SR-506-003-08 (197)
. f ,-B
.
5tJ6 ~oo3-og JAN 1 2 1988
.......-
GS:SES:DA:JS 12/23/87
Council Meeting: January 12, 1988 Santa Monica, California
TO: Mayor and city Council
FROM: City Staff
SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Assessments of Costs to Repair Damaged
Sidewalks, Driveways and Curbs (SR-88-104)
Introduction
This report requests that the City Council hold a public hearing for
the assessment of costs to repair damaged sidewalks, driveways and
curbs at various locations within the City. It is recommended that
the City Council adopt the attached Resolution confirming the
assessment of costs.
Background
On November 24, 1987, the City Council set a public hearing for
January 12, 1988, on the assessment of costs to repair damaged
sidewalks, driveways and curbs within the city of Santa Monica.
Notices were sent on December 31, 1987, to property owners informing
them of the public hearing in accordance with the legal requirements
of Chapter 22 of the Improvement Act of 1911.
Budget/Financial Impact
This assessment district will generate revenues to the City over the
next two years in the amount of $8,916. Any unpaid assessments will
be placed on the FY1988-1989 property tax bill.
-'-8
JAN 1 2 1982
---
-- - - - ------
~
.
Recommendation
It is recommended the city council:
1- Open the public hearing;
2. Close the public hearing;
3. Acknowledge any protests and adopt the attached Resolution
confirming the assessments.
Prepared by: stan Scholl, Director of General Services
Jean Stanley, Administrative Analyst
Attachments: Resolution for Adoption
Notice(s) of Public Hearing
street Superintendent's Report
and List of Property Owners
swhldlO4
. .
~
NOTICE WHEN SIDEWALK DA~AGE IS DUE BY TREE ROOTS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
He: SIdewalk RepaH at
(SIdewalk Assess~ent uls~rlC~: ::5K-jd-1U4) ~
The sIdewalk repalr at the above descrIbed property has been
completed, and the cost of the SIdewalk repaIr IS $ . Your
cost IS $ WhIch is one-half of the cost of the work done
at the locatIon. THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE. You WIll be bIlled later.
Pursuant to Streets and HIghways Code SectIon 5616, thIS letter IS
notIfIcatIon that the CIty Cour..Cll, pursuar..t to ResolutIon No. 7517
( CGS) adopted on November 24, 1937, has scheduled a hearIng to hear
and pass upor: the report of the SuperIntendent of Streets of the cost
of the SIdewalk repaIr, In cor..nectlon WIth the above-descrIbed
proJect, together with any ObjectIons ar.d protests, If any, WhICh may
be raIsed by any property owner lIable to be assessed for the cost of
such SIdewalk repaIr and ar.y other u;.terested persons.
The hearIng WIll be held as follows:
DATE: January 12, 1988
PLACE: CIty Cour.cll Chambers
Clty Hall
1685 [-ialn Street
Santa MonIca, CalIfornIa
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
Any protests or ObjectIons must be In wrltlng and must be f 11 ed wIth
tne CIty Clerk or. or before the tIme set for the hearlr.&.
Upon conflrmatlOr. of th~ report of the Superintender.t of Stredts, as
provlded for In Streets and Hlghways Code SectIon 5613, the cost of
the sld evidl i< repalr WIll be assessed agaInst your property, and you
wlll be notlfled of the manner of paymer..t. The CIty WIll prOVIde
fInanCIal aSSIstance for low-to-ffioderate InCOtlle persons. If your
lncome IS less than $18,600 for a fam 11 y of one persor.., $21,258 for
two parsons, $23,900 for three persons or $26,550 for four persons,
call 453-8701 for In for.nat lOr. on thIS progrdm.
Very truly yours,
Stanley E. Scholl
SuperIntendent of Streets
--- -----
. .
.
NOTICE ;mEN SIDEWALK DA:1AGE IS NOT CAUSED BY TREE ROOTS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Re: SIdewalk RepaIr at
(SIdewalk Assessment D1strict: SR-88-104)
The sIdewalk repair at the above descrIbed property hdS been
cOrnpleted, and your cost of the sldewalk repa1r is . THIS IS
NOT AN INVOICE. You wlll be b1lled later.
Pursuant to Streets and Hlghways Code Sectlon 5616, thIS letter 1S
notlflcatlon that the Clty Councll, pursuant to ResolutIon No. 7517
( CCS) adopted on Nove,nber 24, 1937, has scheduled a hearlng to hear
and pass upon the report of the Superlntendent of Streets of the cost
of the s ld ewalk repalr, H: connectIon wlth the above-descrlbed
proJect, together wlth any obJect1or..s and protests, If a.ny, whlch ma.y
be ralsed by any property owner llable to be assessed for the cost of
such slde'.-lalk repaIr and ar.y other lnterested persons.
The hear1ng WIll be held as follows:
DATE: Jar:uary 12, 1988
PLACE: CIty Counc1l Chambers
CIty Hall
1635 i1a.H'. Street
Santa 110 n 1 c a , Cal1fornla
TIi1E: 7:30 P.M.
Any prot~sts or obJectlor.s ,nust be In wrltlng and must be filed wlth
the Clty Clerk on or before the t1me- set for the hearlng.
Upor. confIrmat1on of the report of the Superlntendent of Streets, as
provided for In Streets ar:d Highways Code Sectlon 5618, the cost of
the sldewalk repair will be assessed aga lr.. st your property, and you
w1ll be notlf1ed of the manner of pa Ylnen t. The Clty WIll prOVide
fll'~anc 1al asslstance for low-to-!lloderate lr:come persons. If your
1r..come 1S less thaI". $18,600 for a fam 11 y of one person, $21,250 for
two persons, $23,900 for three persons or $26,550 for four persons,
call 458-3701 for lnformatlon on thls program.
Very truly yours,
Stanley E. Scholl
Superlnter.der:t of Streets
- ------- ----------- -------
, -
.
STREET SUPERINTENDENT'S REPORT
REPAIR OF DA;1AGED SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, CURBS AND/OR REMOVAL
OF OBSTRUCTIONS, PERFOR~1ED UNDER PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 7,
CHAPTER 22, SECTIONS 56JO TO 5630, OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (SR-88-104)
Pursuant to the prov~s~ons of Dlvislon 7, Chapter 22, SectlOr..s
5600 of 5630, of the Streets ar.d H~ghways Code of the State of
California, the folloWing work was caused to be dor..e by the Street
Superintender.t:
The removal ar.d replacement of 1476 square feet of sIdewalk at
$4 per square fnot;
The removal and replacement of 40 square feet of driveway at
$5 per square fact;
The rernoval nf 72 square feet of cor..crete at $2 per square
foot;
Tne total cost of the above work was $5,248.00.
The total proposed ass~ssmen t for the above sidewalk and curb
dam ag e IS $3,124 or 50 percent of the total cost. The other 50
percent of the cost 1S being pa1d by the C1ty as the above repa1rs
were caused by tree root damage.
The re~ncv al ar:d replacement of 938 square feet of ::ndewdlk at
$4 per square foot.
The removal and replacement of 1830 square feet of drIveway at
$5 per square foot; and
The rerllove1 and replacement of 21 11near feet of curblr.g at
$10 per llnear feet
The total proposed assessment for sldewalks a~d curbs 1S $5,792 or
100 percer.t of the total cost as the da.nag e was r.ot related to tree
roots.
- ----------- - - ---------
,
~
Referen.ce lS made to the attached sheets for a descript10n of
the real property ln front of Wh1Ch the work has been done, the
proposed asse ssmen t dgalnst each property, ar.d a descrlptlon of the
work dor.e lr. front of each property.
Street Superlntar.der.t
Flied wlth the Clty Clerk thlS day of , 1988.
Clty Clerk
- - - - -----------------------~---~ - --- - -- - - ------ ---~-~--
"
. Sidewalk Repair SR-88-l04
NAME Beth Sholom Temple
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 1827 California Ave.
MAIL-CITY-STATE Santa Monica, Ca 90403
SITE-STREET 1827 California
TRACT Green Acres
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 6, block 2
TOTAL-COST 1736.00
ASMNT-COST 868.00
WORK-DONE-1 Remove/replace 434 sg. ft. sidewalk
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
NAME Mildred & Herman Borden
NAME- 2
MAIL-STREET 316 - 22nd st.
MAIL-CITY-STATE SAnta Monica, CA 90402
SITE-STREET 1140 - 23rd st.
TRACT 5239
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 9, block 5
TOTAL-COST 300.00
ASMNT-COST 150.00
WORK-DONE-l Remove/replace 75 sq. ft. sidewalk
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
NAME Sybil J. Heiman
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 920 Berkeley
MAIL-CITY-STATE Santa Monica, CA 90403
SITE-STREET 920 Berkeley
TRACT 2385
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 31, block 0
TOTAL-COST 275.00
ASMNT-COST 137.50
WORK-DONE-1 Remove/replace 60 sq. ft. sidewalk
WORK-DONE-2 Remove 17.5 sg. ft. PCC parkway
WORK-DONE-3
NAME A. Wayne Marshall
NAME-2 Hazelmae H. Marshall
MAIL-STREET 1132 Yale st.
MAIL-CITY-STATE Santa Monica, CA 90404
SITE-STREET 1132 Yale st.
TRACT 3000
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 24, block 9
TOTAL-COST 263.00
ASMNT-COST 131.50
WORK-DONE-l Remove/replace 50 Sq. ft. sidewalk
WORK-DONE-2 Remove 31.5 sq. ft. PCC parkway
WORK-DONE-3
. ~
, Sidewalk Repair SR-88-104
NAME Eleanor V. Nelson
NAME- 2
MAIL-STREET 841 Princeton
MAIL-CITY-STATE Santa Monica, Ca 90404
SITE-STREET 841 Princeton
TRACT 3000
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 31, block 3
TOTAL-COST 400.00
ASMNT-COST 200.00
WORK-DONE-1 Remove/replace 50 sq. ft. sidewalk
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
NAME Rachel Risch
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 1102 Maple
MAIL-CITY-STATE Santa Monica, Ca 90405
SITE-STREET 1102 Maple
TRACT East Santa Monica
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 23, block 24
TOTAL-COST 908.00
ASMNT-COST 454.00
WORK-DONE-1 Remove/replace 220 sq. ft. sidewalk
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
NAME Homa & Mahmoudi Snibbe
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 1010 Franklin st.
MAIL-CITY-STATE santa Monica, Ca 90405
SITE-STREET 1016 Chelsea
TRACT 5239
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 14, block 20
TOTAL-COST 218.00
ASMNT-COST 109.00
WORK-DONE-l Remove/replace 50 sq. ft. sidewalk
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
NAME Willey J. Pickett
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 1024 Chelsea Ave.
MAIL-CITY-STATE Santa Monica, CA 90404
SITE-STREET 1024 Chelsea
TRACT 5239
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 12, block 20
TOTAL-COST 300.00
ASMNT-COST 150.00
WORK-DONE-1 Remove/replace 75 sq. ft. sidewalk
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
.
.
J. Sidewalk Repair SR-88-l04
NAME Clyde V. Fitzgerald
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 1421 Montana Ave.
MAIL-CITY-STATE Santa Monica, CA 90403
SITE-STREET 1425 Montana (15th st. side)
TRACT 5119
LOT-&-BLOCK lot I, block 3
TOTAL-COST 5540.00
ASMNT-COST 4616.00
WORK-DONE-l Remove/replace 1385 sq. ft. sidewalk
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
NAME Roger C. Hartman
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 415 N. Camden Dr.
MAIL-CITY-STATE Beverly Hills, Ca 90210
SITE-STREET 634 - lOth St.
TRACT 2743
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 7, block 23
TOTAL-COST 1370.00
ASMNT-COST 1370.00
WORK-DONE-1 Remove/replace 50 sf sidewalk in driveway
WORK-DONE-2 Remove/replace 196 sf driveway apron
WORK-DONE-3 Remove/replace 14 If curbing
NAME Harold & Irene Rumenapp
NAME-2
MAIL-STREET 716 - 11th st.
MAIL-CITY-STATE Santa Monica, CA 90402
SITE-STREET 716 - 11th st.
TRACT The palisades
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 11, block 24
TOTAL-COST 130.00
ASMNT-COST 130.00
WORK-DONE-1 Remove/replace 15 sq. ft. sidewalk
WORK-DONE-2 Remove/replace 7 In. ft. curbing
WORK-DONE-3
NAME Mack Helmut
NAME-2 Rudi Stutz
MAIL-STREET 19548 Strathern street
MAIL-CITY-STATE Reseda, Ca 91335
SITE-STREET 2633 Santa Monica Blvd.
TRACT Sierra Vista Heights
LOT-&-BLOCK lot 7, block 8
TOTAL-COST 600.00
ASMNT-COST 600.00
WORK-DONE-l Remove and replace 120 sq ft sidewalk in driveway
WORK-DONE-2
WORK-DONE-3
, . . . - .
t_ ol;.. - . ,
~iFORE DISTRIBUTION CHECK CONTENT OF ALL FOR CITY C~ERKfS ACTION
DISTRIBUTION OF RESOLUTION H 7~~'c ORDINANCE If
Council Meeting Date /0-;; It! 8 Introduced:
,..., Agenda Item If 7,-,3' . - Adopted:
en AU~S PlmT,TSH Al:X)I'lNJ ORDINANCES*
..... Was it amended? /YC "'Cross out Attorney's approval
0
N I
....... VOTE: Affirmative: 7-6
0'\
1Il Negative:
v Abstain:
u
l:: Absent:
~ ...:; PROOF VOTE~ WITH ANOTHER PER'S'ON 'BEFORE Al\TVTHING
l::
P'1 DISIRIBtJ110N: ORIGINAL "to De signed.,-sealeo. and 'filed in Vault.
"tj
N
0 NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION (Date: , )
!\.I .
::- Department originat~ng staff report ( * )
.-4
Q) *City Attorney does not want copl.es of his ordJ:1'}anees or resolutions.
u
v rdanagement Ser.,ises Lynne Bar.rette . urdlnances only {;
~ .
..... Agency mentloned in document or staff report
0
c: (certifIed?)
-
:>-
C> Subject file (agenda packet) 1
c:
i-<
0 Counter file
+..I 1
+..I -
<:
+oJ Others: (Review for depai.. uc~nts who need to know) .
ell -
,..
- Airport Parking Auth.
+..I
"'t:l Auditorum Personnel
Q)
.,..J
1Il
iU Building Dept. Planning
::l
C"
Q) CUIIIJUni ty and Econc:mic DeV I Police (en-
1-0
Q) forcement ?)
v Finance
.... Purchasing .
4-1
4-1 Fire
0 Recr/Parks
lfI General Servo /
-
>- Transportation
v
c LIbrary
I-t Treasurer
0
+..I Manager
....,
<(
>-- SEND FOUR COPIES OF ALL ORDINANCES' TO: *Check COde Sections before sendiJ
+..I
..... CODFD SYSTEMS, Attn Peter Mac!earie
u l~O Mpin-rtr~et ~
....... Avo' . ~T ~ w J e r s e y . 0 2 7 1 7
0 ~ - .
~ SEND FOUR COPIES OF ALL OROHltdJ('FS .TO:
+..I 'gK{fft UONtt!t MUNI CI'PAL COURT
1-0
Q) 3
.0 (725 MAIN STREE~ Room 118
0
0:: SAnTA MONICA CA 90401 TOTAL COPIES .
. .
-
~-
-----
. ,
. f'tJ(> - 003 -t!:) $
~
RESOLUTION NO. 7540(CCS)
(CITY COUNCIL SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MONICA CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS REGARDING REPAIRS TO
DAMAGED SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS AND CURBS (SR-88-104 )
WHEREAS, the Superintendent of streets of the City of Santa
Monica, pursuant to sections 5600-5630 of the streets and Highways
Code, commenced proceedings to cause the repair of damaged sidewalks,
driveways and curbs in the city of Santa Monica at 2633 Santa Monica
Boulevard, 716 11th street, 634 lOth street, 1024 Chelsea Avenue, 1016
Chelsea Avenue, 1102 Maple street, 841 Princeton street, 1132 Yale
street, 1425 Montana Avenue, 920 Berkeley street, 1827 California
Avenue, 1140 23rd street, all within the city of Santa Monica: and
WHEREAS, sixty days after said order was served, the work had
not been completed by the owners or persons in possession of the
affected properties, and the Superintendent of streets caused the work
to be done: and
.
WHEREAS, the superintendent of Streets gave notice as required
by Section 5616 of the streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, the Superintendent of Streets did file with the City
Council of the City of Santa Monica his report of repairs and costs as
required by Section 5617 of the streets and Highways Code: and
WHEREAS, upon the day and hour fixed for hearing by Resolution
Number 7517 (CCS), the City Council of the city of Santa Monica heard
and passed upon the report of the Superintendent of streets together
---- ---- -- ------ ----
-- - -- -- -
,
.
with all objections and protests as required by section 5618 of the
.
.
streets and Highways Code,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The report of the Superintendent of streets
heretofore filed and above-described be, and the same hereby is,
confirmed.
SECTION 2. All protests and objections of every kind and
nature to the report of the Superintendent of streets be, and the same
hereby are, overruled and denied.
SECTION 3. The cost of the repairs, as set forth in the
report of the Superintendent of Streets, shall be assessed against the
properties therein described, which properties front the sidewalk upon
which the repairs were made.
SECTION 4. If such assessment is not paid within the time
. permitted by law, the shall constitute special assessment
same a
against and lien on the properties therein described in the amount set
forth in the report of the Superintendent of Streets, which lien shall
continue until the assessment and all interest thereon is paid or
until it is discharged of record.
SECTION 5. If the assessment is not paid within the time
permitted by law, the Superintendent of Streets, in accordance with
section 5628 of the Streets and Highways Code, shall deliver a Notice
of Lien, prepared in the manner required by Section 5626 of the
. \
, .
streets and Highways Code, to the County Auditor who shall collect the
,
assessment together with all other taxes against the property.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in
full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~~
ROBERT M. MYERS
City Attorney
.
I . 1
. .
.
Adopted and approve f January, 1988.
-Mayor ~.. -
I hereby certify that t foregoing Resolution No. 7540(CCS)
was duly adopted by the City the City of Santa Monica
at a meeting thereof held on January 12, 1988 by the following
Council vote:
Ayes: councilmem.bers: Finkel, Jennings, ]I.. Katz, H.
Katz, Reed, Zane, Mayor Conn
Noes: Councilmem.bers: None
Abstain: Councilmembers: None
~ Absent: councilmernbers: None
ATTEST:
~,~
ci ty Cle.rk
- ---- --- ----
4 . ...
. . . . 716-11 th Street
Santa Atonica,C'A 90402
Janurary 12, 1988
Santa Nonica Ci~ Council ,4JJ. +D 7- B
C i t y Ha LI
1685 Main Street
SantaMonica, Co Ufo rn.. i a ,-/2,at
To Whom It May Concern:
I wish to advise on the circumstances regarding the sid~wark
repair at the above address:
The sidewalk and curb in question were installed by the home-
owner when the house at this address was torn down and replaced
with a house moved in from Westwood in 1965. .Zl of the side-
walk exceot one J' x 5' slab was replaced at the owners expense,
The one slab was retained as it contained the new surveyors
button and the slab appeared in good condition. The length of
curb in. question was installed to close the opening left from
an abandoned driveway fron the prior house. A Z I the cem.ent
work was done by the ltcenesed cement contractor who was hired
to set the new house. The work was approved by the City Inspectors.
It should be noted here that within three months the City/at
its expens~ replaced m.y neighbo~s sidewalks because of the poor
condition they werein.
The reason the sidewalk and curb was replaced was because
in April 1986 a neighbor walking on the area of the sidewalk
that had not been replaced..ft!ll down on this slab which had
begun to break up due to Magnolia tree roots from the tree in
the parkway. I called city Hall and inquired about the sidewalk
being repaired to ppevent any further accidents. On 4-30-86
a City sidewalk inspector arrived to see the damaged walk and
at the time noted that asection of curb was also raising on
one end . The inspector filled out forms designating the
areas and the cost estimate which I then filed with the City
as instructed. The Insoector called street repair and a black
top patch was ~ade on the walk. I asked the inspector to
proceed with the replacements. Finally after a year or more
had passed a City crew showed up and proceeded to remove the
damaged watk and curb and replace with new concrete. The curb
had raised another inch between the initial discovery and the
repair. The curb also was raised by the root action of the
same Magnolia tree in the City Parkway. I understand that when
such is caused by oarkway tree roots a consideration is mad e
in the charges. I hereby as~ that this consideration be given
to this account in light of the above noted circumstances.
Sincerely,
Harold E. Rumenapp ,Owner
y~e ~-i1# 1~
AI tl t-o
- ,...." - r t