SR-8-A (28)
l"
Av'" ID <?~A
, JAN 1 2 1988
CA:RMM:LL:11278/hpc
City Council Meeting 1-12-88
Santa Monica, California
SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT
TO:
Mayor and City Couneil
city Attorney
Ordinance Amendinq Chapter 9A of Article IV
of the Santa Monica Municipal Code to Regulate
smoking in Restaurants
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The staff report distributed to the City Council regarding
this item contained a summarj of local smoking laws prepared by
k~ericans for Nonsmokers' Rights as Appendix A.
Today we
received an updated and more complete version of that sU1IUllary.
It shows that as of June 1987, 113 cities and counties had
adopted laws requiring nonsmoking sections in restaurants. As
can be seen in the report, several cities apply nonsmoking
requirements to all restaurants, regardless of size. The
majority of cities and counties require a nonsmoking section to
include fifty percent (sot) of the seating capacity of a
restaurant.
The report entitled "California City and County Smoking
ordinances" is attached hereto and replaces Appendix A as it
appears in the bound version of the proposed smoking ordinance
and staff report.
Prepared by:
Robert M. Myers, City Attorney
Laurie Lieberman, Deputy city Attorney
A -ro ~A
~~ JAN 1 2 1988
CALIFORNIA CIn AND COUNTY SMOKING ORDINANCES
Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights
2054 University Avenue, Suite 500
Berkeley, CA 94704
(415) 841-3032
June 14, 1987
SUMMARY,
This set of charts sl1mm~dzes the provisions of the significant city and
county smoking ordinances in California.
State law regulates smoking in supermarkets, health facilities, and public
meetings (50% nonsmoking) and certain parts of publicly owned build~ngs. Most
localities regulate smoking in theaters. Many communities have enacted far
stronger smoking laws.
To be included in th~s compilation, an ordinance roust affect e1ther private
workplaces, restaurants, or a substantial number of signif1cant public places.
~ong California cities and counties, at least
120 cities and counties have a signif1cant nonsmoker protection law.
112 regulate smoking in private workplaces.
113 require nonsmoking sections in restaurants.
99 restrict smoking in retail stores.
52% of the population of California (14,159,030 people) lives in a
place where a smoking policy is required of private employers.
We say "at leastll because ordinances are now being enacted at the rate of
several a month.
In addition to the jurisdictions counted above, at least 6 counties have laws
protecting only county government employees. They are:
Fresno County
Lake County
Los Angeles County
Monterrey County
Ventura County (by resolution)
Yolo County (by resolution)
THE CHARTS
Five charts are provided. They are:
I C1ties and Counties with Ordinances
II Summary of Major Provisions
III Workplace Provisions
IV Other Public Places
V Enforcement; Exceptions; Other Places
_ 1 _
A, . QUICK REFERENCE
Chart 1 is the "qui.ck reference" for California smoking ordinances. It lists
all counties and cities with s~gnif~cant smoking laws. It shows population,
county, an( whether the laW' regulates smoking for restaurants, private
employers and retail stores.
The year (and month, when known) of enactment of the law 1s also shown. When
two years are shown (for example, 111980..86"), the first date is the year a
significant ordinance was first enacted, and the second is the year of the
most recent amendment.
MORE DETAILS
Charts II through V contain details of each smoking law.
In order to condense a great deal of information into a small space,
abbreviations and footnotes have been used extensively. The indication "Yes"
in a column means that smoking is prohihited or restricted in the
corresponding place, or that the law contains the corresponding provision. A
blank means that smok1ng is not regulated in that place.
Abbreviations specific to certain col~s are explained below. Footnotes
appear at the end of this text.
CHART II - SL~~R~ OF MAJOR paOVISIONS
For each c~ty and county with a smoking ordinance, this chart shows whether
the law restricts smok~ng in private workplaces, in retail stores, and 1n
restaurants. Tnis chart is similar to Chart I, but more information is g~ven
on the ~pecific restrictions in each place.
WORKPLACES REGtn.ATED: "AU" ~nd1cates that all private workplaces are
requued to have a smoking policy. "All 4+" (for example) means that all
private employers with 4 or more employees are covered. nOfc." or "Ofc.Wkpl"
means that the ordinance covers only office workplaces.
RETAIL STORES: "Dept." means only department stc.res are affected. "AIlBusu
means retail stores and all other business establishments are affected.
RESTAURANTS: Most entries in this column show the minimum percentage of seats
required in the nonsmoking section, and the minimum size of restaurants wh~ch
are required to have a nonsmoking section. For example, "25% 40+" means
restaurants with 40 or more seats are required to have at least 25% of those
seats in 8 (usually contiguous) nonsmoking section. "NoZ" indicates no
minimum percentage; often there is a requirement for sufficient nonsmoking
seats to accommodate nonsmokers. If no restaurant size is shown, all
restaurants must have a nonsmoking sect1on.
- 2 -
CHART III - SUMMARY pF WORKPLACE PROVISIONS.
This chart lists only those cities and counties with ordinances requiring all
or most em.ployers to have a smoking policy in the workplace. A "Yes" in most
columns indicates that smok 18 is prohibited in the indicated area. Other
abbreviations:
WORKPLACES REGULA-rku: See Chart II above.
Cafeteria: An entry in this column indicates the minimum percentage of
cafeterias, lunchrooms and (usually) employee lounges required to be
nonsmoking.
Medical Fad!.: "Yesu indicates smoking proh1.bited in medicaLfacilJ.ties and
nurses aid stations.
Mt&,. Rooms: "Yes" indicates smoking prohibited in (usually all of) meeting
rooms, conference rOGOS and auditor~ums. Some ordinances allow for smoking by
unanimous consent of those present.
DesiR. OwnArea: "Yes" indicates that an employee can designate his/her
immed1.ate work area as a nonsmoking area.
Nonsmkr Prefnce: "Yest! ~ndicates that when a dispute arises under, ~he
workplace smoking policy, priority must be given to the nonsmokers. Some
ord~nances require that nonsmokers must be satisfied, even if this requires
banning smoking in a work area.
Nonretaltn: "Yes" indicates that it is unlawful to dismiss or d~scri:!l~:late
against an employee for requesting his/her r~ghts under the smoking law. Most
laws also proh~bit such discrioination in h1.r1.ng.
CHART IV - OTHER PUBLIC PLACES Al'J:<'.t:;CTED
A tlYes" ind~cate5 that st:lok~ng is prohib~ted in the indicated places
(abbrev1.ated in column headings): Theaters (somet1.mes excepting the lobby);
Museums. librar1.es and galleriesj Public (i.e., government) meet1.ngs;
Elevators; Food markets and supermarkets; (indoor) Service lines; Rest rooms
(sometimes "public" only); Pharmacies; Buses and other public transit vehl.cles
and facilities.
- 3 -
~HART V - ENFO~.CEMENT; EXCEPl'IONS i OTHER AREAS Al'l'ecTED
EhTORCEMENT: Tnis column indicates any special enforcement mechanisms. A
violation is usually an infraction; this is true even if 1llnfractionlt is not
specifically shown. unless "m1sdelDeanorll or "noro:" (not a violation of law)
appears. "Misdemeanor" means any violation is a misdemeanor.
Many laws also provide that a violation is a public nuisance and allow the
city to abate it by the appropriate procedure. "Pub.Nuis. rr means individuals
also have this right.
If a particular office or person is given enforcement responsibility, that is
shown here. nCity Manager/complaint" means any person may initiate a
complaint with the city manager.
"Bus.Lic." means compliance is a condition of having a business license.
Self-certification of compliance may be required: IIBus.Lic.Ren." means.it is
required on license renewal; "Inspect" means reqUl.red during othel'"W'ise
mandated inspection by fire or health department.
EXCEPTIONS: "Appl." indicates that an affected business or facility may apply
for a public hear1ng and. upon paying the applicable hearing fees and making
certain showings which vary from place to place, may be granted an exception.
"Sl.gnTr indl.cates that a place may be exernpte1 by posting a "smoking perr.dcted"
sign.
OTHER AFFEcTLD ARR~5: Lists other places where smokl.ng is prohl.bited.
FOOTNOTES TO CH.A..RTS I - V
+ Revised information or new ordinance since January 1987.
* Indl.cates city or county for which we do not have complete or most recent
information.
[1] Smoking prohibited in a11 public places and places of employment except
in desl.gnated smoking areas. Ordinances using thl.s language almost
always contain a list of specific public places in whl.ch a smoking area
may not be designated, and further restrictions affecting places of
employment.
[2] County population includes unincorporated areas only.
[3] Year and month of most recent addition or change.
[4] Exceptions: Appl. = by application; Sign = by posting a sign.
[5] Preference of a majority of the nonsmokers shall prevail.
[6] Workplace minimums are suggested, not required.
[7] If nonsmokers can not be othe~se accommodated, smoking will be
prohibited entirely.
[8] Retail stores over 1.000 square feet.
[9] Violation of the retailiation provision is a m1sdemeanor; all other
violations are infractions.
- 4 -
[10J No sections required but policy must be posted.
[11] Exception can be allowed for certain places certified as meeting a
specific minimum air circulat~on standard.
[12] Smoke free work area must be provided to any employee requesting one in
writing.
[13] Smoking is prohibited in all retail stores, including pharmacies.
[14] Smoking prohibited in inner hallways only.
[15] Private offices may be designated nonsmoking by the occupant.
[16] In employee cafeterias, lunchrooms and lounges, the percentage shown
shall be nonsmOking, and smoking is prohibited entirely in 8m~11 areas
(Palo Alto: under 650 square feet; Irvine: under 40 seats).
[17] No smoking in at least 60% of each restaurant with 50 or more seats.
Smaller restaurants: no sect10n required but policy must be posted. 50%
of all outdoor eating areas shall be nonsmoking.
[18] Smoking prohibited in work areas except for smoking areas, which may be
so des~gnated only if all pe.sons working in the area so request ~n
writing.
[19] Smoking prohibited throughout workplaces except for one smoking lounge.
.
[20] 50% of conference rooms. meet~ng rooms or classrooms over 1500 square
feet; prohibited upon request if under 1500 square feet.
[21] 50% of lobby must be nonsmoking.
[22] Ordinance does not specifically cite this area, but does prohibit smoking
in all enclosed areas available to and customarily used by the general
public.
[23] Requires 25% nons~ok1ng in restaurants seating SO or more. but exempts
restaurants in ex~stence since January 1. 1977.
[24] Except restaurants under 500 square feet. retail stores and markets under
1500 square feet.
[25] Does not regulate restaurants in hotels.
[26] Smaller restaurants must make reasonable efforts to provide nonsrnok~ng
seating.
[27] Shared work areas must be nonsmoking unless all employees in the area
agree otherwise.
- 5 -
CHART I: CALIFORNIA CITIES AND COUNTIES WITH SMOKING ORDINANCES
COMMUNITY COUNTY POPULATION YEAR/MONTH PRIVATE RESTAL~ANTS RETAIL
ENACTED WORKPLACES STORES
Nr. places regulating: 120 112 113 99
Albany Alameda 15.100 1986/03 Yes Yes Yes
Anaheim Orange 242,200 1986/03 Yes Yes
Antl.och Contra Costa 51,800 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
Arcata Humboldt 14,350 1985/12 Yes Yes Yes
Berkeley Alameda 21,850 1980. .86 Yes Yes Yes
+ Benic1a Solano 106,900 1987/03 Yes Yes Yes
+ Beverly Hills Los Angeles 34,300 1987/03 Yes Yes
Brea Orange 32,950 1985. .86 Yes Yes
Brent"W'ood Contra Costa 6,100 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
+ Burlingame San Mateo 27,000 1987/05 Yes Yes Yes
Carlsbad San Dl.ego 55,300 1983/06 Yes Yes Yes
Carpinteria Santa Barbara 11 , 700 1985/03 Yes
Cathedral Cl.ty Riverside 23.550 1982/12
+ Chico Butte 33,750 1986/10 Yes Yes Yes
Chula v"ista San D1.ego 120,300 1984 Yes Yes Yes
Clayton Contra Costa 4,830 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
Conc.ord Contra Costa 108,000 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
Coronado San Diego 24,700 1984/08 Yes Yes Yes
Cupertino Santa Clara 38,650 1985/02 Yes Yes Yes
Danville Contra Costa 28,150 . 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
Del Mar San D1.ego 5.050 1983/06 Yes Yes Yes
Desert Hot Springs Rivers~de 9,125 1986/03 Yes Yes Yes
+ Dublin Alameda 21,500 1986/08 Yes Yes Yes
El Cajon San D~ego 82,900 1985 Yes Yes Yes
El Cernto Contra Costa 23,400 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
Escondida San Diego 86.900 1983/12 Yes Yes Yes
Eureka Humboldt 24,650 1985/12 Yes Yes Yes
Fontana San Bernardl.no 60,000 1986/12 Yes Yes Yes
* Frel:lont Alameda 157.400 1986/08 Yes Yes Yes
Grand Terrace San Bernard:lno 9,875 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
+ Gridley Butte 4,220 1986/05 Yes Yes Yes
Hemet Riverside 30,350 1985. .86 Yes Yes Yes
Hercules Contra Costa 11 , 600 1985/10 Yes Yes Yes
Hunt1.ngton Beach Orange 186.800 1986/02 Yes Yes
Imper1.al Beach San D1.ego 25,150 . 1985/10 Yes Yes Yes
Indl.o Riverside 30.950 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
Irvine Orange 94,100 1985. .86 Yes Yes
La Mesa San Diego 51,500 1984/02 Yes Yes Yes
Lafayette Contra Costa 22,500 1985/10 Yes Yes Yes
Laguna Beach Orange 18,800 1985 Yes Yes
L1.ve Oak Sutter 3 , 800 1986/05 Yes Yes Yes
L1.vermore Alameda 54,400 1985/06 Yes Yes Yes
Lama Linda San Bernardino 12,600 1986/11 Yes Yes Yes
Long Beach Los Angeles 406,200 1985/07 Yes Yes
Los Altos Santa Clara 27,200 1979 Yes Yes Yes
Los Angeles Los Angeles 3,311,500 1984/11 Yes
Los Gatos Santa Clara 27t950 1980/06 Yes Yes Yes
Martinez Contra Costa 28,800 1985/11 Yf!S Yes Yes
Menlo Park San Mateo 27,750 1986/02 Yes
- 6 -
CHART I: CALIFORNIA CITIES AND COUNTIES WITH SMOKING ORDIN&~CES
( page 2 )
COMMUNITY COUNTY POPULATION YEAR/MONTH PRIVATE RESTAUR~vrS RETAIL
ENACTED WORKPLACES STORES
Mill Valley Marin 13,200 1982 Yes
Mi1p~tas Santa Clara 43,900 1985/08 Yes Yes Yes
+* Modesto Stanislaus 138.500 1987/03 Yea Yes Yes
Moraga Contra Costa 15,500 1986/01 Yes Yes Yes
Morgan Hill Santa Clara 21,450 1985/12 Yes Yes Yes
Mountain View Santa Clara 62.200 1984/06 Yes Yes Yes
National City San Diego 54,700 1984/05 Yes Yes Yes
Newport Beach Orange 67,800 1985/06 Yes Yes
Oakland Alameda 356,200 1986/07 Yes Yes
Oceanside San Diego 101,000 1983 Yes Yes Yes
+ Ontario San Bernardino 113,600 1097/05 Yes Yes
Orinda Contra Costa 17,250 1985/12 Yes Yes Yes
+ Oroville Butte 1O,lDO 1986..7 Yes Yes Yes
Palm Desert Riverside 17,100 1986/05 Yes Yes Yes
Palm Springs R1.verside 31,500 1986/02 Yes Yes Yes
Palo Alto Santa Clara 56,600 1983. .85 Yes Yes
ParadJ.se Butte 25,100 1986/04 Yes Yes Yes
Pasadena Los Angeles 130,800 1984 Yes Yes
Pinole Contra Costa 15,000 ,1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
Pittsburg Contra Costa 41,600 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
Pleasanton Alameda 29.950 1986/07 Yes Yes Yes
Pleasant H~ll Contra Costa 10,350 1986/01 Yes Yes Yes
Pavay San Diego 39,150 1983/03 Yes Yes Yes
+ Rancho Mirage R1.verside 8,150 1986. .87 Yes Yes Yes
+ Redlands San Bernardino 54,200 1987/03 Yes Yes Yes
Richmond Contra Costa 78,700 1985109 Yes Yes Yes
Rivers~de Riverside 199,000 1985/05 Yes Yes Yes
Sacramento Sacramento 327,200 1985 Yes Yes Yes
San Anselmo Marin 12,000 19857
San D1.ego San Diego 1,022,400 1982/12 Yes Yes Yes
San Francisco San Francisco 742,700 1983/11 Yes
San Jose Santa Clara 719 ,500 1984 Yes Yes Yes
San Luis Obispo S.Luis Obispo 38,300 1985/12 Yes Yes
San Xarcos San DJ..ego 23,250 1983/03 Yes Yes Yes
+ San Mateo San Mateo 83,500 1986/11 Yes Yes Yes
San Pablo Contra Costa 83,500 1985/10 Yes Yes Yes
San Rafael Marin 21,350 1979/08 Yes
San Ramon Contra Costa 45,600 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 27,450 1984 Yes Yes
Santa Clara Santa Clara 79,100 1985/07 Yes Yes Yes
Santa Monica Los Angeles 89,300 1985/04 Yes
Santee San Diego 96,100 1983/02 Yes Yes Yes
Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 50,200 1985 Yes Yes Yes
+ S 1JId Valley Vent.ura 94,300 1987/05 Yes Yes
+ South San Francisco San Mateo 51,700 1987. .87 Yes Yes Yes
* Sunnyvale Santa Clara 115,200 1986. .86 Yes Yes Yes
+ Tracy San Joaquin 27,300 1987/01 Yes Yes Yes
Tustin Ora.nge 43,100 1985/12 Yes Yes Yes
Ukiah Mendocino 13,400 1981/07 Yes Yes Yes
- 7 -
CHART I: CAUFOIUHA CITIES AND COUNTIES WITH SMOKING ORDINANCES
( page 3 )
, -
COMMUNITY COUNTY POPULATION YEAR/MONnI PRIVATE RESTAURANTS RETAIL !
ENACTED WORKPLACES STORES
It
+ Vallejo Solano 92,400 1987/02 Yes Yes Yes
Vista San Diego 50,900 1983/04 Yes Yes Yes
Walnut Creek Contra Costa 62,100 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
West Hollywood Los Angeles 38,450 1986/03 Yes Yes Yes
+ Wheatland Yuba 1,780 1986/11 Yes Yes Yes
Yorba Linda Orange 42,600 1985/09 Yes Yes Yes
Yuba City Sutter 22,300 1986/06 Yes Yes Yes
County of Alameda [2J 115,700 1986 Yes Yes Yes
+County of Butte (2] 92,800 1987/02 Yes Yes Yes
County of Contra Costa [2] 140,400 1985/09 Yes Yes Yes
County of Marin (2} 62,900 1981/07 Yes Yes -
+County of Monterey [2} 99,900 1987/01 Yes Yes Yes !
County of Orange [2) 326,000 1985..7 Yes Yes Yes ...
County of Riverside [2] 294,700 1985 Yes Yes Yes
County of Sacramento [2] 574,200 1985/02 Yes Yes Yes
+County of San Bern'd'o [2] 410,300 1987/03 Yes Yes Yes
County of San Diego [2] 424,800 1982/12 Yes Yes Yes
County of Santa Clara [ 2] 103,600 1985/06 Yes Yes Yes
County of Santa Cruz [2] 127,100 1985 Yes Ye':! Yes
+County of Solano (2] 17,950 ' 1987/05 Yes Yes Yes
+County of Sutter [2] 33,500 1987/03 Yes ' -Yes Yes
Population covered in workplaces 14,159,030
Percentage of state populat10n: 52 %
( 6/11/87)
- 8 -
CHART II: MAJOR PROVISIONS OF CALIFO~~IA LOCAL SMOKING ORDINANCES
COMMUNIn' POPULATION YEAR/MONnl WORKPLACES RETAIL RESTAURANTS
E..'l'ACTED REGULATED STORES
Nr. places regulat~ng: III 98 112
Albany 15,100 1986/03 All AllBus .. 40% 50+
Anaheim 242,200 1986/03 All 4+ No% 50+
Antioch Sl.800 1985/11 All 4+ Al1Bus .. 40% 50+
Arcata 14,350 1985/12 All 2+ AllBus. 50% 50+
Berkeley 21,850 1980. .86 All AllBus .. 50% All
+ Benicia 106,900 1987/03 All 3+ AlIBus. 50% 50+
+ Beverly Hills 34,300 1987/03 Yes 100%[25]
Brea 32,950 1985.. .86 All 25% 50+
Brent....ood 6,100 1985/11 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
+ Bur lingBltle 27,000 1987/05 All Ai1Bus. NoZ 50+
Carls bad 55,300 1983/06 All [1] Yes No% 20+
Carpinteria 11,700 1985/03 All
Cathedral City 23,550 1982/12
+ Chico 33,750 1986/10 All 4+ AllBus. 10% 20+
Chula V1sta 120,300 1984 All [1] Yes No% 20+
Clayton 4,830 1985/11 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
Concord 108,aOO 1985/11 All 4+ AIlBus. 40% 50+
Coronado 24,700 1984/08 All [l] Yes No% 20+
Cupertino 38,650 1985/02 Dfe. Wkpl. Yes 30% 50+
DanvJ.lle 28,150 1985/11 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
Del Mar 5,050 1983/06 All [1] Yes No% 20+
Desert Hot Sprlngs 9 , 125 1986/03 All [6] Dept. 25% 50+
+ Dublin 21,500 1986/08 All AllBus. 50%
El Cajon 82,900 1985 All 5+ Yes NoZ 20+
El Card to 23,400 1985/11 All 4+ AIlBus. 40% 50+
Escondido 86,900 1983/12 All [1] [8] No% 20+
Eureka 24,650 1985/12 All AllBus. 25% All
Fontana 60,000 1986/12 All 4+ AllBus. 50% 40+
* Fremont 157,400 1986/08 All 4+ AUBus. 40%
Grand Terrace 9,875 1985/11 All (6J Dept. 25% 50+
+ Gridley - 4,220 1986/05 All 4+ AllBus. 50% 50+
Hemet 30,350 1985. .86 All [1] [lJ So% 50+
Hercules 11 , 600 1985/10 All 4+ All1~us . 40% 50+
Huntl.ngton Beach 186,800 1986/02 All 4+ 25% 50+
Imperial Beach 25.150 1985/10 All [1) Yes ~o% 20+
IndJ.o 30,950 1985/11 All [6] Dept. 50% 50+
Irvine 94 t 100 1985. .86 Ofc.Wkpl. 1/4 40+
La Mesa 51,500 1984/02 All [1] Yes NoZ 40+
Lafayette 22,500 1985/10 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
Laguna Beach 18,800 1985 Ofc.Wkpl. 25% 40+
Live Oak 3,800 1986/05 All AllBus.. 50% 50+
Livermore 54,400 1985/06 All AllBus. 50%
Loma Linda 12,600 1986/11 All 4+ AllBus. 50% 40+
Long Beach 406,200 1985/07 All 5+ 25% 50.l.
Los Altos 27,200 1979 All Yes 25% 50+
Los Angeles 3,311,500 1984/11 All 5+
Los Gar.os 27,950 1980106 All Yes 50% 25+
, Martinez 28,800 1985/11 All 4+ AllBus . 40% 50+
Menlo Park 27,750 1986/02 60% 50+
- 9 -
CHART II: MAJOR PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL SMOKING ORDI~ANCES
COMMUNITY POPULATION YEAR/MONTH WORKPLACES RETAIL RESTAURANTS
ENACTED REGULATED STORES
Mill Valley 13,200 1982 No% 20+
~ilpitas 43,900 1985/08 All AllBus. 50%
+* Modesto 138,500 1987/03
Moraga 15,500 1986/01 All 4+ AIIBus. 40% 50+
Morgan Hill 21,450 1985/12 All 4+ AIIBus. No%
Mountain View 62,200 1984/06 All AllBus. 50%
National City 54,700 1984/05 All [1] Yes Na% 40+
Newport Beach 67,800 1985{06 Dfe. > 4 25% 50+
Oakland 356,200 1986/07 All AllBus.
Oceanside 101,000 1983 All [1] Yes N.o% 20+
+ Ontario 113,600 1097(05 Ofc.w'kpl. 25%50+ [26 J
Orinda 17,250 1985/12 All 4+ AllEus. 40% 50+
+ Oroville 10,100 1986..7 All 5+ AllBus. 10% 20+
Palm Desert 17 ,lOa 1966/05 All [1] Yes 25% {23]
Palm Springs 31,500 1986/02 All [6] Dept. 25% SO+
Palo Alto 56,600 1983. .85 Dfc. w'kpl. 60% [17]
Paradise 25,100 1986/04 All 5+ AllBus. 50% 50+
Pasadena 130,800 1984 Ofc.w'kpl. 25% 50+
Pinale 15,000 1985/11 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
Pitts burg 41,600 1985/11 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
Pleasanton 29,950 1986/07 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
Pleasant Hl.ll 10,350 1986/01 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
Powar 39,150 1983/03 All [1J Yes No% 20+
+ Rancho Mirage 8,150 1986..87 All Yes 2/3
+ Redlands 54,200 1987/03 All ,~+ AIIBus. 50% 40+
Richmond 78,700 1985/09 All 4+ AllBl.ls. 40% SO+
RiversJ.de 199.000 1985/05 All I 5 ] Dept. 25% 50+
Sacramento 327,200 1985 All III Yes 10% 50+
San Anselmo 12,000 1985?
San Diego 1,022,400 1982/12 All [1] Yes No% 20+
San Francisco 742,700 1983/11 Of c . w'kpl.
San Jose. 719,500 1984 All Yes 30% 100+
San Luis Obispo 38,300 1985/12 All 5+ No% 50+
San Marcos 23.250 1983/03 All [1] Yes No% 20+
+ San Mateo 83,500 1986/11 All AllBus. 50% 50+
San Pablo 83,500 1985/10 [.11 4+ AlIBus. 40% 50+
San Rafael 21,350 1979/08 20% 20+
San Ramon 45,600 1985/11 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
Santa Barbara 27,450 1984 All 25% 20+
Santa Clara 79,100 1985/07 All Yes 30% 50+
Santa Monica 89,300 1985/04 All 6+
Santee 96,100 1983/02 All [1] Yes No% 20+
Scotts Valley 50, ZOO 1985 All AllBus. No %
+ Simi Valley 94,300 1987/05 AllB[Z4] 50% 124]
+ South San Francisco 51,700 1987. .87 All 4+ Al1B[24] N 0% SO+
* Sunnyvale 115,200 1986. .86 All 4+ AllBus. 60% [17J
+ Tracy 27,300 1987/01 All 4+ AllBus. 70%
_ Tustin 43,100 1985/12 All [1] Yes No% 20+
Ukiah 13 t 400 1981/07 All Yes 50%
+ Vacav111e 58,700 1987/02 All 4+ AllBus. 50% 50+
- 10 -
CHART II: MAJOR PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL SMOKING ORDI~ANCES
COMMUNM POPULATION YEAR/MONTII WORKPLACES RETAIL RESTAURA.vrS
ENACTED REGULATED STORES
+ V'tl1ejo 92,400 1987/02 All 4. AIlBus. 50% 50+
\'~sta 50,900 1983/04 All [1] Yes N'o% 20+
Walnut Creek 62,100 1985/11 All 4+ AI1Bus. 40% 5Oi-
West Hollywood 38,450 1986/03 All Yes 40% 35
+ Wheatland 1,780 1986/11 All AllBus. 50% 50+
Yorba Linda 42,600 1985/09 All 11+ Yes 1/3 40+
Yuba City 22,300 1986/06 All AllBus. 50% 50+
County of Alameda 115,700 1986 All 4+ AllBus: . 40% 50+
+County of Butte 92,800 1987/02 All 5+ AllBus. 10% 20+
County of Contra Costa 140,400 1985/09 All 4+ AIIBus. 40% 50+
County of Marin 62,900 1981/07 [8] No% 20+
+County of Monterey 99,900 1987/01 All AllBus. 50% 40+
County of Orange 326,000 1985 . .7 All 10+ Yes 20% 50+
County of Riverside 294,700 1985 All (6] Dept. 25% 50+
County of Sacramento 574,200 1985/02 All [1] Yes 10% 50+
+County of San Bern'd'o 410,300 1987/03 All 4+ AIlBus. 50% 40+
County of San Diego 424,800 1982/12 All [1] Yes No% 20+
County of Santa Clara 103,600 1985/06 All AllBus. 1/3
County of Santa Cruz 127,100 1985 All Yes No %
+County of Solano 17,950 1987/05 All" 4+ AllBus. 50% 50+
+County of Sutter 33,500 1987/03 All AllBus. ' 50% 50+
-11-
CHART III: SUMMARY OF WORKPLACE PROVISIONS
:OMMUNITY WORKPLACES Cafe- Rest Eleva-Medical Mtg. Hall- Deslg. Nonsmkr f.(onre-
REGULATED ceria Rooms tors Facil. Rooms Ways OwnAreaPrefnce tal'n
places regulating: 111 87 99 102 82 98 81 83 84 57
Lbany All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
lahel.In All '++ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Itioeh All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
~cata All 2+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
'T'keley All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
:!:nicia All 3+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
rea All 25% [20]
:,entwood All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
lrl:Lngame All Yes Yes
irlsbad All [i] Yes Yes Yes
"!"pinteria All [5J
lieo All 4+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
"lUla Vista All [1] Yes Yes Yes
Layton All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
;meord All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
jronado All [1] Yes Yes Yes
"pertino Ofc.Wkpl. 2/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
;i.'wille All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
el Mar All [1] Yes Yes Yes
esert Hot Springs All [6] 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
ublin All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes . Yes Yes Yes
1 Cajon All 5+ 2/3 Yes Yes Yes
1 Cerrito All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
scond~do All [1] Yes Yes Yes
ureka All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
ontana All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
remont All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
rand Terrace All [6] 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
ridIey All 4+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
t:!met All [1] [lJ [1] [1] [1 J [12J Yes
ercules All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
untl.ngton Beach All 4+ Yes . Yes
mpen.al Beach All [1] , Yes Yes Yes
ndl.o All [6] 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
rvine Ofe.WkplA1/2[16] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
.0:1 Mesa All [ 1 ] Yes Yes Yes
.afayette All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
,sguna Beach Ofc.Wkpl. 1/2 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
.:1. ve Oak All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
.i vermore All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
,oma Linda All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
41,)!1g Beach All 5+ 1/2 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
.05 Al tOB All
..os Angeles All 5+ 2/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes
..os Ga toa All
1artinez All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
hIpitas All 75% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
.uraga All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
{organ Hill All 4+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
- 12 -
CHART III: SUMMARY OF WORKPLACE PROVISIONS
COHMUNITY WORKPLACES Cafe- Rest Eleva-Medical Mtg. Hall- Desig. Nonsmkr Nonre-
REGULATED teria Rooms tors Facil. Rooms Ways OwnAreaPrefnce .~al'n
Mountain View All 1/2 Ye Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
National Cuy All [1] Yes Yes Yes
Newport Beach Ofc. > 4 Yes
Oakland All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oceanside All [1J Yes Yes Yes
.. Ontario Ofc.Wkpl. [7] [7] [7] [7J [7] [7] [7] Yes[7]
Orinda A11 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
I- Oroville All 5+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Palm Desert All [1] [1] [1] [1] [1] [1] [1] Yes Yes
Palm Springs All [6] 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Palo Alto Ofc.wKpl.2/3[16] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Paradise All 5+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pasadena Ofc.Wkpl. 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pina1e All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pittsburg All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pleasanton All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pleasant H.211 All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Poway All [1] Yes Yes Yes
t Rancho Muage All [19] [19] [19J [19J [19] [19] [19] (191
t Redlands All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Richmond All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Ri ver:nde All [6J 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sacramento All [1] 1/2 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sen Diego All [1] Yes Yes Yes
San Francisco Ofc.Wkpl. [7] [7] [7] [7] [7] [7] [71 Yes [7]
San Jose All 2/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Luis Obl.spo . All 5+ [7] [7] [71 (71 [7] [7] [7] Yesp]
San I-'.arcos All {ll Yes Yes Yes
+ San ~..ateo All
San Pablo All 4-i- 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Ramon All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santa Barbara All [7] [7] I7] [7] [7] [7] [7] Yes [7 ]
Santa Clara All 2/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santa Monica All 6+ 2/3 Yes Yes Yes- Yes
Santee All [~] Yes Yes Yes
Scatts Valley All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ South San Francisco All 4+ 2/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
* Sunnyvale All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Y~s Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Tracy All 4+ 70% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Tustin All [1]
Ukiah All [12] [12]
Vacaville All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Vallejo All 4+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vista All (1} Yes Yes Yes
Walnut Creek All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
TJest Hollywood All 50% [18] [18] [18] [18] (tB) [18] Yes Yes
+ Wheatland All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yorba Linda All 11+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yuba City All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Alameda All 4,- 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
- 13 -
CHART III: SUMMARY OF WORXPUCE PROVISIONS
COMMUNITY WORKPLACES Cafe- Rest Eleva-Medical Mtg. Hell- Desig. NonslUkr Nonre-
REGULATED teris Rooms tors Facil. Rooms Ways OwnAreaPrefnce tal'n
"
+County of Butte All 5+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Contra Costa All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+County of Monterey All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes f27]
County of Orange All 10+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Riverside All [6] 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Sacramento All [1] 1/2 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+County of San Bern'd'o All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of San Diego All [lJ Yes Yes Yes
County of Santa Clara All 2/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Santa Cruz All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
~ounty of Solano All 4+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Sutter All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
- 14 -
CHART IV - OTHER PUBLIC PLACES AFFECTED
COHXUNITY Thea- Museums Health Public Eleva- Food Service Rest Pharma- Busl
ters & Libr.Facflty Mtgs. tors Mkts. Lines Rooms cies PubTran
Nr. places regulatlng: 117 95 116 108 116 94 101 102 86 '91
Albany Yes[21)Yes[21) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Ana~ei:n Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Antioch Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Arcata Yes[21] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes(13] Yes
Berkeley Yes[2l] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Benicia Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Beverly Hills Yes Yes Yes
Brea Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Brentwood Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Burlingame Yes[21]Yes[21] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Carls bad Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes
Carpinteria Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cathedral CHy Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Chico Yes Mus. Yes Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes [22J Yes
Chula Vuta Yes Yes [11 Yes Yes Yes [11 Yes Yes Yes
Clayton Yes Yes Yes (22) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Concord Yes Yes Yes (22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Coronado Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes
Cupert:lno Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes[13] Yes
Danville Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Del Mar Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes fl] Yes Yes Yes
Desert Hot Springs Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Dubhn Yes[21)Yes[21] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
El CaJon Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
El Cerrito Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Escond.ldo Yes Yes [l} Yes Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes
Eureka Yes[21] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes[l3] Yes
Fontana Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
* Fremont Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grand Terrace Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Gridley Yes Mus. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Hemet [lJ [ll [1] [1] [1] (1 ] [lJ flJ (1]
Hercules Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Hunt1ngton Beach Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Im.perial Beach Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes
Ind10 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Irvine Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
La Mesa Yes Yes [IJ Yes Yes Yes [lJ Yes Yes Yes
Lafayette Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Laguna Beach Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Live Oak Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes[13] Yes
Livermore Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lama Linda Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Long Beach Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Los Altos Yes Yes Yes Yes
Los Angeles Yes Yes 50% Yes Yes
Los Gatos Yes Yes Yes Yes
Martinez Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Menlo Park Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
- 15 -
CHART IV _ ornER PUBLIC PLACES A.FFEcrED
CO}MUNITI Thea- Museums Health Public Eleva- food Service Rest phsI"ma- Bus!
ters & Libr.Fac11ty Mtgs. tors Mkts. Lines Rooll1s cies PubTran
'-
Mill Valley Yes Yes Yes 80% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
'iilpitas Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+'* Modesto
Moraga Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Morgan Hill Yes Yes Yes YeS Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes
Mountain View Yes les Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
National City Yes Yes (11 Yes Yes Yes [1] Yes 'les Yes
Newport Beach Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oakland Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oceanside Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes [11 Yes Yes Yes
+ Ontario Yes Yes Yes Yes
Onnda Yes Yes Ye9 {22) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ OrovUle Yes Mus. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Palm Desert Yes Yes [1) [11 [11 Yes (11 [1 ] Yes Yes
Palm Spn.n3s Yes Yes Yes 'les
Palo Alt.o Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Parad:l.se Yes Mus. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes
Pasadena Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pl.nole Yes Yes Yes [ 22] , Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
p~t.tsbu::-g Yes Yes Yes (221 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pleasanton Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes , Yes Yes Yes
Pleasant Hill Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pallay Yes Yes (11 Yes Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes
+ Rancho Mirage [22] (221 (22) [22] [221 [22] [22] [22] [22] [22]
+ Red1ands Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Richmond Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
R~verside Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sacramento Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Anselmo 1/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Diego Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes (11 Yes Yes Yes
San Francisco
San Jose Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Luis Obispo Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Harcos Yes Yes (1] Yes Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes
+ San Mateo Yes(21)Yes[21] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Pablo Yes Yes Yes (22J Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Rafael Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Ramon Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santa Barbara Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santa ClaI"a Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santa Monica Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santee Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes (11 Yes Yes Yes
Scotts Valley Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (22) Yes Yes [22]
+ 31m Valley Yes[21] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes [221 Yes Yes "fes
+ South San Francisco Yes[211 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
* Sunny"llale Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YeS Yes Yes
+ Tracy Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Ye9
Tustin [1] [11 (1] [1) [11 [1] [1] [11 [11 [11
Ukiah Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Vacaville Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
- 16 -
CHART IV - OTHER PUBLIC PLACES AFFEl.aLD
CO}1MUNITY Thea- Museums Health Public Eleva- Food Service Rest Pharma- Bus/
ters & Libr.Fac'lty Mtgs. tors Mkts. Lines Rooms cies PubTran
.....
+ Vallejo Yes[21]Yes[21] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vista Yes Yes (lJ Yes Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes
Walnut Creek Yes Yes Yes [221 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
West Hollywood Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Wheatland Yes Yes Yes (22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yor-be Linda Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yuba City Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes[13] Yes
County of Alameda Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+County of Butte Yes Mus. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Contra Costa Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Marin Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+County of Monterey Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes[13] Yes
County of Orange Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Riverside Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Sacramento Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+County of San Bernrdro Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of San Diego Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes
COlli~ty of Santa Clara Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Santa Cruz Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+County of Solano Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+County of Sutter Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (22J Yes Yes Yes
- 17 -
CUART V: ENFORCEMENT; EXCEPTIONS; O'TIIER PLACES AFFECTED
OTHER AFFEC'n;O AREAS
COMMUNITY
EXCEP- ENFORCEMENT
TIONS[4]
Albany
Anaheim
Antioch
Arcata
Berkeley
Benicia
+ Beverly Hills
Brea
Brentwood
+ Burlingame
Carls bad
Carpinteria
Cathedral C~t:y
-+- Chico
Chula Vista
Clayton
Concord
Coronado
Cupertino
Danville
Del Mar
Desert Hot Spr~ngs
+ Dublin
E1 Cajbn
EI Cerrito
Escondida
Eureka
Fontana
* Fremont
Grand Terrace
+ Gridley
Hemet
Hercules
Hunt1ngton Beach
Imperial Beach
India
Irvine
La Mesa
Lafayette
Laguna Beach
L1 ve Oak
Livermore
Lama Linda
Long Beach
Los Altos
Los Angeles
Los Gatos
Martinez
Menlo Park
Mill Valley
Milpitas
Appl.
Appl.
Apple
Appl.
Appl.
[ 11J
AppL
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
[ 11)
All City Depts. All publ. encl. areas; sports arenas, polls
Infraction 50% of City Council Chambers
Infraction All enclosed areas used by the
City Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the
Infraction All enclosed areas used by the
City Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the
Infraction
Infraction/Pub.Nuis.
City Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infract10n All enclosed public places
Infraction AIl public places except designated areas [1]
Infraction Laundromats; city facilities
Infraction
Health Dept/lnspectAny establishment open to the general public
Infraction All public places except designated areas [1]
Infraction All enclosed areas used by the general public
City Mgr/compla1nt All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infraction All public places except designated areas [1]
C1ty Mgr/complaint
C1ty Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the general publ1c
Infraction All public places except designated areas [11
Infraction
Infraction
MisdeQeanor/Infr.
City Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infraction All public places except designated areas [lJ
City Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infraction All enclosed areas used by the general public
City Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infraction
Health Dept/InspectAny establishment open to the general public
Infraction All public places except designated areas [1]
C1ty Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infraction Public buildings'
Infraction AIl public places except designated areas [1]
Infraction
Infraction
Infraction All public places except designated areas [1]
City Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infraction
Health D./Complaint!ll enclosed areas used by the general public
City Mgr./lnspect.
Infraction
Health Dept.
Infraction
Infraction [9]
Misdemeanor
Infraction
Infraction
Dir.Conun.Devel.
Infr./Bus.Lic.Ren. Schools; child care facilit1es
general
general
general
general
public
public
public
public
All publ. encl. areas; sports arenas, polls
All enclosed areas used by the general public
All enclosed areas used by the general publ~c
- 18 -
CHART V: ENFORCE.'1ENT; EXCEPTIONS; OTHER PLACES Al'"l,t:CTED
COMMUNITY
EXCEP- ENFORCE;\fE;Vf
TIONS[4]
+* Modesto
Moraga
Morgan Hill
Mountain View
National City
Newport Beach
Oakland
Oceanside
+ Ontario
Orinda
+ Oroville
p~lm Desert
Palm. Spnngs
Palo Alto
Parad:Lse
Pasadena
Pinole
Pittsburg
Pleasanton
Pleasant Hl.ll
Poway
+ Rancho ~rage
+ Redlands
Richmond
Ri verside
Sacramento
San Anselmo
San Diego
San Francisco
San Jose
San Luis Obispo
San. Marcos
+ San Mateo
San Pablo
San Rafael
San Ramon
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Santa Monica
Santee Appl.
Scatts Valley Appl.
+ Sl.mi Valley Appl.
+ South San Francisco Appl.
* Sunnyvale Appl.
+ Tracy
Tustin
Uldah
+ Vacaville
+ Vallejo
Vista
OTHER AFFECTED AREAS
Infraction
City Mgr./lnspect.
City Mgr./lnspect.
Infraction
Infraction
City Mgr/complaint Encl. public areas except Oakland Airport
Infraction All public places except designated areas [1]
Infraction Dav care centers
C1ty Mgr/complaint Ali enclosed areas used by the general public
Co. Health Dept. All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infraction All public places except designated areas [lJ
Infraction
Infraction 50% of outdoor eat~ng areas.
Health Dept/lnspectAll enclosed areas used by the,general publ1c
Infraction
City Mgr/compla1nt All
Infraction AIl
. City Hgr/complaint All
Infract10n All
Infraction All
Infract10n All
Infraction AIl
City Mgr/complaint All
Infraction
Infraction All public places except designated areas (11
None specified
Infraction All publl.c places except designated areas [1]
Civil/Dir.Pub.Health
Health Officer
Admin.OfcjPub.Nuis.All
Infraction All
Infraction All
Infraction All
Infraction
City Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infr. / Pub.Nuis. Laundromats
City Manager
Civil/Infraction
Infraction All public places except designated areas [lJ
HealthOfcr/lnspect All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infraction All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infr. I Pub.Nuis. Public areas of business establishments
Infraction City bldg. hallways; hotels; gymnasiumst stadiuos
City Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the general public
Infraction [1]; but no area 1s required to be all nonsmoking
City Mgr/complaint
City Mgr/complaint
City Mgr/complaint
Infraction
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
AppL
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
[11]
Applo
Appl.
Appl.
- 19 -
All enclosed areas used by the general publ:LC
All enclosed areas used by the general public
Encl. public areas; child care facil.; schools.
All public places except designated areas [lJ
enclosed areas used by the general public
enclosed areas used by the general public
enclosed areas used by the general publ~c
enclosed areas used by,the general publ~c
public places except designated areas [1]
public places and workplaces
enclosed areas used by the general publ:LC
enclosed areas used by the general public
city buildings; laundromats
publiC places except designated areas [1]
enclosed publiC places
enclosed areas used by the general publl.c
All enclosed areas used by the general public
All enclosed areas used by the general publiC
All public places except designated areas [lJ
. \ 4- .
CHART V: ENFORCEME,W; EXCEPI'IONS; OTHER PLACES A!'f:I:;C'I'ED
CO:i?ilJNITY
EXCEP- ENFORCEMENT
TIONS[4]
Walnut Creek
West Hollywood
+ Wheatland
Yorba Linda
Yuba City
County of Alameda
+County of Butte
County of Contra Cos
County of Marin
+County of Monterey
County of Orange
County of Riverside
County of Sacramento
+County of San Bern'd
County of San Dlego
Cou~ty of Santa Clar
County of Santa Cruz
+County of Solano
+County of Sutter
Appl.
Appl.
{11 ]
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
~
I
OTHER AFFECTED AREAS
City Mgr/complaint All enclosed areas used by the general public
Misdem./Civil Suit All public pl~ces except designated areas [1]
Co. a~~lth Dept. All enclosed areas used by the general public
Misdemeanor
Health D./Comp1aintAll enclosed areas used by the
Co. Health Agency All enclosed areas used by the
Health Dept/InspectAll enclosed areas used by the
Health Dept. All enclosed areas used by the
Infraction
Co. Health Officer All publiC places
Infraction County buildings except desig. smoking areas
Infraction
Director of
Infraction
Infraction
Infraction
HealthOfcr/Inspect
City Mgr/complaint
Health Department
general public
general public
general public
general public
Health All public places except designated areas [1]
All enclosed areas used by the general public
All public places except designated areas [I}
Enclosed public areas
Enclosed public areas; public schools
All enclosed areas used by the general public
-.
- 20-
~
?-() 2--00z-0/
.
CA:RMM:LL:11238x/hpc
City council Meeting 1-12-88
Santa Monica, California
STAFF REPORT
.
TO:
Mayor and City Council
city Attorney
Ordinance Amending Chapter 9A of Article IV
of the Santa Monica Municipal Code to Regulate
smoking in Restaurants
FROM:
SUBJECT:
.
At its meeting on February 24, 1987, the City Council
directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance amending the
.
Municipal Code to provide non-smoking areas in restaurants. In
response to this direction, the accompanying ordinance has been
prepared and is now presented to the city council for its
.
consideration.
BACKGROUND
.
Public concern has increasingly been raised regarding the
heal th consequences of passive smoking. More and more studies
are being performed to assess the dangers from exposure to
environmental tobacco smoke.
In response, restrictions on
.
smoking in restaurants have been adopted in numerous cities and
counties.
According to a report prepared by Americans for
.
Nonsmokers' Rights dated December 8, 1986 (attached as Appendix
A), 91 California cities and counties require nonsmoking sections
in restaurants.
ordinances
regulating
smoking
in
restaurants
differ
.
primarily in their approaches to two questions.
First.. the
number of seats a restaurant must have in order to trigger the
.
- 1 -
~
-
.
requirement that it provide a non-smoking area differs from city
to city. Ordinances range from those which require non-smoking
sections in restaurants regardless of size to others which
require non-smoking sections in restaurants with over fifty
seats. Second, ordinances vary in the percentage of seating or
square footage of restaurants required to be provided for
non-smokers. Required non-smoking sections range from a low of
ten percent (10%) of the seating capacity to a high of sixty
percent (60%) of the seating capacity.
.
.
.
In an attempt to determine the appropriate resolution to
these policy issues, an informal telephone survey of 130 Santa
Monica restaurants was conducted.
Approximately 26% of the
.
restaurants surveyed in Santa Monica have voluntarily created
separate non-smoking areas, however the extent of those areas
varies greatly.
When all of the seats in restaurants with
non-smoking sections are added together, non-smoking seating
t.
represents approximately 43% of the total seating capacity of
those restaurants.
The approaches taken by several California cities are
summarized below.
Ordinances adopted by those cities are
.
attached as Appendices B through F.
.
City of Berkeley (Appendix B).
The City of Berkeley requires that all restaurants,
regardless of the n~mber of seats, either prohibit smoking
altogether or designate a separate, contiguous area containing no
more than fifty percent (50%) of the seating capacity of a
.
restaurant as a smoking area.
.
- 2 -
.
city of Beverly Hills (Appendix C).
The City of Beverly Hills initially adopted an ordinance
prohibiting all smoking in restaurants regardless of the number
of seats. However, in response to complaints by restaurant
owners and smokers, Beverly Hills has recently revised its
ordinance to allow a restaurant to provide a designated smoking
area com.prising no more than fifty percent (50%) of the total
floor area of the restaurant. In addition, if the restaurant has
a seating capacity of fifty or greater, it must have an air
segregation, filtration or ventilation system which must be
approved by the city. The Beverly Hills City Council has adopted
standards which govern the air segregation, filtration, and
ventilation systems. (Appendix C-l.) The ordinance contains
interim provisions which allow a restaurant to operate with a
smoking area while awaiting City approval of its air segregation,
filtration and ventilation system.
city of Culver city (Appendix 0) .
Culver City recently adopted an ordinance which requires
that restaurants with a seating capacity of twenty-five or more
either prohibit smoking altogether or designate no more than
thirty-four percent (34%) of the seating area as a smoking area.
City of Sacramento (Appendix E).
The City of Sacramento prohibits smoking in lobbies, waiting
areas, and restrooms of restaurants. In the seating areas of
restaurants, however, Sacramento requires that restaurants with
more than fifty seats allocate no less than ten percent (10%) of
its seating capacity for non-smokers.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- 3 -
~
.
County of Sacramento (Appendix F) .
The County of Sacramento has adopted the same requirements
as the city of Sacramento.
City of West Hollywood (Appendix G).
The City of West HOllywood has adopted an ordinance which
provides that restaurants with more than 35 seats may designate a
separate and contiguous smoking area containing not more than
sixty percent (60%) of the seating capacity of the restaurant.
.
.
.
proposed Approach for the city of Santa Monica
The percent of the population who smoke steadily increased
over the first two-thirds of this century but has declined more
recently. In 1980, according to the United states Department of
commerce, 32% of the adult population considered themselves to be
cigarette smokers. See Environmental Tobacco Smoke -- Measuring
Exposures and Assessing Health Effects, Committee on Passive
Smoking, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, National
Research Council (National Academy Press, 1986). According to a
telephone survey conducted in 1986 by the Center for Disease
Control, the percentage of nonsmoking adults over the age of 17
dropped to 26.5% nationwide. Despite the inherent uncertainty in
comparing data from surveys conducted by different institutions
using difference methodologies, it is widely acknowledged that
the smoking population continues to decline. Therefore, adoption
of a regulation allowing for 30% of the seating capacity in a
restaurant to be designated for smoking would be consistent with
current demographics on the smoking and non-smoking portions of
the population.
.
I
.
.
.
I
- 4 -
...
SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS
-
...
The proposed ordinance amends several sections of the Santa
Monica Municipal Code which currently regulate smoking in public
places and work places so that smoking in restaurants is
.
regulated as well.
The changes to the Municipal Code are
s~m~arized below.
.
Section 4920. Declaration of Purpose. This section has been
amended to add findings which address the need for regulation of
smoking in restaurants more specifically.
Section 4921. Definitions. Two definitions have been added
.
to the existing section. "Bar" is defined as an area devoted to
the serving of alcoholic beverages where the serving of food, if
any, is incidental to the consumption of beverages. "Restaurant"
.
is defined very broadly to include virtually any kind of eating
establishment that might be found within the City. A
"restaurant" m.ay contain a "bar, II but a "bar" does not include
.
the dining area of a restaurant.
Section 4922. General Prohibitions.
The existing secticr.
.
makes it unlawful to smoke in any of a nu111ber of enumerated
places. Subsection (h) amends the section to provide that it is
unlawful to smoke in restaurants unless a restaurant contains a
designated area for smoking. The area designated for smoking can
.
contain up to a maximum of thirty percent (30t) of the seating
capaci ty of the restaurant.
This requirement applies to all
.
restaurants in the City, regardless of size or seating capacity.
The ordinance establishes a procedure wherein a seating plan must
be filed by July 1, 1988, and must be approved by the city. A
smoking area may be provided in a restaurant in advance of City
.
- 5 -
~
.
approval. Signs must be placed within any restaurant providing a
smoking area indicating such area.
Section 4924. ~ostin9' of Signs. This section has been
amended to provide that every restaurant or bar choosing to avail
itself of the option to designate a smoking section must post a
conspicuous sign at every entrance stating that separate smoking
and non-smoking sections are available. Violation of this
section is a misdemeanor.
Section 4925. Exceptions. This section has been amended to
exempt separate banquet rooms within restaurants when in use for
private parties from the smoking prohibition.
Section 4927. Enforcement. This section has been amended to
include a section requiring that owners, operators, managers, and
employees inform persons violating this ordinance of the
provisions herein.
.
.
.
..
.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
On November 4:, 1987, copies of the proposed ordinance and
staff report were mailed to a list of persons and organizations
who have expressed interest and concern about the City's smoking
regulations. All addressees were invited to submit comments or
suggestions in writing and were informed that the ordinance would
be presented to the City Council at its meeting on January 12,
1988.
.
.
.
Since that time, the City Attorney's Office has received
written comments from representatives of the American Cancer
Society and the Tobacco Institute, and from one member of the
public. These comments are attached as Appendix H.
.
- 6 -
,J
.
In addition, we have met with representatives from the
California Restaurant Association. They expressed their
objections to the City's adoption of any non-voluntary program.
Nevertheless, in recognition of the likely adoption of smoking
regulations for restaurants, the representatives from the
Restaurant Association would prefer that the city require that a
lower percentage of the seating capacity be set aside for
non-smokers than that currently proposed. Furthermore, they
object to the requirement of a fixed seating plan. Rather, they
suggest a concept that involves a nrolling" smoking (or
non-smoking) section. Such a system would allow a restaurant to
adapt to its clientele on a continuous basis by moving the
boundary between the smoking and non-smoking sections as
necessary.
The proposed ordinance does not embody any of the above
suggestions of the California Restaurant Association. First, the
need for city-imposed non-smoking requirements in restaurants
exists because so many restaurants have failed to take voluntary
action to address the problem. Second, the percentages proposed
are not arbitrary; they are based on studies comparing the
non-smoking and smoking percentages of the adult population.
Finally, the concept of the "rolling" non-smoking section
seems to us to create too great of an uncertainty for the
non-smoking public as to the existence and location of the
non-smoking section. In addition, due to its constantly changing
nature, both the city and the public would be incapable of
enforcing the non-smoking requirement since it would be
impossible to determine at any given time where and how much of a
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
- 7 -
~
restaurant's seating capacity is designated for non-smokers.
.
Beyond the lack of pUblic appeal and the obstacle it would
present to enforcement, the "rolling" section does not seem to
provide the guarantee of clean air which non-smokers seek in a
.
non-smoking section of a restaurant.
RECOMMENDATION
.
It is respectfully recommended that the accompanying
ordinance be introduced for first reading.
prepared by: Robert M. Myers, City Attorney
Laurie Lieberman, Deputy City Attorney
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
- 8 -
.
CA:RMM:lld155X/hpc
City Council Meeting 1-12-88
Santa Monica, California
.
ORDINANCE NUMBER
(city Council Series)
.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MONICA AMENDING CHAPTER 9A OF ARTICLE IV
OF THE SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE
SMOKING IN RESTAURANTS
.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
.
SECTION 1. Section 4920 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION
4920.
Declaration
of
.
purpose. The City Council of the City of
Santa Monica finds and declares:
(a) smoking is a positive danger
.
to health and a cause of material
annoyance, inconvenience, discomfort and a
.
health hazard to those who are present in
confined places.
(b) The public health, safety, and
.
general welfare of the residents of,
persons employed in, and persons who
frequent the City of santa Monica would be
furthered
by
the
prohibition
and
.
regulation of smoking in public places,
work places, and restaurants.
I
- 1 -
.
.
(e) This Chapter regulates smoking
in public places, work places and
restaurants without imposing exorbitant
costs on persons in management and control
of the places so regulated.
.
.
SECTION 2. Section 4921 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 4921. Definitions. The
following words and phrases, as used in
this Chapter, shall have the following
meanings:
(a) Bar. An area where alcoholic
beverages are served for consumption on
the premises and in which the serving of
food, if any, is only incidental to the
consumption of such beverages. Although a
restaurant may contain a bar, the term
"bar" shall not include the restaurant
dining area.
(b) Employee. Any person who is
employed by any employer in consideration
for monetary compensation or profit,
including an independent contractor
regularly performing services at the place
of employment of the other contracting
party.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
- 2 -
'"
.
(c) Employer. Any person,
partnership, corporation, including a
public entity, who employs the services of
more than five (5) employees.
(d) Place of Employment. Any
enclosed area under the control of a
public or private employer which employees
normally frequent during the course of
employment, including, but not limited to,
work areas, employee lounges, conference
rooms, and employee cafeterias. A private
residence is not a place of employment.
(e) Restaurant. Any public or
private eating establishment of any kind
whatsoever which gives or offers food for
sale to the pUblic, quests, patrons,
members, or employees including, but not
limited to, any coffee shop, cafeteria,
luncheonette, tavern, cocktail lounge,
sandwich stand, soda fountain, private and
public school cafeteria or eating
establishment, organization, club,
including veterans I club, boardinghouse,
questhouse, and catering facilities,
except that the term "restaurant" shall
not include a "bar" as defined above.
(f) Smoke or Smoking. The
carrying or holding of a lighted pipe,
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
I
- 3 -
.
cigar, or cigarette of any kind, or any
other lighted smoking product or equipment
used to burn any tobacco products, weed,
plant, or any other combustible substance.
Smoking includes the emitting or exhaling
the fumes of any pipe, cigar, or cigarette
of any kind, or any other lighted smoking
equipment used burning any tobacco
product, weed, plant, or any other
combustible substance.
.
.
SECTION 3. Section 4922 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 4922. General
prohibitions. It shall be unlawful to
smoke in the following places:
(a) Those portions of any
building, structure, or other enclosed
facility open to the general public for
the primary purpose of holding meetings or
exhibiting any motion picture, stage
production, musical recital, or similar
performance, exclusive of sports events,
other than in a separate balcony area in
which smoking may be permitted and other
than in an area which serves as a separate
lounge area, provided that both smoking
and nonsmoking lounge areas are provided.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- 4 -
.
(b) Those portions of any
building, structure, or other enclosed
facility open to the general public for
the primary purpose of a museum, library,
or gallery, other than in an area which
serves as a separate lounge, provided that
both smoking and nonsmoking lounge areas
are provided.
(e) Any elevator.
(d) On any bus used in the
business of transporting passengers for
hire in the City I excepting for charter
operations.
(e) Any restroom open to the
general PUblic or provided for use to
customers or patrons, unless there are
separate smoking and nonsmoking restrooms.
(f) Those areas within the
buildings or structures of any health care
facility which are open to visitors to the
premises except that in such areas there
may be enclosed areas designated and set
aside on each floor where smoking may be
allowed so long as comparable facilities
in which smoking is not allowed are made
available or in any patient room when all
patients smoke or consent to smoking.
.
I
.
.
.
.
- 5 -
(g) Any retail food marketing
establishments or pharmacies, including
grocery stores and supermarkets, except
those areas of such establishments set
aside for the serving of food and drink,
offices, and areas thereof not open to the
public.
(h) Any restaurant or bar, or bar
area
within a
restaurant,
provided,
however, that this prohibition does not
prohibit
smoking
in
a
designated
.-
-
contiguous area within a restaurant, bar,
or bar area within a restaurant, that
.
contains a maximum of thirty percent (30%)
of the seating capacity of the restaurant
as a smoking area if the following
conditions are met:
.
(1) The restaurant, bar, or
bar area has submitted a seating plan
demonstrating compliance with this Section
.
that has been approved by the City. The
plan must be submitted to the City by July
1, 1988.
.
(2)
The enclosed floor area
of the designated smoking area comprises
no more than 30% of the total enclosed
.
floor area of the restaurant, bar, or bar
,
- 6 -
area used for service of food or beverages
to patrons.
i
(3) Signs are placed within
the restaurant, bar, or bar area which
clearly designate the smoking area as
required by Section 4922(h).
.
SECTION 4. Section 4924 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 4924. posting of signs.
The person having the authority to manage
and control any area designated as a
nonsmoking area pursuant to Section 4922
or section 4923, shall post or cause to be
posted and prominently displayed, and
shall maintain, UNo Smokingn siqns in
conspicuous locations within said area.
.
.
All such signs shall clearly and
.
conspicuously recite the phrase "NO
SMOKING" and/or use the international
no-smoking symbol. The signs shall be
.
.
posted not less than five (5) feet nor
more than eight (8) feet above floor level
and shall be of sufficient number and
location to cause the message of at least
one of the signs to be clearly visible,
legible, and readable. Violation of, or
.
.
- 7 -
j
failure to comply with this Section is a
misdem.eanor.
.
.
SECTION 5. Section 4925 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 4925. Exceptions. The
prohibitions set forth in Section 4922 and
Section 4923 do not apply to:
(a) Private enclosed offices
occupied exclusively by smokers even
though such an office may be visited by
nonsmokers.
(b) Separate banquet rooms within
restaurants when in use for private
parties or functions.
.
.
.
.
SECTION 6. Section 4927 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 4927. Enforcement.
(a) Civil Action. Any aggrieved
person may enforce the provisions of this
Chapter by means of a civil action.
(b) Iniunction. Any person who
commits, or proposes to commit, an act in
violation of this Chapter may be enjoined
therefrom by any court of competent
jurisdiction. An action for injunction
under this subdivision may be brought by
any aggrieved person, by the City
.
.
I
.
- 8 -
Attorney, or by any person or entity which
will fairly and adequately represent the
interests of the protected class.
(e)
AttorneYS'
Fees.
In any
action under this section by an employee
alleging retaliation or discrimination by
an employer for exercising rights under
this Chapter, the prevailing party shall
be awarded costs and reasonable attorneyst
fees.
(d)
Duty to Inform.
Owners,
operators, managers, or employees of same
shall be required to orally inform persons
viOlating this Chapter of the provisions
hereof. The duty to inform such violator
shall arise when such owner, operator,
manager, or employee of same becomes aware
of such violation.
-
-
SECTION 7. Any provision of the Santa Monica Municipal
Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of
this ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no
further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary
.
to affect the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 8.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
I
or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
I
- 9 -
.
remaining porti ons of the ordinance. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each and
every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not
declared inval id or unconstitutional wi thout regard to whether
.
any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 9. The Mayor shall sign and the city Clerk shall
. attest to the passage of this ordinance. The city Clerk shall
cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper
within 15 days after its adoption.
. effective 30 days from its adoption.
The ordinance shall be
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
I
f1..JM~.~-
ROBERT M. MYERS (j
City Attorney
.
.
.
.
.
- 10 -