SR-8-A (26)
rcPZ-OO'Z-OI
'6-A
JAN 1 2 1988
CA:RMM:LL:11238x/hpc
city Council Meeting 1-12-88
Santa Monica, California
STAFF REPORT
FROM:
Mayor and City Council
City Attorney
Ordinance Amending Chapter 9A of Article IV
of the Santa Monica Municipal Code to Regulate
Smoking in Restaurants
TO:
SUBJECT:
At its meeting on February 24, 1987, the City council
directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance amending the
Municipal Code to provide non-smoking areas in restaurants. In
response to this direction, the accompanying ordinance has been
prepared and is now presented to the city Council for its
consideration.
BACKGROUND
Public concern has increasingly been raised regarding the
heal th consequences of passive smoking. More and more studies
are being performed to assess the dangers from exposure to
environmental tobacco smoke.
In response, restrictions on
smoking in restaurants have been adopted in numerous cities and
counties.
According to a report prepared by Americans for
Nonsmokers' Rights dated December 8, 1986 (attached as Appendix
A), 9l California cities and counties require nonsmoking sections
in restaurants.
Ordinances
regulating smoking
in
restaurants
differ
primarily in their approaches to two questions.
First, the
number of seats a restaurant must have in order to trigger the
- 1 -
tt::Z,.,.,~
~N 1 2 lQRI\
- -
requirement that it provide a non-smoking area differs from city
to city. Ordinances range from those which require non-smoking
sections in restaurants regardless of size to others which
require non-smoking sections in restaurants with over fifty
seats. Second, ordinances vary in the percentage of seating or
square footage of restaurants required to be provided for
non-smokers. Required non-smoking sections range from a low of
ten percent (10%) of the seating capacity to a high of sixty
percent (60%) of the seating capacity.
In an attempt to determine the appropriate resolution to
these policy issues, an informal telephone survey of 130 Santa
Monica restaurants was conducted. Approximately 26% of the
restaurants surveyed in Santa Monica have voluntarily created
separate non-smoking areas, however the extent of those areas
varies greatly. When all of the seats in restaurants with
non-smoking sections are added together, non-smoking seating
represents approximately 43% of the total seating capacity of
those restaurants.
The approaches taken by several
summarized below. Ordinances adopted
attached as Appendices B through F.
City of Berkeley (Appendix B).
The City of Berkeley requires that all restaurants,
regardless of the number of seats, either prohibit smoking
altogether or designate a separate, contiguous area containing no
more than fifty percent (50%') of the seating capacity of a
restaurant as a smoking area.
California
by those
cities
cities
are
are
- 2 -
city of Beverly Hills (Appendix C).
The city of Beverly Hills initially adopted an ordinance
prohibiting all smoking in restaurants regardless of the number
of seats. However, in response to complaints by restaurant
owners and smokers, Beverly Hills has recently revised its
ordinance to allow a restaurant to provide a designated smoking
area comprising no more than fifty percent (50%) of the total
floor area of the restaurant. In addition, if the restaurant has
a seating capacity of fifty or greater, it must have an air
segregation, filtration or ventilation system which must be
approved by the City. The Beverly Hills City Council has adopted
standards which govern the air segregation, filtration, and
ventilation systems. (Appendix C-l.) The ordinance contains
interim provisions which allow a restaurant to operate with a
smOking area while awaiting City approval of its air segregation,
filtration and ventilation system.
city of Culver city (Appendix D).
CUlver City recently adopted an ordinance which requires
that restaurants with a seating capacity of twenty-five or more
either prohibit smoking altogether or designate no more than
thirty-four percent (34%) of the seating area as a smoking area.
City of Sacramento (Appendix E).
The city of Sacramento prohibits smoking in lobbies, waiting
areas, and restrooms of restaurants. In the seating areas of
restaurants, however, Sacramento requires that restaurants with
more than fifty seats allocate no less than ten percent (10%) of
its seating capacity for non-smokers.
- 3 -
county of Sacramento (Appendix F).
The County of Sacramento has adopted the same requirements
as the City of Sacramento.
City of West Hollywood (Appendix G).
The city of West Hollywood has adopted an ordinance which
provides that restaurants with more than 35 seats may designate a
separate and contiguous smoking area containing not more than
sixty percent (60%) of the seating capacity of the restaurant.
proposed Approach for the city of Santa Monica
The percent of the population who smoke steadily increased
over the first two-thirds of this century but has declined more
recently. In 1980, according to the United states Department of
Commerce, 32% of the adult population considered themselves to be
cigarette smokers. See Environmental Tobacco Smoke -- Measuring
Exposures and Assessing- Health Effects, committee on Passive
Smoking, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, National
Research Council (National Academy Press, 1986). According to a
telephone survey conducted in 1986 by the Center for Disease
Control, the percentage of nonsmoking adults over the age of 17
dropped to 26.5% nationwide. Despite the inherent uncertainty in
comparing data from surveys conducted by different institutions
using difference methodologies, it is widely acknowledged that
the smoking population continues to decline. Therefore, adoption
of a regulation allowing for 3D%: of the seating capacity in a
restaurant to be designated for smoking would be consistent with
current demographics on the smoking and non-smOking portions of
the population.
- 4 -
SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS
The proposed ordinance amends several sections of the Santa
Monica Municipal Code which currently regulate smoking in public
places and work places so that smoking in restaurants is
regulated as well. The changes to the Municipal Code are
summarized below.
section 4920. Declaration of Purpose. This section has been
amended to add findings which address the need for regulation of
smoking in restaurants more specifically.
section 4921. Definitions. Two definitions have been added
to the existing section. "Bar" is defined as an area devoted to
the serving of alcoholic beverages where the serving of food, if
any, is incidental to the consumption of beverages. "Restaurant"
is defined very broadly to include virtually any kind of eating
establishment that might be found within the city. A
"restaurant" may contain a "bar," but a ubar" does not include
the dining area of a restaurant.
section 4 9 2 2 . General Prohibitions. The existing section
makes it unlawful to smoke in any of a number of enumerated
places. Subsection (h) amends the section to provide that it is
unlawful to smoke in restaurants unless a restaurant contains a
designated area for smoking. The area designated for smoking can
contain up to a maximum of thirty percent (30%) of the seating
capacity of the restaurant. This requirement applies to all
restaurants in the City, regardless of size or seating capacity.
The ordinance establishes a procedure wherein a seating plan must
be filed by July 1, 19S8, and must be approved by the city. A
smoking area may be provided in a restaurant in advance of City
- 5 -
approval. signs must be placed within any restaurant providing a
smoking area indicating such area.
section 4924. Posting of Signs. This section has been
amended to provide that every restaurant or bar choosing to avail
itself of the option to designate a smoking section must post a
conspicuous sign at every entrance stating that separate smoking
and non-smoking sections are available. Violation of this
section is a misdemeanor.
section 4925. Exceptions. This section has been amended to
exempt separate banquet rooms within restaurants when in use for
private parties from the smoking prohibition.
section 4927. Enforcement. This section has been amended to
include a section requiring that owners, operators, managers, and
employees inform persons violating this Ordinance of the
provisions herein.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
On November 4, 1987, copies of the proposed ordinance and
staff report were mailed to a list of persons and organizations
who have expressed interest and concern about the Cityts smoking
regulations. All addressees were invited to submit comments or
suggestions in writing and were informed that the ordinance would
be presented to the City council at its meeting on January 12,
1988.
Since that time, the City Attorney's Office has received
written comments from representatives of the American Cancer
Society and the Tobacco Insti tute, and from one member of the
public. These comments are attached as Appendix H.
- 6 -
In addition, we have met with representatives from the
California Restaurant Association. They expressed their
objections to the city's adoption of any non-voluntary program.
Nevertheless, in recognition of the likely adoption of smoking
regulations for restaurants, the representatives from the
Restaurant Association would prefer that the City require that a
lower percentage of the seating capacity be set aside for
non-smokers than that currently proposed. Furthermore, they
object to the requirement of a fixed seating plan. Rather, they
suggest a concept that involves a "rolling" smoking (or
non-smoking) section. Such a system would allow a restaurant to
adapt to its clientele on a continuous basis by moving the
boundary between the smoking and non-smoking sections as
necessary.
The proposed ordinance does not embody any of the above
suggestions of the California Restaurant Association. First, the
need for City-imposed non-smokinq requirements in restaurants
exists because so many restaurants have failed to take voluntary
action to address the problem. Second, the percentages proposed
are not arbitrary; they are based on studies comparing the
non-smoking and smoking percentages of the adult population.
Finally t the concept of the "rolling" non-smoking section
seems to us to create too great of an uncertainty for the
non-smoking public as to the existence and location of the
non-smoking section. In addition, due to its constantly changing
nature, both the City and the public would be incapable of
enforcing the non-smOking requirement since it would be
impossible to determine at any given time where and how much of a
- 7 -
restaurant's seating capacity is designated for non-smokers.
Beyond the lack of public appeal and the obstacle it would
present to enforcement, the "rollingtl section does not seem to
provide the guarantee of clean air which non-smokers seek in a
non-smoking section of a restaurant.
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that the accompanying
ordinance be introduced for first reading.
Prepared by: Robert M. Myers, city Attorney
Laurie Lieberman, Deputy City Attorney
- 8 -
CA:RMM:lld155X/hpc
city Council Meeting 1-12-88
Santa Monica, California
ORDINANCE NUMBER
(City council Series)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MONICA AMENDING CHAPTER 9A OF ARTICLE IV
OF THE SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE
SMOKING IN RESTAURANTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 4920 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION
4920.
Declaration
of
Purpose. The City council of the City of
Santa Monica finds and declares:
(a) Smoking is a positive danger
to health and a cause of material
annoyance, inconvenience, discomfort and a
health hazard to those who are present in
confined places.
(b) The public health, safety, and
general welfare of the residents of,
persons employed in, and persons who
frequent the City of Santa Monica would be
furthered
by
the
prohibition
and
regulation of smoking in public places,
work places, and restaurants.
- 1 -
(c) This Chapter regulates smoking
in public places, work places and
restaurants without imposing exorbitant
costs on persons in management and control
of the places so regulated.
SECTION 2. Section 492l of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 4921. Definitions. The
following words and phrases, as used in
this Chapter, shall have the following
meanings:
(a) Bar. An area where alcoholic
beverages are served for consumption on
the premises and in which the serving of
food, if any, is only incidental to the
consumption of such beverages. Although a
restaurant may contain a bar, the term
"bar" shall not include the restaurant
dining area.
(b) Employee. Any person who is
employed by any employer in consideration
for monetary compensation or profit,
including an independent contractor
regularly performing services at the place
of employment of the other contracting
party.
- 2 -
(c) Employer. Any person,
partnership, corporation, including a
public entity, who employs the services of
more than five (5) employees.
(d) Place of Employment. Any
enclosed area under the control of a
public or private employer which employees
normally frequent during the course of
employment, including, but not limited to,
work areas, employee lounges, conference
rooms, and employee cafeterias. A private
residence is not a place of employment.
(e) Restaurant. Any public or
private eating establishment of any kind
whatsoever which qives or offers food for
sale to the public, guests, patrons,
members, or employees including, but not
limited to, any coffee shop, cafeteria,
luncheonette, tavern, cocktail lounge,
sandwich stand, soda fountain, private and
public school cafeteria or eating
establishment, organization, clUb,
including veterans' club, boardinghouse,
guesthouse, and catering facilities,
except that the term "restaurant" shall
not include a "baru as defined above.
(f) Smoke or smoking. The
carrying or holding of a lighted pipe,
- J -
cigar, or cigarette of any kind, or any
other lighted smoking product or equipment
used to burn any tobacco products, weed I
plant, or any other combustible substance.
Smoking includes the emitting or exhaling
the fumes of any pipe, cigar, or cigarette
of any kind, or any other lighted smoking
equipment used burning any tobacco
product, weed, plant, or any other
combustible substance.
SECTION 3. section 4922 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 4922. General
Prohibi tions . It shall be unlawful to
smoke in the following places:
(a) Those portions of any
building, structure, or other enclosed
facility open to the general public for
the primary purpose of holding meetings or
exhibiting any motion picture, stage
production, musical recital, or similar
performance, exclusive of sports events,
other than in a separate balcony area in
which smoking may be permitted and other
than in an area which serves as a separate
lounge area, provided that both smoking
and nonsmoking lounge areas are provided.
- 4 -
(b) Those portions of any
building, structure, or other enclosed
facility open to the general public for
the primary purpose of a museum, library,
or gallery, other than in an area which
serves as a separate lounge, provided that
both smoking and nonsmoking lounge areas
are provided.
(c) Any elevator.
(d) On any bus used in the
business of transporting passengers for
hire in the City, excepting for charter
operations.
(e) Any restroom open to the
general public or provided for use to
customers or patrons, unless there are
separate smoking and nonsmoking restrooms.
(f) Those areas within the
buildings or structures of any health care
facility which are open to visitors to the
premises except that in such areas there
may be enclosed areas designated and set
aside on each floor where smoking may be
allowed so long as comparable facilities
in which smoking is not allowed are made
available or in any patient room when all
patients smoke or consent to smoking.
- 5 -
Cg) Any retail food marketing
establishments or pharmacies, including
grocery stores and supermarkets, except
those areas of such establishments set
aside for the serving of food and drink,
offices, and areas thereof not open to the
public.
(h) Any restaurant or bar, or bar
area within a restaurant, provided,
however, that this prohibition does not
prohibi t smoking in a designated
contiguous area within a restaurant, bar,
or bar area within a restaurant, that
contains a maximum of thirty percent (30%)
of the seating capacity of the restaurant
as a smoking area if the following
conditions are met:
(1) The restaurant, bar, or
bar area has submitted a seating plan
demonstrating compliance with this Section
that has been approved by the City. The
plan must be submitted to the city by July
1, 1988.
(2) The enclosed floor area
of the designated smoking area comprises
no more than 30% of the total enclosed
floor area of the restaurant, bar, or bar
- 6 -
area used for service of food or beverages
to patrons.
(3) Signs are placed within
the restaurant, bar, or bar area which
clearly designate the smoking area as
required by Section 4922(h).
SECTION 4. section 4924 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 4924. posting of Signs.
The person having the authority to manage
and control any area designated as a
nonsmOking area pursuant to Section 4922
or Section 4923, shall post or cause to be
posted and prominently displayed, and
shall maintain, "No Smok.ing" signs in
conspicuous locations within said area.
All such signs shall clearly and
conspicuously reci te the phrase "NO
SMOKING" and/or use the international
no-smoking symbol. The signs shall be
posted not less than five (5) feet nor
more than eight (8) feet above floor level
and shall be of sufficient number and
location to cause the message of at least
one of the signs to be clearly visible,
legible, and readable. Violation of, or
- 7 -
failure to comply with this Section is a
misdemeanor.
SECTION 5. section 4925 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 4925. Exceptions. The
prohibitions set forth in Section 4922 and
Section 4923 do not apply to:
(a) Private enclosed offices
occupied exclusively by smokers even
though such an office may be visited by
nonsmokers.
(b) Separate banquet rooms within
restaurants when in use for private
parties or functions.
SECTION 6. section 4927 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code
is amended to read as follows:
SECTION 4927. Enforcement.
(a) civil Action. Any aggrieved
person may enforce the provisions of this
Chapter by means of a civil action.
(b) Iniunction. Any person who
commits, or proposes to commit, an act in
violation of this Chapter may be enjoined
therefrom by any court of competent
juriSdiction. An action for injunction
under this subdivision may be brought by
any aggrieved person, by the City
- 8 -
Attorney, or by any person or entity which
will fairly and adequately represent the
interests of the protected class.
(c) Attorneys I Fees. In any
action under this Section by an employee
alleging retaliation or discrimination by
an employer for exercising rights under
this Chapter, the prevailing party shall
be awarded costs and reasonable attorneys'
fees.
(d) Dutv to Inform. Owners,
operators, managers, or employees of same
shall be required to orally inform persons
violating this Chapter of the provisions
hereof. The duty to inform such violator
shall arise when such owner, operator,
manager, or employee of same becomes aware
of such violation.
SECTION 7. Any provision of the santa Monica Municipal
Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of
this ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no
further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary
to affect the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
- 9 -
remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each and
every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not
declared inval id or unconstitutional without regard to whether
any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 9. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall
attest to the passage of this ordinance. The City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper
within 15 days after its adoption.
effective 30 days from its adoption.
The ordinance shall be
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~.~-
ROBERT M. MYERS ()
City Attorney
- 10 -
v: XrGNaddV
- 1 -
sa~Btd ~aQ~O :suolldajX3 ~1uamaj~0}U3 A
saj8Yd jTlqnd Jaql0 AI
SUOtSt^O~d ajeld~~o^ III
SUOls1Ao~d Jofew 10 ~~?WmnS II
SajU9UTpJO q1lA SaT1Uno,) pUB saJ'J~ I
:a~v Ia~ 'paplAoJd aJ8 SlJ9qj aAT~
SJ.aYlO 3HJ.
(UOLlntOSa~ Iq) llunOO 0101
(Met saj8td jttqnd seq OSI8) AlunCO a8ue~
AlunCO laJJaluoH
hune:) sata8uy SlYJ.
.hunOJ a}{8'1
.hunOO ousaJ~
:a~e !aqI .sawAordma luamu~a^o8 I1UnOj Ituo 8Utl'alo~d
s~el aheq Sat1UnOj 9 'ahoqe palUnOj SU011jtpslJnr a~l 01 UOtltppa ur
.q1uOlll e rE1.laAas
10 .l:1eJ aq1 18 pa:peua 8ul'CIq MOU a.Ie SajUBulP~O asnejaq ..ls8a1 lBu AtlS 31'\
's.laIordwa algAt.ld JO pa.lTnba.l 5T A,trod 8ut~oms 8 a.laqM ajerd
e UL saALI (ardoad O~9'S96'lt) elu.10}lIVO }O UOlletndod aql JO %9~
'sa~ols tTela.1 uJ SUT~oms ljTJ1Sa.1 8L
.SlUe.1ne1Sa.1 ut suol1,as 8ul~omsuou a.11nbaJ 16
'sajeld~~o~ a1eAt.1d UJ 8ul~oms alern8aJ 16
'~er UOtl~aloJd Ja~omsuou lue'TJTu81S 8 aAeq SatlunOj pUB salltj 86
lSeat 1e 'satlUnOj pue sal11j elu.10}tr~ 8uomy
.sa:erd jtlqnd 1UBjTl~u8ts JO laqwnu re~~ug~sqns v lO 'S1U~lnglSaJ 'sajeId~lO^
a1EhLld laqlta 1ja}}8 lsnm ajUeutplO ue 'uOt~eltdwo~ St41 ul papnljuL aq 01
's^el 8ul~oms .1a8UOlls
.Ie} pa1jeUa aAeq salltuowmo~ luew 's~aleaql U1 8ul~oms a~etn8aJ sallllejot
lSOW 'SSUTp!tnq paUAO A!jltqnd JO SllVd UJBlla~ pUB (8uJ~omsuoa %OS) s8Utlaam
,tlqnd pUB 'sallllljej 4lteaq 'sla~l~adns UJ 8Ul~oms sa181n8aJ AUt ale~s
.elalOl~teo uJ sajueuJPlO 8u~~o~ {luno~
pUB !lp 1ua~HluSJ:S aql }O suolSlAOld aql sa2p~I"S Sl.19qj 10 1as s,!=ttJ.
J.avwwns
9861 '8 .1aqmajaa
zrOr-r'78 (Sftl)
7OL'76 VJ 'Aara~lag
ODS altns 'anuaAY Al1S~a^lUn ~~O~
S~48J~ ,sla~omsuoN JOl SU8jllamy
SJJNVNIa~O ~NI~OWS AlNnOQ aNY !lI~ VI~~OdI1VJ
3,~.i]~
- E -
.scrnHPSJ PUlf
sar:JTqaA l'[Sua.n ~Hqnd .Jat{10 pue sasng :saJ:::Jem.zeqd :(.{IuO u::Jnqnd.. SalllnamoS)
SWOOJ lsaH :sault a~J:^Jas (JOOpul) :sla~.J~adns PU8 sla~.Jem POOJ :SJOleAala
:SSUT1aam (~uamu.Ja^o8 'OaOt) Jltqnd :SCltJCllte8 pus SalJe,lQll 'smnasnw
:(!Qqol aql 8Utlda::Jxa SamL1Clmos) S,Jalea~ :(sSutpeaq umntOj ut paletACl,lqqe)
saJeld pCl18jlPUl: cHf1 u1 palTqlt:(old s1 Su'pfoms 18ql sale::npul l.sal~ V
OJlJaldV S3JV1d JI1and EaH10 - AI laVHJ
'~et 8ut~oms aql lapun slq8TJ laqjStq 8UtlSanbaJ JO} aalotdooa ue lSU1:889
a18u"tm1J:lstp JO sS"FlllS1P 01 "[npletun sl ~1 leq1 SClle:>"[pU't "saAI' :ua '[81iUUOn
'eaJe ~,Jo~ a u1 8ul~oms 8uluueq
saJ"tnbaJ S"tq1 }1: Ua^Cl 'pat}St1eS aq lsom sJa~omsuou 18q1 aJ1nba.J sa:>ueutpJo
amos 's.Ja~owsuou aq1 01 uaA18 aq lsnm AltJ01,Jd 'A:lttod 8ut~oms Cl:>e!d~JOM
Cltp Japun saspe a~nds"tp il uaql'l 1iltp saliljlpu1 ..saxu : a::lU1iUd .l)[msuoN
OeaJe 8ut~omsuou a S8 Baja ~JOM a~etpammJ:
JCl4jS'tQ ClleuSJ:sap Uilj aaAOldlIlCl U8 l1:!tp sClle:>tpUJ: "saAu :e.uyUJo\() .~tSaa
.1uasaJd aSO~l JO 1uasuo~ snowlUilun
hq ~ut~oms ~oJ ~Olte sa:>uFU~pJO awos 'smn~J01~pnS pus smoo~ a:lua.JaJuo~ 'smoo~
Sunaam (Jo ITS .lHll'nsn) u1 palTql:qO.ld 8upfoms sa~In"[puy usa!" ;slIl008 ~
'SUOJ:181S Ple saS,lnu
pue san Hpe] re:)I'pam tlJ: pa:nqI'qo.Id 8a'P{om& sa~SjlpuJ usaIN :. IPS.:! I8:1J:paW
.8ul~omsuoa
aq 01 pa~1nba~ sa8unoI aalordma (lrrensn) pUB smoo.Iq~ant 'se~,JalaJ8~
}O a881UajJad mnmlulm a41 SCll9JJ:pul umnlOj 5141 u1 AJ1Ua uy :81.JalC1}~
-.JAoq8 II Ueq:) aas :<I'll~ S3~Y1d](!O^
:SUO'tlC!1:Aa.Jqqu
.ICl41Q .eaJa pa18:)ypu1 aql UY paltq~qoJd sl 8Ul~O~S leql sCllaj"[pul 5umnIOj
:lSOlll uJ: "sax" V .a:)~ld'l.JoM a41 uJ. A:>Hod 8ul~oms 9 .Meq 01 s~aAOIdma :lsom JO
tIe 8utJ1:nbaJ sajueu'tpJo ~lJM sa~lUnOj PUg SaYltj asoq1 AluO SlS'tt lJ~~J St~
.SNOISlhoad 3JV1dJaO^ lO Aa~S - III laYRJ
- ~ -
.LL61 .t AJEnUBf a~u1s a~uals1x3 u1 slu2~ne~sa~
s~dwaxa lnq 'a~om ~o OS 8UL~eaS Slue~nB1Sa~ UJ 8UL~OmSUOu %~Z sa~~nbaH [EZ]
'j~!qnd !e~aua8
a41 Kq pasn ~T~~em01Snj pue 01 alqeTLeAB SBaJU pasoljua 118 uJ 8u1~oms
1~qL40~d saop lnq 'BaJa Sl~l 01 Aldda ~tt8jLJ.jads 10U saop ajueutp~o [ZZ]
(.salQqol ~aleaql 01
ildd~ 10U op sajueu~p~o lSOH) .8Ul~OWSUOU aq lsnm salqqol Jaleaql }O %OS [1,]
'laa} aJenbs aoSt Japun 11 lsanba~ uodn pa11qtqo~d :laaJ
aJenbs OOSI JaAO smDOJsseT~ JO scoo~ 8ul1aam 'smOOJ ajUa~aJuDj JO ~OS COlI
.SU1JLq
Ut uOLleu~m.~jstp oSl8 lnq 'UDL1BttElal ~o a8JeqjSLp lruo lOll sl~q1qOJd [6t]
'SUllJ~
ut lsanbaJ os Ba~e aql U1 8Ul~lO^ suos~ad 118 ~L ~luO paleuSJsap os
aq i~ 4~L4A 'seaJ8 SUt~oms 40J 1d3jXa Sea4& ~4OA uJ pallQrQo4d 8ut~oms [srI
'8ut~omsuou aq tleqs S8a~8 8Ullea ~ooplno 118 JO
%OS 'palsod aq ~snm A~110d ~nq paJlnba~ U011j3S 00 :slU8Jn81S3~ Jatlems
'Sleas alom JO os ql~ lUeJna1Sa~ q~ea }O %09 lS83t 1. u1 8uJ~oms oN [Lt]
'(sleas ~ lapun :aulA~I :laa1 aJBnbs OS9 Japun :ollV oIed)
sea~8 ttems u1 Ata~l~ua pal1qtqo~d &1 8ul~oms PU8 '8ul~omsuou aq tteqs
UAOqS a8g1Ua~~ad aql 'sagunol pUR smoo~qJunl 'S81~alaJ&~ aalo1dma ul [91)
.lugdn~~o aq1 lq 8ul~omsuou pa~9uBlsap aq 1em sa~l}}o a~8Al~d [Sl]
'11uO s1e^tl&Q ~auu1 u1 PQ1lq1qo~d 8u~~o~S [~1)
'satjgmJeqd 8utpnt~Ul .Sa~OlS tle1a~ 118 u1 pa~Jqlqo~d 81 8al~oms [tt]
'SUJ1J~
ut auo aUtlsanba~ aaAOtd~a 1ue 01 pap.AoJd aq ~snm eala ~~o^ aa~} a~oms [ZI]
'pJe1U81S UOtleln~~l' J.e mnmlu~m jlltJadS
e 8Ut~aaw S8 pall11laj sa~eld ut&lJaj JOJ paAoll8 aq u~ uOllda~X3 [11]
.palsod aq 15nm !jl10d ~nq paJtnba~ suo11~as ON [011
CHART I: CALIFORNIA CITIES AND OOU~~IES WITH SMOKING ORDINANCES
C{1oIMUNITY COUNTY POPULATION YEAR/MOh7H PRIVATE RESTAURA~iS RETAIL
ENACTED WORKPLACES STORE:5
Newport Beach Orange 66, 100 1985/06 Yes Yes
+ Oakland Alameda 351,100 1986/07 Yes Yes
Oceanside San Dl.ego 91,800 1983 Yes Yes Yes
Onnda Contra Costa 15,000 1985/12 Yes Yes Yes
+ Palm Desert Riverside 15,200 1986/05 Yes Yes Yes
1- Palm Spnngs Riverside 38,950 1986/02 Yes Yes Yes
Palo Alto Santa Clara 56,200 19B3..85 Yes Yes
+ Parad~se Butte 24. 200 1986/04 Yes Yes Yes
Pasadena Los Angeles 126,600 1984 Yes Yes
Pino1e Contra Costa 14, 700 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
P1t:tsburg Contra Costa 38,650 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
+ Pleasanton Alameda 40,750 1986/07 Yes Yes Yes
Pleasant H1.11 Contra Costa 27,400 1986/01 Yes Yes Yes
Poway San Dlego 35,950 1983/03 Yes Yes Yes
Rancho HU8ge R1.verside 7,575 1986/02 Yes Yes Yes
RJ.chmond Contra Costa 76,900 1985/09 Yes Yes Yes
RlverSlde Rlverslde ]83,400 1985/05 Yes Yes Yes
Sacramento Sacramento 309,400 1985 Yes Yes Yes
San Anselmo Mann 11,950 19857
San Dlego San Dlego 971,600 1982/12 Yes Yes Yes
San Franclsco San FranC1SCO 719,200 1983/11 Yes
San Jose Santa Clara 696.000 1964 Yes Yes Yes
San Luis OblSPO S.Lul.s Obl.spo 37,150 1985/12 Yes Yes
San Marcos San Dlego 19,800 1983/03 Yes Yes Yes
San Pablo Contra Costa 21,200 1985/10 Yes Yes Yes
-+ San Rafael Marln 44,150 1979/08 Yes
San Ramon Contra Costa 23.450 1985/11 Yes Yes Yes
Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 78,000 1984 Yes Yes
Santa Clara Santa Clara 89,000 1985/07 Yes Yes Yes
Santa Honlea Los Angeles 93,100 1985/04 Yes
Sant.ee San Dlego 49.500 1983/02 Yes Yes Yes
+ Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 7, 500 1985 Yes Yes Yes
-.* Sunnyvale Santa Clara 111,700 1986. .86 Yes Yes Yes
Tustln Orange 40,800 1985/12 Yes Yes Yes
Uk:z.ah Mendocl.no 13.050 1981/07 Yes Yes Yes
Vista San Dlego '3.450 1983/04 Yes Yes Yes
Walnut Creek Contra Costa 58,100 1985/Il Yes Yes Yes
West Hollywood Los Angeles 37,000 1986/03 Yes Yes Yes
lorba Linda Orange 36, 100 1985/09 Yes Yes Yes
-+ Yuba City Sutter 21,100 1986/06 Yes Yes Yes
+County of Alameda [2] 114,700 1986 Yes Yes Yes
County of Contra Costa [2J 139,800 1985/09 Yes Yes Yes
County of Karin [2] 62. SOO 1981/07 Yes Yes
County of Orange (2] 294~900 1985/06 Yes Yes
County of Riverslde [2] 323,500 1985 Yes Yes Yes
County of Sacramento [2] 543,500 1985/02 Yes Yes Yes
County of San D1ego [2] 406,100 1982/]2 Yes Yes Yes
County of Santa Clara [2] 106,600 1985/06 Yes Yes Yes
County of Santa Cruz [2] 121,300 1985 Yes Yes Yes
Population covered in workplaces 11,965,640
Percentage of state populatlon: 46 %
(12/8/86)
- 7 -
CHART II: MAJOR PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL SMOKING ORDINA~CES
CCliM'JNITY POPULATION YEAR/MONTH WORKPLACES RETAIL RESTAURA\'TS
EN At: n:;D REGULA TED STORES
Newport Beach 66, 100 1985/06 Oic. > " 25% 50+-
+ Oakland 351,100 1986/07 All AllBus.
Oc.eanslde 91,800 1983 All [1] Yes No% 20+
Orinda 15,000 1985/12 All 4+ Al1Bus. 40% 50+
+ Palm Desert 15,200 1986/05 All (1] Yes 25% [23]
+ Palm Spnngs 38,950 1986/02 All [6] Dept. 25% 50+-
Palo Alto 56,200 1983. .85 Ofe. \ikpl. 60% [17]
+ Paradise 24,200 1986/04 All 5+ AllBus. 50% 50+
Pasadena 126,600 1984 Ofc.Wkpl. 25% 50+
P1nole 14,700 1985/11 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+-
P1ttsburg 38,850 1985/11 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+-
+ Pleas81lton 40,750 1986/07 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
Pleasant H111 27,400 1986/01 All 4+ AllBus. "0% 50+-
Poway 35,950 1983/03 All [1] Yes No% 20+-
Rancho Muage 7,575 1986/02 All [1) Yes No% 20+-
bchmond 76,900 1985/09 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+-
Rlverslde 183,400 1985/05 All [6] Dept. 25% 50+
Sacramento 309,400 1985 6,11 [1] Yes 10% 50+-
San Anselmo 11,950 1985?
San Dlego 971.600 1982/12 All [1] Yes No% 20+-
San Franclsco 719,200 1983/11 Of c. \i'kpl.
San Jose 696.000 1984 All Yes 30% 100+
San Lu~s OblSpO 37,150 1985/12 All 5+ No%. 50+-
San Marcos 19,800 1983/03 All [1] Yes No% 20+-
San Pa bIo 21.200 1985/10 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+
+ San Rafael 44 ,150 1979/08 20% 20+-
San Ramon 23,450 1985/11 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+-
Santa Barbara 78,000 1984 All 25% 20+-
Santa Clara 89,000 1985/07 All Yes 30% 50+
Santa Monl.ca 93,100 1985/04 All 6+
Santee 49,500 1983/02 All [1] Yes No% 20+-
+ Seotts Valley 7,500 1985 All AllBus. No %
+* Sunnyvale 111,700 1986..85 All 4+ AllBus. 60% [17]
Tust1n 40,800 1985/12 All [1] Yes No% 20.
Uhah 13,050 1981/07 All Yes 50%
VJ.sta 43,450 1983/04 All [1] Yes No% 20+
Walnut Creek 58,100 1985/11 All 4+ AIlBus. 40% 50+-
West Hollywood 37,000 1986/03 All Yes 40% 35
Yorba Linda 36, 100 1985/09 All 11+ Yes 1/3 40+-
of. Yuba Clty 21,100 1986/06 All A. 11 Bus . 50% 50+-
+County of Alameda 114,700 1986 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+-
County of Contra Costa 139,800 1985/09 All 4+ AllBus. 40% 50+-
County of Marin 62,500 1981/07 [8] No% 20+-
County of Orange 294,900 1985/06 Co.Gov[1] Yes 20% 50+
County of Riverside 323,500 1985 All [6] Dept. 25% 50+-
County of Sacramento 543,500 1985/02 All (1] Yes 10% 50+
County of San D1ego 406,100 1982/12 All [1] Yes No% 20+
County of Santa Clara 106,600 1985/06 All AllBus. 1/3
County of Santa Cruz 121,300 1985 All Yes No %
- 9 -
CHART III: SUMMARY OF WORKPLACE PROVISIONS
a:R"fUNITY WORKPLACES Cafe- Rest Eleva-Medl.cal Htg. Hall- DeSl&. Nonsmkr Nonre-
REGULATED teria Rooms tors Facl.l. Rooms Ways OwnAr_af~efnce tal1n
Onnda All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
.. Palm Desert All [1] [1] [1] [1] [1] [1] [1 ] Yes Yes
+ Palm Springs All [6} 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Palo Alto Ofc.Wkpl.2/3(16) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Parad1se All 5+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Ye<:- Yes Yes
Pasadena Ofc.Wkpl. 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yel: Yes
Pl.nole All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
PHtsburg A114+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Pleasant on All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pleasant Hill All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Poway All [1] Yes Yes Yes
Rancho Mirage All [1] Yes
Rlchmond All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
RJ.verside All [ 6 ] 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sacramento All [1] 1/2 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Dl.ego All [1 J Yes Yes Yes
San Francl.sco Ofc .lrlkpl. [7] [7] {7] [7] [7] [7] [7] Yes[7]
San Jose All 2/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Luis Ob1.spo All 5+ [7] [7] [7] [7] [7] [7] [71 Yes[7 ]
San Marcos All [1] Yes Yes Yes
San Pablo All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes y~s Yes Yes
San Ramon All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santa Barbara All [7] [7] [7] [7] [7] {7] [7] Yes[7]
Santa Clara All 2/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santa Monlca All 6+ 2/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santee All [1] Yes Yes Yes
+ Scotts Valley All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
.... Sunnyvale All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
rustln All [1]
Uk1ah All [12] [12}
Vl.Sta All [1] Yes Yes Yes
\Jalnut Creek All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yef Yes Yes
;lest HollY"iCod All 50% [IB] [IB] [IB] [18} [IB] r ~] Yes [ 19]
Vorba Linda All 11+ 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
.. Yuba Cny All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+County of Alameda All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Contra Costa All 4+ 40% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Riverside All [6] 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Sacramento All [1] 1/2 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of San Diego All [1] Yes Yes Yes
County of Santa Clara All 2/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yp Yes Yes
COunty of Santa Cruz All 50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Y--<: Yes Yes
- 11 -
CHART IV - OTHER PUBLIC PLACES AFFECTED
CCHiUNITY Thea- Museums Health Pub11c Eleva- Food Serv:lce Rest Pharma- Bus!
ters & Libr.Fac'lty Ktgs. tors Mkts. Lines Rooms CJ.es pubTran
Newport Beach Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Oakland Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oceanside Yes Yes (1J Yes Yes Yes [lJ Yes Yes Yes
Onnda Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Palm Desert Yes Yes (1] [1] [1] Yes (1] [1) Yes Yes
+ Palm Springs Yes Yes Yes Yes
Palo Alto Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Parad:lse Yes Mus. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes
Pasadena Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
P1Dole Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
httsburg Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Pleasanton Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pleasant Jhll Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Poway Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes [I] Yes Yes Yes
Rancho thrage Yes Yes [1] Yes [1) Yes Yes
Richmond Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Rivers1de Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sacramento Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Anselmo 1/3 Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Dlego Yes Yes f 1] Yes Yes Yes [1) Yes Yes Yes
San Franc~sco
San Jose Yes Yes Yes Yes
San LuJ.s ObJ.spo Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Marcos Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes [1 ] Yes Yes Yes
San Pablo Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ San Rafael Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
San Ramon Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santa Barbara Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santa Clara Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santa Hanlca Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Santee Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes [1 ] Yes Yes Yes
... Seous Valley Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes [22 J
+* Sunnyvale Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Tustl.n [1] [1] [I] [1] {I] {I] [1] (1] (1] [ I]
Ukiah Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
V~sta Yes Yes [l} Yes Yes Yes [1 J Yes Yes Yes
Walnut Creek Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
West Hollywood Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yorba Linda Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
+ Yuba City Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesIl3] Yes
+County of Alameda Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Contra Costa Yes Yes Yes [22] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Marin Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Orange Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Riverside Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Sacramento Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of San D1ego Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes [1] Yes Yes Yes
County of Santa Clara Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
County of Santa Cruz Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
- 1 3 -
t'OH:'fJNITY
CHART V: ENFORCmENT; EXCEPTIONS; ornER PLACES AU.t;CTED
OTHER AFFEcn.:D AREAS
EXCEP- ENFORCEME~~
TIONS[4]
Appl.
Oc.eanslde
Onnda
... Palm Desert
... Palm Spnngs
Palo AI to
... Paradise
Pasadena
Plnole
PJ.ttsburg
-+ Pleasanton
Pleasant Hlll
Poway
Rancho M1rage
Rlchmond
RJ.versl.de
Sacramento
San Anselmo
San Dlego
San FranC1sco
San Jose
San LU1S OblSPO
San Marcos
San Pablo
+ San Rafael
San Ramon
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Santa Monica
Santee
+ Scotts Valley
+* Sunnyvale
Tust1n
Uk1ah
Vl.sta
Walnut Creek
Yest Hollywood
Yo.rba Linda
+ Yuba CUy
+County of Alameda
County of Contra Cos
County of Mann
County of Orange
County of Riverside
County of Sacramento
County of San D1ego
County of Santa Clar
County of Santa Cruz
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
[11 ]
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
[11)
Appl.
Appl.
Appl.
Infrac non
City Hgr/complaint
Infraction
Infraction
Infractl.on SO% of outdoor eating areas.
Health Dept/lnspectAll enclosed areas used by the general publlC
Infraction
CIty Hgr/complaint All
Infraction All
C1ty Kgr/complaint All
Infraction All
Infraction All
Infraction All
City Hgr/complaint All
Infractlon
Infraction All publl.c places except deslgnated areas [I}
None specl.hed
Infractlon All pub1l.c places except deslgnated areas [lJ
Civll/DJ.r.Pub.Health
Health Dfhcer
AdmJ.n.Ofc/Pub.Nuis.All
Infractlon All
Infractlon All
Infraction
Clty Mgr/complaJ.nt All enclosed areas used by the general publJ.c
Infr. / Pub.NulS. Laundromats
Clty Manager
Cl.v~l/Infraction
Infractlon
HealthOfcr/lnspect
Infractlon
Infractlon
Clty Mgr/complalnt
Infractl.on
elty Hgr/co~plaint
Misdem./Cl.vl.l Suit
M.isdemeanor
Health D./ComplaintAll
Co. Health Agency All
Health Dept. All
Infraction
Infraction
Infraction
Director of Health All public places except designated areas [1]
Infraction All public places except deslgnated areas [1]
Infraction
HealthOfcrJlnspect Enclosed public areas
- 15 -
All publlC places except designated areas [1]
All enclosed areas used by the general publlC
All public places except deslgnated areas [1]
enclosed areas used by the general publlc
enclosed areas used by the general publlc
enclosed areas used by the general publlc
enclosed areas used by the general public
pub!lc places except designated areas [11
public places except desl.gnated areas [1]
enclosed areas used by the general pub11c
Cl.ty bu~ldlngs; laundromats
publl.c places except deslgnated areas [1]
enclosed areas used by the general publJ.c
All publl.c places except desl.gnated areas [1]
All enclosed areas used by the general publJ.c
Clty bldg. hallways; hotels; gymnasIums, stadlUIDS
[1]; but no area lS requl.red to be all nons~oklng
All public places except des1gnated areas [1]
All enclosed areas used by the general publIC
All publlC places except deslgnated areas [1]
enclosed areas used by the general publlC
enclosed areas used by the general publlc
enclosed areas used by the general publIC
County buildings except deslg. smoklng areas