SR-060491-7B
.
.
7-B
LUTM:PB:DKW:GSjapp90101.pcword.plan
council Mtg: May 28, 1991
MAY 2 8 ij91
santa Monica, California
'~g,
jUN
TO: Mayor and city council
FROM: city staff
SUBJECT: Appeal of a Planning Commission approval of conditional
Use Permit 90-101 and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
22722 to Allow the Construction of a Four unit
condominium at l247 23rd street in an R2 District.
Applicant: Joseph Yadegar
Appellant: Councilmember Herb Katz
INTRODUCTION
This report recommends that the City council deny the appeal and
uphold the Planning commission1s approval of CUP 90-101 and VTPM
22722 to allow a four unit condominium at l247 23th street. At
the Planning Commission meeting of April 17, 1991 the Commission
approved the project by a vote of 6-1. cDuncilmember Herb Katz
has appealed the Planning commission's action based upon the
encroachment of the subterranean underground parking structure
into side, rear and front yards.
These encroachments are
permitted by the zoning Ordinance.
The plans indicate the
subterranean parking structure abuts the north and south side
property lines, (separated by an 8" concrete block wall). The
west wall of the subterranean area abuts the front property line,
while the east wall (nearest to Twenty Third Court alley) is
located 416" from the rear (subterranean) property line. General
services has required a 216" dedication on the rear of this
property for future alley widening.
7-9
- 1 -
JUN 4 /991
.
.
The appeal form is attached for the council's information
(Attachment A).
BACKGROUND
On April l7, 1991, when the project was reviewed by the Planning
Commission. The Commission's principle concerns were the project
design and its compatibility with the one story structures on
either side of the proposed project. The block has approximately
thirteen, or a little over half, single story residential
structures with the remainder being two story apartments or
condominiums. The action of the Planning Commission was to
approve the projeot with the special conditions that (1) the
Architectural Review Board pay particular attention to the
transition of the architecture and mass to the one story
structures located on either side of the proposed project and (2)
that the first l4' in the front yard have no less than 3' of
earth above the garage slab to provide adequate soil depth for
mature landscaping. The one Commissioner who did not support the
motion cited what he felt was sparse landscaping on the north and
south sideyards as the reason for his no vote.
No members of the public spoke at the Planning Commission hearing
and no written comments were received by staff concerning this
project.
The basis for the appeal was the lack of significant unexcavated
areas in the project. Section 9040.17 of the Municipal Code
"Unexcavated Area in Side Yardsfl states that on any (R2) parcel
"having a width of 50' or greater ... there shall be provided and
- 2 -
.
.
maintained an unexcavated side yard equal to 4' in width along
the entire length of at least one of the side property lines..."
Subterranean and semi -subterranean parking structures and
basements may not proj ect into any portion of the required
unexcavated area. At least 50% of the surface area of the
unexcavated area shall be landscaped pursuant to the provisions
of Subchapter 5B, (Landscape Standards).
The dimensions of this property are 40' x 130.l5' (after 2' 6"
alley dedication) with a total lot area of 5,206 sq. ft. The 40'
width of this property exempts it from the requirement of having
one unexcavated side yard.
The planting requirements for the proposed project are for a
minimum of 50% of the required front yard setback to be
landscaped. The application meets this standard. The applicant
has attached a planting plan, with landscape provided in planters
along the south roof decks, balconies along the south and west
elevations of the second floor, and planting pockets and planters
at ground level along the north and south elevations.
ANALYSIS
Project Design
Proposed is the construction of four townhouse style condominiums
containing three, two bedroom units and one, three bedroom unit.
All units have a half bath, primary living, dining and kitchen
facilities on the ground level in addition to private patios.
Bedrooms with two full baths, south facing balconies and roof
- 3 -
.
.
decks accessed from the master bedroom are located on the second
level. Lofts located between the first and second floors, over-
look the primary living area. Construction of the condominiums
would be over a 9 space subterranean parking garage. As pro-
posed, the building would be two stories, plus a loft level and
301 in height. The units would be accessed via the north side
elevation. The design includes private patios and upper level
decks for each unit.
parking
The parking requirements are based on a ratio of 2 spaces for
each two bedroom unit (units B,C,D) and 2.5 spaces for unit A, a
three bedroom unit, for a total of nine spaces. Nine spaces are
provided in a subterranean parking garage accessed from Twenty
Third Court alley. Private stairs provide access for each of the
four units to the garage. One common pedestrian access is pro-
vided at the front elevation.
Nei9hborhood Compatibility
The proposed two story condominium would be located in an area
that currently contains a mix of one to two story residential
buildings. While the proposed building is larger than the one
story buildings located on the adjacent lots to the north and the
south, the height of the building is consistent with other two
story buildings in the area. The proposal is for a 30', two
story condominium with loft and roof decks. The heights and set-
back requirements comply with the standards set forth in the R2
District. The Planning Commission added a special condition to
- 4 -
.
.
address compatibility of the proposed project with the adjacent
one story dwellings on either side of the subject site.
Conclusion
The proposed condominium complies with all applicable provisions
of the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. The Planning Com-
mission's conditions address issues of compatibility with exist-
ing buildings and requires three feet of soil above the subter-
ranean garage to provide adequate depth for mature planting
within the front yard setback. The Zoning Code does not require
unexcavated yard areas for lots of this size (due to the 40'
width of the lot). Staff is in the process of preparing recom-
mendations to the Planning Commission to increase the require-
ments for unexcavated yard areas. However I in the absence of
adopted standards, staff is recommending that the appeal be
denied.
RECOMMENDATION
In that the project complies with existing Code standards, it is
respectfully recommended that the Council deny the appeal and
uphold the Planning commission approval of Conditional Use Permit
90-10l and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 22722 with the findings
and conditions contained in the statement of Official Action
dated April l7, 1991 (Attachment D).
- 5 -
.
.
Prepared by: Paul Berlant, LUTM Director
D. Kenyon Webster, Planning Manager
Gina Szilak, Assistant Planner
Planning Division
Land Use and Transportation Management Department
Attachments: A. Appeal form dated 04/28/91
B. Planning Commission staff report dated 4/3/91
C. Minutes of 4/17/91 Planning Commission Meeting
D. statement of Official Action
E. Plot Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, Landscaping
F. VTPM 22722
GS
PC/app90101
05/16j9l
- 6 -
. Ci!yof .
Santa Monica
~mmumty and EconomiC Development OepartmJfi:
Planning and Zonlna DIvISion
l21J} 458-8341
APPEAL FORM
,~V-'_""'I ~... '{,
~
; tl (-r i
I; I
/ / <:...... !
; .---,.->,/
~ ~ t ~t ...--\.
,'" I;-tS
FEE. $100.00
Date Filed A P n 1 2 3, 1991
ReceIVed by _ PB/DKW
Receipt No. N ( A
Name
Address
Contact Person
Herb Katz
PhOne
Please descnbe the prolect and declSlO/1 to be appealed
Case Number CUP 90-101, VTPM 22722
Address 1247 23rd Street
Apphcant Jos eph Yadeger
Ongmal heanng date AD nl 17. 1991
Onglnal actIOn Approved
Please state the spiClflc reason(l) b'!he apPe~ Aes thet i cs, m1 S- use nf ~ 11tC I1t Of qua -: , ty of"
nei~hborhood, regarding landscapin~ in unexcavated yards.
If add1bDnal space lIl'l8f1ded. u. tiU. ot tonn.
Stgnature
OUt
Mt~~~\- It-
.
.
CITY PLANNING DIVISION
Land Use and Transportation Management Department
M E M 0 RAN DUM
DATE: April 3, 1991
TO: The Honorable Planning Commission
FROM: Planning staff
SUBJECT: Conditional ~se Permit 90-101, VTPM 22722
Address:
Applicant:
l247 23rd street
Joseph Yadegar
SUl.1MARY
Action: Application for a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative
Tract Map to allow construction of a four unit condominium. The
proposal meets all applicable development standards.
rtecommendation: Approval with conditions.
Permit streamlining Expiration Date: August 28, 1991
Subdivision Action Deadline: April 19, 1991
SI~E LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The subject property is a 5306 sq. ft. parcel located on the east
side of 23rd street between Arizona Avenue and Wilshire Boulevard
having a frontage of 40' feet on 23rd street. Surrounding uses
consist of one and two story residential units (R2) to the north,
one and two story residential units (R2) to the south, one and
two story residential units(R2) to the east and one and two story
residential units (R2) to the west. Existing on-site use are two
single story detached structures.
Zoning District: R-2
Land Use District: Low Density Housing
Parcel Area: 40' x 130.15'= 5,206 sq. ft.
(2'611 alley dedication)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Proposed is the demolition of two, single story residences and
one detached garage. The proposed structure is s1tuated between
single story residential buildings on either side. The proposed
project consists of a four unit, two story building w1th lofts. A
- 1 -
A ft-.c1. fV\e.n. +- ~
.
.
nine (9) space subterranean parking garage is proposed, accessed
from Twenty-Third Court alley (between Wilshire Boulevard and
Arizona Avenue)
rlliNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
The proposed project is consistent with the Municipal Code and in
conformity with the General Plan as shown in Attachment A.
CEQA STATUS The project is categorically exempt from the provl-
sions of CEQA, pursuant to Class 3(2) of the City of Santa Monica
Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA.
RENT CONTROL STATUS
Rent Control Board has granted Non-Rental Exempt Status effective
7/2l/88.
FEES
The project is subject to a Parks and Recreation Facilities Tax
of $200 per unit and a Condominium Facilities Tax of $1,000 per
saleable unit for a total tax of $4800. In addition, the project
is required to comply with Program 12 of the Housing Element of
the General Plan as implemented by Ordinance No. 1519 (CCS),
which may be satisfied by providing affordable inclusionary hous-
ing on-site or by payment of an in-lieu fee. This fee, prior to
adjustment in accordance with changes in the CPI, will be $78,000
based on a gross residential project area of 5,200 square feet.
ANALYSIS
The proposal is adjacent to two single story structures on either
slde. The block has approximately thirteen, or a little over
half, single residential structures with the remainder being two
story apartments or condominiums. The proposed proj ect ,;"ould
include the construction of a four unit condominium building over
a nine space subterranean parking garage. The proposed structure
is 30' high to the roof line with an additional 8' for stairwell
enclosures. Included in the units are three two bedroom, and one
three bedroom unit. The design includes a private patio, balcony
and roof deck for each unit. Staff is recommending a condition
that the roof decks be pulled in two feet from the building sides
to maintain privacy of the neighbors. In addition, the front
chimney encroaches into the front yard setback on foot farther
than permitted by code. A condition is included to address thlS.
PARKING AND CIRCULATION
The parking requirements are based on a ratio of 2 spaces for
each two bedroom unit and 2.5 spaces for each three bedroom unit.
The rear unit has two bedrooms and a loft larger than lOO sq. ft.
which counts as a three-bedroom unit for the parking
calculations.
- 2 -
.
.
Parking requirements for this proj ect total nine (9) spaces.
Spaces are provided in a subterranean parking garage accessed
from the 23rd Court alley. Common pedestrian access to the
garage would be provided by four stairways, one for each unit.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY
The proposed two story condominium with lofts are within a neigh-
borhood in transition. Half of the residential structures are
older single story one and two unit lots~ the remaining struc-
tures are two story apartments & condominiums. The proposed site
is just north of st. Johns Hospital.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Condition-
al Use Permit 90-101 and Vested Tentative Parcel Map 22722 sub-
ject to the following conditions and findings.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FINDINGS
1. The proposed subdivision, together with its provision for
its design and improvements, is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans as adopted by the City of Santa
Monica, in that the project conforms to the provisions of
the R2 District standards of the Zoning Ordinance and the
Low Density Multiple Residential Distrlct section of the
Land Use Element of the General Plan.
2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of
development, in that it is adequately sized lot with no
unusual characteristics.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density
of development, in that the R-2 zone allows 1 unit per
1,500 sq ft. The existing lot is 40 x l30.l5= 5,206 sq
ft. By Code density is calculated using half the width of
the alley, there by allowing four units on site.
4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
will not cause substantial environmental damage or sub-
stantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
hab~tat, in that the proposed development is an infill of
urban land which does not currently support fish or sig-
nificant wildlife.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement
will not cause serious public health problems, in that the
proposed development complies with the provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan.
6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public
at large, for access through, or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision, in that the subject site is ade-
quately served by existing streets.
- 3 -
.
.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
1. The proposed use is one conditionally permitted within the
subject district and complies with all of the applicable
provisions of the "City of Santa Honica Comprehensive Land
Use and Zoning ordinance", in that the proposed condomini-
um conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan.
2. The proposed use would not impair the integrity and
character of the district in which it is to be established
or located, in that it would be located in a mUlti-family
residential district.
3. The subject parcel is physically suitable for the type of
land use being proposed, in that the proposed project
meets the densi ty and development standards for the R2
District.
4. The proposed use is compatible with any of the land uses
presently on the subject parcel if the present land uses
are to remain, in that existing structures would be
demolished.
:). The proposed use would be compatible with existing and
permissible land uses within the district and the general
area in which the proposed use is to be located, ln that
the area is a mix of single-family and multi-family
residential buildings.
6. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed
use would not be detrimental to public health and safety,
in that the proposed development is an in-fill of urban
land adequately served by existing infrastructure.
7. Public access to the proposed use will be adequate, in
that the site is adequately served by existing streets and
an alley.
8. The physical location or placement of the use on the site
is compatible with and relates harmoniously to the sur-
rounding neighborhood, in that all setbacks as condi-
tioned, lot coverage and height requirements for the R2
District have been met.
9. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives,
and policies of the General Plan, in that the area is de-
fined as a Low Density Residential area by the Land Use
Element to the General Plan.
10. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare,
in that the proposed project complies with the provisions
of the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan.
11. The proposed use conforms precisely to the applicable per-
formance standards contained in Subchapter 6, Section 9050
- 4 -
.
.
and special conditions outlined in Subchapter 7, section
9055 of the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use
and Zoning ordinance, in that no Performance standards
Permit would be required.
12. The proposed use will not result in an overconcentration
of such uses in the immediate vicinity, in that the area
is defined as a low-density mUlti-family residential area.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS
Plans
1. This approval is for those plans dated (March 27, 1991) a
copy of which shall be maintained in the files of the
city Planning Division. Project development shall be
consistent with such plans, except as otherwise specified
in these conditions of approval.
2. The Plans shall comply with all other provisions of Chap-
ter 1, Article IX of the Municipal Code, (Zoning Or-
dinance) and all other pertinent ordinances and General
Plan policies of the City of Santa Monica.
3. Final parking lot layout and specifications shall be sub-
ject to the review and approval of the Parking and Traffic
Engineer.
4. Minor amendments to the plans shall be subject to approval
by the Director of Planning. A significant change in the
approved concept shall be subject to Planning Commission
Review. Construction shall be in conformance with the
plans submitted or as modified by the Planning Commission,
Architectural Review Board or Director of Planning.
Architectural Review Board
3. Prior to consideration of the project by the Architectural
Review Board, the applicant shall review disabled access
requirements with the Building and Safety Division and
make any necessary changes in the project design to
achieve compliance with such requirements. The Architec-
tural Review Board, in its review, shall pay particular
attention to the aesthetic, landscaping, and setback im-
pacts of any ramps or other features necessitated by ac-
cessibility requirements.
6. The existing mature palm tree shall be preserved in their
present location on site, relocated to a specific location
on site or replaced with specimen trees to the satisfac-
tion of the Architectural Review Board.
7. The Architectural Review Board, in its review, shall en-
sure that at least 50% of the required front yard setback
shall be adequately landscaped.
- 5 -
.
.
8. Plans for final design, landscaping, screening, trash en-
closures, and signage shall be subject to review and ap-
proval by the Architectural Review Board.
9. The Architectural Review Board, in its review, shall pay
particular attention to the project's pedestrian orienta-
tion and amenities; scale and articulation of design ele-
ments ; exterior colors, textures and material s ; l,lindow
treatment; glazing; and landscaping.
10. Construction period signage shall be subject to the
approval of the Architectural Review Board.
11. Landscaping plans shall comply with subchapter 5B
(Landscaping standards) of the zoning ordinance including
use of water-conserving landscaping materials, landscape
maintenance and other standards contained in the
Subchapter.
12. Refuse areas, storage areas and mechanical equipment shall
be screened in accordance with SMMC Section 9040.13-
9040.15. Refuse areas shall be of a size adequate to meet
on-site need, including recycling. The Architectural Re-
view Board in its review shall pay particular attention to
the screening of such areas and equipment.
13. No gas or electric meters shall be located within the re-
quired front or street side yard setback areas. The Ar-
chitectural Review Board in its review shall pay particu-
lar attention to the location and screening of such
meters.
Fees
14. The city is contemplating the adoption of a Transportation
Management Plan which is intended to mitigate traffic and
air quality impacts resulting from both new and existing
development. The Plan will likely include an ord~nance
e stabl ishing mi t iga tion requ irements , incl uding one-t ime
payment of fees on certain types of new development, and
annual fees to be paid by certain types of employers in
the City. This ordinance may require that the owner of
the proposed proj ect pay such new development fees, and
that employers within the project pay such new annual em-
ployer fees related to the City's Transportation Manage-
ment Plan.
15. A Park and Recreation Facilities Tax of $200.00 per
residential unit shall be due and payable at the time of
issuance of a building permit for the construction or
placement of the residential unites) on the subject lot,
per and subject to the provisions of Section 6670 et seq.
of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.
Demolition
- 6 -
.
.
16. Until such time as the demolition is undertaken, and un-
less the structure is currently in use, the existing
structure shall be maintained and secured by boarding up
all openings, erecting a security fence, and removing all
debris, bushes and planting that inhibit the easy surveil-
lance of the property to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Officer and the Fire Department. Any landscap-
ing material remaining shall be watered and maintained
until demolition occurs.
l7. Unless otherwise approved by the Recreation and Parks De-
partment and the Planning Division, at the time of demoli-
tion, any street trees shall be protected from damage,
death, or removal per the requirements of ordinance 1242
( CCS) .
18. Immediately after demolition (and during construction), a
security fence, the height of which shall be the maximum
permitted by the Zoning Ordinance, shall be maintained
around the perimeter of the lot. The lot shall be kept
clear of all trash, weeds, etc.
19. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, applicant shall
prepare for Building Div~sion approval a rodent and pest
control plan to ensure that demolition and construction
activities at the site do not create pest control impacts
on the project neighborhood.
20. No demolition of buildings or structures built prior to
1930 shall be permitted until the end of a 3D-day review
period by the Landmarks Commission to determine whether an
application for landmark designation shall be filed. If
an application for landmark designation is filed, no de-
molition shall be approved for 90 days from receipt of a
complete application for demolition, or upon the deter-
mination by the Landmarks Commission that the application
for landmark designation does not merit formal consider-
ation, whichever is sooner.
Construction
21. Unless otherwise approved by the Department of General
Services, all sidewalks shall be kept clear and passable
during the grading and construction phase of the project.
22. Sidewalks, curbs, gutters, paving and driveways which need
replacing or removal as a result of the project as deter-
mined by the Department of General services shall be re-
constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of
General Services. Approval for this work shall be ob-
tained from the Department of General Services pr~or to
issuance of the building permits.
23. Vehicles hauling dirt or other construction debris from
the site shall cover any open load with a tarpaulin or
other secure covering to minimize dust emissions.
- 7 -
.
.
24. street trees shall be mainta1ned, relocated or provided as
required in a manner consistent with the City's Tree Code
(Ord. 1242 CCS), per the specifications of the Department
of Recreation and Parks and the Department of General Ser-
vices. No street tree shall be removed without the ap-
proval of the Department of Recreation and Parks.
25. A construction period mitigation plan shall be prepared by
the applicant for approval by the Department of General
Services prior to issuance of a building permit. The ap-
proved mitigation plan shall be posted on the site for the
duration of the project construction and shall be produced
upon request. As applicable, this plan shall 1) Specify
the names, addresses, telephone numbers and bus1ness
license numbers of all contractors and subcontractors as
well as the developer and architect; 2) Describe how de-
molition of any existing structures is to be accomplished;
3) Indicate where any cranes are to be located for erec-
tion/construction; 4) Describe how much of the public
street, alleyway, or sidewalk is proposed to be used in
conjunction with construction; 5) Set forth the extent
and nature of any pile-driv1ng operations; 6) Describe
the length and number of any tiebacks which must extend
under the property of other persons; 7) Specify the na-
ture and extent of any dewatering and its effect on any
adjacent buildings; 8) Describe anticipated contruction-
related truck routes, number of truck trips, hours of
hauling and parking location: 9) Specify the nature and
extent of any helicopter hauling; lO) state whether any
construction activity beyond normally permitted hours is
proposed; ll) Describe any proposed construction noise
mitigation measures; l2) Describe construction-period
security measures including any fencing, lighting, and
security personnel; l3) Provide a drainage plan; 14)
Provide a construction-period parking plan which shall
minimize use of public streets for parking; 15) List a
designated on-site construction manager.
26. A sign shall be posted on the property in a manner consis-
tent with the public hearing sign requirements which shall
identify the address and phone number of the owner and/or
applicant for the purposes of responding to questions and
complaints during the construction period. said sign
shall also indicate the hours of permissible construction
work.
27. A copy of these conditions shall be posted in an easily
visible and accessible location at all times during con-
struction at the project site. The pages shall be lami-
nated or otherwise protected to ensure durability of the
copy.
Environmental Mitigation
28.
ultra-low flow plumbing fixtures are reauired on all new
development and remodeling where plumbing is to be added.
- 8 -
.
.
(Maximum 1.6 gallon toilets and 1.0 gallon urinals and low
flow shower head.)
29. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of occupancy, project
owner shall present documentation to the General Services
Department certifying that existing Santa Monica occupan-
cies with toilets installed prior to 1978 have been retro-
fitted with ultra low-flow toilets (1.6 gallons per flush
or less) such that development of the new project will
not result in a net increase in wastewater flows. Flow
from existing occupancies which will be removed as part
of the new development may be deducted from flow at-
tributable to the new development if such occupancies have
been occupied within one year prior to issuance of a
Building Permit for the proposed project. Alternatively,
proj ect owner may prov ide a payment to the General Ser-
vices Department in an amount specified by General Ser-
vices in lieu of the installation requirement, which funds
shall be used by the City for the exclusive purpose of
achieving compliance ~..,ith this condition by retrofitting
existing occupancies. Flow calculations for new develop-
ment and existing occupancies shall be consistent with
guidelines developed by the General Services Department.
Projects subject to this condition shall not be eligible
for the "Baysaver" rebate program.
Miscellaneous CUP Conditions
30. The building address shall be painted on the roof of the
building and shall measure four feet by eight feet (32
square feet).
3l. If any archaeological remains are uncovered during
excavation or construction, work in the affected area
shall be suspended and a recognized specialist shall be
contacted to conduct a survey of the affected area at
project's owner's expense. A determination shall then be
made by the Director of Planning to determine the sig-
nificance of the survey findings and appropriate actions
and requirements, if any, to address such findings.
32. street and/or alley lighting shall be provided on public
rights of way adjacent to the project if and as needed per
the specifications and with the approval of the Department
of General Services.
33. Any lofts or mezzanines shall not exceed 99 square feet
unless appropriate required parking is supplied. Such
areas shall also not exceed 33.3% of the room below unless
compliance with the district's limits on number of stories
can be maintained.
34. No fence or wall within the required front yard setback,
inclusive of any subterranean garage slab and fencing or
railing on top thereof, shall exceed a height of 42" above
actual grade of the property.
- 9 -
.
.
35. A security gate shall be provided across the opening to
the subterranean garage. If any guest parking space is
located in the subterranean garage, the security gate
shall be equipped with an electronic or other system which
will open the gate to provide visitors with vehicular ac-
cess to the garage without leaving their vehicles. The
security gate shall receive approval of the Police and
Fire Departments prior to issuance of a building permit.
Validity of Permits
36. In the event permittee violates or fails to comply with
any conditions of approval of this permit, no further per-
mits, licenses, approvals or certificates of occupancy
shall be issued until such violation has been fully
remedied.
37. Within ten days of Planning Division transmittal of the
Statement of Official Action, project applicant shall
sign and return a copy of the Statement of Official Action
prepared by the Planning Division, agreeing to the Condi-
tions of approval and acknowledging that failure to comply
with such conditions shall constitute grounds for poten-
tial revocation of the permit approval. By signing same,
applicant shall not thereby waive any legal rights appli-
cant may possess regarding said conditions. The signed
Statement shall be returned to the Planning Division.
Failure to comply with this condition shall constitute
grounds for potential permit revocation.
38. This determination shall not become effective for a period
of fourteen days from the date of determination, or, if
appealed, until a final determination is made on the ap-
peal. Any appeal must be made in the form required by the
Zoning Administrator. The term of approval of this permit
shall expire two years from the permit's effective date,
unless a building permit has been issued for the project
prior to the expiration date.
39. Within thirty (30) days after final approval of the proj-
ect, a sign shall be posted on site stating the date and
nature of the approval. The sign shall be posted in ac-
cordance with the Zoning Administrator guidelines and
shall remain in place until a building permit is issued
for the project. The sign shall be removed promptly when
a building permit is issued for the project or upon ex-
piration of the Conditional Use Permit.
Special Conditions
40. Prior to issuance of a certificate of Occupancy, the owner
shall dedicate the rear 2.5' of the property for future
alley widening to the satisfaction of the General services
Department.
- 10 -
.
.
41. The required front yard set back is twenty feet. A chim-
ney and floor area of a bay window encroach into this set-
back by one foot. Plans shall be revised and submitted
to staff prior to Architectural Review Board submittal.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CONDITIONS
1. All off site improvements required by the City Engineer
shall be installed. Plans and specifications for off site
improvements shall be prepared by a registered civil en-
gineer and approved by the city Engineer.
2. A subdivision improvement agreement for all off site im-
provements required by the City Engineer shall be prepared
and a performance bond posted through the city Attorney's
office.
3. The tentative map shall expire 24 months after approval,
except as provided in the provisions of California Govern-
ment Code section 66452.6 and Sections 9380-9382 of the
Santa Monica Municipal Code. During this time period the
final map shall be presented to the City of Santa Monica
for approval. No building permit for the project will be
granted until such time as the final map is approved by
the Santa Monica City Council.
4. In submitting required materials to the Santa Monica En-
gineering Division for a final map, applicant shall pro-
vide a copy of the approved Statement of Official Action.
5. Prior to approval of the final map, Condominium Associa-
tion By-Laws (if applicable) and a Declaration of CC & R's
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. The
CC & R' 5 shall contain a non-discrimination clause as
presented in Section 9392 (SMMC) and in the case of con-
dominiums, contain such provisions as are required by Sec-
tion 9122E (SMMC).
6. The developer shall provide for payment of a Condominium
Tax of $1,000 per saleable residential unit per the provi-
sions of section 665l et seq. of the Santa Monica
Municipal Code.
7. The form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of the
final subdivision map shall conform to the provisions of
sections 9330 through 9338 (SMMC) and the Subdivision Map
Act. The required Final Map filing fee shall be paid
prior to scheduling of the Final Map for City Council
approval.
8. The form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of the
final parcel map shall conform to the provisions of Sec-
tions 9350 through 9357 (SMMC) and the Subdivision Map
Act.
- 1l -
.
.
8. The form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of the
final parcel map shall conform to the provisions of Sec-
tions 9350 through 9357 (SMMC) and the Subdivision Map
Act.
9. One mylar and one blue-line copy of the final map shall be
provided to and recorded with the Los Angeles County Re-
corder prior to issuance of any building permit for a con-
dominium project pursuant to Government Code section
66499.30. Applicant shall also provide the County with a
copy of this statement of Official Action at the time the
required copies of the map are submitted.
10. A copy of the recorded map shall be provided to the Plan-
ning and Zoning Division before issuance of a Building
permit.
11. Pursuant to section 9366 (SMMC) , if the subdivider or any
interested person disagrees with any action by the
Planning commission with respect to the tentative map, an
appeal or complaint may be filed in writing with the City
Clerk. No appeal or complaint may be filed after a ten
day period from the commission's decision on the tentative
map.
Prepared by: Gina Szilak, Assistant Planner
Attachments:
A. Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance
B. Radius and Location Map
c. Photographs of site and Surrounding Properties
D. Plot Plan, Floor Plans, Elevation and Sections
E. vesting Tentative Parcel Map 22722
RES
PC/cup9010l
03/27/91
- l2 -
.
.
ATTACHMENT A
MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
Permitted Use
Land Use
Element Municipal Code
same as Low-Density
Code Multi-Family
Residential
Project
Low-Density
Residential
Condominium
category
Moratorium status
N/A
N/A
Dwelling Units same as 4 Units
Code
4 Units
Helght of Building 30' 30' pitched roof
30' to roof
38' parapet &
mechanical
equipment
Number of stories same as 2 stories
Code
2 stories + loft
Height of Walls,
Fences N/A Not to exceed 42" Will meet Code
in front yard, 6 '
in rear yard, or
8 ' with adjacent
property owner's
approval
Setbacks
Front yard N/A 20' 20 '
Sideyard N/A 4 ' 4'
Rearyard N/A 15' 15 ' (2 ' 6"
required
dedication)
Projections Into
Yards
N/A
Per section
9040.l8
bay window lan
into front yard
l2"-l8" chimney
into front and
rear yards as
conditioned
"
Lot Coverage
N/A
50%
50%
- l3 -
Parking
Access
Alley dedication
.
Alley
access is
encouraged
,,,hen alley
exists.
N/A
Parking Space Number N/A
rrash Area
Compact Parking %
Mechanical Equip.
Screenlng
Front yard
Landscaping
Unexcavated
Sideyard
N/A
NjA
N/A
N/A
N/A
Alley access is
required when
alley exists, wlth
exceptions per
Sections 9044.8-9.
2'6"
9
o
Trash enclosure
with minimum 5-8'
solid walls and
gate is required.
Mechanical equip-
ment extending more
than 12" above roof
parapet shall be
fully screened from
a horizontal plane.
50%
not required
- 14 -
.
access from 23rd
Court alley
2' 6"
9
o
Trash enclosure
provided in
subterranean
garage
Any mechanical
equipment must
meet Code.
50%
not required
i~
~~e c .." :!:!
,.. "'"
~ .. .
~ ~ III
;: l <; c : -.....
a:: ............ ~ 0
J ~.\ .c: a::
:> ~
IoU u..!
- :'01 ...J ;... ::;) W
-= ~ ::> ....I
0 "T ~ Z /~i1LO" :::l
lU g(
10 ~
~4ft
~
. T R AC T X Q 46 5 0 Y
.., ~ o~ ~
....~
fl1 ;
<t
<
\)
N
-
t'l
<:t
.
.
!
\u
c:!.
....
-
V)
-4
.
, STREET
'-.. ~
-
~[p
~el 13
aLDtK 3 tlO
iI ",.,u
1 ~AL DESCRIPTION at 2.. 2.. ~\Q(,.."<- '-\ (~LnQ\~"'--
/ - . ~ C; r~ ~V)
STREET ADDRESS \ Z '-\ t ?- :''-1:\ ~ ~eQ...\-
-.
CASE NO. CU t-" 90- \0\
'1
ZONE
~-L
II
Ii
I
APPLICANT
~~t' 'no VCi d ~ ~<-
/
DATE
RADIUS MAP FOR
PUBLIC
HEARING
DATE
i-~~9.1
J>~[MlMOlM~ [Q)~[p~~If~~{MY
~3'f'1 @~
S-t- Jl1-UCG-
~Uro~f6DA
Refer.nce-
Arlol Mop
Sheet No,
2~
'" '!oil
n~- ...--... 1
- 2
j r I - I - . ~u . . i M l M . ~
I" I '" .,..- .. i "" i .. i '0 i '"
.
~
'" 1 '" I '" fT' 'I \I' : '" 1 ~j'a
.
.
H I NUT E S
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
WEDNESDAY, APRIL l7, 1991
7:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ROOM 213, CITY HALL
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Consent Calendar
A. CUP 90-101, VTPM 22722, l247 23rd street, R2 zone,
Applicant: Joseph Yadeger, To permit construction of a 2
story + loft, 4 unJ.t condominium on a 5306 sq. ft.
parcel. Parking would be provided in a 9 space
subterranean parking garage accessed from the rear
alley. (Planner: Szilak)
The applicant I s architect ,vas present to discuss the
project.
commissioner Nelson commented on the excavation to the
front property line and lack of planting area. The
architect stated that there would be planters with a
depth of three to four feet.
Chair Mechur stated that the Commission's recent
condition has required three to four feet of earth cover
over the garage slab.
Chair Mechur closed the public hearing.
commissioner Nelson stated he could not support the
project because of the weak landscaping.
commissioner Kaufman made a motion for approval of the
project.
commissioner pyne seconded the motion.
commissioner Polhemus asked that to Condition #9 on page
6, wording be added that (1) ARB shall pay attention to
adjacent one story building and (2) that the first
fourteen feet of property shall have no less than three
feet of earth over the slab (of the subterranean parking
garage) .
commissioner Kaufman agreed to the new conditions.
The motion was approved by the following vote:
AYES: Kaufman, Mechur, Morales, Polhemus,
Rosenstein; NOES: Nelson.
pyne,
A "A~tV\~i\\- C
- 1 -
.
.. TfAcH M E-lviT
D
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL ACTION
PROJECT
NUMBER: CUP 90-l0I, VTPM 22722
LOCATION: 1247 23rd street
APPLICANT: Joseph Yadegar
CASE PLANNER: Gina Szilak
REQUEST: Construction of a Four-unit Condominium in R-2
Zone
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
4/l7/9l
Date.
x
Approved based on the following findings and
subject to the conditions below.
Denied.
other.
EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF ACTION(S) IF NOT APPEALED:
5/l/91
4/27/91
CUP 90-l0l
VTPI1 22722
EXPIRATION DATE(S) OF ANY PERMITS GRANTED:
5/1/93
4/27/93
CUP 90-l0l
VTPM 22722
LENGTH OF ANY POSSIBLE EXTENSION OF EXPIRATION DATE(S)
8/1/93
8/27,196
CUP 90-101
VTPI1 22722
FINDINGS
Parking requirements for this proj ect total nine (9) spaces.
Spaces are provided in a subterranean parking garage accessed
from the 23rd Court alley. Common pedestrian access to the
garage would be provided by four stairways, one for each unit.
- 1 -
A~~vY\~~~t)
.
.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY
The proposed two story condominium with lofts are within a neigh-
borhood in transition. Half of the residential structures are
older single story one and two unit lots; the remaining struc-
tures are two story apartments & condominiums. The proposed site
is just north of st. Johns Hospital.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Condition-
al Use Permit 90-101 and Vested Tentative Parcel Map 22722 sub-
ject to the following conditions and findings.
TENTATIVE PARCEL r1AP FINDINGS
l. The proposed subdivision, together with its provision for
its design and improvements, is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans as adopted by the city of Santa
Monica, in that the project conforms to the provisions of
the R2 District standards of the Zoning Ordinance and the
Low Density Multiple Residential District section of the
Land Use Element of the General Plan.
2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of
development, in that it is adequately sized lot with no
unusual characteristics.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density
of development, in that the R-2 zone allows 1 unit per
l,500 sq ft. The existing lot is 40 x l30.15= 5,206 sq
ft. By Code density is calculated using half the width of
the alley, there by allowing four units on site.
4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
will not cause substantial environmental damage or sub-
stantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat, in that the proposed development is an infill of
urban land which does not currently support fish or sig-
nificant wildlife.
~. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement
will not cause serious public health problems, in that the
proposed development complies with the provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan.
6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public
at large, for access through, or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision, in that the subject site is ade-
quately served by existing streets.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
I. The proposed use is one conditionally permitted within the
subject district and complies with all of the applicable
- 2 -
.
.
provisions of the "City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land
Use and Zoning Ordinance", in that the proposed condomini-
um conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan.
2. The proposed use would not impair the integrity and
character of the district in which it is to be established
or located, in that it would be located in a mUlti-family
residential district.
3. The subject parcel is physically suitable for the type of
land use being proposed, in that the proposed project
meets the densi ty and development standards for the R2
District.
4. The proposed use is compatible with any of the land uses
presently on the subject parcel if the present land uses
are to remain, in that existing structures would be
demolished.
5. The proposed use would be compatible ~"ith existing and
permissible land uses within the district and the general
area in which the proposed use ~s to be located, in that
the area is a mix of single-family and mUlti-family
residential buildings.
6. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed
use would not be detrimental to public health and safety,
in that the proposed development is an in-fill of urban
land adequately served by existing infrastructure.
7. PUblic access to the proposed use will be adequate, in
that the site is adequately served by existing streets and
an alley.
8. The physical location or placement of the use on the site
is compatible vii th and relates harmoniously to the sur-
rounding neighborhood, in that all setbacks as condi-
tioned, lot coverage and height requirements for the R2
District have been met.
9. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives,
and policies of the General Plan, in that the area is de-
fined as a Low Density Residential area by the Land Use
Element to the General Plan.
10. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare,
in that the proposed project complies with the provisions
of the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan.
11. The proposed use conforms precisely to the applicable per-
formance standards contained in Subchapter 6, Section 9050
and special conditions outlined in Subchapter 7, section
9055 of the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use
and Zoning Ordinance, in that no Performance Standards
Permit would be required.
- 3 -
.
.
12. The proposed use will not result in an overconcentration
of such uses in the immediate vicinity, in that the area
is defined as a low-density mUlti-family residential area.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS
Plans
~. This approval is for those plans dated (March 27, 1991) a
copy of which shall be maintained in the files of the
city Planning Division. Project development shall be
consistent with such plans, except as otherwise specified
in these conditions of approval.
2. The Plans shall comply with all other provisions of Chap-
ter l, Article IX of the Municipal Code, (Zoning Or-
dinance) and all other pertinent ordinances and General
Plan policies of the City of Santa Monica.
3. Final parking lot layout and specifications shall be sub-
ject to the review and approval of the Parking and Traffic
Engineer.
4. Minor amendments to the plans shall be subject to approval
by the Director of Planning. A significant change in the
approved concept shall be subject to Planning Commission
Review. Construction shall be in conformance with the
plans submitted or as modified by the Planning Commission,
Architectural Review Board or Director of Planning.
Architectural Review Board
5. Prior to consideration of the project by the Architectural
Review Board, the applicant shall review disabled access
requirements with the Building and Safety Division and
make any necessary changes in the project design to
achieve compliance with such requirements. The Architec-
tural Review Board, in its review, shall pay particular
attention to the aesthetic, landscaping, and setback im-
pacts of any ramps or other features necessitated by ac-
cessibility requirements.
6. The existing mature palm tree shall be preserved in their
present location on site, relocated to a specific location
on site or replaced with specimen trees to the satisfac-
tion of the Architectural Review Board.
I. The Architectural Review Board, in its review, shall en-
sure that at least 50% of the required front yard setback
shall be adequately landscaped.
8. Plans for final design, landscaping, screening, trash en-
closures, and signage shall be subject to review and ap-
proval by the Architectural Review Board.
- 4 -
.
.
9. The Architectural Review Board, in its review, shall pay
particular attention to the project's pedestrian orienta-
tion and amenities; scale and articulation of design ele-
ments; exterior colors, textures and materials; window
treatment: glazing; and landscaping.
lO. Construction period signage shall be subject to the
approval of the Architectural Review Board.
ll. Landscaping plans shall comply with Subchapter 5B
(Landscaping Standards) of the zoning ordinance including
use of water-conserving landscaping materials, landscape
maintenance and other standards contained in the
Subchapter.
12. Refuse areas, storage areas and mechanical equipment shall
be screened in accordance with SMMC Section 9040.l3-
9040.15. Refuse areas shall be of a size adequate to meet
on-site need, including recycling. The Architectural Re-
view Board in its review shall pay particular attention to
the screening of such areas and equipment.
13. No gas or electric meters shall be located within the re-
quired front or street side yard setback areas. The Ar-
chitectural Review Board in its review shall pay particu-
lar attention to the location and screening of such
meters.
Fees
14. The City is contemplating the adoption of a Transportation
Management Plan which is intended to mitigate traffic and
air quality impacts resulting from both new and existing
development. The Plan will likely include an ordinance
establishing mitigation requirements, including one-time
payment of fees on certain types of new development, and
annual fees to be paid by certain types of employers in
the City. This ordinance may require that the owner of
the proposed proj ect pay such new development fees, and
that employers within the project pay such new annual em-
ployer fees related to the City I S Transportation Manage-
ment Plan.
15. A Park and Recreation Facilities Tax of $200.00 per
residential unit shall be due and payable at the time of
issuance of a building permit for the construction or
placement of the residential unites) on the subject lot,
per and subject to the provisions of section 6670 et seq.
of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.
Demolition
16. until such time as the demolition is undertaken, and un-
less the structure is currently in use, the existing
structure shall be maintained and secured by boarding up
all openings, erecting a security fence, and removing all
- 5 -
.
.
debris, bushes and planting that inhibit the easy surveil-
lance of the property to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Officer and the Fire Department. Any landscap-
ing material remaining shall be watered and maintained
until demolition occurs.
17. Unless othe~vise approved by the Recreation and Parks De-
partment and the Planning Division, at the time of demoli-
tion, any street trees shall be protected from damage,
death, or removal per the requirements of Ordinance 1242
(CCS) .
lB. Immediately after demolition (and during construction), a
security fence, the height of which shall be the maximum
permitted by the Zoning Ordinance, shall be maintained
around the perimeter of the lot. The lot shall be kept
clear of all trash, weeds, etc.
19. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, applicant shall
prepare for Building Division approval a rodent and pest
control plan to ensure that demolition and construction
activities at the site do not create pest control impacts
on the project neighborhood.
20. No demolition of buildings or structures built prior to
1930 shall be permitted until the end of a 30-day review
period by the Landmarks comm~ssion to determine whether an
application for landmark designation shall be filed. If
an application for landmark designation is filed, no de-
molition shall be approved for 90 days from receipt of a
complete application for demolition, or upon the deter-
mination by the Landmarks Commission that the application
for landmark designation does not merit formal consider-
ation, whichever is sooner.
Construction
2l. Unless othert.vise approved by the Department of General
Services, all sidewalks shall be kept clear and passable
during the grading and construction phase of the project.
22. Sidewalks, curbs, gutters, paving and driveways which need
replacing or removal as a result of the project as deter-
mined by the Department of General services shall be re-
constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of
General services. Approval for this work shall be ob-
tained from the Department of General Services prior to
issuance of the building permits.
23. Vehicles hauling dirt or other construction debris from
the site shall cover any open load with a tarpaulin or
other secure covering to minimize dust emissions.
24. street trees shall be maintained, relocated or provided as
required in a manner consistent with the City'S Tree Code
(Ord. 1242 CCS), per the specifications of the Department
- 6 -
.
.
of Recreation and Parks and the Department of General Ser-
vices. No street tree shall be removed without the ap-
proval of the Department of Recreation and Parks.
25. A construction period mitigation plan shall be prepared by
the applicant for approval by the Department of General
services prior to issuance of a building permit. The ap-
proved mitigation plan shall be posted on the site for the
duration of the project construction and shall be produced
upon request. As applicable, this plan shall l) Specify
the names, addresses, telephone numbers and business
license numbers of all contractors and subcontractors as
well as the developer and architect; 2) Describe how de-
molition of any existing structures is to be accomplished;
3) Indicate where any cranes are to be located for erec-
tion/construction; 4) Describe how much of the public
street, alleyway, or sidewalk is proposed to be used in
conj unction with construction; 5) Set forth the extent
and nature of any pile-driving operations; 6) Describe
the length and number of any tiebacks which must extend
under the property of other persons; 7) Specify the na-
ture and extent of any dewatering and its effect on any
adjacent buildings; 8) Describe anticipated contruction-
related truck routes, number of truck trips, hours of
hauling and parking location; 9) Specify the nature and
extent of any helicopter hauling; 10) State whether any
construction activity beyond normally permitted hours is
proposed; 1l) Describe any proposed construction noise
mitigation measures; l2) Describe construction-period
security measures including any fencing, lighting, and
security personnel; 13) Provide a drainage plan; 14)
Provide a construction-period parking plan which shall
minimize use of public streets for parking; 15) List a
designated on-site construction manager.
26. A sign shall be posted on the property in a manner consis-
tent with the public hearing sign requirements which shall
identify the address and phone number of the owner and/or
applicant for the purposes of responding to questions and
complaints during the construction period. Said sign
shall also indicate the hours of permissible construction
work.
27. A copy of these conditions shall be posted in an easily
visible and accessible location at all times during con-
struction at the project site. The pages shall be lami-
nated or othenlise protected to ensure durability of the
copy.
Environmental Mitigation
28. Ultra-low flow plumbing fixtures are required on all new
development and remodeling where plumbing is to be added.
(Maximum 1.6 gallon toilets and l.O gallon urinals and low
flow shower head.)
- 7 -
.
.
29. prior to issuance of a certificate of Occupancy, project
owner shall present documentation to the General Services
Department certifying that existing Santa Monica occupan-
cies with toilets installed prior to 1978 have been retro-
fitted with ultra low-flow toilets (l.6 gallons per flush
or less) such that development of the new project will
not result in a net increase in wastewater flows. Flow
from existing occupancies which will be removed as part
of the new development may be deducted from flow at-
tributable to the new development if such occupancies have
been occupied within one year prior to issuance of a
Building Permit for the proposed project. Alternatively,
project owner may provide a payment to the General Ser-
vices Department in an amount specified by General Ser-
vices in lieu of the installation requirement, which funds
shall be used by the City for the exclusive purpose of
achieving compliance with this condition by retrofitting
existing occupancies. Flow calculations for new develop-
ment and existing occupancies shall be consistent with
guidelines developed by the General Services Department.
Projects subject to this condition shall not be eligible
for the "Baysaver" rebate program.
Miscellaneous cUP Conditions
30. The building address shall be painted on the roof of the
building and shall measure four feet by eight feet (32
square feet).
31. If any archaeological remains are uncovered during
excavation or construction, work in the affected area
shall be suspended and a recognized specialist shall be
contacted to conduct a survey of the affected area at
project's owner's expense. A determination shall then be
made by the Director of Planning to determine the sig-
nificance of the survey findings and appropriate actions
and requirements, if any, to address such findings.
32. street and/or alley lighting shall be provided on public
rights of way adjacent to the project if and as needed per
the specifications and with the approval of the Department
of General Services.
33. Any lofts or mezzanines shall not exceed 99 square feet
unless appropriate required parking is supplied. Such
areas shall also not exceed 33.3% of the room below unless
compliance with the district's limits on number of stories
can be maintained.
34. No fence or wall within the req~~red front yard setback,
inclusive of any subterranean garage slab and fencing or
railing on top thereof, shall exceed a height of 42" above
actual grade of the property.
35. A security gate shall be provided across the opening to
the subterranean garage. If any guest parking space is
- 8 -
.
.
located in the subterranean garage, the security gate
shall be equipped with an electronic or other system which
will open the gate to provide visitors with vehicular ac-
cess to the garage without leaving their vehicles. The
security gate shall receive approval of the Police and
Fire Departments prior to issuance of a building permit.
Validity of Permits
36. In the event permittee violates or fails to comply with
any conditions of approval of this permit, no further per-
mits, licenses, approvals or certificates of occupancy
shall be issued until such violation has been fully
remedied.
37. Within ten days of Planning Division transmittal of the
statement of Official Action, project applicant shall
sign and return a copy of the statement of Official Action
prepared by the Planning Division, agreeing to the Condi-
tions of approval and acknowledging that failure to comply
with such conditions shall constitute grounds for poten-
tial revocation of the permit approval. By signing same,
applicant shall not thereby waive any legal rights appli-
cant may possess regarding said conditions. The signed
statement shall be returned to the Planning Division.
Failure to comply with this condition shall constitute
grounds for potential permit revocation.
38. This determination shall not become effective for a period
of fourteen days from the date of determination, or, if
appealed, until a final determination is made on the ap-
peal. Any appeal must be made in the form required by the
Zoning Administrator. The term of approval of this permit
shall expire two years from the permit's effective date,
unless a building permit has been issued for the project
prior to the expiration date.
39. within thirty (30) days after final approval of the proj-
ect, a sign shall be posted on site stating the date and
nature of the approval. The sign shall be posted in ac-
cordance with the Zoning Administrator guidelines and
shall remain in place until a building permit is issued
for the project. The sign shall be removed promptly when
a building permit is issued for the project or upon ex-
piration of the Conditional Use Permit.
Special Conditions
40. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the owner
shall dedicate the rear 2.5' of the property for future
alley widening to the satisfaction of the General Services
Department.
- 9 -
.
.
41. The requlred front yard set back is twenty feet. A chim-
ney and floor area of a bay window encroach into this set-
back by one foot. Plans shall be revised and submitted
to staff prior to Architectural Review Board submittal.
42. The Architectural Review Board shall pay particular atten-
tion to the transition of the projects architectural
style and mass to the one story buildings on either side
of this development project.
43. The first 141 in front yard shall have no less than three
(3) feet of earth above garage slab to provide adequate)
mature landscaping.
TENTATIVE PARCEL }~P CONDITIONS
1. All off site improvements required by the city Engineer
shall be installed. Plans and specifications for off site
improvements shall be prepared by a registered civil en-
gineer and approved by the City Engineer.
2. A subdivision improvement agreement for all off site im-
provements required by the City Engineer shall be prepared
and a performance bond posted through the city Attorney's
office.
3. The tentative map shall expire 24 months after approval,
except as provided in the provisions of California Govern-
ment Code section 66452.6 and Sections 9380-9382 of the
Santa Uonica Hunicipal Code. During this time period the
final map shall be presented to the City of Santa Monica
for approval. No building permit for the project will be
granted until such time as the final map is approved by
the santa Monica City council.
4. In submitting required materials to the Santa Monica En-
gineering Division for a final map, applicant shall pro-
vide a copy of the approved statement of Official Action.
5. Prior to approval of the final map, Condominium Associa-
tion By-Laws (if applicable) and a Declaration of CC & Rls
shall be reviewed and approved by the city Attorney. The
CC & R I s shall contain a non-discrimination clause as
presented in section 9392 (Slfi1C) and in the case of con-
dominiums, contain such provisions as are required by Sec-
tion 9122E (SMMC).
6. The developer shall provide for payment of a Condominium
Tax of $1,000 per saleable residential unit per the provi-
sions of Section 6651 et seg. of the santa Monica
Hunicipal Code.
7. The form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of the
final subdivision map shall conform to the provisions of
Sections 9330 through 9338 (SMMC) and the Subdivision Map
Act. The required Final Hap filing fee shall be paid
- 10 -
.
.
-~
prior to scheduling of the Final Hap for City Council
approval.
8. The form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of the
final parcel map shall conform to the provisions of Sec-
tions 9350 through 9357 (SMMC) and the Subdivision Map
Act.
9. One mylar and one blue-line copy of the final map shall be
provided to and recorded with the Los Angeles County Re-
corder prior to issuance of any building permit for a con-
dominium project pursuant to Government Code section
66499.30. Applicant shall also provide the County with a
copy of this statement of Official Action at the time the
required copies of the map are submitted.
10. A copy of the recorded map shall be provided to the Plan-
ning and Zoning Division before issuance of a Building
permit.
11. Pursuant to Section 9366 (S}1MC), if the subdivider or any
interested person disagrees with any action by the
Planning commission with respect to the tentative map, an
appeal or complaint may be filed in writing with the City
Clerk. No appeal or complaint may be filed after a ten
day period from the Commission's decision on the tentative
map.
Prepared by: Gina Szilak, Assistant Planner
Attachments:
A. Municipal Code and General Plan conformance
B. Radius and Location Map
c. Photographs of site and Surrounding Properties
D. Plot Plan, Floor Plans, Elevation and Sections
E. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 22722
RES
PC/cup9010l
05/15/91
~]OTE
Ayes: Kaufman, Mechur, Morales, Polhemus, Pyne, Rosenstein
Nays: Nelson
Abstain:
Absent:
- 11 -
.
.
~OTICE
If this is a final decision not subject to further appeal under
the city of Santa Honica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Or-
dinance, the time within which judlcial review of this decision
must be sought is governed by Code of civil Procedure Section
1094.6, which provlsion has been adopted by the City pursuant to
Municipal Code section l~OO.
I hereby certify that this statement of Official Action accurate-
ly reflects the final determination of the Planning commission of
the city of Santa Monica.
signature
date
Ralph Mechur, Chairperson
Please Prlnt Name and Title
I hereby agree to the above conditions of approval and
acknowledge that failure to comply with such conditions shall
constitute grounds for potential revocation of the permit
approval.
Applicant's signature
Print Name and Title
PCjstoalOl
GSjk
- 12 -
.
.
9-8
CM:CARS:LCB:BFM:dvm
city council Meeting: May 28, 1991
bchrate/pub.manager
MnVi)8~-'1
H. /" -}J
Santa Monica, California ~ . J
JUN
;"~ ; i'l(11
~.. ...... I
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: city staff
SUBJECT: Recommendation to Adopt Resolution to Increase
Maximum Daily Beach Parking Lot Rates
INTRODUCTION
This report recommends that Council approve an increase in the
maximum daily beach parking lot rates from $5.00 to $7.00.
BACKGROUND
The state-owned Santa Monica beaches are operated and maintained
by the city of Santa Monica under an operating agreement between
the City and the state Department of Parks and Recreation. That
agreement gives the City the authority to increase beach parking
lot rates to a level which will not exceed the state's rates by
more than 25%. As of september l, 1990, the State Park System
increased its daily parking rate to $6.00. This action allowed
the City to increase its rate to a level not to exceed $7.50.
The current maximum parking rate for City-operated beach lots is
$5.00.
The rate has been in place since 1987.
The existing
resolution
enables
the
actual
rates
to
be varied
by
administrative action up to the maximum. The proposed resolution
would maintain the flexibility for variation depending on season,
day of the week or other factors.
CJ
B
MllV
....~ ..--...
::.
~991
- 1 -
JUN ~9J
.
.
For example, in an effort to address concerns regarding short
term parking at beach parking lots, staff is planning to test and
potentially initiate a reduced rate system.
One model may
include a decreased rate for weekday parking after 5:00 p.m.
DISCUSSION
Los Angeles County, which administers the beach parking lots
south (Venice) and north (Will Rogers) of Santa Monica has
recently implemented a rate increase. As of May 25, 1991, Los
Angeles County will begin charging $7.00 per entry, seven days
per week during the summer months. In the winter the charge will
return to $5.00 on weekends and holidays and $4.00 on weekdays.
City staff recommends increasing Santa Monica's daily rate to
$7.00 during summer weekends and holidays; $6.00 during the
summer weekdays; and $5.00 at all other times of the year.
Proposed Charges
Current Rates
Weekdays
$ 5.00
Proposed Rates
$ 6.00 summer
$ 5.00 winter
$ 7.00 summer
$ 5.00 winter
$ 7.00
Weekends
$ 5.00
Special Events/Holidays
& Holiday Weekends
$ 5.00
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT
Based on an average of the number of cars parked in the lots over
the last 3 years, it is projected that the gross FYl99l-92 Beach
Fund Revenue would increase by:
Weekdays (summer $6)
Weekends/Special Events/Holidays ($7)
$l93,637
343,742
$537,379
- 2 -
.
.
RECOMMENDATION
staff respectively recommends that City council adopt the
attached resolution increasing the maximum beach parking lot rate
to $7.00.
Attachment
Prepared by:
Lynne C. Barrette, Assistant City Manager
Barbara Franklin-Moran, Oir. of CARS
- 3 -
. '
.
.
'l
I
CARS:BFM:am
Santa Monica, California
RESOLUTION NUMBER 8231(CCS)
(CITY COUNCIL SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA AMENDING SECTION 2A OF RESOLUTION
NUMBER 1786 (CCS) INCREASING BEACH PARKING LOT RATES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
In order to increase the maximum beach
parking lot rate from $5.00 to $7.00, subsection A of section 2
of Resolution Number 1786 (CCS) is amended to read as follows:
A. The rates to be charged shall be fixed by the
ci ty Manager from time to time, but in no event
shall exceed Seven Dollars ($7.00) per day.
SECTION
2.
The
city
council
finds
that
the
establishment,
modification,
structuring,
restructuring,
or
approval of beach parking lot rates contained in section ~ is for
the purpose of meeting operating expenses, including employee
wage rates and fringe benefits and/or obtaining funds for capital
projects necessary to maintain service within existing service
areas.
Pursuant to the Beach Operating Agreement between the
city of Santa Monica and the state of California, all beach
parking lot revenues may only be used in connection with expenses
for operation of or capital improvements in the subj ect beach
area.
- 4 -
.
.
,
J
The rate increase is necessary to fund lifeguard service
at the beach.
SECTION~ 3. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section
21080 (b) (8), the rate increase provided for in Section 1 is
exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, Public Resources Codes sections 21000 et
seq.
SECTION 4. Resolution Number 739l (CCS) is repealed.
SECTION 5. The city Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall
be in full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__~ -;i~ ~<K.Jrc
..........--~...~
J '
- ,
ROBERT M. MYERS
City Attorney
- 5 -
.. .. . ~
.
.
~ '
1
Adopted and approved this 4th day of June, 1991.
a~/;
It - 'Mayor
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 823l(CCS)
was duly adopted by the City council of the city of Santa Monica
at a meeting thereof held on June 4th, 1991 by the following
council vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers: Genser, Holbrook, Olsen, Vazquez,
Zane, Mayor Abdo
Noes: Councilmembers: Katz
Abstain: Councilmembers: None
Absent: Councilmembers: None
ATTEST:
/
~
----- City
~ -
\
.
· /0-8
MAY " ~. 1991
Santa Monica, california
GS:SES:LR:batjCC1083PH.tech.engine
council Meeting: May 28, 1991
JUN
.4 Hi91
--- 1.7
TO: Mayor and city Council
FROM: city staff
SUBJECT: Recommendation to Hold Public Hearing for the Confirmation
of Assessment of Costs for Gutter Construction, Street
Resurfacing and Tree Planting on Colorado Avenue between
Fourteenth street and Twentieth street
INTRODUCTION
This report recommends that the city Council hold a public hearing
to hear protests regarding the work and to confirm the assessment of
costs for gutter construction, street resurfacing, and tree planting
on Colorado Avenue between Fourteenth Street and Twentieth Street.
BACKGROUND
On February 10, 1987, the city council approved the formation of an
assessment district for street resurfacing, gutter installation, and
tree planting for Colorado Avenue between Fourteenth street and
Twentieth street.
Commercial and industrial property owners only will be assessed.
The assessments will be as follows:
$9.50 per lineal foot for gutter construction
$7.50 per lineal foot for street resurfacing
$3.00 per front foot for tree planting
Property owners were notified in accordance with State law and the
public hearing was held on March 10, 1987. After closing the public
hearing, the Council ordered the work to commence.
/P-B
- 1 -
JUN
4 ,( -MAY ) c. ;lnl
'.) , ~'-.'.J
..
.$ ,
.
.
The work was completed in 1989 and commercial and industrial
property owner assessments are now due. A public hearing to confirm
the assessments must be held pursuant to Section 5882 of the
California streets and Highways Code. On April 23, 1991, the City
Council set the public hearing for May 28 I 1991.
commercial and
industrial property owners were notified of the date and assessment
amount on May 10, 1991. A list of property owners and assessments
will be available to Council at the time of the public hearing.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT
Revenue is estimated for FY 91-92 as follows:
Description
Amount
Revenue Account
street Resurfacing
Assessment District .
Tree Planting . . . . . .
$60,107.50
8,370.00
01-500-401-00000-0124-10000
Ol-50Q-40l-00000-0l77-10000
Total $68,477.50
Any unpaid assessments will be put on the 1991-92 property tax rolls
by the Los Angeles County Assessor's office.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Open the public hearing;
2. Close the public hearing; and,
3. Acknowledge any protests and adopt the attached resolution
confirming the assessments.
Prepared by: Stanley E. Scholl, Director of General Services
Dave Britton, Acting City Engineer
Attachment: Resolution for Adoption
Notice of Assessment and Public Hearing
Street Superintendent's Report
- 2 -
. I
.
/p-C-
Mfty '>.;;.; ~991
Santa Monica, California
.
GS:SES:NM:sdg:swhldl72.word.genserv
council Meeting: May 28, 1991
Jlf" .~ 1991
TO: Mayor and city council
FROM: City staff
SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Assessment of Costs to Repair Damaged
Sidewalks, Driveways and Curbs (SR-91-172)
Introduction
This report requests that the City Council hold a public hearing for
the assessment of costs to repair damaged sidewalks, driveways and
curbs at various locations within the city.
It is recommended that
the City council adopt the attached Resolution confirming the
assessment of costs.
Background
On April 23, 1991, the city Council set a public hearing for May 28,
1991, on the assessment of costs to repair damaged sidewalks,
driveways and curbs within the City of Santa Monica.
(See attached
Resolution for exact locations). Notices were sent on May 17, 1991 to
property owners informing them c: - the public hearing in accordance
with the legal requirements of CL pter 22 of the Improvement Act of
1911.
On October 9, 1979, the City council approved a sidewalk repair
program which provided for property owners participation in the cost
of
repairing
damaged
sidewalks.
Residential
property
owner
participation is 50% of the cost of the repairs if the damage is
related to tree roots; the City pays the remaining 50% of the repair
cost. Property owners are assessed lOOt of the cost if the damaged is
/I)-C-
NAY 2 8 1991
Ju"N 4 ~Qat
~ .",,1
.
.
not related to tree roots and commercial property owners are assessed
lOO% of the cost regardless of the case of the damage.
BUdget/Financial Impact
This assessment district will generate revenues to the city over the
next two years in the amount of $4, 7l0. 00.
Any unpaid assessments
will be placed on the 1991-1992 property tax bills.
Recommendation
It is recommended the City Council:
1. Open the public hearing;
2. Close the public hearing;
3. Acknowledge any protests and adopt the attached Resolution
confirming the assessments.
prepared by: stan Scholl, Director of General Services
Ronald Cummings, Acting Maintenance Manager
Richard Valeriano, street Inspector
Attachments: Resolution for Adoption
Notice(s) of Public Hearing
street Superintendent's Report
and List of Property Owners
(SWHLD172)
.
.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Re: Sidewalk Repair at
(Sidewalk Assessment District: SR-9l-172)
The sidewalk repair at the above described property has been
completed, and the cost of the sidewalk repair is $ Your
cost is $ which is one-half of the cost of the work done
at the location. THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE. You will be billed later.
Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 5616, this letter is
notification that the City Council, pursuant to Resolution No. 8209
(CCS) adopted on April 23, 1991, has scheduled a hearing to hear and
pass upon the report of the Superintendent of Streets of the cost of
the sidewalk repair, in connection with the above-described project,
together with any objections and protests, if any, which may be raised
by any property owner liable to be assessed for the cost of such
sidewalk repair and any other interested persons.
The hearing will
DATE:
PLACE:
TIME:
be held as follows:
May 28, 1991
City Council Chambers
City Hall
l685 Main Street
Santa Monica, California
7:30 P.M.
Any protests or objections must be in writing and must be filed with
the city Clerk on or before the time set for the hearing.
Upon confirmation of the report of the Superintendent of streets, as
provided for in streets and Highways Code Section 5618, the cost of
the sidewalk repair will be assessed against your property, and you
will be notified of the manner of payment. The city will provide
financial assistance for low-to-moderate income persons. If your
income is less than $2l,750 for a family of one person, $24,900 for
two persons, $28,000 for three persons or $31,OOO for four persons,
call 458-870l for information on this program.
Very truly yours,
Ronald F. Cummings
Acting Maintenance Manager
.
.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Re: Sidewalk Repair at
(Sidewalk Assessment District: SR-9l-l72)
The sidewalk repair at the above described property has been
completed, and your cost of the sidewalk repair is . THIS IS
NOT AN INVOICE. You will be billed later.
Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 56l6, this letter is
notification that the City Council, pursuant to Resolution No. 8209
(CCS) adopted on April 23, 1991, has scheduled a hearing to hear and
pass upon the report of the Superintendent of Streets of the cost of
the sidewalk repair, in connection with the above-described project,
together with any objections and protests, if any, which may be raised
by any property owner liable to be assessed for the cost of such
sidewalk repair and any other interested persons.
The hearing will be held as follows:
DATE:
PLACE:
May 28, 1991
City Council Chambers
City Hall
1685 Main street
Santa Monica, California
7:30 P.M.
TIME:
Any protests or objections must be in writing and must be filed with
the City Clerk on or before the time set for the hearing.
Upon confirmation of the report of the Superintendent of streets, as
provided for in Streets and Highways Code section 5618, the cost of
the sidewalk repair will be assessed against your property, and you
will be notified of the manner of payment. The City will provide
financial assistance for low-to-moderate income persons. If your
income is less than $2l,750 for a family of one person, $24,900 for
two persons, $ 28,000 for three persons or $ 31, 000 for four persons,
call 458-870l for information on this program.
Very truly yours,
Ronald F. Cummings
Acting Maintenance Manager
.
.
STREET SUPERINTENDENT'S REPORT
REPAIR OF DAMAGED SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, CURBS AND/OR REMOVAL
OF OBSTRUCTIONS, PERFORMED UNDER PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 7,
CHAPTER 22, SECTIONS 5600 TO 5630, OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (SR-9l-l72)
Pursuant to the provisions of Division 7, Chapter 22, Sections
5600 to 5630, of the Streets and Highways Code of the state of
California, the following work was caused to be done by the street
Superintendent:
The removal and replacement of 75 square feet of sidewalk at
$4.00 per square foot.
The removal and replacement of 650 square feet of sidewalk at
$6.00 per square foot;
The removal and replacement of 30 linear feet of curbing at
$lO.50 per linear foot;
The total cost of the above work was $4,515.00.
The total proposed assessment for the above sidewalk and curb
damage is $2,257.50 or 50 percent of the total cost. The other 50
percent of the cost is being paid by the City as the above repairs
were caused by tree root damage.
The removal and replacement of 75 square feet of sidewalk in
driveway area at $7.50 per square foot.
The removal and replacement of 20 lineal feet of curbing at
$10.50 per lineal feet.
The removal (only) of 10 square feet of parkway area at $3.00
per square feet.
The removal only 200 square feet of sidewalk at $6.00 per
square foot;
The removal and replacement of 60 square feet of driveway at
$7.50 per square foot.
The total cost of the above work was $2,452.50.
The total proposed assessment of the above sidewalk and curb
damage is $2,452.50 or lOO percent of the total cost of the above
.
.
repairs were not caused by tree root damage.
Reference is made to the attached sheets for a description of the
real property in front of which the work has been done, the proposed
assessment against each property, and a description of the work done
in front of each property.
street Superintendent
Filed with the City Clerk this
day of
, 1991.
City Clerk
.
Sidewalk Repair 9l-l72
.
NAME LYLE & EMILY SPENCER
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 21000 CLIVUS DRIVE
MAIL-CITY-STATE GRASS VALLEY, CA 95949
SITE-STREET 2302 32ND STREET
TRACT 1980 - PARCEL 4270-007-044
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT l76, BLOCK 7
TOTAL-COST 450.00
ASMNT-COSTl 225.00
WORK-DONE-l REMOVE & REPLACE 75 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME DONALD STERLING
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 9465 WILSHIRE BLVD. - PENTHOUSE
MAIL-CITY-STATE BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210
SITE-STREET 707 IDAHO ST.
TRACT SANTA MONICA LOTS - PARCEL 4292-001-024
LOT-&-BLOCK LOTS M-P, BLOCK 1
TOTAL-COST 1065.00
ASMNT-COSTl 532.50
WORK-DONE-l REMOVE & REPLACE l25 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2 REMOVE & REPLACE 30 LIN. FT. CURB
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME SANTA MONICA 4TH STREET PARTNERSHIP
NAME-2 ATTN: PETER BRONER
MAIL-STREET l347 4TH STREET - ROOM 2ll
MAIL-CITY-STATE SANTA MONICA, CA 9040l
SITE-STREET 40l SANTA MONICA BLVD.
TRACT SANTA MONICA LOTS - PARCEL 429l-0ll-0l0
LOT-&-BLOCK LOTS M&N, BLOCK 11
TOTAL-COST l50.00
ASMNT-COSTl l50.00
WORK-DONE-l REMOVE & REPLACE 25 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME LINCOLN EQUITIES
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 721 SANTA MONICA BLVD.
MAIL-CITY-STATE SANTA MOINCA, CA 90404
SITE-STREET l340 LINCOLN BLVD.
TRACT TOSM - PARCEL 429l-00B-024
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT H, BLOCK 8
TOTAL-COST 750.00
ASMNT-COSTI 750.00
WORK-DONE-I REMOVE & REPLACE 50 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2 REMOVE & REPLACE 60 SQ. FT. DRIVEWAY APRON
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
.
Sidewalk Repair 9l-l72
.
NAME DANIEL & BARBARA COLNER
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 245l 22ND STREET
MAIL-CITY-STATE SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
SITE-STREET 245l 22ND STREET
TRACT 6330 - PARCEL 4273-015-004
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT 378, BLOCK l5
TOTAL-COST 450.00
ASMNT-COSTl 450.00
WORK-DONE-I REMOVE & REPLACE 75 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME LANCE BLAKESLEY
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 2454 22ND STREET
MAIL-CITY-STATE SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
SITE-STREET 2454 22ND STREET
TRACT 6330 - PARCEL 4273-0l6-0l7
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT 352, BLOCK 16
TOTAL-COST 450.00
ASMNT-COST1 225.00
WORK-DONE-l REMOVE & REPLACE 75 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME DONALD KINSBURY
NAME - 2
MAIL-STREET 2446 22ND STREET
MAIL-CITY-STATE SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
SITE-STREET 2446 22ND STREET
TRACT 6330 - PARCEL 4273-0l6-0l6
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT 351, BLOCK l6
TOTAL-COST 787.50
ASMNT-COSTl 487.50
WORK-DONE-l REMOVE & REPLACE 100 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK - 50%
WORK-DONE-2 REMOVE & REPLACE 25 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK IN DRWY-lOO%
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME SHIRLEY & ROLF STUMLEY
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 2437 22ND STREET
MAIL-CITY-STATE SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
SITE-STREET 2437 22ND STREET
TRACT 6330 - PARCEL 4273-015-00l
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT 375, BLOCK 15
TOTAL-COST 450.00
ASMNT-COST1 225.00
WORK-DONE-1 REMOVE & REPLACE 75 SQ, FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
.
Sidewalk Repair 9l-l72
.
NAME LESTER CARLSON
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 2443 22ND STREET
MAIL-CITY-STATE SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
SITE-STREET 2443 22ND STREET
TRACT 6330 - PARCEL 4273-015-002
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT 376, BLOCK 16
TOTAL-COST 450.00
ASMNT-COSTl 225.00
WORK-DONE-1 REMOVE & REPLACE 75 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME CLARA WEBSTER
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 2312 32ND STREET
MAIL-CITY-STATE SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
SITE-STREET 2312 32ND STREET
TRACT 1980 - PARCEL 4270-007-042
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT 175, BLOCK 7
TOTAL-COST 450.00
ASMNT-COSTl 225.00
WORK-DONE-1 REMOVE & REPLACE 75 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME PORNPIMOL PIYAKESIAN
NAME-2 WILLIAM CHEYNE
MAIL-STREET l513 9TH STREET
MAIL-CITY-STATE SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
SITE-STREET 1513 9TH STREET
TRACT SANTA MONICA - PARCEL 4282-029-0l7
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT V, BLOCK 29
TOTAL-COST 240.00
ASMNT-COSTl 240.00
WORK-DONE-l REMOVE & REPLACE 20 LIN. FT. CURBINB
WORK-DONE-2 REMOVE (ONLY) lO SQ. FT. PARKWAY
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME JOAQUIN & LYDIA LAGOS
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET l619 SHATTO STREET
MAIL-CITY-STATE LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
SITE-STREET l233 14TH STREET
TRACT SANTA MONICA LOTS - PARCEL 4282-003-015
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT R, BLOCK 3
TOTAL-COST 300.00
ASMNT-COST1 l50.CO
WORK-DONE-l REMOVE & REPLACE 50 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
.
Sidewalk Repair 9l-172
.
NAME DAVID MICHAELS
NAME-2 ROBERT TOBIASON
MAIL-STREET 810 20TH STREET
MAIL-CITY-STATE SANTA MONICA, CA 90403
SITE-STREET 810 20TH STREET
TRACT 1351 - PARCEL 4277-006-002
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT B, BLOCK 6
TOTAL-COST 300.00 ('88 PRICES)
ASMNT-COSTl l50.00 ('88 PRICES)
WORK-DONE-l REMOVE & REPLACE 75 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME LOUIS & ANN DELIA
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 14738 SUNSET BLVD.
MAIL-CITY-STATE PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272
SITE-STREET 2503 THIRD STREET
TRACT VAWTER'S SUBDIVISION - PARCEL 4287-008-0l9
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT 6, BLOCK 8
TOTAL-COST 375.00
ASMNT-COSTl 375.00
WORK-DONE-l REMOVE & REPLACE 50 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK IN DRIVEWAY
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
NAME HOWARD & FRAN BERGER
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 2121 BUNDY DRIVE
MAIL-CITY-STATE LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
SITE-STREET 332 SANTA MONICA BLVD.
TRACT SANTA MONICA - PARCEL 4291-017-001
LOT-&-BLOCK LOT B, BLOCK l7
TOTAL-COST 300.00
ASMNT-COSTl 300.00
WORK-DONE-l REMOVE & REPLACE 50 SQ. FT. SIDEWALK
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
WORK-DONE-4
.....-....:.;..~~~...
\
\
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 8233{CCS)
(CITY COUNCIL SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MONICA CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS REGARDING REPAIRS TO
DAMAGED SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS AND CURBS (SR-91-172)
WHEREAS, the Superintendent of streets of the City of Santa
Monica, pursuant to Sections 5600-5630 of the streets and Highways
Code, commenced proceedings to cause the repair of damaged sidewalks,
driveways and curbs in the city of Santa Monica at 2302 32nd Street,
707 Idaho street, 40l Santa Monica Boulevard, l340 Lincoln Boulevard,
2451 22nd Street, 2454 22nd Street, 2446 22nd street, 2437 22nd
Street, 2443 22nd street, 2312 32nd Street, l513 Ninth Street, l233
14th Street, 810 20th Street, 2503 Third street, 332 Santa Monica
Boulevard, all within the City of Santa Monica; and
WHEREAS, sixty days after said order was served, the work had not
been completed by the owners or persons in possession of the affected
properties, and the Superintendent of streets caused the work to be
done: and
WHEREAS, the Superintendent of streets gave notice as required by
Section 5616 of the Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, the Superintendent of streets did file with the city
Council of the City of Santa Monica a report of repairs and costs as
required by Section 5617 of the Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, upon the day and hour fixed for hearing by Resolution
Number 8209 (CCS), the city council of the City of Santa Monica heard
and passed upon the report of the Superintendent of streets together
'f
.
.
.
with all objections and protests as required by section 5618 of the
Streets and Highway Code,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION l. The report of the Superintendent of Streets heretofore
filed and above-described be, and the same hereby is, confirmed.
SECTION 2. All protests and objections of every kind and nature
to the report of the Superintendent of Streets be and the same hereby
are, overruled and denied.
SECTION 3. The cost of the repairs, as set forth in the report of
the Superintendent of streets, shall be assessed against the
properties therein described, which properties front the sidewalk upon
which the repairs were made.
SECTION 4.
If such assessment is not paid within the time
permitted by law, the same shall constitute a special assessment
against and lien on the properties therein described in the amount set
forth in the report of the Superintendent of streets, which lien shall
continue until the assessment and all interest thereon is paid or
until it is discharged of record.
SECTION 5.
If the assessment is not paid within the time
permi tted by law, the Superintendent of Streets, in accordance with
Section 5628 of the streets and Highway code, shall deliver a Notice
of Lien, prepared in the manner required by section 5626 of the
streets and Highways Code, to the county Auditor who shall collect the
assessment together with all other taxes against the property.
.
.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full
force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
f'tJ""..;--.....I! ~
ROBERT M. MYERS
City Attorney
-'_-W" ~""----t~...r--
.
.
.
...,..
Adopted and approved this 4th day of June, 1991.
o I-!/b
.,(/ Mayor
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 8233(CCS)
was duly adopted by the City Council of the city of Santa Monica
at a meeting thereof held on June 4th, 1991 by the fOllowing
council vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers: Genser, Holbrook, Katz, Olsen,
Vazquez, Zane, Mayor Abdo
Noes: Councilmembers: None
Abstain: Councilmemhers: None
Absent: Councilmembers: None
ATTEST:
,~
~ - City Cle