Loading...
SR-413-002 (4) . FI:CMD:BR:as:sretopn Council Meeting: 1/12/88 Santa Monica, ccll2A- I 1At:ir 2-1988 Califo1:'nia " ~/:5-ooz- . TO: CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: City and Agency Staff SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR OUTSTANDING PROMISSORY NOTES Introduction The city of Santa Monica holds six Promissory Notes, two for the Downtown Project and four for the Ocean Park Project, for funds loaned to the Redevelopment Agency by the City. These notes, last renewed by the Agency January I, 1987, need to be renewed for the 1988 calendar year effective January 1, 1988. Background The City has loaned the Agency funds for various administrative, operational and miscellaneous expenses. These loans have been formalized in the form of Promissory Notes with payment due annually. If payment in full is not received by the City, it is necessary that the Notes be renewed. Attachment I details the financial history of each of the promissory notes, including amounts repaid to date, and presents the sources and uses of budgeted FY1987/88 Redevelopment Agency income. Through June 30, 1987, approximately $1.8 million (including a $1.5 million repayment made during FY1986/87) has been repaid. An additional repayment of approximately $1.9 million has been budgeted for FY1987/88 as part of the refinancing of the existing Ocean Park bonds, however, completion of this transaction is contingent on a decrease in municipal bond interest rates. Staff will continue to monitor CCthA_I ~rmi9B& and proceed as appropriate. ...-- As'shown in Atta.ent I, Agency income fO~FY1987/88 is not available to effect further repayment of the promissory notes. since the Agency does not have funds available at this time to make payment in full for the amounts outstanding as of December 31 1987, the six Promissory Notes should be renewed effective January I, 1988. The attached Notes include the appropriate accrued interest through December 31, 1987. Repayments which may be scheduled for FY19BB/89 will be determined as part of the regular budget process. Budget/Financial Impact There is no budgetary impact resulting from the renewal of these Promissory Notes. The financial impact is to increase the liability of the Agency by $935,653.06 which represents net accrued interest for the period January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1987 (see Attachment II). continuing the policy adopted last year by Council, staff once again recommends that the interest rate for five promissory notes be one-half of one percentage point (.5%) more than the City's actual rate of investment earnings for calendar year 1988. The additional .5% is to reimburse the City for carrying this debt. As required in the original bond covenant, the sixth promissory note must continue at the same rate of interest, 7.75% I as the Downtown Redevelopment Project Parking Lease Revenue Bonds. Recommendation It is recommended that: (A) the City Council agree to renew the six loans to the Redevelopment Agency and to accept the attached promissory Notes: and (B)' the Redevelaent Agency approve . authorize the Chairperson to execute the six attached Promissory Notes between the Agency and the city, extending the loans for the 19S8 calendar year. Prepared by: C.M. Dennis, Agency Treasurer/city Director of Finance W.R. Ramsey, Assistant Director of Finance . . Attachment I STATUS OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROHISSORY NOTES I. History of promissory Notes The following indicates the original debt amount of each of the six promissory notes between the Redevelopment Agency and the City, and the total net accrued interest for each promissory note as of 12/31/87 i the history of note payments is footnoted by promissory note. Promissory Note Number Original Debt Amount (date) Total Accrued Interest Through 12/31/87 Promissory Note Balance 1/1/88 Downtown Project l. Downtown Redevelopment Project $ 871,840.00 $ 117,602.96(g) $ 989,442.96 (6/30/81) (a) 6. Downtown Redevelopment Project $4,400,000.00 (10/24/78) (f) $2,663,098.25(h) $7,063,098.25 Sub-total $5,271,840.00 $2,780,701.21 $8,052,541. 21 Ocean Park Project 2. Ocean Park Project $1,243,266.88 $1,180,846.86(i) $2,424,113.74 (6/30j81) (b) 3. Ocean Park Project $ 824,449.00 $ 738,472.80 $1,562,921. 80 (1/1/82) (c) 4. Ocean Park Project $ 772,568.08 $ 404,019.68 $1,176,587.76 (9/13/83) (d) 5. Ocean Park Project $ 280,837.00 $ 146,743.96 $ 427,580.96 (9/14/83) (e) Sub-total $3,121,120.96 $2,470,083.30 $ 5,591,204.26 Total $8,392,960.96 $5,250,784.51 $13,643,745.47 Notes: . . (a) and (c) represent General Fund funds advanced to the Agency for various administrative and other expenses as of 6/30/81 (per Agency Resolution 371, 1/12/82). (b) Represents city CDBG funds advanced to the Agency for the payment of interest on outstanding Federal proj ect notes (per Agency Resolution 371, 1/12/82). (d) Represents General Fund funds advanced to the Agency to pay off the outstanding Federal Ocean Park Urban Renewal Grant Note. (e) Represents City CDBG funds held by the Federal government and appl ied to payoff the outstanding Federal Ocean Park Urban Renewal Grant Note. (f) Represents the value of various parcels of property transferred from the City to the Agency for the Downtown Redevelopment Project (per Agency Resolution 352, 10/24/78). (g) Reflects payments of $150,000 in FY1983/84 and $347,548 in FY1986/87. (h) Reflects payment of $1,149,452 in FY1986/87 (i) Reflects payment of $183,000 in FY1984/85 II. FY1987/88 Financial Ability of Redevelopment Agency to Repay Promissory Notes The following table summarizes (in millions) the budgeted sources and uses of Redevelopment Agency income for FY1987/88. As this table indicates, Agency income is not available at this time to effect further repayment of Agency debt to the City. Sources Downtown Project Ocean Park Project Tax Increment and Interest city Lease Payment for Parking structures $1. 0 $1.1 1.2 Total Sources $2.2 $1.1 . . Uses Salaries Supplies & Expenses Capital outlay and Projects $ .1 1.9* 1.6** $ .1 1.0* 1. 0** Total Uses $6.6 $2.2 *Includes existing bonded debt payment requirements. **Includes reappropriated capital projects from prior years which are primarily financed by designated funds in the appropriate fund balance. (rptrapn) . . Attachment II City of Santa Monica Extension of Time for Outstanding Notes* Promissory Accrued Promissory Note Interest Note Promissory Balance 1-1-87 Balance Note Number 1-1-87 12-31-87 1-1-88 Downtown projects 1. Downtown $ 925,145.36 $ 64,297.60 $ 989,442.96 Redevelopment project** 6. Downtown 6,555,079.58 508,018.67 7,063,098.25 Redevelopment Project****** Sub-total Downtown Project $7,480,224.94 $572,316.27 $8,052,541. 21 Ocean Park Project 2. Ocean Park $2,266,586.01 $157,527.73 $2,424,113.74 Federal Allocation*** 3. Ocean Park 1,461,357.46 101,564.34 1,562,921. 80 Federal Allocation** 4. Ocean Park 1,100,128.81 76,458.95 1,176,587.76 Federal Allocation**** 5. Ocean Park 399,795.19 27,785.77 427,580.96 Federal Allocation***** Sub-total Ocean Park Project $ 5,227,867.47 $363,336.79 $ 5,591,204.26 Total $12,708,092.41 $935,653.06 $13,643,745.47 * Effective January 1, 1988 Notes 1 through 5 will carry an interest rate one half a percentage point (.5%) higher than the City's actual rate of investment earnings for calendar year 1988. However, note 6 will continue to carry an interest rate of 7-3/4%, as required by the Resolution of the Agency acknowledging the debt. This is the same rate of interest on the Downtown Redevelopment Project Parking Lease Revenue Bonds. ** Reimbursement for various administrative support and service costs; owed to City's General Fund. **** ***** ****** *** t~pay interest Loan Note: owed on to Reimbursema of COBG funds used outstanding Federal Urban Renewal City's CDBG Fund. Close out of Ocean Park Federal Urban Renewal proj act: owed to the City's General Fund. Close out of Ocean Park Federal Urban Renewal Proj act: owed to the City's CDBG Fund. Represents the value of various parcels of property transferred from the City to the Agency for the Downtown Redevelopment Project (per Agency Resolution 352, 10/24/78). Owed to General Fund.