Loading...
M-1/11/1972 (3) ~--- . . . . - MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA January II, 1972 4:30 P.M. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Monica, California, met in regular annual session in the City Council Chambers, on January II, 1972, at 4:30 P.M. PRESENT: MEMBERS: B. Thomas Barnard, Chairman, entered at 4:50 P.M. Wallace Brown Ted B. Fach L. Wayne Harding Mortimer T. Richey ABSENT: MEMBERS: J. lee Schimmer ALSO PRESENT: Arthur l. Rinck, City Council liaison Eugene E. Hougham, Agency Architectural Consultant Eugene B. Jacobs, General Counsel Michael Metcalfe, Architectural Consultant for Santa Monica Shores Thomas Winfield, Attorney for Santa Monica Shores Lawrence Kates, Manager, Santa Monica Shores Gary G. Jones, Executive Director May Palfrey, Secretary ~PPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of December 14, 1971 were approved as mailed. ~PPROVAl OF ~mRRANT REGISTERS: The Director submitted Warrant Registers Nos. 61 thru 62 for approval. Mr. Richey moved, seconded by Mr. Fach, that Warrant Registers Nos. 61 thru 62 be approved as submitted. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: HEMBERS: MEMBERS: MEMBERS: Brown, Fach, Harding, Richey None Barnard, Schimmer !;ENERAl: Payment to Aqency Staff for Unused Sick Leave The Director stated that the matter of payment for unused sick leave to Agency staff had been referred to Mr. Cliff Connelly, Chair~ wan of the Personnel Committee. for his review and recOff~endations. Mr. Richey, representing the PerSonnel Co~mittee, stated that Mr. CGn- nelly had reviewed the matter and had recommended approval of Lw payment for unused sick leave. as set forth in the proposed Resolu- tion No. 307 (R.A.S.). Mr. Barnard entered at 4:50 P.M. Mr. Richey then moved, seconded by Mr. Harding, that Resolution ['lo. 307 (R.A.5.), "RESOLUTI at! OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THI . e Mjn~t~s - i/l1/72 Page T~JO CITY OF SANTA /10r~ICA, CALIFORI"IA, PROVIDING FOR THE PA~'HEta OF UNUSED SICK LEAVE", be adopted and that further reading be waived. The motion carried with the followIng roll call vote: AYES: MEMI3ERS: Barnard, Brown, Fach, Harding, RichF'ly NOES: MEMBERS: None ABSHlT: MEMBERS: Schimmer . PROJECT ACTIONS AND REPORTS: Projects I (a) , 1 (b) and P.O.P. ~rescent Bay properties Revised Master Plan . . The Director presented a chronology of events relating to the submission and approvals of the Master Plan for development of the project, stating that Crescent Bay Properties I third revised Master Plan had been submitted for Agency approval with substantial changes on Parcel 4 and that the Developer had extended the time for approval by the Agency until January II, 1972. Eugene E. Hougham, Agency Architectural Consultant, submitted his findings and recommendations to the Members, stating that he recommended that the Agency approve the revised Basic Concept Plan as clarified by additional verbal and written inforwation from Mr. Podesta, Crescent Bay Properties' Architect. Mr. Thomas Winfield, Attorney representing Santa Monica Shores, and Mr. Michael Metcalfe, Architectural Consultant for Santa Monica Shores, spoke in opposition to the Plans. Mr. Harding moved, seconded by Mr. Fach, that the Plans which have been submitted for approval as to Parcel 4, which include the 6 to 8-story building, be rejected and that the Agency give favorable consideration to the Plan as modified in the understanding of the Agency's Architect including the elimination of the 6 to a-story building and reduction of height of the plazas to approximately 10 feet adjacent to the Santa Monica Shores parcel on either side; that the Agency cannot approve or accept such a plan at this time because Santa Monica Shores are entitled to adequate opportunity to review such Plan and modifications; furthermore, the Agency cannot accept the conditions imposed on us as set forth in the December 17, 197\ letter from Crescent Bay Properties; and the Agency urges the principals to attempt to work out a solution and make a formal presentation at the earliest possible date, and the Agency anticipates that Crescent Day Properties WIll be in a posi- tion to go forward with the takedown of Parcel 2 on schedule. The motion carried with the following roll call vote; AYES: t.mES: ABSENT: t-tH1BERS; ~IEMBERS : t'lEMBERS: Barnard, Brown, Fach, Harding, Richey plone Schimmer Mr. Brown moved, seconded by Mr. Richey, that Items 5B - Contract for Architectural Services, and 5C - Election of Chairman and Chair~an Pro-Tern, be tabled until the next regular Agency meeting. The wotion carried with a unanimous voice vote. There being no further bUSiness to be brought before the l1embers, Mr. Richey moved, seconded by Mr. Harding, that the meeting be adJour~cd. The motion carripoi ,..,ith a 1I1';\";"'OOlS voice ''/ T mee ng adjourne-' at 7-15 P .'1. / L ) <--. ~G. Jo s Executive ui ecto mp