R-8735
. .
RESOLUTION NUMBER 8735
(CITY COUNCIL SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SANTA MONICA SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 24, 1994,
FOR THE PUR~OSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT THE PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION OF
CONCRETE GUTTER, STREET RESURFACING, SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY
AND CURB REPAIR AND THE REMOVAL OF DAMAGED PAVEMENT IN
PARKWAY AREAS AND APPURTENANT WORK, IN CONJUNCTION WITH
THE FY 1993-94 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM AS SHOWN ON
CITY DRAWING NO. 6061, IN THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
WHEREAS, the City council of the City of Santa Monica proposes
to initiate proceedings under the Improvement Act of 1911 and
Government Code for the construction of concrete gutters, street
resurfacing, repair of damaged sidewalks, driveways and curbs, and
the removal of damaged pavement in parkway areas; and
WHEREAS. Section 19 of Article XVI of the California
Constitution provides that certain specified debt limitation and
majority protest provisions shall not apply if, after the giving of
such reasonable notice by publication and posting and the holding
of such public hearing as the City Council of the City of Santa
Monica shall have prescribed, the City council, by no less than
four-fifths vote of all members thereof, finds and determines that
the public convenience and necessity require the proposed
improvements to be made; and
WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code Section 2804 provides that
the Ifspecial Assessment, Investigation, Limitation and Majority
- 6 -
.
.
Protest Act of 193111 shall not apply to any proceeding otherwise
subject thereto when said improvement proceeding is by a charter
city and said city has complied with the provisions of Section 19
of Article XVI of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Monica is a charter city of the
state of California,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
The City Council proposes to initiate proceedings
for the construction of concrete gutters, street resurfacing,
repair of damaged sidewalks, driveways and curbs, and the removal
of damaged pavement in parkway areas, and appurtenant work adj acent
to residential, commercial and industrial properties on City
streets as shown on City Drawing No. 6061 on file in the office of
the City Engineer as follows:
street
Limits
STREETS TO BE RESURFACED AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTED (Commercial and
Industrial Properties Assessed Only) ON:
street
Limits
1. San vicente - Ocean Ave. to 7th Street
2. Santa Monica Blvd. - Lincoln Blvd. to Ocean Ave.
3. Ocean Park Blvd. - 17th Street to 25th Street
4. 25th street - Pearl St. to pica Blvd.
5. Colorado Blvd. - 4th st. to Lincoln Blvd.
6. Pica Blvd. - 14th street to 20th Street
7. 23rd Street - Ocean Park Blvd. to east City limits
8. Alta Avenue - 22nd Street to 26th Street
9. 24th Street - Montana Avenue to Alta Avenue
- 7 -
.
.
SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS AND CURBS TO BE REPAIRED, AND PARKWAY PAVEMENT
REMOVED (Commercial, Industrial and Residential properties
Assessed) ON:
Street
Limits
1. San Vicente - Ocean Ave. to 7th Street
2. Santa Monica Blvd. - Lincoln Blvd. to Ocean Ave.
J. Ocean Park Blvd. - 17th Street to 25th Street
4. 25th Street - Pearl st. to pico Blvd.
5. Colorado Blvd. - 4th St. to Lincoln Blvd.
6. Pico Blvd. - 14th Street to 20th Street
7. 23rd street - Ocean Park Boulevard to east City limits
8. Alta Avenue - 22nd street to 26th street
9. 24th Street - Montana Avenue to alta Avenue
SECTION 2.
The improvements and repairs shall be conducted
under the Improvement Act of 1911, which is contained in Division
7 and Chapter 22 of the streets and Highways Code of the State of
California.
SECTION 3.
The criteria used to determine which streets are
to be resurfaced and the method of repair include: age, surface and
subsurface condi tions, complaints received, type of use (1. e. ,
commercial, industrial or residential), current traffic volume, and
projected change of use or traffic volume. The proposed work or
improvements in the opinion of City council of the City of Santa
Monica is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the
City Council hereby propose that:
- 8 -
.
.
Proposed Method of Soreadina the Assessment Cost
conunercial/Ind. Residential
Estimated Property Owners Property Owners
Work Performed unit Cost Share of cost Share of Cost
Gutter Construction $23.00 LF 100% NjA
street Resurfacing 18.50 LF 100% NjA
Sidewalks Repair 6.00 SF 100% 50%
Driveways Repair 7.50 SF 100% 50%
Curbs Repair 15.00 LF 100% 50%
Parkway Paving 3.00 SF 100% 50%
Removal
The district affected by the proposed work of improvements is shown
upon a certain map indicating the exterior boundary thereof, which
said Drawing No. 6061-A is on file in the office of the City
Engineer. The map hereby is referred to and shall govern for all
details as to the extent of said assessment district. The
assessment district includes in general the lots and parcels
described in Section 1 above but reference hereby is made to said
Drawing for all details as to the extent of said assessment
district and for any variation between the last mentioned general
description and the extent of said assessment district as shown on
said map.
SECTION 4.
Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, the
24th day of May, 1994, at 6:30 P.M., in the City council Chambers
located in city Hall, 1685 Main street, Santa Monica, california,
- 9 -
.
.
there shall be a public hearing before said City Council for the
purpose of determining whether the public convenience and necessity
require the above-described improvements and for the purpose of
allowing any and all persons having any objections to the proposed
work or improvements to appear and show cause why the said proposed
work or improvements shall not be carried out in accordance with
said Resolution of Intention. Inquiries concerning this public
hearing should be directed to the Department of General services,
Division of Engineering, at 458-8721.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall give notice of the hearing
by posting a copy of this Resolution in the manner described by the
streets and Highways Code Sections 5065 and 5616 and by publication
as hereinafter provided. Any interested person may make protest
against the proposed improvement in writing filed with the City
Clerk at any time not later than the hour set for the hearing in
the manner provided by the streets and Highways Code section 5220.
SECTION 6. The Superintendent of Streets shall cause to be
conspicuously posted along the line of said contemplated work or
improvements and also along all the open streets within said
district, notice of the passage of this Resolution of Intention in
the manner and form prescribed by law.
The City Clerk is directed to mail notices, pursuant to
Government Code Section 54954.9, in the manner and form prescribed
by law, of the adoption of this Resolution to all persons owning
- 10 -
.
.
commercial and industrial property in the hereinbefore described
assessment district, whose names and addresses appear on the last
equalized assessment roll for the city taxes or as known to the
office of the City Engineer.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk is directed to publish this
Resolution, in accordance with Government Code section 6066, in The
Outlook once a week for two weeks with at least five days
intervening between the first date and second date of publication.
The first publication is to be made not less than 45 days prior to
the date of the above public hearing.
SECTION 8. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 20433,
the City Council hereby finds that it is not in the public interest
to allow property owners to contract for the street resurfacing and
gutter construction improvements and thereby the City shall be
responsible for awarding and administering the construction
contract for this district.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution, and thereafter the same shall be in full force and
effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
- 11 -
.
-
Adopted and approved this 22nd day of March, 1994
f{ ctyt
14 Mayor
I hereby certify that the foregomg Resolution No 8735 (CCS) was duly adopted at a
meetmg of the City COWlcIl held on the 22nd day of March, 1994 by the followmg vote'
Ayes:
Councilmembers:
Abdo, Genser, Greenberg, Olsen, Rosenstein. Vazquez
Noes Councilmembers'
Abstain: Councllmembers'
Absent' COWlCllmembers
Holbrook
ATTEST:
~;fPr~
City Cletk
---