The URL can be used to link to this page

SR 10-15-2019 3D City Council Report City Council Meeting: October 15, 2019 Agenda Item: 3.D 1 of 5 To: Mayor and City Council From: Susan Cline, Director, Public Works, Engineering and Street Services Subject: Award Bid and enter into Construction Contract with Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd. for Pier Below Deck Fire Sprinkler Replacement Project - Phase 1 Recommended Action Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Award Bid #SP2364 to Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd., a California- based company, for construction services for the Pier Below Deck Fire Sprinkler Replacement Project – Phase 1 for the Public Works Department; 2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract with Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd. in an amount not to exceed $2,275,860 (including a 10% contingency); 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue any necessary change orders to complete additional work within contract authority. Summary The City of Santa Monica is committed to ensuring a safe experience for visitors to the Santa Monica Pier (Pier). The Pier fire sprinkler system, which protects the wooden decking and substructure of the Pier in the event of a significant fire, is in need of replacement due to corrosion and deterioration of the sprinkler heads, piping, and pipe supports caused by seawater and sun exposure. The Pier Below Deck Fire Sprinkler Replacement Project – Phase 1 is the first of six planned phases to replace the existing Pier fire sprinkler system. Staff recommends awarding a contract to Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd. in an amount not to exceed $2,275,860 (including a 10% contingency) to provide construction services for Phase 1 of the project. Discussion The Pier is composed of combustible wood decking on top of a combination of both combustible and noncombustible substructure elements. In 1996, a below deck fire sprinkler system was installed to protect the wooden decking and substructure in the 2 of 5 event of a significant fire. In 2015, at the request of the Fire Department and Office of Pier Management, the Civil Engineering Division retained the fire protection engine ering services of Cosentini Associates, Inc. for a visual inspection and review of the existing Pier fire protection system. The resulting report recommends replacing the existing Pier fire sprinkler system (Attachment A). The report identifies corrosion of the sprinkler heads, pipe supports, and riser piping due to exposure to seawater. Corrosion could have detrimental effects on the performance of the sprinkler heads, cause pipe supports to fail, and lead to leaks in the riser piping. The report also identifies discoloration of the chlorinated polyvinyl chloride sprinkler piping due to prolonged exposure to the sun. The discoloration could signify damaged piping at risk of failure during a fire event. The report calls for replacement of the sprinkler heads, pipe supports, riser piping, and sprinkler piping with corrosion-resistant materials. The recommended award is the result of this project being rebid after Council directed staff to reject the original single bid, which exceeded the approved project bu dget (Attachment C). Staff revised the phasing for the rebid to reduce the complexity of the project and encourage a more competitive bid response for the first phase. The original bid package called for Phase 1 to be the western-most portions of the fire protection system, which would have required the contractor to erect scaffolding to work over the water. Phase 1 is now at the east end of the Pier, which provides the contractor easier access to the project area and does not require working over water. Staff also provided more time for bidders to submit proposals and made the pre-bid job walk optional instead of mandatory. Past Council Actions March 28, 2017 (Attachment B) Authorized an agreement with Jensen Hughes, Inc. to provide fire protection engineering services to design the Pier Below Deck Fire Sprinkler Replacement Project November 27, 2018 (Attachment C) Rejected the single bid for the Pier Below Deck Fire Sprinkler Replacement Project – Phase 1 and directed staff to reissue a bid to obtain the best bidder for the project 3 of 5 Vendor Selection Bidder Recommendation Best Bidder Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd. Evaluation Criteria Price, previous experience, ability to deliver, quality of product, and compliance with City specifications. Municipal Code SMMC 2.24.180 Bid Data Date Posted Posted On Advertise In (City Charter & SMMC) Vendors Downloaded Date Publicly Opened 07/01/2019 City's Online Bidding Site Santa Monica Daily Press 39 07/30/2019 Best Bidder Justification Staff recommends Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd., the lowest bidder, as the best bidder based on its demonstrated quality of work on past projects and experience with similar projects for the cities of Santa Monica and Newport Beach, and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Construction Management and Public Outreach City staff would provide construction management and public outreach for this project. Construction management would include inspecting the contractor’s work during construction, verifying and documenting unforeseen conditions and changes requested by the contractor or City staff, monitoring and mitigating impacts due to construction activities, attending the contractor’s safety meetings, attending periodic progress meetings, and maintaining all necessary inspection documentation. Public outreach would include notifications distributed to Pier tenants and adjacent properties detailing the scope of the project, potential impacts, construction schedule, and contact information for the construction manager. The notifications would be prepared by Public Works staff and distributed by the construction contractor. Weekly construction updates Submittals Received Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd. $2,068,963 John S. Meek Company, Inc. $2,163,000 4 of 5 would be posted on the City’s “Know Before You Go” (KBUG) website and Monday editions of the Santa Monica Daily Press. Project Phases The proposed Pier Below Deck Fire Sprinkler Replacement Project would be constructed in six phases over the next six years. The first phase would be completed in summer 2020 with the final phase (phase 6) being completed in 2025. Staff anticipates the cost of future phases to increase due to several factors, including rising labor and material costs and the added complexity of working over the water instead of over sand. The overall project budget is estimated at $16,500,000. Staff anticipates that all phases could be completed before the reconstruction of the Pier Bridge, provided funding for the subsequent phases is approved. However, if the two projects did overlap, impacts would be minimal because the fire sprinkler work is phased from east to west, moving away from the Pier Bridge. Financial Impacts and Budget Actions Staff seeks authority to approve funding from the Pier Fund to award a contract with Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd. for construction services for the Pier Below Deck Fire Sprinkler Replacement Project – Phase 1. Contract Request Request Amount FY 2019-20 Budget CIP Account # Total Contract Amount $2,275,860 C5306150.689000 $2,275,860 Prepared By: Robert Zak, Civil Engineer Approved Forwarded to Council 5 of 5 Attachments: A. Pier Fire Protection Assessment Report B. March 28, 2017 Staff Report (Web Link) C. November 27, 2018 Staff Report (Web Link) D. Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd. Oaks Initiative Disclosure Form Fire and Code Consulting Engineers 529 S. Broadway, 4 th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90013 T: 949.809.5040 F: 949.809.5010 www.cosentini.com Building and Fire Code Consulting Performance Based Fire Engineering Fire and Smoke Modeling Smoke Control System Design Special Inspection and Commissioning Negotiation and Equivalencies Hazardous Materials and Process Analysis Due Diligence and 3 rd Party Reviews June 16, 2015 Selim Eren City of Santa Monica | Civil Engineering 1437 4th Street, Suite 300 | Santa Monica CA 90401 310.458.8234 O | 310.393.4425 F Santa Monica Pier Fire Protection System Criteria Development and System Review Dear Mr. Eren, As requested, Cosentini Associates has prepared this letter report to document our review and analysis of the existing sprinkler system installed at the Santa Monica Pier. The letter report documents both the existing condition and potential options addressing current issues and system deficiencies. Pier Background The Santa Monica Pier is a large historic pier with an amusement park, restaurants, an aquarium, and small shops. All areas of the pier have a combustible wood deck on top of a combination of both combustible and noncombustible substructure construction. The Newcombe Pier section in the southwest corner is made up of concrete piles and beams. The long and narrow portion of the pier extending into the water consists of noncombustible substructure with concrete piles and beams and is the only section not provided with an automatic sprinkler system to protect the substructure and wood decking. The remaining sections of the pier are comprised of combustible wooden piles. All areas of the pier deck have an underside consisting of narrow horizontal channels created by wooden stringers. At the request of the City of Santa Monica, a visual inspection and review of the system was performed to identify any potential issues and recommend potential improvements of the system in order to address the Santa Monica Fire Departments concerns regarding system functionality and protection of the pier. June 16, 2015 Page 2 of 16 Applicable Codes Phase I of the system was designed in 1993 in accordance with the following codes and standards: · Santa Monica Municipal Code · Uniform Building Code Standard 38-1, 1991 Edition · NFPA 307, 1990 Edition · NFPA 13, 1989 & 1991 Editions Phase II of the system was designed 1996 in accordance with the following codes and standards: · Santa Monica Municipal Code · Uniform Building Code Standard 9-1, 1994 Edition · NFPA 307, 1990 Edition · NFPA 13, 1994 Edition Sprinkler System Description The sprinkler system was installed in order to protect the wooden decking and substructure in the event of a significant fire capable compromising the structure. The overall system is split into 15 separate zones and was designed and installed in two separate phases. Phase I is comprised of Zones 1-6 and 12, while Phase II is comprised of Zones 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15. The sprinkler system design is in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 307, which is the Standard for the Construction and Fire Protection of Marine Terminals, Piers and Wharves. This standard provides comprehensive guidelines and addresses the typical conditions encountered for piers and wharves. Much of the system is partially protected from outside elements by wooden walls on all sides. Zones2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, and 12 are surrounded by walls on all sides. Zones 1 and 5 are mostly protected but are partially exposed in the bike path running underneath the pier. Zones 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 15 are separated from the remainder of the sprinkler systems by a “wooden perimeter wall” and are exposed to the open air and ocean. Refer to the figure below for a layout of all sprinkler systems. June 16, 2015 Page 3 of 16 In 2010, upgrades and repairs to the fire protection systems on the pier were performed, including the installation of a dry standpipe system, the addition of sectionalizing valves, and the repair of existing conditions found in the sprinkler system was documented in an assessment report completed in September of 2007 2. A review of the fire protection invoice logs from the past five years (shown in Appendix B) reveals that many other repairs to the system have been made since 2010. An automatic fire suppression system was not specifically required for the underside of the pier per the Uniform Building Code and is not required by the current California Building Code (CBC) or the Santa Monica Municipal Code. However, due to the combustible construction of the pier, the typically high occupant load, and the nature of hazards present in the area, the system is considered very important for public safety and structural protection and is in line with recognized engineering practices. Sprinkler Systems 13, 14, and 15 protect a non-combustible, concrete substructure of the pier. However, even these systems are considered important because of the presence of wooden catwalks in the area, and the combustible deck above the concrete pilings. The sprinkler system is especially important given the history of the nearby pier at Pacific Ocean Park, which caught fire multiple times after it was decommissioned 3. These fires were mostly due to arson. Based on our survey, arson and accidental fire are a concern given the homeless population living in and under the pier structure. Background Cosentini understands through conversations with the City that the cost to maintain the sprinkler system is a concern to the City of Santa Monica and has been considered in this report. The fire protection invoice logs shown in Appendix B show that the repairs to the system have cost the city approximately $50,000 in the past five years, which excludes costs for inspections and testing. This sum would likely be significantly higher if inspections of the system were performed more often, as a more recent survey of the system by Cosentini has identified additional outstanding issues. June 16, 2015 Page 4 of 16 Per conversations with the Civil Engineering Department of the City of Santa Monica and personnel from the Santa Monica Fire Marshal’s office, multiple fires underneath the pier have been reported since the automatic sprinkler system was installed, but none have grown large enough to activate the system. The fact that these fires failed to activate the system should not be misconstrued to mean that the system is in a condition such that it would not perform as designed during a fire scenario. Many of these fires reportedly involved the disposing of lit cigarettes through the wooden beams of the pier, which subsequently spread to combustibles beneath the pier. It is likely that these fires were not large enough to activate the nearest sprinkler head, which are designed to spray upwards and protect the underside of the pier and not to extinguish small fires in the decking or at the ground level. In addition, most of the sprinkler heads are located 12 feet or more above the ground, the placement of these sprinklers would require a significant fire for operation to occur. Subsequent system inspections by the Santa Monica Fire Marshal’s Office has identified additional concerns with the system, including discolored plastic piping that may be degrading due to exposure to sun, recalled sprinkler heads, and widespread corrosion due to exposure to the elements. System Specifications Sprinkler Type, Locations and Spacing As required by NFPA 307, pendent sprinklers are installed in the upright position so that water is projected upward to wet the underside of the decking and control fires on the underside of the pier. Per a review of the as-built drawings and field inspections, sprinklers are located 8 feet apart on branchlines, with branchlines spaced 10 feet apart and 5 feet from the nearest walls. The maximum coverage area per sprinkler is 80 ft². This spacing is in compliance with the most recent NFPA 307 and NFPA 13 requirements. Sprinkler deflectors are located approximately 10 inches below the bottom of the stringers in compliance with the NFPA standards. According to notes found in the as-built drawings, all sprinklers are provided with a factory applied corrosion resistant coating designed for salt water and weather exposure and have a temperature rating not exceeding 165°C. All supply, feed main and cross main piping are supported by wrap-around U-hook style hangers. According to as-built drawings, all hangers are provided with factory applied hot-dipped zinc coating to prevent corrosion. Hangers are placed in locations so that they will be in the wetting pattern of the sprinkler to prevent lag screws from failing during a fire. Sprinkler System Design Criteria Each sprinkler system zone was designed in accordance with the guidance found in the 1990 edition of NFPA 307 as follows: · Sprinkler discharge pressure of 12.5 psi · Sprinkler ½ inch orifice · Design density of 0.247 gpm/ft² over a design area of 5,000 ft² The latest editions of NFPA 307 and NFPA 13 state that pier sprinkler systems should be designed based upon the design criteria for Group A plastics. However, the reasoning for this criteria is due to the June 16, 2015 Page 5 of 16 “widely varying nature of commodities that pass through transit sheds, container freight stations, transload facilities, and similar buildings used for handling and temporary storage of general cargo.” Because the Santa Monica Pier is used for amusement purposes only, designing the system to Group A plastic criteria is considered overly conservative. The current design criteria is in compliance with Ordinary Hazard Group 2, which is considered appropriate because piers and wharves are classified as Ordinary Hazard Group 2 in NFPA 13. Water Supply Water for the sprinkler systems is supplied from the city water mains from two different sources. One main runs from the north along Palisades Beach Road, while the other runs from the east down Seaside Tier. An underground water supply loop is provided such that a secondary water supply would be available if any part of the piping network were to become damaged. It is understood that a saltwater supply was capped at some point after the installation of the sprinkler system. However, this supply is not considered necessary, as the current fire supply loop is adequate. Standpipe System and Hydrant Locations The original hydrants associated with the automatic sprinkler system are located throughout the pier, both directly adjacent to the structure and directly on perimeter of the wooden deck and spaced 150 feet to 300 feet apart. These standpipes are connected to the domestic water supply. Eight additional dry standpipe fire hose connections were installed in 2010, spaced approximately 270 feet apart and placed between the original hydrants. A fire hose connection associated with this newer system is located on the north side of the pier adjacent to the bike path. Current Issues Field surveys and reviews of as-built drawings were performed by Cosentini in order to document the current state of the pier sprinkler system. The current conditions of the system were visually examined and compared against the latest standards for pier sprinkler systems in order to determine the adequacy of the system and its expected performance for an expected fire in the area. Note that the California Building Code as adopted by the Santa Monica Municipal Code does not specifically require compliance with NFPA 307. However, this standard has been used for comparison and guidance because the sprinkler system was installed in accordance with the NFPA 307 requirements and because the standard addresses many of the conditions present at the Santa Monica Pier. Sprinkler Pipe Per the General Notes and System Details of the as-built sprinkler system drawings, and confirmation through field inspections, all cross mains and branch lines are CPVC plastic piping meeting UL Standard 1821 and listed for fire service use. Per visual inspection, Blaze Master CPVC sprinkler pipe has been installed in all areas. It is likely that this pipe material was used rather than steel because of corrosion concerns. NFPA 307 requires that listed corrosion-resistant types of pipe be used where corrosive conditions exist. However, this pipe must also be able to withstand all other atmospheric damage and prolonged exposure to the sun. Per installation and design manuals for the Blaze Master pipe installed throughout the system, it is not listed for prolonged exposure to sunlight, and exposure can cause product damage 1. June 16, 2015 Page 6 of 16 Of upmost concern are the openings in the pier decking allow for direct exposure to sun and significant degradation of the pipe. During field surveys, the exposure effects from sunlight exposure were most pronounced on the west side of the pier, where piping was exposed to the elements. Much of the piping had lost its original coloring, leading to concerns that it could possibly be damaged and eventually result in failure which would prevent proper activation of the sprinkler system. In addition to the concerns about sunlight exposure, the pipe is not listed for the hazard classification of the pier and surrounding area. In addition to the combustible construction of the pier, field surveys show significant amount of combustibles stored below that form a substantial fire hazard. Section 6.3.7 of the 2013 edition of NFPA 13 specifically prohibits the use of nonmetallic pipe in any areas besides light hazard occupancies. Per Section 5.3.2, piers and wharves are considered Ordinary Hazard Group 2. The combustible loading observed during survey is consistent with that expected for Ordinary Hazard Group 2. The significant combustible loading and possibility of a fast growing fire leads to concern that CPVC piping could quickly melt and render the system inoperable. Pipe Support Per visual inspection, most of the U-hook style pipe supports in the protected sprinkler system areas of the pier east of the wooden perimeter wall appear to be in working condition. None of the pipe supports examined in these areas require immediate replacement, but they should be examined annually in accordance with the requirements of Section 5.1.1.2 of the 2014 edition of NFPA 25. These inspections are especially important because the hangers are exposed to a harsh environment that could lead to significant corrosion and the failure of hangers prior to or during a fire event. All U-hook pipe supports located to the west of the wooden perimeter wall should be examined for replacement. Per the requirements of NFPA 25, any hangers shown to be damaged, loose, or unattached must be replaced. Many hangers accessible via the catwalks immediately adjacent to the ocean are substantially corroded and some are broken completely in half. A complete replacement of all hangers is not necessary. However, all hangers that appear corroded to the point where they may become unattached or unable to support the sprinkler piping must be replaced. The sprinkler system in the area adjacent to the water was installed in 1996, meaning that the lifespan of these hangers is in the 15-20 year range. Replacement hangers should be expected to last approximately this long, but annual inspection and appropriate replacement of hangers is very important to ensure that the sprinkler piping is properly supported. Per Section 4.3.3.1 of NFPA 307, corrosion-resistant hangers or hangers with listed protective corrosion- resistant coatings should be used. Per the As-built drawings, all hangers installed in the system were provided with a factory applied hot-dipped zinc coating, which is in compliance with NFPA 13 and 307 requirements. These style hangers should continue to be used for all replacement Sprinkler Condition Per visual inspection, the sprinklers located to the east of the wooden perimeter wall appear to be in working condition. However, many sprinklers to the west of the wall exposed to the open air and salt water (Zones 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 15) appear to show the effects of corrosion on the deflectors and operating elements due to exposure to seawater. According to the guidance found in NFPA 25, Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems , corrosion found on the June 16, 2015 Page 7 of 16 deflector of a sprinkler could affect the spray pattern of the sprinkler activation, and the effects of corrosion on operating elements could have detrimental effects on the performance of the sprinkler. According to the standard, light surface corrosion on the boss, frame arms, and/or the deflector, and/or surface discoloration, not impacting the operation of the sprinkler should not warrant replacement. However, significant buildup on any part of the sprinkler should result in the replacement of the sprinkler in order to ensure proper activation and performance. Many sprinklers viewed in the field meet the criteria for full replacement. Recalled sprinkler heads are currently in use throughout the system. In July of 2001, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of Central fire sprinklers with O-ring seals, citing the discovery that the O-ring can degrade over time due to corrosion. Included in this recall are pendent sprinklers manufactured between 1989-2000, stamped with the word “Central” and “GB 4.” Per visual inspection and the examination of system documents, these sprinklers are currently in use on the system. Due to the highly corrosive environment, it is especially important to replace all recalled sprinkler heads. Current testing, NFPA 25 Due to the harsh environment the sprinkler system is exposed to, it is very important that the system is subject to frequent inspections in accordance with applicable NFPA standards. Per conversations with personnel from the Santa Monica Fire Marshal’s Office, inspections of the system occur every five years, which is beyond the timeframe required by NFPA 25 as adopted by Title 19 of the California Health and Safety Code. Refer to Appendix A of this report for a list of system components and the required inspection and testing intervals for each. The City of Santa Monica has provided fire protection invoice logs from the past five years, which are provided in Appendix B of this report. A review of these records confirms that regular inspections of the sprinkler system are not taking place, with quarterly inspections appearing to decline in mid-2012. Quarterly inspection logs for the period ranging from 2013 to present appear to be for the sprinkler systems above the pier in Building 250, the Carousel Building, and the Aquarium, with no corresponding inspections for the system underneath the pier. Detailed records are available for only some inspections, and it is difficult to determine which systems were included for the available reports. Cosentini has reviewed the latest inspection and test report for the system underneath the pier dated 11/7/2011, which gives the address of the pier but does not give details about which sprinkler systems were examined. Because there are multiple systems both above and below the pier, more details should be given in the report to ensure that all systems are examined in accordance with NFPA 25. At a minimum, these details should include the specific systems inspected and tested, the results of the test, and details about any impairments found. It is also not clear from the provided report if testing of the system was properly performed. Per Section 5.3.1.1.2 of NFPA 25, where an automatic suppression system is exposed to outside weather, representative sprinkler samples must be tested, or the sprinklers must be replaced every five years. The pier sprinkler system covers a large area and is split into multiple sections exposed to different conditions, a representative sample of sprinklers from each of the systems should be tested during this time interval. Based on the current condition of many of the sprinklers located near the ocean, this June 16, 2015 Page 8 of 16 testing or replacement of sprinklers does not appear to have been performed recently, leading to a high probability that many sprinklers would not activate as intended during a significant fire. Depending on the extent of repair or replacement of piping or sprinklers in the system, NFPA 25 requires certain actions that must be taken to test the system. Per visual inspection of the current condition of the sprinklers in the systems located adjacent to the ocean, more than 20 sprinklers may require replacement, which would require a hydrostatic test of the system in accordance with NFPA 13. A list of required actions as given by NFPA 25 can be found in Appendix A. Inspection and testing of the standpipes and hose systems should also be in compliance with NFPA 25. A review of the city and inspection testing records reveals that a comprehensive test of all related hydrants was performed at an indeterminate date. More documentation of the testing performed should be provided, and all testing and inspections should be performed within the timeframes mandated by NFPA 25. Refer to Appendix A for a list of requirements. Spare Sprinkler Storage Per the requirements of NFPA 307, 12 spare sprinklers should be stored on site for use in replacement. Per an inspection of the spare sprinkler storage area, only three spare heads are stored on site. Connection to Fire Alarm System System Drawing 4627 gives details of the sprinkler system tamper and waterflow switches and their connection to the fire alarm panel located directly to the west of the Carousel Building. Per discussions with personnel from the Santa Monica Fire Marshal’s Office, recent experience with the fire alarm panel has led to confusion on the layout of the alarm zones. It is apparently difficult to determine the location of the origin of alarms, which could adversely impact the fire department’s ability to quickly suppress a potential fire before it spreads to the pier substructure. This confusion may be partly due to the fact that Drawing 4627 uses a different numbering system for the sprinkler systems than the as-built drawings. The Fire Alarm Drawing begins with System No. 1 at the east end of the pier and then numbers the zones sequentially counterclockwise around the pier. The numbering system of the as- built drawings is less orderly and does not match up with the alarm zones. At the time that this report was written, a study by others was underway to determine the functionality of the fire alarm system and its connection to the fire alarm systems on the underside of the pier. Depending on the results of this study, the system should be updated so that the appropriate personnel and fire authorities are alerted to an alarm as early as possible in order to ensure adequate time to reach the fire location and prevent the fire from growing large enough to affect the structure. Troubles and alarms should show the specific sprinkler system associated with the event so that the trouble condition or fire location can be quickly located, and fire alarm zones should be renumbered so that they match the sprinkler zones numbering system. Riser Piping Each individual sprinkler system zone is provided with a riser pipe fitted with control valves and pressure gauges for both the supply and system side of the piping network. Field inspections of each of these risers revealed that pressure is at or near zero for the system side gauges at risers 103, 104, and 106. It is likely that there are leaks in the system resulting in the loss of pressure in the system. The systems associated with these risers (Systems 5, 2, and 6, respectively) should be examined and tested to June 16, 2015 Page 9 of 16 identify the location of the leak or leaks. In addition, the supply side pressure gauge at riser 208 is near zero, which should also be investigated. It would also be beneficial to install a low pressure switch to activate an alarm when supply pressure is lost. Each riser on the west side of the wood perimeter walls that supply Zones 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 15 is showing the signs of significant corrosion. The horizontal run between supply side riser 707 and system side riser 407 has a significant leak that was spraying water when the system was inspected in late February, 2015. Each of these risers appears in need of replacement. Recommendations After a thorough review of the conditions at the pier, it has been determined that the substructure sprinkler systems are essential to protecting the pier structure and its occupants. The conditions identified in the preceding section should be repaired as quickly as possible in order to ensure proper functionality of the system. Field inspections and a review of documentation of the system design and past testing and maintenance of the system have shown that additional improvements are needed in order to ensure that the system would activate as needed in the event of a significant fire. The following recommendations for addressing these issues are presented in order to ensure the level of safety that the system was intended to provide when it was installed: 1. Replace Sprinkler Piping The CPVC pipe installed throughout the system is less susceptible to corrosion than steel pipe, but it is not properly rated for its use in the pier systems. The pipe is not rated for exposure to sun and should only be used in light hazard occupancies. The hazards presented by the pier lead to concerns that the pipe would melt in a fast growing fire and quickly render the system inoperable. Therefore, the piping should be replaced with a steel pipe similar to what is currently used for the pipe risers, which is black steel pipe hot-dipped zinc-coated (galvanized) meeting the ASTM A 795 standard. According to representatives from Tyco Fire Protection Products, the cost to replace sprinkler piping and heads for each system is expected to be as follows: Materials: $37,000, including galvanized piping and corrosion resistant sprinkler heads Labor Time: Approximately 2.3 hours per sprinkler head. Note that this is a conservative estimate based on additional safety precautions needed to install a sprinkler system underneath the pier. Each system has approximately 250 heads. Labor Cost: Approximately $150 per hour x 575 hours = $86,250 Total Cost: $123,250 2. Replace Recalled Sprinkler Heads As described above, all sprinkler heads stamped with “Central” and “GB” should be replaced due to concerns with the corrosion of the O-ring of these sprinklers and the possibility that they will not activate as intended during a fire. June 16, 2015 Page 10 of 16 3. Improve Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance A review of the latest inspection, testing, and maintenance reports provided by the City of Santa Monica reveals that the current procedures do not meet the requirements of NFPA 25. All portions of the sprinkler systems, the standpipe systems, and the fire alarm system should follow the latest adopted NFPA 25 standard. Following these standards is especially important due to the harsh environment that the system is exposed to, and the fact that multiple sprinklers, piping, hangers, and risers were identified as requiring replacement or upgrades during recent field inspections. Refer to Appendix A for the latest inspection, testing, and maintenance requirements and the required actions for any deficiencies found in the system. 4. Remove Combustible Material Field inspections of the area revealed that a large amount of combustible material is being stored underneath the pier. This significantly increases the chance for a large fire that could affect the pier. Much of the combustible material consists of plastic, paper, wood, and other combustible materials left over from past maintenance projects. To the extent possible, this material should be removed. Per conversations with City of Santa Monica personnel, complete removal of the combustible material underneath the pier is not possible, as there are no options for moving these materials to another location. Therefore, Cosentini recommends that this material be consolidated to a certain area or areas that could be separated from the rest of the pier structure with fire- resistance rated construction. Areas of combustible storage should be separated from the remainder of the pier by firestop construction described in Section 4.3.3.5 of NFPA 307, meeting the following requirements: · Constructed of reinforced concrete or similar materials, with a fire-resistance rating of one hour. · Transverse fire stops must fit tightly against the pier deck and around and structural members or pipes that pass through the firestop so that an effective barrier to fire and draft is maintained 5. Subdivision of Pier and Fire Department Planning It is understood that the Santa Monica Fire Department plans to develop Pre-Fire Plans for responding to a fire at the pier. These plans will involve subdividing the structure and isolating any potential fire in order to limit damage to a specific portion of the pier. It is understood that one technique that the Fire Department plans to use is “trenching” in order to create a gap in combustible material between the fire location origin and the remaining structure. It is recommended that the location of deck openings in the pier be analyzed and coordinated with these Pre-Fire Plans so that revolving nozzles and other fire-fighting devices could be used to assist in creating a barrier in the event of a fire. Deck openings are currently provided on the pier, but many have not been properly maintained. Per conversations with pier maintenance workers, deck openings in heavily trafficked areas and areas used for vehicle parking are difficult to maintain. For this reason, many of the openings have been covered. Covering these openings could significantly hamper the fire department’s ability to control a fire, because these June 16, 2015 Page 11 of 16 access openings are essential for using the standpipe connections currently installed around the perimeter of the pier. The location of deck openings should be coordinated the Santa Monica Fire Department Pre-Fire Plans and the expected areas where “trenching” to remove combustible materials could occur. Openings should also be evaluated for compliance with the latest NFPA 307 standard as follows: · Provided at intervals not exceeding 25 feet on center* · Openings must be over clear spaces to avoid interference by the substructure with effective operation of extinguishing devices. · The effective arrangement of openings must not exceed 100 in² and must not be less than 9 in. in the smallest dimension, so as to pass the appliances for which they are intended. · Openings must be provided with covers that can be removed. · Covers for openings must be constructed of, or insulated with, material that resists the passage of heat and fire in a manner equivalent to that of the pier deck. *Due to layout of structures and obstacles throughout the pier, it is recognized that providing deck openings every 25 feet in all directions is impractical. Therefore, it is recommended that the deck openings be provided at least every 150’ down the length of the pier (East-West), which is in line with the recommended distance for subdividing a pier with tranverse fire stops as found in the guidance of NFPA 307. At these 150’ intervals, deck openings should be provided every 25’ horizontally along the pier (North-South) so that an effective barrier with revolving nozzles can be created in the event of a fire. These 150’ interval locations should also be located in areas where the Fire Department could use a “trenching” method in order to provide a gap in combustible material. Where maintenance of the openings is difficult due to heavy traffic, they should be protected to prevent damage. Instruction should be provided to maintenance workers to prevent the removal or covering of the openings, and periodic inspections should be performed to ensure proper upkeep. Exposed Sprinkler System Options Inspection of the pier sprinkler systems revealed that the biggest issue with proper maintenance will occur with the systems located west of the wooden perimeter wall as they are exposed to the ocean and sun. It is recognized that there may be a large cost associated with keeping these systems in proper working order, two options have been provided to address the issue. Either option could be implemented along with all of the recommendations above. Option 1 – Retain Current Sprinkler Systems The first option involves leaving Zones 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 15 as-is and updating inspection, testing, and maintenance procedures. The current condition of the system has deteriorated to a point where its proper activation is in doubt. Therefore, all deficiencies identified in this report must be repaired, and strict adherence to the requirements of NFPA 25 must be followed. June 16, 2015 Page 12 of 16 Option 2 - Subdivision of Combustible Substructures The current edition of NFPA 307 (2011) allows for alternatives to sprinkler system protection to existing substructures when, in the opinion of the authority having jurisdiction, it is impractical to install and maintain an automatic sprinkler system. Due to a variety of factors, it is of the opinion of Cosentini Associates that sprinkler systems Zones 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 15 may qualify as impractical to maintain. The piping, pipe bracing, and sprinklers in these systems are exposed to a very harsh environment due to their close proximity the seawater, and a lack of barrier between the seawater and the systems. After visual inspections of the system and discussions with personnel from the Santa Monica Fire Marshal’s Office, sprinklers, piping, and bracing designed for corrosive environments are not able to withstand this environment for a significant amount of time, making maintenance costs prohibitive and preventing the system from activating as designed during a potential fire event. If it is decided to decommission the sprinkler system in these areas, protection should still be provided for the remainder of the pier because the substructure is comprised of combustible wood construction. In addition, the wooden catwalks are provided throughout the area within 4 feet of the ground, creating the possibility for a relatively small fire on the ground to spread upward to the wood and spread further to the pier decking. As an alternative to a sprinkler system in this area, other means of protection may be provided, including methods allowed by NFPA 307 in lieu of automatic sprinkler protection. In order to provide an equivalent level of protection to a sprinkler system, the subdivision of the structure should be made by transverse fire walls or transverse fire stops as defined within NFPA 307. The more robust tranverse fire walls must be constructed of reinforced concrete or other materials that are equivalent in stability and fire resistance rating, and must have a fire resistance rating of at least four hours. If these walls are used, they must extend from low water and the full width of the pier and must be installed at intervals not exceeding 450 feet. A section of the entire pier deck over the fire wall must also be constructed of fire-resistive construction to preserve the effectiveness of the wall, and the fire- resistive section should extend for at least 10 feet on each side of the wall. It is of the opinion of Cosentini that the construction of these structures is impractical for the given structure given that the pier deck is crowded with existing structures that would prevent the construction of a fire-resistive section on the pier deck. Where in the opinion of the authority having jurisdiction, the construction of transverse fire walls is impractical, transverse fire stops may be installed in lieu of fire walls. Transverse fire stops must meet the following requirements: · Must extend from the low water line and be installed every 150 feet. · Constructed of reinforced concrete or similar materials, with a fire-resistance rating of one hour. · Transverse fire stops must fit tightly against the pier deck and around and structural members or pipes that pass through the firestop so that an effective barrier to fire and draft is maintained Utilizing as-built drawings of the pier, a hypothetical transverse fire stop system in compliance with NFPA 307 could be installed in the locations shown in the following figures. J u n e 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 Page 13 of 16 J u n e 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 Page 14 of 16 June 16, 2015 Page 15 of 16 The construction of these fire stops must be weighed against the cost of maintaining the sprinkler systems in these areas. Building these firestop walls obviously presents difficult logistical challenges due to the complex network of existing piping and wooden catwalks underneath the pier. All penetrations would need to be sealed to retain a one hour fire rating. In addition, because the catwalks are essential for maintenance to the pier, they would need to be divided into different sections between the firestop walls, with new entrances needed to access the space between them. Conclusion An extensive review of the Santa Monica Pier fire sprinkler system documentation and field surveys of the system have been performed. Based on our review, the system is essential to the safety of the pier and its occupants. However, many existing conditions could prevent the system to activate as needed. Improvements to the system recommended in this report should be made in order to ensure the proper protection of the pier. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours, COSENTINI ASSOCIATES , INC . Code Consulting and Fire Engineering Services Prepared by: Andrew Biery, P.E. | Sr. Fire Protection Engineer Phone: 617-803-8365 abiery@cosentini.com Reviewed by: Andrew J. Thul, P.E. | Director of West Coast Operations – Sr. Fire Protection Engineer Direct: 949-809-5040 | Fax: 949-809-5010 | Mobile: 949-293-2585 athul@cosentini.com Cosentini Associates, Inc. - A Tetra Tech Company 800 W. 6 th , Suite 380 Los Angeles, CA 92614-6213 www.cosentini.com June 16, 2015 Page 16 of 16 References 1. Tyco Fire Protection Products. BlazeMaster Installation Instructions & Technical Handbook. August 2014. 2. Moffatt and Nichol. “Fire Protection System Field Logs & Photographs.” Santa Monica Pier Fire Protection System. September, 2007. 3. Miranda, Carolina A. “The Rise and Spectacular Fall of Venice Beach’s Pacific Ocean Park.” Los Angeles Times. July 28, 2014. http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/miranda/la-et-cam- venice-beach-new-book-rise-and-fall-pacific-ocean-park-20140727-column.html 4. Consumer Product Safety Commission. “CPSC, Central Sprinkler Company Announce Voluntary Recall to Replace O-Ring Fire Sprinklers.” July 19, 2001. http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/2001/CPSC-Central-Sprinkler-Company-Announce-Voluntary- Recall-To-Replace-O-Ring-Fire-Sprinklers/ June 16, 2015 Page A-1 Appendix A: NFPA 25 – 2014 Edition Requirements for Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance June 16, 2015 Page A-2 Appendix A: NFPA 25 – 2014 Edition Requirements for Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance June 16, 2015 Page A-3 Appendix A: NFPA 25 – 2014 Edition Requirements for Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance June 16, 2015 Page A-4 Appendix A: NFPA 25 – 2014 Edition Requirements for Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance J u n e 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 Page B-1 Ap p e n d i x B : S a n t a M o n i c a I n v o i c e L o g f r o m 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 - P r e s e n t A ll S y s t e m s F i r e P r o t e c t i o n W o r k O r de r s Wo r k O r d e r # Co m p a n y Na m e In v o i c e Da t e Ac t u a l Co s t In v o i c e De s c r i p t i o n Ba t c h Da t e Pa i d Date PO Number Fiscal Year FA C M - 2 2 4 6 7 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 12 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 0 25 5 Pi e r - 8 w a t e r f l o w a l a r m s - t a m p e r s w i t c h o n ri s e r 2 0 6 c l o s e d , r e s e t 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 0 12 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 0 17964-OF 2010-11 FA C M - 2 2 4 6 7 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 0 42 5 Pi e r - s h u t d o w n / d r a i n f i r e s p r i n k l e r s y s t e m b y Ca r o u s e l , p l u g , r e f i l l 12 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 0 1/ 6 / 2 0 1 1 17964-OF 2010-11 FA C M - 2 2 4 6 7 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 2/ 1 1 / 2 0 1 1 1, 5 8 0 . 2 5 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r q u a r t e r l y m a i n t e n a n c e in s p e c t i o n p e r t i t l e 1 9 2/ 1 4 / 2 0 1 1 3/ 3 / 2 0 1 1 17964-OF 2010-11 FA C M - 2 2 4 6 7 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 4/ 1 1 / 2 0 1 1 40 0 . 1 5 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t v a l v e l e a k i n e l e c t r i c a l ro o m b y R R - b a l l v a l v e 4/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 1 4/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 1 17964-OF 2010-11 FA C M - 2 2 4 6 7 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 4/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 1 4, 1 2 5 . 0 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l f i r e a l a r m a n n u a l / 5 - y e a r sp r i n k l e r t e s t 4/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 1 4/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 1 17964-OF 2010-11 FA C M - 2 2 4 6 7 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 5/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 1 1, 5 8 0 . 2 5 Pi e r - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r i n s p e c t i o n 6/ 6 / 2 0 1 1 6/ 9 / 2 0 1 1 17964-OF 2010-11 FA C M - 2 2 4 6 7 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 5/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 1 46 4 . 4 7 Pi e r - s w c o r n e r l e a k i n g s p r i n k l e r h e a d r e p a i r s at s u r f l i n e 6/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 1 6/ 2 3 / 2 0 1 1 17964-OF 2010-11 FA C M - 3 5 6 7 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 9/ 7 / 2 0 1 1 1, 5 7 5 . 0 0 Pi e r - q u a r t e r l y m a i n t e n a n c e i n s p e c t i o n o f f i r e sp r i n k l e r s y s t e m 11 / 1 4 / 2 0 1 1 11 / 1 6 / 2 0 1 1 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 3 5 7 0 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 9/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 1 50 9 . 7 7 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r u n d e r P a c i f i c P a r k M R R le a k / r e p l a c e f l o w s w i t c h 9/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 1 9/ 2 9 / 2 0 1 1 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 3 5 6 7 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 10 / 2 6 / 2 0 1 1 10 , 9 3 5 . 0 0 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r 7 P S I w a t e r g a u g e s , 6 t e s t va l v e s , b r a c i n g , 10 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 1 11 / 2 / 2 0 1 1 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 3 5 6 7 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 11 / 8 / 2 0 1 1 3, 6 4 4 . 5 6 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r r e p a i r p a y m e n t # 2 11 / 1 4 / 2 0 1 1 11 / 1 6 / 2 0 1 1 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 3 5 6 7 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 11 / 8 / 2 0 1 1 4, 4 3 7 . 6 2 Pi e r - r e m o v e d / r e p l a c e d h e a d s o n s y s t e m s 7 , 8, a n d 9 2/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 3/ 1 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 3 5 6 7 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 1 61 1 . 6 8 Pi e r - t r o u b l e s h o o t / r e p a i r s p r i n k l e r P a c i f i c Pa r k 1/ 9 / 2 0 1 2 1/ 1 1 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 3 5 6 7 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 1/ 3 1 / 2 0 1 2 1, 9 5 6 . 8 3 Pi e r - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r i n s p e c t i o n , 1 0 n e w ga u g e k i t s w / p i t o t t u b e 3/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 3/ 2 9 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 3 5 6 7 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 2/ 1 4 / 2 0 1 2 1, 0 4 0 . 0 0 Pi e r - s e r v i c e c a l l t o r e p a i r f i r e a l a r m s y s t e m 3/ 5 / 2 0 1 2 3/ 7 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 4 0 2 1 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 2/ 2 9 / 2 0 1 2 24 4 . 6 Pi e r - t r a s h b a r n a r e a s p r i n k l e r r e p a i r s 3/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 2 3/ 2 9 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 4 0 2 2 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 2/ 2 9 / 2 0 1 2 39 0 Pi e r - f i r e a l a r m g r o u n d f a u l t - t a m p e r s w i t c h b y re s t r o o m s 3/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 3/ 2 9 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 J u n e 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 Page B-2 Ap p e n d i x B : S a n t a M o n i c a I n v o i c e L o g f r o m 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 - P r e s e n t Wo r k O r d e r # Co m p a n y N a m e In v o i c e D a t e Ac t u a l C o s t In v o i c e D e s c r i p t i o n Ba t c h Da t e Pa i d Date PO Number Fiscal Year FA C M - 4 4 9 3 9 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 3/ 3 0 / 2 0 1 2 32 5 . 5 4 Pi e r - f i r e a l a r m o s + y t a m p e r f o r R R - r e p l a c e co r r o d e d m o d u l e 4/ 9 / 2 0 1 2 4/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 3 5 6 7 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 4/ 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 1, 5 7 5 . 0 0 Pi e r - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r i n s p e c t i o n 6/ 1 1 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 7 6 6 2 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 4/ 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 1, 9 4 5 . 0 0 Pi e r - a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m / c e n t r a l s t a t i o n t e s t 6/ 1 1 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 7 2 2 5 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 4/ 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 39 4 . 5 7 Pi e r - r e p a i r r i s e r 1 0 6 p i p e a b o v e i t v 6/ 1 1 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 7 6 6 1 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 6/ 7 / 2 0 1 2 1, 1 0 5 . 5 0 Pi e r - f i r e a l a r m c o r r o d e d w i r i n g r e p l a c e m e n t - 8 h o u r s 6/ 1 1 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 3 5 6 7 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 6/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 2 1, 5 7 5 . 0 0 Pi e r - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r i n s p e c t i o n - 6 / 1 3 6/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 7 9 6 6 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 6/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 2 26 8 . 3 1 Pi e r - S a n t a M o n i c a A q u a r i u m - s m o k e de t e c t o r r e p l a c e m e n t 6/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 7 9 6 5 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 6/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 2 62 6 . 3 1 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l - 2 s m o k e d e t e c t o r s , t a m p e r sw i t c h , 2 1 2 v b a t t e r i e s 6/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 7 9 6 1 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 6/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 2 1, 0 7 1 . 7 9 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l - 1 s t f l p u l l s t a t i o n , 2 sm o k e d e t e c t o r s , 1 2 v , b e l l , 6/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 7 9 5 7 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 6/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 2 1, 2 4 4 . 2 6 Pi e r - s p r i n k l e r s y s t e m s h u t d o w n , d r a i n , re p l a c e h a n g e r s , v a l v e , c a p s 6/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 7 9 6 4 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 6/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 2 2, 5 7 0 . 5 3 Pi e r - P a c i f i c P a r k - 7 s p r i n k e r w a t e r f l o w sw i t c h e s , 2 c o n t r o l v a l v e t a m p e r 6/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 7 9 6 2 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 6/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 2 41 6 . 1 4 Pi e r - R u s t y ' s - r e w i r e k i t c h e n s u p p r e s s i o n sy s t e m s , s p r i n k l e r p a r t s 6/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 7 9 6 7 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 6/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 2 1, 9 3 7 . 9 3 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r s h u t d o w n , d r a i n , 1 2 w a x co a t e d h e a d s , b r a c i n g , p i p e , 6/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 2 6/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 2 19022-OF 2011-12 FA C M - 4 9 4 5 5 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 7/ 2 4 / 2 0 1 2 17 0 Pi e r - p a n e l p h o n e l i n e t r o u b l e b y r e s t a u r a n t s / Ca r o u s e l - c a l l t e l c o 8/ 6 / 2 0 1 2 8/ 8 / 2 0 1 2 21017-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 4 9 6 5 1 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 7/ 3 1 / 2 0 1 2 71 4 . 8 4 Pi e r - R u s t y ' s k i t c h e n a n s u l s y s t e m w i r i n g / co n d u i t - t i e i n t o p a n e l 6 h r s 8/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 9/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 2 21017-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 0 5 2 9 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 8/ 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 38 5 . 7 7 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r - i n s t a l l 3 h a n g e r s b y b i k e ba t h 9/ 4 / 2 0 1 2 9/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 2 21017-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 1 1 7 6 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 9/ 7 / 2 0 1 2 53 6 . 0 5 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r - 3 h a n g e r s b y w a t e r s e d g e , le a k y p i p e b y b i k e p a t h 9/ 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 9/ 1 9 / 2 0 1 2 21017-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 1 1 7 2 Al l S y s t e m s F i r e Pr o t e c t i o n 9/ 7 / 2 0 1 2 1, 0 1 2 . 4 8 Pi e r - m e r g e r e s t a u r a n t f i r e a l a r m m o d u l e s Si l e n t K n i g h t 5 8 2 0 X L p a n e l 9/ 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 9/ 1 9 / 2 0 1 2 21017-OF 2012-13 Al l S y s t e m s Fi r e P r o t e c t i o n - 3 5 T o t a l : $5 2 , 0 5 0 . 2 0 J u n e 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 Page B-3 Ap p e n d i x B : S a n t a M o n i c a I n v o i c e L o g f r o m 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 - P r e s e n t Tr i -Si g n a l W o r k O r d e r s Wo r k O r d e r # Co m p a n y N a m e In v o i c e D a t e Ac t u a l C o s t In v o i c e D e s cr i p t i o n Ba t c h Da t e Pa i d Date PO Number Fiscal Year FA C M - 5 6 0 2 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 20 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l f i r e a l a r m a n n u a l t e s t i n g 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 14 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 30 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l m a i n d r a i n a n n u a l t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 38 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B l d g - a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 16 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B l d g - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 20 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B l d g - a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 52 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B l d g - A n s u l a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 30 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B l d g - A n s u l q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r sy s t e m t e s t / i n s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 40 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B l d g - A n s u l a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n sy s t e m t e s t / i n s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 52 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m s y s t e m te s t / i n s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 30 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t i n g / in s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 30 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n s y s t e m te s t / i n s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 52 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 30 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r s y s t e m te s t / i n s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 2 30 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 12 / 1 7 / 2 0 1 2 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 2 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 7 1 2 0 Tr i - S i g n a l 12 / 3 / 2 0 1 2 29 5 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r a l a r m - 2 , 9 , 3 6 - n e e d 3 ne w m o d u l e s 1/ 1 4 / 2 0 1 3 1/ 1 6 / 2 0 1 3 21311-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 8 3 9 4 Tr i - S i g n a l 12 / 2 4 / 2 0 1 2 60 3 . 0 2 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S M P i e r f i r e a l a r m - r e p l a c e 3 s m o k e de t e c t o r s 2/ 1 1 / 2 0 1 3 2/ 1 4 / 2 0 1 3 21311-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 14 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 3/ 4 / 2 0 1 3 3/ 6 / 2 0 1 3 21405-OF 2012-13 J u n e 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 Page B-4 Ap p e n d i x B : S a n t a M o n i c a I n v o i c e L o g f r o m 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 - P r e s e n t Wo r k O r d e r # Co m p a n y N a m e In v o i c e D a t e Ac t u a l C o s t In v o i c e D e s c r i p t i o n Ba t c h D a t e Pa i d D a t e PO Number Fiscal Year FA C M - 5 6 0 2 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 16 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B l d g - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 3/ 4 / 2 0 1 3 3/ 6 / 2 0 1 3 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B l d g - A n s u l q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r sy s t e m t e s t / i n s p e c t i o n 3/ 4 / 2 0 1 3 3/ 6 / 2 0 1 3 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r te s t / i n s p e c t i o n 3/ 4 / 2 0 1 3 3/ 6 / 2 0 1 3 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 3/ 4 / 2 0 1 3 3/ 6 / 2 0 1 3 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 8 8 0 2 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 3 25 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B u i l d i n g - d i s c o n n e c t t a m p e r s w i t c h , st r a p o u t a t m o d u l e 3/ 4 / 2 0 1 3 3/ 6 / 2 0 1 3 21311-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 6 1 3 0 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 4/ 2 / 2 0 1 3 42 0 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r w a t e r f l o w a l a r m d u e t o De l t a p h a s e I V c o n s t r u c t i o n 6/ 1 0 / 2 0 1 3 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 3 21311-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 5/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 14 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 6/ 1 0 / 2 0 1 3 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 3 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 5/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 16 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B l d g - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 6/ 1 0 / 2 0 1 3 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 3 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 5/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 B l d g - A n s u l q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r sy s t e m t e s t / i n s p e c t i o n 6/ 1 0 / 2 0 1 3 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 3 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 5/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r te s t / i n s p e c t i o n 6/ 1 0 / 2 0 1 3 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 3 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 5 6 0 2 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 5/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t / in s p e c t i o n 6/ 1 0 / 2 0 1 3 6/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 3 21405-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 6 6 2 0 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 6/ 4 / 2 0 1 3 35 7 . 5 Pi e r - f i r e a l a r m - m o d u l e 3 3 c o r r o d e d - cl e a n e d 7/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 3 7/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 3 21311-OF 2012-13 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 14 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 9/ 9 / 2 0 1 3 9/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 16 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S i l e n t K n i g h t - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r te s t 9/ 9 / 2 0 1 3 9/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 a n s u l s y s t e m - q u a r t e r l y f i r e sp r i n k l e r t e s t 9/ 9 / 2 0 1 3 9/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r te s t 9/ 9 / 2 0 1 3 9/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t 9/ 9 / 2 0 1 3 9/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 2 4 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 4 / 2 0 1 3 25 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 f i r e a l a r m c a l l - r e s e t d u c t d e t e c t o r 9/ 2 3 / 2 0 1 3 9/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 3 22351-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 8 7 1 1 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 6 / 2 0 1 3 37 5 Pi e r - 2 5 0 r e s t a u r a n t c o n s t r u c t i o n g r o u n d f a u l t & C a r o u s e l f i r e a l a r m 9/ 2 3 / 2 0 1 3 9/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 3 22351-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 8 8 8 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 9/ 2 3 / 2 0 1 3 54 5 Pi e r - 2 5 0 - f i r e a l a r m s p r i n k l e r h e a d d a m a g e d 11 / 4 / 2 0 1 3 11 / 7 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 J u n e 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 Page B-5 Ap p e n d i x B : S a n t a M o n i c a I n v o i c e L o g f r o m 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 - P r e s e n t Wo r k O r d e r # Co m p a n y N a m e In v o i c e D a t e Ac t u a l C o s t In v o i c e D e s c r i p t i o n Ba t c h D a t e Pa i d D a t e PO Number Fiscal Year FA C M - 6 8 8 8 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 9/ 2 4 / 2 0 1 3 2, 9 8 1 . 4 5 Pi e r - r e p a i r p v c s p r i n k l e r l i n e & s p r i n k l e r h e a d un d e r P i e r 11 / 4 / 2 0 1 3 11 / 7 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 9 1 0 0 Tr i - S i g n a l 9/ 2 4 / 2 0 1 3 90 0 Pi e r - r e p a i r p o s t i n d i c a t o r v a l v e b y A q u a r i u m , ta m p e r s w i t c h i n s t a l l 11 / 4 / 2 0 1 3 11 / 7 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 9 1 0 0 Tr i - S i g n a l 9/ 2 7 / 2 0 1 3 90 3 . 5 3 Pi e r - f i r e a l a r m p a n e l m 3 3 - p t - a q u a r i u m ba t t e r i e s , P I V c h e c k 11 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 3 11 / 2 6 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 7 1 3 6 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 10 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 3 3, 4 5 0 . 5 9 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r l i n e u n d e r P i e r r e p a i r s - 10 / 8 t o 1 0 / 1 5 11 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 3 11 / 2 6 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 20 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l - a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 14 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l - a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n t e s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 38 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S i l e n t K n i g h t - a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 16 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S i l e n t K n i g h t - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r te s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 20 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S i l e n t K n i g h t - a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n te s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 52 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 a n s u l s y s t e m - a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m te s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 a n s u l s y s t e m - q u a r t e r l y f i r e sp r i n k l e r t e s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 40 Pi e r - 2 5 0 a n s u l s y s t e m - a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n te s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 52 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l - a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r te s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l - a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n t e s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 52 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m - a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 30 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m - a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n t e s t 12 / 2 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 5 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 7 2 3 0 0 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 4 / 2 0 1 3 29 5 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r h e a d o n s y s t e m 1 2 - i t v op e n e d 12 / 9 / 2 0 1 3 12 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 3 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 7 2 3 0 3 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 3 1, 2 9 5 . 0 0 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r c o n t r o l v a l v e c h e c k / r e c re p l a c e 7 0 7 , 7 0 8 ; 2 0 4 f a i l 1/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 4 1/ 2 2 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 J u n e 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 Page B-6 Ap p e n d i x B : S a n t a M o n i c a I n v o i c e L o g f r o m 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 - P r e s e n t Wo r k O r d er # Co m p a n y N a m e In v o i c e D a t e Ac t u a l C o s t In v o i c e D e s c r i p t i o n Ba t c h Da t e Pa i d Date PO Number Fiscal Year FA C M - 7 6 5 8 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 1/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 4 3, 5 4 8 . 2 7 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r s y s t e m - 2 c n t r l v a l v e , 4 co u p l e r s , 4 s g 2 g a u g e s 2/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 4 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 4 22351-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 14 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 5/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 4 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 16 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S i l e n t K n i g h t - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r te s t 5/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 4 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 a n s u l s y s t e m - q u a r t e r l y f i r e sp r i n k l e r t e s t 5/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 4 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r te s t 5/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 4 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 2/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t 5/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 4 6/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 7 7 8 3 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 3/ 4 / 2 0 1 4 51 3 . 7 5 Pi e r - f i r e a l a r m c a l l - w a t e r f l o w s w i t c h # 8 / d e v M3 3 - 4 9 r a i n d a m a g e 5/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 4 5/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 4 22351-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 7 7 8 3 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 3/ 7 / 2 0 1 4 1, 0 4 0 . 3 0 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r - r e p l a c e f l o w s w i t c h s y s t e m 8, M 3 3 - 4 9 c o n t r o l v l v 4/ 7 / 2 0 1 4 4/ 1 0 / 2 0 1 4 22351-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 7 7 9 5 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 3/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 1, 9 2 0 . 0 0 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r h e a d & p i p e l e a k r e p a i r s 4/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 4 4/ 2 5 / 2 0 1 4 22351-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 7 9 3 7 3 Tr i - S i g n a l 4/ 8 / 2 0 1 4 60 0 . 4 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r r e p a i r / s e c t i o n 9 f l o w sw i t c h 5/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 4 6/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 22351-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 7 9 3 7 3 Tr i - S i g n a l 4/ 8 / 2 0 1 4 1. 1 2 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r r e p a i r - s e c t i o n 9 - h a n d l i n g ta x a d d e d b y F i n a n c e 5/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 4 6/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 22351-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 5/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 14 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 6/ 9 / 2 0 1 4 6/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 5/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 16 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S i l e n t K n i g h t - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r te s t 6/ 9 / 2 0 1 4 6/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 5/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 a n s u l s y s t e m - q u a r t e r l y f i r e sp r i n k l e r t e s t 6/ 9 / 2 0 1 4 6/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 5/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r te s t 6/ 9 / 2 0 1 4 6/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 6 7 6 3 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 5/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m - q u a r t e r l y s p r i n k l e r t e s t 6/ 9 / 2 0 1 4 6/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 22016-OF 2013-14 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 14 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 9/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 4 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 16 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S i l e n t K n i g h t - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r te s t 9/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 4 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 a n s u l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 9/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 4 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 9/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 4 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 9/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 9/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 4 23055-OF 2014-15 J u n e 1 6 , 2 0 1 5 Page B-7 Ap p e n d i x B : S a n t a M o n i c a I n v o i c e L o g f r o m 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 - P r e s e n t Wo r k O r d e r # Co m p a n y N a m e In v o i c e D a t e Ac t u a l C o s t In v o i c e D e s c r i p t i o n Ba t c h D a t e Pa i d D a t e PO Number Fisca l Year FA C M - 9 3 7 8 2 Tr i - S i g n a l 8/ 4 / 2 0 1 4 1, 1 8 1 . 8 5 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r - r e p l a c e 4 " g x g b u t t e r f l y va l v e , 1 6 g a u g e s / k i t s 1/ 2 6 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 20 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 14 0 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 Pi e r - C a r o u s e l a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 38 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S i l e n t K n i g h t - a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 16 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S i l e n t K n i g h t - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r te s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 5 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 20 Pi e r - 2 5 0 S i l e n t K n i g h t - a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n te s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 52 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 a n s u l - a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - 2 5 0 a n s u l - q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 6 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 40 Pi e r - 2 5 0 a n s u l - a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 9 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - H a r b o r P a t r o l q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 52 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m a n n u a l f i r e a l a r m t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 0 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m q u a r t e r l y f i r e s p r i n k l e r t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 8 6 7 0 7 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 / 2 0 1 4 30 Pi e r - A q u a r i u m a n n u a l m a i n d r a i n t e s t 1/ 5 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 9 0 0 6 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 4 1, 5 0 0 . 0 0 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r 1 0 1 s y s t e m - g r o o v e d co u p l i n g l e a k , 2 0 1 c l o s e d 1/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 FA C M - 9 0 0 6 8 Tr i - S i g n a l 11 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 4 3, 0 0 0 . 0 0 Pi e r - f i r e s p r i n k l e r - r e p l a c e 1 0 1 g r o o v e co u p l i n g , f i t t i n g 5 x 6 1/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 5 1/ 1 5 / 2 0 1 5 23055-OF 2014-15 Tr i - S i g n a l - 9 6 To t a l : $4 3 , 3 4 6 . 7 8 REFERENCE: Contract No. 10948 (CCS)