Loading...
SR-8-A (20) 811 SEP 9 2980' CA:SSS:BLB:bl Councll Meetlng 9/9/80 Santa Monlca, Callfornla STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and City Councll FROM: Clty Attorney SUBJECT: Proposed Ordlnance Relatlng to Reports of ReSldentlal BUllding Records INTRODUCTION ThlS report transffilts for flrst readlng a proposed ordlr.ance requlrlng as part of a report of resldentlal bUlldlng records pertlnent lnfor~atlon wlth respect to the bUlldlng's stat~s under the Santa Monlca Rent Control Law. The Councll dlrected the Clty Attorney to prepare the proposed ordlnance at lts March 26, 1980 meetlng, contlnued from ltS March 25, 1980 neetlng, Item 13-D, BACKGROUND Sectlons 9201 through 9205 of the Santa Monlca Munlclpal Cdde requlre that, prlor to sale or exchange, a report of resldentlal bUllding records pertalnlng to the subJect pro?erty's authorlzed use, occupancy, and zoning classlficatlon be furnlshed to a buyer of a resldentlal buildlng. Presently, the report does not provlce any lnformatlon relatlng to the status of the bUllcLng or any of ltS unlts under the prOVlslons of the Santa MO~lca Rent Control Law, Artlcle A~III of the Clty Charter, 8fJ SEP 9 '980 The proposed ordlnance amends Sectlons 9203 and 9204 to lnclude In the report lnformatlon from rent control records relatlng to the number of unlts, the reglstratlon status, the eXe~?tlon status, any appl1catlon for, approval of, or denlal of a re~oval permlt, or a vested rlght clalm for the subJect ?~operty, and any Iltlgatlon affectlng the character of the property. The processlng fee is lncreased from $10 to $15 to cover t~e added cost for the Rent Control Admlnlstratlon to reVlew Lts records and transmlt the lnformatlon to the Dlrector of Plannlng. A form for use by the Rent Control Admlnlstrator 1S in ~reparatlon, as lS a reV1Slon of the report form used by the Dlrector of Plannlng, in order to lncorporate the rent control data. It should be noted that the rent control data May dlsclose a greater number of unlts than the Plannlng Department establlshes for the subJect property. This lssue wl11 be re- solved at some tlme In the future, but that resolutlon lS not necessary for ~assage of thlS ord~nance. ALTERNATIVES T~e proposed ordlnance requlres lncluslon of certaln rent 8ontrol lnformatlon In the report of reslaentlal bU11dlng records prlor to the sale or exchange of all resldentlal bUlldlngs, l~cludlng ~ultlple dwelllngs, bUlldlngs that have been converted to condominlums, and lnolvldual unlts that have been converted ~o condo~lnlums. or amend the proposed ordlnance. The Councll may accept, reJect, -2- RECOp~ENDATION It 15 respectfully recommended the C1ty Counc1l lntroduce thlS oIdlnance amend1ng the requlred contents of reports of resldent1al bU1ldlng records to 1nclude certa1n 1nformatlon wlth respect to the bU1ld1ng's status under the Santa Mon1ca Rent Control Law. prepared by: Stephen Shane Stark, Act1ng City Attorney Bettylou BOIovay, Deputy City Attorney -3- CA:SSS:BLB:bl Councll rieetlno 8/12/80 Santa Monlca, Callfornla Ordlnance No. :Clty Councll Serles) An ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF SANTA r10NICE A!lI:~.JDn~G CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE IX Of' THE SA:\'TA :-1011ICA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATI::\'G TO REPORTS OF RESIDLNTIAL BUILDING RSCORDS WHEREAS, the current code regulatlons requlre that, pr~or tc sale or exchange of a resldentlal bUllclng, a report of the resldentlal bUlldlng record showlng use, occupancy, and zonlng class~flcatlo~ of such property be obtalned and dellvered by ~he owner to the buyer; and Tf'JHEREAS, the purposes of thlS report are to lnform the qran~ee of a resldentlal bUllding of Matters of Clty record and to alert the unwary buyer to posslble restrlctlons on the use of property; and WHLREAS, the possible uses of a resldentlal bUlldlng may be restrlcted by the provlslons of the Rent Control Law, Artlcle XVIII of the Clt~ Charter; and T1HERLAS, the proposed amend@ents would notlfy a prospectlve buyer of t~e status of a resldentlal bUlldlng by lDcludlng \...It.....nn t.he re(]:ll-,,"ed report such lnforrnatlon as the number of rental unlts that are controlled, the reg~strat~on status of the bUl1dlng, dnd whether the owner of such property has sought, recelved, or been denled a removal pernlt, vested right, or eXeITptlon fro~ the Rent Control Board and, wher~ appllcable, a condomlnlum converSLon or cOndltlonal use per~Lt fro~ the CltYi and ~~EREAS, the proposed amendments are In the publlC interest, convenlence, and general welfare, and should be adopted THE Cl'I'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ~'100lICA DOES ORDAeJ: SECTIOJ:>i 1. Sect Lon 9203 of the Santa Monlca Mun1Clpal Code 1S hereby amended to read as follows: Report Requlred. - PYlOr to enterlng lnto an "agreement of sale" 8r exchange of any residentlal bU1ldlng, 1ncludlng any bUl1dlng or portlon thereof In Wh1Ch rental unlts ~2ve been converted to condoffilnlums, or transferr1ng a~y ~nterest there1n, the owner or h1S or her authorized representnt1ve shall obtaln from the Clty a report of the reS1cent1al bU1ldlng record showlng the regularly 3.U-::'.iOr :-zed llse, occupancy, zon1ng clasSlflcatlon of such proper~y, and status of the unlt or unlts under the prOV1slons of the Santa Monlca Rent Control Law, Artlcle XVIII of the Santa Non~ca C1ty Charter. The Rent Control 30ard shall deterM1ne, for purposes of thlS report, the nunber o~ rental unlts sltuated on such property, whether ~hose UD1tS are properly reg1stered, whether the un1ts are exe~pt =rom prov1s2ons of the Rent Control Law, whether the owner of those unlts has sought, recelved, or been den1ed a removal permlt or vesteG rlght cla1m for any or all of the unlts, and the status of any lltlgat10n affectlng the char- acter of the property. Sa1d report shall be valld for a ?erlod not to exceed SlX (6) months froM date of lssue. -2- SLCTION 2. Sectlon 9204 of the Santa Mon1ca Munlclpal Code lS hereby amended to read as follows: Appllcatlon. Upon appllcatlon of the owner or hlS or her authorlzed agent and the pay~ent to the Clty of a fee of F1fteen and ~o Cents Dollars ($15.00), the Adrnlnlstrator of Rent Control shall reVlew rent control records and transnlt the relevant informatlon to the Dlrector of Plannlng. 7he Dlrector shall reVlew pertlnent Clty records ar-d dellver to the appllcant a report of reslden- tlal bU11clng records which shall conta1n the followlng lnfornatlon 1nsofar as It 1S avallable: a. The street acdress and legal descrlptlon of subJect propertYi b. The zone classlflcatlon and authorlzed use as set forth lh thlS codei c. ~he occu?ancy as lndlcated and establ1shed by permlts of record; c. Varlances, condltlonal use permlts, exceptlons, and other pertlnent leglslative acts of record; e. Any speclal restrlct10ns 1n use or development WhlCh may apply to the subJect property; and ~. The character of the subJect property as deterMlned by the Rent Control Board, 1ncludlng the number of ~nlts, the reglstratlon status, the exernptlon status, any appllcatlon for, approval of, or denlal of a re~oval permlt or vested r1ght, and the status of any l~tlgat~on affectln~ the character of the property, -3- ~ SECTION 3. Any provls~on of the Santa Monlca Mun~clpal Code or appendlces thereto lnconslstent therew1th, to the extent of such lnconslstencles and no further, are hereby repealed or nodlfled to that extent necessaxy to effect the provlslons of thlS ord.1nance. SECTION 4. If any sectlon, subsectlon, sentence, clause, or ?hrase of th1s ord1nance lS for any reason held to be lnvalld or unconst1tutlonal by a decislon of any court of any competent Jurlsd1ct10r., such declslon shall not affect the valldlty of the rema1nlng portlons of the ordlnance. The City Councll hereby declares that It would have passed th15 ordlnance and each and evexy section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared lnvalld or unconstltut1onal wlthout regard to whether any portlon of the ordinance would be subsequently declared 10- valld or unconstltutlonal. SEC?IO~l 5. The Mayor shall slgn and the Clty Clerk shall attest to the passage of thlS ordlnance. The Clty Clerk shall cause the sa~e to be published once 1n the offlc1al newspaper w1thl~ 15 days after lts adoptlon. The ordlnance shall become effectlve after 30 days from lts adoptlon. APPROVED AS TO FOill1: ~~5i- S~ STL?H~N SHANE S'.:'ARK - Actlng Clty Attorney -4- PORTION OF MDJUTES OF CITY COUNCIL NEETING OF SEPTEl'1BER 10, 1980 Agenda Iten 8-A: Ordlnance for 1ntroauctlon regard1ng reports of Resldentlal BUlldlng records. Staff report presented. Cm Jennlngs: I RXXKKX~XXHX I have flrst an observatlon and then a few ~H questlons. Flrst of all, I am the one who brought this up, and thlS lS a lot more ambitlouS than what I had ln m1nd. I had In mln d somethlng that was a lot slmpler than thlS. Secondly, some questlons, we already have g~m~Kkxn thlS klnd of thlng on the books. Is lt routlnely 19nored?' 1.; ~~J~ KV'i\P4\ ~ Clty Attorn~y:QJY~ I don't belleve that 1t 15 rout1nely ignored, no. Cm Jennlngs: -'- Then why ~s 1t that your ant~clpatlng that thlS one wlll be 1mposslble to X~N0X~ enforce. S:lty Attorney: I should pOlnt out, that I N~XN~K personally do not antlclpate that some people who calmly call up our offlce up about proposed ordlnances or talk to us about proposed ordlnance make a statement, well If they have to go through the Rent Control Board at all they wlll Just 19nore it. I don't know whether 1t 15 true or not and lt lS lmposs1ble to predlct that, 11m Just relaY1ng the concern that 15 not in the staff report. Cm Jenn1ngs: I Personally, what I wanted vvas not, I G1Gn I t want any approval fromfue Rent Control Board and I dldnlt want us to get lnto the status of saYlng the REnt entrol Board shall do thlS and not do somethlng else, cause then we got the whole problem about we can't really tell them what to do anyway. All I wanted was the report to say Just what lt'S status was vis a V1S Rent Control. Do they have, not whether they need a vested rights perm1t or exempt10n or anyth1ng else, Just do they have 1t, and that's it? It seems to me that lS all gOlng to be dlsclosed by the th1ng that gets flIed w1th the Plann1ng Departmetn or BUlldlng Departmnt, before they get the1r flnal perm1t, llke the condo convers lon permlt or condomlnlUffi perm1t, If that lsn't flIed, then they must not have It. And I really don't th1nk we need to get all th1S complicated. How many unlts there are, and all thlS other k1nd of stuff, status of Ilt1gatlon, I thlnk that gets to be a b1t much, alot more expenslve than what I had In mlnd, and I don't thlnk for ry purposes, WhlCh Just was to let, you know have a slmple report that adds one Ilttle th1ng to what we are alerdy doing in the C1ty, to let any perspect1ve purchaser know whether he 15 bUYlng a glagantlc headache or whether all permlts that illlght have to be obtalned, have been obtalned, and not any deterI'Unatlon whether they have to be obtalned ~xxwRe:1diHX or don It have to be obtalned or anythlng llke that, Just whether or not they have been obtalned. Cffi Reed: I dldn't even recall that we asked for this, and _~I I have several questlons that came to mlnd ln readlng thlS and I am surprised the ~ayor tells ne there lS nobody to speak on thlS ordlnance. Due to the detall wiuch \ve propose to have In th1S report, the, 1. t occurs to ne that there wlll probably be some llab1llty on the C1ty'S part or the REnt Contrl Board's part, 1f errors are made 1.n the reports as we all know 15 entlrely posslble, and If persons are purchaslng property based on what they read In the reports, then I an very nervous about that 1f ln fact the clty lS ln a posltlon or the Rent Control Board 1S 1n a posltlon of alledglng A when In fact B turns out to be the case, then the person who bOught the property cones In and says you did me In and d- and now you should pay me or buy thls property or whatever. That lS one concern that I have, I have a concern about the t1me 1t w1ll take for this report to work its way through the beauracrat1c channels. I have some concerns about the, how th1S system 1S gOlng to work, from the point of view of the consumer. A person w1shes to buy a 4-unit apartment / bUllding. Wlll thls report be requ~red before closes escrow, How does the consumer seller and the buyer, where does xNeXXmpKg~ th1S report 1mpact the bU1ng and sell1ng process of a un1t. Now we have a single famlly dwell1ng next door to my slngle fam1ly dwell1ng, and that slngle fam1ly dwell1gn has been a rental Slnce we've occup1ed our home. Now, 1t was recently sold, the tenants were eVlcted, lt now appears that the new owners are XRXXagXX~~XH~ gOlng to In fact use 1t as a rental although the word was put out 1n the ne1ghborhood that they were gOlng to occupy, however 1t lS clear to me that 1S not happen1ng. So, I can see that there, someone 1S attempt1ng, undoubtedly, to avo1d some rent control regulartlon here. Although, I certalnly couldn't say who. ~Jho knows II the seller, what the seller told the buyer or what the buyer intended when he bought 1t from the seller and what the buyer told the seller. And the city 1S gOlng to get 1nvolved 1n th1S process in SOMe fashion and Just for us to have an ord1nance 1S not gOlng to nake me happy, I need to knrn~ how does th~s nffi~ la,v lIT-pact that consumer process of bUYlng and sell1ng property? How lS It gOlng to work therough the whole escrow bus1ness and all the rest of It? And are read estate agents gOlng to be eth1cally llable or respons1ble and I have all those qUest10ns Wh1Ch 1f none of those pe ople are here to talk to us, we aren't going to be able to get answered tonlght, and so I am not going to vote for thls tonight becasue I think it needs a 11ttle more alr1ng 1n the publlc sector, and that sector of the econo~y \lho deals w1th these real 3 estate transact1ons. em Rhoden: Yeah, I tlunk I I ve got most of the same questlons . that live Just heard, and re1terate it. I as well donlt thlnk that 1t needs to so spec1flc, and 1t could, I'm not qU1te sure what the report does other than say that the bUlld1ng 1S what is already zoned in a certaln way or something to that nature, I guess. And if that 15 the case it slmply to say that th1S bUlld1ng needs to be registered under the rent board alw.ost m1ght be suff1eient and then it 15 up to the consumer to flnd out If 1n fact lt lS proper, and then while I was th1nk lUg that I thought 1t should also say whether or not lt 1S 1U a h1stor1cal d1strlct or has been des1guated as a landnark or If 1t 1S In the Coastal Zone, so that the consumer themselves can undertake the processes to f1nd out if the varlOUS zon1ug regualtlons that 1mp act them are somethlng they want to deal w1th, rather than saY1ng that means thlS, that and the other, they can then undertake lt to schools or whatever. C:u Jennings: Well, what we have r1ght now, Sectlon 9203, says, prlor to enterlng lnto an agreewent of sale, or exchange of res1dentlal bUlldlng, Wh1Ch lucludes condos, aprtmnt bU1ld1UgS, and houses wlth bootleg un1ts and so forth, the owner or h1S authorized representatlve, Wh1Ch I assume would be his agent, shall obtaln from the Clty a report of the Res1dent1al BU1ldlng records showlng the regularly author1-zed use occupancy and zon1ng classif1caton of such property, the report shall H~K be valld for a perlod not to exceed. and then at the very end, 9205 says,the report of Residentlal BU1ld1ng records shall be dellvered by theowenr or the autho4lzed deslgnated representat1ve of the owner, to the buyer or the transferee of the ReSldent1al Building, prlor to the conSu~atlon of the sale or exchange. So, what I had lU mlnd w as adding to the ISlt of th1ngs that are gOlng to be 1n the rpeot, merely, what you i ment~oned about the, whether or not it has been reg~stered w~th the rent control board and what the status of any necessary perm~ts are. I agree w~th llrB. Reed and also MrB. Rhoden, I thlnk there should be some fact to the staff to redraft and make it considera-ble less comprehenslve. I am always sorry to see the staff do to 0 much work on somethlng. It lS nlce to ESBSS see the staff do too much work on something. But, I really think that lt should be much less corrprehenslve in terms of what has to be done. r think If it lS Just statlng whether somehting has been done, not whether It has to be aonel but whether lt has been done does not glve any llablllty to the Clty. For example, the bootleg UDltS sltuatlon, not whether it has to be reglstered or lt doesn't have to be reglsterd, Just lt hasn't been reglstered. em Reed: It seems to me that Mr. Jenings could be met admlnistratively by tYPlng a couple sentences at the top of thlS report that we already lssue. Which sentences would say someth1ng to the effect that the Clty of Sata MOnlca has a rent control system. Resldentlal unlts lf they have been prevlously rneted are ~egulated by that systen and you should check wlth the REnt Control Board at X,Y, Z address and phone number. Then we don't need to allege any thlng at all and we leave lt up to the person who lS bUYlnt the property If 1n fact it was an owner occupled or a rented property. And I don't see as how we need to get ourselves any further lnvolved than a not1f1catlon. Cm Scott: r'm not at all sure that we should be ln the business of furnlshlng the info4matlon at all. It seems to me that if we want to perform a serVlce for the potential purchaser, perhaps what we should do lS prepare a checkllst of questions that shuld concern any purchaser of property, and suggest to them that they obtain answers to those ) quest~ons ~n wr~t~ng from the seller. Whether they have then soneth~ng to move on lf they have been m~slead or as a matter of fact, the record has been falslf~ed. For us to do more than that, I Just really don;t thlnk that lS the funct~on of the Clty because what we are do~ng and much of thlS we are expresslng the Judgemetn on a factual lssue and that Judgement may be good or bad and I don't really thlnk we should do It. City Manager: Your honor, for my clarlf~cat~on, perhaps ~t ~~NX~X would be helpful lf I understood better the purpose of the provislons. I th~nk we were probably, or I was probably labor~ng underlng the ~mpression that the two goals were assumedxM~XXHXg~xxNHmEaXX~Ne to -e achleved by thlS. Nurber one to place a perspectlve buyer on notlce concernlng the propert~es that relates to the REnt Control ord~nance, and number two, to allow the Rent Control B~Hxex staff an opportun~ty to check and see ~= in fact the property ~s reglstered and If not requlre lt to become reglstered. If I am m~sunderstanding the goals then perhaps a restateIT-etn of the goal would be helpful. en Jennlngs: Well, frankly what really happened here was that thlS was someth~ng that we did a long t~me ago, we sent ~t to staff a lon0, long t~me ago and what we do with respect to condo convers ~ons and condos has changed Slnce then, tve didn't really get around to the concept of the condo covers ~on perm1t and what we were go~ng to do w~th respect to Kaat the lssuance of that, and requlrelng sonething from the Rent Control Board unt~l after thlS was sent to the staff, so perhaps some of the concerns we had has been alald by what lS be~ng done now wlth respect ot condo convers ~ons. I thlnk perhaps the purpose that I had in brlnglng the thlng up ~n the flrst place was not so much as the convenlence of the Rent Control Board as It was to put the buyer on notlce of what has or ~ has not been done w1th respect to possible need to comply wlth someth1ng ~av1ng to do w1th the Rent Control Law. Perhaps a consumer checkl1st m1ght be a more useful thlng along w1th the approprlate numbers for the person to call or address to co~e to. To check and ~ake sure the buyer actually, excuse me the seller actually telllng the truth to the buyer, as Mr. Scott has suggested. C1ty ATTOrney: .. Indeed, lt was never theunderstand1ng of our off1ce that th1S ord1nance was lntended to do anything other than not1fy buyers or the fact that there was rent control. Once, the ~X~ ... product was generated, that staff d1scuss1ons to a spec1ficat1on of the lnformat1on that ~ight be useful. I agree am not part1cularly push1ng th1s ord1nance, I agree that a consumer checkllst that does not require an ordlnance. In ffilght 1n llght of our current posse, serve Just as well as long as the consumer 1S made aware of 1t, If that 1S acceptable, 1t apparently seems acceptable. Cm Yanatta Goldway: I would move that we d1rect the C1ty Attorney ane the C1ty Manager to develop a consuw er checkl1st, WhlCh would be attached to the proper forros and that such lists be brought to us for our approval at the next Cauncll meetlng. Is that posslble or wlll It take too long? ~ 'lnc.~. Nanager: t,).' I ~.,ould prefer to have a Ilttle more lead tlne City than that. c~ Yanatta Goldway: A month from now. We could dlrect you to Just do lt, but I th1nk we would all llke to see 1t before 1t gets done. Clty Attorn~~: I don1t thlnk we could get it done by the next Council meetlng, we might want to take a 11ttle blt of care ln aeslgnlng thlS th1ng. l Cm Yanatta Goldway: It seems to me that If It lS simple enough, It could .. be on the Consent Calendar for let's say a month from now, or something llke that so we can Just see theform and know that you are going to be attachlng It. Is that acceptable to perople as a Notlon? Cm Reed: . Slnce thls has the potent1al of lmpactlng alot of consumer transactlons in the communlty, I would llke to suggest that we lnvolve a representatlve of the Board of Realtors In an lnfor~al way so they are part of thls process, at least allowlng then to subm1t suggestlons for conslderat1on for thlS checkl1st. Clty Attornev: . I of the co~~un1ty 1ncludlng Board of Realtors and consumer groups. I would thlnk that we would contact all, segments Cm Reed: Flue. em ,Tel}nlnos_: I was Just gOlng to suggest, I thlnk Mr. Lunsford has some lnput to make on thls, and why donlt we hear what he has to say, thlS lS hlS Job. Lunsford: ThlS ordinance has been on the books for a nuwber of years and lS not routlnely disregarded and lt does serve an lTIportant purpose and that lS not speclflcally consumer protection, it lS pX~XR<<XX~N speclflcally to prevent collUslon between the seller the buyer and the broker. It has over the years been an lmportant XR part of the zonlng enforcement. Becasue the sheet, WhlCh I thlnk you probably have been prov1ded wlth that reqUlres flrst the seller to ask the zon1ng department for the current zonlng, the current number of authorized unlts and the current number of maXlnum unlts that could be bUllt on that property. It 15 the fl4rst sect1on. The second sectlon 15 fllled out by the Plann1ng Deparmtnet w1th that 1nformatlon and then the buyer slgns that, there are three caples, one 15 filed wlth us. A year later when the property 15 belng ll1egally rented or pr10r to the problem of what was ll1egal and what 9-., wasn't. But ~llegally rented, we had proof that the buyer knew at the tlffie that he only had three units and not four. Because prlor before this ordinance was in effect, what the buyer sa2d was why the broker and the seller told me I could do it, I d~dn't know, I was lnnocent. And that lS what that is for, so a checkl~st wlll not serve that purpose, and that 15 an lmportant purpose. Cm Yanatta Goldway: I don't thlnk we're throwing out your existlng law by slmply decllnlng on that statement ltlS status of the Rent Control Board. Lunsford: And two years ago when the question, or threee years ago, when the Councll consldered expandlng th15 program to lnclude greater cons~er protectlon, lncludlng lnspectlon by the BUlldlng Dept., of the unlts that was opposed b~xxHaxx~>>g very strongly by the Real Estate lndustry or Profess lon+*xhax becasue they were now enterlng lnto guarenteelng for one year an lnsurlng bUlldlngs that they were selllng. I aw. concerned about the loss of that legal protection. C~ Yanatta Goldway: We won't take lt away, the ldea 15 si~ply to add a checkllst at that procedure and perhaps somehtlng on the form that says I received the consumer checkllst, so that we have an lndlcatlon that they have gotten the lnformatlon about other laws that might pertaln to thelr propertles. Clty Manager: I was Just gOlng to comment that the Council, If the Councll does not adopt that, the eXlstlng ordlnance would remlan In ef=ect, and the checkllst would be generated and brought back to the Councll for approval as an Admin15tratlve Item at a subsequent Counell rneetl.ng. Cn Reed: We now have that motlon on the floor now& - - 1 Cm Yanatta Goldway: My motlon lS to have staff prepare a checklist and I to brlng It back to us for our reVlew a month from now and thatthe checkllst should be attac hed to the current procedure In some fashlon. Mayor Bambrick: II Mrs. Yanatta moved lS ther e a second? <;;m Rppn ~ Second. Navor lln",l-,=',:",K: Any further dlscusslon on Mrs. Yanatta's motion, hearlng none, all those In favor say ay €. Unanimously approved 6-0 (with C~ van den Steenhoven absent) LC---,r ~--vQ. \b ./ No Carbon '\lecessarv TO BE COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE EXPIRES IN SIX MONTHS INSTRUCTIONS: The owner or agent wIll fill In Part I and send 0//3 copies along with a $10.00 filmg fee (make checks payable to City of Santa Monica) to the Director of Planning, Oty of Santa Momca. 1685 Main Street, Santa MOnIca, California 90401. (A stamped, self-addressed return envelope IS required.) Fee Paid Date' Receipt No. Make checb I'8)'11ble 10 CIlY of Santa MORICI. (SIO 00 per report) PART I APPLICATION FOR REPORT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RECORD Director of Planning. City of Santa Monica 1685 Main Street Santa Monka, California 90401 In compliance With Chapter 2. Article IX of the Santa Monica Murncipal Code, I request a Report of a ReSidential Building Record for the following property: Please Pn'''tor Ty~ Street Address Legal DescnptlOn Legal Owner Signature or Owner or Aulhonmd Representalive Date Mallmg Address n .. ftT IT "'1if1e\t> ~~~, 1. ,~~~ ;r:Jt1"fWf~ ; . :;j'f.1'qf" "'?'fr>.:mo- J . , I, ~'1, I .. , '-"''It.. i {~ \ , \ \ , , . \ , ., f l t \ , r , ! '. '~ \ ~ -~~ . ~ .'. - ~~~~ ... - - ~ . iT t- "'i~o> "