SR-417-003-01 (73)
.
.
L/I ?--oo 3-0/
CA:RMM:rmdl057/hpca
city Council Meeting 9-11-90
Santa Monica, california
STAFF REPORT
~.F
SEP 11 1990
SEP 1 8 1990
TO:
Mayor and City council
FROM:
city Attorney
SUBJECT:
Ordinance Adding section 3238t to the Santa
Monica Municipal Code To Establish Preferential
Parking Zone T
At its meeting on January 23, 1990, the City Council
directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance establishing a
preferential parking zone on Dorchester Avenue between Exposition
Boulevard and Delaware Avenue.
In response to this direction,
the accompanying ordinance has been prepared and is presented to
the city council for its consideration.
The accompanying ordinance adds Section 3238t to the Santa
Monica Municipal Code establishing Preferential Parking Zone T on
Dorchester Avenue between Exposition Boulevard and Delaware
Avenue. Parking in Zone T will be prohibited for more than two
hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday
through Saturday, except by permit.
All other provisions
applicable to preferential parking zones would apply.
An initial study was prepared in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Based
upon this initial study, a negative declaration has been
prepared. Both documents are attached to this Staff Report as
- 1 -
, _pf'.F
~E' 1 1 1990
SEP 1 8 1990
.
.
Exhibit A. Notice of preparation of the negative declaration was
given in the manner required by law.
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that:
1. The negative declaration be approved.
2. The accompanying ordinance be introduced for first
reading.
PREPARED BY: Robert M. Myers, City Attorney
- 2 -
e
.
CA:RMM:rmdl056jhpca
City Council Meeting 9-11-90
Santa Monica, California
ORDINANCE NUMBER
(City Council Series)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA ADDING SECTION 3238T
TO THE SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ESTABLISH PREFERENTIAL PARKING ZONE T
WHEREAS, the Parking and Traffic Engineer has received a
petition requesting establishment of a preferential parking zone
on Dorchester Avenue between Exposition Boulevard and Delaware
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the petition has been verified to be signed by
residents living in two-thirds of the dwelling units comprising
not less than fifty percent (50%) of the developed frontage of
the proposed preferential parking zone; and
WHEREAS, the Parking and Traffic Engineer has undertaken
such studies and surveys deemed necessary to determine whether a
preferential parking zone should be designated in the area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is satisfied that the proposed
area meets the designation criteria set forth in Municipal Code
Section 3232A,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MONICA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
section 3238t is added to the Santa Monica
Municipal Code to read as follows:
- 1 -
. .
Section 3238t. Preferential parking
Zone T.
(a) The following named and
described street within the City shall
constitute Preferential Parking Zone T:
Dorchester Avenue between Exposition
Boulevard and Delaware Avenue.
(b) No vehicle shall be parked or
stopped adjacent to any curb in
Preferential Parking Zone T for more than
two hours between the hours of 9: 00 a.m.
and 6:00 p.m. on Monday through Saturday
without a permit issued and displayed in
accordance with this Chapter.
(c) Any vehicle parked or stopped
without a permit when required by this
section may be removed from the street by
any police officer.
(d) The annual fee for each permit
issued for Preferential Parking Zone T
shall be $15.00 per permit, or such other
fee as may be established from time to
time by resolution of the City Council.
SECTION 2. Any provision of the Santa Monica Municipal
Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of
this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no
- 2 -
~
.
.
further, are hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary
to affect the provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The city council hereby
declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each and
every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not
declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether
any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall
attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The city Clerk shall
cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper
within 15 days after its adoption. This Ordinance shall become
effective after 30 days from its adoption.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~.~
ROBERT M. MYERS U
City Attorney
- 3 -
.
.
SANTA
MONICA
:~:~;~~~~~~~~~~~;:-i.i~~~~~~~~
.r}""_",,, -
- -~"';.:;- ,,~j:~'
..~~
Program & Policy Development
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401-3295
(213) 458-8585
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR
PROPOSED PREFERENTIAL PARKING ZONES S, T
To:
Concerned Persons
From:
The city of santa Monica
PROJECT LOCATION: Zone S: 16th and 17th streets between
Montana Avenue and Alta Avenue
Zone T: Dorchester Avenue between Exposition
Boulevard and Delaware street
PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
An application for a NEGATIVE DECLARATION to carry out the
following project:
Preferential Parking Zone S: To prohibit parking on 16th and 17th
streets between Montana Avenue and Alta Avenue for more than one
hour between 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday,
except by permit. Preferential Parking Zone T: To prohibit
parking on Dorchester Avenue between Exposition Boulevard and
Delaware street for more than two hours between 9: 00 a. m. and
6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, except by permit, in the city
of Santa Monica, California, having been filed by the city of
Santa Monica Parking/Traffic Division, on May 15, 1990, and the
application having been reviewed by the Community and Economic
Development Department in accordance with the procedures
established by Resolution 6694 (CCS), therefore, the Department
hereby finds that:
1. The proposed activity does constitute a project within
the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970, as amended.
2. The proposed activity is not exempt from the provisions
of such act by reason of being a ministerial,
categorically exempt or emergency activity.
3. The proposed activity does not appear to have a
substantial adverse effect upon the environment.
4. Inasmuch as it can be seen with reasonable certainty
that no substantial adverse effect is involved, no
.
.
proper purpose would be served by the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report.
5. A Negative Declaration document is the proper, correct
and appropriate procedure required to assure compliance
with the purpose and intent of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended.
The Department, therefore, has determined that the proposed
project does not have a significant effect on the environment and
that an Environmental Impact Report is not required. Following
the public review period, the decision-making body is required to
consider whether or not a Negative Declaration continues to be
appropriate.
HOW TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The City of Santa Monica encourages public comment on this and
other projects. A copy of the Negative Declaration is available
for your review in the City Planning Division at the address
below and in the office of the city Clerk. If you have comments
about the proposed Negative Declaration, you should forward them
to the city Planning staff so that they can be considered.
DUE DATE FOR COMMENTS
Monday, July 16, 1990
4:00 P.M.
WHERE TO SEND COMMENTS
city Planning Division
1685 Main street
Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Telephone: (213) 458-8585
Attention: Douglas Kim, Assistant Planner
lega1/ppz2ef33
06/14/90
cr'l'Y OF SANTA MONICA .
CITY PLANNING DIVISION
City Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, California
.
IS NO. 90-006
90401-3295
PROPOSED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
An application for a NEGATIVE DECLARATION to carry out the following
projects: Preferential Parking Zone S: To prohibit parking on 16th and 17th
streets between Montana Avenue and Alta Avenue for more than one hour
between 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.{ Monday through Saturday, except by permit.
Preferential Parking Zone T: To prohibit parking on Dorchester Avenue
between Exposition Boulevard and Delaware Avenue for more than two hours
between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, except by permit,
in the City of Santa Monica, California, having been filed by the City of
Santa Monica parking/Traffic Division, on May 15, 1990, and the application
having been reviewed by the Community and Economic Development Department
in accordance with the procedures established by Resolution 6694 (CCS),
therefore, the Department hereby finds that:
1. The proposed activity does constitute a project within the
meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended.
2. The proposed activity is not exempt from the provisions of such
act by reason of being a ministerial, categorically exempt or
emergency activity.
3. The proposed activity does not appear to have a substantial
adverse effect upon the environment.
4. Inasmuch as it can be seen with reasonable certainty that no
substantial adverse effect is involved, no proper purpose would
be served by the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report.
5. A Negative Declaration document is the proper, correct and
appropriate procedure required to assure compliance with the
purpose and intent of the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended.
~:"l'Y OF SANTA MONICA .
CITY PLANNING DIVISION
City Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California
.
IS NO. 90-006
90401-3295
The Department, therefore, has determined that the proposed project does
not have a significant effect on the environment and that an Environmental
Impact Report is not required. Following the pUblic review period, the
decisionmaking body is required to consider whether or not a Negative
Declaration continues to be appropriate.
Date:
h/i /90
fAu#/~
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
Date:
o /l./ q Vi
(J'UG~~LL-<-- -
DIRECTOR' COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOP NT DEPARTMENT
legal/efSpz2
06/0S/90
CITY OF SANTA MON~
CITY PLANNING DIV~ON
city Hall, 1685 Main street,
~ IS No. 90-006
Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
INITIAL STUDY
AND
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT STATEMENT
DATE FILED 5-15-90
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Applicant City of Santa Monica
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 1685 Main street
Santa Monica, California 90401-3295; 213-458-8291
3. Project Address 16th and 17th streets between Montana
Avenue and Alta Avenue; Dorchester Avenue between
Exposition Boulevard and Delaware Avenue.
Name of Proposal, if applicable Preferential Parkinq
Zones Sand T.
4. Initial study Prepared by Douglas Kim, Assistant
Planner
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all answers are required on attached
sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
x
h. Extensive disruptions, displace-
ments, compaction or overcovering
of soil?
x
c. Extensive change in topography of
ground surface relief features?
x
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique
geological or physical features?
x
- 1 -
.
CITY OF SANTA MON~
CITY PLANNING DIVI~N
City Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, California
IS No. 90-006
90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
e. Considerable increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the bed of the
ocean or any bay or inlet?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure, or
similar hazards?
2. Air. will the proposal result in:
a. Considerable air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Substantial alteration of air
movement, moisture, or temperature,
or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
d. Expose the project residents to
severe air pollution conditions?
3. Water. will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the
course of direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
b. Extensive changes in absorp-
tion rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of
surface runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
- 2 -
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
CITY OF SANTA MON~\
CITY PLANNING DIV~, lN
city Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California
.
IS No. 90-006
90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
d. Substantial change in the amount
of surface water in any water
body?
x
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but
not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
x
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
x
g. Change in the qu~~tity of ground
waters, either t rough direct
additions or wi~_drawals, or
through intercel _ion of an
aquifer by cuts ,r excavations?
x
h. considerable redlction in the
amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
x
i. ~posure of people or property
to water related hazards such
as flooding or tidal waves?
x
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species
or number of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
x
x
c. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or result in
a barrier to the normal replen-
ishment of existing species?
x
- J -
CITY OF SANTA MONI.
CITY PLANNING DIVI ON
city Hall, 1685 Main street,
4It IS No. 90-006
Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
5. Animal Life. will the proposal
result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or number of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or
insects)?
x
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
x
c. Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
x
d. Deterioration of existing fish
or wildlife habitats?
x
6. Energy. will the proposal result in:
a. Use of considerable amount of
fuels or energy?
x
b. Considerable increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of
new sources of energy?
x
7. Natural Resources. will the proposal
result in:
a. Considerable increase in the rate
of use of any natural resources?
x
b. considerable depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource?
x
8. Noise. will the proposal result in:
a. Considerable increases in existing
noise. levels?
x
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
x
- 4 -
.
.
CITY OF SANTA MON~
CITY PLANNING DIV~ON
city Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, California
IS No. 90-006
90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
9. Light and Glare. will the proposal
produce considerable new light or glare
from street lights or other sources?
10. Shadows. Will the proposal produce
extensive shadows affecting
adjacent uses or property?
11. RiSk of upset. Will the proposal
involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to,
oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an
accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
12. Human Health. will the proposal
result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
c. Considerable adverse impact on
health care services?
13. population. will the proposal
result in:
a. Considerable change in the distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
b. The relocation of any persons
because of the effects upon
housing, commercial or industrial
facilities?
c. The relocation or dislocation
of employment or businesses?
- 5 -
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
CITY OF SANTA MONI~
CITY PLANNING DIVI~N
City Hall, 1685 Main street,
~ IS No. 90-006
Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
14. Land Use. will the proposal result in:
a. A considerable alteration of the
present or planned land use of
an area?
x
b. Demolition, relocation, or
remodeling of residential, com-
mercial or industrial buildings
or other facilities?
x
15. Housing. will the Proposal:
a. Create a considerable demand for
additional housing?
x
b. Have a considerable adverse impact
on the available rental housing
in the community?
x
16. Right of Way. will the proposal
result in:
a. Reduced lot area?
x
b. Reduced access?
x
c. Reduced off-street parking?
d. Creation of abrupt grade dif-
ferential between public and
private property?
17. Transportation/Circulation. will
the proposal result in:
x
x
a. Generation of considerable
additional vehicular movement?
x
b. Substantial effects on
existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
x
c. Considerable adverse impact upon
existing bus transit systems?
x
d. Alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods by changes
to roadways?
x
- 6 -
CITY OF SANTA MONI.
CITY PLANNING DIVI N
City Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California
.
IS No. 90-006
90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail
or air traffic?
x
f. Considerable adverse impact on
traffic safety to motorists,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
x
IS. utilities. Will the proposal
result in a need for new systems,
or major alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
x
b. communications systems?
x
c. Water?
x
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
x
e. storm water drainage?
x
f. Solid Waste and disposal?
x
19. Public services. will the proposal
have a considerable effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
a. Fire protection?
x
b. Police protection?
x
c. Schools, including
pre-schools or child care?
x
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
x
e. Maintenance of public facil-
ities, including roads?
x
f. Other governmental services?
x
20. construction Effects. will the
proposal have considerable construc-
tion-period impacts due to the scope, or
location of construction activities?
x
- 7 -
CITY OF SANTA MONI'"
CITY PLANNING DIVI~N
City Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, California
.
IS No. 90-006
90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
21. Fiscal. will the proposal have a
considerable fiscal effect on the
city?
22. Recreation. will the proposal result
in a considerable impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
23. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruc-
tion of a prehistoric or his-
toric archeological site?
b. will the proposal result in
adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure,
or object?
c. Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential
impact area?
24. Aesthetics. will the proposed
project result in:
a. The obstruction of any scenic
vista or view open to the public?
b. The creation of an aestheti-
cally offensive site open to
public view?
c. The destruction of a stand of
trees, a rock outcropping or
other locally recognized desir-
able aesthetic natural feature?
d. Any substantial negative
aesthetic effect?
- 8 -
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
CITY OF SANTA MON~
CITY PLANNING DIV~ON
City Hall, 16S5 Main street, Santa Monica, California
.
IS No. 90-006
90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
25. Neighborhood Effects. will the
proposal have considerable effects
on the project neighborhood?
x
26. Mandatory Findings of significance.
a. Does the project have the poten-
tial to degrade the quality of the
environment, SUbstantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal commun-
ity, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major
periods of California history or
pre-history?
x
b. Does the project have the poten-
tial to achieve short-term, to
the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
x
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
x
d. Does the project have environ-
mental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly
or indirectly?
x
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
(See attachment)
IV. DETERMINATION
A Negative Declaration is appropriate.
legal/ef3ppz
05/16/90
- 9 -
CITY OF SANTA MONI~
CITY PLANNING DIVI~N
city Hall, 1685 Main street,
~ IS No. 90-006
Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Attachment
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
AREAS CHECKED "NO"
1. Earth (a,b,c,d,e,f,g)
The parking zones do not have geOlogical impacts.
2. Air (a,b,c,d)
The zones will not significantly impact air quality.
3. Water (a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i)
The zones do not affect bodies of water.
4. Plant Life (a,b,c)
The parking zones do not impact vegetation in the area.
5. Animal Life (a/b/c/d)
The parking zones will not impact animal life.
6. Energy (a/b)
The parking zones will not directly impact energy sources.
7. Natural Resources (a/b)
The parking zones will not impact natural resources.
8. Noise (a,b)
The zones will not impact noise significantly.
9. Light and Glare.
The zones do not create light and glare.
10. Shadows.
The parking zones do not create shadows.
11. Risk of Upset (a,b)
The zones will not create hazardous impacts or impacts to
safety.
12. Human Health (a,b,c)
The zones will not directly impact human health.
13. Population (a/b,c)
The parking zones will not directly impact the areas'
commercial or residential population.
14. Land Use (a/b)
The zones will not directly impact land use in the area.
15. Housing (a/b)
The parking zones will not impact housing.
- 10 -
CITY OF SANTA MONI.
CITY PLANNING DIVI N
city Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, California
.
IS No. 90-006
90401-329~
16. Right of way (a,b,c,d)
The parking zones will not impact any public rights-of-way.
17. Transportation/circulation (a,b,c,d,e,f)
The parking zones will not generate considerable additional
vehicular movement, nor create considerable impacts on
existing transit systems, air traffic, or traffic safety to
pedestrians, bicyclists, or motorists. The zones will not
result in substantial effects on existing parking facili-
ties or create demand for new parking, and will not result
in alterations to present patterns of circulation through
any changes to roadways.
parking Zone S encompasses two one-block areas, while Zone
T involves a one block portion of Dorchester Avenue.
18. utilities (a,b,c,d,e,f)
The parking zones will not impact utilities.
19. Public Services (a,b,c,d,e)
The zones will not create a considerable effect or require
new services in fire or police protection, schools, parks,
or maintenance of roads.
20. construction Effects
The parking zones have no construction impacts.
21. Fiscal
The zones will not have a considerable fiscal effect on the
city.
22. Recreation
The zones do not impact recreational opportunities.
23. cultural Resources (a,b,c,d)
The parking zones do not impact cultural resources.
24. Aesthetics (a,b,c,d)
~he parking zones have no aesthetic impact.
25. Neighborhood Effects.
The parking zones will not have considerable effects on the
project neighborhoods.
26. Mandatory Findings of significance
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife popula-
tion to drop below self-sustaining levels I threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or species or eliminate important examples of the maj or
periods of California history or pre-history?
- 11 -
CITY OF SANTA MONIA
CITY PLANNING DIVI~N
City Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, california
.
IS No. 90-006
90401-3295
No. The parking zones will not degrade the quality of the
environment or affect native plants or animals.
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term,
to the disadvantage of lonq-term/ environmental goals?
No. Zone S will limit parking on two street blocks to one-
hour without a permit, while Zone T will limit parking on
one block of Dorchester Avenue to two hours without a per-
mit. The impacts are limited and does not have the poten-
tial to result in adverse long-term environmental problems.
c. Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
No. As both zones will permit limited parking
permit, and because of the small area involved
zone, the individual impacts of each are minimal.
any cumulative impacts would not be considerable.
without a
wi th each
As such,
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
No. The zones will no have direct or indirect substantial
adverse effects on humans.
AREAS CHECKED nYES"
19. Public services
f. will the proposal have a considerable effect upon/ or
result in a need for new or altered government services in
government services?
Yes. Parking Zone S requires new parking enforcement
surveillance of two street blocks, while Zone T requires
enforcement of one street block. However, the impact on
this government service is not considerable.
- 12 -
CITY OF SANTA MONI. .
CITY PLANNING DrVI N
City Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
CERTIFICATION OF FINAL INITIAL STUDY
AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION
DATE
July 25, 1990
PROJECT TITLE
Preferential Parking Zones S, T
APPLICATION Nill1BER
INITIAL STUDY NU~BER 90-006
This hereby certifies that this Final Initial Study and Negative
Declaration was completed in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the
City of Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines.
LM 1- ~
~ ~
Signature
AssiSt2/1 t ? 12/1/1 er
Title
efl0ppz2
07/26/90
CITY OF~~ANTA MONI~ IS No. ~ EIR No.
CITY PLANNING DIVI~ -,.,-
City Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
~
DETERMINATION
project Title: Preferential Parking Zones Sand T
Project Address: 16th and 17th streets between Montana
Avenue and Al ta Avenue; Dorchester Avenue
between Exposition Boulevard and Delaware
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project could not have a
significant effect on the environment, and a
Negative Declaration will be prepared.
x
I find that although the proposed project could
have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this
case because the mitigation measures described on
an attached sheet have been added to the project.
A Negative Declaration will be prepared.
I find the proposed project may have a significant
effect on the environment, and an Environmental
Impact Report is required.
,/,(90
Date .
of Planning
l/c,/t;c.
~ ' ~
, 'ul ~lt"'--'~iJ-(L}.L-'----" -.
Director,tJCommunity and Economic
Development Department
Date
legal/ef4ppz2
05/16/90