SR-SS-1 (7)
35- I
~ Sb-' ~ 41991
GS:SES:FJS:JSH:sswwrate/genserv STUDY SESSION ITEM
Council Meeting: September 24, 1991 Santa Monica, California
TO: Mayor and city Council
FROM: City staff
SUBJECT: Consideration of Revised Wastewater Rate structure
INTRODUCTION
This information item presents to City Council a new wastewater
rate structure for consideration and discussion. These changes
will allow the city to fulfill its contractual obligations with
the City of Los Angeles to reduce contamination in Santa Monica
Bay and ensure the integrity of the City's wastewater collection
system.
BACKGROUND
In June 1989, the city Council gave conceptual approval to a
long-range financing strategy for the Wastewater Fund. This
strategy encompassed a revenue bond issue for payment of the
City's share of the Hyperion System Upgrade capital costs and a
sewer service charge increase. Over the past two years, City
staff has worked in close conjunction with outside financial and
legal consultants to finalize the structure of the wastewater
revenue bond offering. This process has been complicated by
three main factors. First, the estimates from the City of Los
Angeles of Santa Monica's financial Obligations as they relate to
the Hyperion System Capital upgrade have been revised several
times over the past two years; second, the city's future
operation and maintenance (O&M) and capital costs, as projected
SS-I
- 1 -
..." :- ,..: . 4 193'
....
in a wastewater master plan currently underway, have
significantly increased; and third, the dramatic decrease in
Citywide water usage related to water conservation efforts has
severely impacted sewer service revenues which are, at present,
driven solely by water consumption.
These compounding factors necessitated a thorough review over the
past several months of the current and projected fiscal condition
of the Wastewater Fund. The results of the analysis have led to
a reassessment of the overall financing strategy for the
Wastewater Fund.
The specific elements of this revised financing strategy as well
as an in-depth discussion of the primary cost issues facing the
Wastewater Fund are presented below.
Discussion
Since 1926, the cities of Santa Monica and Los Angeles have
entered into various contractual agreements for the disposal and
treatment of sewage. The most recent agreement is dated February
21, 1964, and provides that Santa Monica may discharge a specific
permitted level of sewage flows into the Hyperion Treatment
System for treatment and disposal. The agreement provides that
Santa Monica will pay Los Angeles an annual O&M charge for sewage
conveyance, treatment and disposal, and will also pay for a
proportionate share of the capital costs of alteration,
improvement, relocation, replacement or reconstruction of the
Hyperion Treatment Plant and the sewage conveyance facilities
between Santa Monica and Los Angeles.
- 2 -
Los Angeles is currently in the process of construeting a
large-scale wastewater system capital improvement program
mandated by federal and state upgrade requirements. The program
began in 1984 and will continue through 2001 for an approximate
total cost of $3.8 billion. Santa Monica, as with other
subscribing agencies, is responsible for financing a
proportionate share of the improvements to the Hyperion System.
The City's share is $63 million over the next ten years, based on
estimates prepared by the City of Los Angeles.
The City also is facing rising O&M and capital costs for our
local wastewater system. To aid in forecasting these local
system costs, the city contracted with the engineering firm of
CH2M Hill to prepare a wastewater system master plan. Although
the plan has not yet been completed, the consultant has estimated
that the City's local system capital needs through FY 2000-01 may
be as much as $37 million. This will be partially offset by
connection fee revenue collected from new development to pay for
capacity expansion.
In addition to the significant cost impacts as described above,
the City'S sewer service revenues have decreased significantly.
The City'S current wastewater rate is based solely on the amount
of water consumed. Due to the success of the City's water
conservation efforts wastewater service charge revenues collected
in FY 1990-91 were much less than had been budgeted. Once the
drought ends, it is not anticipated that the City'S wastewater
flow will return to its original level due to the aggressive
- 3 -
implementation by the city of permanent water conservation
measures.
The magnitude of required Hyperion System capital expenditures
over the next 10 years is too large to be equitably recovered on
a pay-as-you-go basis. Thus, in 1989 the city council
conceptually approved the issuance of revenue bonds to cover the
City's proportionate share of Los Angeles's wastewater system
capital improvement program. The City selected Connell &
Associates to serve as financial advisor, and the law firm of
Orrick, Herrington, and sutcliffe to serve as bond counsel to
City staff in preparation of the bond offering. The first bond
issue of $33 million is scheduled for November 199L Three
subsequent bond issues will be required to to cover Santa
Monica's remaining share of the City of Los Angeles' wastewater
system capital improvement program costs. A summary of the
anticipated bond issues are as follows.
FY 1991-92 $33,235,000
FY 1994-95 19,000,000
FY 1997-98 7,995,000
FY 1999-00 7,820,000
TOTAL $68,050,000
Additionally, the City selected the engineering consulting firm
of Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton (KJC) to work with staff and the
financial advisor to develop a wastewater revenue plan and a
projection of revenue increases which may be necessary to finance
all wastewater operation costs over the next decade.
- 4 -
Wastewater Revenue and Rate Analysis
The objectives of the ten-year Wastewater Revenue and Rate
Analysis prepared by KJC were to assess current projected costs,
assess annual levels of wastewater discharge to project the
city's share of Los Angeles' Capital and O&M expenses, conduct a
cost of service study to equitably allocate utility costs to
wastewater users, and recommend corresponding wastewater rate
enhancements which allow the City to meet the debt service
requirements of the proposed wastewater bond issues.
The study concluded that the following average rate increases
will be required to meet the city's revenue requirements over the
next decade.
December I, 1991 37 percent
July 1, 1993 8 percent
July I, 1994 8 percent
July 1, 1995 8 percent
July I, 1996 8 percent
July 1, 1997 8 percent
July 1, 1999 10 percent
If the City chooses not to finance its share of the Hyperion
capital upgrade costs through revenue bonds, it will be necessary
to implement a 375 percent rate increase effective January I,
1992 in order for the City to meet its current contractual
obligations. Staff believes that bond financing offers a much
more equitable source of funding for these costs.
The City's Present Rate structure
The city's present wastewater rate structure consists of a
variable charge based on a percentage of water consumed times a
per hundred cubic feet (hef) rate. The methodology which is used
- 5 -
to arrive at the correct percentage of water use which is subject
to sewer service charges is based on an assumption as to how much
of each user class' water is used for irrigation or other
exterior uses and how much constitutes interior use which becomes
sewage. These assumptions, or discharge factors, are presented
in the table below. This rate structure has been in place for
several years with the wastewater unit rate presently at $1. 59
per hundred cubic feet.
USER CLASS DISCHARGE FACTOR
Single Family 50%
Business in Residence 50%
Duplex 68%
Triplex 76%
Fourplex 85%
Over 4 Apts. 90%
Industry 100%
Commercial 100%
Public Schools 50%
Churches 100%
Under this rate structure, wastewater customers are charged in
direct proportion to the amount of water they consume, but there
is no minimum charge for cost of service.
Proposed Rate Structure and December 1, 1991, Rate Increase
Using FY 1989-90 data from the city's utilities billing system,
water production records, and wastewater flow records, KJC
performed a cost of service analysis. This analysis provides for
a fair and equitable distribution of costs and groups customers
with similar discharge patterns by user class. Because different
user classes have different wastewater system characteristics and
impose different costs for treatment separate wastewater rates
for each user class are proposed. It is also proposed that costs
be recovered through both a fixed service charge and a variable
- 6 -
- - - -- - - -
volume rate. Additionally, for industrial and some commercial
users with higher sewage strength, it is proposed, in accordance
with state and federal guidelines, that a charge be assessed for
sewage strength. The rate structure presented below incorporates
the proposed initial 37 percent average rate increase.
Fixed Service Charge
An important concept that emanates from the cost of service
analysis is the recouping of fixed wastewater operation costs
from a fixed service charge rather than from a variable volume
rate. The City's present sewer service charge derives revenue
from a rate based solely on water consumption. However, under
such a revenue structure, significant reductions in water
consumption jeopardize the financial integrity of the city's
wastewater utility. Employee salaries and benefits, insurance,
legal, general maintenance and other costs of operation, and the
debt service cost for repayment of bonding for Hyperion System
Upgrade costs does not vary with levels of water consumption or
amount of wastewater flows. This means that a majority of the
City'S wastewater system's costs (approximately 65%) are fixed.
These fixed costs are incurred whether or not customers discharge
wastewater and are associated with the "readiness to serve" of
the system.
In an effort to move the City toward recovery of all its fixed
costs through a fixed service charge, this report recommends that
a fixed service charge be incorporated into the rate structure to
collect approximately 45 percent of the operation's fixed costs
as part of the proposed December 1, 1991 rate increase.
- 7 -
-- - -- - -- -
Subsequent increases in the fixed service charge will be
requested over time, eventually leading to full recovery of fixed
costs.
The newly proposed bi-monthly fixed service charges are:
USER CLASS SERVICE CHARGE BY METER SIZE
Meter Single Multi without with
Size Family Family Permit* Permit**
5/8"-3/4" $ 16.98 $ 34.54 $ 42.81 $ 32.52
1" 23.77 48.36 59.94 98.75
1-1/2" 30.56 62.17 77.07 126.97
211 49.24 ~00.17 124.16 204.56
3" 186.76 379.94 407.96 775.92
4" 237.69 483.56 599.40 987.53
6" 356.53 725.34 899.10 1,481.29
81t 492.36 1,001.66 1,241.62 2,045.60
*ineludes governmental, institutional, and commercial and
industrial without an industrial discharge permit
**includes commercial with industrial discharge permits (such as
restaurants and photo finishes) and industrial with industrial
discharge permits
variable (Flow Related) Charge
The discharge factors for the variable component of the proposed
wastewater rate structure approximate the City's current
discharge factors:
USER CLASS DISCHARGE FACTOR
Single Family 51%
Duplex 68%
Triplex 76%
Fourplex 85%
Over 4 Apartments 90%
Individually metered multi-
family, regardless of
number of units 95%
Commercial and Industrial 89%
Government (except landscape
meters) 89%
Public Schools and Churches 89%
Landscape Meters 0%
- 8 -
-- - - - --- - -- - ------ ----
VARIABLE FLOW CHARGE
single Family $1.13 per HCF
Multi-Family $1.13 per HCF
Government and Institutional $1.13 per HCF
Commercial, not requiring an
industrial discharge permit $1.13 per HCF
Commercial, requiring an
industrial discharge permit $ .84 per HCF
Industrial, not requiring an
industrial discharge permit $1.13 per HCF
Industrial, requiring an
industrial discharge permit $ .84 per HCF
strength charge
In order to comply with state and federal regulations, the City's
wastewater utility is required to also allocate costs on the
basis of sewage strength as indicated by biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD) and suspended solids (58) . These costs are
associated with industrial users and some commercial users (such
as restaurants) whose wastewater discharge strength is stronger
than that of domestic users. The proposed BOD and 55 charges
are:
USER CLASS STRENGTH CHARGE
Commercial and Industrial with $ .15 per pound BOD
Industrial Permit
commercial and Industrial with
Industrial Permit $ .38 per pound SS
The industrial and commercial users which fall into this category
are currently regulated by the city's Industrial Wastewater
Control Ordinance.
Affect of Proposed Wastewater Rate structure (as of December l,
1991)
The effect of the proposed wastewater rate structure and the
December I, 1991, increase differs with each user class, and in
some cases the proposed rate structure will result in a decrease.
- 9 -
The impact on a sample of users from each user class is as
follows:
12-1-91
METER CURRENT PROPOSED DOLLAR
USER CLASS SIZE HCF BILL BILL INCR/DCRS
Single Family 3/41t 32 $ 25.44 $ 35.42 $ 9.98
Multi Family 1-1/2" 92 117.02 159.24 43.91
(7 units)
Small Profes-
sional Bldg. 3/411 38 60.42 81.02 20.60
Auto Repair 3/411 6 13.88 79.43 65.50
Large Sit-Down
Restaurant 1-1/2" 481 764.79 1,495.83 731.04
Laudromat 1-1/2" 496 788.64 674.61 -114.03
Car Wash 21t 517 822.03 726.44 -95.59
Hospital 2 - 4"/
2 - 6" 13,186 20,965.74 20,324.36 -632.38
Hotel 31t/611 1,329 2,113.10 5,486.91 3,373.81
Due to the impact of the proposed fixed service charge, customers
in each user class will also be affected differently depending on
the amount of water consumed. Those customers in each user class
who continue to consume less than the average amount of water
will likely experience a greater percentage increase in their
wastewater bill. The rate re-structuring proposal has been
forwarded to and discussed with Rent Control staff.
The attached table compares Santa Monica's proposed wastewater
rate for single family occupancies with wastewater rates of other
cities in the area.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT
The proposed wastewater rate structure and December 1, 1991, rate
increase will generate approximately $1,396,750 in additional
revenue at account 31-500-661-00000-0165-100000 for FY 1991-92.
- 10 -
The estimated full year impact in FY 1992-93 will be $2,860,544.
This increased revenue is the amount necessary to meet the
proposed debt coverage and on-going operations and maintenance
costs for the wastewater system.
CONCLUSION
On October 1, staff will present for City Council's review the
proposed wastewater rate structure as described in this report.
staff will also present for city council review and approval the
introduction and first reading of an ordinance revising Santa
Monica Municipal Code Sections 7137 and 7143 to incorporate the
new wastewater rate structure.A staff report and resolution which
sets the specific rates described above will be submitted for
Council review and action concomitant with the second reading of
the ordinance.
Prepared by: Stan Scholl, Director of General Services
F. J. Schroeder, Interim utilities Manager
Jean Stanley Higbee, Sr. Administrative Analyst
(srwwrate)
Attachment: Table "single Family Bill Comparison - city of
Santa Monica - Wastewater Utility"
- 11 -
SINGLE FAMILY BILL COMPARISON
CITY OF SANTA MONICA - WASTEWATER UTILITY
aJRRENT FY 1992-93 RATE CONDITl~S
UT I LlTY BI LL(1) BILL(2) SUBSIDY LA ItEMBER
Santa Monica S25 .44 $35,421 NONE YES
Los Angeles 533.15 $39.30 NONE YES
E\ Segl.lf1do(3) $16.00 $11.28 Gen f\roC\ YES
Glendale 542.24 14562 NONE YES
Beverl y Hills $46.70 $50.44 NONE YES
Las Vlrgenes 131.50 $34.02 I NONE YES
LA COlJr\ty San. $10.00 $10.60 Tues NO
MunIcipalities
Torrance(4) $13.00 $13.18 Gen Flrld NO
Inglewood(4) $'\8.00 $19.!J8 Gen F\rId NO
(1) All bltts are bl-monthty and based an 32 Net/Cycle.
(2) FY 1992-93 prOjected bill IS based on the current bill with an
I ncreased of ax, wtl1 ell approlC illl8tes LA treatment I!InCI o&M cost
escalation factor.
(3) Currently in litIgatIon wIth LA over capital cost allocatIons.
(4) These CitIes dlscharge wastewater to LA County Sen. DIstrIct.
~4/t'A IrA --t
~EP .' ;,""
\,; ~ ~. -::: i~;,;1
CITY of
;
SANTA
MONICA
i
n
.1
~ !
!
I
YEAR - END BUDGET REVIEW 1990 -91
I
t1 ~/I!e.lp" -~
~n' ,-, f ~q .
u....r .: 't ".91
- --- - - ----
FIN:CMD:ymn:sryrend
Clty Council Meeting: September 24, 1991 Santa Monica, Cal1fornla
TO: Mayor and C1ty Council
Cha1rperson and Redevelopment Agency Members
Cha1rperson and Parking Author1ty Members
FROM: City Staff
SUBJECT: FY1990-91 Year-End Budget Report
Introduction
The purposes of this staff report are to set forth necessary year-end budget
adjustments for FY1990-91, to transmlt the Year-End Departmental Performance Rev1ew
and the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of June 30, 1991, to recommend
a loan to the Beach Fund, to recommend various FY1991-92 budget adJustments, and to
request approval to establish a Debt Service Fund.
FY1990-91 Budget AdJustments
It is standard pract1ce for budget adJustments to be made based upon the year end
flnancial data Wh1Ch becomes available 1n August. Budget adJustments are made to
ensure that departmental budgets are balanced to the major account group
appropn at ion 1 eve 1 within a department by fund. The reason for each year-end
budget adjustment is indicated in Exhib1tS A and B. These adjustments are essen-
tially technical in nature or to recognize relatlvely minor unantlcipated expendi-
tures which had to be made.
Year-End Departmental Performance Revlew
The FYl990-91 Year-End Departmental Performance Revi ew is hereby transml tted as a
separate document for review. Progress towards accomplishing all objectl yes and
performance lndlcators in the FY1990-91 Adopted Budget is reported. The format of
information presented is 1dentical to that presented as part of the FY1990-91
Mld-Year ReV1ew.
- 1 -
F1nal FY1990-91 Capital Improvement Program Status Report
Quarterly, throughout the fiscal year, staff provides the City Council with Capital
Improvement Program Status Reports. These reports explain the program and f1nancial
status of each active City capital project. The status report for June 30, 1991, is
hereby submltted for information.
Loan to the Beach Fund
Net FY1990-91 expend1tures were greater than anticipated. In order for the Beach
Fund to complete the year in a positive cash pos1tion, it is necessary for the
General Fund to loan the Beach Fund $.1 m1llion.
FY1991-92 Budget Adjustments
Ra ther than wait unt i 1 the FY1991-92 M1d-Year Budget Review, various FYl991- 92
budget changes are now recommended. These changes are necessary to reflect
information not ava1lable when the C1ty'S budget was adopted 1n June, 1991, to make
technical changes, to make additions necessary for implementatlon of the City's TMP
Ordinance Program, to accept an FAA Alrside Improvement Program grant, and to make
corrections.
Acceptance of the FAA Airside Improvement Program grant requlres City Councll
adoption of the resolution at Exhibit F.
To implement the City's TMP Ordinance Program, various budget changes are detalled
at Exhibits C and D. The costs of these changes are financed by TMP Ordinance Fees
and/or Trafflc Mltlgatlon Fees.
All recommended FY1991-92 budget adjustments are detalled in Exhibits C, D, and E.
- 2 -
- - ----
Establishment of a Debt Serv1ce Fund.
The City's outside auditors, KPMG Peat Marwi ck, have recommended that the C1 ty
establish a separate Debt Service Fund to centralize certain accountlng transactions
concerning debt payments. Currently, these transactions are appropriated and
tracked 1n var10US funds. Establishment of a Debt Service Fund and the 1mplementing
technical appropriatlon changes will not 1ncrease or decrease the City's budget or
alter any financing policies.
Budget/Financial Impact
The FYl990-91 budget changes detailed at Exh1b1ts A and B recognize actual
expenditures incurred and will not meaningfully revise fund balance projections for
June 30, 1991 as presented in the Adopted City Budget for FY1991-92. Actual fund
ba 1 ance changes will be reported in conjunction with submission of the City's
Comprehensive Annual FinanC1al Report for FY1990-91 early in December, 1991.
The FY1991-92 budget changes detalled at Exhlbits C, D and E do not signlf1cantly
reVlse projected June 30, 1992 fund balances as presented in the Adopted City Budget
for FY1991-92. The General Fund changes result 1 n a reduct 1 on of $46,398 in the
General Fund balance as shown below:
Adopted Revlsed
FY1991-92 Budget Changes FY1991-92 Budget
6/30/91 Estimated Actual $ 10,487,046 $ -0- $ 10,487,046
Fund Balance
Plus Revenues 108,719,496 797,938 109,517 ,434
less Expendltures 105,994,975 1,034,277 107,029,252
Balance Sheet Transfers (41618,472) 189,941* (4,428,531)
6/30/92 Budgeted Fund
Balance $ 8,593,095 $ (46,398) $ 8,546,697
* Represents difference between One Pico Art ProJect-related expend1tures and
revenues added to the budget Wh1Ch w1ll be f1nanced from developer payments held
as deferred revenues.
- 3 -
-- -- -- -- -- - -------- ---- --- -- ------
Recommendations
It is recommended that the City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Parking Authority
approve the budget adjustments detailed in Exhlbits A through E, approve a loan from
the Genera 1 Fund to the Beach Fund for FY1990-91 of $.1 mill ion, adopt the
resolutlon at Exhlbit F, and authorize the establishment and technical
implementatlon of a Debt SerVlce Fund.
Prepared By: Mike Dennis, Director of Finance
John Karcic, Budget Coordinator
Davld Chamberlin, Senior Administrative Analyst
Ralph Bursey, Revenue Manager/Treasurer
David Carr, Assistant Treasurer
Attachments: Exhlbit A - Summary of Proposed FY1990-91 Appropriatlon AdJustments
and Other Changes
Exhlblt B - Summary of Proposed FY1990-91 Transfers wlthin Departments
Requirlng City Council Approval
Exhibit C - Summary of Proposed FY1991-92 Approprlation AdJustments
Exhibit D - Summary of Proposed FY1991-92 Revenue Budget Changes
Exhiblt E - Summary of Proposed FY1991-92 Other Budget Changes
Exhiblt F - Resolutlon of the Clty Council of the City of Santa Monlca
Authorizing the Clty Manager to Execute Agreement Number
DTFA08-01-C-20650 Accpeting a Federal Aviation Airport
Improvement Program Grant for Runway Reconstruction
- 4 -
EXHIBIT A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FY1990-91 APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS AND OTHER CHANGES
Fund Department(Olv Appropriation Purpose
Genera 1 City Clerk/Elections, $160,494 Increase 1n appropriation
Support Services due to greater than antici-
pated elect10n costs
($74,313) and greater than
anticipated printing and
postage costs ($86,181).
City Attorney 24,981 Increase in appropriation
due to greater than antici-
pated legal expense costs.
Fire/Administration 12,003 Increase in approprlatlon
due to greater than antiC1-
pated ut1lity-telephone
service costs.
Cultural and Recreat10n 77,387 Increase 1n appropriation
Servi ces/Parks due to greater than ant1c1-
pated costs for utilities/
water ($52,525) as 90/91
budget was adopted prior to
water rate increase, and
power ($24,862) due to
increased use of
fac1lities.
Non-Departmental/All 207,351 Increase approprlation to
Other transfer funds to the
Community Development Block
Grant Fund to replace reve-
nue for Ken Edwards Center
as proceeds from sale of Fe
House can not be used for
this project ($200,000),
and increase interfund
transfer approprlation to
Redevelopment Agency (Fund
15) to reimburse unantici-
pated legal expenses
($7,351).
Total General Fund $482,216
- 5 -
Fund Department/Div Appropriation Purpose
Beach Cultural and Recreation $352)372 Increase in appropriation
Services/Beach Parking due to greater than antici-
pated professlonal serVlces
costs associated with
county lifeguard services
and security service fees
($343,087) and MOU-related
costs ($9)285).
Redevelop- Community and Economic $ 7)351 Increase appropriation (net
ment Development/Economlc of other partlally offset-
(Fund 15) Development ting savlngs) due to
unanticipated legal
expenses.
Non-Departmental/ {7 )351) Increase technical inter-
Interfund Transfers interfund transfer appro-
priation to provlde
increased reimbursement
from the General Fund due
to unantlclpated legal
expenses.
Total Redevelopment (Fund 15) S -0-
Redevelop- Community and Economic $726,880 Increase technical appro-
ment Development/Economlc priation (net) to reflect
(Fund 16) Development interest liabllity accrued
during the year for various
promissory notes owed to
the City.
Redevelop- Community and Economic $376,972 Increase technical appro-
ment Development/Economlc prlatlon (net) to reflect
(Fund 18) Development interest liability accrued
during the year for various
promlssory notes owed to
the City.
Comprehensive Non-Departmental/ $132,785 Increase in appropriation
Self-Insurance Interfund Transfers due to greater than antici-
pated level of claims
settlement ($83,651) which
were financed by funds held
in reserve) and purchase of
excess liability policy
($49,134) .
- 6 -
---- - - -----
Fund Department/Div Appropn at 1 on Purpose
Auto Self- Non-Departmental/ $100,309 Increase 1n appropriation
Insurance Interfund Transfers due to greater than antici-
pated level of claims
settlement which were
financed by funds held in
reserves.
Worker's City Manager's Office/ $ 5,603 Increase in appropriation
Compensation- Risk Management due to MOU-related costs.
Self-Insurance
- 7 -
EXHIBIT B
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FY1990-91 TRANSFERS WITHIN
DEPARTMENTS REQUIRING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
Salaries Supplies Capital Capital
Fund Dept./Div. & Wages & Expenses Out 1 ay Project lata 1
General City Counc il
Varlous Accounts $19,188 $(19,188) S -O- S -0- $ -0-
Travel - Council- -0- 2,321 -0- -0- 2,321
Member Vazquez
Travel - Mayor -0- (2,321) -0- -0- (2,321)
Abdo
Total C1ty
Counc 11 $19,188 S (19 , 188 ) $ -o- S -0- $ -0-
Supplles and Expenses sav1ngs are transferred to
Salarles and Wages due to MOU-related costs, and
travel appropr1at10ns are adJusted to recognize
actual Council approved travel-related costs.
General C1ty Manager $ 355 $( 355) $ -O- S -0- $ -0-
Supplies and Expenses savings are transferred to
Salaries and Wages due to MOU-related costs.
General City Clerk
Administration $ -0- $ 850 $ -0- $ -O- S 850
Support SerVlces -0- 607 (1 ~ 457) -0- (850)
Total City Clerk $ -o- S 1,457 $(1,457) $ -o- S -0-
Capltal Outlay savings are transferred to Support
Services Supplies and Expenses due to greater than
anticipated postage costs, and to Admlnistration
Supplies and Expenses due to greater than antic1pated
profess10nal services costs.
- 8 -
Salaries Supplies Capital Capital
Fund Dept.(Div. & Wages & Expenses Outlay Project Tota 1
Genera 1 Finance
Admlnistration $ -O- S (6,522) $ 2,041 $ -0- $(4,481)
Accounting 51,676 S 985 1,556 -0- 54,217
Treasury 30,064 (1,301) 1,386 -0- 30,149
Collectlons (25,239) (55,043) 3, 156 -0- (77,126)
Purchasing (2,718) (934) 893 -0- ( 2,759)
Total Finance $53,783 $(62,815) $ 9,032 $ -O- S -0-
Various Salary and Wage and Supplles and Expenses
Savings are transferred to Salary and Wages due to
MOU-related costs, to Supplies and Expenses due to
greater than anticipated telephone costs and to Capital
Outlay due to various unanticipated Capital Outlay
expenses.
General Personnel $15,963 (15,963) $ -0- $ -O- S -0-
Supplies and Expenses savlngs are transferred to Salaries
and Wages due to MOU-related costs.
General InformatlOn $31,235 (45,969) $14,734 S -o- S -0-
Systems
Supplies and Expenses savlngs are transferred to Capltal
Outlay due to the need to purchase equipment for the new
Informatlon Systems Training Center in the Bus Lines
Admlnlstration Building and to Salaries and Wages due to
MOU-related costs.
General City Attorney $ -0- $ 1,532 $(1,532) $ -o- S -0-
Capltal Outlay savings are transferred to Supplies and
Expenses due to greater than anticipated legal expenses.
General Communlty and $ -0- $ (7,148) $ 7,148 $ -0- $ -0-
Economic Dev.(
City Plann i n9
Supplies and Expenses savings are transferred to
Capltal Outlay due to the unanticipated need to
purchase equipment for the Communlty Noise
Monitoring Program.
- 9 -
Salaries Supplies Capital Capital
Fund Dept./Div. & Wages & Expenses Outlay Projects lata 1
Genera 1 Pollee
An lma 1
Regul at lOn $ -o- S -0- $ (4,970) $ -0- $ (4,970)
Administration -0- 15,963 -0- -0- 15,963
Operations -0- -0- (2,186) -0- (2,186)
Technical
Services -0- -0- (7,983) -0- (7, 983 )
Investigatlons -0- -0- (824) -0- (824)
Total Police $ -0- $ 15,963 $(l5,963) $ -0- $ -0-
Capital Outlay savings are transferred to Supplles and
Expenses due to greater than anticipated training costs.
Genera 1 Fire
Adminls- $ -o- S 669 S (65) $ -0- $ 604
tration
Suppression -0- -0- (604) -0- (604)
Total Flre $ -0- $ 669 $ (669) $ -0- $ -0-
Capital Outlay savings are transferred to Supplies and
Expenses due to greater than anticipated fuel costs.
Genera 1 Cultural and
Recreation
Services
Administration $(33,717) $ 33,717 $ -o- S -O- S -0-
Recreation -0- -0- 3,665 -0- 3,665
Nutn t ion -0- (4,416) 751 -0- (3,665)
Total Cultural and
Recreatlon Services $(33,717) $ 29,301 $ 4,416 $ -o- S -0-
Adminlstration Divlslon Salaries and Wages savings are trans-
ferred to Supplles and Expenses due to greater than anticipated
professional services and utllity costs, and Senior Nutrltlon
Division Supplies and Expenses are transferred to Capltal Outlay
due to various greater than anticipated equipment costs.
General Li brary/
Admini-
stration $ 816 S (1,002) $ 186 S -O- S -0-
Supplies and Expenses savings are transferred to Salary
and Wages due to MOU-related costs and Capltal Outlay due
to greater than anticlpated computer equipment costs.
- 10 -
Salaries Supplies Capi ta 1 Capital
Fund Dept./Div. & Wages & Expenses Outlay ProJects Tota 1
General General Services
Street Maint. S 7t5OO $ -0- $ (7, 500) $ -O- S -0-
Elect./Radlo
Facil ities 11 t 769 (8t620) (3,149) -0- -0-
Fleet Mgmt. 32~759 (25~318) (77441) -0- -0-
Total General Services S 52,028 $(33,938) $ (18, 090) $ -O- S -0-
Various Supplies and Expenses and Capital Outlay savings are
transferred to Salaries and Wages due to MOU-related costs.
Redevelop- Community and $ (136 ) $ 136 $ -O- S -0- $ -0-
ment Economlc
(15 Fund) Development/
Economic Development
Salaries and Wages savings are transferred to Supplies
and Expenses due to hlgher than anticipated legal
expenses.
Redevelop- Communlty and $(20,293) $ 22,900 $ ( 2 , 607) $ -O- S -0-
ment Economic
(16 Fund) Development
Economic Development
Salaries and Wages savlngs and Capital Outlay savings
are transferred to Supplles and Expenses to partlally
offset technical expense for increased interest
liability for various promlssory notes owed to the City.
Redevelop- Community and $(20,353) S 22,961 $ (2,608) $ -0- $ -0
ment Economlc
(18 Fund) Development/
EconomlC Development
Salaries and Wages savlngs and Capltal Outlay savlngs
are transferred to Supplles and Expenses to partially
offset technlcal expense for increased interest
liability for varlOUS promissory notes owed to the
City.
Beach Cultural and
Recreatlon
Servlces/
Be ach Ma i nt. $ 527 $ -O- S (527) $ -0- $ -0-
Capltal Outlay savings are transferred to Salaries and Wages
due to unanticlpated temporary employee costs.
- 11 -
- ----
Salaries Supplies Capital Capltal
Fund Dept./D1V. & Wages & Expenses Outlay Project Total
Water Genera 1 $66,417 $ ( 66 , 417 ) S -O- S -0- $ -0-
Services/Water
Supplies and Expenses savings are transferred to Salaries
and Wages due to greater than antlcipated Overtime
Expenses.
Pier General $ 2,467 $ (3,922) $ 1,455 $ -0- $ -0-
Services/
Pi er Mgmt.
Supplies and Expenses savings are transferred to Salaries
and Wages and Capltal Outlay account groups due to
MOU-related costs and to higher than anticipated vehicle
and Pler renovation expenses.
CiV1C Cultural and
Aud i - Recreatlon
ton urn Services $43,918 $(12,149) $(31,769)$ -o- S -0-
Supplles and Expenses and Capital Outlay savings are
transferred to Salaries and Wages due to MOU-related costs.
Alrport Airport $ 3,840 $ (3,840) $ -O- S -O- S -0-
Supplies and Expenses savings are transferred to
Salarles and Wages due to MOU-related costs.
Cable City Manager/CableTV
Communi- Administration $ -0- $ (1) $ 1 $ -0- $ -0-
catlons
Supplles and Expenses Savlngs are transferred
to Capital Outlay due to greater than antici-
pated equipment costs.
Worker's City Manager/
Compensa- Risk
tion Management $ 2,595 $ (2,154) $ ( 441) $ - 0- $ -0-
Capital Outlay and Supplies and Expenses savlngs
are transferred to Salarles and Wages due to
MOU-related costs,
Parking Genera 1 $20,511 $(20,511) $ -o- S -0- $ -0-
Authority Services
Supplies and Expenses savings are transferred to
Salaries and Wages due to greater than anticipated
Overtime and temporary employee expenses.
- 12 -
EXHIBIT C
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FY1991-92 APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Department/Div Changes Purpose
Genera 1 Information Systems $ 11,050 - Increase appropriation
for computer equipment
for TMP Ordinance Pro-
gram. Cost will be
financed by TMP Ordin-
ance Fees and/or Traf-
fic Mitigation Fees.
Cultural & Recreation 8,022 - Increase Supplies and
Services/Arts Expenses appropriation
by $8,022 to recognize
recelpt of Callfornia
Arts Council grant to
fund "Festival '91" on
the Pier.
Police/Animal Control 1,313 - Increase approprla-
tion to effect
necessary repair of
anlmal cages.
Communlty and Economic 1,404 - Increase approprlation
Development/Community and to fully fund reclassl-
Neighborhood Services fication of Senior
Adminlstratlve Analyst
to Princlpal Human
Servlces Lialson.
land Use and Trans- 97,882 - Increase approprlatlons
portation Management/ to implement City's TMP
Traffic Engineering Ordinance Program in-
cluding the addition of
1.0 FTE permanent posi-
tion of Transportation
Management Plan Coor-
dinator and .5 FTE
permanent position of
Staff Assistant III.
Costs will be financed
by TMP Ordinance Fees
and/or Traffic
Mitigation Fees.
- 13 -
Fund Department/Dlv Changes Purpose
Llbrary/Main Llbrary (4,229) - Decrease Salaries and
Servlces Wages ($-10,586) and
lncrease Supplies and
Expenses ($3,941)
approprlations to re-
flect final amount of
State Literacy Program
grant and to reVlse
allocation of remaining
funds, and to recognize
Literacy Program con-
tribution received in
FY1990-91 but to be
spent in FY1991-92.
($2,416).
General Services/ $ 8,399 - Increase appropriation
Admi nl strat i on to fully fund reclassl-
fication of one posi-
ti ons to Perml t
Speclalist and to
reflect a previously
approved salary
increase for the class.
Non-Departmental/ 677,581 - Increase Supplles and
Retlrement and All Other Expenses approprlation
to reflect anticipated
Bergamont Property debt
servi ce payment. In-
crease is flnanced by
projected additional
lease revenues and
interest earnlngs
($655,000), and,
increase approprlatlons
for employee benefits
associated wlth lmple-
mentatlon of the City's
TMP Ordinance Program
WhlCh will be financed
by TMP Ordinance Fees
and/or Traffic Mitiga-
tion Fees ($22,581).
Non-Departmental/ 31,489 - Decrease Supplles and
Interfund Transfers Expenses approprlation
transfer from the Mis-
cellaneous Grants Fund
to reflect final amount
of State Llteracy
Program grant ($3,909),
and decrease Supplies
and Expenses appropria-
tion transfer from the
- 14 -
-------
Fund Department/Div Changes Purpose
~
Miscellaneous Grants
Fund to reflect flnal
State Budget allocation
for the State Public
Library Foundation Pro-
gram grant ($27~580).
Capltal Projects/ 201~366 - Increase appropriation
Recreation and Cultural for One Pico art proJ-
ect to reflect total
estimated cost. Appro-
priation increase is
financed by developer
fees and associated
lnterest earnlngs held
as deferred revenues by
the City.
Total General Fund Sl,034~277
Miscellaneous Non-Departmental/ $ (31~489) - Decrease Supplies and
Grants Interfund Transfers Expenses appropriat10n
transfer to the General
Fund to reflect final
amount of State Liter-
acy Program grant
(-$3~909)~ and decrease
Suppl1es and Expenses
appropriation transfer
to the General Fund to
reflect final State
Budget allocation for
the State Public
Library Foundation
Program grant
(-$27,580).
Solld Waste General Servlces/ $ 35,739 - Increase appropriation
to provide funding to
pay for contractual
work on the City's
Solid Waste Source
Reduction and Recycling
Element and for con-
tractual solid waste
collect10n program
publ1C education/
not1fication work~ both
of which were budgeted
in FY1990-91 but w1ll
be completed and
charged 1n FY1991-92.
ThlS appropriation
increase is financed by
an under expenditure 1n
- 15 -
Fund DepartmentlDiv Changes Purpose
FY1990-91 ($27,931).
Increase appropriation
to also fully fund new
posltions of Waste
Reduction Coordinator
($4)360) and Refuse
Account Supervisor
($3)448) based on final
compensation decisions.
Airport Capital Improvements/ $I )677 J78 - Increase approprlation
General Government - for Airside Improve-
Alrport ment Program (runway)
taxiway) and apron
repair and reconstruc-
tion) to reflect final
FAA grant award.
Cable Clty Manager/Cable $ 2)000 - Increase approprlation
TV Admlnlstratlon for additional adver-
tlslng costs. Appro-
priation increase is
financed by addltlonal
revenues from sale of
logo materials.
(chtsopac)
- 16 -
EXHIBIT D
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FY1991-92 REVENUE BUDGET CHANGES
Fund Department/Div Change Purpose
General - $ 11,425 - Increase to recognize
additional revenue for
One Pico Art Project
from deferred revenues
held by the City.
General - 655,000 - Increase to recognize
addltional lease and
associated interest
revenues from Bergamont
property.
General - 131,513 - Increase to recognize
TMP Ordlnance Fees
and/or Traffic Miti-
gation Fees which will
finance implementation
of the City's TMP
Ordinance Program.
Total General Fund $797,938
Miscellaneous - $(31,489) - Decrease to recognlze
Grants final amount of State
Literacy Program Grant
($-3,909), and decrease
to recognize flnal
amount of State Public
Library Foundatlon Pro-
gram grant ($-27,580).
Alrport - $2,500,000 - Increase to recognlze
FAA Airside Improvement
Program Grant.
Cable - $ 2,000 - Increase to recognlze
additional revenue from
sale of logo materials.
(chtsoprc)
-17-
---- - - -- - --- --- - -
EXHIBIT E
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FY1991-92 OTHER BUDGET CHANGES
Fund Department/Div Change Purpose
Genera 1 - $ISlt285 - Increase amount of Gen-
neral Fund loan to Beach
Fund from $299tOl0 (as
shown in Final Budget
changes) to $450t29S.
While Beach Fund revenues
increased $412,300 in
Final Budget changes, the
Proposed Budget loan
amount of $711,310 should
have been reduced by only
$261,015 rather than
$412,300 because a
portion of thlS increase
is required to be paid to
L.A. County for lifeguard
services.
Genera 1 $ ( 2 t 337) - Revise travel appropria-
Mayor Abdo tions to recognize Mayor
$ 2,337 Pro Tempore assuming
Mayor Pro Tempore Genser responsibilities of Mayor
Dec. It 1991.
Mlscellaneous - $795,695 - Increase amount of PAL
Grants Center Capital improve-
ment project reappro-
priation from FY1990-91
to correct administrative
oversight. ThlS reappro-
priated approprlation
will be fully financed by
a State Bond Act grant.
(chtspobc)
- 18 -
DATE 1-;J.4-Q/
ITEM # -~
(,.".,)
FILED IN
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
.
-- - --
BEFORE. 016 I k.L.b U .L.J.. '...h. ,",u=...,-_, '-" ~. ~ _~ _ -
DISTF.IBUTION OF RESOLUTION # I d 97 0RDINANCE # -
/
Council Meeting Date 'Uiylf/ Introduced:
Agenda Item It ~elpe,l/-~~ -0(_ Adopted:
/Yo ALWAYS PUBLISH ADO!'TED ORDINANCl
Was it amended? Cross out Attorney's approval
VOTE: Affir~ative:t5~( ~t tf~/ t/7r/'/ ~FI ~
Negatl.ve: /
Abstain: .
Absent: ~
PROOF VOTES WITH ANOT~ER PERSON BEFORE ANYTHING
DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL to he signed, sealed and fl.led in Vault.
NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION (Date: )
--
Department originating staff report( Laur~e Ll.eberman)
Ordinances only for Attorney ( Claud~a Thompson) 2
Management Services Lynne Barrette ORDINANCES ON~Y 1
Agency mentioned in document or staff report
(certl.fied?)
Subject file (agenda packet) 1
Counter file 1
. \
Others: (Review for departments who need to know) . ,
Airport ParJsing Auth.
Auditorium Personnel
Building Dept. Planning
C/ED Police
Finance I Purchasing
General Servo Recr!Parks
Library Transportation
Manager Treasurer
Fire
SEND FOUR COPIES Op?ALL ORDINANCES TO:
. -
CODED SYSTEMS 4 .
120 Main Street
Avon, New Jersey 07717
SEND FOUR COPIES OF ALL ORDINANCES TO: 4
Debra Myrick
Santa Mon1ca Municipal Court
1725 Main Street, Room 118 J
Santa Monica, CA 90401 Total Copies
- -- ~- - -----.-- - - ---
-- ............... - ~-- ~-- --
-- _h - - - ......... - -- ----
~
- - -\ ..~ -
- ..... I
\
, EXHIBIT F
CA:RMM:jld639/hpe/pc
city Council Meeting 9-24-91 Santa Monica, California
RESOLUTION NUMBER 8297{CCS)
(City council Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT NUMBER DTFA08-01-C-20650
ACCEPTING A FEDERAL AVIATION AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM GRANT FOR RUNWAY RECONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Monica is a municipal
corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of
the state of California with the power to carryon its business
as it is now being conducted under the statutes of the State of
California and the Charter of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has filed a Federal Aviation
Administration application AlP Project Number 3-06-0239-05 for
federal funds in the amount of $2,500,000 for runway
reconstruction; and
WHEREAS, the City has consulted with airport users
regarding the above project; and
WHEREAS, the city has reviewed and agrees to the conditions
and assurances specified in the grant agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City has the matching funds necessary
($277,778) to complete the above project,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
....
MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
- 19 -
SECTION 1. The city accepts the Federal Aviation Airport
Improvement program Grant of $2,500,000 and authorizes the city
Manager to execute contract DTFA08-91-C-20650 and make the
necessary budget adjustments.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be
in full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
......, .....{ _"l.F~"''":f',:,'''! ~~,.i'...... ",. .....'-'....~~ ~........
~ -~ ....;-
ROBERT M. MYERS
City Attorney
-
- 20 -
-
Adopted and approved this 24th day of SeptemPer, 1991-
~ 4/&
ayor
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 8297(CCS)
was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Monica
at a meeting thereof held on september 24th, 1991 by the
following council vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers: Genser, Holbrook, Olsen, Vazquez,
Zane, Abdo
Noes: councilmembers: None
Abstain: Councilmembers: None
Absent: councilmembers: Katz
ATTEST:
~~Lfh~~
~ City Clerk I
....