The URL can be used to link to this page

SR-CC/RA/PA/HA-2 (3)r ~ ' ~ ` ~ .~ U N ~ $ ~~~ FIN.CMA sd./sradopt Santa Monica, Califarn~a Council Me~tzng June 28, 1994 TO Mayor and C~ty Counc~l Chairperson and Housing Authority Members Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency Meml~ers Chairgerson and Parkzng Authority Meml~ers FROM: City Staff SUBJECT• Adoption of tlze FY 1994-95 SudgeG INTROI)iTCT ION Th~ purposes of this report are to l} Present revisions to the City Manager's Proposed Budget far FY 1994-95; 2) Recamrnend reappropriation of funds for capital pro~ects continuing inta FY 1994-95 from FY 1993-94; 3) Recommend adoptzon of the FY 1994-95 Budget Reso~utions of the City Council, the Housing Authority, the Redevelopment Agency, and the Parking Authority; 4) Reca~nmend adoption of resolutions establxshing and setting the amqunt of various General Fund and Environmental Program user fees, setta.ng So~id waste Management Program rates, and an ardinance to provide enforcement power for selected new user fees; 5} Recommend that the Council refer to the City Attorney various General Ftiand user fees now set by ord~nance for preparation of amending ordinances so that they can be set by resolution; and 5} Recommend adoption of a resolution approving various pos~.tion salary changes. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS Revisions to the Proposed Budqet Exhibits A and B outline a set of revisaons to revenues and expenditures, respectively, as presented in the Proposed Budget for FY 1994-95 These revisions reflect responses to concerns raised during Counczl }~udget study sessions, technical ad~ustments/corrections, changes necessztated by more complete information, anct other recommended revis~.ons. Exhibit B also revises varzous position classification allqcatians to present ~hem correctly in the Adopted Budget. Position classification allocations have na buc~c~e~a~y$im'pa~t~ -i- ~~ ~ Responses to Council concerns resulted in a General Fund revenue decrease of $43,~22 due to changes in recommended fee levels and an appropriation increase of $60,OOd to purchase Library CD-ROM equipment, and a$6,000 grant to ~he Santa Monzca Symphony for celebration of its 50th anniversary, thereby reducing the GeneraZ Fund ba~ance by $ZQ9,022. The imgact o€ these changes and aZZ other changes deta~led on the attached exhibits on the FY 1994-95 Genaral Fund balance zs summariaed as foZlows In~tial PzQposed Recommended Final Proposed FY1994-95 Budqet Chanqes FY1994-95 Budqet 6/3a/94 Estimated Actuai Fund Balance $ 9,800,OQ0 $ -a- $ 9,800,000 Plus Revenues 113,653,727 81~686 113,735,413 Less Expend~tures 112,615,958 (781,252) I11,834,706 Balance Sheet Changes {1,015~8Q1) (825,000} (1~840,501) 6/30/95 Budgeted F~.ind Balance $ 9,821,968 $ 37,938 $ 9,859,906 The impact of changes recommended far all other funds is set forth in the attached exhibits. Capital Pro~ect Reappropriations As an prior years, the attached budget resolutions anclude a reqezest for reapprogriat~on af certain funds for prev~ously approved capital improvement pro7ects Reappropriations are requested for unexpended encumbrances and t~nencumbered balances This aet~on allows continued expenditures for capital pro~ects up to the amounts previously authorized The exact amaunt of funds reappropriated depends upon encumbrances remaining and expenditures made as af the close of FY 1993-94 After financial reports are avai2ab2e in Zate July ~994, staff will review the status of each project and make a preliminary determination of reappropriation amounts. These amounts will be f~nalized upan comgletion of the financial audit later in the Fall As part of the FY 1994-95 m~d-year budget report, sta~f will report to Council on the final amount of all reappropriations - 2 - Budqet Resolutions The resolutions presented for adoption at Exhibi~ C enable the Council to adopt the FY 1994-95 City Sudget at the level of revenue account, expead~ture appropriations ~n the operating budget at the ma~or account group level within a fund for each department, and in the capital improvements program budgat at the program categary level wathin a fund These revenue and appropriation categoraes are ident3cal to those approved for the FY 1993-94 Budget. User Fees and Solid Waste Manaqement Rates Pursuant to Council policy to recover up to the actual costs of services prov~ded which directly benefit individuals, staff recommends that various existing user fees be increased, and various new user fees be established. Increases are recommended based on a recently completed comprehensive fee study. It is C~ty po~icy to completely review user fees every five years The study indicat~d that increases wil~. enable the City to recover associated costs which have zncreased sznce fees were last set. The comprehens~ve ~ee study also recommended that various new user fees be established so that persons directly benefzting from the associated services provided pay for the services, rather than the general taxpayer Council reviewed staff's recommendatzons during the budget study sessions and raised questions about thirty-one user fees Staff has re-evaluated the previously recommended fees and bel~.eves that no fee level changes are warranted for twenty user fees Fee levels were either increased or decreased for eleven other user fees Detailed information for each of these thir~y-one fees a.s presented at Exhibit D An implement~.ng resolution establ3shxng and sattzng the amount of various existing and nev~ user fees, and an ordinance providing enforcement power for selected new user feea are at Exhibit D Appropriate publ~.c notices have been published in accordance with law - 3 - The Proposed Budget also recommenas increasing Solzd waste Management rates to finance on-going waste callection operations, administration af state-mandated diverszon requirements and enhanc~men~s to the Santa Monica Recycling Program It is anticzpaLed that the new rate structuze wi7.l adequaCely finance activities through ~7une o~ 1996 Implementation of tYte recycling enhancements will be accompanied by a comprehensive public education and outreach ef€ort An implement~ng reaolu~ion xs alsa a~ Exh~bit D It is current City policy that all user fees be set by resolution Some user fees, however, have been prevzausly set by ordinance. To be consistent wzth City palicy, it is theretare also recommend~d that the user fees listed at Exhibit E be referred ta the Csty Attorney for the preparation of ordinance amendments so that, zn the future, these user fees can be set by reso7.utian. Personnel Chanqes As part of the budget process, compensation change requests were reviewed by the Personnel Department in accordance wit2z existing Administrative Instruction.s All recommended saZary changes wiZl be incorporated into the proposed FY 1994-95 budget upon Council adoption of the resolution at Exhzbit F RECDNIMENbATIONS It is respectfully recommended that the City Council, Housing Author~ty, Redevelopment Agency and Parkzng Authority adopt resolutions at Exhihiti C appraving the Proposed FY 1994-95 Budget, as amended by this staff report and Exhibits A and S atta~hed hereto; ad~pt the resolutions at Exhibit D establish~ng and settsng tha amount of various user fees and rates, and an ordinance providing enforcement power for selected new usar fees, refer the fees listed at Exhibit E to the City attorney for preparation of ordinance amendments allowing these fees to be ~et by resolution, and adogt the attached resalution at Exhibit F revising var~ous salary rates - 4 - Exhibits- A- Revisions to FY 1994-95 Proposed Revenue Sstimates B- Revisions to the Proposed FY 1994-95 Budget Appropriations/ Position Classification Ailocations C - Budget Adoptian Resolutiona D- Re-evaluation of Various User Fee Levals, Resolutions Establishing and Setting the Amounr of various User Fees and Rates, and an Ordinance Providing Enforcement Power for Selected New User Fees E- F22s to be R2ferred to City Attorney for Preparation of ~rdinance Amendments F - Saiary Change Resolutian Prepared by Lynne Barrette, Assistant City Manager Katie Lichtig, Senaor Management Analyst Mike Dennis, Finance Director Karen Sancroft, Persannel Director Ralph Bursey, Revenue Manager/Treasur~r David Carr, Assistant Revenue Manager John Karcic, Budget Coordinator David Chamherlin, Senior Administrative Analyst Bill Jias, Senior Accountant - 5 - F'UNI)/ AC:CU[INT N[7MBER ACC'DU67T TITLR -------------- ----------------- - (;rnEardl fll.-1~0-224-pp000-[10J.R 10000 Lnr.al Public Safct,y Fund9 Ol 900 511~ODU00-(7101-1UUU~ Swlm Pc~nl - i~iricuLn 1 Ul Z10 415 ODU00-OA3l-lUUUU Tt•aLfic; Mit.z.q~tion r-~ i U1 13U 2l4 06000-0600-1U0UU Recomm FQe increase Rccount. 4uk~-Total Cener~l Fund Ch~inyn~~ All Uther General Fu[1d Tot.al~; Cc:nr:ral Fsanci ]'ota7 REVISI6N5 TO FY 1994/y5 E'ROl'OSE.U AEVENLIE ~51'1NInTES PR~['OSF;I) I'Y 94/9 ; awce~r ~sr ; ~l4,nnn kEVISLU FY 34/95 NET AiTGC;F.T RST CHAN(;~ $ 559,000 $ 135,000 PXPT~AN7ITION 0~' (_'HANl;E xo reflect. rr.vl=;~,c9 estimate from the State oi Y'PVf'CSI1H'.i f~~:,m Ltin, 1/? r,ent sales tax fur pizk~li,r, ~3~~af.ety This revenur: i<: slufted frorri tl~~r Sf.al.c': C,U lUCal ynvernments to partially oLF:;rt. local ~>ro~>erty t.ax rrrvenur t.aken by the SI_al_e 3U,610 7.F,8(1 (22,9iS11 To reflect acfieduliny r.h~ng.r,~; by t.he °;chool di5t.,rir:t 1,3','1.,955 1,365,591 12,638 To rcflect a revia;rd r..~at~mat.c nf Y..h~ use 'Fraff.ia Mikig~tion deferred revenuev io o£fset General 1'und staiL and other c~dmznistiat.lvc costs of t_hr City's Trnn:aportat.lon Manaqement Plan 1,1~O,bpO 1,1~1,478 (q3,022~ To rr_flect change~ rr.c~uested k~y Cnunnil during budqet etudy seasions $ 2,H58,U63 $ 3,039,749 f 81,66ti 110,6`35~664 ilU,fi35,GFi4 f.} $113,653,727 $i13,7~5,41j ~ 81,GBf, ~ h'i td h-I H a RT:VISIONS TO h'Y 1994/9S k~itUlUSED RFVT•,NiTE ESTI[hflTRS I'UNU/ ACCOUNT NLiMBEk ACC:UUNT TETLE Wat,cr 25 540 6'l1-fll)4qU-Ol.dS lUUUU Water Miscellaneou~.- Nqn-pPerat.in~ F3olid WasLe 25~~bqIS-441-(}!}q(~p i~519 1000U Yrivate ]taul~r Ral.r Sizr<~hdrqe 7~ z r~?r?rf 33 6dU-631-UUUUU-(7146-100~i) F7~A I N ~ All Other - Tol_al GRAND TCITAT~ - GROSS Lesa Reimbursements dnd Transfcrs GRANI) 'i'U9'AL~ ~ NET PRUP0.9L•'ll RP•,V]S~L~ F'Y 34/JS FY 94/95 NFCI' SIIDC;F.T 1?ST Hl]I)C,FI'1' ES'P C:IIANC;E RXPI,ANATION Ul~ CEI71N(;F. 87,95G 98,IU1 1p,752 To refl.ect revised Cex'm~; for ~ prripe>rty ledse 4AI),000 354,U(!l} (1.2f.,,nony 1'o ref.lect. a change Lo Sr..pt.embr;r 1, 1994 for implemr.rikation of a aurcharge on przvat.e hauless operal.irly ~n SanLa Monzca 1,SOO,OOU 1,Fn~i,7S14 104,7U0 1'o retlec.~t. .i~:tual aw~zi•di~d funding from t.he T'AA tUi' LE!@, f]P..W Aixport Safety Impzovement_ ~renk 98. OA7, 999 9B, (l4 7, 994 6 $213,7G9,GA1 $213,840,AI9 $ 71,1~8 117,791,7.Iti) (17,7J1,21Sj 0 $i95,47R,4i)fi $196,049,b44 $ 7'1,138 EXHIBIT B REVISIONS TO THE PROP03ED FY1994-95 BIIDG$T APPROPRIATIONS/POSITION CLASSIFICATIDN ALLOCATIONS Revised Proposed Proposed Net Fund/Department Sudc~et Budqet Chanqe General Fund Salance $ 9,800~000 $ 9,800,00~ $ -0- (FY1993-94 ending Balanca) General/City Cauncil $ 188,993 $ 192,493 $ 3,Sp0 General/Community and 12,985,677 13,309,8flQ 324,123 Cultural Services General/Plann~.ng and 4,7U2rd73 4,71a,~73 8,40o Community Development General/ 1,482,345 1,977,524 (4,725} Resource Management General/Environmental 8,445,781 6,577,121 ].31,340 and Publ~c Works Management Explanation o~ Chanqes Change proposed $400,OQ0 reserve to be a reserve £or a $400,d00 loan to the nesaly establishe$ Earthquake Recovery lzedevelopment Pro- ~ect Increase appropr~a- tion to support onga- ing Iobbying effprts far earthquake recov- ery assistance. Tncrease approprza- tion for FY1994-95 Community Development Program funding ($308,503}, and pro- vide funding to dis- tract far use of the h~.gh school swimining pool by City permit groups {$15,620} Increase approprza- tion for expansion of Regulation xv Rideshare Program Inerease is finaneed by Proposition C lo- cal return revenues already reflected in Proposed Budget. Decrease approprza- tian far FY1994-95 Community nevelopment Program funding Increase appropria- tion to add 1.5 FTE grant funded posi- tions of C~.vil Engi- neer to meet workload demands. - 1 - E7CI3IBIT B REVIS~ONS TO THE PROPOSED FY1994-95 HUDGET APPROPRIATIONS/POS~T~ON CLASSIFICATTON ALLOCATIONS Revised Propased Proposed i~iet Explanatxon af Fund/Department Budqet Budqet Chanqe Chanqes General/Non-Departmental $ 23,611,839 $ 23,543,586 $ {58,253) Increase appropria- -All Others tion to transfer (Non-Assa.gnable) funds ta the Civic Auditorzum F~nd for plannsng for future use of Civic Audito- r~.um ($75, 000} , to grant €unds to the Santa Monica Symphony for 50th Anniversary Celebration {$6,000}; and decrease operat- ing transfer to the Redevelopment, Agency ~o correct calcula- tion error ($-149~253) General/Non-Departmental Z0,293,299 9,p72,542 {1,220,757) Decrease appropria- -Retirement tlon to reflect new PERS rates. General/Non-Departmental {9,961,782} (9,996,252) (14,480) Change appropriation -Interfund due to change in PERS Transactians rates ($11b,850}, and to recognize transfer from Miscellaneous Grants Fund for grant funded pasition in- creas~ to Environmen- tal and Public Works tKanagement Department ($-131,340). General/Capital 1,961,289 2,021,289 60,000 Appropriate funds to Improvements- purchase CD-ROM General Government equipment for the L~brary General/All Other 58,426,444 58,425,444 -0- Appropriations Total General Fund $112,615~958 $111,834,706 $ (767.,252~ - 2 - FIN:CMD:BT:kf/resoraap Santa Monica, California Redeve~apmen~ Agency M~eting• June 28, 1994 RESOLUTIQN NO. 44~ (Redevelopment Agency Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA APPROVING ITS SUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 WHEREAS, the proposed budget for the fiscal year 199~-95 was submitted to the Redevelapment Agency as dire~ted by Section 33612 af ~he Cali~ornia Hea~th and Safety Code; and WHEREAS, the Red~velopment Agency held a public h~aring on said budget after a notice af said budget hearing was published not less than ten (Z~) days prior thereto; and WHEREAS, atter said public hearzng, the Redeve~opment Agency considered further its proposed budget, NOW THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA RESO~VES AS FOLLQWS: SECTION 1. That the budget for the ~iscal year 1994-95, as submitted by the Executive Director and revised by the Redevelopment Agency, which budget is entitled "City of Santa Monaca, Proposed Budget, 1994-95", a copy of which budget is attached here~o, is hereby approved and adopted. In adopting said budget, the Redevelopment Agency intends ta, and by this - 1 - Section does, adopt and approve ~he total operating appropriatian, consis~ing of Salaries and Wages, Supplies and Expenses, and Capital outlay ma~or expenditure cat~gories, each program category of ~he Capital Improvements Budget, and the r~v~nue detail, and does authorize the Executive Director to a~lot as appraprzated. SECTION 2. That a certified copy of sa~d budget be filed with the Director af Finance/City Controller and with the City Clerk and certified copies of said budget be reproduced and made available tor use as directed by Section 1505 of the Charter of said City. SECTIQN 3_ That ~n adopting said budget, the Redevelopment Agency does hereby reappropriate the unencumbered balances and unexpended encumbrances of the 1993-94 Capital Im~rovements Sudget in an amount not to exceed $1,397,685. SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify ~o the adoption of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in fu~l force and effect. APPROVED AS TO FORM• ~~~5~1(r.A~~ / ~-~'C-~ MARSHA J~NES MOUTRIE City Attorney - 2 - $XHIBIT B REVISIQNS TO THE PROPOSED FY1994-95 BUDGET APPROPRTATIONS/P~SiTION CLASSIFICATION ALLQCATIONS Fund/Department Mascellaneous Grants/ Capital Improvements- Streets, Traffic Cantrol & Parking Miscellaneous Grants/ Interfund Transactions Miscellaneous Grants/ All Other Appropriations Total Miscellaneaus Grants Water/ Environmen~al and P~blic Works Nlanagement Water/All Other Appropriations TotaJ. Water Fund Revised Proposed Proposed Net ~xplanation af Budqet Budqet Chanqe Chanqes $ 1,730,400 $ 1,848,OOb $i1e,000 Increase appragria- tion to correct amount far Gate- way/PCH Coastal Cor- ridor Improvements Capital project ($116, ~OQ} , 1,059,352 1,190,692 131,340 Estabiish a technical apprapriation ta transfer fund to the General Fund to fi- nance grant funded positians increase in the Environmental and Pubiic Works Manage- ment Department. ($13I,34Q}. 2,1$5,2~0 2,185,200 -0- $ 4,974,552 $ 5,223~892 $ 8,108,539 $ 8,141,254 3,7~3,419 3,743,419 $249,340 $ 32,715 Decrease apprapria- tian for retirement expense due to new rates {-$Z3,719), and reappropriate FY1993- 44 funds for various supplies, services and equipment items which were ordered in FY1993-94, but which will be paid for in FY1994-95 with funds carraed over zn the fund balance ($46,434). -0- $11~851,958 $11,884r673 $ 32.715 - 5 - EXHIBIT B REVISIONS TO THE PROPOSED FY1994-95 BUDGST APPROPRIATIONS/POSITION CLASSIFICATIQN ALLOCATIONS Fund/Department Solid Waste l~anagement/Environmental and P~xblic Works Management Solid Waste Management/ AIi Other Appropriations Total Solid Waste Management Fund Pier/Police Department Pier/All Other Approgr~.ations Total Pier Fund Revised Proposed Proposed Budqet Sudqet $ 8,697,602 $ 8,688,376 1,181,581 1.181,581 .~ 7~017~18_7 yl 7rp0J~771 $ $76,747 $ 571,485 2,47fi,902 2,476,902 $ 3,p47r649 $ 3,048,3$7 Net Explanation of Chanqe Chanqes $ (9,226} Decrease appropria- tion for retirement axpense due ta new rates (-$18,570}, and reappropriate F'Y1993- 94 funds for various supplies, serv~ces and equipment ~tems which were ordered in FY 1993-94, but which will be paid for in FY 1994-95 with funds carried over in the fund balance {$9,344). -0- $ 9 226 $ 738 Correct appropriation for retirement exp- ense -0- $ 738 Wastewater/ Environmental and Publ~c Management Wastewater/AII Other Appropriation Total wastewater Fund $Z0,311,475 $10,362,445 5,25I,677 5,252,677 $15~563~152 $15,614,122 $ 5D,97b Decrease appropria- tion far retirement expense due to new rates {-$6,829); and reappropriate FX1993- 94 funds for vara.ous equipment items which were ordered in FY1993-94 but which will be paid for in FY1994-95 with funds carried over in the fund balance {$57,799} -0- $ 50~970 - 6 - EXHIBIT B REVISIQNS TO THE PROPOSED FY1994-95 HUDGET APPRQPRIATIONS/POSITION CLASSIFICATION ALLOCATIONS Fund/Department Ci~ic Aud~torium/ Community and Cultural Services Civic Auditorium/ Non-Departmental- Interfund Transactions Civic Auditorium/ All Other Appropriations Total Civic Auditarium Fund Airport-Special Aviation/Resource Management Airport-Special Avlation/ Capita~ Impravements -General Government Airport- Special Aviation/ All Other Appropr~.ations Total Airport-Spec~al Aviation Funds Revxsed Proposed Proposed Net Explanation of 8udqet Budqet Chanqe Chanqes $ 1,825,960 $ 1,854,775 $ 24,815 Decrease appropria- tion far ret~rement expens~ due to new rates {-7,513), and reappropriate ~Y1993- 94 funds for various supply and capital outlay items whxch were ordered in FY1993-94, but will be pa3d for in FY1994-95 with €unds carried aver i~ the fund balance ($32,328} -D- (75,000} {75,OOOa Technical appropria- tion to imp].ement transfer of funds from the General Fund. 128,445 203,445 75,Q00 Appropriation in- creases for planning £or future use of Civic Aur3itorzutrt $ 1~954,405 $ 1,979,Z20 $ 24~815 $ 1,686,218 $ 1,672,779 $(13,439) Decrease appropria-- ~ion fvr retirement expense due to new rates (-$2.I20), and reduce other operat- ing costs to offset increase in FAA grant pro~ect capital im- provement pro~ect funding (-$11,3~9}. 1,73.6,667 I,833,000 116,333 Increase approp~ia- tion for FAA Grant for sa£ety and noise mitigation improve- ments at Santa MoniCa Airpart FinanCed by iilcrease in FAA reve- nues, decrease in Airport operating budget and avaYlahle fund balance. 247,593 247,593 -0- $ 3~650~478 $ 3~753~372 $102~894 - 7 - EXHIBIT B REVISIONS TO THE PR~POSED FY1994-95 BUDGET APPROFRIATIDNS/POSITION CLASSIFICATION ALLOCATIONS Revised Proposed Proposed I3et ~xplanation of Fund~Department Budc{et Budqet Chanqe Chanqes Cemetery/Environmental $ 717,879 $ 741,401 $ 23,522 Decrease appropria- and Publ~c Works tifln far rat~rement Nlanagement expense due to new rates {-$1,642} and reappropr~ate FY1993- 94 funds for cap~tal autlay equipment which was ordered in FY 1993-94, but will be paid for in the fund balance ($25,164}. Cemetery/Al1 Dther 40,000 40,000 -0- Apgropr~ations Total/Cemetery Fund $ „757,879 $ 781,401 $ 23~522 Transportation/Municipal $18,593,950 $18,575,489 $ (18,461} Decrease apprapria- Bus Lines tion for retirement expense due to new rates (-$55,152a; and reappropr~ate FY1993- 94 funds for various Capital outlay equip- ment ~tems wh~ch were ordered in FY1993-94, }~ut will be paid for in FY1994-95 with funds carriea over in the fund balance ~$36,691). Transportation/Al1 Other 4,936,000 4,936,000 -0- Appropriations Total Transportation Fund $23,529,950 $23.511,4B9 $ 18 461 Cab1E/City Manager $ 532,668 $ 542,848 $ 10,180 Decrease appropria- tion for retirement expense due to new rates {-$4,993} and reappropriate FY1993- 94 funds for various supplies and servic- es, which were or- dered in FY1993-94, but will be paid for ir1 FY1994-95 with funds carried over in the fund balance {$15,173). Cable/ {504,847) {504,847] -0- A11 Other Appropriations Total Ca}ale ~znd $ ~7r821 $ 38rOfl1 $ 1Q.18d _ g _ $xHZS=T s REVISIONS TO THE PROPOSED FY1994-95 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS/POSITION CLASSIFICATION ALLOCATIQNS Fund/Department Proposed BudcTet $ 2~573,30Q Revised Proposed Budqet $ 2,572,899 Net Explanatian of ChancTe Chanqes $ (401} All of these self- insurance fund reduc- tivns reflect sma].ler reimbursements to the $ 38p} Workers' Compensation Ft.ind (far wark which is of benefit to these other self-sn- surance funds) due to $ 263) reduced retirement expense in the Workers' Compensation Fund $(1,665? Decrease appropria- tion for retirement e~ense due to change in PERS rates 1,D44 Reflects reduction in aperat~ng cost reim- bursements from other self-insurance funds due to reduced re- tirement expense in the GrYorkers' Campen- satzon F~nr3 -4- Comprehensive Self-Insurance Fund Bus Self-Insurance Fund Auto Self-Insurance Fund Workers' Compensation Seif-Insurance/City Manager Workers' Compensation Self-insurance/Interfund Transfers Workers' Compensation Self-Insurance/ All Other Appropriations TotaZ/ Workers' Compensation Self-Insurance Fund $ 1~139,050 $ 1,138,670 $ fi21,000 $ 620,737 $ 552,750 $ 551,085 (305,121) {304,077) 3,416,QQ0 3,416,OOD .r _. ~ ., ., ., ~ ~. ~. ~ ti. ~ r .. „ _. ~ ,.., .. - 9 - $ 62~) POSITION CLASSIFICAT2013 ALLOCATION CS,ANGBS TO THS PROPOSSD FY 1994-95 GITY BIIDGST FLiND~DEPT~DIV General/Fire/Fire Prevention General/Police/Office of Adminzstrat~.ve Services General/Police/office of Special Enforcement POST',I'IQN CLASSIFICATION IN PROPOS~A SUDGET 1 0 Business Assastant 3 D Staff Assistan~ ITT 1 0 Records P7anager 1 0 Seniar ID Technician 1 fl Staff Assistant IV 1 0 Seniar Crossing Guard 1tEVISED POSITIDN CL1a5 S IFICATION 1 0 Staff Assistanti III 3.0 Transcriber Typist 1.0 Records Mgmt Coard 1 b ID Section Supervisor 1 0 Personnel Technician 1 0 Crossing Guard Supv Genaral/Environmentai & 1.0 Mechanic I Public Works Management/ Fleet Management and Maintenance Management General/~nv~ronmental & 1 0 Dlrector af Ganeral Public Wor3cs Management/ Servicas Administrative Servzces 1 0 Maintenance Manager 1 p Director of Environ- mental & Public works Management General/Environmental & 1 a Senior Civz]. Engineering 1 0 Sercior Civi~ Engi- Public Works Management/ Drafting Technician neering Technic3an Cavil Engineering Beach/Environmental & 1 0 Grounds Maint Worker 1 Q Maintenance Worker I Public Works Management/ Beach Maintenance Water/Environmental & 1 0 Laboratory Technician Public War3cs Irlanagement~ Water 1 0 Utility Locator 1 0 Meter Reader General/Finance/Accounting 3 0 Senior Accountant General/Planning & Comm_ 1 0 Planning, P2rmit and Development/Build~ng and Pro~ect Supervisor Safety Genera7./Cammunity & Cultural Serv~ces/ Community and Sr Programs 1 Q Senior Servaces Manager General/Community & Cultural Services/ Event Facillties 1 0 Water Laboratory TechniCZan 1 p Underground Utzlity Locator 1 0 Water M2ter Reader 1 0 Payroll Supervzsar 1 D Accounts Payable Supv. 1 p General i,edger Supv 1.0 Building and Zoning Enforcement Manager 1_0 Senzor and Cammunity Programs Manager 1.~ Event Facllities Business 1.0 Event Facilities SupErvisor 5ervices Supervisar - 10 - REVISEA 6/~8/94 POSITION CLASSIFZCATION ALLDCATION CHRiQGES TO THE PROPOSED FY 1494-95 CITY BUbGET FUND/~EPT/bTV POSITION CLASSIFICATIO:; IN PROPOSED BUDGET REVISE~ POSITZON CLASSIFICATION General/Community & Cultural Services/ Humari 5ervices General/Community & Cultural 5ervices/ Communi~y and Senior Programs 1.0 ADA/Disability and Senior Serv~ces Cccrdinator 1.0 Recreation Center Admir,~strator 1.0 Vira~~ia Avenue Park Center Administratpr 1.0 staff Assistan* III 3.0 ~ecreation coo~dznatczs General/Resource Manaq~?- 1.0 ~'ouszrg Rssistance ment/Housing & Redevel- Coardina~or opment Pier/Resource Manage- 1.0 Ecanomzc Deve.~,opment ment/Economic D~vel- tianager opment-Pier l.fl Senior Administrative Analyst 1.0 ComTUnity Center Supervisor 1 . ~ Comc*;unity Center Supe_~~.sor l.a Administrative Analyst 2.5 Recreation Coord~nators 0.5 A~~in~s~rative ~r.~lyst ~.v Housi;g Assistance Supervisor 1.Q Administrative Services Officer - 11 - FIN:CMD:BT:kf/resoccap Santa Monica, Caiifornia Counci~ Meeting: June 28, 1994 RESOLUTION NO 8769 (Caty Council Series} A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA NIQNICA APPROVING ITS BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 WHEREA$, the proposed budget for the f~.scal year 1994-95 was submstted to the City Cauncil thsrty-f~ve (35) days prior ta July 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, ~he City Counc~.l held a p~blic hearing on said budget after a notice of said}audget hearing was published not less than ten (10? days pr3or thereto; and WHEREAS, after said public hearing, the City Council conszaered further its pr4posed budget, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY CQi7NCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the budget for the fiscal year 1994-95, as sukam~tted by the City Manager ana revised by the City Council, which i~udget as e:nti~led "City of Santa Monica, Prap~sed Sudg~t, 1994-95", a copy of which budget is attached hereto, is hereby approved and adapted. In adopting said budget, the City Council intends to, and by this Section does, adopt and approve rhe totial operating appropriation for each departmental and non-departmental operating budget, cons3sting of Salaries and Wages, Supplies and - 1 - Expenses, ana Capital Out~ay major expenditure ~ategories, each ~rogram category of ~he Capital Improvements Budget, and the revenue detail, and does authQrize t~e Ci~y Manager to allot by ~a~or expenditure cat~gary as appropr~ated. SECT~ON 2. That in adopting said budget, the City Council does hereby reappropriate the un~ncumi~ered balances and un~xgended encumbrances of the ~993-94 Capital Improvements Budget ~r. an amount not to exceed $18,476,851 frvm the General Fund "'Ganned" reserve for continuing capital pro~ects, the Mal~ Cert~~~cates of Participation reserve, the Library General obligation Bond reserve, and deferred revenue accounts der~ved from various rnitigatlon fees, and not to exceed the follow~ng amounts :rom th~ 1993-94 Capital ~mpravements Budget unencumbered balances an~ unexpended encumiarances for the fo~lowing respective funds: Fund ~eapnro~riation Amount Not ta Exceed Beacn $ 950,90~ TORCA $ 6,169,892 Redevelopment S 1,397,66~ CDBG $ ?,43~,306 Miscel~aneous Grants $12,025,730 Wa~er $ 1,987,107 Solid Waste ManagerrEent ~ 338,236 Pier $ 1,303,965 Wastewater $15,~92,713 Civ3c Auditarzum $ 895,3~5 AirporL* $ 854,266 - 2 - CemeCery TranSportation Gas Tax Parks and RecreaLian Parking Authority $ 97, 799 $ 5,587,057 $ l, 1Q6, 334 $ 292,652 $ 25,374 *Zncludes Airport Specia~ Aviatian Fund SECTION 3. That the budgets af the Housing Authori~y, Redevelapment Agency, and Park~ng Authorzty have been rev~ewed by ~he City Council and are hereby approved and adopted. SECTIQN 4. That a certified cQpy af said budget be fi~ed with the Director of Finance/City Contraller and with ~he City Clerk and certified copies af said budget be reproduced and made available for use as directed by Section 15Q5 of the Charter of said City. SEGTION 5. The City Clerk sha~l certify to th~ adoption of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effec~ AFPROVED AS 'FO FORM: _ ~2,~,{.~" ~..u.~-~,M' ~~'~'~~-~' r f 5f'"~ l MARSHA J~VES MOLTTRIE City Attorney - 3 - Adopted and approved th~s 2$th of June. 1994 _ Q '`~~ ~C Mayor I~ereby cert~fy that the foregoing Resolution 8769 (CCS) was duly adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on the 28th of 7une, ]99~ byr the fol~ow~ng ~ote Ayes Councilmembers Abdo, Genser. Greenberg, Holbrook. Olsen, Rosenstein. Vazc~uez Noes Councilmembers None Abstain Councilmembers None Absent Councilrnembers- None ATTEST_ i~/.~ilGi~ ~~~~~`~*~ ~ City Clerk ~ _ rIN:CMD•BT:kf/resohaap Santa Monica, Ca~ifornia Housing Authority Meeting: June 28, 1994 RESOLUTION NO. fi~ {Housing Authority 5eries) A RESOLUT~ON OF THE HOUSINC- AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONIGA APPROVING ITS BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 WHEREAS, the proposed budget for the fiscal year ~99~-95 was subrniCted to the Housing Authority thirty-five (35S days prior to July 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, ~he Housing Authority he~d a public hearing on said budget after a notice of said budget hearing was published not less than ten (107 dGys prior thereto; and WHEREAS, after said public hearing, the Housing Authority considered further its proposed budget, NOW THEREFORE, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That the budget for the tiscal year 1994-95, as submztted by the City Manager and revised by -the Housing Authority, which budget is entitled "City of Santa Monica, ~ Praposecl Budge~, 1.994-95", a copy of which budget is a~tached hereto, is hereby approved and adopted_ In adopting sa~d budget, ~he Housing Authority in~.ends to, and by this Section daes. adopt - 1 - and apprQVe the ~otal ~peraLing appropriat~on cansisting of Salaries ana Wages, Supplies and Expenses ana ~apita~ Outlay, and revenue 3e~a~1, and does au~horize the Ci~y Manager to allat as appropr;ated SECTION 2. That a certified copy of said budget be =i~ed with the Director of Finance/City Controller anci with the Ci~y Clerx and certified capies af said budget be ~eproduced and r~ade available for use as dir~cted by Sectian 1505 of the Charter c~ ~aid City SEC^'I~N 3. The City Clerk shall certify ~o the adop~~cr of ~his Res~lution, and thenceforth and th~reaiter ~he same srall be in full force and e~fect. APPROVE^ AS TO FQRM: f~l~~~~~ f ~~ ti~RSHA ~ NES MOUTRIE L~ty Attorney - 2 - Adapted and approved thls 2$th day of June, 1994 ~~a Chair I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No b3 (HAS) was duly adopted at a meeting of t~e Hausu~g Commiss~on held on the 2$th day of June, 1994 by the following ~~ote • Ayes. Commissioners Noes Commiss~oners Abstatn Commissioners Absent Commissianers Abdo. Genser, Greenb~rg, Halbrook, Olsen, Roser3stein, Vazquez None Nane None ATTEST ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ J SecreCarv ~IN:CMD:BT:kf~resoraap Santa Monica, California Redevelapmen~ Agency Meeting: June 28, 1994 RESOLUTION NO. 44ti {Redevelopment Agency Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVEL~PMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA APPROVING ITS BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 WHEREAS, the propased budget for the ~iscal year ~994-95 was submi~ted to the Redevelopment Agency as directed by Section 33612 of ~he California Health and Safety Code; and WHEREAS, thE Redevelopment Agency h~ld a public hearing on said budget after a notice of said budget hearing was published not Iess than ten (10) days prior thereto; and WHEREAS, after said pu~lic hearing, the Redeve~apm~nt Agency considered further its praposed budgeL, NOW THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS. SECTION 1. Tha~ the budget for the fiscal year 1.994-95, as submitted by the Executive Director and revised by the Redev~lopment Agency, which hudget is entitled "City of San.ta Monica, Proposed Budget, 1994-95'", a copy of which budge~ is ~ attached here~o, is hereby approved and adopted. In adapta,ng said budget, the Redeve~opment Agency intends to, and by this - 1 - Section does, adopt and approve the total operating appropr~at~an, cansas~ing of Salari~s and Wages, Supplies and Expenses, and Capi~al Outlay ma~or expenditu~e categaries, each program categary ot-~he Capi~a~ Improvements Budget, and the revenue detail, and does authorize the Execut~ve Direc~ar to aliot as appropr~ated. SECTIDN 2. That a certified copy af sa~d budget be filea with the Director of Finance/City Controller and w~th the City C1erk and certified copies of said budget be repraduced and maae avaiiable for use as directed by Section 1505 af the Charter af said Czty. SECTION 3. That in adopting said budget, th~ Redevelopment Agency daes hereby reappropriate the unencumbered balances and unexpended encumbrances of the 1993-94 Capital Imprcvements Budget in an amount not to exc~ed $1.397,685. SECTION 4. Th~ Secretary shall certify ta the adop~ion of this Reso~u~ion, and thenceforth and thereafter the same sha~l be in full force and ~ffect_ APPROVED AS TO FORM: / ~~?.~~,~,~.:;~..~ ~.~ MARSHA J~VES MOUTRIE City Attorney - 2 - Adopte~ and approved ttus 28th day of June, 1994 - ,~ ~ Chair I hereby cerhfy that the foregorng Resvlution I~o 4~6 (RAS) was duly adopted at a meet~ng af the Redevelppment Agency held on the 28th day af June, 1994 by the followmg vote Ayes Agency Member. Abdo, Genser, Greenberg, Holbrooic, Olsen, Rosenstein, Vazquez Noes: Agency Member: None Ahstam Agency Member: None Absent: Agency Member: Nane ATTEST ~ ~ ~~ ~';.~~~~_~ ~ ' Secret~ry FTN:CMD:BT:kf:resopaap Santa Monica, Califoxnia Parking Au~horzty Meeting: June 28, 1994 RESOLUTION NO. 223 {Parking Authority Series} A RESOLUTION OF THE Pp.RKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY ~F SANTA MONICA APPROVING ITS BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 WHEREAS, the proposed budget for the f~.sca1 year 1994-95 was submitted to the Parking Authority thirty-five (35) days prior to July l, 3994; and WHEREAS, the Parking P,utharit~ held a public hearing on sa3d budget after a natice of said Iaudget hearzng was pub~ished not less than ten (10) days prior thereto; and WHEREAS, after said public hearing, the Parking Authority considered further its proposed budget, NOW THEREFQRE, THE PARKING AUTH~RITY OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA RESOLVES AS FOLL~WS: SECTION 1. That the budget for the fiscal year ~994-95, as submitted by the Executive Director and revised by the Parking Autharity, which buciget is ent~.tled "City af Santa Monica, Proposed Budget, 1994-95", a capy of which budget is attached hereta, is hereb~ approved and adopted. In adopting said hudget, the Parking Author~ty intends ta, and by this Section does, adop~. and approve the tatal operating appropriatzan, consisting of Salaries and Wages, Supplies and Expenses, and Capital out~.ay - 1 - malor expenaiture categor~es, each program category of the Capital Improv~ments B~dget, and the revenue de~a~l, and does authorize the ~xecutive Direc~or to ailot as appropriated. SECTION 2. That a cextified copy of ~a~d budge~ be f~~ed with the Director of Finance/City Controller and with the C~ty Clerk and certified copies of sa~d budget be reproduc~d and made available tor use as direc~ed by SeCtian 15~5 af the Charter of saia City. SECTIDN 3. That in adopting sa~d budge~. ~he ?arking Author~4y does hereby reappropriate the uneneumlaered baiances and unexpended encucnbrances of ~he Z993-94 Capital Improvements ~udaet in an amount not ~o exceed $25,374. SECTION 4. The Secretary shall cerCify to ~he adopt~on of this Resolut~an, and thenceforth and thareafter the same sha11 be ~n full ~orce and effect. APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~ /~5-~:-~l,CrGe~ r~sxA Jc~rES MQL7TRIE City Attorney - 2 - Adopted and appraved tlus 28th day of June, I994 ~ ~~ !/~ Chair I hereby certify tl~at the foregozng Resolution No 223 (PAS) was duly adapted at a meetu~g of the Parkuig Authorrty held on t~e 2$th day vf June, 1994 by the followuig vote Ayes: Agency Member: Noes A~ency Member Abstain: Agency Member Absent Agency Merrfber Abda, Genser, Greenberg, Holbraok. O~sen, Rosenstezn, Vazquez None None Nane ATTEST• ~ ~~~ ~~~ -~ `" Secre~fary~ RE~FVALUA'T10N 0~ VARIOIIS USEK NEE I.1"sVELS Division Pldnniiiy ancl Z~~ni~'ig Bull (.1~rrent Oriyirir~l Rev~sed Cost Il~nik, FFF (unlt Propobed Pruposed Name oC Fc c arru~~u~zt ) amountp Fce Council Comments Fee Cxisttirig - SFL By Kesulution Appetals-Pl~ncling Commi3sion 1,;.i4J ]00 1pf.1 o Some memhers thnuqht thcat hhe fc•~:~ A~~~~e:~l:,-( il y Cauncil I t--~ I nirtiiLer t ural [2eview - Signs ~,os.+•> >~rci N/A 1:i0 :',tunilii l~r al lr~ar;t l_,~ u1 cost recovexy o Othrr:, frlt, hti~il lhx:', wc'~u1d r~rcatc a b~rr irr tn < rrt~in :,rginenl a ni t t1F r_ommunity ~oin!7 thrau!7h the c~appea7 prucesr~ 100 u Sume mcmr~r.r, Lhougltir. thc3t tfie fre shuuld L-e at lcast 25~ o€ cost xc•c ovc ry o Uthers fclt tlz~t this would r.te~te ~ harr~.er to certain segment:a nf the community going through the appeal pxcx~ca:~ 3~i0 I)epertment Cr~mments 100 Ur~pa x t m~~ nl, x< < c~mme~ncis3 kr~~piny ~xopa::e d f r r al alUCS, whicli is na cl~a~ige from current level (consultant rer,ommendcd higher) nepartment Lrc ls t h~t tee lc~vel i:; low enaugh sa that na barriere Lu the procer,s are eteaLed 1 (1(1 S~rnr < c~rrunrxil ar'~ ;~hnvr 7.3Q Drpr~rtrnrnt rec_nrnmends c.ret~ting tl'nrd ~ateynry for all sign Architectural 13oard reviews at a€ee level <~f $130 Currerytly, :,~yn Arcfiili~>rtur.~.l Bc~nrd xrvi~we arr rhaxyrd at tliP :;amr ratr as regular revacwa 7~r[h~il.r.c.tural Rrvirw 93fl 13U 351) o bome memhers fBP~ that thz:a fee 35U ['~ep~rtmenf YPCO7177RPlIC~S C}1~..Y norrn:~] Archiffctura] ^huuld tre lnwcr Revirw T3~a~arci titem:s :alioulc9 P~e ch:~Tg~d ttsr n Sorn~ mrmbr~iF~ Lrll I hal I fir crFal lun rFC ammrnded fee oi $3SU t a recover an increased r~f a third (lr~werl level we.xalc9 k.~e pe~rlic~n o[ !ul! co:,,t TruludsS icrunif[lr., mnrc ~,ipprnpLiritr l~nd:s<aping, r.unr.truction under 75,nnn ~c~itire LPPl Divisiun I~lannicty anci 2c~n~ny Name oL Fc•i• ----------------------------- Lxisting - Set Eiy ReeuluLlon Arc.hztecturdl Rrv,LCw Mn~c~r 13u~ainv;3~ T~zcen~r: Revicw 4 N I Cerl c~t 11~~E~rc~F~ri,~tenes,~ Pull ('urrrnt Or1~{1na1 CUbt tuxllt Pee (unil Pic~~us,[ cl aivount ) anwunt ) 1 ee Caunc~il C~nnments 6'I U i45 61U o Son~e [nemk~era 1r r 1 1 hrit th~ 2 frr :,hould bc lower o Somr mcmkxxr, felt th~t thc creation oE a Lhiad (lqw~.r) lc'vc.L would bc more appropriate F~z 2~ 50 o Srnnr membcrs tjucstloned the I ol al amuunt pa7d Lnc hcnnc,• rrccupcltlon (business licenr,r i rv~ rw i-r. e/~u:~inr~a;a lir[n~i lenx/hs>m~ pr.r.up~ncy permil feel husis~Fr,~~r~ o C~epartment head indic ated thit I liita ![i could be waxved for home occupation prrrnits /21 35U 770 o Somf• mernbcis thOUght tkzat the pxn~x~:aed tee :.}iqizlc3 k~e lower bccause ~t mlght create barrirr:, ho p'rople w~nl icty t<~ apply for landmark dcsignation Ltevised Proposcd eee f~epartment Comments G10 Ucpzzrl mc•rit continues to tecocrnneiid thal mr~~r>r AxchltecLural Fic.~,3rd rrvilw:a, whlrh 1ncludP ~1rw c an;,trur.tion and addll icrns '] 5, 00~ ~~cau.are feet ~and aY.~ovc , br c~har!~cd $610 tU tr[~over f ull c nat ~~Il C~rpzrtment belirvrti th~~L pxc~E~n;~ed fr_c is at ~lppii~~ri:~te lcvcl Howevez, Y.lie d~°paciment rFCamir~rr~dr, t hir Fr i• ~1 so cncompaes I[omr i)c<upatlon license revirw '!10 The deparLm~nl c ont tnues I c~ ~•er,ommend tliis tee aimoui~t (based on full coel xNC.~~veryf However, in arr~oad,anr_e with Resolution #83U~ (CC S) (~itPCI ]0/8/91, fees axF turrrntly waivr~d because ( c'~unc ~ 1 fell l hat el im~ nation of tlieer fee~a wa:. an approprialr ST14CT1t1Vp in c~xc,hangc foi the Yxi:,Erv~fion of histotic r',lxia[ture:a ihtil ~n7~~ i i Fiut~ t u I hE~ (.'i ty' s cultural 1leril ~ye Div~;,xqri Pl:~iinsny and Zc'~sliny ltxll Current Orayint~l Cast IuniT C~r (unit Proposed N~mP Of FeP airic~urit 1 c~imraua~t) FE t ----------------------------- ---------- --------- --------- Existinq Set Py Resolution ke~ieed Prapasrd (.`ouncil Commcnts 1'ee uepartmrr,t Comments C erl [~i nppxupxiat enrae, - 1, 03A ~SO :L, 03 ; c~ Scxnr nirmbers thpught thlt the Ma~c~r pioposed 1'rr r.fic•ililci t~r lr.iwer L'rrclus,~~ tt mi~7ht crcatc bairiers Lu pen~~lr wanl iny l o.apply fpr l~indmaik ~~rr',i~rt,s! a<>rr _ [rccd Rcstriction 3S3 2~U .3.,(1 o Sr.~me mc mtu rr. I tiq~ayhS Yhat the ~'} pro~io:~ed fcc shquld bc lower becauee 3 , t c rr~~te3 k~~r.ric xs H~.~mr Ocr_upa[~an F,S 3S ti5 o Some memliece yurslionrd the tol'a1. ~snciunt p~atd ion c~mu oc c up,at 7 on (busineES llcenr,r xrv~rw fer:/I~u^lncs~ l~cen~ae tax/hame occupancy permit LeF} o Dcpartment ltead indicatrd that thie fire unald bc w~~vcci iox }ir.~me occupation pFimitti Latldm,axk Ue~aiqnc~ation 1,7"7'l 8S0 1,17[1 o Sninr rarml~t ~'s t hOi.iylll I hirat the propoe,~d Lr'~r :~hqi,~]d bP Lowta k~fC~air:e a:', propqs3ed, pr.oglc would be tie:~,i taiit t r~ ~~E>E~ ly f c~r 1 andmirk de~:ignal i~~n 1,03b Tfit dE,p~artment continuc9 Tn rer.ummend Lhl~ fee amount {~~srd nn Lu11 <c>;at rtcovccy) However, in ar_r,ordancc with kesolutic~n N8300 {CCS} dalyd 'I p/R/91, Lc•~ .~ 1art~ c,urrerit.ly waived be[.aur;e LOLlfSC1J. lrlt t Y:~r e7 rmrnaticin cif thesc fecs waa :xn :3pF~rnpric~te incrntlve in ex~hangr for the~ preservation oi hlel oxic ;etrucLuic ~, h}ixt ~:or'il~ibute to the City's cultural hrr~t~ge 356 Stt~ff fr.r.l5 E~ropo:,~~d fre ia ~ppzopriate alld w,i71 not r_reate barriers 'lhi~ ie, ra le,qal do[umrnt thit zequixct, a yreat dcal of atatf timc to pxepare U Uepaxtment r~camiriend:, that chaiy~~;a frir this :,rrvice be parl o! 13~r Ru~ineas License Eteview fee 8SU Drpnrtmrnt rcu,,nun[nc1:, no r,hanr{c fram exasting fee Lt mu=,l c;i:,e;,, requcsl:, for 7tmdmark <'1r:',.ign~3t iqn 'r~re madr_ tlzrough Llle I~:~ndru~ark;3 Commissinn, irr whieh case this fee iF. waiv~d 'lhe la~t Ilu~r khe C~ty collcc.ted this fcc was '1386 ~ivision Planning and 'GOning Full Ctiarrcnt Original Hevi~ad Coe,l {u~iit re;e• S~~rut Yropos[d I'rnpoSPd Namc of Fee amount) amounL) Fee <",ounr.il Comments T'ee Department Commri~tS New - To Ae Set T~y kc =,alul lcm ----------------~------------ Alcoho7 ~etermination 4U9 U 240 u Somr IIIf IIIFIE'T:a thouqht That fhe fiee }00 Ue•partmrnt agrAeg thaL iee ~hould bF ai Lull co~..t should be at 1}'iN full c.ost ivr~uvcry rerovrry Propo^cs rrvision to $A00 l~vel Lol Linr Ad~ur,kmr~rtt 654 fl 650 o What Ls Lt1e dlifrrenr.E bclwtcri lhi:3 6SU Dep.ixY~nrnt ennt~rri~F~:, tn rrrommend fee level nt Lcc and t~ze lot linc ad~ustmenL Lee ~~bbU Plannin~'S fee is for planniuy h~oning that Engineering Lr, pxnpo:,ing~ lssues euctt ~i:,, ~<~niily x~qinrements, coxrer_t lot developmcnt, etc Lnginrrring'w Lc[ i:, tor krr.hrlir_a1 i~ virw r~f things suc11 as ~leval ~~~n:3, survcy ~ntormaLl~~ei, rt~. I ~ I Uivieion Ceneral Services-Admir~~stratioTi Fu11 CurLrnl Origin~l C~b~ ~uiilL Fee {unit Px~p~be~ Namc of Fcc amount) amount) H'ee Fxirl iny Sct T~y Ordir~ance --------------------------- Aftrr [Ioizrs I~crmits V~ Cntmr.il L'omments 409 >b 100 o Sornr memtrer;3 thought thaT Th~ f~~ should be al I}'ir~ Cull cc.~:,t Trtovery level o;c'~mc~ mc'mbcr: w~infrd tp knpw the raLinnalr foc :,rrtiny thr fee at $IiJll Rcviscd k~x cspc~trd 1'FF Drpaxim'rsll C'n~runents 1011 7'he d-r_parLmenL due& not feel thaL a gLCalcr than Loui Loid incrr;~;,e zs warr~ntcd becauae tl~e m~~orily of after hoiica pi~rmit e. are• Fcir lr.~w impact interior impzovement e, 1 o htiii ldi rig;, whc re~ , ccamnnnly, the P~Pf7CYlCltjt or water needs to k~r ~shut oL1 sn I li~l wnrk ~. ~an bE camplr l t' c1 wlt hout d~rrupt lny l l~c norrn:~l wr~rk hours for cmpioyees 1n t hF buildi~ig One nf the rc:a^uits t h~il t}iE> ar.tu~l rxpcnsc for procesaing iE Eo lilgh ir~ thret lnur :,rp<an;rte City dr.paLlminls rnu:,t ~3pprove r.~ch pcrmit 'Ph1e 1s a prude~lL way ta rnsii~r th,~t depail inrni ti arF ;~ware oY potcnt i1i imp:~r I c~f Aftcr FIouxs C°crmita oavi:~,inn General Services-Enginccrin~ Currrnt Cost (unit Pee (uriit NamF of Eee amount} amount) ---------------. , -- ---------- --------- Existan!~ - uet Fiy Ftr:.c~lul lr~n A~s~eee,ment I77strz~~t - b"L'1 25 I~r r p~3c ~I. inn Fi,ihlic S~rvi[e - V~ariou:, Servic er. ~ud Saler, aL Pub]ac Countrr ~ Lxamplas ~ Hluepiinht./M:~p;, ~ 8 1/2" x 11" '13„ x 'l0" thrcnagh ?4" x 3E>" 77" x 40" tlirovyl~i 31" x 40" 4'3'~ x 60" St ;ind;ixd Rpr~ .~fi~~~l ic~rlr, Items othcr than listed abov< cenLer~lne TieF, Senchmarks, un<1 Mi~,cclir.innus bixrvcy Tiee 238,'789 2.3,000 Urigznal Revlaed Pruposed Praposrd Fee Council Comments Fre Ucparluicni Cnmme.nl,s -------- ------ ------------- --------------------------------~ :i50 c, '!'hr COT1APIlAl19 iif thF Cutanr,i 1 was LhaL tl7r. ice shr.~uld nut br r_~huryccl Ic~ "uneuccrFHlul" appllcallnnr~ o For Zpplications that arc "sucessful" tlic cosl <hc'~uld l:u inrlucltd 1n the assessment, at full coet, ratheL than chterging ri ;aep,;~re~te tec 0 Depdrtm~nt wtll incoxpnxali Ihr:;r ccrats ~nto thr total asscssmcnt chargea of completed alxrFt 11C]~l~ i:it.!~F''S:;.IIiE'flt:. N/71 c~ Se~rnc^ m~ vik~e r::, nc~niyht th;~t the dupli~aLiu¢1 Lern iut ioidE~r~ :.lunilc9 he lnw~r U Z 3 4 3 50 .~ 3 50 10 Luc,l + 10't Loe,l + lCf~ Cpat ~ l4$ Cp.xt + 70~ :i a U 4 N/A 2 ~ !.~ lU ~,~~ me samc 4 Uepartme~~t Lelieves Lhal all ot Ytie::,e r.haryrr. axc LP21:~Uf1:3I)lf' L]lVPfl the :~taff timc Znd euPP1Y~matetial ~o:,l:, ~aSt,nciated wilh cach of the;,e m~7p:,, k~lui piinl s, i I c It :3hould bc noted that the 8 1/'L" x 11" ll 'rin iti ac tural ly ~~ prlnl c~fF the mir,rof~chr marhinc, which involves considerat~lr et,sLl limr in crrtain ~~isc:; Ic> engurc that thc correct sheet has been eelecled Diviaion Cenera3. Servir.ev-h:nyineerin~ Curxrnt Orlyin~l itevised CosL (us~~L Fec {urut Proposed Yroposrd NaR.c of F'ec eamr~untJ ~amotmtl Fee Council Comments ere Drp~tiloie~cil Comments New - To fir Set fiy Re:,oluti<'~ri ----------------------------- :,nldier He~~m Permit * ?03 9{yfl 600 o F.,omr mrmhcr4 c~i~9tinned the G60 The rtoldi~r b'rain, r,oil nail, and rz~hark permlts ~NP<<~PT~~Yr lrvr~l nf Lhc pLOposcd in virtually all caseE P111811 ;~n rncrnt~chmcnl fee (higher than iull cne,l rrr ov~ry) urit o F~ukrl ~c yrr~pe.rty Theae fees are vFry c> Sc>rne mrmhers we~nted to know of tliere rr~i;ac.iriible it ~t i^ tAnclrr:,tnr.id thcat the mi7ority cou7d hr ~~~ lnwrt Icc dr~prndiny of the rogt is essenLially a rrntal nl Cily if/whcrc cncroar_hments occur on prnpcily ':Che=rr~ ,ire .v~qnlficlnt long- term publir ptc~petly consr.qurnr_rs from the encioachinrnt:, whi~h must bc di~all wiltl ovcx time hy thc City as it p1anE Sn~ 3 Nni l Pr'TVnf + 703 15(1 G00 n Sumi: mrinY~c r:. yuc ;,I inrirc9 the GUU uLi11t y insLallal tinri~,, excav~tt icanr„ ~ I c appropxiate levEl uL Lhe propc~:,ed Lc c (}~iyht+r rhran ful l cost rrcovrry) o Somc mcmbcrs wanted to knuw u1 Lheie r.uuld k~c S le~wcc fee dependin~{ 1f/wllere encioar~kiinrr~r:, n<<iar ori E~uk>.lic E~ro{~E~iY.y Ti'r Ba<~k Permxl * t99 Aq[f 500 0 8omr mrinkxi.~ i;uc~:,t.nqried the 6UU appxopiiate 1FVr1 nf the prnpos~d fcc (hiqhrr than full cost recovery} n Snme memUcrs wa~ll ( d I cr know c~f t}iere cuuld be a luwer 1aF drprndiny i i/whc rr c nr_~Ln,3t tiruc nt :, ac c,tar on publlr~ pt~~'~ei l y I V I * CurrenL Lee rat r w~ir'. r'~t'~4 ~dini[ilr'~t xal iv'rly 6nldirr br. ~irn, soi 1 ntii 1, :~nd l lc bt7[~k p~ rvn I. s(fee~a ZS 27) havc recommendations which exceed the total co~t o1 Ihr ar~lual onr t.irnr prrmlt 133ud1[1CC Thr div~sic.~ro feel,s th1^ 1.^-, ippropri,;~lc k+rc.nus~ Iht^e rxir ~,~tl.~vil.ic•:, which rr•sult tin tl]e continue3use of rlty prc'~p'rxly ~ind thie wTrafi rnu:,,l I.Pirrriorr work r~TOtind tllem lal~x wl~irki rc:.u.ll:, in inc.reased time ~nd costs spcnt on other pro7ecta Uivieion Cencral bervir.es-Street M~tintenance F~zli C~xrrcnl Origlnal Coat iunit Fee (unit [~roposed Name of Fcc amotmt 1 amour,t I F'ee Nr w To ESr. Sel T~y Revcil tit i nr~ Reviacd Progr.~sed Council Comments Fre DP~ilitIllYTlt Cammer~ts Niai~anrr 111aatrment - Ch~~rqed Y,i:sip 0 =,00 o Sc~me memher,s had con~rrns ahrnai the nn T~irir ar~d Maletialr'~ (annual appxoprialenr:,:, crf I,Yse fec~ liasis rcvcnur} o C~rpartmr_nt is requeeted to pxovide lnior~in~at.ion prz whtit ot}ier c7ttcs' puli~ies e.rr rrg~ir~7in3 thP rharr~iny nf nui:~anrr abarrmrnt frrs kcmoval of 111eq;o1 Siynta iri Hight ot Way 9L U lU a Somr_ membera telt that tliis Yee .shnulcA l.x c h~axyc•ci on zx t nnr ranr9 matcrlal~ basis News xack Code Lnfoxcement 19'] U 2S o Some mernL~err~ l t~nughl t hat t hir, fre :,hould be charged at full cost rrc c~vrry I ~ I 'limr & 7he iJepatLment pLOposea to charge the a~t.u,~l Mal r iirnl r~~sl:t ae,:,,c~c ~ated with the abatement of a rniir.:~ncr', e g ~ichris rrmov,il, publ~c s~frty protectiona, et r~ Thlr~ is an ~ic t ivi ty whic~}'i i:, Yypi<_~lly rn~ovr.rr.d ~n thr. same mannes 11l oL21eL ~~illes ana i~ con~ider~d by atail In tri. the most cyuilrit~le• w:iy r.n p~~y for thcsc activities 10 TPir Drp:irtmenl dpcs nr'~I kx lls vi it i:a pnas~blc to chaige on a time and me[rrial L~ae,ir, :aince ~n many Lnr,t~iur:,, Y.he 7T73~NCCUT will icmc~vE thr s~~n3 af more tlian une realtoz, etc at Ihr. ~~mr lc~c.~~tir.m Si~~ax~Y~~~ Trrack~ng anc9 billznc{ would thcrefore be oneruuE aiid nuL rur;t - efLe~ tive n Ll~ll itr' i:, ;intic~ptited to woxk brst 75 The drpaxlme>nt t],P~lPVF'4 that at this polnt in tlme, [he $75 ~ h~aryr w~l ] rncnur,igr• r.~nmE~l,trinr p with the law Divi~ioR Yolzr.e ])ept Ful,l Cuxient ~ost (unlt lee (unit NF#[nP UC Ff F i71RUUfll1 ~ 7m01]Tlt ~ F'xL:~l in~~ - F,et Ely Reaolution t)Ikn e HrE~axts IT}~r.fY.~ 79 10 'i7affir. Ar.cide~nl Rrpuxt^ 29 ]0 I ~ oiiginal ~~i oposed T'ee Cnunr. 11 Cr~rrsmr nt s .17 u Some i~irmbrx:, trll tl'i,it thr f~r should not br raiscd o Oltu~x rc+rmbrss ir~lt t}irat thr fee ]evel wa:a apprnpriatc 'E 7 ~~ S~~me in~mheT s f e~l l L h:z l 1}ir f~ E~ t;hnuld noL l~r rassrd o Uther members felt tl~at t kir trr ]rvPl wza ;3P~,ro~i ~arr RCvi:.~ed P1'npOSPd F!'e 17eQartment Cr~mm~nt ;, I t~ Upon rer,valuat ion, deparLmenl rrc rnrunerid:, xFta~niny the rurr~~nl Lt[^ 7e•vrl 1D Upon recvaluatiun, dep~xtiurnt rrrnrnmr.nds rr•tre~nir~g the currrnt fee lev-rl Uivision Pulice i7rpt Full L"trrrent Cra;3t (unil Fre (unlt Name of Per amount) amount~ ~xlsting - Set By Reso.lution I'kioLOS/Coloi ~','t 5 10 pcr rr.que:3t Ur i y i n~a ] RF~vi:;ed Praposed Pioposec~ Pcc Counrll Comments Fcc FJepar:ment Commente 43 o Somr mrmhors frlt rhar thr frr r,l'ioiild noi k~r r;az;,r~i o Ucpartment needa to provide inf<.irmeat~on r.~n the proce5~ involvr.d iri prc~vidiri~ thiY taer~vir,'r ta::, it rcl~tc,s to thr piopo,9cd fcc lcvcl 5'L~) i OllY91C~C I'rrvinu:~ rationalr f~r riiffFtFnr.e between fee Ink~ ~~rocr:,;.zny for cc~lor ,ind hl~~c,k & whllc ptloln~, le. 111a1 bla[.k fee Current & white uaed to Y~e prorer.sFd in housr, wliich l~:ah fees are wea.~ more rost7y Now all photos are sent to 4xF - ;0/e~~~* out~ir.3e 7~h so the only Vclili3Y)11: 1S Iku~• s,lr~ nL Sx7 2 SU/ca* the photos 'lhe $19 char~e xepresen~F ~iLy 8/12 -; nn/ra* e~t;itf Ismr in pr~xr;~~a~nr~ 7rr;Ue3Y.:, tor phpto^ "plur sa1C s. t ax Pt~iol os/B&w - lU pcr rccjurqt I ~ O I 6U ?!> 60 o Some> momtu x~, f~~~ll rf,~~r Yha~ ff>e S~3fS1E' aas, fc~r ti~r atxnrc~ cqmment~ should not bc raised color photos o Dcparlmcnl nrrds tn prnvidr 1nlurmaLlon Uri the pruceas ic7vulved in E~xc~vic3ir'iy t kii:~ :~~ r~vac c~ ;~S iY Lrlat rr, 1 o I tir pic~pc~r~rci Lrr 1rvr1 p~visior~ Po71ce nrpl Ftill Current (:ost (unit l'ee lunit Ndme qi FPP amounl) iirnount) ----------------------------- ---------- --------- Lxisting Sct Ay U.rdin~nr.e ---------------. . Pdwn ]3xokei - Renewal 5,'L89 4UU I ~--~ ~ I oraginal Proposcd ~'E'Y 1;C11171(.).], ~C~ITIITICI]{ c ---------- ------------------------------------~- ~00 u Soiue memberr~ thought that thr Lre should be srt at a hiRhcr level n Some membc i.^, w<'~r1t c d t he cie•p:~rtmr:it tu provide ininxm.iY ic~n abr.~uY. the ;ahilir.y of tlic pawn hroker to pass alony tlze a3ditic~nal c~c~sl oL F~LCx ~•s :,inc~ Rrvisrd Propoaed Fee Ucpartment Comments . ,.- ---------------.. --------------------- 5{IO '1'he deparTmcnT indlcates thaL Llicre ls ~i kiravy vc~li~irir of wpi'k as I'olli~r :,,taff has to zeview all pawn 611j]F, ln, 5nn x.~er ye~r ~rr proce:a;,ed by the investigationa staft Each :,1ip rnu:at he LFC]191.I:Y1'.f~ with Fhe Srztr E~rpartmrnr nf J~ist~re and Lhen ieviewed for sLUlrn 1Leine, F.srakcc.; ruuli~ prx:,:, an the~e piocessing costs to theix customers by in~ce~~,iny thFir ~nlcrral i~tl c:~ i n c ta;.Ya>rners R; lhcrr axc nnly three pavm shops in Santa Monica, any irr ~ hangr w~ I 1 hc~vc a small xc>ventze 1mE~~;c I ~ i ~ T commercial and manufac~uring business. It shalZ be clearly marked for residential use only and use by commercial and manufacturing businesses shall be prohibited. SECTION 30. Section 9.04.10.02.142 of the Santa Monica MuniGipal Code is amended to read as follows: 9.04.10.o2.i42 Transitional and congreqate housing. Transitional and congregate housing located in any district shaZl be subject to the fo2lowing standards: (ay The transitionaz housing or congregate housing pravider shall have a writ~en management plan inc~uding, as applicable, provisians far staff training, neighborhood outreach, security, screenzng of resident~ ta insure campatibility with services provided at the faciZity, and far training, caunseling, and treatment programs for residents. (b} Maximum Dnit Density. In residential districts, congregate housing, when not deve3oped in an individual dwelling unit format~ and transitional hou~ing, shal~ not be subject to the underZying zoning district~s maximum unit density $6 Dzviaion Yo.lic4 Utpt/luitm~l Rryul I'ull C1~rrent Cn;;t (unil Hee {unil NamEr cr1 F~o amount I arm~unY. ~ ------------------- ---------- --------- Nrw - Tn Se SFL f3y Resolution Yickup Uead luiimel - Owner ltequeat 'l9 CS W I Uriginal Ptapo~ccl ree Cnunrll Commrnts ---------- -------------------------------------- 'IU o'Fhc ronsensus of thc Council was l tl.1l I t1z:. Lr~[ :;}lnuld nnl b~ c ti;~ryrd <'~ Sume me~i~k~rx~ LY11 thal ~ dcmat~on r.ould hc rr.c{ur.s~ted Rr.vtit,ed F'ropoved Fc~E,~ Deplrtment Commr_nts 0 Itevis,rd tPCf71111C1Pil(~:at it>n lr', t~~ nr.rt eHt ~b1J Sh t fll,s fcc I)ivi:;inn Auilding & SaPeYy l~xll Currcnt rost cu~~~t H«~~ l~ln~r Namc oL Fce :~mour~l ~ amount~ EXlf,l ing - Set iiy Urdinancr Ur mrsllt iun Permite ]'L,'7qY 9, 000 * (riiiiiu~31 (annut3l rrvrnl~r) revenue~ Or~Y~n~tl Pruposed Pee Council Commcnts 9,500 " o E~omc mcmbrrs wantcd To know The (~annu~il xa1 i~~n~1r ic~x xrc airirnrndirig e~u~ h revenue~ small increascs ,S.uid Bla~liny Prrmir ~,676 1,UUU ** 1,24U ** o Somc membere wanted to know tt~c (~mnuail l<'+uiiu+il I~~nnu~il r~1t ianol<: for r[:r_ommr:nr~ing aur.h ~ revrnue~ ievenue) reveuue~ r~mall 1n~reascs ~ .~ I + CtiirrrnY ft~ce, ir', $16 1ar Rut7ding F S:~frly dnd $19U Lor Planning (~'lUU Lutal} Fropused tees from fec atudy wcrc $1S for Fsui7c9~ny_ anci $190 Eor Plexczning f$205 tutall keviyed piopc>:,rd Ef'E:1 ar[ ~15 lor T3uildiny xnd $2fi0 Loi P1dn[liily Rcvlsed Px~pUSeci Nee I?,'!4'1 * (ar~nual rrvcnucl 'I ,'1411 ++ {,~rmtial rcvcnur} I)epartment Comment3 I)rpartrnrnt recnm~nrnd.a rh~t Pltannl.nq fee 311ouJ.d be raiEed eo Lhat tull cosL ie, xrr~<~vexrd Uep~artment frrlu th~t fre is ~appzopriate ** C'urrent b'er tis $10 ProE~v:,rc9 frP ia $15 p i highest whole number of units. 9.04.~0.14.030 Spacial housing development standards. The following development standards sha~2 apply to AfFord~ble Housing Projects: (a) Height Bonus. (1) Non-residential districts. The height o€ an Affordable Hou~ing Project located in a non-residential district may exceed by 10 feet the maximum n~mber of feet aZlowed in the underlying zoning district. (2) Residential districts. Affordable Housing Pro~ects located in residential districts, on parcel~ whioh abut or are located acro~s an alley from a non-residential district with a maximum height limit equal ta or greater than the height limit for a pitched roo€ in the residantia~ district, shall not be subject to the requirement for a pitched roof and the flat roof may achi~ve the height estab~ished for a p~tched roof. (b) DenSity Sonus. ~1) Affordable Hausing Prajects in non- residential districts. Affordable Housing Projects located in non-residential zoning districts may 89 ~ Parent Survey: Pr~or to recommending the above ~~e i~creases, program ~arents werz surveyed_ ~~0 surveys were d~sLrib~ted w~th 139 respondenLS. The survey revealed: 920 of respondents are working parents 73o were willina va support a fee incraase of up to $1C ~o ~e~p of~set ~ost~ of the pragram 89o were w~lli:g tc pay an ircreased f~e for additicnal enrich~er_t oppcrtunit~es Aqua~ias Pragrams Current Proposed No of Fee Fee Graups Lifeguard Services $9.05/hr $10 87/hr 5 Average Monthly Increa~e: Youth ~ Seniors -$16.00/group Regional Aduit - $~12.00/group Total Annual Revenue Inor~ase: $10,023 Program Impact: Increased support for coordination and paol :nai~tenance Park Facilities See attached schedule. City Subsidy: Approxamately 880 of ~otal ccsts. Total Annual Revenue Increase: 516,000 Pragram Impact: Wi~~ support increase~ as-needed park facility staffing to protect building and park resaurces. feesl - 1~ - I rr v I , acility ays Staffed CITY OF SANTA MONICA DEPARTMENT OF CONalfJNITY AND CUL'rURAL ~sio> 458-8300 FACILITY RENTAL FEES Time Staffed Room SERVICES Proposed Fee/Hx. urrent Fee/Hr Joslyn Park Mon. - Fri. 8:30 am - 2:30 pm Auditorium $ 9.00 $7.25 633 Kensington Man. - Fri. 5:Q0 pm -10:00 pm Craft 7.00 4.75 Saturday 9:OQ am - 1:00 pm 5aturday 6:OQ pm -lO:Od pm Sunday 6:OQ pm -10:00 pm Marine Park Mon. - Sun. 6:00 pm -11:00 pm Audatori~m 11.50 10.25 1406 Marine L~nco}.n Park Mon. - Fri. 8:30 am - 2:30 pm Auditorium 11.50 9.25 7th & wilshire Mon. & wed. 6:00 pm -10:00 pm Card Room 5.50 4.50 Sat. & Sun. 6:00 pm --10:00 pm SM College --- --- l2ec. Roam 9.00 24.00 1900 Pico Seniar Rec Cnt Mon. - Fri. 9:00 am - 4:00 pm Auditarium 11.50 10.75 1450 Ocean Ave. Sat. & Sun. 11:OOam - 4:00 pm Addit~on 9.00 7.25 Patio 5_50 4.00 Uouglas Park --- ---- Clubhouse 5.50 3.75 25th & wilshire Memorial Park Mon. - Fri. 8:30 am -10:00 pm CA8 Room 11.50 19.75 14th & Olympic Sat. & Sun. 8:30 am - 2:30 pm Craft Room 9.a0 8.75 Sat. & 5un. 4:00 pm -10:00 pm Lounge 7.Q0 6.00 Virginia Ave. Mon. - Thur. 9:04 am - 8:00 pm Auditorium 11.50 13.00 2200 Virginia Friday 9:00 am - 7:00 pm Meeting Room 7.04 4.50 Saturday 9:Oa am - 12 noon Please note: * The rates indicated above are per hour of use. All rentals must pay a min~mum ef two hours. * The rental fees will be doubled for non-resident users. * The rental fee will be increased by 20~; for groups requesting a set-up for 100 or more participants. * Commercial use of any facility wil~ require approval by the Recreation and Parks Commission who wilf also establish the fee. * Uses outside of the days and times listed above will require a$1D.00 per hour staffing fee. Sub~ect to Department appraval. * Uses of the Senior Recreation Center during the above listed days and times must compliment exist~ng senior citizens' programs. * Lincoln Park is temporarzly closed due to remodeling and expected to open in September, 1994. pkf aci13 t ~ ~ . ~inance: CMD:R~B:DRC Santa Monica, ~al~fornia Councyi Meeting of June 28, 1994 RESOLJTIQN NO. 8770 tCity Council Series) A RESOLUTICN OF THE CITY C~UNCIL OF THE C~TY OF SANTA MONICA REVISING Ci7RRENT USER FEES ANB SETTING NEW USER FEES FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Santa Monica recently comp~eted a camprehensive analysis of all user fees charged by varlcus der~artments far ~re pur~cses of upaating fee amounts and tnereby ~xsserv~ng public financ~ai resources; and WHEREAS, it was dete~-m~ined that in many cases, ~he =ees charged by the C~ty do nat reflect fu11 costs incurred ir the provision of r~latea services, and W~?~REAS, ~~ ~s the pol~cy at the City of Santa Monica to charge for *.he full costs of tY1~5E services provided by City staFF when sucr services benefit individual users rather than metnbers of the community as a whole; and W~i~.REAS, Sect~on 9.12.~i.0 of the Santa Moni~a Munic~~a3 Code authorizes the sett~ng o~ planning, zon~ng, and land use fees hy ~esoiution; and WHEREAS, Sect~ons 7 04.170, 7.04.180, 7 04.790, 7.32.020, 7.32.030, 7.32.044, 7.32.05C, and 7 32.060 0€ the Santa Monica Mun~C~p~l Code authorizzs the sett~ng oz varzous General Services anc[ Publ~ c Vdarics =ees by resolution, and - 1 -- WH~REAS, Sections 8.04.18C of the Santa Monica Municipal Code au~hor~zes the C~ty Counc~l to set ~~re Department perm~t ~ee5 by resoiution; and 'vTHEREAS, Section ~.04.240 of the Santa Monica Mun~cipa~ Code au~r~or~zes the setting of =p~s ~or charges for services rendered in connect~on wi~h the or handling animals at the An~ma~ Control Center by resolution; and WHEREAS, Sec~ion 4.C4.17~ of ~he Santa Mon~ca Murici~al Cade au~~or-zes `'_^_e set~in~ of fe~s ~or annual aog licenses by resalution; ana WHEREAS, Sect3on ~.~4.~5G of the Santa Monica Munic~pal Code autho~~zes `~e set~i~g of `ees ~or businesses Lz~ing bus~nass ~~ans ~~ cannect~on with th~ City`s Hazardous Ma~er~a~s Release Resparse P~ans and ~~ventory by resclu~ion, and WHER~AS, Se~tion 8.24.0b0 of the Santa Manica Mun~c~pal Code a~thorizes thP setting o~ s~es zor permic~ to operate ~nderground stara~e tanks by reso~ution, NOW, T~EREFDRE, THE CI:~ COUNCIL OF THE C?TY OF SANTA MONICA ~OES ~~SOLV~' AS FOLLOWS: SECmION 1. Resolut~on~ (C~ty Counczl Series~ ~ab9, 5?90, M 5328, E376, 6974, 75ff7, 7~~9, 7575, 7697, 7698, 7766, 8082, 8127, 8245, ~nd 8408 are hereby arnended to set new ~ee levels ~or var~ous Ci~y services as d~tailed in Attachrnent A to t~is resoist~on - 2 - SECTION 2. SPCtlOn 2(A) of Resolution Number 8417 (CCS) is am~n~ed to set fees for the use af facil~ties o~ the Community and Cultural Serv~ces Department as deta3led ln Attachm~nt B to this res~iut=on. SECTION 3. Fees levels previously set by the resoiutions r~o~e3 ~n Sec~ion 1 ana Section 2 above ~hat are not revzsed in thzs resolution will remazn at the rates previously set SECTIQN 4. The follawing planning, zoning, and land use fees are established as noted on At~achment A to this resolstzon; ALC~HOL D~TERMI~ATIDN - ror applicat~on for a permi~ ~o make ownersh~p and/or other minar cnanges to existing busi~esses that dispen5e alconolic beverages~ a~ee o~ faur h~ndred dollars ;5400.00? FRQJECTS ~N C~ASTAi~ ZONE - For review of "a~prova~ in ~onc~pt" forms that are requi~ed by the ~tate Coastal C~mm~ssion f~r devewopmen~ pro~ects, a fe~ of fifty Live dollars iS55.00}. ~OT LINE ADJUSTMENT - ror ~lanning Division review of applxcati=ons to make minor modifications to the property line ~e~w~er~ ~wo existing ~arcels, a fee af six hundred and xifty dollars f$650.4Q) ~ER~IT EXTENSTON -?~.DMINIS~RATIVE - Far application to extend _ ~~e exnzra`ion date oF any eligible planning and zon~na permit, a tee c~ one r~~ndred and forLy aoiiars ($140.00). - 3 - SIGN AL`JUSTMENT - Foz appxicatzan to apply for any sign adJustrnent, a fee of th~e~ hundred and fiLty aollars ($35D.D0). SECTION 5. The tollowing General Services and Pu~lic Works fees a~e ~stablishea as noted on A~tachment A: BANNER PERMITS - For a permit to hang a banner or pos~er over a pub~~c street or other pubiic property, a fee af fifty dallars ;$sa.ooJ . SOLD?~'R BEAM ?ERMIT - ror encroachment on public property for ~he inst~.Flation ~~ soldie~ beams (underground beam instailed ctur~r~g co:~struction useci to support subterranean excavation and overhead str~cturP;, a fee o~ six nundred do~~ars (5600.00). SOIL NA~L ~~RMIT - For Qncroaehment on public property far the i~s4aJ._ation ;~f soil nails iunderground s~eel rod ins~al~ed dur~na cc~nstruc~icr: used to suDport subterranean excavation and overhead s~xucture), ~ fee of six nundred da~lars ($600.00}. TIE BACK P~RMI'T -~or encroacnment on pubiic property for the installation of ~_e backs, a fee of six hundred doliars ,$6ao.oo) MAF R~VISION -~or c:~ecking and process~ng Engineer's or Surveyor's corrections to recarded maps, a fee of five nundred an3 rwen~.y =_ve doilars ~$52~.00}. LO'T' LiNE ADJLSTMENT -= ox City Eng~neer reviev,f o~ app'_icat~ons ~o maice minor mod~fications to ~he property line - 4 - between two exist~r_g parc~ls, a fee of ane hundred an~ n~net~ da? lars ($190 . 00} . STREET VACATIDN - For revaewing and processing reauests to vacate nublic prop~~+~y, ~ fee ec~ual to the City's time and materiai cast ta provide the s2rvice. REQUEST TO REVIEW LEGAL EASEMENT - For City Engineer review of easements affec~ing praperty rzghts, a fee af s~x hundtred and ~hirty five dol.lars ($'35 . 00? . PARCEL M~RGER -~or Lity Engzneer x'ev~.ew ancz proc~ssYng of reques~s to comi~ine two or more parcels ~nto one iegal parcel, a ~ee af nzne hundred and seventy five dallars ~$975.Q0~. ENCROACHMENTS GREATER '!'HAN $1 MILLION - For reviewing and pr~cess~na requests ~o use public prope~ty far x~ermanent structures wiLh a~ro~ect value greater ~han $~ rnzllion, a fe~ of three nundred and sixty doilars ($36D.~0}. r LOOD HAZARD ~Ei'i'ER -~ or prepar~ng a i.etter ~ndicat ~ng ~.he flood potential for a property accarding to th~ Federal Flood ~nsurance Program, a~ee of f~fty one dol?ars ($~1.00) ADMIN~STRATI~N OF PERFORMANCE 30ND - FQr Qenerai aclministratlon, recordkeeping, f~nal inspec~ion, and_reiease of bond functs for warx perzarmed by a pr~.vate party that may, in the ~ deterrn~natior~ cf the birector of Public Works and the Building Of~zcer, reau~re a eash o} surety band as a condition aaainst possiAle damage tc :~earby property, a fee of eaghty four do~lars ($84.00). - 5 - N'~~SANC~ ASAmEMENT - For abatement o~ pub~~c nuisances as de~i~ed in 5ectior: 8.~2 010 0~ the Santa Monica Municipai Code, a fee equal to the tirne and mate_ial ~ost to the C~ty tc perform the nuzsance abatement REMOVAL OF ~LLEGAL SIGNS FROM RIGHTS-OF-WAY - ~o~ ~he release o~ signs ~osted ~llegai~y ~o the Ci~y, an impound `ee of ~en dol~ars ($10 00?. DAMAGE REPAZR BILLINGS - To r~cover City costs t~ repair or replace damaaes caused by a private party to C~ty infrastructure, a iee eaua? to ~~e tirne and material cost to the Ci~y to repa~r ~n~ aamaQe NEWSRACK CODE ENFORCEMENT - For the xelease af newsracks seize~ by the ~ity rrarn illega~ locatians, a fee of twen~y five aol~ars ($25 00) SECTION 6 the followin~ Police Department fees are ~~tabl~~hed• PARTY RESPONSE - 2ND CAi~L - For a seGOnd compiaia~ call at the same addres~ for the same ~~oise vialatiar: by the property own~r, a fee of one hundrec and forty ~zv~ doilar ($I45 0~}. ALCGHOL DISPENSING LICENSL - For a l~cense -ssued to entextiainmer_~ establishrnents t~at inLend to serve alcorolic _ beveraaes, a~e~ af fourteen doliars ($14.00?. CRIME ANP.L~SIS/RESEA.RCH - SINGLE SEARCH - For c~astomized requAst~ from the publa.c =or c~~me an3 ca1= ~ntormat~on and - 6 - sta~,stics requ~r~~g a single searcn of ~~e Palice ~enarvment's database, a fee o~ fifty six dol~ars ($56.00). CRIME ANALYS~S - MULTI~LE S~ARCH~S - For customiz~d requests ~~om the public ~or cr~me ana ~ali znforma~ion and 5~aL1S41C8 recu~ring mu~t~pie searches af the Po~~ce Department's database, a f~e o~ eignty eiant doilars ,$88 003. DUI RESPONSE - ACCIDENTiiNJURY - For Pailce response to a t~~ff~c acciden~ with in~uries caused by a dr~ver under the ;n~luence cf alcohol or ather control~ea substances, a ~Ae of ~~ree hun~red and sixty eiant ,5368.00) tc be cnarged to ~he d~iver responsible tar *he accident. ~ODT REMOVAL - For removal of a boot or irnmobilization a~vice =rom a vehic?e, a Lee of seventy five dollars ($75.OQ). SECT~ON 7. ~he folyowinq Animal Contral fees are es4ablished. SImE REP~RT AND INVESTIGATION - For ~nvestigation o~ animal bite znc~dents and subsequ~nt reports, a zee of thirty doliars {$3fl.00) . ANIMAL T~ZAP RENTAi~ -~ar use of C~ty traps b_y th~ p~.~bli~ to ~r~p wild animais, a dex~asit of fzve dollars ~$5 00)_ SECTION 8 The foi~owing Environmental Programs Div~sion fe~s are establisned• JNDERGROUND STORAG~ TANKS - P~RMIT TO INSTALL - For a percnit to ~nstali undergrounrt storage ~anks, a fee oi three nundred and - 7 - e~ghty r_ine dol~ars (~389.00) ~or the ~irst tank and a~ee of sixcy seven dollars (567.00; for each additional tank. :.??~DERGROUND STORAGE TANK -~ERMI'I' TG REMdVE - For a~ermi~ to remove existing underground storage tanks, a fee of three hundred and eleven do~lars ($311.~0) Tor the first ~ank and a Lee af one hundred ana nine dallar~ ($109 00) tox eacr addi~~cnal ~~nk. STdRAGE ~'ANK C~EANUP FEE - For staff time spent overseeing undergraund storage tank cleanup, a fee eaual to the total City ccst c~ rev~ewing si~e assessments and c~eanup proposals, ~rspectir~g the s~~e, anci rev~ewing closure documents. ~ECTION 9. Section 2;I) is added to Reso~utz.on Num~ber 8417 (CCS} estanl~shing Fees for youth and teen recreatYOn and act~vity programs as detailed in Attachment B to this resolution. ~ECTION =0. Sec~lor? 2(J) is addea to Resalution Nu~er 8417 iCCS) establ~shing fees ~or permit group use of the City's trunicipal pools as deta~ied in A~~.achment 3 to this resolution. SECTION 11. Beg~nning July 1, 1995 and on JuJ.y 1 of each f~scal year therea~ter, a~' fees established by th~s resolution sha~l be admin~strativeiy revised ar.nually by a factor e~ual ~a ~hp di~f~rence in the Los A.naeles-Anaheirn-Ri~crerside Consumer Pr,ce Index for Wage Earne~s and Clerical ti~Torkers fo~ the 12 -nontr perioci Apr~l through A~_i1 of ~he przor fiscal year. No ~aLer than ~anuary l, 1°99, and at ~ive year inter~ra~s, therearter, the C~~y will cond~zct a compre'riensive study ot a~l =ees set i~y tn~s resoiut~on ~o determine i= ~ees are aciequate~y - S - recovering City costs for vhese services and the results af the cornprehensive study shall be repor~ed to th~ Council. SECTION 1~. The ~ees set for~h in this resolutian s~all be e~zect~ve ~aly _, 1°94, except ~or P~anning fees whach will be etfective Septe3nber 1, 1994 pursuant to State law. SECTION 13 ~he City Clerx shall certzfy ~o the adoption of th~s reso~ution, and thenceforth and thernaf~er the same shall be in fuli force and effect ~PPROVED AS TO FORM: / y{ li 1 ~~ / N-F/r~~'~.P MARS~~JONES QUTTRE Cicy Attarne - 9 - Adogted and agpraved th~s 28th of June, 1994 ~~ Mayor I hereby certify that the fore~o~n~ Resolution $770 {CCS) was duly adopted ar a meeting of the City Council held on the 28th af ]une, 1994 by the folIowing vote: Ayes. Counc~members• Abdo, Genser, Greenberg, HoIbrook, Olsen, Raseristein, Vazquez Noes Councilmembers None Abstazn Counci~rnembers l~one Absent Councilmembers None ATTEST ~ ,.~~~~ ~ ~-~~_ {r ~ Clty Cl£~I~ ATTAGII~v1FNT A- REVISED FEE LEVELS Di~ision: Planning and Zoning Proposed Name of Fee Fee Existing Adjustments $~p0 Admuustrati~e Appro~al-Less than 504 sf 400 AdministratiWe Appro~al-~ver than 500 sf 600 Alcohol Earemption 49D Appeals-Planning Cammission 100 Appe~als~C~~ty Council 100 A~rc}utect~ra~ Review-Signs 130 Architectural Review 350 Architectural Review-Major 610 Business License Review/Home Occupation SO Certification of Appropriateness 720 * Cert~ication of Appropriateness-Major 1,035 * Certificate of Compliance b50 Conditional Use Permit-500 sf or less 1,310 Canditional Use Permit- 501- 5,OOQ sf 1,9'1S Conditional Use Pernut-Over 5,001 sf 2,630 Deed Restriction 350 Demolition Permit 260 ~evelopment Site Review 3,Z70 Environmental Impact Report-Initial 3,080 En~Tironmental Impact Report 4,475 Final Map 625 General Plan Amendment 3,500 Landmark Desi~nation 1,170 Multiple Applications 270 Performance Standard Permit 800 Reduced Parking Pernut 1,000 Plan Check Iess than 101 sf 10[} Plan Ch~ck 101-500 sf 250 Plan Check 501- 5,000 sf 400 Plan Check Over S,IX}1 sf SSO Re-Occupancy Permit 5~5 Temporary Use Permit 300 Tentative Map 1,575 Use PermitJVariance Applications ~,0(~} Yard Modif cation 1,004 Zone Ch~ngefT~~rt Amendment 3,50(} ~ Fee waived by Resolution #8300 {CCS) dated 10I8191. Division: Planning and Zoning Proposed Name of Fee Fee New Alcohol Deternlination $444 Projects in Coastal Zone 5$ Lat T ane Adjushnent 650 Permit Extension-Admin 144 Sign Adju~tment 350 sf = square feet Division: General Serr~c~s--Administration ~raposed Name of Fee Fee ~:xisting Utility Exca~ation Permits Up To 24 Feet $73 25 Feet to 1,000 Feet 584 O~er 1,000 Feet 1,095 Encroachments 100 New Banners Permif $50 Di~~ision: General Services-Engineering Proposed Name of Fee Fee F.xisting Plan Gheck Fees R~idential Under $20,000 Valuation $ZIO $20,001-~1IX},000 Valuation 335 Over ~1Q0,000 Valuation 605 Commercial Valuation $100,000 and Under $170 Vatuation aver $10(I,0~0 2,025 Final Parcel Map $I,220 Final Tract Map 1,75~ Maps, Draw~ings, Plan~, and Specificatians Blue rints/Maps 81~"xll" 13" x 20" throu$h 24" x 3b" 27'~ X ~" ~1TOll~1 ~l~f X ~~ 43" x 60" $2.00 4.i1~ ~.~(} 10.00 Stanclard Specifications Items other than listed abo~e. Center~i.ne T~es, Benchmarks, and lltiscellaneous Survey Ties Cost plus 10% to recover reasonable ad~inistrati~ costs. Cost plus 10% to recover reasonable adm~r~is~ativ~ cos#s. $4.00 I~ivision: Creneral Services-F,n~ineering Name of Fee New Soldier Beam Pernut Soil Nail Permit Tie Back Permit Map Revision Lot Line Adjustrnent Reque,st ~o Review Legal F,asement Parcel Merger Street Vacation Encroachment-Project Valuation Crreater Than ~1 million F1ood I~azard Letter Administration of Performance Bond Proposed Fee $600 600 600 5~5 19(l 63S 975 Time & Material Reco~ery o~ actual City casts. 36(} S1 S4 Di~ision• General Services-Street Maintenance Name of Fee Existi~g C~ean ~blic Right-of-V~ay New Nuisance Abatement Removal of Il1ega1 Signs I3~dmage Billit~gs Proposed Fee Tfzne & MateriaI to recover City cvst~. Time & Material eosts to abate nusiance. $10 T"une and Material ~o recover costs to repair damage. News Rack Caie Enforcement $25 Division: Fue Name of Fee E~sting TO OPERATE OR MAIl~"I"AIN T'HE FOT T.OWIl~IG OCJCUPANCIFS - PER YEAR QR FRACfiION THFREOF UNLF,S.S QTHFRWISE NOTID: H~gh Rise I~spection (Per haur} Laboratory Hos~ital Res~dential Care Fac~ity Day Care Facility - 50 or more Day Care Facility - Less than 50 Private School Pre-Schoal Boarding Horne UN~'~RM FiRE ODDE PERM~T FFFS - PER YEAR OR FRACTTON THERE~F UNLESS OTNFRWISE N~'I'ED: Aircraft Refueling Aircraft Repair Hangar Auto Repair Garage Public Assembly 5,000 sf or more Public Assembly less than 5,004 sf Candles and Open Flame Annual in Assembly Use Areas A. Annual B. Special E~ents C.arnrval & Fairs Cl~ris~mas Tree Lots Combustble Fibers Combustble Materials-Over 2,5(l0 sf Compressed Gases A. Nonflammable B. Flammable Cryogenics Combusti~le Dust Producing EX~}~OS1Ve5 Firewvrks-Public I?isplay A. Grounc~ (Per Day) B. Aerial ~Per Day) Flammable Laquids A. Storage B. Dispense G Use Proposed Fee $$2 71 76 ?1 71 71 71 71 71 $71 71 71 71 35 41 41 71(1} 75 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 142 (1} 71 41 41 Division: Fire Proposed Name of Fee Fee ~umigations 71 High Pi~e Stock 71 Hazardaus Materia~ Reinspection A. Type 1- Law risk hazard U~ B. Type 2-- Mode~ate risk hazard 175 C. Type 3- High risk hazard 40Q D. Type 4- Seve~e risk hazard 650 Iiquified Fetroleum Gas A. Storage 71 B. Di~pense 41 C. Use 41 Magnesium, WorI~.ng with 41 Mall, Use of Common Azea 3b Industrial ~vens (Per aven} 36 Refri~eration Equipment (Per System} 36 Spray~ng of Dipp~ng wi~h F~ammable or 71 Combustible Iiquids Special F,ffecis, Pyroteehnics (Per chy 115 or fraction thereo~; Interior, F~terior, Explosives Tents, Canopies, or Membrane Structures A. Up to 400 sf 71 1 B. 4(}1-- 2,000 sf 142 1 C. 2,001-f,000 sf 213 1 D. Over b,000 sf 277 1 E. Permanent 41 Welding & C~tting operations involving compressed or flammab~e gases 72 FIRE PROTECITON SYS TEM FF,F.S - FOR INSTAi i AT`ION, REPAIl~, QR R~PLACF~NIIIV'T: ~"ire Protective Sig~aling Systems A. Local Fire Alarm-Per Control Unit $106 (1) Per Device 1.50 B. Central Station--Per Control Commun ~ 106 (1) I'eF Device I.SO C. Voice Alarnt/Highrise-Per Gontrol Unit 284 (1) Per Device ~ 1.50 Fire F~n ishing Systems ~l ~~7 Fire Sprin er S}~tems 71 A. With no fire p~mp-per head,riser, 2 connection B. ~Vth fire pump--per head,riser, 2 connection Division. Fue Name of Fee Total Pump Capacity 250 Gallons per minute 500 Gallons per mi~ute 750 Gallons per minute ~,0(l~ C'ra~ons per mi.n~te 1,250 Gallons per minute 1,500 Gallons per minute Z,Ot}~ Gallans per minute pp Tenant Impro~~ements -- Head Relocation Per head,riser, connection Remodel-Ma~~fi~ation of System Piping Per head,riser, connec~on STANDBY SYSTEMS CLA.SS I,II, OR III - NEW, REPLACE, OR RFT ~OCATE Hose Valve Prv Type (Per Valve) Hose Valve Non-Prv Type (Per Valve), Fire F1ow Measurement ~~ DEPARTMF.NT OONSTI~UCI~ON PIAN REVIEW C,onstruction Plan Revie~r of State Fire Marshall Regulated Occupancies (Pez Hour) OTHFR Hazardous Material Response Note •{ 1) Di.ffers from the DMG report. Based an department recommendat~on. (2} T~e l~ourly costs inc~ude cons~ta- t~on, admuustradve work, fie~d inspection and one followup ~nspection. Fee for the inspection for non-compliance is $71 for fitst hour and $41 for each lI2 ~our thereafter. For each addihanal inspection requir~d d~e to non-compliance, a fee of $223 for fi~st hour and $123 for each 1/2 ha~r ~hereafter. Propased F~e 87.50 1 175 1 262.50 1 350 1 437.50 1 525 1 700 1 41 1 2 71 2 $74 73 71 $91 Time and Material costs to recover C'ity costs of respo~se to hazardous materials emergency situatians. Division: Police Depar~~ent Name of Fee Existing Other Reports (Theft} Traffie Accident Reports ~ingerprinting-Public Vehicie Impound & Reiease PhotoslCo~or or Black & VVhite New Party Response -~nd call in day A~cohol Dispensing Lzcense Crime AnalysislResearch-One search of database Crime Analysis - Multiple searches of database DUI Response - Aceiden~l~njury Boot Remova~ Proposed Fee ~10 10 5 25 $19plus outside ]ab lab processing charges. $145 14 56 88 3fi8 75 Division: Police Depd~ u~ientlAnimal Control Name of Fee Existing Pet Relinquishment - with Iieense Pet Relinquishment - wi~out Li~ense Pickup/impount - Retntn to Owner - 2 days Issue License in F~eld Neutered male or spayed female Unneutered male or unspayed female Animal Iicensing Ne~tered male ar spayed female Unneutered male or unspayed female New Bite Repart & Investigation Animal Trap Rental Proposed Fee $5.40 5.00 plus license fee. 34.D0 10.00 20.00 10.00 ~a.oo 30.00 S.tlO Ihvision: En~ironmental Programs Name of Fee Existing Business Plans for Hazardous Materials StoragclHandlin~ Hazardous Matenals - Type II Hazardous Materials -- Type III Hazardous Materials - Type iV :Jnderground Storage Tanks - Pernut to aperate Pemut to aperate;Additionai Tanl~ New Underground Storage Tanks - Pernut to Install Pernut to InstalllAddirional Tank Underground Storage Tanks - Permit ta Remove Permit to Remove,~Addihonal Tank S~orage Tank C~eanup Fees Proposed Fee $320 685 1,Z75 213 47 $389 67 311 109 Time & Materials cost to recover City costs of overseeing undergraund tank leak cleanups. Attachmer~t B Sectian 2(I} should be added to Resolution Nurnber 8417 (CCS) as follows: YOUTHITEEN PROGRAM FEES PROGRAM Youth $10.00 10.00 10.00 Teen T-BafllSoftbafl Superstars Volleyball Footbali Flag - Superstars Flag - teague Basketball Superstars League Dance Fest Day Camp 10.00 15.00 i 0 00 i ~.oa 1 O 00 85.40/week 17.00lday Af~ fees are per session unless otherwise nated S i 5 00 15 00 Sectron 2{J1 shouid be adcfed to Resolution Number 8417 (CCS) as follows: CITY SPONSORED PERMIT GROUP FEES Lifeguard saEanes and a 2D% book~ng and coordrnat~an #ee for cavering reasonable admEnistrat~ve casts wEll be charged to aIl permit groups req~aesting I~feguard ser~ice at pooEs staffed ancf sc~eduled by the Crty. ~ermit groups must pay a$21.84 per haur rentaE #ee when using Santa Manica H~gh Schoo! Pool, which ~s farwarded to tl~e Santa Mor~~ca Malibu Unif~ed School Distnct Permit groups using Santa Monica Mun~cipal Pool must pay a$75 00 mar~thly maintenance fee. Sect~on 2(A) of Resolution Number $417 {CCS1 is amended as follows. BUIf~DING RENTQL ~EES The #oliowing #ees are established far the use of the #acElitEes of t~e Commu~rty and Cuftural Ser~ices Departmen~. The tak~ng of pictures rn these facElEties for commercial purposes is gowerned f~y Resolution Number 8410 jCCS) and the use of these facilrties by carr~tmercEal enterprise or profit making groups ~s co~ered rn S~ction 3 of Resol~tion Numt~er 8417 fCCSy. FAC~LITY Reside~t Nan-Res~dent Douglas Park Clubhause $~ 1 00 $22 00 Joslyn Park Aud~tarium 18.QQ 3fi 40 Craft Raom 14 00 28 00 Lincoln Park AudEtorium 23 00 4fi.00 Card Room 1~ 00 22 00 Marine Park Auditor~um 23.00 46.OQ Mernar~al Park CAB Room Craft Room Gyrnnasium Lounge Santa Monica Colleqe Rec. Raarn Senfor Recreation Center Auditorium AddrtEOn PatEo Virg~n~a Park Auditoriurn Meeting Room 23.0~ 46.00 18.00 36.00 ~ o~.oo ~ ~ ~ .oo 14.00 2$ QO 1$ 00 36 QQ 23.00 46.04 i s oo ~s o0 1 1.00 22.00 23.00 46. DO 14.00 28 DO Fees are based upor~ a m~nimum two-hcur use. A 20°1o tncrease ~n fees w+11 be assessed for graups +n excess a# 100 people ~nrhtch require additionai set-up andlor clean-up A$10.00 per ~our staffing fee will be chargecf for groups renting facilities other than on the days and times I~sted Rental of the 5enior Recreation Center during the IESted days and t~mes must compfim~nt ex~stEng sen~or crt~zen proyrams. A11 other sections ofi Resolut~on Number 84~ 7 tCCS~ shalf remain m fuil force and effect FIN:CMD:BT:kf/resoraap Santa Monica, California Redeve~apmen~ Agency M~eting• June 28, 1994 RESOLUTIQN NO. 44~ (Redevelopment Agency Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA APPROVING ITS SUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 WHEREAS, the proposed budget for the fiscal year 199~-95 was submitted to the Redevelapment Agency as dire~ted by Section 33612 af ~he Cali~ornia Hea~th and Safety Code; and WHEREAS, the Red~velopment Agency held a public h~aring on said budget after a notice af said budget hearing was published not less than ten (Z~) days prior thereto; and WHEREAS, atter said public hearzng, the Redeve~opment Agency considered further its proposed budget, NOW THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA RESO~VES AS FOLLQWS: SECTION 1. That the budget for the ~iscal year 1994-95, as submitted by the Executive Director and revised by the Redevelopment Agency, which budget is entitled "City of Santa Monaca, Proposed Budget, 1994-95", a copy of which budget is attached here~o, is hereby approved and adopted. In adopting said budget, the Redevelopment Agency intends ta, and by this - 1 - Section does, adopt and approve ~he total operating appropriatian, consis~ing of Salaries and Wages, Supplies and Expenses, and Capital outlay ma~or expenditure cat~gories, each program category of ~he Capital Improvements Budget, and the r~v~nue detail, and does authorize the Executive Director to a~lot as appraprzated. SECTION 2. That a certified copy of sa~d budget be filed with the Director af Finance/City Controller and with the City Clerk and certified copies of said budget be reproduced and made available tor use as directed by Section 1505 of the Charter of said City. SECTIQN 3_ That ~n adopting said budget, the Redevelopment Agency does hereby reappropriate the unencumbered balances and unexpended encumbrances of the 1993-94 Capital Im~rovements Sudget in an amount not to exceed $1,397,685. SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify ~o the adoption of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in fu~l force and effect. APPROVED AS TO FORM• ~~~5~1(r.A~~ / ~-~'C-~ MARSHA J~NES MOUTRIE City Attorney - 2 - Adopted and approved th~s 28th day of June, 1994 / / .'.~ ~/ Chair I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolut~on No 446 (RA3) was duly adopted at a meeting of the Redeveloprnent Agency heid on the 28th day of June, 1994 by the following vote Ayes Agency Member• Noes: Agency Member: Abstam. Agency Member Absent Agency Member Abdo, Genser, Greenberg, Holbrook. Olsen. Rosenstein, Vazquez None None None ATTEST J ~ r~ ~i,~i~= f/~°`~ Secret~ry RESOLU~zora ~0.8771 (CITY COUNCIL SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL O~ THE ~ITY ~F SANTA P40NICA REVISING FEES CHARGED FOR SANITATION, COHTAINER RENTAL AND ROLL-OUT, TRANSFER STATIaN AND SPECIAL SERVIC~S FEES WHEREAS, Municipa~ Code Sect~on 5.08.250 allows ~on~hly fee for general City sani~ation servzces ta be set by reso~ution; and t~~HEREAS, t~unYCipal Code Sactions 5.08.210(a) and (b) allow fees for cantainer rer.tal and ra11-out ~ransfer station and special service f~e~ to be set by resolutian; and WHER~AS, a study has deterr~ined that sanztation serv~ce fees nust be revised in order to Aromote waste diverszon e~forts and recover all City costs for ~roviding sanztation services; and ~vHEREAS, the fees ~Stdb13sh2d by this Reso].ution are no more tnan necessary to recover the costs of ~he services pravided, NOW, ~HEREFORE, '~'HE CITY C~UNCIL OF THE CITY OF' SANTA MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOj^l5: SECTION l. Sanitation se~vace fees, as provzded for in Municipal Code Section 5.08.250, shall be as fo~lows: i SANTA r:ONZCA REFUSE BILLING Rate Menu Commercial Rat~s $II~I~Ir7G CODE " QESCRIPTTOPd BIL~':'CI) ~ ~ ~--r e~.r. _ _, CDMMERC~AL: 1 2-Yard bin; 2x/week CBA $~7g.~~ 1 2-Yard bin; 3x/week Cgg Z~9.a~ 1 2-Yard bin; 4x/~aeek CBC 358.67 Z 2-Yard b~n; 6x/week CBD 538.01 1 2-Yard bin; 7x/4~eek CgE 62~.6$ 2 2-Yard bin; 2x/week ~BF ~~~.&~ 2 2-Yar~3 bin; 3x/taee~ CBG 51~.10 2 Z-Yard bin; 6x/week CBH 1,023.29 2 2-Yard bin; 7x/week CBI 1,192.59 3 2~Yard bin; 2x/taeek CBJ 502.33 ~ 2°Yard bin; 3x/week CBK 753.19 3 2-Yard bin; 6xjweek CBL 1~505.44 3 2-Yard bin: 7x/week CBM 1.757.7Q 4 2-Yard bin; 2x/week CBN 663.80 4 2-Yard bin; 3x/~~eek CBO 995.19 4 2-Yard b~.n; 6x/week CBP ~,990.66 ~ 2-Yard bin; 7x/weeK CBQ 2,323.44 5 2-Yard bin; 2x/~,reek CBR 825."27 5 2-Yard bin; 3x/w~ek CBS I,238.91 5 2-Yard bin; 6x/weeic CBT 2,474.86 5 2-Yard bin; 7x/week CBU 2,887.50 2 BILL~NG ~,C~DE DESCRIPTIQN BILL ~CD ~T~ ~st ~-Yd ban; ro; 2x/week CCa 40.83 lst ~-Yd bin; ro; 3x/week CCP 55.59 1st 2-Yd bin; ro; 4x%week CCQ 72.73 Zst 2--Yd bin; ro; 6x/week CCR 81.66 Add'l; 2--Yd bin; ro; 2x/week CCS 30.62 Add'1; 2-Yd bin; ro; 3x/week CCT 41.70 Add'1; 2-Yd bin; ro; 4x/week CCU 61.24 Add'1; 2--Ydbin; r o; 6x/week CCV 100.51 40-gal; 2x/week CSA ~7,g3 ~0-gal; 3x/week CSB 86.11 4a-ga~; 6x/week Csc 172.22 68-gal; 2x/week C5D 6{,2p 68-gal; 3x/week CSE 98,~Z 68-gal; 6x/week CSF I96.82 95-gal; 2x/week CSG 82.?6 95-gal; 3x/week CSH i23.01 95-gal; 6x/week CSI 241.64 2 95-gal; 2x/week CSJ 148.96 2 95-gal; 3x/week CSK 221,43 2 95-ga~ ; 6x/caeek CSL a_ 42 , g4 2 95-gal; 7x/week CSM 568.31 1 4p-gal; lx/week CSN 29.59 1 68-gal; lx/we~k CSO 35.53 ~ 95-g~.i; lx/week CSP 42.14 1 2--Yd bin 1x/week CSQ 10g,62 3 SI.I~LING. C~DE DESCRIPTI~N BIZ,L =CD RAT,~ Non--semi auto srv; 3x/week CSV 41.95 Non-semi auto srv; 6x/week CSW 83.90 City bin/City praperty CSX 34.03 Priv. com b~/city property CSY 34.03 Non-semi auto serv~.ce 2x/taeek CSZ 2g , 05 MULTI-FAM~LY 2-Yard bin; 2x/week MBA g9,5g 2-Yard bin; 3x/week MBB 149.4~ 2-Yard bin; ~x/week MBC 198.20 2-Yard b~n; bx/week MBD 298.80 Zst 2-Yd bin; ro; 2x/week MBO ~Z,~g lst 2-Yd bin; ro; 3x/wee~ r7BP 58.2~ lst 2-Yd bin; ro; ~x/week MBQ ~2.~3 lst 2-Yd bin; ro; 6x/week MBR 85.56 Add'1 2-Yd bzn; ra; 2x/~rieek MBS 32.08 Add'1 2-Yd bin; ro; 3x/week MBT 43.69 Add'1 2-Yd bin; ra; 4x/week P~IBU 54.58 Add'Z 2-Yd bin; ra; 6x/week MGV 64.1b Apts. 1-10 un~~s MFV 1~,flg Apts. 11-5Q units MFW 12.D8 Apts. 51-100 units MFX 12.-08 Apts. 101-199 units MFy 12,~g Semi-auto cont. 40-gai M5A ~3,6~ Semi-auto cont. 68-gal MSC 16.9~ 4 BI.LLING.CODE:DESCR~PTIDN BILL.,CD RATE Semi-auta cont. 95-gaI MSF 20.~6 Clty bzn/c~ty property MSY 34.03 Non-semi auto sErv~ce MSZ ~3.98 Street sweeping charge RCS 57.~4 SINGLE FAMILY 1 40-gal SSA 29.69 ~xtra 4~-gal SSB 27.31 I 68-g~1 SSC 35.53 2 68-gal SSD 67.89 Extra 58-gal SSE 32.42 1 95-ga3 SSF 42.14 2 95-gal SSG 83.44 3 9~-gal SSH 105.82 4 9~-cfal SSI 13Z.56 Extra 95-gal SSJ 42.60 1 95-qal & 1 68-gal SSK '4.55 Non-s~mi auta srvc. S5Z Z4.53 SPECIAL SERVICES Temporary 2-yd bin Temporary 2-yd bin Temporary 2-yd bin Te~;parary permanen~ City plastic bags ~ Speciai bu~.ky ite~ ~ day 30.Ofl 3 days ~5.a0 ; days 60:00 2 ycz la~r~ extra pick-up 2~.00 lot of 5 14.50 curiaslde collection - by estimate minir;um 25.Q~ 5 o~~~RV~Ew lntroduction This Praposed Carnmunity De~elopment {CDy Plan sets forth the specrf~c fund~ng recor~nmendat~ons, gaafs and ob~ectives of the City's FY 1994-95 Community De~elopment iCD) Pragram Th~ City's FY 1994-95 Community Deveiopment lCD? Program proposed in this report w~~l provide funding support flf appraximately $6 mEll~on annually ta approx~cnately 3~ nar~-pr~fit hurnan serv~ce and haus~ng developmen# organ~zat+ons support~ng over 54 d~fferen~ programs to meet the challe~ging needs of a broad range of pop~lat~ons, inciuding youth anc~ fam~i~es, nomeless ancf law-income people, peaple witn d~sabilittes, the eEderly and fraal elderly, and people of di~erse cultural and ethnic backgrour~ds. The GD Program has a direct and s~gr~if~can~ impact on the health and well-being af people r?sECling ~n Santa Mor~~ca Many people who woufd otherw~se not be ab[e ta access t~e ser~ices that they need to ii~e ~ndependentfy, to I~ve ~n affordable housing, to access quaE~ty and affordabie ch~ld and l~ealth care, or to earn a I~vable wage, are gi~en a chance thraugh #he organizations funded by t~e CD Arogram All ofi these programs help to mafntam a compassionate and weff-balanced commun~ty Ta remain respons~ve and relevant to ~rrtportant eomrnunrty needs, the City has er~gaged ~n a variety of planning and policy inrtiatives that have led to new ar ~edefrned d~rect~or~s withEn the City's CD Program The propased fund~ng recommendat~ons ~n th~s Proposed CD Plan seeks to cant~nue to effect~vely fmplement many Counc~i directives established ~r~ the Ten-Year Youth Act~on Plan t1989}, the Ch~ld Care Master Pkan ~1989}, the Tasl< ~orce on Ho~elessness report, A Call to Act~on ~19971, the Amer~can +nr~th D~sa~~lat4es Act {ApA1 Transitson Plan (199i ~ ancf Self ~~aluat~on (1993J, the Comprehens~ve Housing Afforclab~€Ety Strategy {CHAS} (1993}, and other Counc~l-directed pr~orrties Because rrEany of the recommended programs and pol~cy d,reet~ons ~dentif~ed in these reparts requ~re additional resources, the C~ty cont~nues to s~ek new funding apportunfties, ways to more ef#ectively target exist~ng Ci~y funding, and ot~er innavati~e mean~ to #urther these and other critica~ pfannrng ~reas Over the past decade, the CD Program has grown s~gnificantly En #~nd~ng le~el and scope, becornEng a ma~or source of fund~ng to ongoing community programs serv~ng Santa Mon~ca res~dents However, due to reductfons ~n State and lacal revenue sources, Crty grant fund,ng has decreased by 6°% o~er the past two fiscal years {FY 1992-93 as~d ~Y 1993-94} A4though ~Y ~ 994-95 fund~ng ~s ~ot propased to be reduced, ~t also daes not represent a gra~vth that can fully meet the s~gnificant human ser~ice and housing needs among its resEdents The funding recommendatEons set forth En th~s Propas~d CD Pla~ re#lect a slight ~ncrease ~v~thin the o~erall CD Program's ~Y 7 993-94 fund~ng base due to a~ ~ncrease ~n the annual Federal Commun~ty ~ CA:f:atty~muni\laws\mjm\fees City Council Meeting 6-28-94 Santa Monica, Califarnia ORDINANCE NUMBER (City Council Series) AN ORDINANCE aF THE CITY C~UNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT AND COLLECTI~N OF USER FEES OR FEES FOR SERVICES WHEREAS, the City from time to time authorizes fees for services or user fees which represent a cost or portion of the cost to the City of praviding particular services to individual persons rather than to the general public; WHEREAS, as a matter of law, such f~es may be, and are, imposed and set by various procedures; WHEREAS, the City wishes t~ make clear its intent to utiliae all of the variaus means a~ailable to impase and set fees; and WHEREAS, in the event that it may be deemed necessary to pursue legal remedies for callecting user or service fees, the City wishes to ensure that al~ lawful means af enforcement shall be available; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: - i - SECTI4N 1. Chapter 2.72 is added to the Santa Monica Municipal code ta read as follows: Chapter 2.72 FEES FOR MIINICIPAL SERVICEB Section 2.72.010 Fees For Municipal Serviaes. The City may establish and set the amount of user fees or fees for services which are provided to or benefit particular individuals rather than the general public. Section 2.72.020 Method of Setting Fees A user fee or fee for services may be set by ordinance by a resolution adopted by the City Council, or by any other means authorized by law. Section 2.72.030 Responsibility For Payment Any persan who is charged a user fee or fee for services by the City shall pay that fee as soon as it becomes due. Section 2.72.040 Remedies The City may callect any user fee ar fee for services which is due and owing through a civil action. However, this express statem~nt of the City's power to pursue a civil remedy does not - 2 - canstitute and shall not be construed as a limitation upon any power to institute criminal proceedings. SECTION 2. The provisions of this Ordinance are deciarative of existing law. SECTION 3. Any provision of the Santa Monica Municipal Code ar appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, are hereby repealed or modif~ed to that extent necessary to eff~ctuate the provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 4. If any section subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason heZd to be invalid ar unconstitutianal by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdictian, such decision sha11 not affect the validity of the remaining partions af this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it wauld have passed this Ordinance, and each and every secti~n, subsection, clause, ar phrase, not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or uncanstitutional. - 3 - SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoptiqn of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. APPROVED AS T~ FORM: •~ f i1 ,n-~-~t.~ s G•~_~ ~ i~.C-! ; ~ L~~ f ~ ~ ~-t-~- MARSHA JONES 1~IDUTRIE City Attorney - 4 - EXHIBIT E FEES TO BE REFERRED TO CITY ATTQRNEY FOR PREPARATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT3 Fee Narne Plan Checking Bidg/Eiec/Plumb/Mech Permits and Inspections Demolition Fermits Sand Blasting Perm~ts ~.fter Hours Inspectians Afte~ Hours Permits Sewer Saddle Deposits Sewer Connection Perm~ts Sewer Cap Permits False Alarm-3rd response in year False Alarm-4 or mvre in year Various Permits-Initial Applications Various Permits-Renewal Applications Pawn Broker Permits Administerinq Division Building & Safety Building & Safety Building & Safety Building & Safe~y Buiiding & Safety Environmental & Public Works Management (Admin.} Environmental & Public Works Management (Engin.? Envirflnmental & Public Works Management (Engin.) Enviranmen~al & Public Warks Managernent (Engin.) Police Police Police Polic~ Police EXBIBIT F RySOLUTION NO. 8772 (City Council Series) A R~'SOLi7TION OF THE CITY COUN~IL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MQNICA ADOPTING SALARY RATES FOR THE CLASSIFICATIONS QF ZONING INSPECTOR, T~ANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ASSISTAP,~T, BEACH AND SsREET CLEANIhG SUPERVISQR, MAINTENANCE CREW LEADER, C~TV PROGRAMMING SPECIALIST, SENIOR & COMML7NITY PFtQGRAMS M.ANAGER, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SPECIALIST, PAYROLL SL7PERVISOR, SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN, TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIA~i, ~DENTIFICATION '''ECHNIC~AN I, IDENTIFICATION TECHNICIAN II, HOIISING APPLICATION ASSISTANT, MAINTENANCE MANAGER, EVENT FACILITIES SERVICES SUPERVISOR, EVENT FACILITIES ~PERATIONS SUPERVI~OR, EVENT FACILITIES MANAGER, PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF '_"nE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES RES~LVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTI~N ~. ~'he following monthiy salary leveis are hereby established for the indicated p~rmanent classiizcatians eifective Jtily ~, ? 99~ : ZONING INSPECT~F2 $3,527/Month E-~~ep ~53,774/Month w~th PERS) TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT 3EACH AND STREET CLEAI~TING SUPERVISOR MAINTENANCE CREW L:~ADER CITV PROGRA[+~Il~IING SPECTALIST SENIOR & COMMUNT'I'~' PROGRAMS MANAGER ~MPLOYEE BENEFITS SPECIALIST FAYROLL SUPERV~SOR $3,246/Month E-Step ($3,473/Mortth with PERS) $3,819/Month E-Step ($a,~86/Month with PERS) $2,777/Montn E-Step {$2,971/Month with PERS} $3 , 246/Month- E-Step ($3,473/Manth with PERS} $5,197/Month E-Step ($5,~6i/Month with PERS) $3,228/Month E-Step ($3,454/Month w~.th PERS} $4 , 474 /Mflnth E-Step ($4,787/Morlth with PERS) -1- SR. CIVIL ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN IDENTIFICATION TECHNICIAN I IDENTIFICATION TECHNICIAN II HQUSING APPLICATI~N ASSISTANT MAINTENANCE MANAGER EVENT FACILITIES SERVICES SUPERVI50R EVENT ~ACILITIES OPERATIONS SLIPERVISOR .~VENT FACILITIES MANAGER $3,720/Month E-Step {~3,980/Mon~h wzth PERS) $3,639/Month E-S~ep ($3,894/Manth with PERS) $2,997/Monch E-Step ($3,2~7/Month with PERS? $3,800/Month~ E-Step ($4,Q66/Month w~tt; PERS) $3,228/Month E-Step ($3,454/Mon~h with PERS} $6,169/Month E-Step ($6,601/Month with PERS} $4,747/M4nth E-Step {$5,079/Month with PERSS $5,492/Month E-Step {~5,448/Mbnth witih PERS} $6,083/Month E-Step ($5,509/Month with PERS? PARKB MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT $5,092/Manth E-Step {$5.448/Month with PERS) SECTION 2. The Cir_y Clerk shall certify to the adaption of ~:z~s Reso3ut~on, and thenceforth and ~hereaft~r ~he same sha3l be ir_ f:~ll force and e~fect . APPROVED A5 TO FORM: ~ , ~ ~ ~( ~~ ~~ ~ : Marsna Jon ~s~Moutrie ~ V C~ty At`arney _2_ Adopte~ and approved th~s 2$th of 7une. 1994 Lf. ~~ - ~/" Mayor I herehy certify that the foregomg Resolut~vn 8772 (CCS) was duly adopted at a meeung of the City Council held on the 28th of June, 1994 by the following vote Ayes• Councilmembers Abdo, Genser, Greenberg, Halbroak, ~lsen, Rosenstein,Vazquez Noes. Councilmembers: None Abstam. Councilmem~ers None Absent: Councilmem~ers~ None ATTEST _ ~ ~~~ ~~,~~ ` ~ity ctefk REVISED 6/28/94 P05ITION CLA552FICATIO~ ALLOCATION CHANGES TO THE PRdPOSEp FY I994-95 CITY BUDG~T FUND/DEPT~B,V P05ITION CLASSIFICATION ~•v PRO?OSBD BUDGET REVISED PQSITION CLASSIFICATTON General/Cornmuni~y & Cultural Services/ Human Services General/Community & Cuitural Serv~ces/ Community and Senior Programs 1.0 ADa/~isab~lity and 5enior 5ervices Cco~ dir.ator 1 ~ Re~rea~icn Centez AdmirLStrator I 0 V~rgiria Avenue Park Center Adminis*rator 1.0 Staff Assistant TII 3.0 Recreatian Coordi~ators General/Resource Manage- I.0 Hous~.ng Assistance ment/Housing & Redevel- Coordinatar opment Pier/Resaurce Manage- 1.0 Economic Deveiopment ment/Economic Devel- Manager opment-Pier 1.0 Senior Administrative Analyst 1.0 Community Center Supervisor 1.0 Community Center Supervisor l.fl Administrative Analyst 2.5 Recreation Coordinators 0.5 Administrative Rnalyst I.o ~iousing Assistance Supervisor 1.0 Adman~strative Services Officer - 11 -