Loading...
SR-9-A (100) CC:JER:PKSTAFF.510 City Council Meeting: May 10, 1994 9A MAY f 0 1991t Santa Monica. Callforma TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: City Staff SUBJECT: Recommendation To Select A Temporary Shelter SIte at 505 OlympIc INTRODUCTION This report recommends that the Council select a temporary shelter site at 505 Olympic. BACKGROUND On Apnl 26, 1994, Santa MOnica City Council passed an emergency ordinance to close the parks between midnight and 5:00 a.m. and directed the staff to begin planmng for a temporary shelter, including additional lockers, for 75 to 100 people to be operated by the Salvation Army. The Council postponed the final decIsion regarding a site for the shelter and ordinances related to zOning and bidding which would expedite shelter development until Its meeting of May 10, 1994. The staff report from April 26. 1994 for item 9-A, which provides diSCUSSion of thiS Item, IS attached. RECOMMENDA TIQN City staff recommend that the Council desig nate 505 OlympiC as the temporary shelter site and approve the ordinances (under separate cover) to expedite shelter development. Prepared By: Julie Rusk, Manager Human Services DIVIsion MAY 1 0 199't 9A CC:JER: KEL: PKST AFF .426 City Council Meeting Apnl 26, 1994 Santa MOnica, California TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM City Staff SUBJECT. Recommendations to Address Issues Raised at March 29, 1994 Council Meeting Including Aggressive Panhandling and AlternatIves to Sleeping In Parks INTRODUCTION This report proVides Information, discusses polIcy options and offers recommendatIons to address Issues raised at the March 29, 1994 Council meeting regarding the Impact of homelessness In Santa Monica Particular emphaSIS IS given to addreSSing aggressive panhandling and night closure of Santa Monica parks Other staff reports and ordinances are being brought before Council separately for consideration With thiS report as a consolIdated Item. BACKGROUND On March 22, 1994, the City Council held a publiC heanng on Councllmember Items concerning public safety and welfare and the need to develop additional local ordinances to address aggressive panhandling, sleeping or living In parks, serving food to the publiC In parks. unclaimed property, possession of shopping carts, and the delivery of homeless services On March 29, 1994 the City Council undertook deliberation on these Issues. ThiS staff report Will proVide Council With a series of actions In response to Council direction. Further research IS reqUired on Items such as food service In public and possession of shopping carts These and other Items will be brought to Council at a future meeting. 1 DISCUSSION Agaressive Panhandling The City Council directed the City Attorney to draft an ordinance that prohibits aggressive panhandling The City Attorney was also asked to evaluate the legality of including a prohibition of all or certain types of panhandling between 7 p.m and 7 a m as well as a prohibition of all panhandling at anytIme within the Bayslde Dlstnct These Issues are discussed In the staff report that accompanies the newly drafted aggressive panhandling ordinance (Item H8-C). The Police Department and the City Attorney's Office were directed to present information on the results of their FY 1993-94 budget objective concerning aggressive panhandling, specifically on public outreach and education programs to be developed with the Bayslde District Corporation (BDC), Chamber of Commerce and other merchant groups. At present. the Police Department and the City Attorney's Office have developed an Interdepartmental committee to develop an action plan, and undertake an Implementation plan and tlmellne. The Police Department's Office of Operations and Office of Special Enforcement have engaged In several undercover sting operations and undercover surveillance programs to monitor aggressive panhandling Staff has been In contact with the Executive Director of the BDC. and publiC education programs are In the planntng stages City staff also attend the Chamber of Commerce Homeless Task Force Committee meetings on a regular baSIS. The Third Street Promenade Bicycle Detail and the Crime Impact Team are currently conducting speCialized enforcement action targeting aggressive panhandling on the Third Street Promenade. The BDC. the City Attorney's Office, and the Police Department are working closely In thiS effort An analYSIS of the operation Will be forthcoming; however, there are indications that inCidents of aggressive panhandling are relatively few compared to those panhandling SItuations that do not qualify as a Violation of Penal Code SectIon 647(c). 2 Unclaimed Property The City Attorney was given direction to draft an ordinance amendmg the current Santa MOnica Municipal Code pertaining to unclaimed property In order to make It consistent with California State Law. The City Council specIfically discussed the length of time property must be held prior to Its disposal. The City Attorney has addressed thiS Issue as well as the Issue of sale procedures for unclaimed property In a separate ordinance and staff report (Item #8-A) Park Closure The City Attorney was directed to draft an ordinance that allows the closure of the parks from 12 midnight to 5 00 a.m. with no exemptions or permits Technically, thiS Involves the repeal of Santa MOnica MuniCipal Code sections 4 OB 090 and 6.0B.092(f) The City Attorney's Office has drafted an emergency ordinance for Council consideration tonight (Item #8-B) that Will facIlitate clOSing the parks from 12 midnight to 5 00 a m Coooeratlve Efforts Concerning ShOPPing Carts The City Council directed the Police Department to work with the Grocers' ASSOCiation to develop an effective program to collect shopPing carts that belong to grocers and other retailers In Santa MOnica. The Grocers' ASSOCiation sent a letter to the City Council explaining ItS "Industry-funded shopping cart retrieval program" The Grocers' ASSOCiation has expanded thiS program to Santa MOnica. Since the Council meeting of March 29, 1994, City staff have been unable to meet with the Grocers' ASSOCiation staff. Further outreach IS required, necessitating Council conSideration at a later date. Sleeping Alternatives Staff was directed to qUickly develop an alternative to sleeping In parks In order to comply with the legal gUidelines established by the Court of Appeal In the Tobe decIsion from Santa Ana, thereby allOWing for the enforcement of Santa Monica MuniCipal Code 6471 Council stated that the alternative IS not meant to be an 3 attraction to homeless people and should be temporary The Council also expressed a desire to explore the potential of uSing vouchers or other means so as not to erect a new building City staff researched, reviewed and considered the following options. 1) a campground or "safe zone", 2) expanded use of the Culver City armory; 3) SubSidies for downtown Los Angeles single room occupancy (SRO) units, 4) a new Santa Monica shelter (various types, sizes and 10catlonsL 5) additional storage, 6) Intensified and expanded park outreach and case management; and 7) motel vouchers for homeless families Each of these options are described below In addition, staff have conducted several counts to establish the current number of people sleeping In Santa MOnica parks overnight. Four such overnight counts have been conducted over the past several weeks and Indicate a range between 91-133 people sleeping In Santa MOnica parks. This may give some indication as to the numbers of people who may be displaced due to Implementation of a full park closure ordinance From interviews With homeless people In the parks and through diSCUSSions With local homeless service proViders (including review of utilization of armory programL It can be expected that not all of the people currently sleeping In the parks at night will avail themselves of a new City-created sleeping alternative (1) Campground or "Safe Zone" One of the options considered IS the development of a campground or safe zone A campground or safe zone would Include the deSignation of a large outdoor space which would become the City-sanctioned alternative for homeless people who are currently sleeping and/or lIVing In parks. While possibly appealing as a low cost sleeping and liVing alternative, most attempts In other Cities have become little more than a high concentration of people In substandard conditions With major publiC health and safety problems. Examples In Los Angeles, Miami, and San Diego have provided ample eVidence of the problems With disease, drug dealing, Crime, Inadequate 4 sanitation and lack of linkages to needed serVices, employment and housing. In Santa Barbara and Eugene, Oregon, small homeless campgrounds or safe zones have not yet produced major problems. However, It IS Important to note that these cities are not part of a large urban area with high numbers of homeless people and are much more geographically Isolated than Santa Monica. In addition, these cities have devoted large pIeces of property not located In the downtown area of their cIties for thiS purpose Further complications anse In Implementing thiS option due to the inabIlity to Identify a local service provider who would be Willing to operate a campground or safe zone To address the need for site superVISion, the City would have to conSider hiring a prtvate security company or directly operating the campground or safe zone uSing City staff including Police Department personnel Based on the Information gathered on other such operations, It IS Important to note that some form of supervISion and oversight must occur at the campground or safe zone due to the threat of violence, alcohol or drug use, and other related problems associated with large groups of people congregating In one area Further, an assessment conducted by City staff with Clty- funded homeless service providers indicated an overrtdlng concern related to how the campground or safe zone could be part of a larger continuum of care Staff IS further concerned that a campground may become a regional attraction. POSSible locations conSidered for thiS option mclude Santa Monica Airport, beach parking lots, 505 OlympiC, and 502 Colorado Through a careful assessment, City staff has determined that most of these sites are mapproprlate due to eIther (1) a lack of transportation to the Site, (2) current site use for revenue generating purposes with a significant financial Impact, (3) sIgnificant neighborhood Impact, or (4) Inadequate space and Infrastructure needs Depending on the number of people to be served, the amenities to be provided on-site (I e. bathrooms, showers, lighting, etc.), the services to be offered (security, Intake, outreach) and the locatIon to be utilized, one-time capital costs could range between $88,000 and $155,000 and ongoing annual operatrng costs from $100,000 to 5 $200,000. Given the major problems of other such efforts In urban areas, the lack of a sUitable location In Santa MOnica, the lack of an operator, and concerns about the City's liability, staff does not recommend this option (2) Exoanded Armory Use The County of Los Angeles currently uses California National Guard ArmOries for shelter during the winter through ItS reglonal Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program. Funding for 90 days of shelter mid December through mid February and on certain weather-determined nights between November and March, IS proVIded through Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) and Community Service Block Grant (CSBG) funds In the Wests Ide of Los Angeles, armories In Culver City and West LA are used for approxImately 300 shelter beds. The Santa Monica City Council has been urging the County, State and Federal governments to expand thiS program to year round. Specifically, since the January 17, 1994 earthquake, efforts have Intensified to expand thiS regional shelter resource To date efforts to secure the armory faCIlities and Identify program funding have been unsuccessful. The cost for operating one armory for approximately 150 people per night IS $550,000 annually. The County currently funds approximately three months of shelter for $150,000 per year To expand the program by approximately seven months would require an additional $400,000 per year would require that the armory site be made available by the State for extended use Without pass through of other faCIlity-related costs City staff Will continue to work With the Council to gain expanded use of these faCIlities The City has actively supported SB1691 (Campbell" currently before the California Senate, which would reqUire that all armOries be made available to any City, county or nonprofit organization which proVides shelterto homeless people. However, passage of thiS bill IS uncertain and because thiS option IS not Immediately available, use of an armory Will not adequately address the Council's directIon for short-term 6 sleeping alternative (3) SRO Subsidy A possible alternative to sleeping In the parks may Include the creation of a City subsidy program that would provide access to SRO's and motel umts In other areas of the region Many SRD operators indicate that their screening and eligibility process take several weeks. Most requIre participants to have 551, General Relief benefits, or some form of Income and to be linked to case management and other support servIces. These SRD IS are considered to be permanent hOUSing options and therefore are not sUitable as a temporary shelter solution Moreover, whether thiS solution or partial solution would meet legal conformIty IS problematic There are a variety of motels In the downtown Los Angeles area that are more appropriate than SRO ~s for the Immediate need to provide temporary shelter ThiS option requires further research to fully understand the availability and reqUirements of thiS possible resource. It may be the case that In order to secure their availability for Immediate access, the City would need to guarantee the payment of a set number of rooms on a nightly baSIS over the course of the year. Some form of transportation assistance would be essential to make the units acceSSible To determine the feasibility and to establish a vIable program, more work will need to be completed including the establishment of partnerships and agreements between Santa Monica agencies and downtown Los Angeles hOUSing development and social service organizations Staff Will pursue thiS research, develop a program and report back to Council by September 1994. (4) Shelter City staff have researched and considered a number of sites and program plans for the operation of an Indoor shelter which could proVide an alternative sleeping site for people currently sleeping In parks. Options that would address CouncIl direction 7 regarding an alternative to sleeping In the parks and assist people In breaking the cycle of homelessness Including achieving self-sufficiency have been considered. Based on recent park census counts, available accessible property In Santa MOnica, and research on other comparable shelters, It IS recommended that a shelter accommodating 75 to 100 people be established with provIsion for dIrect referrals from outreach and police staff. The program would provide for acceptmg a small number of temporary overflow of sleepers, If needed The Salvation Army IS Willing to operate such a shelter for the City. ThiS would bring the total number of City-funded shelter beds up to 150 Additionally, there are approximately 276 local shelter beds which are privately funded and 300 armory shelter beds dUring the County's Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program every December through February. The new City shelter would provide a structured program With a limit on how long partIcipants could stay Without actively working to get off the streets There Will be a clear expectatIon that people who sleep In the shelter must participate In other needed services. The Salvation Army would deSign a shelter program that would serve as an entry pOint to a full continuum of services Including case management, employment, mental health, alcohol detox and treatment and other supportive assIstance CIty staff Will work closely With the Salvation Army and other local servIce providers to develop a highly collaborative shelter and service model The Salvation Army wlIl document and track participant Involvement in the program Rules of behaVIor Will be established to create a safe environment The Salvation Army Will develop a gnevance procedure. City staff Will work with the Salvation Army to ensure Involvement With homeless and formerly homeless people In adVisory and staff capaCities. (The Salvation Army has successfully Involved homeless and formerly homeless people In their SHW ASHLOCK Program). Staff conSidered the follOWing downtown, CIty-owned sites for a shelter: 612 Colorado, 502 Colorado, and 505 OlympiC After careful review of the advantages and disadvantages of each Site, staff has determined that a temporary shelter IS best 8 sUited for 505 OlympIc. Staff recommends that the Salvation Army be designated as the operator of the 75 to 100 bed shelter In a pre-fabricated structure on 505 Olympic to be established In July 1994. One-time capital costs would be approximately $390,000 and annual operating costs would be approximately $365,000 per year. In order to expedite the development of a shelter, an emergency ordinance IS reqUired to exempt the City from certain zoning requirements and a resolution to expedite purchasing and bidding procedures must be adopted These ordinances are agendlzed separately for Council conSideration tonight (Items #8-D and 9-8) (5) Expanded Storage On March 22 and 29, 1994, the Council Identified as an ImmedIate concern the excessive amounts of personal belongings being stored In parks and other public spaces for long periods of time One strategy to address this may be to Increase the locker storage space available to homeless people. In November 1993, the Salvation Army opened a "SHWASHLOCK" (showers, washers, lockers) program linked with other SOCial services at 505 OlympIc Boulevard This program currently Includes 1 00 cubical style lockers that can store essentIal belongings For program expansion, one time capital costs would range from $5,000 (100 used lockers In a shelter) to $135,000 (200 lockers In an additional trailer at 505 OlympiC.) ThiS option IS feaSible, In conjunction with other options deSCribed above, although alone It does not address the legal conSideratIons of park closure Staff could conSider expansion of thiS program as part of a shelter development or In the review of grant funding In the FY94-95 Community Development Plan to be brought before CouncIl In June 1994. (6) Park Outreach and Case Management The City Council and staff have Identified the need for Significantly strengthened 9 outreach and case management services In Santa MOnica In order to bring additional shelter and service resources to the hardest to reach of the homeless population lIVing In our parks Two separate, although related efforts are underway to address thiS One IS the restructuring of the current Outreach Team contract to Include thiS approach The second IS a one-time pilot establIshed between the City and the Ocean Park Community Center for four months of intensive case management for 50-60 people In Lincoln, Memonal and Palisades parks With the goal of getting people out of the parks and Into needed shelter/hOUSing linked With services. The one-time pilot Will cost $18,000, IS covered wlthm eXisting funds and IS currently underway The pilot Will prOVide Important experience and assIst In makrng the Outreach Team contract program deSign both practical and effective While thiS option alone does not address the legal conSiderations of park closure, It IS an Important component If linked With other options deSCribed above City staff Will direct the efforts of both the newly constituted Outreach Team (July 1994) and the four month intensive case management pilot project (currently underway) to assist With Implementation of night park closure. (7) Motel Vouchers Homeless families do not tend to be VISible In the community and have not been Identified as a Significant population currently sleeping In parks However, there are homeless families In Santa MOnica and several of the other options discussed In thiS report. speCifically a campground or safe zone, an expanded armory program, and a shelter, may not be particularly SUitable for famIlIes Therefore, some type of motel voucher program may be a useful alternative for outreach staff, park rangers or police offIcers when they encounter a homeless famIly Currently. local service prOViders receive an annual allotment of motel vouchers for families through FEMA. While there are never enough vouchers to meet the demand. It would be Important that any Santa Monica voucher program be closely coordinated with agency FEMA vouchers 10 Motel vouchers are expensive on a per night basIs, costing between $30 to $40 per night, depending on the motel. However, there are no one-tIme capItal costs Involved In this option. Annual operatmg costs could range from $10,950 (average of one family per night at $30) to $43,800 (three families per night at $40.) Vouchers could be provided on an-emergency or case-by-case baSIS for famIlies with a requirement that these vouchers be combined with case management services Staff recommends that the voucher program option be conSidered an emergency solutIOn available for homeless families through the Park Outreach Teams and the Police Department Program details and final costs will be presented as part of the FY 94-95 budget Food Service to the General Public On March 29, 1994 the City Council directed the City Attorney to evaluate an ordinance which prOVides that any person serving food to the general public must obtain a City bUSiness hcense and comply with all applicable City and County reqUirements related to food serVice, incorporating the Los Angeles County Health code by reference. The City Council suggested that these requirements should 1) apply to servers that are active on a regular baSIS, 2) apply to food served to the general pubhc. 3) not apply solely to the parks, and 4) be conSidered a health and safety Issue. The Council seeks a solution that IS fleXible so that Infrequent SOCial or political gatherings can serve food to group members Councllmembers Cited examples such as the Girl Scouts' summer camp "day In the park" and a local neighborhood group's annual piCniC Staff has begun evaluating options and plans to return to CounCil In late May with a proposal on thiS matter. In addition, staff will evaluate the usefulness of the County Health Code and any enforcement problems attendant upon uSing It Finally, the diSCUSSion of thiS Issue will Include Information on how other jUrisdictIOns regulate park usage 11 Prosecution Priorities of Public Drunkenness and Dlsorderlv Conduct The City Attorney's Office and Police Department staff were directed to report on enforcement of laws prohibiting public drunkenness and disorderly conduct Current procedures allow people picked up for public drunkenness to become sober and then be released without prosecution. The JOint evaluation of current procedures should be completed by the end of May when the staff Will return to the Council with additional information and recommendations. Results Oriented Social Services The City Council directed staff to provide analysIs and recommendations on the current homeless service network In Santa Monica Including how City-funded efforts could be more result oriented. Council requested information on the potential of redIrecting City support for emergency services to long-term services that are outcome onented. Councllmembers requested data on what programs are working and which are not successful. Council directed staff to address these Issues as part of the budget process. AnalysIs and recommendations Will be Included In the FY1994-95 Community Development (CD) Plan, for Council consideration as part of the budget In June Staff Will consider options for redirecting current funding, better tracking of results and linking shelter to services and employment 12 BUDGET IMPACT The staff recommendation to provide an alternative to sleeping In the parks with a temporary shelter to be located at 505 OlympiC results In the following financial Impact. I I One-Time I FY 1994-95 I Operating Currently $325,889 N/A Appropriated Required $ 64, 111 N/A Appropnatlon Total $390,000 $365,000* * All or part of the FY 1994-95 Shelter Operating Budget may come from a redirection of current homeless program funding. Therefore, the Council will need to appropnate an additional $64,111 from the General Fund for one-time expenses to Capital Improvement Project account #01-720-262- 20093-8900-99378 Any minimal start up operating expenses needed for the current fiscal year will be covered by currently appropriated funds. The annual operating budget for the shelter will be approximately $365,000. Final appropnatlons required for the shelter In FY 1994-95 Will be part of the June 1994 budget recommendations. specIfically In the Communlty Development grant program Staff Will present options for funding all or part of the shelter operating costs from a redirection from current projects. RECOMMENDA TIONS City staff recommends that the Council 1) approve the emergency ordinances (transmitted In separate reports) to expedite shelter development, 2) direct staff to establish a temporary shelter, Includmg additional lockers. for 75 to 100 people at 505 OlympiC to begin as soon as possible, 3) make the finanCial appropriation as defined 13 In the Budget Impact Section above, 4) designate the Salvation Army as the shelter operator, 5) direct the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract for operating assistance with the Salvation Army, 6) Implement the park closure ordinance In conjunction with opening of the shelter or as otherwise deemed appropriate, 7) direct staff to pursue further research and If feasible, develop a program linking homeless people to downtown Los Angeles SRO's and other hOUSing resources, and 8) direct staff to evaluate the use of motel vouchers for families as part of the comprehensive homeless servIces approach to be recommended In the FY 1994-95 Community Development Plan and grant budget. Prepared by: Susan McCarthy, Acting ASSistant City Manager Julie Rusk, Manager, Human ServIces DIVIsion Jim Butts, Chief of Police Marsha Jones Moutrie, City Attorney 14