Loading...
SR-6-C (120) .- 6-c- ':.- -.s nFf J 4~~1 to.. ~_; . "'4'..1 LUTM:PB:DKW:DM/DMCCSTOA.PCWORD.PLAN Santa Monica, California Council Mtg: December 3, 1991 TO: Mayor and city Council FROM: City staff SUBJECT: Certification of Statement of Official Action for Appeal of Conditional Use Permit 91-007. INTRODUCTION This report transmits for City Council certification the statement of Official Action for the denial of an appeal of the above listed Conditional Use Permit to allow the expansion of an existing restaurant/dance club at 1360 3rd Street Promenade. After consideration of the appeal at a public hearing and careful review of the record and staff recommendation, the city council denied the appeal and upheld the Planning Commission denial of the Conditional Use Permit on October 3, 1991. RECOMMENDATION It is respectfully recommended that the City council approve the attached Statement of Official Action, which contains findings for denial of Conditional Use Permit 91-007. Prepared by: Paul Berlant, Director of Land Use and Transportation Management D. Kenyon Webster, Planning Manager David Martin, Associate Planner Attachment: A. statement of Official Action dated lO/03/91 DM PC/DMCCSTOA 1l/14/91 (; .,t, - 1 - !)~ .- . -- <..- . . -' STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL ACTION PROJECT NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit 9l-007 LOCATION: 1360 3rd street Promenade APPLICANT: JWS Investment, Inc. CASE PLANNER: David Martin, Associate Planner REQUEST: Appeal of a Planning Commission Denial of a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Expansion of an Existing Restaurant/Dance Club. CITY COUNCIL ACTION 10/02/91 Date. Approved based on the following findings and subject to the conditions below. XX Appeal Denied, Planning commission Denial Upheld Other. EFFECTIVE DATE OF ACTION: 10/02/91 Case #CUP 91-007 FINDINGS l. The proposed use and location may not be in accordance with good zoning practice, in the public interest, and necessary that substantial justice be done in that the expansion of the existing establishment may result in an over concentration of activity at the subject location. 2. The proposed use may not be compatible with existing and potential uses within the general area; traffic or parking congestion may result; the public health, safety, and general welfare may not be protected; and harm to adjacent properties may result in that the intersection of Santa Monica Boulevard and Third Street Promenade currently has thirteen alcohol outlets either operating or under construction and the concentration of these facilities may represent a potential for problems associated with an over concentration of activity and alcohol outlets. - 1 - --- - ------- I hereby agree to the above conditions of approval and acknowledge that failure to comply with such conditions shall constitute grounds for potential revocation of the permit approval. Applicant's Signature Print Name and Title PC/STOA1360 DM - 3 - 3. The welfare of neighborhood residents may be adversely affected in that the Third street Mall Specific Plan area is intended to be a mixed use district and an over concentration of alcohol outlets and activity may detract from the mixed use nature of the area. 4. The change in the license may contribute to an undue concentration of alcohol outlets in the area in that the intersection of Santa Monica Boulevard and Third street Promenade currently has thirteen establishments with alcohol outlets either operating or under construction. 5. There may be a detrimental affect on nearby residentially zoned neighborhoods considering the distance of the alcohol outlet to residential buildings, churches, schools, hospitals, playgrounds, parks, and other existing alcohol outlets in that in the immediate vicinity of the subject location there are currently thirteen alcohol outlets either operating or under construction and in that any conditions for approval may not adequately minimize the potential affect on the nearby residential uses. VOTE Ayes: Genser, Holbrook, Olsen, vazquez, Zane, Abdo Nays: Abstain: Absent: Katz NOTICE If this is a final decision not subject to further appeal under the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and zoning Or- dinance, the time within which jUdicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of civil Procedure section 1094.6, which provision has been adopted by the City pursuant to Municipal Code section 1400. I hereby certify that this statement of Official Action accurate- ly reflects the final determination of the city council of the City of Santa Monica. ~~:/ ;;L~ /~-~-~/ Csignature 'I date Clarice E.Dykhouse, City Clerk Please Print Name and Title - 2 - ----- ---