SR-9-B (30)~ ` ' ` ~ t - ~
LUTM:PB:DKW:DB/rc001cc.pcword.plan
Cauncil Mtg: July 13, 1993
Ta: Mayor and City Cduncil
FROM: City Staff
~~
,~ . ,
lUt ~. ~ ~~~s
Santa Monica, Califo~nia ~
SUBJECT: Zone Change 92-001 ta Redistrict a Portion of a Parcel
from an M1 (Light Industrial) Designatian ta a C5
(Special OfficeJ Designation, 1920 Colorado Avenue
Applicant: Copely Press, Inc,
INTRODUCTION
This report recommends that the City Council deny Zane Change
(ZC) 92-DO1 to allow the redistriating a portion of a parcel from
M1 (Industrial Conservation) District to C5 (Special Office)
District. The subject parcel is currently bisected by the Ml and
C5 Districts and would come entirely under the C5 designation if
the Cou~cil were to approve ZC 92~-00~. On March 3, 1993, the
Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 in favar of a motion
recommending that the City Council consider redistricting the
parcel to one zone district. The Planning Commission did not
specify which zoning designation would be preferable for the
subject parcel.
BACKGROUND
Propased Zone Change
The subject property is an 88,8~~ sq.ft. parcel located on the
south side of Colarado A~enue between 19th Street and 20th Street
having a frontage of 325 feet. Surrounding uses cansist of an
- 1 - ~
_ ~; ,~~
,~UL ~ '` 'F~~
autamotive repair facility and school across 20th Street to the
north (C5 and M1}; a railroad right-of-way on the adjacent parcel
to the south (C5 and M1); the S~ny Music Campus across 20th
Street to the east (C5); and a cement making facility acrass 19th
Stree~ to the west (Ml).
The propos~d project involves the zone change of the west~rn half
of tha subject parcel from an M1 designation to a C5 designation.
The parcel contains a 45,457 squar~ foat building with the east-
ern portion in the C5 District and the western portion in the M1
District. The western half of the building currently contains
I8,493 square feet of vacant industrial space.
CEQA Status
The proposal is Categarically Exempt from the provisians af CEQA
pursuant to Class 5(13) of the City of Santa Monica Guidelines
far the ImpZementation of CEQA.
ANALYSIS
Background
The existing ~utlaak Newspaper bui~ding was appraved in 1978, At
the time of construction, the ~acility was utilized for affices
and as a newspaper print~ng press. The printing of the newspaper
is now dane at an off-site location, ~hi~h has r~sulted in 18,493
square feet of vacant industrial floor area Iacated on the west-
ern, M1 half af the parcel. of the 325 feet a~ parcel frontage
on Colarado Avenue, the eastern 140 feet is C5 and the western
I85 ~e~t is M1. The existing office portion of the bu~lding is
_ 2 _
lacated predominantly on the C5 portian of the parcel. However,
a portion of the existing office is lacated in tha M1 District.
On April ~, 1992, the Planning Commission appxoved De~elapment
Review Permit (DR} 91-049 to allow a change of use for the vacant
industrial space ta general office use, and the canstruction of
new office mezzanine area which would result in a total of 23,736
square feet ~f office space in the area previously occupied by
the newspaper press and currently zoned Ml. A bui~ding permit
has not yet been ~btained for the approved building improvements
and change of use, but may be obtained prior to the expiration of
DR 91~009 on July 15, 1993. When these changes are completed,
the building will contain a total of 50,700 square feet of
general office space.
On March 3, 1993, the Planning Commissian considered the present
Zone Change and voted 5 to o in favor of a motian recommending
that the City Cauncil razone the parcel to one designation with-
out specifyfng which designation was preferred (Attachment A.)
Included in the motion was a requirement that, prior to schedul-
ing of this matter before tha City Couneil, the applicant provide
staff with a minimum of fifty signatures of Santa Monica resi-
dents and property owners who approve of the proposed Zone
Change. On April 21, 1993, the applicant furnished staff with
the required petitions. (Attachment C)
- 3 -
Council Action on Interim M~rRD Zone
On June 15, 1993, the City Council intraduced for first reading
an ordinance estab~ishing interim deveZopment standards for por-
tions af the City lacated in the Ml and C5 Districts. The secand
reading and adoption af this ordinance occurred on June 22, 1993.
This ordinance applies ta the east half of the subject parcel
which is currently zoned C5.
The interim ordinance was adopted with the intent af eventuaily
creating a new district designation tentatively referred to as
"M1/RD." The wes~ernmost edge of the proposed Ml/RD District
would be the current boundary between C5 and M1 which bisects the
subject property and building.
As currently contained within the Interim Ordinance, the M1/RD
District wo~xid be a light industrial district but would allow a
maximu~n of 50~ of floor area ta be dedicated to associated office
uses, whereas the M1 standards allow a maximum af 25~ af floor
area to be utilized for administratiiv~ office uses. Like the M1
District, new office space in the Ml/RD Distriet would be permit-
ted only for purposes related to industrial uses located on a
given parcel.
The existing office use on the eastern portion of the subjact
parcel is currently zoned C5 and and is subject to thE Interim
M1/RD Ordinance and contains a nonconforn~ing office use. The
vacant industrial use on the western portian of the parcel is
located within the Ml District. If the applicant acts on the
- 4 -
approved Development Review Permit, this space may be converted
to office use. ~f the Council decides ta rezone the entire par-
cel to M1/RD, and the applicant has converted the western portion
of the parcal to of~ice use, then the entire parcel would become
legal nonconforming as to use.
General P~an Conformance
The proposed Zone Change would require an amendment ta the
General Plan Land Use and Circulation Plan contained in the Land
Use and Circulation Element because the Plan currently shows th~
M1 half of the parcel as "Industrial" and the C5 half af the par-
cel as "Special Office District." It is not possible for the
City Council to legally approve the praposed Zone Change without
concurrently approving a General Plan Amendment.
Conclusian
Given the proposal far the creation of a new zoning designation
for the eastern portion of the subject parcel, and the adoption
af interim standards for that portion of the parce~, staff recom-
mends that City Council deny the applicant's request. It would
not be in the interest of good planning to ~ezone a portion of
the parcel to C5, while other C5 properties (except for the Santa
Monica Business Park) are the subject of an interim ordinance
designed to analyze new use entitlements and standards. The is-
sue of the parcel's split zoning should be addressed at the time
the permanent M1/Rfl proposal goes before the Planning Commission
and City Council.
- 5 ~
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Pursuant ta Zoning Ordinance requirements, a not~ce nf the public
hearing was mailed to a11 owners and residential and commercial
tenants of property located wfthin a 500' radius of the project
at least ten consecutive calendar days prior to the hearing. A
copy of the natice is contained in Attachment B.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT
The recommendatian presented in this report does not have any
budget or fiscal impact.
RECOMMENDATION
Yt is respectfully recommended that the Coc~ncil deny the proposed
zane change based upan the following findings:
c+r*rr~T~rnc
l. The propased amendment is incansistent in principle with
the gaals, objectives, policies, land uses, and programs
sp~cified in the adopted General Plan, in that the adopted
Land Use and Circulation Plan contained in the Land Use
and Circulation Element of the General Plan shows the sttb-
ject parcel as divided into "Industrial" and "Special Of-
fice District" land uses and must be amended ta be consis-
tent with the propased Zone Change, and in that the no
applicatian has been filed for the General Plan Amendment
required to brinq the subject parcel into consistency with
the General Plan in connection with the proposed Zone
Change.
2. The public health, safety and general welfare do not re-
quire the adoption of tha proposed amendmant, in that the
parcel propased far zane change may be under cansideratian
for redistricting under a separate propasal in tha future,
and that it is in the interest of good planning to simul-
taneously consider all proposed zone changes and redis-
tricting proposals affecting the s~bject parcel to ensure
consistency,
- 6 -
If the Cauncil decides that the proposed Zone Change is appropri-
ate, staff should be directed to initiate a General Plan Amend-
ment consistent with the Council's decision, and to return to
Council with new findings far approval of the Zone Change and
General P~an Amendment after the required processing for the
General Plan Amendment has been campletad.
Prepared by: D. Kenyon Webster, Planning Manager
Drummond Buckley, Associate Planner
Planning Division
Land Use and Transportation Management Aepartment
Attachments:
A, Planning Commission
B. City Council Public
C. P~anning Commission
D. Radius and Lacation
E. Plan af Praposed Ar~
F. Photographs of Site
DB
PC/rc001cc
07/06/93
Statement of ~fficial Action
Notice
Staff Repart
Map
~a for Zane Change
and Surrounding Properties
- 7 -
A~'T'AC~IM~I1T~' A
~LAN~ING CaMMISSIdN
STA7EMEN7 OF OFFICIAL ACTION
PROJECT
CA~E NUMBER: Zone Cha~ge 92-001
LqCATION: 1920 Colorada Avenue
APPLICRNT: Copely Press, inc.
CASE PLA~NER. Drummand Buckley, Associate Planner
REQ~ES~: App~ication for 7one Change fram M1 (industriai Conserva-
t~on) District to C5 (Spec~al Office) ~istr~ct for a por-
tia~ of an existing lat w~ich is current~y bisected by the
MI and C5 Districts.
CEQA STA7US: Requires pr~parat~on of Initia~ Study tn order to det~rm~ne
CEQA requirements
~LANNi~G COMMISSION ACTION
3-3-93 Date.
Approved based on the following findings a~d sub~ect to the
canditlons belo~.
Denied.
X Other. Ma~ion to require 50 signatures ~n support of Zone
Change prior to schedu7~ng far City Caunti~. R~commendation
that Council consider creating one zoni~g d~s~gnation at the
sub~ect property.
FI~dDIN~S
1. As no specific Zane Change was recommended for approval, no find~ngs were
made by the P~anning Commis5~on.
VOTE
Ayes: 0'Connar, Parlee, Poihe:rus, Pyne, ~iechur
Nays:
Absta~n:
Absent: Morales, G~1F~n
-1-
NOTICE
If this is a f~nal decis~on not sub~ect to further appea~ under th~ City af
Santa ~lonica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Ordinance, the t~me within
wh~ct~ judicial review of this decislon must be sought is gaverned by Code af
Civi1 Procedure Sectifln 1094.6, which pravision has been adopted by tne City
p~rsuant to Munic7pal Code Section I400.
I hereby certify that this Stateme~t of Official Action accurately reflects
the final determinatior~ of the Planning Commission af the City of Santa
Manica.
signature date
Ralph Mechur, Chairperson
Please Pr~nt Na~ne and Title
I hereby agree to the above conditions af approval and acknow~edge tha~
failure to comply with such conditions shal~ constitute grounds for potential
revocation af the permit approvai.
Appi~cant's Signatt~re
Pr~nt Name and Title
PC/rc001sta
DKW:bz
-2-
A~'AC~IMEIIT~' B
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Subject of Hearing: Zone Change 92-001
1920 Colorado Avenue, M~/C5
Applicant: Copley Press, Inc.
A Public Hearing ~ill be held by the City Council on the
following request:
AppZication for zone change fram M1 (Industrial Canservation
District) to C5 (Special ~ffice District) on an existing
parcel which is zoned partial~y M1 and partially C5.
(Planner: D. Buckley~
TIME: TUESDAY, JQLY 33, 1993 AT 6:30 P.M.
LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER, ROOM 213, CITY HALL
1685 MAIN STREET
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA
THE CITY dF SANTA MDNICA ENCOURAGES PUBLIC COMMENTS.
INT~RESTED PERSONS MAY COMMENT AT THE HEARING, dR BY WRITING
A LETTER.
Letters shouid be addressed to:
Planning Division, Room 212
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, California 9040I
Attn: D. Buckley
Additional infox~ination Jnay be obtained fx-om the Planning
Division at the address above or by calling (310) 458-8341.
The meeting facility is handicapped accessible. If you ha~e
any special needs such as sign language interpretzng, please
contact the Office af the Disabled at (310} 458-87Q1.
Pursuant to California Gover~ment Code Sectzon 65009(b), if
this matter is subsequently challenged in Court, the
chall~nge may ]oe limited ta only those issues raised at the
Public Hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered ta the City of Santa Monica at, or
prio~- to, the Public Hearing.
Esta es una naticia de una audencia pub~ica para ~evisar
applicaciones propaniando desarrallo en Santa Monica. Si
deseas mas informacion, favor de llamar a Elsa Gonzalez en
~a Division de Plantificacion al r-umero (310} 458-8341.
- 1 -
i
14~'ACHN~EIITT C
~
~ ~
P&Z:DKW:DS:PC/rc~Olpc Santa Monica, California
Planning Commission Mtg: March 3, 1993
To: Th~ Honorable planning Cammission
FROM: Planning Staff
SU&TECT: Zone Change 92-001
Address: 1920 Colorado Av~nue
Applicant: Copely Press, Inc.
INTRODUCTION
Action: Applicat~an for Zone Change from M1. (Industrial Canser-
vation) District tn C5 (Special 4ffice) District far a portion of
an existing lot which is current~.y bisected by the Ml and C5
Districts.
Recommendation:
Recommendatfan of deniaZ to City Council.
Permit Streamlining Expiration Date: Not applicable to Zone
Changes.
SIT~ LOCATIQN AND DESCRIPTZON
The subject property ~s an 88,8fl4 sq.ft. parcel located on the
south side of Colarado Avenue }aetween 19th Street and 20th Street
having a frontage of 328 feet. Surrounding ~15ES consist of an
autamotive repair facility and school across 20th Street to the
north (C5 and M1), a railroad right-of-way on the adjacent parcel
to the south (C5 and M1}, the Sony Music Ca~pus construction
across 20th Street to the east (C5), and a cement making facility
across 19th Street ta th~e west (M1).
Zoning District: C5, Special Office District
M1, Tndustrial Conservation Distriat
Land Use District: Special Office/Industrial Canser~vation
Parc~l Area: Irregular 328' X 240' to 302' = 88~804 sq.ft.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves the zone change of the western haZf
af the subject para~l from an M1 designation to a C5 designation.
The parcel contains a 45,457 sq~are foot building with the east-
ern portion in the C5 District and the western portian in the M1
District. The western half of the }auilding currently cantains
18,493 square feet af vacant industrial space. 4n April 1, 1992,
the Planning Commission ~ppraved a change of use of this vacant
_ 1 _
a
~
i
~
industrial space to office use, with a provision to allow an ad-
ditianal 5,234 square foot office mezzanine area ta be
constructed.
MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
The proposed zone change would be consistent with the Genaral
PZan if it were approved.
CEQA STATUS
No CEQA review is required if staff recommendation is adopted.
RENT CONTROL STATUS
The project is exempt from Rent Control as a commercial property.
FEES
The project is not subject to any fees.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
The Zoning Ordinance does not require any public notificatian for
zone changes other than a notice in the Outlook. A notice af the
public hearing was mailed to all owners and residential and
commercial tenants of property located within a 500 radius of the
project at least ten aonsecutive calendar days prior ta the
hearing. A capy ~f the notice is contained in Attachment B.
ANALY5I5
Background
The existing Outlook Newspaper building was approved in 1978. At
the time of construction, the facility was utilized for offices
and as a newspaper printing press. The printing of the newspaper
is now done at an off-site location, which has resulted in 18,493
square feet of vacant industrial ~3.oor area located on the west-
ern, Ml half of the parael. Of the 325 feet of parcel frontage
on Calorado Avenue, the eastern 140 feet is C5 and the western
185' is M1. The existing office portion of the building is la-
cated predaminantly on the C5 portion of the parcel. However, a
portion of the existing office is located in the M1 District.
On April l, 1992, the Planning Commission approved a change of
use for the vacant industrial space to general office use, and
the construction of naw office mezzanine area which wou~d result
in a to~al of 23,736 square feet of office space in the area pre-
viausly occupied by the newspaper press and currently zoned M1.
A building permit has not yet been abtained for th~ approved
building i~nprovements and change of use. When these changes are
completed, the building will contain a total of 50,700 square
feet of generai office space.
_ 2 _ ~
~
Proposed Redistricting
~
~n March 2, 1993, the City Council wi~~ consider the issue of
rezoning a portion af the C5 Aistrict with a new designation ten-
tatively referred to as "M3./RD." The westernmost edge of the
praposed M1/RD District would be the current boundary between C5
and Ml which bisects the subject property and building.
As currently envisioned, the M1/RD District wauld be a light in-
dustrial district but would a11.ow a larger proportion of office
space than the 25~5 of total floor area currently permitted in the
M1 District. Like the M1 District, new office space in the Ml/RD
District would be permittsd only for administrative purpases re-
lated t~ industrial uses located on a gi~en parcel. If the M1/RD
designation were adapted and ware to apply ta the existing C5
portian of the aubject property, that portion of the praperty
would be considered legal nonconforming as to use {assuming the
appraved change of use is carried out).
The proposed redistricting ta M1/RD is to be cansidered separate-
ly from the Commercial Develapment Standards Program. It is ex-
pected that th~ process of redistrieting wi13. enc~mpass a year or
more.
GeneraZ P].an Canformance
The proposed Zone Change wauld be consistent with the General
Plan in that the General Plan aalls for office use in the C5 Dis-
trict and the project, as approved, consists of office space.
Howevar, if ~evelopment Review Permit 91-009 is not activated,
the western half of the parcel wauld remain industrial and would
nat canform to the General Plan for the C5 designation. Further,
shouid City Council direct staff to proceed with study of the M1/
RD proposal, the property could be sub~ect to additional rezoning
in tha near future. Conformance with the General P1an would be
addressed at that paint.
Cor~clusian
Given the tentative praposals for the creation of a new zoning
designatian for the eastern partion af the subject parcel, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission n~ake a recommendat~an to
the C~ty Council of denial of the applicant's request. It wouZd
not be in the interest of gaad planning to rezane a portion af
the parcel to C5, only to then rezone the parcel again with an
entirely new designation. The issue of the parcel's split zaning
cauld be discussed at the time the proposed M1/RD proposal goes
before the PZanning Commission and City Council.
RECOMMENDATI~N
It is recammended that the P1ann~ng Commission make a recammenda-
tion of deniaZ to the City Council of the proposed zone change
based upon the fol3.owing finding:
- 3 -
~ ~
FINDINGS
1. The public health, safety and general welfare do not re-
quire the adoption af the proposed amendment, in that the
parc~l proposed for zone change may be under cansideration
for redistricting under a separata proposal in the future,
and that it is in the interest of good planning to simu~.-
taneously consider all proposed zone chang~s and redis-
tricting prapnsals affecting the subject parcel to ensure
consis~ency,
Prepared by: Drummond Buckley, Ass~ciate Planner
Attachments:
A. Photographs af Site and Surrounding Properties
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Radius and Locatian Map
D. Plan af Prap~sed Area for Zone Change
DB
PC/rc001pc
02/24/93
- 4 - ~
~
A TT14 C1~MEN~' D
~ °
`
~ ° '
`
„ I I ~ I _ I I
~n
I I ,,~
I ~ ,
-P
sfI '~f I ~. .-
_ a
, E i a. S Y Z ~"~ ~ E a 6 •+ tl ~ ,~.
'~ p
rn
ci
6
m
'
1
`c
.~ ~ 4
o> K' ~ 6 £ E v c m 7E 6 a 2
~-~1 6 f K{~
I~ .
P
r S r+~
~ c S
e ; ~ ~ < y n ~ ~e
C ; x ~
~
t y
~
n iW' S _~ _ ~- ~..~
~
+
0 a ~ i
S C d I@ S G r n 5 c ~ i _-_
"
'~ . nc r
i .
' 4 n i
"" s-
= b 3 r~ 6
~ '^ r9
~a !T "
~ ~^ 6 s
~ s -• p ~ .
~
°
.
l a
~ seo~^ _ - "tas rs `" T =
~ •~.,~~'s a
~
,
~~~'-
~
y ~
~,
e
aa 6
S
`~"' '~f/E
/S p, ;
6
aB ~'
O
~~.
T~ i
N
p R , `.~ -
__ _
_ r ~ _
~
+
~
~_~ 29 itl OW
f ~ r ~
~ ~ .
s si Y 2B Q - pY a !f~ { x 9 i ° i. ~ F~v , -
u ;
- s~
s 27 a -+c
--
~4 °
A
_~o-
~ ~u
c i~ _ A S =
n
~
- ~
'J 32
~
~
s26o S
o~
c
sz,7~
'~
~
~.f O
^
c
~
t
~
S
~'
Y
o aC ~
~ ~
w rn
"y
Z ~
]c
6 m
2
t 1
! m
~
r
I
" J3 e S
6 Y46
~ ~ { .~ =
nr P ~
^ S4
' ~~
c S25 ~ L
~Y 6 ~' 6
~
~ ~!Y ~
^ ~ y
w ~
.".V E N ~ E c COLQRADO
y!o~ :;~
i
~~a' ~ ,
i ~.
~
~
..
y, f
, l ,
• a ~
3_* ~ 561 97 38; 94~ :r I t0 3 w o 4! - J
~
~
~z I ~ ~e ~ ~ 7 r ,
~
~ S I I ! ~ ~ g ~ ~ ° ~ ^ 1
} a
I (
K, ~~„ { ~ -
,u.rr P ~ ~
_ a " ~ ~ _
~ ,
~
A y 4 P -e a ~ ~ -
N n {~ Y
~
~ . r f
y 8 l~ ~
44 ~ I. ,v _ 10 . av ~ ~~'~~..
~
_ ,~_
~ p~
,
_
~
~
,. 4Y
1
, ~
:
G~
5 6;
~
..~
u
~ .
R 54 ^' R ,
+' +~~+~~.,~
G
4Y
O2jo
a
' I
- - -
Y
~
~
c
z
ye x ~
~`dr~lfT/ ~u P
4 ~
,
rn 6 c~ aJ; T 6 ir.fp 6 2 5 6 + .r
~19 S • .
__t._,~y - ~k~Gy [.~,,,y ~/ f- ,
i ~
~
4 d
:
~ Z ~u
$ ~
m I z
~1! 6
~ m
~
rn w
m
S4 33 E
X
~
s ~.r
ir a t 3 -
F
i f0' ~ i
• : C
" ' `w t.
`F`_-. ~_ <r{,
- ' ' : is
' „
-
----~~ "° Z ,-'., rn td~.~
s- .~
,.
461~X " ._ r'
'
~ ' ' ~ , Y Y ~~i ,o Sp ; 2 ~ °' ^~ ~ ~ ~ i Z ~
` ~
46~"~ _ o
-
' S
i ~ [ .s
5 .~.~f, '^6,J j r~d
; i`
I E s =49 6 IF 5 s a w s3B i y
2
S
aa
6 >
~"6 ~~
E~~ "
~ ~ ~
_
` " ~ s
..
Y
-466 u
a 5 N
a Js s
s !
~ ~ ~
y '
'~
•
/ _,
' ~ ~ •
~~ ~~t~d ~-.
„E~
' .,
~ S~ ~~
' ~ ~ N48 E ~ s .r ~„ad7. ..
v . t%~ o~. o ~ c
~ F ~
~ t~ ao 6 ~ ti K S~ ~ x v. • e'
5 -
fv~• '~~e _
`~"'` BGU~EV.C}2D
•
O LY M ~ - ''~t~3r~4'A[alA A'lEl~
i
~~;5 =
~ ~~ ~~ ~-r ` ~,
~ °' rn :
~~
• a -• c 6 6ji 4
P
c
~ ~ ~ : f ~ u _i
H
~ 6I ~
a 5~
~
I
I S -~r S
`° ~.
~ i ~ L'• L aG t ,O
6
`
w Y! ~
-
~'+ L'
6 `v~c
w
-
~
_ 6 z
-
- - ~r .
[ ~ s _
6 - o. 6 ~
rn ~
i m 8 8 ~
~ C/~ S 6 .
F~~%'_' S: y _ - ~
S - '
~b
K~~
F ~
~
y ~,..-
~S y a+.r
~ E
~ Y
rn
~ ~ ~
3
i S
' -
a~^ 5 Ir ~
.~
N
ro q m0 C ~ - 1~ '.a
y~' _
_ i S 6 S ~
F _ _
~+--~ ea _ _ ~~_
NOTE 2J = OWNERSH/P NUM BER fAPPE4R5 DN UPF£R LEf r OF MA/C1/VG LdBELJ
L~G:~L ~=_SCR~PTION POR OF RANGHO SAN VIGENTE CnsE ho
Y SANTA MONIGA
srREETaDDRE~S i92Q GOLORADO AVENUE Zpn~_
a~~~~~,~hT THE ~QPLEY PRESS,ING. ~A;E
PUBLIC
RAD~US MAP FDR HEAR]ivG
OATE
~
'1^~S~U LUU v`J FV~~~YU~U Ii~N ~J~
.U I~
.
(~O~ ~~ Reference
~ ~~l~
~.R~f'L+~.w O~C~• ,4~IasMap 25
Shtef No
~~in' 1~0 ~fLJIr1~OG:1 .
ATTACH..N~~I1~`~' E
~~
_ ~~
r ~
_ v
~am sTaEEr m O
~
'LOlh BTAEET
.~;~~_,
~ ~ ~ ~y~ ixso rouern sT[eei
! ~ } 1920 COLORApO AVENl1E cv~pa~n ~
I I 7HE COPLEY PRESS, qVC ~y~'~ ~~~~ ;~ 9~K~"A !0{OF ~
~~T~~ 51013l~ a045 ~
. ~ ~
14~'AC1~111~E~TT' 1~
_, ?
1920 Colorado
~.ry
~ .,.~r.,~ . . . ~ , .
.~ ,
Rtr~'"~i, ~~kk' P~,~,,, L ,
,. ",i~, , ,
looking west on Colorado
lookir~g south on 20th Street
looking southwest
looking southe~.st
1920 Colorado
~
looking west at rear
looking south on 19th Street
lookin~ north on 20th Street
looking eas~ at rear