SR-8-E (32)~
. " ~ ~ ~E
P&Z:DKW:DM:CUP92028 3anta Monica, California
Planning Commission Mtg: August 19, 1992
TO: The Aonorable Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 92-028
Reduced Parking Permit 92-003
Address: 370 Santa Monica Pier
Applicant: Russell Barnard/City of Santa Monica
INTRODUCTION
Action: Application for Conditional Use Permit and Reduced Park-
ing Permit to allow the operation of a 19,486 square foot, 699-
seat restaurant and entertainment facility with a Type-47 alcohol
license at 370 Santa Monica Pier. With the approval of the Re-
duced Parking Permit, the proposal meets all applicable develop-
ment standards.
Recommendation: Approval with Conditions
Permit Streamlining Expiration Date: January 5, 1993
SITE LACATION AND DESCRIPTION
The footprint of the project will occupy approximately 6,400
square feet of the Pier platform. Surrounding uses consist of
the Pier platform and the beach parking lot to the north (RVC),
the Pier platform parking area to the south {RVC), the Arcade
Building to the east (RVC), and the Pier Bumper Cars to the west
(RVC).
Zoning District: RVC
Land Use District: Oceanfront District
Parcel Area: (Irregular) 80' X 86' = 6,800 sq.ft.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Proposed is the operation of a 19,486 square foot, 699-seat res-
taurant and entertainment facility with a Type-47 (on-sale
general for public eating place) alcohol license. The 6,400
square foot interior first floor space will include a 151-seat
entertainment/showroom, a 16-seat bar, a 79-seat cafe, a 115-seat
patio, a kitchen and retail space. Two separate first floor pa-
tios will have a total of 1,762 square feet of floor area with 40
seats adjacent to the cafe and 115 seats on the main patio. A
4,983 square foot interior mezzanine will include restrooms, two
- 1 - y`. 067
~ a
12-seat banquet rooms, a 58-seat dining area, a aervica area,
office space and a sound/light booth for the ground floor show-
room. The second floor oP the project will contain 4,325 square
feet of interior space with a kitchen and a 132-seat dining/
banquet room. The 124-seat second £loor terrace will be 2,016
square feet in area for a project total of 19,486 square feet.
MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
The proposed project is consistent with the Municipal Code and in
conformity with the General Plan as shown in Attachment A.
CEQA STATUS
The parking and traffic impacts of the project were considered as
part of the Pier Development EIR. The Conditional Use Permit to
allow the issuance of an alcohol license is categorically exempt
per the City of Santa Monica Guidelines for the Implementation of
CEQA, Class 1(14).
FEES
The project is not subject to any development fees.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9130.8, within 30 days after
the subject application was deemed complete, the applicant posted
a sign on the property stating the following information:
Project case number, brief project description, name and
telephone number of applicant, site address, date, time and
location oP public hearing, and the Planning and Zoning Division
phone number. It is the applicant's responsibility to update the
hearing date if it is changed after posting.
In addition, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9131.5, notice of
the public hearing was mailed to all owners and residential and
commercial tenants of property located within a 500 foot radius
of the project at least ten consecutive calendar days prior to
the hearing. A copy of the notice is contained in Attachment B.
ANALYSIS
Restaurants and entertainment uses are permitted in the
Residential-Visitor Commercial District. Eating and drinking
establishments permitting alcoholic beverages require the is-
suance of a Conditional Use Parmit. The applicant is requesting
approval of a Conditional Use Permit and a Reduced Parking Permit
to allow the operation of the "restaurant and entertainment
facility with a Type-47 alcohol license.
Background
An Administrative Approval is pending to allow the construction
and operation of a two-story plus mezzanine restaurant with live
- 2 - ~"~ ~68
~ ~
entertainment and dancing and an ancillary retail use. The ap-
proval of the Reduced Parking Permit is required prior to the
issuance of the Administrative Approval.
In April of 1992, the City Council approved the Santa Monica Pier
Development project, which included the renovation of some exist-
ing Pier buildings and the addition of the Fun 2one. The shared
parking analysis contained in the Environmental Impact Report
certified by the City Council for the Pier Development Project
concluded that there would be approximately 68,085 square feet of
restaurant/entertainment space and a total of approximately 2,270
seats associated with the redeveloped Pier. This included the
Ash Grove and Sinbad's. The parking analysis stated that there
is currently adequate parking available to meet the parking de-
mand for the new restaurants and entertainment uses.
In May of 1992, the City Council approved an Alcoholic Beverage
Service Policy Statement for the Santa Monica Pier. While the
policy statement recommended by the Pier Restoration Corporation
included a limit on the number of alcohol outlets to be permitted
on the Pier, the Council's action did not specify a number, but
stated that each alcohol permit application ahould be reviewed on
it's own merits.
Project Design
The proposed project will involve the demolition oP the existing
Sinbad's and American Grill buildings. The new bi~ilding will be
a recreation of the Sinbad's building with an adjacent two-story
structure. The building will appear to be two distinct atruc-
tures from the exterior, but will function as one interior space.
The project will contain a total of 15,708 square feet of interi-
or space and 3,778 square feet of exterior space.
The restaurant/entertainment facility will provide a variety of
seating options including interior seating, exterior ground lavel
seating and deck level patios. The first floor will consist of a
kitchen, cafe, retail space and an entertainment showroom featur-
ing live entertainment and dancing. The mezzanine will include
banquet/meeting rooms, restrooms, o£fices, drassing rooms and
storage. The second floor will £eature a^table-cloth" type res-
taurant with a small lounge, a dining room, patio seating and
live entertainment. The type of entertainment in the second
floor restaurant will include small acts such as string or jazz
quartets, piano/vocalist or poetry readings.
The applicant is requesting that the project be approved with a
total of 19,486 square feet of floor area and a maximum of 699
seats. The actual number of seats- and configuration of seating
plans will vary, depending on time of year and type of entertain-
ment beinq offered. For this reason, the applicant has not indi-
cated the number of seats to be located in the specific areas of
the facility.
- 3 - ' ~s~
~ `
Parking
Code required parking for the proposed restaurant and entertain-
ment £acility would be 260 spaces based on a ratio of one space
for every 75 square feet. However, the applicant has applied for
a Reduced Parking Permit to allow a reduction oP the required
number of parking spaces based on the fact that shared parking is
characteristic oP the Pier and the adjacent beach lots. The En-
vironmental Impact Report certified by the City Council for the
Pier Development Project included a parking analysis which con-
cluded that there are enough existing parking spaces to accommo-
date the existing demand from the Pier, as well as the demand
which would be generated by the Ash Grove and Sinbad's projects.
There are currently 1,210 parking spaces that serve the Pier,
with 272 in the Pier surface parking lot, 75 spaces at 1640 Ap-
pian Way, 706 spaces at 1550 Pacific Coast Highway, and 157
spaces at 1440 Pacific Goast Highway. The EIR concludes that the
existing peak parking demand for the Pier is 939 spaces, and that
the peak parking demand for the Ash Grove and Sinbad's would be
101 spaces for a total of 1,040 space. This results in a surplus
of 17o spaces. Based on these calculations, staff is recommend-
ing approval of the Reduced Parking Permit.
Alcohol License
According to the list of all licenses in the City of Santa Monica
as of May 11, 1992, published by the ABC, within a 500' radius of
the site, there is one Type-4D (on-sale beer) license, five Type-
41 (on-sale beer and wine) licenses and two Type-47 (on-sale
general) licenses. These include the following:
Type 40 (On-Sale Beer)
Mermaid Cafe (42 seats) 1557 Ocean Front Walk
Type 41 (On-Sale Beer and Wine for Eating Place)
SM Pier Seafood (115 seats) 258 Santa Monica Pier
Surf View Cafe (80 seats) 330 Santa Monica Pier
American Grill (36 seats) 378 Santa Monica Pier
Jack's on the Pier (58 seats) 390 Santa Monica Pier
Biq Dean's Cafe (64 seats) 1613 Ocean Front Walk
Type 47 (On-Sale General for Eating Place)
Boathouse Restaurant (332 seats) 301 Santa Monica Pier
Crown and Anchor (114 seats) 256 Santa Monica Pier
In addition to the outlets listed above, in May of 1992, the
Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow
the issuance of a Type-47 alcohol license for a new restaurant to
be located at 401 Santa Monica Pier.
~~ 070
- 4 -
~ ~
Planning staff has spoken to representatives trom the Police De-
= partment regarding alcohol outlets on the Pier. In regard to
alcohol sales on the Pier in general, Police Department staff
have stated that the majority of alcohol problema on the Pier and
in the vicinity result from paople who buy alcohol at an off-sale
location and bring it to the Pier or the beach, rather than peo-
ple who consume alcohol in Pier restaurants. Regarding the clos-
ing time of Pier alcohol outlets, Police Dapartment staff have
stated that they do not have significant concerns about es-
tablishments on the Pier being open until 2:00 A.M., although
shorter hours of operation typically result in fewer disturban-
ces. The number of Police personnel in the Pield decreases at
3:00 A.M. and the number of Harbor Patrol personnel decreases at
4:00 A.M. Therefore, a full complement of security personnel are
on duty at the latest allowable closing time.
Planning staff is recommending the standard condition of approval
which limits alcohol sales to 35~ of the eatablishment's gross
revenue. In this case, the establishments gross revenue would
include revenue generated from the sale oP event tickets and
cover charges.
Conclusion
The RVC District standards oP the Zoning Ordinance permit res-
taurant and entertainment uses on the Pier. The sale of alcohol
would be ancillary to the primary use of the premises as a res-
taurant and entertainment venue.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Condition-
al Use Permit 92-028 and Reduced Parking Permit 92-003 subject to
the following findings and conditions:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
1. The proposed use is one conditionally parmitted within the
subject district and complies with all of the applicable
provisions of the "City of Santa iKonica Comprehensive Land
Use and Zoning Ordinance", in that an alcohol license in
conjunction with a restaurant and entertainment use in
conditionally permitted in the RVC District.
2. The proposed use would not impair the integrity and
character of the district in which it is to be established
or located, in that th~ alcohol license will be used in
conjunction with a restaurant and entertainment use, which
is permitted in the RVC District.
3. The subject parcel is physically suitable for the type of
land use being proposed, in that the alcohol license will
be used in conjunction with a restaurant and entertainment
use located on the Santa Monica Pier platform, which is
suitable and intended for such a use.
~' '' ~ 7 1
- 5 -
~ ~
4. The proposed use is compatible with any of the land uses
presently on the subject parcel if the present land uses
are to remain, in that the restaurant and entertainment
use will be compatible with other uses on the Pier, which
include such visitor serving facilities as ahops, res-
taurants and services.
5. The proposed use would be compatible with existing and
permissible land uses within the district and the general
area in which the proposed use is to be located, in that
the restaurant and entertainment facility will be located
in the Residential-Visitor CommQrcial District, which al-
lows restaurant and entertainment uses and conditionally
permits alcohol outlets.
6. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed
use would not be detrimental to public health and safety,
in that the site is located in an urbanized area, ade-
quately served by existing infrastructure.
7. Public access to the proposed use will be adequate, in
that the existing access to the Pier is adequate to serve
the proposed use.
8. The physical location or placement of the use on the site
is compatible with and relates harmoniously to the sur-
rounding neighborhood, in that the restaurant and enter-
tainment use will be located in a building previously ap-
proved through an Administrative Approval.
9. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectivas,
and policies of the General Plan, in that the project is
located in the Oceanfront District, which encourages
visitor-serving entertainment uses.
10. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare,
in that the use is consistent with the 2oning Ordinance
and the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
11. The proposed use conforms precisely to the applicable per-
Pormance standards contained in Subchapter 6, Section 9050
and special conditions outlined in Subchapter 7, Section
9a55 of the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use
and Zoning Ordinance, in that no performance standard per-
mit is required.
12. The proposed use will not result in an overconcentration
of such uses in the immediate vicinity, in that the serv-
ing of alcohol from the subject establishment will be an-
cillary to the primary use of the premises, which will be
as a restaurant and entertainment facility.
- 6 - ~ ` ~~~
~ ~
ALCOAOL OUTLET FINDINGS
1. The proposed use and location are in accordance with good
zoning practice, in the public interest, and necessary
that substantial justice be done in that the alcohol
license will be for a previously approved restaurant and
entertainment facility.
2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the welfare of
neighborhood residents in a significant manner in that
there are no residents within 500' of the restaurant.
3. The proposed use will not contributa to an undue
concentration of alcohol outlets in the area in that the
restaurant is located on the Santa Monica Pier, which
serves a regional population of over two million people
per year.
4. The proposed use will not detrimentally affect nearby
neighborhoods considering the distance of the alcohol
outlet to residential buildings, churches, schools,
hospitals, playgrounds, parks, and other existing alcohol
outlets in that there are no residential buildings,
churches, schools, or hospitals in the immediate area,
and the issuanca of a Type 47 alcohol license which only
allows on site consumption of alcohol will not
detrimentally affect the public beach since it allows
on-site consumption only and in that the conditions for
approval such as the hours of operation, server training
requirements and limitations on the percentage of alcohol
to gross sales that can be sold will minimize the
potential affect on the nearest residential uses.
5. The proposed use is compatible with existing and potential
uses within the qeneral area in that the restaurant will
be located on the Santa Monica Pier which contains several
restaurants, shops and other visitor serving uses.
6. Traffic and parking congestion will not result from the
proposed use in that the Pier is served by existing
streets and parking is available on the Pier and in the
parking lots located adjacent to the Pier.
7. The public health, safety, and general welfare are
protected in that the project is consistent with the
provisions of the Zor.ing Ordinance and the Land Use
Element of the General Plan._
8. No harm to adjacent properties will result in that the
conditions of approval will ensure that the establishment
operates in a responsible manner.
9. The proposed use is consistent with the objectives of the
General Plan in that the Land Use Element of the General
- , - ~°~ 073
•'ki . .
' #~
.: Plan designates the area as the Ocean Front District, and
encouragea uses that serve visitors and residents.
REDUCED PARKING PERMIT FINDINGS
. 1. A sufficient number of spaces ara provided to meet the
greater parking demand of the participating uses in that
~ the shared parking analysis contained in the Pier
Development project EIR concludes that the peak period
= parking demand for the existing Pier uses and the Ash
Grove and Sinbad's project would be 1,040 spaces, and
there are currently a total of 1,210 spaces available.
2. Satisfactory evidence has been submitted by the parties
operating the shared parking facility, describing the
nature of the uses and times when the uses operate so as
to demonstrate the lack of conflict between them in that
the shared parking arrangement was analyzed in the Pier
Project EIR, whiGh has been certified by the City Council.
ALCDHOL OUTLET CONDITIONS
l. The premises shall maintain a kitchen or food-serving area
in which a variety of food is prepared and cooked on the
premises.
2. The premises shall serve food to patrons during all hours
the establishment is open for customers.
3. Seating arrangements for sit-down patrons shall not exceed
699 seats.
4. Take out service shall be only incidental to the primary
sit-down use.
5. No alcoholic beverage shall be sold for consumption beyond
the premises.
6. The primary use of the outdoor dining area shall be for
seated meals service. Patrons who are standing in the
outdoor seating area shall not be served except during
private parties when the general pubic is not admitted.
7. The outdoor patios must be adequately secured to prohibit
contact with non-patrons, and door security must be
provided at all times during hours when alcoholic
beverages are being served.
8. Hours of alcoholic beverage service shall be 6 a.m. to
2:00 a.m., seven days a week.
9. No more than 35~ if gross revenues shall be from alcohol
sales. The operator shall maintain records of gross
revenue sources which shall be available to the City of
Santa Monica and the State ABC upon request.
- a - r.~, 074
~ ~
l0. Alcohol shall not be served in any disposable container
such as disposable plastic or paper cups, unless it is
purchased at a walk-up counter, in which case it shall be
sold in a distinct cup. Alcohol shall not be served at
walk-up counters in cans or bottles.
11. No more than three video or other amusement games shall be
permitted on the premises.
12. Within thirty (30) days from date of approval (if
approved) the applicant shall provide a copy of the
Statement of Official Action for this approval to the
local office of the State Alcoholic Beverage Control
department.
13. This permit shall expire one year from the effective date
of approval unless required ABC permits are obtained. One
ninety (90) day extension of the ona year period may be
permitted if approved by the Director of Planning.
Applicant is on notice that an extension may not be
granted if development standards relevant to the project
have changed since project approval.
14. Applicant is on notice that all temporary signage is
subject to the restrictions of the City sign ordinance.
15. Any new restaurant at the site with greater than 50 seats
is required to install an interceptor with 1000 gallons
minimum holdinq capacity. The General Services Department
may modify the above requirements only for good cause.
Specifically, the facility must demonstrate to the satis-
faction of the Industrial Waste Section and Suilding and
Safety Divieion that interceptor installation is not
feasible at the site in question.
16. No expansion in number oP seats, intensity of operation,
or outdoor areas shall occur without prior approval from
the City of Santa Monica and State ABC.
17. Prior to issuance of a business license, a security plan
shall be submitted to the Chief of Police for review and
approval. The plan shall address both physical and
operational security issues.
18. Prior to issuance of a business license, the operator
shall submit a plan for approval by the Director of
Planning regarding employee alcohol awareness training
programs and policies. The plan shall outline a mandatory
alcohol awareness training program for all employees
having contact with the public and shall state
management's policies addressing alcohol consumption and
inebriation. The operator shall provide City with an
annual compliance report regarding compliance with this
condition. This project shall be subject to any future
City-wide alcohol awareness training program condition
affecting similar establishments. The plan shall also set
- 9 - ~ ~ n75
~ ~
forth a"designated driver" program, which shall be
offered by the operator of the establishment to patrons.
19. Final plans for any changes to exterior design,
landscaping, trash enclosures, and/or signage shall be
subject to review and approval by the Landmarks
Commission.
20. Minor amendments to the plans shall be subject to approval
by the Director of Planning. An increase of more than 10~
of the square footage or a significant change in the
approved concept shall be subject to Planning Commission
Review. Construction shall be in substantial conformance
with the plans submitted or as modified by the Planning
Commission, Architectural Review Board, oY Director of
Planning.
21. The applicant shall comply with all legal requirements
regarding provisions for the disabled, including those set
forth in the California Administrative Code, Title 24,
Part 2.
22. Refuse areas, storage areas, and mechanical equipment
shall be screened in accordance with Sec. 9127J.2-4
(SMMC). Refuse areas shall be of a size adequate to meet
on-site need.
23. The operation shall at all times be conducted in a manner
not detrimental to surrounding properties or residents by
reason of lights, noise, activities, parking, or other
actions.
Prepared by: David Martin, Associate Planner
Attachments:
A. Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Radius and Location Map
D. Photographs of Site and Surrounding Properties
E. Plot Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations
DM
PC/CUP92028
OS/12/92
- 10 - . ~ ~~G
~
~
ATTACHMENT A
MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
Land Use
Category Element Municipal Code Project
Permitted Use Rest- Eating and drinking Restaurant
aurants establishments with and entertainment
w/enter- alcohol sales with with a Type-47
tainment the approval of a alcohol license
Conditional Use
Permit
Parking Space Number N/A 260 spaces Total of 1,210
spaces for Pier.
Pier EIR concludes
that existing
spaces are
adequate for
existing Pier as
well as the Ash
Grove and Sinbad's
- 11 - - n77
e~ .. v'~
... N
-$- z. 3 G< ` ~ .4'~`MAIN
N~ ~ ~,S~v ~ ~ryp ~~ 1 ~nn ~~
\t' y~~
e ~, ~y'~i Y.. ... ~~ .~. ~».,,,, ;;
'° °° '~ • ' <
~ lur~ 6 tTREET ~klnQ Strucfur~ B "~ ~.' ;= i ~
° ., L? ` - ~ ., , .. . . _. ,
• !
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
= Subject of Hearing: Conditional Use Permit 92-028, Reduced
- Parking Permit 92-003
370 Santa Monica Pier/RVC
Applicant: Russell Barnard/City of
Santa Monica
Sujeto de audencia: Aplicacion para un restaurante con
servicio de alcohol
A Public Hearing will be held by the Planning Commission on
the following request:
Application £or a Conditional Use Permit and a Reduced
Parking Permit to allow the operation of a restaurant with
entertainment and a Type-47 alcohol license. (Planner: D.
Martin)
TIME: WEDNESDAY~ Auqust 19 ~ 1992 AT 7:00 P.M.
LOCATION: COi7NCIL CHAMBER, ROOM 213, CITY HALL, 1685 MAIN
STREET, SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA
The City of Santa Monica encourages public comments.
Interested persons may comment at the hearing, or by writing
a letter.
Letters should be addressed to:
Planning Division, Room 111
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, California 90401
Attn: (D. Martin)
Information on any apglication may be obtained from the
Planning Division at the address above or by calling (310)
458-8341.
The meeting facility is handicapped accessible. If you have
any special needs such as sign language interpreting, please
contact the Office oP the Disabled at (310j 458-8701.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65009(b), if
this matter is subsequently challenged in Court, the
challenge may be limited to only those issues raised at the
Public xearing described in thss notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Monica at, or
prior to, the Public Hearing.
Esto es una noticia de una sudencia publica para revisar
applicaciones proponiendo desarrollo en Santa Monica. Si
deseas mas informacion, favor de llamar a Elsa Gonzalez en
la Division de Plantificacion al numero (310) 458-8341.
~~ 079
- ~ - ~.~,r1.~,~+,r' c~
~ ~
AT°TACHMENT F
~so
~ ~
ATTACHMENT F
DEFINITIONS OF RESTAURAi~TT AND NIGHTCLUB
The followin, are the defimtions for mghtclub and restaurant that are currently in the City code
Nightclub An estabhshment which prunarily offers live entertamment or dancmg and which mae
serc•e food or beveraees
Restaurant Any bu~lding. room. space or port~on thereof where food is sold for consumption
on srte A restaurant does not include mcidental food service.
The following aze the defimrions contamed m the Ordmance for wluch the Cm• Council had first
reading on August 8, 1995
Nrghtclub An estabhshment such as a bar, discotheque, restaurant, or similaz facility which, at
all hmes or during specified hours. provides dancing or entertainment as the principal use
Nightclub mcludes a restaurant which offers entertainment beyond the lunitations set forth in the
defuution of "restaurant" ~n Sechon 9 04 02 030 Typical chazacterisrics of a mghtclub mclude,
but aze not hmrted to, the chazgmg of a cover chazge, limited or no food service, a dance floor
or stage. amplified music, and a mmimum dnnk purchase requirement.
Restaurant Any building, room, space or portion thereof where food is sold for consumpuon
on srte, except for uses qualifying as mcidental food service. A restaurant may provide music
or othei entertamment if (1) there is full meal service available at all times wtule the
entertainment is takmg place, (2) there is no dancing; and (3) the entertainment is provided only
in the room(s) m which the service of food is the primary busmess activity A restaurant with
entertamment bevond the scope of these limrtahons durmg specified hours on a mghtly, weekly,
or other regular basis shall also be considered a nightclub and such entertainment use shall be
prohibited unless a sepazate conditional use pernut for that nightclub use has been obtained
18
~81
~ ~
ATTACHMENT G
082
~ ~
C/TY OF SANTA MONICA
INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORAIVDUM
;;; V : _- _ -
August 30, 1995
~J _ ~~ _ __
TO: Captain Mapes
FROM: Detective Heineman #2919 and Detective Hunscke #2927
SUBJECT: Sinbad's
PROJECT DESCRIPTIOIY
5inbad's is a proposed restaurant that will seat approximately 699 persons.
Approximately 150 of those seats wdl be in an outdoor area. This area is compnsed of
an outdoor beverage booth, tables and chairs, picnic tables, and an outdoor stage.
Another stage w~ll be located on the second fioor
POLICE DEPARTMENT
The Police Department was consulted in the initial stages of the project over five years
ago, but there has been little contact untd the recent amendment applicaticn Several
concerns were raised with the Planning and Zonrng Division and in a meeting with Mr
Barnard.
In October of 1992 a police department committee was formed to study two pro~ects,
Sinbad's and the Ash Grove. Several issues were raised by that committee and these
issues continue to be concerns at this time
LAW ENFORCEMENTISSUES
1) Parking
At the present t~me there are 1106 parking spaces available in the 155~ lot, 1440
lot, and the Newcomb Pier lot There has also been some indication that the
long-range plans call for phasing out parking in the Newcomb Pier lot. Our
concerns are that with the addition of the Fun Zone, Sinbad's and Ashgrove
parking reqwrements, insufficient spaces will be available Thus causing
congestion of tra~c flow to the Pier
nR~
~ ~
2) Traffic Flow
= We were unable to conduct an in-depfh analys~s of the traffic pattems in the area
Pnmary arteries in the area are already operating at a near capaaty level With
the planned development of the pier and Fun Zone, the problems wdl become
more serious There is a high potential for gridlock which wdl severely limit the
access of emergency vehicles in the case of an incident Also, the potential for
senous accidents occurring on Pacific Coast Highway due to spol-off congestion
and U-Turns occurnng North of the McClure Tunnel are a major concern
3) Enforcement Problems
One of the primary concerns of the 1992 committee was the ability to prowde
meaningful enforcement The aty's primary means of ensunng an appropnate
enwronment with such pro~ects is the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) associated
with the issuance of the business license.
The only agencies charged with ensurmg compiiance with the CUP are the vice
unit and the city's zoning inspectors. In 1992 it was clear that there was a need
for additional inspectors and the provision of added resources to administrative
procedure to deal with CUP violations
4) Potential Cnme Problems
For statistical purposes the "pier area" was defined as the area extending from
Broadway on the north to Pico on the south and all of Ocean Avenue west to the
furthest end of the Pier
The following chart is representative of statistics from 1992 to present It should be no!ed
that dunng that period no significant expansion of the Pier has occurred And during that
time the Police Department has deployed added personnel and eqwpment which we feel
is a direct result of the decrease in occurrences. Any ma~or developments would
absolutely reqwre added police personnel and equipment to keep the statistics consistent
with past years
084
~ ~
Type of Crime 1992 1993 1994 1995
{thru 8I21)
Homicide 0 1 1 0
Rape 6 5 6 2
Aggravated Assault 47 53 27 19
Robbery 71 64 32 25
Weapons Violations 33 13 9 5
DUI 21 39 23 8
Disorderly Conduct 17 17 25 1
Public Intoxication 47" 287 292 265
Liquor Law violation 5 1 5 4
Total of selected crimes 247 480 420 329
Gang related 10 6 6 5
*Locations of arrest for most (1883 of 2113) public intoxication violations were not
recorded m 1992
ns5
~ ~
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Department resources be expanded to allow for uniformed visibdity, particularly
during the peak use hours it is felt that on weekend evenings, four to six
uniformed officers would be and absolute mimmum for effective deterrence This
wouid prowde adequate secunty for Pier visitors without necessitating pulling
officers away from other parts of the City with frequency
2) The number of vice officers be increased from two to four and the city code
enforcement be enhanced to ensure the compliance with CUP's
3) CUP's associated with all development which involves alcohol be forwarded to the
vice unit in a timely manner Further, the vice unit should be adwsed of all
changes in ownership, new openings and closures, etc. of business' which are
involved m the sale of alcohoi
4) The police department should have a defined role m the planning process
5) All CUP's for establishments involved in alcohol sales should mirror the ABC
requirements. This would provide the police deparlment with a greater ability to
enforce appropriate liquor laws.
SINBAD'S PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS
1) We oppose the outdoor stage for the following reasons
a) The noise level will adversely affect the surrounding residential area Even
where there may be no technical code violation, neighbors are likely to be
disturbed by both the noise commg from the establishment and residual noise from
patrons both coming and going. The police department would have to respond to
citizens' complaints
b) Any persons who are unable to enter the establishment wdl loiter in the area
ad~acent to the outdoor area This disturbance will severly impact a police
responce to any problem that might occur inside as well as impact access to other
extablishments on the Pier Once again this will cause calls to the police
department which will necessitate a response of patrol officers
2) We oppose the outdoor beverage booth for the followmg reasons:
a) This booth will cause congestion ~n the area of the entrance and exit to
the patio area This congestion would make entry difficult for public safety
personnel who may need access to the patio area in an emergency.
b) There is the possibility that aicohol could be passed to persons outside the
establishment due to its close proximity to the patio entrance/exit.
086
~ ~
3) We would oppose using more than one stage at any one time. Hawng more than
one type of entertainment could be the source of a disturbance. This was the
problem at a locai establishment where two different bands were booked to play
one after the other. Unfortunately both bands had a group of followers who began
fighting The owner of the establishment was unaware of both band's background
and didn't know they were unfnendly to one another When police umts arrived
they found approximately 1,000 people in the street fighting All Santa Monica
police units responded as well units from LAPD, the CHP, and Beverly Hdls Police
Department
4) At the last Twilight Dance there were approximately seventy gang members
present Several fights broke out on the pier and it was necessary to redeploy
all available patrol units, as well as the Cnme impact Team, Metro Team,
and Beat 8 Bike Urnt, to the pier to maintain order. This had an obvious effect on
the remainder of the city because routine cails for service had to wait until urnts
were avatlable to respond.
5) We request that any outdoor seating consist of separate chairs and a table No
p~cnic type tables shouid be allowed. Other establishments have been known to
move their tabies to clear an area for dancing. Picrnc tables can be stacked quickly
and ~n a smaller area than tables and chairs This has become a senous concern,
therefore we ask that picnic tables not be allowed
~8~
~ ~
ATT'ACHMENT H
nRR
July 26, 1995
Planning Commission
City of Santa :~lonica ~~ i Y~=
RE: Route 66 Project - 370 Santa Ntonica Pier
y; - ,~-. _ _ _
_~ E.i ~ 1
COD1miSSiOIIeI'S:
As a member of the Sout6 of the Pier Beach Residents
Neighborhood Watch, I fully support tue posir~an c: u.:. ~a:,:~ 1i1WL~V4 Ds!ie~
Department in its opposirion to the Russell Bernard Aoute 66 Pier Projec~
I support the Police Department's position that this Project, with its excessive
outdoor seating, would be a crowd control probtem and should not be
approved.
The negative public safety consequences far outweigh its beaefits.
JL~Gf'.~~~z~~~~ ~/ V~ C,~ ~rF P ~Ku C~-
Signature ~ Address
>, ~go
i~~ ivu.~iU-451-SSUb
July 25, 1995
Pianning Commission
City of Santa Monica
RE: Ruu#~ 66 ~roiect - 370 $anta Monica Pier
Comniissloners:
Jan 12,13 10~55 ~.01
~
~
~
1
i
,~
-,~w °- ~
~~ 'i
~
~ -_ __ -.ti, ~ ~
I
~
"`"`~~- ~t~s` a memaer oi ine-Si1'atti~afZhe Pier Bes~h Residents '
Neigtiborhood Watch, I fully support the position of the Santa Monica Poi3ce~
Depa~ i~;ent in its opposition to the Russell Beroard Route 66 Pier Project '
1
E support the Pollce Department's positiou that this Prnject, with its excessiv~'
outdoor seadag, wouid be a crowd controi problem and should not be ,
approved.
The negati~•e public safety consequences far outweigh its benefits.
~
i
;
~
~ . . . . ~~ ~ .~
ddre
~
~~~.e.~~ ~6 `Se~.~'e~v ~e~i -
~S a rz~ /~'..e~;' c~~ ~A
9~ ~~t
ngp
;~
A TTACHMENT !
nqt
~~ i , F. , 8I ' `d.y;'~+I rr.; , ~, , °.r:J~'I~ ., , Ii ~,..?y+~.,y,y~9l9~F~;~~'Mi~'r;es ,°"~,zl~~',?~,~r cyr.'
''~ , ' ' ' ~~ `n~ ? .e~ ry"9' ,-
' f ~~ x~'~ ~ : s "~`~ i~ > a ~ ~u:~, ,~.
.r ~~ .r, r3, ;..{ .I !~ ~` 3 d 7'~ f ~~ ~' • ~,.. I i h' m~. ~
y~~ ; ~ ~' • , . ~ ~ .~-.~.~~ '°'° ~ ~ aws ~ ae~a ~ ano ~ aa. ~ ,,,P ~ ~„a a ~ , i ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ n ~~ < ~y~h~~~y'~~~a~ ~~~~`~ ,?' ~'~' ~ ' ~ ~ ~f:``~ ~ ~~ "r~5~v~~~ ~ ~,~ ~ y~m ~ ~ ~' ~i~~,r
~ , , ~'~' • aw~ ao~~ ~ao~~' ~ , !K~'.° „~ as~~ `se~* ~aiwM~~1K ~;,.. :d"~ ~. 4qil,,
`,~~ ~ ' ~ t , ~ s }~,.rJ' ~i
~.~ , , ,`,. ~, ''' . , ~ 7 i ~ . i i ww~r«e , , .. . , ;:i, `~' , . , ~;h~t~ ~~ =ffe' ~.+n~~~~ ~ s`~5~.
~ ~ , ' ro„ ~ ~ , ~ i . . ! , ~ . ', ~~ , ~ , ' ~ , ~ ~ I ~ ~J~'~:~T:• i '~; ~
'' I I I I ~.,1„~ :~~I,'a.~~
~~~~; . . .~ :; ~ , ~ I I "` `~"~ I 1 I ~'~ ~ ~t ~ ~ . ~~t,:.,~;.,._ ., ~ ~~ }~,.;kt~
~~~~,~ ~~, ~ ~ ,~ . ;~ ~ ~;~4~. ,: ~
~t;.~ ~', ~-*~7!'i ' ~ ~• ~ i i ~ i i i ~ ~ i• ~ f' ~ i i'• i . ~ ~'" „~ii;',i~~~~f"~ .~ i
~~ ir , 4"`S; :''; ' I µ t y wo
#~,,~~,"`I~ r A , `,,.°~ ~ I +~. ~ e,u..r+ .., ~,w,~ ' - ; , ":~~ ., ~~'~ "} ' Y-, a~ti~4 Y~.a~ ''~~, ,~~,, a;''..,N~,`, „~ f7' " ~ , ~'~ v`~C,~ ~ ~
~~N4 :ti ° ti;a; . A , t ~ _ .1 I ~ ~ _~ wJ ~ ' ~ . y i,.r~ +w"~a~".P. ..~ ~-'~s, ho~ ~~~~ ~h "~1
n • ~ ti+:w~ r-~r-.~ ~ ~~. ~ .. •i ~~.. ~ ~ J . I . . . ~ t ~) ~
~~; T,~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ , -~--- - ~~ - } - - -}- _ _ , 370 Santa Monica Pier ' . ~~ ~. ~ '"
~^~;~ '~;~ .,, ~ ,~,K„~:~''~~~~ 1 ~ " - ~ I .~ ; ~ ` :, Lease Area " ~ '~y' >
"~ ~ ,~ ~ wr w . ~ i 4 9 f 9 9 ~~ • S , i,~ ,. ~ , h, ~ :~t ~ ;~l.u«.
C tfa~ ?"'to"' ' 7V1ppp _ ~.r. _ - - r t'~ ,~d; 6 , .. • ~ ' ~ ~ ' .
tk a~~ ~F~N~r.,~ . .~ ~y I1~ ~W R ~1,4~V .i~Y ;` 1 ~~ '' / ~ ~ ' R
,a,"k~q~i~ ' 1 I ~*..~ "Y~,~ ~` . 1 ~' M, . ( ~ . ~'t ~~,~ ~i ~.s,` .~+ .
~ e'F ~~~ yS~N~ 7n ~ ~ I 1 . a~w.r „ ' ~ ~
~~' ~ i r~"` i,' y i~ .. .. ' _ _ - _ `{ 1 ~ MQ" ir ~ ~ ^ . •+ ~.
~~ '*, iµ , ~~.~ I _ ~ r £ ~~ *I~ +1' eo Y, .' . Y• + ~ ~*' ' r
~ry~s ~ ~.,.~r~ ~ ~~ ,;o~'r+t I: "II~~~ n'. ! , . ..~-.. ~P ~r"i.r~ ~.q.~ ,~~ ~ F• r~ • ~K • •r7'•~_'~7. :
~i•r . ~ ~~ ' c ~ _ 1' . ruwral ~ ~t ~ '~ ~~' „~m,,,,d ~ Y ~~(~. •~'„ , w~,w.,w•':+`.,e, x b i•~ ~ ~~~tiEi, ; _,.~- ~
.• *~%ph • ~ ~~~ ¢~~ ~ . r ~ ~ ~ N ~# ~~'! • ,~+rx ~~9 . ` : ~ ~rY ~ ~• . ~ 1' _.
„,~'. ~ E--~--"-•--~ I ~ - I -- I - - • - M - ~ • ~ 4 . "ii ..r~•~~~ ~}.~i:. ~•.'ir.~~ +~. ~
;;r.., ~~, ~d ~ , ; i ~ • i ~~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~~+-. ~~ ,. . ~..~~.. r•~~•~ ~ F'.~y~yr.~•~• ,i ^•~
' a n ~. a
,~,; ' . ~s~ w ~ { .~ ~ ~ : . + ' '~ '~~; ~S • •iL`i~. ~' i : ~ •, " - e
,`~~;. r ; ,~~_ _~ _i - ~:-.. -- M~~--_ - ., . . . S._. : . ~~ ~ ~
' 1 + •Nlw ', ~~ ••~ ~/ r ~.~
~~,f ~~y - , i ~ ~. ~ i i ~ ~ -- - { - -I--- -..~ ~•- ~,~, r `~ s:.. . ,~._' .--.=~I- t'.':..~ ~ ...rr,~.: ± :~ .~' .~ : ~w~~M' :
,M, ~ I ~ _I ' ; '~~^~ ~. ~ ` ' ~:. f :~ _. ~ •.~~.r. ti7~ '~.t~e ~ • .~ r
i~~' r ,,~, • ' ~ti ' •' ' ~. •' -: ~ ~ti .
f~.+--+.~~.1 __ _I ~~ ~~~ri..~~' . ~ •r ^ ~ ~
~.>f"`„i` t i ~ ~ - -~ '-- i---,i-- i i. i a, q ~' i~..~y~~1~~ 'i~ ,~_~aJ~.,~~
I'!,~~' ~ ' ~. i ' I I 1 i I ~ ! ~ .~~ ~' ~ c~ ~'~ / •i y ~ ~ ~.. ~ ~s~ • `' :
~,~; :i , N _._ i _,,.. T i__'~-~.,~ ~i - ~_ _ ' - ' -~_ ~ ~^°~aM~e~ I J S ~a ~ r• ~ •~ . ~ w
.~,~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ I~ ' T- - - ° ---T -•-~' ~•' ~ ~i'F•• !* ~. ' ~ . '
~,+°.r~ ~ I I I ~ \ ' r __ 4 K ./ + ~ ~ ,~.•~r ; ~ ~~. ••~,•~~•~/~i, i ' ~
"~9Y.e. I ~_ ~,.~~ 2 1 ~~} • ~ _ _ .1_ _ ~_\ _ _ • __~i_ ~ ° . I ` .. , ' ' • C
' ~,.~i.,a~.,y~,i ' i ..
A~n . e , I - \ i ~ ~_....~ _ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'L ~ •. • u f'~1 5~~'~ . ' ~ ~.~ ~ aqI&
-~ , $i ` ~ ~ ~ ~ . . )~~t;
~~• r~~ , ^I i I -^ I ~ , \ ~°'~h I o I y w ~ . ~~ ~r~ ,+"~ I ~'
~4~~"r: ~_._.,_ T ;~._ _ _ ~ - ~-_ - - - ~.~~~+er~ - ~ ~ ~ .. _ i. ~ ~ i i _ ~r~, Y ,i w"~ i i~ ....~,~j,';,I
~ T-_ _ ~~~, '~ „ ~, ~ . ,
i'~~~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ . ~~ ~i \ ~ ~ ~ 'i~ .~+" ~ ~` ~-ii~«~^~-t~~,' ~ ~
~ ".'~ , , K.ffi¢.P..~- ' ~_•__ _ I - ~ i M ' ~ _ • O~1 - • ~ a , . ~ ~ o . ~ ~ ., r, ~"`~~~ ~''t~s~'~~,~~ ,~.P
•~k 4~ ` ~ • ~ ' I ' ~i ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~r'~ ~~~ ~ _ - J Y.n.~. .. ~. ~r ~ ~~ - " `~~~ , i[ 3
,- ,y ~ , ~I ~ ~ i . ~ ~ , ~ ` i . i n ~±- ~ ~ I ~ i ^ I~J ~'i ~~ ~~ i ` j ~ •h4~~, ~~
L---- 1- ? ~- - - - _ _ - rwe .' , p I~ i• 1 ' +y, ,~,.t'~ ,`.f:
f^-~^- ~- ' 1
~ p ~~ I ' . ( w. co~ww{ ~ r-- ----- --~ r ----i i.~~ • 1 I fi~ ~~~' ~
• ~ b ' ~ ~ ~ , ~ f~ , ~ ~ i i ' i i cari.o~ ~ ~ ~' ' , , ~ r i i ~ ~ ~' ~ ~' _~~~' i ~ ±,a+~'~"`; , I
M~..-.y~__i_~_ ' - ~- t/ _ - I= - - ~~_ I _~'~'.ii - j I '~~I _ N ~i,i
~ , , ~` ~ ~ --~-`~'
, ~ ~.~-~ ~. ~ t ~ -~
I ~ ~ ' - o ' ~ ' i ' ~ ~ ' •ii i~` '~i t' ~~ i :r`~ , ~ i ~ i' ,~
La~_....~_Y,... ..~1_ ' : ~ ~~ wen~ ~ ~ ~
N~~.~~~}~_.__ - T.~_ _ ____ ttL_ ~ _.~.~__ _ ~~~ _J ~~ =- i~~
6 ~ ~ ~
~1 + ; • ` ' ~4 _ ~ rr~'fa-i~w ~ I 1^T ~ , ~ a~~--~~~ ~ ' ~ ~~ _ _ ~N ~~
~ '~~~-~~ -a-- ~`~~ I , ~ '- - - --t--- --- -- -,~~ - - -- -- _ ~i ~ i .~ i ~ . wa~
~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ""~ '~.~.
b ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~..~ ~ i ~ , i I= {,~ '`'4
4 ~ I ~ I ~ I , I I I ^'n"1 I I I I I II w~i~ ~ ~ ',~s~ ~R ~ ~~ ii ,, ~r~i~'' ~'
ATTACHMEIVT E
~,
NOTICE OF DEVELOPn4ENT PROPOSAL
To: Concerned Persons
From: The Citv of Santa b4onica
Subject of Hearing: Appeal of Plamm~g Commission Approval of Condinonal Use
Permit 94-024 and Reduced Parkmg Permit 94-006
370 Santa Momca Pier, RVC with Beach Overla}~
Apphcant Russell Barnard/Pier Restoranon Corporanon
Appellants Citizen's for a Safe Santa Momca and the Santa Momca Police Officer's
Association
A Public Heanng will be held by the Ciry Council on the followmg request
Appeal of Plamm~g Commission Approval of Condihonal Use Permit 94-024 and Reduced
Parkmg Permu 94-006 to modify Condmonal Use Permit 92-028 and Reduced Parkme
Permrt 92-003 to 1) perrmt the redesign of the previously approved 699 seat restaurant/
mghtclub with a Type 47 alcohol license and 2) extend the hmit of the permit approvals
TI1bfE: TUESDAY, FEBRIIARY 27, 1996 AT 6:30 P.A1.
LOCATION COUNCIL CHAMBER, ROOM 213. CITY HALL
1685 MAIN STREET, SANTA MONICA
HOW TO COMMENT
The City of Santa Momca encourages public comment on this and other pro~ects You or
your representaave, or any other pecsons may comment at the Ciry CounciPs pubhc heanng,
or by wnting a letter
Letters should be addressed to
C~ty Council, City Clerk's Office
1685 Main Street, Room 102
Santa Momca, Califomia 90401
MORE INFORMATION
If desired, further i~formation on any~ application may be obtained from the Planning
and Zoning Di~ision at the address abo~e or b~- calling (310) 458-8341.
The meetmg facility is handicapped accessible If you have any special needs such as sign
language mterpretmg, please contact the Office of the Disabled at (310)458-8701
- ~ - ;~~ n~3
Pursuant to California Govemment Code 5ection 65009(b), if th~s matter is subsequendy
challenged in Court, the challenge may be lumted to only those issues raised at the Public
Hearmg described m tlus nonce, or m wntten correspondence dehvered to the City of Santa
Momca at, or prior to, the Public Hearmg
Esto es un aviso sobre una audencia pubhca para revisar appLcaciones propontendo
desarrollo en Santa Momca Esco puedo ser de mceres a us[ed. Si deseas mas mformacion,
fa~ror de llamar a Linnea Hemandez en la Drvision de Planaficacron al numero (310) 458-
8341
f \planlshare\council\nonces1a95012
- 2 - , . ~QQ
ATTACHMENT F
'-CM.
F=B 26..7yb b•t:rri r ~
~~ SAF~ SA~'A t~r~aG-
February 21, 1996
To. Kenyon Webster, Santa Monica Planning Division Page 1 of 2
Re: CUP 94-024, 370 Santa Monica Pier (Sinbad's}
Representat~ves ot Citizens f9r a Safe Santa Moniaa and the Santa Mon~ca
Police Officers' Association met 4vith the devetoper Russell Barnard far a
third t~me on Fehruary 8 and agreed on ad~litional conditions that wil! make
his nightclub project less of a public safety risk. f~lUhen we say "his r+~ghtclu~
project," vve're referring to the project as re-re-designed w~th the ground
floor stage enclosed again-not the p;oject the Planning Commission
approved on September 20.)
We would lake to see these conditions added to those already recommended
in the September 20 staff report (maybe you'll want to change some of the
wording):
1 The lessee agrees that the Chief of Police shall have the authority
to req~ire up to three uniformed security g~ards to be on duty, at
lassee's expense, at the leased propeny at least one haur prior to,
during, and one hour after each event that the Chief of Police has
determined, based upon articulated concerns of potentiat problems,
as a resutt of previous probiems with such events, causes a potent~al
for undue demands upon police services or ~eopardy to public safety
2. The pnmary use of the outdoor pat~os and terraces ~s for dining,
ard no cocktai! tabias, bar stools, or bar-he~ght tableS are to be
provided in these areas. Enterta~nment provided in any outdoor area
shalf be mcidental to the pnmary dining use and shall not include
amplsfied music or be performed on any type of elevated stage. No
dancing shall be allowed in the outdoor areas,
3 EithPr the Police Department or the P~er Restorat~on Commission
has the authonty to direct the operator to close the 16-foot roll-up
door at any time to enforce noise restr~ctions and~or ensure public
safety. Compliance wilf be immed~ate
~~ 095
K~M
FEB.20,1996 6::2PM P 2
Kenyon Webster, page 2 of 2
The first two conditions need ne explanation. We felt the third o~e was
necessary because with the roll-up door and the two doubie doors on either
side of it alf open; :he showroom is slil( not compfetely enclosed. (f #he same
crowd-control problems that the pol~ce predicted ihe outdoor stage woukd
cause also occur as a result of this one almost-open wall, then the 3 6-foot
roll-up daor needs to become a rolled-down door
At each of our three meetings, Mr Barnard has stressed the fact that he wilf
be held to much higher standards of sensitivity to the public ~velfare because
the city is nis landlord, and many clauses regulating the way he conducts his
busmess are written mto his lease. We beheve that those provisions of his
!ease should be incorporated as conditions for the project's CUP. That way,
if a new lease is negotiated far the property, either with Mr Barnard or
someane else, the same standards will be in place
The nev,,~ project you are now considenng, because of the enclosed
showroom and addrtional conditions we have developed, ~s much [ess like'y
to place a strain on our law enforcement agencies or on the surrounding
neign~aorhoo~. Whde both the Palice Officers' Association and Citizens for a
Safe Santa Monica still vehemently oppose the open-stage project that we
apoealed, we vril! not oppose this nev~~ly designed pro)ect, as long as the
acditional conoitions we've liste~ in this letter are inciuded in the CUP.
i ha~~e faxed Sgt, Ste~e Brackett a copy of this letter, and he will call you
today (~Vedresday} if I've wntten anythmg that doesn't represent the
SMFC~A's position. I have also faxed this letter to Russel! Barnard, so he can
ver~fy that he agreed to all the cond~t~ons i've I~sted.
Sincerely,
~w
Jean SEGII~I4S
3~3--~a~3
~P• n96
ATTACHMENT G
October 18, 1995
TO Santa Momca City Councd Members
1685 Mam Street
Santa A~omca, CA 90407
FROM South Beach Neighborhood Watch
RE APPEAL OF EXTENSIONS, CO\TDITIONAL USE PER1~qT5
AND REDUCED PARKING VARIAIvCES FOR 370 SANTA
MONICA PIER - SNBADS/CLUB ROUTE 66 -
BERNARD CORP
Counc~l Members
~~'e, the members of the South Beach Neighborhood Watch are opposed to any pernut extens~ons
or approvals and reduced parkmg vanances for 370 Santa Momca Pier - Sinbads/Route 66 Ciub
pro~ect on the grounds that the pubLc health, safety and welfare of residents and v~sitors to Santa
'~lomca are not protected by tlus new pro~ect w}uch now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as well as an enlarged beverage stand not prev~ously approved m the ongmal pro~ect We
ask the Council to uphold tlus appeal and re~ect th~s pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa I~Sonica PoLce Department's Office of Special Enforcement
representatrve who was asked by the Placuvng Staff to test~£y before the Plannmg Commiss~on
on September 6, 1995, about th~s pro~ect, he satd that to approve t}us current pro~ect is to put the
entire City at nsk should any mcident on the pier at this sne occur because currently there are
msufficient poLce resources to handle potential mcidents and at the same nme keep the rest of
the City adequately protected
We beheve and endorse these facts presented by the Santa Momca PoLce Department's Office of
Special Enforcement regardmg the publ~c safety and cnme prevention concems
~Ve now ask you, the Council Members, to ~om wnth your constrtuents to protect the res~dents
and visitors to the Cdy of Santa Momca by re~ectmg tlus pro~ect and upholdmg this appeal
Thank vou
Smcerely, PETITION SIGNATURES
~~~ ~~~
SIG~~TURE ~'~ V
/ ~r ~ ~c~/`{JC~Fl~~
r ~~22 ~ )`~y7
PRINrT`F ~L : A~i
.~~~~ ~~>>
/~ ~~' ~u-u.~~ l G~ , s~1
ADDRESS `~bS`~~
~~c -4~ I -~~s~~
TELEPHONE NUMBER
:~~~ 097
October 18, 1995
TO Santa Momca C~ty Council Members
1685 :Viam Street
Santa Momca, CA 90407
FROM South Beach ~1e~ehborhood ~'atch
RE APPEAL OF EXTEVSIOI~TS, CONDII'IONAL USE PERMITS
r1DID REDUCED PARKING VARIANCES FOR 370 SANTA
VIOIVICA PIER - SI~IBADS/CLU'B ROiJTE 66 -
BERNARD CORP
Counc~l Members
~Ve, the members of the South Beach Neighborhood Watch are opposed to any per~ut e~ctensions
or approvals and reduced parkmg vanances for 370 5anta Momca Pier - Sinbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the erounds that the public health, safety and welfare of residents and visitors to Santa
~4omca are not protected by tlvs new pro~ect w}uch now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as well as an enlarged beverage stand not previously approved m the ongmal pro~ect «e
ask the Counc~l to uphold tlus appeal and re~ect ttus pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa Momca Pol~ce Department's Office of Special Enforcement
representative who ~vas asked by the Placuung Staffto testify before the Planrung Commission
on September 6, 1995, about t}us pro~ect, he said that to approve tlus cunent pro~ect is to put the
entire City at nsk should an_y mcident on the pier at ttus srte occur because cunently there are
msufficient pohce resources to handle potentral mcidents and at the same time keep the rest of
the City adequately protected
We beLeve and endorse these facts presented by the Santa Momca Pohce Department's Office of
Spec~al Enforcement regardmg the public safety and cnme prevention concerns
We now ask you, the Counc~l Members. to ~om wrth your constituents to protect the res~dents
and v~sitors to the City of Santa bfomca by re~ecung tlus pro~ect and upholding tlvs appeal
Thank you
Smcerely, PETITION SIGNATURES
a.
~~~ . `3 4 \ 1~ l ~. ~ c~~, t ~:ti~.m~
SIG`~I~ITURE `~ ADDRESS
`' J
~-~S~ie. 0.'(lel. ~;O(l~S ~~`~" l. ~1,
PRINT FULL NA11E TELEPHONE 1\L'~iBER
~:. nss
October 18, 1995
TO Santa h4omca City Council Members
1685 Ma~n Street
Santa Momca, CA 90407
FROM South Beach Neighborhood VCatch
RE APPEAL OF EXTE~ISIONS, CONDITIONAL USE PERNIITS
AND REDliCED P.ARKING VARIA.~ICES FOR 370 SAI~ITA
MONICA PIER - S1IBADS/CLUB ROUTE 66 -
BERNARD CORP
Counc~l Members
We, the members of the South Beach Neighborhood Watch are opposed to any pernut extens~ons
or approvals and reduced parkmg vanances for 370 Santa Momca Pier - Sinbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the grounds that the publ~c health, safety and welfare of residents and visuors to Santa
'_~Somca are not protected by this new pro~ect which now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as ~vell as an enlarged beveraee stand not previously approved m the ongmal pro~ect We
ask the Council to uphold t}us appeal and re~ect tkus pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa Monica Police Department's Office of Special Enforcement
representative who was asked by the Plan~ung Staff to testify before the Plamvng Commission
on September 6, 1995, about tlus pro~ect, he said that to approve ttus cument pro~ect is to put the
entire Crty at nsk should any mcident on the pier at tlus site occur because cunently there are
msuffic~ent pohce resources to handle potential mcidents and at the same ume keep the rest of
the C~ty adequately protected
~8e believe and endorse these facts presented by the Santa Momca Po]~ce Department's Office of
Spec~al Enforcement regardme the public safete and cnme prevention concems
~~'e now ask ~~ou, the Council D4embers. to ~om with your const~tuents to protect the residents
and v~sitors to the Crty of Santa Momca by re~ecung ttus pro~ect and upholdmg tlus appeal
Thank you
Smcerely, PETITION SIGNATURES
S.~-~..~ t,~p5-.4~ -
SIGN.~TURE
5{tA~ ~~I~~Y~~
PRINT FULL NAN1E
~36 N.A-~9rnS.S'r
ADDRESS ~ ~ 9~d~~, ~ ,~.
~ ~zo ~
rcS~ ~~ 3 - oo ~~
TELEPHO\TE NUAZBER
u> ~99
October 18, 1995
TO Santa Moruca City Council Mem6ers
1685 Main Street
Santa Momca, CA 90407
FROM South Beach Neighborhood ~Vatch
RE APPEAL OF EXTEIVSIONS, COIVDITIONAL USE PER'vIITS
?,ND REDUCED PARKING VARIANCES FOR 370 SAIvTA
b40NICA PIER - SINBADS/CLLB ROUTE 66 -
BERNr1RD CORP
Councd Members
We, the members of the South Beach Neighborhood Watch are opposed to any pernut eactensions
or approvals and reduced parkmg vanances for 370 Santa Momca Pier - Smbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the grounds that the public health, safety and welfare of res~dents and ~~sitors to Santa
blomca are not protected by ttus new pro~ect w-hich now mcludes an outdoor sta~e and dance
area as well as an enlarged beveraee stand not pre~~ousl_y approved m the onemal pro~ect We
ask the Council to uphold t}us appeal and re~ect this pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa Monica Pol~ce Department's Office of Special Enforcement
representatroe who was asked by the Plannmg Staffto test~fy before the Planrung Commiss~on
on September 6, 1995, about t}us pro~ect, he sazd that to approve tlus current pro~ect is to put the
entire City at nsk should any mc~dent on the pier at ttus s~te occur because currently there are
msufficient police resources to handle potential incidents and at the same time keep the rest of
the City adequately protected
~'~'e believe and endorse these facts presented by the Santa Momca Police Department's Office of
Special Enforcement regarding the public safety and cnme prevention concems
«'e now ask ~~ou, the Counc~l Ylembers, to ~o~n u~th youur const~tuents to protect the residents
and visitors to the C~ty of Santa tilontca by re~ectme tlus pro~ect and upholdmg ttvs appeal
Thank vou
Smcerely, PETITION SIGNATURES
~.~i ~~S ~` ~ ~~`~~ ~~~d ~~N~~~
SIG~IA tiRE ADDRESS
~~~~~`-E' ~ ~C~J~ ~{~~~.~~~~
PRINT FULL NA1~IE TELEPHONE NUI~IBER
:~ ~~ 10 0
October 18, 1995
TO Santa Moruca City Council Members
1685 Mam Street
Santa Momca, CA 90407
FROM South Beach Ne~ghborhood Watch
RE r1PPEAL OF EXTENSIO~IS, COI`TDTTIONAL USE PER'~IITS
.~I~'D REDUCED PARKI:~IG VARIPu'~ICES FOR 370 SAIv°I'A
MONICA PIER - SII~BADS/CLUB ROLTTE 66 -
BERi~IARD CORP
Council Members
~Ve, the members of the South Beach Ne~ghborhood Watch are opposed to any permit extens~ons
or approvals and reduced parlang vanances for 370 Santa Monica Pier - Smbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the grounds that the public health, safetv and welfare of residents and visitors to Santa
viomca are not protected by this new pro~ect wluch now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as well as an enlareed beveraee stand not previously approved m the oriemal pro~ect We
ask the Council to uphold tlus appeal and re~ect tlus pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa h4onica Pol~ce Department's Office of Special Enforcement
representatrve who was asked by the Placuvng Staffto test~fy before the Plamm~g Commission
on September 6, 1995, about ttus pro~ect, he said that to approve ttus current pro~ect ~s to put the
enUre Crty at nsk should any mc~dent on the p~er at this srte occur because currently there are
msufficient poLce resources to handle potennal mcidents and at the same time keep the rest of
the City adequately protected
~Ve bel~eve and endorse these facts presented by the Santa h4onica Police Department's Office of
Special Enforcement resazdine the public safetv and crime prevention concerns
~Ve now ask you, the Council Members, to ~om wrth your constituents to protect the residents
and vis~tors to the Qty of Santa Momca by re~ectm~ ttus pro~ect and upholding this appeal
Thank vou
Smcerely,
j< _ ~,~~~
SIGNATL"RE
PETITION SIGNATURES
~ S~el~erkc {Lx
PRINT FULL \'A~iE
lr~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~i, _~~u ~ ,ero~. ~ A
:~DDRESS
~s2~ 5s~o
TELEPHONE NUAIBER 1 O 1
tc a
October 18, 1995
TO Santa Momca City Council Members
1685 Maui Street
Santa Momca, CA 90407
FROM South Beach Ne~ghborhood R'atch
RE APPEAL OF EXTENSIONS, CO~IDITIONAL USE PERMITS
.~,.\'D REDUCED PARKING VARIAIv~CES FOR 370 SANTA
MOi~IICA PIER - SINBADS/CLUB ROL;TE 66 -
BERNARD CORP
Council Members
~i'e, the members of the South Beach Veighborhood Watch aze opposed to any pernut extensions
or approvals and reduced parkmg vanances for 370 5anta Momca Pier - Smbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the gounds that the publ~c health, safety and welfaze ofresidents and visitors to Santa
Moruca are not protected by ttus new pro~ect wh~ch now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as well as an enlarged beveraee stand not pre~~ously approved m the ongmal pro~ect We
ask the Council to uphold ttus appeal and re~ect tlvs pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa b4omca PoUce Department's Office of Speaal Enforcement
representative who was asked by the Plaruung Staffto testify before the Plamvng Commiss~on
on September 6, 1995, about tlus pro~ect, he said that to approve tlvs current pro~ect is to put the
entire Crty at risk should any mcident on the pier at ttus s~te occur because currently there are
msufficient police resources to handle potential ~ncidents and at the same T~me keep the rest of
the Crty adequately protected
We beLeve and endorse these facts presented by the Sa~ta blomca Pohce Department's Office of
Specia] Enforcement regardme the pubLc safety and cnme preventwn concerns
We now ask you, the Councd Members, to ~om w~th your constituents to protect the res~dents
and ~7s~tors to the Ciry of Santa Momca by re~ectmg ttus pro~ect and upholding ttus appeal
Thank you
Smceiely, ~ PETITIO~T SIGNATURES
`" ; ~ ~~
:
~ `~~.~=r"~"~- ~ ~ ' r=~ ~
'~'/ ~r ~l~ ~/I [~ ~ %1'~~-!'-~~
SIGN:~TtiRE ADDRESS
~~
~J f~r.~M~~ .~~~ - -~yy-G`% ~~
PRINT FULL nTA1~1E TELEPHONE NUDI~ER 1 Q 2
~ ~,
October 18, 1995
TO Santa Moruca Crty Council Members
] 685 Mazn Street
Santa Momca, CA 90407
FROb4 South Beach Neighborhood Watch
RE APPEAL OF EXTENSIONS, CO:VDITIONAI, USE PERNIITS
~~1D REDUCED PARKItiG VARIAI~'CES FOR 370 SANTA
~vIO~IICA PIER - SINBr1DS/CLL'B ROUTE 66 -
BERNARD CORP
Counc~l Members
«'e, the members of the South Beach Neighborhood Watch are opposed to any pernut ea-tensions
or approvals and reduced parku~g vanances for 370 Santa h4omca P~er - SmbadsJRoute 66 Club
pro~ect on the grounds that the public health, safety and welfare of residents and v~s~tors to Santa
l~Iomca are not protected by tlus new pro~ect w}uch now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as well as an enlazeed beverage stand not pre~~ously approved m the ongmal pro~ect LVe
ask the Council to uphold th~s appeal and re~ect tlus pro~ect
ro paraphrase the Santa Momca Police Department's Office of Spec~al Enforcement
representatrve who was asked by the Planrung Staffto teshfy before the Planning Commission
on September 6, 1995, about tlus pro~ect, he said that to approve t}us cuirent pro~ect is to put the
enure Crty at nsk should any mc~dent on the pier at tlus site occur because currently there are
msufficient police resources to handle potenUal mc~dents and at the same time keep the rest of
the City adequately protected
~i'e bel~eve and endorse these facts presented by the Santa nfomca Police Department's Office of
Special Enforcement regarding the public safety and cnme prevention concerns
~Ve now ask you, the Council :vlembers, to ~om with your constrtuents to protect the residents
and vtsrtors to the City of Santa Momca by re~ectmg tlus pro~ect and upholdmg tlus appeal
Thank vou
SIGNATURES
~~ i ;~~`~~V.r~ ~ ~;: ~~ ~,'_~~~~•_-x~-- l-
~~Y.~LYR~'' ~ ADDRESS
ffK~,~{eir.~~l~l~i ~~t~i"/ !.~ . .t~`~i~ ' ~ ~,~ ~,
Y'RfNT FU~.L~N~~1~ ~ TELEPHONE NU;~IBER ,, 10 3
October 18, 1995
TO Santa 1~Somca City Council Members
1685 Main Street
Santa h4omca, CA 90407
FROM South BeachNeighborhood Watch
RE APPEAL OF EXTENSIONS, CO\'DITIONAL USE PERNIITS
~\~ REDUCED PARKING VARIA2VCES FOR 370 SANTA
VIONICA PIER - SIPIBADS/CLUB ROUTE 66 -
BERI~IARD CORP
Council 1~embers
We, the members of the South Beach Neighborhood ~Yatch are opposed to any permit e~:tens~ons
or approvals and reduced parkmg vanances for 370 Santa Monica Pier - Sinbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the grounds that the publre health. safety and welfare of res~dents and visitors to Santa
Momca are not protected by tlus new pro~ect wh~ch now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as well as an enlarged beverage scand not previously approved m the onemal pro~ect We
ask the Council to uphold th~s appeal and re~ect th~s pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa h4omca Pohce Department's Office of Spec~al Fnforcement
representahve who was asked by the Planrung Staff to teshfy before the Plamm~g Commission
on September 6, 1995, about ttus pro~ect, he said that to approve tlus current pro~ect is to put the
enure Crty at nsk should any ~ncident on the pier at this site occur because currently there are
msuffic~ent pohce resources to handle potential mcidents and at the same Ume keep the rest of
the C~ty adequately protected
~~'e beheve and endorse these facts presented by the Santa ~lomca Police Department's Office of
Special Enforcement regardmg the pubhc safety and cnme prevention concerns
~~'e now ask you, the Counc~l Members, to ~om wrth your const~tuents to protect the residents
and visrtors to the Ctty of Santa hlomca by re~echng tlus pro~ect and upholdmg tlus appeal
Thank vou
Smcerely, PETITION SIGNATURES
x~rv~~~~/~~~ ,~1~ ~~~FN~F /~.~~ •
SIGN:~TLRE V ~ ADDRESS
3~r~,~~~~ ; ~ ~ ,~~ ~ceiz ~%~,3s ~a
PRINT FIILL NA~SE TELEPHONE NU`IBER .. 1 O 4
October 18, 1995
TO Santa 1~omca City Council Members
1685 Mam Street
Santa Vlomca, CA 90407
FROM South Beach?ve~ghborhood Watch
RE APPEAL OF EXTENSIONS, COh~ITIONAL USE PER'~IITS
,4IVD REDUCED PARKING VARIANCES FOR 370 SA~~ITA
MONICA PIER - SINBADS/CLLB ROUTE 66 -
BER2`TARD CORP
Council b4embers
We, the members of the South Beach ~Ieighborhood Watch aze opposed to any pemut e~ctensions
or approvals and reduced pazkmg vanances for 370 Santa Momca Pier - Smbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the grounds that the pubLc health, safety and welfare of res~dents and visitors to Santa
Momca are not protected by this new pro~ect which now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as well as an enlareed beverage stand not previously approved m the ongmal pro~ect We
ask the Councd to uphold t}us appeal and re~ect this pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa h4onica Police Department's Office of Special Enforcement
representatrve who was asked by the Plamung Staffto testify before the Plamm~g Commiss~on
on 5eptember 6, 1995, about tlus pro~ect, he sa~d that to approve ttus cunent pro~ect is to put the
entue City at nsk should any mcident on the pier at tlus s~te occur because cunently there aze
msufficient pohce resources to handle potenual mcidents and at the same time keep the rest of
the City adequately protected
We bel~eve and endorse these facts presented by the Santa Moruca Police Department's Office of
Spec~al Enforcement regarduig the public safety and cnme prevention concems
«e now ask you, the Council blembers, to ~om with ~~our const~tuents to protect the residents
and visrtors to the Ctty of Santa hiomca by re~ectmg tlus pro~ect and uphold~ne th~s appeal
Tharilc you
Sincerely, PETITION SIGNATURES
i
~~,. ~~,~>z ~ -~--. ..,•,
SIGNATURE ~DDRESS
~ _ ~ . . • _'`T= -~a'/~
PRINT FULL :~?A~IE TELEPHONE NUi~iBER
in5
October 18, 1995
TO Santa h4omca City Council h4embers
1685 Mam Street
Santa i~4omca, CA 90407
FROM South Beach Neighborhood Watch
RE APPEAL OF EXTENSIONS, COI~~ITIONAL USE PERMITS
AIVD REDUCED PARKING VARIANCES FOR 370 SANTA
MONICA PIER - SNBADS/CLLB ROUTE 66 -
BERNARD CORP
Councd Members
~~'e, the members of the South Beach I~Teighborhood ~Vatch aze opposed to any perm~t extensions
or approvals and reduced parking vanances for 370 Santa Momca Pier - Smbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the grounds that the pubLc health, safcty and welfare of residents and visrtors to Santa
'~lomca are not protected by th~s new pro~ect which now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as well as an enlarged beveraee stand not Freviously approved m the origmal pro~ect We
ask the Council to uphold tlus appeal and re~ect this pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa Momca Pol~ce Department's Office of Special Enforcement
representahve who was asked by the Plamm~g Staff to teshfy before the Plancung Commiss~on
on September 6, 1995, about tlus pro~ect, he sazd that to approve ttus current pro~ect ~s to put the
entire Ctty at nsk should any mcident on the pier at this srte occur because currently there are
msufficient pohce resources to handle potential mcidents and at the same tune keep the rest of
the City adequately protected
We bel~eve and endorse these facts presented by the Santa h4omca Police Department's OrTice of
Spectal Enforcement regardmg the public safety and cnme prevennon concerns
~Ve now ask you, the Council Members, to ~om with y~our constrtuents to protect the residents
and visitors to the Gty of Santa blomca by re~eamg tlvs pro~ect and upholding t}us appeal
Thank you
S~ncere-y, PETITION SIG~iATURES
~ s ~~~z~ ~ I~/ C ~/~ v~~ ~ ~'Y/ ~ « ~J~C~
SIGNATURE ADDRESS
~~~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~~ cf~ L? ~l~ - ~~ 5 ,~~ - ~ ,~ ~ ~
PRINT FtiLL ~iAniE TELEPHONE NUMBER
106
October 18, 1995
TO Santa Momca City Council Members
1685 Mam Street
Santa Momca, CA 90407
FROM South BeachNeighborhood Watch
RE APPEAL OF EXTENSIONS, COI\TDITIONAL USE PERibIITS
AIvD REDUCED PARKING VARIA.vCES FOR 370 SP.~~tTA
1~10I~'ICA PIER - SI~IBADS/CLUB ROUTE 66 -
BER.TIARD CORP
Council Members
~'~e, the members of the South Beach Ne~ghborhood ~Vatch are opposed to any pernut eatensions
or approvals and reduced pazkm~ vanances for 370 Santa Momca Pier - Smbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the erounds that the publ~c health, safety and welfare of residents and visttors to Santa
Momca aze not protected by th~s new pro~ect wtuch now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as well as an enlareed beverage stand not previously approved m the on~mal pro~ect We
ask the Council to uphold th~s appeal and re~ect tlus pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa blomca Pohce DepartmenYs Office of Special Enforcement
representative who was asked by the Plamm~g Staff to test~fy before the Planning Commiss~on
on September 6, 1995, about tlus pro~ect, he said that to approve tlus current pro~ect ~s to put the
ent~re C~ty a2 nsk should any mcident on the pier at this srte occur because currendy there aze
msuffic~ent police resources to handle potenual mcidents and at the same hme keep the rest of
the C~ty adequately protected
lVe beheve and endorse these facts presented br the Santa Momca Police Department's Office of
Special Enforcement regarding the publ~c safety and cnme prevennon concerns
~Ve now ask you, the Counc~l Members. to~om ~v~th your consUtuents to protect the residents
and v~s~tors to the C~ty of Santa Monica by re~ectme ttus pro~ect and upholdmg tkus appeal
Thank you
Sincerely, PETITION SIGNATURES
C _' ~
~ ~ j
~. ~''J~~k.Lti..L .-' 1) ~~ r ~ ,~,-~+~..1 ' `~ 1 ~',..C.i.'l~~ ~ ti.t, ~ i :~ l~t c. c ~
i
SIG\'ATURE
~.`Ctt~~r .'~'~C~~~~~c'~-~
PRINT FtiLL 1~A1tE
:~DDRESS
~ ~C~~~..b•~1 ;l,l;;~~~C~~
TELEPHONE NUl•TBER
~ i~~~c~ - 107
October 18, 1995
TO Santa Mocuca City Council Members
1685 Mazn Street
Santa Momca, CA 90407
FROM South Beach Neighborhood Watch
RE APPEAL OF EXTENSIONS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
AND REDUCED PARKING VARIANCES FOR 370 SANTA
MONICA PIER - SINBADS/CLUB ROUI'E 66 -
BERNARD CORP
Council b4embers
~Ye, the members of the South Beach Neighborhood Watch aze opposed to any perm~t extens~ons
or approvals and reduced parkmg vanances for 370 Santa Momca Pier - Smbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the grounds that the pubhc health, safety and welfare of residents and visitors to Santa
~4omca aze not protected by ttus new pro~ect wtuch now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
area as ~vell as an enlarged beverage stand not previously approved m the onemal pro~ect ~Ye
ask the Council to uphold this appeal and re~ect tlus pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa Monica Police Department's Office of Special Enforcement
representahve who was asked by the Plamvng Staff to test~fy before the Placuung Commisston
on September 6, 1995, about tlus pro~ect, he said that to approve this current pro~ect is to put the
entue Crty at nsk should any mcident on the pier at this site occur because cunentf_y there are
msufficient police resources to handle potent~al mctdents and at the same time keep the rest of
the City adequately protected
We believe and endorse these facts presented by the Santa Momca Police Department's Office of
Special Enforcement regarding the public safety and cnme prevention concerns
We ~ow ask you, the Council ~Iembers, to ~om with your constrtuents to protect the residents
and vis~tors to the Citv of Santa Momca by re~ectmg tlvs pro~ect and upholdmg tlus appeal
Thank you
Smcerely, PETITION SIGi~:ATURE5
i ~ ~
~ ! ~ ~ I^~A.t/-G`t°'~t'' ~~vt'~'-~~
`~~ ~ ~ _
SIGNATtiRE ~ :~DDRESS ~ ° M~ g~' 4~J/
~i-~ ~ tii~t~f~~ - ~9 ~-i~79
PRINT FULL NAME TELEPHONE N~JMBER ~ n~
October 18, 1995
TO Santa Momca City Councd Members
1685 Mam 3treet
Santa Momca, CA 90407
FROM South Beach Ne~ghborhood Watch
RE APPEAL OF EXI'ENSIONS, CO~IDITIONAL USE PERMITS
~'~1D REDUCED PARKING VARIANCES FOR 370 SANTA
:v10IVICA PIER - SINBADS/CLUB ROUTE 66 -
BERNARD CORP
Council Members
«'e, the members of the South Beach Neighborhood ~Vatch are opposed to any peraut extensions
or approvals and reduced parkuig vanances for 370 Santa Momca Pier - Smbads/Route 66 Club
pro~ect on the grounds that the public health, safety and welfaze of res~dents and v~s~tors to Santa
Momca are not protected by tlus new pro~ect wluch now mcludes an outdoor stage and dance
azea as well as an enlazeed beveraee stand not pre~~ously approved in the onemal pro~ect We
ask the Councd to uphold ttvs appeal and re~ect t}us pro~ect
To paraphrase the Santa Moruca Pol~ce Department's Office of Special Enforcement
representat~ve who was asked by the Plannmg Staffto teshfy before the Plamm~g Commission
on September 6, 1995, about tlvs pro~ect. he said that to approve tlus current pro~ect is to put the
ent~re City at nsk should any mcident on the pier at ttus site occur because cunently there are
msufficient police resources to handle potential mcidents and at the same nme keep the rest of
the Crty adequately protected
~Ve beLeve and endorse these facts presented by the Santa Momca Police Department's Office of
Special Enforcement regarding the public safet_y and cnme prevenuon concerns
~Ve now ask you, the Counc~l Members. to~om with your constrtuents to protect the res~dents
and visitors to the Crty of Santa Momca by re~echng this pro~ect and upholdmg tlus appeal
Thank you
Smcerely, PETITION SIG\ATURES
~~ _.( .I - ;ild~-.w.~ J / 'r lf ~~ f ~ 1'P~e
SIGNATURE ADDRESS
~-"~z~u u rr/ 1. S t r~~~ ~.i ~I
PRINT FULL NAi~4E
TELEPHONE NUNIBER ~ ~ ~
ATTACHMENT H