SR-8-E (7)
..
.
.
CA:SSS:BLB:bl
Counc~l Meeting 07-22-80
Santa Mon~ca, Cal~fornla
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Attorney
SUBJECT: Ord~nance DeClaring Boats on the Beach
to be Abandoned Property
INTRODUCTION
This report transmits for second read1ng adoption of a
proposed ordinance declar1ng certa1n boats on the Santa Mon1ca
beach to be abandoned property and prov1ding for thelr d1sposal
by sale or other Means.
BACKGROUND
This ord~nance was passed 1n emergency forM by t:le C~ ty
Councll as Item 8G at 1ts July 1, 1980 meetlng, contlnued from
1ts June 24, 1980 Meeting. As per standard procedures lt was
also 1ntroduced in regular form as Item 8H at the same !'\eetlng.
The ordlnance provides for the removal of elght (8) boats
washed up on the beach north of the Santa Monica Pler durlng a
storn 1n February 1980. Declarlng the boats to be abandoned
property wlthln the meaning of Harbors & Nav1gation Code 5522,
the ard1nance dlrects the Clty Manager to take the necessary
actlons to effectuate the re~oval of these boats. It was amended
to delete the section requiring notiflcatlon to the owners of
the boats of the adoptlon of thlS ord1nance and allow1ng them
8E
JUL 2 2 196a
8E"
-JUL 2 2 1980
.
.
10 days from the adoption of this ordinance to remove the
boats at the~r own expense.
Follow~ng adopt~on of the emergency ord~nance, R~chard Koch,
owner of s~x of the boats in quest~on, obta~ned a temporary
restrain~ng order against the sale of the boats in order to
preserve the status quo pending a hear~ng on th~s natter, set
for July 18, 1980.
The boats were removed from the beach on July 3, 1980 at a
cost of approx~mate1y $4,000 and are now be~ng stored at the
beach ma~ntenance yard north of the Santa !lonica Pier.
RECOMrIENDATION
It is respectfully reconmended that the Council adopt th~s
ord~nance dec1ar1ng e1ght boats washed up On the beach north of
the P~er to be abandoned property and prov~ding for the~r
d~sposal by sale or other means.
Prepared by: Stephen Shane Stark, Act~ng City Attorney
Bettylou Borovay, Deputy City Attorney
-2-
- .
CA:SSS:BB:se
Counc~l Meeting 06/24/80 Santa Mon~ca, Cal~fornLa
ORDINANCE NO. 1172
(City Counc~l Series)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DECLARING
CERTAIN VESSELS STRANDED ON THE SANTA
MONICA BEACH TO BE ABANDONED PROPERTY
WHEREAS, a seVere storm struck the C~ty of Santa Mon~ca
on February 18-19, 1980; and
WHEREAS, as a result of that storm, e~ght vessels were
washed up and stranded on the Santa Mon~ca Beach north of the
P~er; and
WHEREAS, the Owners of seven of those vessels were not~-
f~ed by the City to remove the vessels at
the~r expense, and the owner of the e~ghth vessel ~s unknown; and
WHEREAS, notwithstand~ng the passage of more than 30 days
s~nce that notif Lcation , the known owners have not responded or
have refused to remove the vessels; and
~~EREAS, the str~nded vessels have remained on the beach
for more than 100 days w~thout a watchman nearby and are thus
considered abandoned property; and
WHEREAS, the cont~nued presence of these vessels presents
an unacceptable rLsk of lnjury to persons on the beach who
could run ~nto or fall feom the~; ar.d
WHEREAS, removal of these vessels ~s necessary for the
welfare and bafety of the public;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA ORDA1~S AS
FOLLOWS:
.
.
SECTION 1. The fo11ow~ng vessels or parts of vessels,
having been stranded on the Santa Mon~ca beacn fo~ a per~od
in excess of 100 days without a watchman posted nearby, are
found and declared to be abandoned property w~th~n the ~ean-
~ng of SectJ..on 522 of the Californit! Harbors and Navigat~on
Code:
Vessel Owner
(a) Two "survival-escape capsules", R~chard Koch
one orange, one 3J..lver, origJ..nally
marketed to facJ..litate emergency
evacuation on the seas now modlfled
such that ~ts skirt, which stabJ..1izes
the vessel, has been removed:
orange capsule appears to have ~rack
in fiberglass where tne upper dnd
lower portJ..on of the vessel are ]OlneC
together.
(h} Three (3) sailboats - approx- Rlch~rd Koc.
imately 19' in lengtn: all appear
to be set down on their keels w~th keels
stl.ckl.ng
out, cracks ~n stern,
possible fractures where keel jo~ns
hull, garboard strake may leak.
(c) One Boston whaler type skl.ff - R~chard Koch
approximately 12 feet ~n length.
(d) One Owens power boat - approx- Lucio Garcia
imately 26 feet In length: we~ght
-2-
.
.
Vessel
of boat 1S on the propeller, push-
ing propeller 1nto hull and frac-
tured keel llkely
(e) One derelict vessel - possibly Unknown
12 feet in length: generally
d1lapidated old sk1ff
SECTION 2. The C1ty Hanager, or h.l.s deslgnee, shall, upon
the explratlan of ten (10) days after the adoption of thlS ordlnance,
cause the aforementloned abandoned vessels to be sold, destroyed
Owner
or otherw1se dlsposed of 1n such manner as he may deem ex~edlent
or convenlent. Upon sale tltle shall vest ln the purchaser who
shall 1mmedlately take steps to re~ove the property. All pro-
ceeds from such sale shall be the property of the City.
SECTION 3. The Clty Manager, or hlS designee, is author-
ized to ca~se the removal of the aforernentloned abandoned vessels
from the beach for the purpose of effectlng thelr sale or other
means of disposal and to enter lnto contracts necessary for such
removal. The mlnlffium prlce of any vessel so removed shall be
the cost of that removal.
SECTION 4. Any provislon of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
or appendlces thereto lnconslstent therew2th, to the extent o~
such lnconslstencles and no further, are hereby repealed or mO~l-
fied to that extent necessary to effect the prov1sio~s of tnls
ordlnance.
-3-
.
.
SECTION 5. If any section, subsectlon, sentence, clause,
or phrase of th1S ordinance 1S for any reason held to be
inval1d or unconstltutional by a decision of any court of
any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect
the val1dity of the rema1ning portlons of the ord1nance.
The City Council hereby declares that lt would have passed
thlS ordinance and each and every section, subsect1on,
sentence, clause or phrase not declared inval1d or unconstltutlonal
w1thout regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would
be subsequently declared 1Dvalld or unconstltutional.
SECTION 6. The Mayor shall sign and the Clty Clerk
shall attest to the passage of thlS ord1nance. The City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published once 1n the
official newspaper wlthin fifteen (IS) days after lts
adoption. The ordinance shall become effectlve after
thirty (30) days from lts adoptlon.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_~S~e,<Stf~
STEPHEN SHANE STARK
Actlng City Attorney
-4-
.
.
/'
ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS
22nd
DAY
OF July
, J%O.
WfAk?r /;J~~
u- -MAl~ .
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING ORDINANCEJ
No. 1172 J WAS DULY AND REGULARLY INTRODUCED AT A MEETING OF
THE (ITY COUNCIL ON THE 1st DAY OF July ) 1980j THAT
THE SAID ORDINANCE WAS THEREAFTER DULY ADOPTED AT A MEETING
OF THE (ITY COUNCIL ON THE 22nd DAY OF July , 1980
BY THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL VOTE:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: Jennings, Reed, Scott, van den Steenhoven,
Bambrick
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: Yannatta Goldway, Rhoden
ATTEST:
/ ~ ~
/, 1,__;'/
(,\../}L...4,..-. ,. /-~-~_
CITY CLERK
. >-
eo
DISTRIBUTION OF RESOLUTIO~ #
ORDINA,"ICE if
Council Meeting Date
Introduced:
Agenda Item iI
(g-E'
Adopted:
iotas it amended?
~YL--()
I~ f. ._
VOTE'. Affl- rmatlVe"o G.""._~,'c ".1) 0/ L ;, .<' a (f
>C._ ~ ~ t:~._~~~ ^, ~ ~~~--(
N - r
~~---. egatlve:, <
, :~ u/v0J )' Abstain: -."
g;;v :~Vh.<:i Absent: _~.. . U G K.I~__
,(< .-yvL / (7-
'~prstRIBUTION: ORIGINAL/to be sIgned, sealed and filed in
NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION (Date:
Department originating staff report (
City Attorney (~th ~
Agency mentioned in document or ~taff report
(certihed ?)
Subject file (agenda packet)
Counter file
Others:
Airport
ParkIng Auth.
Auditoi:um
Personnel
Building Dept.
Planning
Environ. Servo
vI
Finance
Police (en-
forcement?)
Fire
Purchasing
General Servo
Recr/Parks
Library
Transporta t ion.,
r.Ianager
Treasurer
~1
SE~m niO COPIES OF ALL ORDI,\iANCES
TO CODED SYSTEM~ Attn Peter McCleaLie
PROFESSIO~AL CE~TERjotal
ROUTE 71
BRIELLE, !\LiV JERSEY 08730
....,
Others: J
TOTAL COPIES
.
JI7L
I, I 9[-0
7~
.r--.. I
_.)A-u~
11., .11/
~
/'t ,r
i:_i Ps;
;::5a-~!-/f_
)
)
Vault. :r
p_L'''V ...,/~
~l~
L
_~f
(j)
r
j
j
..
! -
Kead into the rec1lJ at the City Council mee~ of July 23~ 1980
'l.~
ADDHESS TO THE COUKCIL ON ITEM 11D by Richard Koch, JUIY~ 1980
I direct you to my letter to the City dated Jan 17, 1979. In thlS letter
enh. tIed nproposals to Expand Serv~cesn, I propose that I be allowed to
add to my services a motoraoat ride o~tside the Harbor In order to help
stab~lize a business which was sufferlng due to a rough harbor and other
factors. This proposal was denled me on the . s~p;o~~g - grounds that
I had not yet bUllt a dock even though the deadline for completlon was yet
months away. ~ave you required Unlversal Marine to build a dock as a
ccndition for doing business? I purohased a nearly new motorboat and hired
a fully licensed skipper and began the rides to everyone's satisfaction
except your staff who made me qUlt. I needed thlS extra att~acticn to survlve,
lt was not in ccnfllct wlth anY othe~ business yet ~ was fo~ced to STOP.
Let's look now at thethlngs yo~'~e aDou" "0 glve to Unlversa~ Marlne t~t
you have denied ~e. ~~en I started West Wind ln 1975 you charged me $275
per month and 12% of the gross. Only after a bitter fight which made me no
~A1 r;r: !,.t.,,1-.
frlends ",ald I get i t lowe~ed to '~200 and 1a1c of the gross. Now In 1980 you
are asking only 5% of the gross and nothing more from a large copporation.
You have required that I maintain six boats in the water and you ~ave no
=equire~ent of the~(U.M.) Further, you requir~me to keep t~e~ there through
the winter which ultimately led them to be washed up on tte beach. The
agreement with U~ requires that they operate only three days ~er week during
~ost of the year while I am re~u1.red tp operate S1.X days a week even in the
~lddle of winter. Ttese hours of operaticn are far more realistlc than the
ones you saddled me with.
~~ere are you gClng to let U~ put its ~icket booth? Surely 1.t will be up
on t~e ~pper deck where the people are, so they can be exposed to the sales
pitch. l =equested to be allowed to put m~ne on the uppe= deck but that was
denied by your Pler manager who nade me keep l~ down on the lower deck, out
of touc~ w~th the maJo=lty of the F~ergoe=s. Not only that, but the signs
WhlCh I ala put on the upperdeck we~e frequently confiscated by the Follee~.
~o you anticlpate confiscating UM's signs as you ald mlne? ~ill you lnvent
the spurLOus charge that they did not get a coastal permlt for their booth
as you did to me until we pOlnted out to you that no one has?
I i:;.t:.ote from par. (c) subpar. (a) of t~e Tidelands G~ant, "no dlscrimlnatlor:
in ~ates, tolls. or charges, or lTI facillties, fer any use or serVlce i~
connection therewlth shall ever be madeXKJ~ authorlxed or pern~t~ed by
sald Cl t:r or by i -:s successors. n By refu.slng me the ~igh t to r;].~ :':ty
~oto~ccat ~ide, by c~arg~ng U.Y. less re~t, glvi~g the~ ~ore re21lstlc ~ou~s,
anc better bUSl~ess cc~ditlO~S
thar: you have ~e, you are ~lecr~mlr:atlng
..J. 'T" ,..:ot ..0_...' . <ff 10 IL.
Tidel2...~dS '7.~9.-::-:. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 11itlX .
agai~s~ me ~n vlclation of the
. .
__.ether, you are demonstrat~ng in the most graphic way imaginable further
examples oi the breach of the covenant of good faith and fair deallng which
made me sue you in the first place.
It was my fighting for reasonable business conditions for not only me, but
others on the Pier as well, that helped to create the climate into which
U.~. is now attemptlng to enter. I fought the battles, took the hard knocks,
and got the bad reputation in C~ty Hall, so that ultimately 1 could
operate a beating business in a conducive environment and new that it appears
that the environment may finally eXlst, you are thinklng of giving the
thlngs I fought for to another.
Mr. Budai and hlS Corporation are lucky. They are apparently getting the
welcome mat laid out for them. How diffe~ent the cllmate from when I
fisst acted to bring boating to Santa ~onica.- The first person I talked
to in City Hall was the first in a succession of seven Pier managers and
he actually invited me to go away and come back ina year! U.M. is not
experiencing what I did with a totally new and inexperlenced pier manager
ncr are they experienclng the hostlle efforts I did from Don Arnett and h~s
harbormaster who tried to keep mr out. They dont have to generate a rebuttal
to a hostile staff report or go _ through a license review board hea::::,ing
as I did. _ But ~ore than anything else, they are not havlng to know
the deadly effects on a business enxerprise from the hostility of a garbor
Dept who for years had been enJoYlng an aba~doned harbor w~th nething to
do. ~~.o fer years didn't have to worry about anything happening to dlsturb
their soft little deal - thelr own pr2vate little club of 2nslders, who
natura~ly viewed this outsider as somethlng to purge at ~y cost.
C.~. isnt having to fight against all of the entrenched ways of a Pier
which had been ~~changed in 25 years. There was no gladhanding chai~an
of a Lessees assn then because tr.ere was no ='e~~e~',s.-_~~3::;'':\ no Pier
pro~oJion program, no advertising, no pier ~alntenance program, there was
nc program of any xind and as far as T.os~ of the sta~f and the Earbor Dept
were concerned when I cane here, the less progra~s the better. So now
that 2~1 of these eXlst, and I ~ust add that some do as a result of my e~fort ~
~r. 3~C2i and h2S cc~?o~ation a~e viewed much differe~tly t~an was I when
~ fi=st came. Acca~dlng to ~ost of you p~obably, t~ey are viewed 2S
~esi~a81e w~ile all I ~ave ~eally gJtten for f~ve years of fight~~g ~~e
e~t~ecchEent, ~eslsta~ce, a~d i~ so~e cases ig~or~ce of a staff, ~anage~e~tJ
a~d Cou~c~l, as the ON~Y ~ew cusl~ess O~ t~e Pier l~ flve years, is to h2V~
~y ~e;u~at~cu attacked ~y goad na~e c~agged ~O~~,
~y efforts thwa~tedJ
a~d ~y 6oa~s and c=ea~s s~as~ed to ;leces.
.
.
Nothwithstanding the fighting I had to experience to get a foothold here,
I DID fight, and I ]In create a business, and I DID see thousands upon
thousands of people enjoY1ng the fru1t of my hard won victories. The
documentation of that enJoyment is voluminous. The guest books we carried
on the boat rides abound with pra1se for the experience I ~~de available
to those thousands in sp1te of the efforts of the City to prevent me, and
the documentation of my battle with ~1ty Hall is hundreds of pages long.
Every letter, memo, scrap of correspondence, every single document haa been
preserved and it all points unquest1onab~y to the fact that Santa ~onica
City Hall has persistently tried to keep from me the success I fought so
hard to achieve.
The letter 1n the file from Clarence Earmon gives the appearance that
the lessees Assn consciously chose another boating operator over me. !
suggest that you consider that this is a personal letter from Mr Earmon
and was not written or sent upon vmte of the Assn. Asklng one member of
tbe A~~n how the Assn feels is llke asking one of you how the Counc11 1S
go~ng to vote. I donlt think you will find the Assn I se~Ted well for years
coth as Secy and as Chairman of the P~omotion and Advertising Committee will
vote for something Wh1Ch they know would be to ~y detriment. There have been
~oo many voted ex~resslons of thanks for my eff~rts for that.
In summary, I ask t~at the public contact ne at West W1nd Sailing so that
their voices can be heard about how they feel that by this ac~, you are
once again trying to destroy the institution I worked so hard t~ creat e.
. .
~~ST G\V/l\1.()
PROPOSALS TO MPA,"m SERVlcr;s
Jan.17, 1979
In April of 1977, I started the West Wind Harbor Ride. I realized
the desire peonle h3~e to ~o fQ~ a boat ride, and also the fasein-
~tiQn of our harbor, with it's seals and abundant bird life.
Bavln~ ori~lnally started with rentals and school, I felt tnat
Nest Hind WqS somehow slightly out of tune with the general Pie~-
Il:oing nublie in that most of them had never been in a sai11:oa1:, and
very likely never would unless a low cost, easy way to do so were
made aV2il9ble to them. The experience of introducin~ thousands
to the pleasures of sailing bas been a worthwhile one indeed. Some
people have ~ade rather interestin~ co~ments, or asked incredible
qUesti~ns, all of which have enriched the experience for ever,one.
One of tl1e most frequently 2.!'!ked questions has been if t'~e bre~k-
w~ter iq ~an~de o~ natural. and by far the ~ost bi~arre questiJn
wa.s, "Do those rocks go all the way to the bottom?" which was asked
by two different persons! ~any ask about the seals, about sharks,
pelicans, etc., ~nd I f~el that Nest ~inc 1s t~us ~2~ing a meanin~-
ful contributiJn to the live~ ;f ~Rny people by providing them with
~n e~perience that is at the sa~e time recreational and educational.
At t~e ti~e of this writing, appro~imately 40,000 people have taken
the ~est ~lnd Rides.
Many pe~ple would love to go for a ride but, because of certain
fears, will not set foot in a sailboat in spite of our best efforts
in persuad~n; them. I w?nt to oe able to give these people the
pleasure of the Harbor Rides as well, and so I prop0se to offer them
t~e same kind of ride, but in a boat powered by a motor, and perhaps
next t1~e we ~ay convince them to try it in a sailboat. rhis kind
of combination of sail and motor powered rides is quite common in
the industry. Skippers from ~y staff are experts in dealin~ with
the public on the water, and can use this skill in any kind of boat.
~hi~ proposal 1s merely qn e7tension of R D~?n I ~ave ~ad to put
s~~ll outboards on the sailboats for assist in light or calm win~s.
I propose to offer the same general type of rides that I now
?rovlde. Six passen~ers per boat will still be the rule, as thls
conforms with oertaln Coast Guard regulations. If I see t~e need for
19r~er craft with greater capacity, all procedures will be in full
c0mpliance with all COast Guard ~egulations. I might point out that,
althou2h t~ere has been no enforceme~t of the six oassen<<er rule
here in the harbor, I have never exceeded this li~it. Xy record ~lth
the Coast Guard 1s excellent and I ~8ve b~en commended by them for the
condlti~n of my equipment.
~,-ES- ~'-~I'~:: .:::,.c...;_''\I::; ::::"~2 ;5. .Sic--eOl-
soc .5'=-,"-A ../C~:CA- :;"S~
SA.~A "v'Ct.,,:[CA, 0...
__ (21:' 3?~-5A[...
~EST w~ SERVICE EhPANSION PROPOS~. p.2
You "t3.ve probably notic~d my "space ship" moored in the harbor.
It is a 14-~an surviv~l ca~sule from an offshore oil-drilling ri~.
It 1s virtually indestruct~ble, being designed ~ith the capauilitv
of ~otoring through a sea of flaming 011. ~veryone is curious about
t'le "sp8ce ship" and so I am sure they ~ould love to be able to go
f0r ~ ride in it. hhether tr,e ride would be inside the h~rbor O~
0utside I h~ve not yet de~ermined. As with all things here in the
h8rbor. it will have to be determined from experience. Experience
has been the key f3ctor here in the operation of ./est .iind Rides.
Experience in understanding the Pier led originally to the creation
of the Rides, eyperience in pro~otion led to the creat~on )f the
Quaint instituti~n of the rolling sailboat ride si~n which 0v~r
8000 kids have pushed to ~et ~ f~ee ride, experien~e in dealing ~lth
the public has iliade dest wind virtu911y complaint-free, and has
led to such trust by the publiC that h~s seen the third T~turn of
a 2roup of bl~nd people for boat rides, and above all, experience
in toat and passenger handlin~ ~as ~iven ~est Nind an accident-free
record.
It will oe an easy matter to implement this aQditlonal facet of the
services already provided by Nest Nind, and asthere has never been
such a service provided before, I welcome the o~portunity to further
en~ance the qttraction of the Pier to it's ~any visitors.
T~e s~me conditions snd terms of the lease will prevail, with wording
;laded t'J include the use of motor powered boats for skippered rides.
r'1ere will be no infringement on any oth~r existing business.
PROPOSAL .f2
I wls~ to utili~e the area in which oeople w~it for b08t rides to
display and sell my photography af the area. A few xeroxed samples
of ~y work ar~ included. !~e financial arrange~ent Houln be the
sa~e percentage of gross sales as pRid by other Pier vendors of
retail werchandise.
This feature ~ill not only boost nest ~ind revenues, but will pro-
vide a ~eans of helping Pier visitors to ~ore fUlly ap9r~ciat~ this
unique visual envlron~ent.
I propose to s~art both of these ~eW features at once.
E-s~ectfully submitted,
Rlc!1ard K. Koch
.
.
-,
~
. '
February 23, 1979
r4r. Richard Koch
Westwlnd Salllng School
500 Santa Monlca pier
Santa Monlca, CA 90401
Dear Mr. Koch:
Thank you for your proposal regardlng expansion of Westwlnd
Sal1lng School services by additlonally provldlng motor
boat rides ln the harbor. Whlle your proposal is interesting
and of posslble beneflt to pier and harbor users, I cannot
approve such an expansion of serVlce untll you have fully
compIled wlth all the requirements of your current Santa
Monica pier lease, contract No. 3000 (ccs).
The lease reaUlrements that have not been fully compIled
with are as follows:
1.) Exhibit "E": "Lessee shall construct at his
own cost and expense and lnstall a new float and gang plank
appurtenant to the Santa Monlca Pler. ThlS float shall be
lnstalled by Aprl1 30, 1979." Allowance for bad weather and
any "act of "God" over the past year would indlcate an
additlcnal 22 days should be added to this deadllne, redefln-
ing lt to be May 28, 1979.
2. ) Exhlbi t "C" perIll1 tted uses: "Lessee shall
be requlred to malntain, onerate and have avallable for use
excludlng normal maintenan~e and repair durlng all hours
of business not less than six sallboats no later than July 3,
1978. SlX sailboats have not been ~aintained ln the water
as called for in the lease under exhlbit "c" nor have you
fulfilled this requlrement as of thls date.
3.1 Exhlblt "0" of the lease, hours of buslness
between November 1st to Memorial Day, hours of buslness will
.
.
~r. Richard Koch
-2-
February 23, 1979
be: "Six days each week between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and
one hour prior to sunset." You have not conducted and carr~ed
on bUSlness between these days six days a week as called for
by the lease.
When the approved float has been lnstalled ~n the harbor and
lS In operatlon on a regular basis, and items "C" ane "D" have
been complled with, the Clty will reconslder your expans~on
proposal. Unt~l such time, please be advlsed that any operatlon
of ~otor boat rldes by you is ~n confllct wlth the "permltted
uses" sectlon of your lease.
Very truly yours,
~- ~6L
Jeremy B. Ferris, C.P.E.
Director of Entertalnment Fac~lltles
JBF:bf
c.c. C. Kent McClaln, City Manager
Donna Swink, Mayor
Seymour Cohen, Mayor pro tern
John J. Bawbrlck, Councilrnember
Chrlstlne Reed, Councllmember
Perry Scott, Councllmember
Nathan~el Tr~ves, Councllmember
P1etar van den Steenhoven, Councllrnember
.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015 5 C C p )
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Los Angeles,
I am a Citizen at the Untted States and a
resident of thE' County afores<lld. I am over
the age of eighteen years. and not a party to
or mterested In the above entitled matter I
am the principal clerk of the p~Jnter of the
EVi~nNG OUTLOOK
a newspaper of general Circulation, printed
and puhllshed d8~ly ex~~~~ S~~a~ H
SANTA. MONICA
In the City of
County of Los Angeles, and which
newspaper has been adludged a newspaper
of general Circulation by the Superior Court
of the County of Los Angeles, State of
California, under the date of.~~I,1. ~~ 19 .~;,
Case Number.. 3~~31.?. ,that the notice,
of whICh the annexed IS a printed copy (set
In type not smaller than nonpareil), has
been published In each regular and entire
Issue of said newspaper and not 111 any
supplement thereof on the follOWing dates,
to-Wit
_,I
all 111 the year 1980
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
per\ury that the foregomg IS true and
correct
Dated at
SANTA MONICA
~"1, 1980
_ C~llfornla,thls ~
"~~'\...~~ture\" . .
\,. .
Free copies of thiS 61ank form maV lJe 5ecl,lre-d from
CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE
BUREAU,INC
Lega I AdvertiSing Clearing House
South Spring St , Los Angeles. Calrf 90012
Telephone' 6'1S-2141
Plea" request GE NERAL Proof of PlJbhca'lCln
when ordenng thIS form
4t
ThIS'
Proal
CA..;..pSS.;.>>Bt: se ..-..,
q-6uht!'il M~g %.t2
,
.calJ..f or n ~a
ORDINANCE NO. 11'2
(C~ty Counc~l Ser~es)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COU~CIL OF
THE CITY OF SANTA rot' ,... " j' I '"~CLARING
CERTAIN VESSELS STRANDED ON THE S&~TA
MONICA BEACH TO BE AB&~DONED PROPERTY
WHEREAS, ~ severe storm struck the C~ty of S~nta ~onlca
on February 18-19, 1980; and
WHEREAS, as a result of that storm, elght vessels were
washed up and stranded on the Santa Honl-ca Beach uorth of the
Pler; and
.'lHEREAS, the o\mers of seven of those vessel,; were notl-
fled by the Clty to remove the vessels at
the~r expense, and the owner of the e1ghth vessel 15 unknown; and
r..1U'I;'I"C1:"'1\C' .......,...........,....+-hC"....':::!I.......M,........~ +-'h....... .........~C!'C"'::3.~r!l. ...-F TnF'l.~n ...h="" ""'Jr. ~-:::k'[-"""
DATF -
7-Z! .-iV
TO:
'Iarv lennon, Santa \!onlca EvenLng Outlook
FROM-
City Clerk (393-9975, Ext. 211), Santa MonIca CIty Hal~
SUBJECT- REQUEST TO PUBLISH lEG~l XCTICE
Please publIsh the attached
./)
II .. .
LLL0(i.-_~ /.
Ii '
;3 j rroof~ of
~
(/bJhL (Uv/.A' .J-. (17 <=-
/??" u
on
dnd return
publlcatlon to tho CIty Clerk'~ OffIce.
-~n~~ ~nl~ '~IU1'
_ ~J "'-- -' U ., L
-""--------
aS5lstancc,
.Jcanet1:C ~:;]ef, CIty Cler,::'s Secretdry
.'
-
--------------~----~- - - ~-- --.
~[i; 'ZY'
INFOID-fATION REGARDING ADJOURNING Ii HEMORY OF
' (Please Print)
NAHE OF DECEASED And ({,tC- 1t-1~~ll
v
NAME OF PERSON TO RECEIVE BEREAVEMENT NOTICE
ftl ,1 '+ V~1.i'16 t+vJ (!i{.J tfc; ~l/\
THEIR ADDRESS {(71 ( -N r;u/f-a.1/UL I~
R~{;rh~r?rVl( {A- Yhl(f
.---;:? . J
BY J51A.u'hy"'a~
INFOR}fATION REGARDING ADJOURNING IN MEMORY Of
. (Please Print)
NANE OF DECEASED Pr. Ii fnry L i/f/v
NAME OF PERSON TO RECEIVE BEREAVEMENT NOTICE
. /3 [. -r/{ e r L. L; 11 y\
THEIR ADDRESS
BY i!X)#1/b// ILL
-,-- '-~-;::;::""'r ~'-"-7-;!
~ /'
I , ,
L,~~ .'