SR-417-003-01 (65)
.
.
'II -r-P03-o/
CA:RMM:rmdl053/hpca
City Council Meeting 9-11-90
Santa Monica, California
STAFF REPORT
feE,
SEP j 1 1990
St:.r .1. (,) 1.:1:1 Q
,..........
... ",A
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
city Attorney
SUBJECT:
Ordinance Amending Santa Monica Municipal Code
section 32380 to Expand Preferential Parking
Zone 0
At its meeting on January 23, 1990, the City Council
directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance amending
Municipal Code section 323So to expand Preferential Parking Zone
o. In response to this direction, the accompanying ordinance has
been prepared and is presented to the City council for its
consideration.
The accompanying ordinance amends Municipal Code section
32380 to expand Preferential Parking Zone o. The current parking
Zone 0 includes 22nd street between wilshire Boulevard and
California
Avenue.
The
accompanying
ordinance
enlarges
Preferential Parking Zone 0 to include 21st street between
wilshire Boulevard and California Avenue.
No other changes were
made to this section and all parking restrictions currently set
forth in this Section will apply to all streets in the enlarged
Zone as well.
An initial study was prepared in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Based
upon this initial study, a negative declaration has been
- 1 -
r-E
Si:J 1 1 1990
SEP 1 ~ l'iq~
.
.
prepared. Both documents are attached to this staff Report as
Exhibit A. Notice of preparation of the negative declaration was
given in the manner required by law.
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that:
1. The negative declaration be approved.
2. The accompanying ordinance be introduced for first
reading.
PREPARED BY:
- 2 -
.
.
CA:RMM:rmdl052/hpca
City council Meeting 9-11-90
Santa Monica, California
ORDINANCE NUMBER
(City Council Series)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA AMENDING SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL
CODE SECTION 323S0 TO EXPAND PREFERENTIAL
PARKING ZONE 0
WHEREAS, the Parking and Traffic Engineer has received a
petition requesting the expansion of Preferential parking Zone 0
to include 21st street between wilshire Boulevard and California
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the petition has been verified to be signed by
residents living in two-thirds of the dwelling units comprising
not less than fifty percent (50%) of the developed frontage of
the proposed preferential parking zone; and
WHEREAS, the Parking and Traffic Engineer has undertaken
such studies and surveys deemed necessary to determine whether a
preferential parking zone should be designated in said area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is satisfied that the proposed
area meets the designation criteria set forth in Municipal Code
section 3232A,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MONICA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Santa Monica Municipal Code section 323So is
amended to read as follows:
- 1 -
. .
Section 32380. Preferential Parking
Zone O.
(a) The following named and
described streets within the City shall
constitute Preferential Parking Zone 0:
Twenty-First street and Twenty-Second
street between Wilshire Boulevard and
California Avenue.
(b) No vehicle shall be parked or
stopped adjacent to any curb in
Preferential Parking Zone 0 for longer
than two hours between the hours of 9: 00
a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Mondays through
Saturdays without a permit issued and
displayed in accordance with this Chapter.
(c) Any vehicle parked or stopped
without a permit when required by this
Section may be removed from the street by
any police officer.
(d) The annual fee for each permit
issued for Preferential Parking Zone 0
shall be $15.00 per permit, or such other
fee as may be established from time to
time by resolution of the City Council.
SECTION 2. Any provision of the Santa Monica Municipal
Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of
this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no
- 2 -
.
.
further, are hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary
to affect the provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The city Council hereby
declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each and
every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not
declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether
any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall
attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published once in the official newspaper
within 15 days after its adoption. This Ordinance shall become
effective after 30 days from its adoption.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~ h"\...
ROBERT M. MYERS
City Attorney
~-
- 3 -
.
.
SANTA
MONICA
~j}~'-~~~.
Program & Policy Development 1685 Main Street
Santa Momca. CA 90401 -3295
(213) 458-8585
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR
AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING PREFERENTIAL PARKING ZONES X, M, AND 0
To:
Concerned Persons
From:
The city of Santa Monica
PROJECT LOCATION (Amended streets only):
Zone K:
19th street between Wilshire
Boulevard and California Avenue
Bicknell Avenue between Third and
Fourth street
21st street between wilshire
Boulevard and california Avenue
Zone M:
Zone 0:
PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
An application for a NEGATIVE DECLARATION to carry out the
following project:
Amendments to Preferential Parking Zones K, M. O. Zone K would
be amended to prohibit parking on 19th street between Wilshire
Boulevard and california Avenue between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,
Monday through saturday, except by permit. Zone M would be
enlarged to include Bicknell Avenue between Third and Fourth
streets, where parking would be prohibited for more than two
hours between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. daily, except by permit.
Zone 0 would be enlarged to include 21st street between Wilshire
Boulevard and California Avenue, where parking would be
prohibi ted for more than two hours between 9: 00 a. m. and 6: 00
p. m., Monday through Saturday, except by permit in the city of
Santa Monica, California, having been filed by City of Santa
Monica Parking/Traffic Division, on May 15, 1990, and the
application having been reviewed by the Community and Economic
Development Department in accordance with the procedures
established by Resolution 6694 (CCS), therefore, the Department
hereby finds that:
1. The proposed activity does constitute a project within
the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970, as amended.
.
.
2. The proposed activity is not exempt from the provisions
of such act by reason of being a ministerial,
categorically exempt or emergency activity.
3. The proposed activity does not appear to have a
substantial adverse effect upon the environment.
4. Inasmuch as it can be seen with reasonable certainty
that no substantial adverse effect is involved, no
proper purpose would be served by the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report.
5. A Negative Declaration document is the proper, correct
and appropriate procedure required to assure compliance
with the purpose and intent of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended.
The Department, therefore, has determined that the proposed
project does not have a significant effect on the environment and
that an Environmental Impact Report is not required. FOllowing
the public review period, the decision-making body is required to
consider whether or not a Negative Declaration continues to be
appropriate.
HOW TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The City of Santa Monica encourages public comment on this and
other projects. A copy of the Negative Declaration is available
for your review in the City Planning Division at the address
below and in the office of the City Clerk. If you have comments
about the proposed Negative Declaration, you should forward them
to the City Planning staff so that they can be considered.
DOE DATE FOR COMMENTS
Monday, July 16, 1990
4:00 P.M.
WHERE TO SEND COMMENTS
City Planning Division
1685 Main Street
santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Telephone: (213) 458-8585
Attention: Douglas Kim, Assistant Planner
CITY OF SANTA MON~ . IS No. 90-005
CITY PLANNING DIVI~N
City Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
INITIAL STUDY
~D
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT STATEMENT
DATE FILED 5-15-90
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Applicant City of Santa Monica
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 1685 Main street
Santa Monica, California 90401-3295: 213-458-8291
3. Project Address 17th, 18th, 19th, and 20th streets
between Wilshire and California: Bicknell Avenue
between Third and Fourth Streets: 21st street between
Wilshire Boulevard and california Avenue
Name of Proposal, if applicable Amendments to existinq
Preferential Parking Zones R, M, and O.
4. Initial Study Prepared by Douglas Rim, Ass't Planner
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all answers are required on attached
sheets.)
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
x
b. Extensive disruptions, displace-
ments, compaction or overcovering
of soil?
x
c. Extensive change in topography of
ground surface relief features?
x
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique
geological or physical features?
x
- 1 -
CITY
~ITY
City
OF SANTA MONI.
PLANNING DIVISION
Hall, 1685 Main street,
4It IS No. 90-005
Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
e. considerable increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
x
f. changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the bed of the
ocean or any bay or inlet?
x
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure, or
similar hazards?
x
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. considerable air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
x
x
c. Substantial alteration of air
movement, moisture, or temperature,
or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
x
d. Expose the project residents to
severe air pollution conditions?
x
3. Water. will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the
course of direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
x
b. Extensive changes in absorp-
tion rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of
surface runoff?
x
c. Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
x
- 2 -
CrTY OF SANTA MONr~ . IS No. 90-005
CITY PLANNING DIVI~N
City Hall, 1685 Main Street, santa Monica, california 90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
d. Substantial change in the amount
of surface water in any water
body?
x
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but
not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
x
x
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
x
h. Considerable reduction in the
amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property
to water related hazards such
as flooding or tidal waves?
x
x
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species
or number of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)?
x
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
x
c. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or result in
a barrier to the normal replen-
ishment of existing species?
x
.
- 3 -
CITY OF SANTA MON~
CITY PLANNING DIV~N
'City Hall, 1685 Main street,
. IS No. 90-005
Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
5. Animal Life. will the proposal
result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or number of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or
insects)?
x
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
x
c. Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
x
d. Deterioration of existing fish
or wildlife habitats?
x
6. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of considerable amount of
fuels or energy'?
b. considerable increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of
new sources of energy?
x
x
7. Na~ural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Considerable increase in the rate
of use of any natural resources?
x
b. Considerable depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource?
x
8. Noise. will the proposal result in:
a. considerable increases in existing
noise levels?
x
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
x
- 4 -
CITY OF SANTA MONI~ . IS No. 90-005
CITY PLANNING DIVI~N
City Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
9. Liqht and Glare. Will the proposal
produce considerable new light or glare
from street lights or other sources?
x
10. Shadows. Will the proposal produce
extensive shadows affecting
adjacent uses or property?
x
11. Risk of Upset. will the proposal
involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to,
oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an
accident or upset conditions?
x
b. Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
x
12. Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
x
x
c. Considerable adverse impact on
health care services?
x
13. Population. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Considerable change in the distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
b. The relocation of any persons
because of the effects upon
housing, commercial or industrial
facilities?
x
x
c. The relocation or dislocation
of employment or businesses?
x
- 5 -
CITY OF SANTA HONI. . IS No. 90-005
CITY PLANNING DIVI N
City Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
14. Land Use. will the proposal result in:
-
a. A considerable alteration ot the
present or planned land use of
an area?
x
b. Demolition, relocation, or
remodeling of residential, com-
mercial or industrial buildings
or other facilities?
x
15. Housing. Will the Proposal:
a. Create a considerable demand tor
additional housing?
b. Have a considerable adverse impact
on the available rental housing
in the community?
x
x
16. Right of way. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Reduced lot area?
x
b. Reduced access?
x
c. Reduced off-street parking?
d. Creation of abrupt grade dif-
ferential between public and
private property?
x
x
17. Transportation/Circulation. will
the proposal result in:
a. Generation of considerable
additional vehicular movement?
x
b. Substantial effects on
existinq parking facilities, or
demand for new parkinq?
c. Considerable adverse impact upon
existing bus transit systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods by chanqes
to roadways?
x
x
x
- 6 -
CITY OF SANTA MONI~ . IS No. 90-005
CITY PLANNING DIVI~N
'city Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail
or air traffic?
x
f. Considerable adverse impact on
traffic safety to motorists,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
x
18. utilities. Will the proposal
result in a need for new systems,
or major alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
x
b. communications systems?
e. storm water drainage?
x
X
X
X
c. Water"?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
f. Solid Waste and disposal?
19. pUblic Services. will the proposal
have a considerable effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
x
a. Fire protection?
-X-
l
b. Police protection?
c. schools, including
pre-schools or child care?
x
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
x
e. Maintenance of public facil-
ities, including roads?
l
...!....
f. Other governmental services?
20. construction Effects. will the
proposal have considerable construc-
tion-periOd impacts due to the scope, or
location of construction activities?
x
- 7 -
CITY OF SANTA MON~
CITY PLANNING DIV~ON
. city Hall, 1685 Main street,
. IS No. 90-005
Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
21. Fiscal. Will the proposal have a
considerable fiscal effect on the
City"?
22. Recreation. Will the proposal result
in a considerable impact upon the
quality or quantity of eXisting
recreational opportunities?
l
x
23. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruc-
tion of a prehistoric or his-
toric archeological site?
l
b. will the proposal result in
adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure,
or object?
x
c. Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
x
d. will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential
impact area?
x
24. Aesthetics. Will the proposed
project result in:
a. The obstruction of any scenic
vista or view open to the public?
b. The creation of an aestheti-
cally offensive site open to
public view?
c. The destruction of a stand of
trees, a rock outcropping or
other locally recognized desir-
able aesthetic natural feature?
x
x
x
d. Any substantial negative
aesthetic effect?
x
- 8 -
CITY OF SANTA MONl.
CITY PLANNING DIVI N
.CIty Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, california
.
IS No. 90-005
90401-3295
Yes Maybe No
25. Neighborhoo4 Effects. will the
proposal have considerable effects
on the project neighborhood?
26. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the poten-
tial to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal commun-
ity, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major
periods of California history or
pre-history?
b. Does the project have the poten-
tial to achieve short-term, to
the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
d. Does the project have environ-
mental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly
or indirectly?
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
(See attachment)
IV. DETERMINATION
A Negative Declaration is appropriate.
legal/ef3ppz
05/16/90
- 9 -
x
x
x
x
x
CITY OF SANTA MONI'"
CITY PLANNING DIVI~N
'city Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, California
.
IS No. 90-005
90401-3295
Attachment
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIQ~
AREAS CHECKED "NO"
1. Earth (a,b,c,d,e,f,g)
The amended parking zones do not have geological impacts.
2. Air (a,b,c,d)
The amended zones will not significantly impact air
quality.
3. Water (a,b,c,a,e,f,q,h,i)
The amended zones do not affect bodies of water.
4. Plant Life (a/b,c)
The parking zones do not impact vegetation in the area.
5. Animal Life (a,b,c,d)
The parking zones will not impact animal life.
6. Energy (a,b)
The parking zones will not directly impact energy sources.
7. Natural Resources (a/b)
The parking zones will not impact natural resources.
8. Noise (a,b)
The amended zones will not impact noise significantly.
9. Light ana Glare.
The zones do not create light and glare.
10. Shadows.
The parking zones do not create shadows.
11. Risk of Upset (a/b)
The amended zones will not create hazardous impacts or
impacts to safety.
12. Human Health (a,b,c)
The amended zones will not directly impact human health.
13. population (a,b/c)
The amended parking z ones will not directly impact the
areas' commercial or residential population.
14. Land Use (a,b)
The amended zones will not directly impact land use in the
area.
15. Housing (a,b)
The parking zones will not impact housing.
- 10 -
CITY OF SANTA MONI.
CITY PLANNING DIVI N
city Hall, 1685 Main street,
.
IS No. 90-005
Santa Monica, California 90401-329~
16. Righ~ of Way (a,b,c,d)
The parking zones will not impact any public rights-of-way.
17. Transpor~a~ion/circula~ion (a,b,e,d,e,f)
The amended parking zones will not generate considerable
additional vehicular movement, nor create considerable im-
pacts on existing transit systems, air traffic, or traffic
safety to pedestrians, bicyclists, or motorists. The zones
will not result in substantial effects on existing parking
facilities or create demand for new parking, and will not
resul t in alterations to present patterns of circulation
through any changes to roadways.
18. utilities (a,b,c,d,e,f)
The parking zones will not impact utilities.
19. Public Services (a,b,c,d,e,f)
The amended zones will not create considerable effects on
fire or police protection, schools, parks, maintenance of
roads, or other government services.
20. construction Effec~s
The parking zones have no construction impacts.
21. Fiscal
The amended zones will not have a considerable fiscal
effect on the City.
22. Recreation
The zones do not impact recreational opportunities.
23. Cultural Resources (a,b,c,d)
The parking zones do not impact cultural resources.
24. Aesthetics (a/b/c/d)
The parking zones have no aesthetic impact.
25. Neighborhood Effects.
The impact of the amended parking zones is minimal and will
not have considerable effects on the project neighborhoods.
26. Mandatory Findings of significance
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife popula-
tion to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or species or eliminate important examples of the major
periods at California history or pre-history?
No. The parking zones will not degrade the quality of the
environment or affect native plants or animals.
- 11 -
CITY OF SANTA MONI~ ~
CITY PLANNING DIVIJIIN ..,
City Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California
IS No. 90-005
90401-3295
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term,
to the disadvantage of lonq-term, environmental goals?
No. Zone K will further restrict parking in an existing
four block parking zone, while Zones M and 0 will be ex-
panded to include one additional block each. As the scope
of amendments to all three existing zones is limited, there
is no potential for adverse long-term environmental goals.
c. Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
No. Amendments to all three zones will not individually
result in significant adverse impacts, nor result in
impacts that are cumulatively considerable.
d. Does the proj ect have environmental effects which will
cause substantial ~dverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
No. The zones will no have direct or indirect substantial
adverse effects on humans.
- 12 -
CI~Y OF SANTA MONICA . . IS NO. 90-005
CITY PLANNING DIVISION
City Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
PROPOSED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
An application for a NEGATIVE DECLARATION to carry out the following
project: Amendments to Preferential Parking Zones K, M. O. Zone K would
be amended to prohibit parking on 19th street between Wilshire Boulevard
and California Avenue between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through
Saturday, except by permit. Zone M would be enlarged to include Bicknell
Avenue between Third and Fourth streets, where parking would be prohibited
for more than two hours between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. daily, except by
permit. Zone 0 would be enlarged to include 21st street between Wilshire
Boulevard and California Avenue, where parking would be prohibited for more
than two hours between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday,
except by permit in the City of Santa Monica, California, having been filed
by City of Santa Monica Parking/Traffic Division, on May 15, 1990, and the
application having been reviewed by the Community and Economic Development
Department in accordance with the procedures established by Resolution 6694
(CCS), therefore, the Department hereby finds that:
1. The proposed activity does constitute a project within the
meaning of the california Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended.
2. The proposed activity is not exempt from the provisions of such
act by reason of being a ministerial, categorically exempt or
emergency activity.
3. The proposed activity does not appear to have a substantial
adverse effect upon the environment.
4. Inasmuch as it can be seen with reasonable certainty that no
substantial adverse effect is involved, no proper purpose would
be served by the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report.
5. A Negative Declaration document is the proper, correct and
appropriate procedure required to assure compliance with the
purpose and intent of the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA . . IS NO. 90-005
CITY PLANNING DIVISION
City~Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90401-3295
The Department, therefore, has determined that the proposed project does
not have a significant effect on the environment and that an Environmental
Impact Report is not required. Following the public review period, the
decisionmaking body is required to consider whether or not a Negative
Declaration continues to be appropriate.
Date:
IY/9/90
1tMt/~
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
Date:
C;,11!9v
Vl.'LL LU..A_V!1;-f!l-L -<.--- . - . _
DIRECTORj~COMMuNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
legal/ef5pz
06/05/90
CITY
CITY
t City
OF SANTA MONl.
PLANNING DIVISION
Hall, 1685 Main street,
.
Santa Monica, California
90401-3295
CERTIFICATION OF FINAL INITIAL STUDY
AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION
DATE July 25, 1990
PROJECT TITLE
Preferential Parking Zones K, M, 0
APPLICATION NUMBER
INITIAL STUDY NUMBER 90-005
This hereby certifies that this Final Initial study and Negative
Declaration was completed in compliance with the C~lifornia
Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the
city of Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines.
~~~
signature
ASSrJta.~f fral\A eY
Title
eflOppzl
07/26/90
CITY OF SANTA MON
CITf PLANNING DIV N
. city Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, Cal
EIR No.
90401-3295
.
DETERMINATION
Project Title: Amendments to Preferential Parking Zones
K, M, and 0
Project Addresses: 17th, 18th, 19th, and 20th streets bit
Wilshire and California; Bicknell Avenue
bit Third and Fourth; 21st street bit
Wilshire and California
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project could not have a
significant effect on the environment, and a
Negative Declaration will be prepared.
x
I find that although the proposed project could
have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this
case because the mitigation measures described on
an attached sheet have been added to the project.
A Negative Declaration will be prepared.
I find the proposed project may have a significant
effect on the environment, and an Environmental
Impact Report is required.
Date
'I' /~t>
~~
Director of Planning
Date
fc/Y/7U
,
)1LL~~L~L&------
Director,) Community and Economic
Development Department
legal/ef4ppz
05/16/90