SR-9-B (56)
. . 9-s
LUTM:CPD:PPD MAR t 9 ,991
wjmwpcc
COUNCIL MEETING: March 19, 1991 Santa Monica, California
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: city Staff
SUBJECT: Request for Council Direction on Proposed One Year
Commercial Moratorium Work Program
INTRODUCTION
On February 26, 1991, the city Council adopted an emergency
"-
ordinance extending for one year the moratorium on commercial
development above specific threshold levels throughout the City.
The moratorium will expire in February, 1992. This report
proposes a process and work scope for the one year period. In
order to accomplish the work within the one year period, Council
direction is required.
MORATORIUM WORK PROGRAM
The moratorium work program has been designed to incorporate
quarterly briefings with the city Council. These briefings will
include status reports describing the tasks accomplished during
the previous quarter, review the scope and direction of the work
program and request Council confirmation.
The work program will focus on three topics: preparation and
completion of a Master Environmental Assessment, new heights and
- 1 - 9-0
MAR 1 9 1991
. .
floor area ratios for commercial districts, a preferred traffic
methodology and definition of a significant traffic impact.
Using the information from the Master Environmental Assessment,
staff will examine allowable commercial land use densities in the
City as they relate to the existing and future traffic and
infrastructure conditions. By February, 1992, Council will have
determined new height and FAR standards for commercial districts
to address the cumulative impacts identified in the MEA. The
following outlines the work to be completed within each reporting
period.
March - April - May - June
During this period, staff will initiate the preparation of a
Master Environmental Assessment (MEA) by issuing a Request for
Proposals (see attachment # 1). A consultant will be selected in
mid-April, and on April 23rd, the Council will be asked for
authorization to execute the contract and commence work on the
MEA.
Between March and April, while the MEA proposals are being
prepared and consultants selected, staff will conduct a series of
four MEA public scoping and issue identification meetings in
various locations. Meeting locations and times will be noticed
in the Outlook, on PEN and through the Neighborhood Support
Center.
- 2 -
. .
To expedite the MEA process, staff will be contracting directly
for traffic counts throughout the city. These counts will be
taken from April through June 15th. One hundred and sixty one
intersections will be counted. This represents all but 8 of the
city's signalized intersections and includes 4 unsignalized
intersections. All intersections will be counted for typical
weekday AM/PM peak hour conditions, 14 intersections in and
around Santa Monica College will be counted during College peak
periods and 25 intersections near the beach will be counted on a
summer weekend in June. The data from these counts will be used
by the MEA consultant to show existing levels of service and
future levels of service based on all projects approved or under
construction. See attachment #2 for list of intersections to be
counted.
On June 25th, staff will present a status report on the progress
of the MEA and the issues identified by the public and will
request Council review and confirmation of the work program.
July - August - September
During the month of July, staff will be working closely with the
MEA consultant team, monitoring the preparation of the document.
The first draft will be due in early August and after a brief
screencheck review by staff, the MEA will be presented to the
Planning Commission and public on August 21st.
- 3 -
- - ---- - -- -- --- -
. .
On September 17th, staff will present to Council the Draft MEA
document, a summary of the MEA findings and a summary of the
Planning Commission's comments. The Council will be asked to
review and comment on the MEA findings and on the scope and
direction of the moratorium work program.
Based upon the findings of the MEA and the direction of the City
Council, staff will prepare policy alternatives for heights and
FARs in the City's commercial districts. In September, staff
will prepare alternative development standards for evaluation in
the EIR. Planning Commission will be asked to review and approve
the alternatives to be analyzed in September. Council review and
approval will occur in October.
October - November - December
After approval by Council of the alternatives, a Draft EIR will
be prepared analyzing the policy alternatives potential for
environmental impacts. During November, the Draft EIR will be
released for a 30 day public review period and a public hearing
before the Planning Commission will be held on the policy
alternatives and Draft EIR. If a 30 day review period cannot be
obtained by the state Office of Planning, an EIR will not be
available at the conclusion of the one year period. Therefore,
the Council may have to consider extending the moratorium
ordinance until a Final EIR can be certified.
- 4 -
. .
In December, the policy alternatives, Planning commission
recommendations and the Draft EIR will be presented to City
council. At this time it will be critical that Council select
the preferred policies for revised development standards.
January - February, 1992
In January, staff will prepare necessary General Plan Amendments
and ordinance revisions based upon Council direction given in
December. staff will return to Council with these changes in
early February along with a resolution certifying the Final ErR
on the revised development standards.
Limitations of One Year Moratorium Work Proqram
The one year moratorium work program does not include the level
of community outreach and pUblic process the Council is
accustomed to promoting in long range planning and policy
development projects. The one year program does not include the
neighborhood specific orientation that was an integral part of
the proposed two year work plan. The public will only have
opportunities to participate during the MEA scoping meetings
(March-April 1991) , comment during public hearings before the
Planning Commission, and keep informed by monitoring the
quarterly staff reports to Council.
This timeline contains no flexibility and limits the ability of
the City Council or Planning Commission to expand the work
- 5 -
. .
program beyond adjustments to existing heights and FARs in
commercial districts. This timeline can not be adapted to
reflect changes in the local or regional economy or staff changes
without risking expiration of the one year commercial development
moratorium.
This one year program compels the Planning Commission and City
Council to make final land use and policy decisions by no later
than December, 1991.
This proposed work program responds to the negative impacts of
commercial development. It does does not include the development
and evaluation of a commercial allotment program (CAP), or the
development of standards to allow residential development in the
C5 and M1 districts. The work related to height and density
bonuses for child care, affordable housing, and social services
conducted as part of the Growth Management strategy will be
utilized to develop new commercial heights and floor area ratios.
However, neighborhood specific amenities will not be addressed as
part of this work program but will be addressed in the context of
other projects outside the work program.
Traffic Methodology and Definition of si9nificance
At this time, staff has requested that the MEA traffic analysis
use the Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) method of intersection
capacity analysis to determine the volume to capacity ratios.
The MEA will compare existing conditions LOS with the LOS that
- 6 -
. .
will exist after all approved discretionary projects are built
and occupied and all mitigation and traffic improvements planned
for and funded are implemented. The increase in volume to
capacity ratio will be calculated for each intersection and
identification of significant impacts will be determined based
upon the following definition of significance:
The cumulative project traffic is considered to have a
"significant" traffic impact if the addition of the
cumulative project traffic to an intersection currently
operating at:
* LOS A, B or C - future traffic causes the intersection
to operate at LOS D, E or F.
* LOS D - future traffic causes the intersection VIC to
increase 0.04 or greater.
* LOS E or F - future traffic causes the intersection VIC
to increase by 0.01 or greater.
As part of the preparation of the Congestion Management Program,
the LACTC will select an appropriate traffic study methodology.
The MEA will use the Critical Movement Analysis method unless the
Congestion Management Plan determines that another study
methodology is appropriate.
projects to be Completed outside of Moratorium Work proqram
All other tasks described in the previous general plan update
staff report will be done outside of the moratorium work program.
These projects include development of a Fiscal Impact of New
Development (FIND) model, an Historic Preservation Element,
- 7 -
---- ---- - - ----
. .
consolidation of the Open Space, Conservation and Scenic
Corridors Elements to the General Plan and an update of the
Housing Element to reflect new City policies and 1990 census
data. Work on the Seismic and Safety Elements, the Noise
Element, and an Air Quality Plan that are currently in progress
will also continue.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT
The recommendation presented in this report does not have a
budget or fiscal impact for the current fiscal year budget.
However, additional funds will be requested in the 1991-1992
budget for studies related to the evaluation of revised
development standards and preparation of an EIR.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city Council review the proposed
process and work program and provide staff with direction to
proceed.
Prepared By: Paul Berlant, Director of LUTM
Suzanne Frick, PPD Planning Manager
Amanda Schachter, Associate Planner
Liz Casey, Associate Planner
Land Use and Transportation Management Department
Program and Policy Development Division
Attachments: 1. RFP - Master Environmental Assessment
2. List of Intersections to be Studied
- 8 -
---
. .
ATTACHMENT #1
RFP For Master Environmental Assessment
March 4, 1991
NAME
BUSINESS
ADDRESS
CITY
Dear Consultant:
This is a Request for Proposal (RFP) to conduct a Master
Environmental Assessment (MEA) for the City of Santa Monica. The
MEA will be describe in detail the existing environmental
characteristics of the City. Where possible, the MEA will
quantify existing infrastructure capacities. The MEA will
provide the baseline data for future Master Environmental Impact
Reports and all subsequent project and policy related CEQA
documents. The MEA will be updated annually in the form of an
Master EIR to assess the cumulative impacts of new development
keep the information as current as possible.
Attachment #1 to this RFP is a mandatory intent to propose form.
This form must be completed by and returned to the City by no
later than 4 PM on Wednesday, March 13, 1991. The purpose of
the form is to allow the city to assess the potential number of
proposals that will be submitted.
Background
In recent years, the City of Santa Monica has experienced
unprecedented commercial development resulting in a heightened
awareness of city and regional infrastructure capacities,
environmental indicators and quality of life issues. On May 23,
1989, the City Council adopted a moratorium on all new
non-residential development above restricted development review
thresholds. Since this time, staff has conducted numerous public
workshops and hearings before the Planning Commission to review
and discuss proposed strategies of growth management. A
significant result of these efforts has been support for the
preparation of an annual Master EIR, beginning with this Master
Environmental Assessment which will provide an integrated,
comprehensive analysis of the entire City.
- 1 -
. .
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Although the state CEQA Guidelines do not require a specific
format, content or procedures, Section 15169(d) suggests the
following potential uses of a Master Environmental Assessment.
It states:
(1) A Master Environmental Assessment can identify the
environmental characteristics and constraints of an
area. This information can be used to influence the
design and location of individual projects.
(2) A Master Environmental Assessment may provide
information agencies can use in initial studies to
decide whether certain environmental effects are likely
to occur and whether certain effects will be
significant.
(3) A Master Environmental Assessment can provide a central
source of current information for use in preparing
individual EIRs and Negative Declarations.
( 4 ) Relevant portions of a Master Environmental Assessment
can be referenced and summarized in EIRs and Negative
Declarations.
(5) A Master Environmental Assessment can assist in
identifying long range, areawide, and cumulative impacts
of individual projects proposed in the area covered by
the assessment.
(6) A Master Environmental Assessment can assist a city or
county in formulating a general plan or any element of
such a plan by identifying environmental characteristics
and constraints that need to be addressed in the general
plan.
(7) A Master Environmental Assessment can serve as a
reference document to assist public agencies which
review other environmental documents dealing with
activities in the area covered by the assessment. The
public agency preparing the assessment should forward a
completed copy to each agency which will review projects
in the area.
Scope o~ the Master Environmental Assessment
The purpose of the MEA is to determine if suff icient
infrastructure capacities exist to accommodate projected
development. The consultant team must gather and evaluate data
on existing and future conditions in the city.
The MEA should also describe the overall environmental
characteristics of the City as a result of the assessment and
analyze the following specific environmental issues and content
areas. They are: earth, air, water, plant life, animal life,
- 2 -
-- - --
. .
energy, noise, risk of upset, human health, employment, housing,
population, land use, transportation/circulation, aesthetics,
utilities, public services, fiscal, recreation and
cUltural/historic resources and the cumulative effects of local
and regional development.
Earth
Identification of potential unstable or hazardous conditions to
include, but not be limited to:
o areas of potential liquefaction
o areas identified as flood zones
o areas of seismic risk
o areas of toxic soil
Air
An analysis of the air quality issues shall include a description
of regional and local climate conditions (temperature, wind rain,
humidity, inversions). Ambient air quality conditions shall be
measured by monitoring air quality data from the West Los Angeles
station of the Southern California Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) West Los Angeles station to identify and
describe any areas that exceed state and federal standards. The
location of all receptors shall be identified.
Water
A description of Santa Monica Bay water quality should include a
discussion of tidal wave and tsunami potential. The most recent
information available shall be used to assess the impacts of
storm drain run-off into the bay and planned capital projects to
improve the situation should be identified.
All sub-surface aquifers or wells shall be identified. Existing
City water supply sources shall be identified and quantified.
Plant Life
The MEA shall identify any rare or endangered species, including
Santa Monica Bay and plant life.
Animal Life
The MEA shall identify any rare or endangered species, including
birds and sea life.
Energy
Existing energy supply and consumption rates shall be identified.
Energy consumption from approved development in the City should
also be estimated.
- 3 -
. .
Noise
Noise levels throughout the city shall be identified. The
location of sensitive noise receptors shall be included.
Risk of Upset
Inventory of hazardous facilities in the event of a fire or
explosion, including but not limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation. The MEA shall include identification of
City emergency response plans in the event of an emergency.
Human Health
This section shall include describing the location and existing
service capacities of the City's health care facilities and
existing service capacities.
Employment, Housing, Population
The MEA shall describe the City's population, housing and
employment characteristics utilizing 1990 census data (subject to
availability). The discussion shall include growth projections,
employment projections and provide a jobs/housing balance
analysis using SCAG guidelines.
Land Use
Identify City zoning and development intensities, provide a
summary of land uses and general plan designations, and describe
any significant land use studies in progress. Location and type
of approved, but not yet completed or occupied, projects shall be
presented.
Transportation/circulation
The City will be conducting new traffic counts at nearly every
signalized intersection and several unsignalized intersections in
the City (see attachment #2). The counts will be taken during
April, May and June, 1991 and will be carefully timed and
selected to gather counts near the College and schools while in
session, near the oceanfront during weekend summer conditions and
on weekdays during the am and pm peak hours.
The MEA consultant team will be expected to analyze the traffic
counts provided by the City. The critical Movement Analysis
(CMA) shall be used for the intersection analysis. If, prior to
commencing work on the MEA, the Los Angeles County Transportation
Commission in its role as the designated Congestion Management
Agency, determines a preferred method of analysis other than CMA,
the City may adjust accordingly. Attachment #3 provides
guidelines for traffic and parking analysis.
The MEA must also project future conditions by calculating
background regional growth, trip generation estimates for all
- 4 -
-- -------- -
. .
projects approved by discretionary review. See attachment #4 for
a list of cumulative projects. Additionally, all conditions of
approval related to traffic, all traffic mitigation measures and
all planned improvement projects in the city's budget must be
documented and quantified. The analysis shall include a
comparison of existing and future conditions including graphic
representation of levels of service and volume to capacity
ratios. See attachment # 3 for detailed traffic analysis
guidelines including a discussion of the City's level of
significance criteria.
The MEA must also provide a description of existing:
o public transit systems (RTD, 8M, LACTC)
o bicycle path network including lane, paths and routes
o public parking facilities and existing levels of usage
o residential preferential parking zones
Areas of significant pedestrian traffic should also be documented
and analyzed. Particular attention should be given pedestrian
activity near the oceanfront and areas of pedestrian/vehicular
conflict.
utilities
Identify the existing supply and capacity levels required to
provide sufficient water, sewer, storm drain and solid waste
disposal facilities in the city. Identify existing networks for
all of the above.
Public Services
Assess the existing level of service and the capacities to
provide sufficient services to existing and approved development
for the following public services:
o fire protection
o police protection
o public schools
o maintenance of public parks, recreation and cultural
facilities, and public roads and lands
Fiscal
The MEA shall provide an analysis of the existing and future
budget demands and revenue sources for the city.
Recreation
Identify existing recreation facilities and assess the
availability of space and programming.
- 5 -
--- ----- --
. .
Cultural Resources
Identify existing cultural facilities and assess the availability
of space and programming. Identify any prehistoric sites,
archeological sites and all historic buildings,
Aesthetics
Identify significant public views as indicated in the Scenic
Corridors Element of the General Plan and the Draft Local Coastal
Program.
Cumulative Effects of Local and Regional Development
The analysis of cumulative effects from related projects should
include confirmation that approved projects on the cumulative
projects list (see attachment #4) are still planned and/or under
construction. Once the cumulative projects list has been
confirmed, each environmental topic area should include a
discussion of cumulative impacts.
proposal options and Budget
The City encourages creative approaches to accomplishing the
scope of work described above which may result in a multi-level
cost proposal. While cost considerations are critical, the city
values top quality work products and welcomes the opportunity to
evaluate innovative proposals. Whenever possible, please provide
sufficient budget detail to allow the city to assess the cost
implications of specific tasks within content areas.
General Plan Update
The findings of the MEA may result in a decision by the City to
update some or all of the city's General Plan Elements. If your
firm would be interested in working with the city on such a
project, please provide a brief description of your firm's
interest and ability to perform General Plan updates. If your
firm would collaborate with other consulting specialists, please
provide a brief description of the team you would assemble.
Timeline and Public Meetings
Completion of the MEA by September I, 1991 is critical to the one
year commercial development moratorium work program. Proposals
are due on Tuesday, April 2nd. The city will review proposals,
interview consultants, select a consultant and receive city
Council authorization to execute the MEA contract by April 23,
1991- Consultants will receive authorization to proceed by no
later than May 1st. The consultant will provide fifteen typed
copies of a screencheck draft MEA on or before August I, 1991 (12
weeks from authorization to proceed) . Staff will review the
screencheck, consultant will make revisions and Planning
Commission will review a draft during August. The Final MEA
- 6 -
. .
document will be revised and printed in September, 1991- The
consultant shall provide 100 copies of final MEA report.
During March and April, 1991, city staff will be conducting a
public scoping meeting wi th the Planning commission on the MEA
project. Staff will also conduct a series of neighborhood
scoping sessions. Should these meetings result in identification
of additional areas of analysis, the scope and budget will be
modified accordingly.
proposal Requirements
Your response to this RFP is requested no later than 4:00 P.M. on
Tuesday, April 2, 1991. The City is requesting that consultants
submit an intent to propose form (attachment #1) on or before
Wednesday, March 13. The form may be faxed to (213) 394-0992.
To maximize recycling, proposals should be printed on recycled or
white paper and should not include colored or plastic dividers.
You are advised that the city reserves the right to retain an
expert to evaluate your work if you are chosen as consultant.
Additionally, any contract entered into will be subject to
termination at any stage if in the judgment of the City, such
termination is in the best interest of the city. In the event
such decision is made, appropriate written notice would be given
before any termination and the consultant would be paid on a
pro-rata basis for work performed.
proposal Content
Your proposal should include the following in summary form:
I. Statement of the problem.
II. Approach to the task:
a) General description of methodology to be used.
b) Statement of tasks to be performed; number of hours
allocated for each task; methods of information
gathering and analysis to be used; anticipated extent
of City staff participation; percent time, or number of
hours anticipated by key staff; project management and
liaison with City staff; project schedule.
III. Deliverable Products:
A list of documents to be delivered to the City during and
at completion of the project.
IV. Statement of Qualifications:
0 Firm name, address and telephone numbers.
0 Description of Firm.
- 7 -
---
. .
0 Project team:
- Lead and support personnel, including a description of
responsibilities on the project, resume of professional
experience and educational background.
- Contemplated subcontractors if any, must be described.
A statement signed by such subcontractor should be
included with the proposal certifying that slhe has
participated in the proposal development and is
available to undertake a subcontract as indicated in
the proposal.
- Description of experience with projects of similar
scope and character. If your firm has not done work
for the City, a copy of a recent applicable report
should also be submitted.
0 Completed Affirmative Action Questionnaire (see
attachment #5).
0 References: You should include the name, address and
telephone numbers of at least five recent clients whom
we can contact regarding your work.
v. Fee Proposal and Form of Contract:
Proposed fees must be based on calculations of time and
materials necessary to accomplish the proposed scope of
services. Upon selection of the top-rated consultant, the
city will enter into a contract to be drafted by the city
Attorney. A copy of a sample contract is provided as
attachment #6; the city Attorney may require some amendments
to this form contract to fit the particulars of this
project. Your proposal should include any changes to this
form contract you believe are necessary prior to executing
the agreement.
selection of the Consultant
In reviewing and evaluating proposals and qualifications, the
fOllowing criteria will be considered:
0 Experience in preparing similar studies.
0 Proposed approach, tasks and methodology to be used in
providing the required services;
0 Appropriate distribution of responsibilities within the
project team;
0 Qualifications, experience and availability of key
personnel;
0 Record of successful relationships with other public and
corporate clients;
- 8 -
. .
0 Ability to meet or accelerate the project schedule;
0 Reasonableness of proposed fee schedule in relation to
proposed work plan;
0 Demonstrated commitment to affirmative action in employee
hiring and consultant subcontracting.
other Information
Prospective consultants must submit eight (8) copies of their
proposal. All proposals must be received by Tuesday, April 2,
1991. Proposals must be delivered to:
Program and Policy Development Division
city of Santa Monica
1660 7th street, Room 205
Santa Monica, California 90401
no later than 4:00 P.M. (April 2, 1991) .
If proposals are mailed through the u.S. Postal Service,
proposals must be addressed to:
Program and Policy Development Division
City of Santa Monica
1685 Main street, Room 212
Santa Monica, CA 90401
no later than 4:00 P.M. (April 2, 1991) .
By submitting a response to this Request for Proposal,
prospective consultant waives all rights to protest or seek any
legal remedies whatsoever regarding any aspect of this Request
for Proposal. The City reserves the right to select any number
of qualified finalists. In addition, the city reserves the right
to issue written notice to all participating firms of any changes
in the proposal submission schedule, should the City determine in
its sole and absolute discretion that such changes are necessary.
Acceptance of any proposal submitted pursuant to this Request for
Proposal shall not constitute any implied intent to enter into a
contract for consulting services. The City reserves the right to
reject any and all proposals.
Consultant selection will be made by the Land Use and
Transportation Management Department. The consultant selected
will be under contract to the city of Santa Monica.
If you have any questions, please call Associate Planners Liz
Casey or Amanda Schachter, at (21.3 ) 458-8585.
Sincerely,
Suzanne Frick, Planning Manager
Program and Policy Development Division
- 9 -
. .
wjmearfpcc
Attachments: NOT INCLUDED IN PACKET. PROVIDED TO COUNCIL UPON
REQUEST.
1. Intent to Propose Form
2. MEA Traffic Count Intersection List (see
attachment #2 to staff report)
3. MEA Traffic & Parking Analysis Guidelines
4. Cumulative Projects List
5. Affirmative Action Questionnaire
6. Sample Contract
- 10 -
- - -------
. .
ATTACHMENT #2
MEA TRAFFIC COUNT INTERSECTION LIST
SIGNALIZED
Pacific Coast Highway - California Avenue
Ocean Avenue - California Avenue
Ocean Avenue - Wilshire Boulevard
Ocean Avenue - Arizona Avenue
Ocean Avenue - Santa Monica Boulevard
Ocean Avenue - Colorado Avenue
Ocean Avenue - Pacific Coast Highway
Ocean Avenue - pico Boulevard
Neilson Way - Ocean Park Boulevard
Neilson Way - Barnard Way (Marine)
Second street - wilshire Boulevard
Second Street - Arizona Avenue
Second Street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Second street - Broadway
Second street - Colorado Avenue
Main street - Colorado
Main street - Pico Boulevard
Main street - Bicknell
Main street - Ocean Park Boulevard
Main street - Hill street
Main street - Ashland Avenue
Main street - Marine street
Third street - wilshire Boulevard
Third Street - Arizona Avenue
Third street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Third street - Broadway
Third Street - Colorado Avenue
Fourth street - Montana Avenue
Fourth street - California Avenue
Fourth street - wilshire Boulevard
Fourth street - Arizona Avenue
Fourth street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Fourth street - Broadway
Fourth street - colorado Avenue
Fourth Street - Olympic Boulevard
Fourth street - Civic Center Drive
Fourth Street - pico Boulevard
Fifth Street - wilshire Boulevard
Fifth street - Arizona Avenue
Fifth Street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Fifth Street - Broadway
Fifth street - Colorado Avenue
Sixth Street - Wilshire Boulevard
sixth street - Arizona Avenue
sixth Street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Sixth street - Broadway
sixth street - Colorado Avenue
Seventh Street - San Vicente Boulevard
- 1 -
. .
Seventh Street - Montana Avenue
Seventh street - Wilshire Boulevard
Seventh Street - Arizona Avenue
Seventh street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Seventh street - Broadway
Seventh Street - Colorado Avenue
Lincoln Boulevard - Montana Avenue
Lincoln Boulevard - Wilshire Boulevard
Lincoln Boulevard - Arizona Avenue
Lincoln Boulevard - Santa Monica Boulevard
Lincoln Boulevard - Broadway
Lincoln Boulevard - Colorado Avenue
Lincoln Boulevard - Olympic Boulevard (West)
Lincoln Boulevard - Olympic Boulevard (East)
Lincoln Boulevard - pica Boulevard
Lincoln Boulevard - Pearl Street
Lincoln Boulevard - Ocean Park Boulevard
Lincoln Boulevard - Ashland Avenue
Lincoln Boulevard - Marine Street
Eleventh street - Montana Avenue
Eleventh street - Wilshire Boulevard
Eleventh street - Arizona Avenue
Eleventh Street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Eleventh street - Broadway
Eleventh Street - Colorado Avenue
Eleventh Street - Olympic Boulevard
Eleventh street - Olympic Boulevard (East)
Eleventh street - Michigan Avenue
Eleventh street - pica Boulevard
Eleventh street - Ocean Park Boulevard
Euclid street - Wilshire Boulevard
Fourteenth Street - Montana Avenue
Fourteenth Street - Wilshire Boulevard
Fourteenth Street - Arizona Avenue
Fourteenth street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Fourteenth street - Broadway
Fourteenth street - Colorado Avenue
Fourteenth street - Olympic Boulevard
Fourteenth street - Michigan Avenue
Fourteenth street - pico Boulevard
Fourteenth street - Ocean Park Boulevard
Fifteenth street - Wilshire Boulevard
Sixteenth street - Pearl Street
Seventeenth Street - Montana Avenue
Seventeenth street - Wilshire Boulevard
Seventeenth street - Arizona Avenue
Seventeenth Street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Seventeenth street - Broadway
Seventeenth Street - Colorado Avenue
Seventeenth Street - Olympic Boulevard
Seventeenth street - pico Boulevard
Seventeenth street - Ocean Park Boulevard
Eighteenth street - Pico Boulevard
Twentieth Street - Montana Avenue
Twentieth Street - wilshire Boulevard
Twentieth Street - Arizona Avenue
- 2 -
- -----~--
. .
Twentieth street - santa Monica Boulevard
Twentieth street - Broadway
Twentieth street - Colorado Avenue
Twentieth street - Olympic Boulevard
Twentieth street - Michigan Avenue
Twentieth street - Delaware Avenue
Twentieth street - pico Boulevard
Twentieth street - Ocean Park Boulevard
Twenty-First street - Ocean Park Boulevard
Twenty-Second street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Twenty-Third Street - Wilshire Boulevard
Twenty-Third street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Twenty-Third Street - Pica Boulevard
Twenty-Third Street - Ocean Park Boulevard
Twenty-Fourth street - Montana Avenue
Twenty-Fourth Street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Cloverfield Boulevard - Broadway
Cloverfield Boulevard - Colorado Avenue
Cloverfield Boulevard - Olympic Boulevard
Cloverfield Boulevard - Michigan Avenue
Cloverfield Boulevard - 110 west bound off ramp
Cloverfield Boulevard - Delaware Avenue
Cloverfield Boulevard - Virginia Avenue
Cloverfield Boulevard - Pica Boulevard
Cloverfield Boulevard - Ocean Park Boulevard
Twenty-Fifth Street - Ocean Park Boulevard
Twenty-Sixth street - San Vicente Boulevard
Twenty-sixth street - Montana Avenue
Twenty-Sixth Street - Wilshire Boulevard
Twenty-Sixth street - Arizona Avenue
Twenty-Sixth street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Twenty-Sixth Street - Broadway
Twenty-sixth street - Colorado Avenue
Twenty-sixth street - Olympic Boulevard
Yale street - Wilshire Boulevard
Yale Street - Santa Monica Boulevard
Yale street - Broadway
Stewart Street - Colorado Avenue
Stewart Street - Olympic Boulevard
stewart street - pico Boulevard
Twenty-Eighth street - Ocean Park Boulevard
Berkeley Street - Wilshire Boulevard
Ocean Park Boulevard - between Thirty First & Thirty Second st.
Thirty-Third - Urban Avenue
Thirty-Fourth - pico Boulevard
centinela Avenue - Wilshire Boulevard
centinela Avenue - Santa Monica Boulevard
Centinela Avenue - Broadway
Centinela Avenue - Idaho Avenue
Centinela Avenue - Olympic Boulevard
Centinela Avenue - pica Boulevard
Centinela Avenue - Pearl street
centinela Avenue - Ocean Park Boulevard
- 3 -
. .
UNSIGNALIZED
Appian Way - Seaside Terrace
Appian Way - pico Boulevard
Pearl Street - sixteenth Street
Pearl Street - Twentieth Street
TOTAL ::: 161
w/traffic
- 4 -