SR-8-A (20)
811
SEP 9 2980'
CA:SSS:BLB:bl
Councll Meetlng 9/9/80
Santa Monlca, Callfornla
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Mayor and City Councll
FROM:
Clty Attorney
SUBJECT:
Proposed Ordlnance Relatlng to Reports of
ReSldentlal BUllding Records
INTRODUCTION
ThlS report transffilts for flrst readlng a proposed
ordlr.ance requlrlng as part of a report of resldentlal bUlldlng
records pertlnent lnfor~atlon wlth respect to the bUlldlng's
stat~s under the Santa Monlca Rent Control Law. The Councll
dlrected the Clty Attorney to prepare the proposed ordlnance
at lts March 26, 1980 meetlng, contlnued from ltS March 25,
1980 neetlng, Item 13-D,
BACKGROUND
Sectlons 9201 through 9205 of the Santa Monlca Munlclpal
Cdde requlre that, prlor to sale or exchange, a report of
resldentlal bUllding records pertalnlng to the subJect pro?erty's
authorlzed use, occupancy, and zoning classlficatlon be furnlshed
to a buyer of a resldentlal buildlng. Presently, the report
does not provlce any lnformatlon relatlng to the status of the
bUllcLng or any of ltS unlts under the prOVlslons of the Santa
MO~lca Rent Control Law, Artlcle A~III of the Clty Charter,
8fJ
SEP 9 '980
The proposed ordlnance amends Sectlons 9203 and 9204
to lnclude In the report lnformatlon from rent control records
relatlng to the number of unlts, the reglstratlon status, the
eXe~?tlon status, any appl1catlon for, approval of, or denlal of
a re~oval permlt, or a vested rlght clalm for the subJect
?~operty, and any Iltlgatlon affectlng the character of the property.
The processlng fee is lncreased from $10 to $15 to cover
t~e added cost for the Rent Control Admlnlstratlon to reVlew
Lts records and transmlt the lnformatlon to the Dlrector of
Plannlng.
A form for use by the Rent Control Admlnlstrator 1S in
~reparatlon, as lS a reV1Slon of the report form used by the
Dlrector of Plannlng, in order to lncorporate the rent control
data. It should be noted that the rent control data May dlsclose
a greater number of unlts than the Plannlng Department
establlshes for the subJect property. This lssue wl11 be re-
solved at some tlme In the future, but that resolutlon lS not
necessary for ~assage of thlS ord~nance.
ALTERNATIVES
T~e proposed ordlnance requlres lncluslon of certaln rent
8ontrol lnformatlon In the report of reslaentlal bU11dlng records
prlor to the sale or exchange of all resldentlal bUlldlngs,
l~cludlng ~ultlple dwelllngs, bUlldlngs that have
been converted to condominlums, and lnolvldual unlts that have
been converted ~o condo~lnlums.
or amend the proposed ordlnance.
The Councll may accept, reJect,
-2-
RECOp~ENDATION
It 15 respectfully recommended the C1ty Counc1l lntroduce
thlS oIdlnance amend1ng the requlred contents of reports of
resldent1al bU1ldlng records to 1nclude certa1n 1nformatlon
wlth respect to the bU1ld1ng's status under the Santa Mon1ca
Rent Control Law.
prepared by: Stephen Shane Stark, Act1ng City Attorney
Bettylou BOIovay, Deputy City Attorney
-3-
CA:SSS:BLB:bl
Councll rieetlno 8/12/80
Santa Monlca, Callfornla
Ordlnance No.
:Clty Councll Serles)
An ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
TEE CITY OF SANTA r10NICE A!lI:~.JDn~G
CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE IX Of' THE SA:\'TA
:-1011ICA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATI::\'G TO
REPORTS OF RESIDLNTIAL BUILDING
RSCORDS
WHEREAS, the current code regulatlons requlre that, pr~or
tc sale or exchange of a resldentlal bUllclng, a report of the
resldentlal bUlldlng record showlng use, occupancy, and zonlng
class~flcatlo~ of such property be obtalned and dellvered by
~he owner to the buyer; and
Tf'JHEREAS, the purposes of thlS report are to lnform the
qran~ee of a resldentlal bUllding of Matters of Clty record and
to alert the unwary buyer to posslble restrlctlons on the use
of property; and
WHLREAS, the possible uses of a resldentlal bUlldlng may
be restrlcted by the provlslons of the Rent Control Law, Artlcle
XVIII of the Clt~ Charter; and
T1HERLAS, the proposed amend@ents would notlfy a prospectlve
buyer of t~e status of a resldentlal bUlldlng by lDcludlng
\...It.....nn t.he re(]:ll-,,"ed report such lnforrnatlon as the number of
rental unlts that are controlled, the reg~strat~on status of the
bUl1dlng, dnd whether the owner of such property has sought,
recelved, or been denled a removal pernlt, vested right, or
eXeITptlon fro~ the Rent Control Board and, wher~ appllcable,
a condomlnlum converSLon or cOndltlonal use per~Lt fro~ the
CltYi and
~~EREAS, the proposed amendments are In the publlC interest,
convenlence, and general welfare, and should be adopted
THE Cl'I'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ~'100lICA DOES ORDAeJ:
SECTIOJ:>i 1.
Sect Lon 9203 of the Santa Monlca Mun1Clpal
Code 1S hereby amended to read as follows:
Report Requlred.
-
PYlOr to enterlng lnto an "agreement of
sale" 8r exchange of any residentlal bU1ldlng, 1ncludlng
any bUl1dlng or portlon thereof In Wh1Ch rental unlts
~2ve been converted to condoffilnlums, or transferr1ng
a~y ~nterest there1n, the owner or h1S or her authorized
representnt1ve shall obtaln from the Clty a report of
the reS1cent1al bU1ldlng record showlng the regularly
3.U-::'.iOr :-zed llse, occupancy, zon1ng clasSlflcatlon of such
proper~y, and status of the unlt or unlts under the
prOV1slons of the Santa Monlca Rent Control Law, Artlcle
XVIII of the Santa Non~ca C1ty Charter. The Rent Control
30ard shall deterM1ne, for purposes of thlS report, the
nunber o~ rental unlts sltuated on such property, whether
~hose UD1tS are properly reg1stered, whether the un1ts are
exe~pt =rom prov1s2ons of the Rent Control Law, whether the
owner of those unlts has sought, recelved, or been den1ed a
removal permlt or vesteG rlght cla1m for any or all of the
unlts, and the status of any lltlgat10n affectlng the char-
acter of the property.
Sa1d report shall be valld for a
?erlod not to exceed SlX (6) months froM date of lssue.
-2-
SLCTION 2. Sectlon 9204 of the Santa Mon1ca Munlclpal
Code lS hereby amended to read as follows:
Appllcatlon. Upon appllcatlon of the owner or hlS or her
authorlzed agent and the pay~ent to the Clty of a fee of
F1fteen and ~o Cents Dollars ($15.00), the Adrnlnlstrator
of Rent Control shall reVlew rent control records and
transnlt the relevant informatlon to the Dlrector of
Plannlng. 7he Dlrector shall reVlew pertlnent Clty
records ar-d dellver to the appllcant a report of reslden-
tlal bU11clng records which shall conta1n the followlng
lnfornatlon 1nsofar as It 1S avallable:
a. The street acdress and legal descrlptlon of subJect
propertYi
b. The zone classlflcatlon and authorlzed use as set
forth lh thlS codei
c. ~he occu?ancy as lndlcated and establ1shed by permlts
of record;
c. Varlances, condltlonal use permlts, exceptlons, and
other pertlnent leglslative acts of record;
e. Any speclal restrlct10ns 1n use or development WhlCh
may apply to the subJect property; and
~. The character of the subJect property as deterMlned
by the Rent Control Board, 1ncludlng the number of
~nlts, the reglstratlon status, the exernptlon status,
any appllcatlon for, approval of, or denlal of a re~oval
permlt or vested r1ght, and the status of any l~tlgat~on
affectln~ the character of the property,
-3-
~
SECTION 3. Any provls~on of the Santa Monlca Mun~clpal
Code or appendlces thereto lnconslstent therew1th, to the extent
of such lnconslstencles and no further, are hereby repealed or
nodlfled to that extent necessaxy to effect the provlslons of
thlS ord.1nance.
SECTION 4.
If any sectlon, subsectlon, sentence, clause,
or ?hrase of th1s ord1nance lS for any reason held to be lnvalld
or unconst1tutlonal by a decislon of any court of any competent
Jurlsd1ct10r., such declslon shall not affect the valldlty of
the rema1nlng portlons of the ordlnance.
The City Councll hereby
declares that It would have passed th15 ordlnance and each and
evexy section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not
declared lnvalld or unconstltut1onal wlthout regard to whether
any portlon of the ordinance would be subsequently declared 10-
valld or unconstltutlonal.
SEC?IO~l 5.
The Mayor shall slgn and the Clty Clerk shall
attest to the passage of thlS ordlnance.
The Clty Clerk shall
cause the sa~e to be published once 1n the offlc1al newspaper
w1thl~ 15 days after lts adoptlon. The ordlnance shall become
effectlve after 30 days from lts adoptlon.
APPROVED AS TO FOill1:
~~5i- S~
STL?H~N SHANE S'.:'ARK -
Actlng Clty Attorney
-4-
PORTION OF MDJUTES OF CITY COUNCIL NEETING OF SEPTEl'1BER 10,
1980
Agenda Iten 8-A: Ordlnance for 1ntroauctlon regard1ng reports of
Resldentlal BUlldlng records.
Staff report presented.
Cm Jennlngs:
I
RXXKKX~XXHX I have flrst an observatlon and then
a few ~H questlons. Flrst of all, I am the one who brought this up, and
thlS lS a lot more ambitlouS than what I had ln m1nd. I had In mln d
somethlng that was a lot slmpler than thlS. Secondly, some questlons,
we already have g~m~Kkxn thlS klnd of thlng on the books. Is lt
routlnely 19nored?' 1.; ~~J~
KV'i\P4\ ~
Clty Attorn~y:QJY~ I don't belleve that 1t 15 rout1nely ignored, no.
Cm Jennlngs:
-'-
Then why ~s 1t that your ant~clpatlng that thlS
one wlll be 1mposslble to X~N0X~ enforce.
S:lty Attorney:
I should pOlnt out, that I N~XN~K personally do
not antlclpate that some people who calmly call up our offlce up about
proposed ordlnances or talk to us about proposed ordlnance make a
statement, well If they have to go through the Rent Control Board at
all they wlll Just 19nore it. I don't know whether 1t 15 true or not
and lt lS lmposs1ble to predlct that, 11m Just relaY1ng the concern that
15 not in the staff report.
Cm Jenn1ngs:
I
Personally, what I wanted vvas not, I G1Gn I t want
any approval fromfue Rent Control Board and I dldnlt want us to get
lnto the status of saYlng the REnt entrol Board shall do thlS and not
do somethlng else, cause then we got the whole problem about we can't
really tell them what to do anyway. All I wanted was the report to say
Just what lt'S status was vis a V1S Rent Control. Do they have,
not whether they need a vested rights perm1t or exempt10n or anyth1ng
else, Just do they have 1t, and that's it? It seems to me that lS
all gOlng to be dlsclosed by the th1ng that gets flIed w1th the Plann1ng
Departmetn or BUlldlng Departmnt, before they get the1r flnal perm1t,
llke the condo convers lon permlt or condomlnlUffi perm1t, If that lsn't
flIed, then they must not have It. And I really don't th1nk we need to
get all th1S complicated. How many unlts there are, and all thlS other
k1nd of stuff, status of Ilt1gatlon, I thlnk that gets to be a b1t much,
alot more expenslve than what I had In mlnd, and I don't thlnk for ry
purposes, WhlCh Just was to let, you know have a slmple report that adds one
Ilttle th1ng to what we are alerdy doing in the C1ty, to let any perspect1ve
purchaser know whether he 15 bUYlng a glagantlc headache or whether
all permlts that illlght have to be obtalned, have been obtalned, and not
any deterI'Unatlon whether they have to be obtalned ~xxwRe:1diHX or don It
have to be obtalned or anythlng llke that, Just whether or not they
have been obtalned.
Cffi Reed: I dldn't even recall that we asked for this, and
_~I
I have several questlons that came to mlnd ln readlng thlS and I am
surprised the ~ayor tells ne there lS nobody to speak on thlS ordlnance.
Due to the detall wiuch \ve propose to have In th1S report, the, 1. t occurs
to ne that there wlll probably be some llab1llty on the C1ty'S part or
the REnt Contrl Board's part, 1f errors are made 1.n the reports as we
all know 15 entlrely posslble, and If persons are purchaslng property
based on what they read In the reports, then I an very nervous about that
1f ln fact the clty lS ln a posltlon or the Rent Control Board 1S 1n a
posltlon of alledglng A when In fact B turns out to be the case, then
the person who bOught the property cones In and says you did me In and
d-
and now you should pay me or buy thls property or whatever. That lS one
concern that I have, I have a concern about the t1me 1t w1ll take for this
report to work its way through the beauracrat1c channels.
I have some
concerns about the, how th1S system 1S gOlng to work, from the point of
view of the consumer. A person w1shes to buy a 4-unit apartment
/
bUllding. Wlll thls report be requ~red before closes escrow, How does
the consumer seller and the buyer, where does xNeXXmpKg~ th1S report
1mpact the bU1ng and sell1ng process of a un1t. Now we have a single
famlly dwell1ng next door to my slngle fam1ly dwell1ng, and that slngle
fam1ly dwell1gn has been a rental Slnce we've occup1ed our home. Now,
1t was recently sold, the tenants were eVlcted, lt now appears that
the new owners are XRXXagXX~~XH~ gOlng to In fact use 1t as a rental
although the word was put out 1n the ne1ghborhood that they were gOlng
to occupy, however 1t lS clear to me that 1S not happen1ng.
So, I can
see that there, someone 1S attempt1ng, undoubtedly, to avo1d some rent
control regulartlon here. Although, I certalnly couldn't say who. ~Jho
knows II the seller, what the seller told the buyer or what the buyer
intended when he bought 1t from the seller and what the buyer told the
seller. And the city 1S gOlng to get 1nvolved 1n th1S process in SOMe
fashion and Just for us to have an ord1nance 1S not gOlng to nake me
happy, I need to knrn~ how does th~s nffi~ la,v lIT-pact that consumer process
of bUYlng and sell1ng property? How lS It gOlng to work therough the
whole escrow bus1ness and all the rest of It? And are read estate agents
gOlng to be eth1cally llable or respons1ble and I have all those qUest10ns
Wh1Ch 1f none of those pe ople are here to talk to us, we aren't going
to be able to get answered tonlght, and so I am not going to vote for
thls tonight becasue I think it needs a 11ttle more alr1ng 1n the publlc
sector, and that sector of the econo~y \lho deals w1th these real
3
estate transact1ons.
em Rhoden:
Yeah, I tlunk I I ve got most of the same questlons
.
that live Just heard, and re1terate it.
I as well donlt thlnk that 1t needs
to so spec1flc, and 1t could, I'm not qU1te sure what the report does
other than say that the bUlld1ng 1S what is already zoned in a certaln
way or something to that nature, I guess. And if that 15 the case it
slmply to say that th1S bUlld1ng needs to be registered under the rent
board alw.ost m1ght be suff1eient and then it 15 up to the consumer to
flnd out If 1n fact lt lS proper, and then while I was th1nk lUg that
I thought 1t should also say whether or not lt 1S 1U a h1stor1cal d1strlct
or has been des1guated as a landnark or If 1t 1S In the Coastal Zone, so
that the consumer themselves can undertake the processes to f1nd out
if the varlOUS zon1ug regualtlons that 1mp act them are somethlng they
want to deal w1th, rather than saY1ng that means thlS, that and the other,
they can then undertake lt to schools or whatever.
C:u Jennings:
Well, what we have r1ght now, Sectlon 9203, says,
prlor to enterlng lnto an agreewent of sale, or exchange of res1dentlal
bUlldlng, Wh1Ch lucludes condos, aprtmnt bU1ld1UgS, and houses wlth
bootleg un1ts and so forth, the owner or h1S authorized representatlve,
Wh1Ch I assume would be his agent, shall obtaln from the Clty a report
of the Res1dent1al BU1ldlng records showlng the regularly author1-zed use
occupancy and zon1ng classif1caton of such property, the report shall H~K
be valld for a perlod not to exceed. and then at the very end,
9205
says,the report of Residentlal BU1ld1ng records shall be dellvered by
theowenr or the autho4lzed deslgnated representat1ve of the owner, to the
buyer or the transferee of the ReSldent1al Building, prlor to the
conSu~atlon of the sale or exchange. So, what I had lU mlnd w as adding
to the ISlt of th1ngs that are gOlng to be 1n the rpeot, merely, what you
i
ment~oned about the, whether or not it has been reg~stered w~th the
rent control board and what the status of any necessary perm~ts are.
I agree w~th llrB. Reed and also MrB. Rhoden, I thlnk there should be
some fact to the staff to redraft and make it considera-ble less
comprehenslve. I am always sorry to see the staff do to 0 much
work on somethlng. It lS nlce to ESBSS see the staff do too much work
on something. But, I really think that lt should be much less
corrprehenslve in terms of what has to be done. r think If it lS
Just statlng whether somehting has been done, not whether It has
to be aonel but whether lt has been done does not glve any llablllty
to the Clty. For example, the bootleg UDltS sltuatlon, not whether
it has to be reglstered or lt doesn't have to be reglsterd, Just lt
hasn't been reglstered.
em Reed: It seems to me that Mr. Jenings could be met admlnistratively
by tYPlng a couple sentences at the top of thlS report that we already
lssue. Which sentences would say someth1ng to the effect that the
Clty of Sata MOnlca has a rent control system. Resldentlal unlts lf they
have been prevlously rneted are ~egulated by that systen and you should
check wlth the REnt Control Board at X,Y, Z address and phone number. Then
we don't need to allege any thlng at all and we leave lt up to the person
who lS bUYlnt the property If 1n fact it was an owner occupled or
a rented property. And I don't see as how we need to get ourselves
any further lnvolved than a not1f1catlon.
Cm Scott: r'm not at all sure that we should be ln the business
of furnlshlng the info4matlon at all. It seems to me that if we want to
perform a serVlce for the potential purchaser, perhaps what we should
do lS prepare a checkllst of questions that shuld concern any purchaser
of property, and suggest to them that they obtain answers to those
)
quest~ons ~n wr~t~ng from the seller. Whether they have then soneth~ng
to move on lf they have been m~slead or as a matter of fact, the record
has been falslf~ed. For us to do more than that, I Just really don;t
thlnk that lS the funct~on of the Clty because what we are do~ng and
much of thlS we are expresslng the Judgemetn on a factual lssue and that
Judgement may be good or bad and I don't really thlnk we should do It.
City Manager: Your honor, for my clarlf~cat~on, perhaps ~t ~~NX~X
would be helpful lf I understood better the purpose of the provislons. I
th~nk we were probably, or I was probably labor~ng underlng the ~mpression
that the two goals were assumedxM~XXHXg~xxNHmEaXX~Ne to -e achleved
by thlS. Nurber one to place a perspectlve buyer on notlce concernlng the
propert~es that relates to the REnt Control ord~nance, and number two,
to allow the Rent Control B~Hxex staff an opportun~ty to check and see
~= in fact the property ~s reglstered and If not requlre lt to become
reglstered. If I am m~sunderstanding the goals then perhaps a restateIT-etn
of the goal would be helpful.
en Jennlngs: Well, frankly what really happened here was that
thlS was someth~ng that we did a long t~me ago, we sent ~t to staff a lon0,
long t~me ago and what we do with respect to condo convers ~ons and condos
has changed Slnce then, tve didn't really get around to the concept of the
condo covers ~on perm1t and what we were go~ng to do w~th respect to
Kaat the lssuance of that, and requlrelng sonething from the Rent Control
Board unt~l after thlS was sent to the staff, so perhaps some of the
concerns we had has been alald by what lS be~ng done now wlth respect ot
condo convers ~ons. I thlnk perhaps the purpose that I had in brlnglng
the thlng up ~n the flrst place was not so much as the convenlence of the
Rent Control Board as It was to put the buyer on notlce of what has or
~
has not been done w1th respect to possible need to comply wlth someth1ng
~av1ng to do w1th the Rent Control Law. Perhaps a consumer checkl1st
m1ght be a more useful thlng along w1th the approprlate numbers for
the person to call or address to co~e to. To check and ~ake sure the
buyer
actually, excuse me the seller actually telllng the truth to
the buyer, as Mr. Scott has suggested.
C1ty ATTOrney:
..
Indeed, lt was never theunderstand1ng of our off1ce
that th1S ord1nance was lntended to do anything other than not1fy buyers
or the fact that there was rent control. Once, the ~X~ ... product was
generated, that staff d1scuss1ons to a spec1ficat1on of the lnformat1on
that ~ight be useful. I agree am not part1cularly push1ng th1s ord1nance,
I agree that a consumer checkllst that does not require an ordlnance.
In ffilght 1n llght of our current posse, serve Just as well as long as
the consumer 1S made aware of 1t, If that 1S acceptable, 1t apparently
seems acceptable.
Cm Yanatta Goldway: I would move that we d1rect the C1ty Attorney ane
the C1ty Manager to develop a consuw er checkl1st, WhlCh would be
attached to the proper forros and that such lists be brought to us for
our approval at the next Cauncll meetlng. Is that posslble or wlll It
take
too long? ~ 'lnc.~.
Nanager: t,).' I ~.,ould prefer to
have a Ilttle more lead tlne
City
than that.
c~ Yanatta Goldway: A month from now. We could dlrect you to Just do
lt, but I th1nk we would all llke to see 1t before 1t gets done.
Clty Attorn~~:
I don1t thlnk we could get it done by the next Council
meetlng, we might want to take a 11ttle blt of care ln aeslgnlng thlS th1ng.
l
Cm Yanatta Goldway: It seems to me that If It lS simple enough, It could
..
be on the Consent Calendar for let's say a month from now, or something
llke that so we can Just see theform and know that you are going to
be attachlng It.
Is that acceptable to perople as a Notlon?
Cm Reed:
.
Slnce thls has the potent1al of lmpactlng alot
of consumer transactlons in the communlty, I would llke to suggest
that we lnvolve a representatlve of the Board of Realtors In an lnfor~al
way so they are part of thls process, at least allowlng then to subm1t
suggestlons for conslderat1on for thlS checkl1st.
Clty Attornev:
. I
of the co~~un1ty 1ncludlng Board of Realtors and consumer groups.
I would thlnk that we would contact all, segments
Cm Reed:
Flue.
em ,Tel}nlnos_:
I was Just gOlng to suggest, I thlnk Mr. Lunsford
has some lnput to make on thls, and why donlt we hear what he has to say,
thlS lS hlS Job.
Lunsford:
ThlS ordinance has been on the books for a nuwber of
years and lS not routlnely disregarded and lt does serve an lTIportant
purpose and that lS not speclflcally consumer protection, it lS pX~XR<<XX~N
speclflcally to prevent collUslon between the seller the buyer and the
broker. It has over the years been an lmportant XR part of the zonlng
enforcement. Becasue the sheet, WhlCh I thlnk you probably have been
prov1ded wlth that reqUlres flrst the seller to ask the zon1ng department
for the current zonlng, the current number of authorized unlts and the
current number of maXlnum unlts that could be bUllt on that property. It
15 the fl4rst sect1on. The second sectlon 15 fllled out by the Plann1ng
Deparmtnet w1th that 1nformatlon and then the buyer slgns that, there are
three caples, one 15 filed wlth us. A year later when the property 15
belng ll1egally rented or pr10r to the problem of what was ll1egal and what
9-.,
wasn't. But ~llegally rented, we had proof that the buyer knew at the
tlffie that he only had three units and not four. Because prlor
before this ordinance was in effect, what the buyer sa2d was why the
broker and the seller told me I could do it, I d~dn't know, I was lnnocent.
And that lS what that is for, so a checkl~st wlll not serve that purpose,
and that 15 an lmportant purpose.
Cm Yanatta Goldway: I don't thlnk we're throwing out your existlng law
by slmply decllnlng on that statement ltlS status of the Rent Control
Board.
Lunsford:
And two years ago when the question, or threee years
ago, when the Councll consldered expandlng th15 program to lnclude
greater cons~er protectlon, lncludlng lnspectlon by the BUlldlng Dept.,
of the unlts that was opposed b~xxHaxx~>>g very strongly by the Real Estate
lndustry or Profess lon+*xhax becasue they were now enterlng lnto
guarenteelng for one year an lnsurlng bUlldlngs that they were selllng.
I aw. concerned about the loss of that legal protection.
C~ Yanatta Goldway: We won't take lt away, the ldea 15 si~ply to add a
checkllst at that procedure and perhaps somehtlng on the form that says
I received the consumer checkllst, so that we have an lndlcatlon that they
have gotten the lnformatlon about other laws that might pertaln to thelr
propertles.
Clty Manager:
I was Just gOlng to comment that the Council, If the
Councll does not adopt that, the eXlstlng ordlnance would remlan In
ef=ect, and the checkllst would be generated and brought back to the
Councll for approval as an Admin15tratlve Item at a subsequent Counell
rneetl.ng.
Cn Reed:
We now have that motlon on the floor now&
- -
1
Cm Yanatta Goldway: My motlon lS to have staff prepare a checklist and
I
to brlng It back to us for our reVlew a month from now and thatthe
checkllst should be attac hed to the current procedure In some fashlon.
Mayor Bambrick:
II
Mrs. Yanatta moved lS ther e a second?
<;;m Rppn ~
Second.
Navor lln",l-,=',:",K:
Any further dlscusslon on Mrs. Yanatta's motion,
hearlng none, all those In favor say ay €.
Unanimously approved 6-0
(with C~ van den Steenhoven absent)
LC---,r ~--vQ.
\b
./
No Carbon '\lecessarv
TO BE COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE
EXPIRES IN SIX MONTHS
INSTRUCTIONS:
The owner or agent wIll fill In Part I and send 0//3 copies along with a $10.00 filmg fee (make checks payable to City
of Santa Monica) to the Director of Planning, Oty of Santa Momca. 1685 Main Street, Santa MOnIca, California
90401. (A stamped, self-addressed return envelope IS required.)
Fee Paid
Date'
Receipt No.
Make checb I'8)'11ble 10
CIlY of Santa MORICI. (SIO 00 per report)
PART I
APPLICATION FOR REPORT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RECORD
Director of Planning. City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street
Santa Monka, California 90401
In compliance With Chapter 2. Article IX of the Santa Monica Murncipal Code, I request a Report of
a ReSidential Building Record for the following property: Please Pn'''tor Ty~
Street Address
Legal DescnptlOn
Legal Owner
Signature or Owner or Aulhonmd Representalive
Date
Mallmg Address
n .. ftT IT
"'1if1e\t> ~~~,
1. ,~~~ ;r:Jt1"fWf~
;
.
:;j'f.1'qf" "'?'fr>.:mo-
J . ,
I, ~'1,
I
..
,
'-"''It..
i
{~
\ , \
\ , ,
.
\ , ., f l t
\ , r
, !
'.
'~
\
~
-~~
. ~ .'. - ~~~~
... - - ~ . iT
t- "'i~o>
"