Loading...
SR-9-A (55) AP : JPM: TAW: mh : improv Council Meeting 11/15/94 9A Santa Monica, California NOV 1 5 199't To: Mayor and City Council From: City Staff SubJect: Recommendation ~o Direct the City Attorney to Prepare an Ordinance Establishing Procedures for Rev~ew of Improvements at the Santa Monica Airport. Tnt ""oduc~ ~ on This report requests the City Council to direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance establishing procedures for review of improvements at the Santa Monica Airport. Background ~he City Council requested that staff provide a list of approved or proposed improvements at the A~rport. Airport improvements are made in accordance with the 1984 Master Plan and Airport Agreement wh~ch obligates ~he City to mainta~n and improve the Airport to mitigate noise and ensure the safety of aircraft operations. To minimize noise and improve the safety of the Airport the City Council approved a grant from the Federal Av~ation Administration on June 28, 1994 in the amount of $1,604,700. The projects approved to be constructed in the spring of 1995 are detailed in attachment A. In addition to the approved projects the City has applied for a federal grant in the amount of $1,989,000 for future noise and safety improvements. These improvements are detailed in Attachment B. There is no guarantee the City will receive any 1 NOV 1 5 199Jt 9A ; federal funds for the projects listed ~n Attahment B. In addition to the federal 1mprovement projects underway or on file with the Federal Aviation Administration the City will be solicit1ng request for proposals for the existing Cloverfield Fixed Base Operator (FBO) lease Wh1Ch expires in March of 1996. The City is obligated to provide space for three FBO's under the terms of the 1984 Airport Agreement. The Cloverfield FBO has been operating at the Airport since 1966 and serves as the third FBO. The new lease for the six acre FBO will include replacement of the fuel farm, remodeling of the terminal building, fencing and landscape improvements and construction of light aircraft hangars which will serve as a noise barr1er to the homes south of the Airport. Discussion The construction of the light aircraft covers in August of 1994 created neighborhood concerns about the process of approval for improvements at the Airport. The City Council asked staff to develop a public process for improvements at the Airport. It is recommended that an ordinance be prepared providing thresholds for review, the criteria for review and the public notification process. Staff recommends a two tier process similar to that for other development projects in the City. This process would provide for administrative review by Planning staff if the project is below the established threshold provided the project will not 2 have an adverse impac~ on surrounding residential uses. If the project is over the threshold or may have an adverse impact on surround1ng res1dential uses, the project would be subject to a public hearing before the Planning Commission. The follow1ng outl1nes the proposed review process: ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL Threshold Any new construction under 2,500 square feet. Any new building under 18 feet in height. Any addition to an existing structure or expansion of an existing use under 10%. Any new wall up to eight feet in height or extensions to existing walls up to eight feet in height located at least 150 from any residential use. Installa~ion of access control gates, lighting, markings or s1gnage. Installation of aircraft monitoring and directional equipment. Review Criteria Staff will refine the criteria for approval, however, the following will be the general criteria to approve a project: The project would not be detrimental or inJur10us to surrounding residential uses. The proJect would not be contrary nor in conflict with the goals, polic1es and objectives of the General Plan and the Airport Master Plan. The site is physically suitable for the project. Public Notice No notice will be required for administrative approval projects. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW Threshold Any new building over 2,500 square feet. Any new building over 18 feet in height. Any addition or expansion of an existing use over 10%. Any new walls or extensions to existing walls located within 150 from any residential use. Any new walls or extensions to existing walls over eight feet in 3 ~ height. Construction of any new access roads. Review Criteria Staff will develop the findings for review, however, the c=iteria will be similar to the standards for a development review appl~cacion. Public Notice If the project is located with~n 500 feet of any res~dential use, all property owners and tenants with 500 feet of the project shall be notified of the planning Commission hearing. If the project is located more than 500 feet from any residential use, the Planning Commission public hearing shall be noticed in the local newspaper and posted on the Planning Commission agenda. The proposed thresholds are considerably more restrictive than for other zoning districts throughout the City. For example, the C2 Ne~ghborhood Commercial District has a Development Review Threshold of 11,000 square feet and the C4 District has a Development Review Threshold of 25,000 square feet. City staff will follow these guidleines until they are established as an ordinance. The guidelines outlined above are in addition to the current City requirements of review including the Building and Safety Divis~on, Fire Department, Environmental and Public Works Department, and the Architectural Review Board for improvements at the Airport. Minor Airport maincenance and repair such as resurfacing and seal coating will be subject to the review and approval of the Airport D~rector. 4 In addition, any lease with a term longer than month-to-month is reviewed and approved by the City Council. The Council will also award the construction contrac~s for all of the 1mprovements outlined in Attachment A and B and the new Fixed Base Operator lease. Budaetarv Fiscal Imnaci. - - - The development of the ordinance will not have any budgetary or fiscal impact. Recommendat:ion It is recommended that the City Attorney be directed to prepare an ordinance establishing procedures for review of improvements at the San~a Monica Airport in consultation w1th the Resource Management and Plann1ng and Community Development Departments. Prepared by: Jeffrey P. Mathieu, Director Resource Management Timothy A. Walsh, Airport Manager Suzanne Frick, Director, Planning and Community DevelopmentS 5 ATTACHMENT A APPROVED PROJECTS Project 1 - Blast Walls - Phase II Aircraft Blast from depamng on Runway 3-21 has become an mcreasmg problem at Santa Momca Airpon. Phase I of the Blast Wall Project placed walls near the departure runup areas. The walls have effecDvely prevented debns from blowmg across roadways and mto resldenoal areas. Phase IT of the Blast Wall Project will prevent and deflect the lngh veloclty blast of depamng 3.l1'(;.laft from reachIng the reSldenoal areas east of the runway end. TIns will proVlde sigmficam rellef to those affected by the arrcraft blast. Project 2 - Fencing and Gates - Phase II Runway mcurslOns cononue to be a problem at Santa Monica., requiring further restricoons on access. The Phase I Access Control Project involved the mstallation of six (6) access control gates and penmeter fencmg. Addinonal slgnage, road closures, resaictions to access, and educanon of users have reduced the number of runway mCUI'Slons. Further amons are requrred. mcluding the mstallaoon ~rlrlitJ.onal access control gates and fencing. Project 3 - Perimeter Road Realignment The crrculaoon of velncles on the Alrpon's amlde has caused slgmficant safety problems over the past several years. Numerous Improvements have been made to reduce runway mcurslOns and vehicle and arrcraft confliCtS mcluding the mstallanon of an FAA access control project. With ail of the unprovements. runway mcurslOns conanue to be a SIgnificant problem. To complete the safety improvements. the City proposed to realign the west penmeter road to connect with Airpon Avenue TIns will greatly enhance safety by reduecnng velnc1es OlltSlCle the air operations area. Project 4 - Repair, Seal Coat, and Mark Existing Taxiways TIns project conslSts of a crack seal and seal coat of the exIStmg north and south parallel taxiways. The condition of the taxiways at the Anpon has detenorated because of frequent use by aircraft. Some of the taXIway pavement IS part of the onglnal runway bUllt in 1942. Numerous longnuchnal cracks eXIst on the taxIway. Some reconstructton will be requrred m isolated areas where structural fallures have occurred because of the arrcraft usmg the facility. Project S - Lighting and Signing ThIs project conSISts of the mstallanon of runway dIstance remaimng markers that are needed by aucraft reqUJIlllg the full runway length. Addinonally. guIdance SIgnS are to be mstalled to define the runway better and to prevent runway mcurslons. The final component of this project is to recess taxlway lights in those areas where above-ground lights are repeatedly struck by arrcraft maneuvenng on the ground. Project 6 - Repair, Seal Coat and Mark Existing Parking Aprons - Phase II This project consist of a follow-up to the ongmal project subantted as pan of the AlP-04 project ill 1988. The aircraft parking aprons have permanently been estabhshed as a result of the significant change that occurred in 1986 when the aeronauncal acti.vines were moved from the southslde to the nonhSlde of the Auport. As a result, some of the City parlang areas require crack repair, seal coat. and nedown reconfiguranon. Project 7 - Aircraft Maintenance Kunup Enclosure Ai!cHill runup nOlse for maIntenance inspecnons has become an mcreasing problem at urban anports like Santa Momca. The amount of space allocated on the Aupon to conduct these operatIons safely and With as hnle mttuSlon to the surroundIng nC1ghborhoods has become increasmgly difficult. The m~intenance runup enclosure IS requU'ed to abate the nOIse of engme nmups at the A1rpon:. The mamtenance nmup enclosure will handle arrcra:ft With up to 60 foot Wing spans. Project 8 - Pavefield Areas The infield areas between the north and south parallel taxlways and the runway presently conSIst of oiled natIve matenal. These areas have detenorated, causing dramage problems and dcbns that IS blown onto the nmway by mcraft blasts. Project 8 will cap these areas With asphalt to elimmate drainage and FOD problems now bemg experienced. Project 9 - Refurbish Rotating Beacon The present airpon rotating beacon is low-powered and difficult to see at night or in Low visibility in the Los Angeles Basin. The beacon IS over 40 years old and is 10 need of replacement Additionally, the eXisting tower needs pamttng and reparrs. SANT A MONICA AIRPORT PROJECT COST SUMMARY Total Federal Local Project Cost Share Share Blast Walls - Phase II $ 300,000 $297,000 $33,000 FencinglGares 111,111 100,000 11,111 Perimeter Road Realignment 311,000 279,900 31,100 Repair, Seal, and Mark Taxiways 202,000 181,800 20,200 Lighnng and Sigmng 63,889 57,500 6,389 Repair. Seal, and Mark Aprons 220,000 198,000 22,000 Aircraft Maintenance Runup Enclosure 385,000 346,500 38,500 Pave Infield Areas 125,000 112,500 12,500 Refurbish Rotating Beacon . 35.0OQ J 1.500 3.500 TOTAL $1,783,000 $1,604,700 $178,300 ATTACHMENT B PROPOSED PROJECTS Project 1 . Airport Layout Plan Update Recent development and FAA projects reqwre an update of the Airport Layout Plan. The last update was approved by FAA m 1986. Project 2 - Obstruction Marking and Lighting The addmon of blast walls and other obstrucnons near the object free area and the runway protecnon zone reqUIre l1ghnng and marlang. Project 3 - Runway Protection Zone Enhancements The operanon of aircraft on the 4,987 foot runway reqUIreS the study and construction of runway overrun protectton. The Arrport's current runway protecnon zones are very small With residennal uses as close as 275' from the runway end. Enhancements to the runway protectton zone would muror research conducted at the FAA Research and Development facility in Adannc City to protect arrcraft and passengers from arrcraft overrun incidents. Project 4 - Noise Monitoring System Upgrade NOIse Impacts on surroundmg communIties continue to affect the role of the Airport ill the Nanonal Transponanon System. An upgrade to the nOIse momtonng system to mclude fhght track capability and add.1uonal InOmtors ill Vemce. West Los Angeles and Santa Momca ill conformance WIth the 1984 A1rpon. Agreement WIll funher reduce nOIse unpact on surrounding neighborhoods. Project S . General Aviation Noise Study The 1984 A1rport Agreement reqwred the aty to implement an expenmental pexformance- based nOIse program. The program was designed to lower the nOIse levels of smgle and muln-engme piston arrcraft wh1ch compnse 80% of the fleet at Santa Monica. This general aVIatton nOIse study would develop specific general aVlanon nOIse abatement flight profiles by tesung vanous safe pilot techmques to lower nOlse levels. The study would promote the Adnumstrator's General A VIanon Acnon Plan goal 3D reganhng lowenng of general aVIan on nOlse through changes ill mcraft flight manual operanons. This project was one of the recommendanons of the Santa MOnIca Allport Safety Committee. Project 6 - Blast Walls - Final Phase TIns IS the final phase of Blast Wall mstallation at Santa MODIca Arrport. The blast walls proposed ill dus project would be placed at the west-end of the auport to mitigate run-up and reverse thrust nOIse from mcraft deparong on Runway 3. Project 7. Helicopter Approach Path Indicator TIns f!Hlject will include the mstallanon of a helicopter approach path mdIcator (HAPD for hehcopter operanons at Santa MonlCa Auport. The Hehcopter Approach Path Indicator will ensme adequate clearance from obstrucnons for helicopters operanng at Santa MOnIca. The Hehcopter Approach Path Indicator will also lower conunumty nOIse levels by ralsmg the alntude of hehcopter arrivals. The Hehcopter Approach Path Indicator was a recommendanon of the Santa Momca AIrport Safety Repon dated July 25. 1994. Project 8 . Fencing and Access Control . Final Phase The final phase of access control and penmeter fencmg will involve the mstallanon of two more gates and the separanon of arrsl(ie and landside acttVlttes resulnng from aIi~laft parkIng ramp changes. The addInonal gates will further unprove the reduction m runway mcumons resulnng to date from preVIOUS FAA fencmg improvements. Project 9 . East Perimeter Road Realignment The clIculanon of vehicles on the arrslde has caused significant safety concerns over the past several years. To complete the safety Improvements and reduce the vehicle/aircraft conflict a realignment of the east penmeter road to connect with A1rport Avenue IS necessary and will separate vehIcles and mcraft completely. TIus was also a reCOliW.leDcI~t10n of the AllpOrt Safety CommIttee. Project 10 . Taxiway Centerline Lighting The North and South parnllel taxIways are currently marked with centerlme reflectors. TIns project would provide for the mstallanon of 10.000 feet of taXIway centerline lighting and the adc:htion of a regulator and electncal vault expanSIon. Flush mounted taxiway centerhne lighnng IS requIred because of the extensive dnft-off areas North and South of the runway Project 11 . Alternative Aircraft Fuels Study The FAA General A Vlation Acnon Plan reconnnended the orderly development of altemanve general aVlanon fuels to reduce emissions. Santa Monica Arrpon is faced with the potennal Federal Implementanon Program by the EnVlIOnmental Protecnon Agency to 1IDpOse monetary takeoff charges per operanon to rmmmize errnssions. The Santa MonIca A1rport proposes to study and fly an alternanve fuel auCiaft WhICh IS safe and nnmmizes eIDlSSIons to exceed future local and federal arr quahty mandates. The study would be coordinated with the appropnate FAA agenCIes mc1uding m.fc.nift cernficanon and system engmeering and development Altemanve fueled aircraft will funher general avianon and aVOId its delI1lse by proposals such as the FIP Project 12 - Runway Exit Zone Pavement Reconstruction This project will complete the work begun in the 05 FAA project to pave the eXIt zone edge to the Nonh and South taxIway With full strength pavement of 30,000 smgle wheel 60.000 dual wheel and 105,000 dual tandum weIghts. SANTA MONICA AlRPORT Project Cost Summary Prolect Total Cost Federal Share Local Share - AIrport Layout Plan Update $10,000 $ 9,000 $1,000 Obstructton Marlang and Lightmg 50,000 45,000 5,000 Runway Protecnon Zone 400,000 360,000 40,000 Enhancements NOIse Monitonng System Upgrade 300,000 70,000 30,000 General A Vlarion NOIse Study 100.000 90.000 10,000 Blast Walls - Fmal Phase 250,000 225,000 25,000 Helicopter Approach Path Indicator 50.000 45.000 5,000 Fencmg and Access Control - Fmal Phase 100,000 90,000 10,000 East Peroneter Road Realignment 400,000 360,000 40.000 T3X1way Centerline Lighnng 125.000 112,500 12,500 Alremanve AIrcraft Fuels Study 250.000 225.000 25,000 Runway Exit Zone Pavement 175.()(X} 157.500 17.500 Total $2,210,000 $1,989,000 $221,000