SR-6-B (3)
.' . , e
.' - -
. " ~B
(
A- TTA-C-.H tV\ e NT .:2.
CITY PLANNING DIVISION
conununity and EconOffilC Development Department
M E M 0 RAN DUM
DATE: November 4, 1985
TO: The Honorable Planning Commiss~on
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: TTM 43805, ErA 791, 1220 Marine Street and V1cinity,
12-Lot Land Subdlvision, RI, James Kirby.
Site Locatlon and Description. The subj ect property is located
south of Marlne Street approxlmately two blocks east of Llncoln
Boulevard on a parcel prevlously occupled by Fukuhara Nursery.
Surroundlng uses conslst entirely of single famlly homes.
zoning Classificatlon: Rl Dlstrict
Land Use Dlstrlct: Single Farn1ly Houslng Dlstrict
Parcel Area: 83,000 Square Feet (1.88 acres)
proJect Request. The subdlv1slon would create 12 new R1 Dlstrlct
lots ranglng ln Slze between 5,100 and 5,850 square feet, and
would lncorporate a 286' cul-de-sac extenslon of Ozone Avenue
westward from a short stub of Ozone Avenue located on the west
side of Frederlck Street.
A detal1ed proJect descrlptlon may be found in the proJect's 1n1-
tl.al Study (EIA 791), WhlCh is included in each Planning Cornm1 s-
sioner's packet.
Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance.
Land Use
Category Nunicipal Code Element proJect
Perml.tted Use Single Family Single Family Single Fam1ly
Dwel11.ngs Dwellings Dwelllng
HomeSl.tes
Min. Lot Area 5,000 sq . it. 5,000 sq. ft. 5,100 sq. ft .
Mln. Lot
Width 50' - 50'
M1n. Lot
Depth 100' - lOa'
- 1 -
, . , tit
.' I
. .
(
Min. Front
Yard
Setback 10' or as - 20'
specif~ed
CEQA Status. An Inltial Study (EIA 791) has been prepared for
th~s proJect and a Negative Declaration has been recommended by --
the Envlronmental Review Committee.
Analysis. 'The 5ubdivis~on meets all appl~cable Zon1ng and
General Plan requirements. The Tentatlve Map has been approved
by the City Englneer and a detailed set of required public lm-
provements has been speclfied by the Department of General
Services.
The Park1ng and Trafflc Eng~neer and Planning Dlvis10n staff sup-
port the proposed cul-de-sac deslgn as opposed to a through
street in order to prevent the further intrus~on of through traf-
f~c on Ozone Avenue as it extends east from Llncoln Boulevard.
In addition, a cul-de-sac offers a preferred resldential environ-
ment in terms of reduced traffic noise, pedestrlan safety, ne1gh-
borhood ldentity and security.
A pedestrian access way at the west end of the cul-de-sac 15 not
reconunended. pedestrian access would requ~re that a ramp be con-
structed in the lntersectlon of Ozone Avenue a:J.d Glen Court.
Such a ramp would lnterfere wlth veh~cular trafflc. The sub-
divider opposes access at the west end of the proJect due to con-
cerns about maintaining prlvacy and secur~ty on the new street.
Recommendation. It is respectfully recommended that a Negat~ve
Declaratlon be adopted for EIA 791 and that Tentatlve Tract Map
43805 be approved w~th the f~ndlngs and condltions below.
Finding s .
1- The proposed subdivision, together with its prOV~Slon for
its deslgn and lmprovements, 1S consistent with appl~cable
general and spec1flc plans as adopted by the City of Santa
Monlca based on the reVlew and analysis presented in thlS
report, WhlCh are incorporated herein by reference.
2. The site is phys~cally suitable for the proposed density
and type of development based on the items revlewed and
concluslons drawn ln Environmental Impact Assessment 791
and in th~s report, which are incorporated hereln by
reference.
3. The design of the subdlvis~on or the proposed improvements
will not cause substantial envlronmental damage or sub-
stantlally and avo~dably inJure fi sh or wildllfe or the~r
habitat and will not cause serious public health problems
based on the ~tems reviewed and conclusions drawn 1n En-
vironmental Impact Assessment 791 and in this report,
WhlCh are incorporated hereln by reference.
- 2 -
. " ~ . e e
.
{ (
4. The desl.gn of the subdivis10n or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public
at large, for access through, or use of, property within
the proposed subdiv1sion.
5. The design of the subd1vis1on provides for future passive
or natural heating or cool1ng opportunit1es in the sub-
division to the extent feasible short of reducing allow-
able densit1es or standard yard setback requirements.
Conditions.
1- The tentative map shall exp1re 24 months after approval,
except as provided in the prov1s1ons of Ca11forn1a Govern-
ment Code Section 66452.6 and Sections 9380-9382 of the
Santa Monica Muul.cipal Code. During this tlme period the
final map shall be presented to the City of Santa Monica
for approval.
2. The form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of the
final subdiv1s1on map shall conform to the provislons of
Sections 9330 through 9338 (SMl-IC) and the Subd1v1sion Map
Act.
3. Pr10r to approval of the f1nal map, a Declaration of CC &
R's shall be reviewed and approved by the' C1 ty Attorney.
The CC & R's shall contain a nond1scrim1nat1on clause as
presented in Sectlon 9392 (SMMC) .
4. The developer shall provide the Eng1neer1ng Department of
the City of Santa Monlca w1th one D1zal Cloth pr1nt
reproduct1on and microfilm of each sheet of th e final map
after recordatlon. If a Dizal Cloth prlnt is unob-
tainable, a mylar print may be subst1tuted.
5. All off site improvements required by the C~ty Engineer
shall be installed. All 1mprovements in the C1ty of Santa
Monica public right-of-way shall conform with the Standard
Draw1ngs for Public Improvements on file in the offJ..ce of
the C1ty Eng1neer of the City of Santa Monica. Plans and
speciflcatJ..ons for off slte J..mprovements shall be prepared
by a registered civ11 engineer and approved by the Clty
Engineer.
6. Before the City Engineer may approve the f1nal map, a sub-
d1vis1on improvement agreement for all off site improve-
ments required by the City Engineer sha 11 be prepared and
a performance bond posted through the City Attorney's of-
fice. The costs of all requ1red public lmprovement work
shall be borne by the subd1vider.
-
7. One fire hydrant with 6" D.1. lateral shall be supplied by
the subdiVlder and installed per Clty of Santa Monlca
standards.
- 3 -
. ~ ~. 'ee
( (
8. All water and sewer ut~l~ties shall meet current Santa
Monica Water/wastewater D~vis1ons standards.
9. The water serV1ces shall be supplied by the subd1v1der (to
the property line). The proposed water main shall be 8"
ACP. Connections of the proposed water ma1n to the eX1st-
ing water main shall be approved by the Water/Wastewater
D1vis1on.
lO. The proposed sewer ma1n shall be 8" VCP ma1nta1ning a 1 %
grade with installat~on to be as approved by the Water/
Wastewater Div~sion.
11. A 4 foot w1de easement behind the proposed property line
around the cul-de-sac shall be dedicated to the City for
landscap1ng and utility purposes.
l2. Street trees shall be 15 gallons 1n size, supplied by the
subdiv1der, planted approximately every 40 feet along the
street in parkways and easements. Species shall be ap-
proved by the Recreat10n and Parks Department.
13. Trees along the street shall provlde a min1mum separatlon
of 6 feet from sanitary sewer and water serV1ce l~nes.
14. Trees shall be located a m~n1mum of 25 fs 9t from street
ll.ghts.
15. The roadway width of Ozone Avenue shall be 36 feet 1n a 54
feet w1dth r1ght-of-way.
16. All lots shall dra~n towards the street gutter except that
approximately 30% of the lots on the southeast side of
Ozone Avenue may be drained to the alley.
17. The subdivider shall prov1de improvements 1n the alley
southeast and adJacent to the proposed tract development
to the sat1sfaction of the City of Los Angeles, C1ty
Engineer.
lB. The subd1vider's engineer shall set boundary monuments as
required by the Subdiv1sion Ordinance of the C1ty of Santa
Bonica.
Prepared by: R1chard Mills, Assistant Planner
RM:nh TTM 43805
- 4 -
'. ~
1:.-- .~- ! I ....
\ ~ ;
.. I I i
'l. I
SC-Ill[ or:
C: ... <, .
1 0 ~L- th..-
;:::
~ c~.~.r j",.""'_...
I I -
1 ~ I j t.,
<t;
I ~
\ Io.i
'"
..
l IO~~ I.f)
]
-
--
-"
0
...
~
"
\I)
...
~
l<J
u
<:
.....
~
"l
.....
\/1 LIt-.! IT'{ MA.t? - 11M Ll ~ a.........=:" I 1.. '2. ;) \Il. \ iii , .~ ,-
. .. ~ (t. EIA 7q I
\'
\~
~ A TT ,DrC-ff ,Nt e~-r S
- ...
INITIAL STUDY FOR: TTM 43805, 1220 MARINE STREET, SANTA MONICA,
CALIFORNIA
PREPARED BY: JIM HINZDEL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPROVED BY: CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE: SEPTEMBER, 1985
.
!
. ~\ ~ ~
"
~,
,
Env~ronmental and Ne~qhborhood Settinq
. .
The proposed proJect is located in the Ocean Park section of Santa Mon~ca, two
blocks east of LJ.ncoln Boulevard and J.mmedJ.ately north of the CJ.ty of Los
Angeles corporate lJ.m~ts. The proJ ect s~te, currently a vacated nursery, J.5
not wJ.th~n the Coastal Zone and has no ocean or unique scenlC vJ.ews. The
surrounding property 1S completely developed, both in Santa Monica and in the
C~ty of Los Angeles. Detached s1ngle fam~ly res~dences surround the property
on all s~des. Strlp commerc~al uses are located to the west along LJ.ncoln
Boulevard. The Penmar Golf Course 1.5 located one block east of the proJect
site. Maps 1 and 2 show the proJects regJ.onal and subreglonal settlng.
ProJect Descr~ptlon
The proJect lnvolves the subdJ.vlsion of a 83,000 square foot parcel
(approxJ.mately 1.88 acres) J.nto twelve sJ.ngle fam1ly detatched resldent~al
lots. If approved, Tentat1ve Tract 43805 would be developed at 1220 Marlne
Street. The zonlng of the proJect slte 1S "R1", One-Family Res~dent~al
D~strJ.ct. Development of the proposed proJect would requlre the extenslon of
Ozone Avenue and improvements which presently termJ.nate approxJ.mately 90 feet
west of Frederick Street. Ozone Avenue would be cul-de-saced approxlmately
286 feet westerly of J.ts present termJ.nus.
S~te Descriptlon
The 1 . 88 acre site is presently occupled by vacated structures, grounds, and
. build~ngs of a wholesale nursery. Access to each of the proposed homeS.1tes
1
,
/
>., ~ ~
1 "
, "
.
will be available from Ozone Avenue whl.ch also serves four eXl.stl.ng homes
immediately west of Frederick Street. Additionally, access from an alley
which represents the extension of Dewey Street may be provl.ded to lots 7
through 12. This alley located along the southern edge of the Sl.te is within
the CJ.ty of Los Angeles. The parcel J.S situated adJacent to an establJ.shed,
detached sl.ngle famJ.ly residentJ.al area.
Proposed ProJect
The proposed proJect would suhdl.v1.de the 1.88 acre S1.te J.nto twelve sJ.ngle
faml.ly lots, each wl.th a minlmum lot Slze of 5,000 square feet. As part of
the subdlvJ.sion process Ozone Street would be extended westerly 286 feet to
form a cul-de-sac. All Cl.ty l.mprovements l.ncludl.ng underground utlll.ty Il.nes
and servlces would also be extended westerly l.nto the proJect area. A total
of S1X improved lots would be developed north and SlX south of the extended
Ozone Avenue. It has not been determlned whether the appllcant wl.ll develop
or sell the twelve lots. probably a camhl.nation of these two technlque5 w1.ll
be used to eventually dl.spose of all lots.
Envl.ronmental Impacts
The follawl.ng Environmental Impacts sectlon addresses the potentl.al 1.mpacts
whJ.ch may arl.se from the development of the proposed proJect, as 1dentlfl.ed on
the Inl.tl.al Study checklist. Each env1ronmental concern 1.5 first revlewed l.n
accord with the City's Inl.tl.al Study checkll.st. A prell.ml.nary response is .
followed by addl.t1.onal environmental l.nformation and a conclusl.on.
.
2
'/
, .\ ~ ~
,
\
. .~
.,
Item lb. Earth. Question: W~ll the proposal result in d~sruptions,
~isplacements, compaction or overcover1ng of the 50111
Response: Maybe.
The site 1.5 relat1vely flat with a maX1murn change of elevat~on of e1ght feet
from the northwester corner of the proJect s1te to the southeast. The
elevat10n change occurs over a d~agonal distance of 412 feet across the site
for a slope of 1.9 percent. Grad1.ng act1v~t~es \41.11 occur over a per~od of
approx1.mately two weeks after demolition and removal of eX1sting structures.
Approx~mately 5,000 cub1.c yards of mater1al w~ll be moved as part of Tentat1ve
Tract No. 43805. A maJ or portJ..on of th1S grad~ng wJ..ll he needed to extend
Ozone Street ~nto the parcel. Grad~ng actl.V1t1es w1ll be balanced on the S1te
and no exportat~on or llIlportat~on of graded material w~ll occur. Upon
completl.on of grad1ng activl.t1es, approx1mately one th~rd of lots 7 through 12
w1ll be graded to slope southerly toward the C~ty of Los Angeles alley (see
ridge 1 lone on TT No. 43805 map). Two th~rds of lots 7 through 12 and all of
lots 1 through 6 will be graded to slope northerly and southerly respect~vely
toward extended Ozone Avenue. All grading will be completed 1n accord wl.th
the C~ty of Santa Mon~ca requirements. No sign1f1cant ~pacts wl.ll occur.
.
Item 3b. Water. W~ll the proposal. resul.t l.n: Chan';Jes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
Approx~roately 26,680 square feet, 32 percent of the sl.te, is currently paved
or ~s covered by structures (greenhouses, storage sheds, a trailer). All of
.
3
- ---~--
/ ('
. ~
. .
\
, "
"
the ex~st~ng coverage will be removed. New lot coverage 1n the form of a c1ty
street, sidewalks and home sites w1l1 be added. Following proJect completion,
approxJ.mately 41.3 percent of the total site area will he covered. ThJ.s
coverage J.s calculated as follows:
""0 street extens10n - B,064 square feet, cul-de-sac (J.ncludJ.ng sJ.dewalk)
- 4,072 square feet
0 north/south SJ.dewalks - 1,784 square feet
0 pad areas (allowJ.ng for approxJ.mately 1,700 square feet per pad for
each of the 12 pads - 20,400 square feet
Total covered area - 34,320 square feet or 41.3 percent of total s1te area.
In conclusJ.on, development of the proposed sJ.te will have an 1ncremental
(7,640 square teet) but ins~gn1ficant 1ncrease 1n paved surfaces and resultant
proJect runoff. Where sJ.te drainage presently occurs 1n a general northwest
to southeasterly direction, sJ.te gr adJ.ng will redJ.rect draJ.nage patterns
toward Ozone Street and the Alley (for a dJ.sCUSSJ.on of the gradJ.ng changes,
refer to response to 1b. Earth.
Item 8a. Noise. Quest1on: W1l1 the proposal result in sign1f1cant J.ncreases in
eX1st1n9 n01se levels?
Response: Maybe.
.
4
------ --
/
. ~ ('
, "
,
.
Dur~ng demol~tion; grading, site preparat~on; and house construct~on; var~ous
types of construction and equipment/veh~cles will be used on the s~te. A lJ.st
of various types of equipment generally used is indicated in accompanYJ.ng
F~gure 1. The most prominent of these will be a dozer, compactor, wheeled
loader; grader; and a water truck. All work will be carried out in accord
with the C~ty of Santa Mon~ca requ~rements which l~m.l. t the hours of
construct~on act~vJ.tJ.es to daylJ.ght hours (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday
through Saturday) . Construction act~vity, whJ..ch will result J.n sporatJ..c and
intermJ.ttant hJ.gh no~se levels affectJ.ng residents of the surround1ng
neJ..ghhorhood, wJ..ll occur as a result of the followJ..ng sequence: demol~t~on of
eXJ..stJ.ng structures and removal of mater~al from the s~te---1 week, rough
gradJ.ng---2 weeks, site preparat~on---3 months; and house construct~on---7
months on the average (note: some houses will be constructed concurrently and
some lot sales for future development w~ll also occur).
In conclusJ.on, while demolJ..t10n; rough grading; sJ.te preparat~on; and house
construct~on WJ.ll occur durJ..ng a m~nJ.mum one-year perJ.od, these no~se levels
wJ.ll be of short-term durat~on lIlitJ..gated to an J.nsJ.gnJ.fJ.cant level by
adherance to the CJ.ty of Santa Mon2ca requ~rements.
Item 9a. L2ght and Glare. QUest~on: W2ll the proposal produce si(]!nf~cant
new li~ht or 9lare from street li9hts or other sources?
Response: Maybe.
The sJ..te 25 currently dark during the evening hours with the exceptJ.on of
secur2ty l2ght2ng. When the proJect is fully developed there will he an
-
5
- - - -
- It ~ ~
,
, ,
. .
incremental increase 1n l1ghtl.ng due to the introduction of street lighting,
home and yard lighting. Three new street light standards will be added along
the extension of Ozone Avenue in the followl.ng locations: southeast corner of
lot 1, northwest corner of lot 10, and northern part of lot 7. All of these
light standards wl.ll be placed adJacent to Ozone Avenue.
In conclusion, whl.le there w1ll be an 1ncremental increase 1n light1ng on the
site due to the l.ntroduction of street lightl.ng, home and yard light1ng, thl.s
increase in l1ght1ng w1ll resemble that Wh1Ch eXl.sts 1n the surroundJ..ng
area. Ll.ght and glare impacts w1ll be insl.gnif1cant.
Item 13b Population. Questl.on: W1ll the proposal result 1n the relocat1on or
dislocat1on of employment or busl.nesses?
Response: Maybe.
For the last 57 years the s1te has heen known as the Fukahara Nursery, a
wholesale bUS1ness enterprise. On June 20th, 1985 the nursery moved from
Santa Monl-ca to 4216 3/4 Glencoe Avenue 1n Venice and 1S now known as the
Sunshine Nursery. Except for residual bUl.ldl.ngs and structures, the S1te of
the proposed proJect is vacant and no discont1nuance of bus1ness will occur.
Impacts, therefore, are ins1gn~fl.cant.
Item 14a Land Use. Question: W1ll the proposal result in a substantial
alterat10n of the present or planned land use of an area?
. Response: Maybe.
6
- ---
~ ~ ~
' \
, ,
. .
The sitels land use will change from a vacated nursery to a residential
subdivis~on which will eventually contain 12 single-family detatched
-
res~dences. The City. s adopted Land Use and C~rculatl.on Plan des1.gnates the
site and the adjacent street system accord1.ngly: single-fam~ly hous~ng (Land
Use f--Marl.ne street, which 1.5 located approx1.mately 73 feet north of the Sl.te
is designated as a feeder street (C~rculation) . The proposed parcel
subdJ..visl.on and eventual construction of 12 sl.ngle-fanuly detatched houses
conforms to the Land Use component of the Plan. Since Ozone Street w~ll
become a cul-de-sac, proJect development rel.nforces the importance of Marl.ne
Street as a feeder street 1.n the c~ty cl.rculatl.on system. The potentl.al for
Ozone Street to he constructed from Frederl.ck Street to Glencoe Court at a
later date ~s ell.m1nated. Thus, the pos 5 l.bl. 1 l.ty of Ozone funct~oning as a
feeder street, partlocularly Wloth respect to the prospect of traffl.c enter long
and crossl.ng L~ncoln Boulevard is reduced. In conclusloon, the proJect
implements both the Land Use and Cl.rculatl.on components of the C1.ty.s General
Plan and no sl.gnif1.cant 1.mpacts to e1.ther would occur.
Regard1ng conformance to the City.s Zoning Regulations, wlothl.n Sect loon 9106A
"R1" One-Faml.ly Resl.dentl.al Dl.str~ct Regulatl.ons liml.t uses wl.thin the proJect
area to one-family dwell~ngs. Section 9106B, Property Development Standards,
ll.m~ts the lot areas in the R1 zone to a JlUn:unum of 5,000 square feet. Lot
d1.mens~ons are also liMited to a min1mum w1.dth of SO feet and a m~nl.mum depth
of 100 feet. The smallest lot wi thin the proJect would be Lot 5 w1.th 5,100
square feet. All lots withlon the development have approximately 50 foot
w~dths. The mlonimum length of any of the proJects s~de lot l~nes is 100 feet
-
1
- ---- -- -
. tt ~
, ,
.
. '
(see the easterly lot l1ne for Lot 6). In conclus~on, the proJect conforms to
the City's Zoning Reulations and no significant impacts would occur.
Item 14b. Land Use. Question: W~ll the proJ?osal result ~n demolit~on,
relocat10n, or remodel~n9" of res~dent~al, commercial or ~ndustr~al build1ngs
or other facilities?
Response: Maybe.
Project development w~ll result ~n the removal of bU2ld~ngs wh1ch for 57 years
have been used as a wholesale nursery. S1nce the nursery has already moved to
Venice, no d2scont2nuation of serV2ce to customers w2ll occur. No s1gn2f2cant
1mpacts w111 occur.
Item 16a,b,c,d,and e. Util2t1es. Quest1on: W~ll the proposal result 1n a
need for new systems, or substant1al alterat10ns to the the follow1n9"
ut1lit1es?: Power or natural gas?, -cornmun~cat~ons systems?, water?, sewer or
sept1c tanks?, storm water dra1nage?
Response: Maybe.
In general all utilities exist adJacent to the Sl.te wl.thin the Ozone Avenue
right-of-way and will be extended to serv~ce each of the proJect homesl.tes.
This includes electr~cal power, natural gas, telephone, water tan 8" water
main will be )o1ned wlth an eXlstlng maln located at the 1ntersect1on of Glenn
Court and Ozone Avenue) , san1tary sewers (an B" sewer ma1n extens1on) and
storm water drainage which wl.ll, after development, flow easterly into an
.
8
- - -
. t' t'
. .
. . .
existing Ozone Avenue storm drain and then southerly into a Frederick Street
drain. Approximately one/third of lots 7 through 12 will drain southerly to
the Los Angeles alley (Dewey Street Extension) and thence to a catch basin
located at the easterly terminus of the alley. While the proJect will result
in an incremental increase in the consumption of utilities and runoff will be
. ,
increased slightly due to additional site coverage, no significant impact on
the provision of utilities is foreseen.
Item 17d. Right of way. Question: Will the proposal result in creation o~
abrupt grade d~fferent~al between public and private property?
Response: Maybe.
Construction of the extension of Ozone Avenue through the site will result 1n
a maximum potential grade differential. of 2 feet between the City's sidewalk
and the westerly l1m~ts of the tract. The horizontal difference between these
two locat~ons is 14 feet, thus a slanted slope bank of 14.3 percent will be
created. S1nce no road or pedestr1an connect10n will be provided from the
ex~sting Ozone Avenue/Glenn Court intersection through the proposed proJect,
no circulation impact will occur. A barrier to through movement will also be
installed. Th1S consists of the development of a 6 foot high block wall along
.-
the southwesterly tract boundary. At the conclusion of development of houses
on Lots 6 and 7, the intervening slope bank will l1kely be landscaped. In
conclusion, the differential of 2 feet within a d1stance of 14 feet in the
western part of the project area will have no impact on circulation or
aesthetic/visual considerations.
.
, . ~ l'
,
.
Item 1Bd Transportation/Circulation, Question: W.lll the proposal result
in: Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of peopl_e
and/or l]oods?
Response: Yes.
Item 18f. Questl.on: ~l.ll the proposal result in 1ncrease in traffic hazards
to motor vehicles, b.lcyc11sts or pedestr1ans?
Response: Maybe.
On the basJ.s of a traffl.c study prepared for the proposed proJect, "the
proposed proJect would not have any impact on local streets and h.lghways, or
at any of the local l.ntersect.lons. ~he proJect generated traff.lc, expected to
be 120 vpd (veh.lcles per day) , can easl.ly be acconunodated by the eXl.st.l.ng
facil1.tl.es w~th no add.lt1onal improvements 4 II (See attached letter by Kaku
Associates to James ~rby, September 4, 1985.)
Item 1ge and f Questl.on: Will th~. proposal have a sign.lf.lc?nt, ef~ect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered <;Jovernmental serV.l.ces l.n any of the
fol1owl..nc;J areas: ma1.ntenance of ~ubhc facl..l1.ties, includ1.n9 roads? Other
<;Jovenmental serv.lces?
Response: Maybe.
The proposed proJect wl.ll result l.n an incremental increase in c1ty dedicated
. r~ghts-of-way and consequently maintenance of an extended Ozone Avenue. In
10
, " . ce ~
\
.
. .
addition, the growth of street trees located every 40 feet on both the north
.
and south sides of Ozone Avenue will also require addit~onal maJ.ntenance.
Both of these increases are, however, consl.dered to he insignifl.cant.
Regarding the CJ.ty of Los Angeles alley to the south, improvements have not at
present been determJ.ned.
Item 22a Cultural Resources QuestJ.on: Wl.Il the .flroposal result in the
alteratl.on of or the destructl..on of a preh1stoTl.C or hl.stOTJ.C archaeological
site.
Response: Maybe.
An archJ.val search and an in-fl.eld survey has been completed by a qualifJ.ed
archaeologJ.st. Results of thLs research l.ndl.cates that the proJect w1.11 have
no adverse impact on any known h~storical or archaeological resources (see An
ArchaeologJ.cal Assessment of TentatJ.ve Tract No. 43805, Santa MonJ.ca, Los
Angeles County, Californl.a, September, 1985).
Item 23d. Aesthetl.cs. Question: Wl.ll the proposed pro~ect result in any
substantl.al ne9ative aesthetic effect?
Response: Maybe.
From street level, vJ.ews inwardly toward the proJect sJ.te are presently
restricted by walls and structures whJ.ch frame the periphery of the parcel.
These views will be altered as the old walls and structures are removed to be
replaced by a new wall along the southwesterly edge of the site, an improved
-
1 1
, . ~ ~
1
. .
street and twelve houses. Views from some of the adJacent res~dences into and
over the site (particularly from second story w~ndows) w~l1 change.
Furthermore, it is possible that some of the proJect's res~dents may
experience l~mited views from second story windows of nearby Penmar Golf
Course which is located one block east of the s~te. In e~ther case,
1ns:ignif~cant v~ew ~mpacts w11l occur.
Item 24c. Quest1on: W~ll the proposal have sl.gTuf1cant effects on the
proJect nei9hborhood? .
Response: Maybe.
The proJect w~ll alter the present site from l.ts vacated nursery status to a
developed res~dent1al subdivl.s1on. As a result of proJect development, there
will be an :incremental, hut 1ns1gn~ficant :increase 1n the demand for all types
of C1ty utilit:ies and serV1ces. The proJect will have 1nS1gn1f1cant :impacts
on all other concerns addressed in _ this Init1al Study. The proJect conforms
to both the Land Use and C1rculat:ion components of the C:ity's General plan and
conforms w~th the C~ty's Zoning Regulat~ons.
-
.
12
\ l ~ ~
. ~
.
" J a
S1: ro
, ~ I ~
ilL
" ,nz.
- - Cl) It @ ~lo -
- :;: ...: ro
6:J ' .., ..
. c:
~ '" ~ i~'H "'-I ..
J-= @N ~ KH Ir... 0
~ ; @ .... .-
(/) .... @ .. en
. ..
" "- ~, rtt '" Q)
. 0:
,
. . -. I
-t-J-J.JJ.J .c
>- :J
4-{ll-l.4-l en
E-
o ,.., 0- 0'
- ,Otijl16"
PF:OSPS:T ~ r.LJ I/) III (f} ~C\1
....: @Il')~i p..
AVE. @.o 0 000
p:; . a.
0 ... c: 000
.'0.5 M ,,:z: ~ 000 ro
~ ~ C"'1 tfl co Z: ~
::J' t coT\.O
, ~ .. 0
::" ~ +' in
c... ltl Q)
<l.l f1l In -
~ >:
.. )...!l-f+'
u '<+JO
~ tflH ~J n
.J 'd m
r' .. C l-l l--l ::>.
~
0 . ltl 0 0 (DCO U').
m.# /J.J.nI(r"r ..J~~ - -q'
- AA " " ---.n. t rs
~ GLEN ~ IJ!!1..M .1 t- loll .
.f;': .c .!4 ~ @~ ~ o ..,. z -
@CO BOt ~ UJ ~ z~ o:~
. _ a:
~ n~ rr') Ul"
1-' " (j)~
s,... @o ~ @~ a utI! w.
<(:1: (j)'
~I .
- GLEN.... 00 ..J
AVE. . @- . @~ -
... - " U).
:N .
.
0 elO @~ @~ U')
. .. 0:
1X1~ 2:
. G)..: @~ @N
. .
.arn
W 0 e,., @):1 . .. "-@2
z ,c.5 D
0:: w
<{ . GN "@J~ . Z @Ch
~
2 0 ,LJ/J'f
N
(;)- @~ ~ 0 ~~ ~
B:)
dD ere .!C'
b-"
~ f ITH S1:~ 0~ (!;o
~
l .,a,
r I \
-
,
I
----
, (4t ~
~
.
Levels, ~n Dec~be15,
Type of Equipment (A-Weighted) Fast
(1 ) (2}
Scrapers 89-95
.
Scrapers, elevating 88
Graders 77-87
-
Dozers 87-89
with squeaky tracks 90-93
Dozers, sheepsfoot 82-88
Rollers 72-80
. .
Rollers, vibrat.J.ng 80-85
Loaders, bucket 80-81
Loaders, terex 96
Backhoe 79-91
Grada11 87-88
Crane 80-85
Trucks, off highway 81-96
Trucks, asphalt 69-82
Trucks, concrete 71-82
Trucks, cement 91
Trucks, 14-wheel 88
Tractors, with water pump 73-80
Pavers 82-92
Autograder 81
Compressors 71-87
Rock drills (handheld, pneumatic) 88
(track mounted) 91
.
Concrete saws 87
Cbncrete saws, chain 88-93
Water pUlnps 79
Concrete pumps 76
Generators 69-75
Concrete plant 93
Asphalt plant 91
p~le driver (Vulca~ No. 1) 90
Figure 1 Construction Noise
Source: Mestre Greve Associates