SR-9-A (53)PCD:PPA:SF:RF:PC
f:~ppd~share\ccreport\sptraff
COUNCIL MEETING: September 27, 1994
TO: Mayor and City Counci].
FROM: City Staff
Santa Mo~ica, California
SEP2~~
SUBJECT: Recommendation to Conduct a Public Hearing on the Sunset
Park Traffic Plans; Adopt a Resolution Certifying the
Final Environmental Impact Report; Can~eptually Approve
a Suhset Park Traffic P~an and Mitigation Measures;
Direct Staff ta Prepare a Statement of Overriding
Considerations with Recommendations ~or Findings and
Benefits of the Project; and Adopt a Resalution o~
Intention ta Direct the Planning Commissian to Amend the
Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan if
Necessary.
INTRODIICTION
With this report, sta~f is recommending tha Couneil take the
Following actians with respect to a S~nset Park Traffic Plan: 1)
Canduct a public hearing; 2y adopt a resalution ta certify the
Final EnvirQnrr~enta~ Impact Repo~-t ~EIR); 3) conceptually appxove
a Plan and mit~gatian measures; 4) direct staff to prepare a
Statement of Overriding Cansiderations with recvmmendation for
findings and benefits of the Project; and 5) adopt a resolution of
intention to direct the Planning Commission to amer~d the Land Use
and Czrc~latZOn Element of the GeneraZ Plan if necessary.
Because implemantation of soma of the Sunset Park Traffic Plans
would require an amEndment to the General Plan if they include a
barrier or diverter, the pracess for implementing a Plan may
require subsequen~ Cauncil and Planning Cammiss~on actions. The
1
SEP27~
first step for implementing a Plan ~s far the Council to certify
the EIR and give direction to staff on which Plan and mitigation
measures to implement. Staff wou~d return at a subsequent meeting
with the statement of o~erriding considerations on the significant
impacts for the recommended plan, an implementation schedule, and
a request for budget authorizat~on. In the event the recommended
plan requires a Gsneral Plan amendment, staff would return to the
Council after the Planninq Commission acts on the General Plan
amendment.
This report provides background on the Sunset Park Traffic Plan,
discusses the significant impacts identified and mitigation
measures proposed for various alternatives in the EIR, discusses
the public pracess for development of the Plan, outlines the cost
of the plans and mitigation measures, and provides a recommendation
for Council approval of a Traffic Plan.
A range of options are available ta the C~uncil in selecting a
traffic plan. One of ~he three plans (Enciave, Paral2el, and
Staff), the staff rec~mmended Hybrid Plan, or one of the
alternatives identified in the EIR, may be chosen. Elements of the
plans may also be combined to create a modified traffic plan. As
~ong as el~ments were analy~ed ~n the EIR, or the~ are modified in
a less restrictive manner, they can be used by Council in selecting
a Plan. Staff i.s recommending a Hybra.d Plan consisting of cammon
elements within each Plan pius individual measures from one of the
2
three plans where there was not agreement. This recommendad plan
is described in more detail later in the staff r2port.
New traffic control measures not sp~cifically analyzed in the EIR
that would likely create a significant impact can not be used
unless further environmental review is done. The identification of
new measures may create new significant impacts and therefore will
reqvire re-circulation of the EIR.
BACKGROUND
For several years, City staff has been working with groups of
neighbors in Sunset Park to develop and implement neighborhood
traffic plans within the area boundad by Pico Boulevard on the
north, the south city limit, Lincoln Bou~evard on the west and
Centinela Avenue on the east. A neighborhoad traffic plan is the
comprehensive and coordinated implementation of traffic controZ
measures to address neighborhood traffic concerns.
The Sunset Park Traffic Plans were developed by the City with the
assistance of interested residents in the neighborhoad starting in
the Spring of 1990. The two Sunset Park neighborhaod
organizations, Friends af Sunset Park and Sunset Park Associatian
of Neighbors, created separate plans for the neighborhood, known as
the Enclave and Parallel plans, respectively.
3
The primary objectave of these plans is to mitigat~ the volume of
"through" traffic which is traveling or "cutting" through
residential areas. The goal of mo~ing "through" traffic out of
residential areas is be~ng addressed by installing traffic contral
measures on the residential streets to discpurage or divert traffic
out of the neighbarhoads and improving tha adjacent arterial
highway system to facilitate traffic flow thereby reducing the need
to divert through a residential area. Traffic control measures are
being proposed in various degrees ir- the p~ans to me~t this goal,
including the use of typical types of cantrol such as stop signs,
parking restrictions, speed humps, signal improvements, modified
roadway striping and turn restrict~ons. The plans include co~nmon
elements such as traffic circles and one traffic diverter, while
the Enclave plan proposes the use af numerous barriers and
divert~rs or street closur~s that are not included in the Paral~el
or Staff Plans.
DESCRIPTION OF PLAIdS
Enclave Plan
The foZlowing is a brief discussion
~nodified by the Friends of Sunset Park.
from the Enclave Plan ana~yzed in
restrictive ~nanner. Friends of Sunse
modified v~rsion of the Enclave P~an
Council as their recommended plan:
of the Enclave PZan, as
This version is different
the EIR, but in a less
t Park requested that this
be presentad to the C~.ty
4
o Peak Haur turn restrictions on Navy, Marine, Pier Avenue,
Ashland Avenue, Hill and Oak Street at 23rd Street, and
on Pearl Street at Centinela.
o Road closures north of Ocean Park on 21st Street, 22nd
Street, and 25th Street, and at Dewey west of 23rd
Street. Partial road closures on 23rd Street and
Cloverfield north of ~cean Park.
o Partial cul-de-sacs east of Lincoln on Wilson Place,
Ashland Avenue, and Hill Street.
o Peak Periad Parking restrictions on both sides of Lincoln
Boulevard from Pica to the south City 3imits.
o A forced right turn di~erter for northbound traffic at
23rd Street and Ocean Park Baulevard, and pylons in the
median an Ocean Park Boulevard at Cloverfield restricting
turn movements.
o Pedestrian signals on 23rd Street at Hill and Pier, as
well as an 15th Street between John Adams School and Will
Rogers school.
o Traffic circles, speed humps, stop signs, and re--timed
traffic signals throughout the project area.
The differences between the Enclave Plan summarized above and the
one analyzed in the Draft EIR are outlined in detail in Attachment
A. The most recent modifa.cations eliminated ten full barriers by
rep~acing them with p~ak hour turn restrictions, reduced two full
barriers to partial barriers, and left four full bazriers in the
Enclave Plan. Some o~ the measures added to the Enclave Plan were
already included in the Parallel Plan, while other changes are less
restrictive than the original Enclave P~an studied in the EiR.
One propos~d modification not analyz~d in the Draft EiR is a
partial barrier or- Pier Avenue just east of Lincaln. Since this
5
measure was no~ analyzed in th~ Draft EIR and may have a
significant impact, further enviranmental analysis and a
recirculatian of the EIR would be required if Gouncil chaoses to
impl~ment the measure. The remainder of the changes outlined abave
may be implementad withaut further environmental review.
Parallei Plan
The following is a brief description of the Parallel Plan. The EIR
provides additional details about the Plan:
o Conversion of 23rd Street and Clo~erfield Baule~ard ta a
one-way couple~, with 23rd Strest nbrthbound and
Cloverfield Boulevard southbound from Pico to Ocean Park
Boulevards with only ane trave~ lan~ on each.
a Peak Haur turn restrictions at the intersections of 23rd
Street with Pier Avenue, Ashland Avenue, Hil~ Street, and
Oak Street. Median an 23rd Stree~ from Dewey Str~et to
Pier Avenue. Peak hour turn restrictions also on Pearl
Street at 20th and Centinela, at th~ intersectians af
Lincoln Boule~ard with O~one Avenue, Marine Street, Pier
Avenue, Ashland Avenue, and Hill Street, and on Pico and
Ocean Park Boulevards at 21st and 22nd Streets.
o Planted median on 23rd Street between Pier Avenue and the
sauth City limits.
o Pedestr~an signal on 23rd Street at Ashland.
o Peak period parking restrictions on l~oth sides of Lincoln
Boulevard from Pico to th~ so~th City limits, and on Pico
Baulevard from Lincaln to Centinela. Partial parking
removal on Ocean Park Boulevard bEtween 16th Street and
25th Street.
o Stap signs at Airport Avenue and Walgrove Avenue, along
with rep].acement of stop signs on Airport Avenue wi~h
pedestrian activated signal.s.
o Traffa.c circles, speed humps, stop siqns, and re-timed
traffic eircles throughout the project area.
6
Staff Plan
As part af the preparation of the EIR, staff develflped a third
prQposal (the "Staff" Plan) to be included in the analysis to
provide Cauncil with a wide range of options for implementing
transportation control measur~s.
The Staff Plan was developed by comparing the daily traffic volumes
with the capacities identified in the Land Use and Circulation
Element (LUCE) of the Ger~eral Plan for all streets in the study
area and noting those corridors that exceeded the volumes suggested
in the LUCE. The Pian addresses those rautes by installing measures
to reduce the speed and valume of traffic on thase streets without
major diversion of traffic to ather streets. The Staff Plan is not
as restrictive as the other two plans, but still addresses the key
corridors. The key elements nf the Staff Plan include the
following:
o Peak Period parking restrictions on both sides af Lincoln
Boulevard between Pico Bou~evard and the south City
limit.
o Pedestrian signal at 23rd Street and Ashland
o Speed humps at various Iocations in the project area,
including 23rd Street, Cloverfield, 28th Street and 34th
Street between Pica and ~cean Park Boulevards.
a Stap signs throughout the project area, including on 23rd
Street at Hill Street, Pier Straet, Dewey Street and
Airport Avenue.
Copies of the three plans, alang with a wxitten summary, are
provided in the F'inal EIR beginning on Page 3-10. As outlined, the
7
Enclave Plan has been modified from the descriptian included in the
Final EIR.
Recommended Hybrid Plan
Staff is recommending ado~tion of a hybrid plan including elements
frorn all three plans. This includes adoption of common elements ta
all three plans, plus the recomm~nded elements as outlined below in
this section. A detailed summary of the Hybrid Plan is included as
Attach~nent B. Staff recommends this hybrid plan for the following
reasons:
o Minimize impacts to the City of Los Angeles.
o Eliminate th~ need for amending th~ General Plan for
incorporation of adopted elements by removing barri~rs
and diverters from th~ proposed plan.
o Provide a plan that is mare consistent with the legal
apinian presented by the City Attorney's office with
regards to what elements the City is able to implement.
Staff analyxed the three pians s~udied in the EIR, along with the
recommended changes to the Enclave Plan, and identified the cammon
areas of traffic control measures. Thes~ elements include peak
period turn restric~ians, stop signs, speed hu~nps, signxl
synchronization, traffic circles, and most importantly, peak period
parking restrictions on Lincaln Boulevard. These primary common
elements include stop signs on 23rd Stre~t south of ~eean Park
Boule~ard at Ashland, Dewey and Airport, peak hour turning
restriction along 23rd Street sauth of Ocean Park Boule~ard, peak
hour parking restrietions on Lincaln Boulevard, speed humps on 23rd
8
Street and Clo~erfield between Pica and Ocean Park Baulevards. For
a complete list a~ measures see Attachment B.
Staff feels that this is a reasonable plan which addresses the key
corridors without imposing major changes to the circulation system
both inside and outside the neighborhood. It also will not require
an amendment to the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General
P].an and will. allow implementation ta proceed in a more timely
manner.
In brief, a summary of the hybrid plan includes the adaption af the
following:
o Common elements of a11 traffic plans, including stop
signs on 23rd Street south of Ocean Park, peak hour turn
restrictions an 23rd Street south af Ocean Park, and
additional stop signs, speed humps and traffic circles
throughout the project area.
a Speed humps on 23rd Street and Cloverfield Boulevard
between Pico and Ocean Park Boulevard.
a No change to existing condit~ons at Pear~ Street and 20th
Street.
o Left turn packets on Ocean Park Boulevard at 17th, 20th,
21st, 23rd and Cloverfield, while minimizing the amount
of green time for signals at minor cross streets af Ocean
Park.
o Chang~s to the signal timing at PearZ and Centinela, pl~zs
addition of stop signs an Pearl Street at 31st and 34th
Streets.
o Addition af stap signs at Airport Avenue and Walgrove
Avenue, but no further changes on Airport at th~s time.
o Peak hour parking restrictions on Lincoln Boulevard.
9
REY DEGISION AREAS
The follawing is a discussion of areas where each plan proposed a
different approach to a similar issue beyond those common elements,
along with recornmendations far the Hybrid P1an:
Cloverfield/23rd Street Corridox
The three plans provide for different m~asures to address the
volume and speed of traffic on this corridor between Pico and Ocean
Park Boulevard. The measures include the following:
Enc~ave Plan:
o A diverter at Ocean Park Boulevard for traffic
travell~ng north on 23rd Street requiring a right
turn onta Ocean Park and no left turn onto
Cloverfield thraugh use of pylons in th~ median of
Ocean Park.
o Partial barri~rs to traffic travelling sauthbound
on 23rd Street and Cloverfield Boulevard at Ocean
Park preventing the use af those streets
o Full barriers just narth of Ocean Park Boulevard at
21st, 22nd and 25th Street.
o No left turn in the peak hours from sauthbound 20th
Street to Eastbaund Ocean Park Baulevard.
ParaZ~el PZan:
o Convert 23rd street to one-lane and one-way
northbound, and convert Cloverfield Boulevard to
one-lane and one-way southb~und.
a Speed h~mps added to both Claverfi~ld and 23rd
Street from Pico to Ocean Park to slow traffic.
o Peak period turn restrictions from Ocean Park and
Pico Baulevards an to 21st and 22nd Streets, and no
right turn from southbound Cloverfield to westbaund
Pearl Street.
10
Staff Plan:
a Speed humps on 23rd 5treet and Cloverfield
Boulevard.
Hvbrid Recommendation: Staff recommends incorporation af spaed
humps on 23rd Street and Cloverfield Boulevard between Pico and
Ocean Park Baulevards. The stop signs an 23rd Street south of
ocean Park Boulevard at Ashland, Dew~y and Airport, along with
improvements to the arterials including peak hour parking
restriction on Lincoln, will divert some traffic from the 23rd
Street/Cloverfield corridor. The speed humps will address speeding
issues on the segments of the streets between Pico and Ocean Park
Boulevard where the EIR s~.ates that existing valumes 13,840 on 23rd
Street and 14,Q00 on Clo~erfield. These valumes of traffic are
less than the ].5,000 average daily trips limit called for in the
Circulation Element.
xOth Street~PearZ Street/Ca~leqe Traffic
Both the Enclave and Parallel Plans propose traffic cantx~ol
measures to address traffic issues east af Santa Monica College.
These measures include:
Enclave Plan:
o Partial barrier at 20th Street and Pearl Street,
allowing westbound Pearl traffic to turn north or
south on 20th Street only.
Parallel Plan:
I1
o Peak hour turn restrictions including no right turn
from sauthbound Cloverfield ta westbound Pearl, no
left or right-hand turns from Pico Boulevard to
southbound 21st and 22nd Streets, and na right or
left turns from 2oth Street to eastbound Pearl
Street,
5taff Plan:
o No measures in this area.
Hybrid Recommendation: Far vehicles travelling ta the College,
Dath of the propased measures listed abave will divert traffic to
20th and 16th Streets, a~ong with adding additianal traffic to Pico
Boul~vard. These streets already have high vQ~umes of average
daiZy traffic on them and are r~sidentially zoned streets. While
the volume of traffic on Pearl Street west of 20th is 9~380 which
~xceeds the 7,~00 volume limit ealled for a collector street in the
Circulation Element, staff recommends maintaining all exist~ng
access aptions ta the Col~ege and therefore no change ta this area.
Ocean Park Bou~evard
Similar to the 23rd Street/Cloverfield Baulevard corridor, the
Enclave and Parallel P~ans recommend different traffic control
measures on Ocean Park Bo~xievard fram 15th street to 25th Street.
ThESe include the following:
Enclave Plan:
o Barriers just north of Ocean Park BouZevard on
21st, 22nd and 25th Streets.
o No left turn in the peak hours from southbound 20th
Street to eastbound Ocean Park Boulevard.
12
These measures are recommended by the Enclave Plan to prevent
diversion of traffic from the 23rd Street/Cloverfield Boulevard
measures to these parallel streets.
Parallel Plan:
o Left turn pock~ts are recommended at every
intersection fram 16th Stre~t ~0 25th Street. This
would require the removal of parking spaces at
these intersectians as outlined in the EIR and the
response to camments.
Staff Plan:
o Signal timing, which is a common element to all
three Plans.
Hybrid Recommendation: Staff recommends l~ft-turn pockets at the
fallowing signalized intersections on QcEan Park Boulevard: 17th
Street, 20th Street, 2Zst Street, 23rd Street and Cloverfield
Boulevard. This will improve the flow of traffic on ~cean Park
Baulevard by removing turning vehicles aut of the flow of tra£fic.
Improving the arterials is one af the stated goals of all the
traffic plans. Staff also recommends that signal timing be changed
to minimiz~ the gre~n time for minor cross-streets of Ocean Park
Boulevard.
CentineZa Avenue/Pear~ Street
Both the Enc~ave and Parallel Plans recommend measures for the
Pearl Str~et/Centinela Avenue intersection. These include:
Enclave Plan:
o Partia~ barrier at Pearl and Centinela to allow
eastbound Pearl traffic to turn narth or south on
Centine~a only.
13
Parallel Plan:
o Peak hour turn restrictiohs are used. In both peak
hours, left and right turns are prevented from
Centinela to westbound Pearl Street, while in the
PM peak hour anly, ~eft turns are prevented from
eastbound Pear1 Street to northbound Centinela.
Staff Plan:
o Does nat propase any traffic control measures at
this interseetion, except to modify the signal
timing to maximize tha green time far north/south
traffic on Centinela.
Hybrid Recommendation: Staff proposes no changes at this
intersection, except for the signal timing modification af the
Staff Plan. The staff recammendatian already includes the addition
of two additional stop signs on Pearl Street in this area as part
of the cammon elements, at 31st and 34th Streets, and feels this is
adequate ta discourage cut-through traffic withaut incanvenienc~ng
the local residents. Also, the street currently carries 5,71Q
vehicles per day which is less than the ~imit of 7, 500 veh~cles per
day as stated in the ~irculatio~ Element.
Airport Avenue
Improvements to Airport Avenue are recommended in the Paralle~
Plan, but only stop signs on Walgro~e are included in the Staff
Plan, and no recommendations ar~ included in the Enclave Plan. A
range of impravements are detailed in the EIR, including the
follawing:
14
o Replace stop signs on Airport Avenue with pedestrian ar
traffic signals.
o Add a stop sign at Airport and Wa~grave Avenue (23rd
Street).
o Ymplement and enforce a speed limit as approved by the
Parking and Traffic Engineer.
If implemented, the Airport Avenue improvements will pzovide an
additianal option to motarists in the Walgrove/23rd Street
corridar. The cost of these measure is appr~ximately $360,000.
The left-turn prahibition wili remain at Walgrove for westbound
airport traffic, but may be changed at a later date after further
analysis of eff~ctiveness of th~ propased traffic control measures.
Hybrid Recommendation: The sta~f recommendation already includes
stop signs at Airport Avenue and Walgrove. Staff feels that the
traffic increases an Airpart Avenue are modest ~rom the proposed
plans, and do not warrant the installation of expensive pedestrian
ar traffic signals on Airport Avenue. Also, removal of the left-
turn restriction is not proposed as part of this Plan~ k~ut the
appropriateness of removing it af~er initiation o~ the Plan will be
evaluated at that time.
Lincoln Boulevard
All three Plan~ recommend the peak hour parking restrictions on
Lincoln Baulevard between the freeway and the southern City limits.
This m~asure wou~d add capacity to Lincoln Boulevard and thereby
handle more traffic and reduce vehicles on residential streets.
15
As mentioned b~fore, there is a tradeoff between peak hour parking
restrictions, and the effectiveness o~ the Plans in reducing
traffic on residential streets.
~ybrid Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council adopt peak
hour parking restrictions on Lincoln Boul~vard as r~cammended in
all three analyzed plans.
EIR PROCESS
On May 12, 1992 the City Council directed staff to move forward
with an EIR on these two plans. The Enclave Plan was to be
considered the project, while the Parall.el Plan was the main
alternative. However, bath plans would be studied with the same
levei of detail. Other minor alternatives were a~so recommended to
be analyzed in the EIR.
A Public Scoping Meeting was heZd on June ~8, 7.992 as part of this
pracess to se~ if other alternatives should be added or what
~dditianal items shauld be addressed in the EIR. One alternative,
cansisting of the addition of two barriers ta the Enclave PZan was
added to the EIR based upan the pub].ic scoping meeting.
On Sep~ember 29, 1992, the City Council awarded the EIR contract to
The Keith Companies, along with Kaku Associates. Traffic counts on
residential streets occurred in Dec~mber, 1992, with the
develapment of the traffic model taking place from December, 1992
16
thrauqh June, 1993.
In June, 1993 a series of public wvrkshaps were held at Jahn Adams
Middle School to provide an opportunity for residents to comment an
the proposed plans. Notices were sent to all residents in Sunset
Park announcing the workshops.
In December, 1993, the City Council directed staff to meet with the
two neighborhood organizations before completion of the EIR in an
effort to develop a compromise plan that could be analyzed in the
EIR. In addition to staff, Councilmembers Ken Genser, Paul
Rosenstein and Tony Vazquez attended the meetings.
Three meetings were held in the following manths, however no
consensus could be reached on any one plan. There were numerous
measures in a11 threa plans that bath organizations agreed upan,
but a full campromise cauld not be reached.
The significant difference of apinion centered on the treatment
proposed for the 23rd Street/CZoverfi~].d corridor. AZthough
significant discussion occurred on this issue, the neighborhaad
organizations were unable to reach a cansensus. Based upan the
inabil~ty to reach a consensus on ane plan, staff completed the EIR
which studied the Enclave, Parallel, and Staff Plans plus other
minor alternatives. In May, 1994 the Draft EIR was released for a
45 day public r~view period.
17
Notices were sent to over 240 interested people announcing the
availability of the Draft EIR, along with pub~ished notices in bath
The Outlook and Los Anqeles Times. Notices for this public
hearing were sent to those who were noticed about the Draft EIR, in
addition to all people who commented on the Draft ETR. A notice
was also published in The Outlook, and a flyer announcing the
public heari~ng was sent to every business and resident in Sunset
Park.
EIR FINDINGS
The EIR cancludes that there are significant impacts in the
existing and future conditiar-s as a result of any of the Sunset
Park Traffic Plans before mitigation. The EIR sets forth
mitigation measures to offset these adverse impacts, which
eliminate many of the signi.ficant impacts. However, for each plan,
several significant traffic impacts r~main aven after mitigation
measures are implemented.
A sum~ary of the t~affic analysis shows that, in general, the three
plans perform in a similar fashion. They increase eapacity,
thereby encauraging more traffic and creat~ng more impacts, on the
main arterial streets (Lincaln Boulevard, Pico Boulevard, Ocean
Park Boulevard, and Centinela Avenue/Bundy DrzvE~.
Capacity on the main arterials is increased through improvements to
the arterials like peak period parking restrictions on Lincoln
18
Boulevard and traffic signal synchronization throughaut the project
area. Also, in varying degrees, through the use nf peak hour and
full time parking removal on Pica and ocean Park Bou~evards are
proposed.
The plans, as expected, reduce traffic on most residentiaZ streets,
however, removal of on-street parking on Lincoln Baulevard impacts
loca~ businesses since many af the businesses do not have o~f-
street parking. A tradeoff occurs between the removal of peak
parking an Lincoln Boulevard and a reduction of traffic on
residentia~ streets.
A total of 48 signalized intersectians throughout ~.he study area
were analyzed in the EIR, and e~en with mitigation, all three plans
would have significant adverse ~mpacts with respect to traffic.
However, using the City's definition of significance in the
reverse, with the increased capacif.y or signal improvements on the
arterials, the plans wflu~d hav~ beneficial impacts at some
signalized intersectians. The beneficial impacts occur from
directing traffic away from some intersections or providing for
eapacity ar signal improvements a~. intersections. Beneficial
impacts are not a required component of the Califarnia
Environmental Quality Act. How~ver, tYllS infarmation is provided as
a way of determining the positi~e and negative impacts these plans
would ha~e on the circu~ation system.
19
Traffic Impacts with Enclave Plan
The Enclave Plan would have significant adverse impacts in the
future at 10 signalized intersections in the AM and 17
intersectians in the PM peak hours, but would have beneficial
impacts at 17 intersectians in the AM and 20 intersections in the
PM peak periads.
The EYR analyzed ~he Plans with and without peak hour parking
restric~ians, and the Enclave Plan wauld impact 1~ resident~al
street segments with peak period parking res~rictions, while ~9
segments will be impacted withaut the restrictions.
In order to mitigate the identified significant impacts, the ETR
proposes numerous mitigation measures for the Enclave Pian,
including the following:
0 11th Street/Pico B~vd: Re-stripe the westbound approach
to provide an exclusive right turn lane.
0 21st Street/Ocean Park Blvd: Re-s~ripe Ocean Park Blvd.
ta provide an exclusive left-turn lane in both the
eastbound and westbound directions. This would require
the removal of about nine parking spaces on the eastbound
approach and 14 spaces on the eastbound departure.
0 33rd 5treet/Pico Blvd.: Re-stripe Pica Blvd. ta provide
an exclusive left-turn lane an the westbound approach.
This would require the removal of about six parking
spaces on the westbound approach.
o Bund~ Drive~pearl Street: Re-stripe Pearl ta provide an
exclusive l~ft-turn lane on the eastbound and westbaund
approaches. This wauld require the remo~al of about five
parking spaces on the eastbound approach and two on the
eastbound departure. This wauld also require the
approval of the City af Los Angel~s.
2a
o Airport Avenue: Installation of stop signs on Walgrove
at Airport; Replacement af all way stop-controlled
intersectians along Airport with s~gnals; and
implementing and enforcing an appropriate speed limit
alang Airpart.
o The 16 other significantly impacted intersections have no
feasible mitigation measures idantified. A statement of
overriding cansiderations would have to be adopted if
this projeet is approved by the City Council.
Even after mitigation, several intersections cannot be ~u33y
mitigated. After mitigation a total of eight 5anta Monica
intersections and nine Los Angeles intersections wauld be impacted.
The following summarizes those intersectians which would continue
to be significantly impacted after mitigation, separated by thase
intersections in Santa Monica vs. intersections within the City of
Los Angeles:
City of santa Monica
o Lincoln/Pico a 18th St. Alley/Pico
o Lincoln/Ocean Park o 28th St/Ocean Park
o llth St/Pico a 34th St/Pico
0 14th St/Pico o Cloverfieid/I-10 EB Ramp
City of Los Angeles
o Lineoln/Rose o Walgrove/Rose
o Lincoln/Venice o Bundy/Ocean Park
o Bundy/National o Centine~a/Airport
o Centinela/Venice a Centine~a/Pico
o Centinela/I-~0 WB Ramps
The ETR identifies residential street segments that are
significantly impacted in the lpng term. Under future conditions
21
with the Enclave Plan, 16 residential street segments would be
impacted. The number af stree~s with beneficial impacts would be
49 segments. Those segments negatively impacted by the Enclave
Plan include the foilawing:
South of Pico: 0 2oth 5treet o 32nd Street
0 27th Street o 33rd Street
0 29th Street o 34th Street
0 30th Street
North of Ocean Park o Euclid o 28th Street
0 21st Street a 29th Street
0 22nd Street o 30th Street
0 24th Street o 34th Street
East of Lincoln: o P~er Avenue
No mitigation measures are identified far the impacted residentzal
streets.
Tzaffic Impacts with Parallel Plan
The Pa~allel plan wou~d have significan~ ad~erse impacts at in the
future at 4 intersections in the AM and 13 intersections in the PM
peak hours, but would have bene~icial impacts at 24 intersections
in the AM and 26 int~rsections in the PM peak periods.
The EIR analyzed the Plans with and without peak hour parking
restrictions, and the Parallel Plan would impact 15 residential
street segments with peak period parking restrictions, and 18
segments will be impacted without the restrictions.
22
~n order to mitigate the identified significant impacts, the EIR
proposes numerous mitigation measures for the Parallel Plan,
including the following:
o Cloverfield Blvd/ocean Park Blvd.: Re-stripe Cloverfield
Blvd. to provide a second exclusive right-turn lane on
the sauthbound approach. To facilitat~ the dual right-
turn, a minor curb cut may be needed ta increase the turn
radius. This would require the removal of about four
parking spaces an each of the west and east sides of
Claverfield Blvd.
0 33rd Street/Pico Blvd.: Same as the Enclave Plan
mitigation.
o Bundy Dri~e/Pearl Street: Same as the Enclave Plari
mitigation.
o Airport A~enue: 7mplementing and enforcing an
appropriate speed ~~mi~. along Airport. (The Parallel
Plan already includes stop signs at Airport and Walgrove
and replacement of stop signs with pedestrian signals
alang Airport Avenue.)
o The 12 other significantly impac~ed intersections have na
feasible mitigation measures identified. A statement o~
auerriding considerat~.ons would have to be adapted if
this praject is appro~ed by the City Council.
Even after mitigation, several intersections cannot be fully
mitigated. Seven intersections in Santa Monica and five
intersections in Los Angeles will remain impacted. The fallowing
summarizes those intersections which would continue t~ be
significantly impaeted after mitigation, separated by thase
intersections in Santa Monica vs, intersections within the City o~
Los Angeles:
23
City of Santa Monica
o Lincoln/Pico n
a Lincoln/Ocean Park o
0 14th~Pico 0
o Cloverfield/I-la WB Ramp
City of Los Angeles
o Lincoln~Venice o
o Centinela/Venice o
o Centinela/I-10 WB Ramps
Cloverfield/2-10 EB Ramp
28th St/Ocean Park
34th St/Pico
Bundy/National
Centinela/Pico
The EIR identifies residential str~et segments that are
significantly impacted in the long term. Under future canditians
with the Parallel Plan, 15 residential street segments would be
impacted. The numb~r of streets with bene~icial impacts would be
51 segm~nts. Those segments negatively impacted by the Parallei
P~an include the following:
South af Pica: 0 20th Street o 29th Street
a 24th Street o 30th Street
0 25th Street o 32nd Street
0 26th Street
North ~f Ocean Park fl 14th Street o 3~th Street
0 24th Street o 33rd Street
0 25th Street
East of Lincoln; o Cedar Street o Wilson Place
South of Ocean Park o 14th Street
No mitigatian measures are identified for the impactad residential
streets.
24
Traffic Impacts with Staff Plan
The Staff plan wauZd have siqnificant adv~rse impacts in the future
at i2 signa~ized intersections in the AM and ~5 intersect~ons in
the PM peak hours, but wau~d have beneficial impacts at 16
intersections in the AM and 21 intersections in the PM peak hours.
The EIR analyzed the Pians with and withaut peak hour parking
restrictions, and the Staff P~an would impact 24 residential street
segments with peak periad parking restrictions, and 28 segments
will be impacted without ~.he restrictions.
In arder to mitigate the identified significant impacts, the EIR
p~p~?OS~S numernus mitigation measures for the Staff P].an, including
the follawing:
0 14th Street/Ocean Park Blvd.: Widen ocean Park Blvd. on
the north side, west of 34th Street, by about three feet
by narrowing the sidewalk, and re-stripe ta pxavide an
exclusive le~t-turn lane in both the eastbound and
westbound dir~ctians. Th~s would require th~ remaval o~
about three parking spaces on the eastbound departure.
a 17th 5treet/Ocean Park Blvd: Re-stripe Ocean Park Blvd.
to provide an exclusive left-turn lane in both the
eastbound and westbound directions. This would require
the removal o~ about three parking spaces an the
~astbound approach anc~ six spaces on the eastbound
departure.
0 20th Street/Ocean Park Blvd: Re-stripe Ocean Park Blvd.
to provide an exclusive left-turn lane in the eastbot~nd
dir~ction. This wou~d requ~re the removaZ of about three
spaces on the westbound approach and six parking spaces
an the westbound departure.
0 21st Street/Ocean Park Blvd.: Same as the EncJ.ave Plan
mitigation.
25
0 23rd Street/Ocean Park Blvd: Re-stripe Ocean Park Blvd.
to provide an exclusive ~eft-turn lane in both the
eas~baund and westbaund directions. This would require
the removal of about five parking spaces an the westbound
appraach and one parking space on the westbound
departure.
o Cloverfield B~vd/Ocean Park Blvd: In conjunction with
the recammended improvement at 23rd Street, re-stripa
Ocean Park Slvd. to provide an exclusi~e l~ft-turn lane
in the eastbaund diraction. This would require the
removal of about one parking space on the westbound
approach and six parking spaces on the westbound
departure.
0 33rd Street/Pico Blvd: Same as Enclave Plan mitigation.
o Bundy Drive/Pearl Street: Same as Enclave Plan
mitigation.
o The 12 other significantly impacted intersections have no
feasible mitigation measures identified. A statement of
overriding considerations would have to be adopted if
this projeet is appraved by the City Cauncil.
Even after mitigation, several intersections cannot be fully
mitigated. Seven intersections in Santa Monica and six
intersections in Los Angeles will remain impacted after mitigation.
The following summarizes those intersecf.ions which wauld continue
to be significantly impacted after mitigation, separated by those
intersections in Santa Monica vs. intersec~ions within the City of
Los Angeles:
City af Santa Monica
o Lincoln/Pica o 18th St. Alley/Pica
o Lincoln/~c~an Park o 28th St/Pico
o Cloverfield/Pico 0 34th S~/Pico
o Cloverfield/I-10 EB Ramp
26
City of Los Angeles
o Wa~grove/Venice a Lincoln/Venice
o Centinela/Venice o Centinela/Fico
o Centinela/I-10 WB Ramps a Centinsla/Pearl
The EIR identifies residential str~et segm~nts that are
significantly impacted in the long term. Under future canditions
with the Staff Plan, 24 residentia~ street seqments wau~d be
impacted. The number of streets with beneficial impacts would be
45 segments. Those segments negatively impacted by the Staff Plan
include the fallowing:
South of Pico: a 14th Street o 26th Street
0 21st Street o 27th Street
0 22nd Street o 29th Street
0 24th Street o 30th Street
0 25th Street a 32nd Street
North of OcEan Park a 14th Street o 29th Street
0 22nd Str~et o 30th Street
0 25~h Street o 32nd Street
East of Lincoln: o H~11 Street o Ashiand Avenue
o Cedar Street o Wilsan Place
West of 23rd: o Pier Street o Nav~ Street
~ Marin e Street
East of 23rd: o Pier Street
No mitigation measures are identified for the impacted residential
streets.
27
See Attachment C far a summary table af these results.
Traffic Impacts with Hybrid Plan
The EIR did not analyze the impacts af the Hybrid Plan since it is
a combination of elements from aIl three plans that were put
tagether af~~r the ~IR analysis was conducted. The impacts
associated with the Hybrid Plan are most closely compared with the
analysis af the Parallel Plan in the EIR, although it is expected
there would be fewer impacts to the City of Los Angeles since there
is Iess diversion of traffic. Therefore, the mitigation measures
outlined above with the Paral~el Plan will be applicable to the
Hybrid Plan if adopted.
Alley Imnac~s
The EIR a~so discusses the impacts on alleys near proposed
barriers. In almost every insta~ce in the Enclave Plan, a barrier
is proposed on a street to block off automobile traffic where there
is an al~ey parallel to the street. It is likely that motarists
wiii use the alleys as a way to bypass the barriers, even though
alleys have Iimited capacity, narrow widths, poor raadway geometry
and poor sight distances. Therefare, the Enclave Plan could
decrease traffic on the residential streets, but inerease traftic
in the a~leys.
28
Lincoln Boulevard Peak Haur Parkinq Restrictian
It should be noted that a~l three pxoposed plans call for peak hour
parking removal on both sides of LincaZn Boulevard €rom Pica
Boulevard to th~ sauth City limit during the AM and PM peak periods
(generally 7:Oa to 9:00 AM and 4:0o to &:00 PM). This is an
important capacity impronement which would add a third travel lane
in each direction and aliow more traffic to use ~incoln Boulevard
as opposed to the r~s~dential streets. There are simi2ar
differences for beneficial impacts to residential streets in all
three plans, with the peak haur parking restriction having more
beneficial impacts on residential streets than the analysis without
peak haur parking restrict~ans.
In all three Plans, there is a tradeoff between peak hour parking
restrictions, and the effectiveness of the Plar~s in reducing
traffic on residential streets.
Addendum to EIR
One mitigation measur~ was inapprapriately identified in the EIR
for the Enclave and Staff Plans. The measure was restriping at
Cloverfield and the I-10 eastbound on-ramp to remove a significant
impact at that intersection. This m~asure is already included in
the Cloverfield Boulevard w2dening praject and therefore can not be
identified as a mitigatian measure. The staff report correctly
lists the intersection as significan~ after mitigation, and
AttachYnent D provides the Council with an addendum to the EIR which
29
reflects this issue, and should be included when the EIR as
certified.
EIR PDBLIC COMMENTS
Upon campletion of the public comment period on the Draft EIR,
forty-eight comment letters were recei~ed, incZuding 42 from
residents on Rose Avenue in the City of Los Angeles east of
Walgrove Avenue. Resid~nts on Rose Avenue were concerned abaut
increased diverted traffic onto their street. The response to
comments state that traffic decreases east of Walgrave Avenue on
Rose Avenue under all thr~e Plans ta varying degrees, from a rninor
reduction under the Staff Plan to a reduction of elase t~ a00
vehicles per hour under the Enclave and Parallel Plans. On the
ather hand, traffic increases on Rose Avenue west of Wa~grove
Avenue under the Enclave and Paralle~ Plan, especially in the PM
peak hours, by 42a vehicles per haur and 135 vehicle per hour
respectively. The Staff Plan reduces traffic by 90 vehicle per
hour in the PM peak hours on Rose Avanue west of Walgrove Avanue.
In additian to the comments ~ro~ the Rase Avenue n~ighbars, Los
Ange~es Councilwoman Ruth Galanter and Haripal Vir from the City af
Las Angeles Department of mransportatian submitted separate comment
letters stating that the plans will have negative impacts on City
of Los Angeles streets that ar~ unacceptable.
3a
Comment letters were also recei~ed from Friends af Sunset Park and
Sunset Park Associated Neighbors representatives providing detailed
comments on numerous issues in the Draft ~IR. These letters and
responses are included in the Final EIR.
LEGAL ~PINION
The Council has previously received an information item containing
a 1993 by the City Attorney's office discussing the City~s
authority to make the ~ariaus road and traffic impravements to
i~p~ement specific traffic contral measures, including physieal
diversions and barriers. This opinion primarily impacts
implementation o~ the Enclave pian with respect to the use of
barriers on 23rd Street and passibly Cloverfield Boulevard.
The opinion by the City Attorney~s office states that the City~s
authority to make road improveme~ts depends upon the purpose of the
improvements and the ~orm of the improvements. The City does have
authority under the City's constructian and maintenance power to
impl~ment speed bumps, traffic circles, and islands, as long as
~hey are not designed mereZy as barricades to prevent through
traffic onto a stre~t. The City may also r~gulat~ traffic by means
af stop signs, traffic signs prohibiting turns, and restripings.
However, the City's authority to prevent entry to or exit from a
street through th~ placement of barriers and diverters is very
limited. The City may do this only ~f the street is not regionally
31
significant, and the closure ar diversinn is authorized by a
g~neral plan amendment and an ordinance or resolution implementing
the modified general plan.
As noted ~n the opinion by the City Attorney's office, no
definitive criteria have been established regarding what
canstitu~es a"regionally significant roadway". However, in a
previous court decisian, a road in 5an Diega which carried over
5,000 vehicles per day and continued into another City was
determined to be regionally significant and continued into another
City. In Sunset Park, 23rd Street carries between 1~,800 and
21,400 vehicles per day from Pico to the southern City limit. It
is the dpinion of the City Attorney's office that a court may find
23rd Street to be regianal].y significant, precluding the City from
closing it at the Los Angeles border as originally proposed.
Additional, although less certain, the City may a~so be precluded
from implementing some of the proposals included in the "Enclave"
plan which use barriers and div~rters.
Cloverfie~d Baulevard does not continue into the City of Los
Angeles, but it connects with the I-10 freeway on- and off-ramps
and serves the same travel corridar as 23rd Street. Due to this,
Claverfield Boulevard may be considered regionally signi~icant by
a Court which cauld also preclude the City from impiementing
barriers or diverters.
3'?
It is staff's opinion that the diverter on Pearl Street in the
Enclave Plan could be implemented since Pearl Street carries ~ess
traffic than 23rd and Claverfield. While Pearl Street does
continue into the City of Los Angles, Pico and Ocean Park
Boulevards are immediately adjacent to, and ar~ much more
regionally significant, than Pearl Street. The ather streets
recommended for barriers in the "Enclave" p~an do not appear to be
regionally significant, sa barriers could be implemented if the
Circulation Element of the General Plan is amended.
Staff did provide both neighborhoad organizations an opportunity to
modify their plans based upan the opinian of the Ci.ty Attorney~s
office. In order to reduce the risk af the Plan being overturnEd
by a Court consisten~ with th~ opinion af the City Attorney~s
office, the Enclave Plan wou~d have ~o remove approximately four of
the forty to fifty measures in the Plan. However, the four
measures are a crucial. element of the Enclave Plan since they
address the traffic issue on the 23rd Street/Cloverfield Boulevard
carridor by directing traffic heading for the Santa Monica Freeway
to use Ocean Park BouZevard and Cent~nela Avenue thrQUgh the use of
barriers and pylons. Removal of these measures from the Plan would
essential~y eliminate efforts of the Plan to address traffic issues
in the 23rd Street/Cloverfield Bouleuard corridor.
Representatives af Sunset Park Associated Neighbors (SPAN) modified
the Parallel Plan to remove the praposed full and partial barriers
33
on Pearl Street at 20th Street and Centinela Avenue respectively
that were originally praposed before completion of th~ EIR. In
place of the barriers, the Parallel Plan now uses turn
restrictions. These modifications of the Parallel Plan were
analyzed in the EIR.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Currently the adopted Circulation Element identifies neighborhoods
and priorities for implementing neighborhaod pratection plans and
identifies street classifications and acceptable traffic volumes.
Sunset Park is nat identified as one of the neighborhoods targeted
for a pratection plan, however, that would not preciude the
implementatian of a protection plan for the area. In addition, the
Circulatian Elemen~ cantains the following two policies:
o "Upgrade the capacity of 23rd Street south of Ocean Park
Boulevard within the existing street width to facilitate
north-south access ta the City." (Page ~19)
o "The C~t~ shall investigate the feasibility of upgrading
the capacity by improvements to 23rd Street south of
Ocean Park Boul~vard w~thin the existing street width."
(Page 136)
Figur~ 22, on Page 118 of the LUCE alsa identifies 23rd Street
south of Ocean Park Boulevard as a roadway in need of improvements
ta facilitate access.
The State Vehicle Code autlines specific procedures a City must go
through to implement barriers and diverters. On streets that are
34
not regionally significant, a local jurisdictian may implement a
barrier ar div~rter pravided it is identified in the Circulation
Element of the G~neral Plan. Therefo~e, the Land Use and
Circulation Element (LUCE) must be modified before such traffic
control measures may be implemented.
Should ~he Council approve a plan with a barrier or diverter, or
measures which limit access to 23rd Street south of Ocean Park
Boulevard, the follawinq changes must occur to the LUCE:
o Amend Figure 22 (Page 118} of the LUCE relating to ~ajor
circulation proposals and neighborhood traffic plans.
This will require the deletian 23rd Street as an
identified street ~o "Improve to Facilitate Access".
o Amend the first bullet of Major Proposal discussion of
Loca~ Streets (Page 119) to read as follows:
"~mplement neighborhood traffic control plans to
discourage traffic in residential neighborhoods in the
Mid--City, Pico and Sunset Park areas as shawn in Figure
2 2 . ,~
o Amend Policy 4.2.2 of the LUCE (Page 134) ta incorparate
the adoption of a Suns~t Park Traffic Plan. Policy 4.2.2
wiil read as follows:
"Through vehicular traffic shall be reduced and diverted
fram residential neighborhoods by implementation of
neighborhood traffic cantrol p~ans. Adopted neighborhood
traffzc controi pZans incZude the Sunset Park Traffic
Plan as shown in Figur~ 27."
o Delete bullet on Page 119 which state the need ta upgr~de
the capacity of 23rd Street.
a Delete Policy 4.3.5 on Page 136 relat~ng to upgrading ~he
capacity of 23rd Street south of Ocean Park Boulevard.
o Incorporate a map of the adopted Sunset Park Traffic P].an
into the LUCE as Figure 27.
35
See Attachment E far the Resolution af Intention ta Direct the
Planning Commissian ta begin the process for amending the Land Use
and Circulatian Element of the General Plan.
ASHLAND PROJECT MITIGATIQN MEASURES
The prapased seniar housing project at the corner of Lincoln and
Ashland is in the pracess af being built. The project includes
mitigation measures, most of which have been implemented. Two
measures include half barriers on Hill and Ashland just east of
Lincoln Boulevard. While these m~asure ha~~ been incorporated into
the Ene~ave Plan, they wi~l be implemented when the housing project
is campleted whether or nat any ~f the traffic plans are adopted by
the Council. These measure will be included in any Land Use and
Circulation Element revision that occurs as part of this process.
BIIDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT
The EIR identifies cost estimates far the neighborhood traffic
plans, mitigation measures, and alternatives in Volume II, Appendix
G. This section summarizes the costs of implementing the
neighborhoad traffic plans and the costs associated with
implementation of the mitigatian measures identified in the EIR.
As indicated in the ETR, the C05t ~D imp~~ment th~ Enclave Plan is
approximately $3,259,792 of which $2,73~,040 is far signal
zmprovements. Hawever, the City and Caltrans are already updating
the signal systems along Lincoln, Pica and Ocean Park Bou~evards.
36
Therefore, the major signal improvement measures included in the
Enclave Plan (and the ather two Plans} are already in place and
will not require the full funding as identified in the EIR.
Therefore, the cost to implement the Enclave Plan aft~r accounting
for thase costs is $529,792. Implementation of the mitigation
measures associated with the Enclave Plan wil~ cost approximately
$378,647, of which $360,576 are for Airport Avenue Mitigatians
identified by the EIR. The total remaining costs associated with
implementation and mitigation are $908,439.
The cost to implement the Parallel Plan is approximately
$3,901,830, of which $2,730,000 is for signaZ impravements. The
cost to i~plement th~ Parallel Plan after accounting for thase
measures already funded as mentioned above is $1,171,621. The cost
of the mitxgation measures for the Parallel Plan are $5,259. (all
Airport measures except for speed limit enforcement are already
included in the Parallel Plan). The total remaining costs
associated with implementation and mitigation are $1,176,880.
The cost to impZement the Staff PZan is approximate2y $3,~55,19i,
af which $2,73D,000 is for signal improvements. The cost to
implement the Staff P1an after accounting far those measures
alread~ funded as mentzoned abflve is $425,191. The cost of the
mitigation measures for the Staff Plan ar~ $73,341 {there are no
mitigation measures required for Aixport Avenue in the EIR}. The
total remaining costs assoeiated with implementation and mitigation
37
are ~498,~32.
The approximat~ cost for the Hybrid Plan is $3,fl80,00D, of which
$2,730,000 is far signal improvements. Since it is most similar to
the Parallel Plan, the Para~lel Plan mitigation measures would be
adoptEd, which cost $5,259. The tota~ remaining costs associated
with implementation and mitigation of the Hybrid Plan, after
accounting for those measures already funded, are appraximately
$355,259.
The recommendations in this report da not require budget action at
this time. ~nce the Council has identified the plan or measures ta
be implemented, staff will return with a finaneing strategy.
Such strategy may consider advancing general fund dollars in
anticipatian of the Playa Vista mitigation funds. The Playa Vista
Phase I development agreement between the City and Maguire Thamas
Partners provides for $1,500,000 to mitigate potential traf~ic
impacts on Santa Monica generated by the first phase of the
deveZapmer~t. One--half of that sum will be paid ta the Ci~y at the
time of recordation of a constructian loan for any second subphase
of the First Phase development. The balance will be paid to the
City at the recordation of a construction l.oan for any fifth
subphase of the First Phase development.
38
Representatives with Maguire Thomas Partners state that recordatian
of a constructian loan for a second subphase will not occur until
early 1997 at best.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the C~ty Council: 1} hold a public
hearing; 2) adopt a resolution to certify the Final Environmental
impact Report (EiR) for the Plan (See Attachment F); 3)
conceptually apprave a traffic plan and mitigation measures; 4)
direct staff to prepare a Statement of Overriding Cansiderations
with recommendations ~or find~ngs and benefits of the project; and
5) adopt a resolution of intention to direct the Planning
Cammission ta amend the Land Use and Circulation Element of the
General Plan if necessary (See At~.achment E}.
Prepared By: Suzanne Frick, Director
Ron Fuchiwaki, Parking and Traffic Engineer
Paul Casey, Acting Senior Planner
Plan nir~g and Community Development Department
Pa~i ey and Planning Analysis Division
Attachments: A) Praposed Changes to the Enclave Plan
B) Detailed Summary of Hybrid Plan
C) Sumr~ary Table of Intersections and
Residential Streets Impacted
D) Addendum to EIR
E) Resaluti~n of Intention to Direct the
Planning Commissa.on ta Amend the Land Use
and Circulation Element of the General
Plan
F} Resolution to Certify the Final
Environmental Impact Report
G) F~nal Environmental Impact Repart
39
ATTACHMENT A
~'~r~.~r~s
(~F SLTN'~ET P~RK
~ .
~--~~ - - - -~
~.. -~- -- -_.a,.,...,.,.y„~ _ .~ o.~.,~. .,.,..
~-_~ _~.~ -~ -~- ---- -- :.:. ._.... -
.~ Cal~jornrrs nar. pr~sf:: wrporattdn pf 5~rrts~i F~ r~Si~ertCs
25I -~ }! st Srree-. S~rta ~dcx~t~ Colifornus ~1Q4G:~
Pr~r^~r,sr
Rtc~sard Eloo~
T'ice-P-~esidrr~:
]aae ikmpsty
.Se~e.+r~cry:
ReguIa Zieg~et
I~ea.~urar.
Ro~t $iiaiek
puirctnra:
$~tsara Browrn
3~ha ~;,._•i~
~
'ary Gro~walc
I{31~.4 ~.rics.uW ~t
fil'~d Q[dS5h1~iL
~:LTi~1C ~[3~G13
r~~on McYCie.~u
!~ ~~r Pdrlxs
~tuss Sbd~er
Septemher ~,1~&f
Suz~ne ~ic~ VIA FAX 8r. tT.S. M~IL
Directar af LL''~'~~
City ~f Santa ~lionica
1~ ~Ain S~I~t
~a.nta ~o~uca, CA ~1447-224Q
~e• CONSENSU~ h~OD~FICATIONS TO SUYSET P.~
1V'E~GHBORH04D TRAF`FIC PROTECTIOh~ Pi~AN
Dear ~'[a. Fnck;
The Board of Direct,ors of 1~F.IE~4DS' OF ~£~=~~r~S~'~' FARK haa app.rvved I~
modif~cation. ta th~ FRI~NDS 4F SU1I~SET P:~I~ ne~.ghborh~ood t~.~'c
protect~.Q~ p~an.
As yau knopv, ~ha incl~on of thEre ch~~+gQs is ~ refle~,ion af cx~m~,~ats
aad susgestYOns that ~i~~*-+tnated in a senea nf t~ree meetings held ~t
fi,he request oi the Cit~ C~uncil (upon Gauncilmez3al3er Ro~enste~'~
motioa) in ~arly I994. ~unng these meet~ngs n~ast of the ~`RIENDS
compronuse was prdpas~d, ba~t was never t`arma~Iy adopta~ 1 The
meetings were ad~ourned when SFA.'~r represen#~ati~es re~used to
c~~cuss any prapo~a~. t.~at did not elimin~te alI physicai ~barriersb,2
Th~ FRIEli~~S QF S~.'1VSET PARK pian has aiwavs reprasenr.ed t.h~-
views af the ~rea~ mA,~ontq af ~unset Par~ xes4c€ents. Thja fact is
reflect~d in aver si~ years af p~t~tione, rnee~ings and gen~r~l ~npst fro~n
a commt?~;ty whic~ h.ag consiaten~iy ~rouec~ its .~u~pot of ovr plan
Ne~erthe~ess, the ~'RIE?VDS $aard o#' Dir~ctors ~;oted ~o include the
~ Twa s~~n•ficant caod~f:e~t~ons whicb are ~nsludad ~n ihs 2~tt~Ched list wAre ~noz
diseuseed ~n Lis~ maet~sp,a. I'E~e ue.
a. Increas~g the padoatnan ~chvated y~gnals an 23rd ~~teet sauth af Ocean
Pas~ Eivd t'rax~ ane to two, in Iisu of th8 "Para~iei Pl~r~." prapo~al far at~p 4:gr.s az I~1
snd P~ar, anc3;
b Reducir~ ,-he barrier as Pesr~ a,ad Cer~tinela fram "!~u~l' to "~art,~tl".
2 It ahauld ~e natQd Lhat af e~cteen fuly be~rs~ors, t~~s r~,ns~ed plsn cumgIetei1
el~rr~natea t,s~. Of the re~,a,nu~ dev:cn~, tava are redncet~ ia ~a~sa~ loarrie~a, ieanug
oniy four $u11 bamers (pcaan Paric ~ 25th, 22r~d 8~ ?~st an~ I3ewey & 23r~
~~tL1111 L~,7
~F SUNSET PARK
~
~x.~.,....~..._.,,„.__,....,.._.._.~_.~.~ ..._........ .. . . . . - - - --- -.-~ - ~------... - =_= ~---...._.~-
.,- - - .. _ . . _ ... . .. -._. -
--- - - -~~---_ . _.._._.. . -
~~
5eptember 7, ~.99~
modifications enclosed because th~y reflect aa even greater c~vn~ensus of
vaevas wit~wut sacr~fia~ap the ~te~sty of t~he plaa.
VPe requegt ~hat ths City Gouncil be ~pprised af the S{~~~et Parh
"Cc~nsensus Plan" and the r~~ans under~ying it, p~r~terably hy inc~~sion
of this lett,er in the St,a~f l~eport.
~ Ve truly yQUrs,
i
I
; RICHARD Bi,0414~
~ Preside~t, ~'R.~NDS QF SUNSET P.~RE~
Home: 310 ~a2 ~391
Of~ce: 3~d 479 4~41
F aa: 314 473~7Q6
R,HB(mac
~:_.._.,..
I:~ ~. :: ' ..
... . . ..
. ' . ,'
: • • ..
~~~;~}
ALL CHANCf~ A r~~ ~O .~'~rn~g aF S~INSET F.A.BSPLAN
A. South~ve8# S~~n~et P`a:'h fT.~r~~ .~7th, OCean PSrk • aouth Cfty
1. Additianal partial barner on P~er, East of Lincol~.. after
alley,
2 Addition of peek hour Ieft tur~ restriction fro~a
westbaunc~ Marine ta eouthbound Lincoln. (Comment: SPAN praposed
pea~k hour rrght #urn frorn 1VB Lincodn tr~ eastbvunc~ ~~rzne cannot be
amplemerated becatuse access t8 rt~g~tbarnOOCi busines8~. ruould be severely
har~tpered.l
3. Add No Left 'Turx~, peak hour, frara eastbound :~farine to
north~ound 11th;
~. Add I-1a R,igh~ Turn, ~ae~k hour, fm~ v~vest6o~utd ~ar~ne
ta na~thbaund ~ 1 ~,h;
5. ~~dditiona! sgeed humps on ?Vlar~ne as a~prnved by
neighbors; andlor,
6. Addit~onal 4-wa~p stop ~tt Glena &•.12srtne snd/or
Fred~rick/Steiner ~ i4~arine; andfor
"_ Tr~!~~ circle at 17t~/Robson
B. ~Fo~iiwt~t ~l~ee~ ~,t'~ ~ ~ttr~,raju -1~ ~ - O~a p8~1[)
3 Add 4 way stog at Pearl and lOth
C. Soufih~ceatrat S~anset Par3~ (25th -17f.E~ ~eta; 4aesu Park •~ou~
~r li*.,~t)
S. Elim~nate barriers and replace wrth F~AK HOUR ~ux~n
restrictians a~ all East-West Street$ (e~ccept Dewey - full banrierr
]4. Median &or~ Navy tn Marine
11. Pedestrian ac#~vated signals and tr?~~ circle~ at Hill ~
Pier
D Nort~o~e~a~ai 3nn~et Park (~th - 2~h ~ta, F~ -~u Ps~ric)
12. Par~ial barrier at Pearl & 20th, allowin~ E1Vestbound
Pear1 ~ra~ic t~ turn Nar~h or ~outhbound Qn 2Q~h on1y. ~
13. Na trc~cks on 2~th Street,
E. Southes~t Sune~t Park (Oceaa Park • Pier; 23~rd Street - Sbth
~Jlaeet}
14. ~peed heamp~ on O~k, Hi].1, A~h~A~~ & Pier as appmved
by rzei~hbors,
15. Stap signs at SB Clover at ~ier, ~TB Claver at A~h~~,~nd,
EB Pier at ~lover.
lfi. Crassw~iks at 2~th & O~k, HlA d~ A~hland.
Y7. iSc~ool cros~~~+~ szgns &°~arge" speed limit si~s.
G. Na~st ~ia~etPa~ (20~h - C~nti.nela, P'iaa - Oaean Paark)
18. Partial barrier at FearI & Centir_ela, barri~r ta ~lIo~
Eastbound Pearl t~ No~'th or Soui~hbawad Centinela only.
~,9. No tr+Yrk~ vn 33~d & 3~th Sts'eet.
TQTAL r~ ~t~
ATTACHMENT B
RECOA•~TENDED HYBRID PLAN
For City Council h~eeting, September 27, 199~
Sunset Park Traffic Plan
Staff has analyzed the three plans studied in the EIR, aIong w~th recommended changes to the
Enclave Plar~, and has identified comrr~on areas of traffic control measures which are identical
~n ail three plans or very similar TY~ese ele~nents are recommended for adopt~on. Staff has alsa
recommended some impro~ements ta comdars where agreement was not reacherl, or has
recommended no c~ianges to exist~ng conditfons
Staff feels that this xs a reasonable plan which adaresses the key comdors withvut imposing
ma~or changes to the eirculat~on syst~m both jnside and autside the neighborhood. It also will
not require an amendment to the Land Use and Circulat~on Element of the General Plan,
mimmize impacts to the City of Las Ar-geles, improve artena~ capacity thereby reduc~ng traffic
on resident~al streets, and allow irnplementat~on to praceed in a more timely manner.
The following is a prehmmary summaay of changes of the recommended Hybrid Plari to the
Council for the September 27, 1994 Council meetin~:
o Peak peTTOd parlang restnct~ans on Lincoln Boulevard from Pico Boule~ard to
south Cltv iimits to a~d a t~ird traffic lane in each direction
o Signal Synchranzzat~on and timing changes an alI arterials in the pro~ect area to
impro~e arter~al traific flow and minimize ~reen t~me on m~nor cross sueets.
o Left turn pockets at signalized intersections on Ocean Park Bou~evard at 17th,
20th, 2~st, 23rd and Cloverfie~d to improve arterial flaw. Signal timing for
minor sxgnalized crass streets will be ad~ usted to minim~ze green tame.
1
o Stop signs at the fallawing intersect~ans•
o IOth StreeE/Grar~t* 0 17th StreeVPine
o lOth S~re~t/Pear]* a 23rd Street/Ashland
o lOth Stree~/P~ne* 0 23rd StreedDewey
o Euclid/Grant~` 0 23rd Street/Airport
o Euelid}P~ne* a 25th Stxeet/A~hlar-~i
a 14th Street/Grant o 31st Street/Pear~
0 14th Street/Cedar o 34th Street/Pearl
0 16th Street/Hill o Manne/Paula*
a 16th Street/Manne o 2Cth Street/Pearl
0 1$th Street1Hi11 0 1$th Street/Dewey
* Already in Piace
o Speed humps on the follow~mg street segments.
o A~anne Street/Rabson Ave/Dewey Street from Glen Ave. to 23rd
Street
0 16th Street fram Pica to Ocean Park
0 23rd Street from Pico to Ocean Park
o Claverfield from Pico to Ocean Park
0 28th Street from Pico to Ocea~ Park
0 34th Street from Pica to Pearl
o Traffic Circles at the followxng intersect~ons:
0 16th Street/Pearl
0 31st Street/PearI
0 33rd Str~et/Pearl
o Peak hour turn restnct~ons on 23rd Street at ail ~ntersections south of dcean Park
Boule~ard
o~ Peak hour turn restrict~ons an Lincoln Boulevard northbound to eastbound Owne,
Manne, and Pier.
o Implementat~an of Linco~n/Ashland prfl~ect mitigatian measures near campletior~
of pro~ect, incIuding partia,l bamers on Ashl~r-d and Hill east of Lincoln.
2
o Twa left turn lanes w~th arrows for eastbauncE Ocean Park to northbo~nd
Centinela
o Southbound right turn only from Centinela to Ocear~ Park {existing)
o Rig~t turn aniy lane from eastbaund Pico to Centinela
o No nght turn an red on 2StE~ Street at Ocearf Park
o Stnprng of left turn pockets on Ce~tinela at Pearl to pro~ide two frea-flow for the
north/south lanes
o Le~ft turn pocket Fnto Clover Park on Ocean Park Boulevard westbound
o R~ght t~rn Iane on westbound P~co at 20th Street ta 10 Freew~ay vvest.
Areas where na change is recommended, although the Enclave and Parallel Plans re.commend
changes, include Pear1/20th, Pearl/Cent~ne~a (t~eyond sign~l modificat~ons ta increase green t~me
for north/south traffic on Centinela and the restriping an Cent~nela), and 16~h Street near Santa
Momca Col~ege.
Staff feels that changes to Pearll20th will force College bound traffic to other already heavily
travelled streets, and that the extsting access to the College should remain
No changes are recommended at Pearl/Centineia because ~taff feels signal t~ming changes and
the addition of stop signs on Pear~ will remove some cut-through traffic without irnpact~ng the
locat residents.
No changes are recvmmended on lbth Street near the Callege due to the closure af Parlcing
Strueture B from the 7anuary 17th, 1994 earthquake. The ~ssue can be re~is~ted after the future
of the paxking structure is dec~ded.
A preliminary cost estimate of the hybnd plan w~lI be prov~ded in the sta€f report
3
ATTACHMENT C
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS COMPARISON
YEAR 2402 CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS PLUS PROJECT
WTTH PEAK PERIOD PARKL~iG REST'RICTIONS
Under Year 2Qd2 cumulative base condd~ans, 26 and 37 intersechons are
operatusg at LOS E or F deiring t~e AM ana PM pe~: hour, respechve2y Encla~e
AM PM Parallel
AN! PM Staff
AM PM
~f of locations w~th heneficia~ impacts, delay ar V/C decreases 17 20 24 26 16 21
~! af locat~ons w~th signyfica~t {adverse) impacts, delay or VIC increases 10 17 4 I3 12 15
RESIDENTIAL STREET SEGII~'IF~'VT Il1~ZPACT ANALYSLS CdiVIPARISON
YEAR 2002 CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS PLUS PROJECT
WITH PEAK PERIOD PARKING RESTRICTI4NS
Enclave Parallel Staff
# of se~ments with benefic~al ~mpacts, t e, ADT decrease 49 51 45
~ of segments with slgnrf~cant {ad~~erse} ~mpacts, 1 e, ADT utcrease 16 15 24
ATTACHMENT D
PCD:PPA:SF PC
f: l sharelccmfol spaddend
Segtember 27, 1994 Santa Monica, Ca.~ifornta
INFORI~~ATION ITEM
T~: Mayor and Ctty Council
FROM: City Staff
SUBJECT: Addendum to Sunset Park Neighborhood Traf~c Plan Environmental Impact
Report
INTRODUCTION
In the F~nal Sunset Park Neighborhood Traffic Plan En~ironmental Impact Report, one
mitigation measure was inappropnately identified for the Enclave and Staff Plans. The measure
was restriping at Cloverfield and the I-10 eastbaund on-ramp to remove a significant impact at
that intersection. Th~s measure is already included in the Cloverfield Boulevard widening
pro~ect and therefore can not be identified as a mit~gat~an measure. The attached pages remove
that mit~gation measure and state that no feasible mit~gataons measures are ident~fied. The
~n~ersection is there€ore listed as an una~~oidable sigmficant ~mpact. The staff report correctly
lists t~e intersect~on as remain~ng sigmficant after mitigation. The attached pages, which correct
this matter in the Final EIR, should be included tf the Council certifies the EIR.
Prepared By: Suzanne Fnck, D~rector
Paul Casey, Acting Senior Planner
P~anning and Community Development Department
Policy and Plann~ng Analysis Di~ision
Attachment A• Corrected Pages to Final EIR
1
~ In general, the Staff Plan would adversely ~mpact more intersections than the other
twa plans smce, with the Staff Plan, most of the motorists that are either farced ar
mduced to shift wauld ha~e more alternati~e diversion routes because there would be
fewer traffic restricuons areawide The Enc~ave Plan i~vauld impact more intersections
than the ParalleI P1an smce the former is expected ta divert more traffic from the
residenual streets to the arterials
• Under year 2002 cumulative conditions, the Enclave Plan would sigmficantly impact
16 residential street segments The Parallel Plan and Staff Plan would significantly
impact 15 and 24 street segments, respectively. Without peak period parking
restrictions, the Enciave Plan wouid sign~ficantly impact 19 resldentxal street
segments, while the Paralle~ Plan and Staff Plan would sigmficantly unpact 18 and 28
residential street segments, respectively
• Without peak period park~ng restrictions on Lincoln Boulevard ( all three Plans) and
Pico boulevard (Parallel Plan only}, rnore residential sEreet segments would be
impacted
• Wrth the Enclave Plan and recommended mrtigation measures, 17 intersections would
continue to be si~nificantl~T impacted under year 2402 cumulative conditrons The
Parallel and Staff Plans would cantinue to sxgzuficantly Xmpact 12 and 13 intersections
even after implementation of the praposed impro~ernents
~ Using the CMA methodoiogy and the LADOT sigmficance criter~a, under year 2002
cumulative conditions, the Enclave Plan would sigmficantly imgact 13 of the 16
interseetions in the City of Los Angeles The Parallel Plan and Staff Plan would
significantly irnpact 7 and 5 intersect~ons, respecti~ely. WF~hout peak period parkmg
restrictions, the Enclave Plan would si~nificantly impact 7 of the 16 intersectians
~~hile the Parallel Plan and Staff Plan would significantly unpact 5 and 2 intersection~s,
respectively
Air
• In general, implementation of any one of the Plan Alternati~es in the absence of peak
period parkmg rests-~ctions would result in unpacts which are similar to the no-pro~ect
candrtion.
• Implementat~on of the Plan Alternatives, with no parking restrictions ha~e the
potential to create a CO "Hat Spot" standard vialations at five mtersections under the
parallel and staff plans and two under the Enclave Plan
• Under future conditions (2002) each alternative with improvernents and no peak hour
parking restrict~ons would potentially create CO "hat spots" at the intersections of
CloverfieldlMichigan and Claverfield/I-10 WB Ramp.
2-4
9~sa-c,~sv-~zzb~-sL~NS~rsEC ~z3
Tahle I-1
S'U,~thlARY OF F.~[~IRONMEIVTA,[. ADE'IsNS~' lA~FAt"T.S ANI1 ~f~TI(:.~1 TIt)1V MF.A.SUN1rS
L.e~ c1 uf Si~n~firance
lrawpatt MiNgation Mcusures W~Ifi M~tigation
9 L~:-coln f3oulev~erd & Veni~c ~inulevard (PM peak
hour onlY)
l0 I 1 t~ Strcet Rc Peco Brn~levard (AM peak hour
unly)
12 14th 5treet ~k P~co i~oulevard {PM pr,~k hvur
onlY)
17 I Sth 5lrect AilnylSanta Mnnic~~ C;oilege ~nt;'ance
~$ pico F3oulevartl(PM prak ho~.p° only)
20 21 st Sireek & ncean ['uk BouE~van~ (PM peak
hour onty)
23 W~lgiove Avrnue ~ fzose Avenuc (PM peak hour
~~Y)
27 Cloverfield Botrlevard and 1-10 ~B Orrramp {pM
pcak h~ur onlv}
3 i 28lh ~~reet dc Oce~n Park Rouierarci (boW peak
1-aurs)
35 33rd Street ~Rt P~co Roulerard {{'M peNt hnur
anFy}
36 34ch Stner ~ Pico Boulcvard (both pcak lx7urs)
~7 Centinela Arcnue .~ E-14 R+f3 Rnnr-pg (both pet~k
haus)
38 Gentmela Arenue & Piio i3aulo~vard (both pcak
hcxus}
~33 ~~mciy nrive ~ Pear1 Street (PM peak hour onfY?
44 ~undy F)rive ~c Uceas~ P~rk Boulevard {PM pe~1c
hour only)
45 H~3y prive & Nltional got~levard (AM peak
hc-ur only}
~16 Ccnt'sncia Avonuo dc A~rporE Avcmic (AM pesk
hcxa cxilY)
48 Cex~ti~ela Avenue & Venict Baalevazd {both pealc
hot~s)
35 ~.~~lreetii~L~~~~~LZl~~C3~'~,TS~ - RC-5tT11?C
Ficn 8o~d~:varci to E~rnv~cie ~n excEusive Ic~3-
turn lanc on lhe westEiu~urcl appruaLl~ fk~is
wczuld reyuire tlsc re~novnl of :~hout six
parking s~aces ~rn the wetirthound rtP~rrinch
43. ~L~v~ a,~i~~~~~~'t ~ R.c-stripe
Fcart Strcet to prc~vidc ~n exclugive lef~-
turn iane on the ef~sttx~untj .tnc~ we4~tbound
8~)~11'OIIGIlCS This wauld rec~uire the removal
of ai~out ~ve ~srk~ng spaccs on thc eastbo~~d
a~yproach a~~c~ twv or the eas#baund
depanure
M Ai all oth~r intersecEions, nc~ k'eas~ble mtitiga-
t~on mea.sures werc: ic4c,•antifiecl.
~ • ~ninr ~ ~re r~~ rwt+ ro
~-8
_.._~ _ FlJe
Rc~u~d Srprrrebrr l94f
r~s~r~ ~--t
SU~Ni1~lARY U1~' E~'Yy7RU.tVMFNTAI. ADV~`RSE 111~~t'ACT.~ AND MI77(:.~ T1'()N Mf:ASURGS
i,evel ni S~~n~~rancc
lmpact Mitig~fion Measures J.`----- ~_._. Weth Mili~atian ----,~
Staff Flan
4_1-3
t he Stat~~ P1an w~th or withauE peak period i 3.
parking r~stiiciians v~c~utd ~ign~fiica~~tly ~in~YCt
2 t atid 26 intersections :r~clud~ng
w~h.Y~.~ I~.I3s~~{ris~~i~za~
3
5
9
13
!6
17
l9.
zo
22
24
z~
74
30
Lmcoln Boul~vard dc Pico }3ou~vard (PM pca~,
hour unly}
L~s~coin ~1vu~cv~rd & (]ce~n !'ark ~o~dcvt~rd
(bMl~ peak hours)
I rnc,oln Buuk;varxi & Marizie Avcnue (~'M pealc
hn~ os~lY)
14th Street & Ck;can Paric Boulevard (both ~eak
t~ot~s)
17th Strecl 8c (kean ~rk Bnulevar~d (~'M ~eak
ho~rr nnly)
I Sth 54reet Alley/5~nta Monica Cotkge Entrance
dt Pico ~aultvard (FM pc~k h~ur onFy)
20th 3tred & Ocean Paeic Boulev~ (ba1li peafc
hours)
21s1 Street & Ocean Paxk I3uulers~d (both peak
~lailfg~
~3rd Streei ~ Ucean !'ark BoUkvard (AM peAk
hvut vnlY)
WElgrova Aveaue 81c Vanice Baulevard (PM
p~~ ~o~ ~~y~
Clova~tcld L3oulcv~rd 8c I-!4 GD On-ramp (PM
peak hoi~ onlyl
Cluva'field Boulevt~rd ~ ~icv Boulevard (both
pesk hoius)
Clover#ielcl ~oulrvard & O~ean Park Boulevard
{A1~f pesek hvu~ vnly)
L!~lL~ct ana oc~LP~~.~~y~r~ - S~~nificant
Widcn Occan Park ~uulevard u~ tlie rmat~t
side, wcst af 14th Street, ~ry at~ous lhree
feet by ~~arrowing the stdew~lk, at3d re-Stri~e
to provide aiaa cxc~-~sive ~etZ-turn ~ane ~n ~ic+tli
the ea,stt~c~t~r~c1 and westbound direciauns
"T~~115 WpU~CI :1~40 fL`C~UliB ~1~ a'~E1130VELI O~~~Ut
Ehree ~arking s~accs nn the engthnund
dcparturc
16. ~ Zk~~.t[~i~n~ Q~~ti1 +r~s~~o~Y~'~ - Rc-
stripe Oeean Park C3c~ulev~rd to prca~ide an
cxclusivc lef3-twnx la.nc is~ kx?lh the e~tit~aund
an~! westbound dicecttons_ ~'hi~ woald
requ~rc tt~c rcmovat af abs~ui ttxree parkin~
spaces nn the eastbound approach and six
~kiz~~ sp~ces viz die ea.5tbawid dc~~~xi.u~e
19. 2,~lh~l~c~t and Ucessn P:ir~s~.u1~~C~ - Re»
slripe Occ.i+n Park ~3oulev~trd to ~rovide an
e~ccl~sive !cft-turn lane in the e~sttx}u~d
direction. Th~s woulc~ requirc thc ranoval
ok about three spaces on t~-c w~stbaund
approach and six parkinb s~aces on thc
wcsthow~d departw^e
?.-1 {l
-- - ~~--_~_ _,..--- -- -- ~:-i~
IQ~vrwd SrpM+nhrr 140~
i ve fen rao~ ~n rer, ur
Ta61e z-r
SUMM~RY UF CNVIRONMENTAL ADVF_RSF IMPAC'lS~ND MITIGATIQN MEASURES
I,evel o~ Signiticance
~~~~F~~~~ Mitigation Mcayurch With Mit~gat~ot~
32 28th Street Rc P,co i3oulevard (AM pe~k I~our 20 21 st Stre;et znd Ucean Park [3oulevard - San~c
only) as L;iiclave Pl~uz
35 33r~ Slreet & I'ico Boulevard (t'M pt~ak IZOUr
3G only)
;i4th Street & P~co Boalevard (PM peak hour 22 23rd Strcct a~d Ocean Park Fioulcvard -
only) Ro-str~pe Ocean Aark l3oulevarc3 Lo provide
37 Cent~nela Avetiue &!-l0 WB Ramps (botli pezlc ~n exclt~sive lcft-turn l~nc in both thc
huurs} eastbouncl azid westbound direct~ons 'I'h~s
38 Ccntinc:la Avenue & I'ico f3uulcv~rd (AM pet~k
wc~uld require thc rcinoval of about five
4a hour o»ly}
Centincla Avenuc & I'carl Strecl (AM pcak hour park~n~; spaces on the westbound approach
onfy) and one parking space o~i thc westbound
4:3 Bundy f.)nve &c Pearl Strect {I'M pe~k hnur only) deparlure.
4$ Centinela Avenue 8c Veuice 13oulevard (YM peak
hi~ur anly) 3U Cloverfield I3oulevard and Uc~an Park
I3oulcvard - In conjunct~on witli tlie
recoii~mended jmprovemcnt ~t 23rd Street,
re-stripe Ocean Park Rnulevard to providc
an exclusrve left-turn larae ~n the eastbound
d~rr~ct~on. Th~s would rec~~ire tlte rcmoval
of about one ~arking space on tl~e westhound
approacf~ ancf six parking Spaccs on tiie
wcstbound departurc
35 d Strccl anc~ Pico 13ot~levard - Sam~ as
~nclave I'l~n
43 13und, Urive and Pcarl Strcet - Same as
~nclavc Plan
, 2-11
~Yk
D-~l-9~J
Encla~e Plan
4.1-1
3 Lincoln Boule~ard & Pico Boulevard - No feas~ble mitigat~on measures appear to be
aearlable at this locat~on
5 Lincoln Boulevard & Ocean Park Boule~ard - No feasible mirigatzon measures appear
to be availabie at this location
8. L~ncoln Boulevard & Rose A~~enue - No f~asible m~tigatzon measures appear to be
available at this location
9 Lulcoln Boulevard & Venice Boulevard - No feasible mitlgation measures appear to be
available at this location
10 l.lth Street & Pico Boulevard - Re-stripe the westbound approach to pro~+ide an
exclusive right-turn lane.
12. 14th Street & Pxco Boulevard - No feasible mrtigation measures appear to be ava~lable
at this locatian
17 lSth Street AlleylSanta Monica Colle~e Entrance & Pica Boule~ard - No feasible
mitigations measures appear to be available at this ~ocation
20 21st Street &~cean Park Boulevard - Re-stripe Ocean Park Boulevard to prov~de an
exclusive left-turn lane in both the eastbound and westbound directions. This
improvement would require the removal of about nine parking spaces on the eastbound
approach and l4 parking spaces on the eastbound departure
23. Walsrave Avenue & Rase Avenue - No feasible mitigation measures appear to be
a~ailable at this locat~on
27. Clo~erfield Boulevard & I-10 EB On-ramp - No feasibie m~tigat~on measures appear ~o
be a~ailable at this location
33 28th Street & Ocean Park Boulevard - No feasible m~tigation rneasures appear to be
avai~able at this location
35 33rd Street & Pica Boulevard - Re-stripe Pico Boulevard to provide an exclusive left-
turn ~ane on the westbound approach This wauld require the remo~al of about six
parking spaces on the westbound approach.
3b 34th Street & Pico Boulevard - No feasible mitigation measures appear to be available
at this location.
4 1-60
4781-~r'IrN-12?63-5Ll:~5ET 4 Q
16 17#h Street & Ocean Park Boule~ard - Re-stripe Ocean Park Boulevard to provide an
exclusive left-turn Iane in both the eastbound and westbound directions. This wauld
requ~re the removal of about three parking spaces on the eastbound approach and six
parkmg spaces on the eastbound departure
17 1$th Stree~ AlleylSanta Monica College Entrance & Pico Boulevard - No feasible
mitigation measures appear to be available at thls location
19 20th Street & Ocean Park Boulevard - Re-stnpe Ocean Park Boulevard to provide an
exclusive left-turn lane in the eastbound direcnon This would require the removaI of
about three spaces on the westbound approac~ and six parking space5 on the westbound
departure
20 21st Street & Ocean Park Boule~ard - Same as Enclave Plan
~2. 23rd Street & Ocean Park Baulevard - Re-stripe Ocean Park Boulevard to provide an
exclus~ve Ieft-turn lane m both the eastbaund and westbound d~rectlons TIus would
requ~re the removal of about five parking spaces on the westbound approach and one
parkmg space on the westbound departure
24. Walgrove Avenue & Vemce Boulevard - No feasible m~tigation measures appear to be
ava~labte at this location
27 Cloverfield Boulevard & I-10 EB On-ramp - No feasible mitigation measures appear to
be available at th~s location.
29 Claverf'ield Boulevard & P~co BouIevard - No feasible mitigation measuz'es appear to be
available at this location.
30 Claverfield Boule~ard & Ocean Park Boulevard - In con~unction with the recommended
unprovement at 23xd Street, re-stripe Ocean Park Baulevard to provide an exclusive
left- t~rn lane in the eastbound direcuon This would require the removal of about one
parkmg space on tne westbound approach and six parking spaces on the westbound
departure
35 33rd Street & Pxco Boule~arci - Same as Enclave Plan.
36 34th Streei & Pyco Boule~ard - No feasible mitigatian measures appear to be available
at th~s location.
37 Cenhnela Avenue & 1-10 WB Ramps - No feasibie m~tigation measures appear to be
a~ailable a~ this iocation
38 Centinela Avenue & Pico Boule~ard - No feasible mitigat~on measures appear to be
available at this locatian.
4 1-63
9781-V~IV-122b3-$GNSET 4 ~
Staff Plan
Same as 4 1-5 & 4 1-6 of the Enclave Plan
Effectiveness of PhysicaI Mitigation Measures
Th~ potentlal "lnducxng" impacts of the proposed mitigatian measures were cons~dered In
general, the pro~ected level of congestion would be relatively umform within this area; i e,
the pro~ected levels of service after unp~ementatian of the vnprovements represent a stabilized
traffFC condrtion Therefore, little or no traffic «rould shift due to the propased mitigation
measures thraughout the study area as mast of the recommended i~nprovements have Ioca~lzed
effects
For each of the alternative plans, intersection levels of ser~~ce were calculated with
implementatian of the physical improvements descr~bed belot~ The effectiveness of the
proposed physical mitigatron measures to reduce or eliminate potenual unpacts to each af the
48 intersections is summarized 1n Table 4 1-32 through 4 1-34. The results of this analysis
indicate that, even ~i~itl~ the implementation of the proposed impro~ements, impacts at
se~eral intersections cannat be fully ~nitigated. The follow~ng summarizes those
mtersections whach would continue to be significantly impacted e~en after the implementation
of the proposed improvements, and aiso those ~ntersections where no feasible unprovements
are a~ailable {except with extensive right-of-way acquxsrt~on}
Enclave Plan
3 Lincoln Boulevard & Piea Boulevard {PM peak hour only)
5. Lmcoln Bou~evard & Ocean Park Boulevard {AM peak hour only)
8 Lmcoln Boulevard & Rose Avenue (both peak hours)
9 Lincoln Boulevard & Vemce Boule~ard(PM peak hours oniy)
14. l lth Street & Pico Boulevard (AM peak hour only)
12. 14th Street & Pico Boulevard (PM peak hour only)
17. 18th Street Alley/Santa M~ruca Callege Entrance & P~co Boule~ard (PM
peak hour only}
23 Walgrove Avenue & Rose Avenue (PM ~eak hour only)
27 Cloverfield Boulevard and I-10 ES On-ramp {PM peak hour only}
33. 28th Street & ~cean Park Baulevard (PM peak hour only}
36 34th Street & Pico Boulevard (both peak hours)
37. Cenunela Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps (both peak ho~rs)
38 Cent~nela Avenue & Pico Boulevard (~ot~ peak hours)
44. Bundy Drive & 4cean Park Boulevard (PM peak hours anly)
45 Bundy Dri~e & National Boule~ard (AM peak hour only)
46. Centinela Avenue & Airport Avenue (AM peak hours only}
48 Centine~a Avenue & Vemce Boulevard {both geak hours)
4 1-65
9781-~'hiV-12263-5UNS~T 4 0
Parallel P1an
3. Lmcoln Boulevard & Fico Boulevard (PM peak hour only~
5 Lincoln Boulevard & Qcean Park Bo~le~ard (PM peak hour only)
9. Lincoln Boulevard & Vemce Boule~ard {PM peak haur only}
I2. 14th Street & Pico BouIevard (PM peak hour only}
26 Cloverfield Boule~~ard & I-10 WB Off-ramp {AM peak hour only}
27. Claverfield Boulevard & I-10 EB On-ramp {both peak hours)
33 28th Street & Ocean Park Boulevard (PM peak hour only}
36. 34th Street & P~ca Boulevard {both peak hours)
37 Cent~nela Avenue & I-10 WB Ramp (PM geak hours only}
38 Centinela Avenue & Pico Baulevard (AM peak hour only)
45. Bundy Drive & Natianal Boulevard (PM peak hour oniy)
4$ Cenunela Avenue & Vemce A~enue {PM peak haur Qnly}
Staff Plan
3 Lincoln Boulevard & Pica Boulevard (PM peak hour only}
5. Lmcoln Boulevard & Ocean Park Boulevard (PM peak hour only)
9 Lincoln Boule~axd & Venice Boulevard (PM peak hour only)
17. 18th Street Allev/Santa Momca Coilege Entrance & Pico Bouievard (PM
peak hour only)
24. Walgrove A~enue & Venice Boulevard (PVI peak haur anly)
27. Cloverfield Boulevard and I-10 EB pn-ramp (PM peak hour only}
29 Cloverfield Boulevard & Pico Boulevard (both peak hours)
32 2$th Sueet & Pico Bauie~ard (AM peak hour only)
36 34th Street & Pico Bou~evard (PM peak hour only}
37 Centinela A~+enue & I-10 WB Ramps (both pear hours)
38 Centmela Avenue & P1co Boulevard (AM peak hour on~y}
40 Centinela Avenue & Pearl Street (AM peak hour only)
48 Cent~nela Avenue & Vemce Boulevard (PM peak hour only)
B~lo~~ is a summation of ~ntersectrons wY~ch would continue to be significantly impacted even
after implementation of the propased improvements, anc~ also those xntersections where na
feaslble nnprovements are a~ailable
Enclave Plan
3. Lincaln Boulevard & Pica Boule~ard (PM peak hour only)
5 Lincoln Boulevard & acean Park Baule~ard (AM peak hour only)
8. Lmcoln Boulevard & Rose Avenue {both p~ak hours)
9 Lincain Boulevard & Venice Baulevard{PM peak hours only}
14 11tI~ Street & Pico Boulevard (AM peak hour only)
12 14th Street & Pico Boulevard {PM peak hour oz~ly}
17 18th Street Alley/Santa Manica College Entrance & Pico Baulevard {PM
peak haur only)
23. Walgrove Avenue & Rase Avenue {PM peak haur only)
4 1-66
9781 ~`MV-12263-5[S\5ET 4 0
27 Clo~erfield Boulevard and I-1Q EB On-ramp (PM peak haur only)
33 28th Street & 4cean Park Bouievard (PM peak hour only)
36 34th Street & Pico Boulevard (both peak hours}
37 Centinela Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps (both peak haurs)
3$ Centinela Avenue & Pico Boulevard (bath peak hours)
44 Bundy Dri~e & Qcean Park Boulevard (PM peak hours only}
45 Bundy Driee & National Boule~ard (AM peak hour only)
46 CentineIa Avenue & Auport A~enue {AM peak hours oniy}
48 Centinela A~renue & Ven~ce Boulevard (both peak hours)
Parallel Plan
3 Lincoln Boulevard & Pico Boulevard (PM peak hour only)
5 Lincoln Boulevard & Ocean Park Boulevard (PM peak hour only)
9 Linco~n Boulevard & Venice Boule~ard {PM peak hour only}
12. 14th Street & P~ca Boulevard {PM peak hour on~y}
26 Clo~erfield Boulevard & I-10 WB Off-ramp (AM peak hour oniy)
27 Cloverfield Boulevard & I-10 EB On-ramp (both peak hours)
33 28th Street & Ocean Park Boulevard (PM geak hour only)
36 34th Street & Pico Boulevard {both peak hours)
37 Centmela Avenue & I-10 WB Ramp (PM peak hours only)
38 Cenunela Avenue & Pico Boulevard (AM peak hour only)
45 Bundy Drive & Natianal Boulevard {PM peak hour only)
48 Cenunela Avenue & Vemce A~enue (PM peak hour only)
Staff Plan
3. Lincoln Boule~ard & Pico Boulevard (PM peak hour only}
5. Lmcoln Boulevard & Ocean Park Baulevard {PM peak hour oniy}
9. Lmcoln Boulevard & Vemce BouIevard (PM peak haur only)
17 18th Street Alley/Santa Monica College Entrance & Pico Boulevard (PM
peak hour only)
24 Walgrove Avenue & Venice Boulevard {PM peak hour only)
27 Clo~erfield Boulevard & I-10 EB an-ramp (AM peak hour only)
29 Cloverfield Boulet~ard & Pico Boulevard {both peak hours)
32 28th Street & Pico Boulevard (AM peak hour only)
36 34th Street & Pico Boulevard (PM peak hour only}
37 Centinela Avenue & I-10 WB Ramps (both pear hours)
38 Centmela Avenue & Pico Boulevard (AM peak haur only}
40 Centmela Avenue & Pearl 5treet {AM peak hour only)
48 Centmela Avenue & Venice Boulevard {PM peak hour only)
4.1-67
9781-Vh1V-12263-5U15ET 4 0
TABLE 4 1-16
INTERSECTION LOS - Y~AR 2002 - ENCLAVE PLAN
W~TH/WITNOUT PARKING RESTRICTIONS
Year 2002 Base With Peak Penad Parkmg Restnctians Without Peak Penod Parkmg Restnc~ons
Peak Delay V!C Deiay VIC
Intersaction Hour Delay (Z ~ VIC LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Change Impact (2] Delay VlC LOS Change Chan~e Impact
1 Lincoln Bl & 4lympic 81 AM 33 3 1 020 22 7 0 926 C -10 6 -0 094 25 5 0 964 D -7 S -0 056
PM " 1 228 F ' 1 207 F NA -0 022 + " 1 207 F NA -0 022 +
2 Lincoln BI & I-10 EB On-ramp AM 14 6 0 805 8 14 8 4 824 B 0 0 4 019 14 2 0 799 -0 4 -0 008
PM 12 7 0 815 B 11 5 0 840 B -1 2 0 025 11 3 0 823 B -1 4 0 0~8
3 Lincoln BI 8 Pico BI AM " 1 18B F 52 4 1 059 E NA -0 107 ~ ' 1 189 NA 0 023 -
PM " 1 389 F ' 1 506 F NA 4 146 - " 1 G21 F NA 0 061 -
4 Lincoln BI & Pearl St AM 7 7 0 924 B 2 8 0 847 A -4 9 -0 077 5 3 0 9o9 8 -2 4 -0 015
PM 4 7 0 838 A 3 D 0 82D A -1 7 -0 018
~ 4 8 0 868 A 0 1 0 030
5 Lincoln BI & Ocean Park SI AM " 1 386 F ' 1 486 F NA 4 10D - " 1 407 NA 0 02i -
PM ' 1 473 F " 1 539 F NA 0 O88 - ' 1 473 F NA 0 000
6 Lincoln BI & Ashland A~ AM 2 9 0$52 A 0 7 0 737 A -2 2 -0 115 1 S 0 820 A -1 1 -0 032
.
.
.
. PM 3 7
.
.
.
, 0 870 A 0 5 0 802 A -3 2
,
... -0 OBS
- 0 8 0 891 A -2 9 0 021
7 .
_.
.._.
---
--•-
Lincoln BI & Manne Av AM ...
.~
.
-.
--- -...
i~225 F 23 2 1 020 ....--
C .
.
---
NA --
-D 2~5 + " 1 257 F NA 0 D32 -
PM ' 1 315 F ' 1 190 F NA -0 125 + " 1 314 F NA
~ -0 001
'
8 Lincoln 81 & Rose Av AM ~ 1 357 F " 1 395 NA 0 038 - ` 1 341 F NA -a
~16 +
{City vf Los Angelr.sj PM " 1 730 F ' 1 770 F NA D 040 - " 1 699 F NA
~ -0 031
~ +
9 Lincoln BI & Venice BI AM " 1 352 F ' 1 215 F NA -0 137 + ' S 237 F NA -0 1
15 +
(City of Las Anqeles) PM ` 1 598 F ` 1 873 F NA D 075 - ` 1 623 F HA 0 025 -
10 11[h 5[ & Pico 81 AM 21 3 0 872 G 3$ 3 1 027 ~ 17 0 0 155 - 23 7 0 882 C 2 4 0 010
PM 17 5 0 843 C 15 9 0 843 C -1 B 0 000 13 7 0 784 B -3 8 -0 059
11 11th St & Ocean Park BI AM ' 1 254 F '~ 1 095^ F NA -0 159 + ' i 24B F NA -0 038 +
PM " 1 438 F ` 1 380 F NA -4 059 + " 1 076 F NA -0 3B3 +
12 14th St & PiCO BI AM 18 1 D 612 C 14 8~ 0 742 B -3 3 -0 070 14 6 0 733 B -3 5 -0 079
PM 24 4 0 868 C 58 8 1 123 E 38 4 0 2S5 - 29 6
~~ ~
~ 0 995 D 9 2 0 127
13 14kh ~St & Ocean Park BI AM 43 5 0 9B8 E 37 3 0 956 ~ -6 2 -0 012 + 34
0 0 936 D -9 5 -0 032 +
~ PM ' 1 149 F 54 5 1 014 E
~
~ NA -0 135 + ' S 1B1 F NA 0 012 -
14 16th St & Pico
Bl AM 10 4 0 719 B 9 2 0 697 B -0 S -0 022 8 4 0 661 B -1 8 -0 058
PM 6 3 0 611 B 2 1 0 523 A -4 2 -0 D88 2 2 0 506 A -4 1 -0 105
15 17tt~ St & Pico BI AM b 8 0 fi52 B 5 8 0 621 9 -fl 9 -0 031 5 5 0 6t2 B -1 3 -0 040
PM 8 0 0 689 B S 1 0 832 B 2 1 0 143 5 7
~ 0 738 B -0 3 0 049
18 ~ 17kh St 8 Ocean Park BI AM 26 7 0 910 D 2o B 0 865 C -fi 1 -0 045 ~~ 21
8 0 871 C -4 8 -0 039
PM " 1 109 F • 1 061 F NA -D 048 + " 1 057 F NA -0 052 +
17 18th ~Sf Al leylS M Coll Entrance AM ~ 7 2 0 867 C 18 5 0 981 C~ ~ 2 3 0 O f 4 17 6 0 970 C 0 3 0 003
K Pico 81 ~M 51 1 1 150 E ' 1 227 F NA 0 077 - " 1 194 F NA 0 044 -
18 201h St 8 Pico BI AM " 1 122 F 50 9 1 102 E EVA -4 020 ~~ ~+ ~ 32 8 1 O18 NA -0 104 +
PM ` 1 177 F ' 1 158 F NA -0 019 + • 1 218 F NA 0 041 -
19 20ih St & Ocean Park BI AM " ~~~~ ~~ i~157 F 53 7 1 i 33 E NA -0 024 + 54 1 1 132 E NA ~ 025 +
PM ' i 22S F " 1 199 F NA -0 027 + ' 1 213 F NA -4 Ol3 +
20 21 st St & Ocean Park 81 AM ' 1 294 F ' 1 24i F NA -0 053 ~+ ' 1 246 F hA -0 048 +
PM ' 1 195 F ' 1 412 F NA 0 217 - ' 1 3fi7 F NA 0 172 -
21 23rd St & Pico BI AM 12 8 0 832 B 10 7 0 829 B -2 1 -0 003 S 8 0 827 -3 0 -0 005
PM 26 9 1 025 D 13 3 0 913 B -15 8 -0 112 + 13 7 0 81S B -15 2 -0 107 +
22 23rd St & Ocean Park BI AM ' 2 133 F ' 1 485 F NA -0 648 + ' 1 51U F NA -0 fi23 +
PM ' 2 422 F ' 1 819 F NA -0 603 t ' 1 844 F NA -0 578 +
23 Walgrove Av 8 Rose Av AM ' 1 793 F ' 1 719 F NA ~-0 074 + ' 1 687 F IVA -0 12fi +
(Gity ol Loa Anqelesf PM " 2 197 F " 2 240 F NA 0 043 - " 2 155 F NA -4 042 +
24 Walgrcwe Av & Vun~co I AM ` 1 441 F " 1 385 A -0 05B + 1 357 NA -0 084 +
(City of Los Angelfls) PM ' 1 710 F ' 1 B51 F NA -0 058 + • 1 S63 F NA -0 047 +
Noles
i1 ~ A~erage vehrcular delay m aeconda per vehicle ' Oversaturated conditione, average delay cannot be calculaled
~2~ "+" ind~cates beneficial ~mpact, "-" indicales signrficant adverse impact
7"ABLE 4_1-16 COIVTINUED
INTERSECT10N LOS - YEAR 2002 - ENCLAVE PLAN
W~TMlWITHOU7 F'ARKING RESTRICTIONS
Year 2002 Baae Wdh Poak Penod Park~ng Reslnctions Wuhcwt Peak Period Parking RestrFCtions
Peak Delay YIC Delay VIC
fntersuction Hour Delay ~ f] V1G LOS DQlay V!C LOS Change Change Impact ~2~ Delay V1C LOS Change Change Impact
25 Clo~erfield BI & Mich~gan Av AM 1 8s3 F ` 1 820 F NA -0 043 + ' 1 797 F NA -0 088 +
PM ` 1 304 F ' 1 207 F NA -0 097 + * 1 173 F NA -0 431 +
28 Clover i~ld~! & E-10 WB Off-ramp AM " 2 056 F ` 2 027 F NA -0 029 + ` 2 021 F NA -0 035 +
PM " 2 121 F • 2 062 F NA -0 059 + ' 2 00~ F NA -0 120 +
2i Clovnrheld BI & l-10 ES On-ramp AM 14 9 0 925 B 15 6 U 912 0 7 -0 013 13 2 0 857 B -1 7 --Q U68
~ PM " 1764 F ' 1897 F NA 0133 - * 1888 F NA 0104 -
28 Cloverfield
BI $ Virgirna Av AM ' 1 388 F 38 6 0 969 D NA -0 398 + 26 4 0 880 D NA -0 488 +
PM " 1 244 F 31 5 0 925 D NA -0 319 + 27 6 0 895 D NA -0 349 +
29 Clovcrfiold BI & Pico Bl AM " 1 460 F ` 1 198 F NA -0 282 + 51 S 1 119 E NA -0 341 +
PM ' 1 435 F ' 1 31 t F NA -0 124 + ' 1 287 F NA -0 148 +
30 Cloverfield BI 8 Ocesn Park Bl AAA ` 1 214 F NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
PM ' 1268 F NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
31 2SIh 5t 8 Ocean Park BI AM 1 3 U 575 A 2 2 0 712 A 0 3 0 137 2 2 U 713 A 0 3 "~~D 138
PM
~ ~I 9 0 fi98 A 8 7 0 770 8 3 S 0 072 8 S 0 781 B 3 9 0 083
32 28ih St 8~ Pico BI AM 2~ B 0 949 G 24 1 0 959 G -0 5 0 040 ~ 29 5 0 998 D 4 9 0 a49~~
PM ` 1 124 F
~ 48 2 1 086 E NA -0 038 + 35 7 t 023 D NA -D 101 +
33 281h St & Ocean Park 8E AM 40 5 1 026 E 55 3 1 198 E 14 8 0 OSD - 53 ~3 1 101 E 12 8 0 075 -
PM 45 9 1 022
~ T E
~ " 1 545 F NA 0 523 - ' 1 541 F NA 0 519 -
34 31 sl St 8 Ocean Park BI AM 14 3 0 895 B 14 3 0 903 8 ~~ 0 a 0 008 15 5 0 918 C 1 2 0 023
PM ' 1 342 F " 1 274 F NA -D 068 + ' 1 257 ~ NA -0 085 +
35 33~d St ,4 P~cn el TAM ~~12 ~6 0 89Q B 17 2 0 983 C 4 6 0 073 14 7 0 941 B 2 1 0 051
PM 51 3
~~ 1 122 E ' 1 184 F NA 0 082 - * 1 168 F NA 0 046 -
36 34ih St & PICO BI AM 40 6 1 091 E 48 1 1 132 E 7 5 0 041 - 40 2 1 47D ~ -0 4 -0 Q21 +
~ PM ' 1 58~ F " 1 B57 F NA 0 077 - ' 1 535 ~ NA 0 055 -
37 CenUnela
Av 8~1-10 WB Ramps AM ' ~~~~ ~ 1 509 F " 1 5S8 F NA 0 059 - " 1~54D F NA 0 431 -
(Citv of Las Anqelesf PM ` 1 521 F " 1 585
' F
~~
~~ NA
~W~'~ 0 044 - " i 820 F NA 0 099 -
38 Cenhnela Av & Pico Bl AM 39 8 1 043 D 52 4 1 09o E 12 8 p o47 - 41 i 1 051 1 3 0 008 -
(Cdy ot Los Angeles} PM ` 1 444 F ' 1 449 F NA 0 009 - " i 413 F NA -D 027 +
39 Centineld Av 8 I-1D EB On-ramp AM 11 0 0 820 B 13 B 0 882~ ~~ ~ 6 ~~ 2 B 0 062 12 2 0 844 B 1 2 0 024
(City of Los Angalos~
___...-- PM 10 9 0 860 B 10 3 0 883 $ -0 6 0 023 9 4 0 858 B -1 5 -0 D02
40 ---
Centinela Av ~ Pk?3fI St
AM ~.
' ._...
1~~0$S
F
12 0
0 824
B
NA
-0 264
+
10 8
0 778
B
NA
-0 312
+
(Cdy ol Los Angolos~
-......,. , PM ' 1 364 F 19 5 0 903 C NA -0 481 + 17 4 D 8S7 C NA -0 497 +
41
Centinela Av 8~ Occ3n Pa~,c ai
nM
16 B
0 834
C
14 5
0 772
B
-2 1
-0 062
13 9
0 763
B
-2 7
-0 071 _
{Cily o~ L~s An~eleFf
~
~~ PM ' 1 192 F 58 0 1 092
~
~ E NA -0 100 + 45 9 1 071 E NA -0 121 +
42 Bundy
o
& 1-10 EB dn-ramp AM 11 7 0 940 B 14 6 B74
O B 2 8 0 034 13 9 0 976 B 2 2 0 03B
(Cityof Los Angeles) PM 1v 1 0 907 B 11 8 0 946 B 1 7 0 039 13 5 0 975 B 34 0 068
43 Bundy Dr & Pearl St AM 21 0 0 938 C 19 4 0 930 C -1 B -0 OOfi 17 0 0 887 C -4 0 -0 039
(Cily ol Los Angefas) PM `
~ 1 382
~ F " 1 533 F NA 0 171 - " 1 5~13 F NA 0 181 -
44 Bundy ar & Oceran Park BI AM ' 1~374 F ' 1 330 F NA -0 044 + ' 1~ 387 F NA 0 013 -
(Cdy ol Los An~eles) PM ' 1 fi94 F * 1 71 S F NA 0 024 - ' 1 672 F NA -0 022 +
45 Bundy ~ationa! BI AM " 1 343 F ' 1 374 F NA 0 031 - ' 1 316 F NA -4 027 +
(City of Los Angeles) PM ' 1 294 F " 1 255 F NA -0 438 + ' 1 323 F NA 0 029 -
46 Genlmela & Aarpvrt Av AM ' 1 254 * 1 28B F NA 0 032 - ' 1 262 F NA 4 DOS -
{City of Los Angeles) PM ' 1 458 F * 1 460 F NA 0 002 " 1 417 F NA -0 OA1 t
47 Centinela Av &~iuse Av AM 15 B 0 997 C 17 9 1 008 C 2 3 0 011 13 7 D 8~9 6 -1 8 -0 Ol8
{City of Los Angeles) PM ' 1 239 F ` 1 234 F NA -0 005 + ' 1 202 F NA -0 037 +
48 CenUnela Av & Venica I AM ' 1 477 F " 1 487 F NA D 010 - ' 1 442 NA -4 035 +
{City of Los Angeles) PM ' 1 608 F * 1 654 F NA p 048 - ' 1 639 F NA 0 033 -
Notas
[1) Average vehicular delay in aeconds pe~ vehicle " Oversaturated conditions, averago delay cannot be calculated
[2] "+" indicates bon@haal impact "-" indicales significant adverae impact
TABLE 4 1-17
IlVTER5ECT10N LOS - YEAR 20Q2 - PARALLEL PLAN
WITHNVfTHOUT PARKING RE$TRIC'FIQNS
Year 2002 Base With Peak Penod Parking Re~ncncxis Withnut Peak Penod Parkmg Reslnctione
Peak Detay V/C Dalay VEC
Interaection iiour D~lay [i] V!C LOS Delay VAC L05 Change Ghange Impact (2~ beley V!C LOS Change Change Empact
1 Lincnln BI $Olympic BI AM 33 3 1 020 D 23 3 6 S37 -i0 U -0 083 25 Q 0 958 C -8 3 -0 062
PM ' 1 229 F ` 1 203 F NA -0 D28 + " 1 191 F NA -~0 038 t
2 Lincoln BI $ I-10 EB On-ramp AM 14 6 4 805 B 14 0 0 805 B -0 8 0 000 13 9 0 789 8 -0 7 -0 0~6
PM t27 0815 B i13 0836 B -14 0021 111 0816 B -1$ 0001
3 Lincoln BI & Pico 8i AM ` 1 166 F 54 1 1 056 E NA -0 110 + " 1 182 F NA 0 018 -
PM * 1 360 F " 1 543 F NA 0 183 - ' 1 402 F NA 0 042 -
4 Linculn BI & Pearl St AM 7 7 0 924 B 2 9 0 839 A 4 8 -0 085 4 8 0 892 A -2 9 -0 032
PM ~ 7 D 838 A 2 8 0 806 A -1 8 -D 030 4 3 0 849 A -0 4 0 011
5 Lincnln BI & Ocean Park BI AM * i 3a6 F " 1 303 F NA -0 D83 + ' 1 325 F NA -0 061 +
PM ' 1 473 F j " 1 697 F NA 0 224 - " 1 658 F NA U 185 -
s Lincoln BI & Ashland Av AM 2 9 0 852 A 1 1 0 7fi7 A -1 8 -~ 085 4 7 0 913 A 1 8 0 961
PM 3 7 0 874 A
~ I 1 2 0 815 A -2 5 -0 055 3 5 0 899 A -0 2 0 029
7 Linculn BI & Manne Av AM ' 1 225 F ' 1 138 F NA -0 089 + " 1 473 F NA 0 248 -
PM " 1 315 F " 1 265 F NA -0 050 + ` 1 470 F NA 0 155 -
8 L~ncoln B! & Rose Av AM ' 1 357 ' 1 361 F NA 0 004 " 1 3B2 F NA 0 005 -
(City of Los AngelesJ PM ' 1 730 F ' 1 719 F NA -0 011 + " 1 730 F NA 0 000
9 Linculn BI & Yernce BI AM " 1 352 F ' 1 218 F NA -0 134 + ' 1 248 F NA -0 106 +
(Clty O( LOS Al1S~P,IP.6? PM ' 1 598 F * 1 620 F NA 0 022 - ' 1 620 F NA 0 022 -
10 11 tli Sl & Pico 81 AM 21 3 0 872 G 21 2 0 866 C -0 1 0 Ol4 25 4 0 948 D 4 1 0 074
PM 17 5 0 843 C 17 1 0 863 G -0 4 0 oaa 13 9 0 758 B -3 6 -0 085
11 1 1 th St 8 Ocean Park BI AM ' 1 254 ~ F 19 2 0 808 C NA -0 4~18 + 46 2 1 017 E NA -0 237 +
PM " 1 439
~~ F
~ 28 7 0 944 ~ NA -0 495 + 47 5 1 024 E NA -0 415 +
12 14th St 8 Picn BI AM 1$ 1 0 812 C 15 7 0 780 C -2 4 -0 032 15 6 0 783 G -2 5 -0 029
PNi 20 4 0 8fi8 C 44 8 1 Ofi5 E 24 2
~
J 0 197 - 31 2 1 004 D 10 8 0 136
13 14th St 8 Ocoan Park BE ANE 43 5 0 988 E 10 9 0 680 B~ -32 6 0 288 + 11 4 0 691 B -32 1 -0 277 +
PM ' 1 149 F 19 4 0 855 C NA -0 294 + 20 S 0 856 C NA -0 293 +
14 18th 5f~ & f'icu 61 ANi 10 0 0 719 B 7 5 0~685 ~ ~ B -2 5 ~-0~U34 ~~ 7 1 0 614 B -2 9 -0 105
PM B 3 0 611 B 1 9 0 578 A -4 4 -0 U33 2 1 0 505 A -4 2 -0 106
15 17tF~ St $ Pico BI ANk 6 8 0 652 B 5 5 0 684 B -1 3 0 012 5 2 0 607 B -1 6 -0 045
~ ~ PM fi0 Ofi89 B 7D OB07 B 10 0116 54 0705 B -06 0016
16 17th St a Ocean ark ~I AM 26 7 0 910 D A 0 0 599 A -22 7 -0 311 + 5 7 0 627 B -21 0 -0 283 +
PM ' 1 109 F 7 5 0 615 B NA -0 494 + 7 9 0 635 B NA -0 474 +
17 16th 5t Alleyl5 M Cull Enlrance AM 17 2 0 967 C 28 3 1 651 D 11 1 0 084 15 2 0 945 C -2 0 -0 022
& Pico 81 PNi 51 1 1 150 E 4 0 0 725 A -47 1 -0 A25 + 3 5 0 652 A ,47 6 -0 498 +
18 20th Si $ Picn BI AM ` 1 122 F 43 1 1 078 NA -0 044 + 27 2 0 993 D NA -0 129 +
PM " 1 177 F " 1 151 F NA -0 028 + ' 1 17q F NA -0 003
19 20th Sl & Ocean ark BI ANi " 1 157 F 11 8 0 840 B NA -0 317 + 13 1 0 858 8 NA -0 289 +
PM " 1 226 F 13 4 0 841 B NA -0 385 + 14 1 0 8fi1 B NA -0 365 +
20 21 st SL & Ocaari Pdrk Bf AM " 1 284 F B 5 0 792 B NA -0 502 + 8 5 0 804 8 NA -0 490 +
PM " 1 195 F B 1 0 fi90 B NA -0 505 + 7 3 0 713 8 NA -0 482 +
21 23rd St & Pico 81 AM i 2 8 D 832 B 24 7 1 U31 C 11 9 0 199 1 B 0 0 963 C 3 2 0 131
PM 28 9 1 025 ~ 7 0 0 812 B -21 9 -0 213 + B 4 0 756 B -22 5 -0 269 +
22 23rd St & Ocean Paik 61 AM ' 2 133 F ' 1 894 F NA -0 239 t " 1 919 NA -0 214 +
PM " 2 422 F ` 1 890 F NA -0 532 + " 1 927 F NA -0 495 +
23 Walgrove Av R Rose Av AM ` 1 793 F * 1 631 F NA -0 162 + " 1 648 F NA -0 145 +
(City oi Los Angeles) PhA " 2 197 F " 2 048 F NA -0 151 + ` 2 113 F NA -0 084 +
24 Walgrove Av & Vernca ! A ' 1 441 F " 1 3B0 F NA -0 481 + ' 1 355 F NA -0 088 +
(City of Lvs Angeles) PM ' 1 710 F * ~ 700 F NA -0 010 + • 1 70B F NA -0 404
Notes
[1] Average vehir.uE~r delay in seconds per vehicle " Ovareaturated condit~ons averaga delay cannot be calculated
[2J "+" indicates beneticial impacl, "-" mdir.atea significant adverse impact
TABLE 41-i 7 CONTINUED
INTERSECTIOlV L.OS - YEAR 2042 - PARALLEL PLAN
WITHlWITHOUT PARKING R~STRICTI~NS
Year 2002 Sase Wilh Poak PQnod Parkmg Restnctions Wdhoul Peak Per~od Parking Restnctions
Peak Delay VIC Delay V!C
Intersection Hour Qelay(1] V1C LOS Uelay VIG LOS Change Change Impact[2] Deslay V!C LOS Change Change Impact
25 Cloverfield BI R Michiqan Av AM " 1 863 " 1 793 F NA -0 070 + ` 1 791 F NA -0 072 +
?M ' 1 304 F " 1 i91 F NA -0113 + " 1 173 F NA -0131 t
26 C4overf~eld 81 &-10 WB Off-ramp AM " 2 O56 F " 2 101 F NA 0 045 - ' 2 107 F NA 0 051 -
PM " 2 121 F " 2 032 F NA -0 089 + ' 2 030 F NA -0 081 +
27 Clovorlield BI & I-10 EB On-ramp AM 14 9 0 925 B 20 0 0 854 G 5 1 0 028 20 8 0 96U C 5 9 0 035
PM " 1 764 F • 1 a44 F NA 0 oa0 - ` 1 859 F NA o os5 -
28 CloverField BI & Virgmia Av ANi " 1 368 ~ 31 7 0 930 D NA -0 438 + 36 5 0 9S9 D NA -0 409 +
PM ' 1 244 F 22 3 0 834 C NA -0 410 + 22 7 0 839 C NA -0 405 +
29 Cluverhe d BI Pico Bl AM ^ 1 4fi0 F 41 3 1 065 E NA ~-0 395 + 31 3 i 013 D NA -0 447 +
PM " 1 435 F " 1 35i F NA -0 064 + ` 1 299 F NA -0 136 +
30 Gioverlield B[ 8 Ocean Park BI AM ' 1 214 F 5 2 0 B01 B NA -~ 413 + 5 1 0 803 B NA -0 411 +
PM " 1 268 F " 1 357 F NA 0 089 - ` 1 373 ~ NA D 105 -
3i 25th St 8 Ocean Park BI AM 1 9 0 575 A 1 2 0 B15 A -0 7 0 040 1 2 0 612 A -0 7 0 037
PM 4 9 0 fi98 A 3 8 0 B52 A -1 1 -0 046 4 2 0 B75 A -0 7 -0 023
32 2$th St A~ PICO BI AM 24 B 0 949 C 39 3 1 052 p 14 7 4 103 25 6 0 864 D 1 0 0 015
PM ` 1 12q F 59 3 i 087 E NA -0 037 + 55 9 1 076 E NA -0 048 +
33 28th St & Ocean Par k BI AM 40 5 1 026 E 28 1 0 935 ~ -12 4 -0 091 t 29 3 0 9h8 -11 2 -0 078 +
PiN 45 9 1 022 E 47 3 1 OS6 E 1 4 0 064 - 5p 3 1 p97 E 4 4 0 075 -
34 31 st St & Ocean Park BI ArA 14 3 D 885 B 14 1 0 901 B -0 2 0 006 14 2 0 904 B -0 1 0 009
'~~ PM " 1 342 F 53 8 1 100 E NA -0 242 + 55 D 1 105 E NA -0 237 +
35 33rd St ~ Pico 81 AM 12 8 0 SSO B 17 B 0 992 C 5 0 0 102 1 1 4 0 896 B -1 2 q 006
~~ ~~~ ~ PM 51 3 1 122 E ' 1 220 F NA 0 098 - 35 8 1 081 D -15 5 -0 04t +
38 34th St 8~ PICO BI AM 40 6 1 091 E 55 2 1 128 E i 4 6 0 038 - 35 8 1 049 D -4 8 -0 042 +
PM ' 1 580
~ F ' 1 642 F I~A 0 062 - ' 1 512 F N[A -0 OBS +
37 Cemrnela Av & I-10 WS Ramps AM " 1 509~ ~F~~ " 1 467 F NA -0 042 + • 1 S19 F NA 0 010 -
(Gity vf Los Angeles) PM " 1 521 F " 1 558 F NA 0 037 - ' 1 598 F NA 0 077 -
38 Cenlinela A~ 8~ Pico BI AM 38 8 1 043 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~43 7 1 076 E 3 9 0 033 - 40~0 ~ 1 052 0 2 ~ 0 009 ~
{4ity oi Los Angeles)
~ PM " 1 A40 F " 1 28B F NA -0 154 + ' 1 221 F NA -0 219 +
38 Centinela Av & 1-10 EB
On-ramp AM 11 0 0 82o B 13 3 0 8s6 B 2 3 0 046 11 2 0 827 B 0 2 0 007
(Cdy ul Los Angelea) PM 10 9 0 880 B 11 3 0 875 B 0 4
~
y ~ 0 015 10 B 0 860 B -0 3 0 000
40 Centinela Av & Pearl St AM " 1 088 F t6 2 0 778 C ~
NA -0 309 + 18 9 0 824 C NA -0 264 +
{Gity ot Los Angelea) PM ' 1 364 F 25 3 0 940 D NA -0 424 + 33 6 1 000 D NA -0 36A +
41
Centinela Av & Ocean Pdrk BI
AM
t6 6
0 834
C
13 2
0 725
B
-3 4
-0 109
~ .. ..._
13 4 ~~...
0 736
-3 2
-0 098
{City of Los Angeles)
~
~
~~ PM " 1 192 F " 1 i 15 F NA -0 077 + " 1 12D F NA -0 U72 +
42 8undy Dr & I-10 EB On
-ram
{i AM 11 7 0 940 B 13 2 0 969 B 1 5 0 029 10 4 0 932 6 -1 3 -0 008
(City oi Las Anqeles) PM 10 1 0 907 B 12 5 0 961 8 2 4 0 054 13 4 0 973 B 3 3 0 O6B
43 undy r& Pearl 5t AM 21 6 0 936 C 19 6 0 92fi C -1 4 -0 010 18 1 0 916 C -2 9 -0 020
{City oi Los Angele~:) PM " 1 362 F ' 1 494 F NA 0 122 - ' 1 497 F NA 0 135 -
44 Bundy br & Ocean Park Bi AM " 1 374 F ` 1 365 ~~~~NA -0 009 + ` 1 364 F !~!A -0 010 +
{Cityoi Los Angeles) PM • 1 694 F ' 1 670 F NA -0 024 + " 1 684 F NA -0 010 +
45 Bundy Dr 8~ National BI AM " 1 343 F " 1 325 F NA -0 018 + " 1 319 F NA -0 024 +
{Gity oi Los Angeles) PM ` 1 294 F ' 1 360 F NA 0 066 - " 1 321 F 1~lA 0 027 -
46 Cantinela 8 A~rAvrt Av AM ' 1 254 F " 1 249 NA -0 005 + " 1 260 F NA 0 U0B -
(City o1 Los Angeles) PM ' 1 458 F ' 1 39i F NA -0 067 + " 1 4U7 F NA -0 051 +
47 Centinela Av & ose Av AM 15 B 0 997 C 14 0 0 982 8 -1 6 -0 015 14 Q 0 981 B -1 6 -0 pi8
(Cdy oi Los Angalas) PM ' 1 239 F ` 1 187 F NA -0 052 + ' 1 191 F NA -0 048 +
48 CenCine a v enica 81 AM ` 1 477 F " 1 306 F NA -0 171 + ` 1 428 F NA -0 051 t
{G~ty oT Lvs Anqeles) PM * 1 606 F " 1 622 F NA 0 016 - ' 1 847 F NA 0 041 -
Notes
[i ~ AvPrAfle vehir,ular dclay in seconds per vehicle " dvarsdturated condrtions average delay cannot be calcuieted
[2E "+" indicdles beneficiel ~mpact, "-" indicates significant adverse ~mpact
rAB~E a_t-ya
INTERSECTION ~OS - YFJ1R 20Q2 - STAFF PI...AN
WITHlWITHOUT PARKING RESTRICT'IQfuS
Year 2002 Basse With Peak Penud Parking F~:sincucxis Vif~thout Peak Penad Parkmg Restncnona
Peak Delay V!C Delay V/C
Intarsection Ffour Delay ~1~ V1C !OS Uelay VIC LOS Change Change Impact [2~ Delay V1C LOS Changa Change Impact
1 Lincoln BI I~ Olympic 81 AM 33 3 1 020 D 28 7 0 990 ~ -4 5 -R 030 29 1 0 B95 p -4 2 -0 025
PM ' 1 229 F ' 1 231 F NA 0 002 ` 1 208 F NA -0 023 +
2 Lincoln BI & I-10 E8 On-ramp A 14 6 0 805 8 14 9 0 832 8 0 3 0 02 15 0 0 816 0 4 0 01 t
PM 12 7 o a15 B 11 s o aa4 B -0 8 0 029 12 1 0 803 B -0 8 -o 012
3 Lincoln BI S~ Pico I AM ' 1 168 F ' 1 084 F NA -0 OB2 + " 1 220 F NA 0 U54 -
PM ' 1 360 F ' 1 584 F NA 0 224 - ' 1 491 F NA 0 131 -
4 Lincoln BI ~ Pearl St AM 7 7 0 924 4 1 0 895 A -3 6 -0 029 6 4 0 928 B -1 3 0 005
PM 4 7 0 838 A 3 5 0$4$ A --1 2 0 010 6 4 0 895 B 1 7 0 057
5 Lmcoln BI & Ocean Park BI AM " 1 386 F ' 1 455 F IVA 0 089 - ' 1 424 NA 0 034 -
PM `
~ 1 A~3 F " 1 838 F NA 01fi5 - ' 1 785 F NA 0292 -
B Lincnln BI 8 Asl~land Av AM 2 9
~~ ~ 0 852 A 2 2 0 s39 A -0 7 -0 013 7 9 0 956 8 5 0 0 104
PM 3 7 0 870 A 1 7 0 852 A -2 0 -0 018 8 3 0 945 B 2 B 0 07b
7 Lmcoln BI & Marine Av AM ' 1 225 ' 1 155 F NA -0 074 + ` 1 522 F NA 0 297 -
PM " 1 315 F ' 1 214 F NA -0 101 + " 1 407 F NA 0 092 -
8 Lincoln BI & Rose Av AM ' 1 357 F ' 1 347 F NA -0 010 + ' 1 329 -0 Q28 +
(City of Lus Anc~eles) PM " 1 730 F ' 1 698 F NA -0 032 + ' i 727 F NA -0 003
9 Linculn BI 8 Venice BI AM ' 1 352 F ' 1 223 F NA -0 129 + " 1 212 F NA -0 140 +
(City of Los Angelea) PM " 1 b98 F " 1 621 F NA 0 023 - * 1 500 F NA 0 U02
10 11 th St & Pico BI AM 21 3 0 872 C 34 1 1 000 ~ 12 8 0 128 51 2 1 480 E 29 9 0 208 --
PM 17 5 0 843 C 1B 4 0 818 C -1 1 -0 Q25 17 7 0 841 C 0 2 -0 002
11 i 1 th St 8 Ocean Park BI AM ` 1 254 " 1 157 F NA -0 087 + " 1 321 F NA 0 067 -
PM " 1 439 F ` 1 432 F NA -0 007
~ + ' 1 459 F NA
~~
T 0 020 -
12 i 4th St & Picn al AM 18 1 D 812 G 16 D 0 766 C -2 5 -0 046 1 B 4 0 780 C -1 7 -0 032
~~ PM 20 4 0 868 C 30 8 0 987 D 10 5
~ 0 119
~
~ 27 1 0 966 D 6 7
~~
~~~ N~ 0 098
~
13 14th St
& Ocean Park BI AM 43 5 0 968 E 56 3 1 029 E 12 8 ~0 06i - 52 5 1 008 9 0 0
040 -
PM ' i 149 F " 1 258 F NA 0 109
~ -
~ ' 1 374 F NA D 225 -
14 i 8lh St a~~'ico ~I AM 10 0 0 719 B 8 0 0 674 9 -2 0 -0 045 ~ 7 4 0 647 B -2 6 -0 072
~ PM B 3 0 611 B 1 4 0 537 A -4 9 -0 074 1 8 0 518
' A -4 7 -0 093
15 ~~~r, si ~4 P~co BI AM 6 S 0 652 B 5 7 0 631 B -1 1 -0 021 5 9 0 64
0 B -0 9 -0 012
PM 6 0 0 889 B B 5 0 749
~ B 0 5 0 060 6 5 D 742 8 0 b 0 053
16 17th St & Ocedn ark'~I AM 26 7 0 910 D 26 2 0
924 D -0 5 U 014 29 6 0 941 D 2 9 0 031
PM ' 1 f 09 F "
~ 1 157
~ F tJA 0 048 - "
~ 1 18i F NA 0 072 -
17 18ih St ley S M Coll ntrance AM 17 2 U 967 C ~~ 23 7 1 018 C 8 5 0 051 22 4 1 ~09 C 5 2 0 042
& Picv BI PM 51 1 1 150 E ' 1 257 F NA 0 t0y - ' 1 249 F NA 0 099 -
ya 2o~h st a, P~co 8I AM ' 1 tzz ss 2 1 060 E NA -o oe2 + 5a 7 1 os4 E NA -o 028 +
PM ` 1 1~7 F ` 1 165 F NA -0 012 +
~ ' S 263 F NA 0 O86 -
19 20th St & caari ~ark Bi AhrE ' 1 157 F " 1 282 F NA 0 i25 - " i 28t F NA 0 124 -
PhA ' 1 226 F ' 1 303 F NA 0 077 - ' t 321 F NA 0 085 -
20 27st St & Ocean Park BI AM ` t 284 F ' 1 396 F NA 0 104 - " t 4Q8 F NA Q t~4 -
PM " 1 195 F ' 1 274 F NA 0 079 - ' 1 342 F NA 0 107 -
21 23rd St & Pico BI AM 12 8 0 832 B 11 4 0 885 B -1 4 0 063 12 8 0 918 B -0 2 0 084
PM 28 9 1 025 D 16 3 D 958 C -12 B -0 067 17 0 0 966 C -1 f 9 -0 059
22 23rd St & Ocean Park 81 AM ' 2 133 F " 2 263 NA 0 130 - " 2 297 F NA 0 164 -
pM " 2 422 F ' 2 384 F NA -0 038 + ' 2 404 F I+lA -0 018 +
23 walgru~e Av $ Rose Av AM ' 1 7s3 F " 1 691 F NA -a l02 + " 1 752 F NA -0 041 +
(City of Los Angeles) PM ' 2 197 F ' 2 082 F NA -0 135 + ' 2 119 F NA -0 078 +
24 Walgrove A~ 8~ Vernce AM " 1 441 F " 1 382 F NA -0 059 + " 1 389 NA -0 052 +
{City of Los Angeles) ?M ' 1 710 F " 1 718 F NA Q 008 - ' 1 707 F NA -0 003
Motes
~1] Average vehicular delay m sPCOnds per vehicle " Overs~turaled condrtions, a~e~age delay cannot be calculated
(2j "+^ indicates beneficiaE ~mpact, "-" indicatea significant advarse impact
TABLE 4 ~ -18 CONTINUED
INlERSECTIQN LOS - YEAR 2002 - STAFF PLAN
WITNIWIT410UT PARKING R~STRICTIONS
Year 2002 Base W~th Peak Period Parking Rcstnctiona W~thout Peak PerFOd Parking Reslrictions
Peak Delay VIG Delay YlC
Intersectu,n Hour Delay ~1 J VIC LOS pelay V!C LOS Chsnge Change Impact [2j Delay VlC LOS Change Change Impacl
25 Cloverfield BI & chigan Av AM " 1 863 F " 1 807 A -0 056 + " i B17 F A -0 048 +
PM ` 1 30A F ` 1 248 F NA -0 056 + ' 1 247 F NA -0 057 +
26 Clover ield Bl & I-10 WB Off-ramp AIU ` 2 058 F ` 1 888 F NA -0 OBS + ` 1 986 NA -4 070 +
PM " 2 121 F " 2 024 F NA -0 097 + " 2 019 F NA --0 142 +
27 Cloverfield BI 8 I-10 EB On-ramp AM 14 9 U 925 B 30 7 y oys D 15 8 0 094 - 30 8 1 020 D 15 7 0 095 -
PM " 1 784 F " 1 T40 F NA -0 024 + * 1 753 F NA -~0 Oi1 +
28 Cloverfield Bl & irginia Av AM * 1 368 F ' 1 356 F A -0 012 + " 1 384 F NA 0 016 -
Pl4A ' f 24A F ' 7 221 F NA -0 023 + " 1 244 F NA 0 000
29 Cloverhold BI & Pico BI AM " 1 460 F " 1 506 F NA 0 046 - ` 4 535 F NA 0 075 -
PM " 1 435 F " 1 443 F NA 0 ODS - " 1 458 F NA 0 021 -
30 Cluverfield BI $ OCean Park Bi AM " 1 214 F * 1 253 F NA 0 039 - 1 262 F NA 4 046 -
PSJI " 1 2B8 F " 1 251 F NA -0 017 + " 1 258 F NA --0 012 +
31 251h 5t 8 Ocean Park 81 AM 1 9 0 575 A 1 2 0 588 A -0 7 0 O18 1 4 0 592 q -0 5 0 017
PM 4 9 0 B98 A 5 0 0 73& A -4 2 0 038 5 2 0 747 B 0 3 0 tl43
32 28th SI & ico BI AM 2A B 0 949 C 56 1 1 101 31 5 0 152 - 55 2 1 098 30 6 0 149 ~
PM " 1 124 F 24 5 0 948 C NA -0 f 75 + 26 8 0 969 ^ NA -0 155 +
33 28th St & Ocean Park BI AM 40 5 1 026 E ~18 0 0 924 C -22 5 -0 102 + 29 3 d 949 C -20 2 -0 077 +
PM 45 9 1 D22 E 30 4 1 019 D -15 5 -0 003 + 33 2 1 034 ~ -12 ~ 0 p12 +
34 ~ ~ 31 st 51 & Ocean Park BI AM 14 3 0 895 8 28 2~ ~ 1 018 D 13 9~ 0 123 33 B 1 045 D 19 3 0 150 -
PM ' 1 342 F ' 1 234 F NA -0 108 + ` 1 247 F NA -D 1D1 +
35 33rr1 SI & Picq BI AM 72 B U 890 B 13 7 0 917 B 1 1 0 027 14 9 0 933 B 2 3 0 043
PM 51 3 1 122 E 59 7 1 154 E 8 4 0 032 - ' 1 158 F NA 0 036 -
36 34th 5t & Picn BI AM 44 6 1 691 ~ ~ E 37 8 ~ 1 068 D -2 8 -0 025 + 35 2 i oss 'b -s a -0 035 +
PM " 1 5S0 F ' 1 606 F NA 0 028 - ' 1 620 F NA 0 OAO -
37 C~ntniela Av & I-10 WB am~s AM ` ~ 1 509 F ~' ' 1 874 F HA ~ 0 185 ~ - ` '~1 684 F NA 0 175 -
{City of Lo4 Angeles) PM ' 1 521 F `
~ 1 677 F NA 0 156 - " 1 690
~ F NA 0 169 -
38 ~ ~ Centinala Av R Pico BI AM ~ 39 8 ~ 1 043 D ~ " 1 148 F A 0 105 - ' 1 144 F NA 0 101 -
(City of Lus Angeles) PM ' 1 440 F ' 1 303 F NA -0 137 + ' t 2B8 F NA -4 152 +
39 Centinela Av & I-10 EB On-remp ~ AM 11 0 0 820 B V 13 2 0 871 B 2 2 Q 051 12 2 0 859 ~ B 1 2 0 038
{C~ty n! Los Angc~les) PM 10 9 0 S60 B 11 1 0 881 B 0 2 0 021 11 3 0 886 B 0 4 Q 028
40 Carilinela Av & Pearl SC AM '~~~ 1 OBS F '~~ 1 113 F NA 0 025 - ' 1 178 F NA 0 090 ~
(Ciry vf Lvs Angeles) PM ' 1 3Bb F ` 1 336 F NA -D 028 + ` 1 351 F NA -0 013 +
41 Cenlurafd A~ 8 Ocean Par BI AM 16 6 0 834 C 15 4 ~~0 813 C -S 2 ~-0 021 16 3 0 835 C -0 3 0 001
(City ot ~us Angeles)
' PAA ' 1 192 F ' 1 141 F NA -0 051 + ' 1 152 F NA --0 040 +
42 Bundy Dr
& I-10 E On-ramp AM ~ 11 7 0 940 B 12 4 0 961 B 0 7 0 021 11 0 0 945 8 -0 7 0 005
{C~ty nl Los Angel9s) PM 10 i
~ 0 907 8 15 4 0 993 C 5 3 0 086 14 5 0 984 8 4 4 0 077
43 undy Dr & PAarl St AM 21
D 0 936 G 18 2 0 917 G -2 8 -Q 019 18 3 0 931 C -2 7 -0 005
(City o~ Los Angelea) PM " 1 362 F " 1 476 F NA 0 114 - " ~ 4B9 F NA
~ 0 137 -
44 Bundy Dr & Qcean Park BI AM ' 1 374 F ' 1 350 F NA -0 024 + " y 384 F NA 0 010 -
(City o1 Los AnqelesJ PM " 1 694 F " 1 646 F NA -0 U48 + ` 1 670 F NA -0 024 +
45 Bundy Dr & ationa! $I AiN ' 1 343 " 1 325 NA --0 018 + ' 1 312 NA -0 031 +
(G~ty of Los Angeles) PM " 1 284 F " 1 254 F NA -0 040 + " 1 282 F NA -0 012 +
48 Centmela 8 Airporl Av AM ' 1 25A F ' 1 237 F A -0 017 + • 1 2S2 F NA -0 002
(City of Los Angelea) PM ' 1 458 F ' 1 369 F NA -0 089 + ` 1 390 F NiA -0 068 +
47 Centinela Av N~ Ruso Av AM 15 S 0 997 C 14 2 0 985 B -1 4 -0 012 14 4 0 985 B -1 2 -0 012
{Cdy of Los Angeles} PM ' 1 239 F " 1 184 F NA -0 055 + ' 1 214 F NA ~0 425 ~
48 Centinela Av & Venice BE AM ' 1 4 F ` 1 442 F NA -0 D + ' 1 433 NA -0 644 +
(Crty vf los Angeles) PM " 1 608 f " 1 628 F NA 0 022 - " 1 647 F NA 0 041 -
Notas
[1 ~ Average vohicular doiay in aecnnds per vahir,lo " Oversaturated conditione, avorage delay cannot he calcufated
~2~ "+" rndicates benoficiai impact "-" indicates siqnificant adverse impact
TABLE 4 1-32
INTERSECTION LOS - YEAF12b02 - EIVCLAVE PLAN
W[YFI P~AK P~RIOD PARKING R~STRIC710NSNVII~H IM1'ROV~MENTS
Year 2002 Base With Peak Penod Parking Reslnctions With Improvements
Peak Delay V1C Delay V!C fies~dual
Intersect~cx~ Hnur Delay~l~ V1C LOS ~elay V!C ~OS Change Change lmpact~2~ Delay VIC LOS Change Change Impact
7 Lmcvln 81 & Olympic BI AM 33 3 1 020 D 22 7 0 92B C -10 6 -0 094 [3~
PM ' 1 229 F " 1 207 F NA -0 022 + [3~
2 Lmcoln BI & I-10 EB On-ramp AM i4 6 0 805 B 14 8 0 824 B 0 0 0 019 [3~
PM 12 7 0 8i5 B 11 5 0$40 8 -1 2 0 025 [3~
3 Lrncoln BI & P~co BI AM 1 166 52 4 1 059 N -0 rt07 + 4
PM ' 1380 F " 1508 F NA 0148 - [4~
4 Lrncoln 81 8~ PearE St AM 7 7 0 924 B 2 8 0 847 A -4 9 -6 077 ~3~
PM 4 7 0 836 A 3 0 0 820 A -1 7 -Q 018 ~3~
5 Linooln BI R~ Ocean Park BI AM ` 1 386 F " 1 488 F !VA 0 1U0 - ~4~
PM ' 1 473 F ` 1 539 F f~lA 0 Ofi6 - {4~
6 Lincoln BI & Ashlai7d Av AM 2 9 0 852 A 0 7 0 737 A -2 2 ~ 115 '3~
PM 3 7 0 870 A 0 5 0 802 A -3 2 -0 088 ~3~
7 Lincoln 81 & Marine Av AM " 1 225 F 23 2 1 020 C NA -0 205 + ~3~
PM * 1315
~ F " 1 190 F NA -0125 +
~ ~3j
8 Lincoln Bi 8 Rose Av AM ' 1 357 F ' 1 395 F NA 0 D38 - ~4~
(Cdyoi Los Angeles) PM " 1 730 F ' 1 770 F NA 0 040 - ~4~
9 LincoEn 1& ~onico BI A ' 1 352 F ' i 215 F NA -0 137 + ~4~
~ (Gity o( Lns Anqelps) PM ' 1 fi98 F ' 1 673 F NA 0 Q75 - ~4~
10 11 lh 5t & Pico BI AM 21 3 0 872 C 38 3 1 027 D 17 0 0 155 - 37 9 1 027 D 7 B B 0 155 -
PM 17 5 0 843 C 15 9 0$43 C -1 8 0 000 13 3 0 809 B -4 2 -0 034
11 11ih St & Ocean Park BI AM ' 4 25A F ' 1 095 F NA -0 159 + ~3~
~ PM " 1 Q39 F " 1 380 F NA -0 059 + ~3J
12 14ih St & Pico BI AM 18 1 0 912 C 14 8 0 742 8 -3 3 -0 070 ~4~
PM 20 4 0 8fi8 C 58 8 1 123 E 88 4 0 25S - ~4~
13 14ih St $ Ocean Park ~B! AM 43 5 0 968 E 37 3 0 956 D -B 2 -0 012 + ~3~
PM ' 1 149 F 515 1014 E NA -0135 + ~3~
14 16ih St & Pico BI AM 10 0 ~ ~0 719 B 9 2 0 697 8 -0 8 -0 022 ~~ ~ ~~3
----
•
PM 8 3 0 611 B 2 1 0 523 A -4 2 -0 088 ~3~
15 171h St 1~ Pico BI AM 6 8 0 fi52 B 5 8 D 821 8 -0 9 -0 031 ~3~
PM 6 0 0 689 B S 1 0 832 9 2 1 0 143 ~3~
1B 17ih St & Ocedn Park BE AM 26 7 0 91a D 20 s U 865 ~~C~~~ -6 1 -0 045 ~3~
PM ' 1 109 F ' 1 081 F NA -0 048 + ~3~
17 i8ih St Alleyl5 M Coll Entrance A 17 2 0 9$7 C 19 5 0 981 C M ~~~ 2 3 0 074 ~4E
& Pico 81 PM 51 1 1 150 E ' 1 227 F NA 0 077 - ~4E
18 201h St $ PFCO BI AM ' 1 122 F 5D 8 1 102 E NA -0 020 + ~3~
PM " 1 177 F " 1 158 F NA -0 U19 + ~3~
t9 20th St 8 Ocean Park BI AM ' 1 157 53 7 1 133 E~ ~~ NA -0 024 + 3
PM " 1 226 F ' 1 199 F NA -0 627 + ~3~
20 21 sl St & Ocean Park BI AM " 1 294 F " 1 241 F NA -0 053 + S 0 0 BOB B NA -0 488 +
PM " 1 195 F " 1 412 F NA 0 217 - 25 1 0 973 ~ NA -0 222 +
21 23rd St 8 Pico BI AM 12 8 U 832 8 10 7 0 829 8 -2 t -0 003 ~3~
PM 28 9 1 025 D 13 1 0 813 8 -15 8 -0 112 + (3~
22 23rd St 8 Ocean Park BI AM " 2 133 F " 1 485 F NA -0 648 + {3~
PM ' 2 422 F ' 1 BiS F NA -0 603 + (3~
23 Walgrrnre A~ & Rose Av AM ' 1 793 F ' 1 718 F NA -0 074 + [4~
(City of Los Angeles) PM ' 2 197 F " 2 240 F NA 0 043 - [4~
24 Walgrove Av 8 Venice BI AM • 1 441 F ' 1 385 -0 056 t [3~
(City of Lvs AngelesJ PM ' 1 716 F ` 1 851 F NA -0 059 + ~3~
Notes
[1j Average vehicuiar delay ~n seconds per vehicle [3] No mitigation required ` OvPrsaturated conditiona, a~erage delay cannot be calculated
[2] "+^ indECales beneficia! impact, "-" rndicates significant ddverse impact [A] Nn mdi(~aUorl recommended
TABLE 4.1-32 CONTINI,JED
INTERSECTION LOS - YEAR 2002 - ENCLAVE PLAN
WITH PEAK PERIOD PARKlIVG RE$TRECTIQNS/WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Year 2002 Bsse With Peak Pennd Parking RestncUans With Improvemente
Peak Delay YIC Delay VIC Residual
Intersee:tion Hour polay ~7~ V/C LOS pelay YIC LOS Change Ghange Impact [2] ~elay V/C LOS Change Change Impact
25 Cloverfield BI & Michigan Av AM ' 1 883 F 1 820 NA -0 043 + ~3~
PM ' 1 304 F ` 1 207 F NA -0 097 + ~3~
26 Clovortieid BI & I-10 WB Off-rarnp A " 2 056 F " 2 027 F NA -0 028 + E3~
PM ' 2 121 F " 2 062 F NA -0 059 + [3~
27 Cloverfield BE & I-10 On-ramp AM 14 9 0 925 6 15 B 0 912 C D 7 -0 013 ~4~
PM ' 1784 F " 1897 F NA 0133 - [4~
28 Cloverfield 81 A Virgmia Av AM ' 1 388 F 38 6 0 969 D NA -0 399 + i3~
PM ' 1 244 F 31 5 0 925 D NA -0 319 + ~3~
28 ClovQrfield 6i A~ Pico BI AM ' 1 460 F ' 1 198 F NA -0 262 + ~8~
PM ' 1435 F ' 1311 F NA -0124 + ~3~
30 Cloverheld BI & Ocedn Park BI AM ` 1 214 ~ F NA NA NA ~VA NA NA NA NA NA
PM ` 1268 F NA kA ~!A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
31 25th St R dbean Park BI AM 1 9 0 575 A 2 2 0 712 A 0 3 0 137 ~3J
PM 4 9 0 698 A 6 7 0 77D B 3 8 0 072 (3~
32 28th Sk & Pico BI AM 24 B 0 9A9 C 24 1 0 959 C -0 5 0 ~10 E3~
PM ' 1 124 F 46 2 1 086 E NA -0 038 + ~3~
33 281h Sl coan Park 91 AM 40 5 1 026 E 55 3 1 106 E 14 8 0 080 - (4~
PM 45 9 1 022 E " 1 545 F NA 0 523 - [A~
34 31 sl SL & Ocean Park BI AM 14 3 0 885 B 14 3 0 903 B 0 0 0 008 [3~~
Pi~A " 1 342 F " 1 274 F NA -0 068 + [3~
35 33rd St 8 Pico BI AM 12 6 0 890 B 17 2 0 963 C 4 6 U 073 2 6 0 559 A -10 0 -0 331
PM 51 3 1 122 E ` 1 184 F NA 0 ~82 - 4 9 0 699 A -AB 4 -0 423 +
36 341h St 8 Pico $1 AM 40 8 i OSi E 48 1 1 132 E 7 5 0 041 - ~4~
PM " 1 580 F " 1 B57 F NA 0 077 - ~4~
~
37 Centinela Av $ I-10 WB fl~mps AM * 1 509 F " f 568 F NA 0 059 - ~4~
(City of Los Anc~eles) PM ` 1 521 F " 1 565 F NA 0 044 - ~4~
36 Centinela Av & Pico BI AM 39 a 1 0a3 D 52 4 1 o9o E 12 B 0 047 - ~4~
{CI~Y OT LOR Af1fJP.IP.$~ PM " 1 440 F " 1 A49 F NA 0 009 - ~4~
39 Cenlinela Av & I-10 E8 On-ramp AM~' 11 0 0 820 B 13 6 0 882 B 2 6 0 062 ~3~
(City of Los Angelesf PM 10 9 0 860 B 1U 3 0 683 B -0 B 0 023 ~3J
40 Centmela Av & Pearl 5t ~~~ AM " 1 088 F 12 0 0 824 B~~ ~~Y NA ~~~ ~-0~264 + ~3~
(City of Los Anqele~f PM ' 1 364 F 19 5 0 903 C NA -0 461 + ~3J
41 Centmela ~& c~ara ark BI AM 16 6 0 834 C 14 5 0 772 B~~ ~~-2 1 ~ -0 062 ~3~
---- ~--
(C~ty of Los Anqeles~ PM ' 1 192 F 56 0 1 092 E NA -0 100 + ~3~
42 Bundy Dr $ I-10 E8 Qn-ramp AM 11 7 0 940 B 14 6 0 974 B 2 9 0 fl34 ~3J
(City ol Los Angeles) PM 10 1 0 9D7 B 11 8 0 946 B 7 7 0 039 ~3J
~ 43 Bundy Dr & P~ar St AM 21 0 D 936 C 19 4 0 930 C -1 8 -0 008 11 7 6 855 B -9 3 -0 081
{Cityof Los Anqeles) PM ' 1 362 F ' 1 533 F NA 0 17i - ` 1 34p F NA -0 022 +
44 u~dy Dr $ Ocean Park BI AM ' ! 374 ~ F~~ ' t 330 F NA -0 044 + {4~
(Crty of Los Angeles) PM ' 1 694 F ` 1 718 F NA 0 024 - [4~
45 Bundy Dr & National BI AM * 1 343 F ' 1 37q F NA 0 031 - [4~
(City of Los Angelea) PM ' 1 294 F ' 1 255 F NA -0 039 + [4~
46 Cenlinela & Airpor~ Av AM " 1 254 F ' 1 288 N 0 032 - 4~
(City of Los Angeles) PM * 1 458 F ` 1 4s0 F NA 0 002 [4~
47 Cenlinela Av $ Rpae Av A I 5 6 p 997 C 17 S 1 Q08 C 2 3 0 011 (3~
{City of Los Angeles~ PM ' i 239 F ` 1 234 F NA -0 005 + [3~
48 Centinela Av & Vernce AM " 1 477 F " 1 487 F NA 0 010 - [4~
(Cdy of Los Angelesy PM ' 1 BOB F * 1 654 F NA 0 04B - Ial
Notes
~1] Average vehiculer dPlay in secands per vohicle [3~ No mdi gation reqwred " O~ersaturated c onditiona, average delay cannot be calculated
~2] "+ ^ indacates beneficial impect, "-" mdicates si~niF~cant adverse im pact [4t No mi[i gation recomm@ndod
TABLE 4 1-33
INTERSECTiON LOS - YEAR 2002 - PARALLEL PLAN
WITFi PEAK PERIOD PARKING FiESTRICTIONS/WITH IMPROVEM~NTS
Year 2002 Base Wrth Peak Ponod Parkmg Re~tnctions W~th Improvemenle
Peak Delay V/C Delay Y/C Res~dual
Intersection Hour Dvlay [1] V!C LOS bolay V!C LOS Change Chango Impact [2~ Delay V/C LOS Change Change Impac!
1 Lincoln BE & Olympic BI AM 33 3 1 020 p 23 3 0 937 C -10 0 -0 083 ~3]
PM ' 1 229 F ` 1 203 F NA ~-0 026 + (3]
2 Linco n I& I-10 EB On-remp AM 14 8 0 805 14 0 0 805 B -0 B 0 OU4 3
PM 12 7 0 815 B 11 3 0 836 B -1 4 0 021 ~3]
3 Lincoln BI & Pico BI AM " 1 166 54 1 1 056 E NA -0 110 + ~4]
PM " 1380 F * 1543 F NA 0183 - ~4]
4 Lmcoln 81 $ Pearl S~ AM 7 7 0 924 B 2 9 0 839 A -4 8 -0 085 [3~
PM 4 7 0 838 A 2 9 0 808 A -1 8 -0 030 [3~
5 Linculn I& Ocean Park BI AM " 1 386 F ' 1 303 F NA -0 083 + 4
PM " 1 473 F ' 1 697 F NA d 224 - [4f
6 Lincoln BI 8 Aahland Av M 2 9 0$52 A 1 1 D 7fi7 A -1 8 -0 QSS [3]
PM 3 7 0 8y0 A 1 2 0 8i5 A -2 5 -0 055 [3~
7 Lincoln BI 8 Marino Av AM " 1 225 F ' 1 136 F NA -0 069 + [3]
PM " 1 315 F " 1 265 F NA -0 R50 + ~3]
8 l.incoln BI $ Rose Av AM ` 1 357 F ' 1 361 F NA 0 004 ~3]
(G~ly of Los Angeles) PM " 1 730 F ' 1 719 F NA -0 011 + ~3]
9 Lincoln BI & Venice 81 AM ' 1 352 F ' 1 248 F NA -0 134 + ~4]
{City of Los Anq~ies) PM " 1 598 F ' i B20 F NA 0 022 - ~d]
10 11t1i 5[ & Picn BI AM 21 3~ 0 872 C 2i 2 0 886 C -p 1 0 014 ~3]
PM 17 5 0 B43 C 17 1 0 883 C -0 4 0 040 ~3)
11 11ih St & Ocean Park BI AM " 1 254 F 49 2 0 806 C NA -0 448 + ~3)
PM ' 1 439 F 28 7 0 9AA D NA -0 495 + ~3]
12 14th SS F, P~co Bl ~~~~~
AM
1$ 1 4$12 C
i 5 7 ~0~780 C
-2 4
-0 032
14~ _.......,,_..
PM 20 4 0 868 C A4 6 1 065 E 24 2
..
. 0 197 -
~ ~4~
13 14th St & Ocean Park BI
AM
43 5 0~968 E
10 9 0 680 B _
,
..
-32 6
-0 2S8
+ ~
~3~
PM " 1 149 F
~~ ~ 14 4 D 855 C NA
~ -0 294 + ~3~
14 161h 5t 8 Pico BI AM 10 0
0 719 B 7 5 0 685 B -2 5 -0 034 [3J
PM 6 3 D 61 1 B 1 9 0 578 A
~
~ -4 4 -0 033 ~3~
15 17th St & Pico BI AM 6 8 0 652 B 5 5
684 B
0 ~w-1 3 0 012 ~3]
PM B 0 0 689 B 7 0 0 807 B 1 0 0 118 [3]
1 B 17th St ~& Ocean Park BI AM 26 7 0 910 ~] 4 0 0 599 A -22 7 -0 31 1 + 3
PM " 1 109 F 7 5 0 615 B NA -0 494 + ~3]
17 181h St Alleyl5 M Cull Enlrance AM 17 2 0~987 C 28 3 1 051 D 11 1 0 084 3
8~ Pico BI
'~ PM 51 1 1 150 E 4 0 0 725 A
'~
~ -47 1 -0 425 + ~3]
18 20th St & Pico 81 AM " 1 122 F A3 1
D79 E
1 NA -0 044 + ~3]
PM " 1 177 F " 1 151 F NA -0 426 + ~3]
19 20th St 8 Ocean Pdrk BI AM ` 1 157 17 S 0 840 B NA -D 317 + 3]
PM ' 1 228 F 13 4 0 841 B NA -0 385 + ~3]
20 21 xt St 8 Ocean Park BI AM " 1 294 F S 5 0 792 B NA -0 502 r {31
PM • 1 195 F B 1 0 690 B NA -0 5U5 + (3~
21 23rd St & Pico 8! AM 12 8 0 832 B 24 7 1 031 C 11 9 0 189 (3~
PM 28 9 1 026 D 7 D 0 812 B -21 9 -0 213 + [3~
22 23rd St $ Ocean Park BI AM ' 2 133 F ' 1 B94 F NA -0 239 + [3~
PM ' 2 422 F " 1 890 F NA -0 532 + [3~
23 Walgrove Av & osQ Av AM " 1 793 F 1 631 F fVA -0 162 + [3~
(City o( Los AngelesJ PM * 2 t97 F " 2 046 F NA -0 154 + [3~
24 Walgrove Av & enice BI AM ' 1 441 ` 1 3B0 F NA -0 081 + [3~
(City of Los An~eles) PNi " 1 710 F ' 1 700 F NA -0 010 + [3~
Notes
~1] Average vehicular delay m seconds per vehicle [3] No mmqa[lon reguuad " Oversaturated condrtwns, average delay cannot be calculated
~2] "+" iridicates beneficial impac~, "-" indicatas signilicant ad~erse unpacl [4] Ho mitigation recnmmended
TABLE 4 1-33 CONTINUED
INTERSEC~IOf~! LOS - YFJ1R 2002 - PARALLEL PLAI~!
WITH PEAf( PERIOD PARKING RESTRIGTIOIVSlWITH IMPROVEMENTS
- --
Year 2002 ease ---
With Peak Perlod Parkmg Restricuons ~--~
With ImprovamenSs
Peak ~elay V/G Delay V!C Res~dual
intersectlon Haur Delay[i] VIC LOS bofay V1C L~S Ghange Change Impacl(2~ Delay VAC LOS Ghange Chenge Impact
25 Clvverfield 81 $ Michigan Av M " 1 Bfi3 F ' 1 793 NA -0 070 + S3~
PM ` 1 304 F ` 1 191 F NA -o y 1 s + (3]
26 Cloverfield BI & I-10 Off-ramp AM " 2 058 " 2 101 F NA D OA5 - ~4]
PM • 2 121 F ' 2 032 F NA -0 089 + ~4~
27 Cloverlield ~& I-10 EB On-ramp AM 14 9 0 925 B 20 0 0 954 C 5 1 0 029 ~4]
PhA ' 1 784 F ' 1 844 F NA 0 080 - ~4]
28 Glcrverlield BI 8~ Virgi~ia Av AM " 1 368 F 31 7 0 930 NA -0 438 + ~3)
PM ' ~ 2q4 F 22 3 0 834 C NA -0 410 + ~3]
29 Cloverfield 81 & Pico 1 AM ' i 460 F 41 3 1 065 E NA -0 39S + {3]
PM " 1 435 F ' 1 351 F NA -0 OS4 + E3]
30 Cloverheld BI & Ocean Park BI AM " 1 214 F 5 2 ~D 801 B NA -0 413 + 3 4 0 737 A NA -0 477 +
PM " 1 268 F " 1 357 F NA 0 089 - " 1 176 F 1VA -0 090 +
31 25th St $ Ocean Park 81 AM 1 9 Q 575 A 1 2 0 615 -0 7 0 OAO ~3]
PM 4 9 D 698 A 3 S 0 652 A -1 1 -0 O~i6 ~3]
32 28th S[ & Pico BI AM 24 6 0 949 C 39 3 1 052 0 14 7 0 1A3 3]
PM " 1 124 F 59 3 1 087 E NA -0 037 + ~3]
33 28ll~ St & Ocean Pdrk BI AM 40 5 1 02B E 28 1 0 935 p -12 4 -0 091 + ~4]
PM
~ 45 9 1 p22 E 47 3 1 086 E 1 4 0 064 - ~4]
34 31s1 &t & Ocean Parlc BE AM 14 3 0 895 B 14 1 0 90i B -0 2 0 OOB ~3]
PM1A " 1 342 F 53 8 1 100 E IYA -0 2a2 + (3]
35 33rd St & Pico BI AM ~ 12 6 0 690 B 17 fi 0 942 C 5 0 0 1D2 1 5 0 594 A -11 1 -0 29B
PM 51 3 1 122 E " 1 220 F NA 0 098 - 3 4 0 696 A -47 9 -0 428 +
36 3451~ St ~~& PICO BI AM 40 6 1 091 E 55 2 1 i 29 E 14 6 D D38 - l4]
PM " 1 580 F ' 1 642 F NA 0 Ofi2 - ~4~
37 Centin~la Av Fk I-10 WB Ramps AM " 1~SD~ F " 7 467 ~ NA -0~OA2 + ]4J
(Cily nf LoR AngelesJ PM ' 1 521 F ` 1 558 F NA 0 037 - ~4~
38 Ce~itinela Av & Pico BI AM 39 8 1 043 ~ A3 7 1 078 E ~ 3 9 0 033~~ ~ - ~4] ~'
{Ciry nf Lng AngelesJ PM
'µ " 1 440 F " 1 286 F
T NA -0 154 + ~4]
39 Centinela Av & I-1o EB On-ramp AM
~ 1 1 0 0 a2D 8 13 3 0 866 B 2 3 0 046 ~3
(Cdy of Lus Anc~elea) PM 10 9 0 8fi0 B 11 3 D 875 B 0 4 0 015 ~3]
40 CenUnala Av S Pearl St AM "~ i OBS ~~ 16 2 0 779 C NA -0 309 + ~3]
(City o1 Los An~elea) PM " 1 3BQ F 25 3 0 940 D NA -0 424 + ~3)
41 Centinala Av & Ocean Park BI AM ~~~ 16 6 0 83a C 13 2 0 725 B -3 4 -0 109 ~3] ~'M
(Crty of Lfls An}~eles) PM ' 1 192 F ' 1 115 F NA -0 077 + l3)
42 Bundy Dr i~ I-10 EB On-ramp AM ~ i 1 7 Q 940 B 13 2 0 B69 1 5 0 029 [3~
(City of Los Angales) PM 10 1 6 907 B 12 5 D 961 B 2 4 0 054 [3E
43 Bundy Dr Pearl St AM 21 ~0 0 938 C 19 6 0 826 C -1 4 -0 010 10 7 0 835 B -10 3 -0 101
(City of Los Angsles) PM ` 1 382 F ' 1 484 F NA 0] 22 - ` 1 232 F NA -0 136 +
44 Bundy Dr & Ocedn Park BI AM ' 1 374 F ' 1 365 F NA -0 009 + [3~
(City of Los Angeles) PM ' 1 694 F " 1 fi70 F NA -0 024 + [3~
45 Bundy Or &~ational BI AM " 1 343 F " 1 325 F NA -0 018 + [4J
{City vf Los Angelesj PM " 1 294 F ` 1 360 F NA 0 06fi - (4J
46 Centinela & Airpnrl Av AM " 1 25q F " 1 249 F -0 005 + i3]
(C~ty of Los Angeles) PM ' 1 458 F " 1 391 F NA -0 OB7 + (3]
47 Centinela Av 8 Rose Av AM 15 6 0 997 C 14 0 0 882 B -1 B -0 Q15 (3~
(City ot Los Angales) PM • 7 2as F • i 187 F NA -a os2 + [3~
48 Cent~nela Av emce I AM " 1 477 ` 1 306 F NA -0 171 + [4~
(Citv of Los AnQeles) PM " 1 606 F ' 1 622 F NA 0 016 - 141
Notes
[1 ] A~erege vehir.ular dolay in seconds per vehicle (3] No mrtigat~on requ~red ' Overeaturatod conditions, average delay cannot be calculated
~2] "+" indicatas beneficial impact, "-" indir.ates sigruficant adverse impact ~4] No mrtigation recommanded
TABLE ~4.1-34
INTERSEC'TION LOS - YEAR 2002 - STAFF PLAN
WITH PEAIC PERID[) PARKI~[G RESTRICTf01~lS/WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Y~ar 2002 Base WiUi Poak Penotl Parking Rostrictions Wrth kmprovertrenis
Peak Delay V/G Delay VEC Residual
Intvrsect~on Hour polay ~1] V1C LOS Ovlay V/C LOS Channe Chaage Impect ~2~ Delay VIC LOS Change Change Impact
1 L~ncoln BI $ Olympic BI AM 33 3 1 ~28 D 2B 7 0 990 D -4 B -0 430 ~3]
PM ' 1 229 F ' 1 231 F NA 0 Q02 (3]
2 Lincoln BI $ i-10 EB On-ramp AM 14 8 0 80S $ 14 9 0 832 B 0 3 0 027 [3]
PM 12 7 0 815 8 11 9 0 844 8 -0 8 0 029 ~3]
3 Lincoln BI 8~ Pico BI AM ` 1 188 F ` 1 084 F N -0 082 + ~4]
PM ` 1 380 F ' 1 584 F NA 0 224 - ~41
4 Lincoln 81 & Pearl St AM 7 7 0 924 $ 4 1 0 895 A -3 6 -0 029 ~3]
PM 4 7 0 838 A 3 5 0 848 A -1 2 0 010 ~3]
5 Lincoln BI & Ocean Park BI AM ` 1 386 F ' 1 455 F NA 0 069 - ~4]
PM ' 1 473 F ` 1 fi38 F NA 0 185 - ~4]
B Lincoln BI & Ashland Av AM 2 9 0 852 A 2 2 0 839 A -0 7 -0 013 f3~
PM 3 7 0 870 A 1 7 0 852 A -2 0 -0 018 ~3]
7 Lmcoln BI & Manne Av AM " 1 225 F " 1 155 F NA -0 070 + ~3]
PM " 1315 F " 1214 F NA -0101 + ~3~
8 Lmcoln BI & Rose Av AM ' 1 357 F ' 1 347 F NA -0 010 + ~3]
(City of Los Angeles) P!N " 1 730 F " 1 698 F NA -0 032 + ~3]
9 Lincul~ BI & Venice BI A ' 1 352 F ' 1 223 ~ IJA -0 129 + ~4]
(City uf Los Angales) PM ` 1 598 F ' 1 621 F NA 0 023 - ~4]
10 11th St &-~81 AM 21 3 0 872 ~~C 34 1 1 000 D 12 S 0 128 ~3]
PM 17 5 0 843 C 1 B 4 0 818 C -1 1 -0 025 ~3]
1 ~ 11th St & Ocaan Pdrk BI AM ' 1 254 ~ " 1 157 F NA -0 097 + ~3]
PM " 1 439 F " 1 432 F NA -0 007 + ~3]
12 14th St ~ Pico 61 AM 18 1 0 812 C 16 0 0 786 C -2 ~1 -0 046 ~3]
PM 20 4
-~- 0 858
---~ G
-~ -- 30 9
- 0 987 b 10 5 0 1 19 ~3]
13
14th St & Ocean Park Bi
AM -
--
43 5 -
0 968
E - -
56 3 ~ •---
1 029 -,..._..
E ----.._-.
12 8 . _.
D 061
-
9 3
0 896
B
-34 2
-0 272
+
PM ' 1 1 A9 F ' 1 258 F NA 0 109 - 16 8 0 833 C NA -0 31 B +
14 18th St & Pico BI AM 10 0 0 719 B 8 0 0 874 ~ -2 0~ -a 045 ~3]
PM 6 3 0 61 1 B 1 4 D 537 A -4 9 -D 074 ~3]
15 17th St $ Pico BI AM 6 S 0 652 B 5 7 0 B31 B -1 1 -0 021 ~3]
~
~~
~ PM B 0 0 689 B B 5 0 749 B 0 5 0 O60 ~3]
16 17th St
& Ocean Park Bi AM 28 7 0 910 ~ 28 2 0 924 D -0 5 0 014 4 8 0 B71 A -21 8 -9 239 +
~
~
~ PM " 1 109 F
~ " 1 157 F NA
~
~ 0 048
~ - S 3 0 B81
~~ B
.,.,.,...., NA
_ ...,,._. ,,.... ~-0 428
....,_,..,,---- +
17 1
Bth Si AlleylS M CoII Entrance AM 17 2 0 987 C 23 7 1 0~8 C 8
5 0 051 ~4]
& Pico 81 PM 51 1 1 150 E ' 1 257 F NA 0 107 - ~4]
18 20th St 8 Pico BI AM " 1 122 F S5 2 1 06d E NA -0 062 + ~3]
PM ' 1 177 F ' 1 185 F NA -0 012 + ~3]
~ 19 20th ~St 8~ Ocean Park BI AM ' 1 157 F ' 1 282 F NA 0 125 - 10 1 0 8 i 7 B NA -0 340 +
PM ' 1 226 F ` 1 303 F NA 0 077 - 17 4 0 911 C NA -4 315 +
20 21st St & Ocean Park BI AM ' 1 294 F ' 1 398 F NA 0 104 - 1~ 7 0 828 NA -0 366 +
PM ' 1 195 F ' 1 274 F NA 0 079 - 10 0 0 786 B NA -0 409 +
21 23rd St 8 Pico BI AM 12 S 0 832 B 11 4 0 895 B -1 4 0 063 [3]
PM 28 9 1 025 D 16 3 0 958 G -i2 B -0 067 ~3]
22 23rd St cean ark BI AM " 2 133 " 2 263 F NA 0 130 - " 1 979 NA -0 154 +
PM " 2 422 F " 2 384 F NA -0 038 + " 2 058 F NA -0 363 +
23 Walgrave Av 8 Rose Av AM " 1 793 F " 1 S91 F NA -0 102 + [3]
(City of Los Angelas) PM ' 2 197 F ' 2 062 F NA -0 135 + [3]
24 Walgrove Av $ Vernce BI AM ` 1 441 F ' 4 382 F NA -0 059 + [4]
(City of Los Angelea) PM ' 1 710 F ' 1 71 S F NA 0 008 - [4]
Notus
[t] Avarage vehicular delay in seconda per vehicle [3~ No mit~gadon requ~red • Oversaturated cunditions avorago dolay cannot bc calculated
~2j "+" Indicalos benoficial ~mpact, "-" indicates signiFicant advarse impact [4~ No mit~gat~on recommended
TAB~E 4 t-34 CONTINUED
INTERSECl10N LOS - YEAR 2002 - STA~F P'LAN
WITH PEA#C PERIOA PARKING RESTRICTfQNSJWITH IMPFiOVEMENTS
Year 2002 Base With Peak Periud Parking Restnctions Wdh Improvements
Peak Delay V!C Delay V!C Flosidual
Intersectiun Hour Delay [1 ] V/C LOS Delay V1C LDS Chanqe Ghan~e Impect [2~ ~elay Y!C LOS Ghenge Chenge Impact
25 Clo~erfield BI & Mich~gan Av ANi ' 1 863 F " 1 807 NA -0 056 + 3]
PNI ' 1 304 F ' 1 248 F NA -0 058 + ~9)
28 Cloveriield BI & I-10 O-ramp AM * 2 056 F * 1 988 F NA -0 068 + ~3]
PM ' 2 121 F " 2 024 F NA -0 097 + ~3j
27 C ove~lield I& I-10 EB On-ramp AM 14 S 0 925 8 30 7 1 019 D 15 8 0 D94 -- ~4]
PM ' 1 7sa F " 1 74o F NA -p p24 + ~a]
28 Clovertield BI 8 Virgmia Av AM " 1 388 F " 1 356 NA -0 012 + 3J
PM ' 1 244 F " 1 221 F NA -0 023 + [3J
29 Clovertield 81 & Picu I AM ' i 460 F " 1 50fi F NA D 046 - [4]
PM ` 1 435 F " 1 443 F NA 0 008 - [4]
30 Clovertield BI & Ocean Park 81 AM ` 1 214 F~ ` 1 253 F NA 0 039 - 8 B 0 B10 B NA -0 404 +
PM ` 1 268 F " i 251 F NA -0 017 + " 1 221 F NA -0 047 +
31 251h St R Ocean Park BI AM ~1 9 0 575 A i 2 0 588 A -0 7 0 013 [3]
PM 4 9 0 698 A 5 0 0 736 A -4 2 0 038 [3]
82 28th St & PICO Bk AM 24 S 0 949 C 56 1 1 101 E 3i 5 0 152 - ~4]
PM ' 1 124 F 24 5 0 949 C NA -0 175 +
~ [4]
33 28th St & Ocaan Park BI AM 40 5 1 026 E 18 0 0 924 C -22 5 ~-0 102 + ~3]
PM 45 9 1 022 E 30 4 1 019
~ I]
~ -15 5 -0 003 + [3]
~
~
34 31 sl St & Ocean Pdrk BI AM 14 3 0 885 B 28 2 1 018 p i 3 9 0 123 ~3]
PM " 1342 F " 1230 F NA -0108
~~~ + ~3]
35 33rd 51 & Pico BI AM 12 6 0 890 B 13 7 0 917 1 1 D 027 2 0 0 545 A -10 B -0 345
PM 51 3 1 122 E 59 7 1 154 E 8 4 0 032 - 3 1 0 b79 A -48 2 -0 443 +
36 34ih St A plCr~ BI AM AD 8 1 09i E 37 8 1 066 D -2 8 -0 025 + ~A~
PM ` 1 580 F ' 1 608 F NA 0 028 - I~I
37 Centinr.la Av ~4 I-10 WB Rarnps AM ` 1 5U9 F ' 1 674 F NA 0 165 - [4~
(City of Lne Angeles) PM ` 1 521 F ` 1 677 F NA 0 156 - I4I
.... .. .._.ola A~ & Pico BI AM 39 S 1 043 D ' 1 148 F NA ~~.0 105 ~ ~ I41
~38 Cenlm ~ -
(City of Los Angeles) PM " 1 440 F ' 1 303 F NA -0 137 + [A~
39 Genhnela Av & I-10 EB On-rainp AM 11 0 0 820 B 13 2 0~~871 ~'w "~B ~2 2 0 051 [3J
(Cdy oF Lus Angeles) PF/l 10 8 0 S60 B 11 1 0 881 B 0 2 0 021 [3~
40 CenlFnela Av &~'earl SY AM " 1 O68 F " 1 113 F HA 0 025 - [4]
(CUy of Lna AnqelesJ PM ' 1 384 F ` 1 336 F NA -0 D28 + [4~
~~ 41 ~~enlmela Av & Ocean Park BI AM 1fi 6 0 834 C 15 4 0 813 C -1 2 -0 021 [3~
(City of Lng An~eles) PM ' 1 192 F ' 1 141 F NA -0 051 +
~~ [3J
~
42 Bundy Dr 8 I-10 EB On-ramp T"~ AM 11 7 0 940 B 12 4 0 961 0 7 0 D21 [3J
(City of Lus Angeles) PM 10 1 ~ 907 B 15 4 0 993 C 5 3 0 086 [3~
43 Bundy r&~earl St AM 21 0 0 936 C 18 2 0 917 C -2 8 -0 019 10 3 0 834 B -10 7 -0 102
(City of Los Angelee} PM ` 1 362 F " 1 476 F NA 0 114 - " 1 313 F NA -0 049 +
44 Bundy Dr 8 Ocean Park 61 AM ' l 374 F "~ t 35a F ~!A -0 024 + (3S
{Cdy o( Los Angeles~ PM " 1 894 F ' 1 646 F NA -0 048 + ~3]
45 Bundy Dr $ Nat~nnal BI M " 1 343 F ' 1 325 F NA -0 018 + ~3)
(Cdy of Los Angelesf PM ' 1 294 F ' 1 254
~ F NA -0 040 + ~3~
46 Centinela $ Auport Av AM " 1 254 F ' 1 237 F NA -0 017 + ~3~
(Ctty of Los Angeles) PM " 1 458 F ' 1 369 F NA -D 089 + ~3~
47 Gentinals Av & Rose Av AM 15 6 0 997 C 14 2 0 985 8 -1 4 -0 012 ~3~
(Crty of Los Angelesf PM ' 1 239 F " 1 184 F NA -0 055 + ~3~
48 Centinela Av & en ce I AM " 1 477 F " 1 442 F NA -0 035 + ~4~
(Gity of Lvs Angeles) PM ' 1 608 F " 1 628 F NA 0 022 - ~4~
Notes
[i] Average vehicula~ delay in eaco-~ds per vehicle ~3] No miUgaUon requued " Ovorsaturated condiUons, average delay cannot be calculated
~2] "+ " indicates beneficial impact, "-" ~ndicates significant a dverse impact ~4] No mmgaUOn recomrnended
ATTACHMENT E
RESOLUTION NO. 8 8 2 2
A RESOLUTIO~T 4F THE CITY C~UI`'CIL QF
THE CITY OF SA~'~1TA MOIVICA
RECOi~~~~ING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIItECT
THE PLANI~TING Cal~~l~iISSION TO Al~~l~'D
TFIE LAND USE A~~TD CTRCULATION ELEI~'fFNT
OF THE CITY QF SA~~TA 1~~QNICA GENERAL PLAN
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MOIVICA DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS .
SECTION 1 Pursuant to the Santa Manica Munie~pal Cade, the Ciry Councii does
hereby give notice of its intention ro direct the Pianmng Cammission to amend the Land Use and
Circulat~an Elernent of the City ot Santa Momca Genera~ Plan as set forth in Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk sha~i certify to the adopt~on of this Resolution and
thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be an full force and effect.
APPR~VED AS Td FQRM:
~~~ ~
~
;
MARSHA 70NES MOUTRIE
City Attorney
f: lppolsharelresol spintent
Adapted and appro~ed tlus Sth of Octaber, 1994.
i, ,} .61~ j ~
rV
ayor
I hereby certify ~hat the €oregomg Reso~~tion 8822 (C~S) was duly adopted at a meeting
af the City Council held on the Sth of Octaber. 1994 by the following vote•
Ayes. Councilmembers• Abdo. Genser, Holbrook, Qlsen, Rosenstem
Noes: Councilmembers None
Abstain: Councilmembers: None
Absent: Councilmembers. Greenberg, Vazquez
ATTEST
:
/
~ ~ ~~ i.~~ . ~.
Crty Clerk
Exhibi# A
Prior to implementation of a Sunset Park Traffic Plan, the City of Sarita Monica's Land Use and
Cuculat~on E~ement {LUCE) of the General Plan shall be modified to reflect physicat changes
to the street system associated with pra~ect ~mplementation and current conditions of ma~or
circulation proposals. The LUCE shall be mod~fied ~n the following manner:
o Amend Figure 22 (Page 118) of the LUCE relating to ma~ar circulahon proposals
and neighborhood iraffic plans as shown attached.
o Amend the first bullet of Ma~or Proposal discussion of Local Streets (Page
119} to read as follows•
"Tmplemer~t neighborhood traffic cantrol plans to discourage thraugh
traffic in residen~al neighborhopds ~n the Mid-Gity, Pico, and Sunset Park
areas as shown in Figure 22."
o Amend Policy 4.2.2 of the LUCE (Page 134) to incorporate the adaption of a
Sunset Park Traffic Plan Policy 4.2.2 will read as foIlows:
"Thraugh veh~cuiar traffic shall be recluced and di~~erte~ from residential
neighbarhoods by implementation of neighborhood traffic control plans.
Adopted neighborhood traftic cantrol plans include the Sunset Park Traffic
Plan as shown in Figure 27 "
o Delete bullet on Page 119 which states the following:
"Upgrade the capacity of 23rd Street south af 4cean Park Boulevard within the
existing street width to facihtate north-south access to the City."
o Delete Palicy 4.3 5 on Page 136 which states the following:
"The City shal~ investigate the feasibiltty of uggrad2ng the capacity by
rmprovements to 23rd Street south of Ocean Park Baulevard within ~he existing
street w~dth. "
o Incorparate a map of the adapted Sunset Park Traffic Plan into the LUCE
as Figure 27.
REVISED FIGURE 22 FROM LUCE:
"MA70R CIRCULATION PROPOSALS"
~-
~
~
FiGk1RE 22
MAJ4R CIRCULATION PROPOSALS
~ : ~! :~~.~
~ _ .... _._._~ . r . ... :.-r.~~
i ;• •
~ ~
~ ~
i ~
' 'r
r _.._.__ ._..._.- ----~ ;" .r1o ::: '~~ ~
ti ~ .... ... ~ .
~ •4P~ ..• ~'.~
y ~ •vv•
•r~e •~• U:~~
~ ~ ~¢ao iii 4'
~ ~ .ab• ~e• (j:~ ^
~ i :: : iei Q~:r !~i~i..:~. .
1 1 ~ ~s see ~•r ^ ~~ '
; 1 ~.-~ •o~e q. . ~^
y .... W .1 •
1 •avo •~ee x~ ~ .
! ~ .p.. .aso -~.r , .
~ ~v.a •..0 5. ~ ^ .
S ~ ~4° ~oea Q'~ V ' • ~
~ $ ~ ~ Y ~ • o ~ o N ~ .
r t ~ •v~• •0~• ~~ •^
, ' • ^ ~ ^ •
~ •.~~~~~~v'r•I~rn~~~~~~~• ~ •• • •
S ..r.~.~n~r.~..p....~~.. . .
^......e.~.~a~vi•...•.• :~
~ ~~~~~~~a.a~~~~~11~~~a~~•
•~~~~.rq~I~~s~n~r••.e.• ~~
,n ••~.•.~~v/o~o.h•~~~ea~.
• ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ • e • •
~ •~~~~~~~6to~e~/A~r~~~~• .~
•~~~~~~~~Y• 0~4~~~~~er. ~~
• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v • e ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ . .. ~ . a • : • i ^ ~
,l •e~r~~~a..• ~~ =s~~~ ~ a~R~~~r~~
1 •~~~ro~.s•
1 ~o•...~v~• \
~ •~• ^.~• \\\~ )
•sr.~~~*~. ~~~~~..`' 1
1 ~ . . r . . ~ . ~ ~ ~.\~orentawn
•~~~~.... ~ !
~ •~~~~~~~~. Tnn~Nlon~~ ~ 1
~ •aa~~..e~.~ .
~ •~~r~s~~p•
~ a~s~~*~e~.`
\
1
1
r
1
Impfove Ped~~1~1~n1HIY~ ~~ _
Arus~ lo ~nQ ~lony W~f~Amnl -i
Ma~or
Circulatian
Proposals
~~ Improv~ Io Fat111lu~ Act~ra
' a a~ r MAaio~ Trandl Rou1~~
~ R~cr~~klond Shutll~ 2oM
•••••• CI~l~ 1 Bltycl~ Ra~l•
^nd pR~~~1~1~n Tnll
~ Aruas lur Neighborhood
Trailic Cc~niral Measure~s
i~t
! d' n ^ Con~lder m~~~u~aa 1o mlllq~l•
p~rklnp p~ob4~m~
n
~
C
~
V
~
m
r
~
~
~
ATTACHMENT F
RESOLUTION NUMBER 8821
(City Counci2 series)
A RESOLIITION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON
THE SUNSET PARR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, a No~ice af Preparation of an Environmenta~
Impact Report was issued zn october~ 1992; and
WHEREAS, a Notice af Campletion af a Draft Environmental
Impact Report was published in May, 1994 ;and
WHEREAS, the Dra€t Environmental Impact Report was
circulated far a 45 day per~od; and
WHEREAS, in September, 1994, the Final Enviranmental
Impact Report was published; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council f~nds that the Final
Environmenta~ Impact Report adequately discusses all signifieant
environmental ~ssues and c~rtifies that the final EIR was
prepared in compliance with CEQA~ the State EIR Guide~ines and
the City of Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines, and that the Ci~y
Council has reviewed and considered the contents o~ the Final EIR
in its decision-making process.
SECTION 2. The City Council finds that the Final
Environmental Impact Report does not requixe recirculatian sinc~
the additional infarmation added in response to comments on the
Draft Environmental Tmpact Report clarifies or amplifies
i~formation provided in the Draft Environmental Impact Report.
The additiona~ infarmation or eiarification provided does not
identify new substantial environmental effects, new mitigation
measures which the City decl~nes to adapt, or concern a
substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified
enyironmenta~ effect.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this Resoiution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same sha11
be in full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~+C~ S ~c l'~-~u`'z.~
Marsha Janes Moutrie
City Attorney
w/speiresa
Adopted and apgraved this Sth of October, 1994
t.~. ~ y~ ~
~yor
I hereby certify that the forega~ng Resolution 882~ (CCS) was duly adopted at a meetmg
af the CFty Council held on the Sth of October, 1994 by the faIlow~ng vote
A~~es Councilmembers Abdo, Genser. Holbrook. Otsen. Rosenstein
Noes• Councilmembers None
Absta~n Counciimembers None
Absent Cauncilmembers Greenberg, Vazquez
ATTEST:
~ ~~-.U ~tTGr*~~~
~ :~ ,
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT G