI~N
It is respectfully recom~nended that the Council adapt ZC 92-002,
SPA 92-p01 and IS 93-003 based on the follawing findings:
ZONE CHANGE AND 5PECIF~C PLAN AMENDMENT FINDINGS
Z. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change are
cansistent in principal with the goa~s, ob~ectives, poli-
cies, land uses, and programs specified in the adopted
General Plan, in that they are consistent with Land Use
and Circulation EIe~Gnt Objective ~.13, which states that
the City should a11ow for the expansion of existing hospi-
tals while minimizing their impacts on adjacent residen-
t~al neighborhoads, and they are consistent with Objec-
tives 1 and 13 of the Hospital Area Specific Plan.
2. The public health, safety, and general welfare require the
adaption of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zone
Change, in that the amendment would allow increased oppor-
tunities and incentives to address the deficiency of aff-
street parking spaces which exists in the the HospitaZ
Specific Plan area.
NEGAT~VE DECLARATION FINDINGS
The City CaunciZ hereby finds that the Final Initial Study and
Negative Declaration should be certified in that:
l. The C~ty Council has reviewed and considered the contents
of the Final Ynitial Study and NEgatiye Declaratian,
cansisting of the Draft Initial Study and Negative
Dec~aration, public comments, and responses.
2. The Final Initial Study and Negative D~claration
adequately review and analyze patential environmental
eff~cts of the propased pro~~ct.
3. The environmental review was conducted in accordance with
applicable State and City CEQA guidelines including
preparation, notification, and content requirements.
- 13 -
4, A Negative Declaration is appropriate, in that the Initial
Study pravides sufficient data to support a finding that
the project will not ha~e a significant effect an the
environment.
Prepared by: D. Kenyan Webster, Planning Manag~r
Drummond Buckley, Assaciate Plann~r
Planning Division
Land Use and Transpartation Management Department
ATTACI~iENTS :
A. Correspandence from Applicant
B. Initial study 93-003
C. Map 2 vf HASP Showing Study Area
D. Maps l~ and 16 of HASP Showing Zoning Designations
E. Carrespondence from Members of the Public
F. Public Notice and Rada.us Map
G. Planning Cammission Staff Report
H, Planning Commissian Statement of Official Action
I. Correspandence from 5taff
J. C4 and CP Sections af 2oning Ordi.nance
K. PhotograpY+s of Site and Surrounding Properties
L. Ordinance Implementing Zone Change
M. Resolution Implementing Specitic Plan Amendment
N. Plot Plan -
DB
PC/ta002cc
05/22/93
- 14 -
A~'AC1~EIITT A
~LJ ~ _ J
~. ,~ na r
•-:`, ~,,.`
! ~ ~ ~/4fv I
~aW OFFICES OF
SHEx.1S~i,v L. ST~CEY
233 W3LSr~~ai5 BOUG£vawp
51~lTE 510
SA1~TA ~Q\'IC~. C~LIFOB.\'I2i ooa,of
'EL 13~01 394-1163
:4X t3701 394-9B4i
~~D= .i~^"'.7 '1 ! , 14 G 3
,I~ . _~ ::m~nor_d Buckley
_-~rr_-rc DeuartmenL
~~~-: ~~ Yanta Monica
_~~~ ~~u~i1 S~L~GI~
~,~_.~.~ _.~~i•~a, Cal~far^ia ~ OaOI
wp : Rezoninq P.r~plica~~or=
~7~ar i`r Buckley : _
In response to your letter oF January 2i, ?993, I aan
~~c ~ ~si._y ~ze follow~ng docuz*-e~~s:
~. 2Q phocagraph~ a~ the s3te and surraur_dirG zreas
r~o~.:~~~~ cn 8~/? x 11 incn card s~ock and labelled as to location.
?. ~ S4atemen~ ~r ~_nd~ngs for the aone c^ar.gp ar_d
4 vr_~r-wi ~ lar. ~.*nend.-nen~ .
~. ?~ copy o~ ~he Lc~llowing it~ms in ~uppcrt.
a. Peti~ior_ ~~r Distr~.c~ing ~lap Amendmen~ exe^uted
by :~~a~s ~~ros on behalf ~f ~'.:e propert~es at 2225 ~roadway and
_4~~ .:~~d 5treet,
b. 9 copy oT ~he Peti~zon Lo~ ~lstY'~Ct~:~g Map
~mEr.: ^~~nr. ex_ec~ted by the o~r~ers and tenants ot ~he pro~er~y a~
~~~~ ~road~ti*ay; and
c. A'etter iram AS/Management ;n bena?= :f the
~U~~rs o~ ~he propertv at 222I 3road~+ray .
4. A site p~an show~ng the ex~s~~ng structures ~~d land
~se~ c^ t;~e af_*"ected parcels .'r~e are unaware cf tne ~1oor ~reas of
~z~ s:ructures locaced on these propert~es.
~~~~ ~
~aw OFF3CE5 6F
SFE~R~S~i.` L. STACE~
~~"_r . Lru:~:-ond ~uckley
~ ebruar,r 1-, ;993
?~r3a ~ _
= ieas~ proceed ta schedule ~r~_s General Plan Amenc~ment
~:~~~ ~cne cnar_ge at the ear~iest ~oss~b3.e date .
Very truly yours,
~ 4~ /~ .
~ ' ~ ~
She~man L. S~acey ~
w~~ . = s~,- _~~~,..~_ _~~
~ilCl'JSL:?"aS
~ ii ti ~_ ~
PR4PQSSD FYNDINGS FOR
GPA 92-081 AND 2C 92-002
~
1. The Pro~osed Amendment is Cons~stent in Pr~nciple With
the Goais, Ob~ectav~s, Po].ic~es, Land Uses, and Procrrams
Specif~ed in the Adopted General Plan.
The General Pl~.n prov~.des zn Po1.ic~es 1. 13 ,~.? 3. ~ and
~ _~.~ as fo~lows:
" = .1 : OBJECT_TTE :
"Recogn~zYng the importance of the City's hospitals
to the co~nt~nity and the value of ~heir services to
the res~dents of Santa Manica and ~.hos~ in
surraunding areas, the Land Use Element
ac~cnowledgES the nospztals need to expand and
acco~nodates future growth of hospitals anci health-
car~ fac~l~Czes while m~n~m~zing hannful effe~ts on
surroundzng residential neighborhoods.
"POE~ICIES
"~.~3.1 Fo~law~ng City adoption af Specif~c Plans for the
area comprxsing and i:rar-ediate~y surrounding each
°hospztal campus", allow expans~ans of existing
hospita? buildings with the adopted Specific Plans.
- n
~L~v~ ~
~he ~wo C~ty nosp~tals shal~ each prepare hosp~tal
~as~er P?ans ~or ~heir organizat~ona~ growth and
change over ~he 10-15 years tol~owing aaaptian of
~ the Land Use and C~rculation Eler~t~nts. (These
Master Plans shall be ctinsidered ~y 4he Ci~y ~n
prepari~g ehe Specifzc ~lans.) In U~epar~ng said
Master Plans, each hospxtal snal~ provide
oppor~unitzes for neighboring residents, ~roper~y
OW;lErS~ and b~SZ~E55 ~eopZe to ~~rticz~aL~ ~n
Mastnr P~an deveiopment. A~y med~ca~ or med~~al-
reiaced a~velopment proposed by ez~her hosnital
pr~or to C~ty approval of ~ts respec~~ve Specific
Plan shal~ be sub~~et ~o s~te revYew and sha11 he
appraved only ~f the development ~eitner pre7udices
the deve~opment and implementation oz the Spec~fic
Plans, nor adverse~y affects surround~ng
neighbornoods. Neither ~he Spec~~ic Plans nor any
si~e r~view shall ~e adapted w~thout pub~ac
hearings.
* * *
°1.13.3 Parking structures develop~d in *he CP Dis~r~ct in
whicr~ at least half of the spaces are provided to
address an existing parkzng space defiCiency or are
replac~ng ~x~sting parking spaces shall not be
- 2 -
~~~., y ~
sub~~ct to ~AR ~Ar:~i~at~cr_s, but shali rieet alZ
other aeveiopmer_~ standards ~or che area."
~ Under these nolicies, on September 27, ~988, ~he City
3do~~e~ a HosA3ta1 Area Speciti~ PJ.an ("~iASP"?. The Plan^~.ng Area
~e~=r:~~ on page 3 of the H.~SP e~campasses al~ of the area r.artn of
y,oac.aav ~~em 24th to ~.9th Street. '?'he H~SP const~tutes a saecific
N;ar ~~ dEfyned by Cal~.fornia Governmer:~ Code §6~4~1.
Cn page 30 af t~e ~~SP it is s~aced:
"Some reszdents, haspital of£a.cials and organized
neighborhood graups--of the area have expressed a
preference that parcel rezonings focus Saint John's
Hospital develapment south of Santa Monica
Boulevard."
Arior to the adoptior. ef the F.ASP, Saint ~ohn's Hospital
~a~ acquzred a nLmber o~ properties nortn af Ar~zona Avenue. Based
~~ the HASP, Saint John's Hc~spital has directed its Axpansion
~~f~rts south of Santa Monica Boulevard and has disposen af ~he
~.~c~er~i~s north of Arizona Avenue which were rezoned R-2.
The proposed plan amendm~nt 3s consistEnt wzth Ob~ective
Nunbers '_, 2, 13, 24 and 26 of ~he HASP. Szn~e ~988, Sair~ John's
~ospi~al has acquzred additlonal property sauth o~ ~anta Mon~.ca
Boul~vard including frontage a~ong Broadway. Hospital expansion ~n
- 3 -
~~t _ }
~~ese areas o~~ents hospi~al uses away from the res~aent~a~ arEas
:ar`h of ar=zona. To the south o~ iroadway are cammerc~a~ ases.
_•~g~th o~ 4r~zona the hospita~'s ~resent narther~y border, ~he
~ 3evelopment ~s residential.
2. mhe Public Healthr Safety, and General T~e~~are ~pqu~re
t^e Adontion of ~he Proposed Arnendment.
wr~erl,/ expa~sian of ~ealth care facil_t~es =~r Sai~t
~o~s~`s :os~i~a~ ;equ~res ~he inclus~on of lts property a~d -
sy~~ia~ly situated property within tne HASP and the CP zone. Th~
amendment requested is the logiCal extension of the hospital
expansion area contemplated by the HASP. Coordznated development
of hos~i~~~ f~cilities requires that ~he special requirements of
~he ~_ ~one be applied a~ong Broadway from 20th Strest to 23rd
S~_~et.
s_~ohns~findings
~ ~ -
~~J~.. ..
:*~sr~i~sz s~~e4 ~ie• e;s
STI~MAF~I L . 87A
~tiria~r s~a~t a~srt~ic~zxo w~
~s a~
~~~ ~
T~ ~11i~s~ t~sr~crbs i-~~ ~rapsr~~- ~~xs ~~esatet~ i~`
t~~ C~ty o~ satM~ ~ic~ atid h~~w~ pr~itlon tl~ C~tY ax ~l
~dxa~t ~.o tl~ O#fiai~~ asat:~atsr~ t~ap ~hsch Mtli a~s1~AQ• t2~ son~
o! tha p~'vP~s~ty oei !h~ Ka~tn a~df o~ BrQSdirOY ~tMi~li ~0~~ Stri~t iRd
23rc1 Btrt~! ts~a Zar~s C~~ to ~~n* Cg-3. ~
; J~~~ ~
, _ _ i=,~~~=~~~-- . -=.G~~r~S ~- 1 P~~+~
sil~tuts ~ l~i~a~ 7ra~ da~ar j~
Z Z ~ >~ ~ J~lJF-~ ~~~ y
~ ~~ ~ - . _ . s;~,~!!~ ]
.~~
: ~ _ -, "';r-~C.L~/ i~~~/C~
-J;_ 'J ~ ,'- G C G~/S ~- t Ps~oM=ty
-- • ~ :~
3sgr~atlu~ ~ - ~ ~ ~r~A~ ~i*ri ~ oun~s
. f YSr~ .~ ~3 -~% ~j~ ~~`- s~~t ~
_aads . - - . _ , . ~
. • ~ -~ rr~ L-~.' G~/.S ~~/~GS _ P~'ops~
sigr-atvs . pT~ni--~rsi - ~s.r ~ /
'~~~' '/~~~ `f C~C~~~~~/~f-ao :~~ ~
~~~~~~ ~ - - - • - - -
:~,r~,r
-- ~13+~autar~ - - _ . . ~ Pri~t Hal~i ~ ~~ ~wr [ ]
-- • - - - -- ~ , . T~n~f~ ~
Aadrruc~ ~ - - -
- lrfl~s~y
Biq~~lnr~ - ----- -= Priat Ha~a i C-++nir ~ J
Jlaare~~ . ` ~ .~
z~at ~( }
~
Gu~:. :
~~~~~
~ _
E ~ ,~,~~i - - - ,..
~ ~~ -. ~ , - - - - = ",~~ -
t ~i ' _ __
~ _ ~a _ ~I~i s*s~
; ~ i~i~i - --
L ~~ ~. ~
,.-1~'1~L ~~~~ ~ --
~~ .
{ ~ ~ t~~it. ~' ~-
~ ~ ~ ~ _~
~ ~~ ,~~ ,-,_.
~A~~~ . . i i ~ r ~ ~ j ~~ f
r ~
. .~ .ws +• s-~ •^~s ~s rrwri ~
~ ~ ~!!~~4 ~x* si ~. ~~r ~ ~ ~~.~+a ~-
~1~ ~p s i ~ ~3~ ~ ~s~i~'iQ ~~ w4 a+~ ~
! ii3~ ~1~++N # ~M^*~ ~ ~ss ~R
Y~t/ ~i~r~ ~M~~ ~s! ~Nf *~i
~ • - -- _ ~ ~~L ~ - .~e ~~ ~='_-
~
~'M~ A~"'~ "'i p1i1~1a ~K~~ ~~4 t~i;/atlst
TOOf~' t~TIV'J~C-(T~3~LILt t'S!` VrSt cFS F.!! r~•E- .,.. ..r _.
_ ~ ;;; .'-,,~..+,.r ~.~J1Ei~~rt
FEBRIIARY 5, I993
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
~58~ "IAI~l STREET
SANTA M~NICA, CA 90401.
~• ~ r`
R ~~
~
f +~
ti
!~ ~ rl r `~ i %~ ~'
/ ~_~~ ~
:~ - "~ ~ L~~-;~ _
~
~ - ~ ~ ~.. `~
~\ ~.:' ~
~, ~~. `
< i
' ,.~ . ~ - ~~C ~
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ G ~
RE: ~EZONING PETITION - NORTH ~~' BR~ADWAY, BETWEEN 20TH &
23RD STREETS, SANTA MONICA, CA
TO Fr'HOM IT MAY CONCERN:
ON BEHALF OF WHITE EAGLE BRQADWAY PARTNERSHIP, WE AGREE WITH THE
APPLICAT~ON SUBMITTED S'Y SAINT JOHN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER
TO REZDNE THE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BROA~WAY BETWEEN 24TH
ANp 23RD STREETS FR~M ZONE C-4 TO ZONE CP-3. WHITE EAGLE BROADWAY
PARTNERSHIP'S PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED BY THIS PET~TION, AND WE
ARE IN SI7PPORT OF THE PROPOSED REZONING.
PLEASE F£E~ FREE TO CONTACT ME AT (215)739-3338 IF YOU HAV£ ANY
QUESTI~NS REGARDING WHITE EAGLE SROADWAY PARTNERSHTP'S PDSITION dN
'I'?iIS r.ATTER.
S I PICERELY ,
~
_ _,r_,:-, -;~ 1 ,J ~{~i:.•~
ANTHONY J. FILITI
A,TF : es
WE ARE MOST EASILY REACHED AT (215)739-333$
~i1~,.. :
~AW OIrFIGES OF
SHER.~iAi1~` L. STACEY
233 WiL5Fr4RE SOl1LEVA4~
SIf~TE 510
SA.\'TA MOh'ICA, CAi-r1+'OE.~TZA $0401
TEL [31~~ 394-lis3
FAX I314) 3S4-7B41
Dece~nber 9, ~992
P~r . Pau~ ~e~ 'l~n~.
~~~riitlii~ ani~ ~ ~ti~~r
~~.~~y o~ SanL~ P=on_ca
-~$5 Ma~r. S~rper
~an~a `~Ioni~a, Ca~~~crnia 90401
~rrr rj'' _
V f '+
C: -`~ p, ~ ~; . --~ ~ ,.
~~ ~~ J p n
rf~
„.~,
Re: ~a~nt ~ah_n's Hospital and Health Center
~ppl3cabi~ity o= Haspital Area Specifse Plan to
Broadwav Praperty _
~ear '~ir ~erlanL :
Th~s of~ice repr~sents ~aint John's Haspital and Health
C~n:.er ,r_ connection with actzvities related to the Hosp~tal Area
Spec~~~c Flar.. ~ have represented Saznt John`s ln this ~egard for
_he past sAve~ years and was closely involved in the development of
~he uasp~~ai Masc.er P~an and the subsequent formu].a~aan, hearings
an~ aaFro~,ra? of t~e Hospital Area Specific Plan t"HASP").
~ecen~ly. it has come to my attentson that a d~sagreement
~ay ~x~st as 4o whetner or not the properties located aiang the
norrhsid~ o~ Broacway b~tween 20th Street and 23rd Stre~t are a
part ~~ ~^e ~iASP. The impor~ance of this question arises due to
exist~r~u ar.d poten~ial fu~ure ardanances of ~he C~.ty which :nay
nxempt ~r;:n their app~~cati~n praperCies ~ocated within the H~SP.
Bases ~pon my present review of the Hospital Area
Spec~fic ~lan, my rev~ew o£ the Saint John's Master Plan and the
~raft HASF rogether wzth the s~af~ repQrts and environmental
~acuments ~ssoc~ated therew~th, ~t ~s my op~n~on ~hat the
pro~ert~ps a~ong Broadway which I have described are presently part
of the HAS~ and any ordinsnce wha.ch exempts fram ~ts applicat~on
propert~es within the HAS~ would not be applicabl~ to these
~roperL~es I base th~s oYinion upan Mhe following facts, among
atners:
~. In formula~ing its Master Plan and accepting Che
EASP, ~~~nt John's accepted ~he Czty's request that it not e~cpand
~~U._:~
_.aw OFr~CES OF
SHEF~.~'i ~~ L. ST~iCEY
`_~~ . ~dll~ ~ar~~IIi.
Decem.ber ~ . =992
r~ge 2
~
~ur4~er Co the north ac~oss Arizona P_venue and focus any ~o~enr~.al
i ~tu~ e'~osp~tal expar!s~on solxth of ~anta Mon~ca Boulevard Lo
3roadtiray .
2. In fur~zerance cf ~his reorientation cf rosp~tal
~ro~f~~.:~~, SaY~t John`s ac~epted t?~e rezoning of all proper~y nor~h af
~:r~zcr.: ~ve*~ue Ca residznt~al and salu ~h~ ~;rorc~My wh~c~! ~ ~ had
~,re~.--_o~asiy awned in ~~at area. `"he ma~oril.y or the property ~o~d
~y S~. ~~nn's was so-d co Cornmuni~y Corporatzon or` Santa MonYCa and
4ze Szn~o~ Health and ~eer C~unse~~ng Centerr botn ~aenc~es
_~: a:~ci~ily supported Dy ~.he C~.ty of Santa Monica.
3. The mapping of the HASP clear~y ident~~ies
su~stant~al areas outs~.de the present ownersh~.p af each hospxtal.
Accord~ngly, I believe an appropria~e charactera.zat~.on of the
boundaries of the HASP must be either (1} the boundar~.es shown on
t~E man id~ntzfied as HASP Study Area, or (2} the propert~es zoned
CP ownea and operated by each hosp~taJ. tagether with ~uch
~oir„nerclally zaned p~aperties adjoining those propertles for which
4::~ ~osF~ta~~s master ~lan iden~if~ed potent~al iuture use.
It is my unders~anding fram dzscussions with Suzanne
=r~ck that your de~~rtment maintains that t:~e exempt~on for
~ro~er~~es sub~ect ~o t~e F_ASP is l~m~ted to t'~ose propert~es ~n
?~ne CP. I bel~eve this is an unnecessariiy restrictzve
~rite~pr'~rat~an ent~rely incor~sistent with the developntent of the
3P_~~ ~ni~~ally. HoweJer, without pre~udice t~ the posi~ion of
~a_r.~ Lohn's wh~ch I have described in th~s ~etter and wzthout
zecessi~y to resolve t:~~s ~ssue at the present time, i have adv~sed
~a~z~ ~ohn~s, and Sai:~t John's has agreed, to Fiie an applic~~~fln
~c rezone the prapert~ES fronting along Broadway ~rom Zone C-4 to
Zone CP. ~ have con~acted General Telephone Company to req~ae~t
~ha~ they ~oin in sucn application wzth reg~rd to propert~es which
~hey own fronting on Broadway between 20th ~nd 23rd_ St~ch
a~plication w~11 aiso ~.nclude an amendment to the ~~SP to ~nclude
these prapErties w~thin a def~ned boundary. At such time as the
City acts upon the amenc3ment to the HASP, ~t znay wish to adopt
specif~c boundaries of the HASP such that any or3i~ance which makes
re~erence to it will clear].y delinea~e the proper~ies which may or
may noC be affected by such ord~nance.
I believe ~~is will be an appropriate manner ~r~ which to
;esalve tr~ls conf~ict. ~ loak forward to the comple~~on of t~e
apr~~zcat~on for rezonzng and Specific Plan Amendment. By seek3r~g
C t1 ~ ... ~
_?W OFFICES OC
SHE~.~i~\' I„ STACEY
_?= ?aul BerianL
r~~~mber 9, 1992
~ ~ v ~. .3
.. ~.~r. a Snec i f i c P~an ~~nendmp~t , Sazr_~ John' s does not ~^r_ceae that
..~~r_ ~~ ainencunen~ ~s r?au~re~ f~~ ~he N~SP ta inc~ude vrs pro~erty
~~ ~~e rezoned.
V~ry ~ruly yo~rs,
---~ .. _ ,
fi «.-'~.
~ ~~
~~ ~
Sher:nan :., . Stacey ~
--_ _ .. - ~ .r.s ;~~r. lcr
~ ~ . P~:r . ""om PvnA
I~r. Joe Sykora
Mr. Lenard Pick
Mr. John Jalilli -_
Ms. Suzanne Frick
a~tJ:.._ c
LAW OFFICES DF
SHERM A N ~„ ~TACEY
239 M'iLShi~RE BOIJLLYARD
SU~YE 5~0
se..~rrd rsarraca. cA*-**~axrA aoaoi
TEL (31G1 3fl4~163
Fp% ('J101 3g4-7841
May 17, 1993
Planning Co~mr-issioners
City of Santa Monica
1685 Maa.n Street
Santa Manica, Calzfornia 9~4Q1
Re: Spec~.fic Plan Amendment 92-001
D~.strictinq Map Amendment 92-002
Dea~ Coiruniss~oners :
GI7Y w: - ` ~ -_
Cf~'' P~_~t _ - - -_ _ _
'93 !~#Y 1 ~ ~?~ '~ ;
On May 19, 1993, I will appear before you on behalf of
Sa~nt John`s Hospi~a~ and Health Center in support of appraval. of
Spec~fic Plan Amendment 92-001 and DistrYCting Map Amendmen~ 92-
002. These appl~catxons were filed by Sa~nt .7ahn's and others to
~nc?ude the frontage on the north side of Broadway from 20th
~treet to 23rd Stree~ within the Hosp~.tal Area Specifzc Plan
t"hASP") and to rezone that area from Zone C-4 to Zone CP-3.
V~hen the HASP was adopted in 1988, growth of the
hosp~tal and m~dical facilities was directed south of Santa
MonzCa Boulevard. Prior to the adaption of the HASP, Saint
~ohn's had anticipated growth north of Arizona and had acq~a~red
prap~r~y far that purpase. Saint John's agreed not to continue
EtfOYtS to exp~nd narth of Arizona and consented to the rezoning
of its praperty in that area from Zone C-2 ~o Zone R-2. Since
19$$, Sazn~ John`s has dasposed af its px'operta.es north o~
A~izona.
In aecox-dance w~.th the dir~ctYOns zn the HASP, 5aznt
Jor~n's planned for expansion south toward Broadway. Sain~ .7ohn's
acqu~red va~ious com~nercial properties south af Santa Mon~ca
Bo~:levard. The John WaynE Canc~r Insti~ute maved from UCLA ta
Sa2r_~ John`s and the building at 2200 Santa Monica Bouleva:~d was
acquired and remodeled for that purpose. Commercia~ buildings on
the west side of 21st S~reet were removed to expand parking.
SubsCantial non-medical operataons of the hospital were relocated
~rom ~he main nursing tower north of Santa Monica Boulevard to
the ald General Telephone office bu~lding at 20th and Santa
Monzca Boulevard.
Li V l~ .- J
LAW OFF[CES OF
SHER~.a~ L. STACEY
Planning Conanissioners
Ci~y of San~a Monica
May 17, 1993
Page 'I~ro
The CP zone was spec~f~ca~Iy created for the two Santa
Mon~ca hospi~als. The permatted uses and development standards
are geared to the spec~al needs of hospital and medical
~ac~lit~es. To establish unifarm zoning throughout the blocks
from 2~th to 23rd Street fwath the exception of ~he R-2 zone for
the condomin2um at 23ra and SchaderS, Saint John's ar.d General
Te~ephone filed the present applications. Several other smal~
~roper~y owners have jo~ned the application or consented to ~t.
The piann~ng Depar~ment Staff has recommended ~nat y~u app~ove
tne rezonYng. Sain~ John`s supparts that recorn~nendation.
There are two d~fferences in development standards
~e~ween the present C-4 zone and the CP-3 zone. The ~irst
d~fferen~e ~s that the height limzt for CP-3 is 45 feet and for
C-4 ~s 30 feet although tne Floor Area Ratio of 1.5 is th~ same
w~th ex~.st~ng build~ngs (Geneva Towers and the GTE switching
statzon) already 45 feet ar h~.gher, this difference has l~.ttle
~mpact. -.
The second d~fference is ~ha~ parking structures in the CP
zone are per~:3tted within hesght and setbacks withaut an FAR
l~mit. This gravision encourages Saint John`s to build
addit~onal parking for its personnel (and x'educe neighborhoQd
impacts) ~a elim~nate zts parking deficit. Saa.nt John's is an
escrow to buy add3tional property from General Telephone on the
nor~hwes~ corner of Broadway and 21st Street. Long range
p~a::nzng zs to mave the nroposed ioeatzon of a parking structure
from ~:srd and Arizana (oppos~te res~.dentia~ zones on 3 szdes) to
21st and Broaciway (oppos~te commercial zones on 3 sides).
Your act~.on zs a recommendat~on to the City Counci~.
Sa~nt John's agrees w?th your staff that the applications shoulc3
be approved. Sa~nt John`s requests that you act irYednesday
evening to recflmQnend to the Czty Council that an ordinance
a~pro~ing the rezanang be adopted.
Very truly yours,
~ ~i
SHERNIAN L . STACEY
SLS ~'sh
cc: Nr. Joseph Sykora
~u~::.~
LAW QFFICES OF
SHERM A N L. 5TACEY
233 WIL$MIRE BOULEVARD
SU~TE 610
$A'N'TA MQNiCA. C~T-T~+'OBNLA 9Q~p1
TEL 13101 3~4-IIE3
FAJ[ 1370) 304-7g41
May 17, 1993
Mr. Paul Berlant
P1anr~.ng Director
City of Santa Monica
168~ Main Street
Santa Monica, Californ~.a 90401
Re: Specific P1an Amendment 92-001
Zone Chanqe 92-OJ2
Dear Mr. Berlant:
~~+1 t~ 1 Vr~ ~ x ~ ^ }
L- f ' Y ~,'R1 ! ~. ' ' - _ ~
~}~ ~l~ir ~ ~ ~4:: , :~
Th~s off~e~ represents Saint John's Haspital and Health
Center. ~ am in receipt of a~etter dated April 30, 1993 ~rorc~
Irwin Z~k~ UvTarsaw to Paul Berlant re~.a~ing to Specific Plan
A.men~rne::t 92-041 and Zor~e Change 92-002. Mr. Warsaw makes numerous
a~legations in his letter.
I~r. Warsaw mak~s several inaccurate factual statements on
the fi~s~ page in his ~etter. These allegat~ons are unfounded.
1. The small parking booth behind 2200 Sar~ta Monica
Ba~.:~evard ~s not on proper~y wh~ch ~s the sub~ect of ~hE present
appl~.c~t~ons. The parking booCh canstruc~ion rece~ved all
ne~essary permits from the B~ilding Department and has been
~nspected.
2. The electrical permits for the light standards have
~Een 155llEC~ by ~he Buildzng Depar~ment. Electrical permzts were
~ssu~d on Januazy ~3, 1.993 and ~.nspectaons rnade on Apr~l 9 and
Apr,l 15, 1993. The bu~ldxng perrn~t appl~catians were made May 20,
199~ and September 25, 1991.
3. I have na knowledge of wha~ s~~e address your s~aft
might have ~ncluded n a City 3nternal case lYSt on February 23,
1993. However, sznce th~s was not a public not~ce and since this
eYrar, if it occurr~d, has no~ been rel~~d upon by anyone, ~t seems
hardly reievant.
l~it~t ~ J
LAW OF'FICES QF
SHE~~a~ L. STACEY
Mr. Paul Berlant
May ~7, ~993
Page 2
4. Schadex' Drive is a public street. The use of
Schader Dr~ve by abu~ting praperty owners does not requ~re a
hearing by the City. There ~s nothing in the present appli~at~.on
that involves Schader DrYVe or any property abuttzng Schader Dri~e.
~h~s case.
5. Tom Pyne will nat partic~pa~e ~n the decision on
6. The prevzausly existing driveway apron ~ust west of
2210 Santa Monica Baulevard was removed and replaced by a curb and
gu~ter a5 a requ~rement af the City Department of General Serv~ces
as a cand~.t~on t~ puilding permits for remadelling work at 2200
Santa Monica Baulevard. No notice or pub~~c hearing was required.
in~hether Mr. warsaw has ciaims of some easement is not an issue far
the C~ty to judge. Saint John's did..not ask ~he City to close the
driveway, the Czty asked Saint John's to close the driveway.
Nir. Warsaw demands certain actions by the City. NonE of
these actions is warranted.
I. The hearing was postponed from May ~, 1993 to
May 29, 1993 because of lack of a quorum.
II. Mr. Pyne w~ll not participate ~n the d~cis~an.
III. There ~s no grounds for a stop wark arder for
2200 Santa Monica Boulevard as all necessaxy permits and
inspect~ons have b~en made.
IV. A wholesale investigation into viulation oi federaZ,
st~te or 1aca~ ~aws zs unwarranted by any allegavlons made by
Mr. h'arsaw.
V. The presen~ applicatior~ does not involve Schader
Drive in any manner.
VI , The C~ty sta~f has conducted an In~.t~a~ Study and
determined that change of xone from C-4 ta CP-3 does nat inva~ve a
risk of ~zgn~ficant adverse environmenta? effect.
Mr. Warsaw compla~ns of an ~.nabzlity to examine City
f~les on this matter. I have no explanat~on for th~s par~ of his
complaint. I have never e~erienced diff~cul~y in examina.ng any
~~L~~
LAW OF~ICES QF
SHE~zMAr L. STACEY
Mr . Pau~. Berlan~
May ~7, 1993
Page 3
C~.ty fz~es . If Mr. Warsaw has been unable to examine C~ty Planning
Depar~ment fi].es for 224Q Santa Mon~ca Boulevard, thzs rrta~r not be
surpr3sing as I do not believe there have been any planning
app~~cations at ~hat address. The present applications encompass
property front~.ng on Braadway from 20th Street to 23rd Street.
I have represented Saznt John's for inore thar_ ? Q years on
City land use ma~ters. In rny experience, neithex- Saint Jahn's nor
the Ci~y has ever aperated in any fashion other than a~u~ly public
pracess. Mr. Warsaw's charges are w~.thout baszs. I am cer~a~n
that your own evaluation will resu~.t zn the same conclus~on.
V~ry truly yours,
•' C-"'L ~ '
~ ~~-~-~/
Sherman L.~Stacey/I
SLS hslst,ohns`2ber Itr
cc: All C~ty Council m~nbe~s
All Plann~ng Co~tission memb~rs
Kenyon Webster, Planning Diree~ar
B~11 Roms, Buzlding & Safety Director
Ronald Fuchiwak~, Park~ng & Traff~c Enganeer
Stan Sholl, Director of General Serv~ces
~ohn Jalili, Czty Manager
.7oseph Lasarenc~, Acting City A~tarne~
I~u~n Zeke Warsaw
C~,~ ~ ~
~TTAC~EIITT B
.~
vI1L~_. J
~ i ~.~c ,~~~~
INITIAL STUDY CHECKL~ST 33-003
Zone Change 92-aa2
Specific P1an Amendment 92-001
~
PRaJEC~ DESCRIPTION
The proposed project cansists of a zone change from C4 (Highway
CammerciaZ) to CP-3 (Cammercial Professional) District fbr
several parce~s located on the north side of Broadway between
2Ctr, and 23rd Streets, wh~.~h a~so requires amendment to the
:~spital Area Speci~ic Plan. The parce~s are separated by 21st
St~eet and ar~ therefore not campletely contiguaus. The parceZs
are bound by the CP3 District to the narth, the C~ District
acrass 23rd Street to the east, the C5 (Special Office) District
ac;~ss Broadway to the south, and the BCD (Broadway Commercial)
~istr~c~ to the west.
No specific development is called for in the pr~ject. If
approved, th~ project wauld allow new develapment to be ~ maximum
o~ 4~' high instead of the maximum of 30' permitted under the
existing aoning dasignation. The project wau~d also a11nw no FAR
restrictions for parking structures for which half of the spaces
address existing parking deficiencies or replace existing
parking. Under current zoning, there is no density bonus for
parking structures. The base FAR of 1.5 and the maximun~ number
of sto;ies af 3 wou~d remain if the project were approved.
The proposed project would alter the permitted uses on the
sub~ect parcels. Reataurants af any size wauld be perm~tted by
right ~nstead af being restricted by a 50-seat maximum. Places
o~ worship would require a Conditional Us~ Permit rather than be
per.r,itted by right. Residential uses would require a Performance
~~andards Pern~it, as under the existing aoning des~gnation, but
wculd be required to be a component of a mixed usE building,
wi:~~h a.s not required under existing zoning.
~r~~~~ t
CITY DF SANTA MONIrA IS No. 93-4~3
CITY FLANNING DIV :ON
City Hal~, 1585 Main Street, Santa Manica, California ~04~1-3295
INITIAL STUDY
AND
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT STATEMENT
DATE F~LED 12~23~42
z . sACx~ROUrrn
1. Name af Applicant St. John's Hosp~tal & Health Center
2.
Address and Phone Numher af Frapc~nent _
i328 2nd Street~ Santa Monica~ CA 90404
~3I0) 829 - 8833
~. Project Address North Side of Braadway between
2oth and 23rd Stre~ts
P~ame of Proposal, if applicable
~. Initial Study Prepared by Drummond Buck~eyr Assaciate
PZanner
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT$
(Exn~anatione af all answers are required on attached
sheets.)
Yes Maybe No
1.. Earth. Will the praposal result in:
a. [7nstable earth conditians ar in
changES in geologic 5L1}J5tr11CtlirBS~ ~f
b. Extensive disruptions, displace-
ments, compaction or overcovering
of sail? X
c. Extensive change in topography of
ground surface relief features? X
d. The destruction, covering or
mod~fication of any unique
geological or physica7. features? X
j~,_~~
CITY OF SANTA M~NICA IS No. 93-003
CITY PLANNING DIV :ON
City Hall, 1685 Main Street, 5anta Man~ca, California 90~01-3295
Yes Maybe No
e. Conside~able increase in wind or
water erasion of sai~s, either an
~ or off the site? X
f. Changes in depa~ition ar erasion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, depasition or erosion
which may modify the bed of the
ocean ar any bay or ~nlet? X
g. Exposure af people or praperty
to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, ~andslides, mud-
siides, ground failure, or
similar hazards? X
2. Air. Wil~ the propas~l result in:
a. Considerable air emissions ar
deterioratian af ambient air
quality? _ X
b. The creation of objectionable
odors? X
c. Stihstantial a~teratian of air
movement, m~isture, or temperature,
or any change in climate, either
laca~ly or regionally? X
d. Expose the project residents to
severe air pollution conditions? X
3. Water. Wi~l the prop~sal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the
caurse af d~rection of water
mavements, in either marine ar
fresh waters? X
b. Extensive changes in ahsorp-
tion rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of
surface runoff? X
c. Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters? X
O~L., .,
CITY ~F SANTA MONTCA ~S No. 93-403
CITY PL•ANNING DI~ ION
C~ty Hal1, 1685 Ma3n Street, Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Yes P~iaybe No
d. Substantial change in the amaunt
of surface water in any water
bady? __ . X
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration af surface
water quality, a.ncluding but
not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity? __ X
f. Alteration of the direction or
rata of f~ow of ground waters? X
g. Change in the quantity of graund
wate~s, either thraugh direct
additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations? ~ -
h. Considarable reduction ~n the
a~ount of water atherwise avaii-
able for public water supplies? X
i. Exposure of peap~e ar praperty
to water relatad haza~ds such
as floodinq ar tidal waves? X
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species
or number of any species of plants
{inc~uding trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)? x
b. Reduction of the numbers af any
unique, rare or endangered
species of plants? X
c. Introduction af new species of
plants into an area, or result in
a barrier to the normal replen-
ishment of existing species? ~
~L~L~ i
CITY DF SANTA M~NI~A IS No. 93-003
C~TY PL•ANNING DIV :QN
C~ty ~all, 1685 Main Streec, Santa Monica, Cal~fornia 9~401-3~95
Yes Maybe No
5. Animal Li~e. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or number af any species
af animals {birds, land anir~als
including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or
insectsj? X
b. Red~cticn of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of animals? X
c. Introduction of new species of
anima~s into an area, ar result
in a barrier to the rnigration
or mavement of animals? X
d. DeteriQration of exiating fish
or wildlife habitats~? X
6. Enerqy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of cansiderab~e amount of
fuels or energy? X
b. Cansiderable increase in demand
upan ~xisting sources af energy,
or require the development of
new sources of energy? X
7. Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Considerable increase in the rate
of use of any natural resources? X
b. Considerab~e depletion of any
nonrenewable natura~ resource? X
8. Naise. Will the praposal result in:
a. Considerable increases in existing
noise le~els? X
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels? X
uUt~ ~
CITY ~F SANTA MONT^•A IS No. 93-003
CITY PLANN~NG DTV ION
City Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monzca, Californaa ~0401-329~
Yes Mavbe No
g. Light and Glare. will the proposal
produce considerable new light or glare
~ from street lights or other saurces? X
lo. Shadaws. Will the proposal produce
extensive shadows affecting
adjacent uses ar praperty? X _
11. Risk of Upset. WiZl the proposai
involve:
a, A risk of an e~losian ar the
relea~e of hazardous substances
{including, but not ~imited to,
oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiatian) in the event of an
acc~dent or upset conditions? X
b. Possible interferance with an
emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuatioh plan? X
~2. Auman Health. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Creation af any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(exciuding mental health)? X
b. Exposure of people ta potential
health ha2ards? X
c. Considerable adverse impact on
hea~th care services? X
13. Population. WilZ the prop~sal
result in:
a. Considerable change in the distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of
the human pcpulation of an area? X
b. The relocation of any persons
because af the effects upon
housing, commercial or industrial
faciZities? X
c. The relocation or dislocation
af employntent or businesses? X
L' ~ V J .J
CITY aF SANTA MONICA ~S No. 93-Op3
CITY PLANNING DIV ~ON
C~ty Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, 4a11fornia ~90401-3295
Yes 2daybe No
14. Land Use. Will the propasal result in:
~ a. A considerable alteratian of the
present or planned Zand use of
an area? X
b. Demo~ition, relocation, or
remode~ing o~ residential, com-
merc~al or industrial buildings
or ather facilities? X
~5. Hou~ing. Wi~l the Proposal:
a. Create a considerable demand far
additianal housing? X
b. Have a considerable adverse impact
on the av~~lable rental hausing
in the community? X
~6. Riqht af Way. Will the--proposal
reault in;
a. Reduced la~ area? x
b. Reduced access? X
c. Reduced off-street parking? x
d. Creatian of abrupt grade dif-
ferential betwaen public and
prlvate property? X
17. Transportation/Circulation. Wil~
the pr~pasal result in:
a, Generati~n af considerable
addi~ional vehicu~ar movement? ~
b. Substantial effects on
existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
c. Considerab~e adverse impact upon
existang bus transit systems? X
d. A~terations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of
people and/ar goods by changes
to roadways? ~
~v~~~
CITY OF SANTA M4NXCA =5 ~o. 93-D03
C~TY PLANNING DI~ ION
~~ty Ha~l, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica~ Cal~~crn~a G0401-3295
'~es riavbe No
e. Al~erations to waterbarne, rail
or air traffic? X
f. Considerable adverse impact on
traffic safety to motorists,
bicycZists or pedestrians? X
18. Utilities. wili the propasal
result in a need far new systems,
or major alterations t~ the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? X
b. Co;nmunicatians systems? X
c. Water? ~
d. 5ewer or septic tanks? X
e. Storm water drainage? X
f. Solid Waste and disposal? X
~9. Publia Services. Will the proposal
have a considerable effect upan, or
result in a n~ed for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
fol~owing areas:
a. Fire pz~tectian? ~
b. Palice pr~tectifln? X
c. 8choals, including
pre-schools or child care? X
d. Parks or other recreational
faci~ities? ~
e. Maintenance af public facil-
ities, inc].uding roads? ~C
f. Other governmental services? X
20. Canstruction Effects. Will the
prapvsal have considerable construc-
tion-period impacts due to the scope, or
location of construction activities? X
` ~~t,~ _~
CITY OF 5ANTA MONIrA ~S ~a. 93-003
CITY ?LANNING DIV. :ON
C~~~Y ~all, 1685 Main Street, 3anta Monica, Cali~arr.ia ~04~1-3295
Yes Piaybe No
21. Fiscal. Will the nroposal have a
considerable fiscal effect on the
~ city? x
22. Recreatien. Wi11 t:~e proposal resuZt
in a considerab~e ;mpact upon the
qua~ity ar quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? X
23. Cultural Resaurces.
a. Wa.ll the proposal result in the
alteratian of or the dastruc--
tion of a prehistoric or his-
tor~c archeolagical site? X
b. Will the proposal resu~t in
adverse physica3 or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure,
or object? - X
~. Does the proposa2 have the
potential t~ cause a physical
change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values? X
d. Will the proposal restrict
existing religiaus or sacred
uses within the patential
impact area? X
24. Aesthetics, Will the praposed
project resu~t in:
a. The vbstruction of any scenic
vista or view open to the public? X
b. The ~reation of an aestheti-
cally of€enszve site open to
public ~iew?
X
c. The destructian of a stand of
trees, a rock outcrapping or
other locally recognized desir-
able aesthetic natural feature? X
d. Any substantial negative
aesthetic effect? x
~~~• r ti
CITY DF SANTA MONI~'-A
CITY PT.ANNING D~V_ _ON
~~~x Hall, _58~ Ma~.n S~reet, ~anta ?~onica,
Ca~i~orr~ia 9C4o1-329~
Yes Maybe No
25. Neighborhaod Effects. Wi~~ the
~ropasal have ccnsiderable effects
on the praject neighborhood? X
2G. Mandatary Findingg of siqnificance.
a. Does the project have the poten-
tial to degrada the qua~ity of the
enviranment, substant~ally reduce
the halaitat of a€ish or wildlife
speciss, cause a fish or wildlife
papulation to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal commun-
ity, reduce the number ar restrict
tha range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
important examples af the major
periods of California his4ory ar
pre-histc,ry? x
b. Does the project ha~e the poten-
tial ta achieve short-term, to
the disadvantage of long-tena,
environmental goa}.s? X
c. Daes the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumu~atively cons~derable? X
~. Does the project have environ-
~aenta3 effects which will cause
substantia~ adverse effects on
human beings, either directly
or indirectly? X
~i~. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIdN
~,reas c:~ecked "Na" :
1. Larth ;a,b,c,d,e,~,g). T:~e praject will nat effect earth
canditions ~n any manner.
2. nir (a,b,c,d). The project will not affect air conditions in
any : ~anner.
3. t~ater (a,b,c,d,e,f~g,h,i). The project will not adversely
affec~ surface or ground watar in any ~anner.
4. Plant Life (a,b,c). The project wi11 nat impact plant life
in ar.y manner.
IS No. 93-003
~' ~l ~,~ ~ _,
CITY OF SANTA MONT~A
CITY PLANNING DI~ ION
Cit~ Ha11, i685 Ma~n Street,
~. Animal Life (a,b,c,d).
'ife in any manner.
6. Energy (a,b}. The
cansumption.
;. ~datural Resour~as (a,b).
~ resources.
T5 No. °3-403
5anta PSanica, Ca~~fornia 9040~-3295
The project will not af~ect animal
pro~ect wizl not affect energy
The project wi21 not affect natural
8. Naise (a,b). The project will nat affect noise levels, as
any deve~onment in the sub~ect area will be required to canfor~
to the City Noise Ordinance with ar without the project.
9. ~.~.ght and Glara. The project will nat affect light or giare.
~1. Risk of Lpset (a,b). The project will n~t involve hazardaus
substances or impact emergency response or evacuation plans.
~z. .uman Healt:: (a,b,c). The praject will nat expose people ta
po~en~_~1 health hazards, nor wi1Z it create health hazards or
~ave a r.egative ~mpact an health care servicas.
~3. ~opu~atian !a,b,c). The project will not impact Fopulation.
~4. ~and Use (b). The pxoject will not result in the
demoiition, remodeling or relocation af any commErcial or
industrial buildings or facilities.
~5. Housing {a,b}. The p~oject will not create any additional
demand for housing nor will it have an adverse impact on the
ava~lability af rental hausing in the community.
16. R~ght of Way (a,b,c,d). The project wi1Z not r~duce ~ot
area, access, off-street parking or create abrupt grade
d~f~erentia~ betwesn public and private property.
~.7. Transpartation/Circulation (a,c,d,e,f). The praject will
not impact transportation ar circu~aticsn patterns.
~3. L:~ilities (a,b,c,d,e,f). The prQject wil~ not ~equire new
or addztional systems for any utilities.
19. Pub~ic Services (a,b,c,d,e,f). The pro3ect will not have
s3gn~~icant impact on public services.
20. Construction Effects. The project will nat have any
construction-related i~apacts.
2~. Fiscal. The proje~M wi11 have no fiscal impacts.
22. Recreation, The project will hav~ no impact an recreational
opportun~ties.
23. Cu].tural Resources (a,b,c,d). The project wiZl have no
impact an cultural resaurces.
n t; t, ; t
CITY OF SANTA MONI~A I5 No. 93-003
CITY PLANNING DIV_ _~N
C~ty Hall, i685 Main Street, 5anta Monica, Cali~ornia 9040~-3295
24. Aesthetics (a,b,c,d). Any development on 4he subject
~arcels will be subject to the approval of the Architectural
Review Board whether or not the project is approved. Therefore,
the project will not have any impact an aesthetics.
~5. Neighborhaad E~~ects. The praject will have no adverse
impacts on the neighborhood.
~
25. Mandatory Findings. The project will not degrade the
envzronment or affect fish, wildlife, rare or endangered plant
life ar affect examples of history in California. The praject
w311 nat adversely impact long-term enviran~ental gaals, wil~ no~
ad~ersely impact Zong-tarm environmental goals, will not have
considerable cumulative adverse impacts, and will not cause
adverse impacts t~ humans.
Areas Checked "Maybe":
1C. Shadows. The existing develapment standards for the subject
properties allow a maximum building height of 30', whereas the
pro~ect would allow a znaximum height of 45'. There~ora~ the
length of shadows cast by any future development at the subject
proper~ies wo~ld potentially ~?e greater than the length of
shadaws cast by any proposed development under existing
standards. It is not anticipated that any mitigation measures
wauld be required for this pos.sible impact as it is nat
considered signi~icant.
1~. Land Use (a). The pra~ect does not contemplate a specific
development ~or the sub~ect propertie~. However, it wau~d regult
in a limited change to the development standards and permitted
uses on the subject prvperties. The FAR would not be affected
by the project. However, the maxinfum height would ba increased
~rom 30' to 45' and the maximum number of staries would be
increased from ~ to 3 for al~ projeets and there would be no
:~axiinum FAR for parking structures for which at least half of the
spac~s were "pravided to address an existing parking space
deficiency" or tQ replace existing parking.
The total number of permitted uses allowed on the subject
properties would be reduced by the praject. Restaurants of any
siae wauld be permitted by right (instead af limited to a maximum
af 50 seats), and residential uses would be permitted anJ.y in
mixed use prajects (rather than permitted as a single use} with a
P~rformance 5tandards Permit. Places af worship wauld require a
Cond~tianal Use Permit (rather than be permitted by right).
The threshald at which Development Review is required wou~d be
reduced from 25,OQ0 square feet to 22,500 square feet.
Tt ~s not anticipated that the change in develapment standards
wauld result in any significant impacts. Therefore, no
~itzgata,on measures are proposed.
r, . ~
Uv~ = a
CITY aF SANTA MONICA IS *:o. 93-003
CIT~ PI~ANNING DIV ~dN
C~t~ Y.ali, 1685 Main Streez, 5anta Mon3ca, Galifornia 9a401-3295
17. ^'ransportation/Circulation (b). The proposed project may
have a positive impact on exist~ng parking facilit~es, in that
mosz of the subject parcels are currentiy utilized for surface
par?cing and the proposed project would allow a highar F'AR for
parking structures which address current parking deficiencies or
replace existing parkinq. The Hos~aital Area Speci~ic Plan
identifies a severe shortage of parking far the existing
~ hospital/medical affice uses an the vicinity.
~:'. DETERMINATIQN
CITY OF SANTA M~NICA IS ND. 93-Op3 EIR No. N~A
CITY PLANNING DIVISIflN
C~:.y Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90401-32g5
DETERMINATION
Project Title: SPA 92-001, ZC 92-002
Project Address: North Side o~ Broadway between 20th and
23rd Streets
on ~~:e basis af this initia~. evaluation:
~ i~nd ~hat the proposed project could not have a
s~gn~.~icant effect on the environment, and a
Negative Declaration wil,l be prepared.
I ~~r:3 that altho~gh the propvsed pr~ject could
have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a signi~icant effect in this
case because the mitigation measures described on
an a:.~ached sheet have been added to the project.
A Negative Declaration wi.ll be prepared.
X
C~~ _ :~
CITY OF 8AD]'i'A MONT~:a T_S No . 9 3- 0 0 3
CITY FLANNING DI~i N
City Hall, ~685 Maln Street, santa Manica, Cala.~.orn~.a ;0401-~295
2 ~ind ~~.he proposed prcject may have a significant
effect on the environment, and an Environmental
~inpact Report is required.
~~~ ~~3 ~~~
Date Director of Land Use and
Transportation Management Dept.
zc002chk
03/2~/93
~~~ ~ ~
A~'A~~~I1T~' ~
f^
G'~1~, _ ~
~ ~ , ,-~C ~~•r~ ~~; ~
~
-/~~k
~
~~
.~ ~.
~ ~~ .
~ i~~;~
FO frTi-+
J~1 ! f I I I I I ~
f ~~~~~~MF~
~
lfll~lllb
~Il~!~II~
~.~.t~~
~ l I III:~
~Il~I~E~l~fi
-' ~~~
T
i R ~ I ~--~
J l~~ ~~ i f~~~~
•~ c~sT ~
~.~~~lf~+ -
.J~I h ~ ~ ~ --~
~ r1 ~
a~~~~
R
HIi1114~H
~a~l~i[II~~
~ ~t111f
~~~~il~l
~~~~
~i~l
~~~1
~~ ~
~; ;
i 1
~LQ F
~~ '~ ~ ~ ~__~ ~~i~l I~!I~ I~illl~!Ilf~~ ~~~I~I~I~~~~~~!I~~Ei~ll~~ll
~ f ~ ~ :: ~_ ~ --,~~~r~ ~„ ~!~~~,~~i~~~~ ~I~liiiilili~i-~i~~~i~III~
. sT~~~~- ~
JI~..'ll~~ ~~I{I~~f~~~w~~~~Ill~ll~~ ~I~I~~II~I~I ~!I1F]il!!~~~I
l
~~~ ~i~~;~~ _~ ~~I~li~i~~l~l~~~`~l~!~I.!~i ~~~I~ll~!~I~l ~lEr~jll~i~li~
i ~
{ [;,~ti~~;~ ] ~V~~~I~I~i~~ll:if~ill~f~~ ~~I~~~~I11 ~~il!~l11~4t~1
~ .. . ~~~
~ l , , ~
~l"~i ~;E~ - bl~;,,,;i~f lii~'~~~~jl~~ II~III~~I~~~1 li~l~~l!~Ilf~'
rr, ^ S~•c~T
~,.~o i~~ ~..p;~i f~~~ ~~~~~o;' 1 I I 1~ I~f~~~ ~~ I~ i1 I~~~~ f I I I I1~
~ ~~ ~ ~,;,; ;r~~~ ~~~~~;~~j~i;~ I~I~~I~II~~~ ~~~~I.~~IIIII~~
. ~ ~ , ~T 1
~ -i~;I~{`~ ~~!'~;'~I~l ~~'.~ '~I~I~~I l~l~~'~I~!~II !ll~~~f~~l~l!
~ ~I~'i~~~ ~ -~-a'~!!~~; ;~{~ ~~~-~~1~1~~II 1~~~~~l~Mlll I~ll~~~~itl~~
ar esr I
~~~~~!I~~ k~~~l~l~~t~] ~~I~il~It~~~~ ~~~~~9~I~~~~ 1~41IIIIl~f4~
~~~I~~~~~ bIIll~~l~~~ ~'~~~~~I~l~~~ [Il~iil~ll~.I~~~l~~l.l.ll~~
~, ~ - ~~T ~
b!~~Irlb ~_illl~~~~~~ ~~i;~~I~li~ k~l~~~!IIII~ ~~~~I~lll~l~#
~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ - ' I ~ ~ i ~ ~ I I r ~ ~t~ ~ ~ i I f f ~ ~ ~ ! f ~ 1 I ~ ~ I I~~
~.r.~LT
;~If~l~~~b~ ~ _ i~~~~~ ~ ~ . ~ -~~il~i~~lf,y,ll#~~~~EIII
;~~I~Ny~;ai ... ,4,,., o ~r ~~if~llt~l~io~l~~il~~~11~~
~ N
;~~!-IE~~~3 ~~~~!~lil ~ .~ ~ ~~~~t#Ill~~~~~#Q~~II~lI1(l~~
~ . - - r L
Map 2
~v~ : ~
SPECIFIC PLP.N 5TL'DY AREA
ATTACI~ME~' D
C E~ i.~ ~, ;
~~ .,, ~~.fw~~,oJ:~~.~1r~fG,~'°~I"I`"f-,~1-~I
}2}:'LO'~ I NCS
1-- ~ i:A T() ('1'
( 1 ('11 '1'(? ~2 3
~ , .
~~ ~i~ t~~~ ~~~~) ~Z~
~`- ~ (: I' '1'U It 4
1
~ .~ V - ..i te e a ~
Y ~ c 9 ' _ ., ~~
~- " 6 9 14 ~~ 12 I) 14 !5 li IZ I~
~ ~ y ro~ !
e
1 ~0 W'~9 ~~ a{ M M
Y ~ Z • T
~~" .a r a .~ ~ ie '
ly ~~~, ~ I ~q IaS
~.~ ._ 9` 1!y 76 t7~ :i 2Sy ~1 2] i2 71 20 19
~ a
'~- a u
e ! ~_... (r ~r Il ' 1`; ~ ~' N i ' ~
! ~~0 ~ wa ~ ~I~ Y 10 ~1 I M ~ ~e ~a w' ~n
~ }.a!~l~~.. ;.,, ' :. .; ~~~
,
.s y 5 pl 6 ~ 5 x ~ p
ti~~ 1 ) ~ 7 ~~ .e .~ ~371
-~ :_° CLDVER FIELQ ~
, ~ ~ ~ ~... ,__~ ____
o couaf z ~.:r ~ 9 ~ 3 ~ ':'t''': ':;: Q ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ e ~
n a ~ ie ~~ '"T~' ie *- ~~ - x • ~ ~--' r: + ~ ~~
39, ~a n ~c ~s ~~ ~ ~3 ~ ,s ~t x t , •,~~' ~ . . +~.' g~ ,~--
9 ~ D~ ~ ~ qi S r=- s 3~A R~' L] . i ~,~ ~~ '
~,~~ I~ ~ ~ ~.r .K 1j0!_ p' :~:~::'~'~'- ~ ,m _ '~l01
.i ~~ ~a ~o w w ~ k~ ^ ~' Z;01 ~ ~W~~~1'•lf11~V STREET ~
23rd Street STRf~T ~ ~~~~`"`r` ~
is 5 r ^ :
10 W ~C ~P ~0 b tl N ~aC ~ ~~ -S~ ..-- ~~ -" ~'•
~ ~ti ~ ~
r r r r 9~y . ~ R ~ 7^
A ' . A S1 . ~ q ~ Q - . ~yi. - _ ~- ~
l9 24 ]~ I~ Z] ZI 75 ?6 71 ?6 ?9 ~ '~ ~ 3 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ !
9 Y , .,_~w ,-'- ~ ~ ~ ~~ ^
.n w .e ~o ~0 ~~ ~P ~o ~p .0 ^
x W H Y C ^ ~ ~ ! Z ~+ ~ I F
_ ~
r~~ .a w~ a H r y w w M W
11 ! I1 l6 15 11 ~ til1Y 4 ~ T I y,j ~ t .~ If ~ ~ +)
R S~ ~- ~ 4 f' R ~; =~a~~o ~ .~ ~ ~
L
.a r ~
{ ~_-._..-.
Ta ,...~____-- .
__' - ~ ~=.__,~._
[n ~
' ~Q +e
tio w wo '~
"
MI 1- 0 /
Lt4 ~
~ ~
a ~.i~.~ ~ ~ r
..
~ .. +
x x~~
~! 0
v
,
is
t~ t~
te 29
~
~ AR •~p~
OR '
_
~
~
~ _ _; _$~
~
i
~5 K _4 , .. _ ,~_
~ ~~
71 F ~
i
_ ~
~ s
r ,_ :.~t
~ ~i
`~
'~ Ib
; Il 41 14 ZD
YI t! y~ ~
y . ~ ~ ._. _. • ~ N A C T ='° _._. ~
~
~ Il ~
lIQI ,a so .e M w
M ~„_ i lQl OL
~ x ~ s ~ aTRtET ~
rt 7i
e{ »
' ~QQ
~
~ -~--~--- ce ---~-~ r. -
1 ~ _
~0,~c7 -~- S G ~ _
Y«~ 0 E ~' H ~ ~ ~ ~
9d1~~ I
9 Y 7~ -kl -~I -~'•` - -- .rl _yV _x ~.
~
7//~~ ~
~VO ~
I
~M
N
-
3 M fY M M
~ Me ~y ~ ~ fl ~
~y S i' 7_ 8' !•
M 4~
t TwEN 11E~H -.
~ 1 w
'°°~
x
^ Ov .
9 lA~ 3
._.'
v
p
~
~
s
~
q ~
~
R
~o '$"T ~
,, ~ ~
~o~ ~~
r~ocK s
0'ii94
n
S~REEZ s
OACHA~D TRACT
w o r~ cn r~ ~s c u
D
- - -- .,~
lo~ ~1
6lOCR !
W w S
i ~ y f
~ ~. E~d_C S._
0 v ;. t ~
i N Q d y 3 ~
~
M M
~° TWENTY-FlRST
~q
V Y! ? ~
~ : ~
o N N
~V
~-
;"f A
ro ~
~ ~
~
~ - ~ V ~ ~. E~ t _ ~ ~_...~ ~~
f
raa~ 0~ ,. ,~ ~reisfrl lpp~ p!„
p t ~P 1 i
~"-' 20~4i 5t~teet ~=
"=[d - ii - G... r ~ ~-~ r'~--~ ~ ~b
~ `
I f G ,~_ ~
~I A y 6 y C y D [ y t x µ k ~~ ~ K~ 4 ~ ~
1r ~, ~~~ ~ ~ '~ ~I Y IP
i I ' ~
±1
~~ r
f~ E ~ ~1
A
d
~
~
O
i
^`~ s I ~ ; i~ j '~E ; ~ .,. - -~..~.., ~ ~
~ ~ ,, ~, f ~ ~
~ ~1~, i_ ~~, .J, ; , .
~~ ~~~ , .~ ~ ~ ~
, ,
i~~l ~ ~ ~ ~ L _ ~ , ~
~l i U i , ' ~ ~...
r-_~ w ~~~i~F ~~ .
; -,~~;~, -, ~ ;-~ i ~
~J ' L~ U I I # ~..,. ,~~ ~
~~~ ~~ r^~~~as~ ' ~
~
~~ J, a ~.~. ~ •!• i ~ Y~ ~ ~..~~.._.~
.r-~ ~
~ ~ .-~--~ ~.
V Y rM~ o~ ~ f ~ , iJ ~ 'rI J
'~~ ~ ~ - ~!~
.
i__! , E l 1 ~
~ ~ a`~~~ ~ ~Y h ~ P
w ~' ~ ~ ' 1
iI ~ f ~ _ .
~--f ~ ~
i ~ ~ ' ~ ._
~W 4T1 T1~~ ~~-=='
~i E ~~~ ~ _i= -_
i I ~ ll I~ ~ ~
N~H@T~E47++ ~ ~~~l~~~ c'=== -
~ f`l l~~ IL J~~ I~ -'
; ~~
P ~~~.iJ I ~ ~ ~ ~I '
F~~v«TtcKTh~ ~ 7 5 `"
-~ ~ t 4 ~ I F 4 1 l, .~ J ~
l
! l ~ ~ ~ I E ~ i ~ , i . ,
SE+Eti'EEMt„ ^ 5'"=:'
~- i ~ I~ ~ 1 l ~~~, ___..
~ ~~~~~
1 1 s _.._ ~
I S XiE'N*H ~ h " ~ 5~ ~., ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ i ~ ,
.~...~~. ; l 1 ! ^ . ~..-] ~~ ~ ,
~ siKrE=wT~. ' S-e?--
.rr u.u-. + ~ ~ ~ ~ . .
^ ! I
[ ^ 1
-- ~
~ ~ ~ f
~
'
v4uaTEEk
i~ Tk
a
! {~.
~E (~ ^
~a
~J ~-f
-~
l 1 • ~ ! ~ -
~
~ i
Eut.~o ~.s~~ ~i~.~~~~~~~ri .
~.i `-'
; I ~1 I I L ~~~ ~
~ ~
Tw~4cT~ u~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~~
u
~ I
~
~
L~ ~i~
FO~ ~ ~
~
~~ fri
~ i
~
I ~ T l ¢
~p cl
~ C
I
ELEvENrM N
~ j_i ~~
= a
x
~ J ~~~ ~
..i ~~ Fm
.~.~..
~
; 7
~L 4
1~ x~
~~
: ;
'rw-w
i i i
i
~
5'=:?'
~ ~
I 5'P~._ ~ ~ r
. k
~ , ~
~-~ ~
STF-c' ~ ~
f ~ ~
4 ST f F~ `I - k_
~ ~~~F~_ ~
i ~o ; b~~~
~ 5- ~~ ~F-5 t•!!
PROPQSED CP-3 AND CP 5 AREAS
2~ote: Per ~b~ecti~e 36, any properties t~:at are current?y
devoted to res~dentxal uses sY,aJl not be rede~elo~•z~
un~ess the existinc~ xesidential units are replaceci
an- or off-site c~ are relocate~ e~sewhere ~n t~:e
City.
n ~ ~ -~
~i 1: l.~ .~ ..
A~TACHMEIIT~' E
o~~:~,
~ ~ ~ 11 ~ L U U ~;
~
April 24, 1993
n
VI~~ .!r
~IT~ `•~ _
p, .
-~ ~-_ t
~ ^~ ~
3 ~~ ~~s
P~ ~y
Planning Division Room 212
1fi85 Main Street
Santa Monica, Ca 904Q2
Attentfon: D. Buckley '
To Whom it May Concern,
I oppose the zone chang~ for Saint John's Hospftal for the following reasons:
1. fncreased ~~'i~ load on Broadway Street
2. reduction of publ~c street parking on Broadway Street
Thank you.
f~~ f
, .~ ~ ~ .
~ Y
; ~ ""}J ~ r'
: v ~ :~..G ~" ~'`-
- Ruth Bloom, owner
Ruth BZoom Gallery
~ ~ ~ , ~~;~~~»,~ .,
5t~~ ~ ,Vu~~c ~. (_\Lkf~~R1i^
;1 U -~ U -~ - : 9 1 '
;~{y ~j~c~ -{;.i . 1 ~\ ; If} h?K ?fi?~
41 U ~~' ~
-~ :
~
~ E~
144U ?3RD STREET HOi~IEOWNERS ASSOCI aT10'~
~~0 ?3RD 5TREET
SAN'T~ MONICA. CA 90~1fl~
May 17, 1993
Paul Berlant, Director
Land Use and Transpartation Management
Planning Di.vision
Raom 212
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica CA 9d401
Re: Planning Cvmmission
M~y 19, 1993
SAecific Plan 92-00~
Public Hearinq
and Zane Chanae 92-002
Applicant: St. John's Hospita~ & Health Center
Dear Mr. Berlant:
The Board of Directors of 1440 - 23rd Street Homeowners
Association has decided to send you and other city officials this
letter to inform you of their concern with regard to the above
applicatian of St. John's Hospital & Health Center ("Agplicant"}
for a zoning change, and make the follawing requests and
observatYOns;
1. We wish to be advised of the Applicant's stated
purposes in requesting this change in zoning.
2. we are concerned with the apparent or actual canflict
of ~nterest by the App~icant and a member of the Planning
Commission.
3. We wish ta be advised of all public hearings and other
steps the City will take prior to granting the Applicant's
requests.
4. We wish to be infvrmed if the Applicant has recei~red
permits allowing it to do things which the Applicant has already
recently dane, i.e., the construction of lighting and oth~r
structurES at the west end of Schader Drive and, if so, trie date
and the specific number assigned tv each or any a~ such permits,
and whether or not pub~ic hearings were held with regard to
requests for such permits_
' 4~4, J J
l4~}0 ?3RD STREET H~~iEO~VNERS ASSOC[ aT10;!
Paul Berlant, Director ~4~p?3RD STREET
May 17 , 1993 SaNTa MoNtC~. C~ 9o~oa
Page 2
5. We wish to be advised if the above applicatzon ~ncludes
a stated desire by the Applicant to open Schader Drive as a
public thoroughfare.
6. We request an investigation and repart by the City
Attorney to see if any laws, whether city, county or state, hav~
been v~.olated by the Applicant concerning this application ar its
activities in relat~.on thereto.
7. We request, as part of any public study, a
determinat~on af the likely effect of the granting af this
application on the adjacent residentia~ praperty, to wit, 1.440
23rd Street, insofar as increase in traffic, noise, excess
lighting, public safety, and other related matters are concerned.
8. We would also like to know if an environmental impact
study is requi~ed prior to the consideration of this app~.ication
and, if so, whether or not it h~s been made.
We trust that the City of Santa Monica will perform its
lawful public function and require that this Applicant comply
with aZl relevant laws.
very truly yours,
~440-23rd STREET H~MEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
By ~i~~~~ . , ,~~
'1~ALCOLM H. LEVtN, Preszdent
cc: President, Santa Monica City CounciJ.
Kenyon w~bster, Planning Director
Ronald Fuchiwaki, Parking & Traffic Engineer
John Jali~i, City Manager
Joseph Lawrence, Acting City Attorney
Bill Rome, Bui].ding & Safety D~.rector
lJ 1} l,' J .1
I2br'Il~ ZII~ L~.R.5~A4~~
P.O. BDX 3512
5anta Nbn~.ca, CF,. 90408
Tel. (310} 393-2977
.,i~` _
~'~ % -
April 30, z493 V
'JJ ~-ip4 ~` f
City Of Santa Monica `
Paul Berlant, Director of Iarxl Use & Transportataon M~nt.
Plaruung Division, Rnan 212
1685 N',airt Street
sah~a :~uca, c~. 5oaai cc~~zc~ o~ r~.~~
HE: plaruu.ng Ca~mission PubZsc Hearing ar May 7, 1993
b~eciFxc Plan Ar.-e.*~ment 42-061 &
Zone Change 92-00~
APPLICANI': Sv. John's a.osp~tal anc iiealth Cente~.
Dear t~x. Berla.nt:
kzt~ reference to the abov~lasted apw~icat~on, as well as oth~ deve~c~
mer:t ac~,.ivi~iss oc~~in~ an or about the Hospita~'s n-onerty i^ this ce.-~erai
ar~, there a~_ars to be rnanerous ~sregularities for wluch foLZnally I a~ r~
c~westzng iryvestigatw:~s k7y tY~ ap~ropriate respectsve depar~nts listec below.
P.lsc, I r~uld ~i]te to re~st written responses w2~~ answers to m~.~ speci=ic
concerns l~.sted belaw.
R~garciu-ig this applica~aon, i have att~pte~ several times to secure puhli~
;nfozzxiatzon about various pla.*~s and act~vities occurring an or about the sztus
a~~ra_ss of 2200 Santa Nbniea Boulevard, lmown as the Jahr: Wayne Car~cc+x Ixsst~tute,
and ti~e Applicant's propex'ty_ad~acent thereta. Fox ~~h attatg~t I have made tn
see actual files or origanal source infaztaatior~ frtm variaus City departrnents
(Plannang, Parlcing S Traffic, Bu~ 1~, r~q &' Sa€ety. etc. } I hav+e haci no luclc in
satisfyirig my requests. In Plannzng, for e~ran~le, on March 2, 3993, I was told
ta write my n~ie, address ~ telephone n~m~bes on a list; and I wou~d be con:.acted
about see~'-g the origu~al file "in a few days," ivo one has ever written or cal~-
ed me, so I oauld investigate and rev~eJw these Liies in order to prepare myself
for the 4~Say 5th R:bl~c Hearsrw.
Why even ha~re a Public Ffearing if the public is denied access to pu5lic
~.nformation? I3ow oould I br ani~one intesested in ar•c "enco:~raae~"' '-.~~ Cit~=
pubiic :~otices to n~~-ti~ipate in th~s a.~ort~nt grnei~~~tal prxess be expect-
ed #A make x.ntel~ger:t ea:~ients oi as}: imnor*..a.-~t cluestions about public :ieal~h,
safety and welFare wat3~out being given free and ~o~sts~ucted access ta the c"sata
a~c..' infossnation to be the sub;ec~ ma~ter af the hearing? Natura~ly, I r.,id rn~ nk
thss ~ust mi.gtft be an isolated :aZCidence; howev~, I kas surprised ~ shockc-~
to leaxn of sinuliar dLfficuities ~~ receivusa reqaestec uifo~tion,re~•-ted t.o
:~ by Melccm`~ Lerin, Preszdent of ~he E9 vnit Condanuiiwn Hat~.~owners I~ssoc~ation
located, at 144G-23rc Street.
5pecifically, ~ am ooncerned wit~ the foliaw~,.ng matters:
1. The erec`.son of a snali parlcu~a boc~h & U*ility l~nes
lead~ng +~heret~ without a pernu: at ~~ westerly ter-
m~nus of Sc:sader Arive.
2. O:Yier buil~r~g actavity {~tgcing, tre^,cni7q & erectior/:•~ring
of lighti.ng st.an~?m~) withouc oe;nuts a4 t*ie sar~e locatie~_
The 1~c;.~t s*~n~~-ds ase 2~' concrete ci~eter l~ases 3' iug :.
3, An inrnrrect situs adcress an~ fil~.na da4e ~or tus appZicat~oa
an the Pla*znu~g Crnrussion C~se I.ast 3ated Feb. 23, 159s.
4. An ~~~re.t effort t~o open Schader Drive, a Fablic }twraugYr
fare, w~thrn:t no;.ice ar a public Y~ear~ng, w:uch may er riay
etot be inclucied. w-zth~n tne ' e A.?plicaticn {l, I ever a~
given the a~aortwruty ta see it}.
5. At~apar~.t a•x3/or actual Con_`~ict o~-L.terest k~y t~e overse~inc
o~ ttLis A~lication t~y a Pl.an^:irg Ccr.missio^er ~loved by
the Ap~lican~.
6. R~snoval ~~:!'~ut swtice or pti:blic hearing of the :.nc;ressfegi'ess
~riveway }us~ west o~ 221~ S~nta [Kanica 8~vd. 6 P_rection o~ a
concre~ cur~ in its ~lace deswite :~^~ ~rior cla;,*~s c_` xssi.bl~
prescrzp:.ive or a~~ied eas~nerits ar other rights o`_ i:se ~.~ein.
Fj ~ `, J ~
j'4'ARS~'~ tA F3F'RT ]SNi'
April 3~, Z993
Page 2
0~ ~urse, I~n great2y aU.st°arbed that =t is the Caty ~tse2f w:to as
severe~y handicapping my ef~orts to prepare for tl~.is Publ~c iiearin~, as well js
w~.thhnldtr~aother public u~o~nation on related matters. As recentiy as yes-
terday, I calied ti~ P~anning Departm~zt's publ~c countex, askin~, a yra~g i~3.:
w'het~r or not Brcadway v.as in the xighway CarmerciaY District. She d~ na~
knaa ~he ans~s, so she sw1trhed me t~ their a~~an~ mac.~.~n:., wl3ere I was
asked ba leave my n~ie & telephone n-anbar so sarieone oould retuz~:r r~y cali late:
that aft~rnoo~. Agaui, nc response. Sttill, I am confused because another Plar~
nuxJ D~pt. staffer's statemPnt earLter tl~at afternaon usdicated anly Wilsr.~.re
at~ Santa Nbruca ~oulevards were aonsidered ~n tY~ Iiiainaay Catrnercial District.
Si,nce the property owned kry the Applicant borders both BrazGway a~d SantF hlonica
31vd., I~tt oo:icerne8, ~tnng other t~ings. oonverting Broadway into a heav;~ tx~~zo-
dense iuchway Jnstead af 7ust a peaceful city street.
For the above reaso:~s, and more to be deta~led afte^ i~eing gzver #tte access
tc the u~ar_nation which I seek, it is easy to w~derstand h~ frus ~atec w ave-
rac~e ne.:son ean k~eocxne witl: our goverrIInent. Under the carc~m~stan~es I do rot
thv3k it is fair and/or eqaitable tA allow the a:~o~r~listea praposed rp~laca:.ion
tc c~o to Pu~l~c Hearang at *..hts time. fihe propes tir,ie t~o schecule thzs case is
after ma~ir~ers o± the acsblic have ~n affarded FC~.~i~ anG OPIIV access to ali 3nfo=-
mat..ion regard~.nc, tt~.is application and anythuig reason~l}° reiatec t~.eret~.
'~refore, with res~e~t to said Appl~cation 2 recuest the followi:g
a~~aons be taKen:
I. WITf•IDRAi~AL of thts App].xea~on frcar, the Plaruling
C~t~al5sion'5 Pu61ic H~r~ a.-r~„led lyay 5, i993.
II. ~r;F?'E WITFIDFt~i, fran tl7~s App~.Catlon by Pldnning
Oatmissiones 7rxn Pyi~e because he ~s es~P1~Y~ ~5' ~
Applacant, 6 these zs eith~s an actual or apn~res~t Con-
fiict-of-Interest with his anvolv~~t ~ this case.
III. .~: ~~,ate 4RDIIt try the Butldang & Safet}~ Departme,nt
for the Aag]~.cant to cease & desist fmn a21 actavity at
o= abaut 2200 Santa N~onica Blvd. ~t31 ~ns~ectors can
veriiy aJ.l necessary and required ae~ruts have ~ee~-:
reQUestec an~' aranted.
IV. Investtgation and repor't by ttte Cit~r Attorne~~ tn see
l~ any City and/or Coimt~: ordinarces, State statutes
ar~/or any fc~era~ laws have been vaoiated by the
Applxcant regarcttnc tlus AppZica}..io: and/or the
ar+,vities related thereto.
V. An ORDER to ~e C~ty Parkang ~ Traf_`lc ~gzne~ to
conduct a 3RA~x"IC STUDY with res~ect *c tius T~.^p1~ca-
tio:t to anvestigate and report:
A. W'HY Sc:tsacer Drive i'~s l~eer. closed at its west-
er~y tem~nus for ~Ot years?
3. WHAT t:'t~t,Ci' would its proposed o~enir-g r.ave a.-~
ad7acert resi~entaal a^.c caanezcial neigi~bors
wi;1~ respec.~-t, hut not lam~ted, tc:
;. Irl~ease ~n voZts~ of tra`fic.
2. Increase in the noise cenexated therefro~.
3. Creat~o~ o~ a nuisance rrcrr ht9h"P~r~
flood ].ights.
4. Increast~ pt~blic sa~ety hazaras fx-~ pra-
posed Schader I7r, opening ~n close ~rox-
,~, ty to 3 exis,i.ng criveway aF~rons ( 2
oa~r-'es'cial & 1 residenri~l. E9 u.~t condoi.
5. Re~nszderataon as to t'r~e safetv o~ aes~a-
bility whether or not 5chader Drive shauld be
co~ti^.uea as a 2-wav street hest of 23rd S:seet
& a one-way stzeet irs an easterly "a~rection East
ot 23rd 5treet to C3averdal.e Boulevar~.
G'I. De.`.ea^.~ne ~f an FS.'FTF~7tY+'~1v'TnL L~°nCI` R.~~'PORT is :~ecessa_rv
for ttus App].icatian prkor to xts Public Hearang, J
~ lJ C. .J J
W'~R~SAi~; to B~I~1h~T
A~rzl 3~, 1993
Page 3
?1Zthaugh I am ~ust a laym~l in ~h~.s area, ~.t segns to me this Applicat.~an
has been sukzntitted much too pr~naturely. Both as a private citizen and an ad~a-
c~~t pz~rty awner, I am quite upset at bezng shuffl~d, Iri1Sdi rgC~~ mi.slead
and misu;foxn~d by irost persons I have contacted invo~v~.ng ~s Ap~licat~an.
Obvzously, St. John's Hospita2 has ittuch poli~.ical pawer in Santa i+'bnl.ca; and
zt probably ls the City's biggest ~~~loyer. Nevertheless, t-he A~plicant's
right ta have its p~o~ects rev~ewed and apprwed should NOT be super3ar ta the
p~lic' s right to obtai.z~ ope.~l and free access to urfoiznatian ooncern~,zg the
same.
The den~acratic process is greatly dirrun~shed when public ~aforniati.on and
l~awledge zs prevented, st~fled or ~ust severeiy curtailed. Let's oper. the
~r;indaws of ]]arl~ess ~..n t~us case an~ focus so~cae fresh aax ar-d lir~ht on
C'.~CdCtlv j~jFiT S i. ~70~1i1' S HOS~1~1 1ri~EriC$.S t0 d0!
R+espeetfully you.x's r
~' ~ ~~~
IF~~1 Zf~{E 4,~SAW
Capies to:
1. At~ city co,.u~ci~ ~nber5.
2. A~~ Plann~,.ng C~a~~~ussion members.
3. Kenyon W~ster, Planning Director.
y. Bi~l Rcazbe, Bu~ld~.ng & Safety Director.
5. Rnnaid Fuchiwak~, Parlung & Tra~~ic Engineex.
6. Stan Sho?1, Dzrectar af General. Services.
7. Jo~u: Jalzli, City N'.anager.
8. Joseph Lawrence, A~ing City Attorney.
9. R~bert M. S~.nskey, M. D. , property o~rt~~s,
I0. 7~uise Robinson, property owner.
31. M. Levin, Pres. of 144d-23rd St. H~wners Assoc. {69 units},
12. Anne Nbrgenthale.z, E~retvng Ou~~ook.
13. City Editor, L. A. T~es, Westside edition.
~J~~~
Fram : 4~-~flH 3512 ~ S. ~1. ~~ ~408 PF~ Na. : 310 333 2377
I~WIN ?~E ~-R~W
P.o, BOX 3~7.2
~nta Mcm~ca, CA, 944bB
T~1, {32~~ 393-2977
May 1$, Z993
~y. ;,9 1993 5:0=PM Fa~
Cit'~r of Carita ~ic~, C~'i'Y F~4I,~,
~AUL BEf~.,AN~, I7ix~r_~t~,+r a~ Land tlse & Trarnsfxaz~~~ion Nk,~nt.
~685 M-~~ 5~~.~,t
santa Maniog, C'A, 90407 V~a FA7C_ t31~~ 3~h-29G2
Dear Mr, ~sr~.ant:
~]C~OSed ~.s 8t~her v~;y of my le~tar t~v yo~.t, da~ecl A~ril 30th. I 1Q70~w
you are pmk~ably v~.y busy, ~ut ~ vra.s r~a21y disappoint~i in not even receiving
~~aurtesy ~1eg~ne ca13 ir~ xespon~~ to sat~ ser~.o~ Gor~~~ T ra~,sed.
Againr I aatn wr~ting you for t~ao r~eas~n~. Fir~t, I w~rit~ad ~ lax~r w~t y~ur
upin~on was on each of the 5 x~.:~s-~yded actic,~s oaz Page 2 a~ my ~~tter a~ ~ if
~snything had ba~s dane r~c3r~ing an~ of the it.erns 2 n~n~~nad. S~o~d, ~vr
~~ ~splain~d be.lvw, I aaa re~questing ~ OOIrTl'Il~iJANCE af St. J~ ~ s F~spital ~ s
Appla.cation because I was n~ot give,~ a~~,e advanee notice i.n o~r ~o reasonab2y
review ar~c3 px~pare for tatr,~raw ~light ~ s Public f3eaz'iz~q.
~C i a~ t~ ].T~ ~t~'Y~ O~ ~ A~i~ ~ Oth ~@~t~P.,~' ~ r G~1I10~ 1~tS~d~ E4HX lt
~r?i~ taloe 12 c]ays {ir~ludi.ulq 2 vaZuable w~keryds) ~o rx~tify m~ on a s~day
aft~snoart that the S~aff R~epa~t wr~u~d ~ix;a3.~y be avallalale far ~tty reView an
M~xxia~-2 days before the PubL~c ~ring. T..~k~e m~st ottzexs, I w~rk fror a li,v-
~gr ~~9 Pre~'iQus~.y schedt~.Zed appo~nt~nentis and aannuttme~-i~s for yes~.~rlay
and today.
'lb da~e f I hnve r~ivdd ~v wrztten resporis~G addressa.rig ~he iss~es I
hav~ ra~~ed, I am appalied ~nd as~our~3~ Yyy this sil~nr~e. Soe,u~d gw~lY~~n~
mar~aclerial pract.i.ve surely wnuld z`eguir~ same kind ~f respan~ to~ for e,x.~ample,
my 4ues~ioning Mr. Iayr~e's du~. x~a2~ a.s a Plana~ing c~«<ss~ioner ar,d as ar~ c~r-
~l~yee of ~ App3iCant-Hospita7.. Clearly. mast inpartial o~bservers would
ex~e.~ Oo~mt~csiorsex Pyne to ~ar~letely wi~.hr]raw frcm participat~on in this ~a~?,
Oor~id~rit~y ttse ].aCk ~~ r~se I have ix~oeived f~cxt- ~xyorie, I~at1 gr~irig
t,o requ~st th~e City N'~r ta as~stigate whY mY ~1~ ries Y~a`re becn ignor~d«
Ooun~il.rnan Gen~er agreed th~re was ~h roam fvr imprave~ient in the~ manag~nent
nf gc~verr~t ~~ss ~t the ~tecut~ve 1~vel a€ ~ny Cit~ d~r,ts.
zn c~nclusion, I am ~~es~ing poal~~enent of ~aecifz~ Plari Am~~ne~zt
92-a41 ar,d Zaning Charige 92--0~2, ~.Y~ed~led ta be he.~rd on May 39, I993, at
7 p.m, by thc Pi ~*3ni,ng [7ocrrnissicm~ sa T n~Y Pr~p~re tar a PRz3PFR and bona f~.de
Fu~aZic He~3ririg On t~his mat~r. Pledse tel~ph~T~e fie at th~ ~t?~V~ nu~er mi.th
a~al rratis~e o~ yvur decisi~ as soan as possib].e~ as I wil.~ be working in the
mounta~.ns tunarrcyw.
F~~1Y i~ ~ U V I.~ G J
~ ~ / / ~w .d .e . ~ t/ ~
Fram : I~JAi~5AW--P~ 3532, S. M. , CR. J08 PHOhE Na. ' 310 393 2977
~,,,~ ~-_
T4i TiC~~DZaalhh~4 ~R~d~~9I~@It'1~ GII~~[~! , _~
~~ ~~ g~1t~"D~C OGl~Rd7.$&I~]
vfa F'A1C: ~~10) 3~~-2952 ,
~; xrwin ~ waraaw ~~ '
'I'~L, (31fl) 3~3r-29Z7
nP-~: MaY ~~, ~993
I~E: P[7IiL'[C ~~G~ May~.9, 1993
~pe~ific ~5.~ Ameu~t ~a~V~1
7,orsirig qu'+r~ga , 9~^~02
D~~r. U`':~ti55~1~~s3aner Gilpin:
h1ay. 19 1993 5' 30Pht P03
i~c~u~ed 3s a~r vf my Mapr 18~ 1993 1Cttc~ #v M~c. ~aul eer].ar-r, Direc~aac
aL L~nd Use as~d 7~5cansporta~.oa~- Mar~ag~nent ,iROr tl~c~ C~~y o~ ~nta Mpnica.
~br ~e~aone expres~d ~.n this ict~cr ~ iaa ~qv~e~ir~g this hppli.oati.ion be
WS~`f~S~i~WN trcm i:~anigilt' ~ c~.1.~ m~3 xesc~dul:~d ~o acme~i.me ~t.r.~c Z~rm r~ive~n
a zcasonaLie tsme to eee a~ rwiew- el.~ fi3,ea od~-aernir~g thfe m~t~x. P+vr a
oa~lc of moa~th-3 x have be~t~ ~y.ir~g ~o ob~aix~ sra~rc~ filr.a an~d ;•,~,~,+~+tian an
this Appl~ca~.vn wittx~ut suoceg~. I d~o rre~ tl~it~lt a R~b2~c f~~.ng a~o~il.d be
sch«luled ars t.his rna~~ u~il meneb~rs o~ tl~e pubiic ai~e a17.c~wed iull a~~s
~d tl~ sight t+o ~ fil~a, re+~~z~s and g~.~t~ ~crel~rant ba any a~g~caE i~ti.
tKr. sh~nnan L. Btacy, att~y fc~ 5t, Jofin' e~~pi+A }, jus~ se~~~. me a
oC~y+ flf h15 May ~7r ].9~3 l~ttet tA Mr. ~rl.~ut~, advisirig tum t,hat "i~i~C. Pyr~e
w1 1] noti participa~ ~'~]~re decisian q~ this ~A~." ~t is a bit frig~rt.~r~i.ng t~a
think that vaes~e it nvt tox~ mY vbj~iv~r Cu«~~i.ss~oner Pyr~ w~tild ~~~x~bly have
participat~d in t~.a ca~e. ~?hy ~each an a4~ridu~ eit-u~ki~aai rr~ r~at xrxY~. i.x~aly
spottad is bGy~vr~d nt1- ~rp~ensiAn.
I~nyhaw, Y aZ~o wx~t~ ~Cim~r City ~~totr~y I,en,~a~,~ae to~ay, asking tor a
wit~awal o~ thi9 i.t~n. It would ~a to me that ~f this 1~pplicati.o~n wuuld
be all~wed ~a be heard this evening, sare ~erivu~ wn~titut.i.vn~. ~~~,]~a~
mi.ght a~~se incYudint~~ buC t~ ~.~.bed tv~ l.acic ~ du~ ps~oc~eas, c~i.scz'~3atiar,,
via].ati~.u~ t~t civil ri,q~71:s ~r~d xigh~ bo ~}~nrd, e+c:.
I tx~pe tt~ Pl~g C~~~~.ft.~~iar~ wi].1 zu7~~ that ~1~e Appl~r~arit' ~ riglit i.o a
R~lic Hearing ~ollaws ~d ia subvx+~.na~ bo t]~e p~blic' s pri~~ry ri.csht t~a
full and ~n txee a~t~ae~s ta ar~- it~faxxt~tion psi.±a~.•~{ax~ ~o said Agp2ic~tian.
I~s~=ix~S+Y 'Y~ r
~+ • ,
r J ~~ L ~J 4
Y~~ '~ ~R-7~
- ......~. .~...«. . ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ _ ~ , M~~ ~- ~ . ~~ ~..,.... ~~~ ...~
~rom : L#~25At,.HPDB 35i~ ~ S. M. , G.@408 PF~hIE i~. ~ 310 393 ~977 !'~a~. 19 1993 5: 31PP1 P~4
I1~tIN ~~ ~AW
P.a. 80~C ~512
Sertt~a MQr-3n~, G~, 90448
~el, (3ID) 393-2977
May 18. Z993
City of S~nta A~nica, czTY HAI~
PA~]I. ~S~r~ Direc~m of Le~rx~ Use & Trans~or~ation t~«:..
15$5 Main Stree~
Santa Njoa'~ic~, CA. 9D40~. Vis E'A7f: ~3~0) 394-29~2
D~ar Mr'. Bex'lai]t:
~closed ~+ a~oth~x aapy o~ my lc~tcr ~o y~ou, da~rl Apri~ 3D~h. I knahr
yau are pm~h1Y ~~Y ~~Yr bat T wae really di.~~int.ad 3.n nat ever~ receivirrq
~ oourt.~y t2lephone aall itt racpQn;c tA 3Croc ~or~bua cbrio~rn8 I raised.
Agai.n, I ea~- writing y~a~ fcer ~aa rea~ai~. Fisst, T~anted ba ]aavw v-~at your
api+±i cm wa~ on each a~ tk~e 6 reoc~er~efl a~~ar~s an Page 2 of my letter and if
any~hing had be~~ claa~~ re,g~r~ i~~q r~tiy of tha itc~ns I mentioned .~nd, ~or
r^~=^~.a exp3ained be~.aw, I aQn roc~!+~~t~..~q a C1C~?'PINUANGE af 5t. J~hn's Iiaspi.tal's
Application b~eat~+c I wa~ ~ given ~.~,le ~dvan~ ~atice ir~ ord~r to r~±~onablar
x~e~va.ew and pr~pa~~e far tattoxx+t~w r~ights a Pul~l~ Np~~'ing.
Espccia].ly in liytrt of ~ty A~ril 30th ].e~t~pr~ T Ga~t i~dez'st~rid VVt~iY 3t
v-~ulti i.eYkC 12 ~uy~ (iru:luding ~ va1~,A1,1 R w~Ia~rr3s) to notii'y t~ aay a s~nday
aftornoon #~~t the 5}af7F R~~s ~ wl7uld f1.Y~lly he ~v~ii 3~~La fc~ my r~vi.ew on
Morrlay--2 c3aya befcr~ LI~ p~.~.,lic; I3~:ar~c~y. Like i~~~t c~t~~, I w~rk far a liv-
ing. having pr~vio~usly ~ch~ulec~ ~ppoini~ne,nts an~d ~~u~it~~ts ~ar ~~te.s~y
arxl trx]Ay.
T1~ clr~tre~ T have rec~i^v~d ncy wri~~en respor~se~ rrdc~.ie~sing t1~ issu~s I
l~av~ raised. i aan a~lled ancl a~i.outu~cl L~y tl~is silFa~. Scnux3 c~rn+~rlg~~nt
rna~~c~i.a~ prac •tive su~.e.~y wnuld re~„r~ ~ 1cii~d a~ r~s~c,i~ t.a, £c,r ~xan~,l~,
mY c~ucist=ir.ming Nlr. k'y~e's dual ral~ as a P1ai~z~irtg cxxmussiax~x a~ as ~n ~r
lala~''cc of ~ Applicant-Hatcpitdl.. C1eai].y, mast i~artial obse~~r~ers ~aauld
expect C`.annis~ioner Pyne to .~.~,I.~tcly wit.hdraw fran par~icipatson in ~:his caee.
Oonsiderisig t~ lack of respanse Y have X~ived fz~rtt eti~yaor~e, Y ar~- 9~i n~
to request tl,c City l~ar,~ges tA ~vestigat+c v~ty ml' irq'~i rf~s k~rsve ~rt ig~~arc~d.
Co~cilma~z C~~er r~c~~d ~hrxe was mucli x~oaz~ ~or imprarrcxaeaz~ in ~]LC m~~agaren~.
o£ gavcrrn~nt Uusiness at tYye ex~ecu~i.~re lcvel af ~ny City de~ai.-tmetits.
~n c~onclusiarx, ~ am ~~~stir-g poat-pa~~«-i: QS S~acciti~ Pl~~ Anw~~.nt
92-D0~ curl Zas~il~ C1~cu~ya 92-4b~, tsc:}~ult~i t~ be h~eal~d an May 19, 1993, at
7 p.m. by t.h~ Planning Oarm.i~sirm, go ~ rt-~y ps-epr~re for a pI~PER and boila fi.dc
Pula2ic: Iiuasit~y wi ~t~ ttiuttes. ~lect~e ~l~h~r~ m~ ctt th~ ~ nu[tb~r w~.th
oral notiae of yotiu~ dccisai.ars as soo~~ ~s possible. as 2 will be werkiazg in ~he
m4un~ains tannnrraw.
~r ~' I.:lri~a~ ~~/ ~ L~ 1. ,~ ~~
~ ~ lf~.~~.~ +
~J
~ ~
~~n~~n~~~~~~~~~~~Y~
_ _ __..~~,~.
~t~Y ~~ ~~~_ ~ -- ~.=~ =
~~~ P ~_
May 19,1993
r., -. , -
'~3 ~~u ~ c~ - 1 . ;
Planning Commissian
City af Santa Monica
612 Colorado Avenue, #lOb
San~a Monica, ~A 9Q401
RE: Rezoning Application af St Tohn's Haspital
P1~ase be advised ~hat th~ Board of Directo~s of Ivfid-City Neighbors i~as voted
unanimously to appose the applicatior. af St John's Haspital to rezone #he
area immediately south of the existing Hospital District.
We wish to emphasize fhat Mid-City Neighbors daes not oppose the proposal
advanced by St. John's to bui~d a parking garage on part of that site. ~n fact, we
agree with St ~ohn's that that is a much more appropria~e site for such a
facility than the alternative site of 23rd and Arizana Avenue. However, we
believe that the concept af rezoning the property simply because it has been
acqu~red by St John's represents bad pubiic policy and sets a potentially
dangeraus precedent.
We urge the Commission to take no action on khis applicakion at this ~ime.
We believe that a mEaningful three-way dialogue bet~veen the City Staff, the
Hospital and the eommunity shauld be instituted and may weIl lead to an
acc~ptable reso~ution of this issue_
Very truly yours,
~
~ a, ' ~
~~ .Jr~J !` `Z-~~ ~~~ ti,~: L"- ~r`TJt~ ~~ ~ ~
Michael Brourman, Chairperson
of the Land Use Committee, for
David Paley, President
of Mfd-City Neighbars
cr. Sherman Stacey (via facsimile)
s12 CoCarado ,~ivenue, # 106, Santa ~l~foni~a, C~ 90401 (31 ~~ 450-5~ ?B
~~ ~
~,~.`.;~
AT~AC~EN~' ~
,..: .., . t
~t ~ t
N~TICE OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOBAL
To: Conaerned Persons
From: The City af 8anta Monica
8ubject af Hear~nq: Specific Plan Amendment 92-001, Zane Change
92-002, north side of Braadway between 20th
and 23rd Streets, C4
Applicant: 5aint John's Haspital and Health
Center
A Public Hearing will be held by the City Cauncil on the
fo~lawing req~est:
Speczfic Plan Amendment and Zone Change to modify the Haspital
Area Specific Plan and Official Districting Map for parcels
located on the north side of Broadway between 20th Street and
23rd Street ~rom a C4 (Highway Commercial) District designatian
to a CP~3 {Commercial Professional) District designation.
(Planner: Buckley)
T2ME: TIIE6DAY, Jun~ 29 , 1993 AT 6:30 P.M.
LOCATI~N: CQQNCIL CHAMBER, ROOM 213, CITY HALL
1585 MAIN STREET, SANTA MONICA
HOW TD COMMENT;
The City of Santa Monica encourages public Ca~~??prit on this and
othar projects. You or your representative, or any other persons
may camment at the City Council's pu~lic hearing, ar by writing a
lettar.
Lett~rs should be addressed to:
City Council, City Clerk~s Office
1685 Main Street, Roam 3Q2
santa Monica, Ca~ifornia 90401
MORE ~NFORMATION
If desired, further informatian on any application may b~
abtained from the City Planning Division at the address above or
by calling (310) 458-83~1.
The meeting faci~ity is handicapped accessible. If yau have any
special needs such as s~.gn language interpreting, please contact
the Office of the Disabled at (314)458-8701.
Pursuant to California Goverr~ment Cade Section 65049 (la) , if this
matter is subsequEntly challenged in Court, the challenge may be
limited ta only those issues raised at the Public Hearing
dascribed in this notice, ar in written correspondence delivered
to the City of Santa Monica at, or prior to, the Public Hearing.
- I -
~ ~ ,. -. J
Esto es un aviso sobre una audencia publica para revisar
applicaciones proponiendo desarrollo en Santa Monica. Esta puedo
ser de interes a usted. Si deseas mas infarmacion, favor de
llamar a Elsa Gonzalez en la Divisian de P~antificacian al numero
(310) ~58-8341.
PCWQRD/spa001cc
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
D. KENYON WEBSTER
Planning Manager
- 2 -
f-,
4 ~ ~: J J
~
_ ~ - - -~ ~-~ - - i
- - ~` ' ' ' - " ~
_ _ ~~ - ' - rA2K ~~;VE
; J~t'~ i 's~ ' ~~ "c7~A~~'~
q s . ~ . ^ ~
~--~~:NI+ , C' .R ~~ 3 s (~-_
~ rl ~l~l ' '~~I1~L VT , ~ _KT ~ ' .iTK~~ ~
' ' ,. . . . .
i o • -t
:~ ^ ~
~- •Y~\ _~ ~ ~F ~~l•~ ~
' ~ '"i . ~ _
`~~. . . ~~ ~i^
' Ot
"~~'vLR FI=_~
~aa~ ~
- ' . -aatr tio .. ` -
.c -A ~ti~ `
~ ~RAGT
_ ~a .~:J:
, ` • ~ 5 I i
_ , ~
~i;` f
y~ *-.
;
3
~
~ ~ ~
e.. S
~v~::.~Yni{U %
~I=' ~ ~ '~ ~ !' f .= ~ !~ ° ~:/~'
a., ~~~~ -~ ~~~ ~
1- -, , - T
~ - - Vk .:~„ .,~- - ,
~, k_ ,a~~ ~'~v~ r ~~'-• :w:~ .,~itCC~
- -- ' r
_ ~ ~ ~~ 1, _~,.. ;'
_ :-:.J I ~ ~ . J r ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~
~ J~ ~ ~ ~ 1 l,~~I} ~ 4 ~
:_ ~ i ~r ~=~f -
. ;~;~~ ~ ,~ ~ _ ~ .~ - 4 ~r
~ ~____~_~ ~; ~ ~- j i_ ~ ~ _ ~ T , j v ~ -.~
4 _ I~ ~ ~_ ~ ~
~ ~ .~,~ ~~~ t i i ~ E \- ~ .~ ~C E ~ ~
~ .~ _ e 3 3 0 ~
~' = - ~' - - - _ .
~ ty{^ ~-~+4EhTY-~iRST SiR~T
~ ;io2'
~ ~ ~_ .~~-~ ~ _ ~~-~~~ - ~~~
{ : TR ~~ T ~~-
1
~~ ~ ;c~~~a T~ac~
~ ~~
.
~ , . -
. 4~ ` 1 ' f ~1 ~ ` I~ . ~ _ .'
- ~ i ~ ,~";~ s' - ' ' ' -~~ ~ • `
a ~
,~- .
I ~= ~ ~ ~':Y ~ y ~
L - ~
1 ~ ._. ~UF
i ~__ .
~ •,~oz
~
~
~ ~~~~ z -~~~ ~t~~~ .~~~~.~ , - ~
; !~ - .
-~
. ~ z ~ . .-~ ~ . "~ I .
~ '~ •
~a.~~ ~ ~ . :_~ ~ ~ ~rr ~ ~ ~ F
, ~ }f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~
R ~ C1 T
\~ {)
r
~
J
!1 < <
~~
- - '
~~c~ nL ~'A
, _f
~
~ ` ~ te _ , ' ~`~~ j8 ~ y ~f
'
~ ~ - . ~ ti I
v
•~•
~ ~ }
r . !+
~TRt:T
k
_
~
~~~ t
.
~. : .
.
Y ~
~
;~J ~
" '~ Y
. :r~a' '
-
, ~. ~ ~~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~
~ ~
i ~
~ l~ L~ ~ ~
! 1 ~11 ~l lL Yl~~ ~T
0 U ~;, F, :~
P&Z:DKW:DB:TA002PC Santa Mvnica, California
Planning Commissian Mtg: May 19, 1993
T~: The Honorable Planning Commission
FRoM: Plann~ng Staff
SUBJECT: Specific Plan Amendment 92-OQ1, Zane Change 92-Ob2
Address: Narth Side of Broadway between 20th and
23rd Streets
INTRODUCTIQN
Action: Proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change would
change the ~fficial Districting Map far tha parcels on the north
side of Broadway between 20th and 23rd Streets from C4 (Highway
Commercial) to CP-3 (Commercial Professional) and would amend the
Hospital Area Specif ic P3an to include these parcels ~ithin the
Specific Plan Area, Issuance of a Negative Declaration for the
project is also proposed.
Recommendation: Commission discussion and reCammendation of ap-
proval to the City Council. -
Permit Streamlininq Expiration Date: Nane.
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change would affect
11 parcels and portians of parcels with total area of 106,844
square feet lacated on the north side af Broadway between 20th
Street and 23rd Street having a frontage on Broadway of 971 feet
and bisected by 21st Street (which is 84 feet wide}. Surrounding
uses consist of parking structures, surface parking lots, medical
offices, a portion vf an 8-story seniar housing project, a por-
tian af a GTE switching station, and apartment bui].dings to the
narth/ CP-3, R3 (Medium Density Multiple Family Residential) Dis-
tricts, Colarada Place offices/ C5 (Spe~ial 4ffice} District to
the south, 2-story medical af~ices/ C4 District across 23rd
Street to the east and a one-stary retail structure/ BCD (Broad-
way Cammercial) District across 2ath Street to the west. Exist-
ing an-site uses include surface parking for u~es adjacent to the
north~ a partion of a GTE switching station, a portian of an 8-
story senior housing project, two 1-story offices, and two 1-
stary duplexes.
Zoning District: Cur~ently C4, PrQposed CP-3
Land Use District: Currently Highway Commercial, Proposed
Commercial Pro~essianal
- 1 -
r
~ +~ t .} r,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The praposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zane Change wauld result
in a change from C4 District tv CP3 District for parcels located
on the north side of Braadway between 20th and 23rd Street. No
specific de~elopment project is proposed in can~unctian with the
Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change. The subject parcels
currently contain surfaae parking, a portion of a General Tele-
phone switching statian~ a partion of an 8-story senior hausing
project, and three 1-stary bufldings built as dwelling units and
now utilized for office purposes.
MUNICIPAL CODE AND SPECIFIC PLAN CONFORMANCE
The proposed Zone Change is inconsistent with Map 15 of the
Hospital Area Specific P3.an and therefore requires an amendment
to that Specific Plan. The propasal does nat require any amend-
ments to the text of the Zoning Ordinance ar the HASP.
CEQA STATUS
The proposed Specific P~an Amendment and Zone Change does nat
qualify ~or a categorical exempt~~~ under the City of Santa Moni-
ca Guidelines for the Implementation of the Califarnia Environ-
mental Quality Act (CEQA). An Initial Study Checklist and pra-
posed Negative Declaration were prepared for which the 30-day
comment period endecl on April 19, 1993. Na comments were
received. If the City Counci]. appraves the proposed project and
ad~pts a Negative Declaration, a certified Negative Dec~aratian
will be prepared and a Notice of Determinatian will be filed with
the County Clerk. A copy of the Initial Study Checklist and pra-
posed Negative Declarati~n are included in Attachment ~.
FEES
The proposal is not subject ta any development fees.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
The Zoning Ordinance does not require any public notification for
zone changes other than a notice in the Outlook. However,
Specific Plan Amendments require that a notice of the public
hearing be mailed to a~l owners and residential and cammercial
tenants of property located within a 500' radius of the project
at least ten consecutive caZendar days prior to the hearing. A
copy of the notice is contained in Attachment A.
ANALYSIS
Background
The applicant filed SPA 92-001 and ZC 92-042 on DeceYnber 23,
1992. Included in the application is a petitian signed by over
50 Santa Monica residents in suppart of the proposal. Although
- 2 -
~J~t~ r .,
na application has been submitted far a de~elopment in associa-
tion with the proposed amendment~, the applicant stated in a le~-
ter to staff that '~orderly expansion of health care facilities
far Saint John's Haspital requiras the inclusion of its property
and similarily-situated property within the Hospital Area
Specifie Plan (HASP) and the CP ~one." {Attachment ~'.)
Several parcels and portians af parcels on the north side of
Broadway between 20th and 23rd Streets would change from a C4
District designation to a CP-3 District designatian if the pro-
posal is adopted by the City Council. This area is between 100
and 150 feet in depth fram the Broadway street frontage, encam-
passes a total of 10~.844 square faet, and is bisected by 21st
Street, as shown in the plans contained in Attaahment H. The
affected area is surrounded by a nuxnber of different Land U5e
Districts, including CP-3, R3 (Medium Density Multiple Family
Residential), C4, and C5 (Special. Office) Districts. Most o~ the
affected parcels are ut~.lixed for surface parking. A portion of
a General Telepho:~e switching station, an 8-story seniar housing
building, two one-story office structures, and two ~-story du-
plexes are also contained on the subject parceis.
Proposed Specific P~an Map Amendment and Zone Change
The area proposed for rezoning was included in the ariginal Study
Area for the Hospital Area Spec~fic Plan (HASP), as shown ~.n At-
tachment B. However, it was nat included in the area recammen-
ded for rezoning within the HASP, as shown in Attachment C. Per
the HASP, this area was not rezoned and remains part of a C4
District.
The propasa~ would result in a madification of the officia~. Dis-
tricting Map to shaw "CP--3" rather than C4 for the affected par-
cels, and a modification af Map 15 of the HASP ta show the sub-
ject parcels as rezoned to "CP" designations rather than the cur-
ren~ C4. No change td the text of the Zoning ord inance or the
HASP is propased.
The proposal would result in a change to the uses permitted an
the subject parcels. The current C4 designation a~~.ows general
retail, o~fice and automative-related uses (SI+II~IC Sections
9.04.08.22.020-050). The proposed CP-3 designation woul.d
primarily allow medical-related uses, including medical-related
retail uses, medical office uses, hospitals, and "offices and
meeting raams for charitable, youth and welfare organizations."
It is difficult to characterize the change in permitted ~ses in
terms of intensity, as the permitted uses are different in
character. However, it should be noted that the proposal would
allow restaurants af any size by right, whereas the current
zoning requires a CUP for any restaurant of mare than 50 seats;
it wQUld eliminate drive-in, drive-through, take-out and fast--
food restaurants as passible uses on the sub~ect parcels; it
wou~d eliminate service stations and automabile dealerships as a
possible uses on the subject parcels; and it would a~3ow residen-
ta.a1 uses by right (or with a Performance Standards Permit if
part of a mixed use project), whereas the C4 designation allows
- 3 - 1~~~• ~ ~
residential projects only if a Performance Standards Permit is
obtained, (Ordinance 1635, which is effective until August 14,
1993, allows residential ~ses in all commercial districts without
requ~ring a Perfarmance Standards Permit.)
The proposal would not result in any new nonconforming uses. The
surface parking which occupies most of the parcels requires a
Conditional Use Permit under bath the C4 and CP-3 designations if
it is not an the same parce~ as the building which utilizes the
parking. The portion of the General Telephone switching station
would reYaain a legal nonconforming use, the senior housing and
duplexes would become confarming uses, and the medical office
uses would remain confar~aing uses.
With one exception, the maximum permitted floor area ratio (FAR)
of 1.5 would remain intact if the zoning designatian is changed
to CP-3 as proposed. The exception would be the provision of the
CP--3 Section which states that parking structures have no limit
on the number of stories and, if developed with "at least half of
the spaces... pravided to address an existing parking space de-
ficiency or [to replace] existing parking," no maximum FAR shall
apply but the maximum height must not exceed the maxi~um af 45
feet permitted in the District (SNIIKC Sectians 9.04.08.3b.030[a]
and [b]).
Far all types of development, the praposed change would result in
an increase in the maximum height €rom 2 to 3 stories and from 30
feet to 45 feet. The proposal would also result in a required
minimum front yard setback of 20', whereas the current C4 desig-
nation does not have a frant yard setback requirement other than
a landscaped area equal to 1.5 times the street frontage.
The change in develapment standards would creata a nonconforming
frant yard se'~back for the one-story medical office buildings and
residential dup].exes which are lacated on three parcels fronting
23rd Street on the eastern edge o~ the area praposed for a zone
chang~, and for the GTE switching station which fronts Broadway
on the subject area's western edge. The 8-story senior housing
praject would remain nonconforming as to height. It is not known
whether the GTE switching station exceeds 45' in height, but it
does appear to exceed 30', which would mean it is currently non-
confarming as to height.
objections
Two letters of objecticn have been received 1oy staff. Ruth Bloom
wrote that she apposes the Zone Change because it will result in
increasad traffic and reduced parking an Broadway. However, with
the proposed Zone Change, the maximum FAR is the same for all
uses except some parking s~ructures, so it is not anticipated
that the impact of the change on circulation wou3.d be different
than eXisting zoning. In that it provides an incentive to con-
struct park~ng structures which address an existing parking de-
ficiency, the proposed Zone Change may actualZy reduce the demand
for street parking on Broadway.
- 4 -
~ .
av~ : f w
Irwin Zeke Warsaw wrote with a number af eoncerns relating to the
property owned by 5aint John's Hospita~ but not directly related
to the proposed Zone Change. Mr. Warsaw requested a file from
staff for 2200 Santa Moniaa Boulevard, an address for which no
pYanning f ile exists. He inquirad regarding the canstruction of
a small parking booth, far which all required building permits
we~e obtained after review by the Parking and Traffic Division.
Mr. Warsaw states that the 2001 Broadway address used by staff
for th~ file is "incorrect;" however, this number was chasen for
re~erence purposes because it is the lowest numbered address
along Broadway proposed for a~one change. Mr. Warsaw further
states that an Environmental Impact Report should be required far
the pzoposed zone change, whergas the City has prepared an Ini-
tial Study Checklist and, after review by the City Environmental
Review Committee, has prepared a draft Negative Declaratian which
was noticed in the Outiook and made availab~e for public comment
far the required 30 days (no public comtnent wa5 received) . Mr.
Warsaw alsa qusstioned the invol.vement of a P}.anning Commissioner
on this project, an issue which has been referred to the City
Attorney's office.
General P~an and Specific Plan Conformance
The proposed change to the Map 15 of the HASP and the prop~sed
redistricting are cansistent with the gaals and objectives con-
tained in bath the General P~an and the HASP. By allowing in-
creased area far the constructian vf hospitals and oth~r medica~-
related uses, as well as allawing a density incentive For the
construction of parking wh~ch addresses existing parking de-
fic~encies in the vicinity, the proposal is consistent with Ob-
jective 1.13 af the Land IIse and Circulation Element (LUCE},
which states the following:
Recagnizing the importance of the City's hospitals to the
community and tha value of their ser~ices to the residents
of Santa Monica and those in surrounding areas, the Land
Use Element acknowledges the hospitals need to expand and
accommodates future growth of hospita~s and health care
facilities while minimizing harmful effects on surrflunding
residentia]. neighborhoods.
LUCE Policy 1.Z3.1 further stipulates that the City sha11 adopt a
Specific Plan for the area around the City's twa hospitals, and
Palicy 1.13.3 establishes the policy of providing a density
incen~ive for the construction of parking which addresses exist-
ing parking deficiencies in the area. The HASP was adopted on
September 27~ 1988.
The proposad changes are consistent with the statement an page 30
of the HASP which states that "same residents, haspital officia~s
and oXganized neighborhood groups of th~ area have expressed a
prefe~ence that parcel rezonings focus St. John's Hospital
developmen~ south of Santa Monica Boulevard," which incZudes thE
area now proposed for rezoning and which is more predominant~y
cammercial than the area to the north of Santa Manica Boulevard.
- 5 - • ~~7t, ~ .~
Most of the area currently proposed for rezoning is owned by St.
John's Hospital.
As it wou~d allow expanded hospital-related development in an
area more predominantly commercial than the area ta the north af
Santa Monica Boulevard, the proposal is cansistent with Objective
1 of the HASP Land Use Element which states that Iand uses shall
"ensure that development in the hospital area balances the need
far medical fac~lities and uses while protecting residential uses
in the area." The proposal is alsa consistent with Circulation
Element Objective 13 of the HASP, which states that the City
shalZ "protect the environment of local residential streets by
mini~izing the intrusion of nan-residential vehicular traff~c and
parking into residential neighb~rhoods."
HASP Circulation Element Objective 26 states that
Saint John's Hospital Center and Health Center shall,
within f~ve years, provide parking spaces to eliminate any
parking deficiency discussed in the Hospital Area Specific
Plan of 1988. Spaces shall be provided within 500 feet of
the Health Center campus. By or before five years of th~
adoption of the HASP, the Health Center shall submit dacu-
mentation 4hat deficiencies have been eliminated. Failure
to meet this abjective shall be a cansideratian in City
review of Health Center development applications.
Saint John's Hospital has not submitted a development proposal to
address existing parking defic~encies (or an evaluatian of exist-
ing parking deficiencies) with this application. The 5 year
deadline wi~l not be reached until September 27, 1993.
Conclusion
The proposed Zone Change and Specific Plan Amendment is consis-
tent with the objectives of the General Plan and Hospita~ Area
Specific P1an. By allawing a density incentive for the provision
of new parking spaces which address existing parking deficiencies
at Saint John's Hospital and Health Center, by allowing an expan-
ded area in which to construct new parking intended ta be uti-
~ized by the Health Center campus, and by allowing increased op-
portunities for medical uses in tha primarily commercial area to
the south of Santa Monxca Boulevard, the proposal is consistent
with objecti~es in the HASP. An Initial Study Checklist has been
prepared by staff which concludes that a Negative DecZaratian is
appropriate. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Cam-
mission recommend that the City Counci~ apprave of the proposed
Specific Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Negative Declaration.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council approval of SPA 92-001, ZC 92-DO2 and a Negative
Declaration for these projects based on the following findings:
- 6 - ~~t, r ~
ZONE CHANGE AND SPECIFIC FLAN AMENDMENT FINDINGS
l. The proposed Specific P1an Amendment and Zone Change are
consistent in principal with the goals, objectives, poli-
cies, land uses, and programs specified in the adapt~d
General P~an, ~n that thay are consistent with Land Use
and CircuZation Ele~ent Objective 1.13, which states that
the City shou~d allaw for the expansion of existing haspi-
tals while minimizing their impacts on adjacent residen-
tial neighborhoods, and they are cons~stent with abjec-
tives 1 and 13 of the Hospital Area Specific Plan.
2. The public health, safety, and general welfare require the
adoption of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zone
Change, in that the amendment wouZd allow increased oppor-
tunities and incentives to address the deficiency of off-
street parking spaces which exists in the ~he Hospital
Specific Plan area.
NEGATIVE DECLARATIQN FINDINGS
The Planning C~mmission hereby finds that the Final Initial Study
and Negative Declarat~on should be certified in that:
1. The Cammission has reviewed a~d considered the contents of
the Final Tnitial Study and Negative Declaration, cansisting
of the Draft Initial Study and Negati~e Dec~aration, public
comments, and respanses.
2. The Final Initial Study and Negative Declaration adequately
review and analyze potential environmental ef€ects of the
praposed project.
3. The environmental review was conducted in accordance with
applicable State and City CEQA guidelines including
preparatian, notification, and cantent requirements.
4. A Negative DecZaration is appropriate, in that the Initial
Study provides sufficient data to suppart a finding that the
project wi12 not have a significant effect on the
environment.
Prepared by: Drummond Buckley, Assaciate Planner
Attachments:
A. Natice of Public Hearing and Radius Map
B. Map 2 of HASP, Showing S~udy Area of HASP
C. Map 15 of HASP, Showing Area ta Be Rezaned Pursuant to HASP
D. C4 and CP Sections of Zoning Ordinance
E. Initiai Study Checklist and Proposed Nagative Declaration
F. Correspondence
G. Photagraphs of Affected Parcels and Surrounding Properties
^ ' ~ l~ `..r I J
H. Parce~ Assessor's Maps, Plot Plan of Area Proposed for
Reaoninq, and Plan showing Parcels Owned by Saint John's
DB:db
PC/ta~D2pc
06/09/93
- 8 - ~ i_t ~ '.
A TTA CHMEN~' H
~ ,:~ ~, ~ ;
~E
PlAHNIN~ C4MMISSION
STATEMEN7 4F ~FFICIAL ACTION
PROJEC7
CASE NUMBER: SPA 92-DO1, ZC 92-002, IS 93-003
LOCATION: Narth side af Broadway betwee~ 20th and 23rd ~treets
APPLICANT: Saint John's Hospital and Health Center
CASE PLAN~~R: Drummond 8uckley, Assoeiate Planner
REQ~ES7: To amend the Hospital Area Specific P~an and t~e Dfficial
Uistricting Map
CEQA STATUS: Init~al Study 93-043 and proposed Negative Dec~aratian are
pending approval by t~e C~ty Cauncil
PLA~NI_NG COMMISSIQ~ ACTION
5~19/93 ~ate,
Approved based on the fb~lawing f9ndings and subject to
the conditinns below.
penied.
X Other. Recammendatian of appraval ta City Gouncil.
EFFE~fiIVE DATE{S) ~F ACiION~S):
5~19/93 SPA 9Z-001, ZC 92-002, IS 93-003
ZONE ~NAN~E A~D SRECIFIC PLA~ A~E~DME~T ~I~DINGS
1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change are consistent in
principal with the goals, ob~ectives, po~icies, ~and uses, and pragrams
spec~ftied ~~ t~e adapted General Plan, tin that they are canszste~t w~th
Land Use and C~rcuiation Element Ob~ective 1.13, which states that the
C~ty should allow for the expansion of exist~ng ~ospitals while
min~mizing their impacts on a~~acent residential neighborhoods, and
they are consistent with Ob~ec~ives 1 a~d 13 of the Hospjtal Ar~a
5pecif~c Plan.
2. ~he public health, safety, a~d general welfare require t~e adoptio~ of
the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change, in that t~e
amendment would al~ow increased opportun~ties and i~centives to address
the deficiency of off-street parking spaces wh~ch ex~sts i~ the the
Hospital SpecTf~c Plan area.
-I-
'~t~~~ ~ ~
NEGATIVE DECLARATIO~ FIN~INGS
The Planning Correnission hereby finds that the Final Initial Study and Negative
Declaration should be certified in t~at:
1. The Cortanission has reviewed and considered the conte~ts of the Fina~
Initial Study and Negat~ve Dec~arat~on, cons~sting of the Draft Initial
St~dy and Negative Declaration, pubiic comments, and respanses.
2. The Final Initial Study and Negative Dec~aration adequately rev~ew and
analyze ~otent~al environmental effects af the ~ropased project.
3. The environmental review was conducted ~n accordance with applicable
State and City CEQA guidelines ~nclud~ng preparation, natificatian, and
content requ~rements.
4. A~egative Declaration is apprapriate, in
sufficient data to supnort a finding that
sign~fica~t effect an the envtronment.
Ayes: ~echur, 0'Connor, Par~ee, Polhe~us
Nays:
Absta~n: Pyne
Absent: Gilgin, MOraleS
that the Initial 5tudy pravides
the praject will not have a
N07ICE
If th~s is a final decision not subject to further appeal ~nder the C~ty of
Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Ordinance, the time within
wh~c~ judicia~ review o~ this decis~on must be sa~ght is governed by Code of
Civ~l Procedure Section 1094.6, which pravision has been adopted by the City
pursuant to Mur~icipal Code Sect~on 1400.
I hereby certify that this Statement af ~fficial Action accurate~y reflects
t~e final determination of Lhe P7anning Co~nission of the C~ty of Santa
Monica.
signat re
Ral~h F~echur, Chairperson
Please Pr~nt Name artd T~tle
~/Zl~.~
date
PC/cc2sta
DKW:bz
- 2 -
~ 1~ '.3 F ,~
14~'TACI~I~~1TT ~
i~~i~ ~ ~
~.,1~ Y o~,
_~._ ~ ~~
Land Use a~
Managemer
Paul V Berlen~
D~rector
M~y 19, 1993
Irwin Zeke Warsaw
P. O. BoX 3512
Santa Manica, CA 90408
Dear Mr. Warsaw:
This lett~r zs in respanse ta yours of
been tald, up~n receipt of your letter
d~,rected Planning staff ta immedi-ate~y
and further directed staff to contact
occur as discussed below.
t~ , w, ,.,.,-....~ ,
VIA FAX: (310) 393-2977
May 18, 1.993. As you have
of Apr~l 3~, 1993, I
~nvestigate your questions
you. That, in fact, did
With regard to your request for a continuance, only the Planning
Cor;r~~.ssian can da that. The item has been duly npticed and the
appl~cant has a right to and does expect a hearing. Your request
must be taken up tonight. The question of Mr. Pyne's
particzpatzon was immediately referrec~ to the City Attarney and,
Lhus, I~:~11 not camment on it.
With regard to the ather issues you raised, yau have been ca~led
several times by Mr. Drummond Buckiey, Associate Planner, the
case planner an th~s item. He natifiec3 you that your concerns
would be addressed in the staff report, and as you have seen,
they have been on paq~ 5. Specific respanses and yQUr letter are
includ~d in the staff report.
In addatian to Mr. Buckley's ca~ls you spoke with Mr. Kenyon
Webster, Planning Manager abput your questions. Each of the
issues was rev~.ewed in full in that canversation as we~l. Mr.
Warsaw, the Planning staff r~ceives numerous letters an many of
the cases brought b~fore the P~anning Commission and City
Council. We cannot answer each one in writing. Given the nature
of your c~ncerns, we specifically ac~dressed them in the staff
report and Mr. Buckley spok~ to you directly on more than one
occasion. You were also personally notified of the original
hearzng date two weeks ago and of the continuance to tanight.
I am ].ooking f~rward to seeing you at the Commissian hearing.
- 1 - ~~~L ~.. ~_
From : WARSALJ-POB 35~2, S. M. , C `~4~8 PHONE 1*fa. : 31~ 393 2977
~VIN ~E~tE ~~1
P.Q. 8pX ~~3.2
Santa I+'~nica, CA. 90~4D~
~1. (3101 393~2~77
May 1B, }.993
~1~,y.19 1993 12:57AM PF~1
C~.ty Of S~ni-~ Nk~~i.ca s CITY HATjL
PAUL ~tl~i~?r. Dir~tvr af Land Use &~r~nspo~i-~t.i..oa~ Mc~[tt.
~b85 1~~ ~tr~at
5anta Manir~, rp,. 90~43 Vi~ FA?c: f,i~.t]~ 3~4-2~6~
r~r Mr. Bex.'lants
~n~cl,osed is ~na~her aogy af my ~.e~tes- va yc?u, dated A~r~l 30th. I~r~w
you are pro~bly ve~ b~.sy~ ]aut I was really ~lisapp~in~ in ria~ eves~ reaei~ring
~ eou~et~sy telephone ca~l in rasp~ns~ ta ~cxne s~xi.ous Cona~rn~ I rai~7.
Aga~~, a at~t v,l~ititzg ynu for twrs reason~. Fir~t, I wei~tx~. t~v ~r wk~t you~
O~]1TtIQI3 A~S [yT1 E'.c~C~'1 O~ t~ ~ 1"OCk.uF~~~ dGL3-QfIS []Ii ~~B ~ 4~ II~ 1~tGY` a1TC~ l'~
ar-y~hing had beeri do~e regardiu7g ar~ o~ the itc~s I m~n~.ion~l. ~I~d. for
reasai~ c~lained bel.uw, I am x'equestir~g a ODI~I'~N[~ANC;E af St. Jorm's HoSpit.~1's
Ap~lia~.ti.on because Z wcs~ r,at gfven a~1.~ advance not.i.~ in arider i.o reasonably
rev~c~w ~d Fx'~re for t~~~~u,~ nit~h~.' ~ Pu~lic I~.~iru~.
Especi~-lly ~..~~ light ot my Apri~ 30th l.ett~x, T c~nrya~ unders~anc~ V~HY it
would ta3ce 12 days tinclur3ing 2 valuab~e w+~ken~d~) to r~at~#y m~e on a St~nday
a~te.rnvon that t~e ~~ff ~part vaauld fin~lly be avai~.able ~Qr my review on
Nkarx~ay--2 da~-~ t~;~ore th~ Publi~ x~arinq. Issk,e mQSt ot.h~xs, x~ark for a Ii.v-
~ng, havinq pr~cri.aus~.y sck~duied Appain#xnents ai~d ~x-rnitt~mn~ f~x y~st,~rday
and today.
Rb da~t~, Z hav~~ ~e~iv~ no wri~.t~zi rGSpo~7s~3 ~dd~r~ssi~ly the i~sues z
have ~aised. I aa-t appal~ed arid a~t~ur~dec3 by thf.~ silenae. Sso~md gove.~~a~~t
manageri~]. pract~ive surely wvul.d require ~]ciru3 0~ re~se tr.~~ for exan~le~
mY questi.ioning Mr, Pyne' ~ dual x~ole as a Planning Cuus~i.ssa.an~x and as an ~
playee of the App~i~an~-Hospital. C1~'~y~ ~tqs~ ~'tisl vbservers would
e~xpeCt Ca~m~ssifln~r Py~~e ~o ~~~letely wit~t~d~'aw frcm partic~pati.o~i i,n this case.
~ot~6idcxilz~ tt~ lack of res~nse T Y~ave rer~e~.ved trcm ~veryone. I am t~aing
to r~ues~ the Ci~ Mar~ager ~o imr~tagat.~ whY m!' ;~+,.: +-ies hav~ beer~ icp~ared.
~un~zlmarx G~nser agreed there was r~ctl roc~tM for ~~av~nexit u~ the managern~nt
of govert~re.nt businesa at the ewecutiv~ l~vel of m~ny City depar~t~ts.
Tn aonc:lu~f,~r~, I m'n reqi~csting Fost~artener~t of S~cifi.c Plan A~x~nt
92-~01 and Zoning C1~a~ie~e 92 002, scheduled to be heard on 1~~ 19, 1993, at
? p.m. t~y th~ FZaru~isu~ ~i~~ic3n~ so I rnay pr~pare for a PR~ER anci bona fide
publ~c H~aring on this matter. Plc>ase tel~pk~ne r~: at tt~+e ~bave n~mber w~th
oral rx~tiae a~ y~aur decis~vn as svon as possibl..e, as I wa.l~ ~ working in tlxe
mat,u~~ains t.omorx~nr.
+~ ~1 ~; ~ .
RE~P~:rrtilI.~,Y YC~LFRS~
~ ~ ~ r~ . • ~ ~
~. ~~a,L
~ L+~~
(~5~7]..~~ ~A:
1. ~-11 C,'I'L'Y GOLR~1~'tT~ ~r~.
~, P11 F7.anzxiny (~~nissi~xs m~~a~r~
3, ~r~a~ w~bs~, Planninr~ DiY~~t.~tOr
4. Ball Fane, 33u.i.lc~ing ~ safety ~7ir~
5. ~tan Sls~~l, Dix+~c.-t.Ur o~ G~x~~rai 5ervices
6. r~ld F~chiwaki, Park.ir~g &'i~~ffi.c k~xg~er
7. John ~7alili, Ci.ty Man,ac~r
B. Ja~cph L~r.waeence, Aa~iny Ci.ty At~orn~y
9_ L+~t~in.g Oufilaok
10. L.A. Tima~t, Westsi.c~~ eclit~~
_L=-°cec _ u_ -• -
~~~ rt
' ~ ,~
~ ~ l~i ~ ~
Plann~ng ar~d Zar~+ng DE~ns~on
{31 U} 45&8341
June 9, 1993
Irwin Zeke Warsaw
P.O. Box 3512
Santa Monica, CA 90~08
Re: North siae of Hroadway between ZOth and ~3rd Streets
SPA 92-001, SPA 92-Qd2
Dear Mr. Warsaw:
I am writing to let you know that the City Counail pu]a~ic hearing
for the above-referenced pro~ect is scheduled for June ~9, 1993.
The City Council staff report far this matter will be avai].ab1e
from the City Clerk~s office far public review on either the
afternoon of Thursday, June 24, or the moztining of Monday, June
28. (Please note that City Hall will be closed on Friday, June
25.) I suggest that you telephane the City Clerk's office on
June 24 in order to determine the precise time the staff reports
will be made available to the public. The City Clerk's telephane
number is (310) 458-8211 and the office is ~acated in room 142 of
City Hal]..
If you would ~ike to review the file for SPA 92-4a1 and ZC 92-002
priar to the City Council public hearing. which is under the
address 20[31 Broadway, I sugqest that yau telephone me directly
because I have the file at my desk. My telephone rn~?~her is (31Q}
458-8341. Please give me 2-3 days notice if you request tn see
the file sa that we may set up a time for you to review it.
Prior to the May 19 Planning CQm?~~ssion public hearing, you were
contacted regarding the availability ~or your review of a fi~e
for the address 21Q2-2208 Santa Monica Saulevard. This file
includes infcrmatian on the address 2200 Santa Monica Boulevard,
which you have inquired about. I do not know if you reviewed
this file when it was left for you at the Planning and Zoning
counter. If you would like to see this file, you may make
another request at the Planning and Zaning counter. Please be
ad~ised that this file is dated 195o and is kept in storage, sa
- 1- n i~ ti ~
~ 1~ Y ~~
it will take approximate~y three days far retrieval. In arder to
avoid confusion and stream~ine the file retrieval process, please
make the request for the address "2102-2208 Santa Monica
Boulevard, Temporary Box Number 57, Recard Center Box Number
7034."
If you have any other questions regardzng this praject pleasa do
not hesitate to call me. I am also available at the Planning and
Zvn~ng counter if yau would like ta see me in persan. The
Planning and Zaning receptionist (3~0-458-8341 ext.Q) can teZl
yau the dates and times I am on the counter.
Sincerely,
~
Drummond Buckl,ey
Associate Planner
cc: Paul Berlant, Director of Land Use and Transportation
Management
PC/carsaw
06/09/93
n -
- 2 - +.: ~ i ~., _. ~
A TTA CI~EN~`
., ~, . ,
:. ~. _ ~
9.04.08.2ZQ10
Psrt 9.04.0$22 CA Aiel~ws~ Cc~~*~++~r~sl Distsid
9.D4.08.22.a10 Pnrpose.
The C4 Disa~ct ~s mteaded to ~,~~~dc for the futurc
orderty development of the ma~or hig~way a+m~aresal
comdars m the C~ty. The C4 D~s~t is iateaded w
encauras;e serv~ce commercxal bt~.anesscs, auto sales aad
SC2'Vf~ ~C31G1^~i*~S, 8IId Ot~Gr e~tn7ar ug~,g t1~at ~
regional, coauauntry, aa~ local aeeds, w~e res~r~n~
ad~acsnt r~s~eanai ~barhoods aad esta~atishe~ ~
borhood comm~.:.~al ar~~a, co~asteat w~th thc goa~s,
o~}ecm-es, and palic-ss o€ th~ G~aerai Plaa. (Pmor code
~ 9(?20-I)
9.Q4.OS.ZZ.020 Peratitttc~d oses.
Tho #o~lowr.ng vses ahAtt be ~rmuitted ia the C4 D~-
ed
ascx, ~f con~eud wnt~a aa eadasc~ bu~laing, c~xpt
where otherw~se permmed:
~g~ Am~ilanor $GYVICG.
(b) ?-~P~,aace re~a~r shops.
{C~ a41I15I 5ti1[}303 ~7QVt ~G ~25L ~OQI.
(d) .4~utomat~ ~oe dup~*~cn+a mathinC wE-iCh nccd
aot be m an enc~osed bzuldsa~~
(t) Balcenes.
(f~ Hanicc ai3d sannag,~ and loan iatutuuons.
(E} Barber or beaury sha~s
{h) Bowlin8 a11aYs-
(~ H~+*+~ c~a~eges.
(j) {~d day care ceaters.
{k) c~eane:s.
(I) Dancx studioa.
(m) Eiecu~] shaps.
(n) Elccmc dis~tbunoa substanoas
(o} Ftimerai parlars or mortuanes.
(P) Geaera! o~tces.
{c~ Gcaeral retazl aad sp~+~~+~ rz~ utGS.
(r) I.auu~ts
(s) Modical, de~tal aad vptame~at -~~ aad }abvra-
tones.
(t) Medical equtpment rea~A~c
{u) Fuhl~c par~s assd p~aygmuadc
~~) ~~9 ~~ent t~*+.~~~
(w} P~atacogy shctps.
(_) p!A~ of woishtp.
{Y) Plaac rewl stocrs.
(s) Real cstate o~~-
{as) Restauranrs of 50 scau or less.
(ab) Shelteis for the homeless.
(ac) 5ign paiating shops.
(ad) skanng ruilrs.
(ae) Tailors.
(af? Tra~t srhoots.
{ag; Vanety stores.
{a~) ,e-aa~ury usts whic~ an decer*~+++ad lry th~
Z01'lin~ pjdtnin,e**xLOT t4 bG IIEOC.SSat]I sad ~L6~8i111J
~~emat~rj ~ 81Id 5~~raa~raaBLC* ~r~7r4r~~nl ~ SllbOl~}'
I18iC LQ, 1tIG pR'IQCipB~ ~ti~1CCCd L15~S 8ad WbIC~ 8i"C COIf-
SIS[GAt 3I1~ HTC IIO mOIG dL~71D[[VG Dr ~JSI11I~i[lg i~18I]
~ICImI[IGd tler__c_
398
rrTT~~ #~~~ ~,ti?
(az} Ocher us~ ~+~ by che Zonmg A~.~.s ~.4..
Lar t,a he sints~ar rp thase l~ste.~ aha~e aad tvhi~r~h are
ce*+~+a*rat an~ no more d~sruprn-e or disrurb~ng than
perm:,r~~ ~s. (pn~r co~a $ 9U1A.2)
9.44.08.2ZE130 Llses snbject to perfon~ance
siaadards permiL
'Ihe foilawmg use.t may be permititeti in the C4 D~ct
se~e~t tn the aE,~,~~ of a Performance 5tandards Per-
au~
(a) Acrtoatobile deaieish~ps.
{b) Resden~al uses.
{c) Servict stanoas.
(d} 5ideqvalk c~f~ss (Pnor oode $ 90203}
9.04.~22_~i41f Candit~onalt~ permitted asts.
'17~e follaov~ag ~,~ may be permiuea m rhe CA D~smcY
s~ect to the a~~~~,.a1 af a Caad~~oaal Use Perauc:
(g} pnrl:~n*,e
~J ~-WOmO~C ~BI~]II~ IOLS 3II~ S~l1C~LlIGS.
(~~ Anrn~]~C LGpaLf fac:"~i~CS.
~~~ ~illiard ~}p~~,
(e) C3ubs aad lodgcs.
(n Drivo-ia, drn+~-through, take-0ut, and fast faad
restatus~ts.
(gJ F~rose fadls'~.
- [fi} Hotels and motels.
(i) I~qu~r s~arrs.
G? N~~ ~t~~_
{~c} ~~ ~ so ~~.
(1) Se~f~en-ux swrage war~ehoiues. {Pnor aade §
9(1~~.4)
9.04.Oi~??.!~40 Prohibited ases.
(~l ~~~
(b) Rooftop ParbnB on paraeis dir~c~tty abat~ng, ar
sep~araccd bY aa allry from, a ressdennal duuzcr.
(c) AnY use nat s~-±fi-~~~y authorizcd. (Pnar code
~~
9.Q~.Q~ ~ ~b4 Propesty dere~opmmt st~ndaMs.
All proQeny xn the C~i Dumct shal~ be develope~
ia s~dance w~th the follawmg sta~odards:
(a) M~mnm Bali~E*+a Hdgtit s~ld FAR. ManmuID
~dine ~eig~~ at~ber a# stunes, a~d flaor arsa ra~a
ehAll ~ ~C[Gi~1t]G~ 8S f~~OW~:
PrupaYtes Mu.
fioa~+Q t~e M~. Na of lltiz
Foilo+nna Hdght Stona FAR
Santa Mar~ca 3D' 2 1S
BoWevatd
SaaCa Maruca 3~' Z 1.5
BOt1~EY8I~ A,17I0
DGSICISb]pS
Luicola Slvd 45' 3 1S
No. of Fwy
,~ . .~
~~J~ _ ~
9.414.1~?? U60
~
pr~~a ~.
P~vatiag tbe Ma~t, No. of II~L
Fa[I~nag Heeght Stori~+ FAR
Isnooln Bh-d. 3Q' 2 1.0
Su. af Fwy
Pica Hlvd. 3Q' 2 1.0 or
~ceaa Ave. 45' 3 1S if
4th CL SQ% of
t~e
Pr'~!~
ts rest-
dential
a. Hausiag affordable tn low or moderar~ iaa~me hnissc-
holds.
b. Uses w~ch ~**~v local scrncc nc~ds suc~ as a 1~~,*+.
dromat, hume zmprovemeat store, Pb~y ~~B
store, andlor deaners
'Ihere shall be no l~mstation on the num~er af stanes
of a~y ~otel, t~deattai s~icture, or detached gar~nv
snvcriuz, so tong as tht hGtg~ht does not the ma~n-
raum aumber of fcet perm~tted in this Sa~on.
{b) M~~*~+~ Iat Six~ 7,500 square fetL F~, paror,~
3~8II COa~ 3 m+~~munl dCp[ti Of 1SO fCCL 811d e rnins_
mum width of 50 feet ~pt that par~eLs ~±~*+g aa
t~a effecWa ~A~~ of thu C~apter ~~+~~~ not be ~ax
to thia reqauement
{c) ~vnt Yard Sel~cY. I.and~ca~m8 as roquu+ed
pursuant w the pruvz~om of Part 9.04.1Q.04.
(d) Rear Yard Setbsdc. None, e~aoepx
(f} W~erc nar paml line aburs a r~±~~a~al d~R
a resr yard eqttal to:
Piw Btvd. 30' 2 1.0
Tth SL
Yincola
Pico B}vd 3t3' 2 ls
Isacoin-Ilth St
Norch n~~ 30' 2 2S
of Broadwav
ZOth SL to ~
ZSth 5t
Pica Btvd. 30' 2 13
21st-31st 5~s.
14th Si. 3(1' 2 IS
Pzco Slvd-Fwv
With Apg~v:~ o[ A ConditioQal Use Permit
Properties 11+i~r.
FYan~±~o t~e Ms:. Na af ~isl.
Fol~owen; Hag~t SWr~es FAR
Pica Blvd. 45' 3 2Q
~lst-31st Sts,
Y=~ded the pro~cet mcorporates acry af the follo~wrag
,~~-
a A full serv~ce ~_ry ~tanc hav~ng at icau S.ODD squsne
fcet af gross floor area
b. Hou9ng AfFr~~abfe to low or maderate inoome hnusa
holds.
c. Uses w~ich satisfy tocal sernce needs suc~ as a~a~:•+-
drar„sr, home imprwement store, pharrna~.y or drug
store, aad/ar deancis.
Pr'OQlJ'L~la Mx~.
F~+on~~g the Ma=. Na of Ms~.
Followia~ Ha~ht 5tonea FAR
14#h 5~ 45' 3 2d
Psco Htvd.-Fwy.
piav~ded the ~,~~~~t mcarporatas acry af the fa~lawu~g
u~es:
J77
5' +fstones x lat widtl~~
50'
'Iba required rear yard may b~ uscd for ~*}+~~ ar
loading m withiu 5 Eeet of tbe rear parcei line ~,~~ded
#he par~+~ oz loading daes not cxtcnd above the first
tlaoz ievel and pro~mded th~t a wall not leas thsn 5 feet
ar more tw•*+ 6 fee[ ia hzighL ~s ereesed and msiata~ed
along the rear .~,~aercisl ~arcel line. Acceas ~riv~vays
~,^~t be permitted to Pe~pendic~:larlY cYa~a tbe re~ured
rear yard grovided the driv~vay ~oes not ~~ the
~n~mm~ ~~ ~~rrr~ f0; ihe pST~*+o aiea. A rC-
q~n'ed rear ystd S~all not be tued for oQmmeroal pRtrpos-
es.
~~~ ~ISL IICC~C~ LO armtnme~tiat~ jgp~y~ Sa~{
~teTnv fpi 3 ICBi y8I~ bLl$CI 2Cqi11iCd ~t1i5N~t i0
the p~~~stona of Part 9.04.IO.D4.
(c) Side Ysrd 5etbad~ None, e~C
(i) when me ~nttcrso~r s~dc pacecl ti~ne abuts a~~+-
tial dismct, an munor ~e yard equsl to:
5' +~storses x iot andth~
5(Y
13e intenor side yard ~ay be ttsed for pa~rv p=
loac#mg no d~* thaa 5 fea to the mtenar s~e groperry
line ~a~ridad the garlang or i~~~g does nat act~d
above the fust floor ltvel aad prwided a wall aot lpa
rh^~ 5 feet or more than b~eet m he~ght n es+!~!r~! and
mA~ntSIAG~ 8~dri~ ihz S1dC C[+mmSiCidl pBICCI W1C. A
requered intts~or stde yard shall not be used for '!~~
or far c~*nSrtaal purg~±±~-
(Z} ~t fM1f~1{ ~ 9PYY1rflflYfej9M ~9Y~ ~ _-v ~
for a sazet a~e ysrd, lar_~~!=+e huffer and ac~enff1e
pur:uaat to the prov~sio~ af Part 9.44.i0.04. ~
(3} A 10 foat setbadc from an intr.no~ s~de proponp
~ine s~all bc rr.c~uired #or parnons of bw~~~n~ tha[ caa-
tain windawu, doors, or ather openuegs enw the mtenor
of ihe ~w3dmg. An mtenor s~de yazd less than 1Q feet
`, ; ~
~-' V ~v .-, J
9.44.~.??.DbD
sitall be perm~ae~ if y~v~ssons Of the Untform Btu7r~~no
Code re3ate~ to 5t~ tatzd a~++~n~ tn s~dc yards ara
cancfie~,
(f~ I3e~elopmmt Review. A Davd~~~~t Rev~ew
PCrm1t 15 reaulred fOI 3ay dCVC~OpmCxti Of more than
~.ODU square fees aad a~y developmeat ant~ rvoftQp
parhnQ. (pnor code $ 9020.~
9.04.08.21.070 Ae~lt~ r~ew.
All ntw coasauc~uo0. ne~v A~;r;n.~ to pasuag build-
mgs, an~ any othez caterior im~rvti-ements that rr.qtnr~
~.Ysu'*+~'~ Uf $~W1cl:nv p~t elrsll be SO~JtCt W 8lChiteG-
ttual rcvicw puisuant to the g~evs.uans af C:hagcer 932
of this Arade. (Frior codc ~ 9~2D.7~
Part 9A4.08.2A C5 Spcciai URia Ca~~a~al
Disttid
4.04.08.Z~4.010 Purpo~e.
7he C5 Disrncx is iateaded to y~~ide for the t3evel-
u~~zat of ofFrr_ aad s~dva~oed *~+*+^~o~ tu~, scier+~~~
:esra~~, aad a~oa, and fDr ~an3ud maaufact~-
uig of rr~~t~ Froducd R'~h re4uuz Iarge axPans~ o#
Aoor arta aa large parzels. I?ev~cl~~~rat tnoeauxy u
inteflde~i ta encaurage the oonstru~nan of of8ce uus
and other uses wathm a~•~~~u~-i~ce eAVirO~ment t4at
wl~l bG wui~nl,lr_ qr~~ ~nn,nv ~j ~p~pip~,
CS~CCB~Ef lII tCSmg Of SC~C snrl ~rt»7r[ine ~rr'e~e wjthir~
thC CS T}iSQ1C[ lt LS t~ ~ Of t1tC Git)- t0 }ric~ZIYC 8IId
YiuiCCt rr~a~ne ~~,.pfiygy {Ot fUC~I[C t~d~t O~O1t11II1-
ties. (Pnor cod~ ~ 9022.1)
4.04.48.24.O1A Pe:m!*_t*_~ as~s.
The fallawiag uses s~all bc permzeted ~a the C5 Dis-
tI1CL. S{ Cafld»rsr~ ~tiit~Il ~ EILC~QSC~ UT11I~iIIg CXCC~t
W~ClL' OL~CIWLSO pCimlitG~:
(e) Ar'LZSI StIIdiDS.
(b} c~,~~ ~y care ocateia.
{c} Genera3 o~aes.
(d) ~aboratflr~es and fa~i~ for scaennfic researcis
development aQd te~+~~
{C~ ~t mafn~rtnnno
(~ MC~L~. ~nts~i 8ri~ O~WIDCSIISt e~imrc gpd IBbD-
['3It)L'LCS.
{8) Narn-e~tt, mpa~ant h~lih car~ fac~ties
(h~ Piac~s af wossh~.
(s) Pro~ucuon of e~es~mental pradutxs, aad the
n,RR„~~,ssng of ~~~± pro~vcta aa msy i~e naxaaary to
the dcvebpmr~t af p~±~~?!~ or oQera~ng aysten~s ~vhcre
such syst~ems ar~c to be inatall~d and operatad at aaot~cr
~ocanaa
U7 Public or pr~ate sc~oola eastrng pnor m adappon
of iins Cbapttr,
(k) Pe:blic estility sernce centers and seivice yards.
(i} shdce~ tar the h~,.,,._i~
(u~) 'I~a~hr mmra ar mob~eha~ae P~ ~B P~r
ta adoption af th~s C3apter.
(n) p~~ry ~sses arb,icb ane dete~+nm~d by the Z.on-
uig Admm~suator to be nece~aty aad cust,omariiy atsoa-
ated wnh, and anc ~,,.,~,r ~rr. ~r~+~+tsl, aud su6ordinate
400
to Lhe Priac~l Pera~utted uscs aad wtuch are a+~~,~ent
and ao mac+c ~~7ave or drmabmg thaa permuted ~es.
~O~ O[LCT 1tSG1 dCtCFmmSd ~7}- tf1G ZDI31I1~, Admmi~~-
tor to be s~ar to thasc lrsted below which arc c~oasis-
tcat aad aa mos+c d~upave or dzstur~~ag than ~.~ttcd
,,.~.,.~ (Pnor codt ~ 902I1)
9 04.~8.24.OC30 IIses sab~ect to perfarmanoe
stand~ur~ds perm~~
(a) Autflmab~7e rctttal agesscies.
Eh) S~mae stauaas. (Fnvr c~~e § 4Q213)
9.Q,.48.7ss.Q4D Candibonally permtited ases
'Ibe fnlbwueg uaea may be germuud ia the GS Dis~sct
~ax w the s~~~al of a Condiuanal Usc Peimsc:
{a} Art Gallcnes.
(b} A~oh~e dealeiships.
(~~ ~~lenv unsts ~ c~a~uncuoa wit~ liWeaa woric
studtoo. - V
(d) Na mo~e tbsn 259'0 of t~e tatal square footage
af a develc~meAt 4~p~~ bc dcvoted to the followmg
~n~d~i ~ t~at provsde goods and sezvicGS to
em~layees or1 Ehe prem~ses:
(1) aA~~ and sav[a¢ aad ~oan iasutu~ns.
{2} Bu~nesa ma~t sat~s, d~splay, aaa sernoc.
(3~ gr~r;no b~~g ~ ~pxodacnoa scrvlccs.
• ~~~ ~L~S i~~bb ~Id ~*^Aanme_
l~ MC~1~ ~7~ i8~t3.
r~ 0~ ~ anr~ ~CAI S~CS.
~ ]~ P~g~"nnr~e Sna ~I[I$ SLOI'C5.
(~ R.~."„~...~
(9) Reta~ to aerve pF!+++A*tly omployees worlang and
vsstmzs to ~,~*~~~ na the p:cm~-~=
(1Q} Travel and tmplayme~t offias.
{G~ Iti1C4v 1~350[l~ ead mam~fae7~~pq~ iL9C3 OF C~Sa-
510~ ~ C~g Ia~iiS~I3~ 8a~ 1n8n11faC111I10g 11SGS COII-
~ q-~thin ~p ~p~~ ~~d~nv OI ~ OQCn CnG10311TC
SQ'CC~Dd ~IO~ ~~1C VIC7V. ~5i ~}il~ L~G]I 8IC COI~a~~C
w~t~ affice ar~d sd~n~ techaoiogual uses.
(f} Pnb~ic ar prsvate schools.
~8) ~~ ~p~g$C #anlihes, mlat-wBrehOUSCs
(h) Servra stiaons.
(i} .4ny uae a~ a traas~ortaaoa nght of way for otber
t4tisen ~~+...i ~ete-
~j~ OH-stte h~*+~out wa~rt fac~ty. (Pnor cade §
902I.4; ~ by Ord No. 25210CS, adopced 5/&''94])
9A4.08.7AD50 P~vbibited uses.
{a) C'.snemat
(b) Drive-in and drrn-through restatuants.
{c) Roo#Wp parjciteg on parcds ~rectty sbtstttn9; oI
separated by an aliey fsam, a reszdent~ai dutncx.
(d) A~ u~ nat spec~fically authonzc~. (Pnnr codz
~ 9021.5~
9A4.QS.Z4.060 Pt+npert~ derdopmeat staadard~.
Al! groperty m t~e CS Distract shall be dev~elo~ed
~n =~==.s~~a with ihe faliaw~ng sraridardq:
(a) Ma~mam Bnilding Heigbt. Three stones. not
to e~~ 45 fees. Thrn shatl be no ~~m~xaaon an the
~A ~~ ~ ~ ~
9.Q4.08.7.8.07~
(d) Re.sta~naats are ~~•~n~r~d m two rettaurants per
bladt (unltss athe~se s~a~,fit~ m ttus ~nn) (a blod~
be~ both sdes af Main Str~cet at~d t~e ad~accat ssd~
of ad)c+tmno ~de S~eeCS). pcls~om of Ms~~ Strtei to
ba des:¢,,nated "Bla~t" fur the pmpo.se af this 5ec~on
arc:
B1oca~ 1:
Blodc ?:
Bloclc 3:
Bloclc a•
Btocic 5:
Blnc.ic 6:
Bloclc 7:
Hlacr 8:
Block 9:
Hlacic 1Q:
Blocic 11:
South City T~m~ts tu Ma:sae Strzet.
Marme 5treet to Pier Strect
Pier to As~iand
p6k~~*+d w H~l.
H17[ SD 4ceSS Patk.
OCeaa Park ta Holtister (5 rescaurdnrs ~er-
nutted sn t~s bloclt).
Holl~;,~~ w 5~aad
Straad to Paccfi~
Pac~c ta Bic3cnell.
Bidme~l oo Ha;t.
Bav t~ Pirn.
No aew re.st~usacs sha11 be permttted o~n Mam S~ett
unul the C~ty Couaai ~Lerr++nst t~at a isv~ew of t~c
CM DLSn~x has been camtpleted. For purposes of th~s
Sccaoa a"ne~' ~t ~h~n mdude s~- ressauraat
nat a~rea~y ip opcraua~ or ~~z:,,~ by ttie Planaing
Cpmrmcmpn ~Ilpr tp 18aNgiy- ~Q. 1~~ Wlth thC C~Da
of a r~estauraat a~!±~ at ZS10 Main Street. The proh-bi-
aon g~,•~ ~aeW" r~aa ~h9~~ nQt a~rPly ta changes
u~ oaTnersh~ ~f r~t**aat~ alrzady ~a opeiat~an or
a~Y~~Ye~ ~r the P~anm•,g Com*+~*~~a ~nor to Iant~aiy
lfl, I989. ~sctps a~ ott~..~e grov~~~! m suhstcuaa (h).
R~siautgnn w~[h ~ore ehA~ 50 sest~, mcsurafll5 w~th
a substanual t9~~-out ~t~tu+~~ aad airy ~*nd-Aoor
restaurant use anll requue a CoadittoaaI i7se F~~t
(c) Bais raay aoc ~~ sevete m number south of
O~~n Park Bonle~rard, aor fcvt sa aumber aorth of
Ocexa Parr Boulcvard Na bars AnAn be located on aay
Ma~ S~xs w~~ (For purpases af this ~±~. "baas"
are defined a3 r_vnhlnh..,rm: ~vtt~ '~ubii¢ pr~em~ses"
jl~pr I~ct~e Arvi ~ wlt~ 8~r 8'G~Va1B ~G~1tY
i~1flt IS ~~]y ~~k frpm ~ rlinina 8IG8 8~ IS
reSula~i}' operated d~u~nB hours aot carrespond~ag to
food sarv~ee hout~} ~`~m~ Use Pccmita a~+e raquu~d
for atl b~s.
~`I ~ ~ ~Lm~e nrn~ ~nfm~iC~~ 8D~ IC31-
~~~ ,~. ~~.T~ sbaue the 5iat 8oa~ abail be allowed
{S) Ot&er secaoos of t6is t~sapter notwuhstanding,
the folJa~nng r+equtr~ts ~elti~il ~jy t4 esCablitil~eats
w~th We eatersA~•~,rtts ar other loud msisic for wtuch
a buxld~ng permit or use perm~t u anuai~z after October
iU, 198(1:
1. Frt~or wall aad wnndaw cauatruetion must be
to a•r,~,**,um S1'C ranng ot ~5, aa determ~ned bp thc
A.STM or ot~er um~lsr ~~pted indust~y sranciard.
2 ~ dacns ari~ docr~ys;
a. Donrs mtut be sol~d core arr auneaal eled
6. DOVrs m~~SS he o~~trri EO piW1dC a ~eS~ St ~lad,
si11, apd jari,~=
c. Maexs eaoranx mtut caata~n an "acutts~c locl~"
ar arher equn-alent °sound irap."
~
d. ?he mtent af th~s Se~voa ~s ro raq~ure an estab-
issl~mait p~vv+~++a eas~r~a~cat ar [oud m~c to cs~txn-
tt~e r~suktmg nosse w+t~,n iu walls to the greatest atant
possib~e.
{h) NotwlthSiBad~nQ ypCC~C ~CC131 nefezCaoeS cOT1-
r~,*+~ i~ere~t-, tt-c pravsstoas of Part 9.U4 (3B.2B art aot
meaut ro appty co:
1. Usea m~stezsct on Qcto~ex 10, i98~U, regatdless
of chaag~s af oarnersh~p, unkess t~e use u mtens~fied
kry a floar ares A~~,~on of ~sare than 15 percent ar by
QIhCr SL1bS~nret~Ai ~sterfiCdtiO~, SUC~ 3R t$e IpUOduCLtOII
O~ i+Cgll~Si~t'dC~1C~[11C~ CBLGi?Atnm~~, C~ppGF; thar L~CIL
~3y bC ~ mOiC t~.18n 3~1 IaL7~~ ~nrnraa ~ L~C SCIVICC
area floar s~aCe o# bats and restau=aats.
~ c~~A*+~.s m use whu~ result m a~se per~ued
in th:s Part tl~at ~s iess intcnse thaa the ~r=ec~t "~_
F~suag vses ahatl crnmt towatd the Wtai Qum~er of
bazs and res~in$ats garmitt+ed ar-ihia the D~smex. A
csureatty eusnag use shali be caa~dcred no loager
~~ ~{ t}fai USG LS VO~IIIST1~' chanv~ OI 1$ ?~~
far a penod of oaa year. (Prtor code § 4Q23.7)
Fut 4.04.OL30 (~ Commnrl~l Proirss~oaat Dls~ict
9.04.083Q010 ParposG
The CP Districs ~s mr~nded to ~tahde for the fi~ture
orc~=~y e~•+~+~n of the CSt~s haaprtah and related
I~eakth care fac~istiea m order to meet the Qee~s of both
the ~iaity aad r~gioa while P~~~B ~~~Y
of the s~uzoim~ng r~+~~a~ aeioh~or~oods m a m~nr_r
can~sreat ~nth the goals, ab~ecWes, and poluus of t~e
Gzneral Plan. (Priar cadc § 9024.1)
9.Q4.0830.020 Permit~ nses.
The followmg ~sses shsIl6e perm:ttea m t~e ff~ D~s-
uicx, i# aoadncted aith~n aa endosc.d bwlduig, e,uept
whese othetwi.u per~utied:
(a) .4~tult day ca~ faal~aes.
(b) .~msc studiaa.
~C~ HSC~Cl' O~ ~CBlll~- 5~10~3.
~d~ C'~~~rj ~- C~1C CCaICIS.
(e) CAUf~'-~-'^*~atY stoie3.
(f~ Convent, monastcna aad other suailsr group
li~-ing qnarte:a,
(g~ Delicates~set~s.
(h} Drugstoiea.
(i} F1or~srs.
(j) Gift Qr sauv~cnu s~~ps.
(k) g~rA~
(1) Ice cream s~opa.
{m} Medic~i and drntal cUzucs and lahoratones.
(n} Medrta! an~ geaeral offices
(v) Me~cal sugpGra an~ serncrs.
(P) O$ces g~ mce~ng roocns for charitabts, Youth,
and a-elfaza o~~o~a.
{c~ o~cx su~piy stores.
(r) Pu~fit parlcs and piaygrounds.
{s) Res~denc~al uses mdudu~g res~dcnual nse.s at t~-e
graund floor.
(t) Restauranrs.
~IJL; ~ J
~.i34.0830.fl7A
(u) Rat homes.
(v) ~~,:.,,~..
{w) Sc~oo3s.
(a) Sheltcrs for the homeless.
(Y) Statinaery stores.
(z) A~on- uses whi~ arc decer~~ b9 the Zon-
~ p~~~rator ta be a~ry aad a~taman~- atsncr
ac~d wuh, and a~pzopiYate, inadcatal, '~ subardi:~ate
to the pr.~pal perautted uses and whu'h are aoavsuat
aad noc mor~ disturbiag or d~rupnve than ~~~~
uses.
~eg} Q[~ iier¢ ~ }~i 1~ T=.-.:..a ~~-
Cd! LO bC e~tntlar CQ L~OSC ~LStCd 8bOVC Anri W~ $I~
Cnn.e~~CIIt ~ IIO[ mOIC ~StElY~IIAg OI ~t1YC it.la[l
perm:ttcd uses. (Fnar code ~ 90?4.2; ame~~d by Urd.
No. 1476CLS, adopt~d 42589)
4.Q4.4S.30A30 I1ses sab~eac to performaooe
staad~trds
The follawit~g uus may be perm~ m ihe CCP I?i.su~x
subJax ta the agproval af a Performanae 5tandards
Pcrmt~
{a) Re.adeanal tsses wrrhin a m,~ tuc P'r'ole~
(b) S~or $?DUP ho~~+nQ_
(c) Sidewalk cafts. (Pnor code § 94Za3}
9.04.0830.U4~ Con~iitioaally pera~!ti'''~ ases•
'The £ol~own~,~ map be pcrmitud m the CP Ih~c[
st~ect w tha appruvsl af a Condiuonal Use Perm~G
(a) Automo3~e par~~g lors and suvctures.
(b} P~~+~ and sar~no~ ~d loan utisututions.
(c) Qubs aad lodges
{d} C~e~t ageaczes.
(e) c~tdit uaio~
(fl D~,~,~ and ~~ s~os.
(S) Fuaera] pariars aud mortuanes.
f h) Iabranes.
{i} p~axs of wots~tp. {Pzior cflde ~ 9(~'L4.4)
9.04.fl8 ~~ !-~4 Pt4~lbited ua!!.
{a) Hel~oapcer ~a~ading ~~+~=aes.
(b) RooftoP Pa~dng an Pancels d~re~tY ab~~rr,,,o, or
separaud lry aa alley f~vm a res;dtn~al d~suux.
(c) Aa3' usc nos spax~c~lly sut~a~,trd. (Pt~or cocie
~ 9Q24S)
9.04,083Q060 Propert~ d~.elopmest staatl~rds.
A!1 pivpei~y m[hC CCR UistrlCt chal[ ~~~q~~
~a a~,a~na aritl~ tbe followmg stan~ards uajess other-
w~sc ~~..,.~ded in the Haagita! Area Spe~csfic Psat~:
Tabla 9A4.~3D.U60
With Agps~vs~~ u[ ~
I)e~eiapmeai Rerlew Pf=tisjt
:I~sz Maz.
Mai. ;,Fo. of M~Y- M~z. No. o[ 11~z.
Hdgtir Staries FAR He~t Stor~es FAR
CP3 45'
~s as~
IS -- -- -
15 74' S ? 5
~g~ M~mqm $~dins $~t, j4('nn~u~n b~dinp
heighc, aumbcr of stones. and floar a,rea ratw ~,A~~ be
dete~++*+sd az folloacs:
'~~ sFta~l ~~yp issnttAtenA 013 L~C AC~3Ci Of SLDIiCS
af auy hace~ or de~r~ed ~=~~Q s~ucrurz so laag aS
IbC bCl~[ L~OCS L10[ ~~'r!"~ TbC •nur».~ nunfbC! Of
f~cs perm~stcd in th~s Sec~aa.
{b} 'F~c ma~a h~l ~+*~,++~s4 a~ Saiat 1o~hn's Has~sta]
aad H~a~th Centet shaiS be ~imdcd iato two pasceis far
ptirposes of ~a~„? FAR. Panpel A-~i 13, Block
3, Orchard Trac~ Parczl B- L.ots 4-Z9, Tract No. 4618
aad Lass 1, 2 and 3, Tract No. 77b4.
(c) Par~+~ suvctur~s ~eveloped in t3te CP Distrizt
m wh-c~ at Ieasc ~~~ of the spsQes arc Y~~~ide~ ta
add.resi aa e~nsuag p~arjr~~~ ~~ defaeacy ar are
~P~B ~~B P~7f4 s~lt not be snb~ect to FAR
I~rr,~caaams, but s~all be re~ured ca :ueet atl ather devei-
opmeat standardt for t~e $rea.
(d) 14~tn~n~~ ~ S~ 7T500 s4uaze fC~i. F~r~h ~,•~~
chAii pppta~n g n~innn~ ~}~ Of 15D fCGI eIIC~ 8 R+~n+_
mt~m w~dth of SQ fxt, esac~t tbat parx~ on tbe e$er~ve
date a€ ttiis Cha~ter ,~±su ffit be a~ri~jeci to this reguere-
nteaL
(e} ~,nut Yard Setb~dc As shown oa thc 0~~9~
Distncting Map of the C'aty, or, lf AQ SC[aaC~C L4 S~rtfie~,
ZO feet
(f) Aar Yar~i Srtbad~. NQno, exccpt:
(3) ~Vhere rear panel Lne sbuts a res~deausl ~strict,
a rear yard egual to:
5' +{stnnes x lnt widthl
5D'
The rzqnirad rear yard may be ased far par~rt~ or
EQadueg W vrit~in 5#ett of the rear parcei ~iae pro+r+tir~
the parluag ar loa~ag daes aat ~*~~d abo~e she 5:st
tloor level aAd ~vnded that a wali aot less than 5 fas
nr mort than 6 feet sn he~t is crccted aad *na,~*amed
~ ~u~w.
9.44.{D830.060
aiong the sear caR+~+~ai parcel line. ~ess drneways
chail be p~ca~ttGd LO Cs'OSS pCrpeIIdlcut8rl~' th~ rc~sred
rear Vard y~u~sded the drsvewav doas not exaeed ihe
mm~rni~ Wldt~ pGlIDlt[ehd f0i ~he ~az~714 siea. A i'C-
c~uu~ rear vard ~s~~ not be Lsed for eo~ putpa~s--
es
(2) That nee~ed W 9~~*~rydata Iaadsca~ng aad
~nmo fOi s ieai ~Td buffCl iet~tl7ied pulsuBIIi to
the p~~.~ons of Part 9.oa.~a.aa.
(8) Slde Yard Setbidc. None, aoceP'C
(1) Wbrae ti~e mter~or suie pa~cc3 ~me a~tus a~dcn-
nal drstna, an iatenor ade yar+d equal to:
5' +{stories x iot andth~
50'
The ~tenot side yard m~- be ,~~ for pastr+nv pr
~Curnr~v np dpg~ than S fCCL t0 i~ lII[C!!Or e~rir p~~r
~ItC NivaldCd thC ~3l~no pT 108~1itg d~C3 nOL ~~
abave the first floor level and ~,~~-rided a v~l aot lc~
than 5#xt or ~ose thA*+ 6 feet m he~ght ~s e~~~ ~ud
ma~nta~nr~ 8~QQ~ If1C SI~C CL~~*+n~~18~ ~8YL+C~ ~SGC. A
iCtjllllL~ 3IILGI1dI ~aC y8[~ S~ AQL bC II.SC~ ~O[ 7~a.o.u
or for car++n+~aal purposes.
{2} 'Ibar **~~ m ~ ~,wu: ,d.~ ~.,~ ~c}t~
for a sts~ei 5~G ]lard, ~arpC b!1$eT and SCre~*+mv
ptirsuaat to the ~,~vrisi~oms of Part 9.04.10A4.
(3) A IO foat aet~aci~ fmm an ~tGrior properry Eiae
ehail ~~~d fOI p0ldOAS Of bfil7dina.~ i~St OOIIt81II
R7~d04vS, ~OpIB. Or OLhQ O~'„~»aK entn L~IG 1ntCiIOI Of
Ihe busldtag. An inte:zQr side ~su leaa th~n 1Q feeI shall
bc pc~„,m~ if prvv~ons of the Uniform Bu~7dmg Code
related tn 5n-raud op~,nas m ffide yards are sa~.cFr~
(h) Dndopmmt Rstin.. A Devetopmeat Review
P crrnxt u~ for a~ry dav~lopmeat af moro t~aa
77.500 squa:s feet of floor area, fur a~ty deveicsp~ettt
wr~~ ppp~ ~~;,.~. anrl t0 helg~ttS ~i1d SOOr SIC8 S'8~C6
ui 9.0~4.083~.dG0(a).
(r'~ All ncw a+~*++~naa~ devei~~~ant m this Distna
~hAti ~,t~~nde fiu ~oqee Ps~fO aad a~•,*+~,~•,>>m ane
hour frez Vrstar par~~a nniesg a preter~a~al par~++~
zone ras~ or ~s esmblished in the area of t~e dtvelop-
Qlr.lu ~ {.1/G ~ Wl~i7 Lil~ WG ~. ~i~r~tlA~ ~tR4
i
r~ia~ry~ q~ ~]y nn~oatr ~ptea~ a~YCdSC oa-SfiCCt
PSI'1~ng ~gAi~ Of t~tG dEYC~Q~Rti1CItt. Oi lf OthCiWl3G
p~v~ded m the Haapual Area Spec~c PEsa. (Pnor cade
g 9024.6)
bC 1TS[OICa tQ itS CAS~~ dOn~?DIIfOim~nv ~Cl~t, [~17or
cade § 9Q24.8) y
Part 4.04.08.32 CC C'ivit Ceater Dis~icc
4.04.083Z010 ~spox.
The CC Distnct ~s mtended to ~~~,++~de #or the retea-
n0~ O~ ij1C IDSJ4i WnOCIIiI'SnOn Of ~OVC~CIIL 84~ A11AIi
al ~ities at the 5aata Monua ~c Ceater and non-
PlOfit Oiu~ 3~~ ~~n[~shnr~}$j An[i Irersl?'~ U.SCS. itw w
Disnzct is ~~;m,sd m allaw for ad~nanal uses u~ r3ie
~~ j~#nd~na ~~ g~ ~d gpye~D~e~= aad
cultiaal fac~ities, as ~vei1 aa public recrr-~h!+~af ~~~~~+~
aad visitor seivmg uses suct~ as hote~s aad ca~mema]
re~+ea.aonal usp. Tbe developmeat iatens~ry is ~ntendcd
to axammod~au enstmg aad futurc uses ~u thc area
w~aa7$[C~t Wl[~ t~1C ~O~ O~JCCn1tC5~ 3Ild ~Qji~'~~ pf t~1C
Gcneral Plan. (Prior code § 9Q25.I)
9.04.D83Z02Q Permfk+!~ ases.
The faAownng usea stiAtt ~ p~~~ed in the CC Dis-
trtGi
(A) COIIVC~~OII 8nd CO'afE2LIIC+C f8C1~itrCS.
{b) G~tniral ~7iaea.
~C~ •~~,•~ nf~rr. ~r6~rarux»1 anri ~ faewlitirs
{d) Pu~Eic u,~u:.~as
4~) ~~ ~ ~ P~~
~fl ~~ ~~
(gJ 5heltecs far th~ ~omeless.
~~~ ~CI wuaYa~~C ~~1C USGS.
(i} ~n-premue, aacasa~y u~es for any of the a~a~e
~ ~~~riina CgfGg, ICS[$lIIBIILSs 3II~ ~CSYSS~SGd3~ a-~11C~1
a=e pr++nA*a1y mteaded Io ser+re vLUtots aad users Of the
F71''"~'9}~/ IISC. ~]CTC 5~38~ bC 110 dLiiCCL a~< <O S~i ?ir'r5-
sory usa ~om tbc R*r~sas of a bw~~1~+4 or suvr.t~.
p~ e~,all bC permlLted oaly ihI'ough 8 f~yes, Wnrt,
lobbq, Pstio, ~i Ot~ef rnn,inr 3n8. {PrtO[ CO~O ~ 9lT'T.5.2}
9.04AS3Z030 Uses sobject to performanca
s~adazda permiL
(a) Naaa (Prsor code ~ 90253)
9.~4.08.32.040 COndl~ pesn~ff:'a oses.
The follawing uxa may be permitted in the CC Dis-
tnct su~ject w We a~,f;.~,~a! of a Condzaona! Use Perm~_r_
(a) Uaea whrh ,~,~ ~iic recreatLOnsi and vwta~-
ser~rtng uses such a1 hotels and comnserc~al s~rxestionai
„~
9.04.0~34.0"1Q Meh{tawral reriew. ~
Aq coaatrsux~oe, a~tiot~s to e~nsting ~uldin~, and
airy ather extertor imr.~~ment~ that raquue ~ssuance
of a buil~+n~ perr~i s~all be sub~ect to architectural rc-
~ew pursuant to the prwrs~or~s of C~apur 932 of thu
Arude. (Pnor oodc ~ 9Q24.'~
9.04.08~~=~W? Nea-oosfo~+~~~w+ hospitai buiE+line
Natarst.hs~di3sg a[her p.w+~sicsas af t~ Chaptzr, a
hosgstal but~dmg aursatty use~ for ia-pai~eat a~ver+~~~-t
~~~,••^~,~,~ m the (~ D~tntx ~vhirh ~ ~ao~do~m-
ing as to ~e~ht and ~vhich ~s damagcd or deatrcrycd may
4Q7
(b) Prrvate affices.
(c) Restauranta. (Pr~or cade ~ 9Q25.4)
9.d4.0832AS0 Prohlbited naes.
(a) Any use nat s~ficalty a~thanud. (Pnor oodc
¢ 90255)
9.fl4.083ZD60 ~ropeis~ de~dcpaimt ~tandae+da.
A~ }~iv}~!'ty la tht. (~ ~iStrICL S~73jL 5C dC1iE~ppCd
in aaaardaaa anth the standard~ wuhin a spec~fic plaa
adopted by ttse C'iry Counal. {Prtor code § 9(n5.6}
n ~} Lf ~ ...
~T~~cr-~~~ 1~
~~~~~:~
.. .
.t~ Broadwa~ between 21s~. S~re~t &
'' W Cloverfiel.d -- South side
~
~
i
, ~.~~uuwaY ay ~15~ ~zree~ - sou~.h sid~
~+$roadway East ~f 21s~ Str~et - South
,_~ ' s ide
~._
' ~ f3roadway at Claverf~e~.d
, ~r
4F
f.
~A Broadway East of 20th Stree~ - North
~ side (GT~ Parking Lot)
~ Broac~way at 20th Street - North side
~~' (C~TE Swi~ching Station}
~ 1
!"
c
i,, ~ Broadway at 2~st 5treet - North side
Broadway East af 21st Street - rlorth
' 1~ syde (Saint Jvhn's Parking Lot)
~~
~ Broa~way & Claverfield - Facing North
/~ Sroa~way between 21st Street & 23rd
~~ Stree~ - North s~de
~~
~-
~. ~/ Broadway at 2 3rd St~eet ~- North side
, Broadway [~Test of Cloverfield -
~ ~ North side
f~ mroadway Eas~ of 20th Street -
•~} I aOUt~"! SlC~~
~~
~= ~J~ Broadway East o~ 20th Street -
` W Sauth side
~
~~,
,,~"
,_
~'
T IIroadway at 20th Street - South side
,, Broadway East of 20th Street -
y South s~.de
/~ Broa~way at Cloverfield - Facing Wes4
~Broadway at 21st Street - Facing 6dest ~ ~
?
J
' t~
~,Broadway at 20th Street - Facinq East ~~
S~ ~
~
r' ~
~~ ~/Braadway at 21st Street - Facinq East
ATTACI~M~N~'
CA:JL:distmap.ord~pc~df
City Council Meeting 6-29-93 Santa Monica, California
ORDINANCE NIIMBER (CCS)
(City Council 8eriea}
AN ORDINANCE OF THL CITY COIINCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
AMENDING OFFICIAL DISTRICTING MAP
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance Number 1452
{CCS) and 1454 (CCS} in August, 1988, estalalishing a new
Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Ordinance and establishing a
revised Official Districting Map for the City; and
WHEREAS, on December 23, 1992, Saint John's H~spital and
Health Center f iled Zone Change (ZC) 92-002 to amend the Official
Districting Map to include the parcels on the north side of
Broadway between Twentieth and Twenty-Third Streets in the CP-3
(Commercial Prafessianal) District instead of the C4 (Highway
Commercial} District; and
WHEREAS, on December 23, 1992, Saint John's Hospital and
Health Center also filed Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 92-001 ta
revise the Haspital Area Specific Plan to reflect the proposed
amendments to the City~s Official Districting Map; and
1
. .a .
A '
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Divisian deem~d
camplete and accepted for filing ZC 92-aaa on February 25, 1993;
and
WHEREAS, Initial Study Checklist (IS} 93-003, which
recommends that a Negative Declaration be adopted for the proposal,
was duly noticed and circulated for public comment; and
WHEREAS, no pub~ic comment was received regarding IS 93-
003 during the 30-day public comment period which ended on April
19, 1993; and
WHEREAS, on May 19, 1993, the Planning Commission
recommended that the City Council approve ZC 92-002, SPA 02-001,
and IS 93--DQ3, and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent in
principle with the goals, objectives, policies, land uses, and
programs specified in th~ adopted General Plan in that it is
consistent with Land Use and Circulation Element Objective 1.13,
which states that the City should allow for the expansion of
existing hospitals while minimizing their impacts on adjacent
residential neighborhoods, and it is consistent with Objectives ~
and 13 of the Hospital Area Specific P~an; and
2
, ! ~ ~
~~
WHEREAS, the public health, safety, and general welfare
require the adoption of the proposed amendment in that the
amendment would allow increased opportunities and incentives to
address the deficiency of off-street parking spaces which exi,sts in
the Hospital Specific Plan area;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MONICA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS;
SECTION 1. The Official Districting Map af the City is
amended to include the parcels on the north side of Broadway
between Twentieth and Twenty-Third Streets in the CP-3 District, as
set forth i.n Exhibit "A" .
SECTION 2. Any provision of the Santa Mon~ca Municipal
Code or appendices thereto inconszstent with the provisions of this
ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further,
are hereby repealed flr modified to that extent necessary to affect
the provisions of this ~rdinance.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by a dacision of any court of any competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each and
3
every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared
invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portian
of the 4rdinance wou~d be subsequent~y declared invalid ar
uncanstitutional.
S~CTION 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall
attest to the passage af this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper
within ~5 days after its ad~ption. This Ordinance shall b~come
effective after 30 days from its adoption.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~
~
J SEPH~LA~RENCE
ting City Attvrney
4
~ y
~ •
Exhibit A
.
P roposed areas to be rezo n ed fro m
C4 to C P
on the O~~icial Districting Map
........
;::::::: ~~ to ~~-~
........
:- TWEM7Y-iN1AD COURT °
~' •• .a I .a ; a ao . .c ~_ ~ . ~ ar °o ~e
y-~ ~~ a: e0 ~ 3 6 35 ^~ 3s --~~ 33 Y ~ 32
uo' ~h wl _ ' n ~ 3 O ~
~ `' .;•~ ~`~ .:rl~ _ ~ . .al .~ ` ~. ~ _ Z ., 30
1301~
STREET ~
1302
~. ~~c ~ w ~ U ~o ~G ~;. I~C - ~a ~ ~I v' Y r. .C ~
~ I i ~~ : ' s
~
q _ ~ •~ y ~~q ~ s
V 19 ~.0 ` 2; . 3 ?~ ~ T^ 18 29 6 ~--~ -
.~aca d qr~ '~~/! ` ~r~ ~~ ~
- 1 a„ ~C Y, a[ ao ~~6 ~~~ K b ~`- -
~+ ~WEN1~f-SECbND - LOURT Q`~ s , Q
w .~ . .Q b .o w • .o ~ b ~ ~ e - T ~
18 ~ 17 I~6 15 I ~ 1 B 1
_~~P=3_ - - ~ - ` `
= 4 - '
~ ~~ ; a ~w6 ~ ~ ~,~ _ a
;y .o ' w - ~o ~ m ac _ •a I .o .o .o i ~o I a~ a QS '~ ~ N
saoi STREET
~ttEC ~ira a9yiICC51
¢ iaaz
Z `0°
O
~
~
~ Q p -~~
.6~ i]
e~ocx 3
~RCHARD TRACT
ra]y-"v~99 56e
---- - ~° --
.D~ Il
BiOCK 3
0
~
a
Q
U
Z
O
~
~
~
~
Q
cA
caa
„ v~fa1TE0 Rfs'~650~ccs) COURT ..aa~aonea
~t a sc ~ sa ~ j w A w w > >v ~
~ ~ - i +M 3 R
_ ~ ~~
~~i ~! A `S-_ R A C T
i ~
W` ~ c Q p~; !U 4~ 9 i A
x' ~a tf- T
i ~ < ~
s_ x ~ so sc so _ so sv sn x±o }o "'E59~6"~
i 30 i ~ ia - sev;rs 1
~s~ ~:•r ! 6 ,~ ~
~4a1 CLOVER FIELD
~:;.,; TWE~TY-THIRD
~ .q 5 ~I ~..Rc~~N
~ ~
I~
I Q
0
-~
.~
---i
~
~
~
I
I
--~-
I
I
__~_
~7+.r•Kar[[3J
`~" TWEMTIETH STR~E~ ~~~~~~A~~~
Exhibit A
Proposed areas to be rezoned from
~4 to CP
on the afficial D~stricting Map
........
:::::::: ~~ to ~Q-~
........
~ TWENSY-TH10.p COURi °
•~ .c .a r - w ~ .a ~. . i ,r •a ~ ar
€- ~ ~ 6~ ° yG 3 °~ b 35 ^ 34'~ 33 - 3?
~~ ~ s -
~~_ 2n N ~ ~ ~,I ry - CC
N Q~ 's~. ~ _ ~. ~ '~ = w -
° " °F- ._ . ~ . I ~ , ; , 30
130~~
5~ RE~Z ~
w i~C I W ~.7 I b i ~1'i ~C IC ~ W I ' ~f 7C o 1C ~
_ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~I Y ~ r J s ' c ~ q
19 r 20 ! 2; 3 ?;x 1 78 29 ~-
•d pr~ )!/I!J , i {( ~~ ~_~ 7/~ ~
l .~., i~~ a_ ~i. i ~L a0 i7 ' ~[ W ~_ -
~. 7WEN1r(•SECOND LOIfRT ° `'
a0 f a~ ~ lC U' ~ 10 i~0 ' b i~ 1 ~0 ~~0 W - 5 ~5
18 i 1i ~ i6 :5 ~ I I~ I r 1 ~ ~1 r
.~ ..j _ _
_~P-~_ ~, `-
"! [?~ x:~
i,i •~ I ~ ~'~ ~ . [3~ e
. '~ : : " '4~~
~0 ~ I a+ ~ aJ l~ ~~] i b ~. . aG - l~ 0 ES 'S
1307~ STRE~T
t 'Ev yf5 aB: ICC$I
i302
Q
Z
0
~
~
¢
Gn'~,
~~-~
.c~ 13
BLOCK 3
~ ORCHARD TRACT
(V M 7'Jk eil ~G '.. s
- - - t°° -
~~ +
BLOG!( 3
v~cA7E~ a~i'~6S9.cu7 CDVFT ..o~noc~ta
s: : u ~ si w i sa I a w u sc .c v
st! ~ ~~ 3
i ~ R
~ ~~ - Rr R C T
. ~~ , iY
'l~~ ~,,
`~ ' IV I ~ 5 Q P~ 3~ Q 5 9 Z A
z~ ~; ~- T ~ C ~, ~--~
3j'}s 1
n
- ~ ,, so ~ ~: u s~ . ~ ,~ a ~ E -3 ~ °
. ~a•Sao;Tl1
~~~.~ ` 6 ~q ~
140i
; CLOVER FIELD
1402
~w ~.o
_ 3 sl , 8 _ s~
~° ~ ~ ~~I ~~ •.e
'40, TWE~ITY-~E~IRD
~402
.a ,~
s 5 g fi
c .:
s - ~ ~ ~s'~-
_ R ---~`~_ -~~ ~d
° ~ R
~ + ~
~l0
_ _ ~ M ~O _
~g ,4 5 °~ _ L.~,V~N
W
?
CL ry 7RACT MQ ., 8~b
Q .a
~ ~
+ O
~wcz~ ay. N
STREET ~
.~ .
...6.... ~
. ..~r.
FRaCT r
~~at~ •r~s„~~~
~ ~
~I
Q
4 r~l2a~i!
Z
ca
~
~ ~ ~c-• o° oF :c~ 3
c~v J N : ~j ~f ~'~ M a~~~O ~g 3 T
m
- R
~ C!
¢ ~
Z
~ 4' S7 I 5[ I L I
~ l;7 `L
~ x '
a ~ I S~
~
¢ p~I 4~ 5 6~ 7~i 8 4
•~~~•
• ~ ~ ~~ •
......
. ~p....
....
•~~•
t....
....
u ~~~~
E • • •
,o ~
>4
1 ~
~ ~
~i
~
~
:p•~,»•
Z - '~ - - =' _ _ . :w . - a ~
~ b• SC y 50 '4 = SC 50 SD I SC Sc 50 7r ~ Nar ~ I
`n 4a2~1NENYY-FIRS~' STREE~ ~
sa so w sc 5c ' so sa c so I so W~~!~ -- 7
• ~ ~ • ~
I ~
^ ~ ~z~y d 5 6_ ~ ~ ~a ;
~ rer ^ ^ !M
_ ~ + -I ~ T R .' (; . T - =~ - . ~. . ;
I I ;r,dc 1vyaa ••~• ;
~
SC 50 ~ Sp }± S~ I SO ~ 5~ ~ SC ~ Se I so ~'':' s5
~ _ _ 1 _
LCC ~ ~ ~ ~
~crl~ouC~ io' I • ~ ~ • ~
e~ocK a • •' • • :
R ~~-~ RC~IARQ TRACT ~' ~
- • i
~+1Rf~o~~yl5;~ • ~ : . • I
~ ~ ~~ .. .• I
VAG ~d .#+~r/A~~.%vu r~.~~ VA{A7E~ r.'.ar¢e n____
~y u sa se sc ~ ~w~ n w• so~ m~
•• •• ..
~ ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ~.R +'~t • it
~ ' ~ 5 I~~e ~~~ r " • - •~
T N ~t ~
~ x ~ U ~ ~ ,(d~ ~ •• •~r~~ ~
' ~ ' •• •• •+~
,y u Sa se tc u u.: w u ~ w t , e• ~~~~e ~~
~4~ TWENTI~TH STREET y° =~~ ~sf
A~`~'AC~I~N~'
: _~
BEFORE DISTRI$UTION CHECK CONTENT O~ ALL FQR CITY CLERR'S ACT~ON
DTSTRIBUTION OF RESOLUTION ~ ~~ ~ ~ ORDINANCE #
Council Meet~ng Date ~~~ ~ ~~~ Tntrod~ced:
Agenda I~em # ~ ~~ Adopted:
A~WAYS PU$LISH ADOPTED ORDINANC~
Was it amended? ~~~ Cross aut Attorney's approval
VOTE: Aff~.rmative ~,!f-y:,~ ?~~; ~ ~ ~ f~'"
, , . . _ _
Negative:
Abstain:
Absent:
PROOF VOTES WITH ANOTHER PERSON BEFORE ANYTHING
DISTRYBUTION: ORIGINAL to be signed, sealed and fi~.ed in Vault.
NEWSPAP~R PUBL~CATIDN (Date: )
Department originat~ng Staff repart( )
ordinance only for Attorney (Claudia Thompson~ 1
C~ty Manager Lynne Barrette ORDINANCES ONLY .~
Agency ment~.~ned in document or staff report
~certif~ed?)
Sub~ec~ f~le (agenda packet) ^ 1 _^
Countex file 3
Others: [Review for departments who need to know)
Airport ~ Park~ng Auth.
Auditor~um Personnel
Building De~t. Planning /
C/ED Police
Finance Purchasing
General Serv. CARS
Engxneering ~ City Yards
Library T Txansportation
Manager Treas~rer
Fire Wate.r
SEND FOUR COPIES QF ALL ORDINANCES Ta:
Dalores O'Brien 1
Sar~ta Monica Munzczpa3. Court
~725 Main Street, Room 11$
Sax~ta Monica, CA 9b401
SEND ONE COFY OF ALL ORDINANCES T0-
Donn~ Christensen 1
Book P~blishing Go. ~ ~
201 Westlake Avenu~ North
Seattle, WA 98109-5293 Tota1 Copies
RESOLUTION NO. $617(CCS)
iCity council Series)
A RESOLIITION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE GITY OF SANTA M~NICA
AMENDING THE HOSPITAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Monica adopted the existing
Haspital Area Specific Plan on September 27, 1988; and
WHEREAS, on December 23~ 1992, Saint John's Hospital and
Health Center filed Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 92-001 to amend
Maps 15 and 16 af the Haspital Area Specific Plan to reflect Zone
Change (ZC) 92-002, which was also filed on December 23, 1993, and
which is being adopted separately by Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Divis~on deemed
complete and accepted far filing SPA 92-001 and ZC 92-009 an
February 25, 1993, and
WHEREAS, Initial Study Checklist (IS) 93-003, which
recomm~nds that a Negative Declaration be adapted for the proposal,
was duly naticed and circulated for public comment; and
WHEREAS, no public comment was received regarding IS 93-
003 during the 3o-day public camment period which ended Apri1 19,
1993; and
1
.
WHEREAS, on May 19, 1993, the Planning Commission
zecommended that the City Council approve ZC 92-002, SPA 92-001 and
IS 93-003; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has revi.ewed and cansidered the
contents of the Final Initial Study and Negative Declaration,
consisting af the Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaratian,
public comments, and respanses; and
WHEREAS, the Final Initial Study and Negative Declaration
adequately review and analyze potential environmental effects of
the proposed proj~ct; and
WHEREAS, the environmental review was conducted in
accordance with applicable State and City CEQA guidelines including
preparation, notification, and cantent requirements; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration is appropriate, in that
the Initial Study provides sufficient data to support a finding
that the project will not have a sign~ficant effeet on the
envi.ronment; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the Hospital Area
Specific P~an is consistent with the Genera~ Plan in that it is
consistent with Land Use and Circulation E~.ement ~b~ective 1.13,
which states that tha City should allow for the expansian of
2
existing hospitals while mini~izing their impacts on adjacent
residential neighborhaods, and it is consistent with Objectives 1
and 13 of the Hospital Area Specific Pian;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MONICA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The documents attached hereto marked Exhibits
A and B are hereby approved and adopted as Map 15 and 16,
respectively, of the Hospital Area Sp~cific Plan of the City of
Santa Monica.
SECTION 2. A Negative Declaration is adopted in that
Initial Study (IS} 93-003 pravides sufficient data to support a
finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution, and thencefarth and thereafter the same shall
be in full force and effect.
APPR~VED AS TO FORM:
~
J SEP LAWRENCE
Acting City Attorney
3
MAP 15
........
. .. . ... . ~ t .~ ~,
~
........ - 0 v °.i
........
~ TWfNTY•TH10.9 C3URT a
f ~-_-r ` 'a . ._ - a - w " ._ ~~ . ry . ' .r ; . a
I !~= ~~ a~ti ~; ~ 35- 3~- 33 '~
t~ ~~ i ~ x-
a ~ ~~ , ~ ~ ~
-yki'~z~ ~ SI -. t YO - ~
~r~1~~~-~. ._ : .._!. ;. . i- 2~ .~=o
1301
S~REET i
1302
~_ ~.. c ~c . u . ._ ~ .. .: j c. ~. .c a
-~~ = i ~ j ~I sl .~ s ac , S
~9 . ;~ ~, i~3 ^~r~ ` ! T . ~9 ~ :g ~ l~=F~
.a a°•~ ~="~~ I . Y~ }r tiy i~b~ ...
~;, w i.o I u I.. ,~ ~ ~~ _
~+ TWEHIji-SEC4N0 • {OLRT ~ ` '
.o ~.c ,c w~~s i w j w i.:, w w ~~ r~ • T
~g . •, I ti ~. ~5 ~i ~ ~ ~ i g ~ '~
;~~~../~ ~ ~~ {~l -2..P^~ --
C. t.. ~ 'v5 ~9 % lJl ~ ± ~ ,.
_~ ~ I " • s~~'~~ ~.
y .- a_ ~ •~ ~~ . ~. ~4 . IC ' 4 _ e5
130i~
_~~E~ a~, 4az;~t5~ STRE~T
Q 3302
Z ..,.,
0
~
~
¢
~p-~
.~~ I}
3LOCK 3
! ORCHARD TRACT
;vl v: !^ ~~ _ -. o
_ _ - •ao -
.• 1
B:CC[ 3
yAC~TEU R~~'~659.~cs1 CCURT _~~~~_~r~ ,
s.: - _ ~ ia _ so I 5~ +o o ~t ~ ~a `•I ~c
~ ° , ~"i~s 3
~i 5~ x~ ~_ J~ R A C T y
~ I ~
~ ~S G `
x ,,~ +'a l_] `-• y P~~ 4 39 1 T P
_1 i ~ r , ~ ~ I ~at~ ,
~
~ , sa 4 ~ sc ~ sa }c sc _ u ~o "555 t6'
3~1 '~--~o-sao,sJ)
IxV~~! "' 6 ,a ~ ~R ~~ 5 .c,l~a`Y~N
1404 ~~ovE~ Fi~~o
34Q2 "'
~
~ 3 3. 8 ~o = qC „ TRACT t~lQ .. g.,Q -
_ ~? ~ ~ ~ , o
' • ..
~ ~ -
G'~~
~ ~' ~c - M u~z~ .~ =V
~4°1 JTWE~fTY-THIRD STR~~T ~
.o i ~ =° ...•:••e
Y 5 ,.i a s~ • b.• •~
~a ; ~ ~- 'RaCr ~.- ~
% '~ ~I g ~ • r~r~r~
l •~~~r~~i
~ F NSdayer ~ ~ O ~` ~•
s ~ o: ~
_ 1' =l _ 'n W F ~
~~ ~l p , •
~ o q ~e~:=o~s •~~•..~
. r~ ~; "~ •~.~~.R~•
•+~~~•
+ :~ 10 : r~i~ . • ~0• . • • !
i. . _ ,
:~a •~~~ •
~ N 7.~r c° ~~ ~c~ ? •~~~~ Q Q
p ALOLM ~ •
N~ N, ,~'~~~ Me5<<~~~ SL6 Q ~1~
Nm N.
R T C T ..:.. a
Q ~ .... o
~ e _ w . r - . - ~ se ~ y;, y: ~ N~ _-m
Z ~ i
o L:D ~~ ~~ ~ E ••"• ;
~ w~p~.~Q~ a s 4 r; 1 s~ 4 ~n~~~ ~
¢ I ~ ' - - -
~ `~ ~ :i ~ ~ •~ +~ ..y s ~,M • r
Z ~I ~ ~ . ~~~ I~ ~~ 0
Q "! ' SC 57 ~0 50 ~o - v ~ u ~ 50 w~ sY~ ~
`~' ~02TWENTY F~RST STREET ..
~: I sc i so so I;a sa eo . So I sc ~~e f0. ~+ s/ __.
•• • ~
I ' '
~ ~ 4+ 5 O_ _ _~ ~ ~4 I
- ~ - a r . _ ° _ i
I ~ 1~~. ~,Ii N i~ ~•~~~ i
tieb ,Pg2e "~' ~
sy ,~ so x~ v- sa , ~ se ' sa . so S6 ~~ s~ _
-c9c _ _' - i -
-~•bti~c~ ~c` I • ~ ~ • .
'~ BEOGK 4 ' ' ' '
' i
R ~~r `~ ~ L 7i l! ~{ 1/ T R AC 7 ~~ ~
M^ ~" ~,~5r~ •••• I
~ . ~ ~ • I
i !"i ~
v~C ED . tI " v~c~rEfl...~..rk~.~ -'-
}y x ~a _ sc sc .w ~c~ se+ r!J'
• ~ I ° ~~ .. .. ..
~ ~ ~~. ..1. ~_•+~ •'~ •
~ . ` 5 . .W 6~' 0 ~ • - . - . c
T ~ I• ~ji~
.
-x ! u" ~ :e : ..~..~...-
, g ! ~ ~ ~. ~ .. ..*.. o
i k ~n I~a ; I., j s~ ~w: ~ s- ~ as ~i F. L*r• N
~4~ 'I YY ~1Y ! JC J H~7 J f7C~ 1 •~Swr~r Caa...~.~t
3rrr ' ~[s iZ C J;
1
J
_ ~ ~
~, -`_,:=~ ~ _--, ~~ _ ~ S~~i~r ~
~ .t. ... ~ F
i ~11S1~i~~
~ • 'r F . ~ ~ -`~w - w s , ~ { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 SCr4a ~ 1 ~
~ ' 4 . ~ ~_ _~_ ' _ __
._.,. ,~. ~ ~ r~ J ~- ; ~ ~ , ~
-A_ ~-. .y`3•n
~~ ' 'l ~ ~ ^~ , -~ ~
_` _ ;v'`=e~~tic SJ ,-.~ ~ ~
~
'wfti•• ~
1 -
_ ~ '~, ' I # ' L
~hFti~- _' ~~ 1 . e
_ ~.G~._ _ I •~~ 1 I I >.~. :'_" ~l
~µ 1 ^ ~ ~ ~ I
, ~,
. ~
. ' , ~
~
l ' I ~ , ~ ~ i i i ' i ~y
y~yr-cCy~'w '_- _
l ~~ ~~1~ ~
, ,, 1^ I :; I~~ ~
~ ~
~. ~ ~J~~ ~~ ,~ • - --
_ ,~ ;.,-~ . _--- -
_ , t r^
~~ t ~ i ; ~.
; ~
~ i ~ I ~ i ~
~ ~c,cy ccty1T~. ! ~ _ _~ '
~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ I I 1 ~ -. ..
. ~~ r I~~, ~ I
, ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~
= I---'{-- - ' =-- _~
= - • t I ~ ~ , , _~ _. ~
p~c-r-4ir ^ ~ -_=Q- 1
~`~ ~Y ~~ ~ ~ ~~ _ ..
=~~ : ; .
-__--_~NT~ ~. - ~ I ~~ ---=_
~~ ; ' ~
I i
i ~ ~ I , ~
. ~ i
E~G_ ~ ~~~~rl~l~alf~~~~~~w~~~~ - ,-__--
~ i . -- i ---
~ i ~ ~- ~
~ ~ I . K{ ~ i
'YY~~ 'h _'_"
t '
~~ I Z ~ ?~ ~• _;' _
~ ~ . C' G: 4~ ~
_ _ Ca~~ _ 'AC=' -
--- 3 s ; _ - _
rti: anr _ _ _ _ M'
Y`~C ~ __ _ _ a
"ti~ ' ~ _ _~..~ -_ " •• ' _
_ I - - i
MAP 16
CP-3 AND CP-5 AREAS
ND#E Per Oblect~~e 36, any propert~es that are c~rrently de~oted to
reSEdential uses shail not be redeveioped unless the exESt~ng
se~~de~t~al unsts are rep4aced or~- or off-sste oc are relocated elsewhere
~n the C~ty
Adopted and approved th~s 29th day of June, 1993.
f~. ~/~
G~ Mayor
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 861'7 (CCS)
was du~y adapted by the City Council of the City af Santa Manica
at a cneeCing therevf held on June 29, 1993 by the folla~ring
Cauncil vate:
Ayes: Councilmembers: Abdo, Genser,
Ho~brook, Olsen,
Vazquez
Noes: Councilmernbers: None
Abstain: Councilmembers: None
Absent: Councilm~mbers: None
Greenberg,
Rosenstein,
ATTEST:
~
: ~~~ ~ ~
l ,~r~~ ~~y~~
City C3e~'k