Loading...
SR-507-000 (16) i - . GS:SES:JAS:ZH ~ Santa .ca, Counc~l Meet~ng: 28, 1985 Californ~a 5 0 :;z-- 000 7-~ MAY 2 8 I. TO: i4ayor and CIty CouncIl FROM: C~ty Staff SUBJEC:r: Hold Publ~c HearIng on Proposed Streetl~ght System Replacement on La Mesa DrIve Introduction ThIS report requests that the CIty CouncIl hold a public hearIng to determIne the convenIence and necessIty of replacIng the streetlIght system and to order the work done on La Mesa DrIve. Backg-round The Capital Infrastructure Needs Assessment study completed In February of 1984 and presented to CIty Council recommended that deteriorated and energY-IneffIcIent streetlIght circuIts be replaced at varIOUS locatIons tnroughout the CIty. Several streets needIng cIrcuit and pOle replacement were Identified In the study, and of those streets staff has determIned that La Mesa DrIve's streetlIght system ~s In the worst conditIon, followed by AdelaIde DrIve. ThIS determInatIon was based on the number of repaIrs made and number of repaIrs antIcIpated to maintaIn the already deterIorated CIrcuIt. Staff proposes to complete La Mesa DrIve tnls year and AdelaIde DrIve In FY 1985-86. It was also recommended that the CIty assess the property owners for 50% of the cost of replaCIng the CIrcuIts. Staff proposes to form an assessment dIstrIct under the proviSIons of the Improvement Act of 1911, DIVISIon 7 of the Streets and HIghways Code of the State of CalIfornIa. ThIS IS the same procedure that the CIty folloYls when formIng new streetlIght dIstrIcts and 7-A - 1 - K4Y 2 8 '.5 ----- : ~ GS:SES:JAS:ZH ~ Santa .ca, CounCl1 Meetlng: 28, 1985 Californla allows property owners to pay for the cost of thelr assessment over a ten-year perlod. La Mesa Drlve currently has speclal archltecturally sign1.f1.cant post top streetlights wh1.ch staff recommends to replace 1.n klnd Slnce tne overgrowth of the very large trees would block out the l1.ght from the taller, standard streetllghts. The cost of l.nstalllng spec1.al post top streetlIghts 1S more expenslve than standard streetl1.ghts (such as those currently being Installed 1.n other areas of the Cl ty) . Other reasons for extra expense ln th 1. S proJect are: 1) the maSSlve root system of the trees on La Mesa prevents Installing condults In the parkway and makes lt necessary to dlg trenches In the street and subsequently resurface the street, and 2 ) the unlt cost of post top streetllghts is more expenslve than the unlt cost of standard streetlIghts. 'rhlS work 1S belng done 10 conJunctlon wlth Southern Callforn1a Edlson proJect provlding new electrlcal serVlce to this area. The street llghtlng and new Edlson serVlce wlll share the same trench. ThlS wlll result In lower costs to the Clty and lower assessments to the property owners. The proposed assessment wlll be approxImately $1400 per resldence, based on an average lID-foot lot. (A standard streetl1.ght lnstallatlon would cost approxl.mately $1000 per 110 foot lot) . Payments wl11 extend over a ten-year perlod. A letter to La Mesa owners (attached) was sent on April 8, 1985, explalnlng the need for replac~ng the system and the proposed assessment. - 2 - ------- - ---- ---- ----- { ., GS:SES:JAS:ZH ~ Santa .~ca, CouncIl MeetIng: 28, 1985 CalIfornIa On AprIl 23, 1985, the CIty Council adopted ResolutIon of IntentIon 7006 {CCS) settIng a public hearIng for the purpose of determInIng whether publIC convenience and necessIty requIre the replacement of the streetlIght system and declarIng Its intentIon to replace the streetlIght system and appurtenant worK on La Mesa DrIve. The resolut~on set a publIC hearing for May 28, 1985, at WhICh tIme any Interested party may address the proposed work or improvement. Notices of PllbllC HearIng were mal.led to each property owner and posted on each property on May 13, 1985, In the manner prescrIbed by State law. Staff has receIved communIcatIon from approxImately five La Mesa reSIdents ~n response to the letter of AprIl 8, 1985, and the NotIce of PublIC Hear~ng of May 13, 1985. These reSIdents claIm they have never perceIved a problem WIth the streetlIghts and have IndIcated that they wIll protest toe proposed replacement proJect. BUdget/flnanclal Impact The CIty Englneerls estImate for the project IS $155,000 (IncludIng engIneerIng and contIngencIes). 'rhe CIty WIll lImIt Its share to one-half of the cost of replaCIng a standard streetlight system, WhICh IS approximately $64,000. Appropriation authorIty for FY1984-85 15 avaIlable In the amount of $91,080 In Account No. 01-770-453-000-904. - 3 - --- -- ----- - --- - ---- r .' GS:SES:JAS:ZH ~ San ta .ca , Counc~l Meet~n9: 28, 1985 Cal~forn~a The rema~nJ.ng $91,000 wJ.ll be shared between the resJ.dents on La Mesa. RecommendatJ.on It ~s recommended that the CJ.ty CouncJ.l: L Open the publ~c hear~ng on the conven~ence and necessJ.ty and the ResolutJ.on of Intent~on: 2. Close the publ~c hear~ng and acknowledge any protests: and 3. Adopt the attached resolut~on fJ.ndJ.ng that the publ~c convenJ.ence and necess~ty requJ.re the replacement of the streetlight system and ordering the work. Prepared by: Stan Scholl, D~rector of General ServJ.ces Jean Stanley, AdminJ.stratJ.ve Analyst Attachment: Resolutlon Letter to Property Owners (Apr~l 8, 1985) Notice of Publ~c Hearlng (May 13, 1985) LJ.st of Property Owners - 4 - --~-- --------------- ----------- ---- ---------------- ... , ce . CITY S A N TA M 0 N I C A CALIFORNI~~ OFFICE OF THE DIRFClOR OF f~E"'rRAL SER \-leES 1685 \fA N STRH_ T . 458-821 I ~A.NTA 'fOMCA. CALIf 90401 i\prtl 8. 1985 Dear La \~esa Propert\' Owner: The Cny of Santa .\10nlca 15 pro::>osmg to replace the 51reetl1ght ~y<;tem on \'our street. In a study com p I Ptpc. In Fphnl?ry_ 19R&. C~ty <;t3:!f recommended replacemePI of deterIOrated 'itreetl1ght systems on several streets In the Cny. La "'1esa Dnve was determined to be In the worst condItIOn, based on tt>e number of repaIrs made and number of repa:rs antlclDated for mamtenal1ce of the s\-stem. -'\s you are probably aware. n sometImes takes several days to fmd the problem In the C1rCUlt and . restore the lIghting to your area. In add1tlOn to the CIrCUitS, the deterlOrated poles are proposed to be replaced. SpeC1al post top lIghts, SimIlar to those already on your street, are proposed to be Installed at the same locatlOns and same heIght to preserve the aes thetlcs of the neighborhood. In addItIOn, 10 accordance WIth a property owner request, one new l1ght is proposed to be added on 24th Street between La Mesa and San VlCente. In accordance wnh CITy polley of more than twenty years, the City assesses proDerty owners for 50% of the cost of constructing or replacmg Jlghtmg systems smce l! IS a dIrect benef]t to the property owners. For an average 110-foot lot, the proposed assessment on thiS project IS approximately $1.400, based on $12.75 per lineal front foot. If your property is a corner property an additiOnal $2.55 per Side foot wIll be assessed. Bonds wIll be Issued aliowrng the property owner to pay for the assessment over a ten-year perIod. The CIty Council WIll be askE"d to <iet a J')ubJw hparrng for thl<; nrnle>rt tn h'?<lr nroteo:;t<;, ThJ<; I - - - ~ L> 1 -~ - - r- -- publlC heanng should be in May. You will be Informed of the hearIng date by mdlI If the Counell deCides to proceed. It IS not necessary to do anything at thiS time; thiS letter IS for mformatlOn. Please call me at 458-8221 or Jean Stanley at 458-8287 Jf you have any questIOns. Very truly yours. ~ ~ JdM-, Stanley E. SchoU DIrector of General ServIces SES:ct , . crfYe ~ SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 1685 Main Street, Santa MonIca, CalifornIa 9040'-3295 (213) 456-8211 May 13, 1985 y 'lbi~ lettpr is legal notice as required by the 1911 Inproverrent Act;. proceedings ur:tder which the street light system is to be replaced on La Mesa Dr~ve. You are hereby notified that the City Council of the City of Santa MJni.ca, California, rlnopted P.esolution lb. 7006 (CCS) on April 23, 1985, declaring its llltention to replace the street light system and appurtenant w::>rk in the above narred area, determining that bonds be isslJErl to represent the cost therefor, declarmg the w::lrk to be of rrore than local ordinary public l:enefit, and that the expense thereof shall be assessed up:>n a nH:;trict. A public hearlIl9' regarding the proposed mprovenent will te held at 7: 30 P.M., May 28, 1985, III the Council Charnters, City Hall, 1685 Main Street, Santa M:mica. All protests regardmg this matter must l:e filed in writing in the Office of the City Clerk before said titre, and all protests so filed will l:e considered by the C1.ty Council at that ti1re. ~.:'l("h protest nust contain a description of the pro- perty in which each signer thereof is interest~~. The tati'll proJect cost is estimated to be approxinately $155,000. 'Ihe arrount to l:::e assessed upop the d~strict. for this i..nproverrent 1.S approximately $91,000. Fecords av~lable indicate you CMI1 property in the above district. COpies of the Fesolution of Intention which con~fI.;n further particulars on this assessment and all questions regardlIlg the prClp)sed improvenent may be directed to Jean Stanley Jon the Office of General services at 458-8287. Sincerely, {ZU.->L >J l~..jlc~ Ann M. Shore C1.ty Clerk AMS:JS:zh cc: General Services "- . . . Corol A. Fontana 4407-017-006 1837 La l>1esa Dr. 1837 La M=sa Dr_ Santa MJn1cA, CA. 90402 Huqh/Lyrm L. Evans, Jr. 4407-017-007 1901 Ia M2sa Dr. 1901 La M=sa Dr. Santa r-bn1ca, CA. 90402 ~ Anne Strick 4407-017-008 1911 La M2sa Dr. 1911 La Mesa Dr. Santa M::)Jl1ca, CA. 90402 Walter H./Ehzabeth S. Trumbull 4407-017-009 1923 La ~sa Dr. 1923 La l>~sa Dr. Santa M::>mca, CA. 90402 Kathryn Grayson 4407-018-001 2009 La M3sa Dr. 2009 La M2sa Dr. Santa M:mica, CA. 90402 Parker M. Bartlett TRS 4407-018-002 2021 La Mesa Dr. 2021 La M;!sa Dr. Santa t-bmca, CA. 90402. W11ham R. Kurasch CO TR 4407-018-003 2029 La ~sa Dr. 2029 La Mesa Dr. Santa r-bn1ca, CA. 90402 . Neil C. .M:Jrgan 4407-018-004 1460 Three R1verway 2101 La M::lsa Dr. Houston, Texas, 77056 Ibger/ Joan Laverty, Jr. 4407-018-005 2113 La M2sa Dr. 2113 La M:!sa Dr. Santa MJru.ca, CA. 90402 Herbert D./Nora K. Foss 4407-018-006 9223 Sunset Blvd., Rm.S13 2121 La l'Esa Dr. Los Angeles, CA. 90069 . . . ~ Peter A. Sprecher TR 4407-018-007 Lynne A. Sprecher 2131 La M=:sa Dr. 2131 La M=sa Dr. Santa lliru.ca, CA. 90402 Maurice J. /Y.arriet J. Dahlem 4407-018-008 2141 La M=sa Dr. 2141 La M;sa Dr. Santa ~nica, CA. 90402 "- John T. /Anel~sa Thcmpson 4407-018-009 2153 La M:!sa Dr. 2153 La M=sa Dr. Santa !>bnica, CA. 90402 'Ihatas A. /Carol Mllrphy 4407-018-010 2159 La t>-Esa Dr. 2159 La Mesa Dr. Santa M::>nica, CA. 90402 Foh::!rt W. /Fran.ces Kent 4407-018-011 2201 La Mesa Dr. 2201 La M=sa Dr. Santa llin~ca, CA. 90402 Joel H./Jud~th A. NewJnrk 4407-018-012 2209 La !vEsa Dr. 2209 La M;sa Dr. Santa lliru.ca, CA. 904Q2 Cary D. /Joan A. Funk 4407-019-008 2219 La M:!sa Dr. 2219 La Mesa Dr. Santa funica, CA. 90402 Werner G. / SJ.Irone E. Scharf f 4407-019-009 8680 Hayden PI 2233 La M;sa Dr. Culver City, CA. 90230 ~l Brooks 4407-019-010 1900 AVe.Of The Stars 2301 La ~sa Dr. No. 1630 IDs Angeles, CA. 90067 - ------- . . . . Byron H. Lasky TR 4407-019-011 2311 La ~sa Dr. 2311 La Hesa Dr. Santa r-bnlca, CA. 90402 Joe: Nabel 4407-019-012 2323 La ~sa Dr. 2323 La M:!sa Dr. Santa r-bnlca, CA. 90402 Herl::ert J. /Elai.ne B. Kendall 4407-019-013 2327 La M:sa Dr. 2327 La !vesa Dr. Santa Ivbnlca, CA. 90402 Stanley L. Hecrunger 4407-019-014 2407 La ~sa Dr. 2407 La r.~sa Dr. Santa f-nm.ca, Ca. 90402 Rlchard E. /D::>rothy I. Barnard 4407-020-001 2402 La ~sa Dr. 2402 La M;sa Dr. Santa Ivbru.ca, CA. 90402 VlVl.an Kronenberg 4407-020-002 2324 La M:sa Dr. 2324 La Mesa Dr. Santa Ivbnlca, CA. 90402 . Betty G. Eisner 4407-020-003 2314 La M3sa Dr. 2314 La ~sa Dr. Santa Ivbm.ca, CA., 90402 George A./Sue F. Braun 4407-020-004 2304 La. Mesa Dr. 2304 La Mesa Dr. santa M:Jru.ca, CA. 90402 Peter/Orrlstine Nelson 4407-020-005 2230 La Mesa Dr. 2230 La Mesa Dr. Santa M::Iruca, CA. 90402 Rayrrond J. Gertz TR 4407-020-006 1900 AVe.Of The Stars 2222 La !vesa Dr. #2530 T os l\,r1op 1 P"'. CA. gOOfi7 , L' . . .~ Jarres H. /Eleanore E. Meyer 4407-020-007 2210 La Mesa Dr. 2210 La Mesa Dr. Santa ~nl.ca, CA. 90402 John T./Constance S. Wmtler 4407-020-008 2202 La M2sa Dr. 2202 La Mesa Dr. Santa MJru.ca, CA. 90402 Frank.1l.ll/Jean Schaffner 4407-020-009 132 Rcxleo Dr. 2158 La Mesa Dr. Beverly fulls, -CA. 90212 Charles E./Ll.Dda D. Martin 4407-020-010 2154 La Mesa Dr. 2154 La Mesa Dr. Santa Monl.ca, CA. 90402 Gl.1bert Stel.ngart TR 4407-020-011 2134 La !vEsa Dr. 2134 I.a. I-Esa Dr. santa 1>-bIll.ca, CA. 90402 Mlchael J. ~ol te 4407-020-012 2126 La M=sa Dr. 2126 La Mesa Dr. Santa r-bnl.ca, CA. 904.02 Kellogg Moseley TR 4407-020-013 2116 La. I-i2sa Dr. 2116 La ~sa Dr. Santa MJru.ca, CA. 90402 Jane L. Cal VID 4407-020-014 2108 La Mesa Dr. 2108 La M=sa Dr. Santa M:>nl.ca, CA. 90402 Robert E. Jones CO TR 4407-020-015 2034 La Mesa Dr. 2034 La I-Esa Dr. Santa M:>I1l.ca, CA. 90402 RJ..chard G./01ristine H. Newnan 4407-020-016 2024 La I-Esa Dr. 2024 La Mesa Dr. Santa Monl.ca, CA. 90402 I .e e ~ Howard T. Graber, Jr. 4407-020-017 2012 La LvEsa Dr. 2012 La ~sa Dr. Santa lvbnlca, CA. 90402 Michael/Joan Adarrs 4407-020-018 2004 La M=sa Dr. 2004 La M2:sa Dr. Santa M:>nica, CA. 90402 David F. /lX>nna S. Travers 4407-020-019 1936 La !vEsa Dr. 1936 La !vEsa Dr. Santa r-bnlca, CA. 90402 Kerry N. /klna Patterson 4407-020-020 1926 La. !vEsa Dr. 1926 La M2sa Dr. Santa ~DnlCa, CA. 90402 Jera1 L. /Boruue J. Donaldson 4407-020-021 1920 La M2:sa Dr. 1920 La Mesa Dr. Santa M:Jnlca, CA. 90402 Roger/Jul1e Corman 4407-021-011 2501 La. M:!sa Dr. 2501 La Mesa Dr. Santa M:Jnlca, CA. 904G2 Rita Dashew 4407-021-012 2517 La M2:sa Dr. 2517 La ~sa Dr. Santa M:>nlca, CA. 90402 Rex Llckl1der 4407-021-013 1337 Caslano Rd. 2525 La M=sa Dr. l..os Angeles, CA. 90024 Suzanne Weed 4407-021-014 2535 La M=sa Dr. 2535 La M2:sa Dr. Santa r-bru.ca, CA. 90402 John S. /Altheah T. Adluns 4407-021-015 2555 La ~sa Dr. 2555 La Mesa Dr. Santa r-bruca, CA. 90402 - -- -- . 111 . . <- D.H. & V. Keltner 4407-021-016 2524 La Mesa Dr. 2524 La r-:esa Dr. Santa Mon~ca, CA. 90402 Walter C./June S. Pawn 4407-021-017 2510 La Mesa Dr. 2510 La Mesa Dr. Santa Mon~ca, CA. 90402 0 Hoyt B./JacquelJ.ne B. I.e~sure 4407-021-023 4201 W~lshrre Blvd. 2406 La Mesa Dr. IDs Angeles, CA. 90010 Sharon S. Keller 4407-021-018 2515 La Mesa Way 2515 La ~Esa Way Santa Mom.ca, CA. 90402 Arnold & C1arre Schott 4407-021-020 2538 La Mesa Way 2538 La Mesa Way Santa fun~ca, CA. 90402 . M:Jrton H. Maxwell 4407-021-021 2800 01ymp~c Blvd. Ste.202 2528 La Mesa Way Santa M:Jlllca, CA. 90484 Seyrour M. /Mur~e1 Rosenberg 4407-021-022 2520 La Mesa Way 2520 La r-:esa Way Santa MJmca, CA. 90402 IDrrame Aga]anian 4407-021-024 P.o. Box 469 2550 La Mesa Way M3rJ..TIa Cel Rey, Ca. 90291 .... , . ~ . -" ....of-.:.. ~.- RESOLUTION NO. 7024(CCS) - .......~ , -< '''. '<- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA FINDING THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY - REQUIRE THE REPLACEHENT OF THE STREETLIGHT SYSTEM AND ORDERING WORK ON LA HESA WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION OF INTENTION 7006 (CITY COUNCIL SERIES) WHEREAS, the City CounCIl of the City of Santa MonIca, on the 23rd day of AprIl, 1985, passed and adopted Its Resolution of Intention, being Resoution No. 7006 (CCS) , declaring its Intention to order the work descrIbed thereIn to be done, which saId ResolutIon of Intention duly and legally was published as reqUIred by law and notIce of s2id improvement has been given in the manner reqUIred by law and all wrItten obJectIons and protests to the proposed work or the extent of the dIstrIct to be assessed were heard and consIdered by the CIty COUDCIl; and WHEREAS, a pUblIC hearIng has been held duly and regularly pursuant to ResolutIon 7006 (CCS) and the laws and ConstItutIon of the State of CalIfornia on the proposed replacement of the streetlight system and appurtenant wo r 1< thereto, as descrIbed in the ResolutIol1 of IntentIon No. 7006 (eCS), on La Mesa DrIve. WHEREAS, saId Improvement has been consIdered fully, N 0\'/ , THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The publIC Interest and convenIence requIre, and the City CounCIl of the CIty of Santa Morn ca hereby orders, - - ...... _::::""'- 1 -- - - - , . . the work descrIbed In saId Resolu:IO!1 of IntentIon to be done on La Mesa DrIve. Any and all of saId protests and objectIons of every kInd and nature to the proposed work or to the extent of the distrIct to be assessed be the same hereby are overruled and denIed. SECTION 2. The CIty CouncIl hereby finds and determines further that the "SpecIal Assessment InvestIgatIon, LimItatIon and MaJority Protest Act of 1931" shall not apply to the makIng of said improvement. SECTION 3. The Improvements shall be conducted under the Improvement Act of 1911, which IS DIVISIon 7 of the Streets and HIghways Code of the State of CalIfornIa, and the Street SuperIntendent and the CIty Attor:'iey presented to the said CIty CounCIl the ResolutIon of IntentIon requ H"ed by said Improvement Act to InItiate the proceedIngs for saId Improvement. SECTION 4 . The CIty Clerk hereby IS dIrected to post a notice for fIve days on or near the door of the CounCIl Chambers of the CIty Hall il1Vltlng sealed proposals or bIds for dOIng the work ordered and referrIng to Ple speCIfIcatIons on fIle and to pUblISh a notice InVItIng such proposals for two days In the Evening Outlook, a newspaper publIshed and CIrculated In saId CIty. -- -==:"'=ic... - 2 - - , . . SECTION 5. Reference hereby 1S made to saId Resolution of Intent10n for a descr1ptIon of the work, the assessment distrIct, the bonds to be issued and for further particulars. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certIfy to the adoptIon of thIS Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~'-~ \. --- ~ \) CITY ATTORNEY -- -~ =-- - 3 - - , . . Adopted and approved thls 28th day of May, 1985. - ~. ~ /~' ' , ( i ( ,/ .. , ,.. \ ~ I T I Mayor I hereby certify that the foregoJ.ng Resolutlon No. 7024 was duly adopted by the Clty Council of the City of Santa Monica at a meetIng thereof held on May 28, 1985 by the followlng CouncIl vote: Ayes: Councilmembers: Conn, Edwards, EpsteJ.n, Jennlngs, Katz, lane and Mayo~ Reed Noes: Councilmembers: None Abstain: Councllmembers: None Absent: Councllrnembers: None ATTEST: ~ /J:~' ,.... I' City Clerk -.... -~ =-- - - , , .. . . .... BEFORE DISTRIBUTION CHECK CONTENT OF ALL FOR CITY C~ERK1S ACTION DISTRIBUTION OF RESOLUTION # ?6~V ORDINAI"ICE # CouncIl MeetIng Date J/~)/jS-- Introduced- 7--A- . Agenda Item it Adopted: No AJj-fAYS PUBLISH AJX)p l'lli ORDINANCES * Was It amended? *cross out Attorney I s approval VOTE' AffirmatIve' 7-0 NegatIve' Abstain: Absent: -- ~ PROOF VOTES WITH ANOTHER PERSON BETORE 4t~YTHING ----~~ DISTRIBuTION: ORIGINAL ~o be signed, sealed and flIed in Vault, NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION (Date: ) Department origInatIng staff report ( J Management Serv.!~e? Lynne Barrette ordInances only ? . . Agency mentioned In document or staff report (certifIed ?) Subject fIle (a~enda packet) 1 Counter file I Others' ~- Airport Parking Auth. Auditorum Personnel BUildIng Dept. PlannIng Environ. Serv PolIce (en- forcement?) FInance PurchaSIng . Fire I Recr/parks General Servo Transportation LIbrary Treasurer J...1anager SEND FOU~ COPIES OF ALL ORDI~ANCES TO: *Check COde SectIOns before sendlllg. COD~D SYSTEMS, Atln Peter Macl~arie 120 Ma1n r~r~et - AV0'11 ~ew Jersey 07717 , I - 0RnTNAN(,p~ to: SEND FOUR COPIES OF ATJr PRESIDD\G JUDGE SANTA MONICA MU~ICIPAL COURT J :.725 MAIN STREET SANTA MONICA CA 90401 TOTAL COPIES I , . - - -....... and mrs. .arles e. lDardn . Htr. AH 11 ~ fl1~ Vl 8\ ~ 0::' q.j 5a..k ~"'''t4- % --' n:'J.r-" :P- ::3: -~ ;.::- ~~- '3 ~ <_ 'I. /'It' ~~ JlAa-f c ~_ r ,'1-:--7 - ":..--c::~ --- -- 0' c , ~ ~U;t!.A.. ~ f~~ol ]: :x:- c '" ~ N I - co )Ak ~s. ~: ." "l ~ J p~ ~ u5f '4 1...~4 )fi. ( ) ~ S4.JA ~.MIUL-" M k.&t~#.L ff,J '1,/07- (J7..0 - tJ I () ilL )L~I AulfL.,J;"" .Jf 70tl' ~ ~IL :A:L .41..teJ 41.-'" ,.,. k Ita,. )t. is .tMiKlaS~' ~ ~ .AiUl~ y/d f~' Aj# euul 4<.L.. .u; J~ w.~ /it Rk.L lit 51#L1: Jkt:- '1'''' waR U A"~ au..u..LI...i f~ 2.1 ~ !t<'~k.J (pku, ua wJd Ill-! I.A. - - ~?~ . . ADD lD 7-~ R.~ o~ r ~ - ~~ . - I _28- ('\TV ~ ,: \.)-1 _L;~p tJr/rf~Il- "Wi '1 ~'O :4u KJo~LTXEn 8: S(JHRE~nEIl. IX(J. '85 315 S-8Ui....... EE._/EF;;L-~ C:=;;.'.:~ ::::.ON':' _C- .-. ;,." EL~N s~ '~\ ~ h~.A~:~~" '-5L ~:: .c.12 . E::"-J. N :::: S::HO:;;EI3~C; S~t\,E"ERL~....' S ~A ,c~'R' A ",~" ;o~L",7'" IRv.t..,G \~i ~=:(EG';'... .... " -- '- - '- -........- - - ~ .::;REG-;:'RY :: HOR "..I .....ELE<=:I--'C,"-E ;213' 55::! -99: s ::::;::::p >;{I..... .....-IATSG"-J C":",-"::: N HASS P-::-~At:?C P -2-p...... 5 --~- ~~~E:::;O ~-:::: F _;;: "-8 2"'" C:::-U.~S==L C,,-IVER F t...G~NC--. May 16, 1985 Clty of Sar.ta Monlca Callforn1a 1685 !'laln Street Santa Nonl.ca, CA 90401-3295 RE: :-lay 28, 1985 hearl.ng for the Cl.ty counsel regarding adoptlon resolutl.on no. 706 for street lights on ITlY property Gentlemen: Th.cink you for your letter of May 13, 1985 lnforml.ng me of the hearlng regarding street lights on my property. I have the followlng comments: l. Street ll.ghts work perfectly well on my property and on my nelghbor's property. I have no deslre to spend money to flX something that's "not broke." 2. If you lnslst on proceedlng with thlS expendlture of my funds and MY nelghbor's funds, I must In- SlSt that the proJect be submitted to prlvate con- tractors for blds together wlth the blds of the Public Norks Department of the City of Santa :Vlonlca. 3. Agaln, If you lnslst on gOlng ahead ,OJ'l th thls matter, It lS requested that each of the property oTwners in this area be allowed to pay his share of the "lmprovement" In cash at the tlme the bonds are lssued In order to avold the heavy l.n- terest that would be pald over the tenT' of these bonds. AbblO '7-A MAY 2 8 tt85 . . }Lj;FA:- q~d <>/ KEJATXER So SCHREIBER. IXC. Hay 16, 1985 . Cl ty of Santa Monlca Page two Once agaln I urge you not to make thlS unnecessary expendlture. Please do not hesltate to wrlte or call Me 1n the event you were to ask me any questlons. My home address is 2524 La Mesa Drlve, Santa Honlca, Callfornla. Thank you for your courtesy. S'MY" ~/ ~":b ~i '/' .- <./ !~./ DONi(D . KELTNER DHK/km cc: other property owners ~ ~ ~ .- .>. ~.r-~ - f\~';~v": ~ ~_ 'J ...~TY C' . 1}; tf#~ I' I,. N"'!:" :g,j./ /' " ~'C :40 "85 W\'f 11 ::KELTX:ER & S{JHREIBER. IXV. 31=.. SOC7t-: B~VEi::;I?LV CR' v=::: c:o,,~'_-;:: H KSI_""'N~R SM\\ f. hvttiV~" '-SLITE 4'2- ~=="'~.J N :::::: SC....R~'3~~ IRViNG V..i K~~GA-:" ~'~RLY L-j'':'''LS. C:A_;~CR,\JA 8C2,2-~379 GI=iE~ORv c: H::)R \i TEL:::p-taN E ;213" 533 -991 5 DES"R' N ",....-A~50N C.;:'HI~ r-..- r--AS3 i11=hAR::' 1:1' HOP~I 1\.5 ~ F<E==:~ -C FI~:;: 1\18 o~ :::O..J ....SE.... ~L1\/E~ ~ Iv'O~.... c. Hay 16, 1985 Clty of Santa Monl.ca Call.fornla 16BS Ma1n Street Santa Mon1ca, CA 90401-3295 RE: Hay 28, 1985 hearing for the city counsel regardl.ng adoption resolut1on no. 706 for street 11ghts on my property Gentlemen: Thank you for your letter of May 13, 1985 l.nforming me of the hearlng regarding street Ilghts on my property. I have the followl.ng comments: l. Street llghts work perfectly well on my property and on my nelghbor1s property. I have no desire to spend money to f1X somethl.ng that's "not broke." 2. If you 1ns1st on proceed1ng with thlS expendl.ture of my funds and my ne1ghbor's funds, I must 1n- sist that the proJect be submitted to prlvate con- tractors for bids together \.;'1 th the bl.ds of the Public Works Department of the C1ty of Santa Mon1ca. 3. Aga1n, If you lTIS1St on gOlng ahead wlth thlS matter, 1t 15 requested that each of the property owners 1n th1S area be allowed to pay his share of the lI1.mprovement" In cash at the t1.me the bonds are l.ssued 1n order to avoid the heavy 1n- terest that would be paid over the term of these bonds. - -- . - . , .,.....~~ -~'~ ~ ~b' J",,",,-, I)/,n j ~/ J;' J-~ )"T :0.,- ~:: It '" SOli It...~ I n J-~ H. ) X (}. .? I = S OLl ~ H E'LVE"'_' D""vt DC t... ~ L b ..... "t _ , .... [, i;: SLH"E .:'2' [!::., II.. C !;::.... C [" I [ [ t=i H. ''''C.y ..J:r=.l.L F2(....rJ:;:,..... WILl~ C~Llr-0S::: _ ~O?'2" 0&::.3 -~. c~rc.c-c:-" C ......:"'~r 'ElE~H~NE '2'3 ~ ~ 2- - ~{;: II ! Lfc.;:;........ y z--~c.t c.""... t t HiI.,~ ~ I=; ,e. -L'J;;': r:. ....:--c-... 1"-''::- - ~ -~ F;:(r["~ 1C ....I!.E - Cf c:: ..."..~ ~_ Cl.l- [C r L"::[~..;:.... May 16, 1985 Clty of Santa Monica Callfornla 1685 Ha1.n Street San ta Hon1.ca, CA 90401-3295 HE; ~ l1ay 28, 1985 hear.1ng for the C1.ty counsel regarding adopt1.on resolut1.on no. 706 for street lights on my property Gentlemen: Thank you for your letter of Hay 13, 1985 inform.1ng me of the hearing regard1.ng street lJ.ghts on my property. I have the follow1.ng conurtents: l. Street l1.ghts work perfectly well on my property and on my neighbor's property. I have no desire to spend money to fix someth1.ng that's "not broke. II 2. If you l.nSlst on proceed lng ".'1. th thl.s expendlture of my funds and ny ne1ghbor's funds, I must 1n- Slst that the proJect be subITl~tted to prl.Vdte con- tractors for blds together with the blds of the PubllC Works Department of the Clty of Santa 1-1on 1. ca. 3. Agaln, if you l.nSlst on gOlng ahead with th1.S matter, l.t 1.S requested that each of the property owners l.n this area be allo....ed to pay his share of the "1.mprovernent" l.n cash at the tl.ITle the bonds are issued l.n order to avoid the he a Vj In- terest that would be pald over the term of these bonds. . r . ~.! . . _I.", 1//"., rf Rl';I.T:\J-;n . fo>('JlJn~IJn-:n. JXC Hay 16, 1985 C1ty of Santa Monica Page two Once again I urge you not to make th~s unnecessary expenditure. Please do not hesltate to wr1te or call me in the event you were to ask me any guest1ons. My home address 15 2524 La Mesa Drlve, Santa Mon1ca, Cal~forn1a. Thank you for your courtesy. ': , Since~y , , -/;/ ~.(/ . I/~ y~~. / DONALD . KELTNER DHK/km cc: other property owners - . . . AObm 7- A MAY281. J. T. THOMPSON 2163 LA. MESA DRIVE ~ 0 SANTA MONICA 0 C.AT.TII'()R....'IJI.A 0 90402 111./ D7-01 i.(; 0 9 tj l' ~ ?+1~ ,~, J ~ --fa.., ~ ~ ~ 'O~.,..,~ I ~ls..r'1+J~~ ~ ")w. ~ t? f... ~ ~ ............. -..: 90 '10 I , , ~ _ ..At--.~._-{ ~ ~ t)A1 :t... ~ tOt . & ..A...c-1... ~~~ <JI...;. ~ -4~ ~ to ~ ~ ~~ ~ ", o. ,) atu- J-j~~~~ ~ ~~-r::tu ~ ~ ~r~1 · ;1) (kt. -H~~ - ~~ H~~~~ ~ ~~~~A.t- ~. ~ o-eJ-db~ ~ "1 Ctu~. ~.n.,,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~10+1-~ .).f",/7PS:: ~t~~ ~ d:cA ~~~~ ~ .It ..~ · ~ ~ oI.AJ ~ ~ (J'1.; ~~~~~- 0\ - ~ - ~~ c; .~ ...y~ ~ ~ .JJ-x. '-- 0:: cc ~ >i...L-LL! <::: ~ -"8>-1 - --' ..u L'.J U N Z. <..)<..)>-- ~ a wG:t:: ~ a:~'-' 2: ;'It> 7 - OJ f--()~' A~}) 10 7- A ~ ;1''>3 h- ~~. MAY 2 8 1115 . . .. _ J T TIIO~:fPSO::\" ~1,,3 LA ],fESA DRIVE. S,i ~ ~ - :'>iTA .)10.:'\JICA . rA > ~ #'/1)7-0/5' -() c 9' - LIPOR.:\IA. 9Q402 __ . ~ ~ I ,/, } t:J k ~ ~ -1 erA.., ~ ~ ~ '0 ~-'U7~ 1"6)~~~ ~ "'114 ~ ~ 90f../OI I ~ -~ ~ ~lYf1;t,..~,o, . lS>.A..-c-t.. ~ ~ ~ ~~~~to~ ~ ~~ ~if : I) (fkL. 4~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~J-{~~_~~ ~~~~~ o-A-d ~ CIAA-J ~ ~ ~ ~,~~r;-~ ~ '7 /:b.J~. ~~ ~~ 6-t~ ~ ~ 0--\. ~~ .).. PO,/7 J>.r: ~t~~~du ~ n-~ l~ oR.. c;t;::;:,A ~ 01-0 ~ ~ O'"t.o '" ~ f:b-,{~~~A -.;;:r , . . '1J'~ ~ ~ 0\ - - . -, - c:c -,- ...... ~ - ~ .-- N ;; - - - ~ ~~ )--'~ "':-:~ ~ [ 5L.L-- -- -~. '-' ~Clt> 7 -0 I f--() ()'1 Xc li3 3 (S-3 .1'.tL. ~ P1.. . . ~ ~' ex 0 \ d F ~ ls~ 'U:.~"t ~~ ' (C~ ' :l : i Qn,-,~ I Vi ,: U Lt~ q oLf-(/J--- \ A:Oi:> 10 m '~~(~ '7-~ ' 6 ~).., !',:, , .UlI5 ~~ t *k~ (j, ~~ ~ $- E: " , :. "R- ' ~ ~:r " ~ 0"'"1"' ... ~ '" C'....-fT-- " ~ ~ ~:::=:.~ llp0~ ---m '.-d Y ~ ~'i '\", , \. ">, _:.:: ~ r , rs (, r. ' C ~ - - ?,.4....JR \'11 (}~ I ~(t'4'-4t q D40 ) ~ l:P :; , ~ ~ y -~ ..0 , ">t ~ /::t~ ~ n ~i "" _,. r... ,\ j ! ~ UJ\. G..v~'G4. bt -+'v\dJ (lr'-\j"" ',' ,;L)' , .~ ,,] c~ ~ ~ 01 ,- Od-O - D \ r - "\ \&1 '" d-'\) I 'd- U JllQ~_ 1 ;~LLL~ , tN~ i~~~ i"~~'jJ~ i~'- \~St~~ Ole,' D~~~~O~~)::i~ II ,~r ,~~~~: & ~ d j>':~;,~ ~~ct~~~~ ~1:/~~~ -f-\Zo.,' ~ ~\.k- !"!fT;;:"~l (h~ /\\.~0 ; '.' '. I ~~~<rl.'->1r,-t~ \Jrg"" ~h ~ \~'l.t\.)-e_! 1 ~ ~oJt ~ · ~ ," X- Ov\}-~! .' "(i r, ~ G--\.T&-\.,~ ~~ .Jrr'c ~Ac~ ~1.)S'4~--\t:'~ ~ ~~{GM-~-O , , ' A I" (',.. \ l", r"" (\ -\~0: ;;-/- ,', cv!~4-\'j'J!~} (~ ,l "~ ~;" ~h",;,T:6v \st' ~1&r,- i ~~ '\\X-<0S ~ ,) ~,~' ',' c', .,' I-l'/~~~ ' ,L~~ ~~tLmV\ -yt, ~~SL.Jrf\G~~~ t.~lli1 CLC~~- I ' , r r- I~ : f~{{~ ~~rr1- ~~,,-W~\.~Lt~. I~t)~ , ~ l' ~ ' :'0' '; ~t~ ,0 tsJ( AkV" Ie C<...t{UiQJiln.l~ :W""'r !-A \>w ~~ J \ /tirJD 10 L0~~{0\:--~ ;," '" &~ I~ rD'LQ. ~ '1-,4 I ,lIlY 2 Ii' 1n~:- 1. (,." ....: - . , ,.. r. ~ \-n ' \ '. -Le, . \ '\ .. ~ ~'--~~ ' >I.J( .~,,_"-dL\L'u .~~ g~~ ' \~T \".n \..() R- J ( v '.. ~,\.,u~ ,. · , ,rY\,c(" J-y''C!til4. -. ~~ ~ _\ ~ -..~ I S<- I ~\ .,~ . I ~ I ~!~ ~-'--'-'}.,~ gJrJ tJL~~ 0+ . . \ / I K 0 ~() ^' R\) '1: Q- R /}ro~l'( I J R, Up .~d-, ><:tH'--clud. x%..l-kv ( jL 1 V'$ f '.L~J v-I Cl v d T C f C.( lo-e-v 0 ~--- ) . . . . .. . . ....~ ---- -- . . . ~ ! 10 ~';:: .... c ~ II "" ~h.t g II lJ ~ II ~ -;f:l5, =: 5::- r-. .---, ~ C:.""- ,)';- ~-: . ;l if \..:, J f ~ QJJ~ c ....c::. f ~~~ c t ~U1~- o ;;b 'L If.fb ,r ;c j -ca gA- -~,C? . I= ,.~. f: '" --/ -.L:J ~ ~ ,,~';~ Cl;3r - ""';l:> s: .... 0 ...... . r..... ",,- ....../.... .... -"-_--.." ~r <-1-. -g- ~- ~~ - J · l ~ L . . . A1>t>(O . 1-A MY 2 8 1985- 01>. Bat}' ~~A'JS~ 2314 La v \.,~~~< May 25, Santa mom CA. Call~oQma 90402 1985 W HAY 28 A9 :50 Office of the City Clerk Ci t.)1: of Santa MonicBsANT' . 17006( ( 1685- Main Street A MOr,I\;~~'~MiRjasolutl.on CC~ Santa Monica, CA 90401-3295 PropertYI 4407-020~OO3 Dear City Council of Santa Monical My husband, Dr. William R. Micka, and I wish to pro- test against Resolution 17006 (CCS) , passed by the City Council on April 23, 1985, to replace the street lights, etc. on La Mesa Drive at a cost of approximately $155,000. We feel that this cost is exhorbitant. My husband, an~ engineer, talked to the engineer in charge of the project. and was assured that the street lights needed to be replaced. However. he did not make it clear that the present lights are beyond repair. It certai~ly did sound as though something needed to be done, however. We should like to respectfully request thatt 1. the present street lights be repaired (which would cost much less), or, if that is not possible, 2. that the present street lights be replaced by inexpensive but graceful concrete structures which are being used throughout Santa Monica. The cost of $155,000, as adopted in Resolution 17006 (CCS), seems far too much. It is a hardship on those of us who have retired, we senior citizens, and others who own a wide footage on La Mesa. . fIN. fl: ~~ Eisner Dr. William R. M1.cks AwtO 7-4 MAY 2 8 1985 , ~ . . OQ. B€t.tY ~,€~~,€!Sn~R 2314 ta. ~~i\-On~€. u, - I ___ Hay 25, Sa.nta momca, CallfoQma. 90402 1985 '85 HAY 28 A9:50 Office of the City Clerk Ci t)[ of Santa Monic~AN f " . t/:7006( 1685 Main Street A MVllii."a~,L-Beso1ut~on 1. CC Santa Monica, CA 90401~3295 Property: 4407-020=003 Dear City Council of Santa Monica: My husband, Dr. William R. Micks, and I wish to pro- test against Resolution #7006 (CCS). passed by the City Council on April 23, 1985, to replace the street lights, etc. on La Mesa Drive at a cost of approximately $155,000. We feel that this cost is exhorbitant. My husband, an.. engineer, talked to the engineer in charge of the project, and was assured that the street lights needed to be replaced. However, he did not make it clear that the present lights are beyond repair. It certainly did sound as though something needed to be done, however. We should like to respectfully request thatt 1. the present street lights be repaired (which would cost much less): or, if tha~ is not possible, 2. that the present street lights be replaced by inexpensive but graceful concrete structures which are being used throughout Santa Monica. The cost of $155,000, as adopted in Resolution #7006 (CCs) , seems far too much. It is a hardship on those of us who have retired, we senior citizens, and others who own a wide footage on La Mesa. Pr: 'l1~$~ Dr. ~'lilliam R. Micks , . ' . . ~ I-i (l) .-f ()'tl 0 >.~ I.f'\ .we '" .~ 0 .w < N C)~Q)UC""l Q.) I elf <V tel t... -,..-l .c::J.JWC!SO 0 UC:(J)()~ .~ 'tl ..-l 0 C 1o-oJU)c:cO\ ~ o ~ 0 4-im~ ttl <VO::E: 0 m 4-1 ~ >,If"'l W c:: LI-l .j...J <lO c: ni ..... 'M \0 r:1 en o U .-HI' ~ 0 -' .... 0 3 0 u >. JJ .~ U - ~ & . ,# . . Aon 10 7-11 ~~ 2 S '96~ May 24, 1985 CIty of santa MonIca 1685 r1ain street Santa MonIca, CalIfornia 90401-3295 Attention: Jean Stanley, Office of General SerVIces Members of the Santa Monica, CalifornIa City Council Re: Ann M. Shore letter of May 13, 1985 as legal notice statIng that "the street lighting system IS to be replaced on La Mesa Drive" ~ Dear Ms. Stanley and CouncIl Menbers: By letter of May 13, 1985, referenced above, I was not1f1ed that the street lIghtIng system IS to be replaced on La Mesa DrIVe. Having been a 31-year res1dent and property owner of 2535 La Mesa Drlve, I can attest that the La Mesa Drive street Ilghts have been and stIll are work1ng very well. A descrIptIon of my property 1S held by the CIty of santa MonIca as requ1red by law, and IS easily accessIble to ~e~bers of the Santa Monica CIty CounCIl. Enclosed IS a copy of r1r. Donald H. Keltner's May 16, 1985 letter eXpress1ng not only hIS opInIon, but also that of hIS fIrm, Keltner & SchreIber, Inc. In concurrence WIth the statel'1ents expressed 1n that letter, I, too, urge you to deslst iron thIS unnecessary expend1ture. SIgned, - -'0 --~ ~J ~J_ L Suzanne Heed sw/sl Enclosure ~\O 7-A MAl 2 8 1985 --- - - - . -. .- - -_n~i'Q-i~~~ ~~ - ~ --.. . , - ... c-~ '--n)~ ~ ,~- ~, 'd2.~ 7' ~~ ~ ~~ / J/ /9..?.s- , ~~ ~'P70 7-A ~1~~~~ -28. '---r;)~; G.~ ~ ,1 L~~' 0d.--.~~~~~.ej ~~~ ~~~-~. ~~~~~~~- ~~~..-LJ.tZ._~~~ ~ ~ ----.t.- 'P~' .... J'e.. <Sf--v.--t.- ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~-e-~ r~ a-1U~~. + V~~~~~~ ~~ '-4~~..~ ~.~L:~:7 J. cP.;f&.:< or....~~.~~~~ ~ P-d/ ~ o.J .~~~.< - 'lI,~,N(lt1P~ c;7 - ~/6tJr IN 7?ltJ ~ i~~~~.~.~~ ~. ,elj..12.- a....t..e.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. , ~1O~ << ~ -fa 77/'J ~ IIJ 71/If~ ~ MAY 28 liB! p/4{;l ~ ~/fIE: /U1IfnE. 77f'1 ~U - ~ ~ ~ -rH?r 711€ ~ u4w-Q ~ ~ u* L/~ ~ ~ ;49.. ~ ~tr" ICft ~h e~. · I> -# .- -!t", , .~ ;"" . " ..~ - .... : ... - ~;: , Al>1> ro 7-1\ ! - . I " , M#f 2 8 1985 "--:-..... :' t:=- .' ... ' ':. . : t.;, ',r;, - Richard G Newman PresIde!"'! . .=- ~ J~' t": "- ,T - , I ~ Aoril 23, 1985 ; , i , l Mr. Stanley E. Scholl I - Dlrector of General Servlces Clty of Santa Monlca 1685 Maln Street Santa Monicat Californla 90401 I < . ! Dear Mr. Scholl: - . , - ~-am resident of 2024 La Mesa Drlve, Santa Monicat and i ) have been for the past 8 years. , . I , "- I Pursuant to your Notice of April 8tht we have nott dur- I t. f ing this tlme, experienced any problems wlth the street a, ~;: lights and feel it would be a waste of money to replece . . ... them. e. . .{:-- I~ r~ ~ .. I have no problem in adding one llght if our neighbors \ - feel that is necessary for safety. From a safety pOlnt , .... of Vlew, I would suggest the addltlon of 'dead men bumps' I ~ .. \. . " 1n the street to slow up the thru traffic. ;(.. I , , . . , . Thank you for your consideration. . . I , " I ~~ I . '" Very truly yours, ~""l" "~- - I fr-I~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ <..:.... / . 1.....) "'I U-l"? -{...L21-'~ - ... - Richard G. Newman .. i .. f ) , 2024 La Mesa Drive ~ ,- - Santa Monlca, CA 90402 . . . 't. . ~ J4.~r . '. . l. ," . , , L" i ~-r;~ .u. t 3250 W'lst\#~ BOUlevard . . ~l 1 Los Anpeles ~')-t Cahtorma 90010 .l''\.. ~ . MAY 2 8 1985 ,. .... -- - -- ... J , A ... . . -----------..--- ~ --e- '--.- AD1> -,0 '-4 . MAY "l 8 1915 1 HOYT B. LEIsURE 4201 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD. LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA aoolo a31.la31 ~ April 12, 1985 Ms. Jean Stanley Office of the Director of General Services City of Santa Monica 1685 Main Street Santa Monica, California 90401 Dear Ms. Stanley: As I indicated to you yesterday, Mrs. Leisure and I are opposed to the placement of a new light on 24th Street between La Mesa D-rive and San Vicente Boulevard. It is our view that. the double ligh~s' on the northeast and northwest corner of 24th and San - Vicente, plus the double lights on La Mesa where 24th deadends, have provided adequate illumination during the thirty years we have resided at 2406 La Mesa Drive. r have discussed the proposed new light with my neighbor, Mr. Richard Bernard of 2402 La Mesa Drive who recommended it, and we are in agreement that if the City accepts his proposal for a new light on 24th, it will be placed in the pa-rkway on his side of the street (the west side of 24th) rather than on our . side. r trust this agreement will he satisfactory to the City of Santa Honica. If it is not, I would appreciate being so advised , , so that I might make my feelings known at the public hearing. -- Thank you for your courtesy in this matter. - cc: Mr. Richard Bernard 2402 La Mesa Drive Santa Monica, California 90402 '1~'- ~ 2 3' --wo~ ~to 7-A, ",~'t 2 8 \985 TRANSAM'EllllfCA OCCIOENTAL. '-'''IE .waUJIIANCII: COM..ANy ~- - - ~-_.... -- -