SR-6-Q
it? Z --t? tJ ?r
~-^
JANI01~
Santa Monica, California
:-
C/ED:CPD:DKW:DM
Council Meeting: January 10, 1989
TO: Mayor and city council
FROM: city Staff
SUBJECT: certification of statement of Official Action for the
Appeal of Development Review 464, 2338 pico Boulevard.
Applicant: Ken Keatts
INTRODUCTION
This report transmits for City Council certification the
statement of Official Action for the appeal of the above listed
Development Review for Ken Keatts to allow the construction of a
3,106 square foot ten-minute oil change facility at 2338 pico
Boulevard.
BACKGROUND
After pUblic hearing and careful review of the record and staff
recommendations, the City Council denied the appeal and denied
the proposed automotive facility on December 13, 1988.
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that the City council approve the
attached Statement of Official Action which contains findings
for DR 464.
Prepared By: David Martin, Assistant Planner
D. Kenyon Webster, principle Planner
Paul Berlant, Director of Planning
PB:DKW:DM
PCjSTOAMEMO
Attachment
- 1 -
b-Q
JAN 1 0 1989
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL ACTION
PROJECT
NUMBER: Development Review 464
LOCATION: 2338 Pico Boulevard
APPLICANT: Ken Keatts
REQUEST: Application for a Development Review to allow the
construction of a 3,106 square foot building to
be utilized as a Ten-Minute oil change Facility.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
12/13/88
Date.
Approved based on the following findings and
sUbject to the conditions below.
X Denied.
Other.
FINDINGS
1. The proposed development is inconsistent with Policy 1.2.4
on the General Plan Land Use Element which states:
"Mitigate the impact of commercial uses such as auto re-
pair shops in those areas where an over-concentration of
the use would have, or the operation of such uses might
have an adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood".
The service bays for the automotive use front onto Pico
Boulevard as well as the rear alley, and the proposed
traffic pattern could impact adjacent residential
properties.
2. The proposed development is inconsistent with Policy 3.2.2
of the General Plan Land Use Element which states:
"Where commercial uses abut residential areas, there
should be an appropriate transition (landscaped setback or
service alley and screen wall).
The applicant has not proposed a sufficient screen wall or
landscaping to mitigate impacts on adjacent residential
properties.
- 1 -
VOTE
Ayes:
Nays: Abdo, Finkel, Genser, Katz, Reed, Zane
Abstain:
Absent: Jennings
I hereby certify that this statement of Official Action
accurately reflects the final determination of the city Council
of the City of Santa Monica.
~~// ~a;~~
--a-i:grfcft ure - /
January II, 1989
date
C1ar~ce E. Johnsen, C~ty Clerk
print name and title
stdr464
DM
12/13/88
Appeal conSldered December 13, 1988.
Statement of Offlc~a1 Act~on approved January 10, 1989.
- 2 -