SR-092292-7ALUTM:PB:DKW:SMW:APP013:pcword.plan
Cauncil Mtg: July 14, 3992
TO: Mayor and City Cauncil
FROM: City Staff
ADDRESS: 3222-3232 23rd Street
-~
I ~ ~~ 1~~~
Santa Monica, Ca~if~~nia -
SE~ w' a 4n"
iJ.~.L
Applicants: Mohammad Siadat and Mohammad Davari
Appellant: Mahammad Davari
.
~
SUBJECT: Appeal of P~anning Commission Denial of Tentative
Parcel Map 21159 and Variance 92-013 to allow the
subdivision of an ].1,518 sq.ft. parcel with two
existing on-site single family dwel].ings into two (2)
parcels of 6,293 sq.ft. (Parcel 1J and 5,225 sq.ft.
(Parcel 2). Parcel 1 has a substandard depth of 59'
and a 12' nancanfarming front yard setback. Parcel 2
has a substandard depth of 88' and a noncanforming 5'
rear yard setback.
ZNTRODUCTION
This is an appeal of a Planning Commissian denial of Tentative
Parcel Map 2iI59 and Variance 92-013 ta allow the subdivision af
an ].1,518 sq.ft. parcel in the RI district with two existing
single family dwellings inta twa parcels, with stzbstanda~d
lengths and nonconforming buiJ.ding setbacks. No chang~s to
existing structures are praposed.
This repart rc~commends that the Counci]. deny the appeal and
~phold the Planning Commission's denial of Tentative Parcel Map
211~9 and Variance 92-013.
The applicant has agreed to an axtension of the 30-day limit for
the City Cauncil to act upon the appeal from July 11 to Ju~y 14,
1992.
~~~
- 1 - ,~~~ ~ ~ ~J~,~
v~f' ~ ~' ~ru7
--_ „ ~~v.
sACxGxou~D
The Planning Cammission denied tha appiicants' request for
Tentative Parcel Map 21159 and Variance 92-b13 on June 3, 1992 to
a~low the subdivision of an 31,5I8 sq,ft. parcel in the Ri
(Single Family Residantiai; District with two existing on-site
single family dwellings inta turo parcels~ one equal ta 5,293
sq.ft. (Parcel I) and the other equal ta 5,22~ sq.ft. (Parcel 2)
(Attachment B).
The existing ii,sie sq.ft. parael is located on the northwest
carner of 23rd Street and Dewey Street in ths R1 District. An
al~ey is lacated to the north. A radius and location map is
included as Attachment F. The existing parcel dimensions are
shotJn on Attachment J. As indicated on the Tentat~ve Parael Map,
the parcel has a slightly irregular trapezoidal shape. Two
existing, one-story single ~amily structures of 3,4~3 sq.ft. and
1,125 sq.ft, exist on-site. A two car garage with alley access
exists for the residence at the rear. An attached two car gar~ge
exists for the residence at the front af the property with
existing access from 23rd Street. No changes are proposed to
existing on-site structures.
The subdivisi~n of the existing parcel into 2 parcels is proposed
so that separate ownership may be obtained (Attachment A), with
one resid~nce on each parce~. Parcel 1, with frontage aZang 23rd
Street and the alZey to the north, has a 59' depth and a 107'
width for a total af 6,293 sq.ft. (Attachment Iy. P~aposed
setbacks include a 12' front yard ~alang 23rd Street), 7' and 34'
_ 2 _
side yards, and a 25' rear yard. A 24' front yard, 7'2° side
yard and 25' rear yard setback is required for the proposed
parcel. A variance is ~equired far the substandard 59' depth;
the parcel would have a nonconforming 12' front yard and 7'
north sideyard. Code requires a minimum width af 50' and depth
of 100'. Parcel 2, with frontage alanq 23rd Street and Dewey
Street, has an 88' depth and a 59' width for a total of 5,225
sq.ft. Proposed setbacks in~lude an existing 32' frant yard, 12'
and 18' side yards and a 5' rear yard. A 20' front yard, a 5.9'
side yard and 25' rear yard setback is required for the proposed
pa~cel. A variance is required for the substandard 88' depth;
the parcel would have a nonconforming 5' rear yard setback, The
parcels meet the minimum lot size requiremertt of 5,000 sq.ft.
(Attachment CJ.
The 5anta Monica Municipal Code allows modificatian of minimum
parcel dimensions [Section 9I13.3 (a)]. The applicatian was
denied by the Planning Cammission based on findi~gs that the
proposed subdivision is not sim~lar to the prevailing pattern of
development in the area and that substandard setbaaks would
exist. (Attachm~nt B).
APPEAL ISSUES
The applican~ appealed the denia~. af the tentative ~ap and
variance applicatian, stating that the findings of dissimilar
de~elopment pattern of the proposed parcels and inconsistency
with the ~eneral PJ.an are not subs~antiated with text or maps
fram the General P].an (Attachment A). The applicant also states
- 3 -
that the dansity and land use of tha praperty is consistent with
the General P~an and that the existing parcel has twice the
required parcel area in the R1 district. The applicant points
out that there are two lots at the west end of the b~ock with
homes under separate awnership which are ariented in a similar
fashion to the propasad subdivision. The applicant contends that
there was no review of lots acrQSS tha Los Angeles City baundary
which are similar in ari~ntation tn the proposed subd~vision.
The applicant stated that a varia~ce, granted in ~946 which
a~lowed construction of the second dwel2ing on-site, was no~
addressed in the findings. The applicant also suggests that a
deed restrictian running with the praperty to require a
Conditianal Use Permit for further expansion of the existing
homes be recorded as a condition of approval.
PoZicy 1.I.1 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan req~ires
that a11 develapment be consistent with the Land Use and Zoning
Maps. While tha General Plan dnes no~ specify that prapased lats
be similar to existing lots, the prQpos~d subdivision of the
existing Rl parcel into two parc~ls would permit a permanent
increase in density of the existing parcel and an increase in
intensity of the land use, as two dwellings wouid now b~
permitt~d where only one is current~y permitted by code.
The twa existing single family structures are considered to be
legal noncan~orming uses pursuant t~ the Municipal Code. If
substantial alterations were made to either ane af the structures
- 4 -
(a "substantial remode~" under the Municipa~ Cadey,one of the
atructures wauld ba required ~o be demo~ished. Appraval of the
subdivision wauld allow permanent dev~lopment rights for a single
family structure an each new parce~. The app~icant~s proposal to
require recordation af a deed restriction raqui~ing a Conditional
Use Permit for expansion of the structure would not mitigate the
impacts of ~ncreased deve~opment rights.
Review of origina~ building permit appli.cations ~eveals that a
Variance ~~582-Y) was granted to allow the canstruction of a
second dwelling unit to the rear af ~he site i.n ].966 (Attachment
G). The ~irst unit on the site was built in 1955 and appears an
the plot plan for the Z966 application that was for subdivision
into twa parcels. This 1966 app].icatian was not approved
(Attachment G}.
The applicant points out that two oth~r lots facing 2}.st Street
and Dewey Street cantain single family structures that are
oriented towards 21st Street (Attachment H). The assessor's map
shows that a waiver af parce~. map ~ine divide~ the two lots into
parceZs with da.mensi~ns and lot sizes conforming to code
requirements. It is important to note that in this case, two
parcels were reoriented from facing Dewey Street to 21st Street
with no net increase in number of parcels. However, in the
propased subdivis~.on, the parce]. would be reoriented from Dewey
Stre~t to 23rd Street with an increase from ona to two parcels,
thus effecting an increase in density.
-- 5 -
The applicant has submitted copies o~ tha building pern{it
applications for 3221 and 3233 21st Street (Attachment I). A
single family dwelling was oonstruct~d on-site in 1948 oriented
towards 21st Street. The second dwelling was constructed in 1988
and is a~so oriented towards 21st Street. A required 25' front
yard setback is provided for both structures (Attachment H& I).
The applicant contends that there was no review of lats over th~
City boundary ~ine in Los Angeles, The Santa Manica Municipal
Code does not sugqest taking into accaunt the development pattern
af a neighboring jurisdictian.
SUMNIARY AND CONGLUSION
~n June 3~ 1992, the Planning Commission denied Tentative Tract
Map 21159 and Variance 92-013,a raque~t to allaw the subdivieion
of an 11,518 sq,ft. parcel in the Rl Dist~i~t intr~ twa parce~s
with substandard lengths and nonconfarming setbacks. The
Planning Commission denial was based on findings that the
subdivisi~n is n~~ in conformance with the genera~ developmen~
pattarn af the City and that there are no special circumstances
applicable to the praperty, as its si2e and canfiguration ara
sima.lar ta other R1 praperties in th~ surraund~.ng area. The
applicant s~ates that the decision was nat cansistent with ~he
General Plan, that the dansity and land use is consistent with
the G~nerai Plan, that other lots ta the southwest exhibit
similar characteristics as the prop~sed lots, and that a prior
variance permitting tha canstruction of the secand structure
on-site was not addressed. The applicant also proposes that a
.. ~ _
deed restrictian reqtairing a CUP for any development to the
existing structures be recorded as a condition of approval.
Approval af the Tentative Parcel Map and Variance applications
would increase the permitted intensity of iand use and density of
the existing R1 parcel and prolong the existing nonaonforming
nature of the structures on-site.
BUDGET/FINANC~AL IMPACT
Th~ recar~mendatian presented in this report daes not have any
budget or fisaal impact.
REQUIRED NOTIFICATION
Pursuant to Municipal Code Sectian 9~31.5, notic~ of the City
Council meeting was maiied to a11 awners a~d residential and
commexcial tenants of praperty located within a 3D0 foot radius
of the praject at least ten cansecutive ca~endar days prior to
the City Cauncil meeting. A copy of the notice ~s cantained in
Attachment D.
RECOMMENDATION
Tt is respectfully recommended that the Council deny th~ appeal
and uphald the Planning Cammissian's dax~ial of Tentative Tract
Map 21159 and Variance 92-013 to a11ow the subdivision o€ an
Z1,518 sq.ft. parc~l in the Rl, district with two existing single
family dwellings into two (2) parcels with substandard lengths
and noncan~orming setbacks with the fallowing findings:
- 7 -
VARIANCE FINDINGS
1. There are no special circumstances or exceptional charac-
teristics applicable ta the praperty invalved, including
size, shape, topography, locatian, or surroundings, or to
the intended use ar development of the proper~y that do
nat apply to other properties in the vicinity under an
identical zoning classificatifln, in that the orientation
oP the parcel as currentl~r existing is sa.mi].ar to sur-
raunding pr~perties and in that the number of an-site
dwellings is legal noncanforming and that demolition of
50~ or more a~ all exterior walls or ~oad-bearing walls
wil~ cause the noncflnfar~ing portion to be brought inta
confarmance with the code.
2. The granting of such variance wiii be detrimental ar in-
jurious to the property or improvements in the g~neral
vicinity and district in which the property is loaated, in
that the orientation and size of praposed parcels, Parce7.
1 and Parcel 2, are not si~ni].ar to the prevailing pattern
of de~crelopment in the area, in that substandard setbacks
woul.d exist and a.n that the ~ntensity of land t~se and den-
sity would increase permanentiy far the existing R1
parcel.
3. The strict application of the provisions af this Chapter
wauld not result in practzcal difficulties ar unnecessary
hardships, not including ecanamic dif~iculties or ecanomic
hardships, in that the existing parcel f~ts intg the es-
tablished patterh of devalopment.
4. The granting af a variance will be contrary to Qr in con-
flict with the genezal purposes and intent of this Chap-
ter, or to tha goals, ob~ectives and policies of tha
General Plan, in that the orientation and size af praposed
parce~s, Parcel ]. and Parcel 2, are nat sim~.lar to the
prevailing pattern af d~veZopment in the area, in that the
subdivision would result in substandard setbacksf and in
that the intensity of iand use and density WOLlICl increase
permanently for the axistzng R1 parcel.
5. The variance wauld impair the integrity and aharacter of
the district in which it is to be i~cated, in that the
orientation and size of proposed parcels, Parcel 1 and
Parcei 2, are not similar to the prevailing pattern of
development in the area and in that the intensity of land
use and density would increase permanently for the exist-
ing R~ parcel.
6. The sub~ect site is phys~cally suitable far the proposed
variance, ~n that the parcel is ~.evel and the proposal is
to subdivide the existing parcel into two parc~ls with no
change to exist~ng structur~s.
7. There are adequate pxQVisians for water, sanitation, and
public utilities and services to ensure that tha propased
- 8 -
variance would not be detrimental to pub~ic health and
safety, in that the proposal is subdivide an existing par-
cel ~nto two parcels with all amenities on-site.
8. There wi11 be adequate pro~isivns for public access to
serve the subject variance proposal, in that access ta
Parcel 1 exists fram Dewey Place North and access to Par-
ce1 2 exists from 23rd 5treat and no changes to access are
praposed.
9. The strict application at the pravisions of Chapter ~0 of
the City of Santa Manica Campreh~nsive Land Use and Zoning
Ordinance wau].d not resu~.t in unreasonable deprivation af
the use or enjoyment of the property, in that the proposal
existing parcel is developed with two sinqle family struc-
ture~ and no changes are proposed.
TENTATIVE FARCEL MAP FINDINGS
Z. The proposed subdivision, together with its provision for
its design and improvements, is not consistent with ap-
plicable geheral and specifi.c plans as adoptad by the City
of Santa Monica, in that the proposed parcels are not
simi~ar to the pre~railing pattern of development in the
area, ~n that the subdivision wauld result in substandard
parcel lengths and setbacks, and in that the intensity of
land use and densi.ty would increase permanently ~or the
existing RZ parcel,
2. The site is physica].ly suitable for the praposed type of
develapment, i.n that the p~opasal is to subdivide an ex-
a.sting parcel into two parcels with two existing single
famil.y structures ta remain and no changes are proposed.
3. The si~e is physically suitable for the proposed densi.ty
af d~ve~opment, in that the proposal is to subdivide an
existing parcel int~ twa parcels with two existing single
family structures to remain and nv chanqes are propoaed.
4. The design of the subdivision ar the proposed i~provements
wi~.~ not cause substantia~ environmental damage or sub-
stantially and avoidably injure fish ar wild~ife or their
ha3aitat, in that the proposal is to stibdivida an existing
parcel into twa parcels with two existing single family
structures to remain and no chariges are proposed.
5. The desi,gn of the subdivision ar the type of improvement
wi11 not cause serious publa.c h~alth problems~ in that the
praposal is to subdivide an existing parcel into two par-
ce~.s with two existing single fami~y structures ta remain
and with na changes are proposed.
6. The design of the subdivisian ar the type of improvements
will not canflict with ease~nents, acqua.red by the public
at large, for access th~ough, a~ use of, property within
- 9 -
the propased subdzvision, in that the propasal is to sub-
divide an existing R1 parcel into two parcels with no
restriction~ ar changes to existing aocess.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Appeal form dated 6/lI/92.
B. Statement af Official Actian dated 6/3/92.
C. Staff Memorandum to Planning Commission dated 6/3/92.
D. Notice of Public Hearing dated '1/14/92.
E. Letter from Staff to Mohammad Davari dated 6/17/92.
F. Radius and Location Map
G. Applications for Building Permits datad 3/7/55 and
6j~o/b6.
H. Assessor's Map, Tract N~. 8052, Map Bk. 91-38 and Tract
No. 8542, Map Bk. 104--27-29.
I. Let~er fram L. Pau~ Coak t~ City Cauncil dated 6/2&/92.
J. Tentative Parcel Map 21159
K. Site Photagzaphs
Prepared by: D. Iienyon Webster, Planning Manager
Susan White, Assis~ant Planner
Planning Division
Land Use and Transpartation Management Department
SMW
PC/APP013
47 f 08/92
- 10 -
A ~'lACH1V~~N~' A
a~~~~
C~ry of
Santa Mon~ca
Can~m~~ty and Ecanomic E~eve~o~merrt OePartinet~t
P1annlnQ and 2onirq Divlalon
(213) d5$-83~i1
APFEAI FOAM
FEE: S10Q.flQ
Name '~Ohammad Davari
q~~~ 3222 ~3rd SCreet, 5anta ~lonaca, CA
Car~~adPerson L. Paul Caok,
C.W. Cook Co., Inc.
Please descnbe Ihe ~rs}eC and deas+c~ ~o be aopealed
Th?s arapeal is from the decisian
Parcel :?ap f iled for the puzgose
twa existzng ho!;~es, and also from
Variance Rec~uest .
flate Fi~ed .
FieC8lved hy
Fiece~pt fVo.
~~ ~-~ ~ ~
~ ~~~ /~~
S L'~
~ 1`f`i`~4~{
904Q5
Ptione [ 31 0? 31 2- 8 2 2 2
ta den~+ a request
of separatxnq the
the den~ai of the
for a two lot
ownersh~.p far
eorresponding
CaseNvmber Vest~rg T~-~=ative Parcel N?a~ #21 ? 59 and Variance 9~-Q1 3
ACcress 3222-?232 23rd Street, Santa i~1o:1~C~r CA 90405
A~licarti hTohar~~ad Davari a~d 1lohammad Siac~at
Qngrral heanng Cate June 3 rd , 1 9 9 Z
Qngm~iac'+~on Der_ia~ of ~oth ap~Zicat~ ons
Pfease state ~se specffk reason(~) ior the a~oeal
According to the staff report, the primary reasan these applications were denied was
because "the proposed parcels are not similar to the prevaiIing pattern af developnnent in
the area". Some of the findings required for the variance and for the tentative parcei
map were not made, stating again the same reason This statement was also used to f~nd
that the proposed projeet was inconsistent with the General Plan. However, staff could
no# Find any specific text or maps in the City's General Plan which would require new lot
shapes to be similar to the existing tots. The densxty and iand use is consistent with
the General Plan. This is the only lot in the neighborhood which has more than twice the
required Lpt Area of the R1 zone.
Further, staff and the Pla~niag Commission did npt realizc that at the other end of this
very same block, there are twa hames (under separate awnership) which are turned precisely
the same way as the proposed lots are turned.
Also, in the next block ta the southwest, there are numerous "Reversed Corner Lats", which
is a corner lot which is turned 90p+/- to the lot behind See the circled lots on the
attached map
Furiher there ~+as no review of the lots over the city boundary line in Los Angeles,
Driving sout~easterly on the same street, the very next block has all of the lots oriented
in the same direction as proposed [ots. Evcn though the lo#s are in a different city,
someone drxving through the neighborhood would see this continuity. Because of all af the
ab~u~t-#~-p~se~_l_o1ts are similar ta many Iots in the area {see aitach~d map).
ti
,~ ~ ft ad~~ ~~ r~d~d. u~ b~it of L~~~ ( CpNTINUED ON BACK )
Si~f13~.~E? ` `~ { a ~~ ` '~ ~ ~ti! ~L~ / + ~ f ~ ~
~a ~
L; ~,! 1 , r.~.
~
Thc C~ty's 1946 Yariance grant allowing the construction aF the two existing houses on the
subject site was not taken into account.
Staff inentiancd that thcy were concerned about overbuilding on t~e resulting two new lots.
Th~s could easily be controlled through a recorded deec# restriction running wit~s the land
requiring any expansion of the existing homes to obtain a conditional use permit and fuIi
public hearing This would assure e~eryone that any expansion is done carefully and with
consideration for the neighbors.
CONCLUSION•
1. There was no legal justification for the denial of these requests.
2. The density and land use is cons~stent with the General Plan.
3. The proposed lots are similar in size and arientation ta many lots in the
neigt~borhood (see map}.
4. The #wo homes are existang because of a previous City grant {Variance).
5. Protection is readily available for the neighbors and the City regarding any new
canstr~ction in the future
6. This appeai should be granted, subjeet to the standard conditian plus a special
conditian ta proEeci against overbuilding on the new lots in the future.
l~ i! J i J
The City's 1946 Variaace grant allowing ihe construciion of the two existing hQUSes an the
subject site was nat taken into account.
Staff ineationed that they werc concerned aboat overbuilding on t~e resulting two new lots
This could easily bc controllcd through a recorded dced restriction running with the land
requiring any expansion of the existing homes to obtain a canditional use permit and ful(
public hearing. This would assure everyone that any expansion ss done carefully and wi#h
considcration For thc neighbors.
CONCLUSI~N:
~. There was no legai justification for the denial of.these requests.
2. T~e c#ensity and land use is consistcnt with the General Plan.
3. The praposed lots are similar in 5ize and orientation to many lots in the
neighborhood (see map).
4. The two homes arc cxisting becansc af a pre~ious City grant (Ysriance).
5. Protect~on is readily available for the neighbors and the Gity regarding any new
construction in the future.
6. This ap~eal should be granted, suhject to thc standard condition plus a specia!
condition to protect against overbuilding on t~e new lots ia the future.
0~~"_3
~ p ~ t
1
SUBJECT SITE
g TF1E LY LOT OVER 10.000 5C
.,r ~ 23'a ~__ `:~pc_, _. ~
~ '
TE DIRECTl~N
THE LOTS
~~ - °'~ HERE
Y =' I~~;
__ _ ' __- _`~~ .i
THE LOTS HERE WERE
TURNED TO FACE 21ST. ST.
A FE1N YEARS AGO.
TWO HOUSES NOW
FACE 21 ST. ST
LEGEND:
REVERSE CORNEFt
LaTS
( CHANGEi~ DfRECT10N FROM
7HE LOT BEMlND.)
~911
~
, _,°~
- = .,
_; ~
.§ 1 .
~5 ~~
:~
,, -
,9
.,
9r ~
~= 0. y``f
~ ~ l1 =
'~~
S11EFi' ` ~L[vE~/fM
r~~''~~ .,' ~ '~.
.I'F -~`'~
~ ;:~ ~. ~ ~
i~~ W-y ~ ~
L~
_ _ _ ~~ • ~ ~
~~
I `
±
~
,
:v ±
i
~
~ ~ ^
FOR. AP~EAL 4F P.Y.7~t59 8~ YARfANC~ 92-013
.
,r
5
~ r e•.. ;
, -
'
.,,~~f
' :.,~~ ,.r tio:~5~ri,
C.w.C00K ~~.
~;, ,~~o.
..~...~ a.. ,
~,
~, a
9
~
~~
~~.+J Y~ ~'~ E
~ ~ lane survey4g . ciwe engtneir~ng . en~lilemen[a . tLnuc wffalrs
~i
r .~ 1 R.• ~
I
I ~~,\\\ y~~relde Zvw~er+ e~~g wm~ aH~uP~c Bonlecrea. gwoe 3Ts
'4
~ c~ _
~~ ~
'• r1~`~~ ].na ~n8ela Cnllfomla 900(~ yoo~ ~.V[ jiui3i~8W9
5io(~'
~~~y
~}~
' -
~ j{ I
.
d~ ~11`~~ rd }io~gn-RZn a.eyn5 s~,~
Quul~ty und Fxper+ence Otl Ybur ,~1L~P"
P
~
uti 7 oi~~f ,
,
'r
THESE LOTS ARE ABOUT
THE SAME SIZE AS
THE PROPOSED LOTS
ATTACHII~[ENT ~
c~~~ ~
PLANNYNG COMMISSION
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL ACT~ON
r~r~n Tz+nm
CASE NUMBER: Tentative Parcel Map 21159 & Variance 92-0~3
LOCATION: 3222-3232 23rd Street
APPLICANT: Mahammad Siadat and Mohammad Davari
CASE PLANNER: Susan White, Assistant Planner
REQUEST: Application for a Tentative Parcel Map and
Variance to allow the subdivisian of a 11,518
sq.ft. parcel with two existing on-site single
family dwellings into two parcels of 6,293
sq.ft. (Parcel 1) and 5,225 sq.ft. (Parcel 2).
Parcel 1 has a substandard length of 59' and a
12' front yard setback. Parcal 2 has a sub-
standard length Qf 88' and 5' rear yard
setback.
CEQA STATUS: Categorical~y exempt per the City of Santa
Monica Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA;
Class 5.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
6~3~92
X
Date.
Approved based on the fol].owing findi.ngs and
subject to the conditions below.
Denied.
Other.
EFFECTIVE DATE(S} OF ACT~ON(S) IF NOT APPEALED:
6f13~92 Case #VAR 92-013
6/13f92 Case #TPM 21159
- ]. -
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~1
VARIANCE FINDINGS
~. There are no special cir~umstances or ~xceptional charac-
teristics applicable to ~he property invalved, including
size, shape, topagraphy, location, or surroundings, or to
the intended use or deve~opment of the property that do
not apply to other properties in the ~icinity under an
iden~ical zoning classification, in that the property as
currently existing is similar to surrounding praperties.
2. The granting of such variance wiZl be detrirctental or in-
juriaus to the property or improvements in the general
vicinity and district in which the property is located, in
that the arientation and size af proposed parcels, Parcel
1 and Parcel 2, are not similar to the prevailing pattern
of developnaent in the area and substandard setbacks would
exis~.
3. The strict application of the provisions of this Chapter
would nat result in practical difficulties ar unnecessary
hardships, not including ecanomic difficulties or economic
hardships, in that tha existing parcel fits ~nta the es-
tablished pattern of deve7.opment.
4. The granting of a variance will be contrary ta or in con-
flict with the general purpos~s and intent of this Chap-
ter, ar to the qaals, objectives and policies af the
Genera~ Plan, in that the arientation and size of propased
parcels, Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, are not similar ta the
prevailing pattern of development in the area and the sub-
division would result in su}~standard setbacks.
5. The vaxiance would impair the integrity and character of
the district in which it is to be located, in that the
arientation and size of propased parcels, Parcel 1 and
Parcel 2, are n~t similar to the prevailing patterr- of
develapment in the area.
6. The subject site is physically suitable for the praposed
variance, in that the parcel is level and the proposal is
to subdivide the existing parcel into two parcels with no
change to existing structures.
7. Ther~ are adequate provi~ians for water, sanitation, and
public utilities and services ta ensure that the proposed
varianca would not be detrimental to public health and
~afety, in that the proposal is subdivide an existing par-
ce1 into two parcels with all ame~ities on-sita.
8. There will be adequate pravisions for public access to
serve the subject variance prapasal, in that access to
Parcel 1 exists from Dewey Place North and
cel 2 exists from 23rd Street and no change
proposed.
access to Par-
s to access are
- 2 - ~~ ~ ~ i
9. The str~ct application of the provisions of Chapter ~0 of
the City of 5anta Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning
drdinance would not resuZt in unreasanable deprivation of
the use or enjoyment of the property, in that the proposa~
existing parcel is de~eloped with two sing~e family struc-
tures and no changes are proposed.
TENTATIVE PARC~L MAP FIND~NGS
1. The proposed subdivision, together with its provision for
its design and improvements, is nat c~nsistent with ap-
plicable general and specific plans as adopted by the City
of Santa Monica, in that the proposed parcels ar~ nat
simi~ar to the prevailing pattern of develapment in the
area and the subdivision would result in substandard par-
cel Zengths and setbacks.
2. The sit~ is physically suitable for the proposed type of
develapment~ in that ~he propasal. is to subdivide an ex-
isting parcel into two parcels with two existing single
fama.ly structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
3. The site is physically suitable far the proposed density
of development, in that the proposal is to subdivide an
existing parcel into two parcels with two existing single
family structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
4. The design of the subdivision ar the proposed improvements
will not cause substantial environrnental damage or sub--
stantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife ar their
habitat, in that the propasal is to subdivide an exfsting
parcel into two parcels with two existing single family
structures to remain and no chanqes are proposed.
5. Tha design af the subdivisidn or the type af improvement
will not cause seriaus public health problems, in that th~
proposal is to subdivide an existing parcel into two par-
cels with two sxisting single family structures to remain
and with no changes are proposed.
6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public
at large, far access through, or use of, praperty within
the proposed subdivision, in that the praposal is to sub-
divide an existing Rl parcel into two parcels with no
restrictions or changes ta existing access.
VOTE
Ayes: Mechur, Nelson, Polhemus, Pyne, RosenstEin
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent: Gilpin, Morales
, ~~~~g
- 3 -
NOTICE
If this is a final decision not subject to f~rther appeal under
the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Or-
dinance, the time within which judicial review af this decision
must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure Sectian
1094.6, which provis~an has been adopted by the City pursuant to
Municipal Code Section ~4Q0.
I hereby certify that this Statement af Official Action accurate-
1y reflects the final determination of the Planning Commission af
the City of Santa Manica.
signature date
Ralph Mechur~ Chairpersan
Please Print Name and Title
PC~st~l3
SMW
r +
Q'~ ~ _. 3
- 4 -
A ~'~'A CHME~T C
V J J ~ ~
P&Z:DKW:SMW:PCWORD:TPM001 Santa Monica, California
Planning Commission Mtg: June 3, 1992
TO: The Hon~rable Planning Commission
FRaM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 21159 & Variance 92-013
Address: 3222-3232 23rd Street
Applicant: Mohammad S~adat and Mohammad Davari
INTRDDUCTION
Action: Application for a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map and
Variance to allow the subdivisian of a 11,518 sq.ft. parcel with
two existing on-site single family dwellings into two (2y parcels
of 6,293 sq.ft. {Parcel 1) and 5,225 sq.ft. (Parcel 2). Parcel 1
has a substandard length of 59' and a 12' front yard setback.
Parcel 2 has a substandard length of 88' and a 5' rear yard
setback.
Recommendation: Denial.
Permit Streamlining E~iration Date: October 14, 1992
Subdivision Action Deadline: June 3, Z992
SITE IACATI~N AND QESCRIPTYON
The sub~ect property is an 11,505 sq.ft. parcel located on the
west side of 23rd Street between Navy Street and D~wey Stree~
having a frontage of 194.93 feet. Surrounding uses consist af a
single family residence (Rl) to the north, the City of Los An-
geles to the south, Santa Monica Airport (C5) to the east and a
single family residence (Rl~ to the west. Existing on-site uses
include two single famiZy dwellings of 1,462.5 sq.ft. and 1,124.8
sq.ft. There are fourteen mature trees on the site. Na changes
are proposed to the existing on-site structures, vehicle access
or landscaping.
Zoning District:
Land Use District:
Existing Parcel
Area:
Propased Parce~
Area:
R1
(Single Family Residential)
59.08' x 194.93' x 59.08' x 195.17' _
i1,518 sq.ft.
Parcel I- 107' x 59' = 6,293 sq.ft.
Parcel 2- 59' x 88' = 5,225 sq.~t.
a~J~~
_~_
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Variance and Vesting Tentative Par-
cel Map to subdivide an existing 11,518 sq,ft. parcel into 2 par-
cels of 5,293 sq.ft. and 5,225 sq.ft. Parcel 2, facing Dewey
Street, has a substandard length of 88' and, due to the proposed
lot split, the existing structure will have a nonconforming rear
yard setback of 5'. Parcel l, facing 23rd Str~et, has a substan-
dard length of 59' and, due to the proposed lot split, the exist-
ing structure will have a nonconforming front yard setback of 12'
and a nanconforming north side setback o~ a 7 feet. A minimum
depth of l0a feet and a minimum width of 50 feet are r~quired far
an R1 parcel. Under Municipal Code Section 9113.3, a variance
may be granted to aliow modification af minimum parcel
dimensions.
MUNICIPAL C~DE AND GENERAL PLAN C4NFORMANCE
The proposed project is incansistent with the Municipal Code and
the General Plan in that the proposed parcels are s~bstandard in
terms of length and required yard setbacks, and the parcels are
not similar in orientation with the existing pattern of develop-
ment a~ong 23rd Street.
CEQA STATUS
The praject is exempt per the City af Santa Manica Guideiines for
Implementation of CEQA; C1ass 5.
RENT CONTROL STATUS
An owner-ocaupied exemption exists for the two (2) existing sin-
gle family dwellings.
FEES
The praject is not subject ta any additional P~anning fees. A
final map filing fee of $350.00 is required prior to City Council
approval if the project is approved.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Pursuant ta Municipal Code Section 9130.8, within 30 days after
the subject app~icatian was deemed camplete, the applicant posted
a sign on the property stating the fo].lawing information:
Project case number, brief project description, name and
telephone number of appZicant, site address, date, time and
location of public hearing, and the Planning and Zaning Division
phone number. It is the appiicant's responsibility ta update the
hearing date if it is changed after posting.
In addition, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9J.31.5, notice of
the public hearinq was mailed to all owners and residential and
commercial tenants of property located within a 300 foot radius
r R r
- 2 - J~1,~?
of the praject at least ten cansecutive calendar days prior to
the hearing. A copy of the notice is contained in Attachment B.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is propasing the ~ubdivision of an existing 11,518
parcel into two (2) parceZs in the Rl dis~rict. The existing
parcel dimension~ are approximately 59~ in width by 195' in
length. ~his corner parcel faces 23rd Street to the east, Dewey
Street to the south, and an al~ey to the north. There are two
existing one story single family structures on-site. No changes
are propased to the structures. Access ta an existing two car
garage exists from the alley for Parcel l. Driveway access to
Parcel 2 exists from 23rd Street. No changes to existing access
are prapased.
Two parcels are proposed. Parcel 1, with frontage alang 23rd
Street and the narth alley, has a 59 foot depth and a 107 foot
width For a total of s,293 sq.ft. Proposed setbacks include a
12' frant yard (alang 23rd Street), 7' and 34' side yards, and a
25' rear yard. A variance is required for the substandard 59'
depth and noncanforming 12' frant yard and 7' narth sideyard.
Parcel 2, with frontage along 23rd Street and Dewey Street, has
an 88 foot depth and a 59 foot width far a total of 5,225 sq.ft,
Proposed setbacks include an existing 32' frant yard, 12~ and 1S~
side yards and a 5' rear yard. A variance is required for the
substandard 88' depth and noncanforming 5' rear yard setback.
The minimum dimensions of 50 feet in width by IOd' in length and
a ininimum size of 5,000 sq.ft. are required for parcels in the Rl
District. Municipal Code Sectian 9113.3 allows the madificatian
of minimum parcel dimensions and yard setbacks on parce~s with a
depth of 90 feet or Iess or a width of 39 feet or ~ess. The ap-
plicant is requesting a variance for both lat dimensians and
front and rear yard setbacks. The parcels da meet the minimum
lot size af 5,000 sq.ft. The orientation of the two parcels, as
proposed however, are not similar to the dorninant arientation of
parcels in the surrounding residential neighborhaod. All other
parcels face Dewey 5treet and have parcel dimensions greater than
the minimum required by code. The proposed subdivision and
resulting parcels ara not in acc~rdance with this prevailing pat-
tern of de~elopment.
CONCLUSION
The applicant is p~oposing the subdivision of an 11,518 sq.ft.
into two parcels af 6,293 (Parcel 1} and 5,225 sq.ft. ~Parcel 2}.
A variance is requested far propos~d parcel dimensions and yard
setbacks less than the minimum required. Although code perm~ts
granting of variances for parcel dimensions and setbacks, the
orientation of the proposed parcels is not simflar to the pre-
vailing pattern of development in the area.
- 3 - ~~v.~~
RECOMMENDATION
It ~s recammended that the Planning Con~nission deny Variance 92-
013 and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 21159 with the following
findings:
VARIANCE FINDINGS
1. There are no special circumstances or exceptional charac-
teristics appZicable to the proparty involved, including
size, shap~, topagraphy, locaticn~ or surroundings, or to
the intended use or development of the property that do
not apply to other properties in the vicinity under an
identical zaning classification, in that the property as
currently existing is similar ta surrounding properties.
2. The granting of such variance will be detrimental or in-
jurious to the property or improve~ents in the genera?
vicin9.ty and district in which the property is located, in
that the orientation and size ef propased parcel~, Parcel
1 and Parcel 2, are not similar to the prevailing pattern
of development in the area and substandard setbacks wou~d
exist.
3. The strict appli.cation of the provisians af this Chapter
would not result in practical difficulties ar unnecessary
hardships, not including econamic difficulties or economic
hardships, in that the existing parcel fits into the es-
tab~i.shed pattern af development.
4. The granting of a variance will be oontrary to or in con-
fl ict with the general purpases and intent of this Chap-
ter, or to the goa~.s, objectivas and policies of the
General Plan, in that the orientation and size af propased
parcels, Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, are nat similar to the
prevailing pattern of develapment in the area and the sub-
da.visian would result in substandard setbacks.
5. The variance wfluld impair the integrity and character of
the district in which it is to be lacated, in that the
orientation and size o~ proposed parcels, Parcel 1 and
Parcel 2, are not similar to the prevailing pattern af
development in the area.
6. The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed
var~ance, in that the parcel is level and the proposal is
to subdivide the existing parcel into two parcels with no
change ta existing structures.
7. There are adequate pxovisions for water, sanitation, and
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed
variance would not be detrimental ta public health and
safety, in that the praposal is subdivide an existing par--
cel into twa parcels with all amenities on-site.
-4- ~'?~"~~
8. There will be adequate provisions for public access to
serve the subject variance propasal, in that access to
Parcel 1 exists from Dewey Place North and access to Par-
cel 2 exists fram 23rd Stre~t and na changes to access are
proposed.
9. The strict application of the provisions of Chapter 10 of
the City of Santa Monica Comprehensi~e Land Use and Zoning
Ordinance wou~d not re~ult in unreasvnable deprivation of
the use ar enjQyment of the property, in that the propasal
existing parcel is developed with two si~gle family struc-
tures and no changes are propased.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FINDINGS
1. The praposed subdivision, tagether with its provisian far
its design and improvements, is nat consistent with ap-
plicable general and specitic plans as adopted by the City
of Santa Monica, in that the proposed parcels are not
similar to the prevailing pattern af deveiopment in the
area and the subdivision would result in substandard par-
cel lengths and setbacks.
2. The site is physically suitab~e far the proposed type of
development, in that the propasal is ta subdivide an ex-
isting parcel into two parcels with two existing single
family structures to remain and no changes ar~ proposed.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density
of develapment, in that the proposal is to subdivide an
existing parcel into two parcels with two existing single
family structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
4. The design of the subdivision or the praposed improvements
will not cause substantia~ environmental damage ar sub-
stantially and avoidabl.y injure fish or wildlife or thsir
habitat, in that the proposal is to subdivide an existing
parcel into two parcels with two existing single famiZy
structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improv~ment
will not cause serious public health probiems, in that the
prapasal is to subdivide an existing parcel into twa par-
cels with twa existing sing2e family structures to remain
and with no changes are proposed.
6. The desi.gn of the subdiv~sion or the type of improvements
wil]. not conflia~ with easements, acquired by the pt~blic
at large, for access through, or use of~ property within
the praposed siabdivision, in that the proposal is to sub-
divide an axisting RZ parcel into twa parcels with no
restrictions or changes to existing access.
Prepared by: Susan White, Assistant Planner
Attachments:
G~i^..M
~.; ~ ~~
- 5 -
A. Municipal Code and Gen~ral Plan Confvrmanca
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Radius and Location Map
D. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 21159
E. Photographs af Site and Surrounding Properties
SMW
PC/TPM001
D6/23/92
- 6 - C3~ .~
ATTACHMENT A
NNNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
Land Use
Cateqory Element Municipal Code Project
Permitted Use Single Single Family 2 Existing Single
fam.res, Dwelling Family Dwell~ngs
Moratorium Status N/A
Dwelling Units Sing~e Single Family Single Family
fam.res. Dwelling Dwellings to
Remain
Parcel Dimensians 50'W x 100'L Parcel 1-
and size = 5,000 sq.ft. 107'W x 59'L=
minimum. 6,293 sq.ft
Parcel 2-
59'W x 88' L =
5,225 sq.ft.
Setbacks
Frontyard N/A 20' Parcel 1- 12'
ParceZ 2 - 32'
Sideyard N/A 7'2" Parcel 1-
7' & 3~'
Parcel 2 -
N/A 5.9 12' & ~8'
Rearyard N/A 25' Parcel 1- 25'
Parcel 2 - 5'
~~~n.
;~ ~
F
- 7 -
A~"'TAC~MENT D
a~ ~:~~
NOTICE OF DEVELQPMENT PROPOSAL
To: Concerned Persons
From: The City of Santa Monioa
Subject of Haaring: Appeal ~f Denial o~ Application for
Tentative Parcel Map 22159 and Variance
92-012, 3222-3232 23rd Street, R1,
AppZicant: Mohammad Siadat and Mohammad
navari
App~llant; Mahammad Davari
A Public Hearing will be held by the City CQUncil on th~
following request:
Appeal af a Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Parcel Map
22~59 and Variance 92-012 to allow the subdivision of an ~1,5~8
sq.ft. with two existing single family residences in the Rl
(Single Family Residential) District into two parcels of 6,293
sq.ft. (Parce~ 1) and 5,225 sq.ft. (Parcel 2} with subs~andard
lengths and non-conforming ~etbacks).
TIME: TUESDAY, July 14~ 1992 , 1992 AT 7:30 P,M.
LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER, ROOM 2Z3, CITY HALL
1685 MAZN STRE~m, SANTA MONICA
HOW TO COMMENT:
The City of Santa Monica encourages ptzblic comment an this and
other projects. You or your representative, or any other persons
may comment at the City Council's publi.c heazi.ng, or by writing a
~etter,
Letters shou].d be addressed to:
City Council, City Clerk's Office
1685 Main Street, Room 1Q2
Santa Monica~ California 9D401
M~RE INFORMATION
If desired, further information on any application may be
obtained from the City Planning Division at the address abave ar
by calZing (310) 458-8341.
The m~eting facility is handicapped accessible. If you have any
special needs such as sign language interpreting, plea5e contact
the ~ffice of the Disabled at (310)458-8701.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65009(b), if this
matter is subs~quently chal~enged in Court, the challenge may be
- 1 - Q ~~ ±., 3
limited to only thase issues raised at the Pub~ic Hearing
described in this natice, or in wxitten correspondence delivered
to the City of Santa Monica at, or prior to, the Public Hearing.
Esto es un aviso sobre una audencia publica para revisar
applicacianes propaniendo desarrollo en Santa Manica. Esto puedo
ser de interes a usted. Si deseas mas informacion, favor de
Ilamar a Elsa Gonzalez en la Division de Plantificacion al numero
(310} 458-8341.
PCWORD/tempccpn
pc/ap4ol
SMfnT
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
D. KENYOIv WEBSTER
Principal P1ann~r
r ry
~, ~./ ~ ~~
- 2 -
A ~'TA CI~ME~ITT' E
o~f~~~
A~'TACI~MEN~' F
G~`~~~3
~1~~~~
City Plannmg Division
(310) 458-8341
Juna 17, 1992
Mohammad Davar~.
3222 23rd Street
Santa Manica CA 90405
~~~~~~
IB85 Ma~n Street, PO 8ox 2200
Santa Mornca, CA 904Q7-2200
Subject: Appeal of Parcel Map 21159 and Variance 92-013,
3222-3232 23rd Street
Dear Mr. Davari:
Aecording to Municipal Code Section 938]. (e}, the City Council. is
required to act upon the appeal of a Tentative Parael Map within
thirty (30) days of the date of th~ appeal. The appeal was ff~ed
on June 11, 1992 and the 30 day limit is July li, 1992. We are
requesting an extension of the 30 day time limit, so that the
Counci~ may review the appeal of the above noted project on
Tuesday, July ~4, 1992. Please confirm that you or your
representative can attend the meeting on this date and that you
agree tv th~ extension.
PZease call me at 310 458-8341 if you have any qtiestions.
Sincerely,
~~ ~~~
S Whi~e
Assistant Flanne~
cc: L. Paul Cook
PC/dvri
SMW
o~/i~r/~2
_ 1 ..
~ ,~
C ~~~
~
[
c ~~ ~ a~
AT~'AC~IVIEIITT G
Q~~~j
~
!'~~ ~
2z
~a
~ ~
' ~ ~
=
~ ~
~ i
~
o`Q: ~ ' ~
~
Ftii y~
~~
~
S
Z f
Nv~ _ ~
I
~ ~
' !
~ It
. ~ F~
.~
i~ "
iti a}
~
: a
:
,y wat~ ~ov~
, ,
_ ~
~ ~~
W
~' ~
V7 ~
~
~;a1
' 1
~ 23 ih
151 ,
.c a
9 9 150 q:
.p
~ R ~49 =
~
BO
~ ~~1`G~
M
~~ a
5 ~ ~t x
" F„~ r
~, a7 o N~~ M 19
6 R ~13 /
,~
89 I ~+ _ !0
i 41 l7 ° ~
A ,l~.~ ' -
112 ~
~ cs
~~e y~5 ~2 ° I~~
s 4Z = E7 90 ~ 04 ~~ /CI <~ p 106 /3 1~-
P2o~ ~ -~ 4 ~ ° itor ~_
86 ~ - 91 3 to2 A st '07 ' ~
~p ':c ~ ~ U
3 g ~ 85~~ s 92 R 10 8 i u:*108 ~5 0
~ 43 0o io9
~ R / I
~ ~ x s ,~o " ~ ~ ,S x +~,t ~ r:-'
st ~ 83~ Sl 5~ ,~94 9t ~ 94, g 5t ,.eS~~~ ~ L1J~a
g EZ q q 95 a 96 y~ Y11 ~ W °j
' u ~.a ~~ Z ~,s -,,. N Q ti
y 02 ~ 6f ~ a 96 ~ R 97 ~ I12 ~,
2for ~e •+a ' 2ro~ +s ^•~s rm ~
s 21 th ~STREE7 s f W ~~~
~. ~
`~ ~ ~ i i ,.~ ~ ~ ~ , r ~~~ ~ _ ri
~
~~~
i i r~Z Z~t4.`r
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LO T I4O* ~A~T N o. 8542 . CAS~ NO y~' `~ ~~ Z`~ '~
STREET ADDRE55 3222-32 23 RD ST ZONE
SANTA M~NiCA , 9Q4~5
APPLICANT
RADIUS ~IIAP FOR
P~G,1f~1~nl~G`~1C DL~PaG3~~l~G~~
c~ ~~
~ ~
~~~~~~YW
DATE 2 - ~ " ~ 2
PU~LIC
H~ARING
RAT~
Referenee
Aflat Map
Sh~at I+lo._ ~ ~
li~J .~~
~
For Dept IIs~ Oalv
Ftre 7,at1e
No ~....' _ --" f ''---- - `~ - -
?
~ Occur C~oup
I3ete ?-i ~ . ~'' ~ - -•- -
r
Fes
~
~ }
~ # ~
~ Ar,~.rovs
` ~
~ ~~l' r
~~~
..,,
,
. _
~ -
-_
~
AP~LICATI~N FaR ~UILDING PERMIT
BUILDIl~IG DEPARTN~HT. CfTY OF SAl-]TA MONiCA
~ia ]Spplic~lioa Must 8~ Fillid Ou! !a In~ ~
NOTE ~gE POI.I~LN3 d19E ~PR'OVED. 1LN[D PQi1~II'F IS s~ ~3
.
.~2~2 ~y~ - .~~~` ~~`~~
Locat~on Ad~~fess.. - ~
•- ---- -- -- - • - - - -•- l - - • ---- • - f =- - -
Lot- ~~~-- B1oc~ . - -- - - Tract. --- ~~~ v---- •- - • - • - - -• - - Size of ~ot '~/.00 _ x J ~~. ?~-
List Existirig Builci~ngs Or, Lot and Use .. ..__ ~l~`~'
W~II it be necessnry to request permsssiaa fo remove trees from parkway to insta.ll d: ~veway (Yes }(No. `r]
Type oE Construction•
Type 1-Fue Resistive ^ Type ~Hea~ry Timbas ~ Type 3-Ordin~*y Masonry ^ T}pe 1---Metnl Freme p Type ~Yilood Frems ~
~~ Nature of Work ~°
Co~s~uction ~£nlargement ^ AI`aration 0 Con~era~on ~ Repau ^ Descnption _
~ " ~j~, _ l' f ~ ~1' ,~~ ~
Speci~ic Use af Building ... ..~_~1c ~r_~ I. /~~ _~ .. .. __ No of ft oir: _ No a! Fam:hes
~~-
Material ~k~er.^r Walls _ .. . . _. .First Floor Joists.. _x_ _ _ Sec~nd Floor loists . x_ .. . _. ..
Number o! Stones ~ _ . _ _ __ _ _ __ Height to Highest Point.. ~ T! _ . Roof Matennl . . . ___ ~
~a
Size Width `~- ~ •-- - ft , by Length•- -~ ~' - -- -- - - -- --- ft ; Tota1 r~'loor A: ets -~' ~~~ sq tt
Includir-g Plumbiaq, Gas Frtting, ~ rv
VALVATIOPI OF PROPOSED B'_.DG ~ Sewera, Ces$pools. Electrica~, ~ $ . ~ ~ • rd ' . _ _ _ _ __ ..
Paintinq, Fia~ahmg, alI I.abor, etc }
Owner.. . . . .~.~. . - - .~ .~.. ~'~.'~~- - - - - - . Rddress . 3- ~- ~ .~ ~~~~ S T
' ~ State Iacense No ._l~_~~~.~' .. .f~. ~
Cor.tractor. _ ~~~~~5~_ ~D~e~ s--- ~ ~ ~'- - -- - - ---- -- - - - ~ ~ C~
~ City License No ._ _~. .. !_ _ _ . ___._ _.. ~
Address_ . ~~~ ~r .!~( ~_~G. ~iV G ~1~ ~~ . . . Fhone No Q.~~ _ ~1~1 ~ _ _ ~
~
Architect_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ . _ _ _ _. 5#ate E.icense No _ _ _ _ _ ~
A~dress _ - • - - - - - - • -----• - - - -- - - -- - ---- -- --- -- - Phane No - • - - - -
NOTE T: ~ g-antiag ol n Bni~d~nQ Permil daes not qrant any -ight or pnv~lege to (t) E~ec` ary huild~ng and/or s'n:ctu•e
ar an~ ~a*'•or thereof, upon nny etreet, t-lley, or other pubVic p]ace or porho-~ tt~ereoi, or i~) Uae any buzldinq and/or
atruc~~ ~e cr nny portian thereol, far nny purpose thnt is, or may e prohibrted by ordinan~e oE the ~ ity of Santa H!onica
Tte g-an+~ng of n Buildinq Permit daes not nffact or pre~ eny clnim of ttlle to, or r.gkt o! posaession in, !he prop-
erty desc•ibed ~z such Perrti' -
I have ~eaci tr:e above appl:catian and know the conients thereaf, the same is true and correct I further state
thei I am fa.~r_ilisr with the ldw~ goverxunq bu~tcl~rtg witY:in tha City pf Snnta Morsca and State oE Cal~fornia, and
amenrlment~ theretc, that the a~ove building and/or structure will be butlt in confor:n~ty therewith, and that legal
property 3~nes ~- ave been estab] shed
I, the awner, certify ihat al] ]ahor employed on this work vriil be cave*ed durir.g course of construction by work- •
ma~'s com~zsat~on insurance ~~ required i~y the State of Califo .ia •
Signature of Owner or A t Date
~~ ~J~~J
N~TE: SHOW P'LOT FLAN ON OTI~R SIDE.
L~
Curb to Prov :..:r~e
Pr~pzrtt L~ne 'o Build~ng Line
Si~e Yard 1~z~::t'r:
(t'OR ZONII4G D~AR'E14~N? II3E ONL7fy
; ~ ' Pdap Sheet No
~~
• • Use Classificataon
~
~ •.
/
I
~
,
~ `~
~ q,~z ~'
_; -__----_- -.~._-.~ ~ . ~
._
~ ~.
.
~
0 '
~ , T .
. 4~ ~ ~
~.,.. ~~-.r.-.~~, o ~ x
~ , ~
~.
' ~ R~ t
~ ~~ ~ i
Y~
•
1
I
~
~~X ~
~• 1
1
. ~-~ -~'~ ~
~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
!
I ( ~t
~ ~ ` 6i
~lr) ~
f..~f
r_ ~~ '~~,. 1 .. _
_... • i'~~v~~~~ ~ ~, <
~
~
,
~
~~
~
«
~a
l 3
_~
/
f q~~ S~
- \ , -.----..- _'~ ~
.
~~ ,
, ~
1~ ~ y v
~~ ~ ~ ~~
~~ , o
~~ ~
.
~~ ,
~ . -.-.-'-~--~,, , ;
~
,
-~ '
~ ~ Q~/ = ~
~ ~
o~X ~~ r ~~~ ~ ~`
,
~
~ ~ ~'
, ~
~
C'~ i~
«.~ '~RL A.~MTr 7+. . .
, ^ ~., ; ,y ' ~
For D~pt. ~ On1r
N; ~ ~ ~ =~~ / ~
~ APPLlCATl~N ~aR BUlLD~NG P~RMIT
- ~- ~ ~ ~,
nau _.~ `' ,
o«~p
~
~ sn1r.D~ n~a~~r. cirY o~ saNra ~orttr~t
Fe. f Y~~la ¢°~cc _
' wa
Trae ~ N t~. av~e+xm- wv,s sa ria.a ow in r~k
T
~
1G PII~1t[ no xor sr)lR7 wo~lfc
I~or a smLD
P C N~`/~ C Con~tr
~f
C
~v~6 ~O
~
s Is
rt
~
~tTOHE PZ1Lt7S 1[8E EYPEO~/E~. AIiO YE9l~t! Ib 1aSUED.
~~'~/v'
~
'/
j ~ (P
Det.
~
~ Y
-~ ,
f ,z a
~~ ~~
I.oeaba~ Address r ~ ~ ~ _ 2 i 7' - - -• -~--
,
_
~
_
F.. i~_~ _-i'_` _
~~/4o._Hlock. "~t'.'
. Traci ~ r4L. _ S~ze af I.at z ----
L~st Ensiuxg Buildu~gs On Lot end [3se 4~'-' r'~e~ e~ G ~~ -~o~'t -
Nnleue o! Wark Canqroaien f~ Enlarp~rrrnl ~ AI1~n1wn 4n, Convrrs~en ~ RePe~r C
~CIl~10t1 ! C~.u~~lS_L.Cw~ Fh'CTlI- /'_~'?"~irtl~ ~~. _
SpeuiFa Use oS Bu~idmg....~'-'~_'~-~"~'~-. .... . _ 130 01 Rooms ~ i3a n{ Femikxrs ~. _. _
St4 Q
Matenal £xte~or lb'alLs ~'vGcC . Fust F1oor Jrnsts x Second Floor ]o~sYs x _
Number of Stor:es ~~'F .He~gE~t to Highest Pamt 1~ ~ PooE 2vlnter~a! /`~`~'+~.
~ ~L_~ - - sq ~
Sue W~dth z~ !t by I.ength .~^s _ it , Tota] Floar Aree ~a '
r 7nClud~ng P1umb~n9, Gaa F7ttm9 ~
VALUATIOhi OF PROPbSED B:.T7G i Se++ma, CaaPoala Elacteieel ~~ J~,~,(~ r _
i PalaUnq. F!wi•ti:nq df ldbar stc J L,u
Qw ner ~,~ts~.m . _ Address 3 z 3~ z 3'- 5 t _
~Ontractor ~rit.9 rcf I~tQ,pS ~n-C
'~ Address ? ~ Z3 ~I~e+ t~rua ~ ~~ J3Ynv~c,q
Arch~tect. - - - _
~
Address
r State L~eenss No Z 3z• f~5~ --
~ ~ Crty Liccnse NO - - - -- -
Phone Ivo ~„~~' ~ ~ 7 -
5tnte Lacense No
_ Phone No - - - - - - ..__ _
7he g.anrins a' a B~ildmp Perm~e dws no1 goM ~ny riyhf m prrvllap~ to (EJ Ereo any b~ilding and~w strue~r~ or porfron ~hvraf
upon erty nreet e-~Yey or aSh~r public ~pw w portion thano4 or (~ U~e any buildYrq andjor a+runur~ w any ponlen tF+ercaf fpr
~ny purpow the+ i~ or may be proh+h~ted by ordinanq of ihe Ciry ef Sama lYbn¢e
TYia granung ef a 8wldmp Permn dw~ naf afhd w prejudip my dum of ~itle ro, w ngM of ponemen in tF~e p+epatty d~aibed
m wch permrt
7h~ owner or permne~ ia rupons~b3a for efv Wution of proprrry i~end 6a~ldmg~ a alrucNrea w~•h regard Yo ihe property lines
! aenify rhu I have read m~s applKar+ort ~nd ~r~fa ~hu 1ha ~6ev~ infnrm+fien i. corron I~qree ~o compiy ~a all Cny Ord+nanca~ and S~are laws nla~mp
to buikding cons~r~mon 1 cemfy Ynn in tn~ p~rformanp of Yne ahwe wa+k Y ihall nu employ any persen m vioSar+on o+ ehe Labor LoGe af Ls6ferma
rel~hnp ~o Wark~nen i Compensaiqn lmuroncs
CONtIIACTORS SIGN lELOW
i cerf.fy tkuf I em a licemed cmtnctor and Ihar my Iro~rue n in ful! fora and affen
~~ axY ~~o~ f „C~.c+ R,,
~ ,~~ ~
Contrador ~ Au~hpr~zed Agenf
OWNER•lU1LDEQ f16N lEWW
I cartiiy that I em e~empt from ihs provisiom of Chap 9 Orv 3, B and P Code {Conerac7or t Liornsa Lswl heceu~e {chedc one;
~ I~m t~e Owne. o~ ihe a6me properry and w~li paraonally prrlorm ~he a6ove wa~k
~ 1 am the owner o~ ~ha ~6ov~ propsny and I will caneren ro heve aEl oS ~he abovr wark p~rformec by I~oensed canrractan
~ - - gY
Owner e Signer~re Au~hw~zed Ayenr
NQTE: SHOW PLQT PLAN ON OTHF.A SIDE. ~
: c a„~ ~ 3-`~ST~~A 20NSiiG DEPRA7MEN7 USE ONLYf
Csarb to Prco Line ~ p,~.~_~] ~~. p 7 Map Sheet No ~Cti ;' Use Cless~ficei~on
Properly L~~e to Buil3ing 1apa~0 ~ 4 N ~~~ ~ 7' ~" '~
S~de Yerc 1N~dth ~.{~ // PF,~~, r !~ cf~"ti /J C e C"k ~-` ~' I ~
9 . -~ ( ~ 9~ rr... u.~ . ,~S ~
Rear Yard DeP"~ r ~~ -~ ~- -' .~ ff f ~~ f
I latended vse of new eonstruction f 6 f' = n
Depth Of( s•-ee' Loadinq -- - .i f ~ ~ ~ %~ _ ,;, ~~.G r
~ or e]terebon ~~ ~t~y~~ ' ~ ~»~ y /
D~sFance ce•weer. B~a•ld~ngs 5~~ 7 S~e,,cr N `"~
Q ~ J .. ~
Parasl, Reversed Corner. A corn~r
parcel, the side street Iine of wh~ch is
substantially a continuation ~f the front
parcel line of the first parcel ta its rear.
Parcel, Thrauqh. A parcel which fronts
on two parallel stree~s or which frants upon
twa streets which do not intersect at the
boundaries of the parcel.
Parcel Width. The horzzontal distance
betwean the side lines af a parcel measured at
right angels to i~s dep~h along a straight
~ine parallel ta the frant parce~ line at the
street or public right-of-way that is
identif~ed as the parcel's address.
Pedestrian Orientation. Design qualities
and elements that cantribut~ to an active,
inviting street level enviranment making the
area a p~easant place to walk and shop
including but not limited to:
{aj Street furniture.
{b} Design ameniti~s related to the
street level such as awnings,
paseos, arcades.
{cy Visibility inta buildings at the
street level.
30
A~"TACI~M~~TT H
~~ ~ ~.~
4 ~ r ~---` 4~ 1 ~ ~~ ~1
~CALE 1" ^-~ B 0
I`i
~rt
!
~
I
L
!
4
_
;r
~
r~
i
a --
~
~
~! ~ CODE
i ~'-~ R Fi U 4
~ ~-+
/~!
G~ cn
J O
„. b ~ ~\
\ ~~
TRACT NO 8052
M ~ 91-3B
TRACT ND 8542
M B 104-27-29
lv~'t'//
_ r~v~ ~r '
~P7G810A661p0/ ~
~e/zrzo4oo~vaa
~on7i9os'a•,/G~/ 01
y¢~7/~CF~~t'<k'1 ~ 07
~ i
i
w
i~
s
i
i i~
5~
rF
~,~
~ ~,
}k ~
i
~
~
:j
FOR PREV ASSM'I' St;F 755 -?_06 R c10 A55F55011~9 Mdp E
rm+t~sv nr. incr~~i~rirc r•~~ r~ ~'
ATTACHMEf~T I
. ~~
C;~~~ ~ ~
\\''~~ei~@ l^JK O.
~~~`~i ~~~~ ~O V yi incarporated, Est. lgll
~~~~~ ~
~~\\\\ Land Surveying - Civil Engiueerlr~g . Entitlements • Public ~iffairs
^~\\\\
^~,~~,~~ "Qualaty and F.~.~eerience on Your Sade"
June 26, 1992 ~~~~( ~~ ~ ~ =- _ ~~"~ ' -
~t ~ . ~~ = - s _ ~r- -
~•
Santa Monica City Cauncil _ ,
1b85 Main Street =`! k =~ - -
P.O Box 2200
5anta Monica, CA 90407-2200
RECARDINGc ADDITIONAL II~TFORMA'1TON APPEAL
VESTING TENTATIYE PAIZCEL MAP NO. 21159 AND vARIANCE NU. 92-013
CQUNCII, HEARING DATE: JULY 14, 1992
Honorable Council Mem}~ers,
At the time we filed the above referenced appeal, all of our researc~ and documentation
was not in place I would liice to add the fo2lowing documents for your considcration,
The main reason your Planning Department staff recommended against this d'svision is
because, they say, the "orientation" of the proposed lots would not be "similar" to the
development pattern in thc area We disagree wxth that statement.
In addition to the previously submxtted Facts and information, ane of thc kcy elements for
your consideration is the precedent set at the other end of the sub~ect block on 21st
Street At 3221 and 3233 21st Street, there are two houses that face 2lst Street very
much the same way as is proposed for the subject parcel on 23rd Street. The original
house was built ~n the 194{ls, Accord~ng to its address and physical location, it has
always faced 21st Street. In 1988, the City issued a building permit for a new single
family tlOUSC an the northwesterly portion nf the same lots that the original house was
built on
For your edification, I am pro^iding a current copy of the Tax Asscssor's Map which shvws
the two parcel5 facing 21st street I am also enclosing copies of the various building
permits for these two houses
With the enclosed and the previously submitted documents, we have ciearly demonstrated
that the proposed lot pattern ~s consistent with pre~ious City act~ons throughout the area
and that our appeal shouid be granted.
pect y submitted,
L. Paul Caok P S.
Agent for the Subdivider
cc The Planning Department, Attn Susan White
Mr Mohammed Davari
Enclosure
ph/i4/140005
Wesulde ~ovrers i1g35 VLes[ Oly^mpic Eoulevard, Suice 375
~,os ~ngeles, Cal3fornla goo64-Soo4 FAX 3ro/3izeo4q
Tel 3io/3~z-S2zz or 8ief785-5141
~+,~~ .
ti, ° ' _ J
~ ~`~ 1990
- 80
.~
~J
CODE
8604
c~
~
~
~,~ ~
ti::~
FOR PREV ASSf 1T SEE 755 - 20fi 8 2 10
/~(
~\ d
0
~, 60
TRACT No ao5~
M. 8 91-38
TRACT NO 8542
M B 104-27-29
~aad
y~~,~~,
~giczroaoa,oe,
~B~ztla4oa~ooz
99a7/90S~fA~/•aJ'
~7/9oPOG¢G~X DT
A33ESSOR~9-HAp_
COUHTY`OF~L'OS~ANGELES; CAL,If
~+rY VM VLLyr
RlGi1~TS COalr~~
,,.. ~ ~ 37~
~ ~A
~~ ~ -~
S~~ ~ c~.. ~ .~
~..: ~- ~ J-rJ
N~. A ._ i
e~.. ''`„'r. ~ ~
Fr~ 1 D~r+ ~.BG
~ f 0~c ~ ~~A ~CA Bt7II.DING d SAr~r~i
I685 ~ ~ ~4(~~a, Ca, 90~G1
~~a P G .
7~s'~~COMBINAfi~QN BUILDIN ~
t~o~s pf`
~.~sctf~v ~ g~rr ~puc,lTtoN ~ 1
yj r= il~IMT IN FHK QR 7'1'PE]
~S~SI //
AP c~t s N~ne ,~/J~/~/ ~, ,!7/J~f't~~~' ~eL ~~~
p80VmE PLGT gLAH pi~[ OTI~R SIDE OF FO~M
PSOjEG7 ID~rzui~ATiON 6 DF~CR~IION: ~~a'~ ^ ~ ~'r `~
~ s ~~ xaam~ ~~ ~r_....Z E~r .~...... r~ c~s: ~~°~ ~a ~ ~ ~ - ~ , d
..,, ~...... _ -- . ...' ". ...__~- -- -
~pli t ~vailt,o .~1Si.~' y .r
La4a1. Lat ~;,~~~a~~'ar~lac~c ~ ~ ...._...__.=: Tract ~,~Z.. i.cz S~za ~Q --- -s.~~' _
~} Clasa ef WorJc Dwiq Apts Cesam ~ ..Other !Yew Censt ~~iltrss _ ~epr~ts
Cexnpnon: :.S~l..~.!L~ _~'~i'~ ~4 ~l.._...C sr~' G.r.t!,~_ .~1,~' ~iL.1 .._
.... _. ~ _ ......_ _....~ ---
.._ .. ............~.... ......._..r. - - - ------~ --- ~- f ~ ~ 3 ~ ~~
__ ~....--- __ ...~.- - . ___ ..._ __.......^ .~---_.... _
~aar Areca 1~y Us~ {t 4- AFts.. Offlc~, PQ*~~+~q1 ~~G~r _.~ ~~ /r~ He~qht .~,~` ~ h
__=-~!a~~,,..f.~~ S/ s~~ ~~ ---------- - --- - • - • - No_ cf SWn~s 1
ror:u ~sr~r~rEa v~vAnox oF a~aovn~m~rs S./~a. ao a
V¢Iuctspe ~s t}~r ta~a1 S valu~ of aii I~or, mdariaia. 6 permcn4rtt aquipment ~nc?uded us t}te pra~ec~
=s~mc;~d S~e campcred to cturent mn~~uc~cn caat :.zcfe~a Eor dat~rra:nctson cf =erA::t feee
P?~*TG~AL; IDIIVYftZCATION:
?~i C x;,er 9 I3~e: _. y~~....__...~.~12/~~.~.~'~ --- Te1• .~.~~; ~7~~~-
-- --- • - - - ---
,~G~..-~~ _,.~~.,~_S____.,r~~~.~~...~f ~ _ _t~.~-Ll~~ _ . . - - - -- - --- ~ --- -
~1 ~~nsrcr~or a Ycme- _ ~ u!!~'r11......_ ~... •-~.- - - - --••... Tel. .. ... .._. _
Red:eas . ..... . .... _. • -•___......_._...-.•_• ••- •----° - • -- - -- - - • - -
_. ~:~~i:ec:: £.~qu:aer• Q w~L_!!~'~.'L----•°-- - --~---. .. .. - TQE ------ - - -
~,ecreas . _ .• - - ... .. .... ~. ~._.._. - - - .. ..---~.... _.-- - --- - - - - - ------ °---• -- -- °-
~~ ~; ~an~'::.~ .~qenr/ 1tld..!~.l.~- •- • - - .. - - • - - Tei. - -- .. --
~, ~ Acd: ess _ . ..-- --. ....._,........_.. ...._....___ ...... ..~ .. _ . .................. .. ..-- - - .. .. .._. ......- ••--- - - -
C~i~IF?G.~Ti~N5 6 DECL.~AAYTOI+TS: ~/G ~ ~
} ~1 ~?JV:VC.~$ ^L~ ~+'~1T10K h -
~~ I kereby cifir.a tbc: I cm exe~sPt ~an 4:e conx~cton ucerua ;aw b~^,se N
~ i vnll cc cl: wark persenally cr ~hru wcqe er.i~toyeea. cnd w~s stract::e s nat ~.~te:.Cec :cr sce ~
,:•rsil conaact wstn licansed con~ :ctt-s to c~ssauuct th:s pre~ect
51sr:an.ua ^~ - - - - - --, . .... ------ • -- -- •-- - - - ~~ e --
21 L"G'ENSE")i CON'iRACfOAS DECC~LPA'~IOM
I~ereoy ~firm thct I hold ~ ac~ve licensa ur.Cer ~~e Cclttomia Busi^eas 5 P'~'95S1Ct9 ~cae
? ~ce-cse C1ass .. _. . ....... . No _ .. ........ . C~tY Bus L~c ~fa
5:4ncttue - --• -- - - --- .. .`............~~.._. ....•• -•- - - • -~ ~c•e -- -
[~ '1JC]R{~rfA:~1'S C.r1. Mr E:VS~.T:QN [NSUe~AaVC~ DFCI.A.~I+i iON S VEr~IFICstTION ~F' ~NFC9MRT:G.•r
[~are~y cfftrm trct Warfcer a Compen~nr. ir.surcnce is in a~ett Eer a:l wnrlc ~u~~^.c:uec ~y th:s :er.-at W d
rr~~c a! •nsuranca -xvercqe :e on 6!e wtLk City
I cer:fy thct I have reviawed tius appl~caffon ^~d ~hat ~E:a ebove uiformaucn .s ccrr~cs ~ c;.ee •c ~~:: ~:v
^+nth cll aty ardincnres and stcn lc~va roqulati :4 bu~[cl~n4 canmuct~on cr:d 'aereny ~:;~orze er.ay _;.~~ _ e
descr: ed ;,ropercy (or ~nspactian ~uraases
~i~:'a!t:re . - - - °-- --- -~___.. ...__. - -- - •.. Cc•e
CMECIC STATVS Ownee Coenm~tar Pnnaa~~ Autl+ar~:~d Aqene
• Z4M1#1G USS Cld6Y
Maa 5f+e~r ~~ C~t Nora- /'~~ i!0. i•ils
Uye C:e~s ~~ Pl-8L +"' S I' `7{(~~G ~i~~ y ~aarnos Y
'I ~ , 1' Q ~~~ 2- L~y1h~ Latum~ ~n ~Y~'~ ~.~ ~K.
Yar~~ , ,_- L L
or-+s~ T 1~T ~D GxC~ '~j` 1 ~1 Cl~~~ Apo a
a+ar R~~ a ~se ~. r~~ ~~ 4~ v~--{k ~~ F i r e~~
By- ee• ~~ j~ ~~S G'~7Q F61J~. 1, ~
r Gen. Svs.
~ h, r E r-
iS -,1
*CO1~fk3i.IATIO~ix ~(~UAt.t: sr~li u~ltca~iuna^ ~-
ADDR$SS: datie:
$
_ Dw~g _ Co~a ~ Pao1/Spa ~ othar
CLASS NAME?/DBA/TEL ~ STATE LIC ~ CI7.'Y LIC
Geueral (B-I}
Tel: ~ 1
Electrical (C-10} ~
Tel: ~ t
Plumhing (C-36)
Tel: ~ ~
Mechanical CC-20)
Te?: ~ ~
Fire (C-16} Specialty (C-61)
Tai: ~ j
~
~~~ ~ _ ~
.
~
~
i
~
_ . ~(}} '.~.
~ s
v
~ ~ ---- ~ ~. , . .
-- - - -~------~ ~•
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
-~ ~-
~
r i
~. - .,L
~ ~-^% ;S~ ~
~G~ ~ -- -- - - - - - --- - -
~. __ ____~ ~ _
~
~
_~_~~- ~_.^...~,_._
~
!
1
I
~
~ ~
n f ~
~#.,~~ _,)
~°` p'~'' °" °~'" APPL~CATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
~" BV~1II'tG DEP]~R1~1Z G[IY OF S1lt1TlL MOI'~C~L
13a ~ Zon~
pccyp. '[hs~ 1[~-u-•Kea Mwt #~ ritt~d ORt Io iali
/ ~n NOT~ r~as ~s xc: a av~n-rc rEa~nr. no nrn ar,cas woas
bnta ~~~{/' f7L _'[YP~ HEPOSS ALluiS 118E ]lrrav~D J~IlD Pt~lSIS 1S 1~ury.
Constr
Fee = ~ ~ ~ x~~
~ ~ ~ Locahon Address. ,~r„f~3- .. .. 7 r~ - - - - - - --
Latl~l.L~z"~ BIocl~---- Tract. [f~ Q. ~~ ... . . ..... . ... . . . Size of Lot . x - -
l.ist Ensung &uldings On Lot nnd Use .. . . . .. _ .. _ - --. - - - - - - - • .. .... - - -
WtI! ~t be necessary to request perassssion to re~pve trees from parkway to je~stall dnveway (Yes _){No_ __ )
Nntura of Work: .
9 ~
Conrtrucuan C7 Con.antort Q Deaciiptian ~~~Gt ~~t7s-s.-d-~.~-u-~i.~ ~-~~G
Ealuy~m~nt (] ~~~~ ti} ~~ ~
~..
+Ul~ratlan ^
Spec~:~c Use o( Bwld~ng . . ~ ~ t ~~-~~ . _ . . . . . . No ot Aooms . . No of FamiLes. _ _ _ _
4latennl Extencr Wa1Ls.~t~::`-[ :G.,~-x" _Fust Floor laists _ . _ ..z .___ __ 5econd floar Jo~sts ........x.... .. .. _
N•.:.,~ber o( Stones . .. . ... Height to Highest point _.... ... .Aoo! Vlalena]
Size W:dtk: . . . .. .ft by F,ength - _ . _ ... .ft , 'fotnl Fioor Aree _ _ sq k
Lzdudfnq Plumbenq, Gae F1f~,nq, ~ ' C}
VALUA~ON OF PROPOSID B~DG ~ Sswer~ Ceaspoo~s El~ctrica7 ~$ _ . ~ ~ p" . _ „ „
Paintinq. Faiahipq n111abor, slc ~
G'wr.er ~..~ ... '; ' ~~~ } - Address.
~'~~ ~=~-~'~~ -- •- -
fy~.~/ "~JJ ~~`~ ~~- ~~~ /// ( 5iate Lacerse No ~ ~ ~e ~f L" __ {~}
CA:L~dC"l,' ,6~. Z..~» _ ~ ~/ - "~ fi~;~q~ ' ~b~ _ "'--
~ ~~ ---~ ~s ~~ z.~
C:ty L:ce~se Nv
Address 1$' ~ k~ ~. +~~'2. L- r ! ~~ ~ - - / ~ _.FE:one No ~ ~-f ~ `•' ~~ - - - ~
~
Arch~tect __ . • - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - _5tate i.iee:~se Na
Adaress -- • .. -.. • - - - _ . . ._... __ ._ _ . _Phone NQ ..... .. .. , - --
NO?E Tne qremu^g of a Bw:dir.q ParmH dose aot grent eny -iqht ar pnv~leqe to {1} ~rect any Suilding and/or ~tructure
~r nay portion t'aereol, upaa eay svea6 nlley, or olhar,pubhc plaea or pari~en therevf, ar (2I ilse any builduiq end/w
a~rac+ure pr ~y portion thereof, !or my gurpoea tha 3a ~r mny ba protu6ited by ardL~ence oE t`~e C~ty ol Saeta Moslcn.
The grant~zq o! a$uilding Perm[t doas not nlEecl r prsFad'yce any cEeim o[ ~tle to or nyht o~ ~eusaioa in, !ha prop-
e-t+! dascnhad tn such Parcint
I have rend the abova appi:cahon and i~now tha contents thereof, the same is true and correcf I k~rther s,ate
t}:a; I arr. [nmil~ar vrith tha laws gaverivng buildu~g w~t':in the City oi Santa Moruce nnd Slate of Ca]iiomia, and
amer.dmen:s thereto, thai the a:aave buildu~g and/o: structure wili be bu~IS ut cenfor**~~ty iherawith, and that Iegal
propeHy iures heve been estabi~shed
I, !he owner, ee'h!y thet ntI labor e~ployed on t'::s w.rk will na cove:ed dunng ~c~.:-se of rons:n:thon ~y wor=-
-nan s r-:, pensaf~on uisurnnce as requ~red by the Stare o: Calitcm~a .
.~~
~ ~ ~r'~ / - ~;' ~ .
5~g:~a re cf Owner or Agent Date
NOTE: SFiOW PLOT PLAI~i ON O'1~~R SIDE.
` ~ (FOR ZOI4ING DSPARSlHtM IISE ONLY}
/
"~ur~ to ~rop I.zne Map Siseet No ~Jse Cless:i~eat~an
~-overt-, ~:~c ta Euild~ng Lene
S~~e Yar3 VJi~th
Rea: Ya:d Depth
Depah O`f-s+reet Loading
~ista~ce between Be~~l~ngs
^" . D~...~ F'F+w~irorl sinr3 SSao Arnmvari
~
]ntended uae of new conatruetion
or alteretfon. _ --- „..,_,...
('~ ty r7 ' "T
L i ~ ~? . i
Fas A~p~- Qa~ OaiY
FL~ ZOM
•.~ ~.-~~.~..~. Z~ _ _
Occup Gcou1~
- - - `/ ~ 1__ \: _
~ ~ A~ :
ia• i..~1c71 ~11 _ ~~,~
,f.
L.ot ~.~ Bto~k . ~'raee....~43z-' --
].ast F~nst:ng Bui2duigs On Lot and Use a~Je _
APPLICATlON FOR BUii.QING P~RMIT
Bvu~n~rc a~xarr+~r, crrY oF snt~rr~ r~arACa
~,. a~.a~ sw.e a. rEU.d o~ tn ret
NOTE ~ ~ „~'~r ~ ~- o ~`~ai n ,~i~,
~etion ,aaa,bm3.233 _2/ s`~` ~'~ - -
• - - - -- SYZe of Lot .. ~~ ~ s ~I~~~•
/ F~.r~.. ~ ~.s-~ ~r,~ ~ o~P Car ~~'.~~ t
,4'°-' ~t ce ,etessery to request pe~,saiort to remova treea fro~ perlcway to ~nstall driveweY lYes ) (PIo ~)
Type o( Coastniction.
Typs 1~Fira A~~latf~~ p TyD~ Z--H~err Ttmb~r O 27p+ ~diaary l~de~onr~ {] Type {-}A~tel Frame ^ Type ~Wood Frnme ~'
Nafura ai Worlt " ~~
Gcutnachon Lfl Enlary~mlht ~,Rlt~rstloa ^ Convmioa ~ A+palr ^ ~]8~RSp h0l1~~~ C~/v~~ ~i.~//J~ f_c.v~~r1
~ Ge+~lQi : ~f/Gw ~a~e1L CaC'~y~QF
5~ccihc Use of Huflc3fng .f~.la~ ~~/1~C- f~~~~~7~ •No af Rooms. ~ No of FemiLes ¢.hQ
"+~~tenal Ex'eyor Wnfls '~t~O .. First Floor Ta~sts. 2. x~ _Second f'oo: jo:sta _`~t _
r /~~/
'ru:^ber oi Stone~ ~7~ . _ ... ..Haigkt to H:ghest Pomt _~~ 14oof ~{a+erinl. `~~ ~~/~f P
i ~ Ji i, r'
5ize W:dL~ ~~ -~__ _ft, by isnyth .. .-~7' `~ _ ... h., Tota! Fioor Area ~~ sq it
(Ineludiny Plambin4 Gea t7ttlng. p
'/Ai.Jr~IICN OF PROFd5£D B~?G j~+•rs. Cesavools Elsctricel, ~ /DO ~'t
/! ` ~ Ps[nHnQ. Ffnnh9nq. ~1 ]wbar. ~tc j ~-
"~.,~-ier l~.CpC2T .C ~LpQl~GJY . . _Address..~Z~ ,'1 Z~ ~ S7'~
r
~cr:,actor C// SP~1 ~~-Q
~dilf7~/' . ij_ ~ -- -- - - ( State L:cense No
-
r ~ C
t
?
N ~L ~~,~ y
~~ Q ~
~dress r R~ ~~ /
S,~ ~O~t~.~~~ ~1~~ i
y
acense
o
°h~re ho ~f C -
~ ~ ~ ~
r~:ch~tect ~~~.P •- - - - - - State I.~cense ha
= dc•ess - - - - • _ -- - .. - - - -- ---- .. .Phone No _
T:~"E The q-antlnq of n Suild~nQ Petml! due no1 q[nn! enY *~ght or prtv~~g~ !o (1) ErseS eny bu~ld~~q a7d/or etr~:elu-e
cr e-y por~iaa 14vno{, npaf sny sSsesL a[l~y, m o'h~r puhtie placs os partion Sbsrw[ or SZl Usa eny hi'.S~p nndfor
s•~,_~u;e or eny aort,on ther~ol ior na~ purpaes thet ~~ 9s mny ~e proh'bitsd by ordL~ence o1•~e wt~y o' Santa Mnniti
'ka 3eesyLinq a~ a Buildu~q Psra~~t doaa noe nflsc! nr pre~vdies 41y elatat ol tlil~ fe, e! right pE poeesuien m, t6~ pro¢
e-'v desct~d ~n ~u~h P~tmit f
I have read the above appltcahon end kaow~e cor.tents thereo[, the sama ~s true ard cortect I[urther state
•~et i am fumhnr witF~ the Zswa governing buildinq v~nthun ths Gity of Santa Mon:ca as:d State ot Cahforena, and
amer.di-~er•s theretv, tha~ ahe above buildu~g end/or structure will be buelt tn contor:n:ty therewrth, and thct lega'
~r~cer~v lines have been estabLsnad
: t~e owner, ee~fy that all lnbor employed on this work wili be mve-ed d~nng co;~rse ~! ee~s•=ucL•on by wcrk-
~ar s c~r~xrsat~on uvsurnnce es required by the State cf Cal~fomin
V~' _ ' ~ . ~~ ~~J
Sigrature of O~vner or Agent Date
NaTE SHOW P'f.OT PLAN ON aT!l~RR SIDE.
i~
~
_-~ 'c P- L:ne /D r
-~a~-t: ~~~= io Hu~iding L.re ~~-'
~ ~_?sr~ ;fidtit J- •
_ = ~- i'ar~ L epth . ~ 4`r
=sp~~ C'(-street Leadcng -
tros zox~c u~r~axr~r vsE a~x}
-~hiap Sheet No Pl ~
~~s,nr~e be,weea $,uldirigs /d ~
='~i a:~;is C'zecked and Lise Approved
Use ~:ass:E~catran '~ ~ / _
Intendad t~e oi naw conatrud~cn
or eltarnrion._~ `~~ - ~"yyz _ ~°~c•/`.~ucLl.
~
Bv ~P ~v71~~~,_ ~ ~ste ~~ ~~ s ~--' ~
1 ~`~~''~~
/
~
~
~
,.,~r
,~ ra F
~}~isT - O/!t
~~~D1~~y ~ B PIla.ir
l~we~/,•, 4 ! 3' i,~rr
'~Y
1 ~
, kFw ;,
/7.S o e r
E 'rT
e ~ ON
J
4
N
//'d "-~ o
~ ~
~
_ SE
,c.oT - /// - //z /'~i~'%
.~1 rG /~aT~rrr f ~'o ~
2~ sf ~~f'lC ~ J~ rs~~.
}
~ac,t ~ , o
EiY r ' Y ~RN ~Z -E ~ ~
3~~
rLfrC~!
8~ S.~
vl
,~
~
q
~~r~ ~ ~3
1~ For DapL U~. o~y ApPLfCAT1aN FOR SUILDING p~RM1T
'- BUII.DIIYG DEpARTME~VT, C,7'i~ OF SliNlA MON7ClL
~.
~~,
No ~ 7Li~ AppLeauon Mua! D~ Fi11~d Out Ia Iale
r
.. -~- Y
•
9
N O T E dff
a~ n~ ~~`
~
~
~ '~~_ ~ r
~
~
'
~vm
~
.
. i
o
,-r
es
o
~
c.
,
i
_- ~-
~ tee s ~ ` ~
-
LOCATION Address ~ ~- 3 '~ - y2 ~ ~ S ~_ ~.---_~,,~~'~!l G'~-~-s-+~
Lot11+-1 i i Block~ Tr~ct a~~ 5?~ 5~as of I.ot,Sa / x I 9(0 ~~'~
ffOR DEF1L871~E11T ~SS 02RY)
Lhst~c~~urb to Property Line ( )
- Mtnimum bEst~c~-Property Lins to BIdQ Liae ( : Map Shaet Na -
Miniraum Side Y~ Width ( ' ; Use QasstBarttoa - !
'.+~`,ixumum Fte~ Ymd Depth ( ; FEre Zone No
1rlittlmum ~iatamc~a between $uildines ( J
Is there cuiy ~~shnq building on Lot1 Yee ^ No ^ How Used?
` 'yn. 1-FYr. xawaw ( Cansrrucwn L]
'typr 2-iiopvy Tlmber ~ Falmvem~nt ~
~
Type of Canstrvction•
} ly~w 3--ordfn@y MasonrY Ncsture oE Worlc. ~srotia„ ~
•
I Type ~Metal F:s~e f Conversioa ^
~ 7ypa S--Woad Frame r F.~~: p
t
u+.i -norc~i i.-I!~ No otRoorr.s Ivo oEFcr.i~hes /
~~~u~c°:_y i:se of Builc~ng w
'~`_•ena! ~xte^or Wcd~s ~ A U d Firs! Flaor ToEsts x Secon^ =loor Ioists x
`~ _~e: c= Storles ~ Haigh# to li~afr.es* Paint '~I , Roo3 f.`,cte~rictl 4.^.0117r~o .+~ t G tt
as= iAT1G~L}3 J`- h, by Lsncjih ~~ ft., Totuf Fiacr Area ~~'~ sq ft.
(( Iaclucl P1::vipM
"~ :~U ~i:Gl~ ~F PitOP05ED BI.DG 1 g~„d ny Ce~~ooln. slsc•rieol. ~~~r 1 OO `~
! e'~aln:.~sq Fiolshfnq cll Tabor, a~c
~-h-~er ~, ~ ~. ~ ~ r ~ ~ R E n u ~ ~ Aa~~ ~ ~. 3 ~ - a ~ -a ~ i .
^~~ ~G~•o: G~ ,~~r~ 5.ate L.icense . ~o
City Licanse 'do
~
r~ ~
~cd:ess Phone No •
,
~rc':i'~•
S;ate Lieense tio
r?3cirzss _ Pnone Na
i30*E ']h~ prcuctinq ai a Bw1dIrW Permh daes uor y-raot mry N9h[ w Prt'rt1a4a to :1~ Erac` ~y
bv4dlnq ondlor ^t[uCUr~ oc aRy I~Eau ehs~i, cpvn azY a~ravt. a1:eY or o~.'~er a~:ic p:aca or
poWon th~nof, ez (2} Vs~ aay huliG3nq ~dlor ~t~uc•ure or any porton therw! far arv ~urpo~e
that !a, oe maY 6~ Peohi6ibd 6y axd[acnee o! i6a Cl,y of Sartte Monl~.
The q~autlnq o! e Butld:aq ?ermi• does not aE`ec or pre~adles any elafm cf 9t:e io ~r eiqht
of poaeasu~ y~ }}~r pn.p~rry deecsSbed :n such Panatr
~~~
'}a r~d the aho~~ilcction and kncw the contents tnereof, ihe s~e Ls true :~.d cor.ect I fur`.her st~e
_ s' i c~ _~ ;•'_:c;r with C~e 1CfWS gov9Ft]!ng b12~di[iq wi~iln Lle City o! 5~ia hionica tmd 5:a+e o[ Califoriuw ~d
=.__er_dra~ s t7ere:ol ane~ that she above buildinq cmd/or s~:ctura will be bu1It ~n ronforraity therew:th.
~ ~ / ` . y"''-~~ ~~~~~~ /~ ,Q
~ ~ Siqned ~.vr,.~.s~c~-lrr oC . /±~~Applic~t
NOTE. IF NO PT,ARS AA$ FILEA, ltlOW L07 ARp HtA7.DING SI?£. PLAR 1LND WIIIDOW 8lZES ON OTHER S~L.
1
~~~~,;~
j~jSj~lY~i~~tiik'1'i ~T;r~ rl~. ... ., ~ r . .. ~ "
µ~~~tl S~.! ~rl ~.il~ ~~ ` i
A~ ~~' ~
v ~'r ~ 1 :~.. ,. .` , ~ ii
~' ~~~x ii~i" },.~~ '~.i~~lT; "
~i4 7!~! ~'I,~ ~: _~.. ,~ . ~ .
~,~, ;~ia"S ~ •yiI ~ , ~' .
~"3'~! d ~y,d;F4R~~"~'y~`~;,rE` 4~~~r~f ~ ~
'ri ~/~{ 1~3r f ~ 1 " ~ , ii ,
~;'~~:~,~1
;~~
~~~~ ~~ ~r,~~{j,~ ~ ;~ ,~ ~' , ' , ' , , .,..( ~.
~ 4~~f~'~'~j~~~",j~, * '' ~ ~ r +~'~ ~ ~A
i ~
I T~ i'~pa yis~~~~; wii~s, , << ,~~ ~ t-
~k ~~'v~~4~~'~}~~~;~ H ~ ~ • ''
' `I~~, k~ ~1, ~~'~.'~~, ;; ' i `.
, ~jt'~~~~'~~~~ l i i ~w ~
,~~~~~'P~ i~}~~P ~ ~"~` F'yyi f
i ` ~!~ ~,}~ , P ,' c^S y'
~%~~ ¢~"f' ~'~'~~ 4 ~ ' ~ ~~ ~
~~M C~ ~ iR ~ i I~.i i, ~~ CY
i I ~~'. ~T,'~N''~~•~~4,~ e ~~1 ['+~ ~
:~;'~ ! ~h~}~~ ~,a~; .xe.~~ ~ ~ , ~' , ' ~
~ Y~ F~'~~~~~5•.,'''~i~ } J~!` rM3 ~ 9~ T '~ !~ i
~~~ ; '~ ' '' ,
HN; ~+~~ I ~~ ' i ~ P'x~~
~FtF.Y~~ • ~~ ^ LL ~i ^ ~' ~ ~ t .,
nl'i ~K ~ i ~f -
,.AF~4' ,.~,s . ~ ', ~ . ~,
° i j~ ~~ ~i ~,~~'.,i" i
„i''~r, ;~;'~i' ~ ~ ~
~ ,~,• s, ~r ' ~ - ~
'l~r~~i.i~y~~~~~1~ I i ~ ~ ,
,i~~,j~;l E ' ~ ";
1 ~' ,
i '
, F £~ I
~ li~~~~~i ~ '~_'nk ~~ ~~
~iP ~F~Vl~~i ~ i F d~0 `I'~ ^ i~'~~ (~.~ }
~1~5~ i~~ ~E~~' Y~n,~ 1 i ~i+ ~~ ,~ t ~
N~ M ~~ ~'
~s ~'~+h~ Yyl`~,'i~~~~ , ~ " ~
.i~~ ~ ~~ 9 ~r~ ~ . '` ~
' ~~~"4i~y'~~'i~y"7~iS~~1 y~ h~i r.wn w rl ~~~i ~ ~ Ni I ~
~ .~f~V~` :'~C~ ~ ~_ ~ ~}3 ~ ~ i'~!!~}~ '~4kk~ ,
~p± '~n 'rr~~'~,~.'~d~"~~~T,'~~~~Jd~~i~~ t~@~~i ~. „ i ~ , " ~ , . ,
'° '}~I~ ~ ~~~1~ , Y~f}`~I~',1~,~~
~,.~~4~ Y ~'tiY1~ ' 114;.~ 1.~
~ ~ . .. ~ ~~' ~O/M~i~ ~,'~qi~A~~
~~~~~pi~y; li j"R4~ ~.~Z'je1i . ..
'` ~ ~
Fl~h~'~~"'Iyh~~~li~ ~~ .s ,
~~~~~~ 4W I , ~ ~ /a ' 1 1 ^I) ~ r ,
^9`a~~E~,'~WS~I ~r~G~ '"a~~ , ' .
•~~94,~~P1, ,~ " ~',
~(~,:F '' ,
.. r
~
~
~ ~ 1 i
7 " ~.~I .
i "' r
, ~ ~~ . .'t~~'A ~ i
~'~~~f ¢iu,,¢~,y'I.Y;~ro,;,~,~~, j' ' y ' * ~
a~$~SS~FF,~ rx4ir~i~~,'y, , ,
, 4~~~~~~ ,it~~ 1i~~~~V~~~ t . 1 ; ~
,~I~,+~,~, ;~~~~~~~~~r3~' t ~~~
t.~ $ ,.~~j; a,,,v, ~ ' : ,p
1:' i ~~
~ ~ i
1 } ~ '
•
IlJ
~ ~ A~ ~ ,
~ ~, ~
. ~
_ , ~' r
~
~-
, ~~ .
. . . q~..- -. --,~. - ~ ---. . , _
~
_, ~ ~.>' ~ ..,. ~ ~
~
~ '~
` .. _
, ~.
\ '
/
~ i
ill
~i 1
' ~
1
, ~ V
~~ I
~ '" S ~ I ~.
r , ~
~
~
' . ~ ~ r~
' 1
!
. ,~ ~ E ~
; ~_
' ~
; ,~
.. . /
~ r ~ A ,
` ~ ,
.r ~* ~~~
y ~ `4 .!t
-'I
~ ~ ~ i
, (
~
'
~f {
~
t~
.
! }
~/
~
.ti ~ , .r
Y
'
~ ~ Y
/
~~ -
/ ~ I
~..,
^~ ~ {
'
' r^
~
~ k~ ' ~
~ 1,
~~~ 1
1` ~
~ V
. ~
.~~..
/'
~!
For 7epL Use Only qppLICATION ~~~ BUiLDING PERMIz
i
~ BUILDIIRG DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA 2-i4b1ICA
I '~~
^
G
_- ~
Ihls Apphcotioa Mwt Be Flllsd Out Ia Ipk
D=. I
~ ~
' -~ -
19 '~
N OT ~~$ 1S ~~ A H11tLD1NG pERMiT 6D NC: S2A$S WOAI
BEF~RE PLRNS RRE APP80VED 7SND PE"t~P
T IS [SSVED
a , .
"~ L' ~ ~~ 3j ~ ~
~~
Nr
v:~~rtTION r ddrsss •
_~t j l!
B~o~k e raci
~~ La of Lot S
'• }
S
ro
~O 5 7.
II 4 17
~
~•
~OR DEPAATMEN7 USE ONLYi
L s:~ce-fi,u:~ :o Fra~ariy L:ae ( ,
i•IutL:.um : •istcr~e-Froperty I.~ne +o $1dcJ Ltna ( ~~' l '~:a~ 3neet No '
ti'r:ir..um S.de Y~d W`.dth i'~{ r? L~sa C:cs~i#lca~on ~!
tv::rum~.-n ~a~r Y~ Depti2 (/(~ ~~ Fire 2cne ~io
b'inimt:_r.~ : ~star.ce berxeer. ~ uldin~s f +~ . ~
Is 'he:e a:.y exisi:nq buiid:a3 en loE? Yes ~ Na .~~' ~~x Usad7
Tyr,a '_-FL-e ReelsKve I Cors^:x'[on ~
~ Ty~e 2-hea+ry 'laber ` F1:unqam~nt Q
I
T~e of Constn:_tio.^. ; ;r~» 3-crdi.~.. ~9: ur Nat~~ra of ~Vork ~,i.e,r,y~ ^
~ ;ype ~`de'al F^~e ~ Cc-veralcn (]
'"yoa j~-'Jir,cd rra~a x ~ePCie ~']
~_ .~ _ _. :lse ~T B•,v.~.^q ~W ~ LL ~ N ~' Nc ef ?eoms T Ido :,i =ar.`'ues I
' _ - _ ~~nn ~
=x~sr•or `~'c~'s (~n,u,E~,(,~ First P?oo: foist~ ~ x ~7 Se-~~n~ : _.,r'o~s'> x
_ __
~ S'r uNQ O L r,
_ ~~~7es j 3eia~t ta ~~yhes-?cm` ~v ~~ci b'ate~al ~~-
l
~j~
., ~"; ~
.. ~ Q~ ft by Ler.gth ~~ y :: To~a F:oor Arec ~ G fG fs
Ni
sq f
- ?= ° (^.~ ud°-~ ='-.~n~•-9 ~.acs il•H-9 /~ (J. ~,'~ ~ D
~'_~: O: F"Or':J4D ~L:'.~ 1 ^ ^ ~$ l
=e•.-"s ...esspoc~s Eiec•r+_ci
~
_ ~ Pai^•:n~ =ins'-ic.., o~] I.atar etc
3 z a 3- z~:~ ,~ I{ n~ r,q
~ C r~ r- n r~ -5 ~lyN ~~ n~` A U~ H
M cN, ~ R
_ aa~zs5
~ i .S`Q~B ~]~EC~S.. ~4~ ~~• f V
~~ ~ 1 1, ~~ f
F ~ l
_ ___ V '
~
.
f .f ~~.Y ~~~s~~~ ~z~ l r~,,~
~~- ~ ~1- 3 ~ ] ~ i1~ ~{ f. ~ f~ ~ i~' t~1 L'LL,' ~~ ~n
H ~ ~ g ~! 1
T:
_
ess ncr.e
o
-~° e;." 5~~tz Licar.sa tc
~ ~c ~-_= _'~-`17C,P_ :` O
NOi= "C'~e y•cri's.q o: c 6u-ld~uJ ?ersr~ ccea ~c~ ~r~-t ary -y}~ c- pr'v:le5a to IU -:aci cny
~~ h~.l~'L y~nc ~ vr sYucNra ot anq Forii~n •hesec` ~f~^ =: v al-ea• aSiay or ~'}e' PuaLc ~ cca cs
~~t. Fo'4c^ 'tareN cr (2] Jae e~y bullc:ny anci cr at ,;c•crg r, any aa:ticr, iharoci fcr ~rv n-.u-.wea
~ t~cn •s n maY ie pro[~:bl:ed 6y crd:nn~ce of :he C:rv o' Scncs Mor.fca
~.a qcanarq o! a Bu1:d:~q pernu• doea zot c`fa=t cr pre~udica c^y c:c~ o- ~•la •c ^ rlqa~
rcf pcssesslon Ir tha ~tpary ceserl'-ed m s~-ei Par-,..U
~~
_-c -e -°~C L'~~ aa~. s~~~ :c ~cn ax:~? tnow Cne Conte~ts ~:e:eo~ :as s~r_= is tn:z --.. ~o:recl I h:rtha: state
_ ~ f~--~::_~ :~rit,'~ :e lcc.•s governlr_s ~t:i'_d.•n4 w~~n,~ ~~~ C..I ~~ w.._..: Df.ozica ~~ Stcta :: Cali~or_ua ~d
-_ ~ _-<s t~~_atc, .. = :hat L1e c;cve bLi d~n~ ~~%or st-~cti::z vnll 6e ~::i~' _h ~cr_ior-- -r •_'lera•~^:..''1
,j ~ ~ ~_~ ~~~~.
V
S:gr~d ~ .v ~~~ /' 1'i:.~{~,` ~~~J lspp»o~:'
NO7'E, 7}' HO P4.SIdS ARE F{LED SROW LOI AND b4[LDFNG 51TE PLAN RNJ W~NDOW 3IZE5 ON pTHER SIPE.
~ ~' ~ `~ " ' ' I ~~~~ ~
I , /
/
~i~'
li r ~ ! ~ }
ATTACHP~ENT J
~r~n:~~
~ TE N TA TI VE M~P
T~I~T'AT't~~ ~~~~~~ ~VIa4~
iN r; :E ~;rr ~~r s~~~'a ~~oN~;,a
~GJ~,-'' G= ~_OS .~hiGELES
STAT~ 0= ~:,~L~FORNIA
=,rJR ~i,~~i`:,'I~i~~i F~RPOS=S
EE~~I~ A ~~8~~':'S~ON 0~ " ~''
~OT ~ 4~ -~ °~C ~ ,VO 85~2 ~*'
•`~' ~E 1 ~~ 4-- 2, ,%29 "'"'
~~,
-~`.,,~. ~b
~ _ra ~ ~ '
'. 1 PR~PO5EJ 2 LOT 9N0.E FmiL" Sl1BD~N5CM1 9 y
'~, (2 EriSrnG HOUSE5i .~ .,'-.
~ r '_
~I 2 574£E' a05RE55 3217 21Rp STRCET ~c `•__
° )
', 3 ~ESIGNAiE7 51N,'.LE °~MILr qr4OEVnAL OM1 ~+E CITY OF Sn`.Ta 4Cf+'C+ f
~'~ CEHE4FL PiAN ~M4GMuY i p~~/PIRCELI ~
. 4 ARE~-•15'9 SO F' f 2; AC ~ Nrr f*7~.pJ' S'~EE' ~' ~L~ Y5
~ -]"•I 5~ FT I59 ~C ) ~RC55 (wLLLO•~.G ST4EE~ +~~i~ •1cv~
'. ;~YISPNv i~N~ -S R--1 40 =HAYCE CN~hCi_ PAO~OSE]
~. 6 40 SIGN'~ILAHT 4cp~;~Gc q6K 'RfES N~ ~+K TkEES
~~~ 7 AL! Py,9L'C U'IL•71_5 ~N Ar ~ C7N~:ECYEG
~~ S LOCATE3 CY
~ 'a~NT~ uq.uCw una vp 23
~ 'N0+~+5 6RCT1iCR S G:nDE ~9 CRi] ~2
~ 9 iLl ~%ISPNG S'RUCNRES ~r+~ 'REES +RE '0 RE4x•r+
'~ i0 TwE 5i7E IS OEyERfLLr Rw~
~ 1` PAR~(`Ny '/j BE 3 COyEREG 506~5 ~ER LO' ~¢gp$
' 12 71~ER{ wPPE~RS TO BE NO PO'~N~+LLr CwNGE~4M15uCCx~C Cti °1+E S~E ~
I 13 5E4~:~PLEV' i5 CQ+MECTE~ A Ex~S'~HC SE'+E~ 5'r5'EU ANO :p~~~+ACE IS
COr+0UC7E~ TO SV+EE~ u+D EYISTNG STC~M DRAIN S'S7EM
i I{ COYPIy' MTM ~I„L REO~1MtfVE'~~$ ~~ TME CITY OF SAN'1 YDMICl ~EV{QAL lSS
SERN~S pEPUt71~~i7 O
~ t5 A v~in1HCE i5 4~ULT~NEOU2Y BE~nC REOUES'ED FOR uitiOR OEN-n0~+ FRaM 'HE
~~ COOE WE TO Ew57u~G S1kuGtiRf LOG~11d~5 iwD ~OT DEp'w
i
~
5 ~,,~0 5'd Re~iewed By,
ow~~e~/sueo~v~oeR
~
_II
(~ ~ r ~ ~
~j
4R M~CHduMaD SIACAT
Idii hIQHAMMA~ DAL'AR1
3222 23RD S~REE:
ywTa 6~Oti1C.4 Cf 4D<OS
(213)5~6-3394
sE6 SG'~ !~.1~'! ~J (~
`,~ ~4 LOp+ ~f.y PW~ninq l.nl Oote ~~ j,~f'fl", (' `Y (ry O O j1 lJ ww.~w•ra r~ i~u
~P ~ ~r~ ItM Pl~~ar~ Led lurwle~ Cl+ll Eyln~m
12E5 ~o~ci Managw'~„~]ote y~7 r~~i~C~ weu~ ur.~„ c~.~ianu a~+w.•nn.r,
F]foIR~T~OM ~~ ~\\ r..~u. T.«r. ua~n ~..e m~~~ a.w...'d em~. s~s
a~TE63492 rf ow+ aote~7 _ r~~~\\ ~.e. ~nnr. u uoos4 r.i s»/xz-sriz er msl+e~-e~a
ar~eaen ~ ~ela~CLiC7~ 7.I.mpMr 219/31Y-SO~Y
~ .
~~. 2~15~
r ~`3~ i i~~/¢~~y'g +}T~,a
~~\2~BT Y ~~~;4~~~'a`d'~
- ~Y~j' ,. ~/ :a
V!C ~NoITY~MAP
s~o~ 1~ ~ 20'
ERH
~a B/1B/1991 '
F%1-9i-I073-B il
W6 Numbm
ATTACHhSENT K
~~r.~., .
1~
~~i~
,~
.Y ~ ~ ~
' 1
f
1
~ `_~~
~
_ ~~
~~~
,;~-
{ cx`~~!
r
i• r.
-
r
r-.
~
~i
s
~ Q
~ ~
~- ~
. ~
r~ ~\/
!~
J
~~
~ _- ~
. -} _ ~~ ~r'
x_
~ ' ~;~~
~=~ ~ ~t
~~r~.~
¢ ~ ,~
~ =~= Z
ctr- .
~~t~ ~a~
:_,~ `~
2 r~
~ G '~
~~
~ ,,
`~. ~J ~
~ ~ ~~
,_ ~ `
~~ ~
~~
. ~ ~ ~
~~ k =.~ \ ~
~ ~ ~~ ,+ ~ ~t..
~
~ . F:~ ~ ~ ~~
;~_~.,r~ _ '~
_ x~~ ; ~ . ~
_.-, .
~: ~~~ r~~~ _~ ~
V'
~ ~~
~ ~
~ ~.
~ ~,
c~
o~
~
LS
~` , 1~
~ ~
l• i`' '
~ 'S r
G ~ .
~ ~r~tt11
~ ` ~
t1 ',3
V ~r~ ~~
~
u!
~
~
o~
~ ~~
~
L
ti
+ ~_
~ ~ti
d}
~~
~
)~ `
~t ~ '
~~
~~
~~
~
~ ~
~~
f
~,
~
_.1 ~
~~
~~
rJ
I ', , a ~~
r.~ ~ 4
~`_
r~ ~ `,1
~~ -~-.~ ~ ~
~~ {~~ ~-~
~~~~_.~.~ : ~
` ~t' ~' ~ `,
~. ,"" '~ ` `
~ ~
r~
~ ~~
~~
~ ~~
~~
~
~(f r, r~r
- r ~~
~ ~~
~~
~ 1~
~~
E~ ~N~
k ~ z
~ - .~,~ ~
~v
ad
_ c(~ ~~,
~ ~~~~~
~`---
~ y,
~~
~}