SR-905-000 (5)
f ~ . ~
.
to
"
.
.
ecjrA-/
fi7S::-000
AU6 1 3 1985
C/ED:CNS:BJS
CouncIl MeetIng 8/13/85
Santa MonIca, Callfornla
TO: Mayor and CIty CouncIl
FROM: CIty Staff
SUBJECT: RecommendatIon to Approve Resolutions AuthorIZIng
the CIty Manager to SubmIt ApplIcatIon for State
SenIor Center Bond Act Funds for ConstructIon of
SerVIce Center on Parking AuthorIty Lot 22
INTRODUCTION
Thl s report transrru ts resolu tl ons In support of the Cl ty IS ap-
plIcatIon for State SenIor Center Bond Act funds.
The report
also outlInes the proposed senIor center/multlserVIce center
proJect to be presented In the applIcatIon for State funds.
BACKGROUND
The concept of a multi-servlce center to house a range of SOCIal
serVIce agenCIes has been dIscussed and researched by conllllunl ty
groups and CIty staff SInce 1976. SInce that tIme, varIOUS sear-
ches have been undertaken to ldenti fy a sIte or facll i ty that
nleets the expressed prIorities of the Council, CIty CommISSIons,
communIty groups and socral serVIce agenCIes. IdentIfIcatIon of
an acceptable SIte was Impeded by fInanCIal constralnts lmposed
by the 1 ncceas Ingly expens 1 ve commercial real es ta te ma rket 1[1
Santa Monlca, by a lack of consensus In the communI ty as to the
~t/f'If-/
AUG 1 :J :~?5
- 1 -
~
\
,
(' .
.
.
approprIate locatIon for such a center, and by specIfIc acqUISI-
tlon requIrements of the Conmlunl ty Development Block Grant pro-
gram WhICh was a prImary source of funds for the proJect.
StIll recognIzIng the need for stable and low-cost space for San-
ta MonIca's socIal serVIce agencIes yet cognIzant of the many
obstacles to ImplementIng a consolIdated proJect, the proposed
1985-86 CIty budget Included the carry-over of prev10usly appro-
pr1ated funds for a two component proJect: (1) a senIor center
utIlIzIng a yet-to-be determIned amount of these funds to match
possIble State SenIor Center Bond act funds and (2) a Plea Nelgh-
borhood SerVIces Center utIlIzIng the balance of funds for a
faCIlIty to house neIghborhood-based or neIghborhood servIng com-
munlty serVIce agencIes.
In reVIewIng this proposal durIng budget workIng sessIons, the
CIty CouncIl expressed ItS concern that a two component proJect
would further serve to Isolate serVIces by neIghborhood, Income
and ethnIc groups and outlIned several proJect priorItIes for use
of reapproprl a ted funds.
CouncIl dIrected staff to propose a
proJect that
o provIded both sen10r and non-senIor serVIces 1n a con-
solIdated faCIlIty
o was accessIble to resIdents by publIC transportatIon
o met the deadlIne for submIssIon of State SenIor Center
Bond Act funds
In addItIon, In adoptIng the 1985-86 ConmlUnlty Development Plan,
CouncIl deleted reference to a "PIca Neighborhood" serVIces cen-
ter to refocus efforts toward a consolIdated proJect.
- 2 -
-
...
'.
~
.
.
DISCUSSION
(l) SIte ReVIew Process
Because the State SenIor Center Bond Act "Request for Proposals"
was not issued untIl late June and gIven the need to present a
proposal to the CouncIl by August 13th In order to meet the State
deadlIne of September 4th, CIty staff and Involved agencIes have
had to work qUIckly to seek out and evaluate feasIble al terna-
tlves for eIther a senIor center or a larger multIservIce center
WhICh would Include a separate "senIor center" component.
SenIor
agencI es (WI SE and Sen I or Heal th and Peer Counsell ng Center),
wIth the assIstance of Duane NIghtIngale of GTE, the ThIrd Street
Developnlent Corporat I on and prIvate real tors, conducted an exten-
Slve search for all possible SItes
avaIlable for lease or pur-
chase.
ThIS search resulted In only one SIte (at 1443 4th
Street),
beyond those prevIously IdentIfIed by staff or other
agenCIes.
All SItes were evaluated In lIght of fundIng constraInts, State
applIcatIon deadlInes and reqUIrements, and CounCIl prIorItIes.
Inlportant to thIS analYSIS, was the need to complete very
spec! f 1 c steps on a selected sIte In order to apply for State
funds.
These included completIon of a certIfIed appraIsal of the
proposed site prIor to submISSIon of the State applIcatIon, pre-
parIng documents necessary to show SI te control or conmll tments to
lease/purchase a faCIlIty, and completIon of conceptual plans
(Slte, elevatIon and floor plans) upon submISSIon.
S 1 tes were
also evaluated on the followlng:
- 3 -
~
"
.
.
o CQst effectiveness
o prOXImIty to publIC transportatIon
o prOXImIty to other publIc serVIces
o avaIlabIlIty to low Income and ITllnorlty populatIons
o parkIng avaIlabilIty for employees and users
o compatIbIlIty wIth zonIng reqUIrements
o the extent to WhICh the sIte could accommodate the
range of senior services requIred to make the State
applIcatIon competItIve yet also provIde space to noo-
senIor serVIces
USIng these crIterIa, opportunItIes for acqUIsItIon and rehabIll-
tlon of eXIstIng bUIldings were evaluated IncludIng retaIl space
at 1443 4th Street, Smart and FInal warehouse facIlItIes at 21st
and PIca, and A&W corporate offIces at 9th and Broadway. OptIons
for new constructIon were revIewed IncludIng a JOInt venture wIth
St. John's HospItal at 20th and ArIzona, FamIly SerVIce of Santa
MonIca property at 1539 EuclId, and ParkIng AuthorIty Lot #22
between Colorado and Broadway.
RealI zIng the short amount of tIme ava lIable to deve lop a staff
recommendatIon and prepare the necessary documents for CouncIl
reVIew and later for submIttal of the State applIcatIon, status
updates were gIven to CounCIl and CIty ConlIIlIsSIons during the
revIew process.
However, because a fInal recorr~endatlon was not
fInalized untIl the fIrst week In August, dISCUSSIons on the pro-
posed project could not be InItIated wIth other Interested groups
untIl that tIme.
SenSI tI ve to the short notIce Inherent In the
current proces 5, staff IS mak lng 1 tsel f ava lIable pr I or to the
- 4 -
..
~
.
.
August 13th CouncIl meetIng to d~scuss the proposal wIth Inter-
ested groups. Contact has been made wi th the Chamber of Com-
merce, PICO NeIghborhood ASSOcIatIon, the SocIal SerVIces COIT@IS-
Slon and CommIssIon on Older AmerIcans and agencIes who had pre-
vIously submItted SItes for reVIew. Upon CouncIl actIon on the
proJect, staff WIll contInue to work closely WIth all ~nterested
groups to develop a project that addresses communI ty needs and
prIorItIes.
(2) Proposed SenIor Center/MultI-SerVIce Center
After careful conSIderatIon of all SItes, staff reconmlends that a
comblna tlon of Cl ty 1 Federal, State and corporate funds be used
to construct a 25,000 square foot senIor center/multIserVIce cen-
ter on CIty-owned property In the downtown bUSIness area. ThIS
sIte meets local and state cr iter la and effectIvely leverages
funds from a number of sourCES to effectuate a consolIdated, ac-
ceSSIble communIty service faCIlIty. The proposed project can be
constructed w~thIn prevIously approprIated CIty funds, contIngent
upon the receIpt of $750,000 In State SenIor Center Bond Act
Funds. It allows for a full complement of senIor serVIces to meet
State def Inl t Ions of a "senlor mul tl-serVlce centern and also
allows for a substantIal amount of space for non-senIor agenCIes.
Loca tl on: The proposed sIte on the 1500 block of 4 th Street,
between Broadway and Colorado, IS a CIty-owned parkIng lot WhICh
prOVIdes 74 parkIng spaces In the downtown bUSIness dIstrIct. It
IS not In the Coastal Zone or In the Downtown ParkIng Assessment
DIstrIct. The SIte IS located near bus stops and IS acceSSIble
- 5 -
.
.
by publIc transportatIon. It IS a "ne~ghborhood neutral II loca-
tIon WhIch IS prOXImate to areas of hIgh concentratIons of
senIors as well as to the cornmunIty's lower Income and mInorIty
populatIons.
SIze of SIte: The s~te IS comprised of three parcels totallIng
22,500 square feet. Due to Its large size relatIve to other
downtown SItes, It IS possIble to build a consolIdated facIlIty
of approxImately 25,000 square feet of agency space as well as
Include 74 replacement parkIng spaces and the addItIonal parkIng
requIred for the center Itself.
ProJect Desl9n: To aSSIst In developIng cost estImates for the
proposed proJect and preparIng the requIred conceptual plans for
submISSIon WIth the State applIcatIon, the CIty has retaIned an
archItectural fIrm to aSSIst WIth the tentative deSIgn of the
proJec t. The 1 ni t I al assessment of the sIte and of space needs
of the agenCIes IndIcates that a VIable deSIgn can be developed
to Include a "pedestr lan-or Iented II fac 11 i ty that a Iso accommo-
dates the requIred parkIng spaces. The llnx of subterranean and
structured parkIng as well as the prelimInary elevatIon, SIte and
floor plans WIll be determIned prIor to submISSIon of the State
applIcatIon.
The proposed deSIgn would prOVIde for an IdentIfIable "senIor
center" component of the bUIldIng as well as prOVIde for space
for other agencies In a separate area of the bUIldIng. The
senIor component, In order to be compet i tI ve for S ta te funds,
WIll be delIneated from other serVIces by a separate entrance and
- 6
...
.
.
intake area. However, the overall deSIgn WIll emphaSIze the ac-
cessIbIlity of all services to clients enterIng the bUIldIng.
For purposes of submIttIng an applIcatIon to the State, non-
senIor serVIce space WIll not be deSIgned In great detaIl. If
the proJect IS funded by the State, the overall proJect deSIgn
would be refIned and adapted as necessary. Input would be
SolICIted from approprIate agencies and CommISSIons and all stan-
dard envIronmental and archItectural reVIew procedures would also
be followed.
Space AllocatIon:
Staff has conducted a detaIled space analYSIS
of senIor serVIces and a prellIlllnary assessment of current noo-
senIor serVIce space needs. Based on thIS InitIal analysis, it
IS proposed that the senIor center be allocated from 14,000' to
16,000 square feet. The remaInder would be used for other SOCIal
serVIces. However, the fInal allocatIon of space to the senIor
center WIll depend upon a more thorough analysls currently belng
conducted by the proJect1s archItectural consultant. Speclflc
allocatIon of space to indiVIdual agencles would occur once
state funds were approved and a project management plan
fInalIzed.
Tenant Selectlon and ProJect Management: As noted ln preVIOUS
reports, WISE and SenIor Health and Peer CounselIng Center
(SHPCC) submltted a speCIfIC request for CIty support durIng the
1985-86 fundIng process for funds to rehabIlltate or construct a
senlor center to house theIr serVlces as well as those of sIlIaller
senIor programs. The proposed proJect recommends that space be
allocated to SHPCC and WISE for theIr ongOIng serVIces as well as
- 7 -
...
.
.
to smaller programs desiring space. Currently SHPCC and WISE are
dIscussing space needs wIth these programs and aSSOcIatIons
(e.g., LIED-CAP Senior Program, Gray Panthers, CLARE Senior Pro-
granL) . These programs encompass the broad range of services
Identified In the State RFP and It IS staff's assessnlent that
through sharing of COnlITLon space and effIcient deSign that these
serVices can be accommodated.
Given the time constraInts In preparIng thiS proposal, the selec-
t Ion cr Iter la and process for the rema I ni ng space has not been
detailed. If State funds were approved thereby making the entIre
proJect feasible, a proJect Implementation plan Will be developed
proposing tenant selection criteria and a proJect nlanagement
plan. However, because CDBG funds would be used to fund thiS
portIon of the proJect, agencIes, at a mInimum, would be reqUIred
to meet CDBG elIgIbIlIty gtlldellnes ensurIng serVIce to lower
Income reSIdents.
ProJect Cost: A cost analys IS per formed by the pro] ec t' s ar-
chItectural consultants concluded that the total proJect cost for
the proposed faCility Will be $3.22 million, IncludIng construc-
tion of the faCility, replacement and new parking, landscaping,
profeSSIonal fees and contingencIes. While Including replacement
parking In the proJect Increases the total cost by $540,000, thlS
is eqUIvalent to a land cost of $24/square foot whIch IS substan-
tIally below market for comparable land 10 the downtown area.
- 8 -
.
.
...
Project Fundln9
ProJect fundlng wlll be comprlsed of City, Federal, State and
prIvate donatIons.
Through the use of $1.67 mIl110n In General
Funds prevlously approprlated for thlS purpose, $1.55 mllllon In
Federal, State and corporate funds wlll be leveraged to complete
the proJect. The sources of funds Include:
$1,67~,0~~
Clty General Funds
650,000
ConiITlunlty Development Block Grant Funds
75~,000
State Senlor Center Bond Act Funds
l50,00~
Corporate donatlons and fundralslng by
senIor agencIes
$3,220,000
It IS important to note that the success of the proJect, as pro-
posed, depends upon receIpt of a sufflclent amount of State and
pr 1 vate funds.
DIScusSlons Wl th Duane Nlghtlngale of GTE and
ExecutIve DIrectors of the senIor agencles IndIcate that the cor-
porate fundralslng conmlltment can be met wlthln the tlmefranle
outllned by the State. However, If the proJect were to recelve a
smaller State award than antIclpated, a reevaluatIon of the scope
and nature of the proJect would then be necessary.
ProJect Tlme1Ine
CounCll authorIzes Clty Manager to
SubmIt ApplIcatIon for State fundlog
August 13
CIty staff prepares State ApplIcatIon
In conJunctIon WIth senIor agencles,
archItectural consultant
August 13-
September 3
CIty submlts appllcatlon to LA County
Septenlber 4
- 9 -
...
..
.
.
County evaluatIon panel reVIews proposals
and Board of Supervisors approves
recommendatIons
Sept. 5-
October 22
State reVIews and approves awards,
ParkIng authorIty transfers ownershIp
of ParkIng Lot to CIty, State and CIty
execute contract
Oct. 23-
MId-AprIl
ProJect begins
MId-AprIl
ProJect BenefIt: The need for stable, low-cost faCIlItIes for
Santa Man Ica I s sac Ial serVI ce agencIes has been docume nted In
previous staff reports on thIS proJect.
Indeed, the need I n-
creases as the regIonal market for commercIal and retaIl space
makes Santa MonIca more and more attractIve to bUSInesses, makIng
low-cost faCIlItIes for use by non-profIt provIders very scarce.
AgencIes continue to face Increased rents WhICh they can not af-
ford.
In search of alternatIve space, agencIes fInd owners un-
wIlling to s~gn leases gIven the annual nature of agency fundlng~
In the last month, Santa MonIca has lost Its only adult employ-
ment and traInIng placement serVIce (UnIted CommunIty and HousIng
Development Corporation) to VenIce after a futIle search for
space 10 Santa MonIca.
A detaIled space analYSIS of the two senIor agencIes requestIng
funds from the CI ty IndIca tes extremely overcrowded condl tI ons
where Important clIent serVI ces are bel ng performed I n publIC
areas or In outsIde publIC spaces.
Staff members and volunteers,
a maJor resource to senIor agencIes, are scheduled so that two to
three people can share a desk or table.
A prelImInary reVIew of
other agencIes reveal the same condItions.
A 25,000 square foot
- 10 -
....
.
.
faCIlIty WIll not nleet all space needs but It WIll be a maJor
step forward In providIng such space.
The benef], t of such a proJec t to the commun], ty would be the
retentIon of Important socIal serVIces In Santa MonIca, at af-
fordable rates in a central and consolIdated locatIon. The
stabIlIty of rent levels wIll allow agencIes to stem the trend of
spendIng an Increaslng percentage of theIr operatIng budgets on
overhead costs at the expense of dIrect service delIvery to the
communI ty. If agenc les are con fron ted WI th the S I tua tlon of ob-
taInIng 25,000 square feet of offlce space at current market
rates over a perlod of 30 years, for example, they would be re-
qUIred to spend approxImately $13.5 mIllIon durIng that tIme. An
InItIal capItal Investment of $2.3 ml1110n of CIty funds wIll
reduce that burden substantlally -- not only for agenCIes but for
the CIty, as a maJor contrIbutor of operatIng funds for tenant
agenCIes.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT
Current approprIatIons for a multI-serVIce center proJect Include
$1,670,000 In General Funds In account no. 01-720-262-000-920 and
$ 650,0' 00 In Communl ty Development Block Grant funds In account
no. 19-720-262-000-920, for a total approprIatIon of $2,320,000.
No addItIonal appropriatIons of CIty funds are needed for the
proposed proJect. At such tIme as other project funds receIved
from the State and prIvate sources, approprIatIon authorIty WIll
be requested.
- 11 -
,
.
.
RECOMMENDATIONS
CIty staff recorr@ends that the CIty CouncIl:
(1) Approve the attached resolutIon authorIzIng the CIty Manager
to submIt an applIcatIon for State funds to Implement the proJect
descrIbed In thIS staff report;
(2) Approve the attached resolutIon authorIZIng the transfer of
ownershIp of Parking AuthorIty Lot 22 to the CIty upon approval
of the SenIor Center Bond Act applIcatIon by the State.
CIty staff further recorrmLends that the ParkIng AuthorIty:
(1) Approve the attached resolutIon authorIZIng such a transfer,
also contIngent upon the receipt of State fundIng.
Attachments
Prepared by: Barbara StInchfIeld, CommunIty Development Manager
Department of CommunIty and EconomIC Development
- 12 -
t-'"l
co
..........
:::J
N
..........
C\
1.1".;
Q
U
C
~ -?
c
......;
-0
~
C
Q)
>
.-t
UJ
U
CJ
...
+-'
.-.
'"'
C
>.
Q)
c:
...
'"'
'"'
~
~
<
~
"':l
~
+-'
r;::
Q)
~
'J)
.::;
::l
~
0
~
Q)
U
r-I
l.;....
l;....
o
'./'
>.
Q
,.....
;...
o
-+-'
,;..:
<
A
-'
o
'3
~
G
~.
~
VOTE: Affirma tl ve' b - ()
~egative'
Abstain:
A b 5 en t : tC4! -F1<---rU-/-7
PROOF \,'OTEC: KITH AXOTHER PERSOY BEFORE Al\VTHIKG
~ISTRIffUTI0\: ORIGINAL ro be signed, sealed and flIed In Vault.
;
.
BEFORE DISTRIBUTION CHECK CONTE~T OF ALL
DISTRIBUTION OF RESOLUTION If ~obO
Plr3
P F IF/!-- I
CouncIl ~leetIng Date
Agenda Item it
Was It amended? jVo
.
FOR CITY C}E~K!S ACTIO~
ORDINANCE #
Introduced'
Adopted'
AIJIJAYS PUBLISH AOOPI'ED ORDINANCES*
*Cross Qut Attorney's aD1::'roval
?\EI\'SPAPER PUBLICATIO\' (Date:
)
)
Department originating st~ff report C
~anagement SerY~fe~ Lynne Barrette 0rdinances only
Agency mentioned in document or staff report
SubJect file (agenda packet)
Counter fil e
Others-
Airport
ParkIng Auth.
AudltOIUffi
Personnel
BUIldIng Dept.
PlannIng
Environ. Servo
PolIce (en-
forcement?)
Flnance
PurchaSIng
FIre
Recr/Parks
General Servo
Transportation
Llorary
Treasurer
~1anager
S[\;r i"l!!r;' CGr~=s OF \It ORDINA'\CES TO:
LCPL) S\SfE':S, ';ttn Petet-TIaclcane
l~'~: -"~Jli '....-:r"et
\vn~. \e~ Jersey OZ~l~
SE\D Fo'UR- COPIES OF i\u.~ ORDT\J~~.cf.S~ TO:
rRESTDT\C .JU:;JGE
S'.,\""\ "IC.\\IC\ \IU\ICIP;\L COURT
1 ~ ~ s ~ r .\ I '-J SiR E E T
"\'i[., 'I~;\rC\, C\ 9()401
~
(certified?)
I
1
I
*C~ecJ< Cede
5ect.:...o!'cs J:;-e=o~e
senc.:!.:i:=;-.
TOTJ..L COP I ES
-~
I"'"'
co
.........
c::
N
.........
0>
rJj
(I)
U
:::
.:j -?
:::
.-l
'0
H
0
0
>-
.-l
(l)
U
0
lo-
+-'
0
t::
>-.
0
~
....
lo-
0
.j.J
.j.J
<
.j.J
c::
r<
-
+-'
-0
"
.j.J
.'..1)
Q)
-
,..J
c-'
<V
;....
o
u
......
,
1-
o
If'
^
o
....
lo-
~
'-'
.j.J
....,
<
>--
......
u
'-H
o
......
:...
::J
~
~
'-'
-/
e
e
BEFORE DISTRIBUTIO\ CHECK CONTEXT OF
DISTRIBUTION OF RESOLUTION if ,7b 6 J
CouncIl ~leetlng Date J ji'? /
Agenda I tern it (0 t:!' I/' /f - /
Was it amended? )fo
VOTE. A f f 1 rma t 1 ve . If - {)
\egatlve'
Abstain:
Absen t : U.iti4'~'-'/7
PROOF\~O'c~ ~ITH AKOTHER PERSO~ BEFORE A\~rHI~G
DISTRIBUTIO~' ORiGINAL Lo-ne signed, sealed and flIed in Vault.
ALL FOR CITY CfERK'S ACTIO~
ORDINANCE #
Introduced'
Adopted'
AIJ,<.[AYS Pli"BLISH AOOPTED ORDINANCES *
*Cross out Attomey's approval
~EWSPAPER PUBLICATION (Date'
)
)
Department orIgInatIng st~ff reDort (
Hanage~ent Serv~ses Lynne Barrette -UrdInances only
~
Agency nentIoned In document or staff report
(certi fi ed?)
SubJect file (agenda packet)
1
Counter file
1
Others:
AIrport
ParkIng Auth. - I
AudltoIum
Personnel
BUl.ldlng Dept
Planning
EnVIron. Serv
PolIce (en-
forcement?)
FInance
PurchaSIng
FIre
Recr/Part..s
General Servo
TransportatIon
Llbrarv
Treasurer
r.[anager
S~\-::I ;::"UP CJr'[fc:: IT .\fL (']Zl~\;\C=C: Ti
(.')JED SYSTF:-l::, H~'1 pc~cf~rl~lLE,:t:'Jc
1211 ~!:l: n ~~ r~.2 t
_..\ "'j,.:'" n ~l, "'- e ~\- .J e r s e \.'" _ n -= '7 1 --
L_ f '------=---~T\=-1.~.--.1I _-.___ ~_....._
Sc;-..;D FOUR COPIES OF ~-'\T._L <JR!u )':~'.l,f.....~~ h~
p};= s r D 1 \ C JU D G [
S\\"T'\ ',[0\1C\ \IU\IC[P':'L C)l1~[
< - ':::J ,'\ ~ \' slr~: ~ '~
<::;\' [\ .Il)\T(\. C\ ~)f'-+JL
~C~2C~ Cede Sectlons before sendlng.
~
T:;T\~ COPIES
~
.
.
CA~RMH~11r011
CIty CouncIl MeetIng 8-13-85
Santa Monica) CalIfornIa
RESOLUTION NUMBER 7060 (ecg)
(CIty CouncIl Serlesl
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA APPROVING
APPLICATION FOR FUNDS UNDER THE
CALIFORNIA SENIOR CENTER BOND ACT OF
1984 FOR A MULTI-SERVICE CENTER
WHEREAS)
the people of the State of CalIfornIa have
approved the SenIor Center Bond Act of 1984, WhICh provIdes
funds to pllbllC and prIvate non-profIt agencIes for the
purpose of acquIrIng] constructIng]
alterIng] or renovatIng
spnlor center~ and purchasIng equIpment or fundIng startup
costs for senIor centers} ~nd
WHEREAS.
/
the CalIfornIa Department of AgIng ha~ been
delegated the responSIbIlIty for the admInIstratIon of the
program;
settIng
up
necessary
procedures
governIng
npp1lcatlons
by publIC and non-profIt groups under the
program; and
WHEREAS}
~ald procedures establIshed by the CalIfornIa
Dp?arrmpnt of AgIng reqUIre the applIcant to certlfy by
resolutIon thp approval of appllcatlons prIor to submlSS10n of
~ald appll,atlons to the State; and
W~~RF~S) t~p nrl1Ject applIed for under thiS program m\J~t
bp
at a
hlOh
~
prIorIty aod
~atlsfy the most urgpnt nepds WIth
1
i1
.
.
pn on ty
on unmet senIor center
needs from rural) low Inlome
and raclal or ethn1c m~norlty area~; and
WHEREA.S,
the CIty CouncIl of the CIty of Santa MonIca
(hereInafter the "CIty")
15 authorlzed to apply to the
CalIfornIa
DE'partmpnt
of
Ag1ng for fundlng under the
C~ltfornla Sentor Center Bond A.ct of 1984; and
WHEREA.S} the CIty of Santa MonIca, a local publIC agency
organIzed under thE> Constltutlon and statutes of the State of
CalIfornIa} IS elIgIble to receIve fundsj and
WHEREAS,
the CalIfornIa Departmpnt of AgIng may award
the CIty of Santa MonIca a condItIonal fundlng commItment
under the Caltfornla Senlor Center Bond Act of 1984,
NOW] THEREFORE}
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
The CIty of Santa MonIca hereby approves the
tIlIng at an applIcatIon for fundIng under the SenIor Center
Bond Act of lQ84.
SECTTON 2.
The CIty of Santa Monlca hereby cert1fies
that the multI-serVILe center wI}l be avaIlable for use by a11
senior CItIzens.
SECTION 3
The CIty of Santa MonIca hereby cert~f1es
that saId ~apnLY has or WIll have suffICIent funds Or other
r<F'.,our;:~s
to operate and mAintaIn the sen10r center fundpd
under thIS program
')::TTfON 4
The C1~Y nf Santa MonIca hereby certIfIes
~ " " t
~) j d flqP'"'cy has or ~1 1]
have nva11ahlp pr10r
t..
2
.
.
commencement of any work on the proJectrs), matchlng money
from a non-federal or non-state source.
SECTION 5.
The CIty of
Santa Monlca hereby certlfle~
that
sald agency wlll
comply wIth all
federal, state, and
local envIronmental,
publIC health,
relocatIon, affIrmat1ve
aetton,
and
clearlnghouse
requ1rempnt<;
and all other
aprroprlate codps,
laws,
and regulat1.ons
applIcable to the
proJect.
SECTION 6
The C1.ty of Santa Monlca hereby cert1fles
that
the proJect(s) Included In
thlS applIcatIon conform to
the Area
Plan on Aglng for the PlannIng and SerVlce Area 1n
WhICh the senlor center IS located.
SF.CT10N 7_
The Clty Manager
or an authorIzed deslgnee
IS hereby authorIzed to conduct all negotIatIons, execute and
submIt
all
documents
IncludIng,
but not
I1mlted
to)
applIcatIons]
agreemi?nts,
amendments] payment
requests} and
reports;
WhICh may be neces~ary for completIon of
the
aforementIoned proJect.
SE:C'l'ION 8.
The Clty Clerk shall certIfy to the adoptlon
of thlS Resolutlon} and thenceforth
and thereafter the same
shall bp In full forcp and eftect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~ '-.~~
ROR::"P'T' M MY1'RS
C'ty A;-"J,nev
'}
. ~
.
.
Adopted and approved thIS 13th day of August, 1985.
~~Mal. ~
I hereby certIfy that the foregoIng Resolution No. 7060(CCS)
was duly adopted by the CIty CouncIl of the CIty of Santa Monica
at a meetIng thereof held on August 13, 1985 by the followIng
CouncIl vote:
Ayes: Councllmembers: Conn, Epstein, JennIngs, Katz,
Zane and Mayor Reed
Noes: Councllmembers: None
AbstaIn: Councllrnembers: None
Absent: Councllmembers: Edwards
ATTEST:
tk/n '7;;;. ~~
City Clerk
~..
.
.
CA.:RMH.~rtnr047
City CouncIl MeetIng 8-13-85
Santa Monica, CalifornIa
RESOLUTION NUMBER 7061(CCS)
(Clty CouncIl SerIes)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA TRANSFERRING PROPERTY
OF THE PARKING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY
WHEREAS,
the ParkIng AuthorIty of the CIty of Santa
MonIca 15 the owner of certaIn real property located at 1527
Fourth Street In the City of Santa Monlca; and
WHEREAS}
glven the locatlon of such property It IS not
economlC to use such property solely for parkIng purposes; and
WHEREAS}
the CIty of Santa MonIca has applIed to the
CalIfornIa
Departme>nt
of
AgIng for fundIng under the
CalIfornIa SenIor Center Bond Act for the development of a
multI-serVIce center on such property; and
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Stre>ets and H1ghways Code SectIon
3?667-
J
the legIslatIve body by two-thIrds vote may adopt a
resolutlon transferrIng property of the ParkIng AuthorIty to
the CI ty; and
WHEREAS}
the
transfer of such property does not
contravene any covenant or agreement made wlth the hold~rs of
any bonds of tne ParkLng AuthorLty of the City of Santa MonLca
l~sued and outstanding,
NOW;
THEREFORE;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MONrr.A DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1
-.: J 4
,
.
.
SECTION 1. Upon the approval of the ~ppllc~tlon for the
multi-service center by the CalIfornia Department of AgIng,
the property located at 1527 Fourth Street In the CIty of
Santa Monica shall be transferred from the Parking AuthorIty
of the CIty of Santa MonIca to the CIty of Santa MonIca.
SECTION 2. The CIty Clerk shall certIfy to the adoptIon
of thIS ResolutIon, and thenceforth and thereafter the same
shall be In full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
n """'-_"'" ,_ .. _
, ..., ...,..". ~ ~. --
ROBERT M MYERS
CIty Attorney
~-
2
'. .. '"
.
.
. ,
Adopted and approved thIS 13th day of August, 1985.
~~Ma{r.~
I hereby certIfy that the foregoIng ResolutIon No. 7061(CCS)
was duly adopted by the City CouncIl of the CIty of Santa Monica
at a meetIng thereof held on August 13, 1985 by the followIng
Council vote:
Ayes: Councllmembers: Conn, EpsteIn, Jennings, Katz,
Zane and Mayor Reed
Noes: Councilmembers: None
AbstaIn: Councllmembers: None
Absent: Councilmembers: Edwards
ATTEST:
_~7h.~
CIty Clerk
~
~
.
.
CA;RMM~rmr049
Clty Council MeetIng 8-13-85
Santa MonIca} CalIfornIa
RESOLUTION NUMRER 187 (PAS)
(ParkIng AuthorIty SerIes)
A RESOLUTION OF THE PARK1NG AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA TRANSFERRING PROPERTY
OF THE PARKING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY
WHEREAS]
the ParkIng AuthorIty of the CIty of Santa
Mon1ca 15 the owner of certaIn
real property locat~d at 1527
Fourth Street ~n the C1ty of Santa Mon1ca; and
WHEREAS] g1ven the locatIon of such property It IS not
economIC to use such property solely for parkIng purposes; and
WHEREAS,
the C1ty of Santa MonIca has applIed to the
Ca11fornla
of
Ag1ng for fund~ng under the
Department
CalIfornIa SenIor Center Bond Act for the development of a
multI-serVIce center on such property; and
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Strpets and HIghways Code Sect~on
32667}
the legIslatIve body by two-thlrds vote may adopt a
resolutIon transferrIng property of the ParkIng AuthorIty to
the CI ty; and
WHEREAS}
transfer of such property does not
the
contrav@ne any covenant or ~greement made WIth the holders of
any bond~ of tnp ParkIng AuthorIty of the City of Santa MonIca
Issued and autst~ndlng,
NOW
'I'H F:R;:;: FORE;
THE PARK[NG AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF
SAN~A MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1
"
.
.
...
SECTION 1.
Upon the approval of the appllcat10n for the
mult1-serVlce center by the Cal1fornia Department of Ag1ng,
the propprty located at 1527 Fourth Street 1n the C1ty of
Santa Mon1ca shall be transferred from the Parklng Authorlty
of the Clry of Santa Monlca to the Clty of Santa Monlca.
SECTION 2.
The Execut1ve Secretary shall cert1fy to the
adopt1on of thlS Resolut1on, and thenceforth and thereafter
the same shall be 1n full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~'-.~
ROBERT M, MYERS 0
C1ty Attorney
2
. ~ -.... ~ """ ....
; .;
.
.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED 'flIIS
13th
DAY
OF
August
1985
/if {!
~~~ ~~ ()
I ' I'AYOR ~
I HEREBY CER'l'IFY THAT 'l'IIE FOHEGOING RESOLUTION,
NO.
186
, WAS DULY ADOPTED BY THE PARKING AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA AT A ~mETING THERLOF HELD
ON August 13, 1985
I
BY THE FOLLOWING AUTHORITY VOTE:
AYES: AUTHORITY MErlBERS: 1\1ayor Reed, Conn, Jenn~ngs
Katz, Zane, Epstein
NOES: AUTHORITY NEr1BERS :
ABSENT: AUTHORITY f.1ErmERS : Edwards
ABSTAIN: AUTHORITY t-1EHBERS:
ATTEST:
~P-?~
CITY CLERK