Loading...
SR-6-B (18) , ,-B l CA:RMM:jld658bjhpcajpc J'lN 1 ,\ 1991- city Council Meeting 1-14-92 Santa Monica, California STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: city Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 2905 Extending the Deadline for the Charter Review Commission to Issue its Report At its meeting on December 17, 1991, the city Council introduced for first reading an ordinance amending Municipal Code Section 2905 extending the deadline for the Charter Review Commission to issue its report. The ordinance is now presented to the City Council for adoption. RECOMMENDATION It is respectfully recommended that the accompanying ordinance be adopted. PREPARED BY: Robert M. Myers, City Attorney Joseph Lawrence, Assistant city Attorney '-8 Jpl~ ~ -i 19q~ . . CA:RMM:jld657jhpcal city council Meeting 1-14-92 Santa Mon1ca, California ORDINANCE NUMBER l6ll(CCS) (City council Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA AMENDING SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2905 EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR THE CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION TO ISSUE ITS REPORT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 2905 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code 1S amended to read as follows: SECTION 2905. Creation of Charter Review Commission. (a) Pursuant to Section 1000 of the City Charter, a Charter Review Commisslon is hereby established. The Commissl.on shall consist of 15 members appointed by the city Council as follows: (1) Two members of the Commisslon selected by each city Councilmember. (2 ) A chair of the Commission selected by the City Council. (b) The Commission and Commissloners shall be subject to all of - 1 - the terms of Article X of the city Charter sett~ng forth procedures for removal of comm~SSloners, terms, and meetings. The Commissioners shall be appointed no earlier than the first meeting following the swearing in of new Councilmembers after the November 6, 1990, general mun1clpal elect~on. (c) The Commission shall, prior to March 31, 1992, report to the City Counc1l 1n writing whether or not the City Charter should be amended in the following areas: ( 1) The method of selection of members of the city council and Mayor. (2 ) Whether or not City Charter Section 602 should be amended to provide compensation and benefits for members of the City council and if so, what compensation and beneflts should be provided. (3 ) Whether or not any limitatlon should be placed on the terms of office of members of the City Council. (4) The method of selection of the City Attorney and the City Clerk. (5) Review Article X of the City Charter to determine whether or not - 2 - the. Boards and Commissions established thereby should continue to be mandated by the Clty Charter and review the me.thod of selection of the Planning commission. (6 ) Whether City Charter Section 612 relating to special meetings should be amended to conform to the Brown Act. (7) Whether City Charter Sect~on 613 relating to the place of City Council meetings should be amended to provide more flexibility to holding meetlngs within the city. (8 ) Whether City Charter Section 717 relatlng to a city Health Officer should be deleted. (9) Whether City Charter Section 1515 relating to claims against the City should be revised to conform to state law. (10) Whether city Charter Section 608 should be amended to increase the dollar amount requlring competitive bldding on pUblic works proJects. (11) Whether city Charter section 1300 relating to official bonds should be amended or deleted. - 3 - . (12) Whether City Charter section 1501 relating to Cash Basis Fund and city Charter section 1511 relating to Capital Outlays Fund should be amended or deleted. (13) Whether City Charter Section 1513 relating to the presentation of demands should be amended or deleted. (14) Such other matters as the city council by motion may refer to the CommlSS1on. (d) The City council may by resolution extend the date by which the Commission shall issue its report. SECTION 2. Any provlsion of the Santa Monica Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconslstent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, are hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 3 . If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of th1s Ordinance ~s for any reason held to be lnvalid or unconstitutional by a decislon of any court of any competent jurisdictionl such declsion shall not affect the validity of the remalning portions of this Ordinance. The City council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether - 4 - , . . any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconst~tutional. SECTION 4 . The Mayor shall sign and the city Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once ln the off1cial newspaper within 15 days after ~ts adoption. This Ordinance shall become effective after 30 days from its adoption. APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~~.~ ROBERT M. MYERS . City Attorney - 5 - . . ~ . Adopted and approved this 14th day of January, 1992. c:tc:.Cl(\_"_AU'~ Mayor I hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 1611(CCS) ,.,as duly and regularly introduced at a meeting of the city council on the 17th day of December 1991; that the said Ordinance was thereafter duly adopted at a meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of January 1992 by the following Council vote: Ayes: Councilmembers: Abdo, Holbrook, Katz, Olsen, Vazquez, Zane, Mayor Genser Noes: Councilmembers: None Abstain: Councilmembers: None Absent: Councl1members: None ATTEST: ~~/A~ --- ci ty Clerk /