SR-505-001-01-01 (2)
r
.
.
505-o01-o/-0(
II-A
NOV 24 1981
GS:SS:JH:a1l/17
Council Meeting: November 24, 1987
Santa Monica, California
To:
Mayor and City council
From:
city Staff
Subject: Wastewater Fund status Report and Proposed Rate
Increase
Introduction
This report discusses the reasons for rapidly increasing costs of
collection, treatment and disposal of Santa Monica sewage and
recommends sewer rate increases to fund the increased costs.
Background
city sewer use rates and sewer connection fees were revised on
June lOth, 1986. At that time, staff advised the City Council
that with
impending
cost
increases
anticipated
due
to
improvements at the Hyperion Sewer Treatment Facility, rate
increases would be required again in the FY 1987/88. Since that
time, costs related to sewage treatment and disposal have
continued to increase.
The Hyperion Treatment Facility is owned and operated by the city
of Los Angeles. The City of Santa Monica contracts with the City
of Los Angeles for sewer treatment and disposal services, as do
several other area ci ties and agencies.
Due to Federal Clean
Water Act requirements, the City of Los Angeles is in the process
of improving its treatment facilities to provide full secondary
treatment
for
all
wastewater
and
is
constructing
a
waste-to-energy facility to burn sewage sludge to produce
electricity in order to cease dumping the sludge into the Santa
1
II.-A
NOV 2 4 1987
.
.
Manica Bay. As a contractor with the city of Los Angeles, Santa
Monica is required to pay its pro-rata share (2.4%) of the costs
associated with the capital improvements being constructed at
Hyperion and for the increased operating and maintenance (O&M)
costs associated with the Clean Water Act Improvements. In
addition, Santa Monica's internal operating costs continue to
increase at approximately the same rate as the CPl.
Costs passed along to the City have also increased due to recent
expansion of the capacity of the system. Construction of the Los
Angeles water Reclamation Facility in the San Fernando Valley and
the Glendale Water Reclamation Facility in recent years has
served to extend the treatment capacity at Hyperion by reducing
flows from these areas and allowing flows from areas without
water reuse facilities to continue to be treated at Hyperion.
Santa Monica's share of the capital costs and operating costs
associated with these projects has added to the financial burden
of the Wastewater Fund. Figure 1 (attached) shows the rapid rate
at which Santa Monica 1 s share (2.4% of total) of Hyperion O&M
costs have been increasing. These costs have grown from
approximately $350,000 in FY 1984/85 to $1,640,000 projected for
FY 1988/89. Only $750,000 was budgeted for FY 1987/88 for
Hyperion 0 & M costs because this was the best estimate available
from Los Angeles at the time of budget adoption. The Ci ty
received the higher, revised estimates in July, 1987, after the
adoption of the budget.
As shown in Figure 2, Hyperion capital improvement costs have
increased from $641,500 in FY 1985/86 to $3,221,000 in FY
2
. .
r-.. ~
a:l
.... ....
r-.. ~
UJ (/) en
:I:z ~ W
..J
~-U) W I.lJ
(1)0.... 0 l.!l Cl
....-cn Z z
ufo 4 <[ <[
W U ~
f/) en
...J(I)2 ~ 0 9
~~'" Z ..J
::I 1D
a:..J . 0 >-
..JO :E m
....00: <( Q
~oo W 0
:t:..J1L .... W
u<l: ..J <[ ti Z
::1>- <( ~ ~ 0
::l
w....~ I- ~ -
~ ~ <( .... I-
u U) (I) 0::
<l: I.&J W 2
1.&.1 @ ~
.... .
0 <t
Z <.J
-
Z
0
:f
i <t
r:l I-
0'1 Z
<(
UJ
0
0'1
UJ
01 ?-
m UJ
0
(.J
L CD
m :IE
d5
.... d
CD
z
~ >- 0
-
CD ~ 0::
LLl
0-
Il) >-
CD
:r
..
lID
I I
i If) .
I r 1: -
. I I I.&J
CC
I ; j i r :;)
I ).J C)
-
i-j i ~
r i I f I I
0 01 CD ... CO In <It' It'l (\01 0 CJl CD .... co 10 <It' If) N
N - - - - -
0
....0
(1)0
06
uQ
..
..,-
.(1) .
en
LIJ UJ
-I -I
IJ.J I.J.J
C> (!)
CI Z Z
- <t <(
~ (f) CI)
~ 0 0
Z .J ..J
:::> >- >-
0 CD (Xl
:! (f) (I)
<t W LLJ
.J I- ~
<t <t <(
::l ~U) :E r--
~ 1-00 l- ce
U (f)....... CI) ....... crr
<t w~ I.LI l"- I-
CI)
0
. [!J @ U
...J
ex
.-
a..
<t
u
Z
0
-
<D a:::
<D w
~ t::: a..
a::> >-
---- :I:
,....,.. --- ,
I
I
I ,...
S!?
l.D
W
N
W llJ
~
~ cr
<D ::>
C>
u...
~
to
~
C\J
~
4
.
.
$3,275,300.
FY 1987/88 Hyperion capital costs are proJected at
1986/87.
The FY 1987/88 Wastewater budget for Hyperion
capital costs is only $2,441,301, which was the best estimate
available from Los Angeles at the time of budget adoption.
For these reasons, staff is recommending the implementation of a
sewer fee increase, and the re~oval of certain capital projects
from the Wastewater Budget to allow the wastewater operation to
subsidies.
continue to operate as an enterprise without General Fund
Rate Increase
staff proposes increasing sewer use fees, sewer connection fees
and Industrial Wastewater Surcharge fees as follows:
I. SEWER USE FEE (CENTS) (one hundred cubic feet of water wit..~
credit for irrigation water)
Current
$0.39
Proposed 12/1/87
$0.5850
proposed 1/1/89
$0.8775
II. CONNECTION FEES FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT
Class
Single Family Homes
Mult~-Family Units
1 bdr unit
2 bdr unit
3 bdr unit
Hotel/Motel
Commercial Building
Medical Building
Restaurant/bar (sit down)
Restaurant/bar (take out)
Storage Building
Industrial Building
*New use category
Current
$437.50
Prooosed
$1,312.50
656.25
843.75
1,031.25
1,687.50/room
1,125/1000 ft2
1,500/1000 ft2
93.75/seat
$400/100 ft2*
225/l000 ft2
750/1000 ft2
218.75
281. 25
343.75
562.50/room
375/1000 ft2
500/1000 ft2
31.25/seat
75/1000 ft2
250/1000 ft2
5
e
III. INOUSTRIAL WASTE QUALITY SURCHARGE
Classification
Auto, truck, Motorcycle Repair
Bakeries & candy Mfg.
Food Process Fish, Fruit, Tortillas,
Vegetables, oil
Food Process - Meat, poultry
Laundry-Linen & General
Restaurants & Food catering
service stations
Aircraft Service & Mfg.
carpet & Rug Cleaning
ceramic Mfg.
Chemical Mfg.
cosmetic Mfg.
Etching & Engraving
Foundry
Grinding
Lab Analytical
Lab Dental
Lab Medical
Latex & Rubber Products
Laundry - Towel & Uniform
Mirror Silvering
Paint Spraying
Silkscreen, Text Print Paint Removal
soil Lab
Textiles
Non-Surcharged, Non-Domestic Waste
.
Surcharge
Cents/HCF
Current
J..2/1/87
proposed
1/1/89
proposed
72.90
189.00
120.90
54.80
17.22
42.98
lO1. 25
51. 00
11. 48
8.78
13.80
60.75
3l.05
7.43
19.58
3.04
3.70
4.39
1. 69
27.34
19.58
72.90
72.90
51. 64
20.43
0.00
Although these increases are significant, they are essential to
32.40
84.00
48.60
126.00
be able to generate sufficient revenue to meet the fast rising
53.70
24.00
7.65
19.05
45.00
22.65
5.10
3.90
6.15
27.00
13.80
3.30
8.70
1. 35
1. 65
1. 95
0.75
12.15
8.70
32.40
32.40
22.95
9.08
0.00
80.60
36.00
11.48
28.65
67.50
34.00
7.65
5.85
9.20
40.50
20.70
4.95
13.05
2.03
2.50
2.93
1.13
18.23
13.05
48.60
48.60
34.43-
13.62
0.00
costs that are related to reducing pollution of the Santa Monica
Bay. The only option available to the City at this time is to
use City General Funds to pay for the increasing cost. Also, it
is important to note that the rate increase proposed will cover
known system improvements and expansion to date.
Costs and
timelines are not yet available for the proposed expansion of the
Hyperion Treatment system from the existing 420 million gallons
6
.
.
per day (MGD) to the proposed 500 MGD needed to serve future
development.
Financial/Budget Analysis
The higher charges proposed by Los Angeles as outlined above will
cause a deficit in the wastewater Fund this fiscal year if no
action is taken (see Figure 3). Higher sewer use rates, and
industrial wastewater quality surcharges, as proposed, will
generate significantly higher revenue in the future. If
implemented December 1, 1987, an additional $550,000.00 at
account nwnber 31-933-165-000-000 in sewer fee revenue will be
realized during the current fiscal year.
Increasing the sewer connection fee as proposed will make Santa
Monica fees comparable to other local agencies. If implemented
December 1, 1987, it is estimated that an additional $442,983.00
at account number 31-933-l66-000-000 in sewer connection fees
will be realized during the current fiscal year.
Impacts
The proposed new sewer use rates will raise monthly sewer fees to
a single family home by $1.37 per month and to other classes of
users as shown in Table 1.
The proposed connection fees will increase the costs to
developers and will reflect the actual financial impact of
additional sewage flows on Santa Monica. These proposed
connection fees are comparable to those charged by other cities
tributary to the Hyperion system which have enterprise-based
sewer funds. The city of Los Angeles' current connection charges
7
.... ~ 0 ..... e
It:I f'>I 0 0 N If)
f'>I 0 If) 0 0 0 0 In
0 ... N fl ..... e OJ n 0
C . .. . .. . .. .. . .. .
W .... 0 0- ~ or ~ ~ ~ l'? ....
Ul .... In M t'l 0- In N .... n- O
c .... 0- ... f'>I ~ 0 ,... .... 00 .0
Il. .. .. (it . . t!- .. . ..
C ~ ... .0 l'? N II"l
Il .. .. * * (it ..
Il..
.,. 0 .... ....
~ 0 0 .,. N 0 0 N .0
N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 N
0- 0 .... N 0 ..... 0 00 II"l If)
..... WUI . . .. ..
0- I-Ul .,. .. . . .. . .
8 0- .,. .. .,. ~ .,. l'? or
m oCt<t 0 ..... I") D- 10 N .... 0- m
"UI N N l'? N l'? 0 ..... ... OJ N
(! . .. .. * .. .. It .. .. ..
cu ~ N ... to? N lt1 .....
'z .. lit lit
3... ... ...- lit .. .. ..
....
....
.... 0 0 0 ..... e 0 0 0 0 .....
~ 0 0 0 0- ~ 0 0 0 .,. In
0 .. N ..0 f'>I In ..... 0 .,. N
C .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. .
W 0- Ir.l et- ~ ..... 0- 0 .. In ..0 ...
III .. N I") I") 0 0 .0 ~ N l'? ....
0 ... ... N In 0- In 00 '* to") ...
Il.. .. (/I .. . * .. ..
c ~ ... Ifl N .. Il'l
rr * .. .. .. .. ..
Il.
...
D- ~ 0 0 e .0 0 0 0 0 ~
CD ~ 0 e 0 ... ~ 0 0 tt N
0 .... N II"l N II"l I"- .,. 0-
..... WW .. .. .. .. ..
CD I-CD .... 0 0- .. . . . ..
~ ..0 D- o ... ... ..,.
m oCt<t 0 0 ,... to") 0 0 oll .,. ... 0
UJ "w ,... N t? N .... 0- m CD I") N .... .
... " .. .. .. .. . .. . .. m co Q
Ul ou ... N ... N ... ltJ .,. 0- 3 W
>- .....z .. .. .. .. .. lit .. ... 0 to
..J 3... ...- ...I . ....
([ lL. ow :>
i ... g:S IlJ
X "
. UJ ll'-t!J
W U oCt .00.... ....
III W UI: lL. 00
cr C ellC ,
UJ N 0 M 0 0 lI'1 n to? 0 g! .... .JOZC ,...
" ... 0 ID 0 0 et- 0 D- o D- ~ <t crw
u ... 0 oll N 0 D- .... ltJ I") In M ::JZ Ul ffi
z Q . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. ....00-0
.... W N 0 N ~ ltJ to? 0 Dl It) .,. 0- 0 u....mll.. Il..
Ul ,... If) N M N 0 .... ~ .... ll'" .. W <1:".....0
Ul 0 N .... ID N .. .. .... 0 N 0 It.l UllXlII: D-
.1- n. . .. .. lit . .. .. .. .. ([ ZeLma.. 0-
M([ 0 I'? N .... N ... I') .... lXI 0>- .~
Il Il .. .. lit 411- 41- 411- .. xz.m.
W Il.. Ul UJ jotCllI-t")
0::..... m ... W Q..J ....UM
::J1XI m N 0 0 0 N ~ 0 00 ~ ::J z. "uwm
CDll'- ..... ... 0 0 0 ... ~ 0 ll'- III ~ Wt:l>W17*
jot .. ..... ... 0 ..... N 0 ..... M t'"J M 0....0 170
lL. .. ID WIlJ .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. Ulc:ta::CO::UJ
.. I-tn N 0 0- ~ ..0 0 .... It'l t'l ..... UJ Q UlIlCl.::J
ctc:t ..... 0 .... I') 00 ..... or I"- 0- 0 II: OQ.Cl. .J
0:: a::w N N M N 0 .... .... N I"- .... 0 Zll.
W " .. .. .. lit . . .. .. wo .OXIl...
m OU M N .0 ('II ... I") ..... ... "Ul >- . In IlJ ([ l-
I: 'z .. .. .. * lit .. .. lit ::Jm 0::0 >a::iIJ
UJ 3.... ...- mo ctD'QOCO
u ....0.... UJmw>-I:C
UI l.i..C rn..m"ll::J .
C " W cta::OlD w
co.. UtollJ([1- m
Q UI U/::J"UUlC <t
iIJ l- . Z..Ju Ul UJ
Ul ... ....... Il..z......ml- a::
~ If] QW lL. ...mlIlQ. u
::1m ....ti ..........0 z
0 .... ([0 m.c.....c ....
0:: ~ ... ::I ct!lwmOJCot
Cl. ... N .... .J ..0 .....Cl:l ~ Q Ul' W
.... ct co i Z W ..co to
N ... ~ J: .... D-C l.i.. wccooo <t
jot ...w Cl.::JD" :I:
UJ i6 0- ..J "I- ..JCl<..J.......... Q.
i UI <I <I 0.... ctWl.ilu..oo.
m W 0 U I- Ul 1')0 .".... zm UlC
UJ UI W III ... to U ::J~WD..C!l....D-ffiI-Z
~ W l.i.. :l W Cot <I ~ I- .... Z W<I ZOZ .0 <to
lL. Z S u u Z tIl ([ Z ...WC....Ul*O-s::U
al % W ~ ... .... u ~ C ...I ::lco....O<II-Z ...l.lJ
W 0 :> .... ~ ~ u c:t ..,lD<I Cot!i>...t-U1
Q Ul Ul ... W ... al .... Z > Dl .....1-I:mIX mom
z UJ .=I ~ a ,., 4 Q. :z: I: I:) << .J z.....zomw-l Jr.IWUJ
::J 2 u ... .J Z .... eL. <I C OlDW".....&OQ.. w
Il.. " UI " ... w ([ ct 0:: I- ~ H et-I:lL..... uw....c
..... w w ~ l.lJ g ct ll.. .... I- W Z C Ul Q-lrJ OJ Utt<l:::J
to t!l :> 3 :t :> l< z Z 0.. Q: l- lL. IlJ UI .Jz x:t:l~ .J
..... Z W UI 0 I- ct Li.I ([ ct >- C I- toO::eL.ct" I-Q..u
0 .... IX Ul U 0 -J UI m :I: .J t!l 0 <IWI:OUllDOWN.JZ
.. Z Ul .. Z Z CDCl.....JeL. lDa::* ....
... .. Q Ul .... l-
X OJ C z fa a 0 ... ...
u W a ::l Z 0 ..N M~ ll"J oil .....
Z I1l ([ lL. ...I W ~ .... ... ....
8
.
.
are considerably less than Santa Monica's proposed fees, but are
expected to be increased in the near future according to City
sanitation Department staff (see Table 2).
The capital projects that are proposed to be deleted are related
to storm drains and will be requested in future budget proposals.
While these projects are necessary, they are not critical.
Cost impacts of the rate increase for landlords will be one of
the factors considered by the Rent Control Board in June, 1988 as
cost of ownership factors are evaluated to produce the FY 1988/89
annual general adjustment, according to the Cityls Rent Control
staff.
The Chamber of Commerce and Commercial and Industrial Property
Owners Association (CIPA) were notified of these proposed rate
increases as required by state law.
Additional Capacity Requirements
Santa Monica currently has a guaranteed capacity (per contract)
at Hyperion of II million gallons per day (MGD). During the last
several years the daily sewage flow from Santa Monica has
averaged between 12. 5 and l3 MGD. Santa Monica has requested
additional contractual capacity several times but has always been
turned down because of lack of guaranteed available capacity.
However, all Santa Monica sewage has been treated. Santa Monica
pays a surcharge for the treatment of sewage in excess of the
contract limit.
9
.
.
The recent completion of the Tillman Treatment Plant (Phase I),
improvements to the Glendale plant, and the possible expansion of
Hyperion from 420 MGD to 500 MGD will make additional capacity
available for Santa Monica. The additional two to three million
gallons per day required for Santa Monica will cost an estimated
$3 to $6 million dollars per million gallons of capacity or a
total of $9 to $18 million dollars. As stated above, Staff has
not addressed this funding issue in the recommendations of this
report since actual costs are not known at this time.
Local Interceptor Sewage Treatment Plant
Due to the proposed h~gh cost of increased treatment capacity at
Hyperion, it may be more cost-effective for santa Monica to
construct a water reclamation plant and use a portion of the
treated water for irrigation purposes throughout the city. This
type of non-potable water re-use project is being utilized
currently by several Southern California cities (Las Virgenes,
Long Beach, Cerritos and South Laguna). Assistance funding from
the State and Federal governments and the Metropolitan Water
district of Southern california (MWD) is available. As well as
possibly saving a portion of the purchase cost of new sewage
capacity at Hyperion, the plant could reduce the Water Division's
purchase of expensive imported water used for irrigation
purposes. In addition, depending on the site location, a Santa
Monica owned and operated treatment plant would be able to treat
maj or portions of the low flows from the Kenter storm drain
system prior to discharge to the ocean. This is a project that
10
.
.
council instructed staff to pursue in connection with the recent
concerns regarding storm drain pollutions.
Recommendations
City staff recommends that the City council take the following
actions to eliminate the proJected deficit in the Wastewater
Fund:
1) Approve the attached resolution (Attachment A) to revise
sewer use fees, sewer connection fees and industrial waste
quality surcharge.
2) Delete the following capital projects as shown:
Account Number
31-760-661-000-916
31-760-661-aOO-9l5
31-760-661-000-919
31-760-661-000-920
31-760-661-000-933
Description
Storm Drain Laterals
Wastewater Main Reline
26th street storm Drain
Storm Drain Improvements
Master Drainage Plan study
Amount
$ 99,750
46,000
279,048
116,500
157,500
$698,798
3) Increase revenue budget at account number 31-933-165-000-000
by $550,000 and at account number 31-933-166-000-000 by
$442,983.
4- ) Per previous
council
discussion
regarding new
large
developments, direct staff to prepare an ordinance to require
all develop1nents over 80,000 square feet to reduce sewage
generation.
5) Direct the City Manager to initiate a study to evaluate
alternatives to deal with the additional sewage treatment
capacity required by Santa Monica such as a water reclamation
system for irrigation throughout the City and to identify
potential sources of outside assistance funding for such a
project.
11
.
.
Prepared by: Stanley E. Scholl, Director of General Services
John E. Hoagland, Administrative Water Engineer
Attachments: Table 1
Table 2
Attachment A - Resolution
(status2)
12
.
.
o;f'
It) It) J..l
8 - - (I.l
Z +J
~ 0 It) It) LO 0 0 0 0 It!
It) r-- co M 0 It) to 0 3:
~ \0 o;f' CO C\ It) M \0 CO <i-l
E-t M 0 r-- co N ~ f' .... 0
(/) .... N ..-i r-I ..-i N It)
I'il UI
ll:; +J
-.-I
C
::l
M 0
\D
~ tJI
0<( 0 0 \P M 0 0 0 0 C
H o;f' r-I \0 o;f' N \0 o;f' \0 ..-1
U UI
ll:; M It) 0 O'l r-I ~ 0 r-- ::::l
I'il N M M M It) N N N
~ +J
Ql
0 Q)
c; lj...j
Ql
.c::tJ1
~<<I
N S:::~
OC
f' \D f' o;f' 0 0 0 co J::; 0
E-t to co r-- N co r-- It) f' J-I .
tI):t: ll.. ~Ii-I .c::
1'ilE-t < o;f' \0 to .... o;f' .... N f' ..c::Q1 ~
I'ilZ N M M N II) N N N ~ 0..0 C
~O E-t C \0 0
r-I ;l:: H o ~ Ja
p:rC3~ Z !:;Q1'!:
::> +J.j.J ~
~tf.lP::i ~ltI..-i QJ
tXl~ll.. \0- Q)~): 0..
< 0..
E..q:l::: P::i 11-.I...-1 J-IQ)
I'ilt? J...l 0-.-1 QJtJI
:::~ QI m ~J..I
+lm+l m m
I'il:x:: It:l ~ QJ ~..r::
tf.lC; ):..-1 l-l 0
M 0 an o;f' o;f' 0 l!) r-- s:::........ II-IS-I
r-l r-- r-l \0 LO N In r-- 0 ll-l:::::lQl o ::l .
0 0 U1..-i
N o;f' o;f' M o;f' M M LO O..-i UI o-l
:z:: WI'1J..4 .j.J QI-r-i
~ +J <i-l ..-1 +J .Q
tfJ ..-i tJ\ 0 C UJ
C t:: ::lm>:
::l -roj r-I ): <<:l
lI.l <<:l 0 .j.J
o;f' ::l..... LOr-!
,..., 0 Mm>.
trlJ..I -.-I .j.J
tJ'lt::QJ trlJ.l14
c...... S C+lQJ
..-1 't:I a ..-1 Vl ~
00 .-t 0 rn ::l 0
::s...... 0 ::l't:114
::J co..
'1;j QJ..Q.j.J +J -0-1
.j.J QJ J: 0 C C
C Vl O.j.J 0 It!QJO
QI 0 .cCII-I J.l't:1
J.l c.. QJ ::::l::::lOO
l-l 0 >'SQJ <<:l...-l QI
::s J.l ...-l.j.JJ.l ~OtJ'l
c; ll.. ..... J..l m t/l C J..l
Sltlg..Q).....<<:l
I \0 I\:l ~ ..r:: S-I ..r::
- UJ Il-I ltl Ul +J +10
<<:l It! ...-l C +J 0
0 0 m >. ...-l aJ~OOI'ds::QJ
...., ....., 41 +I ...., 0 r-i -rl 0 fEr (11 trI
s:: s:: o-l ...., :t: 't:I tflco rn Vl I'l1
0 0 0) c; s:: aJ CO .14 0)): r-I
X X 0'1 >. ::s r-I ~ -0-1 lOaJltlOaJ I'il
C J..l r-l tfl I'l1 C tf.l \0 r-I 0.. r-- C tI) I'il
ro <<I ,0:( Q) S-I 0) 'g m r:...
+J .j..J > 0) tI) .Q p:;
C C m r-I > aJ l-I --- --- :::
It! <<I 0 ::s Q) r-I r-I ::s r-1l'\lM o;f'LO\O tf.l
tI) tI) ...:i U tXl I'il t!l c:Q --- ---
f;I:":l
t1.lCl
rilO::
r:<.l<
~:I::
U
=::;
o=::;
Nl-IO
81-1
~U8
~f;I:":lt)
lIl:O:O
<:zo::
808
Utf}
Z
ca::O
~t)
~
ril~
tI.l~
Z
'<;!'
8
~
~
8
t1.l
~
0::
M
~
oeC
1-1
t)
0:;
111
~
o
t)
N
&4
A.
<
E-i
H
:z;
::>
\0
r-l
:I::
~
U)
e
10
t"-
to
N
r-l
M
o
t"-
M
0:::1'
M
N
o
o
10
N
\0
10
o
o
10
t"-
CO
\D
r-l
o
o
o
10
t"-
r-l
o lO
o ('II
o r-l
lO t"-
('II 0:::1'
..
in '<;!'
o
10
t"-
M
"=I'
o 0
10 0
N In
r-l CO
M r-l
..
r-l .....
+J
~
(l)
~
~
::I
U
"0
<l.l
fIl
o
0.
o
I-l
A.
I
III
o t1l
-.-I <l.l
s:= r-l
o QJ
::E: tJ'1
s:=
III <
~
s:= Ul
m 0
Ul +-=l
m
o
-.-I
s::
o
::E:
III
~
s:=
III
tf.l
I!l
('II
r-l
CO
III
en
o
o
o
t"-
M
10
o
II)
t"-
M
en
M
o
o
o
\D
M
..
co
r-I
o
II)
N
r-I
M
.....
o
o
CO
'O:t'
M
~
4J
-~
t)
!-l
QJ
>
...-l
='
C,)
OJ
r::
o
z
IV
r:::
o
z
Q)
s::
o
z
IV
s::
o
z
Ul
..-.j
..-.j
-..-l
::r::
>.
r-l
l-l
(l)
>
(l)
t:Q
o
o
N
M
0'\
..
co
o
o
o
~
r-l
0\
r-l
o
o
o
CO
'O:t'
M
o
o
o
co
10
o
'tS
s::
::1
'"
Q)
t1.l
r-l
r..:l
o
o
10
t"-
M
o
o
'<;!'
'<;!'
CO
10
('II
o
III
r---
CO
.....
o
o
lO
\0
o
0:::1'
o
o
o
III
.....
o
o
N
0:::1'
\D
M
o
lO
t"-
M
o
o
0:::1'
\D
\D
Q)
r-l
III
"0
C
Q)
r-l
o
~
~
III
.0
I-l
::1
'"
...
.c::
.J-I
s::
o
S
l-I
..c::Q)
~o.
o I-l
S Q)
+>
I-l lIS
Q) );
0..
~
I-l 0
Q)
+1m
m+J
)..-f
s::
Ii-l:;:l
o
o
tilt"-
+J
-~ t1\
CS::
='..-1
CIJ
..,.:;:1
.-l
.
"'"
"0
Q:l
N
I
10
'0'
s::
III
.JJ
-.-I
s::
:::l
l-I
'tl
III
M
I
r-l
.c::
4J
-..-l
~
I-l
Q)
+J
It!
:J:
(j..j
o
r1.l
+J
-~
C
::s
o
\0
0\
C
..-/
tIl
='
.jJ
Q)
Q)
11-I
Q)
lJ'I
lt1
~
C
o
I-l
11-I
o
\0
.c:
~
..-.1
:J:
r-i
-.-.I
lt1
+J
(l)
I-l
........ Ii-l
Q) 0
u
-.... m
Il-I +J
Il-I --.-I
o ) s::
o :;:I
r-lr-l
ltl''I-IO
-.... ~ 10
O(t1M
!-l<l.l
(l)P..tfl
S C
SE-.-I
o C. fIl
U tJ'1::1
+JtO+J
0('11 C
o~ Itl
li-l I-l
.c:::I
Q) +J It!
I-l -..-l .jJ
Itl ) tIl
::1 Q)
tJ1.c:: I-l
r1.l+J
t:+J
(l) +J 0 0 It!
r-l..-jr1.l0Sa>
tflt;4JO r1.l
C 0 -..-l .. $.!
-.-I s:: 10 Q) In
tf.l \D 0 r-l 0.['.
t1\
tfIl::
~'..-l
-.-.I '0'
r1.lr-l
='-""
:::l
Q).Q
S
Ool-J
..c::s:::
OJ
>tl:::
r-l.J-I
'..-l 1-1
1$ltI
Itlo..
li-lltl
--
r-lN M 0:::1'
-- -
-
s::
CD
..c::
o
4J
.....
~
"0
s::
m
ljl
s::
.....
s::
.....
'tS
11-I
o
.J-I
11-I
.
tJ1
tIl
o
o
o
t"-
-
..c::
+J
C
o
S
$..!
OJ
s:4
I-l
Q)
+J
Itl
)
-
111
r.>::I
"""
0:;
~
t1.l
....,
<Xl
.....-
C
N
......
0'
r.Il
ttl
U
c:
~
-
......
"C
1....,
Q
OJ
>
.....
:1J
U
(l,)
~
....
o
-
>..
<:J
c:
~
o
....
....
<
+-
ell
,I::.
....
'"d
Q)
,-'
VOTE: AffirmatIve:
Negative:
Abstain:
Absent:
PROOF vOtE~ WITH ANOTHER PERSON BEFORE A~~THING
DISTKioulluN: uRiGiNAL ~o oe signea. sealed and
BEFORE' D;STRIBU~N CHECK CONTENT OF
DISTRIBUTION OF RESOLUTION , 7S-~b
CouncIl Meeting Date 10y- /.r 7
/-~
/1/0
,
7-- 0
ALL
Agenda Item *
Was It amended?
.
FOR CITY C~ERK'S
ORDINANCE #
ACTION
Introduced:
Adopted:
AIl-'lAYS PUBLISH AOOP .1.'.t:.ilJ ORDINANCES-I<
*Cross out Attorney I s approval
~
'filed In Vault.
NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION (Date: )
Department orIgInatIng staff report ( -I< )
*CIty Attorney does not ..,,:ant copl.es of his ordi1}ances or resolutlons.
l~anagement SerVi,;t-se? Lynne Bax:rette vrdInances only ~
Agency mentIoned In document or staff report
SubJect fIle (agenda packet)
Counter file
o the r s - (Review for depcu. Lll'CIlts who need to knc:M) .
Airport
AudItorum
Parking Auth.
Personnel
1/"1
~ Building Dept.
cr
Q)
~ CUI"u..UU. ty and. F..corv::mic Dev.
(l.)
~ FInance
Planning
Police (en-
forcement?)
.....
I..;...j
'+<
o
Purchasing
Recr/Parks
FIre
<F
General Servo
Transportation
^
cu
c:
l-<
o
.J
..,
<(
Llbrary
Treasurer
Manager
^
~
.....t
U
~4~
Sr.;ND FOU~ COPIES OF ALl.. ORDINANCES TO:
tOD~D SYSTEMS. Attn Peie~ Maciearie
~:O ~~in-~~r~et ~
Ai""l V~h Jersey_OZ717
SEND FOUR COPIES OF AU. ORDTNANr.ES JO:
D~bIp ~yrIck .
SAN'fA MONICA MUNICIPAL COURT
(725 MAIN STREEt Room l18
SAITTA MONICA, CA 90401
........
o
ro
...,
I-
(l.)
;l
o
0::
(certl.fied?)
1
1
-
.
I
--
*Check COde SectIOns before sendlJ1
TOTAL COPIES
3
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 7526(CCS)
(CITY COUNCIL SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT~;
OF SANTA MONICA ESTABLISHING A SEWER SERVICE
CHARGE, AN INDUSTRIAL WASTE QUALITY SURCHARGE
AND A SEWER CONNECTION FEE
WHEREAS, Section 7143B(C) of the Santa Monica
Municipal Code provides for the establishment of a sewer service
charge and industrial waste quality surcharge from time to time
by the City council; and
WHEREAS, section 7137{b) of the Santa Monica Municipal
Code provides for the establishment of a sewer connection fee
from time to time by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the joint powers agreement between the City
of Santa Monica (Contract No. 1544 (CCS)) and the City of Los
Angeles for the transporation, treatment and disposal of sewage
requires that the City of Santa Monica pay certain Capital
Improvement charges related to improvements at the City of Los
Angeles Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant and certain
operational and maintenance charges related to operation and
maintenance at the City of Los Angeles Hyperion Wastewater
Treatment Plant; and
WHEREAS, the proposed capital improvement charges and
operation and maintenance charges for the City of Los Angeles
Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant result in a projected deficit
for the Sewer Fund in Fiscal Yea= 1987-1988.
- 1 -
.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That effective December 1, 1987, the sewer
service charge shall be $0.5850 per billing unit.
SECTION 2. That effective January 1, 1989, the sewer
service charge shall be $0.8775 per billing unit.
SECTION 3. That effective December 1, 1987, the
industrial waste quality surcharge shall be:
Code Classification
Surcharge
Cents/HeF
New
o Auto, truck, Motorcycle Repair
1 Bakeries & Candy Mfg.
2 Food Process Fish, Fruit, Tortillas,
Vegtables, Oil
3 Food Process - Meat, Poultry
4 Laundry-Linen & General
5 Restaurants & Food Catering
6 Service stations
A Aircraft Service & Mfg.
B Carpet & Rug Cleaning
C ceramic Mfg.
D Chemical Mfg.
E Cosmetic Mfg.
FEtching & Engraving
G Foundry
H Grinding
I Lab Analytical
J Lab Dental
K Lab Medical
L Latex & Rubber Products
M Laundry - Towel & Uniform
N Mirror Silvering
o Paint Spraying
P Silkscreen, ~ext Print Paint Removal
Q Soil Lab
R Textiles
S Non-Surcharged, Non-Domestic Waste
48.60
126.00
80.60
36.00
11. 48
28.65
67.50
34.00
7.65
5.85
9.20
40.50
20.70
4.95
13.05
2.03
2.50
2.93
1.13
18.23
13.05
48.60
48.60
34..D
13.62
0.00
SECTION 4.
That effective January 1, 1989, the
industrial waste ~uality surcharge shall be:
- 2 -
.
Code Classification
o Auto, Truck, Motorcycle Repair
1 Bakeries & Candy Mfg.
2 Food Process Fish, Fruit, Tortillas,
Vegtab1es, Oil
3 Food Process - Meat, Poultry
4 Laundry-Linen & General
5 Restaurants & Food Catering
6 Service stations
A Aircraft Service & Mfg.
B carpet & Rug Cleaning
C Ceramic Mfg.
D Chemical Mfg.
E Cosmetic Mfg.
FEtching & Engraving
G Foundry
H Grinding
I Lab Analytical
J Lab Dental
K Lab Medical
L Latex & Rubber Products
M Laundry - Towel & Uniform
N Mirror Silvering
o Paint Spraying
P Si1kscreen, Text Print Paint Removal
Q soil Lab
R Textiles
S Non-SurCharged, Non-Domestic Waste
.
Surcharge
Cents/HeF
New
72.90
189. no
120.90
54.00
17.22
42.98
101. 25
51.00
11.48
8.78
13.80
60.75
31.05
7.43
19.58
3.04
3.70
4.39
1.69
27.34
19.58
72.90
72.90
51. 64
20.43
0.00
connection fee shall be:
SECTION 5. That effective December 1, 19B7, the sewer
Classification
Single Family Residence
M~lti-Family Residence
1 Bedroom Unit
2 Bedroom Unit
3 Bedroom Unit
Hotel/Motel
Commercial Building
Medical Building
Restaurant/Bar
Sit-down
carry-out
Storage Building
Industrial Buildings
Sewer Connection Fee
$l,312.50/unit
$ 656. 25junit
$ 843.75/unit
$1,031. 25/uni t
$1, 687.50/unit
$l,125.00/1000 sq.ft.
$1,500.00/1000 sq. ft.
$ 93.75/seat
$ 400.00/100 sq. ft.
$ 112.50/1000 sq. ft.
$ 750.00/1000 sq.ft.
The Director of General Services shall have the authority
~o set any fee not covered by the above lis~.
- 3 -
.
.
SECTION 6.
That utility bills which overlap the
effective dates in Section 1, Section 2, Section 3 and Section 4
~~
of this resolution shall have the sewer service charge and
industrial waste quality surcharge, where applicable, prorated
over the period as though the sewer use were equivalent on each
day of the billing period.
SECTION 7.
The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this resolution and thenceforth and thereafter the
same shall be in full force and effect.
Approved as to form:
~ ....... ~
City Attorney
ROBERT M. MYERS
(RESOSEW2)
- , -
. ..
.
.
. .
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 7526(CCS)
1987.
Adopted and
A 11/
--------:
Mayor
was duly adopted by the Cit
ncil of the City of Santa Monica
at a meeting thereof held on November 24, 1987 by the following
Council vote:
Ayes: counci1members: Finkel, Jennings, A. Katz, H.
Katz, Reed, Zane, Mayor Conn
Noes: Councilmembers: None
Abstain: Counci1members: None
Absent: Counci1members: None
. d~
Ci~~rk