Loading...
SR-416-000-01 (5) , . . /1-P OCT 2 8 1986 CM:JG:dvm Council Meeting: 10/28/86 Santa Monica, California tj I tR ,,- OtJO- tf) / TO: Mayor and city council FROM: city Staff SUBJECT: Summary of Findings of Organizational Review of the Building and Safety Division and Recommendations for staffing and Administrative Procedures Modifications INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the findings of a recently completed organizational analysis of the Building and Safety Division. In addition, recommendations are made for modifications in Division staffing and administrative procedures. BACKGROUND In the spring of 1985, the Director of community and Economic Development (C/ED) and the Building Officer requested that a review of the Building and Safety Division be conducted by the Management services Division of the city Manager 1 s Office, in cooperation with the Administrative Division of ClEO. Such analyses are conducted periodically as a tool for reassessing management priorities. The objectives of this organizational review included: 1) performance assessment of the Division to determine extent of client satisfaction and quality of services provided by staff; 2) review of work systems to determine adequacy and - 1 - II-p OCT 2 8 1386 appropriateness ~f case management, tlterwork control, performance standards, and formal appeals boards procedures; 3) review of staffing for evidence of workload problems, need for additional training and necessity of current 4-10 work schedule; and 4) review of internal organizational structure with regard to supervisory control, delegation of authority and responsibility, formal evaluation procedures, and opportunities for advancement. Questionnaires, interviews, observations, telephone survey of clients, and comparison with other cities were the basic data collection methods used. staff members of the Building and Safety Division were extremely cooperative in providing data, answering countless questions in the context of formal questionnaires, field ride-alongs, in-house consultations, work systems orientations and informal conversations. Community and Economic Development Administrative Division staff members were actively involved in all aspects of data collection and evaluation. FINDINGS OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL REVIEW The organizational review revealed that Santa Monica's Building and Safety Division is considered by many clients to be one of the best operations of its kind in the Los Angeles Area. The Division is fortunate to have several staff members who are recognized experts in their respective inspection fields, and to be directed by a Building Official widely respected by his peers - 2 - and clients for.s extensive training a. expertise in the building field. Results of a telephone survey of 32 local property owners, architects and contractors revealed that 73% were satisfied and 20% were highly satisfied with the overall services delivered by the Division. In addition, 66% rated Santa Monica's services as better than that of many other surrounding jurisdictions. However, several findings pointed to the need for modifications in Division staffing and administrative procedures. First, the current ongoing inspection workload is such that complaint and business license inspections and inspection-related paperwork are not dealt with in as timely a manner as possible. The skills of an administrative position could be utilized to insure more efficient processing of paperwork which would, in turn, free up the inspection staff to complete more inspections. Second, currently the Division employs Senior Inspectors and a Supervi sing Inspector, but has no junior inspector pes i tions . This lack of stratification limits promotional opportunities for inspectors and does not allow for the recruitment of less experienced staff. Third, the 4-10 work schedule is costly to the city due to the need to pay overtime rates to many Inspectors who regularly work a fifth day, and results in reduced staffing on Mondays and Fridays which happen to be the heaviest workload days. While the early morning hours provide an important service to the building industry whose normal working day traditionally begins before 8:00 am and concludes by 4:00 pm, the late - 3 - afternoon hours ,: 00 pm - 5: 30 pm) are Iy lightly used by clients. Fourth, no comprehensive written information regarding new construction and property remodeling is available to the public which outlines the procedures and policies of the city's Building and Safety Division, Planning Division, General Services and Fire Departments. Fifth, because each division responsible for plan check (Planning, General services, Building and Safety and Fire) has its own internal plan check procedures and area of expertise, a representative of the one division may not be able to answer all questions from the public regarding the status of plan check in another division or the building requirements enforced by other divisions, and, in a few cases, inconsistent plan checking occurs. Finally, the Division currently has no way to contact Inspectors while they are in the field, particularly in the event of an emergency. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT Based on the findings of the organizational review, city staff make the following recommendations for improvement of the Building and Safety Division: 1) Addition of a Permit Coordinator position to assist in redesigning paperwork procedures, to coordinate complaint and business license inspections, and to coordinate inter-departmental plan check processes with Planning, General services and Fire Divisions to insure - 4 - prompt, .orOUgh and consistent pIn checking across responsible divisions. 2) Reclassification, upon retirement, of 3 Senior Building Inspector positions to Building Inspector. This will expand the promotional hierarchy in the Division. 3) Elimination of the current 4-10 work schedule and return to a 5-8 schedule with daily hours from 7:30 am to 4:30 pm. By opening at 7: 30, the needs of the building industry will continue to be met without the inefficiencies of the 4-10 system of operation. The Department of C/ED and the Personnel Department will meet and confer with the appropriate bargaining unit representatives regarding this change. 4) Initiate a compensation study to evaluate market salary comparisons for Inspector positions; and recommend compensation adjustments if required. 5) Preparation of a comprehensive guide to property development in Santa Monica whiCh will be made available to the public at the counters operated by Building and Safety, Planning and General Services. 6) Increased cross-training of all counter staff in Building and Safety, Planning and General Services in all planning, zoning and building code related procedures and policies. - 5 - 8) 7) Initiati. of an inter-department' plan check team which will meet on a weekly basis to insure that all plan corrections noted by various divisions are discussed and clarified. The proposed Permit Coordinator would be responsible for coordinating team functions. In the short-term, purchase walkie-talkies to enable contact with Inspectors while they are in the field. In the future, City cars with radios should be provided to Inspection field staff. BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT At this time, allocation of $13,563 from the non-departmental contingency account # 01-700-274-000-785 to account #01-200-321-000-804 is required to purchase 11 walkie-talkies to enable communication with field staff. RECOMMENDATION REQUIRING COUNCIL APPROVAL It is requested that Council approve recommendations: following the 1) Authorize the creation of a Permit Coordinator position for the Building and Safety Division and direct staff to make the necessary budget adjustments in the mid-year budget review. 2) Authorize the reclassification, upon retirement, of three Senior Building Inspector positions to Building - 6 - Inspecto. and direct staff to make4lte necessary budget adjustments in the mid-year budget review. 3) Authorize the allocation of $13,563 from the non-departmental contingency account #01-200-321-000-804 for the purchase of 11 walkie-talkies for Building and Safety staff. PREPARED BY: Julia Griffin Senior Management Analyst (bldgdpt) Attachments - 7 - . - -. Plan CheCk. I Englneer . . Attachment I Buildinq and safety Division Formal Orqanizational structure I Building j Officer rASsistantj Building Officer 16 Staff J Assistant II (2) Supervising Inspector Senlor Inspectors (7) . ~uildinq and Safety . Proposed Organizational Chart t staff Assistant J (2) Supervising Inspector I Senior I Building Inspector I Senior Building Inspector r Building 1 Inspector t BUildingl Officer 1 ~ Assistant , I Senior Building Inspector . J Senior 1 Building Inspector I Building I Inspector r Building Llnspector - 8 - Attachment II Plan Check Eng ineer _ Permit coord1inator ~ tJI~,;I' staff Ass,t.k'. V1uJ-' III JI tv . '1 ~t J., ~ r)>V tf'J ":V / cr / " / II