Loading...
O1330 e . CA:RMM:jw6120a CIty CouncIl Meeting 2-26-85 Santa Monica, CalifornIa ORDINANCE NUMBER 1330(CCS) (City Council Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA AMENDING SECTIONS 6120 AND 6123 OF THE SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING QUALIFICATIONS FOR POLICE PERMITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 6120 of the Santa Monlca Municipal Code IS amended to read as follows: SECTION 6120. Permits Required. (a) Any person required to obtaln a lIcense to engage In any business, callIng or pursuit mentIoned In SectIons 6204A, 6204C, 6204D, 6204E, 6204F, 6204H, 6204J, 6204K, 6204M, 6204N, 6204P, 6204Q, 6204R, 6204T, 6204U, 6204W, 6207, 6208, 6208A, 6210, 6218, 6220, 6221, 6222, 6224, 6231, 6233, 6233A, 6233B, 6233C, 6233D, 6239, 6240(6), 6240(8), 6240(20)J 6240(23), 6241 or 6244 of thIS Code shall fIrst obtaIn a permIt to conduct such bUSIness from the 1 e e ChIef of PolIce. In order to obtaIn such a permIt, a wrItten applIcatIon shall be filed with said ChIef of PolIce, WhICh applIcation shall contain a statement of intention as to the location and extent of the premises, If any, to be occupied, and in addition such application for a permit to engage in any of the bUSinesses requiring a permit shall contain the name of any person financially Interested in the bUSIness In any manner. within a reasonable of Police, tIme after (b) The ChIef submission of such application, shall conduct an investigation, in such manner as he or she deems appropriate, In order to ascertain whether such permit should be Issued as requested. The Chief shall issue such permIt as requested, unless, as a result of said Investigation, he or she finds by a preponderance of the eVidence, any of the follOWing: (1) The conductIng of the business or professIon In the location 2 e e stated In the applicatlon wlll be in vIolatIon of any laws or ordInances. (2) That any applicant, includIng but not Ilmited to the appllcant's employees dIrectly engaged In the subJect actIvIty, has, withIn five (5) years of the date of applicatIon, been convIcted of any crime whIch is substantIally related to the quallflcatlons, functIons, or dutIes of the bUSIness or profession for whIch applIcatIon IS made. A convIction wIthIn the meanIng of this actIon means a plea or verdIt of gUIlty or a convIction following a plea of nolo contendere. (3) That any such person has, wIthIn flve (5) years of the date of application, committed an act WhIChl If done by a lIcensee or permittee under thlS Chapter, would be grounds for suspenslon or revocation of a lIcense or permlt. (4) That any such person has, wIthIn flve (5) years of the date of applIcatIon, commItted an act Involving dIshonestYI fraud, or deceIt 3 e e wIth the Intent to substantially benefIt hImself or another or substantially to InJure another 1 or an act of violence, which act or acts are substantIally related to the qualifications, functIons, or duties of the bUSIness or profeSSIon for which applicatIon IS made. (5) That the applicant has knOWIngly and with deceive made a false, fraudulent statement the Intent to mIsleading or of fact to the Clty 10 the applIcation process. (c) The Chief of Police may develop when criteria to aid considerIng the hIm or her, denial, suspension or revocation of a lIcense or permIt, in determining whether a crIme or act IS substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or dutIes of the bUSiness or profeSSIon for which applIcatIon IS made. Such crIterIa, If developed, shall contaIn prOVISIons for granting the application of any person conVicted of a felony, prOVided the applIcant has obtaIned a certifIcate of 4 .. e e rehabIlItatIon under Penal Code SectIons 4852.01 et seq., or If convlcted of a mIsdemeanor, that the appllcant establIshes to the satisfaction of the ChIef he or she 15 rehabIlItated ( d ) The ChIef shall be authOrIzed to condltlon the lssuance of any permlt to insure complIance wlth thls Chapter and other applicable laws. (e) When the Chief fInds from the InvestIgatIon that any of the facts speclfled above are present, he or she shall declIne to Issue the 30 calendar requested days from applIcation. Chlef wlth permIt wIthIn the date of the permlt Any decIsion of the respect to the denIal or condItIonal approval of any such permIt shall be subJect to an appeal by the aggrIeved applIcant, provided that the appeal lS taken wIthIn the time and In the manner set forth In SectIons 6124 and 6126 of thIS Code. (f) Upon approval of an applIcatIon by the ChIef of Pollce, It 5 e e shall then be submitted by of the the applIcant wIth the amount lIcense fee requIred hereunder to the Director of FInance who then shall issue the license provided for in thIs Code. (g) Permits Issued hereunder shall be effective for the same period as the license issued pursuant to such permit. Upon the eXpiration of the permIt, an applicatIon for renewal thereof shall be filed in a like manner as an applIcation for an origInal permIt, and such renewal permit shall be granted only when the requIrements for the issuance of an original issued permit are met. PermIts hereunder shall not be assignable. SECTION 2. Section 6123 of the Santa Monica MunicIpal Code IS amended to read as follows: SECTION 6123. Revocation of PermIt. (a) Any permIt issued by the Chief of PolIce pursuant to thIS Code may be suspended or revoked by the 6 e e ChIef of PolIce In the followIng sItuatIons: (1) When It shall appear that the busIness of the person to whom such permIt was Issued has been conducted In a dIsorderly m~nner or In vIolatIon of any applIcable law or ordInance of thIS CIty or any proviSIons of thIS Code. (2) When subsequent to Issuance of the permIt, the permIttee has been conVIcted of a crIme that IS substantIally related to the qualIfIcatIons, functIons, or duties of the permItted actIvIty. (3) When the purpose for WhICh the permit has been Issued, is beIng abused to the detrIment of the public, or when the permIt is beIng used for a purpose different from that for which it was Issued. (b) If the permIt of any person shall be revoked, another permit shall not be granted to such person wIthin twelve months after the date of such revocatIon. If the permIt person has been suspended, of any another 7 . , e e permIt shall not be granted to such person durIng the prescrIbed perIod of suspensIon. (c) The effect of the suspenSIon or revocation of any permIt by the Chief of Police shall be to suspend or revoke any lIcense Issued by the CIty to carryon such bUSIness for the duratIon of suspension or revocatIon. SECTION 3. Any prOVISIon of the Santa MonIca Municipal Code or appendices thereto Inconsistent with the prOVISions of this ordinance, to the extent of such inconSIstenCies and no further, are hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to affect the prOVISIons of this ordinance. SECTION 4. If any sectIon, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance IS for any reason held to be Invalid or unconstitutIonal by a deCISion of any court of any competent Jurisdiction, such deCIsion shall not affect the validity of the remaInIng portions of the ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that It would have passed this ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase not declared InvalId or unconstitutIonal WIthout regard to whether any portion of the ordInance would be subsequently declared Invalid or unconstItutIonal. 8 . . e e SECTION 5. The Mayor shall sIgn and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this ordInance. The City Clerk shall cause the same to be pUblIshed once In the official newspaper wIthIn 15 days after Its adoptIon. The ordinance shall become effective after 30 days from Its adoption. APPROVED AS TO FORM: .~-'!.-~ " " t;;.._~: ~/~ '- ~ -- - " ROBERT M. MYERS CIty Attorney 9 .., 1" . e Adopted and approved thIS 26th day of February, 1985. f4~yt7~ I hereby cert 1 fy that the forego ing Ordinance No. 1330 (CCS) was duly and regularly Introduced at a meetIng of the City Council on the 19th day of February 1985; that the saId OrdInance was thereafter duly adopted at a meeting of the City Council on the 26th day of February 1985 by the following Council vote: Ayes: Councilmembers: Conn, Epstein, JennIngs, Katz, Zane and Mayor Reed Noes: Councllmembers: None Abstain: Councilmembers: None Absent: Councllmembers: Edwards ATTEST: ~~~ CIty Clerk